<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mayd-group">MAYD Group</a> has set a new residential price record in Queensland with the $30 million sale of the penthouse at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/one-burleigh-88-the-esplanade-burleigh-heads-qld-4220">ONE Burleigh</a> development in Burleigh Heads.

The sale equates to around $37,500 per sqm.

The two-level, 800 sqm penthouse, featuring five bedrooms, five bathrooms, five car spaces, and a private infinity pool overlooking the Pacific Ocean, was acquired by a Gold Coast-based entrepreneur, highlighting continued demand for ultra-premium beachfront product.

Selling agent Freddie Tehle of PRD Burleigh Heads said the result reflects tightening supply of high-quality, large-format apartments in Burleigh.

“There’s very limited opportunity to secure this level of scale and absolute beachfront position in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/burleigh-heads-qld-4220">Burleigh Heads</a>,” Tehle said.

“Buyers are increasingly seeking apartments that genuinely replace a standalone home, and this penthouse delivers that with its size, privacy, and direct ocean frontage.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=146358 project_image_fid=323057]

The sale comes as construction progresses on ONE Burleigh, a boutique development of 17 full-floor residences at 88 The Esplanade, scheduled for completion in early 2027.

Developed by MAYD Group and designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/mas-architecture-studio">MAS Architecture</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/sici-design">Sici Design</a>, the project has been positioned as a collection of house-sized beachfront apartments, each occupying an entire floor with around 381 sqm of internal and external living space.

When construction commenced, MAYD director Todd Mould pointed to the long-term resilience of premium coastal real estate as a key driver behind the project.

“Real estate, particularly at the premium end, remains one of the most resilient and proven long-term investment avenues,” Mould said.

“Our ambition is that anyone who buys a MAYD-built product can genuinely feel the care, craftsmanship and commitment we bring to every detail.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=146358 project_image_fid=323055]

Each residence has been configured with four bedrooms, multiple living zones, a private office, and expansive ocean-facing terraces. Interiors draw on a restrained material palette, including travertine stone, timber joinery, and integrated premium appliances.

Interior designer Sici Design said the approach was to reflect the project’s coastal setting through both materiality and spatial planning.

“ONE Burleigh is our vision of luxury living, designed to bring the essence of Burleigh Heads' vibrant coastal beauty into an unparalleled residential experience.”

Residents will have access to a suite of wellness-focused amenities, including pools, sauna facilities, and dedicated relaxation spaces, reflecting a broader shift toward lifestyle-driven apartment design on the Gold Coast.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=146358 project_image_fid=323052]

The project occupies a southern Esplanade site with uninterrupted beachfront frontage, an increasingly rare offering in Burleigh Heads, free from the Norfolk Pines that line much of the coastline and often limit direct ocean outlook.

Mould said the design intent was to balance that outlook with a sense of retreat.

“Living at ONE Burleigh is about how your day naturally unfolds, morning light across the ocean, coffee on the balcony, and being in Burleigh but elevated above the noise.”

The result further reinforces Burleigh Heads’ emergence as one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held and supply-constrained beachfront markets, where boutique, owner-occupier-focused developments are increasingly setting new price benchmarks.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=146358]

Joel Robinson

MAYD Group sets Queensland record with $30 million penthouse sale at ONE Burleigh in Burleigh Heads

Apartment developers in the Gold Coast are finding new, creative ways to differentiate themselves from competing projects, as new supply starts to flow through up and down the Coast.

Developer Big Projects brought in the renowned Sydney-based design studio YSG to craft the interiors for The Frederick, Big Projects' new Mermaid Beach project and YSG's first move into the multi-residential development space.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5346]

It was a strategic move for Big Projects to bring in a Sydney eye to the development.

“Our role is to give our design partners the space and freedom to explore,” says Matt Barrett, Director of Big Projects.

“We wanted YSG Studio to capture the essence of Nobby’s, to design a building that embraces life, light and connection, while creating a genuine sense of place.”

There are only 39 apartments in The Frederick, including a striking beach house, just 100 metres from the booming Nobby Beach precinct.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5347]

Yasmine Ghoniem, Director of YSG Studio, says their vision&nbsp;for The Frederick "reinvents coastal living."

“Nobby’s has such an iconic energy, it’s one of those rare pockets of the Gold Coast where the community, the beach, and the streets all feel connected,” Ghoniem says.

"Responding to the neighbouring coastline, soothing curves add a relaxing regional overlay, while unique detailing really sets it apart. It’s a place that feels lived in from the moment you step inside.”

A standout feature of The Frederick is its rooftop terrace, an uncommon inclusion for a boutique, low-rise building, where amenity is typically concentrated at ground level.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5360]

Positioned to capture panoramic views from the hinterland to the ocean, the rooftop has been designed as a series of intimate zones. It includes a pool, sauna, sun decks, workspaces and dedicated entertaining areas.

“The rooftop was conceived as a collection of spaces where residents can unwind and connect, an extension of the Nobby’s lifestyle,” Barrett says.

Architecture for the project was led by Plus Architecture, with landscape design by LDG.

SRQ Projects Director Nick Clydsdale, who is handling sales at The Frederick, says the majority of enquiry is coming from South East QLD and Victorian buyers who have been actively searching between Broadbeach and Mermaid Beach for some time.

"They’ve reviewed a number of projects, however this one has stood out for its design flair/ appeal,"&nbsp;Clydsdale says.

Site demolition is slated for this month, with construction commencing soon after. Big Projects is targeting a late 2027 completion.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=110588]

Big Projects taps Sydney’s YSG for first multi-residential project at The Frederick Mermaid Beach

Melbourne-based property developer ALTA Property has this week achieved planning approval for the adaptive re-use of a former commercial tower into a $200 million, 169-apartment project at 10 Queens Road, one of the last developable sites along the Albert Park Lake-fronting boulevard.&nbsp;

Set within one of Melbourne’s most sought-after precincts and designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fraser-partners-0">Fraser and Partners</a>, the illustrious building will offer unparalleled views across Albert Park Lake, Port Phillip Bay and Melbourne CBD.&nbsp;

The mix of 1, 2 and 3-bedroom residences will be complemented by a ground-floor amenity featuring private dining, a lounge bar, gym and wellness spaces, co-working, outdoor communal gardens, and retail.&nbsp;

The 17-storey building is a masterclass in adaptive re-use, with the existing commercial building’s façade, shell and internal structure to be retained, before high-end residences are built from the ground up in a newly built Albert Park facing addition to the building.&nbsp;

Sitting atop the building will be two 320+sqm penthouses with private rooftop terraces, which are expected to be priced between $9 - $11 million.&nbsp;

<img alt="ALTA Property achieves permit approval for $200 million Queens Road tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa11211b-5581-43f9-940c-fc84d30a0e61" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/C_04.png?VersionId=Yhf5p_1EgGDu_zOIMFgvA8Ug8j3sTFQs" />

Architecturally, the building will feature a curved, geometric façade that celebrates and elevates the existing structure, with warm, muted tones which were selected to extend the materiality of the existing building rather than contrast it.&nbsp;

Interiors will bring together three metre high ceilings with waffle concrete in some spaces, natural timber, granite and Australian materials, culminating in crafted, generous and considered spaces that are defined by authenticity.&nbsp;

The adaptive re-use means that the Queens Road project will be a sustainability led, high-quality finished product, with a 62% saving in carbon emissions by re-using the existing structure rather than knocking it down and rebuilding.&nbsp;

ALTA Property was launched by Nigel Givoni in 2023, bringing over 25 years of experience in multi level residential delivery.&nbsp;

Melbourne’s property market growth is currently led by apartments. According to RPM VIC Apartments &amp; Townhomes Market Report (April 2026), units are outpacing houses, especially in the middle ring suburbs where median prices hit $757,500 – a four-year high that represents 2.9 percent growth quarter-on-quarter.&nbsp;

<img alt="ALTA Property achieves permit approval for $200 million Queens Road tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="647e13d7-b4bc-433a-9bc9-fe3c3dd4f2ec" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/V_06.png?VersionId=ou4NUCWUgA3NAy.6CQJlEdKX50j3dOk6" />

For ALTA Property Founder Nigel Givoni, this performance speaks to the confidence he has in the Melbourne market.&nbsp;

“Queens Road represents a rare opportunity to continue to shape our presence in the Melbourne market.,"&nbsp;Givoni says.

"With a considered project team and a premier site along one of the city’s most sought-after boulevards, we look forward to contributing to the fabric of this established address.

“Other Australian markets are getting a lot of attention, but I believe the depth of value in Melbourne is being overlooked. The fundamentals are strong, population growth is steady and, based on our preliminary conversations with a leading builder, construction costs are beginning to normalise, creating further opportunity."

Givoni says the project is a&nbsp;highly considered example of adaptive re-use, delivering quality, high-end residences, premium hotel-inspired amenities and an architecturally striking façade, all achieved without the need to remove the existing structure.

"We are really looking forward to the market’s response,” he said.&nbsp;

ALTA Property to deliver $200 million Queens Road apartment tower

Construction is set to begin at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/orchard-mews-glen-iris-18-scott-grove-glen-iris-vic-3146">Orchard Mews</a> in Glen Iris, with&nbsp;PC Whitehall &amp; Sons&nbsp;now appointed as the townhome development moves into its next phase.

The development by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/montcoeur">MontCoeur</a>,&nbsp;located at 18 Scott Grove, is now around 30 per cent sold, with completion targeted for late-2027.

Orchard Mews comprises a curated collection of three- and four-bedroom customisable townhomes, positioned within one of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>’ more tightly held residential streets. The low-density project has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a>, with landscape architecture by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/jack-merlo">Jack Merlo</a>, bringing together a team known for high-end residential projects across Melbourne.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366285]

The development is defined by its focus on flexible living and long-term usability. Each residence includes multiple living zones and a customisable multipurpose room, allowing buyers to tailor spaces to suit changing needs, whether as a home office, additional bedroom, wellness area or entertainment space.

Architecturally, the townhomes emphasise natural light and spatial volume, with dual-aspect layouts and double-height living areas incorporated into the design. Interiors feature natural stone benchtops, premium appliances, and a neutral material palette intended to support everyday functionality rather than statement-driven finishes.

All residences are all-electric and include private lifts and secure double garages, reflecting a broader shift toward sustainability and future-focused housing in Melbourne’s established suburbs.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366277]

Outdoor connections are also central to the offering, with a mix of private courtyards and terraces extending internal living spaces and integrating with the landscaped surrounds.

The Scott Grove address places Orchard Mews within close proximity to some of Melbourne’s key lifestyle and education amenities, including Scotch College, Sacré Cœur, Cabrini Hospital and the retail hub of Chadstone. Public transport access is also nearby, with trams and Gardiner Station providing connectivity to the CBD and surrounding suburbs.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150128]

Construction to commence at luxury Glen Iris townhome project, Orchard Mews

A rare new apartment development has been proposed on the fringe of St Ives Village.

Developer Newquest Property has lodged plans for a low-rise apartment project designed by well-regarded architecture firm Warren &amp; Mahoney, which is best known for its work in the multi-residential sector in Melbourne.

The building, proposed for a 1,916 sqm site on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/st-ives-residences-3-5-memorial-avenue-nsw-2075">Memorial Avenue</a> opposite St Ives Village Green, has been designed to blend into the surrounding natural environment.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5c1c7437-2fba-4345-a6d7-05321714ad3e" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.28.46%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=KrYyMaJvNqR7vbx0xbB3Ef8sJ6FuHpmn" />

“Drawing inspiration from the pale trunks and flowering canopies of the scribbly gums and blue gums prevalent in the area, a considered material palette was developed,” the architectural design report states.

“This palette references the established materiality of the suburb while elevating it through refined finishes to achieve a more luxurious architectural expression.”

Of the 33 apartments proposed, 21 will be three-bedroom residences. The remaining mix includes nine two-bedroom apartments, one one-bedroom apartment and two four-bedroom residences. The development will be supported by 62 car parking spaces and 33 secure bicycle spaces.

The proposal would replace two single-storey brick buildings currently on the site.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="21422eaf-09a9-4439-9278-b9bd9daf22a1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.38.10%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=v.fXSgcUcEscvOZzqcjG5nk3gVqk_Amt" />

St Ives remains a relatively untapped market for new apartment development. North Shore developer WINIM has a number of projects in the area, while INCA is nearing completion of Ellis Residences.

More recently, Traders In Purple has lodged plans for one of the denser projects proposed in the suburb, a 75-apartment development on a 5,900 sqm site on Cowan Road.

NewQuest, a construction, design and development firm, has delivered over 24 projects across commercial, residential, industrial, and lad markets.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

First look: NewQuest Property proposes new St Ives apartment development

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Opportunities are increasing for vendors to advertise and sell properties themselves online, bypassing the use of estate agents and potentially avoiding thousands of dollars in commission.
Earlier this month a new player entered the DIY space – Intouch Real Estate founded by former Wizard Home Loans’ Paul Ryan – which immediately sparked an expected outcry from real estate agents on industry website Real Estate Business.
Ryan says selling your home yourself is a challenge vendors need to be up for.
Some of the issues DIY sellers must deal with, Ryan says, include ensuring photos, floor plans and description are true and correct, that vendors don’t misrepresent the property or mislead potential buyers, the negotiation process, attracting enough interest in the property and being at the open for inspections.
“Some people don’t like the concept of meeting people attending inspections, answering questions or hearing negative comments about their property,” he says.
But he maintains the sale process is far more transparent.
“The vendor can accept the offer they wish to accept and not be coerced into waiting until the campaign finishes or the auction date and potentially lose a buyer,” he says.
“You obtain genuine feedback, not clouded by real estate agent talk,” Ryan says.
And if the DIY campaign does not prove successful, Ryan says the vendor still has the option of transferring the sale to an agent.
Lorri Baxter, operations manager from Commission Free Real Estate (crfe.com.au), which offers to assist DIY sellers, says most vendors who go it alone have no idea of how to present their property, have an over-inflated opinion of the worth of their property and don't know how to finalise a sale if they find a buyer.
CRFE's service includes a professional advertising script, helping with negotiation and getting DIY listings on websites like realestate.com.au.
"In years gone by, many people have felt they needed to list with a local real estate agent to obtain a successful sale. Let me tell you, those days are long gone! It has become increasingly popular to sell your own home, as this is the only way to avoid paying excessive agent fees," she says.
Among Australia’s most dominant online real estate listings providers – realestate.com.au, domain.com.au and realestateview.com.au – only Domain.com.au provides what it calls a “self-service” offering, and most estate agents, not surprisingly, are firmly against the idea.
Robert Larocca, policy and public affairs manager at the Real Estate Institute of Victoria (which runs realestateview.com.au), says the trend of DIY selling has become more obvious because of the internet but warns that it has always “represented a false economy and still does – regardless of the apparent ease of the internet.
“In the first place, it simply may not be cheaper; many of the websites are simply conduits for a range of service providers seeking to sell a range of services that are often included in the professional fees charged by estate agents.
“Secondly, by not utilising the professional services of agents, consumers can be left exposed. They are less likely to get the best sale price and face the likelihood of having to spend countless hours doing the work normally done by their estate agent. “It may seem cheaper, but will it really be cheaper when you take into account the cost of your time and a lower sale price?”
Despite the large number of online DIY sites (see our list below) DIY listings make up a tiny proportion of the overall market.
As an example, for the post code of 2000 (Sydney CBD), realestate.com.au has over 750 listings while Domain.com.au has nearly 950.
Buymyplace.com.au – which claims to be the no.1 DIY listings website - lists just six properties for sale in the same postcode.
The results are similar for other postcodes Property Observer tried such as 3000 and 2011.
Vendors who do wish to explore the DIY route have a number of online ventures that offer services tailored at this market.
Services range from simply providing a template to completing an online listing to providing a collection of services such as featured listings on sites like realestate.com.au, organising professional photographs, preparing property reports, providing open-for-inspection signs and providing a legal partner for conveyancing.
Most charge a base fee, which rises as more services and features are added to a basic agreement.
Aside from the challenge of marketing, promoting and dealing with buyers, there are also legal obligations and potential hurdles, which can land DIY sellers in trouble.
Vendors must engage a solicitor or conveyance to ensure the necessary legal documents are in place and to also hold the deposit in trust.
Other challenges include estimating a fair price, vetting potential buyers and determining a settlement period.
Despite these challenges, there are numerous well-known advocates for DIY sales
Hotspotting.com.au’s Terry Ryder published a book Real Estate Without Agents, while consumer advocate Neil Jenman also backs the practice as a way to avoid commission costs and the risk of dealing with an unscrupulous agent.
Property Observer has scoured the internet to come up with a comprehensive list of online DIY offerings:
<a href="https://www.intouchrealestate.com.au/" target="_blank">www.intouchrealestate.com.au</a> 
Cost: starts from $995
Services: Access to LiveOffer system which allows vendors to monitor offers on their property online and in real time, yard signs, in-house online listings, listing with realestate.com.au, domain.com.au, promotional flyers. A more expensive vendor-assisted offering is also available for $1,995.
<a href="https://www.buymyplace.com.au/" target="_blank">www.buymyplace.com.au</a>
Cost: starts from $270 to $599
Services: Listing on bymyplace.com.au, for sale sign, six photographs. Auctioneering services, property reports, sales contracts and price negotiation services can be purchased for an extra charge.
<a href="https://selfservice.domain.com.au/">selfservice.domain.com.au</a> 
Cost:  $250 - $499
Services: The ability to build your own listing online and then publish it on domain.com.au. Prices vary dependent on suburb location.
<a href="https://www.forsalebyowner.com.au/">www.forsalebyowner.com.au</a> 
Cost: starts from $699 
Services: Listing on forsalebyowner.com.au, realestate.com.au plus other smaller listings websites, for sale board, property report, printable brochure and ability to manage your own account.
<a href="https://www.noagentproperty.com.au/">www.noagentproperty.com.au</a>
Cost: $295 
Services: Listing on noagentproperty.com.au, 12 photos, unlimited description and time, listing on the Trading Post online.
<a href="https://cfre.com.au/">www.cfre.com.au</a> 
Cost: $699 for “value plus” package (also offers $299 “sell it quick” package)
Services: This is a vendor-assisted offering. It includes a six month listing on realestate.com.au and Domain.com.au, for sale sign and sold sticker, property brochure, solicitor/conveyancer advice form, how to negotiate kit.
<a href="https://www.propertynow.com.au/" target="_blank">www.propertynow.com.au</a>
Cost: $390 listing fee + $90 recurring monthly fee 
Services: Online listing on propertynow.com.au, plus option to buy for sale sign for $75
<a href="https://www.forsaleforlease.com.au" target="_blank">www.forsaleforlease.com.au</a>
Cost: $399 + $99 per month or $795 until sold 
Services: Listings on all major websites, ability to change ad yourself. Extras cost for for sale signs, photographs, a listing on domain.com.au, floorplans etc.
<a href="https://www.owner.com.au/" target="_blank">www.owner.com.au</a>
Cost: $0 - $110 
Services: Standard listing on site with one photograph. For $110 you get unlimited photographs and a pair of for sale signs. Listings are free to renew.
<a href="https://www.diyrealty.com.au/" target="_blank">www.diyrealty.com.au</a>
Cost: $169  
Services:  This covers standard listing on site. ptional services. Optional services that can purchased at an extra cost include additional signage, feature listings and the option of listing on other real estate sites.
<a href="https://www.smartvendor.com.au" target="_blank">www.smartvendor.com.au</a>
Cost: $0 -$2,299
Services: The free offer includes an online ad, five photographs. The top package includes a Google advertising campaign, a listing on domain.com.au, personalised for sale sign and 300 personalised flyers.
 
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Selling the house by owner gets new website advocate assisting the DIY challenge 

<html><body>
Greater financial incentives are being offered to first-home buyers in Victoria following the raising of the stamp duty discount for homes priced under $600,000 from 20% to 30%.
The higher discount kicked in on January 1, 2013, and applies to both existing homes and new homes, delivering first-home buyers additional savings starting from $600 to a maximum of just over $3,000 on a house price at $600,000.
First-home buyers can work out their stamp duty savings using this table provided the <a href="https://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/sronav.nsf/LinkView/C88211C9E07486F0CA2578B70001025018E490D796850F8ECA2575C1008187C7" target="_blank">Victorian government’s State Revenue Office.</a>
Maximum stamp duty savings are now over $9,000. Combined with the existing first-home owners' grant of $7,000 there is nearly $16,000 in savings for those first-home buyers who are willing to venture into the property market in 2013.
The stamp duty discount will rise to 40% on January 1, 2014, and to 50% on September 1, 2014.
To qualify for the stamp duty discount, first-home buyers must also qualify for the $7,000 first-home owners’ grant.
All added up it means Victorian first-home buyers purchasing an existing home receive the highest amount of financial support from their state government.
South Australia, NSW and Queensland all offer higher total incentives and savings, but these are restricted to buying or building a new home.
This is what the other states are offering first-home buyers in 2013:
NSW
A first-home buyer who purchases a $550,000 new home will get $35,240 in assistance.
This includes a $15,000 grant for first-home owners who purchase or build a new home valued at up to $650,000. The grant is available until December 31, 2013, reducing to $10,000 from January 1, 2014.
Non-first-home buyers who buy a new home are eligible for $5,000 whether the new home is off the plan or newly built with a value up to $650,000, The $5,000 grant is also available to buyers of vacant land that is intended to be the site of a new home valued up to $450,000.
First-home owners are also eligible for a maximum stamp duty saving of $20,240 for homes up to a value of $550,000, with duty concessions for new homes valued between $550,000 and $650,000. The transfer duty exemption cap on vacant land is $350,000, with duty concessions for vacant land valued between $350,000 and $450,000.
Queensland
A $15,000 first-home owner construction grant (FHOCG) is available. The FHOCG applies to new property bought or built at a value under $750,000.
First-home buyers also pay no duty on purchases up to $500,000, with a phasing-out rebate applicable for values up to $600,000.
For non-first-home buyers, the Queensland government offers a concessional stamp duty rate of 1% up to a value of $350,000, with stamp duty charged at normal rates for the remaining value of the home purchase. The buyer must occupy the home for a period of 12 months – an applicant may lose the concession if he sells or leases part or all of the home before moving in or within a year of moving in.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
South Australia
South Australian first-home buyers have the chance to secure $23,500 from the state government, provided they build a new home.
The $23,500 handout comprises a doubled first-home owner grant of $15,000 for contracts entered into on or after October 15 and up to a value of $575,000, plus a further $8,500 housing construction grant (HCG). The housing construction grant replaces the $8,000 first-home bonus grant.
The HCG is available to all builders of new homes for properties valued up to $400,000, phasing out for properties valued up to $450,000 where contracts are entered into between October 15, 2012, and June 30, 2013, inclusive.
Concessions could rise to $39,830 if first-tome buyers buy an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD under $400,000, where a stamp duty concession of $16,330 applies.
This part of a new stamp duty concession scheme available on the transfer of a new CBD apartment or a "substantially refurbished apartment" for a contract entered into from May 31, 2012, to June 30, 2014, capped at stamp duty payable on a $500,000 apartment of $21,330.
An example where a $39,830 saving would be available to a first-home buyer is <a target="_blank" href="https://www.realestate.com.au/project-aria+on+gouger-sa-adelaide-600000551">Aria on Gouger Street </a>being developed by Brock Urban Projects, where two-bedroom apartments are priced from $335,750.
Up until June 30 2014, South Australian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $5,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, no first-home owner grant is available to purchasers of established homes.
 
WA
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for a newly constructed or established home. It does not apply to vacant land purchased to build a new home. The total value of the home must not exceed $750,000 if the property is located south of the 26th parallel of South Latitude, or $1 million if located north of the 26th parallel of South Latitude. First-home buyers eligible for the $7,000 grant pay no stamp duty on homes valued up to $500,000 and up to $300,000 for vacant land.
ACT
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for both existing and new homes where the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $750,000.
Tasmania
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for both existing and new homes, with no cap on the value.
Tasmanian first-home buyers buying or  building a new home (including off-the-plan) are eligible for an additional $8,000 under the First Home Builder Boost Scheme, which applies from January 1 2013 to June 30 2014 if the qualify for the first-home owner grant.
Northern Territory
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for both existing and new homes where the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $750,000.
The NT government also offers first-home owners stamp duty concession of up to $26,730 (the duty owed on the first $540,000 value of a property).
</body></html>

Victorian government offers bigger carrot to first-home buyers: Government housing incentives in 2013

<html><body>
Just 793 first-home buyers took advantage of the revised NSW first-home owners' grant in December last year.
There were 4,233 recipients in the prior December.
The numbers were also down in November last year with 1,763 recipients.
There had been a 2,920 monthly average over the past two financial years.
The December figure was the lowest since the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/lib/doc/stats/fhog_apps_received.pdf">first-home buyers' grant was introduced in 2000 </a> as a measure to offset the introduction of the GST.
Click to enlarge
<a rel="shadowbox" href="/images/stories/2013/01/fhbjan15.gif" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2013/01/fhbjan15thumb.gif"></a>
However the NSW opposition has accused the NSW government of "locking young people out of the housing market after the state recorded the lowest numbers in two decades".
The acting opposition leader Linda Burney blamed the drop on the government's decision to scrap the all encompassing $7,000 first-home owner grant along with stamp duty exemptions worth up to $17,990 for first-home buyers purchasing existing homes.
Only buyers of new apartments and houses now qualify for the grant. The $15,000 first-home owner grant (new homes) started in October last year. The grant will reduce to $10,000 in January 2014.
The data was confirmed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) showing only 1,383 loans for first-home buyers were approved in November last year.
This is the lowest ABS figure since February 1992, Burney says.
"These figures show Barry O'Farrell has locked first home buyers out of the property market," she said in a statement on Tuesday.
"The premier's decision to dump first-home buyer grants and stamp duty exemptions has been nothing short of devastating for young people trying to buy their first home."
Burney said first-home buyers buying an existing $500,000 home in November 2012 were forced to pay $24,990 more than they would have a year earlier.
"The O'Farrell government has created the worst environment in 20 years for first home buyers trying to enter the housing market," she said.
Acting Treasurer Greg Pearce told Fairfax Media the fall was due to a period of transition to the new grant. 
"This was a difficult decision. However, we believe this is necessary to make buying a new home or apartment relatively more attractive than buying an existing dwelling."
Murray pointed out that Queensland, which made similar policy changes also taking effect in October, suffered a 33% fall in loans taken out by first-home buyers in November.
"I think it's too early to tell what impact the NSW grant is having," he said. "Clearly, during the periods of transition you get some strange things happening."
The Housing Industry Association economist Geordan Murray also said it was appropriate to wait for a few more months' data before drawing conclusions.
Westmead and Liverpool, with about 550 recipients, were the suburbs with the highest uptake during 2012. 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

NSW first-home buyer numbers fell to 20-year lows in late 2012

<html><body>
Queensland-based bank Suncorp financed 6.1% of all first-home buyer loans arranged by AFG mortgage brokers over December, according to new AFG figures.
It was the top-ranked lender outside the major banks with nearly 40% of all first-home buyer home loans processed in December either financed by the Commonwealth Bank or its subsidiary Bankwest, the latest AFG’s quarterly Competition Index shows.
Second on the non-major bank list was AFG’s own mortgage products, which accounted for 5% of all first-home buyer loans, up from 1.9% at the start of the year.
The other non-major bank lenders to appeal to first-home buyers were WA government-owned lender KeyStart with 4.9% of the market, recording the “most dynamic performance among non-major lenders” growing market share from just 0.1% in January.
ING Direct (2.1%) and South Australian government lender Homestart (1.1%) were the only other non-major bank lenders to pick up more than 1% of the first-home buyer market.
According to the index, the CBA accounted for 29.6% and Bankwest for 9.3% of all first home loans in December with the major banks taking 77.5% of the first-home buyer mortgage market.
The Commonwealth Bank’s success with first-home buyers has helped it pick up overall mortgage market share, which has risen from 17.4% in January to 20.7%
Despite accounting for nearly one in 10 first-home buyer home loans in December, Bankwest’s share of the total mortgage market has fallen from 7% to 4.2% over the past 12 months.
AFG bills itself as Australia’s largest mortgage broker, with its brokers writing one in 10 home loans in Australia.
NON MAJOR LENDER MARKET SHARE FIRST HOME BUYERS DECEMBER

Suncorp 6.1%

AFG 5.0%

ING 2.1%

Citibank 0.7% -

Macquarie 0.2%

Circle 0.2%

AMP 0.4% -

ME Bank 0.8%

Liberty 0.4%

Pepper 0.1%

Homestart 1.1%

Wide Bay 0.8%

Adelaide 0.1%

Heritage 0.3%

Rock 0.1%

Keystart 4.9%

Other 0.3%

All Non 22.5%

 
<div> </div>
<div align="left"></div>
</body></html>

Suncorp ranks as top non-major bank first-home buyer lender as Commonwealth Bank grabs lion’s share of market: AFG

<html><body>
Improving housing affordability is failing to encourage first-home buyers to step onto the property ladder – in fact the exact opposite is happening.
Despite the proportion of income required to meet loan repayments decreasing 1.4 percentage points to 30.4% over the December quarter, the number of new finance commitments to first-home buyers decreased 9.1% over the quarter and 17.4% over the year to be at their lowest level since the March quarter of 2005, according to the latest Adelaide Bank/REIA Housing Affordability Report.
The report found that first-home buyers made up just 16.5% of the market over the December quarter compared to 19% in the September quarter.
This trend looks set to continue with <a target="_blank" href="/news">mortgage broker AFG </a>recording first-home buyers as accounting for just 12.9% of home loans arranged by the group over February, down from 13.2% in January.
First-home buyer numbers fell dramatically in NSW from 11,117 in the December quarter of 2011 to just 4,459 in the December quarter of 2012, according to the REIA.
In comparison first-home buyer numbers increased in Victoria over the same time frame from 6,528 to 7,169 and also increased in WA from 3,699 to 5,014.
REIA president Peter Bushby says that largely due to a higher average income, the ACT remains the most affordable state or territory in which to buy a home, with the proportion of income required to meet loan repayments at 18.7%.
“Though the proportion of income required to meet loan repayments decreased to 36.0%, New South Wales remained the least affordable state or territory in which to buy a home,” he adds.
“Compared to the 2011 December quarter, all states and territories recorded improvements in housing affordability, the largest in Queensland and South Australia.”
<img src="/images/stories/2013/03/reiamarch6.jpg" width="470" height="304" alt="reiamarch6">
</body></html>

First-home buyer numbers fall to near eight year low despite improving housing affordability: REIA

<html><body>
It may be popular to say that first-home buyer incentives don’t work or are inflationary but it’s simply not supported by the data in Victoria.

Not only is this not supported by the data but it is also a position which, from a policy perspective, is inequitable for one simple reason: stamp duty.
The REIV believes that <a target="_blank" href="http:/www.propertyobserver.com.au/first-home-buyers/first-home-buyer-grant-schemes-simply-don-t-work-terry-ryder">first-home buyers</a> deserve a better deal from governments because they have to compete with second- and third-home buyers who enter the market with equity built in earlier transactions. This would be less of an issue if not for stamp duty.
There is no rational reason why a first-home buyer should be subject to a wealth tax such as stamp duty to the same level as someone who has actually generated personal wealth from property.
How is a first-home buyer supposed to compete with other buyers? They have to save for a considerable amount of time to build the deposit, only to see it evaporate when they receive their stamp duty bill.
This is a far more significant issue than the standard debate about affordability for first-home buyers suggests. It is concerning that many who argue for more affordable property don’t also argue for lower wealth taxes on first-home buyers.
The First Home Buyers Grant, now a paltry $7,000 (the equivalent of one 25 point cut in interest rates), pales into insignificance against most stamp duty bills in Australia. Despite that fact, many commentators and organizations take pride in arguing against this form of assistance.
While governments continue to levy large stamp duty bills this is no more than an argument for wealth taxes on those who don’t have any. This position is supported by the findings in the report on Housing Supply and Affordability Reform by the Supply and Affordability Reform (HSAR) Working Party of COAG.
In its report, it found that “the FHOG does provide some help to potential first homebuyers in competing against existing homeowners, who have typically benefitted from capital gains from previous property price growth”.
In the Victorian context, there is plenty of evidence of incentives for first-home buyers being both equitable and delivering on their aims.
The first example is the First Home Owners Bonus, or builder’s bonus as it became known. When the Global Financial Crisis hit Victoria, it had a growing population that was not matched with an increase in supply. The National Housing Supply Council pointed to a supply shortfall which was translating into rapidly increasing prices.
In response, governments responded with significant grants – up to $36,500 for a new home in regional Victoria – to both increase activity in the housing market and, more pointedly, get the builders building more homes.
This policy was also part of the stimulus package aimed at generating employment for builders and related trades.
It worked. First-home buyers flocked to the market and the builders built more homes. The increased incentives came into effect on October 14, 2008 and within 12 months the number of first-home buyers in Victoria increased from 2,420 a month to 4,448. Over the last decade first home buyers have comprised 20% of all buyers; this share increased by 50% with targeted government incentives.  Those incentives achieved their aim by increasing the construction of new dwellings and addressing the supply shortfall.
These incentives also seemed to transcend politics as they were commenced under a Labor government, continued by a Coalition one and then, when they were clearly no longer needed, ended.
All home buyers benefited because housing became more affordable as there was less of an imbalance between supply and demand.
So much for suggestions that the incentives don’t work.
The second example is of the cuts to stamp duty in Victoria.
The REIV campaigned for cuts to stamp duty for all first-home buyers because we believe that it is, firstly, unfair to tax first home buyers’ precious deposits, and secondly, inefficient for governments to take with one hand and give with the other. This should not be taken as a lack of support for the grant; first-home buyers need all the help they can get and the moves by NSW, Queensland and South Australia will only make it harder for first home buyers.
As a result of our advocacy and support from the Victorian Government, by the 15th of September next year most first-home buyers will benefit from a 50% cut to stamp duty. Depending on the home you are buying, that is effectively a doubling of the $7,000 grant. This assistance has not had an immediate noticeable impact on the market nor did the REIV ever expect it to; after all it has been progressively introduced, rising from 20% in 2012 to 50% in 2014.
It may not have had the immediate impact of the builders’ bonuses but that was never the point. It was simply to reduce the inequities faced by first home buyers trying to get a start in the market. If this sort of policy is not more widely adopted, then governments are saying that they are happy for first-home buyers to spend years saving to pay a tax.
How does that help anyone?
Robert Larocca is Real Estate Institute of Victoria (<a target="_blank" href="https://www.reiv.com.au/">REIV</a>) policy and public affairs manager
</body></html>

rlarocca-zWhvjay44N

Why should first home buyers spend years saving to pay stamp duty? Robert Larocca

<html><body>
One of oldest clichés in journalism is that they never let the facts get in the way of a good story. And we’re seeing that shallow principle in play daily as media hammer the myth that first-home buyers are being squeezed out of the market.
All the available facts say otherwise.
Last week two new reports were added to the great pile of evidence that affordability is particularly strong right now. Some of the regular indexes have affordability at its best in 10 years. The one published quarterly by the Commonwealth Bank and the Housing Industry Association showed further improvement in the September quarter, with all capital cities benefiting.
Financial ratings firm Canstar published research showing that while the national average mortgage is today four and a half times bigger than it was in 1990, affordability is much better today than then because interest rates are much lower and wages have risen. Repayments as a proportion of income are considerably lower than they were in 1990.
We can add that to the ABS report which found that average house prices, relative to average incomes, are today at the same level as they were in 1995; and to the affordability index published by the Adelaide Bank and the Real Estate Institute of Australia, which basically concurs with the Commonwealth Bank report.
The thing that appears to conflict with all that evidence is that first home buyer numbers are low at the moment. Far too many attention-seekers are leaping to the erroneous conclusion that the only possible explanation is that young people cannot afford to buy.
The real explanation has nothing to do with affordability. It has to do with choices. Many recent surveys have found that today’s twenty-somethings are not prioritizing home ownership the way previous generations did. They are opting for lifestyle and travel. Home ownership can wait.
The surveys indicate many young adults prefer to rent in an inner-city suburb rather than moving to the suburbs and taking on a mortgage. Some are renting in the city while getting on the property ladder by buying an investment property in a cheaper location, often a regional centre.
It’s a major demographic shift, similar to the one that has Australians delaying parenthood. We no longer live in a nation where young adults move automatically to marriage, children and a suburban mortgage.
But someone seeking a bit of media limelight can always generate some cheap publicity by declaring the ‘Great Australian Dream’ dead. Media will always run that and in a nation of 23.3 million people you can always found a twenty-something malcontent willing to have a public whinge about how hard it is to save a deposit.
Journalists seem to think we’re all desperate for news about the sad plight of the wannabe first home buyer. They apparently imagine Australians are gathered in pubs and homes across the country talking about nothing else. What else could explain their obsession for this story line?
I have to confess I’m not interested in first home buyers. Even at their peak they have never been a major force in real estate and their importance to the property market and to the nation is greatly over-rated.
Buying a first home today is what it has always been: really hard. It’s a massive commitment and you have to really want it. It takes compromise and sacrifice. If you want it badly enough, you’ll go get it. It has always been thus.
The nation offers everyone shelter. But no one has a divine right to own the shelter. And certainly no one has a right to achieve ownership in their dream location as a first purchase.

<hr>
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank" style="font-size: 14px;">hotspotting.com.au</a> and you can contact him via <a target="_blank" href="https://mailto:%20ryder@hotspotting.com.au">email</a> or on <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" style="font-size: 14px;">Twitter</a>.
 
 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

First home buyer affordability is as good as it has ever been

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I'm a new investor and I'm about to invest in a property in Broken Hill. The property is vacant at the moment but the real estate has advised a potential rent of $200.
I'm also yet to do a building and pest inspection. 
Would you be able to give me some advice?
Kind regards,

Ashis
 

When new investors begin the process of choosing their very first investment property, usually they are motivated and guided by the desire to get something as affordable as possible.  In doing so, they consider a price range within their budget, and then go looking for a house to match.  Next, they usually find out the rent return and if it seems as if it will provide a reasonable cash flow, they believe they have a good buy on their hands.
The problem with this approach is that, while it means that you will buy something within your comfort zone in terms of price, with a rent return likely to cover most costs so that your weekly personal cash flows are not too badly impacted, it completely ignores one of the most important features of successful investing – and that is buying a property which will grow and so increase your net worth.  While getting a neutral or positive cash flow is indeed of considerable importance (as highly negative cash flows can cause financial distress and potential early exit), owning property which never grows (or grows very little) will do no more for you than never owning property at all!.
Broken Hill, in my opinion, falls within the category of an area which has affordable housing  and rental yields of over 6%.  However, it has a population which is only not growing; in 2011 it lost 80 people!  There are over 500 properties currently listed, with only four people looking per property available, as compared to a state average of 20.  Combined with a lack of employment opportunities, these facts indicate that there are simply no drivers for property price growth and you’re likely to be left with a property which does nothing in the short and medium term, and likely in the long term too.  You will essentially buy yourself a headache (which most properties are, at some time), with no capacity for a reward at the end!
While I am definitely not a proponent of spending up big when it comes to buying investment property, I believe there is far more risk in buying a cheap property with no demand drivers than there is in buying a more expensive property in an area where you have confirmed employment opportunities, population growth and suitable provision of infrastructure.  Such an area can still have a rental yield sufficient to cover your costs and not stress your budget today,  and in addition to this it can provide growth of your asset and the capacity to leverage into more properties, and thus build a larger portfolio.
Regards,
Margaret
 
<hr>
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Should I buy my first investment property in Broken Hill?

<html><body>
There will be a Senate inquiry into affordable housing this year.
Just a fortnight before Christmas, Queensland Senator Jan McLucas, Labor's Shadow Minister for Housing and Homelessness, secured the inquiry that will investigate private and public accommodation, both ownership and rental.
<a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Affordable_housing_2013/Submissions" target="_blank">The economics references committee, currently taking submissions, will report by 26 June.</a>
Of course it was only 2008 when a Senate select committee on housing affordability in Australia last reported.
So just how much this latest effort involves dusting off the prior submissions and the final report will be interesting to note. It might be optimistic to expect many new understandings emerge.
This inquiry will look at the biggest bugbear - the role of all levels of government in facilitating affordable home ownership and affordable private rental, especially the taxes and levies imposed by the Commonwealth, state, territory and local governments.
It will provide a timely look at the operation, effect and future of the National Rental Affordability Scheme.
The regulatory structures governing the roles of financial institutions and superannuation funds in the home lending and property sectors will be reviewed. 
Issues including appropriate, affordable and adaptable accommodation that  ensures emergency and essential service workers have access to affordable housing close to where they work will no doubt be addressed.
Also the important role of innovation in building materials and construction, including prefabricated and sustainable materials.
Alreeady three submissions have been lodged .. no none from our Monday morning columnist Catherine Cashmore. She's of the view that it could be just a repeat version of the 2008 report entitled “A good house is hard to find: Housing affordability in Australia” which was detailed in its content.
"It’s five years later and we seem to be no further forward," Catherine suggests.
I argue we are actually probably the poorer. And the Abbott Government's inexplicable axing of the National Housing Supply Council does create a void that can, inpart, be filled by the senate inquiry.
But not with any great hope for significant change. I am inclined to agree with economist Saul Eslake that politics – more than any other single factor – means that Australians are likely to have to live with a dysfunctional housing system for a long time yet to come.
</body></html>

2014: Dusting off the Senate's 2008 housing affordability report or real progress?

<html><body>
Last year (according to the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index), capital city home values rose by 9.8%, creating further affordability pressures for those segments of the market who are most price sensitive; the younger aged cohorts and first time buyers.  Our daily index data shows that home values have continued their strong pace of growth through the first month of 2014 with our combined capitals index likely to end the month slightly more than 1% higher.
Based on homes sold over the December quarter, the median price of a house across Australia’s capital cities is now $575,000; ranging from $775,000 in Sydney through to $350,000 in Hobart.  In the most expensive capital cities the challenge to buy a detached house within close proximity to where they work or socialise is simply out of reach for the vast majority of younger buyers.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2844" alt="Chart 1" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Chart-12.jpg" width="470" height="171" style="margin: 0px auto 15px; padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; outline-width: 0px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961); max-width: 100%; text-align: center; height: auto; display: block; vertical-align: bottom;">
Housing finance data indicates that as a proportion of the owner occupier market, first home buyers are currently at a record low level, accounting for just 12.3% of all owner occupier finance commitments. 
If first home buyers aren’t entering the market now, at a time of historically low mortgage rates, one might consider how and when they will ever enter the market.  In my opinion it is not always a case of not being able to afford to enter the market, it is often that the sacrifices a potential buyer would have to make in order to enter the market are too great.
There are some clear reasons why housing in Australia is expensive, including::
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-1.jpg" width="20" height="30" alt="number-1" style="float: left;"> Australian’s have high levels of personal wealth and high incomes relative to most other countries.
 <img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-2.jpg" width="26" height="30" alt="number-2" style="float: left;">Australia’s population is heavily centralised with around 55% of the national population residing in either Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.
 <img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-3.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-3" style="float: left;">Job opportunities and employment availability tend to be most abundant within capital cities.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-4.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-4" style="float: left;"> The supply of new housing within the capital cities has consistently been insufficient to meet the level of demand over the past decade or so.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-5.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-5" style="float: left;"> Population growth is strong with relatively high levels of overseas migration and natural increase creating additional demand for housing.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-6.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-6" style="float: left;"> The cost of vacant land has been driven to unaffordable heights due to the slow release of new residential land supply and the restrictions of urban growth boundaries in most capital cities.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/04/number-7.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-7" style="float: left;"> Negative gearing (which is available on all asset classes) encourages many to invest in residential property as a way of reducing their tax liability which creates additional housing demand.
Although these factors all contribute to a relatively high cost of housing, it does not mean that purchasing a first home is unachievable.  An upcoming analysis which will be released by RP Data this month finds that as at the end of 2013, across the capital cities, 28.4% of all homes had a current value of less than $400,000. Even in a market which is considered significantly unaffordable such as Sydney, 17.5% (almost one in five homes) have a value below $400,000.  Of course most of these properties are not located in the desirable areas of the city, but they are available.
Many potential first home buyers either still live with their parents or rent within areas close to where they work and socialise. For those living with their parents, it’s likely that the home they are currently residing in was not their parents first home. I’m sure if you asked many of those parent’s they would say that their first home was vastly inferior to their current home (ie they upgraded when they could afford to). For those renting in inner city areas, the reason why property prices and rents are so high in these areas is that demand is very strong while supply is quite limited which in-turn results in the high prices you see within these areas.
Given this, the prospective first home buyer is, in most instances, going to have to make a sacrifice in order to enter into home ownership.  As I see it, first home buyers need to make one of two major sacrifices; either move away from their local area to an area where home values are more affordable in order to enter the market or buy something which is at the lower end of the local market (which will often be a unit rather than a house). The strategy for someone buying their first home should rarely be to buy at the  suburbs median selling price; it should be to buy an entry level property.  Of course varying levels of deposit and income will dictate what the purchaser can reasonably afford to borrow and repay.  Over time, the first home buyer should see some capital growth and it would also be reasonable to expect that they should also experience an improvement in their employment conditions (more pay/promotion/new role) which would eventually help in assisting them to upgrade.
Looking at my first home buying experience, the above scenario parallels my own. I have to admit, the home was pretty horrible but it was in the inner city location I wanted.
My first purchase was a two bedroom, one bathroom unit in Fortitude Valley in Brisbane.  The location was great but the unit was not so great.  The complex was largely utilised for short term accommodation and although the unit had two bedrooms and one bathroom, outside of those three rooms it had one further room which functioned as a kitchenette, lounge and dining room.  I purchased the property for $248,000 in July 2005 and sold the property in April 2010 for $334,000 effectively five years later.  At the time of purchase, the median unit price within the suburb was $309,240 and by the time of sale the median unit price in the suburb was $400,000.
The unit was purchased at a price well below the suburb median and upon sale the price had increased by 35%.  In comparison the median sale price across Fortitude Valley had increased by a lower 29%.  At the time I was single so I also had a friend come and live with me which assisted in making the mortgage repayments.
By the time I sold the property I had purchased a subsequent property which was a house, once again it was purchased at a price below the suburb’s median.  I had managed to make a profit on the sale of my first home and purchased a more expensive property, I had also benefitted from an increase in salary over the time which made repayments easier.
In my experience the choice to purchase a first home is never an easy one.  It is often the case that what you think you should be able to get for your money and what you actually can get are very different.  But having an understanding of your budget and doing your research to get a realistic expectation of what properties and in what location you can afford to purchase takes some of the pain out of the house hunting process and purchasing.
Undoubtedly some people will not be able or willing to purchase but bemoaning the high cost of housing in the local area is unlikely to change the situation outside of wide-spread changes to government policy(ies).
Cameron Kusher is senior research analyst at <a href="https://www.myrp.com.au/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">RP Data</a>.
 
 
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News