Apartment developers in the Gold Coast are finding new, creative ways to differentiate themselves from competing projects, as new supply starts to flow through up and down the Coast.

Developer Big Projects brought in the renowned Sydney-based design studio YSG to craft the interiors for The Frederick, Big Projects' new Mermaid Beach project and YSG's first move into the multi-residential development space.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5346]

It was a strategic move for Big Projects to bring in a Sydney eye to the development.

“Our role is to give our design partners the space and freedom to explore,” says Matt Barrett, Director of Big Projects.

“We wanted YSG Studio to capture the essence of Nobby’s, to design a building that embraces life, light and connection, while creating a genuine sense of place.”

There are only 39 apartments in The Frederick, including a striking beach house, just 100 metres from the booming Nobby Beach precinct.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5347]

Yasmine Ghoniem, Director of YSG Studio, says their vision&nbsp;for The Frederick "reinvents coastal living."

“Nobby’s has such an iconic energy, it’s one of those rare pockets of the Gold Coast where the community, the beach, and the streets all feel connected,” Ghoniem says.

"Responding to the neighbouring coastline, soothing curves add a relaxing regional overlay, while unique detailing really sets it apart. It’s a place that feels lived in from the moment you step inside.”

A standout feature of The Frederick is its rooftop terrace, an uncommon inclusion for a boutique, low-rise building, where amenity is typically concentrated at ground level.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110588 project_image_fid=5360]

Positioned to capture panoramic views from the hinterland to the ocean, the rooftop has been designed as a series of intimate zones. It includes a pool, sauna, sun decks, workspaces and dedicated entertaining areas.

“The rooftop was conceived as a collection of spaces where residents can unwind and connect, an extension of the Nobby’s lifestyle,” Barrett says.

Architecture for the project was led by Plus Architecture, with landscape design by LDG.

SRQ Projects Director Nick Clydsdale, who is handling sales at The Frederick, says the majority of enquiry is coming from South East QLD and Victorian buyers who have been actively searching between Broadbeach and Mermaid Beach for some time.

"They’ve reviewed a number of projects, however this one has stood out for its design flair/ appeal,"&nbsp;Clydsdale says.

Site demolition is slated for this month, with construction commencing soon after. Big Projects is targeting a late 2027 completion.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=110588]

Joel Robinson

Big Projects taps Sydney’s YSG for first multi-residential project at The Frederick Mermaid Beach

Melbourne-based property developer ALTA Property has this week achieved planning approval for the adaptive re-use of a former commercial tower into a $200 million, 169-apartment project at 10 Queens Road, one of the last developable sites along the Albert Park Lake-fronting boulevard.&nbsp;

Set within one of Melbourne’s most sought-after precincts and designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fraser-partners-0">Fraser and Partners</a>, the illustrious building will offer unparalleled views across Albert Park Lake, Port Phillip Bay and Melbourne CBD.&nbsp;

The mix of 1, 2 and 3-bedroom residences will be complemented by a ground-floor amenity featuring private dining, a lounge bar, gym and wellness spaces, co-working, outdoor communal gardens, and retail.&nbsp;

The 17-storey building is a masterclass in adaptive re-use, with the existing commercial building’s façade, shell and internal structure to be retained, before high-end residences are built from the ground up in a newly built Albert Park facing addition to the building.&nbsp;

Sitting atop the building will be two 320+sqm penthouses with private rooftop terraces, which are expected to be priced between $9 - $11 million.&nbsp;

<img alt="ALTA Property achieves permit approval for $200 million Queens Road tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa11211b-5581-43f9-940c-fc84d30a0e61" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/C_04.png?VersionId=Yhf5p_1EgGDu_zOIMFgvA8Ug8j3sTFQs" />

Architecturally, the building will feature a curved, geometric façade that celebrates and elevates the existing structure, with warm, muted tones which were selected to extend the materiality of the existing building rather than contrast it.&nbsp;

Interiors will bring together three metre high ceilings with waffle concrete in some spaces, natural timber, granite and Australian materials, culminating in crafted, generous and considered spaces that are defined by authenticity.&nbsp;

The adaptive re-use means that the Queens Road project will be a sustainability led, high-quality finished product, with a 62% saving in carbon emissions by re-using the existing structure rather than knocking it down and rebuilding.&nbsp;

ALTA Property was launched by Nigel Givoni in 2023, bringing over 25 years of experience in multi level residential delivery.&nbsp;

Melbourne’s property market growth is currently led by apartments. According to RPM VIC Apartments &amp; Townhomes Market Report (April 2026), units are outpacing houses, especially in the middle ring suburbs where median prices hit $757,500 – a four-year high that represents 2.9 percent growth quarter-on-quarter.&nbsp;

<img alt="ALTA Property achieves permit approval for $200 million Queens Road tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="647e13d7-b4bc-433a-9bc9-fe3c3dd4f2ec" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/V_06.png?VersionId=ou4NUCWUgA3NAy.6CQJlEdKX50j3dOk6" />

For ALTA Property Founder Nigel Givoni, this performance speaks to the confidence he has in the Melbourne market.&nbsp;

“Queens Road represents a rare opportunity to continue to shape our presence in the Melbourne market.,"&nbsp;Givoni says.

"With a considered project team and a premier site along one of the city’s most sought-after boulevards, we look forward to contributing to the fabric of this established address.

“Other Australian markets are getting a lot of attention, but I believe the depth of value in Melbourne is being overlooked. The fundamentals are strong, population growth is steady and, based on our preliminary conversations with a leading builder, construction costs are beginning to normalise, creating further opportunity."

Givoni says the project is a&nbsp;highly considered example of adaptive re-use, delivering quality, high-end residences, premium hotel-inspired amenities and an architecturally striking façade, all achieved without the need to remove the existing structure.

"We are really looking forward to the market’s response,” he said.&nbsp;

ALTA Property to deliver $200 million Queens Road apartment tower

Construction is set to begin at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/orchard-mews-glen-iris-18-scott-grove-glen-iris-vic-3146">Orchard Mews</a> in Glen Iris, with&nbsp;PC Whitehall &amp; Sons&nbsp;now appointed as the townhome development moves into its next phase.

The development by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/montcoeur">MontCoeur</a>,&nbsp;located at 18 Scott Grove, is now around 30 per cent sold, with completion targeted for late-2027.

Orchard Mews comprises a curated collection of three- and four-bedroom customisable townhomes, positioned within one of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>’ more tightly held residential streets. The low-density project has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a>, with landscape architecture by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/jack-merlo">Jack Merlo</a>, bringing together a team known for high-end residential projects across Melbourne.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366285]

The development is defined by its focus on flexible living and long-term usability. Each residence includes multiple living zones and a customisable multipurpose room, allowing buyers to tailor spaces to suit changing needs, whether as a home office, additional bedroom, wellness area or entertainment space.

Architecturally, the townhomes emphasise natural light and spatial volume, with dual-aspect layouts and double-height living areas incorporated into the design. Interiors feature natural stone benchtops, premium appliances, and a neutral material palette intended to support everyday functionality rather than statement-driven finishes.

All residences are all-electric and include private lifts and secure double garages, reflecting a broader shift toward sustainability and future-focused housing in Melbourne’s established suburbs.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366277]

Outdoor connections are also central to the offering, with a mix of private courtyards and terraces extending internal living spaces and integrating with the landscaped surrounds.

The Scott Grove address places Orchard Mews within close proximity to some of Melbourne’s key lifestyle and education amenities, including Scotch College, Sacré Cœur, Cabrini Hospital and the retail hub of Chadstone. Public transport access is also nearby, with trams and Gardiner Station providing connectivity to the CBD and surrounding suburbs.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150128]

Construction to commence at luxury Glen Iris townhome project, Orchard Mews

A rare new apartment development has been proposed on the fringe of St Ives Village.

Developer Newquest Property has lodged plans for a low-rise apartment project designed by well-regarded architecture firm Warren &amp; Mahoney, which is best known for its work in the multi-residential sector in Melbourne.

The building, proposed for a 1,916 sqm site on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/st-ives-residences-3-5-memorial-avenue-nsw-2075">Memorial Avenue</a> opposite St Ives Village Green, has been designed to blend into the surrounding natural environment.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5c1c7437-2fba-4345-a6d7-05321714ad3e" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.28.46%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=KrYyMaJvNqR7vbx0xbB3Ef8sJ6FuHpmn" />

“Drawing inspiration from the pale trunks and flowering canopies of the scribbly gums and blue gums prevalent in the area, a considered material palette was developed,” the architectural design report states.

“This palette references the established materiality of the suburb while elevating it through refined finishes to achieve a more luxurious architectural expression.”

Of the 33 apartments proposed, 21 will be three-bedroom residences. The remaining mix includes nine two-bedroom apartments, one one-bedroom apartment and two four-bedroom residences. The development will be supported by 62 car parking spaces and 33 secure bicycle spaces.

The proposal would replace two single-storey brick buildings currently on the site.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="21422eaf-09a9-4439-9278-b9bd9daf22a1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.38.10%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=v.fXSgcUcEscvOZzqcjG5nk3gVqk_Amt" />

St Ives remains a relatively untapped market for new apartment development. North Shore developer WINIM has a number of projects in the area, while INCA is nearing completion of Ellis Residences.

More recently, Traders In Purple has lodged plans for one of the denser projects proposed in the suburb, a 75-apartment development on a 5,900 sqm site on Cowan Road.

NewQuest, a construction, design and development firm, has delivered over 24 projects across commercial, residential, industrial, and lad markets.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

First look: NewQuest Property proposes new St Ives apartment development

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/centa-property-group">Centa Property Group</a> has achieved two major milestones at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bilinga-house-107-golden-four-drive-bilinga-qld-4225">Bilinga House</a> apartment development in the sought-after southern Gold Coast.

They've almost sold 50 per cent of the Golden Four Drive building, while at the same time announcing the commencement of construction through reputable builder Greyburn Construction.

The boutique 10-storey building, with 47 two- and three-bedroom apartments, now has a mid-to-late 2028 completion date.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5333]

The <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>-designed project is positioned just 200 metres from Bilinga Beach and brings a relatively rare apartment offering to a market that has seen limited new supply in recent years.

Residences have been designed to maximise natural light and ventilation, with open-plan interiors, generous glazing, and material palettes that reflect the surrounding coastal landscape.

Interiors incorporate engineered timber flooring, stone benchtops, and custom joinery, with layouts designed to adapt to both permanent living and lock-and-leave use.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5336]

Rothelowman Senior Project Leader Matthew Tencate said the design approach centres on liveability and community.

“Providing curated on-site amenities and communal spaces for residents that facilitate a sense of community, liveability, and wellness,” Tencate said.

Residents will have access to a suite of private amenities including a pool, gym, sauna, and communal alfresco areas, alongside practical features such as surfboard storage and bicycle facilities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5336]

Centa Property Group Director Jason Yuen said the project has been designed to appeal to a range of buyers seeking flexibility in how they use their property.

“Bilinga House is designed for those who want the best of both worlds – a modern beachside escape with the flexibility to generate income when you're not there,” Yuen said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5338]

Bilinga remains one of the quieter pockets of the Gold Coast, sitting between the more established hubs of Coolangatta and Palm Beach. Its appeal has strengthened in recent years, supported by proximity to the Gold Coast Airport and the Oceanway coastal path.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150037]

Bilinga House apartments snapped up as Greyburn commences construction

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Statistics don’t lie – but they can certainly mislead if the right questions don’t get asked.
Or, from another perspective, figures don’t lie – except when liars figure – which applies to the counting of first home buyers in the market, with the exploitation of dodgy data by people with dodgy motives.
Real estate people and organisations with vested interests have succeeded in creating the illusion that first home buyers are no longer active because they can’t afford to buy. This is despite the results of the two major affordability indexes, which say the opposite.
Headlines continue to shout that the Great Australian Dream is extinct, and we have a parliamentary inquiry into the affordability issue.
There is a strong argument that today’s generation of young adults are not interested in the heavy financial commitment of a mortgage. They witnessed their Baby Boomer parents slaving over a hot mortgage while struggling with a young family, and have decided to pursue other priorities.
The evidence from surveys is that Gen Y is a restless lot, who would prefer to rent while pursuing a good lifestyle. Commitments like families and mortgages can wait.
This, apparently, is reflected in the statistics. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data suggests that the market share of first-home buyers has been dropping since 2011.
For example, the number of first home buyer commitments as a percentage of total owner-occupied housing finance in late 2011/early 2012 was around 20%. This has slowly declined to 12-13% – according the ABS figures.
But here’s the thing. During 2012-2013 most states and territories implemented building stimulation strategies. Instead of offering the grants for all types of properties, the grants were available only to first-timers who built a new home or purchased off-the-plan.
Given that most first time buyers opt for established homes rather than new ones, this had a huge impact on the numbers of buyers accessing grants. The average price differential across Australia between new and old is $70,000 and it’s well over $100,000 in our largest cities, so $10,000 grants fail to act as an “incentive” to buy new.
This means most first-home buyers no longer apply for grants because they prefer to buy an established home, which is cheaper and often better located.
This is evident in statistics from the NSW and Victorian Offices of State Revenue (which distribute the grants). In the 2012 financial year, NSW distributed 37,464 grants and Victoria 19,051; in the 2013 financial year NSW distributed 17,297 grants and Victoria 21,898; but in the 2014 financial year, the numbers dropped to NSW 7,717 and Victoria 6,115. For NSW, that’s a fall of 79% in two years and for Victoria a decline of 72% in one year.
Western Australia went against the trend by increasing from 13,959 in 2011 to 22,135 in 2013. But Western Australia still offers a grant ($3,000) for first timers buying established homes.
The fact that Western Australia, the only state which offers a grant for both new and established homes, has rising figures for first-home buyers, highlights a discrepancy between states. Why does WA have a higher percentage of first-home buyers than all other states and territories?
Many across the real estate industry believe first-home buyers remain active and have begun to query the accuracy of the statistics.
So, are the right questions being asked? Where do the statistics on first-home-buyer numbers come from? Who collects the data?
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) collects the data from the banks and passes it on to the ABS.
Banks generally only capture what is relevant to their own business, i.e. anything necessary to a loan application. If the loan applicant doesn’t qualify for the first-home buyers grant, the information is not gathered – so many first-home buyers are not recorded as such by the banks.
According to the APRA reporting format, which has not been updated since 2008, commitments should be classified to the category "First Home Buyers" only if none of the borrowing parties to the commitment has previously drawn down on housing finance for owner occupation. Nowhere does it say whether the house is new or established, nor whether the buyer has received any form of grant.
With the changes to grant policies across the nation, many first-home buyers who are buying an established property will not qualify for a grant and, therefore, relevant information is not being passed onto the ABS and the data is becoming skewed.
The ABS is obviously aware of this now. In its June 2014 report on Housing Finance, it advises that an investigation is under way to evaluate the robustness of estimates of loans to first-home buyers.
I expect it to discover that there are more first-time buyers out there than the official data shows.
That parliamentary inquiry into affordability will again be shown to be a waste of time and taxpayers' money.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can contact him through <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email </a>or <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">twitter</a>.
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

We should question the data on first home buyers

<html><body>
Like a B-movie horror flick villain that refuses to die, the first-home owner grant will limp into the new financial year to haunt us all despite the Victorian Treasurer’s valiant efforts in his May budget to curtail this beast.
Yes, the $7,000 grant for established property will be phased out on 1 July. But it will be increased from $7,000 to $10,000 for newly constructed homes.
I’m no fan of grants or concessions that distort the property market. I’ve been railing against the FHOG since it was introduced back in July 2000 ostensibly to offset the effect of the GST on home ownership. In its original guise, the FHOG was a national scheme funded by the states and territories and administered under their own legislation, with a one-off grant of up to $7,000 payable to first home owners that satisfied all the eligibility criteria.
Since then, this scheme has been tinkered with remorselessly to become the Frankenstein’s monster I alluded to earlier.
The scheme is meant to make property more affordable for first home buyers. Unfortunately, experience shows that the grants don’t achieve this end.  Instead, the nominal increase in purchasing power it delivers to first home buyers transmits directly into higher prices for the properties they hope to buy.
The real beneficiaries are the vendors of properties that first timers buy. It would have been simpler if the State Revenue Office of Victoria, who administers the grant, posted the grant cheque direct to the vendor!
The fact that the grant was economic lunacy – and costly to governments’ coffers to boot – didn’t seem to bother politicians in the noughties when state governments were basking in pre-GFC budget surpluses. But now that state treasurers across the country are struggling with fiscal deficits, one by one, they’ve been winding back the FHOG.
Victoria is just the latest.  More focus is now going to providing grants for new property. At first blush this seems like a good idea. The grant has been amended so that it boosts supply – by encouraging the construction of new apartments and houses – as well as demand.
However, I am concerned that there will be serious unintended consequences. The grant will continue to distort market conditions and performance. It will artificially skew property data, especially median values, possibly enough to make them virtually meaningless if the stock level is very high.
And, most worryingly, it will encourage many first-home buyers who otherwise would have opted for existing stock to purchase new and off-the-plan properties.
Why is that problem? Well, I’m afraid that many of these first home buyers will come to regret their decision.
Let me be blunt: much of the off-the-plan property under development is usually in windy Docklands or in fringe suburbs poorly serviced by transport; many properties are poorly built and deteriorate quickly; and, ultimately, many first home buyers and investors will lose money when they come to sell these properties in a few years because of developers’ need to cover their extensive marketing costs and to extract a profit.
In short, these properties are invariably over-priced in the first place relative to what they would sell for in an open market. Further, when the first time owner goes to sell the property, they will be competing against a glut of similar properties. We all know what happens when you’re faced with a buyer’s market!
I’m hoping that this is the penultimate chapter in the grant saga, and that sanity will finally prevail and we can get politically bipartisanship to kill it off. But I’m not holding my breath.
Monique Sasson Wakelin is director at <a href="https://wakelin.com.au/" target="_blank">Wakelin Property Advisory</a>.
</body></html>

msassonwakelin-pDHXgmS5wA

Slow demise of first-home owner grant schemes: Monique Sasson Wakelin

<html><body>
The auctions market has ended the financial year on a solid note, with first-home buyers rushing to take advantage of federal and state-based grants before they are downgraded.
But one expert says the next financial year may not differ so much from the last, in that investors and buyers should expect a slow, drawn-out recovery rather than any short, frantic bursts of improvement.
"We're not expecting any major recovery for the Melbourne market," SQM Research managing director Louis Christopher said.
As for the rest of the country, Christopher's opinion was unwavering – most capital cities will perform over the next 12 months as they have in the past year, assuming interest rates and the dollar remain relatively stable.
"We're still expecting any recovery to be modest and moderate," he says.
According to the Real Estate Industry of Victoria, Melbourne recorded a clearance rate of 73%, compared to 69% last weekend and 55% during this weekend last year.
"The slight increase in the clearance rate this week may be due to the first-home owners grant for established dwellings coming to an end on the 30th, June 2013," chief executive Enzo Raimondo said in a statement.
Various changes are being made to state-based first home owners' grants, including in Victoria and Queensland.
Such changes mean the first home owners' market is likely to taper off over the next few months, Christopher says.
"Melbourne is likely to track Sydney's changes in that regard, meaning there was a drop off in first-home buying over the few months after those changes came into effect.
"There was also a slow and gradual build up after that period."
As for the rest of the year, Christopher says there isn't much reason to expect anything other than what we've seen in 2012-13. Melbourne is tipped to record 2-5% capital growth during this calendar year, while Sydney "is the market we're most bullish about".
"We're seeing fairly strong pricing action now," he says, with more expected in the next few months.
Canberra, however, is expected to remain under pressure, while Christopher says Brisbane is simply "treading water".
"There is no major recovery with lots of stock in the market...and that's likely to continue in the remaining half of the year."
This article first appeared on<a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/property/056271-auctions-strong-as-first-time-buyers-spend-big-for-last-minute-grants"> Smart Company</a>.
</body></html>

pmcstafford-pr9eMARWoN

Victorian first home buyer's market set to taper off: SQM

<html><body>
Economist and property bear Steve Keen says housing grants are a “poisoned chalice” that inflate house prices leaving first-home buyers worse off, not better off.
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/trends/housing-grants-a-help-to-sell-not-a-help-to-buy-steve-keen/2013070362962?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=realitytv">Speaking from Paris</a>, Keen said government housing schemes “drag people into the market who otherwise would not be able to get in" in an interview on the Keiser Report, a program on Russian English language news channel RT.
“What it does is increase the supply of buyers," said Keen.
“It’s a 'help to sell' not a 'help to buy' because those who are flogging their properties suddenly get a whole bunch of people with money in their pockets."
His comments were made in the wake of UK chancellor George Osborne’s heavily criticised ‘Help to Buy’ scheme, which provides state mortgage subsidies.
Keen said he agreed with the likes of the IMF and outgoing governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King that Osborne's scheme is a bad idea.
Keen referred to the Australian experience of the government introducing first-home owner grants in an effort to bring more people into the housing market, which created housing bubbles each time such schemes were introduced, made housing more unaffordable and made buyers “worse off not better off”.
“When the Australian government doubled and trebled the scheme (through the first-home owner boost which ran from October 2008 to December 2009) house prices went up 8% and 12% per annum.
“[That is] 12% more unaffordable. If you can’t control it becomes a poisoned chalice."
Keen said governments sponsoring asset price bubbles to make themselves look like good economic managers was a “perennial theme” in Australia dating right back to when Bob Hawke came to power.
“One of the first schemes he introduced in the 1980s was a first home owners grant of a few thousand dollars, which started a little mini-bubble in housing
“After the 1987 stock market crash they did it again with a much larger amount of money that also started a huge bubble.
Prices rose 20% and 30% and then they fell 20% and 30% on the other side of it.
“In 2000 it was brought back and then doubled by John Howard in 2001. Eeach time they did it, it pumped up house prices even more.
“Housing grants have become part of furniture in Australia," he added.
By comparison, before the government began introducing these schemes, Keen says average house price increases were "one half of one percent" compared to consumer price increase over a year.
After the first scheme was introduced by Hawke, the average was 4% growth per year he said.
Keen also returned to his most controversial 2008 prediction about house prices falling 40%.
“House prices were falling when I made my call that they would fall 40% over 10 to 15 years.
“That’s when the government doubled and trebled the first-home owners scheme, which I renamed the first-home owners 'vendors' scheme.
“That restarted the bubble and they kept it going until mid-2010 when house prices started to fall again.”
“House prices fall much more slowly than the stock market. They don’t have the total crash.
“The biggest crash was in the US where house price did fall about 40% over four years.
“What I had in mind for Australia was the Japanese case of a slow bleed, where prices have fallen 70% over 20 years.”
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Housing grants a “poisoned chalice” that create bubbles and leave buyers worse off: Steve Keen

<html><body>
A preliminary auction clearance rate of 78.0% was recorded across the combined capital cities this week having increased from 77.3% last week. There were 1,777 auction results reported this week with a total of 2,205 scheduled auctions showing that auction volumes have remained virtually unchanged when compared to the previous week (2,268). In comparison, over the same week last year 66.6% of the 1,991 homes taken to auction sold.
<a href="/images/2015/06/29/shana1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 <img src="/images/2015/06/29/shana1.jpg" alt="" width="820" height="620">
The preliminary auction clearance rate across Melbourne was 78.5% this week, down from the previous weeks final result of 79.3% and stronger than at the same time last year (68.3%). So far this year, Melbourne’s weekly auction clearance rate has been, on average, 10.6 per cent higher than over the comparable week one year ago. Across Melbourne’s individual sub-regions, the strongest preliminary clearance rate this week was across the North East region at 85.8%, followed closely by the Inner East region where the preliminary clearance rate was 85%.
 
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/20150628-Melbourne.jpg" alt="" width="796" height="539">
There were 887 Sydney homes taken to auction this week and a preliminary clearance rate of 83.5% across 747 results. Over the previous week, the final auction clearance rate was 82.4% with 862 auctions held across the city. At the same time last year, 71.1% of the 861 homes taken to auction recorded a successful result. This week, the strongest sub-region performance across Sydney’s sub-regions was the Ryde region, with 90.6% of the reported results clearing at auction.
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/20150628-Sydney.jpg" alt="" width="811" height="556">
Brisbane’s preliminary clearance rate was 51.1% this week, compared to 52.2% last week and 42.2% at the same time last year. Across Brisbane, a total of 140 auctions were held this week which is higher than last week (128), but lower than at the same time last year (153).
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/20150628-Brisbane.jpg" alt="" width="801" height="539">
 
Adelaide hosted 81 auctions this week and across the 48 reported results, CoreLogic RP Data’s preliminary auction clearance rate is 70.8%. Last week, Adelaide’s clearance rate was 63.5% across 83 auctions in the city, while at the same time last year 62.7% of the 79 homes taken to auction were sold.
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/20150628-Adelaide.jpg" alt="" width="844" height="566">
For Perth, the number of homes taken to auction this week was 29, less than last week (47) and last year (39). Meanwhile, Perth’s clearance rate of 57.1% this week was higher than last week (38.9%) and last year (50.0%.
Across Canberra 72 homes were taken to auction this week and the preliminary clearance rate across 32 auctions was 81.3 per cent.
There were 22 auctions across Tasmania this week, with 10 successful results out of the 20 reported.
</body></html>

smiller-vwPjRHTkST

National auction clearance rate rises: CoreLogic RP Data's Shana Miller

<html><body>
The most common “common denominator” of boom property markets over time is an elevated level of spending on infrastructure.
It’s not coincidence that Sydney has been having its strongest market in 12 years at a time when the level of infrastructure development is the highest it’s been in 12 years. It’s not the only reason but it has played a significant role.
And as Sydney starts to shows signs of beginning the fade-out that’s inevitable after three years of heightened activity and prices, investors seeking long-term growth are well advised to follow the infrastructure trail.
Real estate that lies in the path of progress usually grows at superior rates.
The property cycle in Sydney has reached the point where investors need to be extremely careful with their locational choices.
The Sydney market has been percolating for three years and most locations have recorded significant price growth, including double-digit annual increases in median prices across much of the Sydney metropolitan area.
This scenario has meant that owning real estate almost anywhere in Greater Sydney has delivered good capital growth.
But it will not be so simple moving forward. There are already indications that the Sydney boom is beginning to fade. It was inevitable that this would occur and it was most likely to happen in the third year of heightened market activity – i.e. during 2015.
Our latest analysis of sales data shows that there are fewer growth suburbs (in terms of sales activity) than before, which is an indicator that the boom may be fading. I do not expect any dramatic decline, but the high level of price growth of the past 2-3 years is unlikely to continue.
I note that other research sources, including BIS Shrapnel and National Australia Bank, have also forecast that the rate of price growth in Sydney will decrease over the next year or so.
Investors now need to be selective to achieve capital growth – and the best strategy is to focus on locations where spending on new infrastructure, particularly transport infrastructure, will be a catalyst to real estate demand. 
Currently, the outer reaches of the metropolitan area are the market leaders in Sydney. Penrith, Camden and Campbelltown – as far as you can get from the CBD and still be in Greater Sydney – have the most upwardly-mobile markets.
Some Top End suburbs remain vibrant. But, increasingly, we are seeing the biggest growth in the middle and bottom tiers of the market. This continues a process which evolved throughout 2014, with the millionaire suburbs a little less prominent and the more affordable areas rising. 
Western areas are prominent, including the far south-west of the Sydney metropolitan area where both the Campbelltown and Camden LGAs still have numerous growth suburbs, the Liverpool LGA and the Rouse Hill precinct in the far north-west. 
These are all areas which will benefit from infrastructure spending, including projects currently under construction and those in the planning stages.
In some instances, the level of new transport infrastructure is quite exceptional. Take the north-west precinct centred on the emerging growth region of Rouse Hill. This area is an obvious and direct beneficiary of the $9 billion North west Rail Link, now under construction. 
Currently the main transport link to this precinct is the M2 motorway, where a significant upgrade was recently completed.
Other accessibility improvements are being made with the upgrade of Schofields Road,linking Windsor Road at Rouse Hill to Railway Terrace at Schofields. The two-lane rural road will be transformed into a major east-west connection between Windsor Road and Richmond Road over three stages costing about $200 million.
Stage one opened to traffic in July 2014. Stage two should be complete in early 2017 while stage three remains in the planning phase.
Richmond Road has also undergone a recent $46 million upgrade.
The north-west region of Sydney will benefit from the M9 Orbital road, which will connect it to the far south-west of Sydney. The M9 will link Camden in the south-west to Penrith in the west and continue north to Windsor, a near neighbour of Rouse Hill.
The link is in the early stages of planning, with $4.6 million set aside in the FY2015 State Budget for a feasibility study on the construction of the M9.
The north-west region will also benefit from the NorthConnex motorway, the $2.6 billion project designed to address the missing link between the southern end of the M1 Pacific Motorway at Wahroonga and the M2 motorway at its Pennant Hills Road interchange.
Spanning 9km, NorthConnex will be the longest road tunnel project in Australia. Construction of the tunnel is expected to be completed in 2019. It was announced in February 2015 that Lend Lease had won the contract to construct the motorway.
These infrastructure projects are part of the mix that will make the north-west a growth market long-term, beyond the current boom.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was recently joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
 
</body></html>

Property investors must follow the infrastructure trail: Terry Ryder 

<html><body>
Two property groups have teamed up to debunk media myths – but have actually added to them.
In seeking to dispel misconceptions about negative gearing and capital gains tax, the Property Council of Australia and the Real Estate Institute of Australia have added to the great seething mass of misinformation about real estate.
They have also missed a clear opportunity by failing to address two of the biggest arguments in favour of negative gearing and other investment incentives. 
That’s a shame. The media hysteria around negative gearing and the CGT “discount” needs a strong and coherent response from the real estate industry.
The PCA and the REIA have sought to provide that by asking a consultancy group to put together an evidence-based examination of the issues. To a certain degree it’s been a worthy exercise because the report presents facts and reasoned analysis, in contrast to media treatment of the issues.
It provides cogent responses to some of the lies about negative gearing, using official figures to show that this is not a tax benefit to the rich, nor is it a massive burden to the Federal Budget with no benefits to society. It shows that investors do indeed contribute to the creation of new housing supply and therefore assist in making homes more affordable. 
But it adds to the problem by reinforcing the notion of a runaway national property boom with soaring prices. It refers frequently to the “current booming residential property market”, belief in which has caused the lunatic fringe to target the industry with a sustained series of irrational attacks.
It also reinforces the greatest myth in Australian real estate – the claim that a national housing shortage exists. It’s poor form by these groups to self-righteously claim to be debunking other people’s myths while re-stating their own equally-fallacious furphies.
The PCA and REIA have also failed themselves and their industry by missing the opportunity to make two of the strongest arguments in favour of investment incentives like negative gearing.
The report examines how much negative gearing costs Budgets but doesn’t consider how much other revenue would be lost if negative gearing was disallowed. If this incentive to investment was removed and Australians stopped buying investment properties (and other forms of investment which have negative gearing provisions), other revenue streams would reduce, including stamp duty (State Governments would be screaming from the high heavens), land tax and capital gains tax. 
Given that the total tax take from the property industry is over $70 billion per year, and the amount claimed in negative gearing benefits is a tiny fraction of that, what would be the overall long-term impact to all government budgets – state as well as federal – if negative gearing ended?
To my knowledge no one has addressed this because everyone is looking at the issue from their own narrow viewpoints and the big picture has been lost.
But there is a bigger issue not discussed in this “debate” – and I couldn’t find any reference to it in the REIA/PCA report. My contention is that the Federal Budget would be a massive loser long-term if negative gearing was disallowed.
Here’s why. The biggest problem for the Budget is the mounting cost of welfare, notably pensions paid to retired people. The problem will get considerably worse, because of our ageing population. Successive Governments have told Australians they have to invest to provide for their own retirement years, because the nation cannot afford to fund them with pensions.
The nation needs to provide incentives to invest. Negative gearing it one of them – and it applies to other forms of investment including shares, businesses and artworks, as well as to real estate.
If we remove negative gearing, it will have to apply across all investment vehicles, not just to real estate. It’s a reasonable expectation that if the incentives are removed, many people will not invest. They will stagger into retirement with a small amount of superannuation and a need to claim the pension. 
A small short-term saving to the Federal Budget will result in a major long-term loss.
The anti-gearing attack is based on the claims that it inflates prices and damages government budgets. There is no evidence that negative gearing results in rising prices, because it’s impossible to measure. 
What we can say with certainty that we currently have negative gearing in place and prices are not rising strongly in any of our major cities except Sydney. If negative gearing inflates prices, why is there no price growth in Perth, Darwin or Canberra, and only muted growth in Brisbane and Adelaide?
Another thing we know, from the experience of the last time negative gearing was disallowed (in the 1980s), is that it results in higher residential rents.
The true impact on government budgets will not be known until someone does a proper study which includes the impact on other forms of real estate revenue if people stop buying investment properties (and other types of investments, including shares) and those who currently own them sell them to home buyers.
My belief is that there would be a net loss to state and federal budgets in the short-term and a massive cost in the longer-term because there would be considerably fewer self-funded retirees. 
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was recently joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
</body></html>

Property groups adding to market myths: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
Hello Margaret, I am currently seeking (with my partner and my parents) to purchase land and put two dwellings onto it. The land we are looking at is greater than two acres with the houses approximately 200 square meters +. we are thinking sub diving but We are unsure of how to best address this and the processes involved as so many people tell you different things. Are you please able to provide us with an insight into the best was to approach this? Kind regards,
 Ian
 
Hi Ian,
Your first port of call will be to the local governing body, the council, to find out their individual policy on subdivision.  It's useful to note here that, while all local councils subscribe to their state's planning rules, each one will have different local rules surrounding what you can and cannot subdivide.  These rules will relate to the original zoning of the block, minimum lot sizes allowed, and a  whole host of other things.  For example, in some areas, apparently residential land may actually have a rural or semi- rural zoning, and this would mean that you may not be able to further subdivide at all, while in others you may be able to make this 2 acre block into two x one acre blocks, or even more. If the current zoning allows the subdivision you are after, you can commence, if it does not then you need to seek the council's advice around your chances of having that original zoning amended to allow the subdivision you want. A frank and open discussion with the local council should give you a good idea of what the current zoning is and their attitude to the plans you have for the land. Once you know what you are allowed to do, it's my advice that you contact a local town planner for phase two. A town planner will be able to clearly advise you on whether your ideas for this subdivision will progress smoothly through council, whether you face objections which may be overcome, or whether the entire idea is so far out of what is allowed that you have no hope. It's a worthwhile expense to have this feasibility study done as it could save you not only a lot of money, but time in satisfying the lengthy progress of seeking subdivision approval, only to find that your proposal is rejected. If the planner agrees that you have a hope then they will also oversee the obtaining of the required surveys, site and engineering plans. Remember that the town planner's fees will be on top of the fees that you pay each of these independent contractors. I have found that town planners usually know the rules intimately, and many have previously worked for council, so they are in the best position to develop a proposal with the greatest chances of success. I want to point out that the costs of subdividing are rarely accurately able to be forecast - in other words, whatever you think you will pay for all of this is likely to be so far below what you will actually end up paying that you will be surprised and possibly a little stressed out by the resulting project cost. These potential costs include, but are not limited to: drainage and sewerage, connection of services, access driveways if they are needed, cutting and levelling to prepare the site for building, potential retaining walls, connection of services, drafting fees, application fees, surveys and reports, environmental studies, permit fees, council contributions... the list goes on.  You will need to fund all of these costs yourself, and it's likely that such fees cannot be included in any bank loan you plan to get for the construction. My advice is to prepare a complete list of all possible costs with the guidance of the town planner, and then add at least 20% to the bottom line. You should also include what you believe to be the total costs of building the houses - and don't go by the advertised prices of houses built by the major project home builders.  My recent experience with this saw a property with an advertised price of $290,000, which purportedly included site costs, end up at a final price of $450,000, and this did not include much in the way of upgrades to the tile allowances and basic provisions - in my opinion project home building is a total rort that you only discover after you have signed the contract. If you can get a good understanding around what the homes will cost you to build, and add this to your projections on the subdivision costs, you'll then know if all the headaches of subdividing are actually worth it in the end. Being forewarned is being forearmed, so it's well worth your time to spend a great deal of time figuring all this out before committing to the deal. Have a property question?     <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: The key to purchasing land

<html><body>
Coming to the end of June is like closing one chapter of your property investing journey and opening the next. You cannot change whatever happened up until 30 June but July is a good time to start thinking about exactly what you are going to make happen over the next twelve months.   
Thank goodness our financial year falls in the middle of our calendar year, particularly because it's winter and cold and we're not distracted by summer holidays. If our financial year finished in December I definitely could not manage the stress of Christmas and holiday preparations, shopping AND finalising all I needed to on my business and property portfolio. 
But as it's winter, what else do we have to do before 30 June but sit in our offices paying as many expenses as possible and working on our new year's strategy?
My top three tips for getting organised as we enter the new year are:
1.  Tax Planning Strategy. 
A good tax planning strategy is important to have when you're a property investor, so make sure you have a good accountant who is not just going to process  your tax returns,  but also offer some really good strategy advice. You need to start strategising well BEFORE 30 June to give yourself time to make any adjustments to ensure you'll get the best results.  
2.  Investment Action Plan. 
As we move into the new financial year, it's time to plan your investment action. Think about the big picture and what you are trying to achieve. One of my clients has a very clear strategy which is to work hard over the next five years to continue to build his property portfolio so he can 'retire' from his salary job which is also his business and be a full time property developer. 
He's given himself a realistic timeframe which takes into consideration the property he already holds and what developments Property Bloom is managing for him. He was clear when he decided to work with us that he'd be using the experience to learn all he could so that he'd feel confident to then manage his own developments in the future. 
I love helping people help themselves, it gives great satisfaction knowing that you've not only helped someone achieve a financial goal but to educate them so they can continue on their journey. 
Another client has set up a self managed super fund which she plans to expand dramatically with strong yielding property over the next seven years which is when she plans to retire. 
Another younger client is chasing the best depreciation she can get as she's on a high salary and paying a lot of tax, with her Property Bloom development, she'll receive strong depreciation benefits and combined with her rent, will make her completed development cashflow positive and so she will be able to continue to borrow without too much impact to her serviceability. 
3. Schedule in Check points. 
For any plan, you need time during the action period to step back and check your progress. Schedule time into your diary and this will remind you to take stock of your achievements and review your plans and progress. It's best if you can do this with someone who you can share your big picture and review what you've achieved and discuss any adjustments that may be necessary to stay on track. Your financial planner is ideal but if not available, then your partner or a good friend who you can chat to about what you are trying to achieve and the purpose behind it. By simply saying this out loud to another person is a good way of cementing your plans and becoming accountable. 
We all have different things that motivate us. The start of the new financial year is a good time to rev up your plans as before we know it, Christmas and lure of warm, summer holidays will be upon us. 
Jo Chivers is Chief Executive Officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Three property development tips for the new financial year: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
This week, the preliminary clearance rate across the combined capital cities was recorded at 78.1%, the strongest result in 4 weeks. There were 1,273 reported auctions this week, with total auction volumes at 1,626. Due to the school holidays, this week the number of homes taken to auction was substantially lower than last week (2,249), but remained higher than at the same time last year (1,442) when the clearance rate was recorded at 68.9%.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2015/07/06/20150705-Capital-City.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2015/07/06/20150705-Capital-City.jpg" alt="" width="849" height="638">
 
 
76.7% of Melbourne’s reported auctions sold this week, compared to a clearance rate of 78.5% last week and 71.4%last year. This week, 617 Melbourne auctions were held, down from 1,007 last week, but higher than the 549 held at the same time last year. Across Melbourne’s individual sub-regions the performance was varied this week. The stand out performer was the Outer East region, where 93.7% of homes were sold, followed by the Inner East, where the clearance rate was 85.7% this week.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2015/07/06/20150705-Melbourne.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2015/07/06/20150705-Melbourne.jpg" alt="" width="893" height="599">
 
 
The preliminary auction clearance rate for Sydney was 84.5% this week with 711 auctions held. Last week, 896 residential properties were taken to auction across Sydney with a success rate of 82%. Auction conditions across Sydney continue to outperform when compared to the same time last year. One year ago, 72.4% of the 597 auctions across the city cleared. Sydney’s strongest performing sub-region this week was the Sutherland region, where 92.8% of reported auctions were successful, followed by the Inner South West (92.1%), and the Baulkham Hills and Hawkesbury region (91.6%).
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2015/07/06/20150705-Sydney.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2015/07/06/20150705-Sydney.jpg" alt="" width="828" height="561">
 
For Brisbane the number of homes taken to auction this week was 113, down from 140 last week and also lower than one year ago (126). Based on the preliminary results, 68.9% of Brisbane homes taken to auction sold this week, compared to 46.2% the previous week and 59.5% last year. There have been 30 Gold Coast auction results reported this week, with a preliminary clearance rate of 50.0%.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2015/07/06/20150705-Brisbane.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2015/07/06/20150705-Brisbane.jpg" alt="" width="814" height="546">
 
Across Adelaide 86 homes were taken to auction this week with a clearance rate of 75.4%. Last week, 69.9% of the 84 Adelaide auctions were sold, while one year ago the clearance rate was 64.6%.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2015/07/06/20150705-Adelaide.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2015/07/06/20150705-Adelaide.jpg" alt="" width="838" height="569">
 
Perth’s preliminary clearance rate this week is 30.0%, across 20 reported results. In comparison, over the previous week, Perth’s clearance rate was 68.0%, the strongest result for the city so far this year, while at the same time last year, 50.0%of Perth auctions were successfully sold.
There were 57 Canberra auctions this week, with a preliminary clearance rate of 75.0%.
Across Tasmania, only 1 result has been reported so far this week with an unsuccessful result.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News