Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

Joel Robinson

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

The Gold Coast Planning Committee has supported the preliminary approval for the Benowa Gardens Urban Village project following an extensive community consultation and assessment process.

The proposal will now proceed to a full council vote on June 2.

The application sought approval for a masterplanned urban village on the existing Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre site, combining new housing, retail, dining, health and lifestyle amenities within a walkable, integrated precinct.&nbsp;

The proposed redevelopment includes around 413 apartments integrated above a revitalised mixed-use centre featuring a full-line supermarket of 4,000 sqm, 6,000 sqm of specialty retail and dining space across around 30 retailers, a 7,000 sqm health and wellness precinct, and roughly 9,630 sqm of office and medical suites.&nbsp;

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fb36ae47-80bc-45f0-9914-31b0c7b6007d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C4%201121%20FI.jpg?VersionId=6mRKk2uU4r67TmTt39DKGUlvFRbTVqWa" />

The broader masterplan also includes very significant traffic and transport improvements, wide pedestrian walkways, upgraded pedestrian and cycle connections, and enhanced public areas designed to create a more connected and walkable community environment.&nbsp;

Centre owner Patrick Lu said the milestone reflected months of detailed planning, technical assessment and ongoing communication with local residents, businesses, schools and stakeholders.

“We appreciate the time, consideration and care Council officers and the Planning Committee have given this proposal throughout the assessment process,” Lu said.

“We also sincerely thank the local community for engaging with us, sharing feedback and participating in the consultation process over many months.

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32fd1fc3-d0e6-485f-ac57-9916c9bcb818" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C5%201121%20FI_2.jpg?VersionId=fz8qQKDBLQ7MyFRc856Zccfbh9nFwLOe" />

“We understand projects of this scale bring questions and concerns, which is why we have worked hard to listen carefully, provide information transparently and continue refining elements of the proposal where possible.

“Our vision has always been to create a well-designed, community-focused urban village that responds to the changing needs of the Gold Coast, while delivering improved amenity, housing diversity, healthcare access and local lifestyle benefits.

“This proposal is about creating a genuine live-work-play environment where residents can access everyday services, schools, healthcare, dining, shopping and green space within walking distance, while also supporting local jobs and economic activity.”

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="50dfbd04-590e-4fc6-983b-766880947867" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Dining%20Day%20Time%20-%20High%20Resolution.jpg?VersionId=BP7ZoKJ0DdL_8iRkkC8VVx99moICV6kg" />

Lu said the proposal had evolved significantly through consultation and technical review, particularly around traffic, pedestrian and student safety and neighbourhood connectivity.&nbsp;

Melissa Griffin, Director at Urbis, said the recommendation recognised the strategic importance of delivering more housing and services within established urban areas already supported by infrastructure.

“This proposal represents the type of thoughtful, integrated growth that planning frameworks across South-East Queensland are encouraging,” Ms Griffin said.

“The project seeks to place housing, retail, healthcare and employment opportunities together in a highly accessible location close to schools, transport and existing services.

“Importantly, the process has involved significant technical assessment and community engagement to ensure local issues and feedback were properly considered throughout the planning pathway.”

$1 billion Benowa Gardens Urban Village heads to council vote following Planning Committee support

Surfers Paradise is officially set for its first new residential development with a 45-storey skybridge connecting the two towers.

John Camilleri’s Celestino Developments has been given the green light by the Gold Coast City Council to develop its major beachfront precinct across its huge 4,000 sqm oceanfront site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/63-79-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">63–79 Garfield Terrace</a>, just five months after its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-billionaire-winx-breeder-s-bold-two-tower-surfers-paradise-play-with-45th-storey-skybridge">submission in late 2025</a>.

The approved scheme will deliver two towers rising 55 and 48 storeys, connected by a skybridge positioned on level 45 that will house a range of resident-only wellness and entertainment spaces.

In its notice of approval, the Gold Coast City Council said the&nbsp;proposed overall built form has been designed to complement the scale, intensity and protect the adjacent amenity and surrounding streets through the use of varied setbacks, site cover and architectural elements.

<img alt="First look exclusive: Billionaire Winx breeder’s bold two-tower Surfers Paradise play with 45th-storey skybridge" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-30%20at%209.53.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=ADyPJ_TFbJvSU9wZFOiCBnlPtgF7VWqW" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dbi">DBI</a>, the development will comprise 275 apartments across the two towers, including a mix of two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences, as well as several penthouses. The apartments will sit above a landscaped podium featuring more than 90 metres of beachfront pool frontage, private resident lawns, lounges, and wellness spaces.

DBI said the design draws heavily from the movement and form of the coastal environment, with curving balcony lines and sculpted façades intended to soften the scale of the towers while maximising ocean outlooks and passive shading outcomes.

“The project occupies a rare, uninterrupted oceanfront site and has been shaped by a design philosophy that merges architectural elegance with environmental responsiveness and a carefully curated lifestyle experience,” DBI said in planning documents submitted to the Gold Coast City Council.

The most distinctive element of the approved project is the skybridge linking the two towers at level 45. The elevated communal space is planned to include executive lounges, formal dining areas, wellness facilities, and panoramic ocean-facing outlooks.

“The skybridge enhances the identity of the development, promotes social interaction, and delivers a lifestyle experience not found elsewhere on the Gold Coast,” DBI said.

At podium level, residents will have access to a suite of resort-style amenities, including resident lounges, private dining rooms, a yoga lawn, gymnasium, plunge pools, and treatment spaces. The beachfront pool has been designed with separate lap, lounge, and children’s areas extending across the width of the site.

The project will also introduce new food and beverage offerings along the Enderley Avenue and Oceanway frontages, contributing additional activation to the beachfront precinct.

First look: Winx billionaire’s beachfront Surfers Paradise apartment development greenlit

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Hi,
I'm thinking about purchasing a property that has been built in underneath with no council approval. The problem is that it is a high set home on recently flood zoned area of <a href="/news">Logan</a>. My question is, is it still possible to get building certification for lower levels in flood areas or does the council never allow it?
Margaret Lomas' answer is on the next page. Please click below to continue.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
When you own a house or unit in any local government area, it is your duty to ensure that the building codes provided by the state department of planning, and administered locally by the council's own planning departments, are adhered to. 
This also means that, if you make any changes to a property which has previously been approved as compliant, you must first ask council for permission to make such changes.
These rules exist for many reasons - to ensure that an area remains aesthetically pleasing, to provide safe living environments for residents, and to protect the environment itself. If you have ever visited a country where there is no building code, and seen how the residential areas look when people build whatever they like, you will better appreciate these rules! 
You will also know that when a natural disaster strikes, the loss and injury caused is far more catastrophic, often due to the unsafe nature of what has been built and the overbuilding of those areas.
And so to your dilemma. You are thinking of buying  property with an unapproved alteration, and you should know that the council is within their rights to ask you to revert it back if they so desire. If the council feels for any reason that the alteration contravenes the current development rules, or in any way poses a risk to the surrounding community in the event of a flood, then they will ask you to revert it. 
You should check the flood maps available on the Logan City Council website, and see if this property falls within a flood zone. If so, your chances of having this alteration retrospectively approved is next to none, and the chances of being asked to remove the alteration is in play.
You should ask the current owner to either have the alteration approved prior to your purchase, or provide a letter from the council attesting to the fact that the alterations do not contravene any planning rules, and would be otherwise approved if you submit a development application. Then, as soon as you settle, take the steps to have the alterations approved to remove any future doubt.
 
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: What happens if I buy a house with an unapproved alteration?

<html><body>
I think we all need to have a cold shower, a few aspirin and a wee lie down.
Then, having calmed down a bit, conduct a rational assessment of our property markets, without the emotion, the self-serving hyperbole and the publicity-seeking rhetoric.
We seem to have arrived at a point where any price rise anywhere in Australia is deemed a crisis. We're also at a point where the argument (it doesn't deserve to be called a debate) about real estate is driven by the people who make the most noise, rather than those with the most knowledge.
And, saddest of all, Australia in 2014 is a place where few people who work in or use the media give a damn about fairness, accuracy or balance. The only thing that matters is the headline or the political points scored or the amount of publicity achieved.
There was a time when journalists performed a worthwhile role. They were the filters through which information and comment had to pass. Claims were challenged, information was checked and alternative views were sought.
No one got to write about a subject unless they had credentials.
Today employees of media organisations are often mere conduits for propaganda. The public is asked to accept that if it's in a press release, it's valid. If someone describing themself as an economist makes a statement, it's likely to be fact. If an offshore "analyst" makes an observation, it's news.
The outcome is a melting pot of extreme views. The missing ingredients are objectivity, scrutiny and balance.
Many journalists no longer feel the need to support their statements with evidence.
A writer from a major media company (not a property specialist but apparently a "personal finance writer") this week stated as fact that Australia has "inflated house prices" and "surging property prices across the country". And that was just the first sentence.
No evidence was presented to back those big statements; we were expected to accept them as truth, despite the writer's lack of expertise and the reality that all the research data contradicts the notion we have "surging property prices across the country". According to the numbers I see every day, it's simply a lie.
On the same day, a writer from a different media company, with even flimsier credentials, sought to justify a pre-conceived attitude that investors exploiting the tax system drive up property prices. He presented graphs which he claimed showed that "whenever investor activity increases, house prices go up".
He saw what he wanted to see but, in reality, the graphs showed nothing of the sort. They showed, in fact, that investors do not lead price rises – they follow them. In every step along the graph line, a change in investor activity came after a change in prices.
My three decades researching real estate has taught me that investors never instigate property booms - they follow them. The biggest force in real estate, always, is the sector comprising home buyers other than first-home buyers, who dominate most markets numerically and have the financial capacity and motivation to pay high prices.
Meanwhile, another columnist with a bee in his bonnet about Asian investors tried to argue that "an influx of murky money from China" had been distorting and inflating our property markets "for years".
There was little in the way of research evidence, just a convoluted set of statements that led to no apparent conclusion.
So there we had, on the same day, three writers, all of them working for major media organisations but none of them with any real estate expertise, all claiming "Australian property prices" were unreasonably high, but each blaming a different bogeyman – one claiming it was foreign investors, another pointing the finger at local investors boosted by negative gearing, and the third blaming slack lending standards.
The one thing they had in common is that they all got it wrong. And probably don't give a damn because the headline is the thing.
So, setting aside all the ego-driven noise, here's a reality check.
Sydney remains the only city to have produced boom growth to date. The figure so many misguided commentators keep quoting – and describing as "the surge in Australian property prices" – is nothing more than the average increase across the capital cities, greatly inflated by Sydney's growth.
The key thing is this: Sydney's upturn follows 10 years of under-performance. Even with the rises of the past year or so, Sydney's average growth over the past decade is still below par. As a number of the more rational observers have commented, Sydney has been playing catch-up. But, despite the recent increases, it still hasn't caught up.
Here are some examples of what I mean. The median house price for <a href="/news">Vaucluse</a> has increased 17% in the past 12 months, according to Australian Property Monitors, but the average annual rise in the past five years is just 1.4%. The 10-year growth average is 3% per year.
The median unit price for <a href="/news">Point Piper</a> is up 17% in 12 months, but the 10-year average is 1.5% per year. In real terms, they've lost value over the past decade.
In <a href="/news">Darling Point</a>, the median unit price today is lower than it was 10 years ago, despite the recent growth. They've lost money, even without allowing for inflation.
Heading out west to a more mainstream and affordable market, the suburb of <a href="/news">Blacktown</a> (Sydney's most popular suburb in terms of sales volumes) has recorded 18% median price growth in the past year, but it's 10-year average is just 3% per year.
You'll find similar numbers right across the Sydney metropolitan area. Even when you examine above-average performers, the numbers are still modest. Balgowlah's five-year growth average is 5% per year; its 10-year performance is 4.1% per year.
All the froth and bubble in the media is being caused almost exclusively by Sydney's growth, but in reality Sydney's long-term performance remains decidedly poor.
Take the recent Sydney growth out of the equation and the average growth in the past year across the other seven capital cities is 4-5%. And that follows several years of price decline.
But, amid the prevailing atmosphere that any price rise is a national disgrace, even that number would be described by some as a bubble.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can reach Terry via <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email</a> or <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">twitter</a>.
 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Headline obsessed writers need a reality check

<html><body>
‘Opportunity cost’ is a buzz phrase when it comes to property and investing generally, and you’d be wise to understand the concept before even thinking about purchasing.
Every time you do or do not buy, you are potentially stopping yourself from buying something else. If that “something else” is a better investment, then you’ve missed that opportunity. That’s your ‘opportunity cost’. It’s the ‘cost’ of money you could have had by making a different choice.
Of course, hindsight is 20/20, and there will likely always be a better choice that could have been made.  There will always be some degree of the unknown – and the fact is, you can never 100% accurately know what the cost of missing that opportunity was. However, it is something you should bear in mind particularly when funds are limited and the property you purchase has a lot riding on it. The point is, you want to be comparing the possibilities to try and make the best choice you can with the information available.
You can consider ‘opportunity cost’ alike to ‘missed opportunities’. Not all of them are particularly measurable. You also don’t be beating yourself up over missed opportunities, but do learn from past mistakes if, indeed, you should have known better.
RentCover’s Sharon Fox-Slater put ‘opportunity cost’ as the<a href="/expert-insights/investing/10-risks-first-time-property-investors-need-to-overcome"> number one risk first time buyers need to overcome.</a>
"Property investment can be financially rewarding but it’s usually negatively geared, at least to begin with, reducing your opportunity to invest in other asset classes or different properties," she said.
"Can you argue the merits of a property you are considering buying over others in the marketplace and over other types of investment?"
Opportunity cost is also worth thinking about when it comes to tying your money up for a period of time – such as in an off the plan property, or in <a href="/expert-insights/investing/letter-from-the-editor-opportunity-cost-is-one-of-the-biggest-risks">a block of land that doesn’t provide you any rental return and has uncertain growth</a>. While some people can afford to speculate on certain properties, or to put money into investments others consider unwise, not everyone has this luxury.
For each person opportunity cost looks different as not everyone is able to seize every opportunity. For instance, those with plenty in the bank and with high serviceability may not miss out on a rare purchase if some cash is tied up in a property that hasn’t seen any equity growth. However, someone else may need to step away from that dwelling due to having no funds left or hitting a serviceability wall.
It doesn’t just relate to property either. Any investment, of your money or your time or another resource, can be seen as opportunity cost. It’s a regularly used term in economics as well.
How can you be aware of opportunity cost?
There are, sadly, no hard and fast rules. However, there are several things you can do with every purchase you’re considering to determine what the outcome may be.
Take a step back and think unemotionally about the purchase
Ask yourself – why am I considering this property? What is the purpose of it? How does it fit into my portfolio?
Understand how it is likely to perform and why
If you’re looking for a growth asset, and this is a high yielding property in an area said to have slow growth, then you might want to re-think your purchase. Make sure you know what performance is expected (this is where research and expert advice can be useful).
Consider the implications for if the property underperforms
It’s always likely that a property will not perform to your best expectations. Know what the worst case scenario is and how this will affect you. If you can’t find a tenant, or it doesn’t grow in value, what will this do to your finances? Knowing this will help you plan and mitigate the risks as well as assess how likely these things are to occur.
How does it compare?
Comparing your property to others within your price range, as well as comparing it to what will happen if you do not purchase at all, is an important part of reasoning out the investment. If you are in a better financial situation in the long run, when considering potential growth and outgoings, then it may be worth asking yourself why you’re buying this particular property.
How do you assess opportunity cost when considering an investment?
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

What is 'opportunity cost'? Investment terms explained

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Nine housing graphs from the RBA on the 2014 property market

<html><body>
Buyer’s agents are becoming increasingly popular, but like every other professional – they weren't all created equal.
If you’re currently considering a buyer’s agent, you can read Property Observer’s comprehensive<a href="/expert-insights/buying/select-your-buyers-agent-wisely-what-you-need-to-consider"> introduction to the factors you should consider before paying someone to act on your behalf</a>.
You might also want to read <a href="/news/how-buyers-agents-pick-the-best-performing-properties">this Q&amp;A with a number of buyer’s agents about their tactics and techniques in finding and purchasing the best investment properties</a>.
However, there are some simple things you can ask a buyer’s agent to quickly get a shortlist of those to consider.
The Real Estate Buyers Agents Association (REBAA) president Jacque Parker says that as well as the questions you should ask below, you also want to know if they’re accepting a fee from any other party or parties besides yourself in the transaction.
“Some agents calling themselves ‘buyers’ agents’ have actually been taking a fee from a selling agent’s commission, yet claiming to work for the buyer,” warns Parker.
“This is a clear conflict of interest because effectively they are representing the vendor, they’re not acting solely on behalf of the purchaser.”
She also notes that it’s worth asking for accreditation to associations and peak bodies, such as REBAA.
Here are their five questions to ask:
<ol>
<li>
How experienced is the buyer’s agent? Many have set up without prior, or field, experience. Make sure they have local experience in the areas you’re considering. 
</li>
<li>
Do they operate as an exclusive buyer’s agent? Ensure that they are being truly exclusive and don’t receive kickbacks or commissions. If they do, they may not be impartial. 
</li>
<li>
Are they a licensed buyer’s agent? Agencies can be licensed in one state, but not others, and still advertise as able to purchase interstate. Ensure they hold qualifications for each territory or state you’ll be buying property in – the rules differ and they need to be licensed for each. Check with your local Office of Fair Trading for licensing requirements. 
</li>
<li>
What and where are their most recent purchases? View their recent purchases to get an understanding of their specialty. Not everyone is able to assist you with your preferred suburbs or areas. 
</li>
<li>
Can they provide recent client testimonials/references? Ask to speak to previous clients.</li>
</ol>
Source: REBAA
YOU MIGHT ALSO WANT TO READ
Investor warning: <a href="/news/investor-warning-is-your-buyers-agent-properly-licensed">Is your buyer's agent properly licensed?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/15-questions-to-ask-your-buyer-s-agent-wa-department-of-commerce">15 questions to ask your buyer’s agent: WA Department of Commerce</a>
Q&amp;A: <a href="/expert-insights/buying/q-a-should-buyers-agents-take-commissions">Should buyer's agents take commissions?</a>
</body></html>

Choosing a buyer’s agent? Five questions you should be asking: REBAA

<html><body>
Last week, I noticed Craig James, chief economist of Commsec, pointing out to David "Kochie" Koch that although wages growing have been growing slower than prices, household incomes are actually growing at the fastest pace in two years, increasing by 4.7% in the last 12 months.
While wages growth has indeed slowed (<a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/wages-grow-at-26" target="_blank">as I analysed here,</a> among other places), apparently household disposable incomes have been rising more quickly. Interesting statistic I thought, so I asked "CJ" for the source.
<img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7SzKL4Y4BIU/VCF5vBSJ3TI/AAAAAAAAP70/Yhw_QqERMLs/s1600/HICJ.jpg"> 
Straight from the National Accounts, advised CJ. So I thought I'd take a little look to confirm or deny.
Household gross incomes rising
First, I ran the seasonally adjusted household income data from the National Accounts.
As you can see from the green line circled below, after a rampant boom in employee compensation spurred on by Australia's mining boom, income growth from paid employment has slowed since December 2012.
Although the trend does remain up on a national basis, in real terms wages are at best flat and at worst declining moderately.
Of course there are many forms of income including dividends, rent, social assistance, other transfers, and more besides, and overall household incomes have increased at the significantly faster pace of 4.4% seasonally adjusted over the last year according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) - in essence, everything that is not wages has increased in real terms.
 
 <img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8H1Wz0wmWcQ/VCF5psR7OkI/AAAAAAAAP7Q/opfMA4K1EVA/s1600/HI1.jpg">
Still, even this income growth cannot fully account for a 4.7% rise in household disposable incomes.
Payables down?
The big mover in terms of payables in recent decades has of course been interest paid on dwellings, which skyrocketed until September 2008, then collapsed as interest rates were slashed and house prices eased. Then it repeated the trick once again from September 2011 as the latest easing cycle took hold.
With interest rates significantly closer to the zero bound than historically has been the case and household debt levels today much higher than they were before the deregulation of the banking system, relatively small adjustments to mortgage rates can result in wild swings in total interest payments on dwellings. And how!
<img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xFfk72ZbyRo/VCF5p2fT1FI/AAAAAAAAP7U/ucfhOLYzSDo/s1600/HI2.jpg"> 
With most mortgage debt being charged on variable rate products, this explains why Australia's housing market is so sensitive to shifts in interest rates, and why only a few rate hikes would quickly quell speculative sentiment and swiftly end the property price uptrend for this cycle.
Why? Because the people lumbered with the highest mortgage debt as a percentage of their household income are those at the margin i.e. those buying much of the property which transacts.
It is difficult to draw hard conclusions from macro level data, but the two charts above show that for existing homeowners on variable rate mortgages, disposable income has surely roared higher in the period since the dramatic peaks in interest repayment levels of September 2008 and September 2011 respectively.
Anyone with existing mortgage debt who has remained in employment will appreciate just how comparatively easy life is with a standard variable rate of 5.2% rather than the 9.6%, we saw as recently as July and August 2008.
<img src="https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2013/images/sp-so-230413-graph11.gif"> 
This article continues on the next page. Please click below to continue. 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Household income accounts
On a national basis total gross income dwarfs property payables largely because most Australians are not mortgaged to the eyeballs as is widely believed. 
Depending on your state, between a quarter and a third of homes <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/dynamics" target="_blank">are owned debt free</a> while mortgage holders over recent years have been moving well ahead on their repayments. 
Meanwhile income taxes payable have moved higher in concert with rising taxable incomes. 
The trend in gross disposable income is shown by the red line below.
 <img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ew6soAsW11s/VCF5umNs6jI/AAAAAAAAP7w/d8MQCRJdCdQ/s1600/HI4.jpg">
So, in this sense, Commsec's observation is correct - gross disposable incomes are indeed 4.7% higher than a year ago.
However it is a fair bet that those who are not homeowners and are 100 percent reliant on a salary for their income do not feel much better off, if they even do at all.
Homeowners and in some instances those with diversified income streams are clearly benefiting very significantly from record low borrowing rates.
These things naturally tend to work in cycles, though - when interest rates were much higher and rising and dwelling prices easing, the boot was on the other foot entirely.
 
 <img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CV4uoAihbTI/VCF5tvRx9fI/AAAAAAAAP7k/dN77fz2dzgw/s1600/HI5.jpg">
Gross disposable income nationally has been launched massively higher by more than 80% in the past decade, unadjusted for population growth.
However, the trend disposable income growth per capita seems likely to slow, and if interest rates are hiked several times gross disposable income in aggregate could plateau unless wages growth rebounds.
 <img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fXYwdyho_XE/VCF5vQP6fjI/AAAAAAAAP74/O2tfGis_r1o/s1600/HI6.jpg">
 
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Are household disposable incomes really increasing at 4.7%?

<html><body>
Leighton's Perisher ski lodge, Barrakee, has been listed for sale at $1.85 million.
Situated in North Perisher close to the North Perisher T-bar and Interceptor Chair Lift, the ski lodge comes with a 50 bed licence.
There are 25 guest rooms plus staff accommodation.
There is a<a href="https://www.fsre.com.au/property-details.php?propid=330&amp;print=1&amp;iframe=true&amp;width=750&amp;height=470" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;"> licensed 34 seat dining room</a>, plus lounge with fire place and bar facilities.
It has been listed through Forbes Stynes Real Estate by the construction giant, which is offloading all its non-core assets.
It had tried unsuccessfully to sell Barrakee in 1989, when the leasehold property had 44 years to run before it expired.
</body></html>

Barrakee, Leighton's Perisher ski lodge, listed

<html><body>
As the mining investment boom deflates, in order for Australia to rebalance its economy, a pick-up in demand for homes and house prices in response to lower interest rates, sending a signal to home builders to build more homes was essential. Fortunately, it's occurred.
The Reserve Bank (belatedly in my view) got rates down, home buyers returned, home prices rose and we are now in the midst of a dwelling construction boom.
The housing sector is doing its part!
But it seems that there is nothing that gets Australians going more than what's happening with house prices. Are they in a bubble? Is negative gearing to blame? Or is it foreign buying? Will it burst? Should the Reserve Bank slow it down? Is housing a good investment? This note looks at the current state of play in the Australian residential property market.
Australian housing remains overvalued
Australian housing remains overvalued on most measures. But then again this has been an issue for more than a decade.
For example, while a bit more extreme than my own view at the time, the OECD estimated that Australian house prices in 2004 were 51.8% overvalued. This compared to just 1.8% for US housing and 32.8% for the UK. While real house price weakness through 2010 to 2012 saw the degree of overvaluation diminish, the problem is returning with a vengeance:
<ul>
<li>According to the 2014 Demographia Housing Affordability Survey the median multiple of house prices to household income in Australia is 5.5 times versus 3.4 in the US.  </li>
<li>On the basis of the ratio of house prices to rents adjusted for inflation relative to its long term average, Australian houses are 30% overvalued and units 17% overvalued.</li>
<li>The ratios of house prices to incomes and rents in Australia are 23.5% and 40.9% above their long term averages respectively, which is at the higher end of OECD countries. This contrasts with the US, which is near the lower end in the OECD. <img src="/images/2014/09/26/Picture%2043.png" alt=""> 
</li>
<li>And on my favourite measure, real house prices have been running above trend since 2003. <img src="/images/2014/09/26/Picture%2044.png" alt=""> 
</li>
</ul>
What's to blame for high house prices?
There are two main drivers of the surge in house prices over the last two decades. The first was the shift to low interest rates. Lower rates enabled Australian's to borrow more for a given level of income and so pay each other more for homes.
As can be seen the shift in house prices from below trend to above (as derived from the last chart) has gone hand in hand with an increase in the ratio of household debt to income.
<img src="/images/2014/09/26/Picture%2046.png" alt="">
The trouble is that the shift to low interest rates occurred in many other countries and most did not have anywhere near the surge in house prices or household debt  Australia had, implying a heavy speculative element in driving prices higher as well. I have long thought this surge in household debt and relative house prices represents Australia's Achilles' heal.
Should anything go wrong with the ability of households to service their debt Australia would be at risk. Fortunately it's hard to see the trigger for this in anything but a small way.
The second reason is a lack of supply. While the US saw a property price surge into 2006 matched by a supply surge, supply in Australia has been subdued due to restrictive land supply policies and high stamp duty and infrastructure charges.
The National Housing Supply Council estimated a few years ago that since 2001 Australia had a cumulative net shortfall of over 200,000 dwellings. Reflecting this, residential vacancy rates remain relatively low.
<img src="/images/2014/09/26/Picture%2047.png" alt="">
Given the supply shortfall, most of the scapegoats that various commentators have come up with to explain high home prices are a sideshow. Foreign and SMSF buying is no doubt playing a role in some areas but looks to be small.
Negative gearing is more contentious, but it's likely that curtailing access to it when stamp duty remains very high will have a negative impact on the supply of property to the extent that it will have the effect of reducing the after tax return to property investment.
Restricting negative gearing for property would also distort the investment market as it would still be available for other investments.
This article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
Rising risks
Our assessment is that the Australian property market is not at the bubble extreme it was at a decade ago: the overvaluation is a bit more modest; annual housing credit growth for owner occupiers and investors is running at around one third the pace seen in 2003; Australians don't seem to be using their houses as ATMs against which debt can be drawn suggesting they are less comfortable regarding the outlook and debt; and the home price gains now have been over a shorter period and are concentrated in just Sydney &amp; Melbourne.
However, danger signs are emerging:
<ul>
<li>After a cooler period during the first half of the year the property market seems to be hotting up again. National average home prices rose at an annualised 16.8% pace over the 3 months to August according to RP Data and auction clearance rates are at or above last year's highs. <img src="/images/2014/09/26/Picture%2048.png" alt=""> 
</li>
<li> The proportion of housing finance commitments going to investors is now back to around the 50% high seen a decade ago, suggesting that the market is becoming more speculative. And there are signs that home buyers are starting to extrapolate recent strong price gains into the future which is very dangerous.</li>
<li>Finally, The Block is back on top as the most watched show on TV highlighting a return to very strong community interest in the property market. </li>
</ul>
Taken together these indicators warn that the housing market is getting a bit too hot.
Policy implications
The heat in the home buyer market is clearly starting to concern the Reserve Bank with its Financial Stability Review indicating that it's becoming concerned about speculative activity in the property market and the risks this poses to the broader economy when the property cycle eventually turns down.
Normally with the property market hotting up the RBA would start to think about raising interest rates but right now it's loath to do this given uncertainty regarding the rest of the economy and the risk a rate hike would put upwards pressure on the still too high $A.
As a result the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is more closely monitoring the banks and the RBA and APRA are now discussing steps that could be taken to ensure sound lending practices are maintained with a focus on investors. The latter would involve the use of macro-prudential controls to slow the housing market – which is really just a fancy term for the old fashioned credit rationing that used to be applied prior to the 1980s.
This could involve limits on loan to valuation ratios, forcing banks to put aside more capital or forcing banks to impose tougher tests when granting loans. Such approaches all have problems: they tend to work against first home buyers; if they target  investors as looks likely they work against a group of lower risk borrowers; people can start to find their way around them; and their impact is hard to gauge.
The best approach is for the RBA to first ramp up its efforts to warn home buyers of the need to be cautious. But if that fails in quickly cooling the property market, expect an announcement from APRA and the RBA on lending restrictions likely targeting investors in the next few months.
Housing as an investment
Notwithstanding the rising risk of macro prudential controls, in the short term further gains in house prices are likely until the RBA starts to raise interest rates probably around mid-next year, soon after which another 5 to 10% property price down cycle is likely to start.
Beyond the short term it's worth noting residential property has provided a similar long term return as Australian shares, with both returning around 11 to 11.5% per annum since the 1920s. They are also complimentary to each in terms of risk and liquidity and are lowly correlated. All of which means there is a case for investors to have exposure to both.
At present though, housing looks somewhat less attractive as a medium term investment. The gross rental yield on housing is around 3.2% and for units is around 4.4% giving an average of just 3.8%. After costs this is just below 2%.
Shares &amp; commercial property both offer much higher yields. Medium term capital growth is also likely to be limited, with the overvaluation likely to see real house prices stuck in a 10% or so range around a broadly flat trend. This is consistent with the 10-20 year pattern of alternating secular bull and bear phases evident in the second chart in this note.
Taken together this suggests that a realistic expectation for total returns from residential property over the medium term is just around 4 to 5% per annum.
Shane Oliver is the head of investment strategy and chief economist of AMP Capital
 
</body></html>

soliver-smf6LQXgW9

Australian housing prices: a bit too hot in parts

<html><body>
There are 72 auctions scheduled this week in Melbourne compared to 92 for the same time last year.
Auction numbers are low this week due to the AFL Grand Final.
Conditions in the private sale market are becoming more competitive with homes taking fewer days to sell and a lower vendor discount.
Recent data shows that all of the top 10 suburbs when ranked by time on market are in the eastern suburbs. Rowville had the lowest number of days on market followed by Blackburn North, Croydon, Wantirna South and Vermont South.
On a city wide basis the time on market results for houses sold at private sale fell from 44 days to 41 days over the last week whilst vendor discounting fell from -5.4 per cent to -5.2 per cent.
Key data
<ul>
<li>Clearance rate week ending 28 September:72.1%</li>
<li>Melbourne auctions expected week ending 28 September: 72</li>
<li>Melbourne private sales time on market week ending 21 September: 41 days (houses)</li>
<li>Melbourne vendor discounting market week ending 21 September: -5.2% (houses)</li>
<li>Listings being prepared for market are 2% higher in month ending 21 September (seasonally adjusted)</li>
</ul>
 
 
</body></html>

rlarocca-zWhvjay44N

Sellers steer clear of Grand Final day: RP Data's weekend auction preview

<html><body>
Any time someone in my family buys property, I know about it. Property fever is in the air regularly in my extended family – I have cousins who are real estate agents, many of them invest, and a few of them have also recently become first home buyers themselves. I am no stranger to the excitement that buying property causes.
Even my parents are in on the action. They are currently in the process of designing plans for a newly purchased block midway between Canberra and New South Wales. It’s a 10 plus hectare land plot that I visited with them on a road trip when back on my last trip back to Sydney, and I absolutely fell head over heels for it.
They’ve bought into the second stage of a rural subdivision and have picked a block that’s conveniently bare save for a few distinctive boulders and trees, largely flat and has a creek running through one end. It has views all the way over the little town that it is adjacent to. Their home plans are also impressive – with a beautiful verandah, a huge kitchen and walk in pantry, energy efficiency measures and an entertainment wing with a sunken snooker table and cinematic-style projector room. It’s essentially their dream home – the property they’ve been planning for years that saw them selling out of Sydney’s north west and hunting for their final nest.
The effect that seeing this had on me was fairly immediate. My initial reaction was to want to know everything about the property and the process. The settlement was painfully slow, and I wanted to know why. Later, they found the land being used for agistment by local farmers, and I listened in on the hilarious attempts of my parents to move cows from their plot so they could wander around. Daily, I’m told plans that they have for it, the tiny changes to the kitchen plan, and intricate discussions about the Kitchen Work Triangle and building chicken coops.
And then, somewhere in the process, I decided I wanted the block next door.
For most people, this is going to sound odd – don’t most of us move out, have our own lives, and endeavour to live as far away from our parents (and in laws) as possible?
But you should see this land.
For the sake of my parents’ privacy I won’t share the address, but it’s stunning. It’s no secret that regional areas hold a huge charm for me, and I was easily taken. While the block doesn’t have the enviable views of my parents’ selection – it’s over the road and down the hill somewhat from their next home – it has a brick bridge for train tracks that runs through it with an infrequent train service (and some freight) over a creek. It’s spacious, and I had basically already chosen where I’d have the house built and where I’d be putting my barbecue before I'd left.
My partner and I have been preparing and slowly saving away for our next property; we have been undecided as to whether it should be an investment or a home in Melbourne given our relocation. This block is just in the range of what we can afford, provided lending doesn’t become an issue in the area, and I called my mother to chat it over.
<blockquote>
We have been preparing and slowly saving for our next property; but have been undecided as to whether it should be an investment or a home in Melbourne.
</blockquote>
We figured that I could buy it for our retirement, and build on it when prepared to live rurally in the distant future. Quickly, I was calling it “my block” (don’t you love how easily that happens?) and checking out my lender of choice's repayment calculator, doing my own sums. My Dad, a bullish property investor – although we rarely agree on locations or what to buy – told me that if I wanted then I could put solar panels onto it, and have some of it grazed by the farmers to provide some form of an income. Obviously, there are some tax implications to this that I’d need to consider, but it was starting to shape up to something worth considering and that could actually work.
See over page for why I decided to steer clear of purchasing
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
But then the dawn of realisation occurred.
The day I retire and do my own “tree change” is some decades into the future. I would be laying down no small sum, taking on a large amount of debt, for an asset that doesn’t produce any real rental income. I then wouldn’t be using it for a long time, and the repayments would put a toll on my ability to save and pay down other more immediate debt. With the funds that I’d be using to purchase something that I dearly wanted, and was starting to daydream about, I might actually be stopping myself from achieving more by being wiser with my purchases. Unless you’re one of the lucky few with bottomless bank accounts, then you’re going to need to be careful with your money.
My ability to stomach risk now is likely higher than it will be in 30 or so years. If I choose a property that underperforms, I can weather it through. What is less likely to work, however, is if I tie up all my capital and push myself to full capacity with debt that stops me from investing further in growth assets. Not to mention that my partner doesn’t necessarily want the same things in retirement that I do (that is, to live within walking distance of my family and not within easy driving distance of anything resembling civilisation).
There are also the other considerations – one being that the area will substantially change by the time I come to live there, meaning it might not be the rural haven I'm after when it comes to retiring, or that my own goals and desires to live like this will also alter.
Or I might need to sell up due to a change in my own financial circumstances. This is just one of many regional areas that moves very slowly. Days on market are extensive for the very few properties that come to market each year, not to mention for that particular type of comparatively large landholding. While my investing ‘profile’ suggests that I can handle more risk – this risk of tying up my capital in a very slow moving asset is certainly not the type of risk I am prepared to deal with.
For this reason, my future tree change location is a dream that I’m putting on hold. It’s the pain of the opportunity cost, and risking better more targeted purchases, that I cannot stomach. Not everyone will make this decision – to choose their head over their heart – but it’s the advice that we’re frequently hearing and considering these implications now will hopefully pay off in the future.
It’s amazing how closely linked our heart strings and our purse strings are. Sure, it might ‘feel right’, but I’m getting increasingly used to having to rein in my desire to purchase something – when you write about property every day you inevitably stumble across stunning cheap “renovator’s dreams” and cheapie Tasmanian heritage homes that you’ve already mentally decided to buy, where the dogs would sleep, what colour you’d paint the walls and so on. These “five unusual NSW renovation opportunities” that I put together in May, for instance, had me hooked for a while. Church conversion? I can see myself in that. Old warehouse requiring substantial work and potential sweat/blood/tears? No problem. 
There's nothing wrong with thinking like that, but there may be an issue with acting on it without due care.
If you’re like me, you might get caught up in the dream of property a bit (a lot), but you need to give yourself that ‘step back’ breathing room where you do a bit of a logic test on your decisions. Just because you love it, doesn’t mean that you should buy it. This isn't a pair of shoes, or a fancy meal, this is an often decades-long financial commitment. If you're looking to invest, it's not about your emotions, or even about your instinct a lot of the time. It's about the cold, hard facts and numbers. And, no matter how much you’ve researched it, no matter how close you are to signing on the dotted line, if it’s not right for you – you can look for something else.
<blockquote>
There's nothing wrong with thinking like that, but there may be an issue with acting on it without due care.
</blockquote>
I’m still learning this lesson, but the fact is that my parents have taken this time, lived in undesirable areas and earned their dream home – both through long careers that they’re still building and through many other years of paying off a mortgage and planning for this. I have a few more stripes yet to earn before I can do the same, so it's back to the drawing board.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News