<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Most Australians entrust their super funds to professionals but you can control your own superannuation and invest your contribution yourself.
Managing your super not only gives you the opportunity to take matters into your own hands, you may also save thousands of dollars on fees.
However, you need to know if managing your own super is right for you.
The biggest advantage of setting up your own SMSF is control. You can invest your money the way you want to – in companies, a property or a fixed interest term deposit.
You can choose among a wide range of investment options like direct mortgages, bank deposits, managed funds, direct property and shares.
Another advantage of DIY SMSF is lower fees. If you have over $300,000 in your superannuation, you may be able to operate your SMSF for less than the annual management fees of a company.
You can also use gearing and leverage to purchase assets like shares and property to expand your investment portfolio faster.
Remember that contributions to your SMSF are tax deductible so you can save more tax through franked dividend income and timing your capital gains carefully.
SMSFs also let you buy other assets for a maximum of 15% tax. SMSFs can continue indefinitely and family members may still enjoy this benefit even after the member's death.
However, you should be aware of the disadvantages, too. As a trustee, make sure you comply with super and taxation laws otherwise, you can be charged a hefty fine and even be imprisoned.
You also have to be savvy about investing to ensure that your SMSF is earning more than what a super company could earn. If not, you can choose to appoint brokers or advisors for a fee.
You will also be required to meet all record-keeping and reporting obligations such as transactions and contribution records and annual tax returns.
Just the same, you may want to ask the experts to handle this for a fee. Another downside of setting up your own SMSF is it may be less diversified than it could have been if handled by a superannuation company.
Note that gearing may add to the risk and though super funds sometimes come with insurance coverage, you still have to get an independent life, income protection and total permanent disability insurance that you need.
Do you think you can set up your own SMSF? Why don't you assemble a team of professionals, such as a lawyer, experienced investor, SMSF expert and financial partner to help you?
You can start with a solicitor, accountant, investment strategist and financial planner. Check their fees and accreditation and don't be afraid to get a second opinion.
ED CHAN is founder and non executive chairman of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor Accountants</a>.
<a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/contact-us/?utm_medium=propertyobserver" target="_blank">Click here</a> to schedule a chat or call one of their <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/contact-us/?utm_medium=propertyobserver" target="_blank">local offices</a>.
</body></html>

echan-hSGJw4wwC5

How to decide if you should set up your own SMSF: Ed Chan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER 
If you are selling your home, you can claim the main residence tax exemption for the property you live in, including the land adjacent to it and other structures associated with the property like a separate garage or laundry. 
The main residence exemption includes compulsory acquisition of the main residence.
A residence or dwelling is a property used mainly for residential accommodation, including a cottage or home, a flat or apartment, a strata title unit, a unit located in a retirement village and a house boar, caravan or mobile home.
The land covered by the main residence exemption is close to, near, adjoining or neighboring the dwelling.
To be tax exempt, the land and dwelling should be sold together and the owner should have used the land mainly for private and domestic purposes with the dwelling. The total area should also not be more than two hectares. If it is more than two hectares, the owner can choose which two hectares will be exempt and the remainder will subject to CGT.
A home unit or flat usually comes with areas that are separate physically from the unit, such as a store room, laundry or garage.
If these areas were used primarily for private and domestic purposes associated with the unit, they will be exempt from CGT as well. However, if these structures are disposed separately from the unit or flat, the capital gain or loss will not be exempt from capital gains tax.
Ed Chan is founder and non executive chairman, Chan &amp; Naylor Accountants and can be contacted <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/">here</a>.
</body></html>

Is your adjacent land or separate structure exempt from CGT? Ed Chan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The countdown to 1st July 2017 begins and people need to act now.
Starting 1st of July, superannuation legislation will change in Australia and everyone needs to understand how the changes will affect them.
Australians are encouraged to plan ahead with the upcoming super changes such as the $1.6 million transfer balance cap, removal of tax exemption for transition-to-retirement pensions, cut in annual concessional (before-tax) contributions cap to $25,000 and catch-up concessional contributions over 5 year period from July 2018, among others.
One advantage to the annual concessional before-tax contributions cap cut is the catch-up concessional contributions.
However, it will not start until 1st July 2018. Unused portions of the concessional cap every year will be allowed to be carried forward for up to five years if you have an account balance of $500,000 or less.
Australians who consider making super contributions starting July 2017 should know that the annual concessional before-tax contributions cap will be a lot lower than previous years, dropping to $25,000 from $30,000 for people under 50 and $35,000 for those over 50.
Starting 1st of July 2017, more Australians will pay double contributions tax (15% + 15%) because of the lowering of the income threshold from $300,000 to $250,000.
Those with adjusted taxable income of over $250,000 will have extra contributions tax and all concessional contributions will have 30% tax instead of 15%. Those in certain public sector funds will be hit with this extra tax which will raise $2.5 billion in four years.
According to the government, only a small number of affluent Australians will be affected by the superannuation changes.
The 2016 budget claims that the changes will affect only 4% of people in super but some disagree, saying it will impact a lot more people than the government expects.
Other issues include estate planning and succession.
Where the death benefit exceeds $1.6 million in estate planning, the excess should be cashed out as a lump sum. Those who wish to retain the superannuation benefits through reverting or paying a pension to their dependents upon inheritance will also be affected.
Those who are in second marriages and wish to make provision for children from a previous marriage will also be impacted.
People have already structured their estate to give pension to their children from their superannuation while the spouse can access the balance as well. With the $1.6 million cap, funds may no longer be enough to sustain the pensions and spouse’s standard of living.
The superannuation changes may be plugging revenue holes instead of building a sustainable system, which can provide for retirement adequately.
This may even result in bigger demands on public finances down the line. People may be discouraged to build their super and find other investment vehicles instead. They may turn to residential property investment but housing affordability remains an issue.
The good news is that superannuation will be more flexible for those with different work patterns as the new caps will be eligible for tax deductions.
This will be beneficial to those who salary sacrifice, who are self-employed and have part-time work.
 
Ed Chan is the founding partner of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor</a>.
 
</body></html>

Superannuation changes and their impact on estate planning and succession: Ed Chan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Often when commentators use "income" to "property price" ratios and compare our property prices with other countries or even different periods in Australia and conclude that property prices are either over valued or undervalued, they are using the wrong statistics. 
We are currently being told that property prices when compared to our income levels make property prices unaffordable and therefore there will be a correction soon. 
We hear this especially from overseas commentators visiting Australian shores.
Harry Dent and Robert Kiyosaki are two such visitors to our shores recently who have said our property prices are overvalued when compared to our income levels. 
If you simply measured those two statistics against each other then one could arrive at that conclusion. 
However affordability is a function of house prices, income and interest rates. It's not simply between income and property prices. 
If you look at the graph below from BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research which compares: 
<ol>
<li>Implied price based on income growth  </li>
<li>Implied price based on income growth and interest rates </li>
</ol>
<img src="/images/2015/01/30/chan%20jan%2030%20one.png" alt="">
As you can see from the graph the red line is a lot below the blue line indicating that property prices are hugely overpriced. Most commentators use this line to run their argument that property prices as a ratio of income is in a bubble and a correction is imminent. 
If you look at the green line it is above the blue line which indicates that property prices as a ratio of income and interest rates are still affordable and not in a bubble. 
I think house price growth will slow in 2015 against a back drop of increasing unemployment figures amongst other indicators.
Ed Chan is founder and non executive chairman of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor Accountants</a>.
</body></html>

Australian housing is not overpriced - and here's why: Ed Chan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Once again we have seen some commentators pushing for the abolition of negative gearing. 
The claim is that the government has lost some $13 billion dollars of revenue by allowing tax breaks through negative gearing to the 'so called rich'. 
As the government is trying to find savings to get the budget back in the black they have been criticized for asking the 'poor' to shoulder most of the budget cuts through GP co-payments, loss of family rebates, higher university fees, etc, etc, whilst so called 'rich' property investors are getting away with generous tax breaks through negative gearing. 
This is simply misrepresenting the facts.
Whilst taxpayers have claimed a total of $13 billion in losses in their tax returns, the actual revenue forgone by the government is calculated at their individual tax rates. 
Thus at an average tax rate of 35% the lost revenue is only $4.5 billion.
So the government has not lost $13 billion dollars by allowing negative gearing, but rather $4.5 billion.
Public housing provided by the government only accounts for around 4% of investment properties. The other 96% of housing is provided by the private investor.
Should they disincentivise property investment by removing negative gearing, we would see the government having to shoulder the weight of providing a much larger percentage of housing for tenants.
This would in effect cost the government much more than the $4.5 billion dollars a year in revenue forgone due to negative gearing.
In fact it would cost the government in the hundreds of billions to provide public housing.
You may recall that the Keating government attempted to remove negative gearing in the 80s but reversed their decision when the queues for public housing doubled.
Secondly there are around 1.6 million property investors in Australia and most of them are not so called 'rich'. 
In fact most property investors only own one property and fall into the category of middle class. They certainly are not considered 'rich'. 
In fact they should be applauded for the sacrifice to their lifestyle (due to the shortfall created by negative gearing) as they attempt to invest for their future and in so doing, reducing the government's burden in providing them an old age pension when they retire. 
In addition they save the government billions of dollars in not having to provide public housing for those unable to buy their own homes currently. 
Not to mention the knock on effect to the economy that property investors produce.
However negative gearing is only one piece of the jigsaw puzzle.
When it comes to the property market, many other factors such as jobs, interest rates, confidence, supply etc, have a far greater effect on the property market than negative gearing.
We need to have a growing economy which leads to increased revenues for the government as businesses do well and able to hire more people and with more jobs, our standard of living is improved. This will ensure the property market is stable and will continue to grow steadily.
Supply is a very important factor as successive governments have not provided the policies to generate more supply in past years. 
Ed Chan is non-executive chairman and founder of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor Property Accountants</a>.
</body></html>

Negative gearing only one part of the property puzzle

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Now that is a dramatic headline and I left off 10 extra words: 'If you want to be rich and they are not'.
By the way that applies to all your friends also. 
If you want to be a great fisherman, then listen to someone who is a great fisherman.
If you want to be a great cook, then listen to someone who is a great cook.
If you want to be wealthy, than listen to someone who is wealthy.
I know that sounds like common sense but sense is not that common
What is even more important is the opposite to "listen to an expert" and that is "not to listen to a non-expert".
So before you decide whether to listen to someone or not, just look at their track record.
I know that's common sense, but how often have we been influenced by our friends and what their well-meaning advice has on us.
How many times have friends or family told us we were crazy to buy property when they don't have any themselves and really have no idea about it.
How many times have friends and family told us how to get rich when they themselves are not rich. We love and trust them so what they say tends to have more of an impact than the words of strangers.
However for example if your parents are not financially wealthy and you listen to them then you will end up exactly where they are.
If you listen to everyone instead of being selective about whom you listen to than you will get completely confused.
Ed Chan is a founding partner of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> accountants and a leading property tax specialist.
He has co-authored three best-selling books as a seasoned property investor who understands the relationship between property investment and tax.
</body></html>

Love your parents, but don't listen to them

<html><body>
Toby Johnstone wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald back in January 2014 that "investors' love affair with Sydney's property market could be over, with experts anticipating a slowdown in property speculation." 
"All the pointers are there showing that the Sydney investor market has overshot its fundamentals," the article quoted Andrew Wilson, the senior economist at Australian Property Monitors.
In the same piece, RP Data senior research analyst Cameron Kusher agreed, saying, "investors thinking of getting into the market had missed the boat. Whether you are chasing capital growth or rental return, neither look particularly strong at the moment certainly not as strong as 12 to 18 months ago. Given that, I do think that we will see a pullback in investor activity this year."
So what do you think? 
Recently I came across a graph (pictured below) that tracked both property growth over a long period of time but also identified yearly rates of change in property values. What's interesting about the graph below is that it shows where we are in the property cycle. 
 <img src="/images/stories/2014/03/14/chan%20march%2014%20one.png" alt="">
Source: Jon Giaan
The blue line shows property values but the orange line shows the actual change in property values year on year, and this is much more relevant in terms of determining when to get into the market and whether the market has run out of steam. 
You can see clearly that the market goes through many years with increasing annual growth rates and then reducing annual growth rates until finally several years of increasing negative annual growth rates before repeating itself. 
<blockquote>
There are several more years of increasing yearly growth rates before the yearly growth rates start to taper off. 
</blockquote>
The green line shows the current trend is upward in nature and, if history this will go on for a few years before the growth rate tapers off year on year until negative growth. 
You can see the positive yearly growth years are much more than the yearly negative growth years and that is why the blue line shows the property market trending upwards over the longer term. 
This also demonstrates that there are several more years of increasing yearly growth rates before the yearly growth rates start to taper off. 
In other words, if last year’s growth was 9.14%, and if the graph is right, we should get double digit growth rates this year and the next year an even higher rate. After that the yearly growth rates, whilst still positive, will be a lower rate year on year until it becomes negative. 
The reason for this is because of human nature. 
People are broken into four groups:
<ol>
<li>Early adopters</li>
<li>Middle adopters</li>
<li>Late adopters </li>
<li>Never adopters </li>
</ol>
The majority of people are middle to late adopters and they tend to create the momentum that is typical of property cycles. 
When the conditions first begin to change for property the early adopters get in first but the majority of people sit back waiting for more certainty and more people to invest. Hence the saying "the majority of people are like sheep".
In the meanwhile, if conditions change early adopters are also the first to get out (sometimes prematurely) but the middle adopters are still just getting in and this creates the momentum that shows up in the graphs as continuing forward momentum. 
This is than added to by the late adopters who are now just getting in, thus providing the "braking" effect to a plummeting of the annual growth rate. This gives the wave pattern we see in orange. 
If you believe the historic property cycle will repeat itself, then this graph demonstrates that the momentum has started to build, the middle adopters are still getting in the market and we are not as yet at the top of the yearly growth rate cycle.
Whilst there are no guarantees, the graph seems to indicate we are still on the upward path and we have not yet started to experience reducing growth rates which would normally run for several more years before we experience negative yearly growth rates. 
</body></html>

Is it the time to get into property?

<html><body>
The property market ebbs and flows over the middle to long term and different forces come into play to cause this.
For example economic growth with low unemployment, low interest rates create the demand for housing which attracts developers to build to meet this demand.
Eventually demand is met and the market reaches saturation as developers may have built too many properties and this causes developers to cease building until the oversupply dries up and demand is there again.  
This may take many years before the tide turns again however it creates the ebbs and flows that are associated with prices moving up and down.  
That was a very simplistic over view of the market. There are many complex dynamics that affects the market as well, the overseas confidence and the Australian dollar.  
One particular area that has not had much coverage but could be a great indicator of the potential movement of property prices is the difference between yields and property prices.  
As demand from investors make up a significant part of property price movements and investors are focussed on returns on investments such as rent yields, we should look at the correlation between rent yields and capital value.  
Let’s see how rental yields dictate where we are in the property cycle 
As rents increase it attracts investors into the property market, especially since the return from fixed interest instruments such as term deposits and other cash investments are considerably low at the moment.  
There is much talk from many economists about the end of the mining boom and predictions of a slowing economy due to China’s slowdown and running into potential head winds with unemployment growing to over 6.5% and economic growth slowing to below 2% per annum over the next five years causing a possible recession on the horizon.  
Whenever economists predict the worst, share investors react first, by cashing in their stocks for safer investments but cash returns are so low that property is the next best group to invest in. So as people hop out of the share market and into the property market, it generates demand for property.  
The other group that drives property prices are owner occupiers.  
Since interest rates on home loans are at its lowest, many people who are renting find it cheaper to purchase, causing a second group of people who drive demand in property.  
The last group that drives property is the supply line. Developers have not been building, where by there is also a shortage of properties.  
Our net immigration of around 250,000 into Australia also drives demand for property.  
Most rental yields are now over 4.2% to 5.2%. Interest rates on home loans are as cheap as 4.85% fixed for three years.  
Research from last month’s RP Data shows, rents have outpaced growth in values since the GFC and created a gap which indicates the conditions are there for the property market to move upwards.  
According to RP Data since the end of 2007, house prices have grown 13.4%percent. For five and a half years, combined capital house prices have been below inflation.  
However over the same period rents have grown 32.1%, almost twice the rate of house prices.  
Refer graph below:
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_one" height="189" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_one.png">You can see the gap is largest right now which means yields are increasing.  
When yields are so high (namely it’s very expensive to rent) it opens the door for people to buy.  
When people start buying (owner occupiers) it pushes prices up faster than rental increases, thus reducing yields down to normal levels.  
As you know, to calculate yield, one must divide the yearly rent by the value of the property, e.g. rents per week of $500 is $26,000 for the year, divided by the value of the property $450,000 gives a rental yield of 5.78%.
So if property values drop, the yield would increase and should property values increase, the yields would drop, without the rental moving at all.  
The last property boom started when yields were around 6% to 7% and as the property market boomed and the values increased, the yields dropped to around 4% per annum making it more difficult to buy into the property market.
When the yields eventually drop to around 3% due to property growth it will hit a ceiling where the market will no longer tolerate and people will go back to renting and put pressure on rents to rise to a level where it becomes cheaper to buy again and thus the cycle repeats itself.  
Let’s look at city by city  
In Sydney, home values have increased by around 20% since the end of 2007, while rents have increased 35%. The gap between rental and value indicates potential for capital growth.
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_two" height="206" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_two.png">In Melbourne both rents and capital growth have increased around 20%. This indicates that there is still a way to go before Melbourne is in a position for capital growth.
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_three" height="220" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_three.png">In Brisbane, house prices have fallen by 3%, and rents have grown 27%. The huge gap between values and rental growth say’s that the high rentals will drag up the values so Brisbane shows a lot of potential.
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_four" height="206" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_four.png">In Adelaide as well, house prices have grown just 7%, while rents have increased 21% and shows great potential
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_five" height="227" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_five.png">In Perth, the gap is quite large where home values have only grown 2% since the end of 2007. Rents on the other hand have increased 48%. Perth appears to have the greatest potential for capital growth.
 <img alt="chan_sept_24_chart_six" height="205" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/24/chan_sept_24_chart_six.png">Please be aware that there are many indicators that drive property prices and this analysis is based only on one indicator, but a useful indicator.
 
<hr>
Ed Chan is a founding partner of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> accountants and a leading property tax specialist.
He has co-authored three best-selling books as a seasoned property investor who understands the relationship between property investment and tax.
 
</body></html>

Rental yields, where do they indicate we are in the cycle and where should you buy? Ed Chan

<html><body>
Everybody is aware that property values move up and down in cycles.
The strategies used vary for different stages of the property cycle should move with them.
Growth Stage 
 
In a growth stage it's always best to go interest only with your loans as the repayments are less, leaving you with extra cash flow to fund another property. Two properties growing will make you more money than one property growing.
Decline Stage 
 
However the strategy is completely different if the property is in a decline stage. This stage is usually accompanied by a recession.
In a recessionary state there is pressure on interest rates to drop in order to stimulate the economy.
At this point the strategy should be to pay down your debts with lower interest payments you will be able to pay off your principle faster.
In a recessionary state most assets are not growing so the capital gain could either be negligible or even have declined.
Hence, if you pay off your debts in this period you will save paying interest. If you are saving on paying interest that’s the equivalent of earning it.
For example if your interest rate was 6.15% than by paying off the principle and not having to pay 6.15% interest you are actually earning 6.15%.
It's very unlikely in a down market you could earn 6.15% on your money. So the best return on your investment in this period is to pay down your principle.
Additionally in a down cycle your property values are also declining in the short term.
Lower interest rates allow you to pay off more of the debt so that when the property market recovers again you will have a lower debt level or greater equity. Therefore you have manufactured some equity if you like in a down market.
As the property market recovers so will interest rates go up but hopefully by then you would have paid off sufficient debt that it will be positively geared in addition to the equity being greater.
So the moral of the story is make sure you roll with the circumstances and adapt your property investment strategies to the market conditions and take advantage of them as they present themselves.

<hr>
Ed Chan is a founding partner of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> accountants and a leading property tax specialist.
He has co-authored three best-selling books as a seasoned property investor who understands the relationship between property investment and tax.
 
</body></html>

Growth v decline; adjusting your investment strategy for stages of the cycle: Ed Chan

Article summary

<ul data-end="785" data-start="311">
	<li data-end="459" data-section-id="5hbcyr" data-start="311">Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at Skye Kangaroo Point, headlined by a two-storey sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm.</li>
	<li data-end="561" data-section-id="1p7lq8n" data-start="460">Early buyer interest suggests the residences could set a new Queensland apartment price record.</li>
	<li data-end="667" data-section-id="1y70z0l" data-start="562">The collection includes four move-in ready penthouses and the highly customised Skye One residence.</li>
	<li data-end="785" data-section-id="yvm0y1" data-start="668">The release caps one of Bri​sbane's most ambitious luxury apartment developments overlooking the Brisbane River.</li>
</ul>

<hr data-end="790" data-start="787" />
Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/skye-residences-by-pikos-kangaroo-point-8-river-terrace-kangaroo-point-qld-4169">Skye by Pikos</a> development in Kangaroo Point, with early buyer interest indicating the flagship residences could eclipse every apartment sale previously recorded in Queensland.

The collection crowns the luxury riverfront development with five residences, including four completed penthouses and Skye One, a two-level sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm that will be tailored to its eventual owner.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374075]

Wanting to offer a fully customisable home, Pikos is offering Skye One as a blank canvas, allowing the buyer to work alongside the developer's design team to customise the home's layout, finishes and internal spaces.

The residence will feature a 247 sqm private rooftop terrace with its own swimming pool, sauna, steam room, outdoor kitchen and multiple entertaining areas overlooking the Brisbane River and CBD skyline.

The remaining four penthouses have been completed and are ready for immediate occupation, each offering four bedrooms, expansive open-plan living areas, soaring ceilings and private lift access.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374059]

One of the defining features throughout the project is its use of Roman Classic Travertine, with more than 20,000 sqm of the natural stone imported from Italy after being personally selected by Pikos Group Founder and Executive Director Pedro Pikos, interior designer Julie Williamson and third-generation stone specialist Mario Caucci.

Pikos said the penthouse collection represented the culmination of the company's long-term vision for Skye.

"True legacy isn't measured by what we build today, but by what endures tomorrow," Pikos said.

"Our ambition is to create places that become more valuable with time, enrich the lives of generations, and stand as timeless landmarks long after we've stepped away."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374060]

Williamson said the interiors were inspired by the natural character of Kangaroo Point and the Brisbane River rather than international design trends.

"Materiality tells the story of a place," Williamson said.

"We looked to the movement of the Brisbane River, the texture of the cliff face and the warmth of the surrounding landscape to create interiors that feel understated, enduring and unmistakably Brisbane."

Positioned above the Kangaroo Point cliffs, Skye places residents within walking distance of Howard Smith Wharves, South Bank and James Street while offering uninterrupted river and city views.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=90059]

Joel Robinson

Brisbane's next apartment price record? Pikos unveils Skye's exclusive penthouse collection

Article summary

<ul data-end="888" data-start="289">
	<li data-end="442" data-section-id="8tsh6o" data-start="289">DVB Projects is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway at 137 Old Burleigh Road, Broadbeach.</li>
	<li data-end="573" data-section-id="1nyxl3e" data-start="443">The 34-level tower will comprise just 49 ultra-luxury residences, including half-floor, full-floor and penthouse apartments.</li>
	<li data-end="717" data-section-id="oiyimj" data-start="574">The launch follows strong demand at DVB's nearby Sea Glass project, which is more than 50 per cent sold and currently under construction.</li>
	<li data-end="888" data-section-id="epk9o9" data-start="718">The development adds to the transformation of Old Burleigh Road, with premium beachfront apartment projects continuing to reshape the tightly held Broadbeach strip.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/dvb-projects">DVB Projects</a> is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway on the Broadbeach site as the Sydney developer moves closer to bringing the ultra-luxury project to market.

The 34-level tower at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/137-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">137 Old Burleigh Road</a> will comprise just 49 residences, ranging from half-floor apartments through to full-floor homes and a penthouse. The launch follows the strong sales performance of DVB's nearby Sea Glass development. More than half of the apartments at Sea Glass, on the other side of Broadbeach, have been snapped up, well ahead of its late 2027 completion

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2944b4be-c84e-4b54-8dc1-c712e76704c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E02_Exterior_Street%20Level%20Entrance.jpg?VersionId=YoNig7pRdrE3HCue7sUj78LzJteeQf3H" />

The start of demolition at 137 Old Burleigh Road signals DVB Projects’ underlying confidence in the Gold Coast’s luxury beachside apartment sector.

“We see the Gold Coast as one of the most compelling lifestyle markets in Australia, particularly at the premium end where demand continues to deepen,” said Dean Brown, Managing Director of DVB.&nbsp;

“This project has been carefully designed to respond to that demand - delivering large-format residences with a level of quality, privacy and amenity that is still relatively rare in the apartment market on the beachside."

Brown says the site itself is "exceptional."

"Old Burleigh Road is one of the most tightly held beachfront strips, and opportunities to deliver a project of this scale and calibre in this location are extremely limited.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="398f377a-c037-455e-9250-0c5e0d84c35b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/I12_FF%20Balcony.jpg?VersionId=NwOiRWGMubR1c8wthuEfggklcja7al9." />

The project will comprise 40 half-floor residences of approximately 260 sqm, alongside eight full-floor residences spanning around 524 sqm.

A single penthouse will crown the building, featuring a private pool, barbecue area, indoor gym and dedicated entertaining spaces.

Residents will have access to a resort-style suite of amenities, including a 20-metre pool with daybeds, a gymnasium, hot and cold plunge pools, a sauna, and private residents’ lounge and dining facilities.

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1642bb0-9a66-4427-a022-dfc0988c6287" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/A02_Pool%20to%20View.jpg?VersionId=c0IXPyn_Gp_Kn3XCwzMrqIVkAdCEwVXP" />

Sales agent Todd Matheson, of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/pezet-matheson">Pezet Matheson</a>, which is marketing both 137 Old Burleigh Road and Sea Glass, said 137 Old Burleigh Road would address a clear gap in the market for genuine luxury products.

“There are very few opportunities on the Gold Coast where buyers can secure a residence of this size and quality in a new building,” Matheson said.

“What we’re seeing is a growing cohort of downsizers and interstate buyers who still want space - they’re not willing to compromise on living area, entertaining or finishes.

“This project has been designed with that buyer in mind. It offers the scale of a home, combined with the convenience and security of apartment living, in one of the coast’s most desirable positions.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="59aae0ca-5639-4320-8aca-d0bf60f48e43" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E01_Exterior%20Hero.jpg?VersionId=DS8Zfy2WtgUEtdfe0TEUuf1W1GfcZq8S" />

Located on a 1,156 sqm site one block from the beachfront, the development will replace an ageing walk-up building and is expected to contribute to the ongoing transformation of the Old Burleigh Road strip into one of the Gold Coast’s most prestigious residential corridors.

With the development moving into the delivery phase, 137 Old Burleigh Road is slated to hit the market later this year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145141]

DVB Projects to launch second Broadbeach apartment tower as demolition commences

A proposal to redevelop one of North Sydney's ageing commercial buildings has taken another step forward, with plans for a 38-storey mixed-use tower adding momentum to the long-awaited transformation of the Alfred Street precinct.

Now on public exhibition through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority-led State Significant Development pathway, the proposal for 271-273 Alfred Street would replace an underutilised commercial building with 95 apartments, ground-floor retail, commercial space and affordable housing. The proposal was submitted by&nbsp;Tara Shore Pty Ltd, acting for the John Taylor Family Trust.

While the project will deliver much-needed housing on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, it also represents another piece of a broader precinct that has spent years in planning limbo.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7e1ce1b4-38df-48ab-992f-386814d86308" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20podium.png?VersionId=sC_h6w.A9VEoB98qsqowPlIoz__sBZBt" />

Despite its proximity to both North Sydney Station and the Victoria Cross Metro, redevelopment of Alfred Street has progressed slowly over the past decade as broader planning controls, zoning and building heights remained unresolved. The introduction of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway has provided a new avenue for projects to progress, allowing rezoning and development assessment to occur concurrently and unlocking sites that have long been earmarked for renewal.

Designed by Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder, the proposal seeks to do more than replace an ageing office building. The architects have positioned the project as the first stage of a wider public domain vision that would improve pedestrian connectivity and create a more cohesive mixed-use precinct as neighbouring sites are redeveloped over time.

The proposal includes a widened Alfred Street setback, new street trees, landscaping and outdoor seating, along with a landscaped through-site pedestrian link connecting Alfred Street with Little Alfred Street. The connection is intended to become the first section of a future east-west pedestrian network extending across the precinct.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8ea39ac3-46ad-4562-b4a0-b862e91c2dda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20site.png?VersionId=K7umCd21KpetEFuVfsPlnJKhUOsmTTdV" />

The mixed-use tower would comprise retail space at ground level, commercial uses on level two and apartments from level three upwards.

In total, the development would deliver 95 apartments, including nine one-bedroom, 28 two-bedroom, 56 three-bedroom and two four-bedroom residences. Twenty-one apartments, representing 15 per cent of the residential gross floor area, would be secured as affordable housing and managed by a registered community housing provider for at least 15 years.

Nine basement levels would provide 133 resident car spaces, seven motorcycle spaces and 111 bicycle spaces.

According to the Architecture and Urban Design Report, the public domain strategy is designed to transform what is currently an inward-facing commercial edge into a more active and connected pedestrian environment, creating a stronger relationship between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighbourhoods.

Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder has also prepared a broader public domain framework spanning neighbouring properties between 263 and 283 Alfred Street, arguing that a coordinated approach to redevelopment will deliver better public spaces, improved tower separation and a more connected streetscape as the precinct evolves.

The proposal comes at a time where North Sydney is slated for future residential growth. Commercial developer FiveX has residential plans for the neighbouring site at 275 Alfred Street. They've proposed a 39-storey mixed-use tower with 184 apartments, while Freecity was recently approved for nearly 300 apartments across a 51-storey building on Walker Street.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-freecity-gets-green-light-for-mixed-use-apartment-and-hotel-tower-in-north-sydney">First look: Freecity gets green light for mixed-use apartment and hotel tower in North Sydney</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-fivex-plans-39-storey-residential-tower-in-booming-north-sydney">First look: Fivex plans 39-storey residential tower in booming North Sydney</a>

&nbsp;

Alfred Street the latest North Sydney pocket to be transformed by residential development

Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Ed Chan

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News