A collection of just 25 large-format apartments and penthouses overlooking Goodwin Park is entering the Coolangatta market, with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marea-residences-coolangatta-27-27a-dixon-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Maréa Residences</a> combining a low-density, residential-only approach with uninterrupted park and Pacific Ocean outlooks.

Located at 27 Dixon Street, Maréa comprises three and four-bedroom residences alongside a limited number of dual-level penthouses, with the project positioned between Goodwin Park and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/coolangatta-qld-4225">Coolangatta</a>’s coastal precinct.

Construction has commenced, with completion currently estimated for late 2027. Three-bedroom residences are priced from $1.8 million.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374005]

The project has been designed around its northern outlook across the park, with the building’s architecture, landscaping and material palette intended to establish a connection with the neighbouring green space. The residences have been configured to maximise natural light and views across Goodwin Park towards the ocean.

Inside, the material palette incorporates timber, stone and brushed brass, complemented by curved detailing and ambient lighting. Kitchens and bathrooms carry the same natural material approach, while residences also include basement parking, storage and lift access.

Maréa’s penthouses are arranged over two levels and include private pools, adding another layer to the project’s focus on larger-format apartment living. Across the development, residences are configured with three or four bedrooms rather than the broader mix of smaller apartment types commonly found in larger projects.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374010]

Resident amenity is concentrated at rooftop level, where landscaped entertaining terraces and pools take advantage of elevated views across Coolangatta and the Pacific Ocean.

The project has so far been particularly well received by local owner-occupiers and downsizers, according to Urban Activation Property Sales and Marketing Director Matt George, with the residential-only format, construction quality and northern park outlook among the features resonating with purchasers.

“The uninterrupted northern aspect overlooking Goodwin Park has been a key point of difference, with buyers attracted to the sense of serenity and open space the park provides, while still enjoying easy access to the ocean and being within walking distance of the lifestyle and amenities Coolangatta has to offer,” George said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374002]

“The combination of high-quality construction, a residential-only building, park outlook and proximity to the beach has resonated strongly with the local downsizer market.”

The Dixon Street address is within walking distance of Coolangatta Beach and the broader southern Gold Coast coastline, including the surf breaks at Snapper Rocks and Kirra. Coolangatta’s cafés, restaurants and retail are nearby, while Gold Coast Airport is also within close proximity.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150999]

Joel Robinson

Maréa Residences brings parkside apartments to Coolangatta

Melbourne developer PDG has secured Victorian Government approval for its $1.5 billion Southbank development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-one-1-queens-bridge-street-southbank-vic-3006">The One</a>, clearing the way for the long-dormant riverfront site opposite Crown to finally be developed.

The Minister for Planning has approved the project at 1-29 Queens Bridge Street, with the Department of Transport and Planning issuing the planning permit following its assessment.

The approval will allow PDG to develop the prominent 5,059 sqm site with a major mixed-use tower comprising premium apartments, including branded residences, a luxury hotel and boutique office space.

PDG acquired the site in late 2024, with its position directly opposite Crown's main entrance and near Melbourne's Arts Precinct making it one of Southbank's most significant remaining development opportunities.

<img alt="PDG" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3933013e-6332-4386-b9be-089df05caf17" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%209.29.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sITIgBqDL0N3VNSMwWEmF5UA.uvcsRyu" />

Designed by COX in collaboration with ODO and PDG, the tower's architecture draws on the movement of the Yarra River, with six vertical pleats running the height of the sculpted facade.

The project will also see the heritage-listed Queens Bridge Hotel restored and incorporated into the development&nbsp;with new hospitality and public uses, including a rooftop venue.

A significant component of The One will be its residential amenity.

More than 5,000 sqm of resident facilities will be delivered across a single level, making it one of the largest consolidated residential amenity offerings proposed in an Australian apartment development.

The planning approval also incorporates a major upgrade of Queensbridge Square, which PDG will deliver in partnership with the City of Melbourne.

<img alt="PDG" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="73167fcd-1031-4b6f-a408-a064cfe45ed1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%209.29.17%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Pf1AEWxw6SNmBqR0zQW5lyEze.MtxgFp" />

The existing square will be revitalised as a new civic and pedestrian space along the Yarra River, strengthening the connection between the project, Southbank and the riverfront.

PDG Founder and Managing Director Vince Giuliano said the approval represented a major milestone for a site which has remained largely underutilised for more than 15 years.

“This is the most significant Planning Permit approval Melbourne has seen in recent years,” Giuliano said.

“For more than 15 years, this site has remained underutilised. This approval enables us to deliver a project that will contribute meaningfully to the revitalisation of Southbank, restore and reactivate an important heritage building, and create a new civic and hospitality destination for Melbourne.”

The latest approval follows an earlier planning permit issued by the City of Melbourne covering demolition works across part of the site at 9-29 Queens Bridge Street. Those demolition and early works are already underway.

PDG has also started generating early interest in the residential component from owner-occupiers ahead of a planned public launch in early 2027.

PDG secures approval for $1.5bn Southbank apartment development, The One

Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

IN BRIEF

<ul>
	<li>
	Just three double-storey Sky Homes sit at the top of The Waterline, each with its own private marina berth and rooftop terrace.
	</li>
	<li>
	Construction on The Waterline is complete, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.
	</li>
	<li>
	Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and are priced from $3.65 million.
	</li>
</ul>

<hr />
Lewis Land has opened the first completed sky home for inspection at Harbour Shores, giving buyers their first opportunity to step inside one of just three double-storey residences crowning The Waterline.

Each sky home comes with its own private marina berth, rooftop terrace and Broadwater views, combining the scale of a larger home with direct access to the boating lifestyle that underpins the wider <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/harbour-shores-biggera-waters-564-oxley-drive-biggera-waters-qld-4216">Harbour Shores</a> masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366708]

Lewis Land Head of Development Michael Long said the inclusion of a berth with every Sky Home had become increasingly valuable as marina access across the Gold Coast tightened.

“Marina berths are becoming increasingly difficult to secure across the Gold Coast, so including one with every Sky Home makes this a genuinely rare offering,” Long said.

“The private 70-berth marina will accommodate boats up to 12 metres in length and is positioned just 2.5 kilometres from the Broadwater, placing the open ocean only 15 minutes away.

“Being able to step out of your home onto your boat is a rare luxury, and it’s something residents here can look forward to when it opens later this year.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366709]

The display opening comes as construction completes on The Waterline, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.

The three Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and each feature three bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive kitchens with butler's pantries and large balconies taking in the Broadwater outlook.

Each residence also has three secure basement car spaces and additional storage.

“This is the first opportunity the Gold Coast has had to step into Harbour Shores and see, touch and feel what we’re bringing to life here,” Long said.

“There are only three Sky Homes within The Waterline, ranging in size from 282sqm to 367sqm, with each residence featuring three large bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive custom-built kitchens with butler’s pantry, and large balconies capturing Broadwater views.”

<img alt="Harbour Shores" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bab65e10-4fab-45e1-92d8-fc56e2ab98ff" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-25%20at%202.00.16%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=XT8q76LsPkw3cYTsvN3JfFDaPLud90PN" />

Residents of The Waterline will have access to a private pool, along with Harbour Shores' wider collection of amenity including a lagoon pool, social clubhouse, tennis court, gym, yoga facilities and sauna.

Lewis Land partnered with Studio Collective to furnish the completed display, with the interiors designed to demonstrate how the residences could function as permanent homes rather than simply as show apartments.

Studio Collective Director Melissa Park said the surrounding waterways informed the interiors, but in a more restrained way than a traditional coastal scheme.

“We drew inspiration from the canals and coastal surrounds, but our approach was to interpret that subtly through layered materials and a grounded palette of earthy tones, rather than literal coastal references,” Park said.

“We introduced hero moments of green and teal to reference the surrounding waterways, while mirrored elements help reflect natural light.

“The result is a residence that feels elevated yet comfortable, somewhere buyers can genuinely imagine themselves living, entertaining and unwinding.”

Sky Homes are priced from $3.65 million.

Lewis Land is also offering private marina berths with The Residences, its limited collection of three and four-bedroom villas positioned directly along the Harbour Shores waterfront boardwalk.

Three-bedroom villas are priced from $2.99 million, while four-bedroom residences start from $3.19 million.

Harbour Shores is being marketed by Colliers International.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113271]

Lewis Land opens sky home display as The Waterline completes at Harbour Shores

St Vincent de Paul Society Housing Australia has filed plans for a major mixed-use housing precinct on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, adding another significant proposal to a pocket around North Sydn​ey Station that is quickly becoming one of the LGA's busiest development zones.

The State Significant Development Application covers a 5,990 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1-19-mackenzie-street-lavender-bay-nsw-2060">1-19 MacKenzie Street and 211 Blues Point Road in Lavender Bay</a>, immediately south of Nor​th Sydney Station and between the commercial core and the lower-rise Lavender Bay Heritage Conservation Area.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal would deliver a new residential tower comprising 88 build-to-sell apartments and 19 affordable apartments, alongside a separate co-living building with 57 rooms and a building manager's studio.

It would also see the significant restoration and upgrade of St Francis Xavier Catholic Church, the adaptive reuse of the former school building, new parish facilities, retail, a new public square and around 1,000 sqm of publicly accessible open space.

<img alt="Vinnies North Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d5dd7f87-a617-463e-b577-17541e01f0e9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.13%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4R8TsFN3P_LrrXO2HswTOIrx2blil8lh" />

The project is seeking a concurrent rezoning of the site to R4 High Density Residential and an increase in the maximum building height to allow a tower reaching RL120, or up to 20 storeys. The proposal was progressed through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The build-to-sell component will be weighted toward larger apartments, with just six one-bedroom apartments compared with 31 two-beds, 43 three-beds and eight four-bedroom residences.

The 19 affordable apartments will comprise two studios, 15 one-bedroom apartments and two two-bedroom apartments, taking the total apartment component to 107 residences before the 58 co-living rooms are included.

<img alt="Vnnies" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d568ca5-cb90-4e18-96c6-d9795dba0c56" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GY2R5M9VtQh0EKy1vajaea19PSLOPuRD" />

Wardle's design for the Vinnies site has sought to negotiate that emerging high-rise context while retaining the lower-scale character of MacKenzie Street and the adjoining heritage conservation area.

The main building adopts a three-storey podium and tower arrangement, with the podium aligned to the ridgeline and front setback of St Francis Xavier Church.&nbsp;Wardle has designed the podium with colonnades, seating, recessed entries and active ground-floor frontages, with sandstone-toned precast concrete and face brick referencing the materiality of the existing church.

The tower then steps back eight metres to the south and six metres to the north before rising in a sculpted form comprising four interlocking quadrants. Wardle has also introduced rounded forms and chamfered corners to reduce the tower's perceived bulk and improve view sharing with neighbouring development sites.

Resident facilities and outdoor areas are planned at the separation between the podium and tower at Level 3, oriented toward Sydney Harbour and the CBD skyline.

The tower itself will feature a glass reinforced concrete facade, with recessed balconies and deep reveals used both to provide shading and privacy and frame views toward the harbour and city. The lower levels take a different architectural approach, using brick and sandstone-toned finishes intended to establish a stronger relationship with St Francis Xavier Church. The Church itself will be conserved and upgraded for its continued use, while the former school building will be adaptively reused as part of the co-living component.

<img alt="Lavendar Bay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2d4418ad-90aa-4d49-af93-c80b140aea80" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.09.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Kv4gzbsACaGvZSRuaqcfGC54jEJRXIDJ" />

&nbsp;

The proposal adds to an increasingly concentrated pipeline of residential development around Blue Street, MacKenzie Street and Lavender Bay.

Just west of the site, Central Element lodged plans earlier this year for one of the most significant residential developments proposed in Lavender Bay in recent years.

Central Element's SJB-designed scheme at 64-66 Lavender Street and 3-7 Middlemiss Street would deliver 163 apartments across two towers rising 23 and 32 storeys, replacing five existing apartment buildings containing 32 homes. The project also forms part of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-central-element-reveals-lavender-bay-apartment-plans?utm_source=chatgpt.com" rel="noopener" target="_blank">First look: Central Element reveals Lavender Bay apartment plans</a>

Immediately around North Sy​dney Station, another two significant proposals have emerged at 5 and 15 Blue Street.

Zurich Australian Insurance Properties is seeking to adaptively reuse its longstanding commercial building at 5 Blue Street, directly above North Sydney Station, rather than demolishing the structure.

Its SSDA proposes converting the building into a 14-storey mixed-use development with 62 apartments and 86 co-living rooms, together with ground-floor retail and a major refurbishment of Blue Street Plaza. The application is currently at the Response to Submissions stage.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-zurich-targets-north-sydney-office-conversion-with-148-unit-proposal-above-metro-station">First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Vinnies files for 20-storey Lavender Bay apartment tower as North Sydney housing pocket heats up

Federal Budget

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
As well as restricting supply to an already full rental market, the 50 percent foreign ownership restriction removes some of the competitive advantages overseas developers had over local developers.
Prior to this change coming into effect, overseas developers had a competitive advantage as they had no overseas sales limits whatsoever. Overseas developers using overseas banks could, if they so desired, have 100 percent foreign sales, with 100 pe cent en masse sales occurring overseas.
What Scott Morrison has done is even the playing field between local and overseas developers, with overseas developers now forced to generally work within the same FIRB sales metrics as local developers.
To commence a development, local banks require local developers to presell approximately 70 percent of the apartments in a development and impose a 25 percent Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) restriction on these presales. This means local developers require 52 percent local sales prior to construction commencing.
Once the developer has achieved financial close with a local bank, they are free to sell the rest overseas. Meaning, under a 25 per cent FIRB presales limit, local developers using local banks can develop buildings with circa 48 per cent foreign ownership.
Banks are always looking at the FIRB presales limit and whilst many current developments are at 25 percent, there is a more recent bank trend to constrict this further – more in the realm of 15 percent. If this is the case, then locally banked projects can end up with 40 percent foreign ownership.
It is also fair to say that overseas purchasers have settled better than local sales. Many pundits were nervous about large buildings settling this year, yet what we are seeing is that very few overseas purchasers are falling through when it comes to quality developments (just 1-2 percent in fact), even against Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s (APRA) headwinds of overseas purchaser mortgage finance.
With the 50 percent FIRB restriction placed across the whole market, coupled with APRA’s new powers across non-bank lenders, it means that the metrics by which local and overseas developers, local and overseas banks, and local and overseas non-bank lenders are becoming converged.
As a flow on effect of the overseas sales metrics now being similar, this policy change will result in overseas developers using local banks and non-bank lenders more readily to avoid foreign exchange risk, again levelling the playing field.
Perhaps this new measure may even narrow the gap between what an overseas and local developer can pay for a site, which sets the market and ultimately gets passed onto the (local) consumer.
As an unintended consequence however, this change will further constrict supply to rental markets, thus driving rental and housing prices further out of reach of local first home owners and owner occupiers. It is only state planning ministers that can affect real change by encouraging the supply side of the housing economic supply/demand pendulum.
Andrew Hogan is a managing director of Point Polaris. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.pointpolaris.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

How will the 50 percent foreign ownership limit affect developers? Andrew Hogan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The property market is currently in a state of limbo, particularly those involved in the selling of new property.
Why?
Because the budget statement in relation to helping “reduce pressure on housing affordability” has potentially changed the game and announced dramatic changes to the way depreciation is claimed on property.
Let’s start with the good news:
1. Any existing investment properties purchased (contract exchange date) prior to 7.30pm Tuesday, May 9th 2017 are not affected.
2. Commercial, industrial and other non-residential properties are not affected.
3. Capital works deductions have not been affected. This means you will still be able to claim depreciation on the structure of the building provided it was built after the 16th of September 1987. You will still need a Quantity Surveyor’s depreciation schedule to do so.
Now that we know what isn’t affected, let’s look at what has changed…
According to the budget statement
“From 1 July 2017, the Government will limit plant and equipment depreciation deductions to outlays actually incurred by investors in residential real estate properties. Plant and equipment items are usually mechanical fixtures or those which can be ‘easily’ removed from a property such as dishwashers and ceiling fans.
Here’s the uncertainty….who actually acquired the plant of equipment?
Was it the builder/developer or was it the initial purchaser of the brand new residential property?
This is key.
Why is the government making these changes?
“This is an integrity measure to address concerns that some plant and equipment items are being depreciated by successive investors in excess of their actual value.
Acquisitions of existing plant and equipment items will be reflected in the cost base for capital gains tax purposes for subsequent investors.”
The industry needs urgent clarification on this matter as many agents are currently advising potential buyers on the cashflow advantages of new property. This figures may prove to be inflated and put the developer or marketer at risk further down the line.
You see investors rely on these figures in assessing the merits of the investment.
Here is why I think this is dumb policy.
The proposed changes are being made to “reduce pressure on housing affordability.” In my opinion, it will have the opposite effect for 3 reasons:
<ol>
<li>Property investors may now feel that they need to hang on to their existing properties in order to continue claiming depreciation. With these new changes, if they sell this property, they won’t be able to get anywhere near as many deductions on the next one.</li>
<li>Developers rely on high depreciation figures in the early years to show investors how affordable an investment property can be. If the allowances are taken away, they will struggle to get the pre-sales which are required by banks to fund the deal.</li>
<li>These budget measures are forecast to save $260 million over a 3 year period. I suspect far more will be lost if developers can no longer get new projects off the ground.</li>
</ol>
Whilst I believe housing affordability is a major issue, this truly appears to be an example of policy on the run…
Here’s the solution:
Plant and Equipment in residential property needs to run it’s natural course.
The ability to re-value and re-assess the item after it’s initial effective life has run it’s course should be squashed.
Put simply, if you a buy a property that is say, 11 years old, and it has a dishwasher installed that had an initial effective life of say 10 years you can't claim it, revalue or re-assess it.
That would alleviate the government's concern that:
“....that some plant and equipment items are being depreciated by successive investors in excess of their actual value. “
This would make a lot more sense in my opinion.
I am looking forward to providing a further update once the legislation is finalised and more details regarding the specifics of these changes come to light.
Tyron Hyde is a director of Washington Brown and can be contacted <a href="https://www.washingtonbrown.com.au/staff/tyron-hyde/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Budget approach to housing affordability changes the game: Tyron Hyde

<html><body>
Housing measures announced in the federal budget drove a high point for Sydney and Melbourne auctions over the weekend, according to Domain's Andrew Wilson.
He said on Saturday, the Sydney recorded an auction clearance rate of 79.6 percent, a sharp increase from the previous weekend’s year-low 73.6 percent.
"This was however lower than the 80.3 percent recorded over the same weekend last year, when interest rate cuts activated the local market," he said.
"This strong performance was likely influenced by the announcement of last week’s federal budget policy initiatives designed to alleviate perceived housing market imbalances.
"These included allowing first home buyers to save home loan deposits through superannuation accounts, incentives for older down-sizers to sell larger homes and financial penalties for foreign investors that leave investment properties vacant.
"The northern suburbs returned to the Saturday boom-time results typically recorded over the past year to clearly lead the regional results at the weekend.
"The top performer was the Blue Mountains with a 100 percent clearance rate from the single reported auction.
"Next highest was the northern beaches with 96.2 percent followed by the lower north 90.6 percent, south 83.8 percent, inner west 81.3 percent (and the highest number of sales at 65), north west 80.0 percent, upper north shore 78.7 percent, city and east 76.1 percent, Canterbury Bankstown 68.8 percent, central coast 66.7 percent, west 65.8 percent and south west with a clearance rate of 65.2 percent."
"Melbourne recorded a clearance rate of 78.3 percent at the weekend which was similar to the 78.7 percent recorded the previous weekend but still well ahead of the 73.6 percent recorded over the same weekend last year.
"Auction listings bounced back hard at the weekend with 936 homes scheduled to go under the hammer which was significantly higher than the previous weekend’s 646 listings and also well ahead of the 759 listed over the same weekend last year. Higher auction numbers will continue through the remainder of autumn with over 1100 auctions listed next weekend.
"Melbourne’s booming north recorded another strong result at the weekend with a leading clearance rate of 83.1 percent. Next highest was the inner south with 81.1 percent followed by the inner city 80.5 percent, the west 79.8 percent, the inner east 79.0 percent, the north east 78.0 percent, the south east 73.1 percent and the outer east with an auction clearance rate at the weekend of 71.6 percent."
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Federal budget measures drive weekend auctions

<html><body>
The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute has compiled a list of new measures for housing and homelessness featured in the 2017 Federal Budget, outlined below.
National Housing and Homelessness Agreement (NHHA)
The NHHA will replace the National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA) from 1 July 2018 and will combine funding currently allocated under the National Affordable Housing Specific Purpose Payment (NAHSPP) and the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH).
The NHHA will target jurisdiction-specific priorities including supply targets, planning and zoning reforms and renewal of public housing stock while also supporting the delivery of frontline homelessness services. Funding for both the housing and homelessness sectors will be ongoing and indexed.
National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (NHFIC)
The National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (NHFIC) is being established as an affordable housing bond aggregator to raise money at lower rates from the wholesale bond market for not-for-profit community housing providers. The Government will provide $63.1 million over four years from 2017–18 (including $4.8 million in capital) to establish and run the NHFIC, which is due to commence operations on 1 July 2018.
National Housing Infrastructure Facility (NHIF)
The National Housing Infrastructure Facility (NHIF) will, over 5 years, provide $1 billion to support local governments to finance critical infrastructure such as transport links, site remediation works and power and water infrastructure needed to speed up the supply of new housing. Payments of $600 million in concessional loans, $225 million in equity investments and $175 million in grants will be made to local governments through state and territory governments. The NHFIC will administer the NHIF.
Funding homelessness services
Government will provide an additional funding of $375 million over three years from 2018–19 as part of the new National Housing and Homelessness Agreement to fund front line services to address homelessness.
Super saver plan
A first home super saver scheme will allow voluntary superannuation contributions of $15 000 per annum and cumulative maximum of $30 000 in total (per person if in a couple) for first home buyers. These savings can be withdrawn and used for a deposit, and will be taxed at 30 percentage points below the normal marginal rate. Both members of a couple can take advantage of this measure to buy their first home together. The scheme commences on 1 July 2017, and contributions and deemed earnings, net of tax, can be withdrawn from 1 July 2018.
Downsizing
The budget provides incentives for older people to downsize their place of residence and thus free up supply of family-sized housing stock. From 1 July 2018 individuals aged 65 and older will be able to contribute up to $300 000 of the proceeds from the sale of a principal residence that they held for at least 10 years into their superannuation and thus take advantage of the tax incentives.
Both members of a couple will be able to take advantage of this measure for the same home, and they will be exempt from the existing age test, work test and the $1.6 million balance test for making non-concessional contributions.
Managed Investment Trusts to build affordable housing
The Government will encourage investment into affordable housing by enabling Managed Investment Trusts (MITs) to invest in affordable housing. The housing must be available for rent to low to moderate income tenants for at least 10 years, with rent charged at a discount below the private rental market rate.
Expanded tax incentives for affordable housing investments
The Government will increase the capital gains tax discount from 50 per cent to 60 per cent to resident individuals who invest in qualifying affordable housing.
To qualify for the higher discount, affordable housing must be provided to low to moderate income tenants; rent charged at a discount below the private rental market rate; be managed through a registered community housing provider; and the investment held for a minimum period of three years. The higher discount would flow through to resident individuals investing in qualifying affordable housing Managed Investment Trusts.
Rental property deduction changes
From 1 July 2017, the Government will not allow deductions for travel expenses related to inspecting, maintaining or collecting rent for a residential rental property. Investors can engage third parties such as real estate agents or property management services to do these tasks for them and deduct those expenses.
From 1 July 2017, the Government will limit plant and equipment (i.e. mechanical fixtures or those which can be easily removed from a property such as dishwashers and ceiling fans) depreciation deductions to outlays actually incurred by investors in residential real estate properties. Investors who purchase plant and equipment for their residential investment property after 9 May 2017 will be able to claim a deduction over the effective life of the asset. However, subsequent owners of the property will not be able to claim deductions for plant and equipment purchased by a previous owner of that property.
Foreign investment restrictions
The Government will introduce a 50 percent cap on foreign investment approvals for new developments and apply an annual charge to foreign owners who leave their properties unoccupied or not available for rent for six months or more each year.
The Government will deny foreign and temporary tax residents access to the capital gains tax (CGT) main residence exemption—however existing properties will be grandfathered until 30 June 2019. The Government will increase the CGT withholding rate for foreign tax residents from 10 per cent to 12.5 per cent and reduce the CGT withholding threshold for foreign tax residents from $2 million to $750 000.
Release of Government land
The Government will establish an open data land registry to provide more detailed information about Commonwealth land to external parties, allowing and encouraging proposals for higher-value land use, including housing development proposals. The Government is also releasing 127 hectares of surplus Defence land in Maribyrnong, which is less than 10 kilometres from the Melbourne CBD and could support up to 6000 new residential dwellings.
Western Sydney housing
Under the Western Sydney City Deal, the Government will offer incentive payments to state and local governments to support planning and zoning reform, accelerate housing supply and deliver affordable housing outcomes in Western Sydney.
The funding will support the trial of incentive payments in the Western Sydney City Deal region, which is facing above average population growth and housing affordability pressures.
Social Impact Investments
The Government will provide $10.2 million over 10 years from 2017–18 to partner with state and territory governments to trial the use of Social Impact Investments. These will fund a small number of innovative programs aimed at improving housing and welfare outcomes for young people at risk of homelessness, including those supported by specialist homelessness services, exiting the out-of-home care system or exiting institutions such as juvenile detention.
Support for the Homes for Homes Initiative
The Government will provide $6 million over four years from 2017–18 toward the national roll out of the Homes for Homes initiative, which encourages property vendors to donate 0.1 per cent of the sale proceeds of their property to fund social and affordable housing projects across Australia.
Security for renters
As part of the Budget, the Government has announced that they want to provide more security for renters by working with State and Territory governments to standardise the use of long-term leases.
For more information, go to the AHURI website <a href="https://www.ahuri.edu.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

What's in the 2017-18 Budget for housing and homelessness? AHURI

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The latest bulletin from Secret Agent charts the winners and losers in the 2017 Federal Budget with first home buyers, downsizers and renters all appearing on the winning list.
Secret Agent said in Victoria the first home super saver scheme may drive demand for property below $600,000.
"First home buyers will be able to use voluntary contributions to their superannuation to save for a house deposit," the report said.
"Withdrawals will be taxed at a lower rate, but the amount you can contribute is capped at $15,000 a year and $30,000 all up. Both members of a couple can take advantage of the scheme. 
"In Victoria, the state government will abolish stamp duty for first time buyers of homes valued up to $600,000, make cuts to stamp duty on homes valued up to $750,000, and also double the First Home Owner Grant to $20,000 in regional Victoria. 
"With the first home super saver scheme, we may see increased demand for property below $600,000. This will push up the prices of houses and townhouses in outer suburbs such as Cranbourne. Inner city suburbs will be less affected, as average prices are typically above $600,000. 
"Developers will also have to compete more aggressively for development sites that allow sub-$600,000 townhouses to be built and sold in these outer suburbs."
Downsizers 
"A person aged 65 or over will be permitted to make a non- concessional contribution to superannuation of up to $300,000 from the proceeds of selling a principal residence owned for the past ten or more years from 1 July 2018," the report said.
"This is good news for real estate agencies operating in areas popular among downsizers, such as the inner city, as there is more incentive for elderly property owners to sell their home. Developers can also benefit from creating stock in these areas."
Resident Investors 
"There will be new tax incentives for investing in affordable housing; specific incentives for Managed Investment Trust (MIT) vehicles, as well as a CGT concession for resident investors who invest in these schemes," Secret Agent said.
Renters 
"Foreign investors are being slugged with an extra charge for properties left vacant —the Budget proposes an annual levy of at least $5,000 and there will be an increase in their application fees. 
"Combined with the state government vacant tax, these additional costs may bring some rent relief and increase stock available for renters. 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
LOSERS 
Developers 
"The Budget outlines that foreign ownership of new developments will be capped at 50 percent. To fund a development project, banks normally require more than 50 percent of stock to be presold. 
"Given that many new developments, especially high-rise apartments, have traditionally been marketed to overseas buyers, limiting foreign ownership to 50 percent will put the feasibility of many projects at risk. This effect is compounded when combined with the recent state tax changes, such as the increase in stamp duty on off-the-plan purchases in Victoria. The number of construction jobs available will also decrease. 
"One silver lining is that, together with the new apartment design standards, we may finally see new stock designed to a higher quality to capture the interest of local buyers, who are now equally important to the success of a development project.
Foreign Investors 
"Foreign tax residents and temporary tax residents will no longer be able to access the CGT main residence exemption. Grandfathering will be available until 30 June 2019 for properties held prior to 7.30 pm (AEST) on Budget night. 
"The loss of CGT exemption could push foreign investors to sell their property as most of these investments are negatively geared already. This may eventually lead to disposal of the investment since it is no longer profitable. 
Investors 
"The Government has introduced two new measures to restrict the availability of deductions with respect to depreciation deduction and travel expenses, expecting to save $800 million over the forward estimates. 
"The restrictions on residential investment property deductions will reduce incentives for buyers to make new investments. The implications are more severe for high income earners, who can no longer claim as many deductions on tax. As there will be less demand for depreciation reports, qualified quantity surveyors may also be affected. 
Banks 
"The introduction of a major bank levy from 1 July 2017 could increase cost of funding for larger banks, which may seek to be compensated by increasing mortgage interest rates. "
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
For more information, <a href="https://secretagent.com.au/">click here</a>.
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

2017 Budget winners and losers: Secret Agent

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Under pressure to tackle deepening housing affordability problems, Treasurer Scott Morrison has included various housing policy measures in his budget, some relating to Australia’s small sector of social and affordable housing.
One headline-grabber is the creation of a new entity, the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (NHFIC). This will source private funds for on-lending to affordable housing providers to finance rental housing development. However, the bigger issue for the sector remains federal and state funding.
This public funding is the money that, along with tenants’ rents, co-funds state and territory housing and homelessness services. Here too Morrison is proposing reform, particularly to the primary federal-state funding arrangement for social and affordable housing, the National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA).
A couple of months ago we suggested the NAHA needed a reboot. Recognising the seriously run-down state of the system, we argued for an increase in funding from its present starvation level. Morrison now proposes a new federal-state funding agreement, the National Housing and Homelessness Agreement (NHHA).
The level of federal funding will be the same as under the old NAHA. But the Commonwealth will press states and territories for action in defined “priority areas”. In effect, this looks like a return to a Canberra-led reform agenda for social and affordable housing unseen since the early Rudd government.
Setting aggregate supply targets
In what appears a significant passage, the budget papers reveal the government’s “priority areas” for the NHHA. We’ll consider these in turn, and then the recurring issue of inadequate funding.
Lack of transparency on the costs incurred by state and territory housing authorities in operating their social housing portfolios has been a particular problem under the NAHA. This is an area where federal engagement is welcome.
All levels of government should be pressed to quantify the level and type of need for housing in the community. And they should be made to set clear “new supply” targets for meeting that need.
That said, the federal government should stop pretending to be shocked at the lack of new social housing delivered by those authorities under the NAHA. The shortfall in NAHA funding has been obvious for years. It simply is too low to bridge the gap between the rents low-income public housing tenants can afford to pay and the costs of properly maintaining the system, let alone growing it to keep pace with rising need.
Residential land development
The stress laid on this issue within the budget policy statement reflects the federal government’s stated concern about “the supply side” of the housing affordability problem. It has framed state government planning controls as an impediment to new housing development.
However, merely loosening requirements and offering existing land owners the prospect of greater development does not ensure it will actually happen.
To ensure land owners don’t just sit on development opportunities speculatively, the federal government should use its NHHA leverage. This could include pushing the states and territories to make greater use of land tax, which would spur development and bring under-utilised land and housing to market.
Inclusionary zoning
Inclusionary zoning is a specific type of planning mechanism. It requires housing developments (above a certain size) to include some proportion of dedicated affordable housing. Ideally, this should be rental housing preserved as “affordable” in perpetuity.
Inclusionary zoning is long established in other countries and has long been demanded by housing advocates in Australia. It is now the subject of increasing interest from planning authorities – for example, the Greater Sydney Commission.
The co-financing arrangements for the NHFIC could incorporate active use of land-use planning powers for inclusionary zoning. Development sites – or developer levy proceeds – could be part of state and territory contributions to funding affordable housing development.
A commitment to build into the NHHA incentives for stepped-up use of inclusionary zoning by state governments is, therefore, very welcome.
However, the budget papers indicate that state compliance with this NHHA expectation might involve not only housing dedicated to affordable rental housing, but also “dedicated first home buyer stock”. This seems to raise the prospect of developers meeting inclusionary zoning requirements simply by reserving some newly built units for first home buyers rather than investors.
The best way to enhance first home buyer prospects vis a vis investor landlords would be to level the playing field by winding back investor negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions, not through this kind of tinkering. And to cast such “FHB reservation” initiatives as in any way equivalent to inclusionary zoning for affordable rental housing would be a highly retrograde step.
Renewing affordable housing stock
An interesting inclusion in the proposed terms of the NHHA is a clause about renewing affordable housing stock.
First, it appears positive in acknowledging the need for a public housing overhaul and indicating a new level of federal government interest in making this happen.
At a minimum, states and territories should be required to undertake a comprehensive audit of their existing portfolios. The level of outstanding disrepair has to be costed. They also should identify where renewal can best take place, balancing need for expanded and upgraded housing with sensitive treatment of existing communities.
Second, it indicates federal backing for further transfers of public housing as a growth path for the affordable housing industry. However, as our recent research for AHURI shows, this is feasible only if the operating cost gap is funded.
Past community housing growth through transfers, particularly following the 2009 housing ministers’ commitment to expand community housing to 35% of all social housing, involved an understanding that Commonwealth Rent Assistance, paid through Centrelink to transferred tenants, would help cover that gap.
Without additional funding in the NHHA, a new phase of growth through transfers requires a recommitment by governments to use rent assistance as an effective operational subsidy to community housing providers. A new target and timeframe to replace the 35 percent benchmark also need to be considered.
Homelessness services
Previously the subject of a separate funding agreement (the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness), homelessness services have struggled for years in the face of that agreement’s pending expiry and short-term extensions.
The NHHA will fund homelessness services on an ongoing basis, which the sector has welcomed.
Funding shortfall remains
As we’ve indicated throughout, the objectives of the NHHA – and of the social and affordable housing system generally – will continue to run up against the reality that decent housing of this kind costs more than low-income households can afford to pay.
This applies especially to people living on the miserable level of benefits such as Newstart. A subsidy is required, both to build up the stock and to keep it in good order.
Clearer targets, more transparent cost accounting, and innovations like NHFIC finance won’t bridge the gap. On the contrary, to successfully use those initiatives to build more stock, both state and territory housing authorities and non-government affordable housing providers need a larger subsidy than present funding provides.
The budget has indexed NHHA funding to wages. It would be nice to think that land and housing prices will increase only in line with wages.
In reality, properly funding the growth and maintenance of our social and affordable housing stock will require more than what the federal government is offering.
Chris Martin is research fellow, Housing Policy and Practice, UNSW and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/chris-martin-203935" target="_blank">here</a>.
Hal Pawson is associate director - City Futures - Urban Policy and Strategy, City Futures Research Centre, Housing Policy and Practice, UNSW and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/hal-pawson-147969" target="_blank">here</a>.
Both are authors for The Conversation.
</body></html>

Budget 2017 charts new social and affordable housing agenda

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
An estimated 300,000 vacant dwellings across Australia will be unaffected by the Budget’s new ‘ghost house’ tax on foreign investors which will do nothing to increase housing affordability.
QUT property economist Dr Andrea Blake said Australia’s empty housing stock was an overlooked resource in an era of high demand for affordable housing.
Some inner city apartment developments have more foreign investors (20 percent) than domestic owner occupiers (19 percent).
While I welcome a vacant house levy being applied to foreign investors as a mechanism to support other affordable housing initiatives, this new tax will do nothing to help the current issues.
This levy will affect only applications for foreign investment made after 7.30pm on 9 May 2017 rather than the more than quarter of a million dwellings we have going empty.
The $5k per annum tax is unlikely to deter an overseas investor. The only thing it could do is put more money into the pot for other housing initiatives.
Another issue could be determining that an apartment is vacant and ensuring compliance.
“Foreign investment in inner and near city markets has driven supply and pushed real estate prices up while much-needed rental and housing stock from the market goes empty when we have a severe affordable housing shortage.”
Dr Blake said the impact of foreign investment on property values in the inner Brisbane apartment markets had caused much debate.
 “In markets such as Hamilton and West End we have seen a price drop of up to 30 per cent on apartments bought in 2011," she said.
This is because strong foreign investment has created a two-tier market - prices for off-the-plan sales are undoubtedly linked to foreign investment and would not be sustainable at the volume or prices for the domestic market alone.
Consequently the impact has been felt by the second tier of the two-tier market - domestic buyers.
The reasons foreign investors buy in Australia are varied. For some purchasers it is part of a future lifestyle plan and so the apartments are left unoccupied, and, in many cases, not even furnished.
“These apartments still deteriorate and bring down the value of the other apartments in the complex, causing owner occupiers and those who do rent out their properties some distress.”
Andrea Blake is senior lecturer at Queensland University of Technology [QUT] and can be contacted <a href="https://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/blakea/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

'Ghost house' tax won't solve housing affordability: Andrea Blake

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/76791/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">GUEST OBSERVER
The budget acknowledges the crisis of affordability for first home buyers, but fails to do enough about demand pressures on prices to put home ownership back within their reach.
In its 2017 budget, the federal government repeatedly stated its preference for a “scalpel” rather than a “chainsaw” or “sledgehammer” approach to demand management in the housing market.
The number of housing measures in the budget are more wide-ranging than in previous budgets of recent times. Policy levers on both the supply and demand side have been incorporated within a raft of housing measures. The government claims this is a “comprehensive package that can make a difference”.
However, do the demand measures go far enough to make much-needed inroads into the housing affordability crisis now facing an entire generation of would-be first home buyers? Or is the so-called scalpel too blunt to make a meaningful difference for them?
<h2>First Home Super Savers Scheme</h2>
The budget’s key housing measure for helping young people gain a foothold on the home-ownership ladder is to allow first home buyers to use up to A$30,000 of voluntary superannuation contributions for a deposit on their first home.
Clearly, the scheme will attract the tax advantages of superannuation. Therefore, in principle, it will help first home savers accelerate their savings to buy a home, thus bridging the deposit gap, while protecting superannuation savings accumulated through compulsory employer contributions.
However, at least two key questions are pertinent.
The first relates to how many first home buyers will likely be well positioned to make voluntary contributions to their super saving account. There appears to be a general reluctance among Australians to make voluntary contributions.
Existing research has found household budget constraints are a major barrier that make it unaffordable for many to make voluntary superannuation contributions. Poor financial literacy and lack of knowledge of the superannuation system are other factors.
The second key question relates to the scheme’s impact on property prices. The scheme does not aim to ease demand pressures in the housing market. It is likely that high house prices will not be curbed, so the prospects of home ownership will continue to fade for many first home buyers.
Existing demand-side levers, including the First Home Owners Grant and stamp duty concessions for first home buyers, have not succeeded in improving the affordability of houses for most young people. Hence, it is difficult to see how an additional demand lever such as the First Home Super Savers scheme is going to have a substantial impact on affordability.
This is not to say that the budget has completely ignored the need to temper demand tensions in the property market.
Demand pressures can be eased via measures that target two other types of property owners – older home owners and property investors. The budget does contain measures that target both groups. Yet again, the question remains as to whether the levers are long enough to produce meaningful impacts.
<h2>Targeting older owners and property investors</h2>
Older downsizers aged over 65 years will be allowed to channel up to $300,000 from the sale proceeds of the family home into their super fund.
Many older home owners are living in larger dwellings than they need after their children leave home. Helping elderly home owners – sometimes coined “last home buyers” – to downsize into smaller dwellings can free up larger homes for first home buyers in earlier stages of life who are forming families.
However, the impediments to downsizing are many. These include financial barriers but also non-financial barriers. Importantly, most elderly home owners have strong emotional attachments to their family home and local community.
However, a lack of appropriate and affordable dwellings in neighbourhoods where older owners would like to stay also poses barriers to downsizing. For downsizing reforms to be effective, financial incentives will need to be accompanied by supply-side solutions that broaden the diversity of the housing stock so older home owners’ housing preferences and needs can be met.
The government has not made any significant changes to tighten negative gearing or capital gains tax concessions to reduce competition from property investors. Concern has focused on the potential contraction of private rental housing supply should investors withdraw en masse from the private rental market. However, a longer-term perspective would take into account second-round effects.
As investors sell off their rental properties, more properties will become available in the market to meet demand from first home buyers. This will not only have the impact of easing tensions in the rental market as more renters become home buyers, but it will also encourage subsequent second property investment as young career-builders seek to accumulate more wealth in their property portfolios after securing their first home.
Such second- and third-round effects need to be incorporated more into policy thinking so that policy design rests on not just short-term, but medium-to-long-term, considerations.
<h2>Is the scalpel sharp enough?</h2>
The budget contains myriad demand and supply levers that directly or indirectly aim to assist young people with their first home purchase. It represents an overdue but welcome acknowledgement on the government’s part that much needs to be done to improve home-ownership prospects for first home buyers.
A package of measures that seeks to influence both supply and demand simultaneously in the housing market is, in principle, a sensible approach to an entrenched policy concern such as housing affordability. However, in practice, policy design matters.
In the case of the 2017 budget, it would appear that the scalpel will need a whole lot more sharpening if it is to make an effective incision into the housing affordability crisis that’s plaguing an entire generation of aspiring home owners.
Rachel Ong is deputy director of the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre, Curtin University and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/rachel-ong-113482" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Budget needs a sharper policy scalpel to help first home buyers: Rachel Ong

<html><body>
The federal government’s budget announcements to make housing affordable has met with mixed reactions, with top accounting and audit firm KPMG saying it won’t do much to cool the hot property market.
KPMG chief economist Brendan Rynne said the budget’s housing affordability moves were “fairly modest and unlikely to have a major impact”. 
“The measures aimed at boosting supply by encouraging the development of new dwellings and better use of existing stock might help the overheated Sydney and Melbourne markets a little,” said Rynne.
Even loan comparison website Mortgage Choice said the measures would not address the affordability crisis.
Mortgage Choice chief executive officer John Flavell said while the government has sought to address the issue of housing affordability, “their measures are likely to have no material impact on the problem”.
He even went further, saying the adjustment to the Medicare Levy “will only serve to increase the cost of living for many Australians, further exacerbating the issues we already face in this area”.
However, the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA) had a different take, citing increased complexity to the superannuation system following the announcement that a person over the age of 65 will be able to make a non-concessional contribution to superannuation of up to $300,000 from the proceeds of selling their home from 1 July 2018.
FPA CEO Dante De Gori said it would only add a layer of complexity to the superannuation system.
“The aim of this incentive is to encourage the baby boomer generation to sell, freeing up larger houses for younger families upgrading into more suitable homes. We support this initiative, however these changes add to the complexity of the superannuation system and are only tinkering with the housing affordability problem,” De Gore said.
First home buyers will be able to withdraw voluntary contributions to superannuation made from 1 July 2017, along with associated deemed earnings, for a first home deposit.
Under the measure, up to $15,000 per year and $30,000 in total can be contributed, within existing caps. Concessional contributions and earnings that are withdrawn will be taxed at marginal rates less a 30 per cent offset. Both members of a couple can take advantage of this measure to buy their first home together.
While the FPA supports initiatives to make housing more affordable, the association said accessing super was not the solution to the housing affordability issue, and is not in the national interest.
KPMG’s Rynne added that the First Home Super Saver Scheme will also help new buyers to compete against investors, but overall the Budget “is just a first step”. “More policy initiatives will be needed to tackle this complex problem, with greater co-ordination between all tiers of government and the private sector.” 
The SMSF Association similarly supported the downsizing and first-home buyer announcements, according to a post on the Professional Planner.
On downsizing, SMSFA CEO John Maroney said: “This means people can make a significant top-up contribution to their super funds, allowing them to fund a dignified and secure retirement. While the measure may not be a significant trigger to encourage downsizing, we welcome the ability for older Australians to top up their superannuation where downsizing their home provides them with funds to do so.”
On the first-home buyer scheme, Maroney said it was an “excellent opportunity to engage younger fund members in their superannuation.” 
Emma Power, author for The Conversation, was direct in her comments, saying housing will remain unaffordable, insecure and out of reach for the majority of Australian renters.
“There are no significant funding increases to social housing and homelessness services. There is no increase in rent assistance to help low-income renters in the private rental market,” she wrote.
“Capital gains tax and negative gearing settings remain largely untouched, and the proposed bond aggregator will support expansion of housing aimed at very specific groups.” 
</body></html>

prateek24-ezbwHMbNAk

Budget 2017's housing affordability plans likely won't have major impact: KPMG

<html><body>
The 2017 Budget may make downsizers delay the sale of the family home - and not just because the new scheme doesn't start until July 2018.
Individuals who are already 65 and thinking of selling their home have been urged to consider putting off a sale at least until the legislation has been approved so they don't miss out on an opportunity to top up their super accounts, tax advisers said. 
Under the proposal, retirees will each be able to inject up to $300,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the family home into super, three times the new annual limit for post-tax contributions.
They will be able to make the contribution even if they have more than $1.6 million in super savings with any amount over $1.6 million needing to be placed in an accumulation rather than a pension account.
While financial advisers have expressed doubt the scheme would be widely used by retirees looking to downsize, there is another likely delay within the mix.
Australians in their late 50s or early 60s could also be expected to delay the sale of the family home if they are confident of becoming self-funded retirees.
Individuals in their late 50 and 60s might also decide to delay a sale of the family home until they turn 65, if they have other assets that they would like to get into super in the interim.
Of course any net proceeds from the sale of the family home will still be included in the assets test for the age pension, which Mark Beveridge, director of Superfund Partners, told The Australian Financial   Review was a major barrier for many retirees wanting to move to a smaller residence.
Following the changes to the pension rules that came in effect in January, for every additional $100,000 of assessable assets, an age pensioner stands to lose $7800 a year of CentreLink income.
Yesterday Property Observer reported on how the budget encourages older residents to downsize.
Last month Property Observer reported on how downsizing will be an important topic in the Budget.
</body></html>

Federal Budget

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Federal Budget

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News