Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

Joel Robinson

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more international and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party

Federal Budget

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
<div id="post-body-6685871502057582012" class="post-body entry-content">
<div>The Coalition, have been crushed in the Victorian elections at the hands of Labor.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Voting was so one-sided it was effectively all over by 7pm.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Not too long now until the Federal election, and it all looks pretty gloomy for Prime Minister Morrison.</div>
<div>
 Some interesting news that quietly slipped out on Friday is that the government's financials are in enormously good nick when compared to the Budget profile. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The year-to-date cash balance showed a deficit nearly $9 billion ahead of the Budget profile (with the year-to-date deficit of $15 billion miles ahead of the $24 profile deficit).</div>
 <div class="separator"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WO4oj3X5o9M/W_m_w6YrtmI/AAAAAAAAtCk/o39wSjwGIr0XdKBW8UmG97Gd04s3_cOtACLcBGAs/s1600/IMG_9793.PNG"><img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WO4oj3X5o9M/W_m_w6YrtmI/AAAAAAAAtCk/o39wSjwGIr0XdKBW8UmG97Gd04s3_cOtACLcBGAs/s640/IMG_9793.PNG" width="640" height="556" data-original-height="1165" data-original-width="1338"></a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Source: Commonwealth Government</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This is mainly thanks to a sharp fall in unemployment and stronger commodity prices, leading to a tremendous surge in tax receipts, combined with lower payments. </div>
<div> </div>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3NCvarkC4RU/W_m_w8UzUmI/AAAAAAAAtCo/C6xsiM1KABgk0kOYgMu4lUq_leqXKiAswCLcBGAs/s1600/IMG_9794.PNG"><img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3NCvarkC4RU/W_m_w8UzUmI/AAAAAAAAtCo/C6xsiM1KABgk0kOYgMu4lUq_leqXKiAswCLcBGAs/s640/IMG_9794.PNG" width="640" height="408" data-original-height="921" data-original-width="1441"></a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>The latest labour force figure<a href="http://petewargent.blogspot.com/2018/11/blessed-relief" target="_blank">s</a> revealed annual employment growth surging back up to 2½ per cent, or +308,100, with an unemployment rate at a six-year low of 5 per cent. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The Budget has been in deficit for more than a decade, but on these numbers a surplus might be withing striking distance as soon as next month when the mid-year Budget update is normally scheduled. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The electorate may not like them much - an understatement - but at least this is a strong result for the Coalition's management of the Budget. </div>
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Here comes the surplus: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
Overall the Budget will boost confidence in the building and construction industry, according to Denita Wawn, CEO of Master Builders Australia. 
“The Government’s infrastructure Budget will play a key role in setting the nation up for future prosperity.
The additional $24 billion investment in infrastructure across the country will boost the productivity and liveability of our cities,” she said. 
“Small businesses will benefit from the extension of the $20,000 immediate tax write-off scheme until 2019. There are more SMEs in buiding and construction than any other industry and this great news for mum and dad building business and tradies,” Denita Wawn said. 
“The uncorporated small business tax discount rate will increase from 5 per cent to 8 per cent allowing SME builders to write-off their assets faster,” Denita Wawn said.
But lower house prices could hit the residential construction boom harder than expected, according to the Federal Government's Treasury department.
<div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
Dwelling investment is forecast to rise slightly by 1.5 per cent next year before slowing further and remaining "largely flat" in 2019-20, Treasury estimates.
Residential construction is easing after reaching a peak of near 6 per cent of gross domestic product in the financial year ended June 2017.
Approvals are likely to keep dwelling investment "elevated by historical standards", according to Treasury, especially in New South Wales and Victoria.
</div>
<div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
Treasury also noted a "reasonable pipeline of work" in commercial buildings, especially for offices in Victoria and New South Wales.
The 2018 Budget had no measures that specifically address housing supply and affordability, according to the Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA).
“Whereas housing affordability was a centre piece of the 2017 Budget there was nothing in this year’s Budget that directly addressed this,” REIA President Malcolm Gunning said.
“It was however pleasing to see that the Government recognises the important role that the current taxation arrangements for negative gearing and Capital Gains Tax play in increasing supply, keeping rents affordable and easing the burden on social housing by leaving these unchanged,” he said. 
Mr Gunning said the Budget’s approach recognises the state of the property market and the impact that APRA’s measures have had in cooling the marking particularly in Melbourne and Sydney and the Treasurer has seen no reason to make any further adjustments. 
“A boost to infrastructure spending, modest improvements in housing income for lower income earners, continued tax write offs for small to medium business and growth in employment can be expected to be mildly expansionary, particularly for regional economies.
“The good news for home buyers is that the Budget is not expected to put pressure on interest rates as inflation is expected to remain within the RBA’s target zone.
“This expected interest rate stability comes at a time when housing prices in some of our major cities are showing signs of easing leading to improved affordability for first home buyers,” Mr Gunning.
 
</div>
 
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Residential housing construction could moderate due to falling prices: Treasury

<html><body>
Despite a chronic shortage of affordable housing, Australian governments have been slow to experiment or support affordable housing provisions through the planning and development process.
It will be interesting to see whether next month's Federal Budget from Scott Morrison advances the complex issue, and then whether further initiatives come from the State Budget.
To date NSW's mostly voluntary planning incentives have failed to deliver worthwhile numbers of affordable homes.
A recent study calculated the main affordable housing scheme had yielded only 2,000 affordable Sydney rental dwellings since 2009.
This is the equivalent to about one per cent of the city’s total supply.
<div>The scheme typically offers a density bonus to NSW developers with increased floorspace to build in return for affordable rental housing that must be rented to eligible households at 20 percent market discount for 10 years.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Some 19 of proposals were by private sector developers, while six were by Community Housing Providers (CHPs) or not-for-profit organisations.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The policy lead in this important area has been South Australia where around 17 per cent of total dwelling approvals within major new residential development areas have been dedicated affordable homes. </div>
<div title="Page 40">
<div>
<div>
The NSW approach has focused on affordable rental housing, while most dwellings secured through the South Australian model are offered for sale to eligible moderate income earners. 
We clearly need better policy to improve the outcome.
When compared to international practice, even the South Australian schemes is modest, according to a recent study by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
</div>
</div>
</div>
In England and Scotland, the general expectation is for 20 percent to 40 per cent of new housing developments to be affordable housing. 
Australia’s first pilot schemes emerged in the mid-1990s through the Federal Government’s Building Better Cities program which funded projects in Pyrmont and Ultimo.
The approach was extended to the major urban renewal precinct surrounding Green Square.
However, the NSW Government has been reluctant to allow local councils to impose mandatory requirements for affordable housing through the planning process.
At the Federal level, the primary focus has been seeking to address affordability through increasing overall land supply.
Indeed the the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) working party on housing supply and affordability expressed the view in 2012 that affordable inclusionary zoning would be counter-productive to overall supply efforts.
<div title="Page 17">
Since affordable housing requirements reduce the value of undeveloped land, incentives to developers will be needed should significant affordable housing outcomes are to be delivered.
<div class="page" title="Page 16">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
It is also important governments, rather than seeking the highest and best use land value in sales of government land, adopt a new approach with the price reflecting the housing needs that the development seeks to address.
Given that affordable housing is a 30-year plus investment, it requires our governments that think shorter to embrace vision.
This article was first published in the Daily Telegraph.
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Affordable housing scheme not yielding results

<html><body>
<h1>
Saul Eslake, University of Tasmania
</h1>
The 2017-18 <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2017-18/content/myefo/html/" target="_blank">Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO)</a> is another reminder - if one is needed - that the relationship between the budget and the economy runs in both directions. While we mostly ask the question, “how will the budget affect the economy?”, this update shows the economy can also have (and has often had) a significant impact on the the budget.
The highlights of this year’s MYEFO, as far as the government is concerned, are the A$9.3 billion improvement in the underlying cash balance over the four years to 2020-21 (compared with what had been forecast in the May budget), and the consequential A$11 billion reduction in the forecast peak in net debt (from A$366 billion to A$355 billion) in that year.
These improvements are the result of revisions to economic assumptions and other so-called “parameter variations” since the budget, which in total have improved the four-year bottom line by more than A$11 billion. The biggest of these came from reductions in payments to people with disabilities, students, single parents and age pensioners (totalling A$4.6 billion over four years) due to lower-than-expected recipient numbers.
<h2>Personal income tax cuts seem possible</h2>
There is no additional detail in MYEFO regarding the government’s <a href="https://theconversation.com/morrison-talks-down-personal-income-tax-cuts-56308" target="_blank">foreshadowed personal income tax cuts</a> ahead of the next election. But if the forecast surplus for 2020-21 of A$10.2 billion is credible, then there’s arguably some scope for the government to fund personal income tax cuts beginning in that year.
Although the cost of more significant tax cuts would escalate substantially over the medium term, there is actually more scope for these cuts than generally realised (provided the government succeeds in keeping growth in spending under control).
That’s because the projected moderate surpluses, averaging about 0.5% of GDP out to 2027-28, incorporate an arbitrary assumption that taxation revenue will be capped at 23.9% of GDP. If that assumption wasn’t made, the projected surpluses would rise to 1.6% of GDP by 2027-28.
In dollar terms that would imply a surplus of around A$55 billion, compared with one of around A$15 billion if the surplus were only 0.5% of GDP. Over the period 2021-22 to 2027-28, relaxing the assumption that tax revenues are capped at 23.9% of GDP results in almost A$90 billion of additional budget surpluses. This is over and above what is projected with that “tax cap” in place.
Presumably, some of those “additional surpluses” are absorbed, in the government’s internal figuring, by the promised phased reduction in the company tax rate for businesses turning over more than A$50 million per annum by 2025-26 - which according to the last publicly available estimate would reduce revenues by some A$65 billion over ten years.
However, that would still leave a considerable amount “left over” to pay for personal income tax cuts, and allow the government to continue to project surpluses of around 0.5% of GDP out to the second half of the next decade.
That’s assuming, of course, that we are able to clock up 36 years of uninterrupted economic growth, and that all the other projections come to pass, including for a return to more “normal” rates of wages growth.
<h2>Economic indicators in MYEFO</h2>
Treasury has revised downwards its forecast for economic growth in the current financial year, from 2.75% to 2.5%. Partly offsetting this is stronger growth in public spending, which is now forecast to rise by 4% in real terms in 2017-18, up from 2.5% at the time of the May budget.
This reflects faster growth in both government spending (on the NDIS) and investment (NBN and state government infrastructure investment). The forecast for business investment has also been upgraded, from flat at budget time to growth of 2%, the result of both stronger growth in non-mining business investment and a smaller decline in mining investment.
This is largely the result of a downward revision to the forecast for growth in household consumption spending which has been lowered from 2.75% to 2.25%: and this carries over into a 0.25 percentage point reduction in the forecast for 2018-19, to 2.75%. Even these require a further decline in the household saving rate.
The forecast for dwelling investment spending has turned around from 1.5% growth to a decline of 1.5%, with the “softening in dwelling investment occuring slightly earlier than expected”.
Longer term, the government is still anticipating that economic growth will average 3% per annum from 2018-19 through 2023-24, by which time all the “spare capacity” in the labour market will have been absorbed. That is, the unemployment rate will be down to 5% and underemployment (workers not being able to get enough hours at work) returned to more normal levels.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/89291/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">The longer-term projections also assume that wages growth accelerates significantly from 2019-20. This represents the greatest risk to the goverment’s promise of a return to surplus by 2020-21.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/saul-eslake-665" target="_blank">Saul Eslake</a>, Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow, <a href="http://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-tasmania-888" target="_blank">University of Tasmania</a>
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/government-budget-update-saved-by-higher-than-expected-economic-figures-89291" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

Government budget update saved by higher than expected economic figures

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
We need more justification around the NSW Government’s solution for housing affordability after it revealed no concessions would be afforded to buyers making property purchases over $800,000.
The measures, taken to cabinet last week, proposed stamp duty would be abolished on all homes up to $650,000 and relief to buyers of homes up to $800,000.
My offices are already experiencing vendors around both the $650,000 and $800,000 price points asking agents to list their homes for slightly more, given that first home buyers will soon have more to spend. 
When first home buyer grants were introduced a few years ago, as a group, we saw the same thing. The market needs to find its natural level, as otherwise these measures could prove counter-productive and possibly even lead to an artificial increase in prices.
The new measures certainly look like a step in the right direction, but we need to stop the applause and critique the performance. It is a complex matter, as the State Government needs to protect the cash cow that is stamp duty, but also make an attempt at solving the affordability crisis.
If the intention is to alleviate affordability woes amongst first home buyers, how did it reach the figure of $650,000? This tells me the measure was designed to drive more first home buyers into apartments.
With far fewer investors as a result of the macro-prudential measures and tens of thousands of new apartments in the pipeline, who is going to buy them otherwise?
Sydney’s median dwelling price is $872,300 – two thirds the figure proposed for abolishing stamp duty, and according to CoreLogic, 20 percent of Sydney Metro dwellings sold at a price of $650,000 or less over the past 12 months were houses.
This rises to 34.4 percent when looking at dwellings that sold for a price of $800,000 or less.
Last year, the apartment development boom raised concerns about an apartment oversupply in Sydney. The stamp duty changes are designed to drive more first home buyers into apartments. 
First home buyers currently represent about four to five percent of the market. We need to get this to double digits and this measure might not do that.
When you really look at it against the market, less than 10 percent of Sydney’s suburbs would have homes with a median price below $650,000.
If the Government was serious about alleviating barriers, it would completely abolish stamp duty for first home buyers or at the very least make the first $650,000 exempt, irrespective of the purchase price, and not cap it at a price that forces people into apartments to reverse engineer the cycle. 
In addition to believing first home buyers be exempt from paying stamp duty, they should have to reside in the property to be eligible. 
However you spin it, rentvestors are still investors, and we have been overly advocating rentvesting as a wealth strategy, which is taking its toll on the market.
The base of the affordability iceberg is that there have been too many investors in the market and unless we’re careful, these measures could inadvertently make things worse. It is further exacerbating the problem which APRA has tried so hard to alleviate. 
If the Government is not open to completely abolishing stamp duty for first home buyers on all properties, concessions should at least be tracked against median house prices annually. 
House prices are relative against the cost of living – someone in the Eastern suburbs might pay more for property compared to someone in Western Sydney, but they are usually paying more for everything – not just property. Therein lies the problem – the affordability crisis is a Sydney issue, not necessarily a State issue. 
Regional NSW first home buyers are set to benefit the most from this, but what about buyers in Sydney’s Inner West, Lower North Shore, Eastern Suburbs and the South?
If you are looking to buy in these areas and hoping to benefit from the abolishment of stamp duty for properties up to $650,000, you can either uproot your life, don’t buy at all, or buy a garage.
DOUGLAS DRISCOLL is CEO of real estate agency <a href="https://www.starrpartners.com.au/" target="_blank">Starr Partners</a>.
</body></html>

Budget failing many buyers: Douglas Driscoll

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
For active investors, the Budget comes with positive changes such as in super and home ownership but many are negative such as targeted measures against the banks and sharp cutbacks on property tax breaks. Everyone will be affected by the recently delivered Budget and here are some key features that affect properties:
The government has constantly been pressured to scrap borrowing in super but it has not reversed its position and SMSF operators can still borrow. However, there is a new super cap of $1.6 million and borrowed funds will be computed based on the $1.6 million cap.
Starting 1st July 2017, first-home buyers may salary sacrifice up to $15,000 or a total of $30,000 a year into their superannuation account at a concessional tax rate. They will be allowed to withdraw the cash to use as a deposit on their first home. This measure allows super to be accessed early.
Those who will sell a property investment will be subject to CGT at a marginal tax rate but those who hold a property for more than a year will get a discount of 50 percent on their CGT tax assessment. The negative gearing tax rate remained the same and investors can claim expenses and interest for the cost of an investment property against their tax bill. One advantage of higher interest rates among commercial banks is that the amount that can be deducted in negative gearing increases.
Downsizers may be able to make post-tax contribution to superannuation of up to $300,000 from the proceeds of selling their home, even if they exceed the $1.6 million cap. Investors will no longer be able to claim tax deductions for travel expenses related to inspection, maintenance or rent collection of a property. Many investors have properties a long distance away from their home and they incur travel expenses when they visit their investments.
This change may upset many investors because an outright ban on claims for travel expenses is an absolute loss. It used to have no limit and the allowance may have been abused because the government expects to collect $540 million from the scrapped tax allowance starting 1st of July.
Depreciation deductions may only be claimed on personally purchased items for an investment property, excluding plant and equipment which was included with the purchase. These measures will not please many investors but the truth is, it is to their advantage that negative gearing remained untouched because any changes related to this could have been more dramatic. Investors are relieved that the changes have not gone further as well.
Lastly, foreign property investors will lose the CGT exemption on the sale of their main residence and are now required to report all sales over $750,000 or have a withholding tax applied upon sale. There will also be a new annual levy of at least $5,000 for properties left vacant for more than six months a year.
PS.
Disallowing deductions for travel expenses and depreciating assets not directly bought by the investor may be the thin edge of the wedge and increasing deductions for work-related expenses can be quite worrisome. This change is controversial and some people suggest that if it is a step towards a slow-down of deductions for Australian taxpayers, debate has to begin now.
Ed Chan is the founding partner of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor</a>.
</body></html>

Federal Budget 2017 features that affect Australia's real estate: Ed Chan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Two weeks following the budget, the topic of housing affordability is still not waning.
Australia and the world united last week to slam young real estate mogul, Tim Gurner, who claimed young Australians can’t afford to buy property because they are spending “$40 a day on smashed avocados” and “not working”. The story spread like wildfire nationally as well as globally with media outlets including TIME Magazine, Washington Post, and The LA Times picking up the story.
While sensationalised, the crux of the problem has still not been addressed.  
Recent research conducted by iBuildNew which surveyed Australian FHBs to examine how much an affordable house is considered to cost, what the biggest barriers to entry are, where and what housing alternatives were being considered, and other useful statistics and insights. The full findings can be found in the Appendix below.
About the super saver scheme
The Government will help Australians boost their savings for their first home by allowing them to build a deposit inside superannuation. These contributions, which are taxed at 15 per cent, along with deemed earnings, can be withdrawn for a deposit from 1 July, 2018.
While the 'First Home Super Savers Scheme' will provide some benefit to Australian FHBs, it needs to still be kept in perspective in terms of popularity among its target audience:
As an incentive to help FHB's save I really like the scheme, but am skeptical as to how effective this will be in terms of how many people will take this up.  
I suspect FHB's will not see the incentive as strong enough and have concerns their savings will be locked away until retirement if they can't ultimately save enough, property prices keep rising, or their personal circumstances change, which are all legitimate concerns. 
In theory however, if a FHB is on $80,000 pa and elects to salary sacrifice $1,000 per month into super for a deposit, within 2.5 years they will save the $30,000. Depending on their state, they should be eligible for the FHB grant of $10,000-$15,000 (let's say $15,000), so they then have $45,000 in total savings. An average off-the-plan house and land package across Australia is $440,000 and if you assume you need 20% of the total amount (worst case) to secure a loan from the bank, the FHB still needs to save or access another $43,000.  
This is in no way a slam dunk but may be possible if they already have some sort of additional savings or can access equity in their parent’s home, for example. However, with only just over 20 percent of FHB’s considering new home builds with most preferring established properties at much higher starting prices, this savings challenge is far more acute for most. Unfortunately, the numbers don’t lie, and while this initiative may create some savings discipline from the few that take it up, most FHB’s dream of owning their own home will still be out of reach.
Relevant statistics (per iBuildNew recent survey findings): 76 per cent of first home buyers can’t get into the property market because they can’t save the deposit or secure a loan.
Only 22 percent of FHBs are considering a new home build as their entry option to the property market, with 60 per cent preferring to buy established despite the significant price differential between the two options.
About retirees downsizing super exemptions 
In a bid to release more property to the market and help tackle housing affordability for Aussie first home buyers, Australians over 65 years of age will be able to contribute an additional $300,000 from the sale of their main residence (if they have owned it for 10 years) into their superfund at non-concessional rates.
Starting from July next year, this scheme was designed to encourage retirees to actively consider downsizing in an attempt to free up larger homes for younger families and FHBs. Downsizing to free up capital makes a lot of sense for the older generation as they often own their own home with significant equity, but may not have much super to live off.
I am is very skeptical about this initiative. He thinks this won't help first home buyers at all and is simply a strategy from the government to relieve pressure on pension entitlements:
Firstly retirees that have been in their home for more than 10 years generally live in homes that cost $1,000,000 or more, so creating new supply in this high-cost range won't help first home buyers at all. Any impact is likely to be at the upper end of the housing market, not in the sub $450,000 where most FHB’s consider affordable. This initiative in the short term actually has a negative impact on supply as some retirees that would have otherwise downsized in the next 6-12 months will now be holding off selling their house until this initiative takes effect in July 2018.
Secondly, and most importantly, we see this as being a strategy from the government to relieve pressure on pension entitlements. At the end of the day the country has an issue on how to fund pensions entitlements, so this would take some pressure off if retirees took it up. However, accountants will advise their clients to think very carefully about this as the principal place of residency is excluded from the net asset means test calculations when it comes to pension eligibility.
Many simply don’t want to leave what they know, but many won’t want to forgo the state pension in lieu of their super pension, so you really have to question what impact this will have on housing supply. Branding the retiree downsizing scheme as a housing affordability measure I find very strange, at least for FHB’s.
Relevant statistic (per iBuildNew recent survey findings): 63 pe cent of first home buyers believe an affordable house costs less than $450,000, 85 percent think it’s less than $600,000.
About the foreign owners rent levy
Overseas property investors who leave their houses unoccupied will face an annual charge to help encourage foreign owners to make their property available to rent to improve rental supply – or that’s the plan anyway. Predictions on empty properties put the number as high as 300,000 across the country, however Mr. Peterson believes the levy will do nothing to increase housing affordability:
The levy only starts from $5,000, so even the more expensive properties around Australia will only attract a $15,000 slap on the wrist. For the Chinese who are using this as a strategy to get money into a safe haven (often several million dollars), a small annual charge is unlikely to drive a change in behavior from these types of investors who are more concerned about capital preservation than realizing rental returns. Even if it does, all this would do is ensure more blue chip houses are available for rent, generally at rental rates that people who are looking for affordable housing, can't afford anyway.
I think this is bit of a cop out by the Government who are trying to blame foreign investors for the housing supply shortage and affordability, when in reality they are a minority group undertaking this activity, so they have missed the mark.
About the release of surplus government land
As part of the housing affordability package released in the budget announcement the government has earmarked 127 hectares of surplus land in Melbourne which could house up to 6,000 properties. They have also outlined similar measures for Western Sydney. It is initiatives like this that can make a real difference.
The release of government land is one of the few genuine measures announced in this year’s budget that will actually help the housing affordability challenge. It directly impacts supply of land, and that has a direct impact on price and affordability.
In my view this type of land should be made almost exclusively for first home buyers, with a double FHB grant available on the purchase of such land when committed as part of a house and land package. If the super saving scheme is going to have any real impact, it still needs to be coupled with a first home buyer grant if FHB’s are going to be any chance of saving sufficient deposit in the Melbourne and Sydney markets.
However, FHB’s need to look beyond the inner suburbs of Melbourne and Sydney, lift their eyes and explore some of the outer suburbs if they are serious about getting into the property market. A new build house and land package is typically 40% plus cheaper than an inner suburb established property, not to mention its brand new.
Relevant research (per iBuildNew recent survey findings): 64 percent of first home buyers are only prepared to look at properties within their suburb of choice or surrounding suburbs.
Only 22 percent of first home buyers are considering a new home build while 60 per cent are focused on buying an established home or townhouse.
76 percent of first home buyers can’t get into the property market because they can’t save the deposit or secure a loan.
Daniel Peterson is chief executive officer, iBuildNew, and can be contacted <a href="https://www.ibuildnew.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

iBuildNew rejects three key initiatives from the 2017 Budget first home buyer measures 

<html><body>
Those Federal budget announcements affecting property are actually going to have a bigger impact than initially concluded.
Young first home buyers certainly appear willing to dive into the proposed simple superannuation top-up scheme that offers tax breaks. They will likely overtime become the big Budget winners in the housing arena.
The headline housing measure kicks in from July 1 when the first-home buyer can salary sacrifice into their super account above their compulsory contribution.
Regular super remain off limits, but the scheme ought be better than money in the bank, as Treasurer Scott Morrison calculates an accelerated savings of 30 percent.
That is of course unless calamity strikes superannuation as it did in the global financial crisis.
The Budget also offered the elderly an incentive to down-size homes with tax breaks too.
But downsizes are likely to delay the sale of the family home - and not just because the new scheme doesn't start until July 2018.
Individuals who are already 65 have been urged to put off a sale at least until the legislation passes so they don't miss out on the opportunity to top up their super. 
Australians in their early 60s might also delay their downsizing if they are set to become self-funded retirees.
Of course any net proceeds from the sale of the family home will be included in the assets test for the age pension which remains a major impediment for many retirees.
Not much outcry about residential investors losing their travel expense claims when they inspect their investment property. It was good while it lasted most investors have mumbled.
But investors keen to sell their strata units have real concerns as they will be selling their second-hand properties without the attraction of a major tax deduction to the next owner.
Intended to address issues that items such as air conditioners are being claimed as tax write-offs by successive investors in excess of their actual value, it is still not clear just what the government will define as plant and equipment.
The policy intent is to restrict depreciation claims to items purchased and installed by the claiming taxpayer. Investors await draft legislation to see if it extends to say the exisiting communal lifts. 
One commentator says the changes to negative gearing depreciation claims will see investor demand for recently completed housing fall or flatline - resulting in a cooling in the Sydney apartment market price growth.
Another big measure taxing and restricting foreigners in many ways in a revenue treat for the Treasurer in the Budget will impact the market in many ways under the guise of levelling up the playing field for struggling locals.
And no one really knows just how yet that will unfold.
 
</body></html>

Negative gearing changes worry the property market 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
As someone who’s been working with property clients across three market cycles now, I’ve certainly lived through the aftermath of many Federal Budget announcements, and the latest iteration is no different.
While for many their first response is to begin poring over the finer details of the budget with their advisors, looking for latent loopholes, the smart operators will have recognised that the 2017-18 Budget actually provides a number of new opportunities.
What is abundantly clear is that if you take the time, Treasurer Morrison’s budget already gives the property sector, and in particular developers, the “answers to the exam”, by highlighting market segments that could (and should) receive more attention.
For instance, the Budget incentivises empty nesters nearing retirement to leave their family home and downsize. For developers, this presents an opportunity to invest in more developments targeting the empty nester market, but rather than marketing these developments to "over 55s", an alternative approach may be to focus on a desirable standard of living for this generation of buyers.
Meanwhile, first home buyers are being enticed to save for a property deposit by topping up their super at the marginal tax rate. The jury's out on whether this change will actually help young buyers, but the intention is good. Again, developers may consider this as an opportunity to create more innovative first home buyer packages, helping them shift existing stock that may already be slower to sell anyway.
Another key point relates to foreign investment in new properties, with a Federal clampdown and rising State Government charges blunting the sales edge previously enjoyed by some offshore-owned development companies. On the other hand, you could take the view that it's an opportune time for these same companies to focus more of their creativity and marketing spend on Australian buyers.
So to anyone in property still trying to get to grips with this Federal Budget, I suggest they consider it an opportunity rather than an obstacle, and consider altering their approach to adapt to the changing environment. Developers who don't do so risk being left behind. 
<a href="https://www.capital.com.au/" target="_blank">John Quinn</a> is the founder of The Capital Group.
</body></html>

Treasurer delivers property sector the ‘answers to the exam’ with latest budget: John Quinn

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Neither the Government nor the Opposition are being bold enough in their actions to address Australia’s housing crisis.
In particular, the Budget measures intended to encourage investment in affordable housing will do little to change the investment decisions of “mum and dad” investors.
Australian’s have a love affair with property, and a penchant for negative gearing.  If the Government, or the Opposition, was clever, they’d use these tendencies to help resolve Australia’s housing crisis. 
The Government needs to appreciate that investing in affordable housing means lower rental income and lower capital growth. It needs to be as financially attractive for someone to invest in affordable housing, as compared to investing in any other residential property.  This is where tax policy can help.
A key reason for introducing the CGT discount was to encourage capital investments.  Modifying how the CGT discount operates will change the way people invest. Increasing the CGT discount is going down the right path, but an increase from 50 per cent to 60 per cent is not enough to change the investment decisions.
Our bold suggestion: increase the CGT discount to 100 per cent for affordable housing held for 10 years or more.  Make the capital gain tax free.  This will move investment in affordable housing from being a marginal investment decision, to being very attractive.
At the same time, consider reducing the CGT discount on other residential properties from 50 per cent to say 40 per cent, or lower.  Or require a property to be held for five years, rather than one year, before the CGT discount applies.  This change would temper investment into residential property, and reduce speculative investment decisions.  It would also help balance the impact on the Budget.
That is an intelligent policy decision. That is bold, and would start to change people’s investment decisions. 
This change would need to be a long term one.  The CGT discount can become like the superannuation rules, and get changed every Budget. That would only serve to undermine investor confidence.  
If the Government can look to be bold in seriously addressing housing affordability with a scalpel rather than a feather approach, it would really start to make a difference.
 
Greg Travers is tax director, William Buck Chartered Accountants and Advisors and can be contacted <a href="https://www.williambuck.com" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Federal Budget

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Federal Budget

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News