Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.

Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;

David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;

“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;

Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;

At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.

Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.

Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.

David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.

“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;

Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;

Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;

However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.

Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;

Joel Robinson

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.

The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.

Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.

“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.

“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" />

Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.

The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.

“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.

“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" />

Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.

“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.

The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.

“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”

The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.

The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.

Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.

Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.

The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.

“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.

“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.

“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”

The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.

“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”

From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.

“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”

The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.

“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.

Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.

“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.

“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”

The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.

“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.

Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.

&nbsp;

Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

Housing Affordability

<html><body>
There are 9.6 million dwellings across Australia, whose owners don't really want their own eventual sale price to be cheaper as a result of any government policy to make housing more affordable.
There will be acute interest in the negative gearing policy election debate from the 1.25 million investors, who represent an indisputable spread across low, middle and high income earners.
They thought property investment a relatively safer option than shares.
Already the recent debate surrounding negative gearing has made the market place nervous.
Normally federal elections trigger slightly reduced listings and sales activity as there's typically only lip service to any housing policy.
But this year's election is shaping up with housing as a stark policy debate.
It has already, and will continue over forthcoming weeks, trigger diverse reactions.
Some vendors hoping to sell their established homes as investment property have brought forward their listings to get it out before any adverse policy.
Others have bought an investment hoping there will not be any retrospectivity of any adverse policy.
Ray White Group chairman Brian White said any shift in policy would be a “terrible hit” to the market.
"It has already taken away some of the enthusiasm for property," he said yesterday.
"The debate has created uncertainity which is never good for a market."
“It'll be mayhem,” Century 21 chairman Charles Tarbey forecasts.
Noting most people invest in property for the capital growth benefit not for the gearing benefits, the Aussie Home Loans founder John Symond recently suggested only allowing negative gearing on new homes would trigger a drop by at least 20 percent in value once a new home became an established home that investors would likely pass on.
John Symond says the average Australian understands housing and they try to build up a nest egg for future years.
"But they'll run a mile," he said if their was any tinkering.
"Everyone will be too scared."
"Imagine what that will do to the real estate market."
This article was first published in the Sunday Telegraph.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Negative gearing and house price values to be key election issue

<html><body>
If you rely on mainstream media for your news, you probably won’t be aware of this: there has been a significant improvement in housing affordability in Australia recently.
In fact, my reading of the HIA’s Affordability Report for the March Quarter is that the Housing Affordability Index for Australia is now the best it’s been in five years. In some parts of the nation, the situation is the best it’s been in 13 years.
Affordability nationally improved 2.7 percent in the March Quarter, compared to the December Quarter, despite slightly higher interest rates.
Affordability is significantly better than it was five years ago, because interest rates are much lower (notwithstanding the recent out-of-cycle increases), average earnings have been gradually rising and price growth (meaning changes in the national median dwelling price) has been relatively muted, despite three years of big growth in Sydney.
Very little was said about this in Australia’s major newspapers. They’re simply not interested in facts that conflict with their cherished storylines about an affordability crisis, young Australians being priced out of the market by foreign investors and negatively-geared Australian investors, and the Great Australian Dream being dead.
A long-standing joke in journalistic circles is that you never let the facts get in the way of a good story. A good story is, by definition, a negative one. If it bleeds, it leads. If something comes along that doesn’t fit the formula (for example, portrays a positive scenario or contradicts beloved beliefs), bury it. 
So we have a situation where the national affordability index portrays a strong position but few people realise it. The national median dwelling price has decreased and average earnings have risen. The situation would be better were it not for major banks lifting their mortgage rates. 
That’s the average national situation. As the HIA report points out, “the differences in affordability across and within states are still considerable”.
In aggregate, affordability improved 4.1 percent in the eight capital cities in the March Quarter, with a lesser improvement in the regional areas.
Sydney’s quarterly improvement was considerably larger than the national average. It recorded an 8.9 percent increase in affordability, while Perth was 4.9 percent better and Darwin 4.4 percent.
Sydney’s affordability is now at its most favourable since the March 2015 Quarter. Price growth has stopped and incomes have risen. But it still has some way to go before it gets in line with the national average situation of being the best in over five years. Regional NSW, on the other hand, needs only a marginal improvement to achieve that.
Melbourne’s affordability index has improved with a slight reduction in the median dwelling price and increases in earnings, but remains 4.4 percent less favourable than a year ago.
Brisbane’s affordability position, on the other hand, has deteriorated because the median dwelling price is up and average earnings are down (slightly). 
But in Perth the affordability index improved 4.9 percent in the quarter and 9.9 percent for the year, because prices have been falling and incomes, surprisingly perhaps, have risen. Perth’s affordability position, and that of Western Australia generally, is the best it’s been for a long time. “Statewide affordability in WA is at its most favourable since the final quarter of 2003,” the HIA report says.
The position has improved also in Hobart and Tasmania. There the economy has been making notable strides and income growth is well above the national average. The HIA notes: “For Tasmania as a whole, affordability has reached its most favourable level since late 2003.” 
In the Northern Territory, the housing affordability index is 11.3 percent better than a year ago. And it’s better than it’s been any time in at least the past five years. Darwin’s index has improved 13.9 percent compared to a year ago. The Darwin market peaked more than three years ago and prices have been trending downwards since then, but average earnings have been rising.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Significant improvement in housing affordability: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
<div>Macroprudential measures have had the desired effect, and the rate of home price growth has steadied.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>CoreLogic-RP Data's Daily Home Value Index may be a little seasonal, but the year-on-year figures show the slower gradient of growth.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nationally home price growth has slowed to +6.3 percent year-on-year.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Melbourne (+8.8 percent), Sydney (+8.1 percent) and Brisbane (+4.5 percent) between them have accounted for most of the price growth over the past year.  While Sydney and Melbourne have been grabbing all the attention in recent years, Brisbane prices have just kept rising steadily and under the radar.  CoreLogic's index shows the median price for Brisbane &amp; Gold Coast having increased by $61,330 or +13.1 per cent over the past three years.  Although I have long been sceptical about the somewhat parlous state of the South Australian economy, Adelaide mediabn prices have also increased by just shy of +10 per cent over the same timeframe.</div>
<a href="/images/2016/04/11/RP1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/04/11/RP1.jpg" alt="">
<div class="separator"> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I was busy doing other things than charting data over the Christmas/New Year 2014-15 period, so actually have no idea what happened in the gaps in the chart.  Maybe there was a property crash and a speedy recovery, for all I know, not sure.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>. 
His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Home price growth steadies: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
With affordability being such a hot topic of late, a new report from CoreLogic RP Data on the most affordable suburbs in every capital city was timely, says property expert John McGrath, even though many are on the outskirts.
In fact, in the case of NSW, four out of the top five cheapest suburbs are actually on the Central Coast, which is increasingly being seen as an extension of metro Sydney and becoming a popular choice for first home buyers willing to commute, McGrath wrote in his Switzer blog. 
"However, these lists do remind us that there are affordable locations in or very close to every capital city," he says. 
"Here’s another angle on the whole affordability debate. Prices aren’t going to change (at least not much) but there are things you can do yourself to improve your own ‘affordability’."
The best possible thing to do is take advantage of historically low interest rates, he advises. The interest on your home mortgage will always be your greatest expense as a first home owner, so low interest rates can make a huge difference. For further security and sleep-at-night comfort, lock in those rates with a fixed loan for 3-5 years
Another option could be considering a second job.
"Think outside the square about what else you could do – maybe from home, to pick up some extra cash to contribute to your deposit. Alternatively, if you feel you deserve a pay rise at work, ask for one!        
"Just be prepared to explain why you deserve it."  
Compromise on property type
<ul>
<li>Consider an apartment, townhouse or villa over a house; and</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If you really want a house, consider buying an original home that you can renovate over time  </li>
</ul>
Talk to a broker who can shop around for you, as lenders have vastly different criteria for assessing borrowing power – in some cases, the amount lenders are willing to give to the same candidate can vary by tens of thousands of dollars 
Compromise on your desired location
<ul>
<li>Look at areas immediately surrounding your target suburb – you might be surprised how much less you’ll pay just next door; and </li>
<li>Consider cheaper suburbs in the same city that offer a similar lifestyle. For example, if you enjoy living close to the beach, do some research on other beach areas. For example, compare these median prices for one bedroom apartments in these popular Sydney beach suburbs: </li>
</ul>
         - Bondi $740,000          - Manly $656,500           - Dee Why $550,000          - Cronulla $480,000
Source: realestate.com.au
What is probably most notable here is the $100,000-plus difference between Manly and Dee Why. These are both Northern Beaches suburbs with their own beaches and established shopping and dining precincts and they’re only 10-15 minutes apart by car. 
Cheapest capital city suburbs (Houses)
New South  Wales
Spencer (Gosford area) $342,372 
San Remo (Wyong area) $371,669 
Mannering Park (Wyong area) $390,821  
Victoria
Melton (Melton area) $265,335
Melton South (Melton area) $280,966
Millgrove (Yarra Ranges) $294,664
Queensland
Russell Island (Redland area) $225,655 
Dinmore (Ipswich area) $227,512
Leichhardt (Ipswich area) $227,658
South Australia
Davoren Park (Playford area) $179,954
Elizabeth North (Playford area) $180,191
Smithfield Plains (Playford area) $192,237
Western Australia
Medina (Kwinana area) $276,935
Calista (Kwinana area) $308,061 
Parmelia (Kwinana area) $309,380
Tasmania
Herdsmans Cove (Brighton area) $137,724
Gagebrook (Brighton area) $140,650
Clarendon Vale (Clarence area) $154,642 
Northern Territory
Moulden (Palmerston area) $465,257
Gray (Palmerston area) $492,119
Woodroffe (Palmerston area) $511,911
ACT
Charnwood (ACT) $400,119
Ngunnawal (ACT) $435,859
Holt (ACT) $442,124
*Source: CoreLogic RP Data – only suburbs with at least 10 sales over the 12 months to January 2016 are included 
<div> </div>
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

John McGrath on the most affordable suburbs 

<html><body>
Housing in Australia is more than 40 per cent overvalued, according to the Economist's latest round-up of global housing.
Last year, a similar report rated Australian property was more than 25 per cent overvalued and among the most expensive in the world, more than the United States and Britain. 
Globalisation has created a handful of metropolises that attract people, capital and ideas from all over the world, almost irrespective of how their national economy is doing.
House prices in such places, unsurprisingly, outpace the national average. In the Economist's latest update, it says prices have risen in 20 of the 26 countries tracked over the past year, at an (unweighted) average pace of 5.1 per cent after adjusting for inflation.
Prices in pre-eminent cities in these countries, however, have risen by 8.3 per cent on average.
In a survey conducted last year, fewer than one in nine residents of Amsterdam, Berlin, London, Paris, Stockholm and Zurich thought that it was easy to find reasonably-priced housing.
In these cities, house prices have risen at an average pace of 6.5 per cent a year over the past three years (again, unweighted), compared with a national average rise of just 3.2 per cent.
The value of homes in four cities on the Pacific—San Francisco, Vancouver, Sydney and Shanghai—has increased by 12 per cent a year over the past three years, twice the average national pace.
The supply of housing is rather inelastic, so in the short term house-price inflation is driven more by demand factors, such as the number of households, disposable income, interest rates and the yield available on other assets. In recent years all of these have helped to push house prices steadily upwards, especially in big cities.
BOOM TOWNS
In the conurbations in question, the number of households is rising fast as hordes of ambitious millennials pour in. Two in five of Zurich's residents were born outside Switzerland; 44 per cent are between the ages of 20 and 44.
The boom towns also have tight labour markets and therefore relatively high income growth: the unemployment rate in San Francisco and Stockholm is around a percentage-point lower than the national averages.
Some are havens for second homes and money seeking safety: foreigners snap up half of London's princeliest dwellings, according to Savills, an estate agent.
Finally, they provide a decent return: net yields in Vancouver were 11 per cent in 2015, according to MSCI, a data provider, three percentage points above the average for Canadian housing.
EXUBERANCE
Whenever the supply of a good is limited, there is potential for exuberance. San Francisco's property market is intertwined with the technology sector: since 2008 there has been a 93 per cent correlation between the monthly movements in the NASDAQ and house-price inflation in its metropolitan area. Since bottoming out in early 2012, prices in Silicon Valley have risen by 73 per cent, compared with 31 per cent in America as a whole.
To determine whether homes are fairly valued The Economist looks at the relationship between prices and disposable income (an indicator of affordability) and between prices and rents (a substitute for buying a home).
If rising prices move these ratios above their long-run averages, then either incomes or rents are likely to rise, or house prices to fall.
Across America house prices, after falling by 25 per cent from their peak between 2007 and 2012, are now at fair value compared with rents and incomes. In San Francisco, too, they are at fair value when compared with rents, but 45 per cent overvalued relative to incomes.
Thanks largely to their big cities, housing appears to be more than 40 per cent overvalued in Australia, Britain and Canada, according to the average of our two measures.
Between 2002 and 2012 the typical London home sold for seven times the city's average annual salary. That figure has since risen to 12 times.
As property developers from Las Vegas to Limerick will attest, when supply does eventually respond to soaring demand, property prices fall.
Restrictive planning laws curb new construction in the area around San Francisco Bay; the narrow peninsula that San Francisco itself occupies compounds the problem.
London suffers from an even more severe planning regime. Yet housing starts are at a nine-year high in San Francisco. In London, too, builders are finding a way: construction began on 24,000 new homes in the capital in 2015, the highest rate for ten years.
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

House prices in Australia '40 per cent' overvalued: The Economist

<html><body>
Australia climbed to number four while New Zealand was at second place in the latest global house price index for the last quarter of 2015 compiled by property consultancy Knight Frank, even as global outlook for 2016 remained muted in contrast to the previous year. 
The Global House Price Index monitors and compares the performance – rate of capital growth – of mainstream residential markets in 55 countries. The index rose by 3% in 2015, up from 2.3% in 2014. Concerns over the global economy in 2015 failed to dent buyer confidence; instead the lingering low interest rate environment influenced sentiment, it said.
The index, established in 2006, is compiled on a quarterly basis using official government statistics or central bank data where available. The index’s overall performance is weighted by GDP on a Purchasing Power Parity basis and the latest quarter’s data is provisional pending the release of all the countries’ results.
It allows investors and developers to monitor and compare the performance of mainstream residential markets around the world.
Australasia was the strongest-performing global region in 2015 at 12.4%, buoyed by the strong performance of New Zealand and Australia, both of which saw annual price growth in excess of 10%, said Knight Frank’s director, Residential Research, Australia, Michelle Ciesielski.
“Australia was ranked number four on the Global House Price Index for the fourth quarter of 2015, up from seventh in the previous quarter, with an annual growth rate of 10.7%. Turkey led the Global House Price Index, with growth of 18.4%," said Ciesielski.
“New Zealand followed directly behind Turkey, with an annual price growth of 14.2% as of the fourth quarter of 2015, bringing it to second place from third in the previous quarter."
“Housing affordability, or the lack of it, is rising up policymakers’ agendas worldwide. According to the latest data from the OECD, which measures house prices against incomes for 24 of its 34 members, Belgium, New Zealand and Canada are currently the world’s least affordable markets, whilst home ownership is most accessible in South Korea and Japan."
Australia is ranked at four among the least affordable, at 29% over-valued relative to the long-term average held, according to the OECD. 
“Our global outlook for 2016 is muted. We expect the index’s overall rate of growth to be weaker in 2016 than in 2015. The global economy is experiencing a potentially dangerous cocktail of low oil prices, a strong dollar and a continued slowdown in China,” said Kate Everett-Allen, partner, International Residential Research, Knight Frank.
Results for Q4 2015
* Forty-three of the 55 housing markets tracked in our Global House Price Index saw prices rise, up from 10 countries in the aftermath of the Lehman’s collapse in September 2008 (please see Figure 1 which compares the shift in global house prices starting from Q2 2008, the latest global house price index available at the time of Lehman’s collapse).
<a href="/images/2016/03/23/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-23%20at%209.34.53%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge.</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/23/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-23%20at%209.34.53%20AM.png" alt="" width="349" height="523">
* Turkey leads the rankings with prices rising 18% during 2015. Increasingly viewed as a safe haven for Middle Eastern investors, Turkey is bridging East and West whilst also seeing strong population growth.
* Belgium and New Zealand are the least affordable countries when house prices are compared to incomes.
* Ukraine and Greece were the weakest housing markets in 2015, recording price falls of 12% and 5% respectively.
“2015 saw Asian mainstream residential markets record only 1.9% annual price growth, lower than the global average of 3%. While a number of markets experienced positive growth, Taiwan and Singapore, which have seen negative growth for a number of quarters, were joined by Hong Kong this quarter, which saw its residential market decline by 3.7% in Q4 2015," said Nicholas Holt, head of Research for Asia Pacific.
“While long-term growth prospects remain positive, the continued economic uncertainty in the region is likely to weigh on housing market sentiment in the near term.”
Added Everett-Allen, “Although house prices in Hong Kong increased in 2015, the rate of growth has slowed significantly from 17% in the year to September to 7% in the year to December 2015. The slower rate of growth is attributable to rising supply (more than 11,200 homes were completed in 2015), as well as China’s financial market volatility and the expectation of increasing interest rates.”
Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics showed house prices rose marginally in 2015 (0.4%), having reached their peak in the first quarter of 2014. Cities such as Shenzhen and Shanghai continue to outperform the national average due in part to favourable government policies and strong demand in first-tier cities.
 
</body></html>

prateek24-ezbwHMbNAk

Australasia is strongest-performing region in Knight Frank's Global House Price Index

<html><body>
Let’s assume for a moment that the people raging about the alleged affordability crisis actually care about the issue and want to see solutions.
I say that because much of it is grandstanding by attention-seekers who really don’t give a damn.
The problem they face is that they’re never going to find a remedy, one that actually works, until they identify the real problems. 
So far the debate, for want of a better word, has focused on fighting phantoms. Everyone, it seems, has their pet theories about who’s to blame and is filling up the airways with angry demands that the culprits be dealt with. 
The problem is, no one can agree on who the villains really are.
Recently we had former federal minister and previous NSW premier, Bob Carr, stridently declaring that rising prices were all caused by migrants flooding into Australia. Apparently these people have more money than sense and rampage around our major cities paying way too much for houses, thereby pushing prices beyond the reach of our kiddies.
But the current Federal Government, after two long and expensive parliamentary inquiries into the affordability smokescreen, somehow came to the belief that it was all caused by foreign investors buying mansions when they’re supposed to be buying new dwellings. With appropriate sabre-rattling, the feds declared they were going to clamp down on the dastardly aliens, thereby creating a level playing field, thereby making homes cheaper for our kiddies, therefore affordability fixed. 
So they jolly well forced a handful of foreign buyers to sell back their mansions. There you go, problem solved. Houses cheaper right across Australia. 
Meanwhile, federal Labor has popped up and postulated that it’s not the fault of overseas migrants, despite one of their own declaring that it was, nor the fault of foreign investors breaking the rules. Labor has mandated that it’s the fault of our home-grown investors – not all of them mind you, just the ones who claim negative gearing tax benefits.
So Labor claims it can fix the (Sydney) affordability problem by removing the right to claim negative gearing tax benefits, except for new properties.
There are a few others, including a couple of obscure university activists who published a paper recently, who adhere to the theology that declares negative gearing the source of all evil in real estate, notwithstanding the laughable illogic of their arguments. 
Labor is also part of the camp, which is also populated by economists, that believes it’s the so-called capital gains concession that drives investors beyond reason to paying silly prices for things. 
But there’s yet another school of thought out there, often put forward by economists who think they know more about real estate than they actually do. They claim that it’s grants and stamp duty concessions given to first-home buyers that have forced up house prices, by empowering youngsters who would not otherwise be competing in the market. One sub-theory is that the price of houses rises by the amount of the government grant. 
So take your pick. According to various schools of thought, all of them expounded vehemently by zealots totally convinced of their validity, the villains who force up house prices are:- 
(1)  migrants,
(2)  foreign investors,
(3)  negatively-geared Australian investors,
(4)  all investors who benefit from the CGT concession, or
(5)  first-time buyers bolstered by government grants and stamp duty concessions. 
So who’s right? The answer, sadly, is: none of them! They’re all wrong!
And this is why there will never be any realistic solution to the alleged affordability crisis. Everyone who appears to care is out there chasing phantom targets.
You can’t devise a cure if you’ve mis-diagnosed the illness. 
The buying sector most responsible for prices rising over time is never mentioned in the “debate”. This buying sector is the biggest influence of housing markets because they’re the biggest in number - and they have both the financial capacity and the motivation to pay high prices to secure the homes they want.
They’re home-buyers other than first-time buyers – the next-time buyers. People relocating, upgrading, moving onward and upward. People who have owned homes for years and are seeking to move to bigger and better ones, armed with a strong financial position. 
The problem for those all worked up about affordability (which, essentially, is a Sydney issue, not a national one) is that it’s very hard to nobble them. They don’t receive government grants, they don’t claim negative gearing and they don’t pay CGT so they can’t benefit from the so-called concession. 
To show you what I mean, let’s examine some statistics about market share, as revealed by the NAB quarterly surveys.
Foreign investors, an easy target for politicians wanting to blame an unpopular minority with no political cost, are about 8 percent of buyers of established property.
Australian investors comprise 28 percent of buyers and first-time home buyers are 20 percent. 
The remainder of the market, around 43 percent of it, are those people who never get discussed in the “why prices rise” debate, the next-time buyers.
Given that foreign investors are only 8 percent of the market, it’s unreasonable to blame them for prices rising. You might well ask: what about the other 92 percent?
ATO data shows that a lot of Australian investors don’t claim negative-gearing tax deductions, as many own properties where the rent covers all costs. I am one of them.
My estimate is that about 15 percent of the market comprises negatively-geared Australian investors. According to Labor leader Bill Shorten, in his announcement of his tax policy, those 15 percent are solely responsible for all price rises over the past 30 years. If he truly believes that, he’s an idiot. Again you might well ask: but what about the other 85 percent? 
It’s not just about numbers of people in the market. It’s also about financial capacity and motivation. 
First-home buyers, with or without state government grants (only available now on new properties), are relatively few in number and are constrained by their tight budgets. They don’t pay silly prices for homes. 
Investors are a little more numerous but are still very much in the minority. And they are highly motivated to buy at the lowest possible prices. For investors, it’s all about the numbers, not about falling in love with a single property they just have to have. If they can’t get it at a price that stacks up as an investment, most will walk away – because there are a hundred others just around the corner. 
That leaves that anonymous bunch of people we call the next-time buyers. They’re remarkable for their ability to fly under the radar of media debate. No one ever talks about them. But they’re the most influential part of the market, by a wide margin. 
They’re not half the buying market, but they’re close to it. Because they’ve owned property for a while and built up equity, they’re financially strong. And they’re aspirational, so they’re highly motivated and will often pay whatever it takes (within reason, mostly) to secure that one property they must have.
They’re the sneaky bastards who force prices to rise. And there’s almost nothing politicians can do to stop them.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

Housing affordability debate focused on fighting phantoms: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
At the end of 2015, the median price of vacant land across the combined capital cities was recorded at $265,000 while the median land price across the combined regional markets was $156,000. 
A $109,000 (69.9%) price difference between regional and capital city prices is now the largest differential on record for both.
It also goes some way to explaining the differences in the cost of built form (houses or units) in the capital cities relative to non-capital city areas. Over the past year, capital city vacant land prices have increased by 4.0% compared to a -5.2% fall in prices in regional areas.
At the end of 2015, the median lot size for capital city vacant land was 466 sqm having increased by 3.6% over the year. Across regional markets the median land size was a much larger 809 sqm having increased by 8.3% over the past year. 
Land sizes have fallen over time in capital city and regional markets however, lot size compression has been much greater in capital cities. To put this in perspective, median lot sizes have fallen at a rate of - 2.5% annually in capital cities over the past decade compared to falls of -0.5% per annum in regional markets. 
Across the combined capital cities the median rate/sqm for vacant land was recorded at $552 at the end of last year. At the same time the rate was a substantially lower $179/sqm in regional markets. Capital city rates/sqm has fallen by -2.5% over the past year while in regional markets they are -12.4% lower.
The fall in capital city rates/sqm is due to the increase in land sizes while in regional markets it is due to both prices falling and land sizes increasing over the past year.
<a href="/images/2016/03/10/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-10%20at%2012.41.40%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/10/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-10%20at%2012.41.40%20PM.png" alt="">
As can be seen in the tables outlining the key vacant land statistics across each of the state capital cities, Sydney’s median land price ($410,000) is substantially higher than the other capital cities. Compared with the second most expensive city, Perth, at $299,000, Sydney’s median land price is more than $100,000 higher. The two cities which have seen the highest rates of housing value growth in recent years, Sydney and Melbourne, have also recorded an exceptional increase in median land prices over the past year at 20.2% and 23.5% respectively. Although Sydney is the most expensive on a rate per square metre basis, vacant land in Perth is the nation’s most expensive by virtue of the fact that only Adelaide has smaller lot sizes. 
Today’s data provides valuable insights into the reasons why housing costs in the capital cities is so high. In a market like Sydney for example, if the typical land costs $410,000 it is difficult to imagine being able to buy the land and build a home for less than $550,000. 
With housing affordability now back on the national political agenda it is likely we will see renewed focus on the high cost of developable land in our capital cities. Reforms to reduce the cost of the vacant land would go a long way to improving housing affordability, particularly for new homes. Of course the other alternative is to encourage greater economic development of regional areas where the cost of housing is significantly lower than it is in the capital cities.
<a href="/images/2016/03/10/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-10%20at%2012.43.35%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/10/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-10%20at%2012.43.35%20PM.png" alt="">
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/about/">here</a>.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

Land prices on the increase: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The January update on housing finance approvals was uniformly weak with the total number of owner occupier loans down 3.9 percent, the value of investor loans down 1.6 percent mth and the total value of all loans down 3.4 percent mth.
The consensus forecast was for a somewhat milder 2.8 percent decline.
It should be noted at the outset that housing data is notoriously unreliable over January with the Christmas holiday period making month to month moves more prone to big changes and revisions.
For finance approvals, the raw data for January usually sees about a 20 percent drop in approvals – adjusting for this can produce more volatility in headline seasonally adjusted estimates.  
The detail showed declines in owner occupier finance approvals across all major states: NSW (–4.6 percent mth); Vic (–1.9 percent mth), Qld (–4.1 percent mth), SA (–2.9 percent mth) and WA (–3 percent mth). Annual growth remains positive for NSW and Vic but is about flat for Qld, tracking at –3.7 percent yr in SA and contracting at a solid double digit rate in WA (–12.3 percent yr). Note that the value of investor loans and therefore the total value of loans is not yet available for states (data to be released on Friday).
Construction-related finance approvals were also down about 3 percent.
Overall, the numbers show a broad-based weakening in momentum although the aforementioned issues with January data mean we will need another month or two to get a firm handle on whether we are seeing a more rapid slowdown. Details  Owner–occupiers (no.)   –3.9 percent mth, 7.3 percentyr        – ex-financing (no.)        –3.6 percent mth, 0.6 percent yr                           Construction of dwellings (no.)               –2.8 percent mth, 0 percent yr            Purchase of newly built dwellings (no.)   –3 percent mth, 22.1 percent yr                         
Value of loans:             
Owner-occupiers ($bn)   –4.3 percent mth, 15.9 percent yr       Investors ($bn)              –1.6 percent mth, –14.8 percent yr      Total ($bn)                    –3.4 percent mth, 2.7 percent yr         Total ex refi ($bn)          –3.7 percent mth, –4.1 percent yr  
 
Matthew Hassan is senior economist with <a href="https://www.westpac.com.au/" target="_blank">Westpac</a>.
</body></html>

January owner occupier loans down 3.9 percent: Matthew Hassan

<html><body>
Following recent policy announcements by the Federal Opposition, housing related issues such as affordability have come onto the political agenda. 
Whether Labor’s policies would actually improve housing affordability, especially without supply and infrastructure reforms, remains to be seen. Nevertheless the following piece looks at affordability by analysing median house and unit values into bands across Australia’s suburbs in order to get a deeper look at the cost of housing.
House values tend to be more expensive in capital cities than in regional areas. This is highlighted by the fact that 51.2% of regional suburbs have a median value of between $200,000 and $400,000 compared to 15.4% of capital city suburbs. 
Similarly just 0.6% of capital city suburbs have a median house value of less than $200,000 compared to 13.1% of regional suburbs. There is no value band that shows a clear majority across the combined capital cities however, the 33.1% of suburbs with a median value of between $400,000 and $600,000 is the band with the greatest share of suburbs.
<div>
<h3>Suburb median house value bands, capital cities vs. regional areas, Dec-15</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image1.jpg" alt="">
Across the unit markets, the greatest share of suburbs both across the capital cities and in regional areas have a median value between $200,000 and $400,000. There is a large difference between the two in that 71.4% of regional suburbs have a median unit value of between $200,000 and $400,000 compared to 41.2% of suburbs in the capital cities. Again when we look at the most affordable suburbs there is a large difference, just 1.7% of capital city suburbs have a median unit value of less than $200,000 compared to 13.3% across regional Australia. 
<h3>Suburb median unit value bands, capital cities vs. regional areas, Dec-15</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image2.jpg" target="_blank"> Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image2.jpg" alt="">
Focusing solely on the data across the capital cities really highlights just how expensive Sydney is relative to other cities.
For houses, 25.3% of Sydney suburbs have a median value of between $1 million and $1.5 million making it the largest single value band for the city. Across the other capital cities the value band with the greatest proportion of suburb median values is $400,000 to $600,000 with the only other exceptions Hobart ($200,000 to $400,000) and Darwin ($600,000 to $800,000).
Sydney, Melbourne and Darwin have no suburbs with a median house value of less than $200,000. In Sydney, 47.8% of suburbs have a median house value of more than $1 million compared to 20.5% in Melbourne, 2.6% in Brisbane, 3.8% in Adelaide and 12.9% in Perth.
<h3>Suburb median house value bands across capital cities, Dec-15</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29--image3.jpg" alt="">
It is a similar story for capital city unit markets with 33.1% of Sydney suburbs having a median unit value of between $600,000 and $800,000 making it the largest band for the city. In most other capitals, the highest proportion of suburbs have a median unit value of between $200,000 and $400,000 with the exception of Melbourne and Perth (both $400,000 to $600,000).
As with house values, no suburbs in Sydney, Melbourne and Darwin have a median unit value of less than $200,000. 8.8% of Sydney suburbs have a median unit value of more than $1 million compared to 0.3% in Melbourne, 0.4% in Brisbane, 0.0% in Adelaide and 0.9% in Perth.
<h3>Suburb median unit value bands across capital cities, Dec-15</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29-image4.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge </a>
<img src="/images/2016/03/4/2016-02-29-image4.jpg" alt="">
The data shows that particularly in our larger capital cities there is a critical undersupply of affordable housing options (even in the unit market). As a result an increasing number of residents are being locked out of home ownership or are being forced to purchase outside of the cities. Remember that although job prospects are generally better in the larger capital cities the difference in average wages across the capital cities is nowhere near as large as the differences in home values.
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/about/">here</a>.
</div>
</body></html>

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News