Longstanding Gold Coast and Canberra developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/morris-property-group">Morris Property Group</a> is continuing to roll on with its Glitter Strip apartment pipeline, seeking to return to Mermaid Beach with a new 68-apartment development.

Morris, founded by Barry Morris in 1978 and one of the Gold Coast’s most prolific apartment developers over the past two decades, has filed plans for a 12-storey mixed-use building at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/36-seabeach-avenue-mermaid-beach-qld-4218">34-36 Seabeach Avenue</a>, on the prized eastern side of the Gold Coast Highway.

The 1,227 sqm site occupies a prominent corner position at Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway, opposite the Mermaid Plaza retail and office precinct and around 140 metres walking distance from the future Mermaid Beach South light rail station.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fraser-partners-0">Fraser &amp; Partners</a> has designed the project, which will comprise 68 apartments across a mix of 48 two-bedroom and 20 three-bedroom residences.

The building will rise 12 storeys, reaching a maximum height of 36 metres, with the apartments accounting for a total of 156 bedrooms. The development application also seeks approval for short-term accommodation across the 68 apartments, while two office tenancies are proposed at ground level.

The plans show 108 car spaces across the development, with parking accommodated at ground level and within a three-level basement accessed from Seabeach Avenue.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c2175c99-12fd-4a3c-9be1-89bbf258a90d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%202.59.41%E2%80%AFPM_0.png?VersionId=iNLzWcE6gaAE76rafhEXfHve.4g4Se0p" />

Resident amenity will be concentrated on level two, where Fraser &amp; Partners has designed a recreation deck with a swimming pool, 90 sqm pool terrace, outdoor barbecue area and gym.

The broader communal offering will also incorporate landscaped spaces, with the planning documents noting the amenity has been designed to provide areas for recreation, social interaction and outdoor living.

The proposal would continue the transformation of the Gold Coast Highway corridor through Mermaid Beach ahead of the arrival of the light rail.

The site is zoned Neighbourhood Centre and sits within the Mermaid Beach/Broadbeach Light Rail Corridor neighbourhood plan. While the prescribed building height is 24 metres, the site is identified within an Urban Neighbourhood context providing for a 50 per cent height uplift to 36 metres.

Planning documents describe the stretch of the Gold Coast Highway between Broadbeach and Nobby Beach as increasingly characterised by medium and high-rise development, with the proposed Morris tower joining projects including Ventura, The Alfred, Oceans and Otto.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="911f193f-e381-4a55-be08-58be87fcf978" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%202.59.48%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=oxVvLJaY.SOXEdXrIcogfyEXDfvCmmpM" />

The development would mark Morris Property Group's latest investment in Mermaid Beach, where it has already delivered two apartment projects.

Otto, at 1 Bondi Avenue on the western side of the Gold Coast Highway, comprises 70 apartments across nine storeys. The project was completed in 2019 and includes a residents' gym, recreation deck and swimming pool.

Morris also developed Oceans at 46 Ocean Street, a nine-storey, 70-apartment build-to-rent development completed in 2019. Oceans was the group's first build-to-rent project and incorporates commercial space at ground level.

The two existing Morris projects sit further north along the same Gold Coast Highway corridor as the proposed Seabeach Avenue development. Fraser &amp; Partners' planning analysis specifically identifies both Otto and Oceans among the established built-form precedents surrounding the site.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="14925119-7b71-4812-8149-340317512c7c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%203.00.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=aEJqYuw_nTCjcin17BSD0piB1EFotTlj" />

Mermaid Beach represents only part of Morris' considerable Gold Coast footprint.

The family-owned developer has been particularly active in neighbouring Broadbeach, delivering projects including Sierra Grand, Eclipse, Synergy, Qube, Koko, Opus and Malo, while its current pipeline includes Maison and the two-tower Crest development.

Further south, Morris has also developed a string of projects in Burleigh Heads, including Element, Boardwalk and Sandbar, while Essentia expanded its footprint north into Surfers Paradise.

The Seabeach Avenue application has been lodged by PMM Broadbeach Pty Ltd and seeks a development permit for a Material Change of Use for multiple dwellings, short-term accommodation and office uses. Zone Planning Group prepared the planning application, with Fraser &amp; Partners commissioned as architect.

The project comes as the developer continues to expand its Gold Coast pipeline while retaining a significant presence in Canberra. Morris now has more than $2.5 billion of development in its national pipeline and has delivered more than 7,000 homes during its near five-decade history

Joel Robinson

First look: Morris Property Group returns to Mermaid Beach with new Seabeach Avenue apartment development

<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3hvFB2uWTRfEyEcpTSnnK9" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis" target="_blank">Fortis</a>&nbsp;is continuing its stronghold on Sydn​ey’s eastern suburbs apartment market, launching&nbsp;in September&nbsp;its latest boutique&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/double-bay-nsw-2028&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0GI5S9-wNeiLUnM-d1uYkw" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/double-bay-nsw-2028" target="_blank">Double Bay</a>&nbsp;development,&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-william-double-bay-55-william-street-double-bay-nsw-2028&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2YNouJQcFjiTTgVHbgDLA-" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-william-double-bay-55-william-street-double-bay-nsw-2028" target="_blank">55 William</a>.

55 William presents&nbsp;just eight north-facing&nbsp;two-bedroom, three-bedroom and full-floor&nbsp;residences to the market, priced from $4.5 million.

The upcoming launch comes just weeks after Fortis secured approval for the $80 million development, its third eastern suburbs approval in two months. Construction is already underway, with completion targeted for 2028.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376250]

55 William adds to a growing concentration of Fortis projects in and around Double Bay, a market the developer has become increasingly active in over recent years.

Fortis previously completed the nine-residence Marmont on New South Head Road, while it is currently developing a mixed-use residential and retail project at 12 Cross Street. Its wider Double Bay footprint also extends into commercial and retail development.

The developer's broader Sydney residential pipeline is particularly concentrated across the eastern suburbs, with projects spanning Doub​le Bay, Ro​se Bay, Wo​ollahra, Dar​ling Point, Poi​nt Piper and Eli​zabeth Bay.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376253]

At 55 William, Fortis has again turned to MHN Design Union, the architecture practice behind several of its eastern suburbs projects, while London-based 1508 London has been appointed to handle the interiors and Wyer &amp; Co the landscaping.

The six-level building will comprise a combination of two and three-bedroom apartments, including a garden residence, full-floor apartments, a sub-penthouse and penthouse. Each residence will have secure basement parking and private outdoor space.

A rooftop terrace for all residents, along with select apartments, enjoys views across Double Bay Harbour and toward the Sydney skyline.

Ceiling heights will reach up to three metres&nbsp;in select residences, while the kitchens will feature natural stone and integrated Gaggenau appliances.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

The boutique nature of the project reflects the type of stock Fortis has increasingly targeted across Sydney's eastern suburbs, where larger apartments and smaller buildings are being pitched primarily toward local owner-occupiers and downsizers.

Fortis Group General Manager Ed Eve said the developer continues to see demand from buyers wanting to remain in the eastern suburbs but move into newer, lower-maintenance housing.

“We're seeing continued demand from local owner-occupiers and downsizers looking for high-quality homes that allow them to remain in the eastern suburbs, close to the lifestyle and community they know,” Eve said.

55 William is also one of the early projects to respond directly to the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing reforms. Fortis had previously secured approval for just two townhouses on the 599 sqm site before revising the scheme to eight apartments following the planning changes.

Situated one street back from Double Bay's water's edge, the project enjoys an enviable harbourside setting within walking distance of Double Bay Village and the ferry wharf.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376252]

Fortis has increasingly made the eastern suburbs a major focus of its Sydney pipeline. Beyond Double Bay, it recently completed the 14-residence Piper in Point Piper and has projects underway or planned across Rose Bay, Woollahra and Darling Point.

The developer recently secured approval for Verano in Rose Bay, a six-level development comprising 21 two, three and four-bedroom apartments, also designed by MHNDU.

55 William&nbsp;is soon to be release to the market with VIP appointments commencing early September,&nbsp;with residences priced from $4.5 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152579]

Fortis continues eastern suburbs push with 55 William launch

UAE-based developer Arada has unveiled plans for a $2 billion twin-tower apartment development in Broadbeach, marking its first move into Queensland as it continues its rapid expansion across Australia.

Arada will develop 952 apartments across two towers on a prominent site opposite the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre, with the project targeted for completion ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

The project represents Arada's largest commitment to the Australian market since arriving in the country in 2024 and significantly expands a local pipeline that has now grown to eight projects and more than 5,000 homes.

It will also be the first major Queensland project delivered by Roberts Co since the tier-one contractor was acquired by Arada Group in 2025.

Plus Studio has designed the Broadbeach development, which will comprise one, two and three-bedroom apartments across two towers connected by a landscaped podium.

A significant resident amenity offering will include lagoon and lap pools, a gym, sauna and steam room, alongside a mist room, infrared room and salt scrub facilities. Communal terraces, private dining areas, a library, residents' lounge and work-from-home spaces are also planned. Around 1,200 sqm of retail and hospitality space will occupy the ground floor.

The site puts Arada in one of the Gold Coast's most active apartment markets, directly opposite the convention centre and within walking distance of Pacific Fair, The Star Gold Coast and Broadbeach's dining and retail precinct.

It also has immediate access to the Gold Coast light rail network and sits just a few blocks from the beach.

Arada Group Chief Executive Ahmed Alkhoshaibi said Broadbeach represented an opportunity for the developer to expand beyond its initial NSW pipeline.

“Broadbeach is a world-class address that gives us the canvas to create a community of exceptional design and lifestyle quality that genuinely enriches the daily lives of the people who call it home,” Alkhoshaibi said.

“This is our first development outside New South Wales, and it reflects our growing ambition to grow in key urban markets around the country.”

Alkhoshaibi said bringing Roberts Co into the project would give Arada greater control over the development and construction process.

“Delivering this project through Roberts Co, our own tier-one construction business, means we can bring the quality, pace and accountability that our buyers expect.”

The move into Broadbeach comes as Arada accelerates its Australian expansion following its entry into the market two years ago. The developer has assembled a pipeline of eight projects comprising more than 5,000 homes, while the acquisition of Roberts Co last year gave the group its own Australian construction capability.

Globally, Arada has a development portfolio valued at $50 billion comprising more than 55,000 homes across the UAE, United Kingdom and Australia.

The Gold Coast is emerging as the next major market for the developer, with strong population growth and infrastructure spending ahead of the 2032 Games continuing to underpin significant apartment development across the coastal strip.

Arada plots $2 billion Broadbeach towers in major Queensland move

Sydney’s downsizer market is changing, with a growing cohort of buyers prioritising the right home over simply finding a smaller one.

Coronation Property Head of Sales Cam Porter says the traditional idea of downsizing does not necessarily reflect what many buyers are now looking for, particularly those moving from established family homes across Sydney.

Instead, he says they are increasingly becoming “right-sizers”, seeking lower-maintenance homes without sacrificing the space, amenity or quality they have become accustomed to.

“We are increasingly seeing buyers who are not motivated by the idea of simply moving into a smaller property,” Porter says.

“They are right-sizers. They want a home that is easier to manage and better connected, but they still expect generosity, quality and a floorplan that supports the way they live.”

It is a subtle but important distinction in a market where apartment developers are increasingly targeting established owner-occupiers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377495]

For many of these buyers, moving from a house to an apartment is not driven by a desire to dramatically reduce their living space. Instead, the appeal is in removing some of the maintenance associated with a larger home while retaining generous living areas, storage and enough flexibility to accommodate family and friends.

Coronation’s sales team is seeing buyers place particular importance on natural light, practical storage and additional rooms that can be used as guest bedrooms, home offices or secondary living spaces.

Kitchens and dining areas are also playing an increasingly important role, particularly for buyers who regularly entertain or have children and grandchildren visit.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377494]

“These buyers still want their home to feel generous,” Porter says.

“They may want less maintenance, but they are not looking for less life.”

The challenge for the broader housing market is providing enough of the right stock to encourage that move.

While much of the discussion around Sydney’s housing shortage has centred on the number of homes being delivered, Porter says the diversity of those homes is equally important.

Older homeowners can remain in large family houses for longer when they cannot find an appropriate alternative in the neighbourhoods where they have built their lives.

“The decision is rarely as simple as wanting fewer bedrooms,” Porter says.

“People are weighing up their connection to a neighbourhood, the space they need for family, the quality of the home and whether it will continue to work for them over the long term.”

It also has implications beyond the downsizer market. Providing suitable apartments for smaller households can free up established houses for families who need the additional bedrooms and land, creating greater movement through the housing market.

<h2>Lillian targets the next stage of apartment buyer</h2>

It is a buyer Coronation is targeting at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lillian-erskineville-9-metters-street-erskineville-nsw-2043">Lillian</a>, its new collection of apartments, terraces and penthouses at Erskineville Village.

Designed by Silvester Fuller, Lillian has been shaped around larger living spaces, natural light and flexible floorplans, alongside landscaped areas, wellness amenity and communal spaces for residents.

The development will form part of Coronation’s broader Erskineville Village precinct, which will combine new homes with green space, retail, hospitality and new pedestrian connections.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377688]

McPherson Park will sit at the centre of the precinct, creating a significant new green space alongside the project’s retail and hospitality offering.

For Porter, the opportunity is to give buyers another housing option without forcing them to leave the part of Sydney they already know.

“People should be able to change the type of home they live in without having to change their entire life,” he says.

“For many buyers, Lillian offers the opportunity to remain connected to the Inner West and the city, while gaining access to a more convenient, walkable and considered way of living.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377687]

Coronation will explore the changing <a href="https://lillianresidences.com.au/news/lillian-x-space-x-downsizers-event-27-august/">right-sizer market at an event on August 27</a>, bringing together experts across property, design and lifestyle.

Held in partnership with SPACE, Poliform and Downsizer.com.au, the event will include a property market outlook from economist Michael Blythe alongside discussion around the considerations facing buyers planning their next move.

Attendees will also be able to learn more about the residences and amenity planned at Lillian Erskineville.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135149]

From downsizing to right-sizing: What Sydney buyers want from their next home

Family-owned builder and developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/omaya">Omaya</a> is bringing its 27-storey The Maybelle development to market, with the 229-apartment tower rising alongside Ismay Reserve near North Strathfield.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-maybelle-21-parramatta-road-homebush-nsw-2140">The Maybelle</a> will comprise one, two and three-bedroom apartments, with its height providing elevated outlooks towards the Sydney skyline and Harbour Bridge, while other residences will look across neighbouring Ismay Reserve.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/squillace-architects">Squillace Architects</a>, the tower combines its parkside setting with proximity to the established retail, dining and transport amenity around North Strathfield.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376196]

Residences will feature open-plan living spaces and a choice of two interior schemes, while communal amenity is spread across two elevated levels of the building.

Level 8 will be home to the Garden Pavilion, a full-floor resident space incorporating communal entertaining and breakout areas, seating and recreation spaces. Further up the tower, a landscaped Sky Terrace on Level 14 will provide another communal area with panoramic views towards the Harbour Bridge and Sydney skyline.

At ground level, the development sits directly alongside Ismay Reserve, where lawns, walking paths, children's play areas, picnic spaces and recreational facilities extend the green space available immediately around the project.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376194]

The Maybelle is also within walking distance of North Strathfield and the Bakehouse Quarter, which provides a mix of cafés, restaurants, shops and everyday services.

Existing rail and bus services provide connections across Sydney, while the future North Strathfield Metro and access to the M4 will add to the transport options available around the precinct. Walking and cycling routes also extend via Powells Creek towards Sydney Olympic Park and its sporting, entertainment and parkland precincts.

Families are also well positioned for access to a broad selection of established schools and education options across Strathfield and the surrounding Inner West.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376181]

Omaya has operated in Sydney for more than 35 years, managing projects from acquisition and design through to construction and delivery. The family-owned company is both developer and builder of The Maybelle.

Apartments start from $560,000, with the development protected by 10-year Latent Defects Insurance.

Construction is well underway, with completion expected by the end of 2026 and move-in anticipated from Q1 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134873]

The Maybelle brings 27-storey parkside tower to market near North Strathfield

First Home Buyers

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ housing finance statistics for April 2014 have maintained that first home buyers are still keeping out of the market, with <a href="/expert-insights/finance/first-home-buyers-fall-back-to-record-lows">figures at historical lows of 12.3%</a>.
This 12.3% figure was also noted in November 2013, ticking up to 12.6% in March 2014.
The Real Estate Institute of Australia’s president, Peter Bushby, noted that increases were recorded in six of the states and territories: Queensland, Western Australia, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. The ACT had the biggest increase, of 0.9%.
New South Wales fell by 0.9% while the Northern Territory remained flat.
When excluding refinancing, April saw a drop of 0.1% in owner occupied finance commitments in trend terms.
“In trend terms, the number of commitments for the construction of new dwellings climbed 1.1% and the purchase of established dwellings increased by 0.1%. However the purchase of new dwellings fell by 1.3%,” said Bushby.
Investment housing commitments increased, but by 0.5%, which follows three years now of monthly increases that were not as modest.
“The April 2014 lending figures indicate a stable market, and signal a period in which interest rates should stay at their current levels,” he said. You can read more about interest rates and predictions here.
ANZ Research’s David Cannington and Paul Braddick noted that mortgage commitments are “easing in line with moderation in housing market sales and price growth”.
“Today’s data continues to reflect a housing market dominated by investors and upgraders/downsizers, while first home buyer activity remains at historical lows,” they re-iterated.
It was suggested that sentiment has had some impact over recent months, however housing finance was noted to be at a new historical peak with the value of finance commitments 1.7% higher over the month.
Over the year to April, housing finance was 20.7% higher.
This has Housing Industry Association chief economist Harley Dale noting that there is upward momentum to the lending for construction of new dwellings, even when allowing for a decline in the seasonally adjusted number and value of loans in April.
“Over the three months to April 2014 the number of construction loans increased by 5.4% to reach the highest quarterly level since early 2010,” said Dale.
“In value terms the profile is very similar.”
“Today’s update is consistent with further growth in detached and low density dwelling construction into the new fiscal year,” he said.
“Meanwhile a modest downward trend in lending for the purchase of new dwellings still signals historically elevated levels of medium-high density construction being maintained in 2014-15.”
He also noted that the value of lending for investment in new rental stock is now at its highest since before the GFC.
<a href="/expert-insights/housing-finance-data-for-february-2014">Housing finance statistics: February</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/level-of-investment-remains-stubbornly-high-in-housing-finance-data">Housing finance statistics: March</a>
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

First home buyers at historical lows, investors dominate: Industry reactions

<html><body>
First home buyer grants aren't available for every first time buyer and there are many hoops that need to be jumped through. One of these hoops is buying a property that fits under a certain dollar value threshold.
Here are those cut off points across the country.
For more information as to which properties are eligible for a grant (the majority of offered grants are now for new builds only) you can <a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants">see our state-by-state round up here</a>.
For those who aren't first time buyers, here are <a href="/expert-insights/investing/grants-for-non-first-time-buyers-a-state-by-state-guide">the other grants on offer around the country</a>.
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Total value of eligible properties (home and land): $750,000 cap
Has applied since 1 September 2013.
Note: The new Over 60s Home Bonus Scheme has a cap of $764,999
NEW SOUTH WALES
At present, the cap for homes is $650,000.
For land, the cap is $450,000.
However, pre-budget announcements have <a href="/expert-insights/building/nsw-first-home-buyers-can-buy-up-to-750-000-under-extended-fhog">confirmed that this will now be increased to $750,000</a>.
NORTHERN TERRITORY
$600,000​ (established homes only)
QUEENSLAND
$750,000
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
$575,000
Note: The housing construction grant has a $450,000 cap.
TASMANIA
No limit.
VICTORIA
$750,000
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
$750,000
Or, if the home is north of the 26th parallel, then $1,000,000 or less.
</body></html>

First home buyer price thresholds: The cut offs you need to know

<html><body>
First home buyers are back at record lows.
Loans to first home buyers as a proportion of total new home loans fell 4% in the year to April – the share of first-time buyers in the market equalled the record November 2013 low at 12.3% of all loans.
Meanwhile the value of investor home loans rose by 2.3% to a record $11 billion in April, surging some 29.9% in the same 12 month period, filling the void.
First home buyer mortgages peaked in May 2009, accounting for 31.4% of total new home loans on the back of boosted government grants.
Craig James, the CommSec economist noted the first home buyer finance levels were well below the long-term average of 20%.
The St George senior economist, Hans Kunnen attributed the lack of first home buyers to state governments scrapping first home buyer grants for existing dwellings and the solid increase in house prices over the past year.
First home buyer families might need three income sources in future, he told Ross Greenwood's 2GB Money News.
Total housing finance edged 1.7% higher in April, in seasonally adjusted terms to $27.89 billion, while commitments for owner-occupied housing rose 1.4% and investor commitments by greater 2.3%, the Australian Bureau of Statistics ­figures showed.
The average home loan across Australia stood at $323,400 in April, up 7.2% on a year ago
Fairfax Media columnist Michael Pascoe noted the RBA had intriguingly dropped first home figures from its <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/" target="_blank">June economic data chart pack</a>, perhaps as a consequence of rising concerns about the underestimating of first home buyer statistics.
<img src="/images/2014/06/11/fhb%20june%2011%20one.gif" alt="">
A RBA spokesperson advised Property Observer that the Bank had decided to remove the data from the graph while it is being reviewed by the provider.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

First home buyers fall back to record lows

<html><body>
The NSW government has extended the first home owner grant in its June 17 budget.
First-time buyers who purchase new properties - houses or apartments - worth up to $750,000 will now qualify for the $15,000 payment from July 1. 
The previous threshold had been $650,000 since the June 2012 budget. 
Sydney's runaway median dwelling price has moved from $541,000 as at June 2012 to sit currently at $678,500, according to RP Data, so the catchup decision barely keeps pace with actual price movements.
However Housing Industry Association chief economist Harley Dale said the median price for new homes in NSW was around $650,000 which means most first home buyers will be able to get the full benefit. 
The threshold decision also brings NSW into line with several other states and territories.
Treasurer Andrew Constance initially announced the extended eligibility criteria for the first home owner grant by $100,000 with Premier Mike Baird in a visit to Sydney's north west.
“This will make the dream for young families of owning their own home that bit easier,” Andrew Constance said.
The government claims 100,000 new homes have been built since the March 2011 election. But NSW first home buyers still remain at well below the long term average in their buying habits, in part due to the desire to shift their buying to new homes, and also given affordability issues.
Last year around 7600 home owners secured the $15,000 grant, compared with 36,000 in 2011, after the scheme was restricted to new homes. 
<a href="https://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/grants/fhog" target="_blank">The First Home Owner Grant (New Homes) scheme</a> was established in 2012 to assist eligible first home owners to purchase a new home or build their home by offering a $15,000 grant.
The take-up of the grant scheme has been greater in recent times - some 45 per cent higher in the four months to April compared with the same time in 2013.
The scheme applies to new homes only, houses or apartments, and is scheduled to be reduced to $10,000 on 1 January 2016.
In Victoria first home buyers qualify for the $10,000 First Home Bonus, but the value of the property must not exceed $750,000. Eligible recipients will also qualify for a reduction of up to 40% on stamp duty payable on first homes purchased below $600,000. 
Queensland's Great Start Grant valued at $15,000 is paid to first home buyers who are buying or building a new home valued up to $750,000.
The ACT offers first home buyers $12,500 when purchasing new, off the plan with the grant is capped at $750,000 purchases.
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants">Last month Property Observer published a national guide for first home buyers.</a>
</body></html>

NSW first home buyers can buy up to $750,000 under extended FHOG

<html><body>
Mortgage Choice says it’s surprised by the results of its own survey of property investors.
Why? Because the people at Mortgage Choice have their heads as full of misinformation about real estate issues as everyone else out there.
They apparently expected the survey to show that saving a deposit was the biggest problem faced by property consumers, given the (alleged) big increase in property values around the nation and the (apparently) ongoing affordability crisis.
<a href="/expert-insights/finding-an-investment-property-harder-than-saving-for-one-mortgage-choice">But the survey showed</a> that the biggest challenge for investors was finding the right property, while affordability issues ranked well down the list of concerns.
There’s actually nothing surprising in any of that. You just need to have a little market knowledge – by which I mean real knowledge, not vague impressions absorbed from media sound bytes.
Mortgage Choice issued a press release, which presumably was designed to generate credibility for the organisation, but it did the opposite.
Here’s what the media release said:
“According to Mortgage Choice's 2014 First Time Investor Survey, 50.6% of investors who purchased their first investment property within the last two years said finding the right property was the hardest part of investing. Mortgage Choice spokesperson Jessica Darnbrough said the results were surprising, especially given the current market conditions. With property values climbing considerably over the last 12 months, we expected to see more first time investors saying their biggest challenge was saving a deposit, Ms Darnbrough said. Instead, just 15.3% said 'saving a deposit' was the biggest challenge they faced when investing in property.”
A couple of points about that - property values haven’t been climbing considerably in the last 12 months. Only in Sydney (and, more recently, in near-Sydney centres) have property values boomed. Most major cities and regional centres have had only moderate growth and some have had no growth at all.
While media continues to fabricate an affordability crisis, the two quarterly indexes published on affordability show the opposite is true. They’ve both just published their latest editions and found that affordability continues to improve and is the best it’s been in 12 years.
How can national organisations that make their living from real estate be so badly informed about it?
It’s no surprise that finding the right property is the biggest issue for novice investors. At Hotspotting we encounter this from consumers on a daily basis. The most commonly used word is “overwhelmed”.
Real estate consumers are overwhelmed by many things, including the massed of bad and conflicting information, but most of all by what to buy and where to buy it. This is a seriously large country with tens of thousands of locational choices. Sydney alone has over 700 suburbs.
The key element missing for most investors is not financial capacity – it’s the absence of a clear strategy for putting their financial capacity to effective use.
The investors who are not overwhelmed are those who have a clear set of goals, an understanding of their risk profile and borrowing capacity, and a strategy for achieving the end game.
Investors like that are quite rare – which is why the Mortgage Choice survey found that most novice investors struggled with finding the right property in the right location.
You can contact Terry via  <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email</a> or on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

No surprise that finding a property is first time investors' biggest worry

<html><body>
The Queensland Newman government’s Great Start Grant, which gives first home buyers $15,000 for buying or building a new home, is finally finding some take-up.
As of 2 June, 6,251 applications had been approved and paid. This was well up from 5,343 in March 2014.
More than 3,000 had been granted for Brisbane, according to Treasurer Tim Nicholls' budget papers.
Eligible first home buyers of properties up to $500,000 pay no duty, with reduced rates available up to $550,000.
It had been a slow start as in March 2013 the Queensland government renamed its $15,000 first-home owner construction grant (FHOCG) the 'great start grant' as just 126 first-home buyers had taken advantage since September 2012 last year.
But despite a small increase in new construction activity, the budget papers showed overall dwelling investment declined in Queensland for the sixth consecutive year in 2012-13. It was mainly due to a sharp fall in alterations and additions, partly reflecting the completion of earlier disaster-related renovation activity, and also slower income growth.
With sustained low interest rates and an improved outlook for residential property prices, growth in new dwelling approvals did accelerate in 2013, particularly for apartments in inner-city Brisbane. As a result, overall dwelling investment is expected to increase in 2013-14.
"Increased activity by interstate and overseas investors is also expected, as recent large gains in Sydney house prices prompt investors to seek markets elsewhere," Nicholls noted.
Beyond 2014-15, as the RBA moves to a more neutral monetary policy setting, dwelling investment growth is expected to moderate.
The first home grant take-up accompanies Treasury forecasting a further increase in residential sales.
“The recovery in the housing market is expected to continue in fiscal 2015 supported by low interest rates and the continuation of the government’s Great Start Grant,” budget papers said.
Revenue from transfer duty is expected to grow by 9.6% in 2014-15, following strong growth of 28.2% in 2013-14 that was supported by a number of large commercial transactions.
The 2014-15 estimate also includes the duty expected from a large commercial transaction. Underlying growth was 14.8% in 2013-14 and 13.3% in 2014-15 once the impact of these large transactions is removed. 
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Annual growth in transfer duty averaged over 22.6% from 2000-01 to 2007-08, driven by a range of factors including Queensland’s relative affordability of housing, high population growth and the impact of the burgeoning mining sector. 
Transfer duty growth is expected to be modest relative to that experienced between 2000-01 and 2007-08. The transfer revenue is tipped to be $2.65 billion in the 2014/15 year, compared to $2.42 billion in 2013/14. There is a $2.73 billion estimate for 2015/16.
"While low interest rates and a solid economic outlook are expected to support recovery in the property market, this is expected to occur at a gradual pace, particularly in the non-residential sector," the budget papers said.
Average growth of around 6.6% per annum is expected over the period 2013-14 to 2017-18.
Every one percentage point increase in the volume of sales sees transfer duty collections increase by about $25 million.
Land tax revenue of $980 million this year is tipped to increase to $995 million in the 2014/15 year.
Transfer taxes represent 21% of state taxation income and land tax represents 8%. 
Revenue growth from transfer duty can vary significantly from year to year due to the volatility of both the residential and non-residential segments of the property market, while land tax has a relatively stable base and the effect of three year averaging of land values for assessments.
Resident individuals are generally liable for land tax if the total taxable value of the freehold land owned by that person as at 30 June is equal to or greater than $600,000.
Companies, trustees and absentees are liable for land tax if the total taxable value of the freehold land owned as at 30 June is equal to or greater than $350,000.
Land tax is estimated to grow by 1.5% to $995 million in 2014-15, the first year of annual growth since 2010-11.
The budget papers noted in recent years, land tax revenue has been adversely impacted by declining values, particularly for commercial and multi-unit residential land. 
Real Estate Institute of Queensland’s chief executive Anton Kardash said Queensland's real estate sector was starting to hit its straps" with more favourable market conditions.
The Queensland Treasurer, Tim Nicholls, has delivered a budget with a projected surplus of $188 million, the first surplus in a decade.
"The Queensland economy is now entering a period of transition as the investment phase of the large LNG projects nears completion and the production and export of LNG begins.
"Supported by sustained low interest rates, rising asset prices and a lower exchange rate, economic growth in 2013-14 is expected to be underpinned by household consumption growth, a recovery in dwelling investment and a significant contribution from net exports.
"However, as construction of the major LNG projects nears completion, business investment is expected to fall and see overall economic growth ease to 3% in 2013-14, compared with 3.6% in the previous year," the budget papers said. 
Employment growth picked up during the course of 2013-14, supported by some recovery in the labour-intensive household sector.
"This recovery is expected to support a further strengthening in employment growth in 2014-15 and beyond.
"This, in turn, is expected to drive a steady improvement in the unemployment rate, from 6% in 2013-14 to 51⁄2% in 2016-17."
Following the global economic slowdown, Queensland’s annual population grew by almost 95,000 in the year ending December quarter 2012.
Since then, it has fallen back to approximately 84,000 in the year ending September quarter 2013, reflecting lower inflows from both net overseas and net interstate migration.
The decline partially reflects a slowdown in the influx of workers as the resources investment boom peaked during 2013.
"Looking ahead, net overseas migration to Queensland is expected to pick up to be more in line with the State’s share of the national population.
"This increase will be supported by an expected recovery in overseas student arrivals as a result of the lower Australian dollar, as well as measures to simplify student visas.
"Net interstate migration is also expected to recover from current low levels, assisted by improved housing affordability in Queensland relative to New South Wales and Victoria," the budget papers said.
Overall, Queensland’s population growth is expected to be 13⁄4% in 2013-14, similar to that nationally. Growth in Queensland is then expected to strengthen to 2% per annum over the remainder of the forward estimates period, slightly stronger than the 13⁄4% per annum forecast national growth over the same period. 
</body></html>

Interstate investors arrive as Queensland Great Start Grant finally finds a place

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
When should a young person start getting paid as an adult?
It depends on where the money is coming from, according to current government policy - policy that is sending conflicting messages about the true value of young people to Australia’s economy.
In March, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) decided to alter the General Retail Industry Award so that 20 year olds would receive the “adult” rate of pay instead of the current rate of 90%. They will now be eligible for the full adult rate once they have been in the job for six months. This means that 20-year-olds will be treated virtually the same as those aged 21.
And yet in May, the federal budget proposed that unemployed people under the age of 25 would no longer qualify for the Newstart allowance of $510 a fortnight, currently available to people after they turn 22. People under 25 will have to apply for the lower Youth Allowance of $414 a fortnight at the full rate.
Currently, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) is <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/business-push-on-sunday-penalties/story-fn59noo3-1226940798835#mm-premium" target="_blank">leading a campaign</a> to lower Sunday penalty rates, arguing that it will create jobs for young people.
These measures send contradictory messages about when young people officially join the mainstream “adult” workforce. Let’s look at each in turn.
First the FWC decision. The Australian Retailers Association has argued that changes to the system of junior rates could discourage employers from appointing young people. But as Damian Oliver from the University of Sydney has <a href="https://theconversation.com/adults-in-all-but-pay-the-case-for-increasing-youth-wages-16030" target="_blank">pointed out</a>, some employers already pay young people in this age group at the adult rate.
Parts of the manufacturing and construction industries - significant employers of young males - have already removed junior rates for many categories of workers aged 18 to 20. Coles and Woolworths, the two largest employers of young people in the retail sector, have already removed junior rates for 20 year olds from their enterprise agreements.
Casual work is on the rise
At the same time, young people face an increasingly casualised workforce, with access to full-time secure work happening later in life. The steady decline of full-time job opportunities over the last 20 years has meant that many teenagers must make do with part-time and casual work, in which associated entitlements such as access to flexible holidays are not available. Combine this with the ever-increasing challenges of entering the housing market and young people find that the secure markers of “adulthood” enjoyed by previous generations are often out of reach. Recognition of a fair level of pay commensurate with “adults” is one of the few concessions available in a fluid job market.
Recent surveys of business show concern that young people lack loyalty to their employers. Loyalty is a two-way street. Recognition of the value of young people’s labour through wage levels, with the expectation that in return young people will stay with employers, is one way of addressing this concern, so the FWC decision is potentially positive in this regard.
The Australian Industry Group has suggested: “The emphasis should be on preserving employment in the industry, not on imposing higher costs,“ but a more sophisticated response is required that both ensures fairness as well as providing youth employment and training opportunities. Arguably, wage rates could be traded off against traineeships with a qualification at the end or other benefits.
A less sophisticated approach is to lower penalty rates. ACCI Chief executive, Kate Carnell, <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/small-business/trends/acci-prioritises-youth-unemployment-20140521-38naz#ixzz33XBhZTkq" target="_blank">recently suggested</a> that “With youth unemployment rates going up, and the policies announced in the budget… you could get more jobs, especially with the young market, very quickly with movement on weekend penalty rates”.
With major employers of young people such as retailers joining the campaign, there is some justification to potentially opening up job opportunities. But again, the value of young people’s work (and rest) is ambivalent. While it may create jobs, it may also inadvertently contribute to the broader lack of security that permeates the youth labour force. And the argument that these jobs will lead to secure employment becomes problematic given that teenagers in part-time work are only <a href="https://www.fya.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/FYA_HYPAF_Full_Report_PDF.pdf" target="_blank">slightly more likely</a> to move into full-time employment than those who are unemployed.
Earning or learning
Under the government’s new earning or learning regime, jobseekers under the age of 30 will have to wait six months before receiving unemployment benefits, depending on their work history. In one stroke, this policy effectively extends the age of transition from school to work by five years. It does this by treating young people under 30 as one category, consisting of those who apparently need economically punitive motivation to seek work. Advocates of this policy may characterise this as an “incentive”, but the outcome is the same: if you’re young and not earning or learning, you will not be supported by government support derived from societal taxation.
What this does is to extend the economic definition of unemployed youth to the age of 30. It stands in contrast to the FWC’s implied judgement that 20 year-olds should be treated the same as those aged 21. The latter decision affords entitlements to a fair wage to younger Australians, the former denies entitlements to later in life. One step forward, two steps back.
At the heart of the FWR decision is that “the discounted rate for all 20-year-old retail employees is not a fair and relevant minimum safety net”.
Beneath these decisions is a social question: “When does a young person become an adult?” Prior to this decision, 18 year-olds working in retail are paid 70% of the full adult rate (i.e. the wage applied to those over the age of 21). 19-year-olds are paid at 80% of the wage, and so on until at age 21 they are recognised as “adults”.
What changes between the ages of 20 and 21? Based on the evidence, the Commission found there to be “little difference in the duties and responsibilities assigned to 20 and 21-year-old retail employees”. And what changes between the age of 21 and the age of 30?
A consistent message needs to be sent to young people about their economic status as “adults”. Recognising their work through providing the adult wage level is one small way of doing this, while addressing the discrimination evident in the way young people are paid.
The FWC described the decision to change the retail award as a special case and that this would not necessarily lead to similar findings for other awards. The federal government’s policy to alter conditions for receiving Newstart Allowance has yet to make its way through the Senate.
When viewed in combination, these approaches to youth employment suggest we are some way off from sending a consistent message to young people about the value of their work to the economy.
Lucas Walsh is associate professor and associate dean (Berwick), faculty of education at Monash University.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>. 
Photo courtesy of Flickr/<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>.
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

Earning, learning or confused: Mixed signals on jobs for young

<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
But laws around negative gearing and super are unlikely to change so it’s time to revisit the issue.
I believe the answer lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
 A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
<blockquote>
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite.
</blockquote>
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first homebuyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
This article was first published on Property Observer in October, 2013.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ:
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts">Exclusive: First home buyer picks from the experts</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers">How will rising student debt affect first home buyers?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants">The national guide to first home buyer grants</a>
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

It's time to re-think first home buyer grants

<html><body>
Only 28 days remain for first home buyers in South Australia hoping to receive government assistance to buy an established home.
South Australian first time buyers are currently eligible for a first home owners grant (FHOG) on both new homes and established homes. 
For those purchasing established homes, current $5,000 is attainable. However, from the start of July the grant for established properties will end.
For those buying a new home, a grant of $15,000 is achievable for properties not exceeding $575,000 in value.
If you previously held any interest in residential property before 1 July 2000, even if it was an investment property, you're not eligible.
Those who have had a property since - but used it solely for investment purposes and did not live in it - may be eligible. You'll need to give them tax return details, tenancy agreements and current electricity and phone accounts.
After the property is built, you must then live in the property for six months commencing within 12 months of completion.
Off-the-plan properties may also be eligible for a stamp duty concession for a new apartment or substantially refurbisged apartment. This is for properties from 31 May 2012 to 30 June 2014, capped at the stamp duty payable on a $500,000 apartment (or $21,330). A partial concession will apply from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016.
The concession does, however, apply to specific areas as outlined on the Revenue SA site and associated maps.
You can check out the <a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants">national guide to first home buyer grants</a> to see a more detailed rundown of what's available across Australia for first home buyers.
</body></html>

South Australian FHOG for established houses runs out on 30 June

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Until now, student debt in Australia has been relatively modest, with low repayment rates, low indexation and high repayment thresholds. This won’t be the case if the government proceeds with changes mooted in the recent budget, including higher fees and higher interest on debts. Australia will move to a student debt model similar to the US, so this is a good place to look at the effects that large levels of debt have on young graduates.
<a href="https://www.demos.org/what-cost-how-student-debt-reduces-lifetime-wealth" target="_blank">Much recent research</a> from the United States shows that student debt is having profound and negative effects, both at the individual and at the national level.
Graduates living with debt
Purdue University is a public university in South Bend, Indiana. President Mitch Daniels commissioned a large, evidence-based study of the impact of student debt on university graduates. <a href="https://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/168791/gallup-purdue-index-inaugural-national-report.aspx">The results</a>, based on a survey of 30,000 graduates, were recently released.
The <a href="https://www.nuvo.net/indianapolis/purdues-mitch-daniels-talks-college-costs/Content?oid=2837651#.U4KfSPmSyPY" target="_blank">findings of the study</a> are sobering, on two fronts.
First, student debts weigh heavily on students’ later wellbeing. Wellbeing was measured along five dimensions: life purpose, social engagement, community engagement, financial satisfaction and physical health. Graduates without student debt were seven times more likely to report themselves to be “thriving” along all of these dimensions than graduates (or indeed dropouts) with more than $40,000 in debt.
This finding tends to confirm the results of a <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735813001256">major meta-analysis</a> of evidence from the United States, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. The findings suggest that higher levels of debt while a student are significant predictors of stress and secondary negative health consequences. This study also points to other evidence of serious consequences more generally. Higher levels of debt have serious long-term consequences, including mental, neurotic or psychotic disorders, depression, suicide attempts (or suicide completion), problem drinking and drug dependence.
Secondly, large debt burdens influence choices related to work, careers and lives. Graduates with higher debts are less likely to be entrepreneurial and start new businesses. This is to be expected, as student debt repayments tend to constrain the capacity to borrow for other productive purposes.
In the robust free-market economy of the US, such entrepreneurial timidity among the best and brightest is a source of real and valid concern for policy makers.
Other <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272710001337" target="_blank">recent research</a> has shown that students with higher debts tend to pursue higher-paying careers, not pursuing “public interest” jobs in areas like teaching and community services. Over time, this means that public institutions like schools will have to pay higher wages to attract the best and brightest, indirectly shifting some of the cost of student debt back to the taxpayer in the form of higher public sector salaries.
Large student debts <a href="https://www.learnvest.com/2012/10/real-women-speak-out-how-student-loans-have-affected-me/" target="_blank">have also been shown</a> to lead to delays in home purchases and having children.
Debt ain’t free
Shifting more of the burden for higher education back on to students, and saddling them with huge debts, may seem like a good idea for policy makers, but it will have serious long-term consequences for those students and thus the wider Australian community.
In the United States, the average student graduated with around $30,000 of student debt in 2013. Currently, Australian graduates of three-year business degrees have debt of a similar level.
If the proposed changes lead to higher fees, <a href="https://theconversation.com/how-much-student-debt-will-you-be-facing-post-budget-26712" target="_blank">as most analysts expect</a>, it would be reasonable to anticipate the graduates of 2018 completing their three-year degrees with debt of around $50,000.
It would be naïve to think debts of this level won’t have far-reaching consequences for graduates’ well-being and the work and economic choices they make in their lives. These choices will have serious consequences for our economy and society.
John Rice is associate professor in strategic management at Griffith University.
John Rice works for Griffith University, a public university. His most recent previous role was Chief Researcher at the National Centre for Vocational Education Research, a ministerial company owned by the Commonwealth and State education ministers. He has received grant funding from the Australian Research Council. He is a current member of the Australian Labor Party and the National Tertiary Education Union.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
Photo courtesy of <a href="https://taxrebate.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-rapid_p="22">TaxRebate.org.uk</a> / <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>.
</body></html>

First Home Buyers

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

First Home Buyers

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News