Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

Joel Robinson

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

The Gold Coast Planning Committee has supported the preliminary approval for the Benowa Gardens Urban Village project following an extensive community consultation and assessment process.

The proposal will now proceed to a full council vote on June 2.

The application sought approval for a masterplanned urban village on the existing Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre site, combining new housing, retail, dining, health and lifestyle amenities within a walkable, integrated precinct.&nbsp;

The proposed redevelopment includes around 413 apartments integrated above a revitalised mixed-use centre featuring a full-line supermarket of 4,000 sqm, 6,000 sqm of specialty retail and dining space across around 30 retailers, a 7,000 sqm health and wellness precinct, and roughly 9,630 sqm of office and medical suites.&nbsp;

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fb36ae47-80bc-45f0-9914-31b0c7b6007d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C4%201121%20FI.jpg?VersionId=6mRKk2uU4r67TmTt39DKGUlvFRbTVqWa" />

The broader masterplan also includes very significant traffic and transport improvements, wide pedestrian walkways, upgraded pedestrian and cycle connections, and enhanced public areas designed to create a more connected and walkable community environment.&nbsp;

Centre owner Patrick Lu said the milestone reflected months of detailed planning, technical assessment and ongoing communication with local residents, businesses, schools and stakeholders.

“We appreciate the time, consideration and care Council officers and the Planning Committee have given this proposal throughout the assessment process,” Lu said.

“We also sincerely thank the local community for engaging with us, sharing feedback and participating in the consultation process over many months.

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32fd1fc3-d0e6-485f-ac57-9916c9bcb818" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C5%201121%20FI_2.jpg?VersionId=fz8qQKDBLQ7MyFRc856Zccfbh9nFwLOe" />

“We understand projects of this scale bring questions and concerns, which is why we have worked hard to listen carefully, provide information transparently and continue refining elements of the proposal where possible.

“Our vision has always been to create a well-designed, community-focused urban village that responds to the changing needs of the Gold Coast, while delivering improved amenity, housing diversity, healthcare access and local lifestyle benefits.

“This proposal is about creating a genuine live-work-play environment where residents can access everyday services, schools, healthcare, dining, shopping and green space within walking distance, while also supporting local jobs and economic activity.”

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="50dfbd04-590e-4fc6-983b-766880947867" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Dining%20Day%20Time%20-%20High%20Resolution.jpg?VersionId=BP7ZoKJ0DdL_8iRkkC8VVx99moICV6kg" />

Lu said the proposal had evolved significantly through consultation and technical review, particularly around traffic, pedestrian and student safety and neighbourhood connectivity.&nbsp;

Melissa Griffin, Director at Urbis, said the recommendation recognised the strategic importance of delivering more housing and services within established urban areas already supported by infrastructure.

“This proposal represents the type of thoughtful, integrated growth that planning frameworks across South-East Queensland are encouraging,” Ms Griffin said.

“The project seeks to place housing, retail, healthcare and employment opportunities together in a highly accessible location close to schools, transport and existing services.

“Importantly, the process has involved significant technical assessment and community engagement to ensure local issues and feedback were properly considered throughout the planning pathway.”

$1 billion Benowa Gardens Urban Village heads to council vote following Planning Committee support

Surfers Paradise is officially set for its first new residential development with a 45-storey skybridge connecting the two towers.

John Camilleri’s Celestino Developments has been given the green light by the Gold Coast City Council to develop its major beachfront precinct across its huge 4,000 sqm oceanfront site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/63-79-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">63–79 Garfield Terrace</a>, just five months after its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-billionaire-winx-breeder-s-bold-two-tower-surfers-paradise-play-with-45th-storey-skybridge">submission in late 2025</a>.

The approved scheme will deliver two towers rising 55 and 48 storeys, connected by a skybridge positioned on level 45 that will house a range of resident-only wellness and entertainment spaces.

In its notice of approval, the Gold Coast City Council said the&nbsp;proposed overall built form has been designed to complement the scale, intensity and protect the adjacent amenity and surrounding streets through the use of varied setbacks, site cover and architectural elements.

<img alt="First look exclusive: Billionaire Winx breeder’s bold two-tower Surfers Paradise play with 45th-storey skybridge" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-30%20at%209.53.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=ADyPJ_TFbJvSU9wZFOiCBnlPtgF7VWqW" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dbi">DBI</a>, the development will comprise 275 apartments across the two towers, including a mix of two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences, as well as several penthouses. The apartments will sit above a landscaped podium featuring more than 90 metres of beachfront pool frontage, private resident lawns, lounges, and wellness spaces.

DBI said the design draws heavily from the movement and form of the coastal environment, with curving balcony lines and sculpted façades intended to soften the scale of the towers while maximising ocean outlooks and passive shading outcomes.

“The project occupies a rare, uninterrupted oceanfront site and has been shaped by a design philosophy that merges architectural elegance with environmental responsiveness and a carefully curated lifestyle experience,” DBI said in planning documents submitted to the Gold Coast City Council.

The most distinctive element of the approved project is the skybridge linking the two towers at level 45. The elevated communal space is planned to include executive lounges, formal dining areas, wellness facilities, and panoramic ocean-facing outlooks.

“The skybridge enhances the identity of the development, promotes social interaction, and delivers a lifestyle experience not found elsewhere on the Gold Coast,” DBI said.

At podium level, residents will have access to a suite of resort-style amenities, including resident lounges, private dining rooms, a yoga lawn, gymnasium, plunge pools, and treatment spaces. The beachfront pool has been designed with separate lap, lounge, and children’s areas extending across the width of the site.

The project will also introduce new food and beverage offerings along the Enderley Avenue and Oceanway frontages, contributing additional activation to the beachfront precinct.

First look: Winx billionaire’s beachfront Surfers Paradise apartment development greenlit

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Sydney’s first alcohol-free bar, Lentil on the Rocks has opened in Newtown, right in the heart of the inner west.
The brain child of Melbourne-founded vegetarian food outlet Lentil As Anything, the bar is on the upstairs level of the food outlet’s existing Newtown premises.
The Lentil as Anything restaurant asks patrons to pay what they can afford, or what they think the food is worth, rather than listing prices. Staff are volunteers and the business is not for profit.
This new bar will also operate on an "honesty policy" system and is free entry.
Many mocktails were consumed upon the official opening last week, allowing teetotalers, general abstainers and the underage to enjoy a Newtown night out.
The bar will be open every Friday and Saturday from 8pm to 11pm.
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/newtowns-lentil-as-anything-upsizes-to-new-address">Lentil as Anything upsized to their “own premises”</a>, closer to the heavily trafficked Newtown train station, at 391 King Street in July this year. They were previously renting the nearby 531 King Street. This is their first, and currently only, foray into Sydney.
The alcohol-free bar is next door to one of Newtown’s favourite alcoholic watering holes “Sando”, or the Sandringham Hotel.
Alcohol-free bars are becoming increasingly popular overseas, dubbed ‘dry bars’ by offshore media, in particular in the United Kingdom. The Brink in Liverpool, Redemption Bar in London, Sobar in Nottingham and The Umbrella Café and Dry Bar Manchester have all recently opened. The Brink and The Other Side are, like Lentil on the Rocks, not for profits. 
The Date Report notes that there are also 'dry bars' in Paris, Dublin and Chicago.
The OECD ranks Australia equal 16th internationally, tied with the United Kingdom and Switzerland, for alcohol content consumption per person.
The Preston and St Kilda Lentil as Anything restaurants are currently looking at potential renovations, with fundraising a la carte dinner nights to be held later this month. There are also outlets in Abbotsford and Footscray. But there is no word yet whether Melbourne can expect an alcohol-free Lentil as Anything bar any time soon.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Sydney’s first alcohol-free bar Lentil on the Rocks opens

<html><body>
The latest RP Data CoreLogic Home Value Index for October indicates strong growth in a number of capital cities.
Here’s the 12 month growth from largest to smallest across the capitals.
<ul>
<li>
Sydney 13.1% 
</li>
<li>
Melbourne 8.9% 
</li>
<li>
Brisbane 5.6% 
</li>
<li>
Darwin 5.0% 
</li>
<li>
Hobart 4.4% 
</li>
<li>
Adelaide 4.3% 
</li>
<li>
Perth 3.4% 
</li>
<li>
Canberra 0.9%
</li>
</ul>
The combined capitals together recorded an uptick of 8.9% over the year. Over the month of October, prices increased by 1.0%, contributing to a quarterly result of 2.2%.
</body></html>

How the capitals performed over the past year: RP Data

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
I personally invest across all asset classes, property, shares and cash and I was interested in finding out how my property investments stacked up compared to other investments in my portfolio over the long-term.
So with that in mind I thought I would undertake some research into the performance of the two major investments in my portfolio, property and shares, and which is the better asset class to invest in. 
This is an age old question and the answer will depend on who you talk to. However, I wanted to strip the debate right back and look at recent data. As they say in the classics “you can’t argue with the facts”.  So, here is what I discovered.
According to statistics and the reputable Russell Investments/ASX Long-term Investing Report 2014, the past 10 years may have been a great time to invest in the equity market, but residential property delivered better, more steady returns over the longer run.
The report concludes comparing the total returns - after fees, and including rental and dividend incomes over the past 10 years up to the end of 2013, that Australian shares unsurprisingly led at 9.2% even after the crash associated with the global financial crisis.  It was closely followed by hedged global shares which delivered an 8.2% return. Investment property lagged behind at 6.1%, comparable to fixed interest over the same period.  
But the results over the past 20 years look quite different.  An investment in residential property returned a 9.9% gain, beating both Australian shares at 8.7% and global shares at 8.0%.  In addition, over the past 20 years residential property delivered steady rental returns compared to the erratic equity market.
However, the report also shows that the dominance of property over shares in the 20-year period becomes reduced after the tax benefits of the fully-franked dividends provided by Australian listed companies are factored in.  At the top marginal tax rate, property delivered a 7.5% return over the past 20 years, only just ahead of a 6.9% return for shares.
So now I sit back and look at the numbers provided by economists and then equate this back to my personal situation.  Have I achieved the sort of growth quoted by the reports? 
Firstly, returns vary from property to property and for me have not been as consistent as quoted within the report.  Yes rental returns have been consistent, with very little no vacancy periods and consistent CPI increases.  
Some of my properties have performed well and above the returns quoted and others below, however the same could be said about the shares.  The performance of individual assets, are probably more of a function of location and selection of the particular property or share investment, more than the Investment class itself. 
So, for me yes the returns are important but there are other reasons why I see property as a strong investment.
<ol start="1">
<li>As the report states, property delivers steady rental returns due to low vacancy rates and low supply, we are simply not building enough properties quickly enough in areas where people want to live to accommodate the growing population. 
</li>
<li>Lenders see property as a solid security and will lend up to 80% (in some cases more) of the asset at historically low rates, and even though my shares are more liquid it is more complex to borrow against them.  However the ability to access equity in property (without selling) is quite simple, as property lending is mainstream for banks that are aggressively competing for market share. 
</li>
<li>The tangible ‘see, touch and feel factor’ of property provides me with comfort and gives me control. 
</li>
<li>The ATO allows me to claim the tax benefits of depreciation on the building and various inclusions over a number of years, although some conditions do apply.  In other words on top of the rent I receive, the tax office is assisting my cash flow by allowing me to claim depreciation on the capital outlay. You cannot depreciate a share!</li>
</ol>
My conclusion is that both asset classes are an important part of my portfolio but the key is in the selection process. Seek professional help when it comes time to making your choice. 
For property I would recommend you speak to a registered buyer's agent and with shares a licenced financial planner. Assuming I have purchased the property well, specifically in the right location, taking into account the points 1-4 above and the economists research (numbers don’t lie), then I feel very confident that over the longer term my property portfolio will grow and is a good and solid investment.
David Naylor is non executive chairman and co founder of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor</a>.
</body></html>

dnaylor-vq8r8EznXA

Property v shares: Which is the best assest class to invest in?

<html><body>
A huge shift in net interstate migration has taken place since the financial crisis, a major demographic trend which is a game-changer for this property market cycle, particularly in Sydney. Let's take a look in four short parts.
Part 1 - Mining states slowing...but Sydney booming 
Drilling into the most recent round of demographic data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics confirmed an interesting fact: net interstate migration from New South Wales has declined to its lowest level on record at just 1,036 in the March 2014 quarter.
Typically there has been a very significant population flow away from NSW, especially expensive Greater Sydney, which is comfortably more than replaced by immigrants from overseas and natural population increase. But as the mining construction boom fades so too does the tide of interstate population shift away from Sydney.
The mining states which have benefited most from net interstate migration historically are now no longer doing so - predominantly the maroon line of Queensland (and how!), the gold line of Western Australia (we use state cricket colours, see?) and the red of South Australia (Redbacks? Ah, you have the hang of it now), in that order.
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TqZE7VZ8DeY/VFFcNaz6RgI/AAAAAAAAQ00/_WzKb3KVooI/s1600/NIM.jpg">
Instead an expected rebound in services and construction jobs in Sydney and to a lesser extent Melbourne is seeing a massive boom in the population of those two cities.
Charted below is the annualised rate of population growth by state, which shows New South Wales (+115,000) now threatening to spiral off the top of the chart, with Victoria (+109,000) not too far behind.
<img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-afEmTfIBbSk/VFDtIiTQVCI/AAAAAAAAQzw/ZC_nBRz52Dg/s1600/DEMOG2.jpg">
It never pays to get too aroused by one quarter of data - particularly from ABS releases at the present time! But the population change in the March 2014 quarter showed NSW recording an extraordinary increase of 35,285, potentially implying an unheard of annualised pace of well over 140,000.
In the event, we will not see the state's annual population growth figure scaling such dizzying heights due to the now slowing pace of net overseas migration, with fewer Kiwis and Poms in particular choosing to take the path Down Under at this stage in the cycle. Indeed, most immigrants to Australia now hail from Asia.
Nevertheless, despite the slowing pace of net overseas migration, by the time the June 2014 data rolls around we will probably see New South Wales annual population growth approaching 120,000, which is a huge figure.
<img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6qzI7bGd7Hs/VFDtI7tCGpI/AAAAAAAAQz0/fNpiDo3qm-s/s1600/DEMOG3.jpg">
Part 2 - Dwelling supply: too hot, too cold...or just right?
There is some some conflicting and some zany market commentary when it comes to the adequacy of dwelling supply in Australia, often involving a preconceived notion ("massive overbuilding" or "chronic undersupply") and the producing of data to support the position.
Sometimes we see analysis of building completions in Australia compared to the existing population, which is an interesting point of comparison, but a clear confusion of stock versus flow.
Much more unusually we see offbeat comparisons of Australian construction versus that seen in certain US states which previously had a cahuna oversupply and now aren't constructing much (relevance?), or on particularly obscure days, comparisons with Japanese construction. 
The slightly boring answer is that there is no chronic undersupply of dwellings in Australia and nor is there massive overbuilding in aggregate, although it is possible to highlights regions and suburbs which represent examples of each.
Property markets are complex and imperfect beasts. If you can analyse and understand data flows it becomes possible to identify specific areas where undersupply will begin to bite, and thus you can comfortably outperform market capital growth averages over time by buying investment property with an element of scarcity value in these locations. 
The data to analyse 
A better starting point is to scrutinise Australian building approvals, dwelling commencements and completions data against the changes in demand in Australia, drawing inferences based upon average household sizes (a little over 2.5 depending on your preferred source) for the regions analysed.
There have been warnings about a potential oversupply of dwellings in Sydney, for example. Travelling around certain parts of town I can see why you might reach that conclusion, but from a macro perspective, you'd be wrong. 
There is something of an oversupply of units looming in a few pockets - in the CBD and inner city, around the airport and inner south, and in a few of the new Urban Activation Precincts (UAPs) around transport hubs, where there will now be fewer height restriction on the building of apartment tower blocks.
Largely bought by offshore investors, these off-the-plan apartments will generally be poor performers and are likely to suffer from falling rents, vacancies, and possibly both.
(As an aside it's often highlighted how most property investor loans written are for established dwellings, but since there are now 9,366,800 dwellings and counting in Australia, and since a high proportion of the new stock is sold offshore, the percentage of domestic investment in established stock will continue to rise. 
Moreover, established properties usually represent better value than most expensive new units and therefore a majority of domestic investors will rationally steer clear of the newly constructed stock in the absence of incentives to do otherwise. In short, we probably do need foreign investors to create supply).
Sure, there are some areas where there are more new flats than willing renters. But ask anyone in the market and they'll tell you that in the lifestyle suburban areas where most people actually want to live, precisely the opposite problem exists - there is a dearth of quality stock and the decent stuff is selling in a matter of days.
Article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Part 3 - New stock has come online 
Think back to the annualised population growth figures discussed previously for New South Wales, which are tracking at about 115,000 over the year to March 2014. In the 12 months to June 2014, the state saw the completion of 19,134 houses...
 <img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9sqF6UvrvTg/VFDtMwvBFQI/AAAAAAAAQ0M/scA_2nrj8wE/s1600/DEMOG6.jpg">
...and only 17,510 completions for unit and apartments.
 <img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Pey-sa1PVEE/VFDtNSYhAJI/AAAAAAAAQ0U/ltPQkykWxb8/s1600/DEMOG7.jpg">
That's a grand total of 36,644 completions. Given that the state population in the year to March 2014 increased by 114,509, I don't think we need to panic about massive overbuilding just yet.
Completions have not even been high enough to match the demand from the state population growth let alone address previously inherent supply imbalances in Sydney...and that's before we even begin to account for brownfield site demolitions and stock obsolescence.
In fact, if you drill in more closely to the population and demographics data you will find that population growth in New South Wales regional centres has been far below the national averages in all but a tiny handful of localities. Meanwhile Greater Sydney is set to record population growth somewhere in the vicinity of 90,000 in this calendar year.
Part 4 - Decent approvals &amp; supply in the pipeline
In terms of forthcoming supply, it is true that there is more to come in the pipeline. In the 12 months to June 2014, New South Wales commenced 20,000 houses and 25,000 units. And Greater Sydney apartment approvals are now tracking at a little over 26,000 on a rolling annual basis.
That's a decent enough supply response to rising prices, assuming all approvals make it to completion, which they won't.
However the level of monthly apartment approvals peaked way back in March 2014 and is now rolling over. The major developers, who are nobody's dummies, are aiming to have their Greater Sydney new apartment stock completed and sold by December 2015.
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-T_iG24vTjOY/VFDtODsprWI/AAAAAAAAQ0c/uz-oy6QHkaY/s1600/DEMOG8.jpg">
Oversupply theory? Doesn't pass the "sniff test".
With the exception of the aforementioned locations, there is no city-wide oversupply of dwellings in Sydney, and nor is there going to be any time soon. 
Inner Melbourne and inner Brisbane are two other areas we can talk about with an apartment oversupply. And, for example, some coal mining towns and regions are likely to experience oversupply too, albeit as result of a collapse in demand rather than overbuilding.
As a Chartered Accountant and sometime auditor, too many years ago now I was trained at accounting college to consider that when people make sweeping yet unsubstantiated claims such as "there is an obscene amount of construction going on in Sydney" then that claim should be weighed up against or made to pass a common sense or "sniff test".
Even if you choose to dismiss vacancy rates as an unreliable indicator, which in Sydney are hovering way below the notional equilibrium position of 3% at just 1.7%, the best "sniff test" for oversupply to my mind is to look for signs of negative rental growth. 
Today apartment rental growth is tracking somewhere between at 3% and 5.3% in Sydney, depending on your data provider of choice.
Over the past 10 years the growth in median rental for detached houses in Sydney has been 80%, and for attached dwellings the equivalent growth in median rental is 77%.
'Nuff said.
You can visit <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) or Pete's <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blog</a>.
His latest book is '<a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>' .
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Migration away from Sydney falls to record low

<html><body>
We just finished a great little duplex project for a client. The site was in an older suburb and had a derelict house on it and it came with some challenges.

When you are looking at a knockdown, it's important to factor in a few things. One of the biggest of course is the demolition costs.  These can range dramatically in cost.

As we had time whilst waiting for the DA to be processed, I ended up getting no less than seven quotes. The old house was full of asbestos of course so that was factored into each quote and there was a big garage slab to be removed.

The highest quote I got was $22,000 and the lowest was $13,000. This was a contractor who actually recycled a lot of the materials, on selling them and was therefore cheaper.  

[smartcode_project:default project_id=3783]

Lesson number one, it is worth the efforts of getting lots of quotes.

The cost of the site was $160,000 (negotiated down from $180,000) plus demolition costs bought it up to $173,000. This was a nice big 876 square metre block of land located close to the school and a good price to pay for a dual occupancy site. It had a 20 metre frontage but there was no kerb and guttering to the front of the house, just a gravel shoulder. 

The site had a slight fall to the rear and we planned to build up the site to drain to the street. But council had other ideas and one of the conditions of our DA consent was to drain to the rear where there was a gravel laneway.

The problem was that there were no drains in the laneway and we had to install a dish drain to direct the water to the nearest cross street, which was pretty ridiculous considering there was no drain there either.

Lesson number two, look for land that has establish drainage in the street, preferably with kerb and guttering.  

The next hurdle we found building in an old suburb was the water and sewer infrastructure was aged.

We were asked to install a new water service which included boring under the road to pick up the main for the water service and install a new junction as per the minor works contract issued by the local water board.

This added about $7,000 to the development costs effectively wiping out most of our $9,000 saving on the house demolition.  

Lesson number three, make allowances for infrastructure upgrades. These are not required in new land estates.

The good news for this development was that the villas were in high demand, being in an older suburb where there was very little new housing. Typical dwellings consisted of 80 year old miners cottages with a sprinkling of 1950s brick homes.

All through the construction phase I had people phoning me wanting to rent them or buy them. Our client was building to hold and so as we neared completion, I was able to have both villas leased for our client before handover.

We have a great relationship with our builder and they allow us to hold open houses and show through prospects before handover which is invaluable and means cashflow from the moment the final builder's drawdown is paid.

This little duplex project ended up costing $570,000 including land and construction costs to build two three-bedroom attached villas (a duplex).  Both were rented for $350 per week, giving a gross yield of 6.4%.  There was some equity created as well with the villas worth about $320,000 each.

There are advantages and disadvantages of a knock down rebuild project. It's important to get the land cheap enough to compensate for any additional issues that may arise due to the older area.

<img alt="" src="/images/2014/10/31/chivers%20oct%2031%20one.png">

<a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au" target="_blank">www.propertybloom.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Three lessons from a knock down rebuild project

<html><body>
Home equity withdrawal has become increasingly popular over the past decade, despite the convulsions caused by the global financial crisis, a new peer reviewed study has found.
The study from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), Housing equity withdrawal: uses, risks, and barriers to alternative mechanisms in later life, sheds some interesting light on the way different people use their wealth in this critical period of their life.
In 2010, 18% of older home owners took some, or all, cash out of their housing equity. In 2001/2002 this sat at 13%.
The dominant form of home equity withdrawal for those under pension age is “in situ” equity borrowing (staying in the home and borrowing on the asset).
For those above pension age there is a shift towards downsizing or selling up.
It is noted that home owners making these decisions are more likely to suffer from material deprivation than those who do not touch their home equity, while those who withdraw equity are “also have more housing-oriented wealth profiles”.
“Unsurprisingly, income poor-housing asset-rich groups feature prominently among groups cashing in housing equity,” the report notes.
Mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW), however, is used by those who appear to have sounder economic positions than those downsizing or selling up.
MEW was found to most commonly be a technique used by people under pension age as they look to spend on a wide range of items, including holiday spending, home maintenance, car repairs, upgrades or children’s education costs.
Meanwhile, older home owners selling up, usually have little income or assets to fall back on, relying on housing-dominated portfolios with little other assets.
“They are also the least able to raise emergency funds among all the groups investigated, and so most likely to sell up when financial emergencies arise,” the study notes.
“While in situ equity release by adding to mortgages is common, particularly in the group approaching retirement, and associated with pressing spending needs, the typical in situ equity borrower has a relatively strong financial and employment context. These owners are becoming more indebted, but their borrowing is not reckless.”
If serious misfortune is, however, faced, then financial stress may not be far away.
Those downsizing or selling up were found to have most likely faced ill health, separation, divorce or bereavement prior to sale.
“One senses that amidst older downsizers and sellers, in situ MEW is no longer an option to cushion living standards in the face of adversity. Importantly, they appear to be options that older female, single person households are prone to fall back on.”
Selling up is, ultimately, seen by most as a last resort.
Risks the study notes you should be aware of:
<ul>
<li>Adverse life events can quickly alter your ability to repay any new borrowings.</li>
<li>Life events can force quick financial decisions to be made that are not well thought out, leaving an elevated risk of making a poor decision.</li>
<li>Transaction costs when downsizing can be substantial.</li>
<li>Social isolation can occur on the sale of your primary home.</li>
<li>Those selling up to re-enter the rental market may face a lack of security.</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

Borrowing against house increasingly popular, but selling up a last resort

<html><body>
The South East Queensland market is gathering momentum, Stockland managing director Mark Steinert said in his address at the company’s annual general meeting earlier this week.
Steinert said Melbourne is steady with high levels of activity, while Perth’s vacant land market is continuing to moderate.
Stockland’s newly released projects, Elara and Willowdale in New South Wales and Calleya in Western Australia, have seen strong demand. Meanwhile, their major projects in Victoria’s Lockervie and Davis Road, as well as Queensland’s Caloundra are progressing well for a 2015 launch and 2016 settlements.
“Overall we have around $460 million of redevelopments underway and $700 million of redevelopments in our next wave of commencements, all of which are expected to deliver incremental internal rates of return of 12-14% and 7-8% stabilised FFO yields,” Steinert said.
He noted that as part of the growth strategy for Stockland they have acquired 2,300 lots adjoining their successful projects that will provide returns at or above their hurdle rates.
“We also made good progress establishing our strategy to reach new customers with medium density products and completed homes and this will see us commence work on 550 new homes in FY15,” he said.
Their projection is that they are on track to settle at the top end of 5,000 to 6,000 net deposits through the cycle range “assuming current residential market conditions continue”, given the first quarter saw 1,652 net deposits, which was noted as the strongest period in four years.
</body></html>

South East Queensland’s residential momentum continues: Stockland

<html><body>
A 50% stake in North Sydney’s 101 Miller Street/Greenwood Plaza has sold for $300 million plus.
The deal, one of the biggest commercial property transactions for the fourth quarter, was negotiated by Rob Sewell and Simon Rooney of JLL &amp; CBRE.
TIAA Henderson Real Estate, on behalf of TIAA-CREF purchased the half stake from Eureka Funds Management.
The remaining 50% share of the landmark office tower and dominant shopping centre will continue to be owned by the Mirvac Group.
Mirvac will continue to operate 100% of the asset.
Rob Sewell said 101 Miller and Greenwood Plaza was one of Australia’s limited stock of 35 premium grade buildings.
"But more importantly it is the only premium asset across Australia that is outside of a CBD area," he said.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Half share in North Sydney's 101 Miller Street-Greenwood Plaza sold for $300 million plus

<html><body>
Foreign investment in Australian property is a divisive topic.
The Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) <a href="/news/tougher-firb-rules-delayed">is coming under close scrutiny</a>, with many believing the board is neglecting to police the current rules around offshore purchasers. Others suggest that the existing rules are too weak and are pushing for new legislation. 
But what actually are the current rules for foreign buyers looking to purchase Australian residential property? Here are some of the most pertinent rules:
<ol>
<li>An application must be made for each specific property that a foreign buyer intends to purchase. An application must be lodged for that home – it cannot be lodged for a general or in principle approval. This approval then stands for 12 months from the date on the letter. Separate applications can simultaneously be made and granted for multiple properties. 
</li>
<li>The approval letter (which comes as an email) only applies to the individual or group who applied. It is not transferrable, and if another party wants to buy they must re-apply. 
</li>
<li>Temporary residents, and 457 visa holders, are only able to buy one established dwelling, which is to be used as a primary place of residence. There are no restrictions on the number of vacant and new properties (or established properties for redevelopment) that approval can be received for. 
</li>
<li>Temporary residents cannot purchase established dwellings until they actually live in the country. 
</li>
<li>Temporary residents must sell the established property when they leave as it is no longer their PPOR. They cannot rent it out. It must be sold within three months of leaving the country. 
</li>
<li>Foreign non-residents can only purchase vacant land or new property upon application. Established properties for redevelopment can be purchased under certain circumstances. 
</li>
<li>Approval is not required to sell unless the conditions have not been met. For instance, if vacant land was not developed by the purchaser, then approval will be required. 
</li>
<li>Those who no longer wish to purchase the property need to withdraw their approval by notifying the FIRB. 
</li>
<li>If you become a permanent resident then all conditions cease to apply. 
</li>
<li>If the developer has been granted pre-approval to sell new dwellings to foreign buyers, the foreign buyer does not need to submit an approval application. 
</li>
<li>Approval is required for foreign non-residents regardless of the method in which they buy – e.g. through a trust or company structure. 
</li>
<li>Foreign non-residents cannot buy secondhand (established) property, or buy a stake in the property, unless they do so with a spouse. Approval is still required.</li>
</ol>
</body></html>

What are Australia's foreign investment in real estate rules?

<html><body>
In July, economists Ryan Fox and Peter Tulip delivered a paper for The Reserve Bank which looked at the broad question: is Australian housing overvalued?
It found that Perth residents who bought a property during the 2005-2007 boom would have to hold it for three decades before the investment worked out cheaper than renting for the same period.
The RBA research also revealed that the surge in prices over the past decade had made renting more economically sound than buying.
Value equation
Although the researchers found long-term that prices were generally “fair value”, they also looked at whether people were better off buying or renting and discovered that the boom of seven years ago had significantly changed the equation.
They took into account all the costs of buying and running a house, including interest rates and depreciation, and the expected increase in value home owners hoped to get on their property.
Between 1955 and 2014, owning a home was less expensive than renting within about eight years. But over the past decade when prices in Perth more than doubled, those who bought have gone backwards relative to those who decided to rent.
Research data
“If real appreciation over the previous 10 years is used as a guide, buying is less expensive than renting only with extremely long expected tenure – in excess of 30 years,” the researchers found.
“Consistent with conventional wisdom, households expecting to move again in a few years time are better off renting, unless they believe they can sell the property for an unusually large capital gain.”
House prices in Perth have climbed 120% since early 2004 and rents have climbed 81%.
Capital gains since the start of this year have slowed a little, with preliminary REIWA data showing the metropolitan median price in Perth down by one per cent in the June quarter and up by a modest 3.8%t on the same time last year.
Advantage
The main benefit with buying is the long-term capital growth that comes from owning a quality asset which is tax free, given the absence of capital gains tax on the family home.
Home ownership is also a huge advantage in retirement when most people have diminished earning capacity and survive on low and fixed incomes, such as the pension.
Australian research shows that pensioners who don’t own their home can spend up to 60% on their income on rent, pushing them into housing poverty.
So while only very long-term home ownership is the more affordable strategy, it provides the best outcome for people in their latter years.
Personal benefits
Another benefit of buying over renting was the ability to paint, decorate and renovate as you like, as well as shaping the garden.
There are some personal and psychological benefits to buying that go beyond money.
It’s also a lifestyle improvement for many people and can provide a sense of security that isn’t always possible in the rental system.
In spite of the recent report from the RBA, I don’t know many people who would strongly agree with the findings.
I think most tenants aspire to home ownership and I can’t see that changing much for the time-being.
While it’s true that long-term renting is far more common through Europe and the US, I think social, cultural and economic conditions are different enough in Australia to still nurture the strong desire for home ownership among those who can secure a mortgage.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News