Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

Joel Robinson

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

The Gold Coast Planning Committee has supported the preliminary approval for the Benowa Gardens Urban Village project following an extensive community consultation and assessment process.

The proposal will now proceed to a full council vote on June 2.

The application sought approval for a masterplanned urban village on the existing Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre site, combining new housing, retail, dining, health and lifestyle amenities within a walkable, integrated precinct.&nbsp;

The proposed redevelopment includes around 413 apartments integrated above a revitalised mixed-use centre featuring a full-line supermarket of 4,000 sqm, 6,000 sqm of specialty retail and dining space across around 30 retailers, a 7,000 sqm health and wellness precinct, and roughly 9,630 sqm of office and medical suites.&nbsp;

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fb36ae47-80bc-45f0-9914-31b0c7b6007d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C4%201121%20FI.jpg?VersionId=6mRKk2uU4r67TmTt39DKGUlvFRbTVqWa" />

The broader masterplan also includes very significant traffic and transport improvements, wide pedestrian walkways, upgraded pedestrian and cycle connections, and enhanced public areas designed to create a more connected and walkable community environment.&nbsp;

Centre owner Patrick Lu said the milestone reflected months of detailed planning, technical assessment and ongoing communication with local residents, businesses, schools and stakeholders.

“We appreciate the time, consideration and care Council officers and the Planning Committee have given this proposal throughout the assessment process,” Lu said.

“We also sincerely thank the local community for engaging with us, sharing feedback and participating in the consultation process over many months.

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32fd1fc3-d0e6-485f-ac57-9916c9bcb818" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C5%201121%20FI_2.jpg?VersionId=fz8qQKDBLQ7MyFRc856Zccfbh9nFwLOe" />

“We understand projects of this scale bring questions and concerns, which is why we have worked hard to listen carefully, provide information transparently and continue refining elements of the proposal where possible.

“Our vision has always been to create a well-designed, community-focused urban village that responds to the changing needs of the Gold Coast, while delivering improved amenity, housing diversity, healthcare access and local lifestyle benefits.

“This proposal is about creating a genuine live-work-play environment where residents can access everyday services, schools, healthcare, dining, shopping and green space within walking distance, while also supporting local jobs and economic activity.”

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="50dfbd04-590e-4fc6-983b-766880947867" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Dining%20Day%20Time%20-%20High%20Resolution.jpg?VersionId=BP7ZoKJ0DdL_8iRkkC8VVx99moICV6kg" />

Lu said the proposal had evolved significantly through consultation and technical review, particularly around traffic, pedestrian and student safety and neighbourhood connectivity.&nbsp;

Melissa Griffin, Director at Urbis, said the recommendation recognised the strategic importance of delivering more housing and services within established urban areas already supported by infrastructure.

“This proposal represents the type of thoughtful, integrated growth that planning frameworks across South-East Queensland are encouraging,” Ms Griffin said.

“The project seeks to place housing, retail, healthcare and employment opportunities together in a highly accessible location close to schools, transport and existing services.

“Importantly, the process has involved significant technical assessment and community engagement to ensure local issues and feedback were properly considered throughout the planning pathway.”

$1 billion Benowa Gardens Urban Village heads to council vote following Planning Committee support

Surfers Paradise is officially set for its first new residential development with a 45-storey skybridge connecting the two towers.

John Camilleri’s Celestino Developments has been given the green light by the Gold Coast City Council to develop its major beachfront precinct across its huge 4,000 sqm oceanfront site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/63-79-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">63–79 Garfield Terrace</a>, just five months after its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-billionaire-winx-breeder-s-bold-two-tower-surfers-paradise-play-with-45th-storey-skybridge">submission in late 2025</a>.

The approved scheme will deliver two towers rising 55 and 48 storeys, connected by a skybridge positioned on level 45 that will house a range of resident-only wellness and entertainment spaces.

In its notice of approval, the Gold Coast City Council said the&nbsp;proposed overall built form has been designed to complement the scale, intensity and protect the adjacent amenity and surrounding streets through the use of varied setbacks, site cover and architectural elements.

<img alt="First look exclusive: Billionaire Winx breeder’s bold two-tower Surfers Paradise play with 45th-storey skybridge" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-30%20at%209.53.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=ADyPJ_TFbJvSU9wZFOiCBnlPtgF7VWqW" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dbi">DBI</a>, the development will comprise 275 apartments across the two towers, including a mix of two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences, as well as several penthouses. The apartments will sit above a landscaped podium featuring more than 90 metres of beachfront pool frontage, private resident lawns, lounges, and wellness spaces.

DBI said the design draws heavily from the movement and form of the coastal environment, with curving balcony lines and sculpted façades intended to soften the scale of the towers while maximising ocean outlooks and passive shading outcomes.

“The project occupies a rare, uninterrupted oceanfront site and has been shaped by a design philosophy that merges architectural elegance with environmental responsiveness and a carefully curated lifestyle experience,” DBI said in planning documents submitted to the Gold Coast City Council.

The most distinctive element of the approved project is the skybridge linking the two towers at level 45. The elevated communal space is planned to include executive lounges, formal dining areas, wellness facilities, and panoramic ocean-facing outlooks.

“The skybridge enhances the identity of the development, promotes social interaction, and delivers a lifestyle experience not found elsewhere on the Gold Coast,” DBI said.

At podium level, residents will have access to a suite of resort-style amenities, including resident lounges, private dining rooms, a yoga lawn, gymnasium, plunge pools, and treatment spaces. The beachfront pool has been designed with separate lap, lounge, and children’s areas extending across the width of the site.

The project will also introduce new food and beverage offerings along the Enderley Avenue and Oceanway frontages, contributing additional activation to the beachfront precinct.

First look: Winx billionaire’s beachfront Surfers Paradise apartment development greenlit

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body><div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas has advised locally-based, but foreign-controlled developers, such as Mirvac and Australand, may be exempted from the government's new foreign buyer taxes.
The 3% stamp duty on foreigner buyers of especially residential off-the-plan purchases also applies to the purchase of residential land for development itself.
This catches major developers when they acquire land for residential projects. 
Mr Pallas confirm it would apply to companies with majority foreign ownership, when questioned by The Australian Financial Review.
"Appropriate exemptions will apply to ensure relevant Australian based corporations and trusts are not unintentionally caught," Mr Pallas said.
Queensland has been prompt to take advantage, ruling out any similar surcharges on foreign buyers in the sunshine state.
New South Wales is yet to makes its strategy clear.
</div></body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Mirvac, Australand want out of Victorian foreign buyers tax

<html><body>
The Athelstone Shopping Centre in Adelaide’s north-east suburbs has been sold for a $12 million reflecting a 7.9% yield.
The property, prominently located on a 1.328 hectare land holding at 312-328 Gorge Road at Athelstone, was sold by Peter Isaksson and Rino Carpinelli of Savills South Australia,
It was sold to a private Adelaide-based investor with a total retail floor space of 4,611 square metres, anchored by Romeo’s Foodland Supermarket.
It also includes 200 car park spaces.
Romeo’s Foodland Supermarket, comprises 42.8% of the centre’s total income and is secured on a long-term lease until 2022.
Savills recorded $460 million worth of retail property transactions in South Australia in the year to December 2014, up from $209 million in the previous year, and up on the five year average of $323 million. 
In the year to December 2014, Savills recorded 51 retail property sales in South Australia, up from the previous year of 31, and up on the five year average of 43.
 
</body></html>

Savills South Australia sells Athelstone Shopping Centre

<html><body>
The Mortgage &amp; Finance Association of Australia has leased Sydney office property on Pitt Street. 
The ninth floor 130 Pitt Street space is 381 square metres.  
CBRE’s Jamie King negotiated the five-year term on behalf of Investa Funds Management.
The annual rental is $760 per sqm gross. 
</body></html>

Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia take Pitt Street lease

<html><body><div id="doc" class="route-profile">
<div id="page-outer">
<div id="page-container" class="AppContent">
<div class="AppContainer">
<div class="AppContent-main content-main u-cf">
<div class="Grid Grid--withGutter">
<div class="Grid-cell u-size2of3 u-lg-size3of4">
<div class="Grid Grid--withGutter">
<div class="Grid-cell u-lg-size2of3 " data-test-selector="ProfileTimeline">
<div class="ProfileHeading">
<div class="ProfileHeading-content ">
<div>
The 2015 Federal budget left property well-alone, other than confirmation of the looming pension asset test changes in early 2017. 
Last week Property Observer suggested couples approaching retirement - and aware of the rules in advance - will possibly <a href="/expert-insights/investing/upsizing-homes-before-retirement-and-forget-passing-down-the-holiday-shack-joe-hockeys-2015-budget-pension-implications">compromise on their superannuation voluntary contributions</a> - or sell one of the two $400,000 investment properties - and instead push the funds towards buying an untaxed, un-counted bigger, better home that can be beneficially sold later in retirement.
Now with budget confirmation, data and commentary confirm that some supposed asset-rich part pensioners will wisely upsize homes in order to retain their pensions, and then build up a tax-free asset for their late retirement years. The Scott Morrison aim was for older couples who own their home and have other assets between about $800,000 and $1.2 million to lose their part-pension altogether. 
It presumes the asset test pension limit changes get through parliament.
It will certainly take some planning by nearing pensioners and professionals to ensure it all works, but as one listener told 2GB's Ross Greenwood pre-budget it makes fiscal sense to sell that second $400,000 investment property in coming years to get below the asset test threshold.
</div>
<div>Ross Greenwood also explained to <a href="https://www.9jumpin.com.au/show/today/videos/4230274363001/" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">his Channel 9 Today show viewers</a> pre-budget how wise financial planning following the Federal Budget would save part-pensions, to the applause of his colleagues.</div>
"Clever people can work out how to get around Scott Morrison’s new pension rules," the morning show report advised, warning part-pensioners can't give the money away as otherwise Centrelink will nab you..
"Just before you reach pension age you buy something that is not subject to the assets test.
"That something is a new house.
"So in this case the people with $800,000 sell their current home and buy a new home that is $400,000 more expensive, so they reduce their assessable assets to $400,000.
"And they get a 75% pay rise in retirement.
"Infuture if they are desperate for their dough they sell the house which hopefully keeps going up with inflation," Ross Greenwood advised.
</div>
</div>
<div class="GridTimeline">
<div class="GridTimeline-items" data-max-position="598253202652459009" data-min-position="595871921897537536">
<div class="Grid" data-component-term="tweet">
<div class="Grid-cell " data-test-selector="ProfileTimelineTweet">
<div id="stream-item-tweet-597944759773175808" class="StreamItem js-stream-item" data-item-id="597944759773175808" data-item-type="tweet">
<div class="ProfileTweet u-textBreak js-tweet js-stream-tweet js-actionable-tweet ProfileTweet--low has-cards media-forward" data-tweet-id="597944759773175808" data-disclosure-type="" data-item-id="597944759773175808" data-permalink-path="/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808" data-retweet-id="597988970857762816" data-screen-name="TheTodayShow" data-name="The Today Show" data-user-id="23879043" data-has-native-media="true" data-has-cards="true" data-card-type="photo" data-mentions="Ross_Greenwood" data-retweeter="Ross_Greenwood" data-you-follow="false" data-follows-you="false" data-you-block="false">
<div class="ProfileTweet-contents">
<div class="js-tweet-details-fixer tweet-details-fixer">
<div class="TwitterPhoto js-media-container">
<div class="TwitterPhoto-container" data-card-url="//twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808/photo/1" data-card-type="photo" data-element-context="platform_photo_card">
<div class="TwitterPhoto-media"><a class="TwitterPhoto-link media-thumbnail twitter-timeline-link" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808/photo/1" data-url="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large" data-resolved-url-large="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large"> <img class="TwitterPhoto-mediaSource" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large" alt="Embedded image permalink" width="755" height="421"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="js-machine-translated-tweet-container"> </div>
<div class="js-machine-translated-tweet-container">
Ross Greenwood quickly sensed retirees set to lose their very small part pension could envisage the gradual destruction to the income under the 2015 Federal budget initiative set to start in 2017.
One pensioners was prompted to write that the Scott Morrison-Joe Hockey 2015 Federal budget proposal "can have only been dreamed up by comfortably well off politicians who have no appreciation of what it is like to try to live off one’s own assets." 
And two charts compiled by the pensioner show how home-owning couples will be effected.
In the first chart, with an interest rate of 3% a couple with $800,000 of assets would only end up with a yearly income of $25,773, whereas a couple with $400,000 and almost a full pension will have a yearly income of $44,973.
A difference in income of $19,200 to the advantage of the couple with less assets.
<img src="/images/2015/05/08/700_2015_budget.jpg" alt="">
In the second chart, where the interest is increased to 5% a couple with $800,000 of assets would only end up with a yearly income of $41,773 whereas a couple with $400,000 and almost a full pension will have a yearly income of $52,973.
A difference in income of $11,200 to the advantage of the couple with less assets.
<img src="/images/2015/05/08/700-budget2.jpg" alt="">
It was calculated it is not until the interest rate is at about 7% that the couple on $800,000 earns an income more or less level with the couple on $400,000.
The outcome is not exclusive to home owning couples, but effects all four categories of retirees.
Pensioners acknowledge the present taper and thresholds can also show the same sort of warp in incomes, it is less evident and indeed at 4% interest most asset levels draw equal in the income they can achieve.
Retirees who are very cautious with investing their assets especially after their experiences in the GFC - are finding trying to earn even 3% is getting harder.
Pensioners suggest any riskier investments could invite loss of capital, which for a retiree can never be made up.
Lots of retirees will either have to dip into their capital and with the spiral down effect that this will produce, will sooner rather than later end up on the full and part pension anyway.
Many others will decide to spend their assets on holidays, upgrading homes or renovations, in order obtain a higher income via the full pension.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Offloading assets and home upsizing: the maze to keep your part-pension in 2017

<html><body>
The historic Newspaper House, at 247 Collins Street, Melbourne is under offer.
It comes with mosaic mural on its front facade designed by Napier Waller in 1932.
Mervyn Napier Waller's "I'll put a girdle about the earth" features heroic human figures appear among scenes of commerce, construction and communication.
There's lots of gold, an echo of the Byzantine era, in the 1933 commission by Sir Keith Murdoch from the Herald &amp; Weekly Times who needed more than their empire on Flinders Street.
It was the former WH Rocke Ltd building on a 478 square metre holding.
<a href="https://www.realcommercial.com.au/property-retail-vic-melbourne-501464323" target="_blank">Set near Swanston Street with a 2084 square metre floor area</a>, it was marketed recently by CBRE as an irreplaceable seven level sandstone retail and office building, fully refurnished and upgraded.
Agents suggested it was a genuine “blank canvas” providing strategic opportunity for multi-level retail and/or residential/hotel conversion.
In 2010 Savills Australia had brokered a five-year lease deal for 250 square metres to Nespresso, who have now departed.
Its latest sale price has not been revealed but the former Herald and Weekly Times building sold for $11.08 million to a private investor, Melbourne horse-racing identity Ken Biddick in 2006 through Knight Frank, fully leased for $403,600 a year, reflecting a yield of 3.6%.
The then vendor, Desmond Oppenheimer had bought the building for $7.55 million in 2002.
The ground floor of 247 Collins Street had been previously leased to the House of Cashmere, and the upper levels to Sydney International College.  
HIDDEN TREASURES OF NAPIER WALLER
1926-27 MURALS Melbourne Town Hall, Swanston Street.
1927 MURAL Menzies Hotel, cnr Bourke and William streets (building demolished in 1969, mural sold privately).
1928 MURAL Better Than to Squander Life's Gifts Is to Conserve Them and Ensure a Fearless Future T&amp;G Life Building entry foyer, cnr Collins and Russell streets.
1928 MURAL Peace After Victory State Library of Victoria, first-floor landing near La Trobe Reading Room, cnr, Swanston and La Trobe street.
1933 MOSAIC I'll Put a Girdle Round the Earth Newspaper House facade, 247 Collins Street.
1934 FLORENTINE MURALS Florentino Restaurant, now Grossi Florentino, first floor, 80 Bourke Street.
1935 STAINED GLASS WINDOW Wesley Church, Pioneers window, upper gallery, north wall, 148 Lonsdale Street.
1935 STAINED GLASS WINDOW Ian Potter Museum foyer, Swanston Street on university campus. (Designed for Wilson Hall, University of Melbourne, which was destroyed by fire in 1951. Window was retrieved from the ruins.)
1935 MUIRALS Myer Melbourne Mural Hall dining room, sixth floor, 314 Bourke Street.
1937 STAINED GLASS Orchid Window University of Melbourne Botany School.
1940 MURAL Australian Symbolic Figures University of Melbourne Achitecture, Building and Planning Library (Orginally on display at Royal Insurance Company, 414-418 Collins Street, but donated to university after building was demolished in 1969.)
1963 MOSAIC The Eight Aboriginal Tribal Headmen Temple Court foyer, 422 Collins Street.
1967 MOSAIC Prometheus Monash House foyer, 15 William Street.
List Source: Fairfax Media
 
</body></html>

Newspaper House, Collins Street under offer

<html><body>
Analysing trends of the number of properties advertised for rent is the single most useful metric for property investors to make informed property management decisions. Propertyology has just completed an analysis of rental market trends across Australia and there are some interesting trends developing.
<table style="width: 507px; height: 244px;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr>
<td>
<div>
Biggest Increase In Rental Stock (last 12 months)
<ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2015-03_Propertyology_SuratBasin.pdf" target="_blank">Roma</a> QLD (311% more)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2015.03_Propertyology_ArmidaleNSW.pdf" target="_blank">Armidale</a> NSW (81% more)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/darwin/" target="_blank">Darwin</a> NT (79% more)</li>
<li>Whyalla SA (39% more)</li>
<li>Newcastle NSW (34% more)</li>
<li>Karratha WA (32% more)</li>
<li>Perth WA (31% more)</li>
<li>Mackay QLD (25% more)</li>
</ul>
 
Biggest Decrease In Rental Stock (last 12 months)
<ul>
<li>Canberra ACT (31% less)</li>
<li>Port Macquarie NSW (30% less)</li>
<li>Muswellbrook NSW (26% less)</li>
<li>Orange NSW (22% less)</li>
<li>Gold Coast QLD (21% less)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr></tbody></table>
The most common method for reporting the state of a rental market is vacancy rates. Data houses such as SQM Research do this by calculating the number of properties advertised for rent as a percentage of all rental properties within that given market. For example, if a specific location had one thousand properties which make up the total rental pool and twenty five of those owners were looking for a tenant the vacancy rate would be 2.5%.
A 3% vacancy rate is considered to be a ‘normal’ market. In my experience, pressure starts to build on rental prices when vacancy rates fall below 2%.
While the vacancy rate of a particular location at a particular time is useful information I find it even more meaningful to understand the rental trends which have been forming leading up to that point in time – is the available number of properties increasing or decreasing?
Imagine yourself receiving that friendly reminder from your property manager that a lease on one of your investment properties is getting close to expiry - the tenant has stated that they will not be renewing, and your property manager now needs your instructions on what rental price to advertise your property for. Propertyology is often asked by our clients to provide input in scenarios just like this.
The most appropriate response in this situation would be different if the property was in the south-west Queensland town of Roma compared to the Nation’s capital, Canberra. Research conducted by Propertyology confirms that Roma has experienced the biggest increase in the number of properties advertised for rent over the last 12 months (from 42 to 173). Canberra has experienced the biggest decrease (from 1,056 properties to 737).
When rental trends show a significant increase in volumes of properties available the most appropriate response by the landlord is often to set the rent below the rest of your competition. 80% of something is more than 100% of nothing; rents don’t always go up. And, unless there is a pending economic shift which gives hope for a reversal of this trend in the short term it might also be appropriate to seek a 12 month term as opposed to the traditional six months.
Conversely, there is more scope to increase rents when there is a limited number of properties for tenants to choose from. And, if the trend appears to be that the number of properties available is likely to decline it might be appropriate to stick with a short-term lease.  Port Macquarie in New South Wales (from 171 properties to 119), Muswellbrook in Hunter Valley (from 226 to 167), and Gold Coast (from 2,665 to 2,125) have also seen a significant reduction in the number of properties advertised for rent.
As forecast by Propertyology quite some time ago, Darwin (79% more rentals) and Perth (31% increase on an already high base) have significantly more properties available for rent today compared to 12 months ago.
Factors which influence the number of properties advertised for rent include:
<ul>
<li>The level of supply of new properties recently built;</li>
<li>Seasonal factors such as school holiday periods, peak tourism periods, Christmas / New Year, agriculture seasons;</li>
<li>Commencement and completion of large employment contracts; and</li>
<li>Commodity price peaks and troughs.</li>
</ul>
Large volumes of properties purchased by investors (as opposed to owner-occupiers) within a short period of time will also result in more stock available in a defined rental pool. A good example of this is Sydney where it has been reported that as high as 70% of home loan approvals during 2014 were to investors (30 – 45% is ‘normal’). Logic would suggest that pressure on rents will start to ease in Sydney.
Astute property investors will also analyse rental trends as part of their broader research in determining where to invest (although there are far more important considerations than this).  
Property is an asset class which requires investors to hold for the long-term. Over the years of holding a property there will invariably be periods when there are large volumes of properties available for rent and other periods when the rental market is tight. The astute landlord will understand the economic drivers which influence demand for their market, the supply pipeline, and current rental trends.
Simon Pressley is Managing Director of Propertyology, a REIA Hall Of Fame Inductee, property market analyst, accredited property investment adviser, and Buyer’s Agent. Contact Simon <a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/contact-us/" target="_blank">here.</a>
</body></html>

spressley-sBoeMhannA

Watching rental market vacancy rate trends key for investment success: Propertyology's Simon Pressley

<html><body>
When the Head Teller at the Reserve Bank of Australia dropped the cash rate to a record low of 2.00% this week the Head Cashier AKA Joe Hockey immediately started bellowing "Australians – spend – spend – spend."
So let me let you in on a secret Joe – Australians are spending up big, it’s just that they are using the online loophole where they don’t have to pay you GST. The other problem is that following the Global Financial Crisis many Australians (to save money) reverted back to paying cash for services simply because that way they get a significant discount.
Naturally those who have negatively geared their properties don’t engage in the cash for services given they need the receipts in order to gain their much required tax reduction. I guess that given nearly all developed countries have a tax structure where you do pay a tax when you sell the family home, however all monies spent – mortgage, maintenance and improvements – are a tax deduction. So I hope now that you can understand why GST receipts are in decline.
When the GST was introduced nearly 15 years ago a comparative analysis was undertaken to see what the online shopping receipts were likely to be for purchases under $1,000. The analysis which in all probability was done using a Commodore 64 with a flashy floppy disc drive found that it would cost as much to collect the GST on these purchases so the plan was shelved.
Today Australians are all over <a href="https://www.ozsale.com.au/default.aspx?cid=10" target="_blank">OZSALE</a> and <a href="https://www.dealsdirect.com.au/" target="_blank">DealsDirect</a> to name just two who just happen today to be hugely successful online businesses that turn over hundreds and hundreds of millions each year. According to the National Australia Bank’s (NAB) latest Online Retail Sales Index – Australians spent a record (yes record) $16.6 billion online in the year to January 2015. Given that the vast majority would be sales with no GST payable that’s at least $1.500 billion in missing revenue each year – now that’s embarrassing.
Deloitte has just readjusted the budget projections to take into account the latest economic news where last year’s budget deficit was $48.5 billion. Deloitte is predicting this year’s deficit will be $5.5 billion worse than predicted a year ago, and will be close to $45.9 billion. All will be revealed next week but rest assured it will be a shocker – although it’s difficult to agree with increasing the GST when we have all those ‘rivers of gold’ that the federal government is missing simply because they won’t reform.
Just as embarrassing was the announcement last week by Prime Minister Tony Abbott that foreign investors who have purchased illegally in Australia have until the end of November to come forward to avoid criminal charges and severe fines. Now I have no doubt that illegal property acquisitions will be huge in number but how about upgrading from Windows 2003 and start a proper National Property Register which has been promised for years.
The illegal buying debate does get amusing at times given some are saying that the best method is when buyers attend an auction to bid they must provide identity and that data is recorded – that then will stop illegal buyers. Well, sorry no it won’t. That legislation was brought in 2003/2004 in an effort to stop dummy bidding where records of identification are recorded should the Office of Fair Trading require an investigation. If a party attends an auction and they want somebody to bid on their behalf it is that person bidding who provides the identification not the eventual buyer who is not required to provide any identification – even though they may successfully buy the property.
Any buyers who have purchased illegally would now be contacting their respective legal representatives and immediately transferring ownership into the name of an Australian resident – the federal government has given them a six month window to conform and that’s based on the illegal owners coming forward. Brilliant plan that one!
With the Head Cashier now dutifully accepting the pseudo role of Housing Minister the forensic search for illegal purchasers across Australia has begun in earnest. Maybe Joe should spend a week of work experience at the NSW government who just collected more than $5.000 million from those naughty first home buyers who illegally applied for grants. Going back three years and with nearly 1,400 investigations they found 478 first home buyers who were forced to repay their illegal grants. A spokesman for the NSW Office of State Revenue said it routinely conducted ‘’random and targeted audits matching and data mining.”
All that Joe Hockey needs to do is find a way to get hold of that data and do a targeted audit through his Australian Taxation Office audits plus some additional data mining using stamp duty records.
Why is it that Canberra just doesn’t see the billions they lose each year from GST online sales and why it’s so easy to set up a National Property Register?
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Chaos in Canberra but that’s not unusual: Robert Simeon

<html><body>
The developer lobby, better at promoting self-interest than anyone else in society, would have us believe that building more homes will make homes cheaper.
Developers themselves believe that building more houses will make themselves more profitable – particularly if government gives them their wish list of things to make their lives easier - and what happens after that … well, who cares?
The truth is: the only way to make homes significant cheaper is to build far too many of them. Over-supply is the one thing that can crash a market. 
All of the areas I call the No Go Zones are places undermined by over-supply. Investors far too often fall victim to such places because supply is the factor most over-looked by property investors.
Those who take the time to do some research before tossing a few hundred thousand at an investment property tend to focus on demand, with scant regard for the flipside of the growth equation.
Some organisations that purport to advise investors preach a simplistic follow-the-population-growth strategy.
If high population growth was the core element in a good locational choice, the leading capital growth performers in the past five years would have been the Gold Coast and Wyndham City in the south-west of Melbourne. Gladstone, boosted by the influx of tens of thousands of gas project employees, would have soaring prices.
The opposite is true in those markets, which have all suffered recent periods of marked decline. The too-often forgotten factor is supply.
The Gold Coast had five years of falling property values because of too much supply. Wyndham City, which overtook the Gold Coast as the municipality with the greatest annual additions to its population, recorded no growth in prices for three years, because of an excess of house-and-land packages – ultimately flogged off to distant investors by dodgy marketing companies.
Gladstone, after recording high growth in rentals and prices in 2011 and 2012, saw rising vacancies and a sharp downturn in prices and rents after 2012 because developers went overboard yet again.
Over-supply causes rents to fall and that drags down property values.
The developers building the new projects don’t care as long as they can sell their product to someone and move on to the next project. In over-supplied markets, they tend to target distant investors unfamiliar with local conditions. The Chinese are the victims of choice these days.
There are two “danger situations” at the core of the No Go Zones issue: (1) inner-city apartment markets; and (2) regional centres where a rise in supply (through new development) has coincided with a decline in demand (through downsizing in the resources sector).
Inner-city units present a significant danger throughout capital city Australia. Boom-bust scenarios are common. As Hegney Property Group chairman Gavin Hegney says: “Apartments are always in over-supply or under-supply because of the lumpy nature of the market. With a housing estate you can release allotments in stages but you can’t do that with an apartment tower.”
Another problem is the long lead time in creating high-rise unit buildings. Multiple developers will decide simultaneously to build towers in a strong market – two or three years later when they are completed, a lot may have changed.
This is a clear and present danger for Australian buyers. Developers don’t care who buys their units as long as someone does, nor are they concerned if their buyers later find themselves unable to tenant their units or are forced to sell at a loss.
But it is a concern for the market and for real estate consumers.
Given that Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Canberra and Darwin already have – or are heading towards - surpluses of inner-city apartments, and Sydney and the Gold Coast are trending in that direction, a good strategy for property investors is to simply avoid CBD unit markets altogether. There are much better (and cheaper) places to buy.
The coal and iron ore industries are the cause of the other core “danger situation”. When the resources boom was at its strongest, mining expansion created strong property markets in towns and regional centres that felt the positive impacts.
This prompted developers to initiate new projects to exploit the demand. Sadly, this coincided in a downturn in the coal sector, with commodity prices declining at a time of rising costs for mining companies. The iron ore industry has had similar problems.
Rising supply coincided with falling demand – a recipe for decline in property markets. The result has been sharply rising vacancy rates, leading to lower rents and ultimately falling prices.
Another factor is the growing use of fly-in-fly-out workers accommodated in workers camps, rather than renting in the local property market. 
This has been a big factor in the Surat Basin region of Queensland, where developers built a lot of new dwellings in anticipation of strong rental demand – but more than 90% of resources workers have been 
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Danger at the core of property investment 'No Go Zones': Terry Ryder 

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 409">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Despite design and administrative shortcomings that overshadowed the National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS), they in no way warranted the scheme's discontinuation, according to the Senate Inquiry into Affordable Housing.
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
NRAS is a partnership between the Australian Government and the states and territories to invest in affordable rental housing with property investors.
 It is a $6 billion initiative intended to stimulate the supply of affordable rental homes across Australia aimed to increase the supply of new affordable rental housing; reduce rental costs for low and moderate income households; and encourage large-scale investment and innovative delivery of affordable housing.
But while evidence to the Senate Standing Committees on Economics indicated clearly that a range of individuals and organisations strongly supported NRAS, the inquiry found some difficulties with its implementation: 
<div class="page" title="Page 393">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li>
teething troubles, including administrative practices associated with too much paperwork, delays in processing applications and slow response to emerging signs of problems; 
</li>
<li>
understaffing, inexperience and high turnover within the department administering the scheme; 
</li>
<li>
design inadequacies including a one size-fits-all approach which failed to take account of, or appreciate, the housing circumstances of particular areas with an identified need for affordable housing such as high value suburbs and regional, rural and remote areas; 
</li>
<li>
lack of clarity around the targeting of incentives and eligibility, which allowed significant allocation of incentives to overseas students; 
</li>
<li>
disclosure measures, which allowed the trading of incentives with excessive fees to persist and ultimately to damage the perceived integrity of the scheme; and 
</li>
<li>
external factors, notably the global financial crisis which created challenges in attracting private investment. 
</li>
</ul>
"These design and administrative shortcomings have overshadowed NRAS' success but, while they point to the need for refinement, they in no way warrant its discontinuation," the committee concluded. 
From its commencement in 2008, the annual incentives available to NRAS providers were to last for ten years, indexed annually for the rental component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and comprise two parts.
The incentive values for 2014–2015 were:
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 376">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li>
a Commonwealth Government incentive of $7,996 per dwelling per year as a refundable tax offset or payment; and 
</li>
<li>
a state or territory contribution of $2,665.6 The total amount came to $10,661. 
</li>
</ul>
When announced, the original proposal was for an initial round of 50,000 incentives, though the scheme was introduced in the middle of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) at a time when the banks were very hesitant and valuers were very negative. 
The Community Housing Federation of Australia suggested that one of the benefits of NRAS had been the partnerships it had facilitated across the not-for-profit, for-profit, development, and financial sectors, building sustainable communities with some private sales, some NRAS and some social housing.
The committee noted NRAS brought direct private investment into the affordable housing arena and significantly increased the community housing providers' engagement with financial institutions.
The committee heard it created a mechanism which has enabled a combination of private equity, the private sector, community-housing providers and the government to work in collaboration. 
Despite the strong support for NRAS, a number of witnesses drew attention to weaknesses that have undermined its performance.
JELD-WEN indicated that some NRAS incentives had been allocated to tenderers that did not have sites for the commencement of rental housing, saying it was implausible that NRAS incentives could be approved without tenderers submitting proposed developments on actual sites.
JELD-WEN also criticised NRAS for poor accountability. It referred to 'a glaring need for a report card on the cost-effectiveness.
The Property Council of Australia made a number of observations about NRAS including that some participants had been concerned about repetitious and costly tendering processes in rounds 1–3. 
Grace Mutual Limited referred to delays in processing applications and unclear, complex and poorly drafted regulations and law that 'hurt the program'.
Some argued greater consideration should be given to the geographic location of the NRAS incentives granted to ensure those regions with the poorest housing affordability and suitability for disadvantaged groups receive more incentives. 
The Tenants Union of Victoria noted that NRAS had played an important role in bringing private finance to increase the amount of affordable housing in Australia. 
But it also referred to recent negative media coverage reporting allegations that NRAS had been 'rorted to provide accommodation for wealthy international students, and that foreign investors, brokers and small time investors' were exploiting NRAS tax breaks.
The Tenants Union of Victoria held the view that NRAS was one of the important supply side interventions that made a positive difference. 
The committee did believe the review of NRAS was warranted. 
It noted lessons needed to be learnt from NRAS such as the need for clear and tight eligibility criteria and better targeting to areas of need.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
But the cancellation of round 5, however, "was a very different matter."
"This cessation has set back the scheme just as it was gaining the trust and support of the private sector and beginning to make a material contribution to the supply of affordable housing. 
"Not only has it undermined investor confidence in this scheme, it has also fed into the general uncertainty that has engulfed the national policy on affordable housing. 
"The committee is firmly of the view that the government should start immediately to rekindle the confidence that institutional investors were starting to show in investing in affordable housing and to provide greater certainty in order to attract such investors."
The Senate committee recommends that:
<ul>
<li>
in the absence of any credible alternative scheme designed to increase the supply of new affordable housing and considering steps have already been taken to improve the administration and implementation of NRAS, that the Australian Government continue with NRAS round 5; 
</li>
<li>
the Federation White Paper process look at the Queensland NRAS model, which appeared to have much tighter controls over eligibility, as a means of determining where further improvements or fine-tuning could make the system more robust and effective; 
</li>
<li>
the Federation White Paper process look at how NRAS or a replacement scheme could be reframed to take account of the particular housing circumstances of regional Australia and ensure that NRAS housing was better targeted to areas in most need; and 
</li>
<li>
as part of the Federation White Paper process, a thorough cost benefit analysis of NRAS be undertaken, and that any such analysis include comparison of forgone revenue from demand subsidies such as the first home owners grant, and negative gearing and capital gains tax.
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

NRAS should be restored with improvements: Senate Affordable Housing Inquiry 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The Reserve Bank of Australia would dearly love to be like Dr Doolittle’s amazing pushmi-pullyu, able to face both directions at once. Cutting interest rates to encourage economic activity (and a lower dollar), but at the same time raising rates to dampen the superheated Sydney housing market. But unlike the mythical vicuna, the RBA board just cannot have it both ways.
So after being dragged to its second rate cut this year, the RBA looks like it will throw up its hands and hospital pass the housing problem to someone else – the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
Since late last year, the RBA and APRA have been <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-25/rba-says-too-early-to-judge-home-loan-restrictions/6346872">brainstorming</a> what could be done about the rise in investment mortgage lending, which along with foreign investors, appear to the main culprits in runaway house price increases. In December last year, the two regulators announced they had <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Documents/141209-Letter-to-ADIs-reinforcing-sound-residential-mortgage-lending-practices.pdf">written to banks</a> reminding them they should be “prudent” about their lending practices.
In fairly benign language APRA warned bank CEOs that if banks did not pay heed they “may institute further supervisory action” and threatened such action “could include increases in the level of capital” that individual banks are required to hold.
In its Dear CEO letter, APRA also drew a line in the sand pointing out that growth in lending to property investors “materially above a threshold of 10%” will be an important risk indicator in considering the need for further action.
That particular letter must have sat in the “do after the holidays” pile because the latest figures show a 10.4% <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Documents/MBS-March-2015.pdf">increase</a> in lending for property investment for the year to the end of March. Only the Commonwealth Bank stayed within the regulator’s guideline - just.
Market jitters
When APRA head Wayne Byres brought this <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/apra-keeps-macroprudential-strictures-on-bank-lending-secret-20150320-1m3nik">profligacy</a> to everyone’s attention and warned of further action, the markets got spooked and bank shares were <a href="https://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/bank-shares-wiped-out-over-apra-real-estate-crackdown-fears-20150430-1mwucx">sold off</a> by nervous investors.
But why would banks take APRA’s warnings that seriously? In an ongoing stoush resulting from APRA’s <a href="https://theconversation.com/is-the-basel-process-broken-you-can-bank-on-it-11488">cave-in</a> to the banks on the so-called Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF), it is <a href="https://www.australianbankingfinance.com/banking/the-games-we-play--part-two/">reported</a> that some of the big banks are not cooperating on the relatively simple matter of reporting which mortgages make up their Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS). Given the amount of low-risk profits banks make from investor lending (due to the magic of negative gearing) it is highly likely they would turn a deaf ear to APRA on this one.
The three little pigs (also known as the Council of Financial Regulators) may puff and blow all they like but the banks will continue to lend to property investors until the rules are changed and it becomes unprofitable. But that is another discussion.
Regulating the economy
Should APRA have any role at all in implementing economic policy?
In 2012, the RBA and APRA issued a <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/fin-stability/resources/2012-09-map-aus-fsf/pdf/2012-09-map-aus-fsf.pdf">document</a> attempting to clarify the roles of the respective regulators – not an easy task. In obtuse regulatory speak, APRA’s role was described as: "…to promote financial system stability in Australia while balancing its objectives of financial safety and efficiency, competition, contestability and competitive neutrality."
In addition to being the supervisor of individual banks, credit unions, insurance companies and the largest superannuation firms, APRA is also what is known as the macro-prudential, systemic regulator.
APRA’s remit is to take actions to reduce so-called “systemic risk”, specifically in the case of clearing and settlement facilities, and more generally and opaquely by “limiting the systemic risks associated with breaches of financial promises”.
Does lending to property investors pose a systemic risk?
Depending on one’s position, borrowing to purchase investment properties may be a good thing (if one is benefiting from negative gearing), or bad (if one is frozen out of the housing market). However, this is an economic, tax and social issue rather than a banking one.
The question is whether this is a risk sufficient to cause a major bank to fail and bring other banks down with it.
In reality, negative gearing is as close to a risk-free profit as banks can get - after all taxpayers pick up the tab. Banks are more likely to fold as a result of other systemic risks, such as lending to iron ore producers.
The role of APRA in this issue is disquieting. Where did the 10% growth “limit” come from? [It turns out it was agreed with ASIC and RBA]. Why not 5% or 15%, what is the economic purpose of this very specific limit?
And why would shareholders not be informed of which banks are being targeted by APRA, as Byres has intimated? It is not APRA’s role to control continuous disclosure requirements, that is up to ASIC.
If the government wishes to dampen down the housing market, using banking regulators to do the hard work for it just won’t work. Banks are too far removed from the problem to be able to force meaningful change.
But more than that, banking (and other) regulators should not be used as agents of short-term government policy, they should be independent agencies warning when policies start to go wrong.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/41188/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/pat-mcconnell-13137">Pat McConnell</a> is Honorary Fellow, Macquarie University Applied Finance Centre at <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/macquarie-university">Macquarie University</a>.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News