Family-owned builder and developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/omaya">Omaya</a> is bringing its 27-storey The Maybelle development to market, with the 229-apartment tower rising alongside Ismay Reserve near North Strathfield.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-maybelle-21-parramatta-road-homebush-nsw-2140">The Maybelle</a> will comprise one, two and three-bedroom apartments, with its height providing elevated outlooks towards the Sydney skyline and Harbour Bridge, while other residences will look across neighbouring Ismay Reserve.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/squillace-architects">Squillace Architects</a>, the tower combines its parkside setting with proximity to the established retail, dining and transport amenity around North Strathfield.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376196]

Residences will feature open-plan living spaces and a choice of two interior schemes, while communal amenity is spread across two elevated levels of the building.

Level 8 will be home to the Garden Pavilion, a full-floor resident space incorporating communal entertaining and breakout areas, seating and recreation spaces. Further up the tower, a landscaped Sky Terrace on Level 14 will provide another communal area with panoramic views towards the Harbour Bridge and Sydney skyline.

At ground level, the development sits directly alongside Ismay Reserve, where lawns, walking paths, children's play areas, picnic spaces and recreational facilities extend the green space available immediately around the project.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376194]

The Maybelle is also within walking distance of North Strathfield and the Bakehouse Quarter, which provides a mix of cafés, restaurants, shops and everyday services.

Existing rail and bus services provide connections across Sydney, while the future North Strathfield Metro and access to the M4 will add to the transport options available around the precinct. Walking and cycling routes also extend via Powells Creek towards Sydney Olympic Park and its sporting, entertainment and parkland precincts.

Families are also well positioned for access to a broad selection of established schools and education options across Strathfield and the surrounding Inner West.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376181]

Omaya has operated in Sydney for more than 35 years, managing projects from acquisition and design through to construction and delivery. The family-owned company is both developer and builder of The Maybelle.

Apartments start from $560,000, with the development protected by 10-year Latent Defects Insurance.

Construction is well underway, with completion expected by the end of 2026 and move-in anticipated from Q1 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134873]

Joel Robinson

The Maybelle brings 27-storey parkside tower to market near North Strathfield

Melbourne developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pdg-corporation">PDG</a> has unveiled its vision for the former Water Tank Site in Ivanhoe, which would see it transformed into a thriving residential neighbourhood, complete with a 2000 sqm public park.&nbsp;

Delivered in partnership with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/development-victoria">Development Victoria</a>, the proposal would transform the prominent corner of Bell Street and Upper Heidelberg Road into a connected community comprising two residential buildings, generous public open space and shared amenities.&nbsp;

The vision includes 287 one, two and three-bedroom apartments, with a minimum of 10 per cent allocated to affordable housing, alongside a 2,000-square-metre publicly accessible park featuring a children's playground, activity lawn, indigenous planting, timber climbing logs, seating areas and a rock gathering circle.&nbsp;

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dko-architecture">DKO Architecture</a>, the proposal draws on the site's industrial heritage, using a robust architectural language that references the former water tank through expressive structural elements and durable, self-finished materials.&nbsp;

Extensive landscaping has been woven throughout the development, creating a living landscape that strengthens connections to nature while responding sensitively to the surrounding neighbourhood. Two residential buildings ranging from three to 12 storeys are linked by a landscaped forecourt, creating a welcoming arrival experience and improving pedestrian connections through the site.&nbsp;

Residents would also enjoy more than 1,000 square metres of communal open space, including barbecue and dining facilities, vegetable gardens, landscaped seating pavilions and a dedicated coworking space.&nbsp;

PDG Founder and Managing Director Vince Giuliano said the vision reflected an opportunity to transform one of Ivanhoe's most recognisable sites into a place that balanced housing, community and landscape.&nbsp;

"This is an opportunity to reimagine an important site and create a neighbourhood that delivers lasting benefits for Ivanhoe," Giuliano said.&nbsp;

"We're creating much more than new homes. The vision brings together affordable housing, quality architecture, meaningful public open space and shared places that encourage people to connect, while respecting the site's history and its place within the local community."&nbsp;

Development Victoria’s Executive General Manager Precincts, Niall Cunningham, said the application is an important step for the government-owned site.&nbsp;

“This is about delivering more homes in a well-connected location, along with public open space that the Ivanhoe community will benefit from for years to come,” Cunningham said.&nbsp;

PDG was selected as development partner in late 2025 following a competitive tender process.&nbsp;

A planning submission for the project is currently being progressed through the Victorian Government's Development Facilitation Program, with positive early engagement from both Banyule Council and the Department of Transport and Planning.

PDG unveils plans to transform landmark Ivanhoe Water Tank Site

Shane Wilkinson's <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pace-development-group">Pace Development Group</a> has lodged plans for a major residential precinct on the former Presentation College site in Windsor, with an eight-building masterplan ultimately rising to 10 storeys.

The proposal at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/167-dandenong-road-windsor-vic-3181">167–187 Dandenong Road</a> spans a substantial 19,027 sqm site and is being progressed across six stages, with the first residential stages comprising 170 homes across four buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a>.

Stage Two will deliver the bulk of the initial housing, with Building A comprising 81 apartments and Building B 49 apartments, both rising to six storeys.

Stage Three will deliver a further 40 homes. The heritage Nagel Building, identified as Building C, will be converted to 12 dwellings, while a new five-storey Building D will comprise 28 apartments at the Hornby Street and Dandenong Road corner.

The 170 homes across Stages Two and Three will include a mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments, including townhouse-style dwellings.<img alt="First look: Pace plans landscaped housing precinct on former Windsor school site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="83c56e3e-dfb9-4e12-b172-c3f18513ec32" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_9.png?VersionId=xRcRpSZsxX.UX_NDDGcRZktw7HVrzx7u" />

&nbsp;

The longer-term masterplan points to considerably greater density across the site.

Indicative plans show Building E accommodating around 80 dwellings across up to 10 storeys, while Building F is earmarked for around 120 dwellings and also up to 10 storeys. Building G is planned to range between four and 10 storeys, however its apartment yield is yet to be determined. That means the masterplan currently identifies at least 370 dwellings across Buildings A to F before any apartments within Building G are counted.

Across the 1.9-hectare site, that represents an indicative density of at least 194 dwellings per hectare, with the final figure to increase once the yield of Building G is established.

Pace is pursuing the project through the Victorian Government's Development Facilitation Program, with Urbis lodging a combined Section 96A planning scheme amendment and planning application on behalf of the developer, which secured the site earlier this year.

The application seeks detailed approval for Stages One, Two and Three, alongside approval of the broader masterplan framework that will guide the later residential stages. Stage One will see an existing heritage building adaptively reused for a wellness and fitness-related facility, while the broader precinct will retain several significant heritage buildings and established trees as part of the redevelopment.

A minimum 10 per cent affordable housing contribution is proposed across both the initial residential stages and the later masterplan stages, delivered through a discounted rental model.

The project comes immediately after a major change to the site's planning controls.

The site was rezoned to the Housing Choice and Transport Zone through Planning Scheme Amendment GC285, gazetted on July 22, 2026, and now sits within the inner catchment of the Windsor Station precinct under the State Government's Train and Tram Zone Activity Centres Program.

While the new controls identify large sites within the inner catchment for buildings of up to six storeys, Pace's masterplan pushes height to 10 storeys in parts of the site, with the taller buildings concentrated toward the centre and along the Sandringham railway corridor.

Lower-scale built form is proposed toward the site's more sensitive residential and heritage edges, with Buildings A and B generally stepping from three storeys at their interfaces to six storeys at upper levels.

Cera Stribley's masterplan breaks the development into a collection of separate buildings rather than a continuous built form, with landscaped spaces, new pedestrian links and a new publicly accessible road forming part of the precinct.

The planning report says the development will create new pedestrian connections to Elm Place and along the railway corridor, as well as a new publicly accessible road linking Elm Place with Dandenong Road. The proposed buildings will occupy around 54 per cent of the site, leaving a substantial portion available for landscaping, communal areas and permeable surfaces.

Urbis said the scale of the project reflected the site's strategic location close to Windsor Station, tram services and the Chapel Street Activity Centre, with the former school campus identified as a significant opportunity to increase housing supply on an underutilised inner-Melbourne site.

&nbsp;

First look: Pace plans landscaped housing precinct on former Windsor school site

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/jl-place">JL PLACE</a>'s Veil Brighton is approaching its final months of construction, with the nine-townhouse development at 17 Rooding Street expected to complete in December 2026.

The milestone is bringing the boutique project closer to becoming a finished part of the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/brighton-vic-3186">Brighton</a> streetscape, with much of Brighton's everyday amenity within a short walk.

Palace Cinema, Coles Supermarket and North Brighton Station are all around five minutes on foot from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/veil-brighton-17-rooding-street-brighton-vic-3186">Veil</a>, alongside numerous cafés, restaurants and bars. The station provides a direct rail connection toward Melbourne's CBD, while Bay Street and the wider Brighton retail and dining network add to the range of services accessible without relying on a car for every trip.

"The location was fundamental to the project. Brighton is an established suburb where many buyers already have strong connections to the area and want to remain close to the people, places and amenities that form part of their everyday life," the developer said.

"Veil sits in a highly walkable part of Brighton, with a Walk Score of 90/100."

For buyers looking to right-size within Bayside, that level of walkability adds to the appeal of a more manageable way of living. Everyday shopping, dining, entertainment and public transport can be accessed without relying on the car for every trip, while residents remain connected to the places and routines that make Brighton familiar. It allows buyers to simplify day-to-day life without giving up the convenience, amenity and connections they already value.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7877 project_image_fid=355754]

As completion approaches, the architecture, landscaping and material palette are progressively becoming visible on site, giving prospective purchasers a clearer view of the finished development beyond its plans and renders.

Veil comprises nine townhouses, predominantly three-bedroom homes with between 2.5 and 3.5 bathrooms, two car spaces and, depending on the residence, study areas and private outdoor space. Selected homes include a bedroom on the ground floor.

Veil occupies a middle ground between detached housing and apartment living, retaining private gardens, storage and secure parking within a more manageable residential format.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/schmidt-pang-architects">Schmidt &amp; Pang</a> designed the architecture around natural light, ventilation, privacy and practical use of space. From Rooding Street, the façade has been composed to read as a cohesive residential building rather than nine individual townhouses, with landscaping by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/john-patrick-landscape-architects">John Patrick Landscape Architects</a> integrated throughout the site.

Inside, natural stone, oak flooring, integrated joinery and brushed nickel finishes establish a restrained material palette, while kitchens include Miele appliances and substantial storage such as pantries. Walk-in robes and dedicated study spaces have also been incorporated across the collection.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7877 project_image_fid=355852]

The project team said the planning of the homes has been informed by how the spaces function for both daily routines and larger gatherings.

"Our new homes owners at Veil have enjoyed the attention to detail in creating efficient layouts that use every space well. Hosting Christmas lunch and large family gatherings is an ease when care is taken to consider how people really live and entertain."

Private landscaped gardens extend the living spaces outdoors, while secure basement parking and bicycle parking are provided below. The homes have also been designed to achieve a 7-star energy rating, supported by double glazing, high-quality insulation, natural ventilation, LED lighting, water tanks and water-efficient fittings. Each residence is backed by a 10-year building guarantee.

Veil is being built by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/jeniton">Jeniton</a>.&nbsp;Limited-time stamp duty savings are also currently available on selected purchases at Veil, adding another consideration as the project moves toward completion.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7877]

Veil Brighton nears completion in one of the suburb's most walkable pockets

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mosaic-property-group">Mosaic Property Group</a> has recorded 134 sales worth just over $400 million in two months of pre-release activity at The Riversdale, as the developer brings its $750 million South Brisbane riverfront project to the broader market.

The sales represent more than 60 per cent of the project's 213 apartments, with Mosaic reporting the majority of purchasers have been local owner-occupiers and downsizers.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-riversdale-by-mosaic-south-brisbane-91-montague-road-south-brisbane-qld-4101">The Riversdale</a> will rise 39 storeys from its north-facing site at 91 Montague Road, delivering a mix of two, three and four-bedroom apartments alongside a collection of Mosaic's premium Masterpiece Series Sky Homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151614 project_image_fid=371872]

The early buyer response comes ahead of the wider evolution of the northern end of Montague Road, where The Riversdale will be one of the first major residential projects delivered within an emerging riverfront precinct.

Directly adjoining the development is a planned 7.1-hectare mixed-use precinct, set to introduce new residences, parkland and public realm along the river's edge. The Riversdale's position directly on the Brisbane River gives it a relationship with the waterfront that Mosaic says cannot be replicated by future buildings within the precinct.

The site is also the result of a years-long pursuit by Mosaic. The developer first earmarked the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/south-brisbane-qld-4101">South Brisbane</a> property in 2018, reflecting what Founder and Managing Director Brook Monahan has described as a deliberately patient approach to acquiring development sites.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151614 project_image_fid=372083]

"We aren't opportunistic," Monahan previously told Apartments.com.au.

"Every site purchase is carefully considered. As seen with Kangaroo Point and South Brisbane, it can take years to eventuate. There are sites we're looking at now that we may not secure for several years."

Designed in collaboration with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bureauproberts">Bureau Proberts</a>, The Riversdale has been shaped around the qualities of the riverfront site, with apartments oriented to capture northern light and uninterrupted Brisbane River views.

Generous floorplans and expansive balconies extend the living spaces towards the river, while natural materials and a restrained interior palette have been selected with longevity in mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151614 project_image_fid=371890]

Residents will have access to a level of amenity more commonly associated with world-class hotels and private members' clubs, with almost 3,000 sqm dedicated to wellness, connection, recreation and everyday convenience.

At ground level is a business lounge, private meeting rooms and dedicated workspaces. Mid-tower is a wellness sanctuary featuring magnesium hot and cold plunge pools, sauna, steam room, infrared therapy facilities, a Pilates and yoga studio, and a commercial-grade gymnasium.

Crowning The Riversdale is a rooftop featuring a 35-metre swimming pool with lap lane and spa, outdoor dining and seating terraces, firepit lounges and views of the city, river and Mount Coot-tha.

A private members' club-inspired retreat offers private dining rooms, a whisky lounge, media rooms and immersive entertainment experiences. Completing the amenity offering are two hotel-style guest suites and a resident-exclusive electric vehicle fleet and car-share program.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151614 project_image_fid=371877]

The Riversdale sits at the northern end of Montague Road between South Bank and West End, around 1.3 kilometres from the Brisbane CBD, providing access to the city's major cultural, dining and recreation precincts.

It becomes Mosaic's largest Brisbane project to date and adds to a pipeline already under construction across the city.

In Brisbane, the developer is currently delivering The Bedford and The Carter at Kangaroo Point, both of which are approaching sell-out, with a further four projects being delivered on the Gold Coast. Mosaic has completed more than $2 billion in projects since 2012 and has a further development pipeline exceeding $2 billion across South East Queensland.

Early works are underway at The Riversdale, which will be delivered by Mosaic's in-house construction division. Completion is anticipated in late 2029, with remaining apartments priced from $1.98 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151614]

Mosaic records more than $400m in two months at South Brisbane's The Riversdale

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body><div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas has advised locally-based, but foreign-controlled developers, such as Mirvac and Australand, may be exempted from the government's new foreign buyer taxes.
The 3% stamp duty on foreigner buyers of especially residential off-the-plan purchases also applies to the purchase of residential land for development itself.
This catches major developers when they acquire land for residential projects. 
Mr Pallas confirm it would apply to companies with majority foreign ownership, when questioned by The Australian Financial Review.
"Appropriate exemptions will apply to ensure relevant Australian based corporations and trusts are not unintentionally caught," Mr Pallas said.
Queensland has been prompt to take advantage, ruling out any similar surcharges on foreign buyers in the sunshine state.
New South Wales is yet to makes its strategy clear.
</div></body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Mirvac, Australand want out of Victorian foreign buyers tax

<html><body>
The Athelstone Shopping Centre in Adelaide’s north-east suburbs has been sold for a $12 million reflecting a 7.9% yield.
The property, prominently located on a 1.328 hectare land holding at 312-328 Gorge Road at Athelstone, was sold by Peter Isaksson and Rino Carpinelli of Savills South Australia,
It was sold to a private Adelaide-based investor with a total retail floor space of 4,611 square metres, anchored by Romeo’s Foodland Supermarket.
It also includes 200 car park spaces.
Romeo’s Foodland Supermarket, comprises 42.8% of the centre’s total income and is secured on a long-term lease until 2022.
Savills recorded $460 million worth of retail property transactions in South Australia in the year to December 2014, up from $209 million in the previous year, and up on the five year average of $323 million. 
In the year to December 2014, Savills recorded 51 retail property sales in South Australia, up from the previous year of 31, and up on the five year average of 43.
 
</body></html>

Savills South Australia sells Athelstone Shopping Centre

<html><body>
The Mortgage &amp; Finance Association of Australia has leased Sydney office property on Pitt Street. 
The ninth floor 130 Pitt Street space is 381 square metres.  
CBRE’s Jamie King negotiated the five-year term on behalf of Investa Funds Management.
The annual rental is $760 per sqm gross. 
</body></html>

Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia take Pitt Street lease

<html><body><div id="doc" class="route-profile">
<div id="page-outer">
<div id="page-container" class="AppContent">
<div class="AppContainer">
<div class="AppContent-main content-main u-cf">
<div class="Grid Grid--withGutter">
<div class="Grid-cell u-size2of3 u-lg-size3of4">
<div class="Grid Grid--withGutter">
<div class="Grid-cell u-lg-size2of3 " data-test-selector="ProfileTimeline">
<div class="ProfileHeading">
<div class="ProfileHeading-content ">
<div>
The 2015 Federal budget left property well-alone, other than confirmation of the looming pension asset test changes in early 2017. 
Last week Property Observer suggested couples approaching retirement - and aware of the rules in advance - will possibly <a href="/expert-insights/investing/upsizing-homes-before-retirement-and-forget-passing-down-the-holiday-shack-joe-hockeys-2015-budget-pension-implications">compromise on their superannuation voluntary contributions</a> - or sell one of the two $400,000 investment properties - and instead push the funds towards buying an untaxed, un-counted bigger, better home that can be beneficially sold later in retirement.
Now with budget confirmation, data and commentary confirm that some supposed asset-rich part pensioners will wisely upsize homes in order to retain their pensions, and then build up a tax-free asset for their late retirement years. The Scott Morrison aim was for older couples who own their home and have other assets between about $800,000 and $1.2 million to lose their part-pension altogether. 
It presumes the asset test pension limit changes get through parliament.
It will certainly take some planning by nearing pensioners and professionals to ensure it all works, but as one listener told 2GB's Ross Greenwood pre-budget it makes fiscal sense to sell that second $400,000 investment property in coming years to get below the asset test threshold.
</div>
<div>Ross Greenwood also explained to <a href="https://www.9jumpin.com.au/show/today/videos/4230274363001/" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">his Channel 9 Today show viewers</a> pre-budget how wise financial planning following the Federal Budget would save part-pensions, to the applause of his colleagues.</div>
"Clever people can work out how to get around Scott Morrison’s new pension rules," the morning show report advised, warning part-pensioners can't give the money away as otherwise Centrelink will nab you..
"Just before you reach pension age you buy something that is not subject to the assets test.
"That something is a new house.
"So in this case the people with $800,000 sell their current home and buy a new home that is $400,000 more expensive, so they reduce their assessable assets to $400,000.
"And they get a 75% pay rise in retirement.
"Infuture if they are desperate for their dough they sell the house which hopefully keeps going up with inflation," Ross Greenwood advised.
</div>
</div>
<div class="GridTimeline">
<div class="GridTimeline-items" data-max-position="598253202652459009" data-min-position="595871921897537536">
<div class="Grid" data-component-term="tweet">
<div class="Grid-cell " data-test-selector="ProfileTimelineTweet">
<div id="stream-item-tweet-597944759773175808" class="StreamItem js-stream-item" data-item-id="597944759773175808" data-item-type="tweet">
<div class="ProfileTweet u-textBreak js-tweet js-stream-tweet js-actionable-tweet ProfileTweet--low has-cards media-forward" data-tweet-id="597944759773175808" data-disclosure-type="" data-item-id="597944759773175808" data-permalink-path="/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808" data-retweet-id="597988970857762816" data-screen-name="TheTodayShow" data-name="The Today Show" data-user-id="23879043" data-has-native-media="true" data-has-cards="true" data-card-type="photo" data-mentions="Ross_Greenwood" data-retweeter="Ross_Greenwood" data-you-follow="false" data-follows-you="false" data-you-block="false">
<div class="ProfileTweet-contents">
<div class="js-tweet-details-fixer tweet-details-fixer">
<div class="TwitterPhoto js-media-container">
<div class="TwitterPhoto-container" data-card-url="//twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808/photo/1" data-card-type="photo" data-element-context="platform_photo_card">
<div class="TwitterPhoto-media"><a class="TwitterPhoto-link media-thumbnail twitter-timeline-link" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/597944759773175808/photo/1" data-url="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large" data-resolved-url-large="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large"> <img class="TwitterPhoto-mediaSource" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CExTlxXWYAArPmq.png:large" alt="Embedded image permalink" width="755" height="421"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="js-machine-translated-tweet-container"> </div>
<div class="js-machine-translated-tweet-container">
Ross Greenwood quickly sensed retirees set to lose their very small part pension could envisage the gradual destruction to the income under the 2015 Federal budget initiative set to start in 2017.
One pensioners was prompted to write that the Scott Morrison-Joe Hockey 2015 Federal budget proposal "can have only been dreamed up by comfortably well off politicians who have no appreciation of what it is like to try to live off one’s own assets." 
And two charts compiled by the pensioner show how home-owning couples will be effected.
In the first chart, with an interest rate of 3% a couple with $800,000 of assets would only end up with a yearly income of $25,773, whereas a couple with $400,000 and almost a full pension will have a yearly income of $44,973.
A difference in income of $19,200 to the advantage of the couple with less assets.
<img src="/images/2015/05/08/700_2015_budget.jpg" alt="">
In the second chart, where the interest is increased to 5% a couple with $800,000 of assets would only end up with a yearly income of $41,773 whereas a couple with $400,000 and almost a full pension will have a yearly income of $52,973.
A difference in income of $11,200 to the advantage of the couple with less assets.
<img src="/images/2015/05/08/700-budget2.jpg" alt="">
It was calculated it is not until the interest rate is at about 7% that the couple on $800,000 earns an income more or less level with the couple on $400,000.
The outcome is not exclusive to home owning couples, but effects all four categories of retirees.
Pensioners acknowledge the present taper and thresholds can also show the same sort of warp in incomes, it is less evident and indeed at 4% interest most asset levels draw equal in the income they can achieve.
Retirees who are very cautious with investing their assets especially after their experiences in the GFC - are finding trying to earn even 3% is getting harder.
Pensioners suggest any riskier investments could invite loss of capital, which for a retiree can never be made up.
Lots of retirees will either have to dip into their capital and with the spiral down effect that this will produce, will sooner rather than later end up on the full and part pension anyway.
Many others will decide to spend their assets on holidays, upgrading homes or renovations, in order obtain a higher income via the full pension.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Offloading assets and home upsizing: the maze to keep your part-pension in 2017

<html><body>
The historic Newspaper House, at 247 Collins Street, Melbourne is under offer.
It comes with mosaic mural on its front facade designed by Napier Waller in 1932.
Mervyn Napier Waller's "I'll put a girdle about the earth" features heroic human figures appear among scenes of commerce, construction and communication.
There's lots of gold, an echo of the Byzantine era, in the 1933 commission by Sir Keith Murdoch from the Herald &amp; Weekly Times who needed more than their empire on Flinders Street.
It was the former WH Rocke Ltd building on a 478 square metre holding.
<a href="https://www.realcommercial.com.au/property-retail-vic-melbourne-501464323" target="_blank">Set near Swanston Street with a 2084 square metre floor area</a>, it was marketed recently by CBRE as an irreplaceable seven level sandstone retail and office building, fully refurnished and upgraded.
Agents suggested it was a genuine “blank canvas” providing strategic opportunity for multi-level retail and/or residential/hotel conversion.
In 2010 Savills Australia had brokered a five-year lease deal for 250 square metres to Nespresso, who have now departed.
Its latest sale price has not been revealed but the former Herald and Weekly Times building sold for $11.08 million to a private investor, Melbourne horse-racing identity Ken Biddick in 2006 through Knight Frank, fully leased for $403,600 a year, reflecting a yield of 3.6%.
The then vendor, Desmond Oppenheimer had bought the building for $7.55 million in 2002.
The ground floor of 247 Collins Street had been previously leased to the House of Cashmere, and the upper levels to Sydney International College.  
HIDDEN TREASURES OF NAPIER WALLER
1926-27 MURALS Melbourne Town Hall, Swanston Street.
1927 MURAL Menzies Hotel, cnr Bourke and William streets (building demolished in 1969, mural sold privately).
1928 MURAL Better Than to Squander Life's Gifts Is to Conserve Them and Ensure a Fearless Future T&amp;G Life Building entry foyer, cnr Collins and Russell streets.
1928 MURAL Peace After Victory State Library of Victoria, first-floor landing near La Trobe Reading Room, cnr, Swanston and La Trobe street.
1933 MOSAIC I'll Put a Girdle Round the Earth Newspaper House facade, 247 Collins Street.
1934 FLORENTINE MURALS Florentino Restaurant, now Grossi Florentino, first floor, 80 Bourke Street.
1935 STAINED GLASS WINDOW Wesley Church, Pioneers window, upper gallery, north wall, 148 Lonsdale Street.
1935 STAINED GLASS WINDOW Ian Potter Museum foyer, Swanston Street on university campus. (Designed for Wilson Hall, University of Melbourne, which was destroyed by fire in 1951. Window was retrieved from the ruins.)
1935 MUIRALS Myer Melbourne Mural Hall dining room, sixth floor, 314 Bourke Street.
1937 STAINED GLASS Orchid Window University of Melbourne Botany School.
1940 MURAL Australian Symbolic Figures University of Melbourne Achitecture, Building and Planning Library (Orginally on display at Royal Insurance Company, 414-418 Collins Street, but donated to university after building was demolished in 1969.)
1963 MOSAIC The Eight Aboriginal Tribal Headmen Temple Court foyer, 422 Collins Street.
1967 MOSAIC Prometheus Monash House foyer, 15 William Street.
List Source: Fairfax Media
 
</body></html>

Newspaper House, Collins Street under offer

<html><body>
Analysing trends of the number of properties advertised for rent is the single most useful metric for property investors to make informed property management decisions. Propertyology has just completed an analysis of rental market trends across Australia and there are some interesting trends developing.
<table style="width: 507px; height: 244px;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr>
<td>
<div>
Biggest Increase In Rental Stock (last 12 months)
<ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2015-03_Propertyology_SuratBasin.pdf" target="_blank">Roma</a> QLD (311% more)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2015.03_Propertyology_ArmidaleNSW.pdf" target="_blank">Armidale</a> NSW (81% more)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/darwin/" target="_blank">Darwin</a> NT (79% more)</li>
<li>Whyalla SA (39% more)</li>
<li>Newcastle NSW (34% more)</li>
<li>Karratha WA (32% more)</li>
<li>Perth WA (31% more)</li>
<li>Mackay QLD (25% more)</li>
</ul>
 
Biggest Decrease In Rental Stock (last 12 months)
<ul>
<li>Canberra ACT (31% less)</li>
<li>Port Macquarie NSW (30% less)</li>
<li>Muswellbrook NSW (26% less)</li>
<li>Orange NSW (22% less)</li>
<li>Gold Coast QLD (21% less)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr></tbody></table>
The most common method for reporting the state of a rental market is vacancy rates. Data houses such as SQM Research do this by calculating the number of properties advertised for rent as a percentage of all rental properties within that given market. For example, if a specific location had one thousand properties which make up the total rental pool and twenty five of those owners were looking for a tenant the vacancy rate would be 2.5%.
A 3% vacancy rate is considered to be a ‘normal’ market. In my experience, pressure starts to build on rental prices when vacancy rates fall below 2%.
While the vacancy rate of a particular location at a particular time is useful information I find it even more meaningful to understand the rental trends which have been forming leading up to that point in time – is the available number of properties increasing or decreasing?
Imagine yourself receiving that friendly reminder from your property manager that a lease on one of your investment properties is getting close to expiry - the tenant has stated that they will not be renewing, and your property manager now needs your instructions on what rental price to advertise your property for. Propertyology is often asked by our clients to provide input in scenarios just like this.
The most appropriate response in this situation would be different if the property was in the south-west Queensland town of Roma compared to the Nation’s capital, Canberra. Research conducted by Propertyology confirms that Roma has experienced the biggest increase in the number of properties advertised for rent over the last 12 months (from 42 to 173). Canberra has experienced the biggest decrease (from 1,056 properties to 737).
When rental trends show a significant increase in volumes of properties available the most appropriate response by the landlord is often to set the rent below the rest of your competition. 80% of something is more than 100% of nothing; rents don’t always go up. And, unless there is a pending economic shift which gives hope for a reversal of this trend in the short term it might also be appropriate to seek a 12 month term as opposed to the traditional six months.
Conversely, there is more scope to increase rents when there is a limited number of properties for tenants to choose from. And, if the trend appears to be that the number of properties available is likely to decline it might be appropriate to stick with a short-term lease.  Port Macquarie in New South Wales (from 171 properties to 119), Muswellbrook in Hunter Valley (from 226 to 167), and Gold Coast (from 2,665 to 2,125) have also seen a significant reduction in the number of properties advertised for rent.
As forecast by Propertyology quite some time ago, Darwin (79% more rentals) and Perth (31% increase on an already high base) have significantly more properties available for rent today compared to 12 months ago.
Factors which influence the number of properties advertised for rent include:
<ul>
<li>The level of supply of new properties recently built;</li>
<li>Seasonal factors such as school holiday periods, peak tourism periods, Christmas / New Year, agriculture seasons;</li>
<li>Commencement and completion of large employment contracts; and</li>
<li>Commodity price peaks and troughs.</li>
</ul>
Large volumes of properties purchased by investors (as opposed to owner-occupiers) within a short period of time will also result in more stock available in a defined rental pool. A good example of this is Sydney where it has been reported that as high as 70% of home loan approvals during 2014 were to investors (30 – 45% is ‘normal’). Logic would suggest that pressure on rents will start to ease in Sydney.
Astute property investors will also analyse rental trends as part of their broader research in determining where to invest (although there are far more important considerations than this).  
Property is an asset class which requires investors to hold for the long-term. Over the years of holding a property there will invariably be periods when there are large volumes of properties available for rent and other periods when the rental market is tight. The astute landlord will understand the economic drivers which influence demand for their market, the supply pipeline, and current rental trends.
Simon Pressley is Managing Director of Propertyology, a REIA Hall Of Fame Inductee, property market analyst, accredited property investment adviser, and Buyer’s Agent. Contact Simon <a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/contact-us/" target="_blank">here.</a>
</body></html>

spressley-sBoeMhannA

Watching rental market vacancy rate trends key for investment success: Propertyology's Simon Pressley

<html><body>
When the Head Teller at the Reserve Bank of Australia dropped the cash rate to a record low of 2.00% this week the Head Cashier AKA Joe Hockey immediately started bellowing "Australians – spend – spend – spend."
So let me let you in on a secret Joe – Australians are spending up big, it’s just that they are using the online loophole where they don’t have to pay you GST. The other problem is that following the Global Financial Crisis many Australians (to save money) reverted back to paying cash for services simply because that way they get a significant discount.
Naturally those who have negatively geared their properties don’t engage in the cash for services given they need the receipts in order to gain their much required tax reduction. I guess that given nearly all developed countries have a tax structure where you do pay a tax when you sell the family home, however all monies spent – mortgage, maintenance and improvements – are a tax deduction. So I hope now that you can understand why GST receipts are in decline.
When the GST was introduced nearly 15 years ago a comparative analysis was undertaken to see what the online shopping receipts were likely to be for purchases under $1,000. The analysis which in all probability was done using a Commodore 64 with a flashy floppy disc drive found that it would cost as much to collect the GST on these purchases so the plan was shelved.
Today Australians are all over <a href="https://www.ozsale.com.au/default.aspx?cid=10" target="_blank">OZSALE</a> and <a href="https://www.dealsdirect.com.au/" target="_blank">DealsDirect</a> to name just two who just happen today to be hugely successful online businesses that turn over hundreds and hundreds of millions each year. According to the National Australia Bank’s (NAB) latest Online Retail Sales Index – Australians spent a record (yes record) $16.6 billion online in the year to January 2015. Given that the vast majority would be sales with no GST payable that’s at least $1.500 billion in missing revenue each year – now that’s embarrassing.
Deloitte has just readjusted the budget projections to take into account the latest economic news where last year’s budget deficit was $48.5 billion. Deloitte is predicting this year’s deficit will be $5.5 billion worse than predicted a year ago, and will be close to $45.9 billion. All will be revealed next week but rest assured it will be a shocker – although it’s difficult to agree with increasing the GST when we have all those ‘rivers of gold’ that the federal government is missing simply because they won’t reform.
Just as embarrassing was the announcement last week by Prime Minister Tony Abbott that foreign investors who have purchased illegally in Australia have until the end of November to come forward to avoid criminal charges and severe fines. Now I have no doubt that illegal property acquisitions will be huge in number but how about upgrading from Windows 2003 and start a proper National Property Register which has been promised for years.
The illegal buying debate does get amusing at times given some are saying that the best method is when buyers attend an auction to bid they must provide identity and that data is recorded – that then will stop illegal buyers. Well, sorry no it won’t. That legislation was brought in 2003/2004 in an effort to stop dummy bidding where records of identification are recorded should the Office of Fair Trading require an investigation. If a party attends an auction and they want somebody to bid on their behalf it is that person bidding who provides the identification not the eventual buyer who is not required to provide any identification – even though they may successfully buy the property.
Any buyers who have purchased illegally would now be contacting their respective legal representatives and immediately transferring ownership into the name of an Australian resident – the federal government has given them a six month window to conform and that’s based on the illegal owners coming forward. Brilliant plan that one!
With the Head Cashier now dutifully accepting the pseudo role of Housing Minister the forensic search for illegal purchasers across Australia has begun in earnest. Maybe Joe should spend a week of work experience at the NSW government who just collected more than $5.000 million from those naughty first home buyers who illegally applied for grants. Going back three years and with nearly 1,400 investigations they found 478 first home buyers who were forced to repay their illegal grants. A spokesman for the NSW Office of State Revenue said it routinely conducted ‘’random and targeted audits matching and data mining.”
All that Joe Hockey needs to do is find a way to get hold of that data and do a targeted audit through his Australian Taxation Office audits plus some additional data mining using stamp duty records.
Why is it that Canberra just doesn’t see the billions they lose each year from GST online sales and why it’s so easy to set up a National Property Register?
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Chaos in Canberra but that’s not unusual: Robert Simeon

<html><body>
The developer lobby, better at promoting self-interest than anyone else in society, would have us believe that building more homes will make homes cheaper.
Developers themselves believe that building more houses will make themselves more profitable – particularly if government gives them their wish list of things to make their lives easier - and what happens after that … well, who cares?
The truth is: the only way to make homes significant cheaper is to build far too many of them. Over-supply is the one thing that can crash a market. 
All of the areas I call the No Go Zones are places undermined by over-supply. Investors far too often fall victim to such places because supply is the factor most over-looked by property investors.
Those who take the time to do some research before tossing a few hundred thousand at an investment property tend to focus on demand, with scant regard for the flipside of the growth equation.
Some organisations that purport to advise investors preach a simplistic follow-the-population-growth strategy.
If high population growth was the core element in a good locational choice, the leading capital growth performers in the past five years would have been the Gold Coast and Wyndham City in the south-west of Melbourne. Gladstone, boosted by the influx of tens of thousands of gas project employees, would have soaring prices.
The opposite is true in those markets, which have all suffered recent periods of marked decline. The too-often forgotten factor is supply.
The Gold Coast had five years of falling property values because of too much supply. Wyndham City, which overtook the Gold Coast as the municipality with the greatest annual additions to its population, recorded no growth in prices for three years, because of an excess of house-and-land packages – ultimately flogged off to distant investors by dodgy marketing companies.
Gladstone, after recording high growth in rentals and prices in 2011 and 2012, saw rising vacancies and a sharp downturn in prices and rents after 2012 because developers went overboard yet again.
Over-supply causes rents to fall and that drags down property values.
The developers building the new projects don’t care as long as they can sell their product to someone and move on to the next project. In over-supplied markets, they tend to target distant investors unfamiliar with local conditions. The Chinese are the victims of choice these days.
There are two “danger situations” at the core of the No Go Zones issue: (1) inner-city apartment markets; and (2) regional centres where a rise in supply (through new development) has coincided with a decline in demand (through downsizing in the resources sector).
Inner-city units present a significant danger throughout capital city Australia. Boom-bust scenarios are common. As Hegney Property Group chairman Gavin Hegney says: “Apartments are always in over-supply or under-supply because of the lumpy nature of the market. With a housing estate you can release allotments in stages but you can’t do that with an apartment tower.”
Another problem is the long lead time in creating high-rise unit buildings. Multiple developers will decide simultaneously to build towers in a strong market – two or three years later when they are completed, a lot may have changed.
This is a clear and present danger for Australian buyers. Developers don’t care who buys their units as long as someone does, nor are they concerned if their buyers later find themselves unable to tenant their units or are forced to sell at a loss.
But it is a concern for the market and for real estate consumers.
Given that Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Canberra and Darwin already have – or are heading towards - surpluses of inner-city apartments, and Sydney and the Gold Coast are trending in that direction, a good strategy for property investors is to simply avoid CBD unit markets altogether. There are much better (and cheaper) places to buy.
The coal and iron ore industries are the cause of the other core “danger situation”. When the resources boom was at its strongest, mining expansion created strong property markets in towns and regional centres that felt the positive impacts.
This prompted developers to initiate new projects to exploit the demand. Sadly, this coincided in a downturn in the coal sector, with commodity prices declining at a time of rising costs for mining companies. The iron ore industry has had similar problems.
Rising supply coincided with falling demand – a recipe for decline in property markets. The result has been sharply rising vacancy rates, leading to lower rents and ultimately falling prices.
Another factor is the growing use of fly-in-fly-out workers accommodated in workers camps, rather than renting in the local property market. 
This has been a big factor in the Surat Basin region of Queensland, where developers built a lot of new dwellings in anticipation of strong rental demand – but more than 90% of resources workers have been 
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Danger at the core of property investment 'No Go Zones': Terry Ryder 

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 409">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Despite design and administrative shortcomings that overshadowed the National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS), they in no way warranted the scheme's discontinuation, according to the Senate Inquiry into Affordable Housing.
<div class="page" title="Page 375">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
NRAS is a partnership between the Australian Government and the states and territories to invest in affordable rental housing with property investors.
 It is a $6 billion initiative intended to stimulate the supply of affordable rental homes across Australia aimed to increase the supply of new affordable rental housing; reduce rental costs for low and moderate income households; and encourage large-scale investment and innovative delivery of affordable housing.
But while evidence to the Senate Standing Committees on Economics indicated clearly that a range of individuals and organisations strongly supported NRAS, the inquiry found some difficulties with its implementation: 
<div class="page" title="Page 393">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li>
teething troubles, including administrative practices associated with too much paperwork, delays in processing applications and slow response to emerging signs of problems; 
</li>
<li>
understaffing, inexperience and high turnover within the department administering the scheme; 
</li>
<li>
design inadequacies including a one size-fits-all approach which failed to take account of, or appreciate, the housing circumstances of particular areas with an identified need for affordable housing such as high value suburbs and regional, rural and remote areas; 
</li>
<li>
lack of clarity around the targeting of incentives and eligibility, which allowed significant allocation of incentives to overseas students; 
</li>
<li>
disclosure measures, which allowed the trading of incentives with excessive fees to persist and ultimately to damage the perceived integrity of the scheme; and 
</li>
<li>
external factors, notably the global financial crisis which created challenges in attracting private investment. 
</li>
</ul>
"These design and administrative shortcomings have overshadowed NRAS' success but, while they point to the need for refinement, they in no way warrant its discontinuation," the committee concluded. 
From its commencement in 2008, the annual incentives available to NRAS providers were to last for ten years, indexed annually for the rental component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and comprise two parts.
The incentive values for 2014–2015 were:
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 376">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li>
a Commonwealth Government incentive of $7,996 per dwelling per year as a refundable tax offset or payment; and 
</li>
<li>
a state or territory contribution of $2,665.6 The total amount came to $10,661. 
</li>
</ul>
When announced, the original proposal was for an initial round of 50,000 incentives, though the scheme was introduced in the middle of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) at a time when the banks were very hesitant and valuers were very negative. 
The Community Housing Federation of Australia suggested that one of the benefits of NRAS had been the partnerships it had facilitated across the not-for-profit, for-profit, development, and financial sectors, building sustainable communities with some private sales, some NRAS and some social housing.
The committee noted NRAS brought direct private investment into the affordable housing arena and significantly increased the community housing providers' engagement with financial institutions.
The committee heard it created a mechanism which has enabled a combination of private equity, the private sector, community-housing providers and the government to work in collaboration. 
Despite the strong support for NRAS, a number of witnesses drew attention to weaknesses that have undermined its performance.
JELD-WEN indicated that some NRAS incentives had been allocated to tenderers that did not have sites for the commencement of rental housing, saying it was implausible that NRAS incentives could be approved without tenderers submitting proposed developments on actual sites.
JELD-WEN also criticised NRAS for poor accountability. It referred to 'a glaring need for a report card on the cost-effectiveness.
The Property Council of Australia made a number of observations about NRAS including that some participants had been concerned about repetitious and costly tendering processes in rounds 1–3. 
Grace Mutual Limited referred to delays in processing applications and unclear, complex and poorly drafted regulations and law that 'hurt the program'.
Some argued greater consideration should be given to the geographic location of the NRAS incentives granted to ensure those regions with the poorest housing affordability and suitability for disadvantaged groups receive more incentives. 
The Tenants Union of Victoria noted that NRAS had played an important role in bringing private finance to increase the amount of affordable housing in Australia. 
But it also referred to recent negative media coverage reporting allegations that NRAS had been 'rorted to provide accommodation for wealthy international students, and that foreign investors, brokers and small time investors' were exploiting NRAS tax breaks.
The Tenants Union of Victoria held the view that NRAS was one of the important supply side interventions that made a positive difference. 
The committee did believe the review of NRAS was warranted. 
It noted lessons needed to be learnt from NRAS such as the need for clear and tight eligibility criteria and better targeting to areas of need.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
But the cancellation of round 5, however, "was a very different matter."
"This cessation has set back the scheme just as it was gaining the trust and support of the private sector and beginning to make a material contribution to the supply of affordable housing. 
"Not only has it undermined investor confidence in this scheme, it has also fed into the general uncertainty that has engulfed the national policy on affordable housing. 
"The committee is firmly of the view that the government should start immediately to rekindle the confidence that institutional investors were starting to show in investing in affordable housing and to provide greater certainty in order to attract such investors."
The Senate committee recommends that:
<ul>
<li>
in the absence of any credible alternative scheme designed to increase the supply of new affordable housing and considering steps have already been taken to improve the administration and implementation of NRAS, that the Australian Government continue with NRAS round 5; 
</li>
<li>
the Federation White Paper process look at the Queensland NRAS model, which appeared to have much tighter controls over eligibility, as a means of determining where further improvements or fine-tuning could make the system more robust and effective; 
</li>
<li>
the Federation White Paper process look at how NRAS or a replacement scheme could be reframed to take account of the particular housing circumstances of regional Australia and ensure that NRAS housing was better targeted to areas in most need; and 
</li>
<li>
as part of the Federation White Paper process, a thorough cost benefit analysis of NRAS be undertaken, and that any such analysis include comparison of forgone revenue from demand subsidies such as the first home owners grant, and negative gearing and capital gains tax.
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

NRAS should be restored with improvements: Senate Affordable Housing Inquiry 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The Reserve Bank of Australia would dearly love to be like Dr Doolittle’s amazing pushmi-pullyu, able to face both directions at once. Cutting interest rates to encourage economic activity (and a lower dollar), but at the same time raising rates to dampen the superheated Sydney housing market. But unlike the mythical vicuna, the RBA board just cannot have it both ways.
So after being dragged to its second rate cut this year, the RBA looks like it will throw up its hands and hospital pass the housing problem to someone else – the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
Since late last year, the RBA and APRA have been <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-25/rba-says-too-early-to-judge-home-loan-restrictions/6346872">brainstorming</a> what could be done about the rise in investment mortgage lending, which along with foreign investors, appear to the main culprits in runaway house price increases. In December last year, the two regulators announced they had <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Documents/141209-Letter-to-ADIs-reinforcing-sound-residential-mortgage-lending-practices.pdf">written to banks</a> reminding them they should be “prudent” about their lending practices.
In fairly benign language APRA warned bank CEOs that if banks did not pay heed they “may institute further supervisory action” and threatened such action “could include increases in the level of capital” that individual banks are required to hold.
In its Dear CEO letter, APRA also drew a line in the sand pointing out that growth in lending to property investors “materially above a threshold of 10%” will be an important risk indicator in considering the need for further action.
That particular letter must have sat in the “do after the holidays” pile because the latest figures show a 10.4% <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Documents/MBS-March-2015.pdf">increase</a> in lending for property investment for the year to the end of March. Only the Commonwealth Bank stayed within the regulator’s guideline - just.
Market jitters
When APRA head Wayne Byres brought this <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/apra-keeps-macroprudential-strictures-on-bank-lending-secret-20150320-1m3nik">profligacy</a> to everyone’s attention and warned of further action, the markets got spooked and bank shares were <a href="https://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/bank-shares-wiped-out-over-apra-real-estate-crackdown-fears-20150430-1mwucx">sold off</a> by nervous investors.
But why would banks take APRA’s warnings that seriously? In an ongoing stoush resulting from APRA’s <a href="https://theconversation.com/is-the-basel-process-broken-you-can-bank-on-it-11488">cave-in</a> to the banks on the so-called Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF), it is <a href="https://www.australianbankingfinance.com/banking/the-games-we-play--part-two/">reported</a> that some of the big banks are not cooperating on the relatively simple matter of reporting which mortgages make up their Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS). Given the amount of low-risk profits banks make from investor lending (due to the magic of negative gearing) it is highly likely they would turn a deaf ear to APRA on this one.
The three little pigs (also known as the Council of Financial Regulators) may puff and blow all they like but the banks will continue to lend to property investors until the rules are changed and it becomes unprofitable. But that is another discussion.
Regulating the economy
Should APRA have any role at all in implementing economic policy?
In 2012, the RBA and APRA issued a <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/fin-stability/resources/2012-09-map-aus-fsf/pdf/2012-09-map-aus-fsf.pdf">document</a> attempting to clarify the roles of the respective regulators – not an easy task. In obtuse regulatory speak, APRA’s role was described as: "…to promote financial system stability in Australia while balancing its objectives of financial safety and efficiency, competition, contestability and competitive neutrality."
In addition to being the supervisor of individual banks, credit unions, insurance companies and the largest superannuation firms, APRA is also what is known as the macro-prudential, systemic regulator.
APRA’s remit is to take actions to reduce so-called “systemic risk”, specifically in the case of clearing and settlement facilities, and more generally and opaquely by “limiting the systemic risks associated with breaches of financial promises”.
Does lending to property investors pose a systemic risk?
Depending on one’s position, borrowing to purchase investment properties may be a good thing (if one is benefiting from negative gearing), or bad (if one is frozen out of the housing market). However, this is an economic, tax and social issue rather than a banking one.
The question is whether this is a risk sufficient to cause a major bank to fail and bring other banks down with it.
In reality, negative gearing is as close to a risk-free profit as banks can get - after all taxpayers pick up the tab. Banks are more likely to fold as a result of other systemic risks, such as lending to iron ore producers.
The role of APRA in this issue is disquieting. Where did the 10% growth “limit” come from? [It turns out it was agreed with ASIC and RBA]. Why not 5% or 15%, what is the economic purpose of this very specific limit?
And why would shareholders not be informed of which banks are being targeted by APRA, as Byres has intimated? It is not APRA’s role to control continuous disclosure requirements, that is up to ASIC.
If the government wishes to dampen down the housing market, using banking regulators to do the hard work for it just won’t work. Banks are too far removed from the problem to be able to force meaningful change.
But more than that, banking (and other) regulators should not be used as agents of short-term government policy, they should be independent agencies warning when policies start to go wrong.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/41188/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/pat-mcconnell-13137">Pat McConnell</a> is Honorary Fellow, Macquarie University Applied Finance Centre at <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/macquarie-university">Macquarie University</a>.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News