Construction is set to begin at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/orchard-mews-glen-iris-18-scott-grove-glen-iris-vic-3146">Orchard Mews</a> in Glen Iris, with&nbsp;PC Whitehall &amp; Sons&nbsp;now appointed as the townhome development moves into its next phase.

The development by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/montcoeur">MontCoeur</a>,&nbsp;located at 18 Scott Grove, is now around 30 per cent sold, with completion targeted for late-2027.

Orchard Mews comprises a curated collection of three- and four-bedroom customisable townhomes, positioned within one of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>’ more tightly held residential streets. The low-density project has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a>, with landscape architecture by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/jack-merlo">Jack Merlo</a>, bringing together a team known for high-end residential projects across Melbourne.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366285]

The development is defined by its focus on flexible living and long-term usability. Each residence includes multiple living zones and a customisable multipurpose room, allowing buyers to tailor spaces to suit changing needs, whether as a home office, additional bedroom, wellness area or entertainment space.

Architecturally, the townhomes emphasise natural light and spatial volume, with dual-aspect layouts and double-height living areas incorporated into the design. Interiors feature natural stone benchtops, premium appliances, and a neutral material palette intended to support everyday functionality rather than statement-driven finishes.

All residences are all-electric and include private lifts and secure double garages, reflecting a broader shift toward sustainability and future-focused housing in Melbourne’s established suburbs.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150128 project_image_fid=366277]

Outdoor connections are also central to the offering, with a mix of private courtyards and terraces extending internal living spaces and integrating with the landscaped surrounds.

The Scott Grove address places Orchard Mews within close proximity to some of Melbourne’s key lifestyle and education amenities, including Scotch College, Sacré Cœur, Cabrini Hospital and the retail hub of Chadstone. Public transport access is also nearby, with trams and Gardiner Station providing connectivity to the CBD and surrounding suburbs.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150128]

Joel Robinson

Construction to commence at luxury Glen Iris townhome project, Orchard Mews

A rare new apartment development has been proposed on the fringe of St Ives Village.

Developer Newquest Property has lodged plans for a low-rise apartment project designed by well-regarded architecture firm Warren &amp; Mahoney, which is best known for its work in the multi-residential sector in Melbourne.

The building, proposed for a 1,916 sqm site on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/st-ives-residences-3-5-memorial-avenue-nsw-2075">Memorial Avenue</a> opposite St Ives Village Green, has been designed to blend into the surrounding natural environment.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5c1c7437-2fba-4345-a6d7-05321714ad3e" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.28.46%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=KrYyMaJvNqR7vbx0xbB3Ef8sJ6FuHpmn" />

“Drawing inspiration from the pale trunks and flowering canopies of the scribbly gums and blue gums prevalent in the area, a considered material palette was developed,” the architectural design report states.

“This palette references the established materiality of the suburb while elevating it through refined finishes to achieve a more luxurious architectural expression.”

Of the 33 apartments proposed, 21 will be three-bedroom residences. The remaining mix includes nine two-bedroom apartments, one one-bedroom apartment and two four-bedroom residences. The development will be supported by 62 car parking spaces and 33 secure bicycle spaces.

The proposal would replace two single-storey brick buildings currently on the site.

<img alt="St Ives" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="21422eaf-09a9-4439-9278-b9bd9daf22a1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-04%20at%201.38.10%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=v.fXSgcUcEscvOZzqcjG5nk3gVqk_Amt" />

St Ives remains a relatively untapped market for new apartment development. North Shore developer WINIM has a number of projects in the area, while INCA is nearing completion of Ellis Residences.

More recently, Traders In Purple has lodged plans for one of the denser projects proposed in the suburb, a 75-apartment development on a 5,900 sqm site on Cowan Road.

NewQuest, a construction, design and development firm, has delivered over 24 projects across commercial, residential, industrial, and lad markets.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

First look: NewQuest Property proposes new St Ives apartment development

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/centa-property-group">Centa Property Group</a> has achieved two major milestones at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bilinga-house-107-golden-four-drive-bilinga-qld-4225">Bilinga House</a> apartment development in the sought-after southern Gold Coast.

They've almost sold 50 per cent of the Golden Four Drive building, while at the same time announcing the commencement of construction through reputable builder Greyburn Construction.

The boutique 10-storey building, with 47 two- and three-bedroom apartments, now has a mid-to-late 2028 completion date.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5333]

The <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>-designed project is positioned just 200 metres from Bilinga Beach and brings a relatively rare apartment offering to a market that has seen limited new supply in recent years.

Residences have been designed to maximise natural light and ventilation, with open-plan interiors, generous glazing, and material palettes that reflect the surrounding coastal landscape.

Interiors incorporate engineered timber flooring, stone benchtops, and custom joinery, with layouts designed to adapt to both permanent living and lock-and-leave use.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5336]

Rothelowman Senior Project Leader Matthew Tencate said the design approach centres on liveability and community.

“Providing curated on-site amenities and communal spaces for residents that facilitate a sense of community, liveability, and wellness,” Tencate said.

Residents will have access to a suite of private amenities including a pool, gym, sauna, and communal alfresco areas, alongside practical features such as surfboard storage and bicycle facilities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5336]

Centa Property Group Director Jason Yuen said the project has been designed to appeal to a range of buyers seeking flexibility in how they use their property.

“Bilinga House is designed for those who want the best of both worlds – a modern beachside escape with the flexibility to generate income when you're not there,” Yuen said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150037 project_image_fid=5338]

Bilinga remains one of the quieter pockets of the Gold Coast, sitting between the more established hubs of Coolangatta and Palm Beach. Its appeal has strengthened in recent years, supported by proximity to the Gold Coast Airport and the Oceanway coastal path.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150037]

Bilinga House apartments snapped up as Greyburn commences construction

Breaking into the Sydney property market has long felt out of reach for many first home buyers, particularly as median house prices sit above $1.6 million and unit prices push beyond $900,000.

But entry points still exist in pockets of Greater Western Sydney, where pricing, government incentives, and product mix are aligning to make ownership more attainable.

Understanding where those opportunities sit, and how the numbers actually stack up, is becoming increasingly important for buyers weighing up their next move.

<h2>Work out what you can actually afford</h2>

Sydney is expensive, but it isn’t uniformly expensive. The Greater Parramatta region continues to offer comparatively accessible entry points, particularly for buyers open to alternative configurations like studios.

There's an assumption that a first home needs to be a certain size, that anything smaller than a one-bedder is a concession rather than a choice. That assumption doesn't hold up against what well-designed studios in the right location actually offer: immediate liveability, strong urban amenity, and a price point that makes the deposit target realistic rather than theoretical.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/mason-main-merrylands-249-259-merrylands-road-merrylands-nsw-2160">Mason &amp; Main</a>, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/coronation-property">Coronation Property</a>'s multi-award winning precinct in Merrylands, studio apartments are unlike the typical studio configuration.

Starting from $498,000, the bedroom is fully enclosed, separated from the living area by a cavity sliding door, creating a genuinely private sleeping space that functions more like a one-bedroom apartment than a traditional open-plan studio.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=31751 project_image_fid=359814]

At 42 sqm internally, with an open-plan kitchen, built-in robes, modern bathroom, and separate laundry, the apartments are designed for everyday liveability rather than short-term use.

With a five per cent deposit under the Federal Government's First Home Guarantee, that equates to a deposit of around $24,200, achievable for many first home buyers without the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance.

<h2>Understand the real cost of renting versus buying</h2>

For buyers weighing up the shift from renting to owning, the numbers are closer than many expect.

Here’s how the numbers stack up for a studio at Mason &amp; Main (based on a $498,000 purchase):

<ul>
	<li>Purchase price: $498,000</li>
	<li>Five per cent deposit (First Home Guarantee): ~$24,900</li>
	<li>Loan amount: ~$473,100</li>
	<li>Estimated mortgage repayment (6.29% variable, 30-year term): ~$675–$695/week*</li>
	<li>Estimated rental return: $590–$620/week*</li>
	<li>Rental yield: 6.16% - 6.47%</li>
</ul>

At this level, the gap between renting and owning is relatively narrow, particularly when factoring in long-term equity, with rental returns also making the apartments a viable option for investors.

The rental range reflects current asking rents for remaining studio stock in the development and, based on prevailing asking prices, equates to an indicative gross rental yield of up to 6.47 per cent.

For buyers seeking more internal space, Mason &amp; Main also offers a range of one-bedroom apartments from $629,000, alongside larger one-bedroom plus multipurpose room configurations priced from $680,000 - all priced under $800,000 and eligible for first home buyer incentives.

<ul>
	<li>Purchase price: $629,000</li>
	<li>20 per cent deposit: ~$125,800 (5% deposit on exchange: $31,450)</li>
	<li>Loan amount 80%: ~$503,200</li>
	<li>Estimated mortgage repayment: ~$720–$740/week*</li>
	<li>Estimated rental return: $650–$680/week*</li>
	<li>Rental yield:&nbsp;5.37% - 5.62%</li>
</ul>

One-bedroom apartments continue to present a balanced option for both owner-occupiers and investors, supported by steady rental demand across Western Sydney.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=31751 project_image_fid=359812]

<h2>Make sure you're across the government incentives</h2>

Government incentives continue to play a key role in reducing the upfront cost barrier.

At Mason &amp; Main, studio, one, and two-bedroom apartments are priced under $800,000, allowing eligible buyers to access a full stamp duty exemption under the NSW First Home Buyers Assistance Scheme.

On a $498,000 purchase, that represents a saving of roughly $17,900 that would otherwise need to be paid at settlement.

Combined with the First Home Guarantee, which enables purchases with as little as a five per cent deposit, the total capital required to secure a home is significantly reduced compared to traditional lending pathways.

<h2>No waiting, no uncertainty</h2>

For first home buyers who want to move sooner rather than later, Mason &amp; Main removes one of the more common pain points from the purchase process entirely. The development is already complete and move-in ready, meaning buyers can walk through the apartments, inspect the finishes, and have full certainty about what they're purchasing before signing anything.

Coronation brought in renowned architecture firm <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a> to design the development.&nbsp;

"The project's design drew inspiration from the area's rich heritage, in particular the nearby brickworks and aqueduct, infusing a contemporary perspective to seamlessly integrate historical influences into the design," Woods Bagot Principal Dom Alvaro says.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=31751 project_image_fid=736]

<h2>Factor in location and lifestyle</h2>

Beyond the apartment itself, the surrounding infrastructure matters, particularly for a first purchase. Merrylands Station sits 350 metres from the development, putting the Parramatta CBD a five-minute drive away and the Sydney CBD roughly 25 minutes via the Western Line. Directly across the road is Stockland <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/merrylands-nsw-2160">Merrylands</a>, one of Greater Western Sydney's major retail centres.

At street level, Mason &amp; Main's own retail and dining precinct has more than 30 tenants trading, including Iftar, Macelleria, Hayat, San Churro, Yuzu, and Fat Jaks. Residents also have access to a resort-style pool, a Technogym-equipped gym, private dining rooms, and a rooftop terrace with panoramic views across Parramatta, the Sydney CBD, and the Blue Mountains, all exclusive to the building.

Due to the mix of configurations, including studios which are rarely offered in today's new apartment market, first home buyers and investors have driven Mason &amp; Main to over 90 per cent sold.

Coronation Property Managing Director Joe Nahas says the development is driving a revitalisation of Merrylands, setting a high standard for future developments in the area.

Mason &amp; Main is move-in ready and is the latest in a series of award-winning mixed-use developments by Coronation Property.

Disclaimer: Mortgage repayment figures are estimates only, based on a 6.29 per cent variable rate over a 30-year term (Canstar, April 2026). Pricing and rental estimates are indicative and based on current listings and project information. Gross yield figures are indicative and derived from asking prices and estimated rental ranges. Stamp duty savings are indicative only. Buyers should seek independent financial and legal advice before proceeding.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=31751]

How first home buyers can enter the Sydney property market for under $500k

Australia’s housing debate has rarely been more urgent. The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council forecasts the country could fall around 262,000 homes short of housing needs by 2029, underscoring the scale of the challenge facing planners, governments and developers.

In response, much of the conversation has centred on high-density towers around transport corridors and strategic centres.

Diversified developer Coronation Property, while also focused on well-located, strategic sites, is incorporating an arguably underutilised typology, the terrace.

Difficult to integrate into true high-rise developments, terraces have become a defining feature of Coronation’s lower-rise portfolio, including projects in Ashbury and Erskineville. <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/ashbury-terraces-165-171-milton-street-ashbury-nsw-2193">Ashbury Terraces</a> places a stronger emphasis on this housing type, forming part of a broader community mix.

At its Erskineville development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lillian-erskineville-9-metters-street-erskineville-nsw-2043">Lillian</a>, terraces are more limited, with just a handful&nbsp;included within the wider, predominantly apartment-led precinct, one of the first developments to launch in Erskineville in several years.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=368392]

Terrace residents at Lillian benefit from many of the same advantages as apartment owners, the lock-up-and-leave lifestyle and access to shared amenities like the rooftop wellness space, but with significantly more space.

Spanning multiple levels, the terraces also feature front and rear courtyards, providing direct access to the central landscaped gardens within the precinct.

<h3 data-end="212" data-section-id="1n97jye" data-start="191">The terrace model</h3>

Terrace housing has long been part of Australia’s urban fabric. From Paddington and Surry Hills to Glebe and Annandale, rows of terrace homes have shaped neighbourhood streets, offering a housing form that sits between detached houses and apartments.

The contemporary terrace, however, addresses many of the limitations of older designs, where narrow staircases and constrained layouts often compromised liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=368157]

“Terraces represent one of the city’s most intelligent housing models,” says Joe Nahas, Managing Director of Coronation Property.

“They deliver density without losing the human scale that makes neighbourhoods liveable. In many ways, they provide a bridge between the Sydney we know and the Sydney we need to build. If Sydney is going to grow well, it can’t rely on towers alone.”

<hr data-end="1090" data-start="1087" />
<h3 data-end="1124" data-section-id="1a7l0gw" data-start="1092">The evolution of the terrace</h3>

That thinking has shaped Coronation’s approach at Ashbury Terraces, where the terrace typology has been reinterpreted for modern living.

Designed by SJB, the project recently received recognition at the 2026 Better Future World Design Awards, acknowledging its architectural clarity and response to the surrounding suburban context.

SJB Director Adam Haddow says the intent was to evolve a familiar housing form rather than reinvent it.

“The terrace is one of Sydney’s most familiar housing forms, so our approach at Ashbury was to reinterpret that typology in a contemporary way,” Haddow says.

“The homes are designed to sit comfortably within the existing neighbourhood while introducing more light, landscape and shared spaces that support modern living.”

Ashbury Terraces combines terraces, apartments and penthouses across a series of low-rise buildings, integrating contemporary architecture with landscaped communal spaces and resident amenity.

That same typology is now being carried into Coronation’s Lillian development in Erskineville, where a smaller number of terraces sit within a predominantly apartment-led precinct.

<hr data-end="2269" data-start="2266" />
<h3 data-end="2289" data-section-id="cazuws" data-start="2271">Buyer response</h3>

Coronation’s decision to include terraces at Lillian was informed by strong buyer feedback from Ashbury Terraces, where purchasers were drawn to the flexibility and scale the housing type offers.

One resident, Sweta Pursem, purchased a terrace as a single buyer, citing its long-term versatility.

“As a single buyer, it might seem surprising that I chose a terrace over an apartment, but I was thinking long term,” Pursem says.

“The terraces are incredibly versatile, catering to a range of lifestyles while still offering the space and privacy of a house.”

For Pursem, the multi-level layout provides a level of functionality not typically found in apartment living.

“Having a separate living area from the bedroom and home office makes everyday living feel both functional and comfortable. When friends and family come to visit, the layout gives a sense of privacy while still feeling open and spacious.”

Her terrace also supports a more connected, lifestyle-driven way of living.

“I love entertaining, and the courtyard is ideal for relaxed weekend drinks with friends. I tend to use each level differently throughout the day, it creates a natural rhythm between work, downtime and entertaining, which I didn’t have in apartment living.”

Ashbury Terraces is now complete and ready to move in, while Lillian in Erskineville is under construction and expected to welcome residents in mid-2027.

Coronation champions terraces as a key piece of Sydney’s housing mix

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Housing affordability for first home buyers loomed large in the news this week, largely because properties in Sydney and Melbourne are selling for more than many first timers can afford.
But if you’re a first home buyer, is this really a time to panic just because you missed out at a couple of auctions?
If there’s 20 bidders at an auction, 19 miss out.
If you’re committed, you still have to save as much deposit as you need, and enough to cover the stamp duty and conveyancing costs. If you don’t have enough, you have to save more.
You also have to monitor your ability to pay the cost of the loan. So be realistic about how much income you can rely upon and what it takes to service your mortgage.
Or, could you do what most home buyers do and buy a cheaper property?
If you don’t want to adjust your goals downwards, you’ll have to adjust upwards your deposit, stamp duty and loan repayment equations.
Also, use an online loan calculator before saying yes to a low-equity mortgage. If housing values weaken again, 20% equity feels better than 10.
On a policy level, would you like to see governments releasing more land to meet demand? Or should government promote more competition in the mortgage market, creating more options for more consumers?
Should New South Wales reinstate the First Home Owners Grant for existing homes?
Regardless, I do wonder if the affordability story is the whole story. Might it have more to do with where people want to buy and less to do with a generation missing out?
Stephen Koukoulas, an economist writing in Business Spectator, uses Reserve Bank numbers and finds that new home loan repayments as a percentage of household income is around the same now as it has been for 30 years. He concludes, “There is no evidence of a first home buyers’ affordability problem.”
He goes further: the prices of so-called cheap city properties bought by older generations were offset by the high interest rates; the rising Sydney house prices are offset by the historically low interest rates.
Interest rates and property markets fluctuate, but households and lenders stay within basic serviceability ranges.
This may not be the desired conclusion for those who have set their hearts on buying somewhere beyond their resources. And it doesn’t fit with the idea of a generational conflict where one cohort is ‘shut out’.
Actually, every first home buyer finds it hard – people in my generation bought modest first homes with interest rates at 20%.
Perhaps the current first home buyers would be better served by recognising the opportunity rather than the problem? At 4.8%, a mortgage is currently cheaper than it will be again in our lifetimes.
This is a massive, historical opportunity. So forget about scapegoats and do what you need to do: which is boost your deposit, set your sights on what is affordable and think in steps – it’s a long road.
What do you think?

<hr>
Mark Bouris is executive chairman of <a href="https://www.ybr.com.au/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Yellow Brick Road</a>, a financial services company offering home loans, financial planning, accounting and tax, and insurance.
You can contact Mark on <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/markbouris" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

mbouris-tauSvXGAM2

First home buyers have no cause to panic: Mark Bouris

<html><body>
A Melbourne real estate agent was ordered to serve 200 hours of community services after illegally claiming a First Home Owner Grant (FHOG) despite already owning a home, according to the State Revenue Office (SRO) of Victoria. 
The man pleaded guilty to the First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 and Tax Administration Act 1997. His legal team told the court that he was unclear about what he was doing and the repercussions of his actions. The magistrate dismissed this claim due to the nature of the man’s occupation.
The man first bought a property in St Kilda in 2005 and received the FHOG. The grant was later reclaimed after the SRO found he did not meet the residency requirements.
In 2009, he purchased a second property in Chadstone and applied unsuccessfully to receive the FHOG. The SRO rejected the application on the basis that he had not repaid the FHOG for his St Kilda property.
After repaying that amount, he once again applied for the FHOG. During this period he acquired another property in Moorabbin. When SRO investigators questioned the purchase of this property, he provided a statutory declaration stating the Moorabbin property was for investment purposes and he had never lived there.
Upon receipt of this declaration, he was then paid a $16,000 FHOG.
The SRO conducted further investigations and found that the man once again did not meet the residency requirements to receive a FHOG.
The court heard that the man was extremely sorry and had learned an important lesson from his actions. He was then sentenced without conviction to a 24-month community correction order that requires him to perform 200 hours of community work, amongst other conditions. He was also ordered to pay an extra $203.60 of out-of-pocket costs to the SRO within a month.
</body></html>

dleow-BGaNPbHWyK

Melbourne real estate agent pleads guilty to First Home Owner Grant offences

<html><body>
Its never been easy. Every generation of first home buyers has faced affordability obstacles and choices, but the noisiest of the latest batch of first home buyers would prefer to bleat rather than make the latterday sacrifices that were undertaken, in an earlier form, by their parents. 
I accept that the 2013 buying prospects are diminished, but the buying priorities and requirements appear almost non-negotiable by this so-called, doomed to rent for life generation.
At weekend auction, when the APM median house sale price was a likely record $1.065 million, I spotted at least 25 offerings sold at below $500,000, with opportunities for instance to buy a unit in Meadowbank, Cronulla, Parramatta, Summer Hill, Burwood, Five Dock, Croydon Park, even Bronte.
There were houses in Granville, Casula, Parramatta, Blackett and Fairfield West.
The weekend's cheapest sale was $191,000 for a four bedroom 1960s house on 1500 square metres in the Blue Mountains. The Bullaburra property, which sold to an investor, had last sold at $240,000 in 2007. The suburb's median house price is $377,000.
Sydney currently has 51 suburbs with median house prices below $400,000 including:
Tregear $240,000
Bidwill $250,000
Blackett $251,000
Emerton $252,000
Lethbridge Park $255,000
There are 122 Sydney suburbs with house medians below $500,000.
For units, it has 45 suburbs with median unit prices below $400,000.
There are some 98 suburbs with below $500,000 unit median prices.
That's out of the 650 Sydney suburbs.
Some of these options are located in the upper north shore, the inner west and the city and east, including Hornsby $450,000 units, Forest Lodge $456,000 units, Newtown $466,000 units, Ultimo $490,000 units and Eastlakes $410,000 units.
Yes APM has previously acknowledged the average distance from the city centre for the Sydney suburbs below $400,000 was 52 kilometres.
That's compared with 36 kilometres in Melbourne and 30 kilometres in Brisbane, APM noted.
But as Andrew Wilson, the senior economist at Australian Property Monitors recently noted, Sydney has a lower end housing market that is "as accessible, if not more accessible, than most other capital city markets."
With the Sydney median house price now exceding $700,000, it is the option for first buyers to look where they can buy new houses for less than $400,000 and existing stock for over $240,000.
Sydney, with its high median because the middle market is so strong, does has the buying prospects. They just have to be viewed as worthy, transitory, not unpalatable.
<a target="_blank" href="mailto:news@propertyobserver.com.au"></a><a href="mailto:news@propertyobserver.com.au">news@propertyobserver.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

First home buyers have choices; but they deem distant western Sydney option unpalatable

<html><body>
It was reported recently in October 2013, the NSW state government made the largest monthly windfall on stamp duty since it began recording such data trends back in 2005.
With over $350 million collected in the month of October, stamp duty is unquestionably one of the biggest revenue raisers for NSW.
However, we shouldn’t get too carried away with what, at face value, appears as a larger than usual money-grab by the state government. The increase in stamp duty revenue also needs to take into account some other market factors, such as near-record high auction clearance rates for the months of August, September, and October of 2013. It is within these two to three months that the state government’s stamp duty tax windfall reported, would have been derived from.
It is safe to call a spade and spade and realise that in NSW, higher than usual auction and private sales data – and thus higher volumes of stamp duty collection as a result – is an indication of renewed buyer and market interest in residential property.
And hey, why wouldn’t there be?
The current property market climate has been something of a perfect storm for home buyers and investors alike in recent months. This is especially evident in NSW. Though housing affordability challenges continue to persist, there are just too many well-received positive factors at play that are stirring home buyer and investor market activity. These include:
-          Some of the lowest interest rates on offer of all time
-          Not only are rates low, but some of the most competitive and cost-efficient two-year, three-year, and five-year fixed interest rate deals are on offer. These deals are ‘security’ music to a first home buyer’s ears
-          Though affordability remains a challenge, property values throughout most of NSW have not risen in as high a proportion as other states in the past 12-24 months
-          Previously the construction industry was in a slump, however it is starting to heave back into prosperity and with more construction upstarts and projects commencing, buyer confidence levels boost
As an investor, my view on stamp duty is in a constant state of flux. Though it prohibits many first home buyers from entering the market initially, it can be argued that it also prevents first home buyers entering the market foolishly and setting themselves up for failure. Yes, saving that initial first home deposit will take a little longer due to the needed stamp duty capital being raised, however it also means buyers need to learn more diligent saving and spending habits in their quest to home ownership.
This can be a good thing for buyers who have unrealistic expectations or a view that their first home purchase should be the ‘forever dream beach house’ that they want, long term. First home buyers need to view stamp duty as a challenge; a necessary evil that means they may need to compromise on certain elements of their first property purchase.
Stamp duty also encourages would-be first home buyers to consider renting longer, and perhaps buying a more affordable investment property to start with, saving first home ownership for a few more years down the track. I personally think this is one of the smarter and more cost-efficient strategies out there.
Say for example your goal is to buy your first home, a $500,000 property, within the next few months and you have your 15% deposit saved. Here’s what you’d be up for if you bought it as a home and lived in it for three years:
-          15% deposit: $75,000 (leaving a mortgage value of $425,000)
-          LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) because you do not have the needed 20% deposit: around $4,000 (that’s $4,000 of wasted money you can never get back or make any claims on)
-          NSW stamp duty on purchase of $500,000 (payable at time of settlement, remember): $18,010 (yes, that is dead money you can never get back)
-          Other settlement costs (legal, any loan fees, searches): $2,000
-          Total upfront payable: $99,010
Assuming you take out a mostly-fixed loan product (say 30 years), two to three years of chipping away at the mortgage will not make much of a dent, because remember, most 30-year mortgages do not start to make headway until around year #5 or #6. You are also liable to pay hefty interest on your mortgage from day one, because of a substantial $425,000 sized mortgage.
In my view, a better strategy for this home buyer is to rent for a few years, but buy a cheaper investment property up front. Let’s say a modest unit or apartment in middle-outer Sydney suburbs, or a well-located property in a regional centre such as Wagga, Newcastle, or the North Coast. Let’s say you still have that $99,000 upfront budget mentioned above to spend.
-          Buy one $250,000 investment property right away
-          Put down 20% deposit (thus negating the need to pay LMI): $50,000
-          This means you have a loan amount of $200,000. I’d take out a split loan that is 60% fixed for three to five years, and 40% variable (with an offset facility that is redraw-capable). This means 40% ($80,000) of your mortgage is offset-capable
-          NSW stamp duty on $250,000: $7,260
-          Other settlement costs (same as above): $2,000
-          You are ‘all in’ for $59,260 initially
-          As for the remaining $30,000 of savings, don’t spend it, but put it into that $80,000 offset account. This means that for the first few years you are only paying interest on $50,000 of offset plus 120,000 of fixed loan = interest payable only on $170,000
-          Over years one to three you continue to rent and pour savings into that offset account, all the while reducing the interest you pay on the investment property. Then in year three, you pull out your original $30,000, plus three years’ worth of savings revenue. Assuming you save an average $20,000 per year, this will see you back at the $90,000 mark to buy your home with.
-          Oh and let’s not forget some of the tax minimisation benefits that often come with well-purchased investment properties. Even if this saves you only a couple of thousand per year, that’s still an additional $2,000 each tax year that will help to ease the mortgage stress of your big chunky home mortgage, when you are ready to buy your home.
This strategy will not work for everyone or every situation. It is not financial advice and is not to be construed or applied as such. However, it is an example of how renting for a few more years whilst having an investment property up your sleeve, can better your home-buying position later on.
Stamp duty is one of those necessary evils in the property game. It may not always be, but for now, it is. In my view, though stamp duty is an evil, it is not the real problem here – a poor buying strategy mixed with unrealistic buying expectations is. Australian property buyers need to get smarter in their home ownership aspirations and realise that the best course to take isn’t always the direct one.

<hr>
Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/">Property Correspondent.</a>
 
</body></html>

cmcevoy-Go82SmsJA9

The best course to home ownership is not always the most direct one 

<html><body>
The latest affordability index by the Adelaide Bank and Real Estate Institute of Australia has once again flooded the real estate headlines with the jolly news that housing is growing ever more affordable.  
This pre Christmas gift of optimism from the newly updated affordability studies commissioned by the financial and real estate sectors, comes with a host of commentary – usually from those with a vested interest – who happily advise aspiring home owners that ‘they’ve never had it so good’ – in other words, to paraphrase Terry Ryder’s thoughts, first home buyers should <a href="/news">‘put up, or shut up.’</a>  
Of course, it wouldn’t be half as palatable if it didn’t come accompanied with the seeming contradiction that not only is it more affordable than it’s been in the last decade (according to the HIA-Commonwealth Bank affordability index), it’s also substantially more expensive than its ever been. Yes, housing is only item than can be both affordable and unaffordable at the same time.  Work that one out Einstein.  
In fact, according to <a href="#more-3603" target="_blank">Residex</a>, median prices in both Sydney and Melbourne have already exceeded their historical highs, ‘nudging’ $750,000 in Sydney and $600,000 in Melbourne - additionally, Perth has also reached its previous peak of 2008, with a median price of $521,000.  
<a href="https://www.rpdata.com/" target="_blank">RP Data’s</a> dwelling price index shows a year to date increase of 14.3% in Sydney, 6.4% in Melbourne and 9.7% in Perth.  For home buyers, the benefit derived from lower lending rates has been all but offset by the inflationary pressure placed on prices.  
Rarely is it mentioned that housing affordability and the cost of servicing a mortgage are two separate entities.  
Mortgage rates are set up with different structures dependant on circumstance, and subject to interest rate changes influenced by the macro environment.  
To take out a 25 year mortgage requires the expectation of secure employment in a terrain where frequent job changes or part time work are becoming a norm.  
They may influence house prices through a cycle, but they do not take away the fact that home prices now – even with lower lending rates – require longer terms to pay down, with the interest over the duration of that period adding considerably to the capital cost.  
In fact I couldn’t put it any better than current governor of the Bank of England - <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/nov/29/mark-carney-bank-of-england-home-buyer-warning" target="_blank">Mark Carney</a>, when he warns;  
“Think about the mortgage you are taking on, the debts you are taking on…You are taking at least a 25-year mortgage, maybe a 30-year mortgage.  Are you going to be able to service that mortgage five years from now, 10 years from now, if interest rates are higher? Or are you counting, even subconsciously, on the price of your house keeping going up and if something happens an ability to sell it quickly and not facing the consequences of not being able to pay?"
Carney’s cautionary words pre-empt the Bank of England’s decision to scale back its inflationary Funding for Lending Scheme amidst fears of a rapid escalation of house prices in the south-eastern regions of the country.  
From next year funding for lending will only be available for business loans -not mortgages – and if the banking sector’s concerned about signs of frothiness in an industry in which it’s heavily invested, so should we also be.  
The Bank of England governor is not alone. Central banks in Sweden, Hong Kong, Norway, New Zealand, Canada and Switzerland (to name but a few) have all adopted macro prudential measures to buffer against the associated risks of a boom/bust investor lead recovery in a post GFC environment - highlighting the importance of keeping lending standards robust – all, that is,  except Australia.  
Having weathered the impact of the GFC a little more effectively than others – the RBA seem to think we live in some magic faraway tree, effectively doing little more than wagging a cautionary finger to a sector which for the duration of the year, have outstripped owner-occupier lending with well over a third of all new loans on interest only terms and roughly the same proportion with LVRs of over 8%.  
In other words, there are still over a third of all loans in which the principle is not being reduced – with 37.3% lent on these terms for the September quarter alone.  
In NSW, investment lending is at record highs, making up over 50% of the market and although many use the well worn argument that the unwanted boom is predominant ‘only in Sydney’ – let’s not forget, Sydney is not some nether land off the coast of Tasmania. What happens in our biggest capital, with the largest and most diverse economy in Australia, inevitably impacts us all.  
Historically, this sector is more sensitive to interest rate changes with a tendency to wax and wain pro cyclically with market movements, exaggerating both gains and falls.  A housing recovery built on the back of small mum and dad investors pouring their money predominantly into negatively geared established dwellings – especially considering our current levels of private debt to income ratios - is not ideal for the long term the stability of our housing market, or house prices.  
The common Aussie term ‘spruiking’ - which APRA warns against in the self-managed super sector, is not only a contributing aspect of what inspires our culture to see property as the undiversified road map for building wealth for retirement – it is also part and parcel of what has kept our property prices high by both local and international standards.  Yet the risks associated with spruiking in SMSFs is simply the tip of a much larger iceberg.  
Having worked in many aspects of the housing industry, I have seen first hand the type of material that’s presented at seminars not just from those who receive under the table commissions from developers, but also from advocates working as independent advisors for either the seller or buyer.  
It really isn’t unusual to see slides presented at seminars with straight lines charting the difference between investing in properties that supposedly “grow” at steady 5% per annum, compared to those that grow at 10%, using historical median data as ‘evidence’ that future returns can replicate those achieved in the past, without any distinction of how such data is correlated or the difference between individual “house prices” and “median values.”  
This information borders on financial advice and comes with no mention of risk or the type of rigorous analysis, which you would reasonably expect when choosing to invest in a single asset.  
Another widely used industry favourite is the statement;  
“FACT: fewer than 5% of properties are investment grade”  
A myth if ever there was one.  Perhaps the well-known companies that use this as an advertising tool, would like to point to the person who researched every property in Australia to correlate such a statistic? Maybe we could also ask for a comprehensive definition of what ‘investment grade’ really is – because I guarantee there would be no shortage of differing opinions from industry ‘experts.’  
This endless promotion of residential property, with rows of investment magazines lining newsagency shelves, promoting subjective ‘hotspots,’ or as I <a href="https://catherinecashmore.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/do-we-have-a-changing-landscape-concerning-australian-real-estate-and-property-prices/" target="_blank">pointed out</a> a few weeks ago, agencies cold calling households, and sending ‘advisors’ round to ‘educate’ and encourage inexperienced investors to negatively gear against their principle place of residence, is toxic.  
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Meanwhile, the RBA continue to sit on their hands, not wanting to pull a regulatory lever, instead <a href="https://www.afr.com/rw/2009-2014/AFR/2013/09/25/Photos/160229d4-2585-11e3-bbca-a7ec88bfff7c_FSR.pdf" target="_blank">warning</a> investors to employ caution, hoping they will fall into line like a bunch of good school kids. However, whilst macro prudential tools may assist in ensuring banking lending standards remain robust – can they have any long-term sustainable or lasting impact on property prices?  
In a recent research paper by BIS (Bank for International Settlements), entitled <a href="https://www.bis.org/publ/work433.pdf" target="_blank">“Can non-interest rate policies stabilise housing markets?”</a>, evidence was gathered from 57 countries spanning more than three decades, investigating the effectiveness of nine non-interest rate policy and macro prudential tools on restraining credit growth and house prices.  
The analysis used a new dataset going as far back as 1980, making it the most comprehensive study to date in terms of both scope and time span.  
The paper concluded that whilst reductions in the maximum LTV (loan to value) ratio can restrain demand, its effects can be partially or wholly offset by a rising market enabling the investor to borrow more, therefore, changes in the maximum DSTI (debt service to income) ratio were assessed to be more substantial.  
But importantly;  
“Only tax changes affecting the cost of buying a house, which bear directly on the user cost, have any measurable effect on prices” and,  
“None of the policies designed to affect either the supply of or the demand for credit has a discernible impact on house prices.”
The study puts this down to the ‘can buys’ still outnumbering the growing pool of credit constrained ‘can’t buys’ – stressing that the importance of housing supply was not explicitly considered. Therefore if we want to lower house prices or put in place policies to aid affordability, we need to look outside the limited powers of the RBA alone.  
As has been proven <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/1/21/national-affairs/built-backs-first-home-buyers" target="_blank">time and time again</a>, intermittently stoking at the bottom end of the market with FHB grants and incentives does little more than provide a short term happy pill for vendors, as the price multiplier effect ripples across the rest of the housing terrain, stimulating both an inflationary and volatile environment.  
Instead, we need to focus on the real problem in Australia – and it’s not property prices, it’s land prices - as economist <a href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/11/residential-land-values-reflate-across-australia/" target="_blank">Leith Van Onselen effectively points out</a> when he analyses the difference between commercial and rural land compared to residential land values, and building costs.  
“Whilst commercial and rural prices have remained relatively stable over the last 24 years relative to GDP, residential prices have skyrocketed.”  
In other words, the cost of residential fringe land, which without constraint, should be close to its ‘raw’ value, is not cheap at all – and it’s all down to ineffective urban planning policy.  
As I (<a href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2012/12/englobo-the-shady-world-of-land-banking/" target="_blank">and others</a>) have pointed out previously, even within a wide expansive boundary as mooted in Melbourne’s new urban growth strategy, the government limits land use until they have gone through a lengthy process of mapping out areas for infrastructure known as a ‘<a href="https://www.gaa.vic.gov.au/precinct-structure-plans/" target="_blank">Precinct Structure Plan’</a> (PSP) – it is a slow laborious process and as soon as you restrict the supply of anything, scarcity inevitably inflates values.  
Larger developers are not slow to purchase swathes of acreage prior to rezoning, and then once PSPs have been finalised, drip feed it onto the market. Not only do government bodies have little understanding of how released plots respond to consumer demand, they have no policy in place to deter the practice. It’s therefore a failure.  
Furthermore, facilitation of infrastructure is currently financed via hefty development overlays, which are passed onto the buyer rather than initiatives such as bond financing, where residents pay back proportionally over a lengthy period of time, as was the case historically.  
We must remove these barriers with effective policy and let land prices revert back to normal levels to reflect a real price closer to commercial values.  
Without doing so, we can’t gain a true indicator of the trade-off buyers are prepared to make between price and distance. Currently, the average price of a newly built house and land package is around $400,000, this is not serviceable on the single median wage, and therefore can hardly be deemed affordable.  
Get the land supply, price, and infrastructure equation right and I suspect there would be no lack of demand from genuine aspiring home buyers.  Only when this is done, can we have a truly transparent debate on first home buyers’ willingness to spread over the land.  
 
<hr>
 Catherine Cashmore is a market analyst with extensive experience in all aspects relating to property acquisition.
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

catherinecashmore-6LXia3pPQj

Can housing really be affordable and unaffordable at the same time?

<html><body>
When Australia’s biggest underwriter of lenders mortgage insurance rules a line through an entire asset class of property then investors should take note.  
Recently Genworth announced that from December 19, 2013 they would no longer accept off-the-plan or new properties as security when purchased in self-managed super funds. The announcement reads:
“Off-the-plan purchases and new properties that have been completed for less than 12 months are no longer acceptable. A “new property” is defined as being any property (including any house, unit, villa or townhouse) that has been fully completed for less than 12 months and/or has not been previously sold since construction (i.e. the vendor is a developer/builder or a related party of the developer/builder).”
Genworths’ role in the finance world is to ensure a bank does not lose any money if a borrower cannot meet their loan repayments. If the bank is forced to sell the property and is still left short the mortgage insurer fills the gap.  
Lenders mortgage insurers are very conservative by nature and they are sending a clear signal that they do not see a positive capital growth outlook for these types of properties.  
Genworth is looking to protect its own bottom line and are ruling out allowing their SMSF clients to invest in properties they think are risky investments. While the main reason for this is self-preservation it does provide a level of protection for these investors.  
At the same time that Genworth is waving a red warning flag to wealthy SMSF investors the government is still encouraging first homebuyers to buy this exact kind of property.  
Our government knows how important the building industry is to our economy so they are making it appealing for first homebuyers to invest in new properties only.  
For example a payment of up to $10,000 is available for eligible first home owners in Victoria for contracts entered into on or after July 1, 2013 to build or purchase a new home valued at up to $750,000.  In NSW the grant is currently $15,000 for first home buyers who build or buy new property.  
The government is leading first home buyers to focus on one particular type of property. Again the focus is to underpin the building industry but the byproduct is many first home buyers are in danger of being placed in a dangerous position.  
This is because new properties tend to have a low land to asset ratio meaning most of the value is tied up in the building not the land. It is land that appreciates in value and buildings depreciate. The result is capital growth that is more likely to fall behind the rest of the market. In addition new homes and apartments tend to be clustered together and can often be located in areas where there is an over supply of similar property.  
The current first home buyer policy solves a short-term problem by creating jobs in the building sector. However in the long run it is likely to place young first home buyers under financial pressure. The policy fails to acknowledge the dynamics of the property market and lures them into buying properties that well educated investors are avoiding.    
 
<hr>
 Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
 
 
 
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

The first home buyer policy is luring people into properties investors know to avoid

<html><body>
First-home buyers can still take advantage of significant financial incentives and savings as state and territory governments prepare their 2013-14 budgets.
Victoria will be the first to announce its state budget on May 7 with Queensland to release its state budget on June 4 and NSW on June 18.
However, time is running out for some first-home buyer grants, which are due to expire at the end of the financial year.
In South Australia the $8,000 Housing Construction Grant (HCG) will expire on June 30. It applies to contracts entered into between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013, or in the case of owner builders, where construction commenced between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. A property value cap of $450,000 applies.
And in the ACT, the Home Buyer Concession Scheme (HBCS), offering stamp duty concession to first-home buyers and anyone else purchasing a new home or residential vacant land under certain thresholds, is due to expire on June 30.
Nothing has yet been leaked about possible changes to first-home owner grants and stamp duty savings, but the Real Estate Institute of NSW (REINSW) is already campaigning for the reinstatement of first home buyer incentives in NSW for purchasers of existing properties as demand from this key sector continues to fall.
First-home buyer as a proportion of the mortgage market fell to just 14.4% in February, down from 15% in January, according to ABS figures - their lowest share of the market in more than eight years.
“We are calling on the Treasurer to not only reinstate first home buyer incentives that were removed in 2012, but to also explore additional opportunities to assist first home buyers to take their first step onto the property ladder,” says REINSW president Christian Payne. “It is not too late for the NSW Government to reverse its decision to abolish from 1 January 2012, the stamp duty exemption/concession and from 1 October 2012, the $7000 grant, for those buying existing properties.
A similar campaign could be on the cards in Queensland, which also abolished the $7,000 first-home owner grant for those buying existing properties last year in favour of a $15,000 incentive for those buying or building a new home.
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Changing the name of the scheme</a> from the first home owner construction grant (FHOCG) to the 'great start grant’ in March is unlikely to have made any difference to sentiment.
This is what is currently on offer across states and territories: 
Victoria
On January 1 this year, the state raised its stamp duty discount for homes priced under $600,000 from 20% to 30%.
The higher discount kicked in on January 1, 2013, and applies to both existing homes and new homes, delivering first-home buyers additional savings starting from $600 to a maximum of just over $3,000 on a house price at $600,000.
First-home buyers can work out their stamp duty savings using this table provided the <a href="https://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/sronav.nsf/LinkView/C88211C9E07486F0CA2578B70001025018E490D796850F8ECA2575C1008187C7" target="_blank">Victorian government’s State Revenue Office.</a>
Maximum stamp duty savings are now over $9,000. Combined with the existing first-home owners' grant of $7,000 there is nearly $16,000 in savings for those first-home buyers who are willing to venture into the property market in 2013.
The stamp duty discount will rise to 40% on January 1, 2014, and to 50% on September 1, 2014.
To qualify for the stamp duty discount, first-home buyers must also qualify for the $7,000 first-home owners’ grant.
All added up it means Victorian first-home buyers purchasing an existing home receive the highest amount of financial support from their state government.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/SROnav.nsf/alltitle/First%20Home%20Owners?open">Victorian government first-home owner website</a>.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
NSW
A first-home buyer who purchases a $550,000 new home will get $35,240 in assistance.
This includes a $15,000 grant for first-home owners who purchase or build a new home valued at up to $650,000. The grant is available until December 31, 2013, reducing to $10,000 from January 1, 2014.
Non-first-home buyers who buy a new home are eligible for $5,000 whether the new home is off the plan or newly built with a value up to $650,000, The $5,000 grant is also available to buyers of vacant land that is intended to be the site of a new home valued up to $450,000.
First-home owners are also eligible for a maximum stamp duty saving of $20,240 for homes up to a value of $550,000, with duty concessions for new homes valued between $550,000 and $650,000. The transfer duty exemption cap on vacant land is $350,000, with duty concessions for vacant land valued between $350,000 and $450,000.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/benefits/first_home/">NSW first home benefits</a> website.
Queensland
A $15,000 first-home owner construction grant (FHOCG) is available. The FHOCG applies to new property bought or built at a value under $750,000.
First-home buyers also pay no duty on purchases up to $500,000, with a phasing-out rebate applicable for values up to $600,000.
For non-first-home buyers, the Queensland government offers a concessional stamp duty rate of 1% up to a value of $350,000, with stamp duty charged at normal rates for the remaining value of the home purchase. The buyer must occupy the home for a period of 12 months – an applicant may lose the concession if he sells or leases part or all of the home before moving in or within a year of moving in.
Further information can be found the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.osr.qld.gov.au/first-home-owner-grant/fhog-fhocg-landing-page.shtml">Queensland first home owner grant</a> website
South Australia
South Australian first-home buyers have the chance to secure $23,500 from the state government, provided they build a new home.
The $23,500 handout comprises a doubled first-home owner grant of $15,000 for contracts entered into on or after October 15 and up to a value of $575,000, plus a further $8,500 housing construction grant (HCG). The housing construction grant replaces the $8,000 first-home bonus grant.
The HCG is available to all builders of new homes for properties valued up to $400,000, phasing out for properties valued up to $450,000 where contracts are entered into between October 15, 2012, and June 30, 2013, inclusive.
Concessions could rise to $39,830 if first-tome buyers buy an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD under $400,000, where a stamp duty concession of $16,330 applies.
This part of a new stamp duty concession scheme available on the transfer of a new CBD apartment or a "substantially refurbished apartment" for a contract entered into from May 31, 2012, to June 30, 2014, capped at stamp duty payable on a $500,000 apartment of $21,330.
An example where a $39,830 saving would be available to a first-home buyer is <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/project-aria+on+gouger-sa-adelaide-600000551" target="_blank">Aria on Gouger Street </a>being developed by Brock Urban Projects, where two-bedroom apartments are priced from $335,750.
Up until June 30 2014, South Australian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $5,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, no first-home owner grant is available to purchasers of established homes.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/IamaFHB">South Australia first-home buyer</a> website.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
WA
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for a newly constructed or established home. It does not apply to vacant land purchased to build a new home. The total value of the home must not exceed $750,000 if the property is located south of the 26th parallel of South Latitude, or $1 million if located north of the 26th parallel of South Latitude. First-home buyers eligible for the $7,000 grant pay no stamp duty on homes valued up to $500,000 and up to $300,000 for vacant land. There is also The Home Buyers Assistance Account, which provides a grant of up to $2 000 for the incidental expenses of first home buyers when they purchase an established or partially built home through a licensed real estate agent for the purchase price of $400,000 or less.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.finance.wa.gov.au/cms/content.aspx?id=3868">WA’s Department of Finance</a> website. 
ACT
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for both existing and new homes where the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $750,000. The territory government also offers a Home Buyer Concession Scheme (HBCS) to assist persons in purchasing a residential home or residential vacant land by charging stamp duty at a concessional rate. This scheme ends on June 30 and applies to homes valued less than $450,000 and land valued at less than $263,000.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/home_buyer_assistance">ACT Revenue website</a>.
Tasmania
A $7,000 first-home owner grant remains in place for both existing and new homes, with no cap on the value. Tasmanian first-home buyers buying or building a new home (including off-the-plan) are eligible for an additional $8,000 under the First Home Builder Boost Scheme, which applies from January 1 2013 to June 30 2014 if the qualify for the first-home owner grant.
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sro.tas.gov.au/fhog">Tasmania first home buyer website.</a>
Northern Territory
For transaction after December 4 2012, a $12 000 first-home owner grant is available for an established home in the urban area or $25,000 outside of urban areas where the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $600,000. An urban area is the Darwin, Palmerston or Litchfield municipalities; Wagait Shire; the Darwin Waterfront Precinct; the “prescribed area” for the Darwin Rates Act, any other area prescribed by regulation.
The Northern Territory Government provides a stamp duty Principal Place of Residence Rebate (PPRR) to persons purchasing a new home or land on which to build a home. A calculator is provided to work out <a target="_blank" href="https://www.treasury.nt.gov.au/TaxesRoyaltiesAndGrants/StampDuty/StampDutyCalculators/Pages/PPRR-Calculator.aspx">stamp duty payable on a home eligible for the rebate</a>
Further information can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.treasury.nt.gov.au/TaxesRoyaltiesAndGrants/HomeOwnerIncentives/Pages/default.aspx">NT treasury page.</a>
 
 
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Still plenty to tempt awol first-home buyers as REINSW campaigns for reinstatement of $7,000 grant in state budget

<html><body>
Analysis of the latest Victorian first-home owner grant (FHOG) application statistics suggest first-home buyers (FHB) will not be easily corralled into buying  a new property over an existing one with individual market dynamics dictating buying preferences.
From July 1 a new $10,000 first-home owner grant will only be available to build or buy a new home in Victoria, but those who buy an existing home will <a href="/news">lose the existing $7,000 incentive.</a>
Property Observer analysis of $7,000 FHOG applications in the top 10 Victorian postcodes suggests FHBs are primarily making purchase decisions based on what type of property predominates and makes sense within any given market.
For example in postcode 3754, which incorporates the City of Whittlesea suburbs of Doreen and Mernda, where new housing estates are planned, nearly nine out of 10 grant applications are for new homes.
Similarly, in the Melbourne CBD (postcode 3000), where new apartment projects prevail, nearly two-thirds (61%) of FHOG applications are for new homes.
However, in contrast, postcode 3350, which incorporates established suburbs close to the Ballarat CBD, grant applications for existing homes outnumber those for new homes by a healthy margin.
Similarly in a suburb like Croydon, where most of the new housing blocks were sold and developed in the 1990s and early 2000s, FHOGs for existing home dominate making up 81% of applications.
In the top FHOG application postcode of 3029, comprising the suburbs of Hoppers Crossing and Tarneit, there is a fairly even split of grants for new and existing homes, reflecting both the prevalence of new master-planned housing estates such as Tarneit Gardens being developed by Peet and Williams Landing near Hoppers Crossing, being developed by Cedar Woods as well as a fair supply of existing homes.
Analysis of the figures suggest that a one-size fits all approach to incentivising FHBs is unlikely to be very successful as an overall strategy, though it may succeed in suburbs where new house sales predominates such as in the inner city or those on the outskirts.
Developers in some of the outlying suburbs, where grants for new homes predominate, may see a rise in demand for homes in their communities.
However, any artificial rise in demand may only encourage developers to push up their prices – as has been argued by many analysts (from BIS Shrapnel to Steve Keen) which would hardly be to the advantage of FHBs – though perhaps the housing construction industry would be in a better state.
Paul O’Regan, head of home loans at LJ Hooker, expects the new grant will benefit the housing construction industry and hopefully employment but highlights that the majority of FHBs of late have been for established homes “so there is a possibility that this will be impacted given grant has been taken away for established homes”.
He says the ending of previous FHOGs has resulted in kids staying at home longer as they try to save enough deposit monies to qualify for a home loan or getting greater assistance from their parents.
Some FHBs, he says are choosing to buy an investment property initially to enter the home loan market (foregoing any government benefits) and then moving in when they can afford to.
“First home ownership is now very much all about affordability and blue collar workers need to look at the house and land packages available in outer suburbs and weigh up transport / schools / shopping as well as sustainability such as the costs to run the house.
“The obvious preference is an established house close to work and the city but this may not practical or possible in a lot of cases,” he says.
Top 10 postcodes for Victoria $7,000 FHB grant applications (July 2012 to March 2013)
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
Postcode
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
Total number of FHB applications received
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
Distance from CBD
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
For new homes
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
For existing homes
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3029 - Hoppers Crossing, Tarneit
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
816
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
433
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
383
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3977 - Cranbourne, Devon Meadows, Skye
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
792
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
43kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
506
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
286
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3030 - Point Cook, Werribee, Derrimut
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
639
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
25kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
284
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
355
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3064 - Craigieburn, Donnybrook, Roxburgh Park, Mickleham
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
610
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
401
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
209
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3754 -Doreen, Mernda
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
435
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
384
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
51
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3810 - Pakenham, Rythdale
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
394
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
56kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
247
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
147
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3350 - Alfredton, Ballarat, Canadian, Invermay Park, Mt Clear, Mt Helen
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
298
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
0-10 kms from CBD
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
133
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
165
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3136 - Croydon, Croydon Hills, Croydon North, Croydon South
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
272
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
27kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
67
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
205
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3000 - Melbourne
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
256
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
0kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
156
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
100
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3805 - Fountain Gate, Narre Warren, Narre Warren South
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
261
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
42kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
39
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
212
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Source: Victorian goverment State Revenue Office figures. 
</body></html>

Victorian FHB property choices unlikely to be dictated just by government incentives

<html><body>
The NSW government’s decision to only incentivise first-home buyers who purchase new homes from October last year appears to be gaining traction, the Reserve Bank has noted in its May monthly statement on monetary policy.
"For the state as a whole, there has been an increase in demand from first home buyers, which is likely to reflect the increase in government incentives to first-home buyers purchasing new homes relative to the incentives available for purchases of established homes," says the RBA.
The following graph prepared by the RBA shows the trend of rising first-home owner grants (FHOGs) in NSW for new dwellings and also a small uptick in Queensland, where a similar incentive scheme is in place.
In Victoria the trend is heading in the other direction, but this is ahead of the introduction of a <a target="_blank" href="/news">$10,000 FHB grant for new homes only from July 1</a>, with an expected rush among some FHBs to finalise purchases of existing dwellings.
<img alt="fhb_in_nsw" src="/images/stories/2013/fhb_in_nsw.jpg" width="470" height="402">
The <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-nsw-first-home-buyer-%2415000-grant/2012092756828/Page-1" target="_blank">NSW government provides $15,000 to first-home buyers</a> purchasing a new home up to $650,000 but has removed the previous $7,000 grant available for both new and existing FHBs.
A first-home buyer maximum stamp duty exemption of $20,240 is also available for new homes worth up to $550,000.
From January 1 2014 the $15,000 grant will reduce to $10,000.
</body></html>

FHB demand for new homes rising in NSW: RBA

<html><body>
Tasmania has joined NSW, Queensland and South Australia by announcing plans to axe the $7,000 first-home owner grant (FHOG) for established homes on June 30, 2014.
It will coincide with the end of Tasmania's First Home Builder Boost (FHBB) - a payment of $8,000 - on June 30.
From July 1, Tasmanian first-home buyers who build or buy a new home (including off-the-plan) will be entitled to a $7,000 FHOG. Those buying an existing home will receive no grant.
The withdrawal of the FHOG for existing homes was announced by Tasmanian premier Lara Giddins as part of her recent 2013-14 state budget announcement.
Giddins said the $7,000 grant for new homes only would provide "an ongoing stimulus to the building industry and creating jobs in the process".
"This change will bring Tasmania into line with other States such as Victoria, NSW and South Australia while saving an estimated $11 million per annum, which will be used to fund job-creating changes to the payroll tax," Giddins said.
South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill will deliver his state budget on June 6, but the state's revenue office website reveals that the already reduced $5,000 FHOG will end on June 30. The state's $15,000 FHOG for new homes is ongoing.
These are the key dates first-home buyers need to diarise:
All dates correct as of May 27 2013.
June 30, 2013 - Victoria
The date the Victorian government ends its $7,000 first-home owner grant. The grant is available if the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $750,000. An exception to this requirement is where the contract relates to a home that is on, or to be built on, primary production land.
June 30 2013 - South Australia
The $8,000 Housing Construction Grant (HCG) will expire on June 30. It applies to contracts entered into between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013, or in the case of owner builders, where construction commenced between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. A property value cap of $450,000 applies.
June 30 2013 - ACT
The Home Buyer Concession Scheme (HBCS), offering stamp duty concession to first-home buyers and anyone else purchasing a new home or residential vacant land under certain thresholds (<a href="https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/home_buyer_assistance" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">details on the ACT government website</a>), is due to expire on June 30.
July 1, 2013 – Victoria
The start of the $10,000 grant in Victoria for newly constructed homes. In addition, the state government will also increase stamp duty cuts of 40% for all first home owners (including those buying existing homes) for homes valued up to $600,000. The combination of a $10,000 first-home owner grant and 40% stamp duty cut means that Victorians buying a newly constructed first home for $400,000 will save over $16,500.
January 1, 2014 - NSW
The $15,000 grant for first-home owners who purchase or build a new home in NSW valued at up to $650,000 will reduce to $10,000 from this date.
June 30, 2014 – Tasmania
Up until this date, Tasmanian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $7,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, the grant is only available to those who buy or building a new home, including off the plan and house and land packages.
June 30, 2014 – South Australia
Up until this date, South Australian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $5,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, no first-home owner grant is available to purchasers of established homes.
June 30, 2014 – South Australia
Stamp duty concessions for first-time buyers who purchase an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD will end on this date. The scheme is available on the transfer of a new CBD apartment or a "substantially refurbished apartment" for a contract entered into from May 31, 2012, to June 30, 2014, capped at stamp duty payable on a $500,000 apartment of $21,330. 
June 30, 2014 – Tasmania
The $8,000 First Home Builder Boost Scheme grant available to Tasmanians building a new home (including off-the-plan) if the qualify for the first-home owner grant will end on this date.
September 1, 2014 - Victoria
All first home buyers (whether purchasing newly constructed or established homes) will benefit from a 50% stamp duty concession for homes valued up to $600,000.
June 30, 2016 - South Australia
Partial stamp duty concessions for first-time buyers who purchase an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD will end on this date.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News