Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Joel Robinson

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

When buying an apartment, most people compare the big-ticket items first. Floorplans. Kitchens. Balcony size. Natural light. The view.

But there's one everyday consideration that often doesn't come up until after moving in: how parcels are delivered.

As online shopping has become part of everyday life, parcel deliveries have shifted from an occasional event to a regular occurrence. Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally.

For apartment residents, that can present a challenge.

If nobody is home to accept a delivery, parcels may be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in a building lobby or common area, or require building management to step in. In higher-density buildings, where dozens or even hundreds of residents may receive deliveries each day, parcel management has become an increasingly important part of everyday living.

That can create a range of frustrations. A missed delivery often means making time to collect a parcel elsewhere, while packages left unattended in foyers or mail areas can create clutter and increase the risk of theft. What seems like a minor inconvenience can quickly become a recurring issue for residents who shop online regularly.

It's one of those details that rarely features in a display suite but can have a noticeable impact once residents move in.

As a result, buyers are beginning to look beyond traditional apartment features and consider how a building supports day-to-day convenience, including whether there are secure options for receiving deliveries.

Australia Post's Parcel Lockers provide one solution.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CkF2oKmlACg?si=C50sDaoUUn2nuLmq" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than having a parcel delivered directly to an apartment, eligible deliveries can be sent to a nominated Parcel Locker. Once the parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can collect it using a QR code or one-time PIN at a time that suits them.

The Parcel Locker network now includes more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with installations at Post Offices, shopping centres, transport hubs and an increasing number of residential developments. By providing a secure collection point, Parcel Lockers help reduce missed deliveries and avoid parcels being left unattended in common areas.

For developers, parcel infrastructure is becoming another way to improve the resident experience. Rather than relying on concierge staff or leaving parcels in communal spaces, secure collection points help streamline deliveries while preserving the presentation and functionality of shared areas.

For buyers, it's a reminder that the best apartment features aren't always the most obvious.

A generous floorplan or quality finishes might help narrow the shortlist, but the conveniences that simplify everyday life, whether that's EV charging, secure bike storage or reliable parcel delivery, often become the features residents appreciate most once they're living there.

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hg-developments">HG Developments</a> is doubling down on Maud Street in Newstead, filing plans for a new apartment tower just a few doors down from its under-construction Aire Newstead development.

Recently submitted to Brisbane City Council, the proposal is for an 18-storey building designed by bureau^proberts, which has drawn heavily on Brisbane's subtropical design principles while referencing the suburb's industrial heritage.

A total of 64 apartments are planned for the amalgamated 1,518 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/17-21-maud-street-newstead-qld-4006">17–21 Maud Street</a>, a short walk from the Brisbane River and Newstead Riverwalk.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a400c7fd-bd15-48f8-a63b-10ede92efe00" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20bldg.png?VersionId=.0vPmjpbC7CNP7kqGWa6L7rGIwsNExaw" />

"The building is defined by a series of vaulted motifs that reinterpret the arches, colonnades and layered facades evident throughout Newstead's historic built fabric," the Urban Design Report states.

"Combined with recessed glazing and generous balconies, these elements create a layered building envelope that provides shade, weather protection and opportunities for natural ventilation whilst establishing a distinctive architectural identity."

The proposal comprises 64 two, three and four-bedroom apartments across 18 residential levels, positioning it alongside a growing number of taller residential projects transforming Newstead's northern precinct. The tower incorporates extensive subtropical landscaping, with cascading planter boxes, deep planting at street level and a landscaped rooftop recreation area.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="1d8140f4-8b98-45cd-b1b8-1efe8c8e266b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20podium.png?VersionId=VAZtbCoD44YCJ57N99fQCAKeSJx7ldZs" />

Bureau Proberts has prioritised passive environmental design throughout the project, with generous balconies, recessed glazing and operable façades helping reduce solar heat gain while maximising natural ventilation. River views become available from the upper levels, while the building has been orientated to capture prevailing breezes from both the Brisbane River and the west.

The architects say landscape is intended to be integral to the building rather than an applied element.

"Vertical greenery, cascading planter boxes and elevated gardens are woven throughout the architecture, softening the built form and strengthening the connection between residents and the subtropical environment."

"Through the integration of landscape, high-quality materials and passive design principles, the development delivers a refined residential address that celebrates Newstead's heritage character while contributing positively to Brisbane's evolving subtropical identity."

Newstead has remained one of Brisbane's most active apartment markets in recent years, with a number of developers continuing to back the inner-city suburb.

HG Developments is currently delivering the 40-apartment Aire Newstead at 25 Maud Street. Fortis recently launched the 65-apartment <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> on Kyabra Street, while builder-developer BPG and Don O'Rorke's Consolidated Properties are both expected to launch their respective Newstead projects before the end of the year.

HG Developments doubles down in Newstead with second Maud Street apartment development

Walk past a new apartment development promoting its sustainability credentials and it's easy to picture rooftop gardens, mature trees, landscaped courtyards and residents surrounded by nature.

But in many cases, that's not actually what those sustainability ratings guarantee.

Australia's leading environmental rating tools have played a significant role in improving the energy efficiency and environmental performance of buildings. Yet despite their focus on reducing emissions, many don't require developers to include trees, biodiversity or meaningful green space.

In other words, a building can achieve one of the country's highest sustainability ratings while containing little more than concrete, glass and hard landscaping.

That disconnect has led to the emergence of a new movement across Australia's property industry: nature-based cities.

The concept goes beyond designing buildings that consume less energy. Instead, it encourages developers to treat nature as essential infrastructure, integrating biodiversity, tree canopy, living landscapes and green spaces into projects from the earliest stages of planning.

Research has consistently linked access to nature with better physical and mental health, cooler neighbourhoods, improved biodiversity, stronger climate resilience and more connected communities. As Australia's cities continue to become denser, advocates say those outcomes should be considered just as important as energy efficiency.

Nature Based Cities (NBC) was established in 2022 to help accelerate that shift.

Founded by Hamton Executive Chairman Paul Hameister OAM, the not-for-profit was created after research highlighted a significant gap in Australia's sustainability framework. While existing environmental rating tools rewarded energy performance and emissions reductions, they placed little emphasis on the inclusion of living landscapes.

"We've always wanted to do more, and we know other developers who want to do more, but the ESD rating tools just aren't there," Hameister says.

"In Australia, you can have a five-green-star rated building that's concrete and glass with not a blade of grass.

"The focus is on reducing emissions, which is laudable, but there hasn't been enough attention paid to protecting and re-establishing nature. We need both for the health of the environment and for communities."

Since its launch, NBC has developed independent design guidelines and accreditation frameworks that encourage developers to prioritise ecology, biodiversity, tree canopy, walkability and living landscapes alongside traditional sustainability measures. The organisation first focused on medium and high-density residential developments before recently expanding into precinct-scale communities and masterplanned neighbourhoods.

Jan Talacko, founder of sustainability consultancy Ark Resources and a member of the Nature Based Cities Advisory Council, says the initiative addresses an area that has largely been overlooked by the property industry.

"Throughout my 25 years of working collaboratively with all stakeholders in the property sector, I've always favoured a pragmatic approach to sustainable design which encourages initiatives that not only meet environmental expectations but also improve amenity," Talacko says.

"Whilst we are making steady progress in relation to energy and carbon emissions from buildings, there has been much less emphasis on encouraging biodiversity and tackling the urban heat island effect.

"The Nature Based Cities initiative responds to a gap in the suite of tools currently used by the property development sector, which don't provide sufficient incentive, or recognition, for the integration of landscaping and greenery."

For apartment buyers, the shift is also changing the questions worth asking.

Rather than assuming a sustainable building will naturally include abundant green space, buyers are increasingly being encouraged to look beyond environmental ratings and ask what nature is actually being delivered. How much tree canopy will the development create? Has biodiversity been considered? Are landscaped spaces designed for people as well as appearance?

As Australia's cities continue to grow upwards and outwards, the next generation of sustainability may not simply be measured by lower emissions, but by how successfully developments bring nature back into everyday urban life.

What does it really mean for a building to be 'green'?

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Analysis of the latest Victorian first-home owner grant (FHOG) application statistics suggest first-home buyers (FHB) will not be easily corralled into buying  a new property over an existing one with individual market dynamics dictating buying preferences.
From July 1 a new $10,000 first-home owner grant will only be available to build or buy a new home in Victoria, but those who buy an existing home will <a href="/news">lose the existing $7,000 incentive.</a>
Property Observer analysis of $7,000 FHOG applications in the top 10 Victorian postcodes suggests FHBs are primarily making purchase decisions based on what type of property predominates and makes sense within any given market.
For example in postcode 3754, which incorporates the City of Whittlesea suburbs of Doreen and Mernda, where new housing estates are planned, nearly nine out of 10 grant applications are for new homes.
Similarly, in the Melbourne CBD (postcode 3000), where new apartment projects prevail, nearly two-thirds (61%) of FHOG applications are for new homes.
However, in contrast, postcode 3350, which incorporates established suburbs close to the Ballarat CBD, grant applications for existing homes outnumber those for new homes by a healthy margin.
Similarly in a suburb like Croydon, where most of the new housing blocks were sold and developed in the 1990s and early 2000s, FHOGs for existing home dominate making up 81% of applications.
In the top FHOG application postcode of 3029, comprising the suburbs of Hoppers Crossing and Tarneit, there is a fairly even split of grants for new and existing homes, reflecting both the prevalence of new master-planned housing estates such as Tarneit Gardens being developed by Peet and Williams Landing near Hoppers Crossing, being developed by Cedar Woods as well as a fair supply of existing homes.
Analysis of the figures suggest that a one-size fits all approach to incentivising FHBs is unlikely to be very successful as an overall strategy, though it may succeed in suburbs where new house sales predominates such as in the inner city or those on the outskirts.
Developers in some of the outlying suburbs, where grants for new homes predominate, may see a rise in demand for homes in their communities.
However, any artificial rise in demand may only encourage developers to push up their prices – as has been argued by many analysts (from BIS Shrapnel to Steve Keen) which would hardly be to the advantage of FHBs – though perhaps the housing construction industry would be in a better state.
Paul O’Regan, head of home loans at LJ Hooker, expects the new grant will benefit the housing construction industry and hopefully employment but highlights that the majority of FHBs of late have been for established homes “so there is a possibility that this will be impacted given grant has been taken away for established homes”.
He says the ending of previous FHOGs has resulted in kids staying at home longer as they try to save enough deposit monies to qualify for a home loan or getting greater assistance from their parents.
Some FHBs, he says are choosing to buy an investment property initially to enter the home loan market (foregoing any government benefits) and then moving in when they can afford to.
“First home ownership is now very much all about affordability and blue collar workers need to look at the house and land packages available in outer suburbs and weigh up transport / schools / shopping as well as sustainability such as the costs to run the house.
“The obvious preference is an established house close to work and the city but this may not practical or possible in a lot of cases,” he says.
Top 10 postcodes for Victoria $7,000 FHB grant applications (July 2012 to March 2013)
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
Postcode
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
Total number of FHB applications received
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
Distance from CBD
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
For new homes
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
For existing homes
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3029 - Hoppers Crossing, Tarneit
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
816
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
433
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
383
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3977 - Cranbourne, Devon Meadows, Skye
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
792
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
43kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
506
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
286
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3030 - Point Cook, Werribee, Derrimut
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
639
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
25kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
284
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
355
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3064 - Craigieburn, Donnybrook, Roxburgh Park, Mickleham
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
610
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
401
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
209
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3754 -Doreen, Mernda
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
435
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
26kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
384
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
51
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3810 - Pakenham, Rythdale
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
394
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
56kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
247
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
147
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3350 - Alfredton, Ballarat, Canadian, Invermay Park, Mt Clear, Mt Helen
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
298
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
0-10 kms from CBD
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
133
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
165
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3136 - Croydon, Croydon Hills, Croydon North, Croydon South
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
272
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
27kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
67
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
205
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3000 - Melbourne
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
256
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
0kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
156
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
100
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="132">
3805 - Fountain Gate, Narre Warren, Narre Warren South
</td>
<td valign="top" width="132">
261
</td>
<td valign="top" width="108">
42kms
</td>
<td valign="top" width="121">
39
</td>
<td valign="top" width="123">
212
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Source: Victorian goverment State Revenue Office figures. 
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Victorian FHB property choices unlikely to be dictated just by government incentives

<html><body>
The NSW government’s decision to only incentivise first-home buyers who purchase new homes from October last year appears to be gaining traction, the Reserve Bank has noted in its May monthly statement on monetary policy.
"For the state as a whole, there has been an increase in demand from first home buyers, which is likely to reflect the increase in government incentives to first-home buyers purchasing new homes relative to the incentives available for purchases of established homes," says the RBA.
The following graph prepared by the RBA shows the trend of rising first-home owner grants (FHOGs) in NSW for new dwellings and also a small uptick in Queensland, where a similar incentive scheme is in place.
In Victoria the trend is heading in the other direction, but this is ahead of the introduction of a <a target="_blank" href="/news">$10,000 FHB grant for new homes only from July 1</a>, with an expected rush among some FHBs to finalise purchases of existing dwellings.
<img alt="fhb_in_nsw" src="/images/stories/2013/fhb_in_nsw.jpg" width="470" height="402">
The <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-nsw-first-home-buyer-%2415000-grant/2012092756828/Page-1" target="_blank">NSW government provides $15,000 to first-home buyers</a> purchasing a new home up to $650,000 but has removed the previous $7,000 grant available for both new and existing FHBs.
A first-home buyer maximum stamp duty exemption of $20,240 is also available for new homes worth up to $550,000.
From January 1 2014 the $15,000 grant will reduce to $10,000.
</body></html>

FHB demand for new homes rising in NSW: RBA

<html><body>
Tasmania has joined NSW, Queensland and South Australia by announcing plans to axe the $7,000 first-home owner grant (FHOG) for established homes on June 30, 2014.
It will coincide with the end of Tasmania's First Home Builder Boost (FHBB) - a payment of $8,000 - on June 30.
From July 1, Tasmanian first-home buyers who build or buy a new home (including off-the-plan) will be entitled to a $7,000 FHOG. Those buying an existing home will receive no grant.
The withdrawal of the FHOG for existing homes was announced by Tasmanian premier Lara Giddins as part of her recent 2013-14 state budget announcement.
Giddins said the $7,000 grant for new homes only would provide "an ongoing stimulus to the building industry and creating jobs in the process".
"This change will bring Tasmania into line with other States such as Victoria, NSW and South Australia while saving an estimated $11 million per annum, which will be used to fund job-creating changes to the payroll tax," Giddins said.
South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill will deliver his state budget on June 6, but the state's revenue office website reveals that the already reduced $5,000 FHOG will end on June 30. The state's $15,000 FHOG for new homes is ongoing.
These are the key dates first-home buyers need to diarise:
All dates correct as of May 27 2013.
June 30, 2013 - Victoria
The date the Victorian government ends its $7,000 first-home owner grant. The grant is available if the price of the property or construction of the home does not exceed $750,000. An exception to this requirement is where the contract relates to a home that is on, or to be built on, primary production land.
June 30 2013 - South Australia
The $8,000 Housing Construction Grant (HCG) will expire on June 30. It applies to contracts entered into between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013, or in the case of owner builders, where construction commenced between 15 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. A property value cap of $450,000 applies.
June 30 2013 - ACT
The Home Buyer Concession Scheme (HBCS), offering stamp duty concession to first-home buyers and anyone else purchasing a new home or residential vacant land under certain thresholds (<a href="https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/home_buyer_assistance" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">details on the ACT government website</a>), is due to expire on June 30.
July 1, 2013 – Victoria
The start of the $10,000 grant in Victoria for newly constructed homes. In addition, the state government will also increase stamp duty cuts of 40% for all first home owners (including those buying existing homes) for homes valued up to $600,000. The combination of a $10,000 first-home owner grant and 40% stamp duty cut means that Victorians buying a newly constructed first home for $400,000 will save over $16,500.
January 1, 2014 - NSW
The $15,000 grant for first-home owners who purchase or build a new home in NSW valued at up to $650,000 will reduce to $10,000 from this date.
June 30, 2014 – Tasmania
Up until this date, Tasmanian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $7,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, the grant is only available to those who buy or building a new home, including off the plan and house and land packages.
June 30, 2014 – South Australia
Up until this date, South Australian first-home buyers of established homes are entitled to a $5,000 grant. From July 1, 2014, no first-home owner grant is available to purchasers of established homes.
June 30, 2014 – South Australia
Stamp duty concessions for first-time buyers who purchase an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD will end on this date. The scheme is available on the transfer of a new CBD apartment or a "substantially refurbished apartment" for a contract entered into from May 31, 2012, to June 30, 2014, capped at stamp duty payable on a $500,000 apartment of $21,330. 
June 30, 2014 – Tasmania
The $8,000 First Home Builder Boost Scheme grant available to Tasmanians building a new home (including off-the-plan) if the qualify for the first-home owner grant will end on this date.
September 1, 2014 - Victoria
All first home buyers (whether purchasing newly constructed or established homes) will benefit from a 50% stamp duty concession for homes valued up to $600,000.
June 30, 2016 - South Australia
Partial stamp duty concessions for first-time buyers who purchase an apartment off the plan in the Adelaide CBD will end on this date.
</body></html>

Tasmania and South Australia to axe first-home owner grants from June 30 2014: key dates to diarise

<html><body>
 
When it comes to developing, we have all heard about the Development Application (DA) and the Construction Certificate (CC), but how and what exactly is involved with each council approval?
It is important to understand this process before you start developing.
The DA and CC are two very different approvals. If you find a DA approved site but the CC has not yet been issued, then you should understand that there is still a lot of work to do before you can start to build. Development Application (DA)  The DA is a request for permission to carry out proposed development. It also categorises the developments as requiring consent, developments not requiring consent (Complying Development, CDC) and prohibited development.
A development application is required for the following reasons:
<ul>
<li>Construction of new building or structure, including swimming pools, outbuildings,     retaining wall, jetties, etc</li>
<li>Add or alter an existing building or structure</li>
<li>Demolish a building or structure</li>
<li>Display an advertising sign</li>
<li>Change the use of an existing building or land</li>
<li>Carry out excavation, earthworks or adding fill</li>
<li>Development on or near a heritage listed item</li>
<li>Development within a heritage conservation area</li>
<li>Subdivide land or strata subdivide a building</li>
</ul>
A development application must consist of at least:
<ul>
<li>Completed application form and fees.</li>
<li>Copies of Site Plans indicating location of the proposed development on the land.</li>
<li>Copies of Plan/Drawings of the proposed development indicating elevations heights.</li>
<li>Other supporting documents (if required)</li>
<li>Construction Certificate (CC)  A Construction Certificate is required after the DA Consent is issued and before any building work is carried out.  You can apply for a Construction Certificate only if you have prepared detailed plans, specifications or engineering details. And importantly, if all the council and other service fees and charges have been paid.  This is where some first time developers may get caught out when buying a DA approved site. It's very important to understand the Conditions of the DA Consent and how they will impact the development.</li>
</ul>
The Construction Certificate certifies that relevant matters are adhered to, this includes:
<ul>
<li>The construction plans and specification comply with the relevant standards (ie Building Code of Australia);</li>
<li>The construction plans and specifications are consistent with the development consent; and</li>
<li>All conditions of the development consent requiring compliance prior to the issue of a construction certificate are finalised.</li>
</ul>
The CC is not required for complying development, where building details are covered by a  Complying Development Certificate (CDC).
If you are unsure of the planning process, then use a qualified town planning consultant or development project manager.
Jo Chivers is the director of Property Bloom.
 
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Planning your property permits

<html><body>
Its never been easy. Every generation of first home buyers has faced affordability obstacles and choices, but the noisiest of the latest batch of first home buyers would prefer to bleat rather than make the latterday sacrifices that were undertaken, in an earlier form, by their parents. 
I accept that the 2013 buying prospects are diminished, but the buying priorities and requirements appear almost non-negotiable by this so-called, doomed to rent for life generation.
At weekend auction, when the APM median house sale price was a likely record $1.065 million, I spotted at least 25 offerings sold at below $500,000, with opportunities for instance to buy a unit in Meadowbank, Cronulla, Parramatta, Summer Hill, Burwood, Five Dock, Croydon Park, even Bronte.
There were houses in Granville, Casula, Parramatta, Blackett and Fairfield West.
The weekend's cheapest sale was $191,000 for a four bedroom 1960s house on 1500 square metres in the Blue Mountains. The Bullaburra property, which sold to an investor, had last sold at $240,000 in 2007. The suburb's median house price is $377,000.
Sydney currently has 51 suburbs with median house prices below $400,000 including:
Tregear $240,000
Bidwill $250,000
Blackett $251,000
Emerton $252,000
Lethbridge Park $255,000
There are 122 Sydney suburbs with house medians below $500,000.
For units, it has 45 suburbs with median unit prices below $400,000.
There are some 98 suburbs with below $500,000 unit median prices.
That's out of the 650 Sydney suburbs.
Some of these options are located in the upper north shore, the inner west and the city and east, including Hornsby $450,000 units, Forest Lodge $456,000 units, Newtown $466,000 units, Ultimo $490,000 units and Eastlakes $410,000 units.
Yes APM has previously acknowledged the average distance from the city centre for the Sydney suburbs below $400,000 was 52 kilometres.
That's compared with 36 kilometres in Melbourne and 30 kilometres in Brisbane, APM noted.
But as Andrew Wilson, the senior economist at Australian Property Monitors recently noted, Sydney has a lower end housing market that is "as accessible, if not more accessible, than most other capital city markets."
With the Sydney median house price now exceding $700,000, it is the option for first buyers to look where they can buy new houses for less than $400,000 and existing stock for over $240,000.
Sydney, with its high median because the middle market is so strong, does has the buying prospects. They just have to be viewed as worthy, transitory, not unpalatable.
<a target="_blank" href="mailto:news@propertyobserver.com.au"></a><a href="mailto:news@propertyobserver.com.au">news@propertyobserver.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

First home buyers have choices; but they deem distant western Sydney option unpalatable

<html><body>
It was reported recently in October 2013, the NSW state government made the largest monthly windfall on stamp duty since it began recording such data trends back in 2005.
With over $350 million collected in the month of October, stamp duty is unquestionably one of the biggest revenue raisers for NSW.
However, we shouldn’t get too carried away with what, at face value, appears as a larger than usual money-grab by the state government. The increase in stamp duty revenue also needs to take into account some other market factors, such as near-record high auction clearance rates for the months of August, September, and October of 2013. It is within these two to three months that the state government’s stamp duty tax windfall reported, would have been derived from.
It is safe to call a spade and spade and realise that in NSW, higher than usual auction and private sales data – and thus higher volumes of stamp duty collection as a result – is an indication of renewed buyer and market interest in residential property.
And hey, why wouldn’t there be?
The current property market climate has been something of a perfect storm for home buyers and investors alike in recent months. This is especially evident in NSW. Though housing affordability challenges continue to persist, there are just too many well-received positive factors at play that are stirring home buyer and investor market activity. These include:
-          Some of the lowest interest rates on offer of all time
-          Not only are rates low, but some of the most competitive and cost-efficient two-year, three-year, and five-year fixed interest rate deals are on offer. These deals are ‘security’ music to a first home buyer’s ears
-          Though affordability remains a challenge, property values throughout most of NSW have not risen in as high a proportion as other states in the past 12-24 months
-          Previously the construction industry was in a slump, however it is starting to heave back into prosperity and with more construction upstarts and projects commencing, buyer confidence levels boost
As an investor, my view on stamp duty is in a constant state of flux. Though it prohibits many first home buyers from entering the market initially, it can be argued that it also prevents first home buyers entering the market foolishly and setting themselves up for failure. Yes, saving that initial first home deposit will take a little longer due to the needed stamp duty capital being raised, however it also means buyers need to learn more diligent saving and spending habits in their quest to home ownership.
This can be a good thing for buyers who have unrealistic expectations or a view that their first home purchase should be the ‘forever dream beach house’ that they want, long term. First home buyers need to view stamp duty as a challenge; a necessary evil that means they may need to compromise on certain elements of their first property purchase.
Stamp duty also encourages would-be first home buyers to consider renting longer, and perhaps buying a more affordable investment property to start with, saving first home ownership for a few more years down the track. I personally think this is one of the smarter and more cost-efficient strategies out there.
Say for example your goal is to buy your first home, a $500,000 property, within the next few months and you have your 15% deposit saved. Here’s what you’d be up for if you bought it as a home and lived in it for three years:
-          15% deposit: $75,000 (leaving a mortgage value of $425,000)
-          LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) because you do not have the needed 20% deposit: around $4,000 (that’s $4,000 of wasted money you can never get back or make any claims on)
-          NSW stamp duty on purchase of $500,000 (payable at time of settlement, remember): $18,010 (yes, that is dead money you can never get back)
-          Other settlement costs (legal, any loan fees, searches): $2,000
-          Total upfront payable: $99,010
Assuming you take out a mostly-fixed loan product (say 30 years), two to three years of chipping away at the mortgage will not make much of a dent, because remember, most 30-year mortgages do not start to make headway until around year #5 or #6. You are also liable to pay hefty interest on your mortgage from day one, because of a substantial $425,000 sized mortgage.
In my view, a better strategy for this home buyer is to rent for a few years, but buy a cheaper investment property up front. Let’s say a modest unit or apartment in middle-outer Sydney suburbs, or a well-located property in a regional centre such as Wagga, Newcastle, or the North Coast. Let’s say you still have that $99,000 upfront budget mentioned above to spend.
-          Buy one $250,000 investment property right away
-          Put down 20% deposit (thus negating the need to pay LMI): $50,000
-          This means you have a loan amount of $200,000. I’d take out a split loan that is 60% fixed for three to five years, and 40% variable (with an offset facility that is redraw-capable). This means 40% ($80,000) of your mortgage is offset-capable
-          NSW stamp duty on $250,000: $7,260
-          Other settlement costs (same as above): $2,000
-          You are ‘all in’ for $59,260 initially
-          As for the remaining $30,000 of savings, don’t spend it, but put it into that $80,000 offset account. This means that for the first few years you are only paying interest on $50,000 of offset plus 120,000 of fixed loan = interest payable only on $170,000
-          Over years one to three you continue to rent and pour savings into that offset account, all the while reducing the interest you pay on the investment property. Then in year three, you pull out your original $30,000, plus three years’ worth of savings revenue. Assuming you save an average $20,000 per year, this will see you back at the $90,000 mark to buy your home with.
-          Oh and let’s not forget some of the tax minimisation benefits that often come with well-purchased investment properties. Even if this saves you only a couple of thousand per year, that’s still an additional $2,000 each tax year that will help to ease the mortgage stress of your big chunky home mortgage, when you are ready to buy your home.
This strategy will not work for everyone or every situation. It is not financial advice and is not to be construed or applied as such. However, it is an example of how renting for a few more years whilst having an investment property up your sleeve, can better your home-buying position later on.
Stamp duty is one of those necessary evils in the property game. It may not always be, but for now, it is. In my view, though stamp duty is an evil, it is not the real problem here – a poor buying strategy mixed with unrealistic buying expectations is. Australian property buyers need to get smarter in their home ownership aspirations and realise that the best course to take isn’t always the direct one.

<hr>
Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/">Property Correspondent.</a>
 
</body></html>

cmcevoy-Go82SmsJA9

The best course to home ownership is not always the most direct one 

<html><body>
The latest affordability index by the Adelaide Bank and Real Estate Institute of Australia has once again flooded the real estate headlines with the jolly news that housing is growing ever more affordable.  
This pre Christmas gift of optimism from the newly updated affordability studies commissioned by the financial and real estate sectors, comes with a host of commentary – usually from those with a vested interest – who happily advise aspiring home owners that ‘they’ve never had it so good’ – in other words, to paraphrase Terry Ryder’s thoughts, first home buyers should <a href="/news">‘put up, or shut up.’</a>  
Of course, it wouldn’t be half as palatable if it didn’t come accompanied with the seeming contradiction that not only is it more affordable than it’s been in the last decade (according to the HIA-Commonwealth Bank affordability index), it’s also substantially more expensive than its ever been. Yes, housing is only item than can be both affordable and unaffordable at the same time.  Work that one out Einstein.  
In fact, according to <a href="#more-3603" target="_blank">Residex</a>, median prices in both Sydney and Melbourne have already exceeded their historical highs, ‘nudging’ $750,000 in Sydney and $600,000 in Melbourne - additionally, Perth has also reached its previous peak of 2008, with a median price of $521,000.  
<a href="https://www.rpdata.com/" target="_blank">RP Data’s</a> dwelling price index shows a year to date increase of 14.3% in Sydney, 6.4% in Melbourne and 9.7% in Perth.  For home buyers, the benefit derived from lower lending rates has been all but offset by the inflationary pressure placed on prices.  
Rarely is it mentioned that housing affordability and the cost of servicing a mortgage are two separate entities.  
Mortgage rates are set up with different structures dependant on circumstance, and subject to interest rate changes influenced by the macro environment.  
To take out a 25 year mortgage requires the expectation of secure employment in a terrain where frequent job changes or part time work are becoming a norm.  
They may influence house prices through a cycle, but they do not take away the fact that home prices now – even with lower lending rates – require longer terms to pay down, with the interest over the duration of that period adding considerably to the capital cost.  
In fact I couldn’t put it any better than current governor of the Bank of England - <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/nov/29/mark-carney-bank-of-england-home-buyer-warning" target="_blank">Mark Carney</a>, when he warns;  
“Think about the mortgage you are taking on, the debts you are taking on…You are taking at least a 25-year mortgage, maybe a 30-year mortgage.  Are you going to be able to service that mortgage five years from now, 10 years from now, if interest rates are higher? Or are you counting, even subconsciously, on the price of your house keeping going up and if something happens an ability to sell it quickly and not facing the consequences of not being able to pay?"
Carney’s cautionary words pre-empt the Bank of England’s decision to scale back its inflationary Funding for Lending Scheme amidst fears of a rapid escalation of house prices in the south-eastern regions of the country.  
From next year funding for lending will only be available for business loans -not mortgages – and if the banking sector’s concerned about signs of frothiness in an industry in which it’s heavily invested, so should we also be.  
The Bank of England governor is not alone. Central banks in Sweden, Hong Kong, Norway, New Zealand, Canada and Switzerland (to name but a few) have all adopted macro prudential measures to buffer against the associated risks of a boom/bust investor lead recovery in a post GFC environment - highlighting the importance of keeping lending standards robust – all, that is,  except Australia.  
Having weathered the impact of the GFC a little more effectively than others – the RBA seem to think we live in some magic faraway tree, effectively doing little more than wagging a cautionary finger to a sector which for the duration of the year, have outstripped owner-occupier lending with well over a third of all new loans on interest only terms and roughly the same proportion with LVRs of over 8%.  
In other words, there are still over a third of all loans in which the principle is not being reduced – with 37.3% lent on these terms for the September quarter alone.  
In NSW, investment lending is at record highs, making up over 50% of the market and although many use the well worn argument that the unwanted boom is predominant ‘only in Sydney’ – let’s not forget, Sydney is not some nether land off the coast of Tasmania. What happens in our biggest capital, with the largest and most diverse economy in Australia, inevitably impacts us all.  
Historically, this sector is more sensitive to interest rate changes with a tendency to wax and wain pro cyclically with market movements, exaggerating both gains and falls.  A housing recovery built on the back of small mum and dad investors pouring their money predominantly into negatively geared established dwellings – especially considering our current levels of private debt to income ratios - is not ideal for the long term the stability of our housing market, or house prices.  
The common Aussie term ‘spruiking’ - which APRA warns against in the self-managed super sector, is not only a contributing aspect of what inspires our culture to see property as the undiversified road map for building wealth for retirement – it is also part and parcel of what has kept our property prices high by both local and international standards.  Yet the risks associated with spruiking in SMSFs is simply the tip of a much larger iceberg.  
Having worked in many aspects of the housing industry, I have seen first hand the type of material that’s presented at seminars not just from those who receive under the table commissions from developers, but also from advocates working as independent advisors for either the seller or buyer.  
It really isn’t unusual to see slides presented at seminars with straight lines charting the difference between investing in properties that supposedly “grow” at steady 5% per annum, compared to those that grow at 10%, using historical median data as ‘evidence’ that future returns can replicate those achieved in the past, without any distinction of how such data is correlated or the difference between individual “house prices” and “median values.”  
This information borders on financial advice and comes with no mention of risk or the type of rigorous analysis, which you would reasonably expect when choosing to invest in a single asset.  
Another widely used industry favourite is the statement;  
“FACT: fewer than 5% of properties are investment grade”  
A myth if ever there was one.  Perhaps the well-known companies that use this as an advertising tool, would like to point to the person who researched every property in Australia to correlate such a statistic? Maybe we could also ask for a comprehensive definition of what ‘investment grade’ really is – because I guarantee there would be no shortage of differing opinions from industry ‘experts.’  
This endless promotion of residential property, with rows of investment magazines lining newsagency shelves, promoting subjective ‘hotspots,’ or as I <a href="https://catherinecashmore.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/do-we-have-a-changing-landscape-concerning-australian-real-estate-and-property-prices/" target="_blank">pointed out</a> a few weeks ago, agencies cold calling households, and sending ‘advisors’ round to ‘educate’ and encourage inexperienced investors to negatively gear against their principle place of residence, is toxic.  
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Meanwhile, the RBA continue to sit on their hands, not wanting to pull a regulatory lever, instead <a href="https://www.afr.com/rw/2009-2014/AFR/2013/09/25/Photos/160229d4-2585-11e3-bbca-a7ec88bfff7c_FSR.pdf" target="_blank">warning</a> investors to employ caution, hoping they will fall into line like a bunch of good school kids. However, whilst macro prudential tools may assist in ensuring banking lending standards remain robust – can they have any long-term sustainable or lasting impact on property prices?  
In a recent research paper by BIS (Bank for International Settlements), entitled <a href="https://www.bis.org/publ/work433.pdf" target="_blank">“Can non-interest rate policies stabilise housing markets?”</a>, evidence was gathered from 57 countries spanning more than three decades, investigating the effectiveness of nine non-interest rate policy and macro prudential tools on restraining credit growth and house prices.  
The analysis used a new dataset going as far back as 1980, making it the most comprehensive study to date in terms of both scope and time span.  
The paper concluded that whilst reductions in the maximum LTV (loan to value) ratio can restrain demand, its effects can be partially or wholly offset by a rising market enabling the investor to borrow more, therefore, changes in the maximum DSTI (debt service to income) ratio were assessed to be more substantial.  
But importantly;  
“Only tax changes affecting the cost of buying a house, which bear directly on the user cost, have any measurable effect on prices” and,  
“None of the policies designed to affect either the supply of or the demand for credit has a discernible impact on house prices.”
The study puts this down to the ‘can buys’ still outnumbering the growing pool of credit constrained ‘can’t buys’ – stressing that the importance of housing supply was not explicitly considered. Therefore if we want to lower house prices or put in place policies to aid affordability, we need to look outside the limited powers of the RBA alone.  
As has been proven <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/1/21/national-affairs/built-backs-first-home-buyers" target="_blank">time and time again</a>, intermittently stoking at the bottom end of the market with FHB grants and incentives does little more than provide a short term happy pill for vendors, as the price multiplier effect ripples across the rest of the housing terrain, stimulating both an inflationary and volatile environment.  
Instead, we need to focus on the real problem in Australia – and it’s not property prices, it’s land prices - as economist <a href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/11/residential-land-values-reflate-across-australia/" target="_blank">Leith Van Onselen effectively points out</a> when he analyses the difference between commercial and rural land compared to residential land values, and building costs.  
“Whilst commercial and rural prices have remained relatively stable over the last 24 years relative to GDP, residential prices have skyrocketed.”  
In other words, the cost of residential fringe land, which without constraint, should be close to its ‘raw’ value, is not cheap at all – and it’s all down to ineffective urban planning policy.  
As I (<a href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2012/12/englobo-the-shady-world-of-land-banking/" target="_blank">and others</a>) have pointed out previously, even within a wide expansive boundary as mooted in Melbourne’s new urban growth strategy, the government limits land use until they have gone through a lengthy process of mapping out areas for infrastructure known as a ‘<a href="https://www.gaa.vic.gov.au/precinct-structure-plans/" target="_blank">Precinct Structure Plan’</a> (PSP) – it is a slow laborious process and as soon as you restrict the supply of anything, scarcity inevitably inflates values.  
Larger developers are not slow to purchase swathes of acreage prior to rezoning, and then once PSPs have been finalised, drip feed it onto the market. Not only do government bodies have little understanding of how released plots respond to consumer demand, they have no policy in place to deter the practice. It’s therefore a failure.  
Furthermore, facilitation of infrastructure is currently financed via hefty development overlays, which are passed onto the buyer rather than initiatives such as bond financing, where residents pay back proportionally over a lengthy period of time, as was the case historically.  
We must remove these barriers with effective policy and let land prices revert back to normal levels to reflect a real price closer to commercial values.  
Without doing so, we can’t gain a true indicator of the trade-off buyers are prepared to make between price and distance. Currently, the average price of a newly built house and land package is around $400,000, this is not serviceable on the single median wage, and therefore can hardly be deemed affordable.  
Get the land supply, price, and infrastructure equation right and I suspect there would be no lack of demand from genuine aspiring home buyers.  Only when this is done, can we have a truly transparent debate on first home buyers’ willingness to spread over the land.  
 
<hr>
 Catherine Cashmore is a market analyst with extensive experience in all aspects relating to property acquisition.
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

catherinecashmore-6LXia3pPQj

Can housing really be affordable and unaffordable at the same time?

<html><body>
When Australia’s biggest underwriter of lenders mortgage insurance rules a line through an entire asset class of property then investors should take note.  
Recently Genworth announced that from December 19, 2013 they would no longer accept off-the-plan or new properties as security when purchased in self-managed super funds. The announcement reads:
“Off-the-plan purchases and new properties that have been completed for less than 12 months are no longer acceptable. A “new property” is defined as being any property (including any house, unit, villa or townhouse) that has been fully completed for less than 12 months and/or has not been previously sold since construction (i.e. the vendor is a developer/builder or a related party of the developer/builder).”
Genworths’ role in the finance world is to ensure a bank does not lose any money if a borrower cannot meet their loan repayments. If the bank is forced to sell the property and is still left short the mortgage insurer fills the gap.  
Lenders mortgage insurers are very conservative by nature and they are sending a clear signal that they do not see a positive capital growth outlook for these types of properties.  
Genworth is looking to protect its own bottom line and are ruling out allowing their SMSF clients to invest in properties they think are risky investments. While the main reason for this is self-preservation it does provide a level of protection for these investors.  
At the same time that Genworth is waving a red warning flag to wealthy SMSF investors the government is still encouraging first homebuyers to buy this exact kind of property.  
Our government knows how important the building industry is to our economy so they are making it appealing for first homebuyers to invest in new properties only.  
For example a payment of up to $10,000 is available for eligible first home owners in Victoria for contracts entered into on or after July 1, 2013 to build or purchase a new home valued at up to $750,000.  In NSW the grant is currently $15,000 for first home buyers who build or buy new property.  
The government is leading first home buyers to focus on one particular type of property. Again the focus is to underpin the building industry but the byproduct is many first home buyers are in danger of being placed in a dangerous position.  
This is because new properties tend to have a low land to asset ratio meaning most of the value is tied up in the building not the land. It is land that appreciates in value and buildings depreciate. The result is capital growth that is more likely to fall behind the rest of the market. In addition new homes and apartments tend to be clustered together and can often be located in areas where there is an over supply of similar property.  
The current first home buyer policy solves a short-term problem by creating jobs in the building sector. However in the long run it is likely to place young first home buyers under financial pressure. The policy fails to acknowledge the dynamics of the property market and lures them into buying properties that well educated investors are avoiding.    
 
<hr>
 Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
 
 
 
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

The first home buyer policy is luring people into properties investors know to avoid

<html><body>
RE/MAX Western Australia’s managing director Geoff Baldwin has spoken out against potential changes to current stamp duty dispensations for first home buyers, saying that if the relief was decreased or abolished there would be dire effects across the market.
 “The negative affect the ceasing of stamp duty relief for first home buyers would be extremely damaging however, when this segment of the market stagnates it ripples up through all price ranges and the effect would be crippling”, said Baldwin.
“If you take a line through New South Wales and Victoria where subsidies have been abolished, first home buyer activity has dropped to 8% and 12% respectively, compared to the current 22% in Western Australia (RP Data).
“Historically, in a healthy market, first home buyers account for around 25 to 30% of all buyers.
“The established home market has already taken a massive hit through the government’s recent actions in changing the First Home Owner Grant whereby those building new homes receive $7,000 and people buying established only $3,000.
“To abolish first home owner stamp duty concessions would be extremely short sighted as it will a negative impact the whole market and hence the Industry, just at a time where we are again experiencing some prosperity in the property sector.”
 
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Rumoured cuts to stamp duty relief for first home buyers would be “extremely damaging”: RE/MAX

<html><body>
The delay in changes to the first-home owners grant (FHOG) is good news for many buyers.
Legislative changes to the distribution of the FHOG were anticipated to take effect last Sunday, however, the Western Australian parliament has not yet passed the necessary bill.
The state government announced changes to the FHOG in the August budget and was aiming for 15 September as the change-over date, but parliament has not yet fully processed this legislation so the change now looks like happening in October.
This is good news for the 70% of first-home buyers who preferred to purchase existing, older homes rather than building new.
Currently first-home buyers are eligible for a grant of $7,000 whether they buy an established home or build a new one. However, once the FHOG change takes effect the grant will drop to $3,000 for established homes and lift to $10,000 for new-builds.
The current delay in the change means that first-home buyers looking for an established property have a few more weeks to access the higher grant and, conversely, those who want to buy a block and build will be likely tohold back until the grant lifts to $10,000.

<hr>
David Airey is president of the <a href="https://reiwa.com.au/home/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Real Estate Institute of Western Australia.</a> This article was originally published on <a href="https://reiwa.com.au/Faq/Pages/Feature.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">reiwa.com</a>.
 
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News