Sydney developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/odus">ODUS Property Group</a> is continuing to expand its local Gold Coast development pipeline, filing plans for a new 40-storey tower in the Southport CBD.

Odus, which bought two luxury Main Beach projects, now La Mer and Le Reve, to make its move into the booming Gold Coast apartment market, has secured its third site. But it is tweaking the plans for a previously proposed 50-storey skyscraper, now seeking to deliver 40 storeys.

The project, dubbed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/80-marine-parade-74-80-marine-parade-southport-qld-4215">80 Marine Parade</a>, sits on a prime&nbsp;2,032 sqm amalgamated corner site at 74–80 Marine Parade and 4 Welch Street, across the road from the Gold Coast Aquatic Centre. It will have unobstructed, never-to-be-built-out views to the east given its position opposite the Broadbwater Parklands.&nbsp;

The plans are for 316 apartments, ground-floor retail, and resort-style resident amenities. The project sits within Precinct 1 (Central Business District) of the Southport Priority Development Area, where high-density residential and commercial development is actively encouraged.

BGD, ran by Bayden Goddard and the architecture firm behind Le Reve, has revised the original concept plans, substantially reworking the built form. Basement parking has been replaced by an expanded podium designed to improve functionality while reducing the tower's overall visual impact.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<img alt="First look: Odus Property Group plots landmark 40-storey tower for Southport's Broadwater gateway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0f13d065-2cf5-45ec-aa17-1a03754d93d8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Southport%20da%202.png?VersionId=.9QS2n7kBc_U3PyaI247uOyNSXIqnXSE" />

The tower rises above the eight-storey landscaped podium with a distinctive architectural language defined by sweeping arches, integrated greenery, bronze-toned glazing, and a sculptural rooftop crown.

The development will comprise 104 one-bedroom apartments, 208 two-bedroom apartments, and four four-bedroom penthouses across levels 9 to 36. Apartments are designed to accommodate both permanent residents and short-term accommodation within the same building.

A double-height lobby and reception will anchor the ground floor alongside a 23 sqm food and drink outlet, activating the Marine Parade frontage.

Parking will be accommodated within the podium, providing 288 vehicle spaces and 74 bicycle spaces, accessed from Welch Street.

<img alt="First look: Odus Property Group plots landmark 40-storey tower for Southport's Broadwater gateway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d7528b91-2c47-4094-98b3-5eecbacc0041" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Southport%20da%20podium.png?VersionId=efF5oWs4T9PDvxJwJEDHu5kSQ5eE3IBy" />

Residents will have access to an extensive suite of amenities spread across multiple levels. A podium recreation deck will include a swimming pool, spas, sauna, steam room, cinema, residents' lounge and children's games room, while a second wellness level near the top of the building will feature a gym, co-working spaces, reading room, dining areas and communal kitchen. Extensive podium landscaping wraps the building to soften the built form and strengthen its interface with the surrounding streetscape.

The planning report notes the project responds directly to Southport's ongoing urban transformation.

"Consistent with much of Southport, the surrounding area is undergoing significant transition, with many older low-rise developments progressively being redeveloped for higher-intensity urban outcomes, as envisaged within Precinct 1."

It also states that the proposal "will contribute to a defined and legible eastern gateway to the Southport CBD, reinforcing the area's high-density urban character while maintaining a strong visual connection to the adjoining public open space network."

<img alt="First look: Odus Property Group plots landmark 40-storey tower for Southport's Broadwater gateway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0b9fdebd-4b35-400b-a287-6bd1cdbcdb1b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Southport%20da.png?VersionId=4LG35XR5mfir7jvG2TShtQx.utMLYBxu" />

Located opposite the Broadwater Parklands, the site enjoys immediate access to the Gold Coast Aquatic Centre, Australia Fair Shopping Centre, TAFE Queensland Southport campus, the G:link light rail corridor and Southport's established commercial precinct. The location places future residents within one of the Gold Coast's fastest-evolving mixed-use centres, where numerous high-rise residential projects are reshaping the CBD skyline.

Odus is headed by development professionals Byron Sakha, Jarrod Younan and Sebastian Younan. The Younans also head family-owned builder Nazero Constructions, established in the 1960s.

They are currently delivering La Mer, 24 luxury apartments on Main Beach Parade, and Le&nbsp;Rêve, on the same street but on the prized beachfront side of the sought-after strip.

Joel Robinson

ODUS plans landmark 40-storey tower for Southport's Broadwater gateway

A boutique collection of just 10 residences could become the catalyst for the next phase of renewal along the southern end of Surfers Paradise Boulevard, with new plans laid for a mixed-use tower designed to transform a long-vacant site.

The proposal for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/3098-surfers-paradise-boulevard-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">3098 Surfers Paradise Boulevard</a> has been conceived as more than a standalone residential project. Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bda-architecture">BDA Architecture</a>, the development aims to spark the revitalisation of what the design team describes as the "South Boulevard" precinct, creating an active streetscape with retail uses at ground level beneath a collection of full-floor luxury residences.

The application, by PR Property Holdings, an entity directed by the Brisbane-based Ryan and Petrovic families, seeks approval for a 17-storey, 62.2-metre mixed-use development on a compact 427 sqm site between Surfers Paradise Boulevard and Appel Street.

The project will comprise just 10 apartments, including eight full-floor residences and two duplex apartments, positioned above a two-level retail podium. Three podium parking levels will accommodate 26 vehicle spaces, while a recreation deck is proposed on Level 4.

<img alt="First look: PR Property Holdings plans boutique apartment tower to kickstart Surfers Paradise's 'South Boulevard' revival" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="46cfa37d-5051-4449-8d8e-6724f8ca0d59" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_8.png?VersionId=e7UkeV1eTZAC2lXhdq72E3jpUbwiFD2t" />

Rather than pursuing apartment volume, the proposal focuses on large-format homes with a slender tower form intended to maximise outlooks while limiting visual bulk.

BDA Architecture said the proposal has been designed to become an urban renewal catalyst for the precinct.

"The ambition of 3098 Surfer's Paradise is that it provides the catalyst for incremental infill redevelopment and upgrade of what is coined the 'South Boulevarde' of Surfers Paradise which connects to the beating heart of Cavill Avenue."

The architects added: "An incremental approach to development that provides quality ground plane interface, human scale design, integrated subtropical landscape and semipublic permeable frontage can over time entirely upgrade a precinct."

The architecture adopts soft curves, articulated balconies and a slender tower profile rising from a human-scaled podium. The design report describes the project as delivering "bespoke residences of enduring distinction, sculpted with precision and quiet sophistication," with a focus on timeless coastal architecture.

The application also includes retail tenancies addressing Surfers Paradise Boulevard, reinforcing the site's role as an active mixed-use destination rather than a purely residential address. The planning report states the combination of the podium, landscaping and active frontage is intended to strengthen the pedestrian experience while contributing to the evolving character of the boulevard.

The site occupies a prominent position in the southern section of Surfers Paradise, directly opposite the G:link light rail corridor and within walking distance of Surfers Paradise Beach, Cavill Avenue, the Nerang River and Bruce Bishop Car Park. It is currently vacant, having previously accommodated a single-storey commercial building that was demolished in 2022. The planning report notes the surrounding area is characterised by a mix of commercial buildings and residential towers, with unlimited building height provisions applying under the Centre Zone.

The proposal also replaces an earlier 2022 approval for a restaurant and bar on the site, instead introducing a permanent mixed-use development that combines retail activation with boutique residential living.

Boutique apartment tower to "kickstart" Surfers Paradise's 'South Boulevard' revival

One of Hervey Bay's best-known waterfront landmarks could undergo its biggest transformation in decades, with plans lodged to redevelop the Hervey Bay Hotel &amp; Resort into a four-tower mixed-use precinct combining apartments, retirement living, a new hotel, wellness facilities, retail and an expanded hospitality offering.

The proposal seeks approval to redevelop the 8,981 sqm site at 249 Esplanade, Pialba, transforming much of the existing 1980s-era hotel and resort into a staged masterplanned precinct while retaining the Hervey Bay Hotel as its centrepiece.

Rather than a conventional apartment project, the proposal has been designed as four distinct towers delivered across four stages, each with a different role within the precinct.

<img alt="First look: Four-tower transformation planned for iconic Hervey Bay Hotel site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="89db2163-cdf2-484e-90a0-9804ece86a31" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Pialba%20da%201.png?VersionId=JsYhCwLtFk2p72uhjPQBqQ57.vWoIPeB" />

The largest hospitality component sits within Stage Two, which combines a refurbished tavern, sports bar, gaming lounge, bottle shop, lobby café and wellness facilities beneath a new 52-room hotel and 55 apartments, including 30 dual-key residences. The tower rises 14 levels above the Esplanade and includes gym, spa and wellness facilities together with more than 260 car spaces.

Stage One introduces a retirement living component comprising 69 retirement apartments alongside communal facilities, while Stage Three delivers 59 apartments overlooking the Esplanade. Stage Four includes a retail tenancy at ground level with a further 45 apartments above. Collectively, the masterplan provides 228 apartments across the four towers in addition to the new hotel accommodation.

Urban Planet Town Planning Consultants, acting on behalf of Herbay Pty Ltd, says the redevelopment builds on the long-standing role of the hotel within the Fraser Coast community.

"The Hervey Bay Hotel is an iconic use (notwithstanding the current format) and the retention for this facility in the community as an effective and successful business will advance the goals of the Planning Scheme," the town planner noted in its planning documents.

<img alt="First look: Four-tower transformation planned for iconic Hervey Bay Hotel site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="cca3617b-693f-40e2-8fa3-f609c2c95d00" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Pialba%20da%202.png?VersionId=8.hhkMuikoiLvoD6ei655Pj9mTKob4xV" />

The planning report argues the redevelopment responds to demand for greater housing diversity, additional tourism accommodation and expanded hospitality offerings within Hervey Bay's established urban area, rather than continued greenfield expansion.

"The delivery of contemporary services in the form of hotels, dining opportunities and short-term accommodation will be the cornerstone of the proposed development and does have a significant community outcome in the retention and expansion of existing services."

The masterplan has been prepared by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/oge-group-architects">OGE Group Architects</a> and features three basement parking levels beneath towers rising to around 14 storeys, creating one of the largest integrated mixed-use developments proposed for the Fraser Coast. The design also incorporates gym and wellness facilities, communal recreation areas, retail space and new landscaped public interfaces across the four street frontages.

The site occupies a prominent waterfront block bounded by the Charlton Esplanade, Thomas Street, Watson Street and George Street, immediately opposite the foreshore and within walking distance of Hervey Bay's city centre, Wetside Water Park and surrounding commercial precinct. The existing Hervey Bay Hotel &amp; Resort currently occupies the site, with buildings dating largely from the 1980s.

First look: Four-tower transformation planned for iconic Hervey Bay Hotel site

The transformation of the Gold Coast’s CBD of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/southport-qld-4215">Southport</a> is underway with the official commencement of one of the area’s first ‘next generation’ towers, the $200 million Maris residences.

More than 250 onsite and offsite workers will deliver the project being delivered by Malaysian company <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mrcb">MRCB International</a> and its build partner, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/binah-constructions">Binah</a>.

The start of construction by Binah follows an exceptionally strong sales campaign, with more than 90 per cent of apartments sold since its market launch less than a year ago.

The project has attracted predominantly local buyers and downsizers, many of whom who live and work in the CBD or the nearby Health and Knowledge precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134403 project_image_fid=372756]

The commencement of construction was marked by an official sod turning ceremony on site today (Friday, August 7).

MRCB International CEO Ravi Krishnan said MRCB was delighted to be playing a part in the transformation of the Southport precinct.

“We’re very aware of the importance of Southport as the CBD hub of the Gold Coast and the need for high-quality residential facilities for locals who live and work in the area,” said Krishnan.

"Across Southeast Queensland, new apartment supply remains constrained, particularly in established precincts with infrastructure and amenity already in place. Projects like Maris are increasingly critical in meeting that demand, especially on the Gold Coast and in the city's CBD precinct."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134403 project_image_fid=350661]

Binah's Managing Director Khalil Hafza said the company was delighted to be constructing Maris in its first foray into the Gold Coast market.

“Binah has been in Queensland for some time but we are very pleased to be given the opportunity to construct a project of such magnitude on the Gold Coast,"&nbsp;Hafza said.

“Some 250 on and off-site tradespeople and consultants will work on Maris over the course of the next two years bringing significant economic benefits to the Gold Coast community.”

Maris will deliver 192 residences across 20 levels. The project forms part of an Australian and New Zealand development pipeline by MRCB now exceeding $1.6 billion in gross development value, alongside a growing portfolio of projects globally.

The company also commenced construction on its $600 million 26 Vista residences in Surfers Paradise last year, following strong sales momentum, with over 70% of residences sold.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134403 project_image_fid=372760]

Positioned next to the Broadwater in the Southport CBD, Maris will sit directly opposite the Broadwater Parklands light rail station and within easy reach of retail, dining and lifestyle precincts, placing residents at the centre of one of the Gold Coast's most connected and rapidly maturing urban centres.

Maris will offer a full suite of resort-style residential amenities, including a pool, gym and sauna, along with a rooftop level featuring decks, lounges and dining and yoga areas that command sweeping views across the Broadwater and out to the ocean.

Construction at Maris is anticipated to be completed in 2029.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134403]

MRCB and Binah mark start of construction on $200m Maris Residences in Gold Coast CBD

To say Frank Licastro is keen on Wyandra Street, the small 400m strip that straddles Teneriffe and Newstead, would be an understatement.

Licastro, who runs Frank Developments, first jumped onto the street with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/ducale-teneriffe-33-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">Ducale Teneriffe</a>, just 26 apartments at 33 Wyandra Street.

With those apartments heading towards construction completion later this year, Frank went again just a few doors down with the recent launch of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/murano-teneriffe-37-wyandra-street-new-farm-qld-4005">Murano House</a>, a further collection of 41 apartments at 37 Wyandra Street.

Now Licastro is planning his third building on the strip.

Frank Developments has submitted plans to Brisbane City Council for a considerably larger 147-apartment project across an amalgamated 1,928 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/22-40-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">22-40 Wyandra Street</a>, which also runs through to Wyatt Street.

The Cavill Architects-designed proposal, on the opposite side of the street to Ducale and Munro House, will rise to 22 storeys at its tallest point, stepping down towards Wyandra Street as the building transitions between the higher-density Newstead skyline and the lower-scale character of Teneriffe.

<img alt="Frank" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fe60dd88-c9f1-495c-b918-ddfd5dbae504" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-17%20at%207.57.08%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=0cxIChr_1aSNoE3K3VbVl8qNyENf4a90" />

The plans comprise just two one-bedroom apartments, with the project overwhelmingly geared towards larger apartments. There will be 80 two-bedroom apartments, 58 three-bedders, six four-bedroom apartments and a single five-bedroom residence.

The apartment mix continues the owner-occupier focus Frank has pursued across its recent inner-Brisbane developments.

There will be 222 resident car spaces and seven visitor spaces across four basement levels, along with 166 bicycle spaces.

Cavill has approached the architecture as a transition between two very different parts of inner Brisbane.

The site effectively sits on the dividing line between Newstead's high-density mixed-use precinct and Teneriffe's medium-density residential area, something that has heavily influenced the massing of the building.

Rather than presenting as a single 22-storey tower, the building steps up from a 13-storey form towards Wyandra Street to its taller 22-storey element towards Wyatt Street and Newstead. The design documents describe the taller component as the "backdrop massing", with the lower form creating the transition towards Teneriffe.

The architecture itself also changes as it rises.

At the lower levels, Cavill has drawn from Teneriffe's heritage buildings and the tuff stone found below ground, before shifting towards a more contemporary Newstead-inspired tower expression with continuous balconies higher up.

<img alt="Frank 2" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3c6953c7-f65c-4ca5-bba0-08c1782b72af" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-17%20at%207.56.33%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=NxHPok5FY.omKhxPVqVWIN9ONqfoQV53" />

Frank is also proposing a significant amount of resident amenity throughout the building rather than concentrating everything on one recreation level.

Amenity terraces are proposed at levels 13 and 16, before another major rooftop terrace at the top of the building. The plans show a pool terrace and landscaped outdoor spaces, with shaded outdoor rooms, tree planting and protected "City Rooms" incorporated into the shared areas.

At street level, the project will also seek to open up the connection between Wyandra and Wyatt streets.

A currently constrained pedestrian laneway along the northern boundary would be expanded, while a double-height "City Room" would be created on Wyandra Street. A separate two-storey outdoor arcade would run through the site from Wyandra Street to Wyatt Street.

The ground floor plans also show food and beverage tenancy space alongside the residential lobby, lounge, office and landscaped public areas.

Cavill says the intention is to create a more generous and heavily landscaped Wyandra Street frontage, with weather protection and public spaces designed to encourage people to spend time at street level.

Frank has been busy across Brisbane and the Gold Coast in recent years, with two ultra-luxury projects under construction in Surfers Paradise, as well as several projects in the pipeline across New Farm and Hamilton in Brisbane.

&nbsp;

First look: Frank Developments triples down on Teneriffe's Wyandra Street

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

For most Australians, buying an apartment is one of the biggest financial decisions they'll ever make

The location, floorplan and price are often the first considerations, but in recent years another question has become increasingly important: who is actually delivering the project?

A series of high-profile builder collapses, construction delays and defect concerns have fundamentally changed how many Victorians approach buying off the plan. The collapse of Porter Davis in 2023, which reportedly left around 1,700 homes unfinished, became one of the most visible examples of the risks that can emerge when a construction company fails. <a href="https://www.equifax.com.au/sites/default/files/lpassets/pdf/Final-Business-Market-Pulse-June-Sector-Deep-Dive-Report-2.pdf">Similar challenges across the broader construction sector</a> have left buyers asking more questions before signing a contract.

As Victoria continues encouraging higher-density housing to address supply shortages, transparency is becoming just as important as location or price.

One tool increasingly entering the conversation is the <a href="https://icirt.com/">Independent Construction Industry Rating Tool (iCIRT)</a>, an independent assessment framework designed to help buyers better understand the developer or builder behind a project. Originally developed by Equifax in consultation with government and industry as part of NSW's Construct NSW reforms, the system has since expanded nationally.

<h2 data-end="1519" data-section-id="7nmx3" data-start="1492">What is an iCIRT rating?</h2>

Most Australians are familiar with independent ratings in everyday life.

We compare ANCAP safety ratings before buying a car. We look at Health Star Ratings in supermarkets. Banks rely on credit assessments when lending money.

Until recently, however, there has been very little independent information available to help apartment buyers assess the business responsible for delivering a residential project.

That gap is what iCIRT was designed to address.

Builders, developers and other construction professionals with an iCIRT rating have demonstrated high-trust characteristics through an independent, evidence-based assessment across six criteria: Character, Capability, Conduct, Capacity, Capital and Counterparties. This involves a rigorous review of financial health, past project track record, and ethical conduct. Crucially, an iCIRT rating could help provide property buyers with confidence that they are working with a professional who has demonstrated the capability, capacity, and willingness to return and rectify issues.

Importantly, iCIRT is not a recommendation to purchase a particular property, nor is it a traditional credit rating. It is an independent assessment framework designed to provide objective information about a construction business using a <a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Methodology-Issue1-May-2021.pdf">published methodology</a>.

The system has been widely adopted in New South Wales, where more than one-third of medium and large residential builders and developers now hold an iCIRT rating, representing over two-thirds of the state's residential building market by value as of 2025/26.

<h2 data-end="3126" data-section-id="h6ohtj" data-start="3084">Why buyers are doing more due diligence</h2>

For many buyers, particularly those purchasing off the plan, the biggest risk isn't whether they'll like the kitchen finishes.

It's whether the project will be delivered on time, to the expected quality, and by a company capable of completing the development.

<a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2026-07/iCIRT%202025%20Consumer%20Survey%20Report%20v05.pdf">Consumer research commissioned by iCIRT</a> found more than half of respondents believed current protections do not adequately safeguard buyers from builder insolvencies or defective projects. Other research found 88 per cent of prospective buyers would seek independent ratings or due diligence before purchasing, while 90 per cent said trust in construction professionals is essential.

That doesn't mean buyers should rely on a single rating alone.

Independent legal advice, understanding the contract, and seeking financial advice all remain important parts of the due diligence process.

However, an independent assessment can provide another source of information alongside those traditional checks.

<h2 data-end="4138" data-section-id="pquzxc" data-start="4094">Trust is becoming a competitive advantage</h2>

The conversation isn't only changing for buyers.

Developers are also recognising that trust has become an increasingly important part of the sales process.

Five years ago, purchasers typically asked about floorplans, finishes and settlement dates.

Today, sales teams are increasingly being asked about the developer's experience, financial stability, previous projects and construction partners.

For companies with strong governance and established delivery records, an independent iCIRT rating provides another way to demonstrate those credentials before buyers even visit a display suite.

According to Equifax, the assessment can also help businesses drive sales and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/icirt-rating-helps-scion-secure-high-value-projects">secure high-value projects</a>, as well as identify operational improvements and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/mirvac-reinforces-brand-trust-and-quality-independent-icirt-rating">attract top talent</a>.

<h2 data-end="4962" data-section-id="1j54ng5" data-start="4912">Beyond buyers: lenders are paying attention too</h2>

The influence of independent construction ratings is also extending beyond consumers.

According to Stamford Capital's Real Estate Debt Capital Markets Survey, an increasing number of lenders now incorporate iCIRT ratings into their due diligence processes when assessing residential development finance applications.

The survey found lender adoption has continued to rise, with many respondents saying independent assessments provide additional insight into governance, counterparties and delivery capability beyond traditional financial analysis. Some lenders also reported declining funding applications where businesses had poor or no ratings.

As construction costs remain elevated and access to development finance becomes more selective, demonstrating credibility is becoming increasingly valuable.

<h2 data-end="5801" data-section-id="1qazuxs" data-start="5772">What it means for Victoria</h2>

Victoria's apartment market is entering a new phase.

The state is seeking to accelerate higher-density housing while simultaneously introducing reforms aimed at improving confidence in residential construction.

For buyers, that means there are more tools available than ever before to research the businesses behind a project.

For developers, it signals that transparency is becoming another point of differentiation in an increasingly competitive market.

Buyers are asking more questions than ever before and increasingly expecting independent information, not just marketing material, before making one of the biggest financial commitments of their lives.

Find out how to get iCIRT rated <a href="https://www.icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Infographic-Assessment-Process-Final.pdf">here</a>.

<hr data-end="6469" data-start="6466" />
The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personal, financial, legal or tax advice. It does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it and, where appropriate, seek independent professional advice.

This article contains links to third-party websites. These links are provided for convenience only. Equifax Australia does not control and is not responsible for the content, accuracy or privacy practices of external sites.

Copyright © 2026 Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

<html><body>
A reputable, licensed mortgage broker, who has lending agreements with a wide range of lenders, should be able to tell how much you can realistically afford to borrow based on your financial position, goals and income and provide you with a number of suitable options.
Always ensure there is enough of a buffer in your budget in case interest rates rise and your monthly repayments increase. Alternatively, consider taking out a fixed-rate home loan if you want certainty or splitting your home loan between fixed and variable to hedge your bets.
Be aware that some brokers and lenders will try to charge you a higher interest rate for an investment loan, insisting it carries more risk.
However, other lenders do not differentiate between investors and owner-occupiers, so keep a look out. Before signing up, ask the lender to waive the establishment fee. Many lenders will waive these to secure your business.
<hr>
This article is fromProperty Observer's free ebook <a href="/guides/free-ebook-top-10-property-investment-tips">Top 10 Property Investment Tips</a>
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Look locally to see what the real rental returns could be

<html><body>
I have no doubt that Sydney’s property markets are set for rapid growth at the lower price ranges which will flow to the top-end, however it will be a trickle not a tsunami. They say: when you make a mountain out of a molehill, don’t expect anyone to climb up to see the view. You see the view is otherwise known as an opinion with the voice coming from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The Sydney Morning Herald conveniently published this week – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/how-to-spot-a-housing-bubble-20130925-2ue44" title="How to spot a housing bubble.">how to spot a housing bubble.</a>
When looking at the view of our local market look no further than <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" title="this week’s sales">this week’s sales</a> which identifies in Mosman, Cremorne, Cremorne Point, Neutral Bay and Cammeray there were 32 sales with 22 of those sales being apartments, making up 69% of the week’s sales. 
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/09/rba-get-real-sydney/" title="RBA tells Sydney to get real">RBA tells Sydney to get real</a> when the RBA released its financial stability review this week. “Over the past year or so there has been an increase in property market activity. This is not surprising given the reductions in interest rates. The pick – up in demand, which has been sharper in New South Wales and from investors more generally, has been associated with recent increases in housing prices. It is important that those purchasing property do so with realistic expectations of future dwelling price growth.”
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/reserve-warns-diy-super-may-set-new-property-debt-trap-20130925-2uei4" title="Reserve warns DIY super may set new property debt trap ">Reserve warns DIY super may set new property debt trap </a>although what needs to be pointed out is that Australia’s mortgage market is worth a whopping $1.2 trillion with the SMSFs totalling approximately $80 billion. If you want to throw another hand grenade: the RBA could start a rumour that the Abbott government is looking at abolishing negative gearing. Now that would add plenty to the spinning property fan.
Christopher Joye, writing for the Australian Financial Review wrote <a target="_blank" href="https://www.afr.com/p/markets/market_wrap/only_fools_ignore_bubble_trouble_tcMdVkWXAAWCs1PcK2SG9O" title="Only fools ignore bubble trouble">only fools ignore bubble trouble</a>; “residential property is the biggest source of household wealth and underlies the most important asset – home loans – held by Australia’s colossal and concentrated banking industry, which accounts for 30% of the share market’s value. There is $4000 billion of housing and $1300 billion of debt held against it. It is our most significant investment class. So are we in the throes of a bubble, and should we worry about the risks of one materialising?”
<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline-width: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; color: #be002d; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2013/09/23-09-2013-9-57-43-AM.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto; padding: 0px; outline-width: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; display: block; max-width: 100%;" height="219" width="470" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2013/09/23-09-2013-9-57-43-AM.jpg" alt="23-09-2013 9-57-43 AM" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8206"></a>
Source: RP Data, ABS, Australian Financial Review
The main issues as I see it is that banks maintain a lending responsibility given our economy still harbours strong concerns with what is happening overseas. What many seem to forget is that despite Australia experiencing a record low cash rate of 2.5%, if the property markets take-off so too will the cash rate. So with all these warnings and variables it would be fair to say there has never been a better time to buy given the cash rate will go-up, so lock and load the present rates in.
Another factor that is being missed is <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scmp.com/property/international/article/1311717/record-number-chinese-buyers-pump-property-prices-sydney" title="Record number of Chinese buyers pump up property prices in Sydney.">record number of Chinese buyers pump up property prices in Sydney.</a> Then you have the combination of Chinese and local investors buying <a target="_blank" href="https://www.afr.com/p/australia2-0/of_barangaroo_apartments_sell_out_jF37jrlXYVTvxYQ5wNsnhK" title="$300m of Barangaroo apartments sell out in hours ">$300m of Barangaroo apartments, which sold out within hours</a>, an expected result given its unique location. Agents today are being taught and advised on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/marketing-your-property-to-chinese-buyers/2013092465226" title="Marketing your property to Chinese buyers ">marketing your property to Chinese buyers </a>as <a target="_blank" href="https://www.news.com.au/realestate/news/significant-investor-visa-holders-target-highend-sydney-properties/story-fnd91nhy-1226711353150" title="significant investor bias holders target high – end Sydney properties.">significant investor bias holders target high – end Sydney properties.</a>
It will be most interesting to see what the newly elected Abbott government does with the previous government’s Significant Investor Visa (SIV). SIVs were introduced on November 24 2012, and have attracted over 100 applications from wealthy Chinese investors looking to spend at least $5 million in Australia. Whilst some are suggesting that the Abbott government will scrap this initiative it should however be noted that this is aimed at the top-end markets which are showing just a pulse in terms of activity.
Another week of tight listings which continue to remain well down on previous year’s volumes. With school holidays finishing on October 8 we should see just how confident our market is, although I expect that we won’t see much difference from what we have seen all year.
Another reason why (in my opinion) that we have such a strong focus on what’s happening to the property markets at the moment is that there is not that much to write about. Newspapers are renowned for talking real estate up due to them trying to reignite their “rivers of gold” print revenues.
That’s my conspiracy theory.
 
<hr>
 Robert Simeon is a director of <a style="font-size: 14px;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.rwm.com.au/" title="RWM">Richardson  Wrench Mosman and Neutral Bay </a>and has been selling residential real estate in Sydney since 1985. 
He has also been writing real estate blog <a style="font-size: 14px;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" title="Virtual Realty News">Virtual Realty News</a> since 2000. 
The RWM real estate model has sold in excess of $1 billion in database sales globally.
 
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

There's never been a better time to buy: Robert Simeon

<html><body>
Housing bubble?  Give me a break.
I forewarned a few weeks back, that we might see an increasing detachment from reality as this residential market recovery takes hold.
I was thinking it would start in earnest sometime next year.  But it looks like I was wrong.  The loopers are already at it and in force.  Lord help us when we actually see some real heat in the overall housing market.
Just the normal noises
For the record, Sydney house prices are up 8.3% over the past 12 months according to RP Data, but were up only 1.2% last year and were down 2.4% in 2011.
As for the rest of the country, Perth is up 7.9% for the year but down 0.5% last month while Melbourne is up 5.4% for the year and the Brisbane-Gold Coast region is up a measly 1.8%.
Hmmm, a housing bubble indeed.
Yet we now have the IMF – yes those clowns – planning to visit Australia (to help get a suntan, I suggest, rather than anything else) to determine if Australia is in deep throes of a housing bubble.
It was just two months ago, when we were still waiting for Australia’s housing market to bust.
For mine, what we are experiencing is the normal machinations of the property cycle - nothing more, nothing less.
Valuations are often short at the recovery stage of the cycle.  They sometimes overshoot near the peak.  There are many issues regarding valuations in Australia.  We have written about them several times.  Go <a href="https://matusikmissive.com.au/2011/06/01/queensland-site-valuations/" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="https://matusikmissive.com.au/2011/11/16/a-tale-of-two-buildings/" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="https://matusikmissive.com.au/2012/02/22/bank-vals-101/" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="https://matusikmissive.com.au/2012/05/16/modern-marketing/" target="_parent">here</a> if you have nothing much better to do.  
Development, redevelopment and renovations 
One of the problems with house price reporting is the way prices are measured and more importantly what influences the rise (or fall) of both median and mean house price figures.
New development or redevelopment often causes the middle and average price to rise, without seeing resale values increasing much at all.
This is what often happens around key infrastructure, such as railway stations.  New projects lift the median/mean values, whilst resale prices remain flat at the time of new development/redevelopment.  The same can be said about weekly rents.  Base property values/rents often rise faster closer to core infrastructure, but the overall residential cycle must be on the improve.
A similar trend can be found in many areas affected by flooding across Australia in recent years.  Many of these areas, especially in Queensland, have now been redeveloped.  This has seen new properties replace older stock.  Median/mean values have often risen as a result.  But many owners in these areas, who are trying to resell flood-affected but unimproved homes, cannot get much more for their property than they originally paid for it.  They are often getting less than they most likely would have if they sold just prior to flooding.
Median and mean housing prices are also affected in the same way when it comes to individual house renovations.
Many areas across Australia are experiencing a renovation surge.  Areas which are going through his swell of reno activity are seeing a strong lift in suburban median and mean prices.  But when you factor in the cost of the renovation itself (and especially if you include your time at a commercial rate), then the true uplift in financial gain is far less than the headline suburban price growth being touted.
It is true that a high and consistent proportion of renovation work across many homes in an area, is a good thing in terms of improving the underlying investment potential of a location.  It is another of<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/forget-hotspotting-lists-you-need-to-dig-a-lot-deeper-michael-matusik/2013092565254" target="_blank"> our key 10 measures which helps us determine the strength of a place’s underlying investment clout</a>.
Such activity suggests that owners are ‘placing money where their mouth is’, so to speak; which in turn often leads to more owner-resident resale interest; which increases the actual size of the resale market and in due course, can help get a much better price on resale.  But it takes time for the base value of property in such an area to increase.
New development, large scale redevelopments and major renovation activity cause median and mean values to rise.  But this isn’t the same as seeing the base value of the existing, unimproved housing stock increase in a certain location.
When we see rapid increases in the base value of residential property, and across widespread areas, then we are experiencing boom-like conditions.
I suspect that - outside of a certain areas in Sydney and Perth, maybe parts of Melbourne now – the base value of Australian housing isn’t increasing much at all.
But the IMF and the  newspapers will be telling you otherwise.
 
<hr>
Michael Matusik is the founder of <a style="font-size: 14px;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.matusik.com.au/">Matusik Property Insights</a>, which has helped over 550 new residential projects come to fruition.
Read <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.matusikmissive.com.au/">Michael’s Blog</a> or follow him on <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.facebook.com/ThinkMatusik?fref=ts">Facebook</a> and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.twitter.com/michaelmatusik">Twitter</a> or connect via <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelmatusik">LinkedIn</a>.
 
</body></html>

michaelmatusik-49YzLvdmNv

Housing bubble? Give me a break: Michael Matusik

<html><body>
One of Port Melbourne’s newest developments, Aqueous, is 90% sold as construction kicks off.
The $24.7 million development by Prince Developments on Nott Street will feature 41 apartments across six levels.
Architecturally designed by ROTHELOWMAN, inspiration has been drawn from the Port Melbourne area and the inherent connection to the beach and the movement of water.
“The façade has depth thanks to carefully placed voids enabling internal spaces and surfaces to be revealed, while permitting light and ventilation as well as protection from the elements,” says ROTHELOWMAN principal Shane Rothe.
“This allows privacy to tenants while encouraging activation to the street frontage,” says Rothe.
Peter Mitrevski managing director of Prince Developments says Aqueous has attracted a mix of both owner-occupiers and investors.
Aqueous offered a mix of studio, one- and two-bedroom apartments as well as penthouse style apartments.
One two-bedroom apartment remains for $750,000 and is 85 square metres in total.
Two one-bedroom apartments remain, priced from $475,000 and range in size from 53 square metres to 60 square metres.
Aqueous has a scheduled completion date of October 2014.
</body></html>

ntrotman-Et3xWpamVh

Construction on Rothelowman-designed Aqueous kicks off

<html><body>
Is it de rigueur to hang chandeliers in a garage?
<img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/HE-SAID-WORDS.jpg" alt="HE-SAID-WORDS" width="132" height="30"><img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/NO.jpg" alt="NO" width="55" height="30"><img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/jc-silhouette-5.jpg" alt="jc-silhouette-5" width="165" height="248" style="float: right;">
Hanging chandeliers in a garage is a wasteful and unnecessary Marie-Antoinette style of extravagance that should be discouraged. Gathering dust in a corner is okay, but sparkling overhead is a silly notion.
Even the late Liberace, who was the king of gaudy over-the-top interior décor, didn’t hang crystal confections in the garage of his cheap Palm Springs home.
No bloke will honestly want the garage space turned, even rarely, into a ballroom. Imagine having to get the oil spill stains off the floor before the big night.
A garage with chandeliers is almost as ridiculous as chandeliers in a chook shed.
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="https://st.houzz.com/simgs/c2f10f3100357a9f_3-5369/traditional-garage-and-shed.jpg" width="210" height="320" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">Photo: Lindsay von Hagel, Houzz
</div>
<img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/mb-silhouette-4.jpg" alt="mb-silhouette-4" width="165" height="248" style="float: left;">
<img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/SHE-SAID-WORDS.jpg" alt="SHE-SAID-WORDS" width="149" height="30"><img src="/images/stories/2013/09/06/YES.jpg" alt="YES" width="55" height="30">
Why not? It’s frivolous and fun. As interior designer Garth Barnett says “if you can you afford it, you can have it”.
But be warned hanging chandeliers in the garage will only work in some homes. But certainly for instance, the Gold Coast hinterland mansion which sold recently for $7.2 million,<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/bellagio-la-villa-the-grand-gold-coast-mansion-sells-at-72-million/2013092465239" target="_blank"> Bellagio La Villa</a>. This vast 10-bedroom residence has a five-car garage festooned with gilt and glass chandeliers (pictured below). Given the sumptuous décor throughout the rest of the house, these garage light fittings seem appropriate.
<img src="/images/stories/2013/09/27/tallebudgera-sept-27-one.jpg" alt="tallebudgera-sept-27-one" width="470" height="240">
A champion of chandeliers is the renowned international designer, Iain Halliday, who often allows the uniqueness of Venetian or Baccarat crystal to make a lighting statement within a contemporary inner city interior.
While his use of glamorous chandeliers usually is confined to living and dining spaces, garages could be next if he turns his attentions to projects in the NSW Southern Highlands. Perhaps even horse stables!
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Chandeliers hanging in the garage? He Said/She Said

<html><body>
The SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) has come out against claims that property purchases in SMSFs are playing part in the surge of property prices, saying it is negatively geared independent investors who are the bigger influence.
Director technical and professional standards of SPAA, Graeme Colley, said that despite talks of SMSFs flooding residential property, it's actually still a significantly small part of the market.
Of the $500 billion worth of assets under management, it's a small percentage that make up residential property purchases, Colley said.
“At June 30, property in SMSFs consisted mainly of non-residential property such as commercial property ($58 billion) compared with residential property ($17 billion) out of total of $495 billion. At $17 billion, that’s 3.4% of all SMSF assets," he said.
“In addition, gearing is not the issue its critics allege.  According to ATO statistics, geared property in SMSFs makes up less than one half of one per cent (0.4848%) of their total investments."
Compared to individual investors using negative gearing, it would take a "huge shift" in investments to influence the market.
“Property is not an inappropriate investment per se, but it must be appropriate to the fund and consider the member’s circumstances, just like all investments whether they are via an SMSF or personal investment decisions outside superannuation," he said.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

SMSF purchases not inflating property market

<html><body>
The June 2013 reporting season has recently been completed, with most AREITs releasing results in-line or slightly better than forecast. A review of the major underperformers and outperformers during the reporting season (31 July 2013 to 30 August 2013) has been undertaken.
AREIT performance over the reporting season 
During the reporting season, the AREIT sector generated a negative return of 0.2%, underperforming the Australian share market by 2.7%. Underperformance of the sector is partly attributable to an increase in long-term government bond yields during the month with long-term bond rates increasing by approximately 0.18% to 0.20%. Chart 1 below shows the total returns of individual AREITs over the reporting season.
Chart 1 – AREITs returns over August 2013
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/2013/10/08/areit-oct-9-big.gif" title="Click to enlarge" rel="shadowbox"><img src="/images/stories/2013/10/08/areit-oct-9-small.gif"></a>
 
 
Source: IRESS
 
Underperformers
Key underperformers during the reporting period were FKP Property Group whose share price fell by 16.9%, BWP Trust which fell by 5.9%, and GPT Group falling 3.0%.
FKP Property Group reported an impairment of $188m of its held properties and an 11% fall in its NTA just prior to the release of its financial year-end results and was subsequently sold down heavily. Statutory profit, dividend per share and earnings per share fell considerably.
The fall in value of the BWP Trust during the reporting period is mainly attributable to an entitlement equity raising made on August 8, 2013 at a discount of 4% to the prevailing stock price. This raising was completed on August 26, 2013. Financial results were in-line with expectations for the Trust with the exception of an increase in debt which increased finance costs by 6.2% and a fall of 1.2% in distributable profit for the financial year.
GPT financial results were below expectations attributable mainly to downward revaluations of properties held in Dandenong and Charlestown. Statutory profit, which includes exceptional items, was down by 6.7% from 2012 results and was below expectations. Net operating income growth slowed by 0.7% during the first six months of the year. The company’s has revised its earnings per share forecast down by 0.4% for the financial year ending June 30, 2014.
Outperformers
Key outperformers during the reporting period were Cromwell Property Group, whose share price rose by 5.6% and Stockland, which rose by 4.2%.
Cromwell Property Group stock price rose by 2% on the day of its release of the financial results. Results were in-line or slightly above expectations for the financial year. Dividends per share and dividend payout ratio were slightly higher relative to 2012 financial results and in-line with expectations. Operating profit amounted to 7.6 cents per share relative to expectation of 7.5 cents per share, with property investments contributing to 95% of operating earnings (up by 21% from last year). Additional rental income from properties acquired in NSW and Brisbane CBD in May 2013 contributed to a higher operating profit than expected. The company forecast an increase in operating profit of 8.8% and an increase in distributions of 3.4% for the financial year ending 30 June 2014.
There was no significant impact on Stockland’s share price following the announcement of weaker financial year results, as they were in-line with expectations. Stockland reported a fall in earnings per share of 24% during the financial year mainly attributable to a fall of approximately 79% in statutory profit, resulting from the writing down of its residential portfolio by around $355 million during the year. Strong performance relative to the sector during the reporting season can be partly attributable to the company’s positive outlook for the residential property market.
 
<hr>
 Binesh Seetanah is an analyst at <a href="https://atchison.com.au/" target="_blank">Atchison Consultants</a>.
 
 
</body></html>

bseetanah-MkzVfc9t4h

A-REIT performance over the reporting season: Binesh Seetanah

<html><body>
To receive an attractive rental return from your investment, you will firstly need to find tenants and secondly find tenants that are willing to pay the rent you’re advertising.
Terri Scheer Insurance general manager Carolyn Majda says that when choosing a property to invest in you should think about the tenant demographic you want to  attract, for example a family, sole tenant or couple, and choose a home that is likely to appeal to them.
She also advises considering properties that are close to good schools, shops and public transport as these are likely to be well sought after and may give you a larger pool of prospective tenants from which to choose.
Other things to consider include whether it is a well-maintained building (if you are buying an apartment) and if there is good natural light.
Byron Rose principal of real estate firm Rose &amp; Jones, NSW, says the question investors should ask themselves is: “Would you live here, and would you be prepared to pay market rent for the property?”
<hr>
This article is fromProperty Observer's free ebook <a href="/guides/free-ebook-top-10-property-investment-tips">Top 10 Property Investment Tips</a>
</body></html>

Don’t put all your eggs in the one basket

<html><body>
There are many myths associated with company title property ownership and most are not positive. You will often hear statements like “I wouldn’t touch company title with a barge pole”. For some – this is a valid and educated position; for others it is a form of hysteria born of ignorance and misunderstanding.

Make no mistake – there are a number of issues pertaining to company title property ownership that can be vastly less than ideal. Before addressing the pros and cons we should understand just what company title ownership is and provide some comparison to the modern and now more customary strata title ownership.

Company title ownership was essentially the legal precursor to strata title. It allowed for the subdivisionof an apartment building so that there could be individual ownership of home units or flats. A company was formed and share parcels created. The company owned the building (and the land it occupied) and individuals could acquire specific share parcels. Each of these share parcels were linked to a respective flat (and/or other improvements such as a parking space or storeroom). The owner of a share parcel essentially became the tenant of the associated flat and was insomuch bestowed the exclusive and quiet enjoyment of the pertinent residential space. Their ownership is indeed that of shares and those shares are in a company formed specifically as owner of the building concerned.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=3205]

To clarify this – let’s create a fictional building. Let’s call it “Park Royale”. Park Royale has 10 equally sized flats and the company Park Royale Pty Limited is the owner of the building. Park Royale Pty Limited comprises 1,000 shares and these are divided into 10 share parcels (ie one for each flat). Share numbers one to 100 are for flat #1; shares 101 to 200 are for flat #2 and so on. A buyer seeking to buy flat # 2 is actually buying shares 101 to 200 in Park Royale Pty Limited.

And now our story begins...

Strata title ownership offers a defined area within a building (ie as defined in a surveyed strata diagram). It is clear what area of the building and precisely what square metres you own. In almost all cases, no such diagram of specifically defined area exists for company title ownership (in very rare instances – company title buildings have prepared a survey diagram of the flat areas. This is very much the exception). In company title, one does not actually own a specific area of the building – rather they are buying shares in the company and the exclusive use of a particular flat.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=3730]

As is normal with corporations law – Park Royale Pty Limited will have a constitution and articles of association. This will establish definitions and the manner and form of the company’s operation. Most of this detail is fairly standard; however amongst the articles of association and then the “house rules” you will find the level of restriction associated with this particular building. People often state “you can’t rent in a company title building” or “the banks won’t lend against company title”. These are generalisations that are sometimes true and sometimes completely erroneous. Here is a list of some of restrictions/allowances to look for when considering a company title purchase:

<ol>
<li>
	Are there restrictions upon who may actually be approved to purchase the shares (eg does a minor criminal infringement preclude board approval)?
	</li>
	<li>
	Is renting of the flat allowed (ie sub-letting given you are already the ‘tenant’)? Some buildings completely prohibit renting (ie the shareholder must be in residence).
	</li>
	<li>
	If renting is allowed; are there restrictions?

	<ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha;">
<li>
		Is there an exclusion period of ownership before renting is allowed (eg no rental for first 12 months of ownership)?
		</li>
		<li>
		Is there a time limit to how long a flat may be let (eg four years then must be returned to owner/occupied)?
		</li>
		<li>
		Does the tenant need to be approved by the company board?
		</li>
		<li>
		Is there any control on the weekly rental price (minimum or maximum) that the flat may be leased for (eg some buildings may set a minimum rental price to ‘control’ the quality or calibre of tenant)?
		</li>
		<li>
		Do the articles limit or restrict the level of mortgage that may be taken against the shares (eg some buildings insist on certain levels of equity/deposit to purchase)?
		</li>
		<li>
		Are there restrictions upon the style/plan of any renovations to the flat (eg some buildings control the use of certain tiles/materials hoping to maintain character)?
		</li>
		<li>
		Can the board resume shares (ie if the board feels the owner is not ‘appropriate’; they can seek to resume the shares and force their sale essentially evicting the owner)?
		</li>
	</ol>
</li>
</ol>
Some company title buildings are very restrictive and others are essentially laissez faire. Some company articles specifically resolve in favour of renting and providing comfort to borrowers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=2881]

Having considered some of the issues that may arise within a specific company title building, we should also focus upon broader issues that are fundamentally significant to this type of share ownership. We return to the matter of owning shares versus a defined portion of real property.

 

<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Interestingly, until recent years, almost every company title sale by an agent was in contravention of the Financial Services Reform Act. This also applied to the majority of bank valuations upon such sales. When given due thought – the issue is somewhat obvious. Rarely is an agent nor a valuer also a holder of a Financial Services Licence under the Act. That is neither are licenced to represent a sale nor provide an a opinion of value for shares – which is precisely what is happening when selling and valuing company title properties. As the REINSW outlined:

“ASIC have identified this as an anomaly in the legislation and accordingly by Class Order [CO 00-213] has exempted real estate agents from the licensing regime under the Act in respect of the sale of company title property.

 

"Class Order [CO 05/1243] ensures that persons providing financial services by providing valuations of shares in real estate companies are not subject to the burdensome and inappropriate regulation under the financial services regulatory regime. 
"The exemption recognises that the valuation of shares in real estate companies is equivalent to valuing and providing advice on the valuation of real estate, rather than providing financial product advice in relation to shares in a company.”

 

This concession by ASIC helped draw company title ownership a step closer to strata title by acknowledging that company title shares are relevant only to a specific piece of real property. Our fictitious Park Royale Pty Limited only owns “Park Royale” and shares 101 to 200 are specific to flat # 2. You can’t sell five shares (as you might sell part of a equity share portfolio on the stock market) and you as a shareholder in the company also have duties relating to the building and deposited plan as a whole (as a strata tile owner has with the common corporate body).

This was a small bonus; however the real “elephant in the room” which is not discussed often enough (especially between agents and buyers) is the issue of recourse or remedy.

What happens if there is a dispute or need for an interpretation within a company title building? If strata title – there are benchmark statutes and tribunal bodies for judgement and appeal. Company title buildings are governed ostensibly by Federal Corporations Law and the jurisdiction is court. Happily the Local Court Amendment (Company Title Home Unit Disputes) Bill 2013 means that many disputes may now be heard in the Local Court (previously the Equity Division of the Supreme Court action was required).

[smartcode_project:default project_id=27728]

An owner who has a grievance or dispute that cannot be resolved “in house” must take their issue to court – a vastly more cumbersome, intensive and potentially costly exercise. When all is well in a company title building; as with everything – life is easy. When matters “go off the rails” – company title can be a horrible Pandora’s box.

For example – a young couple owned a two-bedroom company title apartment on the waterfront of Darling Point. By the time they had their second child; the apartment was simply too small for their family. They had owned the apartment for a number of years always as owner-occupiers. They decided to move out to a rented house and to try out a new area of Sydney. On this basis they decided to lease out their current apartment and enter into a two-year lease with another owner in the building (ie a board approved share holder) who also needed to upsize.

Whilst renting, the young family found a new house they wished to purchase; however they needed to sell their company title apartment to do so. A suitable buyer was found. The price was accepted and the buyer was deemed appropriate by the board. The issue was that the building restricted a new owner from leasing in their first 12 months of ownership. The subject flat still had 14 months to run on its lease. Insomuch the board refused the approval of the sale on the basis that its “house rule” concerning leasing could not be satisfied. The tenants were locked in and the board would not budge. The upshot is that the young couple were denied any opportunity to realise a sale and essentially meant that all of their property equity was tied up and not accessible.

Many appeals were made to the board with various undertakings about the intending new owner taking up residence the moment the tenants vacated and so on. The board was steadfast and an impasse was reached. It should be noted that the specific “house rule” had been varied over the years at the board’s discretion. The board could have easily approved the sale however it would not. The end of this story is happy – however it took a group of new board members being elected before the sale was able to proceed.

The events above may fall into the domain of an “oppressive board” as discussed in the 2006/7 New South Wales Law Reform Commission (NSWLRC) investigation into disputes in company title home units. The NSWLRC considered legislating company title ownership to more closely mirror strata title ownership in terms of rights and remedies available to shareholders.

It found that examples existed of individual or multiple shareholders feeling or actually being “oppressed” by boards (or members of). That is the board abusing its power and knowing that opposition would require involved court action. Some owners were found to be too frightened to oppose or speak up against a board or board member in fear of associated consequences or fall out. The initial board’s stance in the story outlined above essentially rendered the young family’s ownership with ‘zero equity’ and they were unable to move forward with their lives on the basis of the particular boards’ belligerent and unreasonable position on a unique anomaly.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=22803]

Significantly – whilst the NSWLRC recommendations did result in some important revisions, there remained a view that company title ownership had its own particular idiosyncrasies and benefits that had appeal for a section of the home owning community and that the Commission was loathe to attempt a change upon a system that conferred a type of control that the majority of owners are aware of when making their purchase decision. Many owners relish the level of control over the approval of their co-owners or the limitation or complete prohibition of renters. It is this “quality control” that often appeals to intending company title purchasers.

 

<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Returning to the question of equity is a segue to the matter of mortgages or lending for a company title purchase. The fact remains that the sale concerned is that of shares and some lenders simply don’t lend for company title. It is an in-house risk and legal assessment and some institutions just don’t offer the requisite facility.

Other lenders do; however they may require a larger injection of upfront cash equity (ie their loan to value ration or LVR may be lower). In these cases lenders may only be prepared to lend 60 to 70% of the sale price – the balance needing to be paid in the form of a larger deposit. Having said that, some of the major lenders will allow an LVR of 80 to 85% with company title purchases (subject to the restrictions in the articles of association). Company title borrowing is certainly widely available; however not as easily as against its strata-title cousin.

Conveyancing for company title is another item to address. Whilst a contract will require council zoning and sewerage diagrams – these are pertinent to the overall building and deposited plan. The contract will require company financials; copy of the share certificate; the constitution and articles of association; special conditions and so on. Whilst being a sale of shares – there is no cooling off period applicable. That is the sale is essentially unconditional and no 66W certificate is involved.

Essentially unconditional is the case in so far as most company title share sales involve a special condition that the sale is indeed subject to the company board’s approval of the purchaser and transfer. The purchaser cannot “cool off” and they are obligated to conduct their best endeavours to satisfy the board’s inquiries; however until the transfer is approved – the sale remains conditional.

Having given attention to all of this; what is the attraction to owning a company title home unit? One significant factor is that of actual value for money. Despite all of the ‘baggage’ that may be involved; the silver lining is that purchase prices are often lower than buying strata title. I regularly hear comments like “company title is 10% lower” which is actually a complete shot in the dark. A much broader context applies – not the least is the market expectancy. That is whether or not company title is a regular or expected event within a certain market place. If one considers Potts Point or Elizabeth Bay then company title is very much regular place and a large proportion of wonderful art-deco buildings in this area are indeed company title.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=32136]

There is often a certain cache attached to company title in these areas. They are reminiscent of the elite New York co-operative buildings filled with celebrities and the mega-rich. Often these New York buildings are cash only ownership and approval is a genuine ordeal with new owners having to provide vast details of their personal history and financials. The postcode 2011 isn’t at these exclusive levels; however buying company title in Potts Point/Elizabeth Bay isn’t nearly the impediment that the solitary company title building in Dover Heights might present.

This Eastern Ave block is a surprise stand alone amongst a deluge of neighbouring strata title lots and is often met with “Company title? Out here? What?”. This building is assisted by a very ‘helpful’ set of articles of association; however it definitely suffers price-wise against its competing strata title offerings. A company title flat with restrictive articles not in an “accepted” locale will incur significant buyer resistance which is usually only offset by a genuine price advantage.

The message in all of this is that company title ownership is quite distinct from strata title apartment ownership. Strata title is a vastly more uniform pursuit with clear rights and obligations and opportunities for recourse in the event of dispute. Company title may represent a saving in the upfront purchase and it may offer an improved level of “quality control” for owner occupiers.

Each instance is quite specific and particular due diligence is required on a case by case basis. In certain situations (such as owning in a grand building in Potts Point or Elizabeth Bay) there is almost no avoiding it. Company title ownership shouldn’t be treated as ‘buyer beware’ – instead it’s more a case of ‘buyer be aware’.

 

<hr>
Brad Caldwell-Eyles is a principal at <a href="https://www.1stcity.com.au/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">1st City - Hasemer+Caldwell-Eyles</a>.

 

 

 
</body></html>

bcaldwell-dCALvnaEBt

Truth v myth; the must know facts about buying company title: Brad Caldwell-Eyles

<html><body>
The Coalition’s new paid parental leave (PPL) scheme – starting from July 1 2015 - will pay a replacement wage up to an annual salary of $150,000, funded by a levy on the 3,000 biggest employers.
No policy is perfect, and the Coalition’s PPL scheme is no exception, but I think this is a good move for a number of reasons.
Firstly, we need women to be involved in our economy where possible and we need our policy settings to encourage and support that. The good news is that female participation in the labour force is rising – from 60.3% in 2000, to 65.3% in 2011. That’s a 5% rise in just 11 years while the male participation rate was flat.
The problems for women are many: as the cost of living increases, they are compelled to work; when working women have children and stop working, it puts stress on household finances; when they do go back to work, women still absorb most of the home duties meaning their extra income often goes on child care costs; when women take time off to have children, they usually lose their superannuation contributions; and when women with kids do go back into the workforce their preference for part time and casual work reduces their income and their superannuation.
Therefore we are faced with this conundrum: women earn less than men during their working lives, meaning they have less superannuation. Yet women live longer and therefore have longer retirements to fund.
The government needs to be congratulated for ensuring that the new PPL scheme will keep the superannuation guarantee contributions going during the paid leave.
More still needs to be done to lift the average super balances of women to parity with men’s – in 2010 the average female super balance was around $40,400, compared to the average male balance of $71,600. But allowing women to take 26 weeks off to care for their baby, with no discontinuation of their super, is a really good start.
Small business owners are also going to benefit from the PPL scheme. Many women choose to work at large companies or government departments, attracted to maternity policies and benefits.
With paid parental leave being funded from Canberra, smaller business owners will be on a more level playing field with the big employers, because they’ll be able to attract and retain female employees of child-bearing age.
And women will be able to make employment decisions based on criteria other than maternity benefits.
In the end, superannuation could be the crucial part of this policy. But also watch women of child bearing age giving up long commutes to the CBD as they realise that working for a small business does not penalise them for having a baby.
 
<hr>
Mark Bouris is executive chairman of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ybr.com.au/">Yellow Brick Road</a>, a financial services company offering home loans, financial planning, accounting and tax, and insurance.
You can contact Mark on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/markbouris" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.
 
</body></html>

Latest Expert Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Guides

Editor's Picks

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Expert Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Guides

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News