Brisbane-based developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/azure">Azure</a> is has been greenlit for its $115 million residential project within the Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct in Southport

Following the acquisition of the site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/1-clarke-street-southport-qld-4215">1 Clarke Street</a> in October 2025 with development application Lodgement in January 2026, Azure has been granted approval for the 114 terraces which will form the final stage of the wider Lumina development.

“It’s a fantastic milestone for us to receive the green light on our second Gold Coast project,” said Trent Keirnan, Founder of Azure.

“The Gold Coast continues to evolve, with demand for considered, high-quality residences at an all-time high. This project has been thoughtfully shaped to respond to that demand.

“We’ve worked closely with Economic Development Queensland to bring this project forward, and the collaboration has been both proactive and highly considered. Their shared commitment to quality housing outcomes has enabled a streamlined approvals process and a strong result for the precinct.”&nbsp;

Appealing to a wide demographic, the project will deliver a range of two- and three-storey designs comprising a collection of three-bedroom terrace homes as well as one- and two-bedroom apartment-style residences. The designs by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a>&nbsp;focus on&nbsp;“urban coastalism”.

Residents will have access to an array of lifestyle amenities, including a resort-style pool with multiple lounging zones and landscaped gardens.

The residential offering will support the thriving Health and Knowledge Precinct, which includes Griffith University, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Private Hospital and the new RDX Lumina and Proxima Towers, which are home to a range of health, education and research tenancies, including a 200-place childcare centre.

Azure aims for an off-market release for the project in the third quarter of this year, at the same time as construction is anticipated to start.

Joel Robinson

Azure approved for new townhouse development in Southport

Fortis has secured approval for a 57-room hotel at Richmond Square, marking another milestone in the delivery of the $330 million mixed-use precinct in Melbourne's inner east.

The hotel will occupy Levels 1 and 2 of Carmine House and forms part of Fortis' vision for Richmond Square, a precinct that will bring together apartments, hospitality, wellness and lifestyle offerings between Richmond and Cremorne.

Once complete, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/richmond-square-1-wiltshire-street-richmond-vic-3121">Richmond Square</a> will comprise 107 residences across Wiltshire House and Carmine House, alongside the hotel, hospitality venues, wellness facilities and a range of services aimed at both residents and visitors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348529]

The approval adds another layer to what Fortis is creating at Richmond Square, as developers increasingly look beyond standalone apartment buildings and towards mixed-use precincts that provide amenity and activation beyond the front door.

Jordan Winada, Head of Acquisitions (Commercial) Victoria at Fortis, said the approval was an important step in delivering the broader vision for the project.

"Richmond Square has always been about creating a destination rather than simply delivering residential apartments," Winada said.

"As buyer expectations continue to evolve, we're seeing increasing demand for developments that offer convenience, connection and access to high-quality experiences and amenity as part of everyday life.

"The hotel approval allows us to further realise that vision and create a precinct where residential living is complemented by hospitality, services and amenity in a way that is rarely seen in Melbourne's CBD and city fringe."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348530]

The hotel will also support a range of optional services for residents of Carmine House, including housekeeping and linen refresh programs, laundry and dry-cleaning services, in-residence food and beverage delivery, grocery and pantry stocking services, and concierge assistance.

The approval comes as owner-occupiers continue to dominate Australia's new apartment market, with buyers increasingly seeking developments that offer convenience, flexibility and lifestyle amenity alongside their homes.

Winada said buyers are now placing greater emphasis on the broader precinct and surrounding amenity when making purchasing decisions.

"Residential amenity is no longer limited to what sits within an apartment building. Buyers are increasingly assessing the broader lifestyle ecosystem surrounding their home and the ways in which a precinct can support their day-to-day needs.

"Richmond Square has been designed to provide that experience through a carefully curated mix of residential, hospitality and lifestyle offerings that work together to create a more connected way of living."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348534]

The hotel is expected to open in early 2027, with the operator to be announced later this year.

Further hospitality, retail and lifestyle tenants are also expected to be revealed in the coming months as Fortis continues to shape the offering at Richmond Square.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=13181]

Fortis approved for hotel component of Richmond Square precinct

Having successfully expanded into a new region with its Caloundra apartment development, Sunset by Dusk Group, growing South East Queensland developer Dusk Group is again venturing into new territory.

The developer has lodged plans for a 70-apartment project in the Moreton Bay region, to be known as <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/sunrise-on-sutton-25-sutton-street-redcliffe-qld-4020">Sunrise on Sutton</a>, named after its prime Sutton Street location, just one street back from Suttons Beach.

<img alt="Sutton" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="88a9f9ee-6ace-47f5-a0c6-8fb134b27e98" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-15%20at%209.20.42%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=iMXmJ7_BNZAmCt.jjupMSLdV_Qa9zJAK" />

Dusk Group Directors Huw Feeney and Anthony Short seized the opportunity to acquire the near-1,800 sqm amalgamated corner site at Sutton and Ella Streets for their first project in the area.

They have again enlisted MAS Architecture Studio, the architects behind Sunset by Dusk, to design the new eight-storey development.

The building will comprise a mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments and has been designed to maximise views towards Suttons Beach, Margate Beach and Moreton Bay.

Pending approvals, the project could launch before the end of the year.

<img alt="Dusk" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="90c0c26c-096c-4ceb-8c58-f8303aea542f" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-15%20at%209.20.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=nw8bqQtpOrf5nA95tuYhtqdB59YUzmO0" />

The development will provide 111 car parking spaces and 40 bicycle spaces.

Positioned within walking distance of Suttons Beach, Bluewater Square, Redcliffe Hospital and the Redcliffe Paceway, the development will sit within one of the peninsula's increasingly urbanised coastal pockets.

Redcliffe's new apartment market remains exceptionally tight, with Gardner Vaughan Group's One Redcliffe currently the only new apartment development actively being marketed in the beachside suburb.

It's another beach-focused development for Dusk Group, who has seen considerable success at its Caloundra apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/sunset-by-dusk-group-caloundra-5-7-bombala-terrace-caloundra-qld-4551">Sunset by Dusk Group</a>.

Over 80 per cent of the 36 apartments have sold ahead of its early 2027 completion.

&nbsp;

First look: Dusk Group targets Suttons Beach precinct with 70-apartment Redcliffe proposal

Leading Brisbane developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/consolidated-properties">Consolidated Properties Group (CPG)</a> has completed and settled $450 million worth of apartments at Monarch Residences in Toowong, marking one of Brisbane’s most significant and prestigious riverfront residential completions in recent years.

The final apartment at Monarch sold at auction on the 30th May for $4.1m.&nbsp;

The milestone has been marked at a ribbon-cutting ceremony at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/monarch-residences-toowong-600-coronation-drive-toowong-qld-4066">Monarch Residences</a>, with Cr Penny Wolff highlighting the importance of completing major residential projects to boost the city’s much-needed housing supply.

The 224 apartments, delivered across two 15-level towers, are now officially in the hands of owners, including Brisbane downsizers, families and professionals who have traded traditional houses for apartment living. The completion underscores sustained demand for absolute riverfront living in Brisbane’s inner west.

<img alt="$450M Monarch Residences sells out as Brisbane riverfront demand surges" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="56ae05e9-092f-41f0-98a1-a10984fdd171" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ROBNN_MONARCHLAUNCHEVENT-131.jpg?VersionId=p76J6weGZqseNrE6aOAjmAHUah.y65Gd" />

Monarch Residences was planned and delivered over four years on a 1.2-hectare parcel with more than 130 metres of direct frontage to the Brisbane River, occupying one of the last remaining true riverfront sites of its scale and orientation within close proximity to the CBD. The site has been transformed from an underutilised, derelict block of land, into a thriving residential precinct with Middenbury House at its centre.&nbsp;

Consolidated Properties Group CEO and Chairman Don O’Rorke says the project’s completion represents the culmination of years of careful planning, design collaboration, market conviction and outstanding team delivery.

“We announced Monarch Residences in late 2021 and it’s been one of the most strongly received residential projects in our 45-year history,” Mr O’Rorke said.

"We are incredibly grateful to the outstanding team who helped bring Monarch Residences to life. A special thank you to Hutchinson Builders and their hardworking labour force for delivering a development of exceptional quality that our residents will be proud to call home for many years to come.

“Brisbane City Council and Titles Queensland also played a huge role in getting residents into their homes early through the pilot programs they ran to speed up the approval processes. They understand the challenges of the housing industry and are doing something about it.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113455 project_image_fid=211466]

Consolidated Properties Group Head of Residential, James MacGinley said Monarch Residences showed what could be achieved when private industry and government worked together to deliver new housing for Brisbane.

“Monarch Residences has delivered more than 200 new apartments in Brisbane’s inner-west at a time when additional housing supply is critically important,” MacGinley said.

“It’s fantastic to see residents now moving into this landmark riverfront development, which reflects the strength of collaboration between Council and the project team throughout delivery.

“All government agencies played a significant hand in achieving a fast-tracked outcome for Monarch Residences with Brisbane City Council, Urban Utilities, Energex and Titles Queensland assisted to remove hurdles to achieve settlements.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113455 project_image_fid=302326]

With Monarch Residences now complete, CPG has launched River Living, a bespoke on-site property management service designed to enhance the resident experience. The service will support all future CPG residential projects, including the recently announced <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/gloriette-30-bedivere-street-yeerongpilly-qld-4105">Gloriette</a> in Yeerongpilly and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/castile-47-skyring-terrace-newstead-qld-4006">Castile</a> in Newstead.

The completion also marks the opening of a prized leasing opportunity at the heritage-listed Middenbury House, built in 1865 and which has been carefully restored and integrated into the broader masterplan.&nbsp;

CPG said the adaptive reuse of the landmark riverfront residence presents an opportunity to introduce a complementary boutique tenancy that respects the site’s historic significance while activating the riverfront frontage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113455 project_image_fid=211495]

Colliers Director of Residential Andrew Scriven said the move-in phase highlights continued demand for completed premium riverfront apartments in Brisbane.

“Residents are now experiencing firsthand the scale, craftsmanship and irreplaceable riverfront position that Monarch offers,” Scriven said.

“Opportunities to secure a brand-new, completed residence on Brisbane’s absolute riverfront are exceptionally rare. Combined with the proven track record of Consolidated Properties Group and Hutchinson Builders, combined with a design vision brought to life by some of Australia’s leading architects and designers, Monarch represents a unique opportunity to purchase a home of enduring quality and prestige.”

Monarch Residences was designed in collaboration with Melbourne-based architect Wardle Studio, alongside leading national practice Cottee Parker, with construction delivered by Hutchinson Builders.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113455]

Consolidated Properties Group sells out Monarch Residences as Brisbane riverfront demand surges

An entity directed by HSN's Rafi Assouline and Rebel Property's Allen Linz has filed plans for an impressive new precinct in Woolloomooloo.

The major mixed-use development would transform a prominent William Street site into a new residential village anchored by affordable housing and a large public park.

The proposal, submitted as a State Significant Development Application, covers 164-172 and 174-194 William Street, a 6,398 sqm site between Forbes Street and Dowling Street on the southern edge of Woolloomooloo.

Designed by fjcstudio in collaboration with Bangawarra, Studio Bright and Tribe Studio Architects, the scheme would deliver 227 apartments across four residential buildings ranging in height up to 18 storeys, alongside retail space, public domain improvements and a new publicly accessible park.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0eb59b7c-914a-4a5c-b849-3a56749f5e93" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.18.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=mxM6EEqeoLjrCiTlCzTKTvzpKuh6kSkH" />

It's another design scheme for Rebel, who took <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-rebel-property-group-takes-woolloomooloo-precinct-to-nsw-government">concept plans to the NSW Gov late last year</a>.

The latest plans will be a mix of 167 build-to-sell apartments and 60 affordable apartments, with the affordable housing component representing 15 per cent of the project's gross floor area. The apartment mix includes 12 one-bedroom, 53 two-bedroom, 89 three-bedroom apartments and 13 penthouses, while the affordable housing component would comprise 42 one-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom apartments.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3b3d4553-8a8c-4af5-aa8c-519ffb1e28c6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.12%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=_Yb6ibN7eDnOtQjCNDK2eviORa4qzgv." />

Rebel Property is seeking to take advantage of the NSW Government's infill affordable housing bonus provisions under the Housing SEPP, which provide additional floor space and height in exchange for the delivery of affordable housing for a minimum of 15 years. The planning pathway allows a 30 per cent increase in floor space ratio and building height where 15 per cent of the development is dedicated to affordable housing.

&nbsp;

At the centre of the development is a 1,356 sqm sunlit public park designed to become a new community gathering space at the gateway to Woolloomooloo. The park would be complemented by a network of pedestrian laneways connecting William Street with the surrounding streets, improving permeability through what is currently a largely impermeable block.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="257af931-a393-4007-8c6d-7219796df58d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=KAHy94GrhaReFsWTGDKfy39EDJ8gEEv4" />

The design team says the public domain has been heavily influenced by the site's topography and Aboriginal cultural heritage, drawing on the escarpments, gullies and landscape characteristics that historically defined the area before urbanisation. The landscape design has been developed in partnership with First Nations consultancy Bangawarra.

The project would be delivered across four separate buildings. The William Street East and William Street West buildings, designed by fjcstudio, would contain the majority of the apartments. Melbourne-based Studio Bright has designed the Forbes Street building, while Tribe Studio Architects is responsible for the Dowling Street building.

Rebel had secured approval for the concept plans late last year.

First look: HSN, Rebel, advances Woolloomooloo precinct plans

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

Are mortgage holders set to get a reprieve from the RBA in 2026?

Big Four bank NAB believes so. They are now expecting the next move from the RBA to be a cut, rather than a hike, which they had pencilled in for August. They are unsure of the timing of the cut however, they note in their latest&nbsp;NAB Economics RBA Watch.

NAB Chief Economist, Dr Sally Auld, said recent data suggests the economy has lost momentum and the outlook for rates has shifted, noting that the broader economic backdrop has changed since earlier in the year.

“The next move in the cash rate is likely to be down, but the timing is uncertain," Dr Auld said.

"In February, growth was above trend, the economy was operating above capacity and there was uncertainty over the restrictiveness of rates. None of these conditions exist today,” she outlined.

Dr Auld said recent data pointed to softer momentum across the economy while acknowledging that at the same time, uncertainty remains a key feature of the outlook.

“Both Q1 GDP data and the NAB business survey suggest momentum in the economy has slowed, meaning that growth has likely peaked for the cycle. That said, we are cognisant there is still considerable uncertainty around the outlook, both with respect to activity and inflation.”

Dr Auld said inflation risks and labour market outcomes would be important to watch.

“On the prices side, we are still forecasting above target core inflation through to mid-2027. Margins will compress and weaker labour market outcomes are a risk.”

She said tighter financial conditions are expected to weigh on housing and activity.

“Tighter financial conditions will be reflected in a slowing in house price growth and housing credit growth. In summary, we have greater conviction that the next move in rates is down, but less conviction on the timing.”

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

<html><body>
The First Home Saver Account scheme was one of the Rudd government initiatives axed in the Abbott government’s first federal budget.
Under the scheme, First Home Saver Accounts were given concessional tax rates and government co-contributions. Despite offering a concessional tax rate of 15% on interest earned in the accounts and awarding 17% co-contributions on the first $6,000 deposited by savers each year, the scheme failed to attract many savers preparing to purchase their first home.
The scheme’s low take up has been attributed to poor marketing and the regulations attached to the accounts. In order to qualify for the benefits, savers needed to deposit a minimum of $1,000 a year over four years before they could withdraw any money in the account. If the money was not used for a payment on a saver’s first home, it was added to their superannuation account.
Any new accounts created after 13 May will be ineligible for tax concessions or co-contributions. Existing accounts will not receive any co-contributions after 1 July 2014. National tax director of professional services firm BDO Lance Cunningham says that the government has begun winding down the scheme.
“It’s basically been abolished but with a phase out, so that from budget night you won’t be able to open any more new accounts. But for existing accounts, the co-contribution will cease from 1 July 2014.”
Savers who hold existing accounts will be able to receive co-contributions for deposits made in the 2013-14 financial year up until July.
“Be careful, it’s only a budget announcement,” says Cunningham. “But it seems to be fairly clear that if you make contributions before July this year, the co-contributions will be honoured.
“If you haven’t reached the co-contribution cap, which I think is about $6000, you might consider depositing more money in the next month to receive your co-contribution.”
Although co-contributions will end on July 1 this year, tax concessions will continue for another year.
“The tax concessions will still be available up until July 2015,” says Cunningham. “They will still be treated as First Home Saver Accounts, but the concession ceases after that date. After July 2015, they will be treated as any other account.”
Savers who have held their existing accounts for less than the four year period will have to wait until 1 July 2015 to withdraw their savings.
Steven Gunzburg is a 26 year old account manager who holds a First Home Saver Account. He says that though he understands why the scheme is being scrapped, it provided good incentives to save.
"I was contributing the maximum amount, which increased over the past 3 or 4 years, every year." 
"Mainly it was a fantastic way to incentivise people to think about saving from a much earlier age. There’s no way in the world that it’s going to make the vast majority of my deposit, but it helps you get into the right mindset."
Gunzburg opened his account when he was 18 or 19, after his mother explained the benefits of the scheme.
"My mum actually found out about it, explained it to us and I begrudgingly put quite a reasonable amount of my money into the account," he says. But Gunzburg says that the scheme had its downsides.
"Part of the problem with the scheme was that it was so complex and convoluted, it was incredibly hard to understand when and how you could access your money."
When the scheme was announced in 2008, the Rudd government predicted that 750,000 First Home Saver Accounts would be opened over the next four years. However, as of December last year, only 46,000 accounts had opened.
Late last year, <a href="/expert-insights/calls-for-urgent-revision-of-first-home-saver-account-scheme">comparison website RateCity called for changes to the scheme</a>. Chief executive Alex Parsons said that at the time, none of the “big four” banks offered the accounts.
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

First Home Saver Accounts scrapped: What now?

<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
But laws around negative gearing and super are unlikely to change so it’s time to revisit the issue.
I believe the answer lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
 A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
<blockquote>
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite.
</blockquote>
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first homebuyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
This article was first published on Property Observer in October, 2013.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ:
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts">Exclusive: First home buyer picks from the experts</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers">How will rising student debt affect first home buyers?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants">The national guide to first home buyer grants</a>
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

It's time to re-think first home buyer grants

<html><body>
If you had seven hundred and eighty two odd thousand dollars, or the median price of Sydney to spend, how would you spend it?
I was reading an article recently about finding a suitable property in Sydney and paying just the median price, which was around $782,000 at the time.
The story continued as property experts put forward their ideas. One suggested a small house in outlying Sydney suburbs like Rockdale, but most properties in this price range would be on busy roads and that would be the compromise.
Another expert recommended inner ring apartments over old terraces or townhouses that would need substantial renovations. He said you could pick up a one bedder for $600,000 to $700,000, or a two bedder for $775,000 to $900,000, with expected yields around 4.5%.
Reading about this expensive Sydney property mentioned in the story got me thinking about what you could buy for the same price if you drove two hours north of Sydney to the Lower Hunter Region of NSW. Depending on which city you chose, your $782,000 would stretch to an impressive acreage or farm. 
In the city of Cessnock you could buy three houses, each for $260,000 (around this city’s median price). They would be on large 800 square metre blocks with 3 bedrooms and each rent for around $300 per week delivering a 6% or more gross yield. Or you could buy two larger, newer homes or a really beautiful house within a golf resort and even a commercial property.
In the city of Maitland you could buy a luxury restored heritage home built at the turn of the century with manicured gardens, a 6 bedroom homestead on acreage, or two substantial, almost new houses in new land estates each on 750 square metres of land.
Or you could develop land and build a dual occupancy – for around $782,000, your budget would cover building two four bedroom homes on a larger corner block with a Torrens Title subdivision.
The big difference between buying multiple or larger properties with your budget compared to building two dwellings yourself would be the equity creation and depreciation benefits. You see if you used your $782,000 to add value, you would create about $120,000 in equity within a year and get around $25,000 in depreciation in year one (using the diminishing method).
I know what I’d chose if I had a lazy $782,000 to spend particularly if I was an investor...hmm a two bedroom unit in Sydney or a four bedroom dual occupancy project in the fast growing city of Maitland? 
Oh, and another very important thing to note. The Hunter was a big winner in the New South Wales budget. This week it was announced that the <a href="https://www.hunterinfrastructure.nsw.gov.au/" target="_blank">Hunter Region gets $100 million to top up the Hunter Infrastructure Fund</a>.
Plus more than $300 million had already been announced for Hunter projects ahead of the budget including $280 million for the last link of the Newcastle inner-city bypass, $20 million to rebuild the Hunter Sports High School, $6 million allocated towards the Glendale interchange and $3 million for the planning of a new Maitland Hospital, among many others.
Infrastructure spend is one of the key indicators that an area is earmarked for growth.
<a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/">www.propertybloom.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

What would you buy with Sydney's median price?

<html><body>
When it comes to purchasing a property, it’s easy to forget that there’s a vendor on the other end of the struggle who, ultimately, will determine the outcome to your offer. Their motivations, requirements and attachment to the home in question can all be crucial in getting the deal over the line.
Usually, the real estate agent will play the part of ‘go between’ for yourself and the vendor, leaving very little, if any, opportunity to meet and discuss in person. While this can do wonders for keeping emotions out of the transaction, it can also leave you completely unsure of who you are dealing with and what you can do to push the deal over the line.
There are a number of ways to determine what you can about the vendor.
Questioning the agent correctly
Upon your initial conversation with the real estate agent, you want to take things fairly easy. Remember that the selling agent is the vendor’s agent and is there to act in their best interest. For this reason, you do not want to be asking them to reveal personal information, or details that may limit the potential success for the vendor.
One way to structure your questions is to do so in terms of offers. You could say to them something like the following: “I’m interested in making an offer. Are there any favourable terms and conditions I could include that might make my offer more acceptable? Such as a longer or shorter settlement?”
You haven’t put your cards on the table in terms of a dollar figure, but you’ve alerted the real estate agent that you’re a serious contender for this property and you’ve put the ball into their court.
Don’t be scared to further question why they want those terms, for instance “Excellent, yes, I can certainly put that in. Do they already have their next home lined up?”
If this isn’t particularly revealing, you can ask questions framed in terms of the property itself. You may say “This is a beautiful home, why are they moving away from it?!”
These non-threatening exchanges may provide you a few snippets to get started with.
Checking the property’s history
Heading on to the past records, such as RP Data, can show you a number of important pieces of information. This could include:
<ul>
<li>How long the property has been on the market for</li>
<li>Whether the vendor has changed agents previously</li>
<li>If it is/has been rented or advertised as a rental</li>
<li>Whether the price has been decreased over the sales campaign (also known as ‘vendor discounting’)</li>
</ul>
You can use the area’s averages to get an understanding for how it looks on a comparative basis. You may even find the vendor’s name and a few details within these records, otherwise a land title can reveal the information necessary.
With the vendor’s name, particularly for prestige properties, a quick Google may result in the reason for the move. High quality homes, with high price tags to match, can often be owned by the movers and shakers. Press releases and ‘about us’ staff pages may reveal whether they are moving for a new job offer, or perhaps heading overseas. You’d be surprised what information the internet holds about people – and their properties. Googling the street address can also be just as revealing.
You might just find that Property Observer has written about the home in the past. Here are <a href="/news/watch-your-tracks-the-digital-footprints-your-property-leaves-beind-peter-omalley">some of the digital footprints that properties might just leave behind</a>.
At the open home
Open homes can be good for multiple reasons. While it gives you an opportunity to have a thorough look around the property, you can also get an understanding of the people who lived here last. Children’s rooms, family pictures and new baby paraphernalia may suggest you’re dealing with an upsizer. Meanwhile, older and black and white photographs may indicate otherwise. Other clues can also be in what is displayed – are there certificates and trophies?
You may find that the entire house has already been cleaned out. If it’s the primary place of residence for the previous owners then this may suggest that they have already purchased their next home and that they are looking for a quick sale.
How well presented the home is, and whether it has been professionally staged or not, can also attest to how savvy the vendor is about property.
You may also find that the neighbours are poking around the open home as well, which may give you an opportunity to field some questions about the home and its occupiers as possible.
Speak to the agent again
Head back to the agent with this information. If it has been listed for a long time, you might want to ask questions like the following:
“Are the vendors actually interested in selling? It has been listed for five months, which is far longer than the area’s average.” If you look as though you might step away from purchasing, the real estate agent is likely to try a little harder.
You may also want to ask about any previous offers and the reasons they were not accepted.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

How to: Find out as much about the vendor as possible

<html><body>
Over $10 million was spent on real estate every day in Boroondara during 2013.
It takes a few months after the end of the calendar year for a vast majority of property transactions to settle and be finalised.
With final numbers for 2013 now available, a comparison with previous years can now be undertaken.
In 2013 there were 81,590 residential sales in Melbourne and 107,845 in Victoria. Looking at the Melbourne market over the medium term this is a comparatively low level of sales. Since the year 2000, nine years have seen a higher level of sales with a peak in 2007 with 105,194 sales.
Thankfully, a combination of more confident consumers and record low interest rates has been the catalyst for the level of sales in 2013 rising above the two preceding years of 77,867, and 73,459 respectively.
It is important to note that the volume of transactions has a direct impact on the health of the Victorian government budget as a significant portion of its income is derived from stamp duty as well as the industries that supply and support the housing sector, real estate, building and ancillary services.
On a more local basis, the highest number of sales took place in the city’s growth areas with the highest levels of the spending taking place in the inner east.
<blockquote>
The highest number of sales took place in Melbourne's growth areas with the highest levels of the spending taking place in the inner east.
</blockquote>
Across the state’s municipalities, the highest number of total transactions took place in Casey where 4,130 sales were recorded equating to around 11 sales every day. Similar numbers were recorded in the Mornington Peninsula with inner city locations, Melbourne and Boroondara following.
The largest volume of sales in financial terms was recorded in Boroondara where $3.97 billion was spent on residential real estate, or just over $10 million every day.
At the other end of the scale, Nillumbik recorded the lowest number of sales, at 946 and the lowest in financial terms at $507 million.
</body></html>

rlarocca-zWhvjay44N

$10 million spent on property every single day in Boroondara

<html><body>
The Australian residential property market has recently been showing signs of improvement.
Investors and changeover buyers are being drawn back to the market following interest rate cuts and the positive outlook for housing.
Unfortunately, first-home buyers are missing out on the favourable environment due to  a number of reasons – stamp duty, the size of deposit required and ability to save for it, unemployment and underemployment concerns.
Recent changes to the first-home owner grant in all states and territories (except for Western Australia and the Northern Territory) have added to the uncertainty and impacted on the activity of first-home buyers in the market.
As part of the inter-governmental agreement (IGA) on the reform of Commonwealth/States financial relations signed in June 1999, all states and territories agreed to provide uniform financial assistance to Australians who are buying their new or established first-home through the introduction of the first-home Owner Grant.
According to the recently released QBE Lenders’ Mortgage Insurance’s (QBE LMI) 2013 Mortgage Barometer Report, 84% of first-home buyers believe property prices are close to reaching or are above what they can afford and 69% worry they will neverbe able to afford their own home (compared to 24% of all respondents).
Unfortunately, governments of most states and territories have made it much harder for first-home buyers to see their dreams realised. Table 1 (below) shows recent changes to the first-home owner grant.
<img alt="hawthornejuly25table1" height="328" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/07/hawthornejuly25table1.jpg" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
As a result of the new policies, the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ figures for March 2013 show that first-home buyers are becoming an endangered species. 
Figure 1 (below) shows that in Australia, only14.2% of owner-occupier housing finance commitments in March were from first-home buyers – the lowest level seen since May 2004.
<img alt="hawthornechart2" height="226" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/07/hawthornechart2.jpg">
Housing finance figures for April show that in New South Wales and Queensland (both below), where the grant ended in Octobe rlast year, first-home buyers made uponly 7.3% and 10.3% of the owner occupier market respectively with both states significantly decreasing their share in the total number of first-home buyers in Australia.
<img alt="hawthornechart3" height="212" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/07/hawthornechart3.jpg">
<img alt="hawthornechart4" height="203" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/07/hawthornechart4.jpg">
Two out of three first-home buyers in NSW and Queensland surveyed by the QBE LMI’s indicated the new policies made an impact on their purchase intentions.
With new arrangements aiming to stimulate building activity, it is too early to expect substantial positive results on the industry. REIA has been lobbying hard against the breach o fthe IGA, however we are still to hear what the Commonwealth will do.
Evgeniya Hawthorne is Research Officer for the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.reia.com.au/">Real Estate Institute of Australia</a>.
 
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

First-home buyers left out as residential market improves: Evgeniya Hawthorne

<html><body>
Western Australia has followed the example of the other states by incentivising first-home buyers if they choose to buy a new home over an established home.
In the state budget released yesterday, treasurer Troy Buswell announced that from September 15 FHBs that purchase new homes will be eligible for a $10,000 first-home owner grant while those who purchase an existing home will only get $3,000.
This means that first-home buyers wanting to purchase an existing home have just over a month to access the existing $7,000 grant.
At the same time, those FHBs considering buying a new home may delay their purchase until after September 15 to take advantage of the bigger incentive.
NSW, Queensland and South Australia offer a $15,000 grant for FHBs building or buying a new home and Victoria offers $10,000 for those who buy or build a new home.
From September 1 first-home buyers in the ACT will receive $12,500 if they buy or build a new home or buy one that has been substantially renovated.
From July 1 2014 Tasmania will offer the $7,000 first-home owners grant for new home purchases only.
The Northern Territory offers a first-home owner grant for both new and established homes providing $12 000 if the home is an established home in the urban area or $25,000 everywhere else. 
Also as part of WA’s Housing Supply Package - designed to increase the supply of housing in a state, which has the fastest growing population - the state government intends to expand the number of affordable rental properties by committing an additional $47.8million for an extra 1,000 homes under the National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS).
It will also aim to streamline residential planning and building approvals processes to ensure the supply of new housing is not held up in red tape.
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

WA bumps up first-home owner grant to $10,000 for new homes

<html><body>
What will it take for the real estate industry to be satisfied? 
   It’s doubtful there’s been a time in the past 10 years when the industry has had it this good.   Interest rates at historic lows, sales volumes rising, housing finance increasing month by month, building approvals trending strongly upwards, grants and stamp duty concessions to people building new homes, affordability the best it’s been since 2003 and confidence rising – it’s an almost perfect set of parameters for service providers to make money.   But the industry is still complaining. I say that with a sense of disbelief that a sector with so much in its favour still thinks it has legitimate complaints.   The welfare mentality in the industry borders on the pathetic.   I didn’t think anyone could challenge the Housing Industry Association as the greatest malcontents in real estate, but the Real Estate Institute of Australia is giving it a good try.   Interest rates are the best they’ve ever been but the REIA is demanding more cuts from the Reserve Bank.   There are a couple of issues I have with that. One is that the boffins at the institute clearly think interest rates are the dominant influence on property markets. All the available research contradicts that notion. Rates are a factor, but only one of many. There have been many periods in the past 50 years when markets have thrived in a high rates environment and others where low rates have failed to stimulate activity.   Another issue if that the REIA leadership apparently believes that the key consideration for RBA board members in making interest rates decisions is the wellbeing of the real estate industry. I doubt the RBA gives more than a moment’s thought to hard-luck stories from real estate agents. They have far greater considerations to ponder than the trading of houses and apartments.   But the bottom line is that we’ve never been so well off when it comes to housing finance. Not only is the official rate extremely low, but multiple lenders are competing to provide attracting mortgage products.   Another recent REIA press release complained that first-home buyers need more encouragement. They already have plenty of help and it’s really up to individuals to take action. It’s probably not going to get any better than this.   The real estate industry has shot itself in the foot, the other foot and both hands, with its constant stream of negative comments about affordability and the alleged plight of first-home buyers.   The HIA (which greeted the news that building approvals are up 28% in the past year with yet another negative press statement) has led the way, with Master Builders Australia and the REIA close behind.   The theme of their messages, gleefully regurgitated by the media, is that young people just can’t afford to buy homes. And potential first-home buyers appear to have accepted that as fact, without even giving it a try.   The reality, as demonstrated by ABS, is that housing costs (as a portion of household income) are no higher today than in 1995. And housing affordability now is the best it’s been in 10 years, according to the quarterly report published by the REIA itself.   The main thing holding back first-home buyers is the perception that it’s all beyond their reach. And for that, the industry only has itself to blame.   The ingrates of real estate should stop pleading for handouts and start taking advantage of the best market conditions in 10 years. 

<hr>
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" rel="nofollow">hotspotting.com.au</a> and you can contact Terry via <a href="https://mailto:%20ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email</a> or on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Real estate industry only has itself to blame for holding back first-home buyers: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
Our Friday poll found that the majority of respondents are looking to purchase in the $300,000 to $400,000 bracket, further suggesting that they may be pushing up against first home buyers.
With 26.9% of readers pointing to the $300,000 to $400,000 bracket, and 62.7% looking to purchase under $500,000 in total, it looks like investors will be driving the affordable bracket.
<img alt="poll-results-sept-23" height="320" width="470" src="/images/stories/2013/09/23/poll-results-sept-23.jpg">
With investors pouring into the market, and talks of prices rising substantially in some capitals, it’s no wonder that first time buyers are starting to feel the heat.
Of course, there are two waves of thought here. One goes along the lines of ‘get in now before everything jumps in value and prices you out’, while another perspective is ‘wait until there isn’t any competition in the market’.
Similarly, if you’re sitting on a 5% deposit, then the temptation to hold off of entering can be strong.
In fact, investors have <a href="/news">recently been blamed for first home buyer woes</a>, and SQM Research announced that<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finance/first-home-buyers-priced-out-of-the-market/2013092265179?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=news" target="_blank"> first time buyers are already getting priced out</a> of the market.
All this comes at a time when markets are heating up.
 
{module Should first time buyers be holding off or jumping into the market now?}
 
 
</body></html>

Should first time buyers purchase now?

<html><body>
Housing affordability is at its best in 10 years, but first home buyer activity is low.
The relatively low level of buying by first timers has enabled some to claim that there is a lack of affordability, never mind the official data.
So often in real estate, observers add one and one together and come up with seven. People with a bee in their bonnet about an issue seldom dig any deeper than the surface to find what really lies beneath.
So the industry is resplendent with simplistic analysis in which myths – such as elections cause markets to stall (the pre-election rise of markets around Australia this year suggests otherwise), interest rates dictate market movements (there’s no historic basis for that), we have a housing shortage crisis  (the REIA’s city average vacancy rate of 3% and the lack of rental growth suggests we don’t) and young people can’t afford to buy – become accepted as facts.
Many surveys have been conducted on the activity or otherwise of potential first home buyers. A recent survey by RAMS showed most thought this was a very good time to buy - but most did not intend to buy.
Therein lies the clue as to why first home buyers are not exploiting strong buying conditions. It’s all about attitudes and priorities.
Many younger Australians say they have priorities other than home ownership. They want to travel, own expensive gadgets and have a nice lifestyle in their location of choice, in preference to taking on a mortgage in a less desirable location.
Others do want to own a home but they want their dream home in a premium location as a first purchase. That’s never has been achievable and probably never will be.
First home ownership demands sacrifice and compromise and the new generations are less willing to do that.
Buying a first home has never been easy, but in many ways it’s easier today than before. When I bought my first home, there were no government grants or concessions, you needed a 20% deposit and the only borrowing option was the institution you’d saved with for several years.
That first home was a shack in a downmarket suburb 90 minutes from the CBD. It was all about compromise to get on the lowest rung of the ladder. But ugly real estate grows in value, often faster than luxury property, and two years later I was able to sell the shack for a healthy gain and buy something better, much closer to my inner-city job.
I achieved something approaching my dream home on my sixth purchase.
Those who want the dream home as a first purchase are kidding themselves.
Some newspaper articles are declaring that we have a “generation rent”, people doomed to a lifetime of renting. That’s only true for those unwilling to prioritise home ownership and make the necessary compromises. It seems many young Australians prefer to rent and have the lifestyle they prefer. That’s fine, if that’s their choice, but stop telling us you can’t afford to buy.
For those willing to stop complaining and start acting, there is so much in your favour – a high level of affordability, attractive loan options from competing lenders, a leg up from government and rising markets to create equity in the future.

<hr>
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank" style="font-size: 14px;">hotspotting.com.au</a> and you can contact Terry via <a target="_blank" href="https://mailto:%20ryder@hotspotting.com.au">email</a> or on <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" style="font-size: 14px;">Twitter</a>.
 
</body></html>

Latest Expert Insights

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

Guides

Editor's Picks

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Expert Insights

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

Guides

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News