Article summary

<ul data-end="785" data-start="311">
	<li data-end="459" data-section-id="5hbcyr" data-start="311">Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at Skye Kangaroo Point, headlined by a two-storey sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm.</li>
	<li data-end="561" data-section-id="1p7lq8n" data-start="460">Early buyer interest suggests the residences could set a new Queensland apartment price record.</li>
	<li data-end="667" data-section-id="1y70z0l" data-start="562">The collection includes four move-in ready penthouses and the highly customised Skye One residence.</li>
	<li data-end="785" data-section-id="yvm0y1" data-start="668">The release caps one of Bri​sbane's most ambitious luxury apartment developments overlooking the Brisbane River.</li>
</ul>

<hr data-end="790" data-start="787" />
Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/skye-residences-by-pikos-kangaroo-point-8-river-terrace-kangaroo-point-qld-4169">Skye by Pikos</a> development in Kangaroo Point, with early buyer interest indicating the flagship residences could eclipse every apartment sale previously recorded in Queensland.

The collection crowns the luxury riverfront development with five residences, including four completed penthouses and Skye One, a two-level sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm that will be tailored to its eventual owner.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374075]

Wanting to offer a fully customisable home, Pikos is offering Skye One as a blank canvas, allowing the buyer to work alongside the developer's design team to customise the home's layout, finishes and internal spaces.

The residence will feature a 247 sqm private rooftop terrace with its own swimming pool, sauna, steam room, outdoor kitchen and multiple entertaining areas overlooking the Brisbane River and CBD skyline.

The remaining four penthouses have been completed and are ready for immediate occupation, each offering four bedrooms, expansive open-plan living areas, soaring ceilings and private lift access.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374059]

One of the defining features throughout the project is its use of Roman Classic Travertine, with more than 20,000 sqm of the natural stone imported from Italy after being personally selected by Pikos Group Founder and Executive Director Pedro Pikos, interior designer Julie Williamson and third-generation stone specialist Mario Caucci.

Pikos said the penthouse collection represented the culmination of the company's long-term vision for Skye.

"True legacy isn't measured by what we build today, but by what endures tomorrow," Pikos said.

"Our ambition is to create places that become more valuable with time, enrich the lives of generations, and stand as timeless landmarks long after we've stepped away."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374060]

Williamson said the interiors were inspired by the natural character of Kangaroo Point and the Brisbane River rather than international design trends.

"Materiality tells the story of a place," Williamson said.

"We looked to the movement of the Brisbane River, the texture of the cliff face and the warmth of the surrounding landscape to create interiors that feel understated, enduring and unmistakably Brisbane."

Positioned above the Kangaroo Point cliffs, Skye places residents within walking distance of Howard Smith Wharves, South Bank and James Street while offering uninterrupted river and city views.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=90059]

Joel Robinson

Brisbane's next apartment price record? Pikos unveils Skye's exclusive penthouse collection

Article summary

<ul data-end="888" data-start="289">
	<li data-end="442" data-section-id="8tsh6o" data-start="289">DVB Projects is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway at 137 Old Burleigh Road, Broadbeach.</li>
	<li data-end="573" data-section-id="1nyxl3e" data-start="443">The 34-level tower will comprise just 49 ultra-luxury residences, including half-floor, full-floor and penthouse apartments.</li>
	<li data-end="717" data-section-id="oiyimj" data-start="574">The launch follows strong demand at DVB's nearby Sea Glass project, which is more than 50 per cent sold and currently under construction.</li>
	<li data-end="888" data-section-id="epk9o9" data-start="718">The development adds to the transformation of Old Burleigh Road, with premium beachfront apartment projects continuing to reshape the tightly held Broadbeach strip.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/dvb-projects">DVB Projects</a> is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway on the Broadbeach site as the Sydney developer moves closer to bringing the ultra-luxury project to market.

The 34-level tower at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/137-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">137 Old Burleigh Road</a> will comprise just 49 residences, ranging from half-floor apartments through to full-floor homes and a penthouse. The launch follows the strong sales performance of DVB's nearby Sea Glass development. More than half of the apartments at Sea Glass, on the other side of Broadbeach, have been snapped up, well ahead of its late 2027 completion

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2944b4be-c84e-4b54-8dc1-c712e76704c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E02_Exterior_Street%20Level%20Entrance.jpg?VersionId=YoNig7pRdrE3HCue7sUj78LzJteeQf3H" />

The start of demolition at 137 Old Burleigh Road signals DVB Projects’ underlying confidence in the Gold Coast’s luxury beachside apartment sector.

“We see the Gold Coast as one of the most compelling lifestyle markets in Australia, particularly at the premium end where demand continues to deepen,” said Dean Brown, Managing Director of DVB.&nbsp;

“This project has been carefully designed to respond to that demand - delivering large-format residences with a level of quality, privacy and amenity that is still relatively rare in the apartment market on the beachside."

Brown says the site itself is "exceptional."

"Old Burleigh Road is one of the most tightly held beachfront strips, and opportunities to deliver a project of this scale and calibre in this location are extremely limited.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="398f377a-c037-455e-9250-0c5e0d84c35b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/I12_FF%20Balcony.jpg?VersionId=NwOiRWGMubR1c8wthuEfggklcja7al9." />

The project will comprise 40 half-floor residences of approximately 260 sqm, alongside eight full-floor residences spanning around 524 sqm.

A single penthouse will crown the building, featuring a private pool, barbecue area, indoor gym and dedicated entertaining spaces.

Residents will have access to a resort-style suite of amenities, including a 20-metre pool with daybeds, a gymnasium, hot and cold plunge pools, a sauna, and private residents’ lounge and dining facilities.

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1642bb0-9a66-4427-a022-dfc0988c6287" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/A02_Pool%20to%20View.jpg?VersionId=c0IXPyn_Gp_Kn3XCwzMrqIVkAdCEwVXP" />

Sales agent Todd Matheson, of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/pezet-matheson">Pezet Matheson</a>, which is marketing both 137 Old Burleigh Road and Sea Glass, said 137 Old Burleigh Road would address a clear gap in the market for genuine luxury products.

“There are very few opportunities on the Gold Coast where buyers can secure a residence of this size and quality in a new building,” Matheson said.

“What we’re seeing is a growing cohort of downsizers and interstate buyers who still want space - they’re not willing to compromise on living area, entertaining or finishes.

“This project has been designed with that buyer in mind. It offers the scale of a home, combined with the convenience and security of apartment living, in one of the coast’s most desirable positions.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="59aae0ca-5639-4320-8aca-d0bf60f48e43" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E01_Exterior%20Hero.jpg?VersionId=DS8Zfy2WtgUEtdfe0TEUuf1W1GfcZq8S" />

Located on a 1,156 sqm site one block from the beachfront, the development will replace an ageing walk-up building and is expected to contribute to the ongoing transformation of the Old Burleigh Road strip into one of the Gold Coast’s most prestigious residential corridors.

With the development moving into the delivery phase, 137 Old Burleigh Road is slated to hit the market later this year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145141]

DVB Projects to launch second Broadbeach apartment tower as demolition commences

A proposal to redevelop one of North Sydney's ageing commercial buildings has taken another step forward, with plans for a 38-storey mixed-use tower adding momentum to the long-awaited transformation of the Alfred Street precinct.

Now on public exhibition through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority-led State Significant Development pathway, the proposal for 271-273 Alfred Street would replace an underutilised commercial building with 95 apartments, ground-floor retail, commercial space and affordable housing. The proposal was submitted by&nbsp;Tara Shore Pty Ltd, acting for the John Taylor Family Trust.

While the project will deliver much-needed housing on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, it also represents another piece of a broader precinct that has spent years in planning limbo.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7e1ce1b4-38df-48ab-992f-386814d86308" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20podium.png?VersionId=sC_h6w.A9VEoB98qsqowPlIoz__sBZBt" />

Despite its proximity to both North Sydney Station and the Victoria Cross Metro, redevelopment of Alfred Street has progressed slowly over the past decade as broader planning controls, zoning and building heights remained unresolved. The introduction of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway has provided a new avenue for projects to progress, allowing rezoning and development assessment to occur concurrently and unlocking sites that have long been earmarked for renewal.

Designed by Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder, the proposal seeks to do more than replace an ageing office building. The architects have positioned the project as the first stage of a wider public domain vision that would improve pedestrian connectivity and create a more cohesive mixed-use precinct as neighbouring sites are redeveloped over time.

The proposal includes a widened Alfred Street setback, new street trees, landscaping and outdoor seating, along with a landscaped through-site pedestrian link connecting Alfred Street with Little Alfred Street. The connection is intended to become the first section of a future east-west pedestrian network extending across the precinct.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8ea39ac3-46ad-4562-b4a0-b862e91c2dda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20site.png?VersionId=K7umCd21KpetEFuVfsPlnJKhUOsmTTdV" />

The mixed-use tower would comprise retail space at ground level, commercial uses on level two and apartments from level three upwards.

In total, the development would deliver 95 apartments, including nine one-bedroom, 28 two-bedroom, 56 three-bedroom and two four-bedroom residences. Twenty-one apartments, representing 15 per cent of the residential gross floor area, would be secured as affordable housing and managed by a registered community housing provider for at least 15 years.

Nine basement levels would provide 133 resident car spaces, seven motorcycle spaces and 111 bicycle spaces.

According to the Architecture and Urban Design Report, the public domain strategy is designed to transform what is currently an inward-facing commercial edge into a more active and connected pedestrian environment, creating a stronger relationship between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighbourhoods.

Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder has also prepared a broader public domain framework spanning neighbouring properties between 263 and 283 Alfred Street, arguing that a coordinated approach to redevelopment will deliver better public spaces, improved tower separation and a more connected streetscape as the precinct evolves.

The proposal comes at a time where North Sydney is slated for future residential growth. Commercial developer FiveX has residential plans for the neighbouring site at 275 Alfred Street. They've proposed a 39-storey mixed-use tower with 184 apartments, while Freecity was recently approved for nearly 300 apartments across a 51-storey building on Walker Street.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-freecity-gets-green-light-for-mixed-use-apartment-and-hotel-tower-in-north-sydney">First look: Freecity gets green light for mixed-use apartment and hotel tower in North Sydney</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-fivex-plans-39-storey-residential-tower-in-booming-north-sydney">First look: Fivex plans 39-storey residential tower in booming North Sydney</a>

&nbsp;

Alfred Street the latest North Sydney pocket to be transformed by residential development

Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
With interest rates at or near-record lows and the recent release of the 2015 Australian government Intergenerational Report, people nearing retirement may well be evaluating their retirement investment decisions.
Retirees who invest in increasingly conservative assets, such as reallocating their capital from equities to bonds and/or cash, are under threat. If current low bond yields and cash rates persist, which looks likely, the lifecycle method of investing, with all its benefits, will fall short in meeting retirees’ income needs.
Lifecycle investing is the conventional idea of allocating capital into risky assets (equities) during your working life and then de-risking your super savings into more conservative assets (bonds and/or term deposits) as you approach retirement.
A glidepath is the relationship between a fund’s asset allocation and an individual’s age. While equity investment do not typically fall to zero at retirement for lifecycle strategies, many advisors justify the concept of a declining equity glidepath on the basis that retiree’s horizon decreases with increasing age.
Put simply, the young investor is assumed to be able to accept more risk than the older investor. Hence the young investor should invest a large proportion of their savings in equities at the onset and gradually reduce the allocation to equities over time.
Although recent studies suggest otherwise, financial planners are resolute in reducing their clients’ asset allocation in equities when their clients approach retirement. Why? Because it seems right! Conventional thinking suggests that retirees with a moderate nest egg will look to protect their savings in retirement and deploy their lifetime savings in low risk investments.
A big challenge to the lifecycle strategy in an era of low interest rates is accumulating enough lifetime savings to fund your longevity risk. This is the risk of individuals living for an unusually long time and thereby outliving their retirement incomes.
In Australia, many funds use the Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) framework as a default investment strategy. This strategy is representative of the optimal combination of different asset classes. These assets are periodically rebalanced to the target allocations as investment returns skew the original asset allocation proportions.
With the masses of Australians paying their Superannuation Guarantee (SG) into their fund’s default strategies, the Australian government introduced a cost-effective product called <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/Super/Publications/Documents/20141002_MySuper_selected_feature_overview.pdf">MySuper</a>.
There are currently 116 MySuper products, 88 of which have a single investment strategy with the remaining having a lifecycle investment strategy. The static strategy has up to 49% of assets invested in equities while the lifecycle strategy holds approximately 31% of wealth in growth assets (equities) at retirement age 65 and the remainder in conservative assets.
<a href="https://aatheory.blogspot.com.au/2007/12/dynamic-allocation-strategies-for">Research</a> has shown that the SAA outperforms portfolios with decreasing asset allocations in equities. More importantly, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2324930">recent studies</a> find evidence to support an increasing (that’s correct, increasing) asset allocation to equity investments in retirement which challenges the conventional thinking in the financial planning profession.
The increasing equity glidepath has the potential to reduce both the probability of failure and the magnitude of failure for investment portfolios. The idea of an increasing equity glidepath in retirement may present some concerns for retirees from a risk tolerance perspective, and therefore require a very meticulous approach.
<a href="https://www.mercer.com.au/content/mercer/asia-pacific/au/en/newsroom/white-collar-workers-killing-average-life-expectancies">Life expectancy</a> among Australians is among the highest in the world today. Retirees have elongated life expectancies of up to 86 and 90 for males and females, respectively. There is a 15% chance that one person of a retired couple will live past the age of 95.
Some 20% of white collar male and females are now expected to live to age 94 and 96, respectively. And 5% of the male white collar cohort will live to age 99, with the females living beyond 100. These statistics suggest that if you’re planning to retire at 65, you potentially face a very long retirement period which you will need to fund. The current world of low interest rates means retirees investing in safe assets risk facing financial ruin over long retirement horizons.
These low interest rates in today’s financial markets may be the “nudge” financial advisors need to address the issues of longevity risk. One proven method is to consider these new equity-focused investment strategies that exhibit a higher probability of investment success. Although the past is not necessarily indicative of the future, it is illustrative for risk purposes.
Strategies that follow the concept of de-risking with increasing age under-performs <a href="https://www.researchaffiliates.com/Our%20Ideas/Insights/Fundamentals/Pages/F_2012_Sep_The_Glidepath_Illusion.aspx">contrarian strategies given 141 years of historical data</a>. When we lower our expectations and live in the present, with low yields and market uncertainties, the outcomes do not change. Equity-centric strategies perceived to be riskier provides more certainty with retirement outcomes.
The eminent economist John Maynard Keynes famously said, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” From a retiree perspective, when bond/cash yields change, let our investment and retirement advice change along with it.
Osei K. Wiafe is research fellow, Griffith Centre for Personal Finance and Superannuation (GCPFS) at Griffith University.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Low interest rates set to stay, so what’s the best investment course for retirees? Osei K. Wiafe

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
My most read and commented on blog was <a href="/news/i-d-rather-stick-a-fork-in-my-eye-than-buy-nras-todd-hunter">my thoughts on the NRAS “scheme</a>”.
Well, I can say I was right and the story of this “scheme” only gets worse I’m afraid.
Earlier this year I had a client call me and let me know her NRAS property in Sydney that she purchased through another property company had been trashed. She only found this out after not receiving rent for two months. This sparked her to inspect the house to find they had fled the house and left it damaged along with rubbish everywhere.
When she investigated it further, she found that four bedroom house had eight people living in the house. The lease agreement was only approved as having four people living there. The consortium managing the property had not done any of the required property inspections, like they had said they would do.
And funny enough, they now don’t return her phone calls.
So after spending several thousands of dollars in repairing and cleaning the house, they thought they may want to sell it. The bad experience had put a foul taste in their mouth. I offered to refer her to a friend who is an agent, who works in the area and they have done an inspection. Now the fun begins…
The agent gave them what they believed to be fair market value price in a strong Sydney market and this dollar figure was still $80,000 less than what they paid for the house.
So, now they have a house that has been trashed, now vacant and worth far less than what they paid for it.
Could it get any worse?
Yes it can.
Now I don’t know the reasons why, but it would appear that the government department responsible for NRAS has amalgamated with another government department and as a consequence many (and quite probably all) of the tax refunds for NRAS were not paid for the last financial year, due to a software glitch that they couldn’t repair.
These payments amount to close to $10,000 per annum that the investor is supposed to receive back in compensation for letting out their property 20% below market value.
To make it even better, they have no ETA on when the problem will be fixed, if at all.
This was money these investors could have really done with to help pay for the trashed and damaged property they have been left with.
So I am sorry, but have I missed the positives of NRAS?
TODD HUNTER is a buyer’s agent, director and location researcher for Sydney-based <a href="https://www.wheregroup.com.au/" target="_blank">wHeregroup</a>.
He reached a personal investment portfolio of 50 properties in 2006 and has also started building an SMSF portfolio.
This article was originally posted on <a href="https://www.wheregroup.com.au/blog/todd-hunter/" target="_blank">Todd's blog</a>.
</body></html>

thunter-umjjMzoT8b

NRAS – you've got to be kidding me: Todd Hunter

<html><body>
The No Land Tax Party candidate Peter Jones is ahead of the Liberal Party in the race for the final of 21 seats up for grabs in the NSW Legislative Council.
The Daily Telegraph report the Coalition on track to win nine, Labor seven, the Greens two and the Shooters and Fishers and Christian Democrats one each.
The final results should be declared on Friday with the veteran ABC election analyst Antony Green saying he was “confident” No Land Tax will take the 21st seat.
If No Land Tax does win a seat for the next eight years, it would leave the ­Coalition with 20 of 42 upper house seats. 
The party secured the prime Group A spot on the long Legislative Council ballot.
It secured about 80,000 upper house votes with 70% of the vote counted, representing about 2% of the overall vote. 
The party, which went close to imploding in the days before the 28 March election, owes money to a large number of the 3,600 people who worked by handing out how to vote cards on election day. 
The promised wage delivery had been revised, yet again, to be undertake this week.
"I profoundly apologise," party candidate Peter Jones told 2GB's Ben Fordham.
The No Land Tax Party was initially throught to be in battle with the Animal Justice Party for the 21st spot, with the election result feared set to be challenged.
Due to human error, the Animal Justice Party was left off about 19,000 iVote ballots in the early pre-poll voting.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

No Land Tax looms as NSW Upper House policy gadfly

<html><body>
Most of the debate surrounding so-termed "negative gearing" in Australia circles endlessly debating one point: were the rules regarding deductions to be quarantined again as they were previously in 1985, would rents increase at eye-watering growth rates?
<img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LekpHXdEyV4/VSebrNLNTaI/AAAAAAAAUYc/Fm6u0wlxNzg/s1600/VIc4.jpg">
In other words, are the existing rules an effective rental subsidy that are now pushing rental growth down below the rate of inflation. It's something of a hypothetical debate. Firstly that's because looking historically nobody knows the counter-factual (i.e. would rents have kept rising beyond 1987 had the rulings not been reversed?). And secondly, because to all intents and purposes there were no property investors in the lead up to 1985, so conditions today are completely different. In the year 1985 investor finance accounted for a miserly 13% of total housing finance, compared to a whopping 40% or a stonking <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/housing-finance" target="_blank">$139 billion of domestic investor finance</a> over the past 12 months alone. 
<img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6JnIgcfHRIA/VSeb36SW8dI/AAAAAAAAUY0/oK4u8WnVBU8/s1600/HF3.jpg">
I'm sure that nobody believes for a minute changes to the tax law would force rents higher in Kununurrra or Kurrajong, but research has consistently shown that there is a heavy concentration of investor-owned dwellings in the inner- and middle-ring suburbs of our largest capital cities - remove a portion of the rental stock in these locations and some increases in rents would be certain. Moreover, changes to the tax law would quickly undo the system which has succeeded in kick-starting the <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/building-approvals-smash-record-high" target="_blank">greatest residential building boom</a> in Australia's history, which will soon result in an oversupply of dwellings in at least six of our capital cities, and possibly eight of them. <img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-c7hq4qdu59o/VPUtgH00IUI/AAAAAAAATfQ/HYH30ROsgMA/s640/Approvals3.jpg"> With a nascent boom in residential construction now underway and home starts <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/record-high-for-dwelling-commencements" target="_blank">breaking record highs</a>, the tax law won't be changed because it's creating the supply that's needed, estimated at more than 180,000 dwellings per annum. Budget impacts
The rents argument is a sideshow in any case. It's often also argued that negative gearing rules should be scrapped in order to "save" $4 billion from the budget and $2 billion per annum going forward but this is a flawed notion.
Between 1985 and 1987 the numbers on the New South Wales housing waiting list reportedly increased alarmingly by almost a third from fewer than 110,000 up to nearly 140,000 in only 18 months, a trend which was immediately reversed upon the re-introduction of the previous ruling on interest deductions.
In Britain, approximately 17% of households live in social housing. The problem in Australia is that at a measly 4.5% of total housing stock, public housing "cannot provide a realistic alternative to a private rental market for existing homeowners" - AHURI's 2010 <a href="https://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/projects/p40561" target="_blank">report</a> on the future of public housing explains in detail the many reasons why:
"Through the stimulus package, the Commonwealth put $6 billion on the table to build 20,000 houses. That’s lovely. But the shortfall in social housing is 160,000 dwellings. So either they find another, whatever that is, another $50 billion - no way!".
Other estimates put the shortfall at up to 200,000 dwellings, and without adequate additions the social housing shortfall can only get worse.
<img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GB5kSEgYZoc/VShKLsYGTEI/AAAAAAAAUZY/A_AO-ngvJ84/s1600/AHURI.jpg">
Source: AHURI
As highlighted in AHURI's report, with Commonwealth and state elections held in 3-year cycles, committing large amounts of money for long-term capital housing investment is seen to be risky for politicians. It's just not going to happen. And indeed, there is no intention of addressing underfunding of the sector, with core funding declining in real terms by 26% between 1996 and 2008. Confirmed the AHURI report "there is no way that Commonwealth or state governments are going to kick-in capital funding which is going to enable social and affordable housing to grow at 2% per annum". Australia is projected to have <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/43-million-more-households-by-2036" target="_blank">4.3 million more</a> households in the 25 years to 2036, and (and<a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/aussie-investing-until-2055" target="_blank">millions more</a> by 2055, particularly <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/big-australia-to-give-way-to-huge" target="_blank">if my assumptions on population growth are proved correct</a>) so the total demand for rental accommodation will be beyond huge. 
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ag1ZbNZWc3Q/VSitV8CD1LI/AAAAAAAAUZs/cJOsx22Ue9Y/s1600/AHURI2.jpg">
Source: AHURI
As I will discuss below, the solutions can only come from private individual and offshore investors, with upwards pressure on prices encouraging more construction, which is exactly what is playing out right now. 
Case study: Public housing in Victoria
Having been the subject of an <a href="https://www.audit.vic.gov.au/publications/20120328-Public-Housing/20120328-Public-Housing" target="_blank">audit</a> in 2012, public housing in Victoria is worthwhile case study. In my living purgatory as an auditor I wrote seemingly endless reviews and reports for Central Banks, Treasuries, Ministries of Finance, Government Finance Departments and the like - the reality is that such reports in draft form often promise to be somewhat spicy, but after internal reviews and by the time final reports are issued the recommendations tend to be watered down and uncontroversial. I don't think I've seen many more damning auditor reports than the one issued by the Auditor-General to the Legislative Assembly on the subject of "Access to Public Housing".
The main source of social housing in Victoria is public housing, yet as at the audit date there were fewer than 83,000 social housing dwellings in Victoria, 65,352 of which were public housing, owned and managed by the Department of Human Services (DHS).  Victoria's population, meanwhile is <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/help-commentary-on-demographics-and" target="_blank">rapidly approaching 6 million</a> and counting.
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gcUpwdaGmkk/VRPWXczZb7I/AAAAAAAAT-M/AWfaCu1AmRE/s640/Dem4.jpg">
The chart below shows those 65,253 public housing dwellings by type and location at 30 June 2011.
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mQRMvvwP1RI/VSebrJYBj0I/AAAAAAAAUYU/zR_qakFZrGc/s1600/VIC1.jpg">
Source: Auditor General 
A $17.8 billion property portfolio, housing around 127,000 Victorians, noted the auditor, requires “informed, cohesive and comprehensive asset management”, but condemningly the audit found no such systems in place. Here are four reasons that public housing is not a viable alternative to the provision of rental stock by private investors. 
This article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Reason one - The public housing financial model is unsustainable
The situation for public housing was found by the auditor to be “critical” and public housing’s operating model “unsustainable”.
Funding for the division in 2011–12 was $402 million, with set aside $169 million for social housing activity, and the audit found that the operating model for public housing, with costs comfortably increasingly exceeding revenues, to be unsustainable. 
The review found that in 2011 operating costs exceeded rental revenue by a thumping 42%, up from 30% in 2002. The review further forecast that the division's deficit would more than double from $56 million in 2011 to $115 million by 2015 and that all cash reserves would be exhausted by within two years.
<img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mbA3FPTqdHg/VSebr1fo_1I/AAAAAAAAUYg/fAUj9uATIRk/s1600/Vic2.jpg">
Source: Auditor General
The division’s short-term strategies to address its financial position had only deferred and compounded the problem using short-termist band aid solutions to address its dire financial situation.
Such short-term solutions included the reduction of stock acquisitions, the deferring of preventative maintenance, and funding deficits by utilising cash meant for long-term programs - which only compounded the issue, particularly the growing maintenance liability.
While rent and other property income had increased by 7% (in nominal terms by $24 million between 2007 and 2012), operating costs had spiralled by 27% or $92 million in nominal terms over the same period.
Reason two - Public housing stock is grossly inadequate and under-supplied
The Auditor-General found that demand for public housing had easily exceeded supply over the preceding ten years - the cost of living and household numbers had increased and the availability of affordable housing had decreased. 
The demand for public housing is measured as the number of households that have applied for public housing and are on the public housing waiting list.
The audit found that as at 30 June 2011 there were more than 38,000 households on the waiting list – and once applicants are approved for public housing, they still have to wait to be housed. 
In 2009–10, applicants who had received a priority allocation waited an average of 8.5 months for housing, and non-priority applicants wait several years. 
Reason three - Public housing stock is grossly mismatched
The tenant profile of public housing has changed substantially over time.  Large estates built in the 1960s were intended for working families on low to moderate incomes as a transitional measure before moving into private housing. Most properties were accordingly built to meet the needs of families as opposed to an increasingly single and older tenant group.
Today, however, public housing now serves an increasing proportion of elderly, single and economically and socially disadvantaged tenants.
Thus the need for one-bedroom dwellings has increased dramatically while the need for larger dwellings has decreased. The chart below shows the mismatch between public housing stock, and demand as reflected by the public housing waiting list.
<img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AOPBSIO7JD4/VSebrPFmwMI/AAAAAAAAUYY/oOr3pbg_uxo/s1600/VIC3.jpg">
Source: Auditor General
Unfortunately, legislative, regulatory and policy settings prevent authorities from actively trading public stock to help finance necessary dwelling upgrades (or from expanding stock levels by changing the mix of densities, dwelling types and locations to match the needs of target households). As was shown in the above graphic, at the audit date it would have required almost 100% turnover of households in one-bedroom properties to meet waiting list demand, as compared to only 25% for three-bedroom properties. The National Housing Supply Council projected that the demand across Australia from older householders for single households would increase from 86,500 to 189,800 between 2010 and 2029.
Reason four - The quality of public housing stock is in sharp deterioration 
The public housing portfolio was found to be in a seriously deteriorating condition with the division estimating that 10,000 properties (or 14% of the total) would reach obsolescence over the following four years, and a significant mismatch of properties to tenant needs.
The asset base was found to be deteriorating awfully with 42% of housing stock being over 30 years old. Of course, properties of this age generally require more frequent and larger scale repairs, maintenance and upgrades. 
Yet the division was found not to have articulated any long-term objectives or plans at all for public housing.
A property portfolio approaching $20 billion in value housing 127,357 Victorians, requires an "informed, cohesive and comprehensive asset management system", but in fact no such systems were found to be in evidence.
In 2011 well over 14,000 dwellings (25%) had not been assessed for over three years, with 2,400 of those not inspected for over five years, in spite of the supposed divisional policy to assess all properties at least three-yearly.
The division also estimated that, due to limitations within the system, maintenance costs of $298 million across the portfolio were, on average, understated by a whopping 138% for each property.
The wrap
As concluded by AHURI, is very little optimism that public housing can or will play a significant role in the overall housing system, or contribute in any significant way to addressing the supply of affordable rental housing stock. Perhaps more importantly, there is no political will at all to invest in public housing. Private housing is all there is, and government policy has clearly concluded that the road ahead will necessarily involve incentives for Mum and Dad investors to provide rental accommodation. Institutional funds and the private sector won't touch the sector because rental returns are too low. Indeed the Treasury was approached with a request for investment from the Future Fund and the response was exactly that - the Future Fund will not invest in residential property because rental returns are too low. So if the private sector won't invest in rental housing because the returns are too low, and the Australian government won't invest its money there either, the only remaining alternative is to incentivise individual investors to do so. And that's why the negative gearing rules won't be squashed. 
PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>.
His book '<a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>' is out now.
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Four reasons negative gearing won't be squashed: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) announcement to hold the cash rate for April at 2.25 percentage points could ease the increase in house and unit values over the next month. A market slowdown would allow greater purchasing power for first time home buyers in unaffordable housing markets.
The number of first time homebuyers taking out home loans has declined as a result of the recent housing boom, which saw more investors enter the market. This is supported by ABS data, which shows that home loans taken out by first time homebuyers have steadily decreased from 18.8% in 2012 to 14.9% in 2015.
Furthermore, according to ABS data, the size of the average home loan increased 1.07% between December 2014 and January 2015, to $346,600.
The decision to hold rates is partly attributable to Australia’s two-tiered housing market. According to <a href="https://Onthehouse.com.au" target="_blank">Onthehouse.com.au</a> data, at February 2015, Sydney experienced quarterly growth of 3.55% for houses, and 2.83% in units. These are down from the January quarter of 4.10% for houses and 3.04% in units, although they still reflect strong investor demand.
Despite Sydney’s strong performance, other markets, including Melbourne and Brisbane, saw contraction in property values at the end of the February quarter.
On the supply side of the housing market, February housing approvals were almost at a five-year high. In NSW, approvals for February 2014 totalled 4,692 dwellings, approximately 2,600 of which were units. Dwelling commencements in NSW, as last recorded in September 2014, were at a high of 14,063, which is a 43% increase in commencements from the previous quarter, and is 49% higher than the five-year average of commencements.
Dwelling commencements also increased in QLD and VIC, but at a lower rate. Nationwide, commencements hit a record high of 54,436, despite migration currently sitting below the five-year average. A further cut in the cash rate could have seen funds misallocated in a market where migrant and first homebuyer demand is in decline.
Overall, despite the benefits to first time homebuyers, the rate hold decision does come within a tricky economic climate for the RBA, where economic indicators have remained virtually unchanged for the previous period.
Some notable indicators include:
<ul>
<li>The unemployment rate decreased from 6.4% in January to 6.3% in February. However, this was coupled with a decrease in the participation rate from 64.7% to 64.6%, suggesting that the unemployment rate fell as people came out of the labour force, rather than finding work.</li>
<li>Annual wage price growth was at a five year low in the quarter ending December 2014, at just 2.5%. The December quarter also saw low inflation, which was last recorded at 1.7%.</li>
<li>Iron ore is currently at a 10 year low, at $US46.7 a tonne. Iron ore is expected to fall further as competitors amplify supply to win greater market share.</li>
<li>Oil prices seem to be stabilising following a significant decline since July 2014. Oil rose marginally in the latest trading session to $US53 per barrel. While the price is stabilising at approximately half the five-year average, Australians may no longer enjoy further discounts in the oil price. </li>
</ul>
Though the above factors call for a further cut in the cash rate, the hold is more about timing than tightening monetary policy. This month will reveal new quarterly inflation figures and employment data, which would allow more insight into the impact of February rate cuts. 
Eliza Owen is a market analyst at <a href="https://Onthehouse.com.au" target="_blank">Onthehouse.com.au</a>.
</body></html>

The RBA April rate hold will benefit first time home buyers: Eliza Owen

<html><body>
Michael Cameron, the GPT chief executive, has warned the office markets in Perth and Brisbane are moving into a "dangerous area".
"I think there is a sufficient oversupply of money looking for investment into Australia, and investment into Australian real estate, that some of the underlying problems associated with the demand from the resources sector are being overlooked," Michael Cameron told BOSS Magazine, the AFR publication.
"There's the potential for a continual level of overheating,"  he warned, followed by a "dramatic slowdown" in Perth and Brisbane. 
With the end of the resources investment boom, office vacancies in Perth and Brisbane have soared and rents weakened. At 1 January, nearly 15% of Perth CBD offices were empty and in Brisbane over 15%, according to the Property Council. 
Last month the Reserve Bank of Australia warned the risk in the commercial property sector had increased.
Cameron noted commercial property rents had dropped 30% in Perth in the past year compared with a 3% rise in Sydney and Melbourne.
</body></html>

Perth and Brisbane office markets in dangerous space: GPT boss

<html><body>
Claims have been made that the new Victorian Planning Minister Richard Wynne had been bullied by the trade union movement into knocking back the Spring Street apartment tower planned by Grocon in the Melbourne CBD.
Wynne acted against the advice of his department, according to claims by the opposition leader and former Planning Minister Matthew Guy.
Matthew Guy claimed the Construction, Mining, Forestry and Energy Union (CFMEU) bullied Richard Wynne to <a href="/news/victorian-planning-minister-richard-wynne-refuses-grocon-application-while-list-awaiting-approval-lengthens">refuse permission for construction of the 43 level tower at 85 Spring Street</a>.
Grocon has been locked in a state of fierce workplace relations war over several years with the CFMEU.
Guy said Wynne's decision had been made after his chief of staff met with union officials about the project.
“Dick Wynne needs to explain why he failed to take his own independent departmental advice and reject a project weeks after his staff met Grocon’s arch enemy the CFMEU,” Guy said.
The 335 apartment project in a sensitive area close to the Bourke Hill heritage zone was ruled as too high and too close to other buildings within the precinct.
Melbourne City Council had not been keen for permission to be granted.
Despite acknowledging on ABC radio that the union had raised its opposition to a CBD tower during a meeting with his chief of staff whilst he himself had been sick, Wynne denied any suggestion that the union had influenced the decision in any way, the website Sourceable noted.
“Any representations that the CFMEU may have made, they were in relation to a pipeline of works for their employees, and any suggestions that the CFMEU played any role in my decision-making is completely wrong and false,” he said.
</body></html>

Matthew Guy accuses Richard Wynne of being bullied by unions over Grocon refusal

<html><body>
Smart Property Investment magazine teamed up with three experts in June 2012 to pick 20 "inner city steals": suburbs where one in four units were selling for $300,000 or less.
CoreLogic RP Data's Cameron Kusher, Domain Group senior economist Andrew Wilson and SQM Research founder Louis Christopher ranked 20 suburbs within three kilometres of capital city CBDs based on their capital growth potential over a five year period.
At the halfway point of their time horizon, we've taken a <a href="/expert-insights/investing/looking-back-on-2012s-inner-city-steals">look back at the 20 suburbs</a> to see how they're faring.
We've picked the list's winners – the five suburbs which have displayed the biggest median unit price growth between June 2012 and the end of 2014. We've also identified the five biggest losing suburbs, where the median unit price was lower at the end of last year than it was in mid-2012. Note that any price growth or decline may not have been consistent over the 18 month period, and the percentage differences may display season variations.
<h3>The Winners:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Wayville, South Australia:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $312,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $608,500 Price change: 95%
<ul>
<li>North Melbourne, Victoria:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $390,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $495,000 Price change: 26.9%
<ul>
<li>North Hobart, Tasmania:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $312,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $375,000 Price change: 20.2%
<ul>
<li>Kent Town, South Australia:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $505,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $600,000 Price change: 18.8%
<ul>
<li>North Perth, Western Australia:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $385,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $452,500 Price change: 17.5%
<h3>The losers</h3>
<ul>
<li>West Leederville, Western Australia:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $385,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $452,500 Price change: -23.5%
<ul>
<li>Keswick, South Australia:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $240,000 Last recorded median unit price: $202,500 Price change:-15.6%
<ul>
<li>New Town, Tasmania:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $270,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $240,000 Price change: -11.1%
<ul>
<li>West Hobart, Tasmania:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $330,000 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $317,000 Price change: -3.9%
<ul>
<li>Carlton, Victoria:</li>
</ul>
Median unit price in June 2012: $297,500 Median unit price at the end of 2014: $290,000 Price change: -2.5%
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

The 2012 so-called inner city "steals" winners and losers 

<html><body>
As a buy-and-hold investor, I’ve come across tenants of all walks of life.
Bachelors, single mums, share-house friends, retirees, young families; I thought I’d had a taste of every type of tenant possible. But then I realised, this is incredibly naïve. The truth is the diversity of the rental pool at any given time is as limitless as the diversity we find in humanity. So, I recently had my own little ‘witching hour’ of property insight recently with one such tenant.
With over seven billion people living on planet Earth, there is a practically infinite volume of lifestyles that people can live, making for so many different types of tenants that one could attract to their property.
Today I thought I’d share one such ‘out there’ example.
I recently acquired a new investment property that very much added up for me. After much due diligence on the area itself, the property itself, and some crunching of numbers, I made the decision to purchase the property.
This decision was made despite the appearance of the property which was, how do I say it, a little ‘kooky’. Upon looking at the property ad online, the property clearly appeared to be inhabited by, well... a practicing 'witch'.
Some of the interior features included:
<ul>
<li>Gothic statues hung above the kitchen cupboards</li>
<li>Animal skin rugs, an Eastern European throne chair, hanging Native American dreamcatchers, and many, many candlesticks adorned the living area</li>
<li>Dolls, fairies, tepees, more dreamcatchers, a witch’s hat, and mystical elements appeared in the bedrooms</li>
</ul>
To most prospective buyers, the creepy appearance of this property would have been enough to turn them away. Clearly, the price of the property, which was slightly below market rate for such a property in the area, was compensating for this appearance.
But to the trained investor looking a little deeper under the surface of things can sometimes fruit some great surprises. Upon further investigation, I discovered that:
<ul>
<li>The appearance, whilst full of kooky knick-knacks, was pristinely maintained. Not a speck of dust, not a single mark on the tiles, the floors squeaky clean. Clearly this tenant went to a great deal of effort to make the property appear clean – at least for the sale.</li>
<li>Why did the tenant do this? Turns out that she has been living there for 10 plus years, and had no desire to move out anytime soon. She clearly treated the property like it was her own, owned home.</li>
<li>I also learned that the tenant had been OK with incremental rental increases (in line with market rate) over the years, another good sign for the investor.</li>
<li>The body corporate of the property checked out well, as did the building and pest inspection. The townhouse was in a small complex, at the back of the block, avoiding the noise of any nearby roads.</li>
</ul>
Sometimes the quality of a tenancy applicant, or a tenant you may ‘inherit’ when you take ownership of a property, needs to be judged beyond any perceptions you have about that person based on their lifestyle.
I couldn’t care less about what a tenant in my property does in their personal life, so long as they comply within the requirements I maintain when seeking a good tenant.
These things are:
<ul>
<li>On-time payment of rent always; and understanding/respecting the odd occasion when rental rates need to increase in line with the market</li>
<li>Not damaging the property and generally looking after it</li>
<li>Reporting malfunctioning appliances, or maintenance works required; as/when they come up</li>
<li>Respecting common property areas and neighbours nearby</li>
<li>(Ideally) looking to stick around for as long as possible</li>
</ul>
If you have employed a highly skilled and competent managing agent to look after your property then they are the ones to make the best guided ‘judgement call’ on the quality of any particular tenant.
At the end of the day, astute investors need to draw up a list of the things that actually matter when seeking quality tenants and look beyond initial perceptions when weighing up tenancy selection decisions.
</body></html>

cmcevoy-Go82SmsJA9

My investment property witching hour: Cameron McEvoy

<html><body>
New Savills research shows that London is the most expensive city in the world for businesses to relocate their employees.
Hong Kong and New York are not far behind. In all three cities, the provision of office and living space now costs more than $110,000 per employee, per year.
Sydney ranks ninth on the Savills Live/Work Index (see table below) which has been dominated by London, Hong Kong and New York since it was launched in 2008. 
It is the second time that London has reached the top slot, having toppled Hong Kong in 2014, the capital's live/work costs at $118,085 per year, are still some way off the record $128,000 per year set by Hong Kong in 2011.
The recent Live/Work Index also indicates that London costs have dropped 7.3% in dollar terms since 2014.
Meanwhile, Hong Kong and New York have closed the price gap with London, showing a drop of 2.3% and a rise of 1.1% respectively.
Further down the rankings, a strong economic recovery and rising commercial and residential rents are combining with the strong dollar to make north Amercan cities increasingly expensive.
San Francisco, in fifth position, has shown the biggest increase, with growth in rent and other real estate costs up 4.8% since 2014, and 55.1% since 2008. 
<div align="center"><img src="https://232.v3.savills-vx.com/_images/Relocation_4.jpg?1428443524.16361" alt="Live/Work Index" width="475" height="712"></div>
<div id="txt_03" class="vx_text">
Source: <a href="https://www.savills.co.uk/research_articles/186576/187068-0" target="_blank">Savills World Research</a>
</div>
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News