<html><body>
<p>Consumers are increasingly looking online for bathroom products for renovations, but little is available that offers high quality at a low price, according to a supplier that hopes to fill the gap in the market.</p>
<p>The sanitary wear and bathroom fixtures market in Australia is worth about $1.4 billion a year but major competitors in the sector do not have a significant online presence, said Calvin Ng, director of Disruptive Investments Group which recently bought a 50% stake in <a href="https://www.allurebathrooms.com.au/" target="_blank">Allure Bathrooms</a>.</p>
<p>“The internet has become where consumers are starting their researching journey particularly in the home renovation market,” Ng said.</p>
<p>Studies show that 51% of consumers research prospective purchases online before visiting a store to buy; 44% research and buy online; 32% research online, visit a store to view the product and then return online to buy; and 17% visit a store first before buying online.</p>
<p>“The line between physical and online is blurring and that’s one of our big strategies,” Ng said. “We intend to have showrooms and distribution centres in every state but we think the bulk of [customers’] research will start on the internet.”</p>
<p>Television programs like <em>The Block</em> and <em>House Rules</em> were helping to fuel a mini boom in the renovation market, while declining housing affordability was encouraging people to renovate rather than buying new homes, Ng said.</p>
<p>Allure Bathrooms started in 2010 designing and selling high-end bathroom fittings, vanities and accessories via eBay, and subsequently through a dedicated online store.</p>
<p>The first physical store opened about 12 months ago in Collingwood, Victoria. Although the supplier has only one store, Ng said it was already receiving orders from all over the country from both wholesale and retail customers.</p>
<p>“There isn’t too much in this space that is well-priced and high quality and that’s a huge gap in Australia,” Ng said.</p>
<p>He added that some of Allure’s products cost half to a third of comparable products from larger suppliers such as Harvey Norman and Reece.</p>
<p>“That’s typical of a market that is ripe for disruption,” Ng said.</p>
<p>Similar trends had already occurred in the markets for home electronics and white goods, with businesses such as electronics supplier Kogan, furniture retailer Milan Direct and white goods retailer Appliances Online, taking market share.</p>
<p>Allure plans to open more stores and franchise the business to develop a wider reach across Australia.</p>
<p>The business is already cash-flow positive and profitable. Disruptive Investments Group reported Allure’s revenue in the six months to January 2014 grew by about 65% compared with the previous six months. </p>
</body></html>

zfielding-GvX3Uq9KTa

DIY-renovators heading online to snap up home improvement products

<html><body>
<p>Property investors feel the effects of interest rate changes just as much as home owners do, although that impact may be disguised in the short-term by negative gearing.</p>
<p>Investors receive a tax deduction on mortgage interest expenses, so paying more interest on an investment property loan may not seem as bad as when rates rise on the loan that funds the family home. A bigger interest bill means a bigger tax deduction, after all.</p>
<p>But interest rate increases do hit the bottom line of investment returns. Higher costs, without accompanying rent increases, reduce the income the investor receives each year. This means the investment must achieve a higher capital gain to produce the same total return.</p>
<p>Accounting firm, HLB Mann Judd has crunched some numbers for <em>Property Observer</em> that demonstrate the effect of interest rate rises on a fairly typical property investment.</p>
<p>The property in the example is worth $465,000 and achieves a weekly rent of $400. An investor buys the property with a loan of $418,500 (having paid for 10% of the property in cash). The mortgage is taken over 25 years with monthly repayments. In the example, the investor has decided to repay the principal as well as interest.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Loan details</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Property Value</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5 style="text-align: right;">$465,000</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Loan Amount</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5 style="text-align: right;">$418,500</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Interest Rate</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5 align="right">5.1%</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Term of Loan (years)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5 align="right">25</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Repayment Frequency</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="130">
<h5 align="right">Monthly</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">The property generates an annual rental income of $20,800 and there are no periods of vacancy throughout the year.</span></p>
<p>Annual expenses total $6,306.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5>Estimated Annual Income</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Estimated Annual Expenses</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5>Rental income (at $400/wk)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5>$20,800</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Strata Levies ($470/qtr)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$1,880</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Council Rates ($270/qtr)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$1,080</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Water Rates ($160/qtr)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$640</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Management Fees (5.8%)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$1,206</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Repairs &amp; Maintenance</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$1,000</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Landlord Insurance Premium</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$500</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="177">
<h5>Total Income</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="94">
<h5>$20,800</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="208">
<h5>Total Expenses</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="151">
<h5>$6,306</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><strong style="line-height: 1.3em;">Case study – mortgage rate 5.1%</strong></p>
<p>In the first case, the interest rate on the loan is the Reserve Bank of Australia’s indicator rate for a discount variable mortgage, current as of May 2014, of 5.1%.</p>
<p>At that rate, the investor pays $2,471 a month for the mortgage, or $29,651 over the year. This comprises of $21,147 in interest and $8,505 in principal repayments.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Mortgage Repayments (at 5.1%)</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Monthly Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$2,471</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Yearly Repayments*</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$29,651</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>*Comprised of :</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual interest repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$21,147</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual principal repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$8,505</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total cost of loan</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$741,286</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total interest paid</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$322,786</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">That means the property generates a taxable loss of $6,653 for the year. Taking into account the principal repayments, the property has generated an annual cash loss of $15,158.</span></p>
<p>The principal has reduced by $8,505 so there is $409,995 outstanding on the mortgage.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Taxable profit/loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Income</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">$20,800</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Expenses</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$6,306</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Interest Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$21,147</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Taxable Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$6,653</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Principal Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$8,505</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Cash Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$15,158</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><strong style="line-height: 1.3em;">Case study – mortgage rate 5.6%</strong></p>
<p>Say the interest rate was 0.5 percentage points higher at 5.6%, while rent and other expenses on the property remain the same.</p>
<p>Repayments on the loan are $2,595 a month, or $31,140 over the year. The amount of interest paid increases to $23,235 for the year. However, the amount that is repaid off the principal reduces to $7,905.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Mortgage Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Monthly Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$2,595</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Yearly Repayments*</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$31,140</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>*Comprised of :</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual interest repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$23,235</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual principal repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$7,905</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total cost of loan</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$778,503</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total interest paid</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$360,003</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">The annual taxable loss on the property increases to $8,742. The total cash loss is $16,647 and there is still $410,595 outstanding on the mortgage.</span></p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Taxable profit/loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Income</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">$20,800</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Expenses</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$6,306</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Interest Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$23,235</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Taxable Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$8,742</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Principal Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$7,905</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Cash Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$16,647</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><strong style="line-height: 1.3em;">Case study – mortgage rate 6.1%</strong></p>
<p>If the mortgage interest rate was higher again, at 6.1%, repayments on the loan would go up to $32,664 for the year.</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Mortgage Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Monthly Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$2,722</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Yearly Repayments*</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$32,664</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>*Comprised of :</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual interest repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$25,326</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual principal repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$7,339</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total cost of loan</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$816,612</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Total interest paid</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="95">
<h5>$398,112</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">The taxable loss for the year would be $10,832 and the cash loss, after principal repayments would be $18,171. Just $7,339 would have been paid off the principal, leaving a $411,161 outstanding on the mortgage.</span></p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Taxable profit/loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Income</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">$20,800</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Estimated Annual Expenses</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$6,306</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Interest Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$25,326</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Taxable Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$10,832</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5> </h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Principal Repayments</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$7,339</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="217">
<h5>Annual Cash Loss</h5>
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="101">
<h5 align="right">-$18,171</h5>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p><strong style="line-height: 1.3em;">After tax comparison</strong></p>
<p>In the first example, the investor made a taxable loss of $6,653 and ended the year with $409,995 outstanding on the mortgage.</p>
<p>Let’s assume the investor’s annual taxable income (from employment and other sources) is $100,000. In the example where interest rates were 5.1%, the taxable loss on the property reduces the investor’s taxable income to $93,347 for the year, cutting the investor’s tax liability for the year by $2,462 and leaving them with an after-tax income of $70,862.</p>
<p>That means the after-tax cost of the investment (not including the principal repaid) is $4,191 and the total after-tax cash loss including the principal repaid is $12,696.</p>
<p>In the second example, the investment’s after-tax cost is $5,507 and the total after-tax cash loss is $13,412. The investor is $1,316 worse off at the end of the year in this case than if the interest rate was 0.5 percentage points lower.</p>
<p>In the third example, the after-tax cost is $6,824 and the cash loss after tax is $14,163. The investor is $2,633 worse off at the end of the year than when the interest rate was 5.1%.</p>
<p>Interest rate changes have a real impact on the returns from investment properties. To recoup higher interest charges, investors have a choice to increase rent, cut costs elsewhere (which might not be practical or possible), or cross their fingers for greater capital gains to compensate.</p>
</body></html>

Negative gearing disguises short-term impact of rate changes on investors

<html><body>
<p>Australians millionaires hold over 40% of their wealth in property, more than double the global average, the <em>18th annual World Wealth Report</em> has found.</p>
<p>The report by Cap Gemini revealed there were 218,700 people in Australia who had US$1 million or more to invest (excluding their family home). That was up by 5.8% from 206,600 people a year earlier.</p>
<p>Cap Gemini wealth management specialist Dorus van den Bizenbos told <em>Property Observer </em>that Australian millionaires had always held around 35 to 40% of their wealth in real estate over the time since the first survey was conducted.</p>
<p>“The Australian dream is to own your home and people invest a lot in real estate because the market has been going up for years. It’s understandable and tangible and people want to own property,” van den Bizenbos said.</p>
<p>Real estate values across Australia rose 6.5% from 2013 to 2014, Cap Gemini’s analysis found. Van den Bizenbos said rising property prices were one of three contributors to the increase in the number of Australian millionaires during the year.</p>
<p>A strong economy, with GDP growth of 2.4% in Australia compared with the global average of 2.2%, and Australian share market gains of 15% also helped boost the ranks of Australian millionaires.</p>
<p>Rich people around the world held an average of 18.7% of their wealth in real estate, the 2014 <em>World Wealth Report</em> found. That was down from 20% in the 2013 report, with the shift going towards fixed income and alternative assets such as hedge funds, structured products and private equity funds.</p>
<p>“What we’ve seen is that people have started to spread out their wealth more,” van den Bizenbos said. “They retreated to cash in times of uncertainty and now they have got more confidence they are starting to invest more in alternatives.”</p>
<p>The report found there were 13.73 million high net worth individuals (people who had more than US$1 million to invest) in the 2014 report, almost two million more than in the previous year. That represented a 15% growth rate, the second largest increase since 2000.</p>
<p>North America had the largest number of high net worth individuals, while the Asia Pacific region was second and quickly catching up. </p>
</body></html>

Aussie millionaires hold twice as much property as their global counterparts

<html><body>
<p>The NSW real estate industry is in conflict over proposals to deregulate the state’s commercial property services sector.</p>
<p>The proposals form part of draft regulations put forward to replace the Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation 2003, which will lapse on 1 September, 2014.</p>
<p>The Shopping Centre Council of Australia is calling for the removal of licensing requirements for agents dealing with large commercial properties.</p>
<p>“From our point of view it’s classic red tape. It’s dumb, counterproductive regulation,” SCCA deputy director Angus Nardi told <em>Property Observer</em>.</p>
<p>The SCCA argued in its response to consultation on the proposals that the regulations aimed to protect consumers in residential property transactions and were largely irrelevant to major commercial property owners that were big enough to protect their own interests without regulatory assistance.</p>
<p>Nardi said ‘consumers’ in the case of large commercial property transactions were professional organisations such as Westfield Group, AMP Capital Shopping Centres, and Real Estate Investment Trusts rather than individual consumers or small businesses.</p>
<p>But Real Estate Institute of NSW president Malcolm Gunning said removing the licensing requirements would hurt tenants in major shopping centres.</p>
<p>“It’s taking away that level of accountability and responsibility. The Shopping Centre Council’s argument is that it’s not required because [the consumers] are sophisticated but we question that level of sophistication ... Tenants will be more exposed to the dealings of major shopping centres,” Gunning said.</p>
<p>He added it would be difficult to determine where the line should be drawn on which agents needed to be licensed and which did not.</p>
<p>The SCCA proposed that agents should not have to have a license if they were dealing with commercial property worth more than $10 million or that was more than 10,000 square metres in floor space. Agents that were related to the property owner should also not have to be licensed, it argued.</p>
<p>Such exemptions would save an estimated $4 million a year in compliance costs, but affect only 629 commercial buildings in NSW, the SCCA said.</p>
<p>Nardi argued that if licensing requirements for commercial agents were cut, tenants would still be protected by the Retail Leases Act, while owners of small commercial properties would be covered by the new Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation as they would not be considered sophisticated investors.</p>
<p>But Gunning said some areas fell outside the remit of the Retail Tenancies Act, such as holding deposits, and tenancies that applied to offices within retail shopping centre.</p>
<p>“The deregulation of commercial property agency work would be going further in the wrong direction and would be counterproductive for consumer protection in the commercial space,” the REINSW said in its submission to the consultation.</p>
<p>REINSW said existing licensing requirements were “grossly inadequate” and should be remodelled based on the stricter regimes that applied in the Northern Territory, South Australia and Tasmania.</p>
<p>The SCCA said Queensland’s regulations already exempted large commercial properties and Victoria’s government has agreed in principle to a similar system, and that NSW should follow the lead of those states.</p>
<p>NSW Fair Trading plans for the updated regulation to commence on 1 September, 2014. Consultation on the Regulatory Impact Statement closed in mid June.</p>
</body></html>

Industry conflicted over NSW's proposed commercial property services deregulation

<html><body>
<p>Banks earned $1.226 billion in fees on home mortgages in 2013, up slightly from the year before, a survey by the Reserve Bank of Australia has found.</p>
<p>Fee income from home lending increased by 0.4% over the year, despite a drop in exception fees (such as fees for late payment), charges for breaking fixed-rate loans, and service fees from securitised loans.</p>
<p>The Reserve Bank’s annual bank fee survey for 2013, released last week, included 16 financial institutions, which together accounted for about 90% of total Australian banking sector assets.</p>
<p>The study found that between 2007 and 2012, fees on home loans increased by an average of 2.5% a year, the fastest growth rate for fees on any category of bank product sold to households.</p>
<p>Account-servicing fee income from housing loans increased during 2013 due mainly to a rise in housing loan approvals.</p>
<p>Housing finance approvals for owner occupation rose by 1% from November 2013 to December 2013 in trend terms, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data. Seasonally adjusted, the number of home loan approvals rose by an average of 1.44% a month over 2013, ABS data shows.</p>
<p>The RBA study noted that growth in housing loan approvals was usually associated with higher establishment fee income, but some banks had been waiving those fees for some customers.</p>
<p>Exception fee income from housing loans to households fell by 16.6% to $30 million in 2013. The RBA noted that exception fee income had declined by more than 50% since 2009.</p>
<p>The major banks reported low levels of bad debts during the recent reporting season and many customers were ahead on their repayments.</p>
<p>Overall, banks earned $4.136 billion in fees from households, an increase of 2.3%, following three years of declining fee growth. Most of the increase was driven by higher fee income from credit cards and personal loans.</p>
<p>From businesses and households combined, banks earned around $11.6 billion in fees in 2013. </p>
</body></html>

Banks earned more than $1.2 billion from home mortgage fees last year

<html><body>
<p>Larry Kestelman (pictured right), a property developer with more than 20 years experience, heads LK Property Group, among other real estate businesses.<img src="/images/2014/06/24/Larry-BW.jpg" alt="" style="float: right;"></p>
<p>Kestelman founded telecommunications company Dodo, which was sold to M2 Telecommunications Group for $203.9 million in 2013. He remains a major shareholder.</p>
<p>He is also director of Oxygen Ventures, which invests in and develops up-and-coming businesses.</p>
<p>Kestelman talked to <em>Property Observer</em> about the outlook for the Melbourne residential property market, an upcoming product launch and the way he runs his businesses.</p>
<p><strong>What are your views on the outlook for the Melbourne property market?</strong></p>
<p>The market is very good. We’re doing well with sales. We produce quality product and there’s demand for that.</p>
<p>We are reasonably bullish about the Melbourne property market.</p>
<p>We don’t concentrate on only one suburb. [Our properties] are selling well and getting interest from local and overseas buyers.</p>
<p>The overseas market is still strong. Australia is an attractive place to live, work and study.</p>
<p>Locally, we’re definitely in a good moment in time with low interest rates. We’ve got a lack of supply and there is a shortage of quality development sites. I look at what’s in the pipeline and it’s hard to find quality sites.</p>
<p><strong>Tell me about your upcoming launch.</strong></p>
<p>It’s a joint event between LK Property Group and Qantas Frequent Flyer on June 24. We first initiated our affiliation with Qantas in 2013.</p>
<p>We are the exclusive partner for Qantas for property in Melbourne and we develop a number of properties around town and market them to Frequent Flyer members.</p>
<p>About 600 members of the Frequent Flyers program have been invited to attend the invitation-only launch event in Melbourne’s Docklands.</p>
<p>I’ve been in property for 20 years and over the last four to five years there have been different gimmicks but the only true loyalty program that works is the Qantas Frequent Flyer program. It’s a way to reward clients and keep them coming back.</p>
<p><strong>LK Property Group uses mainly in-house design, trade, marketing and sales staff. What is the advantage of this strategy?</strong></p>
<p>To achieve a consistent result over a long period of time it’s hard to get different contractors to do the work: as their interest wanes, you get a different result. If you build the processes and people internally, you get a consistent result.</p>
<p>The property industry in the past has been used to using external people but I intend to be here still for a while. We intend to do the hard yards now to get consistent results in the long term.</p>
<p>We invest in all the people we work with, both inside and out of the business. A happy customer is one who will come back. We have a concierge service for all of our purchasers. We hold their hands through the entire process.</p>
<p><strong>How do you choose the external business partners that you do work with?</strong></p>
<p>First of all I have to meet the people and get comfortable with them. For that, history speaks a lot. I would want to talk to other clients they have, understand what experience they have and make sure they are of the right calibre. To me, company name is irrelevant.</p>
<p><strong>You run other ventures. Tell me about them.</strong></p>
<p>I’m a business person. I’m in the business of setting up businesses, processes and people to make businesses operate. That’s what I do. Property is the same thing.</p>
<p>The Big Pitch is [one current project through Oxygen Ventures that aims] to find the brightest people with the best ideas and then helping them succeed. We are hoping to attract the best of the best with the form of people and ideas and we can help them with funding and services they need.</p>
<p>In the [LK Group of companies] we have legal, financial, call centres, we have a complete incubator service to help [start-up businesses] grow quickly.</p>
<p>The Big Pitch received more than 400 responses. I encourage online retail and technology companies mainly. Those are my areas of expertise. I love businesses that use underutilised resources where we can match supply with demand.</p>
<p><strong>How do you apply technology in your property businesses?</strong></p>
<p>From a technology point of view, for property it’s more about the data and the way we market to customers. [Working with] Qantas is an example of working in a scientific way, analysing what kind of people will be interested in the properties and marketing to them.</p>
<p id="yui_3_11_0_3_1403573221096_820"><em><span class="character-name-holder">Picture courtesy of Vincent Q/Flickr/<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>.</span></em></p>
</body></html>

Q&A: Property developer Larry Kestelman on the outlook for the Melbourne property market

<html><body>
<p>The Australian Taxation Office has raised concerns that self-managed superannuation funds have been incorrectly reporting the details of limited recourse borrowing arrangements used to buy property.</p>
<p>The warning comes as the ATO prepares to take up new and more flexible powers to deal with SMSF trustees who fail to follow the rules.</p>
<p>From 1 July, the ATO will be able to impose a wider range of penalties on funds that breach superannuation law. Under the new penalty regime, trustees may be personally liable for penalties of up to $10,200 per breach. They may be forced to rectify the problem and complete an SMSF education course.</p>
<p>SMSF trustees are required to lodge accurate annual returns each year to the ATO detailing their fund’s assets, liabilities and income. Penalties can be applied to those that fail to lodge their annual returns on time, or incorrectly report the details of their fund.</p>
<p>The ATO said it had noticed some trustees had misreported details of limited recourse borrowing arrangements, which are used to borrow to buy property through an SMSF, in their funds’ annual returns for 2013.</p>
<p>To help trustees understand the requirements, the ATO has released a detailed guide describing how to complete each section of the annual return.</p>
<p>The ATO has recently released the 2014 version of the annual return for SMSFs. It has also clarified some of the rules that apply to the borrowing arrangements and assets they are used to acquire.</p>
<p>Strict conditions apply to borrowing money through limited recourse borrowing arrangements. There can be civil or criminal consequences for fund trustees that fail to follow the rules.</p>
</body></html>

ATO concerned that SMSFs are incorrectly reporting borrowing details relating to property purchases

<html><body>
<p>A key indicator of expectations for the housing market has revealed consumer attitudes towards buying a property improved from May to June, reversing a six-month trend of declining sentiment.</p>
<p>The ‘Time to buy a dwelling’ component of the Westpac-Melbourne Institute Consumer Sentiment Index rose by 11.4% from May to June, indicating more people thought it was a good time to get into the market.</p>
<p>The rise was the first time the index had improved since November 2013.</p>
<p>Westpac senior economist Matthew Hassan said the rebound was a positive sign but the improvement was tempered by a significant drop in expectations for house prices.</p>
<p>House price expectations fell 11.1% in June, compounding a 9.8% drop in May.</p>
<p>“While those expecting house prices to rise over the next 12 months still outnumbered those expecting declines, nearly a third of respondents now expect prices to be unchanged,” Hassan said.</p>
<p>The ‘Time to buy a dwelling’ index, with a reading of 121.2 in June, is still lower than the long-term average of 123.4. The index dipped below the long term average value in February 2014 for the first time since August 2012.</p>
<p>Broader sentiment stabilised after a sharp fall following the federal budget in May, with about three quarters of people surveyed recalling bad news on the budget and taxation, the highest proportion since the survey was started in the mid-1970s.</p>
<p>At 93.2, the general consumer sentiment index was down 8.8% compared with the same time last year, and well below the neutral 100 point level.</p>
<p>Across all measures of sentiment, including those concerning current and future family finances and the economy, the index was lower than a year previously.</p>
<p>Hassan said based on the weakness of the index, Westpac’s view was that the case for higher interest rates would not be strong enough until the middle of 2015 at the earliest. </p>
</body></html>

Consumer sentiment reverses towards buying property: Westpac-Melbourne Institute index

<html><body>
<p>Owners of strata properties in North Queensland have been hit by insurance premium increases of up to 200% over the past five years and the industry is calling for action to alleviate the strain.</p>
<p>Strata Community Australia Queensland branch president Simon Barnard, who is also a principal of Hartley's Body Corporate Management, said skyrocketing strata insurance premiums were affecting owners’ corporations across North Queensland.</p>
<p>Barnard said under state laws, strata buildings must be insured to full replacement value.</p>
<p>“There’s no option to not insure or to self-insure and that put enormous pressure on owners and property values. In some cases the debts became worth more than the properties,” he said.</p>
<p>Between 2007 and 2012, strata premiums in North Queensland rose by around 200% as strata insurance underwriters realised they had previously under-priced their policies in the wake of Cyclone Yasi.</p>
<p>Barnard said there was currently no mechanism for insurers to use to differentiate risk between individual properties.</p>
<p>“If you’ve got a brand new building that’s cyclone rated next to an old one that’s not, they are currently paying the same insurance,” he said.</p>
<p>North Queensland presents a greater risk to insurers than other regions as it is more prone to severe weather events. An Australian Government Actuary study in 2012 found that strata insurers in the region spent $130 on claims, commissions and operating expenses for every $100 of premium they earned.</p>
<p>At present only two insurers – IAG and Suncorp – offer cover to new strata buildings in North Queensland. Other strata insurers have exited the North Queensland market, or limited their exposure by only offering renewals.</p>
<p>Barnard said more competition would help to lower premiums, as would measures to allow insurers to better assess the risks of individual strata properties.</p>
<p>The federal government released a discussion paper examining the high cost of home and strata title insurance in North Queensland on 9 May and is calling for submissions by 2 June.</p>
<p>Minister for Finance Mathias Cormann noted in the discussion paper that homeowners in North Queensland were paying premiums around two and a half times higher than Queenslanders who live in the state’s south.</p>
<p>The paper also noted that home contents insurance prices across Australia had risen at twice the rate of the consumer price index since 2009, while home buildings insurance prices had risen at six times CPI.</p>
<p>Properties in North Queensland were worst affected with average premiums for combined home and contents policies in that region around two and a half times those in Queensland’s southern cities.</p>
<p>Average premiums for home and contents insurance for a property with no or little flood risk for a sum insured of about $300,000 for building and $80,000 for contents could range from $3,000 to $6,000 a year.</p>
<p>Adding to the costs for owners’ corporations, the Queensland state government has recently lifted stamp duty on strata insurance products to 9% from 7.5%.</p>
</body></html>

North Queensland strata property owners slugged with massive insurance premium increases

<html><body>
<p>The number of people running businesses in the construction industry rose slightly in the year to February 2014, following a dramatic drop in the previous year.</p>
<p>Around the country, 242,500 people ran construction industry businesses in February 2014, 0.5% more than at the same time last year, according to the Bankwest Business Trends Report, which analysed Australian Bureau of Statistics labour force data.</p>
<p>The increase coincided with a rise in dwelling approvals, with the Australian Bureau of Statistics reporting a 23.2% increase in dwelling approvals over the year to February 2014. However, approval rates have slowed since then with the latest ABS data revealing a 5.6% drop in approvals from March to April, following a 3.5% decline between February and March.</p>
<p>The increase in the number of construction sector businesses came as a result of growth in Victoria and Queensland, the Bankwest Report found.</p>
<p>There was a 9.8% increase in the number of workers running construction industry businesses in Victoria over the year.</p>
<p>“Victoria is a much sought-after place to live, with trends showing that more Australians are moving into the state every year. That has huge implications for development which has helped deliver significant growth in the construction industry,” said Bankwest executive general manager of business banking Sinead Taylor.</p>
<p>In Queensland, 49,600 people ran their own construction industry business in February 2014, up 1.5% compared with the same time in 2013. This was still 23.5% lower than five years ago.</p>
<p>The establishment of 1200 new construction businesses in the year to February 2014, did little to make up for the 21,250 drop in the number of construction sector businesses over the previous year.</p>
<p>While the construction industry still accounts for the largest number of business owners around the country, with 23.9% of workers who run their own businesses engaged in that sector, numbers are down by 12.4% over the past five years and 2.8% over the past decade.</p>
<p>The number of construction industry business owners in Western Australia fell by 4% in the year to February 2014. In NSW, there were 2.8% fewer business owners in the sector, while in South Australia there was a 1.4% decline in construction sector businesses.</p>
<p>More young people established construction sector businesses in the year to February 2014 with an additional 2,280 workers aged 15-24 running their own construction businesses. That represented an increase of 18.1% compared with the year before.</p>
<p>Across all sectors, 1,160,300 people ran their own business in February 2014, either as an own account worker or an employer. That was down by 6% compared with five years earlier, the Bankwest Report showed.</p>
</body></html>

Construction businesses starting to multiply after dramatic drops in 2013

<p>Developers and apartment buyers have a narrowing window of opportunity before Brisbane's Olympic infrastructure pipeline begins competing directly with residential construction, pushing up costs, tightening labour supply and making new projects increasingly difficult to deliver.</p>

<p>While Brisbane's apartment market continues to benefit from strong population growth and limited housing supply, industry research suggests the years leading up to 2027 could prove to be the most important period for developers looking to secure builders and buyers hoping to purchase before the next wave of price increases.</p>

<p>A new Colliers report, <em>Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games: Creating Solutions</em>, highlights the scale of the challenge. While thousands of new homes are planned across South East Queensland, the Brisbane Olympic Athletes Village alone will deliver more than 10,500 beds during the Games before being converted into around 1,750 to 2,000 apartments. Equivalent to almost two years of typical inner-city apartment supply, the project will also absorb a significant share of the construction workforce and building materials.</p>

<p>The broader construction pipeline paints an even clearer picture.</p>

<p>Construction Skills Queensland's <em>Horizon 2032</em> report forecasts Queensland's annual construction pipeline will average $69 billion over the coming years before peaking at $75 billion in 2027-28. Demand for construction workers is expected to increase by 17 per cent to almost 150,000 people, with the industry facing an annual shortfall of around 19,000 workers that could blow out to as many as 35,000 during the peak construction period.</p>

<p>The Olympic venues, athletes village and supporting infrastructure will account for billions of dollars worth of work across South East Queensland through to 2032, creating intense competition for labour at a time when Australia's residential construction sector is already under pressure.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=373834]</p>

<p>Colliers Queensland Residential Director Andrew Scriven said the convergence of these projects is creating a clear window of opportunity for both developers and buyers.</p>

<p>"From 2027 onwards, the market will shift dramatically," Scriven said.</p>

<p>"Labour will increasingly be locked into government-led infrastructure and Olympic projects, which means private residential developments will face higher costs and tighter margins. The developers who move now are the ones most likely to get projects off the ground."</p>

<p>Scriven said the same dynamic would also affect buyers, with fewer apartment projects expected to launch once construction capacity tightens.</p>

<p>"If you're looking to change your lifestyle over the next five years, now is your window of opportunity to buy."</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=150713 project_image_fid=373827]</p>

<p>Developers are already positioning themselves ahead of that window.</p>

<p>Following the success of Monarch at Toowong, Consolidated Properties is preparing to launch two new Brisbane apartment projects in the second half of 2026. They include <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/gloriette-30-bedivere-street-yeerongpilly-qld-4105">Gloriette</a> at Yeerongpilly Green, a 25-storey tower within one of Brisbane's key Olympic precincts, and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/castile-47-skyring-terrace-newstead-qld-4006">Castile</a>, a recently approved 25-storey riverfront development at 47 Skyring Terrace in Newstead.</p>

<p>Hutchinson Builders will deliver both projects, with early works already underway at Yeerongpilly and Newstead expected to commence later this year.</p>

<p>The timing comes as Brisbane's fundamentals continue to strengthen, with strong interstate migration, population growth and vacancy rates remaining below 1.5 per cent.</p>

<p>Colliers Queensland researcher Pragya Sharma said Greater Brisbane is forecast to require around 40,000 new apartments between 2021 and 2031.</p>

<p>"There's a real mismatch emerging between when housing is needed and when it will be feasible to build," Sharma said.</p>

<p>"As a result, the period leading up to 2027 presents a key window of opportunity for developers to secure approvals, funding and construction capacity, while buyers will have greater choice before supply constraints intensify."</p>


Colliers research outlines a critical pre-2027 window to start residential projects before labour squeeze: now is the time to buy

Joel Robinson

Developers, buyers on watch in South East Queensland ahead of construction crunch: Colliers

<p>It's taken less than nine months for developer Sherpa Property Group to sell out all 51 apartments in its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-oasis-palm-beach-7-9-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Oasis</a> development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/palm-beach-qld-4221">Palm Beach</a>, over a year before its anticipated completion.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Located at 7-9 Sixth Avenue, the $67 million development has resonated strongly with both local owner-occupiers and downsizers seeking high-quality apartments within walking distance of the beach, dining precincts and everyday amenities.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357458]</p>

<p>Christie Leet, Founder of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sherpa-property-group">Sherpa Group</a>, said the sell-out reflected both the strength of the Palm Beach market and the success of Sherpa's community-first approach to development.</p>

<p>"The sell-out of Oasis is a fantastic outcome and reinforces the strong demand we're seeing for thoughtfully designed apartments in lifestyle locations," Leet said.</p>

<p>"From the outset, our vision was to create a development that genuinely enhanced the Palm Beach community while providing residents with exceptional homes and wellness-focused amenities.</p>

<p>"We've been incredibly encouraged by the level of local support throughout the campaign, 72.5 per cent of buyers are locals, with a significant proportion of purchasers choosing Oasis as their future home rather than an investment."</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357463]</p>

<p>Construction is now progressing following development approval, with trusted builder LPS Group delivering the project and completion anticipated in Q3 2027.</p>

<p>Oasis forms part of Sherpa Group's successful Flourish collection, which has become recognised for its focus on wellness, community and elevated coastal living.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357469]</p>

<p>Residents will have private access to a rooftop amenity space featuring a pool, gym, sauna, steam room, hot and cold plunge pools, spa and barbecue facilities.</p>

<p>"The success of Oasis demonstrates that buyers continue to prioritise quality, location and lifestyle," Leet said.</p>

<p>"We are proud to have delivered a project that has resonated so strongly with the market and look forward to bringing Oasis to life for our future residents."</p>

<p>Sherpa recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-palm-beach-1150-1160-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a>, its third instalment of the Flourish brand in Palm Beach following Flourish Oasis and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/amargo-6-12-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Amargo</a>.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151449]</p>


Sherpa sells out Flourish Oasis in booming Palm Beach

<p>Urban Property Group's <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/la-vera-macquarie-park-94-talavera-road-macquarie-park-nsw-2113">La Vera</a> is leading the next phase of Macquarie Park's residential evolution, with the new apartment development set to become the first of several new apartment projects in the precinct to complete.</p>

<p>The 169-apartment building has now topped out ahead of its scheduled completion in the third quarter of 2026, as new residential investment continues to reshape one of Sydney's largest employment hubs into a true mixed-use precinct.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=368645]</p>

<p>Cox Architecture has designed La Vera to capture the best of its unique positioning on Talavera Road, orienting the building towards Lane Cove National Park.&nbsp;The building features a sculpted northern façade with flowing curves inspired by the surrounding landscape, while its city-facing elevation adopts a more structured architectural expression to maximise skyline views.</p>

<p>"The vision for the project was to conceive a building that adopted an organic and curvilinear form to the northern portion that faces the Lane Cove National Park," <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">Cox Architecture</a> Director Felipe Miranda said.</p>

<p>"The residents that reside in the northern portion of the building benefit by having beautifully crafted curved balconies that speak to the natural context and heighten the relationship of their internal living spaces to the external balconies."</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=358802]</p>

<p>La Vera offers a diverse mix of one, two, three, and four-bedroom configurations, with prices currently starting from $740,000. Buyers so far have been a mix of Sydney-based investors,&nbsp;metro commuters, owner-occupiers and downsizers from surrounding North Shore suburbs.</p>

<p>Both investors and owner-occupiers have been drawn to La Vera's proximity to Macquarie University, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Centre and the Sydney Metro, infrastructure that supports both strong rental demand and a convenient lifestyle for residents.</p>

<p>The apartments feature full-height glazing, timber flooring throughout living areas, stone kitchen benchtops, SMEG appliances, floor-to-ceiling bathroom tiling and ducted air conditioning.</p>

<p>Residents will have access to a rooftop recreation level featuring a swimming pool, sauna, barbecue facilities and landscaped relaxation areas, complemented by additional communal space at ground level. Many apartments enjoy uninterrupted views across Lane Cove National Park, reinforcing the project's connection to its natural setting.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=364551]</p>

<p><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a>, a family-owned developer and builder with nearly four decades of experience, holds a 4.5-star iCIRT rating and was Australia's first developer to introduce 10-Year Latent Defects Insurance (LDI). La Vera is the first apartment development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/macquarie-park-nsw-2113">Macquarie Park</a> approved to offer the additional insurance protection, alongside a five-year warranty on SMEG appliances.</p>

<p>Urban Property Group CEO Patrick Elias said the additional protection reflects changing buyer expectations in the off the plan market.</p>

<p>"Consumers are a lot more weary and a lot more concerned in buying off the plan than they ever have been. Having LDI is a tool to portray the confidence that we have in our product, and a confidence we want buyers to share," Elias said.</p>

<p>Following completion of the building later this year, buyers will move into their apartments well before Christmas.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134951]</p>


La Vera closes in on completion as Macquarie Park continues residential transformation

<p>Brisbane developer Red &amp; Co's decision to include dual key apartments in its debut Gold Coast apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/como-varsity-lakes-22-lake-street-varsity-lakes-qld-4227">COMO Varsity Lakes</a>, is proving to be one of the project's biggest drawcards, with buyers quickly snapping up the flexible residences.</p>

<p>More than half of the project's 36 dual key apartments have already sold, helping drive COMO beyond the 50 per cent sold mark within the first month of launch.</p>

<p>The strong response highlights growing demand for apartment designs that can adapt to changing lifestyles, with buyers increasingly looking for homes that accommodate multi-generational living, provide rental income opportunities or simply offer greater flexibility over time.</p>

<p>Located on the shores of Lake Orr, COMO will deliver 156 apartments across 16 levels, with the dual-key residences forming a limited release within the broader development.</p>

<p>Each combines a primary two-bedroom apartment with a fully self-contained studio on a single title, connected by a shared foyer and lockable internal door. The design allows owners to house ageing parents, adult children or guests while maintaining privacy, or lease the secondary residence to generate additional income.</p>

<p>Just 17 of the original 36 dual key apartments remain available.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=367096]</p>

<p>The innovative configuration combines two fully self-contained residences on a single title, typically comprising a primary two-bedroom apartment alongside a separate studio residence, connected via a shared foyer and lockable internal door.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The model is proving particularly attractive to owner occupiers navigating changing family dynamics and the realities of the current housing crisis.&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363511]</p>

<p><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/npa">NPA</a>&nbsp;CEO Andrew Erwin said dual key living was resonating strongly with modern buyers because it delivered both financial flexibility and practical lifestyle benefits.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“The housing crisis and rising cost of living are fundamentally changing how Australians think about home ownership,” Erwin said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“Dual key apartments provide a genuine solution for families who want to stay connected while maintaining independence. Parents can help adult children save for a future home, ageing parents can remain nearby without moving into aged care, and owners still retain privacy and flexibility.</p>

<p>“Importantly, buyers are also recognising the financial advantages. It creates the opportunity to generate additional income from part of the home without the holding costs associated with owning a separate investment property.”&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363509]</p>

<p>Unlike traditional dual occupancy arrangements, the residences operate under a single title, meaning owners only incur one set of body corporate fees, council rates and holding costs.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The secondary residence can also evolve over time - functioning as guest accommodation, a home office, creative studio or private retreat before later becoming an income-producing asset.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/red-co">Red &amp; Co</a>&nbsp;Director and Co-Founder David Laverty said the strong early sales reflected growing buyer urgency and changing priorities within the market.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“Securing more than half of COMO’s residences within such a short timeframe is an outstanding result and a clear endorsement of both the design and location,” Laverty said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“Buyers are responding to the combination of location, connectivity and amenity, but ultimately it’s value relative to other East Coast markets that is driving enquiry.”&nbsp;</p>

<p>“We’re also seeing strong interest from owner occupiers looking for homes that can adapt with them over time. Flexibility has become one of the most important considerations for buyers in today’s market.”&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363515]</p>

<p>Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bda-architecture">BDA Architecture</a>, COMO features a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom residences with 2.7-metre ceilings and larger-format floorplans aimed at owner occupiers, downsizers and lifestyle-focused buyers.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The development will feature an extensive rooftop recreation and wellness offering including a 25-metre lap pool, sundeck, barbecue and dining areas, gym, sauna, plunge baths, landscaped gardens, wellness spaces and rooftop pickleball and paddleball courts.</p>

<p>The remaining dual key apartments range from 137 sqm to 167 sqm and include generous three-bedroom layouts with separate self-contained studio accommodation and dual parking.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Erwin said the dual key concept represented a broader shift in how Australians would live in the future.</p>

<p>“People want homes that can evolve with their lives,” he said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“A dual key apartment can suit a family today, support an ageing parent tomorrow, and potentially generate income later on. That adaptability is becoming incredibly valuable in the current environment.”</p>

<p>Prices currently range from $2,115,750 to $2,583,000.&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135546]</p>


Inter-generational living drives demand for COMO’s dual key apartments as housing pressures reshape buyer priorities 

<p>Builder-developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/ceerose">Ceerose</a> has doubled down on its Leichhardt ambitions, lodging its second State Significant Development Application (SSDA) in the suburb in the last six months.</p>

<p>Their newest proposal seeks to transform a former industrial precinct into a new residential community centred around the adaptive reuse of one of the site's heritage warehouse buildings.</p>

<p>The new project, on a 6,930 sqm block at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/40-76-william-street-leichhardt-nsw-2040">40–76 William Street</a>, will bring more than 200 apartments to a suburb that has seen little to no new supply in recent years. It follows Ceerose's late 2025 SSDA for a mixed-use apartment project on nearby Parramatta Road, signalling the developer's growing investment in Sydney's Inner West.</p>

<p>Ceerose Founder Edward Doueihi told Apartments.com.au the developer’s long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West had given it a strong understanding of how the area has evolved and where its future opportunities lie.</p>

<p>“Ceerose has had a long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West, giving us a unique understanding of the area’s evolution and future potential,” Doueihi said.</p>

<p>“Having delivered projects throughout the region, we have witnessed the suburb’s transformation first-hand and understand the opportunities for its continued growth.”</p>

<p>Doueihi said that understanding also informed the planning process, with a comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement Outcomes Report prepared before the application was lodged.</p>

<p>The report identified the key issues and concerns raised by neighbouring residents and other stakeholders, allowing those matters to be considered and incorporated into the design where appropriate.</p>

<p>He said the delivery of additional housing would also play an important role in supporting the revitalisation of Norton Street and the Italian Forum.</p>

<p>“By increasing the local residential population, the development is expected to strengthen demand for local businesses, encourage further investment, and help restore the vibrancy that made the precinct a thriving destination in the early 2000s.”</p>

<p><img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7258c54c-8167-479e-8361-2d5fca9915b4" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010B%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%202.jpg?VersionId=S9DQfxu_jpcB5LrAEYFUbyMzg5odW6i5" /></p>

<p>Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a>, the redevelopment would involve the demolition of four existing industrial buildings while retaining and adaptively reusing the site's most significant warehouse. The retained structure would anchor a new residential precinct comprising five interconnected buildings arranged around a large central landscaped courtyard, with heights stepping from five storeys along the surrounding residential streets to 11 storeys at the William Street corner.</p>

<p>According to the Architecture Design Report by Woods Bagot, the proposal "seeks to create a residential village centred around a generous green heart while celebrating the site's industrial heritage through the adaptive reuse of the existing warehouse building."</p>

<p>The development would comprise 203 apartments, with 188 proposed as build-to-sell residences, alongside 15 affordable housing apartments.</p>

<p>Rather than treating the retained warehouse as a standalone heritage object, Woods Bagot has sought to weave the site's industrial history throughout the masterplan. The proposal retains the north and west facades of the landmark corner warehouse, while new buildings reinterpret the site's brick-and-steel industrial language through their material palette and architectural expression.</p>

<p><img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9e8c64c2-881b-49e1-8c90-6b6acaaa45b6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010C%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%203.jpg?VersionId=Qm8_8H_Xrg_sc4Mdjc59vlAcKF_5wRTb" /></p>

<p>The design is organised around what Woods Bagot describes as a "green heart", a landscaped communal open space that reinstates the leafy character removed when the site became an industrial storage facility. A new pedestrian laneway running through the site would improve permeability between William, North and Francis streets, linking residents through landscaped public spaces while activating the ground plane.</p>

<p>Residents would have access to communal gardens and shared recreation areas distributed throughout the development. Sustainability has also been prioritised, with the project targeting an average 7.9-star NatHERS rating. Proposed initiatives include rooftop solar generation, rainwater harvesting, passive solar design, naturally ventilated lobbies, extensive cross-ventilation and the reuse of existing building fabric to reduce embodied carbon.</p>

<p>The adaptive reuse strategy became a defining feature of the application after heritage investigations found only one of the site's industrial buildings could feasibly be retained. The Heritage Impact Statement concludes that preserving the key warehouse façades while referencing the site's industrial character throughout the new development provides an appropriate balance between renewal and conservation.</p>

<p><img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="efffafdb-594f-4e2b-a067-921fd51c05e1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010D%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%204.jpg?VersionId=DPmE4.k16YRt0i27hEZVtJAffarpvUfx" /></p>

<p>"Retention and adaptation of the site buildings has been explored but found not to be feasible except for the tallest building, whose street facades will be retained," the heritage report states.</p>

<p>"The proposed building will interpret the brick and steel character of the subject site, including reuse of some components and construction of a large 'sawtooth' structure in the proposed open space."</p>

<p><img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3bfef2b5-83f5-40cd-9cab-767092f34266" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010E%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%205.jpg?VersionId=7asb3i_ql4ybbuJOUb5UHBEIy0Q9t.DF" /></p>

<p>The William Street site is located around 300 metres from Leichhardt North Light Rail station and a short walk to Norton Street's retail, dining and hospitality precinct. The surrounding area has increasingly become a focus for urban renewal given its proximity to public transport and the Parramatta Road corridor.</p>

<p>Doueihi founded Ceerose in 1998 and has grown the business to become one of Sydney's more active apartment developers in recent years, with completed projects including The Alex Collective in Alexandria, Abbie's Lane in Annandale, and the award-winning Munro House in Elizabeth Bay. They are currently delivering Belgravia, 17 luxury apartments in Potts Point.</p>


Zoe Fielding

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News