<html><body>
Proactive property developers and sales agents are using phase A depreciation estimates, or "phase As", to help market developments to investors.
What is a phase A? A phase A depreciation estimate is a report that  shows the potential depreciation deductions available to a property investor, based on a specific property or development. Phase As are most commonly found when looking at a unit within a major development. The phase As are generally prepared in line with the major unit variations. For example, you’d have one report for the one-bedroom units and another report for the two-bedroom units.
The reports generally show a minimum and maximum range of deductions over the first few years of ownership. A good phase A will show 10 years' worth of minimum and maximum deductions, and will also break up the division 40 items (plant and equipment assets), which are things like the blinds, stoves, carpets and the like, from the division 43 component, which represents the building structure.
Property investors are becoming more aware of potential depreciation deductions. In fact, we’re receiving daily calls from prospective purchasers asking what the deductions would be per year on specific properties. Investors are also turning to Excel sheets and investment analysis templates to analyse their current and potential investment properties. These tools require the purchase price, rental income and interest rate in order to spit out some interesting figures and metrics such as rental yield, cost per week before tax and so on. Depreciation is a key component to many of these investment tools, and this leads to investors asking sales agents what their likely deductions are if they purchase the listed property. A good sales agent will have a phase A ready to hand to the investor.
Phase As provide developers and sales agents an easy way to show the depreciation allowance available based on the specific property and are almost exclusively prepared free of charge by quantity surveyors. While depreciation is just one part of the investment decision, it can mean the difference between properties being unaffordable on a weekly basis to manageable or even cashflow positive.
Why do quantity surveyors prepare phase As free of charge?
The phase As are merely estimates, but they’re generally very accurate. However, a phase A report cannot be used by a property investor to calculate their depreciation entitlements at tax time. The investor would need to engage the quantity surveyor to provide a full capital allowance and tax depreciation schedule specific to the property purchased, in the purchaser's name and based on the settlement date and purchase price. The good news is that you’ll often be able to have a full report prepared at a reduced fee due to the quantity surveyor's familiarity with the development.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
How is a phase A prepared?
Most phase As I’ve prepared personally have been for properties under construction. This means that I’ve needed to source the plans for the development and the schedule of inclusions. This is a very accurate way of providing an estimate as the exact floor area is known, and there’s normally a great amount of detail about the types of kitchen appliances, floor coverings and the like. It’s also something that agents always seem to have ready at hand, as it often forms part of their advertising anyway.
Other phase As can be prepared on established properties where there are no plans or inclusions lists available. These include commercial properties or individual established houses. The best way to prepare an estimate is based on the estate agents' photos and notes. Simply looking up the property on a website can provide excellent photos of the plant and equipment items. The size of the property can be tricky to estimate. However, we can often find the size of the property through some of our search information providers. The age of the property is one of the most crucial considerations when preparing estimates on established properties, but the construction completion date is often on record at the local council. Wherever the level of detail is poor, the minimum and maximum depreciation ranges will tend to increase. These estimates still provide a good idea of the potential deductions, and the accuracy can be increased where more detail or information becomes available.
Phase A reports are generally three to five pages long with some information specific to the property, advice on having a full report prepared, but the most important part is the figures themselves. Below is an example of some estimates I’ve prepared on a new residential property for sale.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/11/mortlocknov27.gif">
You can see the box on the top left hand side shows the maximum range, with the plant and equipment items and the division 43 component adding to make the total depreciation. The property is likely to achieve between $8,112 and $9,554 worth of depreciation deductions within the first full year under the diminishing method. The graphical analysis simply follows the figures within the minimum and maximum ranges and charts them to show the decrease in deductions over each subsequent year, and the cumulative deductions over time. You can see that after 10 years, the property is likely to achieve over $60,000 worth of depreciation deductions.
Phase As are a fantastic tool to market a property that is geared towards property investors. A unit development of 30-40 units is surely to end up with a number of investor purchasers. These estimates enable investors to analyse the potential cash flow of the property and make a more informed investment decision. For developers and real estate agents, the reports represent a free tool to assist the prospective purchasers with the information they need to progress towards the decision to purchase or keep looking. No major development should be without a phase A.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation schedules for property investors. <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/mike_mortlock">Mike can be followed on Twitter</a> 
</body></html>

mmortlock-YX58RgDaQB

Understanding phase A depreciation estimates, and how they can save you money

<html><body>
In a recent study in Canada by a Professor Paul Anglin, an analysis of the language used in real estate ads shows that certain words are strongly correlated with the final sale price of a house. Surprisingly, words like "charming", "spacious" and "fantastic" do not equate to a higher sale price. The study dissected the wording of more than 20,000 Canadian home listings from 1997 to 2000.
According to the study, the five terms commonly used terms correlated to a higher sale price are:
<ul>
<li>Granite</li>
<li>State-of-the-art</li>
<li>Corian (Corian is the brand name for a solid surface material created by DuPont.)</li>
<li>Maple</li>
<li>Gourmet</li>
</ul>
The five terms correlated to a lower sale price are:
<ul>
<li>Fantastic</li>
<li>Spacious</li>
<li>!</li>
<li>Charming</li>
<li>Great neighbour</li>
</ul>
It’s clear that descriptive words that are physical descriptions of the house work well. For example even if you don’t like “granite’, the term doesn’t give the impression that the house is in poor repair.
The terms "fantastic" and "charming" are ambiguous terms that appear to be real estate agent code for a property that doesn’t have many specific strong points worth mentioning. The exclamation point was shown to be very bad news for the property, described as “a bid to paper over real shortcomings with false enthusiasm.”
The estate agent's job is to market a property as well as possible, and often the property has some serious shortcomings. The choice of language is crucial as it can focus the potential purchaser on the positive attributes of the property. However, it can also provide clues as to severe shortcomings.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
An agent in the U.S., John Reed, responded to the study by saying “I do not believe this means you can raise the sale price of your house by using the right ad words. Rather, the cause and effect are the opposite direction. Attractive houses have specific, objective, positive things that can be said about them because they are fundamentally better houses.”
I tend to agree with this point. It’s very easy to rattle off features like ducted air conditioning and roman blinds so long as the property has them. Of course the trouble with advertising something that has few discernible qualities is that you have to say something. Reed suggests that in advertising these properties you need to remember the phrase “If you have something to say, say it. If you don’t have anything to say, sing it.” In other words, if your product has no real advantages over the competition, use a jingle to advertise it. Reed argues that real estate ad words like “cozy” and “charming” are the print equivalent of a radio or TV jingle.
What can we take from this study? I would argue the importance of keeping ambiguous terms to a minimum and focusing on the specific physical strong points of the house wherever possible and applicable.
I’d love to hear from local agents about how they attempt to market some of their more ‘fantastic’ houses.
Some more words that helped to sell a home were: handyman special, curb appeal, move-in condition, landscaping and golf. Words that hurt a sale included: motivated seller, good value, as-is, clean, quiet and new paint.
Interestingly, listings where "landscaping" was heralded sold 20% faster, and homes in "move-in condition" took 12% less time to sell than the benchmark, although the study showed that "move-in condition" had an insignificant effect on the sales price.
It’s obvious that words matter, and Anglin’s study isn’t the only research that confirmed the importance of the choice of words. Whether it has an effect on the final sale price of the property or the time it takes to sell the property, both are important. Anglin was asked whether he had any advice for today’s sellers. "Yes," he replied. "Avoid the word 'motivated.' "
Homes where the seller was "motivated" took 15% longer to sell.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation schedules for property investors. <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/mike_mortlock">Mike can be followed on Twitter</a> 
</body></html>

The five words that help sell your home and the five that don't motivate: Mike Mortlock

<html><body>
I’ve recently returned from some time in the United States, and I always find Americans' service gratuity or ‘tipping’ an interesting contrast to life back in Australia. Tipping got me thinking of the book Freakonomics (which I’d recommend to anyone who’s interested in bizarre correlations and the hidden rules that govern what’s happening under the surface of everyday life). Tipping jogged my memory of the book, as it asserts that humans respond to incentives.
That idea in itself does not seem terribly revolutionary, but incentives pose some interesting questions. For one, on the whole are wait staff in the United States more courteous, friendly and efficient? If pressed I’d have to say yes, but I’m not allowing for cultural differences, the specific location of the restaurant, the average price of the meal and so on. All of these variables cloud the ability to objectively answer the question of whether tipping is the reason for their superior service. Eliminating variables and drawing conclusions is what the book Freakonomics is all about. Perhaps the conclusion is not always black and white, but the data and the correlations are. Real estate features in the book with specific emphasis on the incentives within a real estate contract of sale.
Real estate sales contracts, and all transactions for that matter, are based on incentives. The incentive for a real estate agent selling your home is that they’ll be paid once a sale has been achieved. Generally they’ll also have the added incentive that the higher the sale price, the higher their commission. The home owner’s win in this transaction is that they’re engaging the services of an expert who knows the market well, has connections with buyers and knows the best strategy for achieving the highest sale price.
Selling the property for the highest price is the reason why the agent is engaged, but what if the incentives aren’t geared correctly to achieve this aim? Within the book, the authors Levitt &amp; Dubner examine the incentives for a real estate agent in the US and source data to analyse whether the incentive is perfectly aligned with the aim of achieving the highest price.
As most of us are aware, the commission structure in the US differs from here in Australia. For one, the commission is split between the seller’s agent and the buyer’s agent. Not to be confused by buyer’s agents in Australia, who are paid directly by the buyer. However, and for the purposes of illustrating the point, Levitt &amp; Dubner show that an average 6% real estate commission is first split in the middle to 3% and then typically half again goes to the agency, which leaves a direct 1.5% commission for the real estate agent. On the sale of a $300,000 home, it equates to $4,500 for the agent. This is their basic incentive; once the house is sold for $300,000 they’ll receive their $4,500.
The problem, as Levitt &amp; Dubner point out, is what happens if the property might actually be worth $310,000? They say that the market value of a property is what any one person is willing to pay for it and if someone out there is willing to pay $310,000 then the agent has an incentive to find that person, right? The answer is yes. However, is the incentive strong enough? Thinking back to our 1.5% commission the estate agent will take home, the advantage that the agent receives for finding the new buyer and or negotiating their way up to $310,000 is a mere $150. Will the agent want to risk a guaranteed sale at $300,000 to ensure they get their $150? Perhaps the incentive is not very well aligned with the goal of achieving the highest possible price at all.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
Levitt &amp; Dubner discovered a way of finding out for certain. They measured the difference between sales data for houses belonging to real estate agents themselves, compared with houses real estate agents sold on behalf of their clients. They used data from the sale of 100,000 homes in Chicago, controlling for variables such as location, age, investment or occupier, aesthetics and so on. The results showed that on average the real estate agents kept their homes on the market for an extra 10 days and sold for an extra 3%+. The 3% represents the $10,000 in the example. It’s an example of an incentive that is ineffective as the risk of losing a sale for the additional commission is not worthwhile.
Now the authors don’t have an agenda to tarnish the reputation of real estate agents. In fact, they show additional problems with incentives using teachers, doctors and even sumo wrestlers. I personally know many agents who will always go the extra mile as that’s the reason they went into business and love the feeling of a job well done and the repeat business that results from it.
However, the point of analysing this study is to show how incentives are most effective when they’re formulated carefully with the end result in mind. So what can Freakonomics offer the Australian property market, both agents and home owners? I would suggest an insight into the importance of incentives and an opportunity for us to consider how best we can tailor them to achieve a mutually beneficial result. It certainly gives us something to think about when we consider the costs involved in engaging two different service providers.
Real estate sales contracts are a pretty standard document, but it’s not difficult to alter the incentive or commission. I’ve seen a number of properties with a flat commission to a certain point and a higher flat commission over a certain value, a flat out bonus or a sliding scale based on the final sale price. The structure of the incentive within a sales contract is an important consideration for the vendor. To ensure the highest price is achieved, it makes sense that the incentive be aligned to that exact goal. After all, who wouldn’t want their extra $10,000?
 Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions and traditional Quantity Surveying Services.
</body></html>

Are commissions the best way to incentivise real estate agents?

<html><body>
The ATO allows two very different methods of calculating property tax depreciation deductions, the diminishing value method and the prime cost method. Most investors choose the diminishing value method as it will return the greatest amount of deductions over the first few years of ownership. However it’s worth discussing with your accountant, as maximising your claim upfront might not be beneficial if your income is likely to increase substantially down the track.
Let’s take a look at some of the key differences between the diminishing value and prime cost methods.
Diminishing value depreciation method
<ul>
<li>Returns higher deductions in the first few years of claim</li>
<li>Utilises low value and low cost pooling to increase the claim on items under $1,000</li>
<li>Allows investors to claim 100% of the value of items $300 or less</li>
<li>Decreases (diminishes) in value each year, so depreciation claims drop each year until asset values run out (or are rounded down to zero)</li>
</ul>
Prime cost depreciation method
<ul>
<li>Returns a straight line depreciation amount until the full value of assets are claimed</li>
<li>Returns greater deductions in the latter years of the depreciation schedule</li>
<li>Allows investors to rely on a more consistent depreciation claim each year</li>
<li>Suitable for investors looking to maximise their depreciation claim in later years, e.g. investors who will live in their property for the first few years</li>
</ul>
Both methods of depreciation claim the same total value over 40 years. However, they use different rules to achieve either aggressive upfront claims or a more consistent claim each year.
For example, consider an asset like carpet, worth $18,000 with an effective life of 10 years.
So for year one:
The calculation to reach the depreciation rate for the diminishing method is 200 dived by the effective life. So, 200 / 10 = 20%
The calculation to reach the depreciation rate for the prime cost method is 100 divided by the effective life. So, 100 /10 = 10%
In subsequent years, the calculation for the diminishing method becomes more complex, whereas prime cost stays the same. Prime cost will be 10% of $18,000 until all of the value is claimed after 10 years, so $1,800 every year for 10 years.
The diminishing method needs to subtract the value of the previous year(s) claim before working out the deductions for the current year. So for year two the calculation is:
Opening value ($18,000) minus year one claim ($18,000 X 20%, or $3,600) multiplied by 20%
This equates to:
$18,000 – $3,600 = $14,400, then
$14,400 X 20% = $2,880.
Year three will then be ($18,000-$3,600-$2,880) X 20%. This will give $2,304.
When represented in a line graph, you can clearly see the result of the diminishing method and its decreasing deductions, versus the constant deductions of the prime cost method.
The line graph is useful as it shows the point at which the diminishing method of claim ceases to produce higher deductions than the prime cost method. In this 10-year scenario, the diminishing method wins out each year until year five.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/10/mortlockoct9.gif">
The point at which the two methods meet is different for each property as the mix of plant and equipment assets are different. As plant and equipment items have different effective lives, their depreciation percentages will be different. For example, ceiling fans with an effective life of five years will be 40% under the diminishing method, and 20% under the prime cost method.
For information on how effective lives are calculated, <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/blog/property-tax-depreciation-effective-lives/" target="_blank" title="How depreciation effective lives are calculated">you can visit here.</a> 
Property investors are usually keen to get the maximum depreciation deductions up front, and we’re often asked “why would someone choose the prime cost method?”
An investor who wants more of a guaranteed tax return amount each year would benefit from the prime cost method. As you can see from the line graph, the deductions are constant over a long period of time. Another reason might be someone purposely trying to minimise their deductions in the first few years of ownership. For example, someone with a low income who is likely to have a much higher income later on. Finally, there are property investors who occupy their property as their primary place of residence. A short six- to 12-month stay might not make much of a difference, but occupying the property for five to six years most likely would.
The purpose of putting this article together other than giving a background into how the depreciation methods work, and how they affect depreciation claims over time, is to encourage you to look at both methods and talk to your accountant to ensure that you’re working with the method that’s most suitable for your scenario.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

How to find which property tax depreciation method is right for your investment

<html><body>
Home insurance is a balance between minimising the cost of the insurance premiums paid and maximising the peace of mind that comes with knowing you’re adequately insured. Too often home owners focus only on the premium and are not even sure how a replacement cost estimate is calculated. A little knowledge goes a long way, as there are often associated reconstruction costs that have been overlooked. It’s important to understand the dangers of outdated replacement cost estimates and the breakup of the estimate itself.
Firstly, a replacement cost estimate (RCE) report is an estimate of the cost to replace a particular building in today’s economic climate. Of course the economic climate is not static, so the cost to build two identical properties over time varies based on a multitude of factors such as fluctuating material and labour. A home owner could be forgiven for estimating the cost to build a brand-new home on their block based on current costs advertised for project homes or the latest display homes at their local display centre. However, there are costs over and above the construction of a new house that must be included in a full replacement cost estimate. These include, but are not limited to:
1. The demolition and removal of the remainder of the original structure – a house destroyed by fire, for example, will not be left neatly packed away in a skip bin. There will be costs associated with removing and clearing the debris, which could include hazardous materials (like asbestos) if the property is of a certain age.
2. The cost of constructing the new building based on current planning constraints and building codes – what is built on the block at the present time may not necessarily comply with the current building codes if it were to be reconstructed. The property may require repositioning on the block, or it could have to be rebuilt subject to BASIX requirements.
3. Consultants and preliminaries fees – these include architects’ fees, costs associated with the development application and the like.
Additionally, you’ll need to consider cost escalations associated with the time it takes for planning, design and documentation, the calling of tenders and tender evaluation as well as the construction fit out period itself.
As you can see, the total value that a property should be insured for goes over and above a brand-new construction cost alone.
The risk of being underinsured exposes the home owner to significant losses in the event of a disaster. Even if the property only requires partial reconstruction, it’s possible to be out of pocket when the insurance company does not release the total insured value for the property.
A replacement cost estimate also works in reverse to ensure that if the replacement value of a building is overstated, it can be brought back in line with an appropriate current replacement cost to minimise the insurance premiums. Nobody wants to pay more than is necessary, and an RCE will identify if this is the case.
It comes back to a balance between ensuring the premiums are not based on an overstated replacement value, and confidence that you’ll not be out of pocket should the worst happen. A replacement cost estimate is the best tool to ensure the balance is achieved.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

Beware of outdated replacement cost estimates when choosing home insurance

<html><body>
In most instances a quantity surveyor will conduct a property inspection when preparing a tax depreciation schedule. Sometimes this is not required, for example if a property has been built by the owner or the quantity surveyor has previously inspected a unit within the same complex. A good quantity surveyor knows when an inspection is not needed, and this generally results in a saving to the owner/investor. But if certain information is overlooked you will miss out on significant tax deductions. Below are the two main reasons why an inspection may not be required:
1. The quantity surveyor has inspected a unit within the complex before.
This is one of the more common reasons that a quantity surveyor will not need to inspect the property. As the quantity surveyor has been to the property before, the inspection on the common areas would have been completed, and he will apply their same information over the new unit, allowing for the new unit entitlement.
For example, if the unit is larger, the unit entitlement might be 110/10,000 instead of the unit entitlement of 100/10,000 that applied to the previously inspected property. The inspection would have also revealed the standard appliances through the property, the floor coverings, window furnishings light shades, etc. Many property investors take advantage of this situation to save around a third of the cost of a depreciation schedule. However, the saving must be accompanied by a firm understanding of whether preparing the report without an inspection is appropriate.
Your quantity surveyor should explain his rationale after asking a few questions about the property. For example:
<ul>
<li>Has the property had any additions or renovations? Two units side by side in a development may have been built identically, but have the owners differed in their property improvements? This is especially important in older developments, where the property may have had a new kitchen and bathroom installed by the previous owner. In this instance, the cost information is not available to the new owner. If improvements or renovations of this nature have been completed, the property should be individually inspected as the unit differs from the standard.</li>
<li>Are all units completed to the same standard? A one- or two-bedroom unit on the second floor might have a vastly different standard of finish to the penthouse or units on the upper floors. In this instance, a previous inspection on a lesser standard of unit cannot be used as the basis for a report on the units with premium fixtures and fittings. </li>
<li>Is the property furnished? If the property is furnished, the previous inspection needs to have been completed on a unit that was also furnished. Again, it's important that the furniture package is identical and that the furniture does not vary from unit to unit.</li>
</ul>
2. The property is brand-new and the report is prepared based on the plans and inclusions/specifications list. 
This is another of the more common reasons for a report to be prepared without an inspection. In this instance, the report is only as good as the level of detail contained within the plans. I've seen plans where the floor coverings are not completely specified and it's impossible to tell whether the living areas are carpet or tile. This may not sound important, but with tiles depreciating at 2.5% of their opening value each year compared with carpet at 20%, getting the measurements right equate  to a major difference in deductions. You'd also need to ensure that the specifications list contains enough detail to determine the type of appliances, rather than just the brand, most of the time this information is available.
There are a number of companies that provide for a “self-assessment”, schedule where you're undertaking the inspection yourself and sometimes even providing cost information. The ATO allows for this under the self-assessment rule, however these reports tend to attract greater scrutiny (for good reason) and both the Tax Practitioners Board and Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors have acknowledge that they are not in favour of this type of report.
Property investors can certainly save on costs where their property does not require an inspection undertaken. However, ensure that your quantity surveyor explains the reasons in simple terms, lest you miss out on additional tax deductions.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

When an inspection is required for a tax depreciation schedule

<html><body>
1. Not treating the investment property like a business
If your investment property is occupied by a family member you’re helping out, then your investment goals might be a little different. However, most investors are in the business of owning a property to make money. There are often times when investors make decisions based on emotions, whether it is paying too much for a property or basing decisions on their personal tastes. While you might like to purchase a new property with tiled floors because it looks appealing, a new property with carpet will return greater tax deductions each year. Under the diminishing value method, $2,500 of carpet will return $500 worth of deductions in the first full year, whereas tiles will return only $62.50 in the first full year. The difference to a tenant might be minimal, but the difference to the Tax Office is that carpet is a plant and equipment item depreciable at 20% (Division 40) whereas a tiled floor is considered as capital works (Division 43) depreciable at 2.5%.
Treating a property like a business also means charging market rent. While a good tenant is worth holding onto, it’s important to think of charging less than market rent as handing over your money to someone else each week. Your property manager should be on top of comparable properties and managing your rental reviews. Rental increases need to be reasonable and in line with the market. Don’t make the mistake of charging less than market rent waiting for your lease term to expire, and always remember that your decisions should be based on investing rather than personal preferences. Some of the best investment properties might exist in places or properties where you’d never wish to live yourself.
2. Not maximising deductions
Most property investors are aware that they can claim their property managers’ fees, interest expenses, repairs and the like, however it’s important to know everything you can claim, and at the same time maximise those claims. An accountant who is experienced with property deductions should be the first port of call, as he or she will make sure that everything that can be claimed is being claimed. The next step is contacting a quantity surveyor to undertake a capital allowance and tax depreciation report. Many investors either don’t know they’re entitled to claim tax depreciation deductions on their investment properties or have been convinced that the property is too old to be worthwhile paying for a report. Even a property constructed before the qualifying date for capital works deductions (for residential, properties built after July 17, 1985) should have significant deductions available 95% of the time. This might consist of capital improvements prior to your purchase (concreting, painting, renovations), or simply the residual value of the plant and equipment items within the property. This includes things like air-conditioning, blinds, carpets, cooktops, curtains, hot water systems and much more. If you’re renovating a property, there are also significant deductions available when you’re throwing away or “scrapping” assets. The residual value of assets thrown in the bin can often help to finance the renovation itself!
I’ve been fortunate enough to convince investors to have a report prepared and been able to identify many thousands of dollars worth of deductions in the current financial year and often even more in back claims. The difference between tax depreciation reports can quite often be vast. Be sure you’re dealing with a registered tax agent, and that the report includes a low value/low cost pooling schedule. You might save a few dollars on a report prepared by a quantity surveyor inexperienced in tax depreciation, but considering the fee is tax deductible and you might be missing out on thousands of dollars' worth of claims, it’s worth doing your homework.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
3. Not getting property insurance
Property insurance can be broken into two major components: landlord insurance and replacement cost insurance.
With replacement cost insurance, many investors might be able to estimate a construction cost, but there are additional costs that are quite often neglected. A replacement cost estimate prepared by a quantity surveyor shows the actual cost to reinstate a building in today’s economic climate and to today’s building standards. This often results in additional costs such as compliance costs, demolition of the existing structure, site clearing, professional fees and costs associated with the time it takes for reconstruction (including design and documentation).
Investors wary of their cashflow need to consider whether a small saving on their premium is worth not being covered for the full cost of reinstating a property if it was damaged or destroyed.
Cashflow is also a consideration when it comes to landlord insurance. It might feel like it’s just another expense you can do without, but you need to decide how you’d fare should the worst happen. Can you afford for a vacancy period, or a tenant in arrears moving out with a cleaning bill that won’t be covered by the bond? What about malicious damage to the property? It’s OK to take on risk, so long as you’re confident you have a strategy to deal with it. With the majority of landlords having only one investment property, most investors don’t have much wiggle room when it comes to cashflow. Common features of landlord insurance include:
<ul>
<li>Malicious or intentional damage to the property by the tenant or their guests;</li>
<li>Loss of rent if the tenant defaults on their payments;</li>
<li>Liability, including for a claim against you by the tenant; and</li>
<li>Legal expenses incurred in taking action against a tenant</li>
</ul>
Not all products are created equal; some insurance is designed to be taken out in addition to general home insurance, whereas others are more all-encompassing.
4. Poor tenant selection and tenant relationships
Many investors make the mistake of not undertaking proper screening of their tenants such as checking references and other documentation; this is really a mandatory way to ensure to the best of your ability that you’re going to have a co-operative tenant. If you’re working with a property manager, ensure that you’re confident with his or her selection process and ask any questions you might have about their rental history and references. Selecting a tenant should not be merely based on whoever is prepared to pay the most for your property. If your price is too high, you risk attracting fewer quality applicants. Your relationship with your tenant is an important one, and it’s important that once you have a good tenant, you’re living up to your side of the bargain. Repairs are one of the major reasons that tenants won’t extend their leases.
Landlords aren’t the only ones with tenancy horror stories; tenants have plenty of experience with snooty property managers not returning their calls, legitimate repairs being ignored and surprise appearances at their doorstop. Ensure you have properly screened your tenants, be upfront about the responsibilities and expectations of both parties, and wherever possible always attend the property inspections.
5. Failing to understand repair costs
Repair costs are part and parcel of property ownership and won’t necessarily exceed fair wear and tear. However, a major repair can be very costly and may require the property to be vacated. Not only do you need to understand your legal obligations to undertake urgent repairs, you also need to consider the cost implications. Many investors don’t set aside enough money to cover urgent repairs or stay on top of minor problems that have the capacity to escalate if not managed properly. Sometimes the quick fix works fine, but often it’s delaying a problem that’s going to cost more money in the long run. Any areas that come in contact with water such as bathrooms, kitchens, windows and weatherproofing can potentially result in damage that is difficult to detect but eventually very expensive to repair. It’s always a good idea to take plenty of time inspecting the property, and engaging the services of a qualified building inspector is often worth it in the long run. Strata-titled properties have a sinking fund that forecasts the requirements for repairs and the associated costs, preparing a similar plan and setting the money aside is an easy way to ensure you’re able to cope with any surprises.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

The five biggest mistakes landlords make: Mike Mortlock

<html><body>
On June 27, 2012, the ATO withdrew the taxation ruling TR 2011/2. This outlined the effective life of all qualifying plant and equipment depreciating assets. The new and excitingly named TR 2012/2 ruling is in effect from July 1, 2012 and includes some changes to existing depreciating assets and the addition of some new assets. The new legislation applies to all assets acquired individually or through the purchase of a property from the July 1, 2012 onward. If you’ve previously had a tax depreciation schedule prepared, there’s no need to worry about updating any effective lives. In the ATO’s words:
“If, for a particular asset, you were using an effective life from the determination as in force before the latest amendment (for example, as contained in the Schedule to TR 2011/2), you should continue to use that life for that asset.”
The legislation has been updated due to an ongoing review of the commissioner’s effective life determinations, which is being undertaken by the ATO. Specifically, there have been changes to assets under the following descriptions;
<ul>
<li>Animal feed manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Coffee manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Concrete product manufacturing - concrete roof tile manufacturing;</li>
<li>Concrete product manufacturing - fibre cement building board manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Edible oil or fat (blended) manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Ethanol manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Frozen pre-prepared meals and selected snacks manufacturing assets;</li>
<li>Health and fitness centre operation assets;</li>
<li> Motor vehicle manufacturing - automotive metal stamping and blanking assets;</li>
<li>Motor vehicle manufacturing - motor car engine manufacturing and assembly assets;</li>
<li>Radio broadcasting assets;</li>
<li>Steel coil roll forming, slitting, blanking and sheet metal forming assets;</li>
<li>Sheet metal tank manufacturing assets; and</li>
<li>Tea manufacturing assets. </li>
</ul>
This will of course change the depreciation deductions for commercial properties operating under those descriptions, but will not affect residential property investors.
The effective lives affect depreciation deductions by changing the depreciation rates. For example, under the diminishing method, the rate of depreciation for an asset is calculated by 200 divided by the effective life of the asset. So if we take a dishwasher in a residential property as an example, the calculation would be 200 divided by 10 years, giving us a depreciation rate of 20%. If the effective life was to be changed to the same as an oven, the depreciation rate would reduce to 16.7%.
We can expect an updated taxation ruling on effective lives around the end of June each year, due to the ongoing review of effective lives. Hopefully we’ll see the addition of some new assets under the residential property operators’ subsection such as water tanks. We’ll keep you abreast of all legislation changes.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

What new depreciation tax rules mean for property investors

<html><body>
As quantity surveyors, we’re often telling investors that there are more depreciation deductions available within a unit than a house of similar age and finish. Of course depreciation is just one part of property investment and shouldn’t be the driving reason to choose one investment over another, but I want to look at why a unit returns more depreciation deductions.
Residential units tend to be constructed to a more compact floor plan or layout, rather than the larger open spaces property investors would expect to see within a residential dwelling or house. The cost to build per square metre increases with a compact construction layout, due to more infrastructure (walls, services, etc) and less open spaces than commonly seen within houses. This can make a significant difference to the overall claim, but is not the major reason why residential units will return greater deductions.
In short, the answer is that it’s all about common property.
Most investors are aware that they can claim deductions on the building structure of their unit (subject to age) and the plant and equipment items within such as blinds, carpets, ovens, range hoods and the like. However, many investors aren’t aware that they can claim deductions on the common areas as well.
Unit developments are all different, but generally the more units there are within a development, the more common property there is likely to be. Common property includes things like:
<ul>
<li>Basements</li>
<li>Entry foyers</li>
<li>Foyers and corridors on each level</li>
<li>Barbecues and pool areas</li>
<li>Driveways</li>
</ul>
Now that’s just the building components. You’ve also got the associated plant and equipment items. The list is far more expansive, but some of the more common items include: 
<ul>
<li>Air-conditioning</li>
<li>Automatic gate motors and controls</li>
<li>Barbecue assets</li>
<li>Carpet</li>
<li>Door closers</li>
<li>Emergency warning and intercommunication systems (EWIS)</li>
<li>Fire control assets</li>
<li>Fire extinguishers and hoses</li>
<li>Furniture, freestanding</li>
<li>Garbage compacting systems</li>
<li>Garden watering installations</li>
<li>Generators</li>
<li>Gym assets – cardio and resistance</li>
<li>Hand dryers, electrical</li>
<li>Hot water systems</li>
<li>Intercom system assets</li>
<li>Lifts</li>
<li>Lights</li>
<li>Master antenna television assets (MATV)</li>
<li>Security and monitoring assets</li>
<li>Swimming pool chlorinators</li>
<li>Ventilation fans</li>
</ul>
This is just a sample of some of the plant and equipment items you might find in a unit development.
But how are investors entitled to claim deductions on common property and how does it work?
It’s now all about the strata plan. When you purchase a unit, you’re purchasing a particular lot within a strata plan. A strata plan shows the building on the land, the lots making up the plan and the common property.
Each lot is given a unit entitlement, which is shown on the strata plan.  The amount of the unit entitlement varies depending on a number of factors, such as the size of the lot.  Unit entitlements regulate what proportion of the total annual budgeted levies will be paid by each lot owner.  Unit entitlements also can regulate voting strength at meetings if the value of the votes is required.  Unit entitlements also provide the entitlement that the owner has to claim over the common areas. For example, if there 50 units within a strata plan, the unit entitlement might be something like 1/50.
Using this ratio of 1:50, let’s consider the potential depreciation deductions in this case study.
The total common area written down value is estimated to be $3.5 million.
The total estimated value of common plant and equipment items is $68,000.
The calculation for the building structure in the first full year is $3.5 million x 2.5% x (1/50).
This results in $1,750 per year worth of deductions on the common building(s).
Plant and equipment items all deprecate at different percentages but will normally be somewhere around 20% on average. So using this as an example, the calculation would be; $68,000 x 20% x (1/50), which equates to $272 in the first full year.
Adding the plant and equipment to the depreciation on the building gives us a figure of $2,022 in a single year on just the common areas.
This calculation also ignores some of the legislation that enables you to maximise the depreciation on plant and equipment items such as the ability to claim 100% of the value of all assets under $300 in total, within the year of acquisition.
The extra value that common property depreciation deductions add to the overall claim can be significant, and investors should ensure that they’re claiming deductions on every asset that they’re entitled to claim over.
While high-rise unit developments will return the most common property deductions, even strata-titled villas with a shared drive way and perhaps some solar garden lights will attract deductions on the common areas.
Be sure to contact a tax depreciation quantity surveyor for more information on how to maximise your claim on common areas.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au" target="_blank">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a>, providing residential and commercial tax depreciation services to property investors.
</body></html>

Why more depreciation deductions are available for units than houses

<html><body>
A display home can be a very attractive option when it comes to property investment. They’re normally built to a high standard, impeccably maintained and have guaranteed rent for a set period. Coupled with this, there’s often a high yield and always fantastic tax depreciation deductions.
Purchasing a display home is a little different from your average investment property. The builder or developer will sell the property with a lease-back option, where they retain the property as a tenant for normally around one to two years. These lease-back contracts often contain extension options where the sales agreement enables the builder to extend the term of the lease beyond the initial period.
A display home is likely to be in the most desirable part of the development and will often have extensive landscaping and quality finishes. After all, the job of a display home is to entice people into the development and showcase upgrades to the standard packages available.
The tax depreciation deductions available are significant with high quality display homes. As an example, consider the depreciation deductions on a display home with a total build cost of $190,000 (excluding soft landscaping). The property includes plant and equipment items such as coo tops, blinds, carpet, hot water systems, ovens, packaged air-conditioning and more. A property with a construction cost of $190,000 could expect around $30,000 in total plant and equipment items. In the case study scenario I ran, the value was exactly $27,867. So this gives us the following figures:
<ul>
<li>Division 40 Assets (plant and equipment items) - $27,867</li>
<li>Division 43 Component (capital allowance) - $162,133 </li>
</ul>
The division 43 component will return 2.5% of the opening value each year, which equals $4,053 per year.
The division 40 assets will depreciate at different rates, from 100% for assets under $301 in value, to 13.33% in this example. The total division 40 depreciation in the first year came to $5,423 under the diminishing method.
This gives us a total tax depreciation deduction in the first year of $9,476.
Out of interest, the second year, which won’t include any of the assets written off at 100%, came to $8,573.
This example gives you an idea of the potential deductions on a fairly standard display home. You can certainly find display homes with construction costs double the value of the case study.
Depreciation however, is just one part of the picture. Even more important is the yield. This is yet another attractive feature of a display home. There are major builders currently advertising yields as high as 7.5% to 8%.
Now I did say there were going to be cons. The normal rules of doing your research and checking the contract apply, however there are some things to consider that are specific to display homes. One such consideration is outgoings. Quite often the term of the lease does not include a provision for the tenant to pay the outgoings. These include electricity and water for example, and can add up significantly over time. It’s important to be clear about the contract and understand what you’re responsible for.
Another consideration is the purchase price itself. The display home might have some great upgrades, but what effects will that have on the market value of the property when it comes time to sell? Display homes may also be situated where there is no precedent for that quality of home, say in regional areas. So it can quite often be difficult to know what the capital growth prospects are, and what the current market value is. A local estate agent can be a valuable resource.
Lastly, let’s look at conversion costs. Display homes can be configured differently to the way a normal tenant would require. For example, many display homes won’t include a hot water system as there is no need for it to sit idle for two years not being used. You can also find display homes with the garage converted into an office. In this situation the roller door may be replaced with a sliding door. They may also have security fencing encroaching onto the driveway. Are there conversion or rectification costs required before a tenant moves in, and who pays?
These are all questions that require investigation when purchasing a display home as an investment.
With that being said, a well-researched display home can be a hassle-free, high-yielding investment with great depreciation deductions and no property management fee.
Mike Mortlock is a director of <a href="https://www.mcgqs.com.au/">MCG Quantity Surveyors</a> specialising in tax depreciation deductions for property investors.
</body></html>

The pros and cons of investing in a display home

After inspecting the a mixture of new apartment developments in Sydney's thriving north west corridor, Rouse Hill downsizers Lynne and Dale Kennedy were set to buy a two-bedroom apartment in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/ellipse-property-group">Ellipse Property</a>’s Carrington Place development, until they saw the penthouse floorplans.

The retired police officer and her builder husband, aged in their mid-60’s, quickly upsized to a three-bedroom penthouse within the Atrium building, the first stage of the Castle Hill masterplan.

Their luxury apartment is one of eight in Atrium’s exclusive Penthouse Collection and features striking interior design. The penthouses offer flexible open-plan layouts with abundant space and tranquillity. With two living spaces, walk-in wardrobes and butlers’ pantries, Atrium’s penthouses feature large balconies with sweeping views to Cattai Creek and the wider Hills District.&nbsp;

“As soon as we saw the floorplan for this penthouse, we knew it was the one for us," Lynne said.

"It is oversized with abundant storage, so we know we are not going to feel cramped, even though we are downsizing from a large, five-bedroom family home. The open-plan design spills out to a large deck, perfect for entertaining and when the grandchildren visit. The finishes are top-quality and I love the butler’s pantry and integrated appliances in the kitchen – with the steam oven, pyrolytic oven and coffee machine all built in.”

High-quality material finishes and premium appliances are used throughout Atrium’s penthouse collection. Miele appliances in the newly-released Pearl Beige finish, Vintec wine fridges, Parisi tapware and fireplaces are set within luxe finishes including pure wool carpets and statement Caesarstone benchtops. Built-in barbecues, and in some cases bars and skylights, are further signature features of the penthouse design.

Dale Kennedy owns Inspect It FIRST, a building inspection company he has operated for over 25 years. With stringent views on design and build integrity, he was quick to recognise the quality behind the architectural design and iCIRT-rated builder, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/decode">Decode Group</a>.

“This penthouse sets a new benchmark in terms of quality and attention to detail. The floorplan is well-considered - special features like the skylight are a stand-out and not typical in new builds. The iCIRT-rated builder adds a further level of comfort buying off-the-plan, and we are confident that the finished apartment will be high-quality with no nasty surprises,” said Dale.

The Kennedy’s are excited at the freedom that apartment living will unlock for them.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151821 project_image_fid=360287]

“We won’t have to maintain a house, swimming pool and gardens anymore, and are looking forward to having more leisure time," Lynne added.

"The low maintenance apartment lifestyle and security of the building means we can travel more and take extended trips. We can simply ‘lock and leave’, something we can’t do with a big house. We also love the location so close to Showground Metro Station and retail precinct, but without being in the thick of it. Everything is literally on our doorstep, just a few minutes’ walk. It will be so convenient being able to access the city so easily and not having to drive to the shops.”

After 11 years in their home on Morrisey Way, Rouse Hill, the couple will sell it before moving into their new penthouse. The expansive five-bedroom family home features a cinema, swimming pool and six-car garage.

There are just six penthouses left in Atrium’s Penthouse Collection in a mix of three- and four-bedroom configurations, ranging from 160 to 334 sqm in size and priced from $3.025 million to $5.4 million.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151821 project_image_fid=360286]

According to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/colliers">Colliers</a>, exclusive sales agents at Carrington Place, Atrium’s Penthouse Collection is meeting a groundswell of demand from local downsizers – aligned with broader trends in Metro-connected suburbs across Sydney.

“The Penthouse Collection sets a new standard for apartments in Castle Hill,"&nbsp;said Blake Schulze, National Director – Residential at Colliers.

"There is simply nothing else like these penthouses. Downsizers are drawn to their house-like scale and premium finishes. With sought-after views plus access to outstanding new local amenities, the Penthouse Collection unlocks a new lifestyle for buyers.

Schulze says buyers are drawn to Carrington Place’s lifestyle with close proximity to the Showground precinct’s vibrant mix of retail and dining options.

"Being able to walk to the Metro and this rapidly emerging lifestyle hub is of huge appeal to this demographic.”

According to Puja Khanna, Associate Director at Ellipse Property, the carefully curated interiors are proving to be a point of difference.&nbsp;

“Our floorplans have been thoughtfully considered, knowing that many buyers will be downsizing from large homes," Khanna says.

"Smart and abundant storage was an absolute must. And for many of our buyers, entertaining is a priority – with adult children, grandchildren and family visiting and sometimes staying over. We made sure bedrooms are spacious and living spaces are oversized, and kitchens incorporate butler’s pantries alongside the latest appliances."

Atrium is under construction by award-winning iCIRT-rated builder Decode Group, with completion scheduled for Q3 2026.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151821 project_image_fid=360285]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lily-lane-at-carrington-place-castle-hill-32-carrington-road-castle-hill-nsw-2154">Lily Lane</a>, the second stage&nbsp;of Carrington Place, is set to commence construction later this month on the back of Atrium’s significant sales success, with 85 per cent of all apartments now sold.

Carrington Place will be constructed across multiple stages and deliver more than 800 new homes, with the entire precinct set for completion in 2032. It will feature abundant open space with over 20,000 sqm of outdoor recreational area, including a one-kilometre boardwalk to the nearby Fred Caterson Reserve.&nbsp;

The project is also integrated with the surrounding bushland, with a site boundary that stretches to the edge of Cattai Creek, immersing residents in the beauty of Sydney’s ‘Garden Shire’.

The Hills Showground Metro Station is just a two-minute walk away, offering fast connectivity to Sydney’s CBD, North Sydney, Chatswood, Macquarie Park and Norwest Business Park.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151821]

Joel Robinson

Local downsizers set sights on Carrington Place, Castle Hill penthouses

Lifestyle, residential and wellness developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/lowe-living">Lowe Living</a>, and joint venture development partner lNT.RE (formerly Icon Developments) have announced the popular SOAK Bathhouse brand will anchor the ground floor of their $160m luxury <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/emerald-place-by-lowe-living-200-clarendon-street-south-melbourne-vic-3205">Emerald Place</a> development at 182-200 Clarendon St, South Melbourne, which is set to open in August 2026.&nbsp;

This will be the second Melbourne outpost for the SOAK Bathhouse brand, after its inaugural Victorian location in South Yarra launched in 2025, which has quickly become a staple in Melbourne’s bathing and wellness scene.&nbsp;

SOAK Bathhouse has signed a 10-year partnership to take out the 459sqm prime corner ground-floor tenancy, which will join the other two retail tenancies, high-end commercial space and 38 ultra-luxury residential apartments and penthouses above.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135816 project_image_fid=365847]

SOAK Bathhouse is renowned for its luxurious and socially-focused mineral pools, cold plunge, sauna, steam room, infrared LED therapies, and massage services. Its arrival at Emerald Place, South Melbourne marks a significant milestone for both brands and for South Melbourne.&nbsp;

While the specific inclusions of the venue are still under wraps, SOAK Bathhouse has confirmed the space will be equipped with a signature SOAK Bathhouse mineral pool, cold plunge, saunas and steam room, alongside a lush dedication to verdant greenery and ferns throughout the tranquil bathing spaces.&nbsp;

SOAK Bathhouse will serve both Emerald Place residents and the broader South Melbourne business community, creating a wellness destination that bridges the gap between work and home. For residents, it's a daily ritual on their doorstep. For the surrounding office workers, it's a place to decompress, recharge and transition between professional and personal life.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135816 project_image_fid=365850]

The partnership has underpinned Lowe Living’s commitment to delivering wellness-led amenities that not only embed physical spaces within the projects but integrate established, renowned wellness brands to anchor and operate these spaces.&nbsp;

Through the partnership with SOAK Bathhouse, penthouse buyers will be granted complimentary memberships, while all other residents of the Emerald Place development will benefit from exclusive discounted access. Together, these privileges deliver a compelling lifestyle enhancement and a lasting investment in wellbeing.&nbsp;

Lowe Living has been steadily carving out a niche in the luxury property market as a wellness-led developer, having a partnership with the Sorrento-based Aurora Spa &amp; Bathhouse to offer a private, residents-only wellness spaces at its upcoming Camberwell and Brighton projects.&nbsp;

These partnerships with Aurora Spa &amp; Bathhouse and now SOAK Bathhouse, reinforce a broader shift across Lowe Living’s portfolio towards a meaningful commitment to health-focused amenity and wellness offerings.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135816 project_image_fid=231195]

Since its inaugural offering in Mermaid Beach, which has since expanded nationally across Queensland, Sydney and Melbourne, SOAK Bathhouse has grown into a leading contemporary bathhouse brand, attracting a dedicated following thanks to its unique social-focused approach to bathing.&nbsp;

Emma Lowe, Co-Founder and Managing Director of Lowe Living, said the Lowe Living team "view our partnerships as an extension of our design philosophy."

"We align with brands that genuinely elevate the everyday experience of our residents and deliver tangible value for our purchasers that enrich their lives.&nbsp;SOAK Bathhouse was a natural fit for Lowe Living and specifically Emerald Place. Their approach to contemporary bathing and social wellness strongly aligns with our vision of creating homes that prioritise long-term health, connection and lifestyle.”&nbsp;

Tim Lowe, Co-Founder and Managing Director of Lowe Living, said securing Melbourne’s second SOAK Bathhouse for Emerald Place is a significant milestone for Lowe Living, INT.RE and South Melbourne.&nbsp;

“This partnership reflects the continued evolution of luxury residential development," Lowe says.

"Today’s buyers are looking beyond finishes and floorplans and investing in holistic living environments, not just inside their apartments but in the communal and wider local amenity offerings, too."

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135816]

Lowe Living secures SOAK Bathhouse on 10-year lease at Emerald Place, South Melbourne development

While the Gold Coast continues to densify around key transport and lifestyle nodes, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mermaid-beach-qld-4218">Mermaid Beach</a> has retained its village-like charm even as demand intensifies for walkable beachside living. It’s a suburb that holds firm to its community feel, while sitting within one of Australia’s fastest-growing urban corridors.

Developer DANKAV put the neighbourhood and its residents first when drawing up the plans for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-alfred-residences-mermaid-beach-2375-gold-coast-highway-mermaid-beach-qld-4218">The Alfred Residences</a>, which will replace the former Mermaid Beach Shopping Village near Nobby Beach. The project marks a rare example of precinct renewal at a truly local scale.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-alfred-residences-mermaid-beach-2375-gold-coast-highway-mermaid-beach-qld-4218">The Alfred Residences</a>&nbsp;comprises a wide variety of one- and two-bedroom apartments, set above a new ground plane of curated hospitality and boutique retailers, all framed by generous laneways, shaded plazas, and garden paths designed to enhance pedestrian flow and public interaction.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149942 project_image_fid=355148]

The site’s configuration reflects both a respect for the area's established rhythm and a recognition of its future trajectory, particularly with the planned Mermaid Beach South light rail station directly across the road.

Residents will find immediate access to both everyday needs and broader connectivity. A Woolworths Metro and local cafés are already operating nearby, while the beach sits just 100 metres from The Alfred’s front door. Pacific Fair, the region’s flagship retail centre, is also close by, with an extensive mix of dining, fashion and entertainment.&nbsp;

For those commuting or exploring beyond Mermaid Beach, the upcoming light rail link promises seamless movement north through Broadbeach, Surfers Paradise and into Southport, expanding access without the need for a car.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149942 project_image_fid=355150]

Neighbouring locales such as Miami and Nobby Beach further enrich the lifestyle offering. These established precincts contribute everything from surf clubs and oceanfront parks to laid-back dining venues and independent retailers, all within a short walk or bike ride.&nbsp;

The Alfred effectively places residents within one of the Gold Coast’s most liveable pockets, where the essentials of daily life converge with long-term infrastructure planning and timeless natural appeal.

Predominantly local buyers jumped at the first release at The Alfred Residences, transacting the majority of the release in a matter of weeks. Demolition of the former shopping village is now underway, and Dankav expects completion of the first collection of residences in 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=149942]

The Alfred Residences brings village-style living to the heart of Mermaid Beach

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/chermside-qld-4032">Chermside</a> is better known for bus interchanges and Westfield than for high-end apartment towers. Kabbalah, on Playfield Street, is a deliberate push against that reputation.

Developed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/playfield-developments">Playfield Developments</a>, the building holds 64 apartments, all three and four bedrooms, across its 13 storeys. The apartments are generous by any measure: lower-floor three-bedrooms start at 164 sqm, each with a multi-purpose room and private balcony, while the north-facing penthouse stretches to 382 sqm. Every residence comes with two car spaces.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ana-architects">ANA Architects</a>, the Brisbane firm behind the 25-storey Willahra Tower on Queen Street and the 45-storey Mantra on Mary in the CBD, shaped the building around curved forms drawn from the natural landscape. Balcony gardens run throughout, with planter boxes worked into the private outdoor spaces of each apartment, giving residents greenery at the threshold rather than just at the rooftop.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149578 project_image_fid=354319]

That rooftop carries its own weight: a pool, landscaped gardens, and outdoor entertaining areas sit above the city, designed as much for quiet evenings as for hosting. The wellness offering continues at ground level, where a centre with pool, sauna, and communal lounge zones anchors the building's other end. Together they give the building a rhythm, somewhere to arrive at the top and somewhere to retreat to below.

The site itself is part of the pitch. "One of the last available sites to develop in an established precinct," is how Playfield Developments describes the Playfield Street address, and the surrounding context backs that up. Westfield Chermside, the second largest Westfield in Australia, is within a few minutes on foot, along with its dining precinct and cinema complex.&nbsp;

The Chermside bus interchange connects directly to the Brisbane CBD and across the northern suburbs via more than 20 Translink routes, with the CBD roughly 15 minutes away by road. The Prince Charles Hospital, one of Queensland's major teaching hospitals and the state's leading cardiac centre, is roughly a kilometre up the road on Rode Road.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149578 project_image_fid=354321]

Place Projects is handling sales, bringing a track record across some of Queensland's largest residential developments. Early buyer response has centred on the finishes and scale, "buyers consistently comment on the high-quality finishes throughout the apartments," the sales team notes, pointing to craftsmanship and considered design as the recurring draw.&nbsp;

"They're looking for generously sized apartments that offer both space and functionality, combined with a strong lifestyle offering," Place Projects says.

Construction has been awarded to Clearcon, with completion slated for late 2027. Pricing runs from $1.5 million for a lower-floor three-bedroom up to $3.65 million for the penthouse.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=149578]

Playfield Developments brings 64 apartments to Chermside with Kabbalah

More than 3,000 dwellings are currently selling or gearing up to launch across Surfers Paradise, the suburb’s most concentrated apartment pipeline in years. At least eight projects are already in market, with more moving through registration and presale, creating a meaningful wave of new supply.

This isn’t happening in a vacuum. Strong interstate migration into Queensland, particularly the Gold Coast, continues to underpin demand, with the local population expected to push past 800,000 in the early 2030s.

We’re also seeing solid early-stage buyer activity. As usual, the earliest phases tend to offer the best mix of pricing and choice, before the more popular layouts get snapped up.

Comparing Surfers Paradise projects? Browse all listings → <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/surfers-paradise-qld-4217">View all Surfers Paradise apartments</a>

<hr data-end="1189" data-start="1186" />
<h2 data-end="1218" data-section-id="tdhbfr" data-start="1191">How to Read the Pipeline</h2>

Apartment projects in Surfers Paradise are at various stages of their project lifecycle, from pre-launch, selling now, construction commenced, or construction complete.

Where you buy in that cycle matters.

<ul data-end="1674" data-start="1409">
	<li data-end="1542" data-section-id="d5c11p" data-start="1409">Registration and&nbsp;presale: Typically the lowest price points and best choice, but with longer wait times to completion</li>
	<li data-end="1608" data-section-id="plnjqp" data-start="1543">Under construction: Greater certainty, shorter timelines.</li>
	<li data-end="1674" data-section-id="13k7yl8" data-start="1609">Completed: No construction risk, but pricing reflects that.</li>
</ul>

The projects below are grouped by stage to help buyers understand where they sit in the buying window.

<hr data-end="1942" data-start="1939" />
<h2 data-end="1967" data-section-id="zj5dj7" data-start="1944">Projects Now Selling</h2>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a> is the newest apartment development to launch in Surfers Paradise.

Exhale, being developed by SIERA, comprises just 54 apartments, a density not often seen in Surfers. It sits on the corner of Enderley Avenue and Garfield Terrace, just off Northcliffe Beach. SIERA Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson spent over a year trying to secure the rare beachside site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

SIERA engaged BDA Architecture to design the building, with a striking glass curtain wall&nbsp;façade.

Offering two-, three-, and four-bedroom apartments, Exhale will also offer its residents a two-level wellness podium with a heated magnesium pool, spa, sauna, Nordic&nbsp;cold shower, and biophilic designed landscaped gardens.

There's also a dedicated Pilates and yoga studio, library and reading retreat, cinema lounge, and private dining room with a private bar and wine cellar.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about Exhale →</a>

<hr data-end="2500" data-start="2497" />
Paradiso Place is the largest project currently in market in Surfers Paradise. Developer SPG Land recently begun construction on its 845-unit development they are bringing to 103 Ferny Avenue.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=106566 project_image_fid=185858]

At this scale, it’s effectively its own sub-market, offering a wide mix of configurations across multiple price points, from entry-level investor stock through to larger owner-occupier product. Amenities include a pool, gym, and outdoor spaces.

With projects of this size, early buyers typically benefit most from the broader selection before key layouts are taken up.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/paradiso-place-surfers-paradise-103-ferny-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about Paradiso Place →</a>

<hr data-end="2500" data-start="2497" />
Jewel Residences is the only completed development on this list. The three towers, which drastically altered the Surfers Paradise skyline when they were complete in 2020 from their dress circle position&nbsp;at 36 Old Burleigh Road, home 512 apartments.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=8843 project_image_fid=264503]

With the six-star The Langham within the middle tower, Jewel offers&nbsp;​​​​​​significant hospitality venues including&nbsp;signature restaurants, a bar, cafe, and a resort pool with a swim-up bar

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/jewel-residences-surfers-paradise-36-old-burleigh-road-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about Jewel Residences </a>

<hr data-end="2938" data-start="2935" />
Andrews Projects recently commenced construction at South Beach, just shy of 400 apartments at 3006–3016 Surfers Paradise Boulevard. Prices start from $1.08 million for the one-bedroom apartments.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=8887 project_image_fid=358399]

Central to the South Beach offering is a 5,500m sqm wellness and lifestyle precinct designed around the concept of renewal as a daily ritual.

The wellness facilities include sunrise and sunset pools, an indoor hydrotherapy pool, plunge baths, a Hammam, traditional and infrared saunas, red-light therapy and dedicated treatment rooms. A Technogym gym,&nbsp;cinema, co-working lounge and a range of indoor and outdoor dining and entertaining spaces, including BBQ terraces, complete the amenity.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/south-beach-surfers-paradise-3006-3016-surfers-paradise-boulevard-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about South Beach →</a>

<hr data-end="3316" data-start="3313" />
Another new entry to the market is Palmera Residences, developed by Central Equity at 18 Garfield Terrace. That majority of the 347 residences are large three-bedroom apartments, priced from just shy of $3 million.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=361247]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera Residences</a>&nbsp;is being constructed in the prestigious Northcliffe residential neighbourhood on an expansive 3,239 sqm site. It is located at 18 Garfield Terrace near the Northcliffe Surf Life Saving Club and the patrolled Northcliffe surf beach, situated between&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/broadbeach-qld-4218">Broadbeach</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Surfers Paradise</a>.

Residents will have private access to extensive, state-of-the-art amenities, featuring two large pools including a generously scaled, family-friendly pool with safe shallow zones, and a 25-metre lap pool facing the western side, ensuring maximum sunlight all day.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-surfers-paradise-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about Palmera Residences →</a>

<hr data-end="3711" data-start="3708" />
26 Vista has benefitted from the boom in Surfers Paradise over the last few years. Over 70 per cent of the 280 apartments have sold, with the remaining priced from $1.86 million.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112730 project_image_fid=365605]

26 Vista, being developed by MRCB, is scheduled to complete in late 2030 and has attracted strong interest from locals and interstate buyers, Matt George, from project marketer Urban Activation, says.

“The diverse mix of buyers we’ve seen investing in this development stands as a testament to the superior product that is being offered. 26 Vista is truly the gold standard for coastal living, with its thoughtfully considered design and its commitment to providing residents with five-star luxury in sub-tropical surrounds.”

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-surfers-paradise-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about 26 Vista →</a>

<hr data-end="3711" data-start="3708" />
Away from the beach and closer to the Budds Beach area of Surfers Paradise is Homecorp's new tower, Florence Residences.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150414 project_image_fid=357950]

The Monte Carlo building has 116 apartments amid a suite of wellness spaces including&nbsp;a private residents’ only wellness club including a resort-style rooftop pool, hot and cold plunge pools, a spa retreat, contemporary gymnasium and a spacious yoga and Pilates studio.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/florence-residences-24-monte-carlo-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217" style="text-decoration:none">Enquire about Florence Residences →</a>

<hr data-end="4321" data-start="4318" />
<h2 data-end="4364" data-section-id="1bj0450" data-start="4323">The Broader Pipeline</h2>

There's a lot more to come in Surfers Paradise in the coming years. The most interest is likely the two-tower beachfront project proposed by Winx billionaire John Camilleri. The two towers, which will comprise 275 apartments, are to be connected by a 45-storey skybridge.

On the more boutique end, Cavella, by SEYAH, will have <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-seyah-to-launch-cavella-in-emerging-sunrise-boulevard-surfers-paradise-pocket-following-density-rethink">just 18 residences</a> across a more modestly-sized 12-level building, also nearer the river than the beach.

For a broader view, see our breakdown of the top 10 new apartment projects launching on the Gold Coast in 2026, covering key opportunities suburb by suburb.

<hr data-end="5185" data-start="5182" />
<h2 data-end="5234" data-section-id="1kp72fk" data-start="5187">What Buyers Should Weigh Up Before Enquiring</h2>

Where a project sits in the development cycle matters just as much, if not more than, the price.

An off-the-plan apartment at registration stage may offer the lowest entry point, but it typically comes with a 24–36 month settlement timeline.

Later-stage projects trade some of that upside for greater certainty, so the right choice ultimately depends on your timeframe, risk appetite, and what you’re prioritising: price, selection, or delivery.

Mike Mortlock

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News