<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have been looking for a two-bedroom investment. Do you think Mascot is a good suburb to invest in?
And do you suggest off-the-plan or existing property?
Thanks,
Mag
Hi Mag,
I always find it interesting that investors write to me and ask if a specific suburb makes a good investment.  Thinking about this, usually someone will ask about a suburb because they live near it, or it’s within close proximity to their own home and they feel a comfort investing in property close by.
When someone decides to become a property investor, their first action is usually to buy a property.  They pick a suburb fairly randomly, and then try to get a bargain there. Later, when this investment does not perform as well as they would like, they blame the investment, or property investing in general, never seeing that they are most definitely responsible for things not working out!
Just like any occupation, becoming a good property investor commences with the process of gaining an education.  Asking me if Mascot is a ‘good suburb’ means that you have not acquired the very basic skills needed to become a successful property investor!
The process to choose an area requires you to consider the entire country first, and narrow down which areas within the country show the greatest number of growth drivers.  Growth drivers include things such as a population growing faster than the national average, an abundance of infrastructure development, a median household income growing faster than inflation, a diversified industry base, low unemployment and a strong and active local council.  Most notably, though, an area with these characteristics should also be one which has yet to ‘take off’.  Choosing long established areas may mean that you get some growth, and it may already be a proven performer, but your aim should be to buy in those areas that have everything about to happen, soon, so that you can buy there at an affordable price and before everyone else does.
Considering Mascot, it is well established with little room for the bigger growth drivers to exist to propel the prices along at higher than normal growth rates.  It should be a solid area, but it won’t have that ‘boom’ in prices which makes a great investment.  You need to look further afield to areas where growth drivers exists and where values are yet impacted by these drivers.  In and around Sydney this includes many of the outer Western suburbs and some of the larger regional cities such as Penrith and Bathurst.
With regard to the second part of your question, an off-the-plan purchase carries far greater risk than an established property, and little advantage over one.  It’s very difficult to establish whether the off-the –plan property is being offered at what will be a fair market value – even a registered valuer cannot forecast future values accurately enough to assure you  that what you pay is going to be what it is worth when completed.  When you tie up your borrowing capacity on a yet-to-be completed project, you may not be allowed by the bank to borrow for additional investments, as your true position cannot be determined until the property is complete and owned by you.  If you are getting a loan to buy the property, and the property subsequently has a value less than you have agreed to pay, you may not be able to borrow enough to complete the sale, as the bank will use the value at the time, not your purchase price, to determine how much they will lend.  If you cannot complete the purchase due to lack of funds, you will be sued to proceed and you may lose your deposit.
Confirming an accurate future rent return is also nearly impossible, as this is affected by demand and supply.  Where the development is large, there could well be a sudden oversupply as they all complete and come on line, and you could get far less rent than expected, causing further financial distress to you.
Finally, I’ve seen far too many off-the-plan properties with large commissions built in for middlemen marketing people, meaning what you pay may be well over its true underlying value.  That said, I’d prefer an established property which you can buy today, whose value you can easily confirm and whose rent return is more assured.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: Should I buy off-the-plan or an existing property?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,   
I just wanted to ask if North Wollongong is a good suburb in which to invest in a one-bedroom apartment?  
Thanks,
Enrique
Hi Enrique,
There are many things which make a good investment – demand, infrastructure development, population growth and a good price to name a few.  Areas which display strong drivers in many areas, and are priced well, are usually those which see the greatest future demand and become good investments.  
North Wollongong has been fairly rapidly developed and it’s the unit market where we have seen most of the building.  There are quite a few spruikers actively selling there too, which means that some of these properties may well be overpriced.  
In this area there is a huge disparity between the prices of the newly built, stunning apartments and the older, established ones – up to $300,000 difference within a few streets.  This is telling me that many units are selling off-the-plan or as just completed and there has not been a true test of their value yet.  While people may well be buying them, we will not know the value of these new units until we see secondary sales. For those buying them first, there is a huge risk that the value will not hold up.  
If we add to that the fact that the demographics would suggest that demand in Wollongong is coming quite firmly from families, then we now see several alarm bells – an oversupply of units being presently sold well over market value to a demographic group not well represented in the area.  To me this does not bode well for the ability of these units to either hold their value or see suitable rent return.  
It’s vital that if you find an area which has the growth drivers, you buy the right kind of property there. Wollongong is an area where families live and so you should have families in mind when purchasing an investment.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Should I invest in a one-bedroom apartment in North Wollongong?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,   
We own a three-bedroom house in Sydney's North Shore and are considering the option of selling and buying a bigger house (we have three children). We bought the house five years ago (brand new) but given what we've spent on landscaping, don't think we'll make much from the sale. Given the current interest rate situation, would you advise holding off selling and buying in the same market (and for how long?) or selling/buying sooner rather than later? 
Thank you very much, 
Kris
Hi Kris,  
From your question, I gather that you are thinking of upgrading your family home to a larger one, and keeping the one you are moving out of until such times as the market is better and more advantageous to sellers.  In theory, this should mean that you buy now while the market is lower, and sell in a higher market.  
There are a few issues with this strategy though:  
<ol>
<li>
Depending upon the current mortgage on the house you live in now, the yields are likely to be very low and not enough to cover your holding costs.  Higher priced homes tend to have relatively lower yields and this makes the gap between what comes in and what goes out much greater than it would be if you owned an investment property in a higher yielding area.  These holding costs soon add up, and if the sale takes longer than you’d hoped, might eat into any increased value you will get from waiting.
</li>
<li>
If your equity lies in the current home, and you need to finance the new home to 100% of its value, your largest debt will most likely be the non tax deductible one on this new home, while your lower debt (on the old house)will be tax deductible.  This is an upside down financial situation to be in
</li>
<li>
As you can only have one Principle Place of Residence (PPOR) exemption, one of the two properties you own will begin to accrue Capital Gains tax (CGT).  If you choose for that to be the one you move out of, then any additional gain you may make by holding off will be further reduced by CGT.  The 6 year rule only applies if you don’t have another PPOR
</li>
<li>
While the North Shore might be considered ‘blue chip’ it does not follow that this is the best investment you can make.  It’s an area which has already had its boom and now, at top prices, movement upward will be significantly smaller. Other areas which are yet to be ‘discovered’ have their greatest period of growth ahead of them, while top end property, once it reaches the top end, tends to have much smaller incremental growth ahead of it. As an ‘investment’ your current home may not be the best you can do.
</li>
</ol>
It might be more advantageous for you to sell now and while you are in the CGT free period, use any un-encumbered proceeds to buy the new home, and then use the equity you have in your new home to immediately leverage back into a 100% loan for a property situated in a true, up and coming hotspot!
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Should we hold off selling and buying again in Sydney's North Shore?

<html><body>
Hello Margaret   
Long-time fan of yours!  Thank you for your insights.   
I am a single mum who has managed to grow (through some tough personal times), a small portfolio of three properties since 2004 in south-east Melbourne.   
I purchased a small development property during the GFC and have sat on this waiting for the “right time” to develop (it's a two-unit site). 
I am fast approaching retirement age (currently 53) and believe I should be developing now, but my “gut feel” says wait. 
How do I know “when is the right time”?   
I have contacted real estate agents to find out rental / sale values and research seems to show the area is devaluing slightly/stagnating as with a few areas of Melbourne. 
However the agents seem to talk up the amount of rent I could receive, as well as the amount I would get for them should I sell, once built. I don’t know who or what to believe. 
My current PPOR (beachside) also has potential for a 3-4 unit site.
Thanks.
 
The decision to develop any site must come after an extensive analysis of both the area, and the potential costs involved, before proceeding.  
It’s crucial that you first examine your capacity to meet budget blow outs and also the holding costs of waiting until this development is income producing.  Among the costs you will be required to meet will be:  
<ul>
<li>
Costs to obtain the DA, which can run to $40 - $50,000 and includes town planners fees and council contributions and fees
</li>
<li>
Costs to retain architects to draw up plans
</li>
<li>
The interest on progress payments as the build progresses
</li>
<li>
Stamp duties and other statutory charges
</li>
</ul>
Even if you are able to access a loan from a bank for the entire amount, you will need to meet the interest payments as you draw down, and you will not have any rental income to support this.  You must try to establish an overall loan amount, workout the interest payments and establish if this is within your capacity to afford.  Make sure you consider the worst case scenario – I have seen developments take years to complete and you will have holding costs right up until you can rent the properties or sell them.  
You also need to then add these holding costs to the overall project amount so that you can determine whether the final product is worth what you are paying to build it.  You would want to see at least a 20% profit margin to make this worthwhile, as there will be capital gains tax to consider.  In order to reduce that capital gains tax, you will need to ensure that you hold the properties for 12 months past the contract date to get the 50% discount, although if you are building with the intention to sell for profit, the tax office may treat you differently and you may not get the discount.  
There is so much more I could say about this, but I think you get my drift at this stage – developing is quite a risky venture and if you are a single mum who has worked hard to get where you are, you are about to add a level of risk to your investing which has the potential to undo all of your hard work.  
Your other option is to sell this development site to another developer and you might like to put in place the DA approval first, which can often make the property more saleable.  This still has costs attached though, which you will need to meet with no guarantees that you will recoup it via a gain to the value of the property.  
You should speak to a town planner to get a good idea of what you may be up for regarding costs, and then to a qualified valuer to see what potential value you might get out of building.  Then perhaps even talk to a builder about the costs of the build so that you can establish a ballpark project cost before making any decisions.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: when is the right time to develop my investment properties?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret, 
I have a brand new property settled in early June 2012. I have lived in it since settlement and claimed it as my principal place of residence until Jan 2013 after which I moved out and rented it out. 
I have also obtained a depreciation report and am trying to decide if I should depreciate or not this financial year. 
Since I’m claiming this property as my PPOR, if I sell within the six-year rule, what are the CGT implications caused by me depreciating? Will I still be fully exempt from paying CGT? 
Furthermore, my depreciation report lists a maximum I can claim every year. Since my property was settled early June 2012 (i.e. in the 2011-2012FY) does this mean this year I would only be able to claim a pro-rated amount on the year 2 figure on the report?
Thanks,
Min
Hi Min,
You have a number of questions here so I will deal with them one at a time:  
<ol>
<li>
As you probably know, you have a six-year window from Jan 2013 to either move back in, or sell, to avoid CGT.  Be aware though, that this is only possible as long as you do not own another property in which you live and on which you wish to claim the principal place of residence exemption.  The rule is that only one property can have the exemption – so if you have bought something else to live in, that may be the one you apply the exemption to, therefore losing this six-year window on the one you moved from.
</li>
<li>
Your depreciation report should show you the amount of depreciation available for the remainder of the year and then for each of the subsequent 9 years.  There is no real reason not to claim the depreciation in this FY as it does not roll over or accumulate – therefore not claiming it will not result in a better outcome next year.  Often, due to low value pools and items under $300, there are immediate write-offs for some items which can boost the amounts claimed.
</li>
<li>
There is no CGT impact, as far as I am aware. If we assumed that you bought an item, or the quantity surveyor specified the items and you subsequently write them off each year (as you would from your report) your accountant will most likely treat the depreciable assets as sold at written down value, so there is no write back of depreciation.  My tax expert tells me that the majority of contracts do not specify a value of these items, so the treatment of writing down the value is in accordance with the general rules around depreciation.
</li>
<li>
If you obtained the report when you bought it, rather than when you rented it for the first time, then an adjustment must be made for days rented/days not rented.  If it’s only just been prepared then this report should make allowances for when it first became income producing and provide a figure to be used from that date (therefore the report amount is the full amount which can be claimed).  If you are not sure you should go back to the quantity surveyor and ask them to give you an exact amount calculated from the date it was first rented until the end of the FY.
</li>
</ol>
Remember, I am not a tax accountant or a quantity surveyor and this general information is provided based on my experiences.  You really should consult both of those professionals who can accurately establish your true position in relation to tax.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: what are the tax implications of depreciating my principal place of residence?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I am currently residing in Wisconsin, USA however I own a two-bedroom townhouse in north-western Sydney. I am interested in potentially selling this property with a view to buying a property in the USA. When, in your opinion, would be the optimum time to sell in Sydney in the next 6-18 months, and why? Thank you for any information and advice you may be able to provide. Kind Regards, Michael
 
Hi Michael,
I’d have to say that the optimum time to sell a property in Sydney is not likely to be in the coming 18 months at all!  Of course this will depend very much upon where your property actually is, but if it is somewhere around the Hills District, which I imagine it is since that is North Western Sydney, then this is an area which is slated to continue with some respectable growth.  
While the area has, over the past 15 years, had a population growth of almost twice that of Western Sydney, there is more to come yet. Industrial and office rents consistently rank well below the Sydney average, which means that business is well and truly attracted to the area. Purchase costs for commercial and industrial property also rank lower than the Sydney average and this should enhance employment growth.  
While question marks still hang over the development of good transport infrastructure, this must come, since the population is showing no signs of slowing down. There are some significant land releases planned which, for a time, may cause growth to hover a little, but an upward climb should still be seen.
In my opinion, I wouldn’t be likely to buy in right now, as to do so would be at the cost of buying into a market which will boom sooner, however I also would not be inclined to sell, unless you bought the property for a song and already have significant gains.  If that’s the case then selling now, or in 18 months’ time, won’t make a lot of difference.  If not, then I’d be hanging around for the gains likely to be seen over the coming 10 years.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
 
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: is there a good time to sell in Sydney soon?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,   

I would like to ask you how one can go about converting residential property into commercial property such as a medical centre.  

What are the pros and cons of doing that?

Thanking you.

Regards,

Opinder

<hr>
Hi Opinder,

The answer to this question may vary a little from state to state – each state has their own department of planning and, sadly, not all states are on the same page with the same rules.  

Having said that, and generally speaking, the ability to convert a standard residential property into a commercial property is going to depend upon the current zoning.  Note that this is different from electing to run a home business from a residential property – in some councils that may also need some kind of approval, however the purpose of such a venture does not specifically change the purpose for the building itself.

Where you wish to turn a house into a doctor’s surgery or some other business, the zoning must be appropriate for the new use.  This is because there are many considerations to make: – will there be sufficient parking so that the neighbours properties aren’t affected by cars in the street? Will the business affect the peaceful habitation of homes in the area? Will the presence of customers have any kind of impact which may be detrimental to the area? and so forth.  

[smartcode_project:default project_id=8669]

In some cases there may already be a commercial zoning or a ‘mixed business’ zoning in place, and in these cases often doctors’ surgeries and the like are allowed.  However, where the zoning is purely residential, then the intended use will either be not allowed, or you will have to apply to council for a change in zoning.  

In these circumstances it’s often better to engage a town planner to assist you with the application.  The money you spend on such a professional will most likely save you countless hours of your time.  The town planner can usually give you a good indication of your chances of success before you incur much time, or spend much money.

Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Destiny</a>.

Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: how can I convert residential property into commercial property?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have a number of properties in my portfolio and I know that you do too.  Can I ask – do you have yearly pest inspections done on each property?  My agent says I need to do this, but this is quite costly and usually it doesn’t turn up anything.  Are they required, or is the property manager on a commission with the pest inspection companies?
Sarah
 
 
Hi Sarah,
Mostly we need to be able to trust our property managers to advise us on what we need to do with our properties, and when, but you don’t have to take all of their suggestions on board and carry them out.  In the end you are the owner and common sense should always prevail.  Whether you get yearly inspections done, or not, is up to you and will depend upon many things including the age of the property and its history of pest activity.
My suggestions are:
<ul>
<li>Ensure that, before buying, you get a pest inspection done.  Your legal person or real estate agent should be able to point you to a qualified professional</li>
<li>Read and be familiar with it – it will outline the risks for the future.  You might even use this as a negotiating tool</li>
<li>Some properties at higher risk may need regular inspections and I highly recommend yearly in this case</li>
<li>Others, and depending upon your report, you can probably do every 2 or 3 years, but always read the reports thoroughly.</li>
</ul>
Some property managers will automatically suggest pest inspections be done yearly, and while I don’t think they are on any commissions for this, they may not always be necessary.  I always tell all of my property managers not to arrange anything without my prior approval, and I treat each property differently, according to its age, the level of risk it has and the findings in that original pest report.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: do I need annual pest inspections on my investment properties?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret, We are aware of the benefits of having a depreciation schedule compiled for investment properties. Can you tell me if there is any benefit in having a depreciation schedule compiled for one's principal place of residence? Many thanks,
Maria
While I frequently talk about depreciation, I guess we haven’t really painted the picture of how it looks as a bottom line.
Basically, all of the fixtures, fittings and furniture in any income producing property are eligible for you to make a claim for the depreciating value. This is done in consideration for the fact that one day you may have to replace them, and getting the tax breaks can help you to save up for that eventuality.  In a nutshell:
<ul>
<li>Each item has a different rate depending upon its effective life.
</li>
<li>Each year you work out how much value has been ‘lost’ and deduct from the income.  
</li>
<li>No money is lost, only value. That’s why we call it ‘on paper’.
</li>
<li>The same applies to the building but over 40 years
</li>
</ul>
Each movable item has a different rate that you can claim depending upon how long the tax office thinks it will last – usually between 2 and 10 years. This means that each year you work out how much value has been ‘lost’ and take that amount off the income.  
You haven’t lost actual money here, only value, but you do get actual money back as you now pay less tax on the income.  That’s why we call it ‘on paper’. You can do the same with the building, but it takes longer for that to run out, being 40 years
The extra tax you get back helps a lot with your cash flow – in essence the rent, plus your extra tax, make up your cash inflows, while your expenses make up the outflows. Claiming depreciation can mean that you reduce the gap between what comes in and what goes out and helps you to stay in the market longer!
As for your own home, as it does not produce an income there’s no point in having a schedule done as you cannot make any claims there. If you move out and make it a rental, you can have one done at that time.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: do I need a depreciation schedule for the home I live in?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
 I was wondering, if I buy a house that can be rented out on the short-term holiday rental market, can I, if I wanted to, stay there and rent this back from myself?
 Regards,
Scott
Hi Scott,  
The issue of whether you can rent it back from yourself is only one of the many to consider, and when you buy such a property you have to think of them all! Often the ability to get some kind of personal benefit from a property causes investors to buy property which is not in a potentially good area and which, without the benefit of the holiday option would not be a good investment at all.  
Here are some important points:
<ul>
<li>
The tax office may not see this as an arm’s length transaction if you stay there yourself and may not allow claims for that period
</li>
<li>
Paying the rent, or not receiving the rent if you stayed there free, is pretty similar and still represents a period of personal benefit
</li>
</ul>
Scott I am unclear as to why you would be doing this anyway – paying rent to yourself, presumably via the manager who would be looking after it, means you only get the net rent after management costs.
As I said earlier, the problem is that few places we would like to holiday too are actually good places to invest and a holiday unit is often amongst the worst type of property too. Therefore, doing this could mean you would end up with a bad property, in the wrong area, just for the few weeks benefit, which is not a benefit since you are paying rent anyway!
Stick to buying great properties in strong areas which you legally rent to bona fide tenants – build up a solid portfolio and soon enough you’ll be choosing to holiday anywhere you want.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: can I rent my holiday house from myself?

Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

Joel Robinson

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more internation and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

Margaret Lomas

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News