<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I am currently looking at purchasing an investment property in Sydney.  I am considering the purchase of an established one or two bedroom apartment in the inner west. Do you believe this is the right option and that the Sydney market will continue to have good capital growth? I hope I would not be buying at the peak of the property cycle in Sydney.
Also, can you have your investment property transaction account offset against a personal home loan and not the investment home loan? I presume that it is more advantageous to have this arrangement as the interest on the investment property is tax deductable, where my personal home loan interest is not?  I just want to ensure that I would not be breaking any tax rules by having this loan structure.
Thank you
Darren
Margaret's answer on next page. Please click below.
                        
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Darren,
Some experts are saying that the Sydney market will continue to boom during 2014, but I believe it will be headed for a distinct slowdown toward the middle of the year.  Even so, I truly believe the best Sydney buying opportunity is now behind you and it may be better to seek out an emerging market, like the mid-ring suburbs of Brisbane, and get in on the start of that boom.
When you refer to your ‘investment property transaction account’, I am going to assume you mean that you have a savings account set up, into which you pay money which covers your investment property expenses, which is also able to offset loan interest.  You can have this offsetting interest on any loan and the tax office does not prescribe where you choose to offset interest.  They can only prescribe which interest is deductible and they have made it clear how they feel about capitalising interest.
Having sad that, remember that you can have your rental income paid straight into your home loan (or home loan offset account) and as long as you meet the interest payment on your investment loans as and when it falls due, this is acceptable. 
Some accountants also say that you can redraw from an investment loan to meet investment property expenses such as rates and repairs, or keep a separate, smaller line of credit style loan which you use to pay investment property related expenses, ensuring you also pay its interest bill each month too.  I’d always seek a private ruling form the tax office before putting any of these unusual arrangements in place.
Regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
                                      
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Is it still a good time to buy in Sydney and how can I structure my personal and investment loans?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I got a question regarding buying off the plan in Bungarribee region close to <a target="_blank" href="/news">Doonside</a> in NSW.
The off the plan property will cost somewhere between $550,000 to $600,000 after construction, whereas the ready to move houses in the Doonside region are in the range of $480,000 to $500,000, albiet without the first home buyer grant and without stamp duty exemption.
Is it an attractive buy from a first home buyer perspective? Does it makes sense to buy property which is valued at least $50,000 to $60,000 higher than the ready to move, relatively new houses.
And what sort of growth is expected in Doonside and the surrouding region? Additional things I am considering are affordability, community, proximity to transport, schooling and resale value after five to seven years.
Regards,
Rajesh
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
                
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Rajesh,
When off the plan marketing was first established, it was a great chance for buyers to obtain under- market value properties. Developers needed to get a proportion of pre-sales in order to qualify for development finance and so they offered up to 25% of the development as pre sales, usually at the prices of the day, or less. 
Lucky buyers committed to buy and years later, when finally finished, often found they were paying a lower price for property which due to market movements was now worth more.  The developer got his finance as the bank happily provided the money on the basis of the pre-sales.
These days developers are much greedier, trying to sell entire developments off the plan at tomorrow’s prices.  The entire risk sits with the buyer who is fully exposed to many drawbacks.
These include:
<ul>
<li>
Their commitment to the sale can often mean that, while they wait for completion, a bank won’t lend to them for additional purchases, as this off the plan purchase is a commitment with no income as yet.
</li>
<li>
The market may plateau or even fall after the commitment is made, making the property worth less at settlement than is being paid (and this is actually very common)
</li>
<li>
If the property is worth more than is being paid, there is often a clause deep in the contract allowing the developer to pull out for any reason, but no such clause for the buyer, whose commitment is irreversible
</li>
<li>
On delivery, the property is often quite different in appearance than it appeared in the brochures – developers can make changes of up to 10% without voiding the contract.  You cannot be assured of exactly what you are getting.
</li>
<li>
Though the lender may approve a loan to buy the property, on completion of the building they will reassess the borrower and value the property.  If the buyer’s financial circumstances have changed they may no longer qualify for the loan, and if the valuation is less than purchase price the buyer may not be able to borrow enough to proceed.  They will not, however, be able to get out of the contact and will be sued by the developer to complete.
</li>
</ul>
There are many more drawbacks than this, and a few positives, but as far as investing goes, off the plan can be a poor choice.
While I expect that Doonside will grow at slightly above average, you’ve already established that these off the plan properties are well above current market value, up to 25%.  The market will need to grow by at last that amount in the coming two to three years for you to at least be even, and even then it will be a wasted exercise, as you are tying your money up and there should be some upside to that.
If you would like to buy in Doonside, check out what else is available first in an already established, possibly near new property.  That way, by the time these off the plan properties are completed, you may well have a few existing properties already under your belt and growing!
Kind regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? Ask Margaret!
                
</body></html>

I'm a first home buyer, is off the plan a good investment? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hello Margaret,
My husband and I, both 50, are considering purchasing an investment property to potentially provide us with an income for our retirement. We have two dependent children, aged 19 and 16, a combined annual income of around $200,000, a mortgage of $320,000 and our home, recently appraised, is worth about $1 million. We are paying off our mortgage at $2,200 per fortnight at 5.1%. We always clear credit card debts before interest is incurred. We have no other loans.
We both have frozen pension overseas, seven and 12 years, and both have had workplace super since returning to Australia in 2006, contributing an extra $100 per fortnight each. We have savings and shares to totaling about $10,000.
I am concerned we will need to sell the family home and downsize, in order to adequately fund our retirement. We would prefer to leave an inheritance for our two children, to enable them to each get on the property ladder before real estate eventually becomes too pricey.
I have been reading your articles over the past year and I'm not sure if we are in a position to purchase a second home, or if this is the way forward for us?
We used 10 years of (cashed in) super, to purchase and develop our first property, at the ripe age of 38 and 35, overseas, giving us a significant profit over the seven years we lived there. Ultimately, this enabled us to return to Australia and purchase our first home here in a good suburb.
Hope you can help us with some independent advice.
Kind regards,
Maria
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Maria,
I'm glad you wrote to me before rushing ahead and making any major mistakes.
Firstly, I think it is imperative that you think about planning for your own retirement before you think about planning for your children's inheritance!  You are a lot older and closer to retirement than they are, and the best inheritance you can give them is parents who are financially independent and who lead by example.  Teach them how to be good investors by becoming one yourself and they won't need to inherit.
You are in an excellent position to begin investing, in fact you have been for some time so there's no time to waste.  I've done some quick calculations based upon your equity of around $700,000 and your incomes of $200,000 and, along with projected rental incomes which buying property would bring, there is no reason why you could not in fact borrow enough to buy total property to the value of around $2 million.
Now, don't rush out and do that  - just because you qualify doesn't mean you should do it! 
You must start with a strategy, an assessment of your risk profile, a plan which matches your personal circumstances, then some good quality education to enable you to become a skilled investor before you start.  If you do not follow this sequence you will be setting  yourself up as fodder for every dodgy property spruiker that you are bound to find lurking in every corner - waiting to part you with your money on property which might be right for them (due to their large commissions) but possibly wrong for you. 
Here are some things to be wary of:
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/21/number-1.jpg" width="20" height="30" alt="number-1" style="float: left;"> Mortgage brokers giving you 'property advice' - they are licenced to give you loan advice only and largely have no qualifications or skills to assist you to invest well.  Their property recommendations are most likely being made because they will be receiving commissions from developers for anything you buy.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/21/number-2.jpg" width="26" height="30" alt="number-2" style="float: left;">Financial advisers giving property advice - recent changes to the law means financial advisers no longer make money from commissions, instead they must charge the client.  Some are turning to developer stock to sell to their clients, for which they receive large commissions, with no requirement in the legislation to tell you about them.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/21/number-3.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-3" style="float: left;">Glossy brochures advertising fabulous property in areas that you cannot confirm is really a hotspot.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/02/21/number-4.jpg" width="22" height="30" alt="number-4" style="float: left;">Anyone giving you 'property advice' and selling you a property as well - it's impossible to be independent if there are commissions to be made, and these people cannot possibly have properties to sell you in a hotspot which also just happens to be perfectly matched to your own financial circumstances.
Now that I've provided all the warnings, get going!  Read some good property books and look for an adviser who offers a pure advice model.  Get educated too, but beware the spruiker seminar with the high price tag!
Regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
 
      
</body></html>

Am I in a good position to become a property investor? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,

I have a duplex approved vacant block in Queensland. The block size is 928 square metres. I don't want to build two houses/units that are attached. I have checked with the local council (Logan City Council), they have informed me that it is possible to have two detached houses build on that block (which we will have to apply for).

Now I also asked them if I could subdivide that block into two lots. They said that was possible as well with application of subdivision costing $1,095 plus $520 per lot which comes to a total of $2,135. They said that the headworks charges would come to approx $28,000. This $28,000 is for one block as there will only be one additional block.

I asked them if there is any other charges that I may come across. They said there would be a water meter connection (which a different department of the council informed would be $1,414.41).

They said that I will also need to hire a surveyor, at least for official drawings for sealing. I estimate the total cost of subdivision to be around $40,000 (including some contingencies). the subdivision is on a corner block so roadworks will not be required. The duplex block is part of a subdivision that happened approx 1 year ago and therefore the infrastructure and all services are all new.

Now I am trying to figure out whether it is better to have the block subdivided into two lots and then build a house each on it or build two detached houses on it without subdividing. If I subdivide, I think the bank valuation would be higher but the rental income would be the same for both scenarios. But if I subdivide, then the return on investment through rent would be less.

Can you please shine some light on things or views that I am missing out on. What do you think I should do?  Should I spend to subdivide (while the extra money spent for subdivision may turn out to be the same valuation that the two blocks combine will generate), or should I build detached houses without subdividing and let the subdividing idea sit for future.

Kind regards,

Chetan

Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.

 

<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Chetan,

It seems like you have already  done a lot of the due diligence in considering the true costs of this subdivision, so well done.  Often people don’t consider this big picture and instead rush ahead, only to find out too late that the costs exceed the benefits.

It is true that, most often, two separately titled blocks can fetch a better valuation than a single-titled, two dwelling lot.  In my experience the difference is between $30,000 and $50,000, depending upon where the block is.  However, usually the rental return remains the same – tenants are rarely aware of the title arrangements and won’t know whether they are on a separately titled dwelling or not.

You need to consider your personal circumstances before working out if it’s worthwhile spending this money now, or later.

If you will be relying on equity to allow you to leverage into more property, you will want every cent of equity that you can get.  It’s possible that subdividing now will allow each individual block to gain value at a greater rate, giving you more overall equity and allowing you to leverage into more property sooner.  That extra $10 - $20,000 in equity might add up to $100,000 in borrowing capacity (subject to your qualifying), and you could then acquire more property now.

On the other hand, if you have plenty of equity elsewhere in other property and are not stopped from further leverage, I cannot see the point in subdividing at this stage.  Keep the money and use it to pay down debt, which in itself will provide some more leveraging power.

Down the track, when you wish to liquidate your portfolio to access retirement funds, you will probably want to subdivide then, as it will be easier to sell two separate blocks and you should fetch a higher price for each than you could get for the two combined.

Regards,

Margaret

Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.

She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Destiny</a>.

Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>

<h2 style="font-size: 14px;">Properties you may like:</h2>

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6284]

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7742]

[smartcode_project:default project_id=24323]
</body></html>

I want to build two houses on one block; should I subdivide now or later? 

<html><body>
Hi Margaret, 
Can you tell me what has happened to unit rentals in Sydney over the past two years? 
Your advice is appreciated.
Kind regards, 
Peter
 
Hi Peter,
This is almost like asking ‘how long is a piece of string!
‘Sydney’ is a very large place and unit rentals can vary greatly from area to area, depending on many things including current demand, current and future supply, housing affordability, demographics and population growth.
For example, rents in <a href="/news">Double Bay</a> are 15% higher than last year while those in <a href="/news">Mosman</a> are 2% lower.  <a href="/news">Cronulla</a> sits 1% lower than last year while <a href="/news">Alexandria</a> sits 3% higher.  <a href="/news">Woolloomooloo</a> is 7% lower while <a href="/news">Parramatta</a> is 4% higher.
As an investor, it's crucial that you have a wider view of what you are buying and you must consider many aspects alongside potential rental yield. Look at areas where the population is growing faster than average but relatively few new developments are planned.
Consider buying in suburbs which have a lot of future infrastructure plans and where it seems that the services required by the demographics of the area are considered and being supplied.
And, more importantly, don’t buy a unit just because it seems to have a good yield, or it feels like a ‘cheaper’ way to get into the market.  In some areas the units grow better than the houses and in others the reverse is true. 
This is related to the kinds of people who live there – in family oriented areas houses will always get better growth and better yields, while in areas targeting couples or singles it will most likely be the units which present the better buy. 
Buying the wrong property type for the demographics could lead to a bad investment in an area which otherwise might have presented a good opportunity.
Regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

What has been happening with Sydney unit rentals recently?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
We are looking to buy an investment property in the next couple of months, preferably a house on the Gold Coast, because we've lived there before and it's affordable.
 We have a house in Penrith, but Sydney is too expensive for what we're after at present.
 Do you think the Gold Coast would be a wise move?
Kind regards and many thanks,
Stacey
 
Hi Stacey,
You sound like you are about to make some of the classic first time investor mistakes, so well done for writing to me first so that we can make sure that you don't!
You have said "preferably a house on the Gold Coast" and then quoted two reasons - that you lived there before and that it's affordable.
Living in an area doesn't turn it into a viable place to invest!  In addition, while investors always state that they have lived in an area, and so 'know it well'  as a reason for choosing it, it's highly unlikely that you 'know' the investment fundamentals about that area.
For example, can you quote the current vacancy rate?  Population growth statistics?  Median household income?  Council plans for infrastructure? Employment stats and industry spread?  I'd say no, and unless you start at least with those basic questions then you might as well throw a dart at a map of Australia and invest where it lands. You have the same chances of success using that method as you do using the 'we know it' method.
Investors must take care not to fall into the trap of believing that living in an area gives them special knowledge, and also that unless you live somewhere you cannot know it well.  There's absolutely no added safety investing in a market you've previously lived in.
In fact, there is often added danger as your familiarity makes you careless and you fail to adequately perform the due diligence needed to make sure that, at that moment in time, you are choosing the very best area to invest in.  Contrary to the rubbish that property spruikers spout, property investment can, and does, fail dismally and until you have learned how to recognise a viable investing area, you shouldn't be buying at all.
The second mistake you are about to make is that your decision making process is being 'price driven'.  This is common and is a situation where an investor uses a price range or price point to determine where they buy.  The reality is that it is never price which determines how well an area will grow. If you are driven by price you may well end up in an area where the returns you see mean that keeping your money in the bank would have been a more profitable venture.
Instead, you should learn how to select an area by doing the research first, and then, if properties in your price range are not available in that area, go looking again for another area which also shows the growth drivers.  I can assure you this 'Sydney' obsession will soon end and those buying there may land quite disappointed with the overall results.  There are many, many areas today with significant growth drivers, showing great promise and with affordable property - you just have to learn how to find it!
Regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

A couple of classic first time investor mistakes

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I am from Sydney and I have a property that is one acre, well it's around 4,375 square metres. 
Originally it was all farm land, but there's been a new development and now I have one of the only acres left. Now have homes all around me and my land has roads at the back and front of me.
I don't think there is much else that I can do to my acre. I would like to subdivide it and I need to do it the right way so I don't make any costly errors. 
I gave spoken with local council and the lot sizes I am allowed to do is 550 square metres. 
If you could push me in the right direction I would really be grateful.
Thanks, 
Shane
 
Hi Shane
It sounds like you have your one acre available to subdivide into around eight lots, depending upon what your council will allow. That should be fairly straightforward, though not without cost.
You must be aware that all councils will have different rules, regulations and processes even though they all fall under the one state government planning department rules.  It's important that you know and understand all of the requirements before you get started.
You should start by going to your local council website and looking up the town plan.  Here you will find the minimum lot size according to the incline of the land, and you can work out how many you can do.
After this it would be wise to contract a local town planner who should be able to have the required surveys, site and engineering plans drawn up for you.  While there is a cost involved in having a town planner involved, it can save you a lot of time and effort and often the risk of getting rejected after you've spent a lot of money.  Town planners usually know the rules intimately, and many have previously worked for council, so they are in the best position to develop a proposal with the greatest chances of success.
You will incur a large amount of cost before you even get to the point where these could be sold. These include, but are not limited to: roads (if required), drainage and sewerage, connection of services, access driveways, cutting and levelling, retaining walls, tree removal and more.  On top of this will be planner fees, council contributions, application fees, drafting fees, engineers costs and surveys.  You will need to fund all of these costs yourself, as until the final approval is in place and a 'construction certificate' is issued, you won't be able to sell them. 
My advice is to make very sure that someone has adequately estimated these costs and that you can afford to meet them before you get started, or you may find yourself in a situation where you run out of money before you are done.
Another option is to either sell to a developer before you even begin, or do the initial work in designing the subdivision but place the acre on the market as a 'pre DA approved' lot. This may then get you a bit more money if you can show the potential subdivision allowed.
Regards,
Margaret
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular 'Property Success With Margaret Lomas' and heads up the panel on 'Your Money, Your Call', both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
 
</body></html>

I want to subdivide but how do I avoid costly mistakes?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret, 
 We own a five acre block near Darwin with a four-bedroom house under renovation. 
 My hubby is a 65 year-old self-employed tradesman and as we are not overly endowed with super, had the idea that if he built a small residence (granny flat) on same block with separate power, water etc, we could base ourselves there and rent out the main dwelling for income.
We would also caretake the block, e.g. mow lawns, remove palm frond,s etc. (There are a lot of properties this size in this area which build granny flats /dependant units and rent those out seemingly with no trouble planning-wise it seems.) We can’t subdivide five acres here. 
 Can you please advise if our idea is even feasible tax wise before we look into it further? I realise it is a pretty broad query! 
 Many thanks, 
 Jane 
 
Dear Jane,
This is an interesting question and one which is not often asked, and so I referred to Julia Hartman, a great expert on these more obscure scenarios.
She has said that there are many things to consider, the main one being the capital gains tax exemption for your principal place of residence. Once the granny flat is built, if you moved into it immediately, then from a tax point of view this would be treated as two separate properties. Once you rent out the former family home, the cost base of that property is considered to be the market value at the time. The granny flat and the land underneath it would also be given a market value.
At this point you would have to choose which one you wanted covered by the main residence capital gains tax (CGT) exemption – and ahead of time it can be really hard to work out which of the two is likely to have the greatest amount of growth.  If you choose the former family home to have the exemption, then the granny flat and its land will have CGT from its determined market value, and if you choose the granny flat, then the family home will attract CGT from the market value established upon you moving out.
If you don’t want  the property to be treated like two separate assets,  then you need to live in both the granny flat and the house, combined as your home, for the first three months at least.  This way, the two houses are seen as one dwelling,  and for CGT purposes the treatment would be just the same as if you were renting out rooms or part of your home.  This of course exposes the whole property to CGT from the market value of the whole property at the time the granny flat is built, but only for the portion of the home which was rented out – and so it’s done on a pro rata basis.
As you can see – its complex! It’s going to be really hard to actually work out which pathway is the best one to take, since you can’t really estimate future values.  Make sure that you have an accountant who can help you work out some ballpark figures and don’t make any decisions until you have a clear understanding of what could potentially happen in the future.
Regards,
Margaret.
<hr>
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

How will building a granny flat work out tax wise?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I'm a new investor and I'm about to invest in a property in Broken Hill. The property is vacant at the moment but the real estate has advised a potential rent of $200.
I'm also yet to do a building and pest inspection. 
Would you be able to give me some advice?
Kind regards,

Ashis
 

When new investors begin the process of choosing their very first investment property, usually they are motivated and guided by the desire to get something as affordable as possible.  In doing so, they consider a price range within their budget, and then go looking for a house to match.  Next, they usually find out the rent return and if it seems as if it will provide a reasonable cash flow, they believe they have a good buy on their hands.
The problem with this approach is that, while it means that you will buy something within your comfort zone in terms of price, with a rent return likely to cover most costs so that your weekly personal cash flows are not too badly impacted, it completely ignores one of the most important features of successful investing – and that is buying a property which will grow and so increase your net worth.  While getting a neutral or positive cash flow is indeed of considerable importance (as highly negative cash flows can cause financial distress and potential early exit), owning property which never grows (or grows very little) will do no more for you than never owning property at all!.
Broken Hill, in my opinion, falls within the category of an area which has affordable housing  and rental yields of over 6%.  However, it has a population which is only not growing; in 2011 it lost 80 people!  There are over 500 properties currently listed, with only four people looking per property available, as compared to a state average of 20.  Combined with a lack of employment opportunities, these facts indicate that there are simply no drivers for property price growth and you’re likely to be left with a property which does nothing in the short and medium term, and likely in the long term too.  You will essentially buy yourself a headache (which most properties are, at some time), with no capacity for a reward at the end!
While I am definitely not a proponent of spending up big when it comes to buying investment property, I believe there is far more risk in buying a cheap property with no demand drivers than there is in buying a more expensive property in an area where you have confirmed employment opportunities, population growth and suitable provision of infrastructure.  Such an area can still have a rental yield sufficient to cover your costs and not stress your budget today,  and in addition to this it can provide growth of your asset and the capacity to leverage into more properties, and thus build a larger portfolio.
Regards,
Margaret
 
<hr>
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Should I buy my first investment property in Broken Hill?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,  
I need your help. Currently I have an old house on a piece of land in Longanlea. I would like to look into subdiving the property. Where do I start?
Appreciate your help and knowledge.  
Thanks  and kind regards,
Stacey
 
Hi Stacey,
Many investors write to me eager to begin a subdivision, as they see it as the chance to make quick profits, easily.  Sometimes it is, but more often than not subdividing ends up being costly, time consuming and very stressful, with the profits made disappointing and sometimes not commensurate with the effort which has been made.  
Before you subdivide, it is critical that you establish the likelihood of being able to make a considerable profit from the exercise, both in terms of the final value of the subdivided property and the improved rental yield.  If you are able to subdivide a property while keeping the existing property (with or without a renovation) then this will always be preferable.  In this case you can essentially end up with a free piece of land, which, if developed, will more than likely be worth more than it was before the subdivision.  While you subdivide you can at least be earning  rental yield from the existing property.
On the other hand, if subdivision requires demolition of the existing property, you really must do your numbers to establish if this is a worthwhile exercise.  Demolition can run to tens of thousands of dollars, and along with the costs of subdivision, which in itself can be up to $50,000, you should be sure that the resulting two blocks, considering any loss of value once they no longer have a dwelling on them (or the improved value once you spend money on erecting two new dwellings) is worth it. 
When establishing this, do be sure to take into account the accruing interest on any loan on the property (which you must pay without the benefit of rental income), and the interest on any loan you need to create the subdivision and/or build new dwellings, all which add to your cost base.  
If you have done the exercise and still feel that there is a chance for profit, the next step would be to consult with a local town planner.  Town planners can guide you and help to establish if the proposed subdivision falls within the council’s development application (DA) requirements.  If it does not, they can also advise what they believe to be the chances that you can be granted an approval under an exemption of some sort, which can happen.  The costs of a town planner, which can be anything from $2,000 - $5,000 should be considered in your subdivision costs.  
The town planner should be able to arrange for you any surveys, engineer’s drawings for driveways, drainage and easements and even prepare the submission for you.  Remember that at this stage you must pay all of these costs prior to even knowing if the subdivision will be approved.  Some councils have good pre- DA processes in place designed to minimise costs and save you submitting a DA application which they would never approve in the first place, while others don’t.  I personally have spent $10,000 in an area in Queensland for a DA which is now dead in the water due to a constantly changing opinion about what can and cannot be done, so there is a very real possibility that you will lose money unless you are sure that your subdivision is straight forward.  
Your DA approval will come with a list of requirements which must be attended before the final subdivision is cleared (such as access-way construction, and any sewer and drainage requirements) and, once done, your subdivision is complete.  Depending upon the council and their policy, this can take three months or it can take 12 months – there seems to be no standard here, and however long it takes you’ll have money on the table not getting a return and essentially adding to your costs.
Regards,
Margaret
 
<hr>
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
 
 
     
</body></html>

I want to subdivide, but where do I start?

Repeat buyers are one of the strongest measures of confidence in any apartment development.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/era-newcastle-west-124-126-bull-street-newcastle-west-nsw-2302">ERA</a> in Newcastle West, some purchasers are returning to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gwh">GWH</a> after living at the developer's One Apartments. Their decision to purchase again was driven by the quality of life they found after moving into their first GWH home.

Keith Wilton had spent years living in a house in East Maitland before deciding it was time for a change. Apartment living had always been on his radar, but he was selective about what he wanted.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FH_1EzB-1vs?si=XScVlP1ERsTDJoME" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

"I had some boxes I wanted to tick," he says.

Keith points to the open-plan design, generous outdoor areas and considered inclusions as key reasons One Apartments worked for him.

“One of those things was a nice indoor open plan area, but also I wanted a nice outdoor open area that I could entertain on in summer or Christmases or birthdays,” he says.

He also found value in the smaller details, from integrated appliances to shared resident spaces including the pool, cinema and rooftop areas.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356818]

After comparing several developments, he chose One Apartments because of GWH's longstanding local reputation and his own experience working with the developer on a commercial project more than a decade earlier.

"I knew that they were local, that the quality of the build was going to be up there. I'd looked at other apartment complexes around and close by, and I just knew that here was a better decision location wise."

Today, Keith says the move has completely changed how he experiences Newcastle.

"I enjoy living in this location because it's more of a lifestyle change. That Newcastle city living where you can walk to restaurants and bars and even beaches and parks and even shopping across the road."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356828]

Beyond the location, he says it's the sense of community that has surprised him most.

"Everyone loves living here because they chose to live here, but everyone looks out for each other. It's a real great community feel here."

For Aimee and Lyle Goodman, the journey started almost by chance.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tsioMLcnjas?si=zq-ys3JuWpfa5hFv" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The couple happened to be having coffee in Newcastle when they noticed the site where One Apartments was about to begin construction.

"We were aware GWH was planning a development," Aimee says. "We made one phone call and things moved pretty quickly after that."

As busy business owners, they initially thought apartment living would simply reduce the maintenance that came with larger homes. Instead, it fundamentally changed how they spent time together.

"We actually catch up more as a family now," Aimee says.

"We've had homes with big yards and lots of space, but everyone ended up in different rooms. Here we'll have dinner together, the kids can play, and we spend far more quality time together."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356829]

Lyle says their confidence came from GWH's reputation within Newcastle's building industry.

"I know people who've worked across different apartment projects, and whenever GWH came up the feedback was always the same. They're rock solid. They're quality."

That confidence only grew throughout the buying process.

"One of the things that really impressed us with GWH was the whole process, was the communication," Lyle says. "It was consistent, it was regular, there was no problem if we had some weird questions, there was no problems in getting answers."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351104]

Aimee says one moment stood out.

"The project actually finished on time. We realised we needed to hurry up and sell our house because everything was happening exactly when they said it would."

The positive experience at One Apartments ultimately gave all three buyers the confidence to purchase again with GWH, this time at ERA.

Their confidence reflects what many buyers are seeking in today's apartment market. Location remains important, but so too does certainty around delivery, quality and long-term liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356822]

ERA builds on those foundations with 280 one, two and three-bedroom apartments across two landmark towers in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/newcastle-west-nsw-2302">Newcastle West</a>.&nbsp;

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fk-australia">Fender Katsalidis</a>, the project will include more than 2,000 square metres of resident amenities, including a resort-style pool, gym, sauna, private cinema and rooftop entertaining spaces overlooking the harbour and coastline.&nbsp;

The development is also within walking distance of the Newcastle Interchange, Honeysuckle, Darby Street, the harbour foreshore, restaurants, retail and the city’s beaches, continuing the walkable lifestyle that existing GWH buyers say has transformed how they live.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356826]

For Keith, the appeal remains straightforward.

"You feel at home even before you've moved into your home."

For Aimee, the change is measured in time.

“I just felt like I had more time,” she says.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351102]

Construction at ERA is now underway, with more than half of the residences already sold and limited two and three-bedroom apartments remaining in the East Tower release. Priced from $980,000 for two-bedroom residences and $1.46 million for three-bedroom residences, buyers can secure an apartment with a 10 per cent deposit, with premium homes offering ocean views from Level 8 and harbour views from Level 10.

ERA is also backed by Resilience Insurance's 10-year Latent Defects Insurance policy, providing protection against structural or waterproofing defects for 10 years after completion. The project is anticipated to be completed in early 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135096]

Joel Robinson

From ONE to ERA: Why buyers are choosing GWH again in Newcastle West

Virgate Property Group is preparing to commence construction of Verdé, its new apartment development in Melbourne's Arts Precinct at Southbank, following a strong run of sales that has seen more than half of the project's 173 apartments secured.

Verdé has attracted a broad mix of first home buyers, owner-occupiers upgrading from nearby inner-city suburbs and investors, with younger owner-occupier couples aged between 28 and 45 accounting for the strongest enquiry. Many are already living in Southbank, South Melbourne, Albert Park, Port Melbourne, South Yarra and the CBD.

"Verdé is located in one of the most desirable pockets of southern Melbourne," Blair Property Group Director Darren Blair, who is managing sales at Verdé, said.

"It's within walking distance of the Arts Centre, Royal Botanic Gardens, Albert Park Lake, and Southbank's restaurants and retail. It's a great lifestyle location with strong amenity and liveability, which made it a very attractive choice for the project."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372549]

Virgate was already familiar with the precinct, having previously delivered the successful Domain House development in neighbouring South Melbourne. That experience gave the developer confidence to acquire the Coventry Street site and continue expanding its presence in Melbourne's inner south.

"We had been keeping an eye on the site and the broader precinct for a few months before deciding to move forward with the acquisition," Virgate said.

The project was ultimately secured in 2020 following feasibility studies, planning assessments and due diligence, with the brief centred on delivering "a high-quality, considered design that feels both refined and fit for purpose."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=314259]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bruce-henderson-architects">Bruce Henderson Architects</a>, Verdé comprises 173 one, two and three-bedroom apartments priced from $599,000. The architecture is distinguished by a faceted glass façade that responds to both the site's outlook and Melbourne's changing light conditions.

According to Bruce Henderson Architects, the coloured glazing gives the building a distinctive identity while also providing privacy and solar shading, with residences oriented to capture views across the bay, city skyline and surrounding parklands.

Inside, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/designoffice">DesignOffice</a> has created interiors focused on natural light, efficient planning and enduring materials. Apartments feature engineered oak flooring, natural stone benchtops, floor-to-ceiling glazing and SMEG appliances, while a restrained material palette aims to complement the expansive outlooks rather than compete with them.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372550]

Resident amenity has also been designed around everyday functionality rather than occasional use. Facilities include a concierge-serviced lobby, residents' lounge with fireplace, library and co-working space, gym, terrace garden with barbecue facilities, ground-floor café, and package delivery management.

The project's location continues to be one of its strongest drawcards. Positioned on Coventry Street, Verdé sits within walking distance of the National Gallery of Victoria, Arts Centre Melbourne, Royal Botanic Gardens and Albert Park Lake, while Southbank's dining precinct, Sturt Street trams and the new ANZAC Station are all nearby. The surrounding education catchment also includes Melbourne Grammar, Melbourne Girls Grammar, Mac.Robertson Girls' High School and several major university campuses.

The sales team says buyers have responded particularly well to the combination of location, design quality and long-term liveability.

"They're responding really positively to the quality of the design, premium resident amenities and the uninterrupted views. Many also appreciate the location and how connected it is to everything they need."

The ability to secure stamp duty savings before completion has also been a key factor for purchasers, alongside the opportunity to personalise finishes ahead of settlement.

With construction set to commence soon and more than half the apartments already sold, Verdé enters its next phase as one of the Arts Precinct's more established apartment developments, offering remaining buyers an opportunity to secure a residence before construction advances further. Expected completion is scheduled for late 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=4661]

Virgate's Verdé Southbank moves toward construction as sales fly past halfway stage

Downsizer-focused apartment development Kooyongkoot in Hawthorn has been recognised at the 2026 Better Future Melbourne Design Awards, taking home Gold and Silver awards in two categories.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/kooyongkoot-hawthorn-1-kooyongkoot-road-hawthorn-vic-3122">Kooyongkoot</a>, currently being delivered by developer PQD and designed by Cera Stribley, received Gold in the Interior Design – Proposed category and Silver in the Architecture – Proposed category.

The dual recognition reflects the design approach behind the boutique development on prestigious Kooyongkoot Road, where the focus has been on creating homes for downsizers seeking the space, quality and functionality of a detached house within a low-rise apartment building.

Rather than maximising apartment numbers, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pqd">PQD</a> and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a> limited the development to just 18 residences, allowing for larger floorplans, greater privacy, generous landscaping and expansive communal spaces.&nbsp;The majority of the apartments also benefit from corner aspects, allowing for dual sources of natural light.

Now around 70 per cent complete and on track for completion in November 2026, Kooyongkoot will comprise a mix of garden residences, ter​race apartments, sub-penthouses, and is crowned by two half-floor penthouses with direct lift access and private rooftop terraces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355297]

The Silver Award for Architecture recognised the way the building responds to its prominent corner position at the ent​rance to Hawthorn's Scotch Hill precinct, one of Melbourne's most established residential neighbourhoods.

Rather than competing with the grand homes that line Kooyongkoot Road, the architectural approach focused on restraint and longevity, using curved brickwork, generous landscaping and carefully considered proportions to integrate with the existing streetscape.

"The form feels fluid and timeless, as though shaped by the landscape itself – architecture that belongs, rather than competes," said Chris Stribley, Co-Founder and Managing Principal of Cera Stribley.

The judging submission also highlighted practical innovations throughout the building, including lift cores servicing only nine homes each, a central landscaped lightcourt designed to bring daylight and ventilation into the building, and fully enclosed private storage rooms with lighting, power and shelving to better accommodate residents transitioning from larger family homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355293]

The Gold Award for Interior Design recognised the project's focus on long-term liveability rather than display-home aesthetics.

According to the awards submission, the interiors were designed from the inside out, prioritising how homes would function over decades of daily use through generous proportions, practical storage, durable natural materials and flexible layouts.

The specification includes natural stone throughout, upgraded acoustic glazing, V-ZUG appliances and fully enclosed storage rooms, alongside an amenity offering focused on wellness, entertainment and everyday convenience.&nbsp;

Residents will have access to a gym and yoga studio, a wellness centre featuring traditional and infrared saunas, a cold therapy shower and treatment room, as well as a residents' lounge and golf simulator/cinema room for entertainment.&nbsp;Kooyongkoot has also considered the everyday convenience of its residents by offering a private carwash and pet wash facilities on site as well as dedicated parcel lockers and oversized fully enclosed storage rooms.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355303]

The project's attention to detail has already resonated with buyers. Earlier this year, Kooyongkoot recorded one of Boroondara's highest apartment sales when an $8 million penthouse was purchased by a Melbourne CEO downsizing from a nearby family home.

"Every detail feels deliberate, from the overall design down to the smallest touches," the purchaser said.

"The level of quality and refinement is exceptional, but what really sold it was how liveable it felt... It felt like a place where everything had been considered, not just a luxury building."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355304]

Sustainability also formed a key part of both award submissions. Kooyongkoot is targeting a minimum 7.5-star NatHERS rating across all residences, supported by passive design principles, high-performance glazing, EV charging infrastructure, water reuse systems and a wellness model focused on lower-energy dry facilities rather than pools and large wet areas.

Located within walking distance of Scotch College, Methodist Ladies' College, Koo​yong Lawn Tennis Club, Aubur​n Village and Camberwell Junction, Kooyongkoot continues to target owner-occupiers looking to remain in Melbourne's inner east without compromising on space or quality. A limited selection of two, three and four-bedroom residences remains available, with prices starting from $1.9 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=102717]

Kooyongkoot wins Gold and Silver at Better Future Melbourne Design Awards

New apartment supply has become increasingly constrained across <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/parramatta-nsw-2150">Parramatta</a> in recent years, with fewer projects progressing through to completion as development conditions have become more challenging.

It makes <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/novm">NOVM</a>'s 2021-completed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/the-lennox-parramatta-12-phillip-street-parramatta-nsw-2150">The Lennox</a> one of the most recently completed residential towers on the Parramatta River, and among the newest apartment developments in Sydney's second CBD.

With the project largely completed before the sharp escalation in construction costs and inflation following the pandemic, The Lennox is now offering pricing that would be difficult to replicate in a comparable new development in Parramatta today, or across much of Western Sydney.

The majority of the 413 apartments at The Lennox sold before and shortly after completion. A limited release of the remaining apartments has recently been brought to market by capital partner <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/equitifund-group">Equitifund</a>, with entry-level pricing from $700,000 and two-bedroom apartments available from under $1 million.

Rising above the Parramatta River at 12 Phillip Street, The Lennox comprises one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments, appealing to first home buyers, young professionals, families, downsizers and interstate investors seeking a completed apartment in one of Australia's fastest-growing economic centres.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=372394]

Rather than positioning Parramatta as an alternative to Sydney's CBD, Equitifund believes the city has reached a point where it stands on its own merits.

"Parramatta is no longer simply an alternative to Sydney CBD, it's becoming a destination in its own right," Equitifund Executive Chairman Greg Huxley said.

"The Lennox captures that evolution with a level of quality and amenity that's difficult to match at its price point."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=953]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/marchese-partners">Marchese Partners</a>, the tower responds directly to its riverfront setting through expansive glazing and open-plan layouts that maximise views across the Parramatta River and city skyline. Interiors feature engineered timber flooring, stone benchtops, stainless steel appliances and floor-to-ceiling glazing, while generous balconies extend the living spaces outdoors.

Marchese Partners says the project was conceived to balance high-quality apartment living with practical, long-term functionality, pairing larger, efficient floorplans with amenities more commonly associated with five-star hotels.

That emphasis continues through the resident facilities, which include a 20-metre rooftop swimming pool, fully equipped gym and wellness spaces, full-time concierge, a residents' lounge, function room, private lifts, secure basement parking and rooftop communal areas overlooking the Parramatta River. Ground-floor boardwalk retail and dining further activate the riverfront and integrate the building into the surrounding public realm.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=925]

Australian housing and finance group Equitifund has secured the remaining apartments, believing there are few completed apartment opportunities in Parramatta that offer the same combination of location, amenity and pricing.

Equitifund National Sales Director Ben Hamblett says buyers are increasingly recognising that premium apartment living no longer needs to come with Sydney CBD pricing.

"The Lennox is where aspirational living becomes attainable," Hamblett said.

"Wake to river and mountain views, step into Sydney's Second CBD, and arrive home to resort-calibre amenities, all without the harbour price tag."

Hamblett says owner-occupiers are also attracted by the convenience of having Westfield Parramatta, Church Street's dining precinct, Parramatta Park, Riverside Theatres, Western Sydney University and major transport connections all within walking distance.

"At The Lennox, lifestyle is not an afterthought, it is the foundation."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=5374]

The Lennox places residents within walking distance of Parramatta Square, Westfield Parramatta, Church Street Eat Street, Parramatta Station, the ferry wharf, Light Rail, the future Sydney Metro West, Parramatta Park and CommBank Stadium, reinforcing Parramatta's position as one of Australia's most connected metropolitan centres outside Sydney's CBD.

Equitifund says buyers visiting the display suite consistently comment on the quality of the finishes, generous floorplans, river and skyline views, and the walkability of the location. The project has attracted a broad mix of local professionals, upsizers, downsizers, buyers relocating from Sydney's inner suburbs and interstate investors seeking long-term growth opportunities.

That demand aligns with Parramatta's continued evolution as an economic powerhouse. Equitifund Research and Market Insights specialist John Bekiaris says sustained population growth, infrastructure investment and expanding employment opportunities continue to support long-term housing demand across the city.

"Parramatta has evolved from a satellite city into one of Australia's most important economic centres. Population growth, infrastructure investment and employment are all supporting sustained long-term housing demand."

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=5743]

The apartment price gap drawing Sydney buyers west

A luxury beachfront apartment at Rainbow Bay has more than doubled in value since it sold off the plan six years ago, setting a new local apartment record in the process.

The three-bedroom apartment in the Flow development on Petrie Street, the first of four new projects locally by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects, has sold for $7.4 million, after originally selling for $3.27 million when the project launched in 2020.

The seventh-floor apartment, comprising 187 sqm of internal living space and a 54 sqm balcony overlooking Froggies Beach and Snapper Rocks, was purchased by a local family.

The transaction was negotiated by Pezet Matheson director Kerry Pezet and equates to more than $30,000 per sqm.

Pezet said the sale reflected the limited opportunities to buy into the boutique beachfront development.

"The sale highlights the rarity of opportunities within the boutique beachfront development, where residences seldom become available," Pezet said.

"Flow is one of the Gold Coast's most tightly held buildings. Buyers from our database move quickly when residences become available, and achieving an off-market sale at $7.4 million demonstrates the depth of demand for property of this calibre."

<img alt="Flow" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c585b206-2130-4eee-a50c-3f27c51a7c70" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-06%20at%208.33.25%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=m3pHRDV62Y3fvN.XQuQHq.52ilTWpRLf" />

Flow was the first of four luxury apartment developments delivered by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects at Rainbow Bay and was completed in 2023.

Positioned on the beachfront overlooking Snapper Rocks, the residence includes three bedrooms, three bathrooms, a powder room and views stretching north along the coastline towards Surfers Paradise.

Pezet Matheson Residential principal Mitchell Lambert said buyers continued to prioritise quality beachfront apartments in tightly held locations.

"Flow Residences offers a rare combination of elevated beachfront positioning, architectural excellence, comprehensive resident amenity and premium finishes, which is exactly what discerning purchasers are seeking," Lambert said.

"The transaction further reinforces Rainbow Bay's reputation as one of Australia's premier coastal lifestyle destinations, where limited supply and growing demand continue to support strong market performance."

Pezet Matheson originally marketed and sold out Flow off the plan, making the latest transaction a return to one of the project's original buyers.

Paul Gedoun is selling his third project, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/radia-rainbow-bay-271-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Radia Rainbow Bay</a>, after recently completing, and selling out, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/esprit-217-227-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Esprit</a>. He has plans for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-s-s-projects-proposes-88-apartment-wellness-tower-at-coolangattas-boundary-street">fourth building</a>, 88 apartments on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/209-213-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Boundary Street</a>.

Margaret Lomas

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News