<html><body>
Hi Margaret,   
This is a question about the tax deductibility of break costs on an investment loan for an investment property. My husband and I had a fixed rate investment loan which we broke last financial year. I am wondering whether the break cost associated with this loan is tax deductible in the year it is incurred, or whether it has to be classed as a borrowing cost for tax purposes and deducted over a five-year period. Also, does it make a difference if the break cost was capitalised into the new refinanced loan?   
Thanks in Advance,   
Kirsten
 
Kirsten, one of the main reasons why someone breaks a fixed rate loan is because they can get a better <a target="_blank" href="?option=com_googlesearch_cse&amp;q=ask%20margaret">rate</a> elsewhere and so reduce their expenses, and this may be the reason why the tax office allows you to claim these costs completely in the year they are incurred.
In addition to this, the interest on the money you borrow to finance the $20,000 will also be deductible, but only while the property is used to produce income.  
Make sure that you have a complete record of the exact costs which you incurred and give it to your accountant in plenty of time to make the allowable claims.
 
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popularProperty Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: When are my loan break costs tax deductible?

<html><body>
Hello Margaret,
I have an investment duplex in which I pay body corporate fees, but they do not cover flood damage. Do I need the body corporate or do I get insurance that will cover the lot? And if I have to have a body corporate do I seek an insurance company that will cover for flood only?
Cheers,
Erik Smith.
Erik, I’ve checked this one with Michael Teys, who is my resident expert on Property Success. He tells me that you cannot take out the flood insurance yourself. This is because you have no insurable interest in the common property - this is vested in the owners corporation. The owners corporation is obliged only to insure for fire, lightning and explosion.
Some bodies corporate may insure for flood - remember this is not always available as some insurance companies will not provide flood insurance in some areas -  but they can't be forced to do so.
If you believe that your property is at risk, and you live in an area where flood insurance is available, you should  propose that the body corporate consider adding this insurance cover.  This will then be put to a motion and voted upon by all committee members.
Failing that, I'm afraid there is little you can do. Make sure your contents are well insured though, as anything within your four walls is your responsibility.
I've added the following clarification following queries from readers:
To clarify, any common property, which can include garages, car ports, structures on common land and anything essentially outside of the inner surface of your own four walls is not an insurable  interest for individual lot holders.  Anything inside your walls is, and you should hold all possible insurances to protect your interest in them.
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Do I need flood insurance if I pay body corporate fees?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
If I buy a property to rent out, what insurances do I need to cover me for the tenants etc?
Phillip, ACT 
Phillip, as you know the basic insurances are going to be really important for you, as with all property, so you need to start with a good house and contents policy. 
This means insuring the building, and any contents too.  Where it is rented you might not have a lot of contents but remember there are some things which still need covering, like window treatments and anything not part of the building. 
A lot of people think they don’t need to cover the building if it’s a strata-titled property, since the body corporate has building cover, but that’s not entirely true.  You will still need that gap insurance to cover parts of your property not considered common property - so anything inside your four walls.
In addition to that you will need landlords insurance.  This will cover:
<ul>
<li>Damage caused by a tenant</li>
<li>An amount for public liability</li>
<li>Loss of rent if the damage renders your property uninhabitable</li>
<li>The costs of pursuing a tenant through a tribunal for unpaid rent</li>
</ul>
It won’t cover loss of rent through periods of normal vacancy but that’s something you should be planning for before you buy anyway. 
It’s important to be aware that not all policies are the same – the important things you are looking for will be a low excess, and a high cap on claims for each event – many companies cap the claim you can make at too low an amount leaving you very out-of-pocket in the event of damage.
Shop around and don’t just take the cheapest option – a few dollars more might save you thousands in the long term and remember, the cost of this insurance is tax deductible.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" target="_blank">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: What insurance policies do I need to cover my tenants?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret
There is a very confusing and ongoing debate about houses and apartments which is quite confusing at times.
I need to ask you: in your opinion, which is a better investment and why?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Opinder
 
This is an oft-asked question and, in my opinion, it shouldn’t be confusing at all!
Many investors start out with the notion that they will consider buying an apartment (also known as flats or units) as there is a perception that they are cheaper and represent a more ‘entry level’ price.
Alternatively, it’s believed that because a freestanding house has land around it, and land appreciates while buildings depreciate, a house ultimately becomes worth more.
Both of these notions are actually based more on myth than fact, for a number of reasons.
Firstly, an apartment can often have hefty body corporate levies which can add considerably to the holding costs.  If we considered that ‘profit’ in a property is the difference between the purchase price (plus costs) plus holding costs, and the eventual sale price (less costs), then these levies can add considerably to the holding costs and eat into profits.  One could argue that a body corporate’s sinking fund is like a savings plan for eventual repairs and maintenance, the costs of which you would otherwise bear alone, however a portion of these fees are for the type of ongoing maintenance which you’d probably carry out yourself if it were your home alone.
Secondly, it’s not proving true that a house and land necessarily grows in value more quickly than an apartment, and if the myth that buildings depreciate were true where it relates to value growth, then we’d be seeing all apartments go backward in value while all houses grow. Buildings do depreciate for tax purposes, and they do get older, requiring repair and maintenance (this applies to both units and apartments), however for value purposes this depreciation is not necessarily evident.  It’s a fact that in some areas the houses grow better than the apartments and in others the apartments are the better performer.
And that brings me to my final point – it’s demand which ultimately drives growth, not the property type. Therefore, the only way to establish whether to buy an apartment or a house is to discover what kind of people live in the area, and their preferred choice of property type. In some areas, such as those where young, childless couples live, apartments are the bigger sellers, and in others, such as areas where family units are settling, it will be houses. It makes sense to realise that the property type most in demand will also be the property type which grows better in value!
This is why property type choice should never be the first thing you do.  You should never decide to buy, say an apartment, and then go looking for the best area. You should always work out the best area to buy, discover the largest demographic in that area, and buy a property which suits that demographic. Buying a property which is not the preferred choice in any area is one of the biggest reasons investors do not get the outcomes they would like in terms of growth.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Are houses or units the better investment?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret
We have an investment property that needs some tidying up to maximise the rent – things such as replacing the carpets, renovating the kitchen and bathroom, painting and a carport.
Should we get a depreciation schedule before and after the renovations?
Your help is appreciated.
Regards
Debbe
 
 
Hi Debbe
I am so glad that you clarified this before you went ahead.  There is a significant benefit to be gained from what is known as ‘scrapping’, but all too often investors think of this after they have already thrown everything out, and this is too late.
First of all, your property has to be technically in the middle of being rented.  So, if it’s never been rented and you carry out these minor renovations before you make it available to rent, then you will not be able to make claims.  The property must be ‘income-producing’ in order to make claims.  So the best time is either while the tenant is in there, or in between tenancies.
If you do not know the value of the items which you will be removing from the property, start out by having a depreciation schedule prepared.  You are allowed to estimate the value of plant and equipment yourself (but not construction values), but in my experience it’s easier to have the schedule prepared, as this provides your construction values too.   Once you have had this done, go ahead and carry out the makeover.  Then, have the quantity surveyor come back to prepare an updated schedule.  It’s probably helpful if you can keep a list of anything you threw out to assist them.
You can then go ahead and ‘scrap’ any items which had a value before you disposed of them.  This means that their full, remaining value as at the time you threw them out carries an immediate deduction of 100% of the value for you, in that year!  For example, if you dispose of $5,000 worth of old items, you can claim an immediate tax deduction for the entire amount! For those on the 40% tax bracket, this is a tax break of $2,000, which isn’t to be sneezed at!
Good luck with your renovation!
Update
Last week a reader asked me to clarify whether I meant that you could avoid capital gains tax if you move out of your Principal Place of Residence for up to 6 years (as written), or if I meant 6 months!
You can move out of your PPOR for up to 6 years and still claim the PPOR exemption on that property, as long as you are not claiming the exemption on any other property.  You can rent it out during this time.  You must move back in (or sell it) not a day later than the 6 years are over.
The ‘6 month overlap rule’ is a different rule – it states that you can apply the PPOR exemption to two properties at the same time for an overlap period of not more than 6 months.  This allows you to move from your former home and into a new one and have 6 months to sell the old one without incurring CGT.  Again, the timing is strict; one day more than 6 months and the CGT applies form the date you moved out.
 
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx">Destiny</a>.
Have a property question? <a target="_blank" href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: When should I get a depreciation schedule?

<html><body>
Investors of anything should only ever buy investments that stand alone as strong and viable propositions not because of tax benefits.
It’s no secret that I am not a fan of NRAS property.  I’ve written extensively about it since it was first introduced and watched how an essentially great scheme has been prostituted for gain for greedy developers and their marketers.
In its purest form, NRAS was a scheme designed for large institutional investors, such as public superannuation funds and insurance companies.  They would undertake these developments, which were built in lots of 100, and gain the tax credits for the lot.  It was a good deal and a good idea, providing discounted rent to para professionals who would, it was claimed, make suitable tenants. The scheme was not designed for individual investors.  In fact the NRAS Policy Guidelines stated:
The scheme encourages large-scale investment in affordable housing so it is not directly available to small-scale, private, individual investors in the rental property market. 
Somehow, probably due to one of those tax office loopholes, some of the developments were sold to individuals as single lots.  The powers that be clearly didn’t sew up the scheme tightly enough, and someone drove a Mack truck through the space.  I still remember the day the tax office woke up and realised that it had no method in place to deal with the tax returns of individuals who bought them, and it scurried about with transitional arrangements to cope with the issue.  Lo and behold a precedence was created, and before we knew it whole companies were set up to move this latest tax advantaged product.   NRAS Policy Guidelines were amended to include:
Individual investors may wish to participate in the scheme as part of a non-entity joint venture or another joint venture arrangement or by purchasing NRAS dwellings from an approved participant. 
It’s pretty easy to counter the flippant claims of NRAS marketers when they use simplistic three line statements espousing the benefits of buying one – just buy it, discount the rent and get tax benefits–with a plethora of dangers;
<ol>
<li>The middlemen do make big commissions – I’ve not seen one less than $20,000, and you’d have to be very dull to be convinced that this isn’t built somewhere into the price.</li>
<li>They are released in lots of 100 – that’s a very large influx of competition all at the one time – affecting both the capital value and the potential rent return. Your 20% discount may end up being a 20% discount to a rent that has already dropped by 30% because of oversupply!</li>
<li>They are rarely built in hotspots, and when they are, well, refer to point 2!</li>
</ol>
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
But in a recent email to me from an investor who recently felt similar concern to mine over the legitimacy, or otherwise, of these investments, far greater issues were brought to my attention.  Proponents may claim that in return for a financial loss each year of between $3,500 and $5,000 you get "tax-free" money of $9,980, but the writer of this email found that to be potentially misleading in the extreme.
This investor had such a great concern that he sought a private ruling, and to his alarm he found the following:
<ul>
<li>A portion of the rebates for this scheme ($2495) are provided by the state in which the property is built. As state governments cannot raise income tax, the portion of the rebates received from the state cannot be considered a tax offset. This portion of the rebates received is known as NANE income.</li>
<li>As entering the scheme is for the purpose of receiving a rental income and the NANE, claims related to the investment property must be apportioned.</li>
<li>On low rental properties, this can reduce claimable rental expenses by as much as 17%.</li>
</ul>
The investor who wrote to me wanted to be sure that he had it right, and so he telephoned the person who provided the ruling. This person advised that a further ruling was not necessary as the position is clear:  those costs relating to the scheme – being the initial NRAS set-up cost, the annual audit cost for scheme payment eligibility and the periodic rental market rates audit – are not considered expenses related to the derivation of assessable income.  Neither the NANE nor the Commonwealth tax offset, are considered assessable income.
He went on to apply this information to one set of figures provided by one of the many companies promoting NRAS, and found that the swing was $141 per week!  That pretty much wiped out the positive cashflow, and if the property could not actually be leased for the rent amount forecast by the seller (which is what I am finding with many of these once they are constructed and settled) it could leave unsuspecting investor in quite a financial pickle!
This was one smart investor who, rather than believe everything presented to him by a property seller, chose to do the due diligence himself.  Getting a private ruling was a good move, one all investors should take before taking the plunge on any scheme that sounds so good.
While I agree that NRAS isn’t olive trees or an emu farm, it’s still a tax scheme, and its opponents draw their comparison from this notional similarity, rather than from any physical likeness between the two.  It’s not the physical product itself which is being attacked – it’s the marketing of the tax scheme over the property itself.  Luring investors into a property based on getting tax benefits can be compared to stock market- based investments, as the results can be the same – the investor buys the asset for the overlying scheme, giving little consideration to whether the scheme is appropriate for them, or whether the underlying asset stacks up. Investors of anything should only ever buy investments which stand alone as strong and viable propositions – tax benefits, income guarantees or free holidays should only ever be icing on an already tasty cake.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
</body></html>

NRAS is a tax scheme; a property investment must stack up on its own: Margaret Lomas

<html><body>
You’ve probably met someone who bought property in a mining town and made a bucket load. 
Years ago when everyone else was turning up their noses at those giant red holes in the ground that were mining towns, some crazy risk-takers bit the bullet and took the gamble.  It wasn’t much of a gamble, really – you could buy property that probably fit within your credit card limit, but at that time everyone figured nothing much could come of it.
Stories abounded of untold success.  It was the first we’d ever heard of a "donga", but apparently these tin sheds skyrocketed and fetched astronomical prices and rental yields.    Everyone wanted a piece of that action, and you had to jump out of the way to avoid the stampede of investors racing to these one-horse towns for their piece of investing gold.
There’s no question that a great return can potentially be made buying property in a mining town, but people make money investing in pork bellies and trading foreign currency, too.  Why don’t we all jump on that bandwagon?  Quite simply, because we know they are high risk, and we are mostly pretty acquainted with our own personal appetite for risk.
So what madness is this that causes property investors, many of them without money to lose and gambling the equity in their own family homes, to completely ignore the risk factor attached to buying in mining towns?
I have a few theories around this.  Firstly, property investors rarely educate themselves before taking the plunge.  Somehow they feel that just because they own a home of their own they are suddenly experts at picking the right property.  It’s a bit like believing that just because you bought Telstra shares you vicariously received a crash course in share investing and are now an expert at it.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
Secondly, it seems that when you use someone else’s money (the bank’s) it’s OK to be less careful.  There’s a misplaced confidence that comes when a bank gets a valuation and then agrees to advance you the money – as if it somehow provides its tick of approval for your decision and, well, banks know what they’re doing, right?
Lastly, it’s public enemy number one – the undying belief that property, as long as it’s held long enough, will always go up.  It provides a false sense of security around property buying and removes any common sense many investors might otherwise use when choosing an appropriate investment that sits nicely within their risk profile.
Investing in a town based solely on only one industry carries a risk that  is greater than buying property in an area where the industry is diversified. An event that may initially have little to do with that one industry, such as another GFC, a slowdown in China’s demand for our resources, to name a couple, could eventually develop to create an impact great enough to negatively affect the fortunes of the true risks involved.
Where an entire area extracts its income and employment from that one industry and its related industries (such as retail and hospitality), a closure of that industry can have swift and devastating effects upon those who own property. An investor may go quickly from having a property with a high value and exceptional rental returns to one with no tenant and no buyers.
I’ll never argue that significant gains cannot be made by those who invest in towns such as these, typically mining towns. However, all investing must be undertaken with a sound grasp of the true risks involved. If you are prepared to accept those risks, and you have considered what your position would be if you owned a property that suffered a significant loss, then a mining town may be an excellent investment for you.
Contrarily, if you need a little more surety in your investing, stick with areas of more diversity, which can manage industry closures because there are many other employers to take up the slack.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
</body></html>

Are mining towns really property investment goldmines?: Margaret Lomas

<html><body>
I love it when debates around whether there is a property bubble begin, and so I particularly enjoyed reading about the latest debate, right here on<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/room-for-debate-is-there-an-australian-housing-bubble/2012110157585" target="_blank"> Property Observer</a>. 
This one pitted Terry Ryder, whose job is to examine property markets and their movements at their most fundamental, determining the potential impact of future, planned activity on micro property markets, against Phillip Soos, a master’s research student and employed researcher at Deakin University.
People always take sides, and it comes down to which side of the fence you sit on.  In this particular debate, the two sides have completely different backgrounds, experience and perspectives and use entirely different methods to assess and forecast the property market.
Terry uses factual data to establish whether or not there is likely to be property price growth in the future, along with issues of housing affordability, supply and demand and general price movements.  From what I can see he looks at areas in their individuality, considers the micro-economic situation in its present form and then overlays the information he has about what’s happening next in that area.  When this is all measured against the supply factor, I think he is saying that strong, local area economic growth, where there is an undersupply of property, has to mean that property in that area will go up.
Phillip uses some pretty impressive data, some great-looking graphs and some economic theory to predict a bubble.  From what I can see, he overlays this theory and graph drawing upon the Australian property landscape and from that he draws the conclusion we are in a bubble.  In addition, he quotes Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis, one that says that where income flows cover neither principal nor interest repayments the result is an asset bubble, to assert that there is, in fact, a bubble.
I like economic theory as much as the next guy, and I definitely use economic factors on which to base my own prognosis of where I think a property market is headed.  It’s not an exact science, but there is a good degree of empirical evidence to show that strong underlying economic factors, such as decreasing unemployment, increasing median household income and an improvement in gross regional product can often lead to property price growth.
However, I can’t help but get an uncomfortable squirming feeling when I see someone who devotes their life’s work to studying property markets at the most micro of level debating against someone who uses economic theory to pronounce to the property investing world that there is a bubble.
If my two cents worth means anything, here it is:  If we live in a country where there is such a vast difference in property prices, where we have areas that are ramping up and those that are plateauing or falling in value, where we have two-speed economies (Queensland) and varying degrees of local government activity, infrastructure development and employment opportunities, how can we possibly rely on a single, economic projection of a single property market to establish if there is a bubble or not?
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
The other factor that has me twitching at my desk, wanting to shake someone, is that those basing forecasts on economic theory like to ignore the bottom line impact of taxation.  Yes, I get it that at any time the government can take away tax benefits. 
I also know that investing for a tax benefit is no way to approach your retirement  income needs.  However, we do live in a country where the tax treatment of investors is quite unique and decidedly different than most others in the developed world, and from what I can see it makes it difficult to rationalise the theory that ‘where income flows cover neither principal nor interest repayments the result is an asset bubble’. 
To the average punter, what matters most is cashflow, and since investing in property in this country is tax advantaged, (and includes on-paper deductions for depreciation in many cases), the cashflow for many properties purchased today in economically strong areas with great yields and potential for further values growth is positive, or at least even.  Whether gross rent covers principal and interest repayments is a moot point when you consider that you can get a tax break equal to, or greater than, the difference.   And while ever that possibility exists, investors will continue to support those markets, creating further, albeit moderate, values growth and continuing strong yields.
I’ll never understand why economists cannot see the forest for the trees and why they insist on having a single-minded, broad view of the Australian property market. I am not suggesting that the market in Australia is fantastic or risk- free, and I don’t think Terry Ryder is, either.  But I do believe that talk of a unilateral property bubble decidedly ignores the true underlying situation – that opportunities for great property investing do exist, and that now is as good a time as ever to find them.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel on Your Money, Your Call, both on Sky News.
</body></html>

Australian housing market too complex to make sweeping bubble statements: Margaret Lomas

<html><body>
For the past four years we’ve been waiting for the property bubble to burst. To be honest, it’s been a little like waiting for the end of the world.
When I was a kid, there was a slated date for the end of the world to occur. We knew what it would look like – black thunder clouds, strong winds and then judgement day would be upon us. Depending upon your religious persuasion, a couple of things would happen on that day – you’d either be saved while non-believers everywhere perished, or the entire world would disappear in a fireball. There was also the threat of the nuclear bomb giving us incurable cancer, turning the earth to fallow pasture and causing slow and painful deaths always foreshadowing our everyday existence.
More recently, another end of the world date came and went, but the real one, sometime this December, is still before us, scaring our children and creating lively debate.
For property investors, though, we haven’t given the imminent destruction of the world a second thought, given the more dire situation surrounding the property bubble and its impending bursting. It’s consumed us and dictated our every investing move, and it seems like we are finally sick of it. Property investors have decided that enough is enough, and that if something was ever going to happen, it should have happened by now.
I’m somewhat cheered that there seems to be a renewed confidence in the market, but extremely worried, too. You see, the dodgy spruiker is back, in fine form, and investors, many with memories too short to recall the bad old days of rip-offs and questionable deals, are just begging for their money to be taken.
A recent Sun-Herald investigation established that “aggressive marketing by Heritage Financial Solutions of often overpriced and second-rate Queensland properties has left a trail of burned investors, bankruptcies and broken hearts”. This is by no means a one-off situation, and I am seeing more and more people being taken advantage of, and a return to a situation we saw in the early 90s.
The problem is this – there is no regulation to protect property investors, and therefore literally anyone can call themselves a property investment adviser and get away with it. In doing so they create around them an illusion of expertise and qualification, and usually their websites are so professionally created that this illusion appears real and legitimate.
So what is happening here? Well, it’s quite simple – the spruikers are once again convincing a whole new generation of property investors that they have only their best interests at heart and selling them deals with exceptionally poor underlying assets. And the investors, often time poor and looking for the solution to their retirement income woes, are lapping it up, neglecting due diligence and choosing to place their trust in those who have a big financial incentives to tell them what they want to hear.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
How can you tell if a deal is dodgy? You can’t, but here are some clues:
 
<ul>
<li>If there is a middleman between you and the supplier (excluding standard real estate sales), then there is going to be big commissions built in. While the property may be OK, the commissions usually run from around $15,000 up to $40,000. You won’t know about it, as it’s often provided as an after-sales “kick-back” and it doesn’t have to be disclosed – there is no law around property investment advice, and so no disclosure requirement. Such a big commission will, in this subdued environment, take years to recoup and put a dampener on leveraging ability. </li>
<li>If the property exists in a state other than where it is being marketed, there has to be a reason why the locals haven’t snapped up the deal.</li>
<li>If the person advising you to buy the property is also representing the seller then it is not possible for their advice to be independent – it is biased, and the deal is likely better for the marketer than it is for you.</li>
<li>If the company selling the property waxes lyrically about how you are their first concern, it’s likely to be dodgy. It’s fine to sell property as a middleman but not fine to claim that your interests are with the buyer. </li>
<li>If there is any kind of incentive scheme, such as a rent guarantee or bonus, something is likely to be up. Property that makes a viable investment can sell itself.</li>
</ul>
Now is the time to take extra care. If you’d like to invest in property, you can do so safely, but you have to have your eyes open and take responsibility for your own successes and failures. Protect yourself with the following guidelines:
<ul>
<li>Beware of property being marketed by a seminar or telemarketer – such campaigns are expensive, and these people are paid big commissions that are hard to recoup through capital appreciation. Don’t believe claims that commissions aren’t built into the price – this is simply not possible.</li>
<li>Never sign a deal on the day you see it. If an extra incentive is offered to do so, be doubly wary!</li>
<li>Always confirm the value of a property through recent sales. Only recent sales can determine the actual value.</li>
<li>Be aware that forecasts on income are based on historical figures and do not consider future supply.</li>
<li>Be extra careful of off-the-plan – especially tax advantaged ones. They are often part of a huge development which will affect future supply and impact on your yields. </li>
</ul>
Most importantly, become educated before you become an investor. Too many people decide to invest and then go looking for a property, and this is why they are so vulnerable. Get that education under your belt first and then you will know how to spot a dodgy deal at 10 paces.
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of<a target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx"> Destiny</a>.
</body></html>

No sign of a property bubble, but dodgy spruikers are taking advantage of investors: Margaret Lomas

<html><body>
Jordan Wirsz is at it again. This time, thankfully, not many here in Australia are listening to him.
In this latest diatribe, Wirsz claims that he has been studying human behaviour for 22 years. In the past he has tried to have us believe some fairly hard to swallow claims, but that one has to take the cake!
You see, Wirsz was born in 1983, making him barely 29 year of age.
I have five children. I think back to when each of them was seven.  My eldest was a bit of a larrikin – I still recall the day when he set the sprinklers to the “on” position right in the middle of his dad’s work barbecue. Of course, all of the staff were picnicking on the lawn at the time, but it was true seven-year-old behaviour, and most of us were able to laugh about it. My three girls were most likely playing with Barbies at that age and my youngest boy, the studious one, would have been reading a young person’s book.
Studying human behaviour? It conjures up the picture of one of them sitting at the dinner table, thoughtfully stroking their chin and saying to me, ‘you know mum, Mrs Wilson next door has an interesting response to the post man, and I’ve been pondering this peculiar behaviour’!
It’s rubbish, as is much of what Wirsz claims to know about the Australian property market, one which, by his own admission, he researches using Google.
Further, he states that he has learned to “virtually ignore all media/news, because most of the time, they are wrong”. He then goes on to say that ‘this is because they are listening to so called “experts” who have agendas’. Has anyone asked Wirsz how he makes his money? It looks to me like it’s from running seminars and real estate classes, ones that give you the strategies to employ after he has wound you up with his press releases and lathered you into frenzy about the latest gloom and doom.  If that’s not an “agenda”, then I’d like to know what to call it.
He seems to have lately jumped ship a little – from talking about the woes of US real estate to now saying that “the normalcy bias is keeping many people too fearful of buying real estate, which is going to create an exaggerated bottom, just like we saw an exaggerated top”. He now wants to buy into a market that he said, not that long ago, was doomed.
And, in the latest blog (littered with grammatical errors, which I will ignore because, let’s face it, he’s a product of that younger set), he couldn’t resist another swipe at Australia. He says that he has done a lot of research on the Australia real estate market, and can see some “very significant signs that they are almost exactly where the U.S. market was in 2008”. Who knew it could fall so much?’
He thinks Australia is in for it in a “big way” and invites you to “stay tuned for more later”. I gather this means another webinar – more money-making for Wirsz.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
I gather he is doing his research on Google again, because I am finding much more encouraging news from some fairly reliable sources.  Housing affordability is improving monthly, and the average Australian now spends below 30% of his or her income on the average home loan payment, with even better results expected in the coming months. Australians are repaying debt too, with more than 50% of all mortgage holders now in advance on their loans, many of them over one year in advance. We are great ones for hunkering down and shoring up for that rainy day, even if the signs show we may not need it. Lenders are being careful, and under the new credit reforms our lending policies, already tight with an abundance of integrity, just got stronger, providing further protection.
And look at all of those areas in the country today with low buy in prices, growing population and housing shortages.  With technology allowing us to live and work in areas other than capital cities, the choices for housing have become more and more diverse and available, and the Australian people’s confidence in property values remains as strong as ever.
The figures don’t lie. The September quarter showed some slow, albeit low, growth in many markets, as we carefully creep along, prudently buying, bargaining hard but keeping property values just about where they should be given the world economic outlook.
Let’s listen to true experts – you know the Australian ones. Like Tim Lawless from RP Data, who forecasts rising housing prices for the major urban areas of Australia. He says “based on index data over the month up to September 28th, dwelling values across the combined five largest capital cities of Australia are likely to increase by around 1.4% over the month of September, and the quarterly rate of growth will be around 2% over the quarter – that's the strongest quarterly change since May 2010”.
And what of those other real experts – those guys over at BIS Shrapnel? They say that house prices in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth will recover over the next three years, which sounds pretty good to me.
My money’s with the guys who know.  The ones who live here and make the details of our markets their life’s work.
Jordan who?
Margaret Lomas is a best-selling author and writes and hosts the popular Property Success With Margaret Lomas and heads up the panel onYour Money, Your Call, both on Sky News. She is the founder of<a target="_blank" href="https://destiny.com.au/dotnetnuke/en-au/home.aspx"> Destiny</a>.
</body></html>

US doomsayer Jordan Wirsz's Australian housing bubble predictions rubbish

Repeat buyers are one of the strongest measures of confidence in any apartment development.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/era-newcastle-west-124-126-bull-street-newcastle-west-nsw-2302">ERA</a> in Newcastle West, some purchasers are returning to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gwh">GWH</a> after living at the developer's One Apartments. Their decision to purchase again was driven by the quality of life they found after moving into their first GWH home.

Keith Wilton had spent years living in a house in East Maitland before deciding it was time for a change. Apartment living had always been on his radar, but he was selective about what he wanted.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FH_1EzB-1vs?si=XScVlP1ERsTDJoME" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

"I had some boxes I wanted to tick," he says.

Keith points to the open-plan design, generous outdoor areas and considered inclusions as key reasons One Apartments worked for him.

“One of those things was a nice indoor open plan area, but also I wanted a nice outdoor open area that I could entertain on in summer or Christmases or birthdays,” he says.

He also found value in the smaller details, from integrated appliances to shared resident spaces including the pool, cinema and rooftop areas.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356818]

After comparing several developments, he chose One Apartments because of GWH's longstanding local reputation and his own experience working with the developer on a commercial project more than a decade earlier.

"I knew that they were local, that the quality of the build was going to be up there. I'd looked at other apartment complexes around and close by, and I just knew that here was a better decision location wise."

Today, Keith says the move has completely changed how he experiences Newcastle.

"I enjoy living in this location because it's more of a lifestyle change. That Newcastle city living where you can walk to restaurants and bars and even beaches and parks and even shopping across the road."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356828]

Beyond the location, he says it's the sense of community that has surprised him most.

"Everyone loves living here because they chose to live here, but everyone looks out for each other. It's a real great community feel here."

For Aimee and Lyle Goodman, the journey started almost by chance.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tsioMLcnjas?si=zq-ys3JuWpfa5hFv" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The couple happened to be having coffee in Newcastle when they noticed the site where One Apartments was about to begin construction.

"We were aware GWH was planning a development," Aimee says. "We made one phone call and things moved pretty quickly after that."

As busy business owners, they initially thought apartment living would simply reduce the maintenance that came with larger homes. Instead, it fundamentally changed how they spent time together.

"We actually catch up more as a family now," Aimee says.

"We've had homes with big yards and lots of space, but everyone ended up in different rooms. Here we'll have dinner together, the kids can play, and we spend far more quality time together."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356829]

Lyle says their confidence came from GWH's reputation within Newcastle's building industry.

"I know people who've worked across different apartment projects, and whenever GWH came up the feedback was always the same. They're rock solid. They're quality."

That confidence only grew throughout the buying process.

"One of the things that really impressed us with GWH was the whole process, was the communication," Lyle says. "It was consistent, it was regular, there was no problem if we had some weird questions, there was no problems in getting answers."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351104]

Aimee says one moment stood out.

"The project actually finished on time. We realised we needed to hurry up and sell our house because everything was happening exactly when they said it would."

The positive experience at One Apartments ultimately gave all three buyers the confidence to purchase again with GWH, this time at ERA.

Their confidence reflects what many buyers are seeking in today's apartment market. Location remains important, but so too does certainty around delivery, quality and long-term liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356822]

ERA builds on those foundations with 280 one, two and three-bedroom apartments across two landmark towers in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/newcastle-west-nsw-2302">Newcastle West</a>.&nbsp;

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fk-australia">Fender Katsalidis</a>, the project will include more than 2,000 square metres of resident amenities, including a resort-style pool, gym, sauna, private cinema and rooftop entertaining spaces overlooking the harbour and coastline.&nbsp;

The development is also within walking distance of the Newcastle Interchange, Honeysuckle, Darby Street, the harbour foreshore, restaurants, retail and the city’s beaches, continuing the walkable lifestyle that existing GWH buyers say has transformed how they live.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356826]

For Keith, the appeal remains straightforward.

"You feel at home even before you've moved into your home."

For Aimee, the change is measured in time.

“I just felt like I had more time,” she says.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351102]

Construction at ERA is now underway, with more than half of the residences already sold and limited two and three-bedroom apartments remaining in the East Tower release. Priced from $980,000 for two-bedroom residences and $1.46 million for three-bedroom residences, buyers can secure an apartment with a 10 per cent deposit, with premium homes offering ocean views from Level 8 and harbour views from Level 10.

ERA is also backed by Resilience Insurance's 10-year Latent Defects Insurance policy, providing protection against structural or waterproofing defects for 10 years after completion. The project is anticipated to be completed in early 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135096]

Joel Robinson

From ONE to ERA: Why buyers are choosing GWH again in Newcastle West

Virgate Property Group is preparing to commence construction of Verdé, its new apartment development in Melbourne's Arts Precinct at Southbank, following a strong run of sales that has seen more than half of the project's 173 apartments secured.

Verdé has attracted a broad mix of first home buyers, owner-occupiers upgrading from nearby inner-city suburbs and investors, with younger owner-occupier couples aged between 28 and 45 accounting for the strongest enquiry. Many are already living in Southbank, South Melbourne, Albert Park, Port Melbourne, South Yarra and the CBD.

"Verdé is located in one of the most desirable pockets of southern Melbourne," Blair Property Group Director Darren Blair, who is managing sales at Verdé, said.

"It's within walking distance of the Arts Centre, Royal Botanic Gardens, Albert Park Lake, and Southbank's restaurants and retail. It's a great lifestyle location with strong amenity and liveability, which made it a very attractive choice for the project."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372549]

Virgate was already familiar with the precinct, having previously delivered the successful Domain House development in neighbouring South Melbourne. That experience gave the developer confidence to acquire the Coventry Street site and continue expanding its presence in Melbourne's inner south.

"We had been keeping an eye on the site and the broader precinct for a few months before deciding to move forward with the acquisition," Virgate said.

The project was ultimately secured in 2020 following feasibility studies, planning assessments and due diligence, with the brief centred on delivering "a high-quality, considered design that feels both refined and fit for purpose."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=314259]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bruce-henderson-architects">Bruce Henderson Architects</a>, Verdé comprises 173 one, two and three-bedroom apartments priced from $599,000. The architecture is distinguished by a faceted glass façade that responds to both the site's outlook and Melbourne's changing light conditions.

According to Bruce Henderson Architects, the coloured glazing gives the building a distinctive identity while also providing privacy and solar shading, with residences oriented to capture views across the bay, city skyline and surrounding parklands.

Inside, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/designoffice">DesignOffice</a> has created interiors focused on natural light, efficient planning and enduring materials. Apartments feature engineered oak flooring, natural stone benchtops, floor-to-ceiling glazing and SMEG appliances, while a restrained material palette aims to complement the expansive outlooks rather than compete with them.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372550]

Resident amenity has also been designed around everyday functionality rather than occasional use. Facilities include a concierge-serviced lobby, residents' lounge with fireplace, library and co-working space, gym, terrace garden with barbecue facilities, ground-floor café, and package delivery management.

The project's location continues to be one of its strongest drawcards. Positioned on Coventry Street, Verdé sits within walking distance of the National Gallery of Victoria, Arts Centre Melbourne, Royal Botanic Gardens and Albert Park Lake, while Southbank's dining precinct, Sturt Street trams and the new ANZAC Station are all nearby. The surrounding education catchment also includes Melbourne Grammar, Melbourne Girls Grammar, Mac.Robertson Girls' High School and several major university campuses.

The sales team says buyers have responded particularly well to the combination of location, design quality and long-term liveability.

"They're responding really positively to the quality of the design, premium resident amenities and the uninterrupted views. Many also appreciate the location and how connected it is to everything they need."

The ability to secure stamp duty savings before completion has also been a key factor for purchasers, alongside the opportunity to personalise finishes ahead of settlement.

With construction set to commence soon and more than half the apartments already sold, Verdé enters its next phase as one of the Arts Precinct's more established apartment developments, offering remaining buyers an opportunity to secure a residence before construction advances further. Expected completion is scheduled for late 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=4661]

Virgate's Verdé Southbank moves toward construction as sales fly past halfway stage

Downsizer-focused apartment development Kooyongkoot in Hawthorn has been recognised at the 2026 Better Future Melbourne Design Awards, taking home Gold and Silver awards in two categories.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/kooyongkoot-hawthorn-1-kooyongkoot-road-hawthorn-vic-3122">Kooyongkoot</a>, currently being delivered by developer PQD and designed by Cera Stribley, received Gold in the Interior Design – Proposed category and Silver in the Architecture – Proposed category.

The dual recognition reflects the design approach behind the boutique development on prestigious Kooyongkoot Road, where the focus has been on creating homes for downsizers seeking the space, quality and functionality of a detached house within a low-rise apartment building.

Rather than maximising apartment numbers, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pqd">PQD</a> and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a> limited the development to just 18 residences, allowing for larger floorplans, greater privacy, generous landscaping and expansive communal spaces.&nbsp;The majority of the apartments also benefit from corner aspects, allowing for dual sources of natural light.

Now around 70 per cent complete and on track for completion in November 2026, Kooyongkoot will comprise a mix of garden residences, ter​race apartments, sub-penthouses, and is crowned by two half-floor penthouses with direct lift access and private rooftop terraces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355297]

The Silver Award for Architecture recognised the way the building responds to its prominent corner position at the ent​rance to Hawthorn's Scotch Hill precinct, one of Melbourne's most established residential neighbourhoods.

Rather than competing with the grand homes that line Kooyongkoot Road, the architectural approach focused on restraint and longevity, using curved brickwork, generous landscaping and carefully considered proportions to integrate with the existing streetscape.

"The form feels fluid and timeless, as though shaped by the landscape itself – architecture that belongs, rather than competes," said Chris Stribley, Co-Founder and Managing Principal of Cera Stribley.

The judging submission also highlighted practical innovations throughout the building, including lift cores servicing only nine homes each, a central landscaped lightcourt designed to bring daylight and ventilation into the building, and fully enclosed private storage rooms with lighting, power and shelving to better accommodate residents transitioning from larger family homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355293]

The Gold Award for Interior Design recognised the project's focus on long-term liveability rather than display-home aesthetics.

According to the awards submission, the interiors were designed from the inside out, prioritising how homes would function over decades of daily use through generous proportions, practical storage, durable natural materials and flexible layouts.

The specification includes natural stone throughout, upgraded acoustic glazing, V-ZUG appliances and fully enclosed storage rooms, alongside an amenity offering focused on wellness, entertainment and everyday convenience.&nbsp;

Residents will have access to a gym and yoga studio, a wellness centre featuring traditional and infrared saunas, a cold therapy shower and treatment room, as well as a residents' lounge and golf simulator/cinema room for entertainment.&nbsp;Kooyongkoot has also considered the everyday convenience of its residents by offering a private carwash and pet wash facilities on site as well as dedicated parcel lockers and oversized fully enclosed storage rooms.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355303]

The project's attention to detail has already resonated with buyers. Earlier this year, Kooyongkoot recorded one of Boroondara's highest apartment sales when an $8 million penthouse was purchased by a Melbourne CEO downsizing from a nearby family home.

"Every detail feels deliberate, from the overall design down to the smallest touches," the purchaser said.

"The level of quality and refinement is exceptional, but what really sold it was how liveable it felt... It felt like a place where everything had been considered, not just a luxury building."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355304]

Sustainability also formed a key part of both award submissions. Kooyongkoot is targeting a minimum 7.5-star NatHERS rating across all residences, supported by passive design principles, high-performance glazing, EV charging infrastructure, water reuse systems and a wellness model focused on lower-energy dry facilities rather than pools and large wet areas.

Located within walking distance of Scotch College, Methodist Ladies' College, Koo​yong Lawn Tennis Club, Aubur​n Village and Camberwell Junction, Kooyongkoot continues to target owner-occupiers looking to remain in Melbourne's inner east without compromising on space or quality. A limited selection of two, three and four-bedroom residences remains available, with prices starting from $1.9 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=102717]

Kooyongkoot wins Gold and Silver at Better Future Melbourne Design Awards

New apartment supply has become increasingly constrained across <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/parramatta-nsw-2150">Parramatta</a> in recent years, with fewer projects progressing through to completion as development conditions have become more challenging.

It makes <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/novm">NOVM</a>'s 2021-completed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/the-lennox-parramatta-12-phillip-street-parramatta-nsw-2150">The Lennox</a> one of the most recently completed residential towers on the Parramatta River, and among the newest apartment developments in Sydney's second CBD.

With the project largely completed before the sharp escalation in construction costs and inflation following the pandemic, The Lennox is now offering pricing that would be difficult to replicate in a comparable new development in Parramatta today, or across much of Western Sydney.

The majority of the 413 apartments at The Lennox sold before and shortly after completion. A limited release of the remaining apartments has recently been brought to market by capital partner <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/equitifund-group">Equitifund</a>, with entry-level pricing from $700,000 and two-bedroom apartments available from under $1 million.

Rising above the Parramatta River at 12 Phillip Street, The Lennox comprises one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments, appealing to first home buyers, young professionals, families, downsizers and interstate investors seeking a completed apartment in one of Australia's fastest-growing economic centres.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=372394]

Rather than positioning Parramatta as an alternative to Sydney's CBD, Equitifund believes the city has reached a point where it stands on its own merits.

"Parramatta is no longer simply an alternative to Sydney CBD, it's becoming a destination in its own right," Equitifund Executive Chairman Greg Huxley said.

"The Lennox captures that evolution with a level of quality and amenity that's difficult to match at its price point."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=953]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/marchese-partners">Marchese Partners</a>, the tower responds directly to its riverfront setting through expansive glazing and open-plan layouts that maximise views across the Parramatta River and city skyline. Interiors feature engineered timber flooring, stone benchtops, stainless steel appliances and floor-to-ceiling glazing, while generous balconies extend the living spaces outdoors.

Marchese Partners says the project was conceived to balance high-quality apartment living with practical, long-term functionality, pairing larger, efficient floorplans with amenities more commonly associated with five-star hotels.

That emphasis continues through the resident facilities, which include a 20-metre rooftop swimming pool, fully equipped gym and wellness spaces, full-time concierge, a residents' lounge, function room, private lifts, secure basement parking and rooftop communal areas overlooking the Parramatta River. Ground-floor boardwalk retail and dining further activate the riverfront and integrate the building into the surrounding public realm.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=925]

Australian housing and finance group Equitifund has secured the remaining apartments, believing there are few completed apartment opportunities in Parramatta that offer the same combination of location, amenity and pricing.

Equitifund National Sales Director Ben Hamblett says buyers are increasingly recognising that premium apartment living no longer needs to come with Sydney CBD pricing.

"The Lennox is where aspirational living becomes attainable," Hamblett said.

"Wake to river and mountain views, step into Sydney's Second CBD, and arrive home to resort-calibre amenities, all without the harbour price tag."

Hamblett says owner-occupiers are also attracted by the convenience of having Westfield Parramatta, Church Street's dining precinct, Parramatta Park, Riverside Theatres, Western Sydney University and major transport connections all within walking distance.

"At The Lennox, lifestyle is not an afterthought, it is the foundation."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=5374]

The Lennox places residents within walking distance of Parramatta Square, Westfield Parramatta, Church Street Eat Street, Parramatta Station, the ferry wharf, Light Rail, the future Sydney Metro West, Parramatta Park and CommBank Stadium, reinforcing Parramatta's position as one of Australia's most connected metropolitan centres outside Sydney's CBD.

Equitifund says buyers visiting the display suite consistently comment on the quality of the finishes, generous floorplans, river and skyline views, and the walkability of the location. The project has attracted a broad mix of local professionals, upsizers, downsizers, buyers relocating from Sydney's inner suburbs and interstate investors seeking long-term growth opportunities.

That demand aligns with Parramatta's continued evolution as an economic powerhouse. Equitifund Research and Market Insights specialist John Bekiaris says sustained population growth, infrastructure investment and expanding employment opportunities continue to support long-term housing demand across the city.

"Parramatta has evolved from a satellite city into one of Australia's most important economic centres. Population growth, infrastructure investment and employment are all supporting sustained long-term housing demand."

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=5743]

The apartment price gap drawing Sydney buyers west

A luxury beachfront apartment at Rainbow Bay has more than doubled in value since it sold off the plan six years ago, setting a new local apartment record in the process.

The three-bedroom apartment in the Flow development on Petrie Street, the first of four new projects locally by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects, has sold for $7.4 million, after originally selling for $3.27 million when the project launched in 2020.

The seventh-floor apartment, comprising 187 sqm of internal living space and a 54 sqm balcony overlooking Froggies Beach and Snapper Rocks, was purchased by a local family.

The transaction was negotiated by Pezet Matheson director Kerry Pezet and equates to more than $30,000 per sqm.

Pezet said the sale reflected the limited opportunities to buy into the boutique beachfront development.

"The sale highlights the rarity of opportunities within the boutique beachfront development, where residences seldom become available," Pezet said.

"Flow is one of the Gold Coast's most tightly held buildings. Buyers from our database move quickly when residences become available, and achieving an off-market sale at $7.4 million demonstrates the depth of demand for property of this calibre."

<img alt="Flow" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c585b206-2130-4eee-a50c-3f27c51a7c70" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-06%20at%208.33.25%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=m3pHRDV62Y3fvN.XQuQHq.52ilTWpRLf" />

Flow was the first of four luxury apartment developments delivered by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects at Rainbow Bay and was completed in 2023.

Positioned on the beachfront overlooking Snapper Rocks, the residence includes three bedrooms, three bathrooms, a powder room and views stretching north along the coastline towards Surfers Paradise.

Pezet Matheson Residential principal Mitchell Lambert said buyers continued to prioritise quality beachfront apartments in tightly held locations.

"Flow Residences offers a rare combination of elevated beachfront positioning, architectural excellence, comprehensive resident amenity and premium finishes, which is exactly what discerning purchasers are seeking," Lambert said.

"The transaction further reinforces Rainbow Bay's reputation as one of Australia's premier coastal lifestyle destinations, where limited supply and growing demand continue to support strong market performance."

Pezet Matheson originally marketed and sold out Flow off the plan, making the latest transaction a return to one of the project's original buyers.

Paul Gedoun is selling his third project, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/radia-rainbow-bay-271-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Radia Rainbow Bay</a>, after recently completing, and selling out, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/esprit-217-227-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Esprit</a>. He has plans for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-s-s-projects-proposes-88-apartment-wellness-tower-at-coolangattas-boundary-street">fourth building</a>, 88 apartments on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/209-213-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Boundary Street</a>.

Margaret Lomas

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News