Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

Joel Robinson

First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-5" data-turn="user" data-turn-id="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" data-turn-id-container="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" dir="auto">Time &amp; Place’s plans to transform the former David Jones factory building in Surry Hills into a mixed-use residential precinct have gone on exhibition through the NSW Government’s In-fill Affordable Housing pathway.</section>

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" dir="auto">
The Marlborough House proposal, lodged for the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marlborough-house-47-97-marlborough-street-surry-hills-nsw-2010">47-97 Marlborough Street</a> site, would see the adaptive reuse of the heritage-listed warehouse building alongside the construction of new residential additions and a separate apartment building on the northern portion of the site.

The proposal seeks approval for 172 apartments across three buildings, including 15 per cent affordable housing managed by a community housing provider for at least 15 years from occupation.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5d1d3c2a-bf13-47d6-a335-7c01102cdee1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.36%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=cjMYrbR.BLUlWH4dar0RVDDo0bG.u2YT" />

Interior view from the Northern Building Penthouse overlooking the park

&nbsp;

The redevelopment is planned for the prominent 3,413 sqm site bounded by Marlborough Street, Goodlet Street and Lansdowne Street, directly opposite Eddie Ward Park and around 200 metres from the Surry Hills light rail stop.

Time &amp; Place acquired the former David Jones building in 2024, marking the first time the property had changed hands in around 50 years.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal centres around the adaptive reuse of the former David Jones factory, originally constructed between 1913 and 1935 in the Inter-War Chicagoesque architectural style.

Wardle noted in its Architectural Design Report that the building “occupies a significant place in the industrial and cultural history of Surry Hills” and at its peak was “the largest department store manufacturing facility in Australia, employing over 800 people and fuelling the growth of Sydney’s fashion and retail industries.”

The practice said the project positions itself “not as an isolated intervention, but as a contributor to the civic, social, and architectural grain of the precinct.”

The proposal would deliver 75 apartments within the retained southern heritage building, 59 apartments within the central addition, and a further 38 apartments within the new northern building fronting Lansdowne Street.

Planning documents show the scheme would comprise a mix of heritage apartments, new-build apartments, townhouses and penthouses.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="57758518-40a3-4b83-958c-d06e96a2cffa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.42%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VerlX9ST5xgBi8.1_YRsqdWTJeT6ygjs" />Interior View of the Heritage Building Apartment

The development would also include a ground-floor retail tenancy on the corner of Marlborough and Lansdowne streets, rooftop communal open space, a landscaped pedestrian link along the western edge of the site, and basement parking accessed from Lansdowne Street via a car stacker system.

&nbsp;

The scheme emerged from a competitive design process run by Urbis, with Wardle ultimately selected as the winning architect ahead of FJC Studio, TZG, Architectus and Wilkinson Eyre.

The Design Integrity Panel later described several aspects of the Wardle scheme as fundamental to the project, including “the stepped character of the new addition to the north of the site”, the landscaped western pedestrian link, and the “garden arrival” experience separating the original Marlborough House from the heritage addition.

Wardle’s design heavily references the site’s industrial and heritage history, while also responding to the surrounding Surry Hills streetscape.

The Architectural Design Report describes Surry Hills as “a finely grained neighbourhood with beautiful and expressive brickworks throughout the suburb,” with the proposal introducing a material palette intended to sit comfortably alongside the existing warehouse fabric and neighbouring terraces.

The report also outlines the project’s relationship with Eddie Ward Park and the broader landscape context of the area.

“Marlborough House occupies a site of deep cultural memory and the neighbouring Eddie Ward Park is of local ecological significance, where natural systems, topography, and stories have long shaped human experience,” Wardle noted in the report.

The architects said the proposal sought to “rebind built form to Country” through landscape, materiality and the adaptive reuse of the heritage structure.

<img alt="Marlborough House" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9ae3f2f9-c85f-477a-a6f8-b43f6cb97c41" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.53%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=B.qUCLqRvJOR.n9CvYcTpaknIX9LuqKZ" />

The project is also being progressed under the NSW Government’s in-fill affordable housing provisions, allowing developments that include affordable housing to access additional height and floor space incentives.

Under the plans, 2,593 sqm of the project’s floor space would be dedicated to affordable housing, slightly exceeding the required 15 per cent threshold.

In its Design Excellence Strategy, Urbis said the project aimed to “sensitively adapt and enhance the heritage-listed building on site through alterations and additions that preserve its historical significance” while delivering “high-quality market and infill affordable housing development in Surry Hills.”

Time &amp; Place has been one of the most active developers nationally in the last 12 to 24 months. Late last year they completed&nbsp;The Queensbridge in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/southbank-vic-3006">Southbank</a>, a mixed-use tower with 353 apartments and a hotel. They are currently selling Park Modern, 246 apartments near the famous Botanic Gardens in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/south-melbourne-vic-3205">South Melbourne</a>, and have future projects, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-wilmot-173-burke-road-28-hope-street-glen-iris-vic-3146">The Wilmot</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>, the redevelopment of the Northcote Plaza, and another tower in South Melbourne.

The developer broke into Sydney just a few years ago with Two Tides in Manly. They have another project nearby, which is at the ultra-luxury end of the market on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/shoreline-manly-beach-89-90-north-steyne-manly">North Steyne</a>, fronting the beach.

It is also continuing to work through the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-time-place-settles-on-design-for-the-chimes-potts-point-redevelopment">redevelopment of The Chimes building</a> on Macleay Street in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/potts-point-nsw-2011">Potts Point</a>, as well as a project on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Mosman's Redan Street</a>.
</section>

First look: Time & Place unveils Marlborough House redevelopment designs for former David Jones warehouse in Surry Hills

The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Wing Tai unveils 325-apartment St Kilda Road tower on former VACC House site

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Property Development

<html><body>
Last week I was assisting a client with her dual occupancy construction finance. We have Development Application (DA) and Construction Certificate (CC) consents and the builder has issued their Building Contract. The bank now has all the documentation required to unconditionally approve her construction finance.
They had conditionally approved her loan a few weeks earlier after verifying income and assessing serviceability and all the other stuff they do after you sign a mountain of loan docs. The next step was for the bank to value the two dwellings and then they could finalise the construction loan.
Her bank did an "As if Complete" valuation. This is also known as a Tentative on Completion valuation. It's when the bank value the project before it's constructed but based on how they think it will be completed.  lf it's more than one dwelling - a dual occupancy or multi unit project - they look for a value of the property '"in one line". This means not subdivided. If the bank had to sell the dwellings all on the original title, what would they get for them?
The number one, massive, biggest, fattest, most frustrating issue with this type of valuation  is that there are generally NO sales references. Who in their right mind would sell in one line if given the choice of making far more profit by subdividing?
When there are no sales references in one line, it is up to the valuer to determine how they discount the end values if the dwellings were on their own title.  Valuers must take legal responsibility for their opinion. The valuer needs to cover themselves in the instance that the bank may need to fire sell the properties together on one title of land.
The process of subdivision after building works are complete, whilst not complicated, can take a number of months to get to the registration stage. Yet the builder's final payment is due on completion of construction.
The Australian Property Institute publish a very interesting document on valuation standards. It's 395 pages long. That's how complicated the valuation process can be.  It covers valuations for different purposes such as market, mortgage and loan security, rating and taxing, for compulsory acquisitions, for assessing rental value, for property plant and material, for insurance purposes and to use in financial reports. 
In this instance due to no direct sales the valuer will possibly use a gross realisation of the dwellings assuming they are subdivided and on separate titles and then deduct a profit and risk factor, holding and selling costs to arrive at their valuation figure. 
They may also take into consideration a capitalisation of the gross income and use an acceptable market capitalisation rate or cap rate. 
In my opinion, without actual sales references of properties sold in one line, the valuer will be super conservative in their calculations and hence, a low On Completion valuation may be received. This is one of the perils of construction finance and so a buffer of cash should be put aside in case the construction loan requires supplementing. 
Applying for and then finally receiving approval of, construction finance can be one of the most lengthy phases of a development project. It can take longer than obtaining the DA consent and in some cases, has taken longer than the construction phase itself!  So be careful to allow, not only enough extra funds, but also time for your construction finance.
Jo Chivers is chief executive officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

The complicated process of valuation: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
The contracted buyer of the $16.85 million Soul penthouse on the Gold Coast has been ordered to pay the developer $14.1 million - but won't get to keep the unit.
Industrial transport entrepreneur Charlie Caltabiano was sued by receivers for Juniper Property Holdings, developer of the Surfers Paradise landmark.
Queensland Supreme Court judge David Jackson declare that the 2007 deposit together with interest accrued was to be forfeited to the plaintiff.
The defendant was ordered to pay $14,132,246 including interest of $1,471,509 over the failed Soul deal.
Caltabiano was at the Gold Coast having a drink in April 2006 when he saw a display for Soul apartments.
He spoke to the salesman, Justin Daniels and noticed the four level penthouse was priced at $16.85 million. 
As constructed, the penthouse had a total floor area of 1,043 square metres, divided between 519 square metres of internal living area and 524 square metres of balcony or roof deck outdoor area.
After he opted not to proceed to the 2012 settlement the penthouse sold for $7 million<a href="/news/soul-surfers-paradise-penthouse-auction-results-in-7-million-sale-to-tony-fung"> at McGrath auction last year to businessman Tony Fung</a>.
The Juniper receivers claimed Mr Caltabiano, who paid a $1.68 million deposit on the luxury four-level apartment, breached the contract when he failed to settle on it three times over two years.
The plaintiff claimed a declaration that the deposit, together with interest accrued, was to be forfeited along with damages for breach of contract in the sum of $8,817,552.
The judge rejected Mr Caltabiano’s claims he reneged on the deal to buy the penthouse because the sellers misled him over its value.
Mr Caltabiano claimed the seller told him the Jade penthouse had sold for $20 million and that the Q1 penthouse sold for $7.8m but had half the floor size of the Soul penthouse — both sales that were untrue.
The judge said taking the other sales claims at their word and without any other research about the apartment’s value was “incredible”.
“It is commercially illogical and inherently improbable that in deciding upon a $16.85 million purchase the defendant would not have obtained such advice,” <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QSC/2016/5" target="_blank">the judgement read</a> "because of reliance on the alleged representations made by the plaintiff’s sales consultant comprising comparisons with properties that the defendant did not know anything about.
'This is where the defendant’s story is incredible," the judge noted.
Mr Caltabiano founded Force Corp, that rented out equipment like cherry pickers and hydraulic lifts in 1994, which by 2007 was a $100 million company.
The Gold Coast Bulletin reported the business was bought by Coates Hire last year.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Juniper receivers win Soul penthouse default settlement court battle 

<html><body>
As I finalise the Project Analysis on one of our last development projects for 2016, I've realised we've broken our equity creation record for a dual occupancy project.
We've manufactured just under $200,000 in equity within a year which represents an 18% return on investment (ROI). 
This wonderful client is now onto his third project with Property Bloom and so I'm very happy we've been able to deliver this amazing result for him, it's a fabulous Christmas present for our client but also for us. 
This was one of those projects where financially, things just went right. We started with a build estimate and with every update of our builder's tender the project costs dropped. We ended up with an actual construction cost of just under $40,000 less than we'd originally estimated. This includes Torrens title subdivision costs so that our client ends up with two x three bedroom dwellings each on their own title. 
We secured the development site in Newcastle in an estate that ticked all our  'great location' boxes. It has a high proportion of owner occupiers, strong sales and rental demand, community facilities including primary and high school, sporting fields, bike paths, picnic areas, children's parks and close to the local shopping centre and on the bus route. The location also allows quick drive time into the CBD and onto the major arterial roads.
We were able to prepare plans and other documentation required for the Development Application (DA) quickly and have it lodged with Newcastle City Council even before our client settled on the land. This saved on holding costs. However, the DA processing time was disappointing. It took 16 weeks, although I have to add this included Christmas, so you could say 14 weeks. Still, this is a long time. Our best DA processing time with the same council is two weeks. It all comes down to the town planner we are allocated and how efficient they are.  
The construction time was five months from the site cut date to Handover of a full turnkey product. Again, we've done better but I was happy with this result considering there is a shortage of building trades right now in the Hunter. 
Of course there was a few unexpected hiccups, like two windows that needed to be replaced after the internal linings were finished, we realised they were not centered in the area we wanted them to be. Our builder quickly had them replaced. But this didn't delay the project, just added some extra work for the builder. 
Our client will enjoy strong depreciation benefits from his new properties and a 6.5% gross yield. 
As we move closer to closing the door on 2015, it's nice to finish the year on a high. We'll be back for more fun and games in 2016. I hope you've enjoyed our stories this year, wishing all our readers and the wonderful people at Property Observer  a safe, relaxing and happy Christmas.  May 2016 bring you much joy and happiness, and a maybe a shiny new property development!
Jo Chivers is chief executive officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

Finishing the year with a bang: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
<img src="/images/2015/12/16/Holdencapital_banner.jpg" alt="" width="617" height="130">
SPONSORED POST
The lure of a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow certainly attracts many property developers. The promise of large tranches of cheap off shore funding with minimal strings attached and for no particular reason they have chosen your project to invest it in.
Who could resist? Often, when it all seems too good to be true, it usually is. The finance industry also has its share of doubtful operators who specialise in taking large upfront fees while offering developers the promised pot of gold, and while these overnight finance ”experts” have a case to answer, I struggle to sympathise with the developer who heard what he wanted to hear and proceeded to run head first into a brick wall under his own steam.
The combination of the developer’s entrepreneurial spirit, optimism and confidence that they have the skills to deliver the project while overcoming all the potential obstacles, gives them the courage to borrow millions of dollars to turn a piece of land into something the market will buy. And those qualities are all admirable and contribute to their successes, particularly when you consider that the majority of Australians will spend their whole lives in employment, reliant on a weekly pay cheque and that less than 1 on 4 take the leap to start their own business.
However, of all the business opportunities that you could take on, like buying a franchise, leaving the big firm and starting your own consultancy, or opening a café, only a select few take on the risks of property development. Risking substantial capital and borrowing significant debt just to make a pre-tax profit of between 18-25% on the total funds utilised! Frankly, I take my hat off to those property developers because there are a lot of obstacles to overcome and a lot of variables that can go either way.
They say “the harder you work the luckier you get” but it is this innate sense of optimism peculiar to developers that seems to enable them to take on these levels of risk and more often than not win. Unfortunately sometimes that optimism goes into over-drive or is born out of naivety and many developers live by the mantra “think big and multiply” only to hit an even bigger wall.
The problem with all this optimism/naivety is their reliance upon those factors at play outside of their control, and the amount of energy and time spent chasing those rainbows. Imagine if they put that energy and time into the core elements of their business creating a better product and the mechanisms to sell and deliver it?
Having seen quite a few developers chase those rainbows I thought about what in particular motivates an otherwise smart person to throw $20,000 - $50,000 in non-refundable application fees at a so called expert finance broker who has no fixed office address or one who has just appeared in town with a “cheap offshore funding” offer, neither of them with even one reference from a happy customer.
The only answer I could come up with is that ultimately they want “Dumb Money”, that in return for a modest dividend/profit share/interest rate doesn’t ask questions and leaves them to largely do as they please with the funds. But the truth is that if their project was that good and the returns they were offering truly reflected the market risks, a local investor would be more likely to open their chequebook.
What we constantly observe is investors looking to max their return while taking as little risk as possible, which is only natural, while the developer chases large chunks of naïve money that they can manipulate to only provide low returns for what is actually a higher risk than they appreciate. While this reflects typical market forces at work, I question the level of the so-called sophistication on both sides of the equation.
Some people find satisfaction in making money through others losses, but a zero sum game where one party loses and other wins happens all too often in business, including development. As Henry Ford apparently said, “a business that makes only money is not a good business’.
I don’t believe that it is too idealistic to think that deals can be structured in such a way that both parties can win. While Mr Developer can argue that those investors would only otherwise be getting 2%pa in the bank, the fairness comes into it when you compare the risk of that return versus the risk their money is exposed to and the reward being paid.
I have made the case in a previous commentary that developers need to work harder on ensuring that they secure the services of skills consultants/advisors in those areas where they lack the necessary expertise in order to ensure they achieve their targets and this is another instance where too much energy is expended on saving a cost that is disproportionate to the projected outcome.
We are lucky that in Australia there is quite a deep market of passive investors willing to take equity positions on development projects. So it makes you wonder what developers could achieve if they used the right consultants and redirected their energy/time into enhancing their core skill sets, how much more successful their business would be in 5-10 years from now?
This is not to say that you should just accept the finance framework that is offered to you by your local bank manager. The HoldenCAPITAL business is based around pushing boundaries on finance to optimise project profits, we certainly don’t recommend that you don’t base your whole business model around that elusive pot of gold sitting at the end of the rainbow.
This article was written by Dan Holden of HoldenCAPITAL, who are a bespoke construction finance firm, they arrange construction finance and invest in projects through their equity fund, Queen Street INVEST. To discuss your project finance requirement please call (07) 3171 4200 or visit HoldenCAPITAL <a href="https://www.holdencapital.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

firstname-zEygzUaHDN

Chasing rainbows, overseas funding and other unicorns: HoldenCAPITAL

<html><body>
A mixed-use development property in west Melbourne has sold to a local investor at auction for $6.8 million.
The <a href="https://www.realcommercial.com.au/property-land+development-vic-west+melbourne-501776166" target="_blank">55 Walsh Street</a> property comprises a three-level office building with multiple tenancies currently returns $208,000 per annum gross. 
There are some vacancies as well, hence the potential to increase income.
The sale through Anthony Carbone of CVA Property Consultants represents a rate of $3,269.23 per metre square.
The building is in a mixed-use zone allotment of 695 square metres, allowing for development including but not limited to office and residential (STPA). 
It is close to Queen Victoria Market and Flagstaff railway station.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

West Melbourne office building fetches $6.8 million at auction

<html><body>
Architectus has been awarded Auswin TWT’s mixed-use development project at 495 Harris Street, Ultimo in Sydney.
It followed a design competition chaired by acclaimed architect Tony Caro. 
The 5,322 square metre site is located next to the Ultimo Community Centre. It was the headquarters of Tabcorp, one of the last substantial development opportunities in the area.
There will be a multi-layered building that steps down from nine-storeys along Harris Street to six levels facing Bulwara Road with a likely total of 213 apartments ranging from studios to three-bedrooms, including two-level terraces with street level access.
There also will be ground floor retail/commercial space and two basement levels for vehicles and bicycles. 
The jury was impressed by Architectus’ contemporary interpretation of the site’s semi-industrial history.
It includes a large courtyard and a purpose-built pedestrian laneway.
It also features an innovative series of vertical masonry ventilation pipes which draw hot air in from the courtyard and expel it naturally, helping the building to ‘breathe’.
The director of urban design and planning with Architectus, Michael Harrison, said his firm had previously been engaged by a group of local residents who had been initially concerned that a new building on such a prominent site could impact their amenity.
“Armed with this knowledge we believe our scheme reflects many of their wishes for a development that doesn’t overpower the neighbourhood nor compromise their privacy, and which minimises the chance of overshadowing their properties,” Harrison said.
The upper levels are designed to ‘float’ above the traditional warehouse base.
The Harris Street site was originally owned by the Harris family who were the dominant landowners in the area for more than a century. Bushells Tea purchased the site in 1938 and built a four-storey warehouse to store its produce.
In 1964, the newly founded Totalizator Agency Board (TAB) acquired the property as its headquarters and nerve centre for its betting business. In 2004, TAB was taken over by the Victorian-based wagering and media company Tabcorp, which 10 years later sold the property to Auswin TWT.
</body></html>

Architectus to design $300 million Ultimo development

<html><body>
 <img src="/images/2015/12/2/Holdencapital_banner.jpg" alt="" width="551" height="116">
SPONSORED POST
Just what are the nine must-ask questions you nee to consider before you enter a joint venture?
1. “Needs V Wants?” – A successful Joint Venture or “JV” is typically formed on the basis that the JV parties are contributing complimentary skills and or value to the alliance. The question for the Developer to ask himself is are the skills/value that the other party brings to the deal i) needed; and ii) cannot be better satisfied by other means such as paying an external consultant. A JV partner generally comes at a price such as an agreed profit share based on the contributions each party makes to the “Project”, which results in the Developer giving away a large percentage of his profits. 
2. Trust – What do you know about the party/ies you are about to enter into a JV with? Have you done business with them previously or do you know other Developers who have and if so, what was the outcome? How did they perform against initial expectations? Past performances can provide you with a valuable indication of what to expect in terms of behaviour, work ethic, and integrity. Its just as important to undertake thorough due diligence on a potential JV partner as it is on the metrics of the project. 
3. Incorporated or Contractual JV? – There are pros and cons for both, so its important to understand the features of each and decide which best suits the participants and the project. Appropriate legal and taxation advice upfront is strongly recommended; i.e. the Corporations Law allows parties to look behind the corporate structure of an incorporated JV and attach liability to individuals. On the positive side, the transfer of an interest in an incorporated JV can be done via a simple transfer of shares, which is useful where a JV evolves and needs to take on a different shape from that first envisioned. A contractual JV may be a quicker and simpler structure to establish, but documenting it can still be quite cumbersome. There are potential tax benefits in a Contractual JV allowing tax losses to be affectively offset against income outside the JV, while an Incorporated JV quarantines them within the incorporated entity. Again, it is recommended that the parties seek independent legal and taxation advice having regard to their respective interests, prior to establishing the JV.   
4. Decision Making – It is important to understand and agree how key decisions will be made. In some JV’s decisions will be made by one party only (where the other parties are considered “silent partners”), whereas in most JV arrangements, decisions are made jointly. It is important to establish from the outset, who will be responsible for making key decisions that affect the project.
5. Who will do what? -  a simple way to determine each parties responsibilities is to list the tasks/responsibilities that need to be completed throughout the development process and assign a lead role and a peer review role. A suggested way to simplify this is detailed below: 
<a href="/images/2015/12/2/Screen%20Shot%202015-12-02%20at%202.17.58%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/12/2/Screen%20Shot%202015-12-02%20at%202.17.58%20PM.png" alt="">
This is obviously a simplified list, but by allocating responsibility for the macro tasks, that party is then responsible for allocating the appropriate sub-tasks with peer reviews undertaken by the secondary party to ensure compliance as a double check.
6. Tracking Performance – From the outset it is important to establish clear performance targets for all JV parties and then ensure that these measures are tracked and reported. Regular meetings between the JV parties should be scheduled and performance against the agreed measures should be discussed to ensure the project remains satisfactorily on track. Identifying poor performance early and acting to resolve any issues is critical to the projects success.      
7.Profit sharing – It is critical that the distribution of profits and risks borne fairly represent the contributions made by each party based on their contributions - skills and financial. These contributions can change over the life of a JV and it is therefore important that there are agreed mechanisms to allow changes to the profit distributions to reflect those changes. Typically, this occurs where there is a requirement for subsequent equity contributions, particularly where only one party has the capacity or will to participate. The agreement should contemplate this and provide for appropriate adjustments to entitlements to reflect the change in contributions/risk. Poorly structured agreements inevitably result in a dispute situation and if a party is not adequately incentivised, this could impact their performance and in turn the project success. 
8.Disputes – All agreements should include appropriate dispute resolution clauses to ensure the project is not stalled where an impasse is reached on key issues. To avoid the cost in time and money, it is important to clearly articulate the dispute resolution procedures and most good JV Agreements will include a suite of tailored clauses. Typically, they will provide for a number of pre-agreed outcomes but also where a critical dispute cannot be resolved using those clauses; the agreement will should either have a deadlock or mediation process. Ultimately, if mediation fails it could result in expensive litigation, which is to be avoided at all cost. 
9.Ending a JV arrangement – Unlike a “partnership” a JV is not a legal entity and is typically an agreement between two or more parties to form a strategic alliance for the purpose of a single or specific number of projects. Therefore the dissolution of a JV is reasonably straightforward, doesn’t typically require any further legal documentation and will end on completion of the project/s. This is why JV’s are quite common in property development as they can be formed for the purpose of a single project, should contemplate various exit solutions to deal with situations where the project fails meet the original expectation and allow for the JV parties to move on at completion. 
This article was written by Dan Holden of HoldenCAPITAL, who are a bespoke construction finance firm, they arrange construction finance and invest in projects through their equity fund, Queen Street INVEST. To discuss your project finance requirement please call (07) 3171 4200 or visit HoldenCAPITAL <a href="https://www.holdencapital.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Nine must-ask questions before you enter a joint venture: HoldenCAPITAL

<html><body>
Johnson Property Group has received approval to develop a tourist precinct within its $388 million masterplanned marina community, Trinity Point overlooking Barden’s Bay in Lake Macquarie.
The NSW Planning Assessment Commission has approved the group's plan to modify its earlier approved Masterplan Concept to incorporate a 5-Star hotel/commercial precinct and an apartment precinct which includes short stay and residential apartments.
“This will be a key economic driver for the local community and a major new tourist destination for New South Wales,” said Keith Johnson, CEO of Johnson Property Group.
The hotel precinct is proposed to comprise a 5-star hotel, a resort-style pool, spa and gym facilities, a 200-seat restaurant and a cafe. 
The apartment precinct is expected to comprise 250 apartments comprising of a mix of residential and short stay units, with car parking.
The company received development application approval to build the first 94 berths of a proposed 188-berth marina as part of the masterplanned community earlier, to be called Trinity Point Marina.
Trinity Point spans 23 hectares and is located in Lake Macquarie, an hour and a half from Sydney. 
Former Miss Universe, model and entrepreneur, Jennifer Hawkins is a brand ambassador of Trinity Point, being a local girl from Holmesville near Newcastle. 
Former Australian cricket captain Michael Clarke joins model Jen Hawkins in becoming an ambassador for Johnson Property Group as he announced this week he had bought into the new development Trinity Point.
<img src="/images/2015/11/23/clarke.jpg" alt="" width="567" height="344">
Caption: Johnson Property Group Managing Director, Keith Johnson and former Australian cricket captain Michael Clarke
He bought a three storey, four bedroom terrace off the plan. It cost $1,388,888.
"Trinity Point is going to become an absolute Sydney weekend hotspot – another Palm Beach or daytrip destination but with more of a marina-lifestyle resort focus,” he said.
“We are absolutely delighted to be the first buyers to secure a stunning lakeside home at Trinity Point and are already planning our family holidays and weekend trips away staying in our beautiful three storey terrace house with views out over Lake Macquarie.” 
The launch of land sales at Trinity Point which will take place on November 29 on site.
The first release will comprise a total of 32 land lots, priced from $398,888 ranging in size from 450 square metres to 660 square metres.
To register for interest in land or apartment sales at Trinity Point, register <a href="https://trinitypoint.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
Once completed, Trinity Point will include 189 residential land lots, 250 residential and short stay apartments and a five star, 65 room Pullman resort.
</body></html>

Johnson Property's Trinity Point gets NSW govt nod to modify Lake Macquarie tourist and residential precinct

<html><body>
The billionaire property developer Lang Walker is seeking to sell his $2.5 billion Collins Square project in Melbourne, likely to be the largest single property sale in Australia.
But Lang Walker, who sold his empire just ahead of the last peak of the market, says he is not selling at the top again
"I don't think it is at the top," he told the Australian Financial Review.
"Look at the yields and the 10-year bond rates. There is still a big gap and interest rates are going to stay lower for longer and there is a lot of overseas capital looking for projects in the gateway cities." 
He told The Australian he was getting two or three offers every week from potential buyers over the past six months.
Investment bank UBS has the sales mandate for Collins Square, five towers at the western end of Melbourne. 
Two of the five towers are complete and fully tenanted, with two more scheduled to be completed mid-2016 and the fifth in 2017, with more than 250,000 square metres of lettable area.
</body></html>

Lang Walker seeks Collins Square buyers at $2.5b

<html><body>
<img src="/images/2015/11/24/Holdencapital_banner.jpg" alt="" width="408" height="86">
SPONSORED POST
Often property developers, particularly inexperienced or would be developers, will purchase a residential or rural property with view to redeveloping it into townhouses or apartment style developments or residential allotments.
With the current high demand for redevelopment sites, often the purchase price is inflated when compared to similar properties in the immediate surrounds which may not possess redevelopment potential. The developer can justify paying a higher price based on the project profit they can forecast to earn.
Despite the property being a residentially zoned, the trap that the inexperienced buyers fall into is in incorrectly believing that they can obtain residential property finance to purchase what is really a development site. 
Which raises the question of what are the requirements when seeking residential finance as opposed to site funding?
Residential property finance (Investment Loan or Home Loan), can be obtained if the site is purchased for a comparable price to neighboring residential properties, or the applicants have owned the property for a long time or the borrower can demonstrate an ability to service the proposed debt. 
The first hurdle our developer applicants face is a requirement to demonstrate their servicing capacity, however many developers do not have consistent cash flows and the rental income is rarely enough resulting in a servicing shortfall. 
The second stumbling black occurs when the property is valued for the lender and the question arises, is it a residential property or a development site for the purposes of the valuation?
The API regulates the valuation industry heavily and Professional Indemnity insurance is expensive. Claims by lenders can have a huge impact on the valuer’s business costs. So, when conducting a valuation on a residential property, the valuer typically searches for comparable sales in the area to support the purchase price. If the valuer cannot find comparable sales evidence they are unlikely to support pioneering values and will typically discount their valuation accordingly.
A development valuation involves the use of a feasibility analysis of the proposed project and considers the project and development viability in greater detail than a residential valuation based on comparable sales.
Do your own research on the market and provide the valuer with supporting sales evidence that you have collected, don’t rely on the valuer to do all the research or have access to the most recent sales.
When should I order a valuation: The best results occur when the valuer is engaged early, the main benefit of early engagement is that the process allows the developer to assess the valuation risk prior to the settlement occurring. If the valuation comes in short the whole project can fall over very quickly if more equity cannot be secured or settlement extensions cannot be granted. Speak to your broker about the most suitable valuer to engage.
 It is important to have all information ready and organized to send to the valuer upon engagement.
Recently a client contracted to purchase a residential property with development potential for $1.5m with a 12 month settlement period to allow the client sufficient time to achieve development approval with a neighboring development site. The client expected to finance 80% of the purchase price and obtain a loan for $1.2m.
A residential valuer was engaged and responded very quickly with a valuation of $1.2m, a $300,000 discount to the purchase price of $1.5m. The valuer correctly reasoned that the purchase price was outside of the normal range for this location. The valuer noted the redevelopment potential but without a detailed feasibility analysis or council development approval they could not accurately gauge the value of this development potential.
With HCAP involvement we managed to obtain loan for 100% of the valuation figure via a structured debt facility that layered the capital stack with 1st and 2nd mortgage funding by highlighting to the lender the redevelopment potential of the property that the valuer was unable to do. The client was able to settle the acquisition and now has time to obtain the relevant approvals before obtaining finance for stage 1 construction with a full development valuation.
If you are buying a development site, best to engage your valuer early and ensure that you speak to an experienced construction finance broker who can assist you to navigate through this process.
 
This article was written by Dan Holden of HoldenCAPITAL, who are a bespoke construction finance firm, they arrange construction finance and invest in projects through their equity fund, Queen Street INVEST. To discuss your project finance requirement please call (07) 3171 4200 or visit HoldenCAPITAL <a href="https://www.holdencapital.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Property Development

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Property Development

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News