Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

Joel Robinson

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

IN BRIEF

<ul>
	<li>
	Just three double-storey Sky Homes sit at the top of The Waterline, each with its own private marina berth and rooftop terrace.
	</li>
	<li>
	Construction on The Waterline is complete, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.
	</li>
	<li>
	Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and are priced from $3.65 million.
	</li>
</ul>

<hr />
Lewis Land has opened the first completed sky home for inspection at Harbour Shores, giving buyers their first opportunity to step inside one of just three double-storey residences crowning The Waterline.

Each sky home comes with its own private marina berth, rooftop terrace and Broadwater views, combining the scale of a larger home with direct access to the boating lifestyle that underpins the wider <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/harbour-shores-biggera-waters-564-oxley-drive-biggera-waters-qld-4216">Harbour Shores</a> masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366708]

Lewis Land Head of Development Michael Long said the inclusion of a berth with every Sky Home had become increasingly valuable as marina access across the Gold Coast tightened.

“Marina berths are becoming increasingly difficult to secure across the Gold Coast, so including one with every Sky Home makes this a genuinely rare offering,” Long said.

“The private 70-berth marina will accommodate boats up to 12 metres in length and is positioned just 2.5 kilometres from the Broadwater, placing the open ocean only 15 minutes away.

“Being able to step out of your home onto your boat is a rare luxury, and it’s something residents here can look forward to when it opens later this year.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366709]

The display opening comes as construction completes on The Waterline, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.

The three Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and each feature three bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive kitchens with butler's pantries and large balconies taking in the Broadwater outlook.

Each residence also has three secure basement car spaces and additional storage.

“This is the first opportunity the Gold Coast has had to step into Harbour Shores and see, touch and feel what we’re bringing to life here,” Long said.

“There are only three Sky Homes within The Waterline, ranging in size from 282sqm to 367sqm, with each residence featuring three large bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive custom-built kitchens with butler’s pantry, and large balconies capturing Broadwater views.”

<img alt="Harbour Shores" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bab65e10-4fab-45e1-92d8-fc56e2ab98ff" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-25%20at%202.00.16%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=XT8q76LsPkw3cYTsvN3JfFDaPLud90PN" />

Residents of The Waterline will have access to a private pool, along with Harbour Shores' wider collection of amenity including a lagoon pool, social clubhouse, tennis court, gym, yoga facilities and sauna.

Lewis Land partnered with Studio Collective to furnish the completed display, with the interiors designed to demonstrate how the residences could function as permanent homes rather than simply as show apartments.

Studio Collective Director Melissa Park said the surrounding waterways informed the interiors, but in a more restrained way than a traditional coastal scheme.

“We drew inspiration from the canals and coastal surrounds, but our approach was to interpret that subtly through layered materials and a grounded palette of earthy tones, rather than literal coastal references,” Park said.

“We introduced hero moments of green and teal to reference the surrounding waterways, while mirrored elements help reflect natural light.

“The result is a residence that feels elevated yet comfortable, somewhere buyers can genuinely imagine themselves living, entertaining and unwinding.”

Sky Homes are priced from $3.65 million.

Lewis Land is also offering private marina berths with The Residences, its limited collection of three and four-bedroom villas positioned directly along the Harbour Shores waterfront boardwalk.

Three-bedroom villas are priced from $2.99 million, while four-bedroom residences start from $3.19 million.

Harbour Shores is being marketed by Colliers International.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113271]

Lewis Land opens sky home display as The Waterline completes at Harbour Shores

St Vincent de Paul Society Housing Australia has filed plans for a major mixed-use housing precinct on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, adding another significant proposal to a pocket around North Sydn​ey Station that is quickly becoming one of the LGA's busiest development zones.

The State Significant Development Application covers a 5,990 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1-19-mackenzie-street-lavender-bay-nsw-2060">1-19 MacKenzie Street and 211 Blues Point Road in Lavender Bay</a>, immediately south of Nor​th Sydney Station and between the commercial core and the lower-rise Lavender Bay Heritage Conservation Area.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal would deliver a new residential tower comprising 88 build-to-sell apartments and 19 affordable apartments, alongside a separate co-living building with 57 rooms and a building manager's studio.

It would also see the significant restoration and upgrade of St Francis Xavier Catholic Church, the adaptive reuse of the former school building, new parish facilities, retail, a new public square and around 1,000 sqm of publicly accessible open space.

<img alt="Vinnies North Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d5dd7f87-a617-463e-b577-17541e01f0e9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.13%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4R8TsFN3P_LrrXO2HswTOIrx2blil8lh" />

The project is seeking a concurrent rezoning of the site to R4 High Density Residential and an increase in the maximum building height to allow a tower reaching RL120, or up to 20 storeys. The proposal was progressed through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The build-to-sell component will be weighted toward larger apartments, with just six one-bedroom apartments compared with 31 two-beds, 43 three-beds and eight four-bedroom residences.

The 19 affordable apartments will comprise two studios, 15 one-bedroom apartments and two two-bedroom apartments, taking the total apartment component to 107 residences before the 58 co-living rooms are included.

<img alt="Vnnies" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d568ca5-cb90-4e18-96c6-d9795dba0c56" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GY2R5M9VtQh0EKy1vajaea19PSLOPuRD" />

Wardle's design for the Vinnies site has sought to negotiate that emerging high-rise context while retaining the lower-scale character of MacKenzie Street and the adjoining heritage conservation area.

The main building adopts a three-storey podium and tower arrangement, with the podium aligned to the ridgeline and front setback of St Francis Xavier Church.&nbsp;Wardle has designed the podium with colonnades, seating, recessed entries and active ground-floor frontages, with sandstone-toned precast concrete and face brick referencing the materiality of the existing church.

The tower then steps back eight metres to the south and six metres to the north before rising in a sculpted form comprising four interlocking quadrants. Wardle has also introduced rounded forms and chamfered corners to reduce the tower's perceived bulk and improve view sharing with neighbouring development sites.

Resident facilities and outdoor areas are planned at the separation between the podium and tower at Level 3, oriented toward Sydney Harbour and the CBD skyline.

The tower itself will feature a glass reinforced concrete facade, with recessed balconies and deep reveals used both to provide shading and privacy and frame views toward the harbour and city. The lower levels take a different architectural approach, using brick and sandstone-toned finishes intended to establish a stronger relationship with St Francis Xavier Church. The Church itself will be conserved and upgraded for its continued use, while the former school building will be adaptively reused as part of the co-living component.

<img alt="Lavendar Bay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2d4418ad-90aa-4d49-af93-c80b140aea80" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.09.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Kv4gzbsACaGvZSRuaqcfGC54jEJRXIDJ" />

&nbsp;

The proposal adds to an increasingly concentrated pipeline of residential development around Blue Street, MacKenzie Street and Lavender Bay.

Just west of the site, Central Element lodged plans earlier this year for one of the most significant residential developments proposed in Lavender Bay in recent years.

Central Element's SJB-designed scheme at 64-66 Lavender Street and 3-7 Middlemiss Street would deliver 163 apartments across two towers rising 23 and 32 storeys, replacing five existing apartment buildings containing 32 homes. The project also forms part of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-central-element-reveals-lavender-bay-apartment-plans?utm_source=chatgpt.com" rel="noopener" target="_blank">First look: Central Element reveals Lavender Bay apartment plans</a>

Immediately around North Sy​dney Station, another two significant proposals have emerged at 5 and 15 Blue Street.

Zurich Australian Insurance Properties is seeking to adaptively reuse its longstanding commercial building at 5 Blue Street, directly above North Sydney Station, rather than demolishing the structure.

Its SSDA proposes converting the building into a 14-storey mixed-use development with 62 apartments and 86 co-living rooms, together with ground-floor retail and a major refurbishment of Blue Street Plaza. The application is currently at the Response to Submissions stage.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-zurich-targets-north-sydney-office-conversion-with-148-unit-proposal-above-metro-station">First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Vinnies files for 20-storey Lavender Bay apartment tower as North Sydney housing pocket heats up

When the opportunity arose for South Australian developer Palumbo to return to Kent Town, where it had previously delivered East Park Apartments and the East 
Rundle Apartments, it wasn't one the longstanding developer-builder was going to pass up.

The decision was quickly vindicated, with more than 30 apartments sold within the first month of launching <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/royal-apartments-kent-town-2-8-north-terrace-kent-town-sa-5067">Royal Apartments</a> to the market.

The 206-apartment development, which will bring significant new supply to Adelaide's tightly held eastern city fringe, also gives <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/palumbo">Palumbo</a> the opportunity to bring new life to one of Kent Town's most recognisable watering holes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376073]

Royal Apartments incorporates the historic Royal Hotel, a venue Palumbo Managing Director Daniel Palumbo said has a longstanding connection with the local community.

"Everyone in the area has history with the Royal Hotel," Palumbo told Apartments.com.au.

"It was quite an active pub and social gathering place for locals. We want to bring it back to its former glory."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376072]

The wider development will comprise two residential towers alongside the restored hotel, sitting on North Terrace opposite the Adelaide Park Lands.

For Palumbo, the project also marks a return to familiar territory.

The developer completed East Park Apartments next door more than a decade ago and jumped at the opportunity to develop in Kent Town again when the Royal Hotel site became available.

"The opportunity emerged, and we moved to secure the site," Palumbo said.

"We were approached by the previous landowner, who said they had extensive commitments in Sydney and weren't in a position to deliver the project.

"We took over the site and within six months recut the design scheme to be more in keeping with the type of development we want to bring to Adelaide.

"Now we're on the market and those changes have really resonated with local buyers."

That has translated into a strong start to sales, with 33 apartments transacting in the project's first 35 days.

Palumbo said the early purchaser profile had been consistent with the group's traditional focus on owner-occupiers rather than investor-led apartment stock.

"Local owner-occupiers have always been our market," he said.

"There are always some investors, but we've never developed what would be called traditional development stock. Owner-occupiers are very much our market."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376068]

The buyer mix has been diverse so far, with downsizers and younger professionals both accounting for a significant portion of early sales.

South Australia's current stamp duty settings, which allow&nbsp;eligible homeowners in South Australia aged 60 savings of up to $103,830 on stamp duty when they downsize to a new property valued at up to $2 million,&nbsp;have helped encourage downsizer activity, while younger buyers in their late 20s and early 30s have been attracted to the opportunity to live immediately outside the CBD while still being able to walk into the city.



Location has been a major part of the proposition for both buyer cohorts.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376075]

Royal Apartments sits on North Terrace directly opposite the Adelaide Park Lands, with residents able to walk through the parklands toward the East End, Rundle Street and Rundle Mall.

Apartments have been positioned to capture views across the parklands, Adelaide skyline, Botanic Gardens and Adelaide Hills.

Palumbo believes the scarcity of developable land along this section of the Park Lands makes the site particularly difficult to replicate.

"There's very few allotments on that side that can be developed," he said.

"If this location was in New York and you were sitting on Central Park, you'd be talking about a $60 million apartments."

Royal Apartments will offer a broad mix of residences, ranging from one-bedroom apartments through to four-bedroom sub-penthouses and penthouses.

Current listings include one-bedroom apartments from $680,000, while larger three and four-bedroom residences are priced around $2.5 million.

Residents will have access to a swimming pool, gym, barbecue and recreation areas, residents' lounge and dining space, and a communal deck.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376067]

The apartments will feature generous balconies, while secure parking, bicycle storage and storage cages will also be provided.

A porte-cochère-style arrival and drop-off area has also resonated with buyers, particularly those attracted to being able to walk into the CBD during the day while retaining secure vehicle access at home.

Palumbo is acting as developer, architect and builder on Royal Apartments, continuing the vertically integrated model it has used across its South Australian portfolio.

The group was also behind the $150 million Sofitel Adelaide, the 251-room five-star hotel and residential tower which opened in 2021.

Palumbo said Royal's launch had come at an interesting time for the broader Adelaide apartment market.

Buyer confidence had initially been impacted by uncertainty surrounding the Federal Budget and broader economic conditions, but Palumbo believes sentiment is beginning to improve against a backdrop of significant investment flowing into South Australia.

He pointed to increased activity across defence and resources, including Olympic Dam, as potential long-term drivers of the state's economy and housing market.

"Money is starting to flow into Adeliade, significant amounts as Adelaide bucks the trend of the rest of the country.," Palumbo said.

"There's a lot of activity in the economy over the next decade. I think more investment will come into this market."

Early works on Royal Apartments are expected to commence this year, with major construction activity and cranes anticipated on site from early next year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6109]

Palumbo's return to Kent Town strikes early chord with buyers

Go-to builder-developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/graya">GRAYA</a> is continuing to bulk out its already impressive and diverse apartment portfolio across South East Queensland. Their latest milestone is securing development approval for Silk, its boutique riverfront apartment development in St Lucia.

The approval clears&nbsp;the way for the team to begin construction planning for the 22-residence project.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/silk-st-lucia-16-18-sandford-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">Silk</a> will rise 15 levels from an 810 sqm site at 16-18 Sandford Street, occupying a prominent bend of the Brisbane River with a prized northern aspect across Orleigh Park toward the Brisbane CBD.

The approved scheme will comprise 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences, continuing GRAYA's move into larger-format apartment developments targeting Brisbane's prestige owner-occupier market.

The project has been designed around the site's broad river frontage and dual-direction views, with GRAYA prioritising larger residences, privacy and outlook over apartment yield.

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa5c2349-f96c-4914-a812-1f2cd6827af8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.44%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=WY0vEU_7vYjeRJKQHiCwFdMxu8PvFh52" />

GRAYA Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Rob Gray said the project had been shaped around local homeowners wanting to remain in St Lucia without maintaining a traditional family home.

"St Lucia is one of those suburbs people do not want to leave," Gray said.

"They know the river, the trees, UQ, the golf course, Toowong and Indooroopilly, and that familiarity is hard to replace.

"True riverfront opportunities here are exceptionally scarce. What we have designed at Silk is a way to stay in the suburb people love, with the scale and privacy of a private home and far less to maintain.

"This is not typical apartment product. It is a proper home on the river, and that is exactly what this market has been missing."

The approval comes as new apartment development continues to increase across the St Lucia and neighbouring Toowong corridor, although direct riverfront sites remain considerably more tightly held.

GRAYA Co-founder and Managing Director Andrew Gray said securing the approval had removed a significant element of development risk from Silk.

"Genuine riverfront sites of this quality in St Lucia are not something that comes up regularly," Gray said.

"The approval removes a substantial layer of execution risk, and the location underwrites demand in a way very few inner-city sites can.

"The fundamentals here are as strong as anything we have assessed in Brisbane."

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d0f3d734-65e1-48e8-8ed3-2e0715ffcdd9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sOLSs_jdHkXLWbBKzRyayf5BfTb2vPsD" />

Silk will see GRAYA return to a stretch of the Brisbane River where it already has recent construction experience. The vertically integrated group recently completed ARC in neighbouring Toowong as builder for developer Spyre, delivering the riverfront project on a constrained site.

GRAYA will take a different role at Silk, controlling the project from design and development through construction and aftercare under its vertically integrated model.

The development will include a gym and resident leisure areas at ground level, integrated with the river's edge.

Silk joins a growing pipeline for GRAYA across Brisbane and the Gold Coast, which includes Enclave, The Gallery, Coral and Ripple.

The developer-builder has also recently lodged plans for its largest project to date, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-silo-19-chester-street-newstead-qld-4006">The Silo</a>, a proposed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/graya-buys-frasers-newstead-site-plans-the-silo-between-james-street-and-gasworks-precincts">$700 million mixed-use development</a> in Brisbane's James Street precinct.

Silk is expected to predominantly target local owner-occupiers and prestige buyers seeking a permanent riverfront home in Brisbane's inner west.

Registrations of interest are now open, with further details on the project and construction program to be released as it progresses.

<hr />
<h2>SILK PROJECT FACTS</h2>

Developer-builder: GRAYA

Project: Silk

Location: 16-18 Sandford Street, St Lucia

Apartments: 22

Built form: 15 levels

Site: 810 sqm riverfront holding

Mix: 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences

Status: Development approved

Next step: Construction planning underway

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152168]

GRAYA greenlit for riverfront St Lucia apartment development, Silk

Property Development

<html><body>
An undisclosed developer in Erskineville in Sydney's inner-west has told the Australian Financial Review that an increasing number of her clients were getting knock backs from banks, even though they were pre-approved to buy apartments.
"Even with buyers who can pay, the banks are changing their minds, so of course there'll be a settlement problem," she said.
"If bank policies are consistent, they should honour what they have agreed to lend."
The developer said the local market was "fast retreating" as banks rein in their lending.
Overseas demand is still strong, but banks were stepping up their limits on those sales to as low 10 to 30 per cent.
It reported newly arrived migrants, who are one of the biggest groups of buyers, were being rejected because they have either little wage history or very new businesses.
"It doesn't make sense. The government and economists talk about growing population to fuel demand. But that demand is made up of new migrant families and business migrants who need homes.
"Of course they don't have much credit history in Australia."
The developer said the banks had mitigated their risks by reducing loan valuation ratios to about 70 to 80 percent. 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Erskineville developer sees apartment settlement problems with bank lending

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
After a series of well publicised instances of developers exercising their rights of contract rescission under ‘sunset’ provisions – the NSW state government moved to tighten guidelines restricting the ‘out clauses’ and were duly reinforced by the NSW Supreme Court’s first common law ruling under the new legislation.
Sunset clauses are common place in off the plan contracts of sale – being the contract of the sale for as yet unregistered lots (mostly new strata apartments or land sub-divisions). Often off the plan sales are agreed prior to the commencement of construction of a new development project and may even form a pre-requisite for funding of the project.
The sunset provisions are included in the contract to essentially protect both vendor and buyer from being potentially locked into an agreement ad infinitum -  that is; should there be a substantial delay in the developer being able to deliver the completed product; a date is agreed in the terms of the contract as the ‘sunset date’ and thereafter either party is able to rescind the contract and walk away from the agreement rather than being contracted to sell or purchaser forever.
In principle, the notion of a sunset clause seems reasonable; however certain cases involving developers exercising their rights to rescind following delays in completion have received waves of negative press which then have been viewed cynically by the NSW Government – in particular Victor Dominello, Minister for Innovation and Better Regulation.
In particular there has been scrutiny of the Kaymet Corporation development in Wolli Creek and the Samadi Developments project in Surry Hills. In each instance, there were delays in completion and the developers each attested that rising costs had forced them to rescind their current contracts with a view to re-selling the same lots at higher prices. Their premise was that they could not afford to settle the off plan sales at the ‘old prices’ and needed to achieve the improved realisable values to cover their unforeseen inflated costs.
Whilst legal challenges were mounted by the off plan purchasers – the prevailing provisions relating to sunset clauses were deemed to be in favour of the developers. In the matter of Wang v Kaymet Corporation Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1459 – 34 of the 94 off plan purchasers launched a major class action against the developers. The original sales were entered into between November 2009 and April 2010 with Kaymet issuing rescission notices March 2013.
The matter was heard in the NSW Supreme Court by Justice Stevenson and ruled upon October 2015. Estimates show that a Wolli Creek 2 bedroom unit was worth around $500,000 in 2009/10 and had appreciated to around $900,000 by late 2015. On this basis – Kaymet Corporation stood to increase its bottom line by some $13,000,000 by re-selling the apartments in 2015. Justice Stevenson found that the plaintiffs had failed to show Kaymet had been deficient in its duties. The net result was that Kaymet was allowed to rescind and the plaintiffs were burdened with around $1,000,000 in total legal costs. At the time of writing, Plaintiffs are ongoing with their class action against Samadi Developments.
To a large degree – the exposure to genuinely unforeseen costs or losses and extended delays were why the sunset clauses were originally created; however unhappy purchasers, and evidently Victor Dominello, view in certain instances the exercising of the sunset provisions as a grab for further profits by developers in a rising market. The suggestion is that off plan buyers have been exploited by some developers to get their projects ‘off the ground’ only to unceremoniously dump the sales when there is a big lift in profits available.
And so – what has occurred in response to Mr Dominello’s distaste for this scenario?
On November 17, 2015 the NSW Government passed the Conveyancing Amendment (Sunset Clauses) Act 2015 to provide further protections in favour of the purchasers in off the plan property contracts. The Act inserts Division 10 into the Conveyancing Act 1919 – “Off The Plan Contracts”. Whilst most property-informed parties are familiar with sections 66P to 66Y of the Act (dealing with definition of Residential Property and cooling-off provisions); Division 10 – 66ZL deals with the new rules for the exercising of a sunset clause by a Vendor and can be quickly outlined by reading subsection (3):
 A vendor may rescind an off the plan contract under a <a href="https://emarketing.multiarray.com/_r/c.cfm?l=45055&amp;c=59667&amp;m=23921&amp;b=42687">s</a>unset clause if the subject lot has not been created by the sunset date, but only if:
(a) each purchaser under the contract, at any time after being served with the notice under subsection (4), consents in writing to the rescission, or
(b) the vendor has obtained an order of the Supreme Court under this section permitting the vendor to rescind the contract under the sunset clause, or
(c) the regulations otherwise permit the vendor to rescind the contract under the sunset clause.
Subsection (4) outlines that the Vendor must provide notice of at least 28 days written notice to each Purchaser of their proposal for rescission and reasons why they need to rescind and what has created the delay in completion. Should an agreement be reached with a Purchaser – all is good. If the Purchaser declines to accept the request for rescission – the Vendor must apply to the Supreme Court to rule on the merits of its application. The Act outlines: 
(7) In determining whether it is just and equitable in all the circumstances the Court is to take the following into account:
(a) the terms of the off the plan contract,
(b) whether the vendor has acted unreasonably or in bad faith,
(c) the reason for the delay in creating the subject lot,
(d) the likely date on which the <a href="https://emarketing.multiarray.com/_r/c.cfm?l=45056&amp;c=59667&amp;m=23921&amp;b=42687">s</a>ubject lot will be created,
(e) whether the subject lot has increased in value,
(f) the effect of the rescission on each purchaser,
(g) any other matter that the Court considers to be relevant,
(h) any other matter prescribed by the regulations.
The Vendor may also be liable for any costs incurred by the Purchaser(s) attributable to the application to rescind.
These changes came into effect  and will apply to any off the plan contracts entered into on or after 2 November 2015. In addition any off the plan contracts that have not completed, but were entered into before 2 November 2015 will also be captured. 
Having addressed the essential drafting of the new legislation – focus then immediately turns to the common law/court interpretation and application of 66ZL(7). That is – how will the Supreme Court react to new applications for rescission?
The first test case has been Jobema Developments Pty Limited v Zhu &amp; Others[2016] NSWSC 3.
The facts in brief are that a Purchaser (one of the Plaintiffs) contracted in December 2013 to buy an apartment off the plan in a new Hurstville development of 72 units offered by developer, Xycom. The sunset date for the registration of the strata plan (which occurs following completion and the granting of the project’s Occupation Certificate) was 31 December 2015. The Vendor’s right to rescind was qualified by the requirement to ‘use all reasonable endeavours to have the Strata Plan registered by the sunset date’. The court heard that Xycom, despite having DA consent, carried out very little construction work after entering into the off plan contract(s).
In October 2014, Xycom on-sold the development site to Jobema Developments and this sale was settled in January 2015. The sale was subject to existing off plan sales – which were novated to Jobema. Some, but not all, of the off plan contracts had their sunset date extended. Jobema took an active approach to construction and by December 2015 the project was well progressed. 
A new estimate for completion was set for mid-2017. Prior to the 31 December 2015 (ie sunset date); Jobema approached the Plaintiffs offering to extend the sunset date in return for agreeing to new, higher prices (on the basis of escalated construction costs). The Plaintiffs rejected the offer and Jobema duly issued Notices of Intent to rescind (in accordance with the new 66ZL(4) of the Act).
The matter was presented to the Supreme Court’s Justice Black who ultimately found in favour of the Plaintiffs (the Purchasers). Probably the largest factor weighing against Jobema as developer was that despite their own best endeavours since acquiring the site – they were also burdened by Xycom’s apparent breach of the best endeavours covenant. Jobema had assumed all of Xycom’s obligations under the sales contracts. Justice Black was also concerned that only some Purchasers were offered an extended sunset date and others not. 
This practice brought doubt as to the legitimacy of the application. The court also responded to Jobema arguing that construction funding terms had deteriorated and that the new legislation had not been in effect when Jobema acquired the site by suggesting that each should be considered a “business risk”. 
BCE’s COMMENTS
My own view on this is that the statute has not been fully tested in Jobema v Zhu as the project was adopted by Jobema following Xycom’s extended lack of endeavour to progress the site. The specifics of this matter are not generally applicable. It will be interesting to witness the court’s view in instances of genuine endeavour incurring serious and reasonably unforeseen negative circumstances.
Further, the NSW Governments new legislation has gone some way to endorse sunset clauses. The opportunity existed for sunset clauses to be outlawed altogether; however the passing of the statute in itself conveys that there is deemed a legitimate place for Vendor rescission. We now await a judgement in favour of rescission to provide more clarity on the judicial application of the legislation. 
It will be interesting to see how the court views the Samadi matter given the heightened levels of negative publicity and new legislation. Whilst I remain impartial in any debate on ethics; it would seem to me that the ratio decidendi in both the Kaymet and Jobema decisions would suggest that Samadi had acted within the laws as they existed at the time. Kaymet reinforces this and Jobema’s application was denied partly on the basis that potential changes in legislation should be an assumed “business risk”. Surely this logic is a double-edged sword.
I will also be intrigued to watch whether clever legal minds devise some form of off plan ‘put and call’ style of agreement that operates outside of the Conveyancing Act and therefore may be drafted to essentially re-instate a form of sunset provision. Any such legal pact will also need to satisfy funders as being sufficiently binding.
Finally, whilst the new legislation will undoubtedly afford heightened protection for Purchasers and ideally elevate their confidence to commit to off the plan contracts – there may also become a subcutaneous penalty to Purchasers. Developers may simply factor in an additional margin of risk as insurance against unforeseen negative circumstances – that is that off the plan sale prices may simply become more expensive under the Sunset Clauses Law.
Brad Caldwell-Eyles is principal, 1st City and can be contacted <a href="https://www.1stcity.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
This piece first appeared in <a href="https://eliteagent.com.au" target="_blank">Elite Agent</a>.
</body></html>

Has the sun set on a developers' window to rescind? Brad Caldwell-Eyles

<html><body>
Property developing can throw many different challenges at you and one thing I have learnt in this industry is there is always a solution to a problem.
 The trick is to understand what possible problems may arise and preparing yourself for them.  Unfortunately things don’t always go to plan and as a project manager it is up to us to make sure the development gets through as efficiently as possible.
One of the biggest areas for problems is not allowing enough for building works. 
When pricing a development and running feasibilities, it is important to understand that your building estimate is an organic creature. By this I mean the building estimate you start with will nearly always be different to the one you end with.  It will evolve throughout the process as you obtain more and more details.  Once you have all the fine details, the building estimate can be finalised to the fixed price builder’s contract. 
If architecturally designing our villas, we generally follow this process:
<ol>
<li>Concept plan – this will show the number and size of villas on the land, but not much detail</li>
<li>Development Application (DA) plans – enough information is included on the plans to satisfy  council</li>
<li>Construction Certificate (CC) plans –more detail, including engineer drainage and slab design</li>
</ol>
The starting point for our build estimate will be based on similar projects that we have recently completed and an allowance for the different site.
This progresses to an estimate based on the Concept Plan.  Still a very ‘loose’ estimate as there is usually not enough detail on the Concept Plan for the builder to have all information he needs.  The build estimate we have at this stage will tell us whether we are tracking within budget.  If not, we can make the necessary changes required, perhaps reducing the size of the villas working with both our builder and architect to design the right dwellings for our project to be successful.
Once the Concept Plan is approved, the architect will proceed to full DA plans.  It is here that much more detail is added and we will have our builder price the DA plans.  Again, this does not give us a final build cost but we will be getting closer to the expected outcome.  Once approved by our client, the DA plans are finalised and the DA is prepared.
During the DA process, council may request some changes to the plans, so it is important to understand we are still ‘evolving’ at this stage. We also need to review the Conditions of the DA Consent before we have more detail to finalise the build costs.
Once council have approved the DA, we will start to prepare the CC plans.  Engineers will be briefed and a drainage and engineered slab design or footings for the foundations will be produced. More detail is added to the CC plans, finalising levels and double checking schedules. 
Before we lodge the CC plans with our private certifier we will have our builder issue a third costing. It is this costing that will give us the final build costs...well almost.  We still need to have the CC approved and ensure there are no further revisions to the plans required.  
After we have the CC stamped plans, our builder will issue their final tender and building contract. This will be a fixed price contract; however, there may still be a few items that will be ‘provisional’. They are usually some site works, removal of fill and retaining walls.  The builder may mark these items as provisional as they won’t know until works proceed exactly what the cost is. For instance, if rock is hit during the site cut, this will increase the site costs. If the site cut differs slightly to the plans, this may impact on the height of retaining walls.  So these ‘provisional’ items will be charged at actual cost whether it is lower or higher. Our clients often enjoy credits on their provisional items as it’s always best to over allow than under.
So you can see how the build estimate must evolve through the development process and until your development is completed, you really won’t know the exact cost.  It’s important you allow a contingency amount for any variations that may crop up along the way.  At Property Bloom we are happy to say that for many of our projects the end construction cost is lower than our original estimates. This is because our builder uses accurate allowances and because we’ve worked together for so long, we all understand what the cost is likely to be based on the typical, lower risk development sites we select for our clients.
As a developer, you will embark on a challenging journey from start to finish and the path you choose can be simplified with the help of a project manager to guide you along the way.  Always take the time to have full builder’s estimates done at each stage to avoid any nasty surprises. 
Jo Chivers is chief executive officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Why construction costs evolve: Jo Chivers

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The debate around 'bad development' in Brisbane just got a new counterpoint. 
#yimbyqld – Yes, in my back yard Queensland – has been created to highlight the many benefits that good, innovative and well-planned developments bring to modern cities.
Brisbane property consultancy Wolter Consulting Group is spearheading the initiative, to bring back some balance to the development debate, after concerns that “good development” was being unfairly tarnished.
Wolter's director and planning manager, Natalie Rayment, said Brisbane had a track record of outstanding developments from successive Brisbane City Council administrations, including the Gasworks precinct at Newstead, the Urban renewal precinct at New Farm and Teneriffe and Waterline at Bulimba.
“Development is anything but adhoc. It is driven by the City Plan, a document prepared in conjunction with the people of Brisbane,” Rayment said.
“Residents were given double the usual period of time to comment on the City Plan to ensure the best outcome was achieved. The City Plan sets the direction of development in Brisbane for the next decade.
“It is misinformed to say that developers get to do what they like unchecked. The fact of the matter is there is an extremely rigorous system in place that takes into account every aspect of development as well as future planning."
She added that Brisbane City Council is one of the toughest to deal with for development, with anywhere from three to 12 months needed for an approval. Even a basic code assessable application involves detailed assessment against multiple land use, development and constraint codes examining anything from land use to landscaping, design to acoustics, traffic to engineering and much much more.
The debate around development -- always a political topic -- has gathered steam ahead of the Council elections on March 19.
The “yimby” concept has its origins from New York City as an initiative to discuss, document and promote good development against the negative “nimby” (not in my back yard) viewpoint often encountered by developers in big cities.
Rayment said we had not only come to enjoy but expect the benefits of good development, including exciting lifestyle precincts with vibrant public spaces.
“Residents want good interactive public spaces, public artworks, green spaces, environmental excellence, contemporary and innovative design and the housing options and jobs they create,” Rayment said.
“Unfortunately new developments are quite often faced with negativity and the ‘not in my back yard’ brigade. We want to create #yimbyqld to get factual information out there on cutting edge, good developments to encourage debate with an open mind.”
Rayment said recent and proposed developments including the Howard Smith Wharves, Queen’s Wharf, South City Square at Woolloongabba and West Village in West End were examples of good development the people of Brisbane could be excited by.
“Let’s not forget the places we live and play in have been produced by good development,” she said.
“There are many benefits that have flowed from that – including cycle ways, parks, footpath dining and even the recent focus on vibrant laneways and roof-top spaces.
“Our aim is to generate balance in the development debate and start an intelligent, grown-up discussion on what makes a good development,” she concluded.
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

prateek24-ezbwHMbNAk

Why development in Queensland is a great thing: a property consultant's take

<html><body>
A $650 million makeover with a precinct housing apartments, retail and entertainment spaces is being planned for Gosford CBD and establish Gosford as the heart of Central Coast.
The master plan for ‘Gosford Alive’ by Lederer Property outlines the redevelopment proposal of a 5.8-hectare site in Gosford CBD close to Gosford Train Station.
The project, a brainchild of Lederer Property and architects, Conybeare Morrison (CM+), is in line with the NSW government’s Draft Central Coast Strategy, which calls for new homes and employment opportunities to accommodate the forecast regional population increase of 100,000 over the next 20 years.
A Stage 1 Development Application (DA) will be lodged with Gosford City Council in the first quarter of 2016. Due to the cost of the project, NSW planning legislation requires that the DA is assessed by the Joint Regional Planning Panel on behalf of Gosford City Council.
Residents will benefit from new shopping, food and entertainment experiences with an additional 8,000 square metres of retail/commercial space and 300 more parking spaces, proposed as part of the ongoing redevelopment of the Imperial Centre. New cafés and restaurants are planned for Kibble Park, while Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) principles will connect seamlessly to existing public transport nodes and promote walkability, said a media release.
This will happen over the project’s 15-20 year horizon and extends on the work Lederer Property has already begun at the Centre which has recently undergone a $20 million redevelopment. The Kibbleplex Centre building will be replaced by apartments over the next five years.
“With Gosford Alive we’re proud to contribute to the NSW’s government’s vision to establish Gosford as the capital of the Central Coast,” said Marek Ristwej, general manager – property at Lederer Group.
Lederer Property, a part of Lederer Group, has a property portfolio including retail, office, residential and industrial.
For more information, <a href="https://gosfordalive.com.au" target="_blank">click here</a>.
</body></html>

Lederer Property plan unveiled for $650 million makeover of Gosford CBD

<html><body>
Property developer and funds manager Charter Hall Group announced operating earnings of 15 cents per security in the six months to December-end, a rise of 9.5 percent from the previous comparable period, and raised its outlook for FY 16.
The company made a statutory profit after tax of $143.5 million, up 259.6 percent from pcp, helped by $89 million in property valuation gains.
Operating earnings rose 26.3 percent to $61.2 million over the comparable period. The group made property deals worth $1.7 billion, and grew its funds under management to $15.9 billion, a 17 percent rise.
“Given volatility across global equity markets, we expect quality property with secure cash flow to remain highly attractive to both institutional and retail investors. We will continue to focus on portfolio security by investing in assets with strong tenant covenants and long lease durations delivering sustainable income and capital growth for securityholders,” Charter Hall’s managing director and group CEO David Harrison said.
The company increased its distribution of 13.3 cents per security, up 9.9 percent over pcp and raised its operating earnings outlook for FY16 to 8-10 percent growth over FY15.
Charter Hall focuses on two key earnings streams; property investment income generated from investing alongside its capital partners in property funds and partnerships and earnings generated from property funds management.
The group focuses on office, retail, industrial and hospitality.
Charter Hall $15.9 billion property portfolio had a total occupancy of 98.1 percent and a stable WALE (weighted average lease expiry) of 7.9 years. This followed 283 leasing deals, including new ones with Target and The Reject Shop in Melbourne, and Amazon Corporate Services and Twitter in Sydney.
</body></html>

Charter Hall half-year profit boosted by property valuation gains

<html><body>
<img src="/images/2016/02/16/Holdencapital_banner.jpg" alt="" width="513" height="108">
SPONSORED POST
The lure of a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow certainly attracts many property developers.
The promise of large tranches of cheap off shore funding with minimal strings attached and for no particular reason they have chosen your project to invest it in. Who could resist? Often, when it all seems too good to be true, it usually is.
The finance industry also has its share of doubtful operators who specialise in taking large upfront fees while offering developers the promised pot of gold, and while these overnight finance ”experts” have a case to answer, I struggle to sympathise with the developer who heard what he wanted to hear and proceeded to run head first into a brick wall under his own steam.
The combination of the developer’s entrepreneurial spirit, optimism and confidence that they have the skills to deliver the project while overcoming all the potential obstacles, gives them the courage to borrow millions of dollars to turn a piece of land into something the market will buy.
And those qualities are all admirable and contribute to their successes, particularly when you consider that the majority of Australians will spend their whole lives in employment, reliant on a weekly pay cheque and that less than 1 on 4 take the leap to start their own business.
However, of all the business opportunities that you could take on, like buying a franchise, leaving the big firm and starting your own consultancy, or opening a café, only a select few take on the risks of property development.
Risking substantial capital and borrowing significant debt just to make a pre-tax profit of between 18-25% on the total funds utilised! Frankly, I take my hat off to those property developers because there are a lot of obstacles to overcome and a lot of variables that can go either way.
They say “the harder you work the luckier you get” but it is this innate sense of optimism peculiar to developers that seems to enable them to take on these levels of risk and more often than not win.
Unfortunately sometimes that optimism goes into over-drive or is born out of naivety and many developers live by the mantra “think big and multiply” only to hit an even bigger wall.
The problem with all this optimism/naivety is their reliance upon those factors at play outside of their control, and the amount of energy and time spent chasing those rainbows. Imagine if they put that energy and time into the core elements of their business creating a better product and the mechanisms to sell and deliver it?
Having seen quite a few developers chase those rainbows I thought about what in particular motivates an otherwise smart person to throw $20,000 - $50,000 in non-refundable application fees at a so called expert finance broker who has no fixed office address or one who has just appeared in town with a “cheap offshore funding” offer, neither of them with even one reference from a happy customer.
The only answer I could come up with is that ultimately they want “Dumb Money”, that in return for a modest dividend/profit share/interest rate doesn’t ask questions and leaves them to largely do as they please with the funds.
But the truth is that if their project was that good and the returns they were offering truly reflected the market risks, a local investor would be more likely to open their chequebook.
What we constantly observe is investors looking to max their return while taking as little risk as possible, which is only natural, while the developer chases large chunks of naïve money that they can manipulate to only provide low returns for what is actually a higher risk than they appreciate. While this reflects typical market forces at work, I question the level of the so-called sophistication on both sides of the equation.
Some people find satisfaction in making money through others losses, but a zero sum game where one party loses and other wins happens all too often in business, including development. As Henry Ford apparently said, “a business that makes only money is not a good business’.
I don’t believe that it is too idealistic to think that deals can be structured in such a way that both parties can win. While Mr Developer can argue that those investors would only otherwise be getting 2%pa in the bank, the fairness comes into it when you compare the risk of that return versus the risk their money is exposed to and the reward being paid.
I have made the case in a previous commentary that developers need to work harder on ensuring that they secure the services of skills consultants/advisors in those areas where they lack the necessary expertise in order to ensure they achieve their targets and this is another instance where too much energy is expended on saving a cost that is disproportionate to the projected outcome.
We are lucky that in Australia there is quite a deep market of passive investors willing to take equity positions on development projects. So it makes you wonder what developers could achieve if they used the right consultants and redirected their energy/time into enhancing their core skill sets, how much more successful their business would be in 5-10 years from now?
This is not to say that you should just accept the finance framework that is offered to you by your local bank manager. The HoldenCAPITAL business is based around pushing boundaries on finance to optimise project profits, we certainly don’t recommend that you don’t base your whole business model around that elusive pot of gold sitting at the end of the rainbow.
This article was written by Dan Holden of HoldenCAPITAL, who are a bespoke construction finance firm, they arrange construction finance and invest in projects through their equity fund, Queen Street INVEST. To discuss your project finance requirement please call (07) 3171 4200 or visit HoldenCAPITAL <a href="https://www.holdencapital.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

firstname-zEygzUaHDN

Chasing rainbows, overseas funding and other unicorns

<html><body>
As Property Bloom nears it's one hundredth development project, it occurred to me that we, as project managers and our clients as investors/developers, have been contributing to the diversity of main stream housing supply.
What I mean by this is that we build small dwellings - two or three bedroom villas that once subdivided end up on small, manageable lots. The majority of new housing stock is still four or five bedroom family homes.  
I read a document released by the NSW Government Planning and Environment  department about the importance of housing diversity. It mentions the changes occurring in the housing market which are driven by demographics, affordability and lifestyle trends. 
Families are having less children and some choosing not to have any at all, couples are working longer hours leaving less time for property and yard maintenance, there are more single person households than ever before,  first home buyers are looking for more affordable homes and we are living independently  longer and so older people are looking for low maintenance properties.  
Whilst the mainstream consumer is still after the large four to five bedroom homes, there is a definite need for smaller dwellings. In one of the locations we are developing in, there is strong demand by older buyers who want to down size but live close to their kids who have built their four bedroom dream home in this premium estate. There are so few smaller dwelling available that when one does become available there are several buyers vying for it.
So this is what we do, find these areas and meet the demand. There is a need to diversify the types of housing available in new release areas to ensure housing is affordable and meets the needs of all community members.
Jo Chivers is chief executive officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

The importance of housing diversity: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released building approvals data for December 2015 which have been analysed here by CoreLogic RP Data research analyst Cameron Kusher.
The results tend to be somewhat volatile on a month-to-month basis, largely due to the more ‘lumpy’ unit approvals. 
Following a -12.4% monthly fall in dwelling approvals in November, approvals rose by 9.2% to 18,868 approvals in December 2015.
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.47.54%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.47.54%20pm.png" alt="" width="515" height="163">
The 18,868 dwelling approvals in December 2015 consisted of 9,968 house approvals and 8,899 unit approvals. 
Both house and unit approvals recorded a large jump in December, up 5.7% and 13.5% respectively. 
Year-on-year, house approvals are 3.4% higher while unit approvals are -8.3% lower resulting in a -2.5% fall in total dwelling approvals. 
Despite the year-on-year fall in approvals they remain at close to record high levels although they are -8.7% lower than their recent record high recorded in June 2015.
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.19%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.19%20pm.png" alt="" width="501" height="181">
Looking specifically at the types of units being approved over the 2015 calendar year, 27.0% were townhouses, a record-low 8.7% were low-rise units (less than four storeys) and 64.3% were high-rise units (four storeys or higher). 
The above chart highlights the rising prevalence of high-rise approvals over the past few years, largely at the expense of townhouses. 
Of course this is reflective of the large volume of in-fill development taking place, particularly in inner-city areas. 
From a developer’s perspective the returns are much higher building to high-densities than there are constructing medium density properties such as townhouses. 
More recently the chart shows that there has been a slight easing of high-rise unit approvals however, developers are still overwhelmingly seeking more high-rise approvals than approvals for low-rise or townhouses.
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.29%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.29%20pm.png" alt="" width="455" height="169">
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.41%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.41%20pm.png" target="_blank"><img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.41%20pm.png" alt="" width="444" height="163"></a>
The above two charts show the six month average number of house approvals across each of the capital cities. 
The charts show that in most cities the number of house approvals have recently started to trend lower. 
In particular this downwards trend is now most prevalent in Perth, Darwin and Canberra. 
Despite the recent downwards trend in approvals, they remain well above average levels in Sydney and Perth, are at about average levels in Melbourne, Adelaide and Hobart and Darwin and are well below average in Brisbane and Canberra.
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.46%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.46%20pm.png" target="_blank"><img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.46%20pm.png" alt="" width="477" height="175"></a>
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.51%20pm.png" target="_blank">Click here to enlarge</a>
<a href="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.51%20pm.png" target="_blank"><img src="/images/2016/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202016-02-03%20at%201.49.51%20pm.png" alt="" width="472" height="176"></a>
 
Unit approvals have also generally started to trend lower over recent months however, the notable exception is Sydney where they are still increasing. 
Despite the recent slowdown of unit approvals they have been at record highs in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane and remain at extremely high levels. 
The challenge now will be to see how many of these recent approvals end up constructed. 
With sales volumes slowing, offshore demand reportedly slowing, investor activity reducing, value growth slowing and concerns of an oversupply in certain areas it will be interesting to see how many of these projects go ahead.
We anticipate that despite the month-to-month volatility in the data, building approvals will most likely trend lower through 2016. 
This will be driven in large by the market due to an expectation of slowing value growth and sales volumes. 
Furthermore, many are concerned about oversupply in certain markets and developers may find it harder to achieve their pre-commitment targets, particularly for units. 
The recent slowdown in investment lending will also impact units more than houses with the last Census showing that units are more than twice as likely to be rented as houses are. 
The fact that rental yields have pushed to record lows and rents are unchanged over the year is also likely to act as a further deterrent for buyers of new off-the-plan property.
While the trend in dwelling approvals appears to have peaked, there are still a large number of projects that are either under construction are due to start construction, which implies building activity probably has some way to go before we see a similar easing trend that is visible with approvals.
 
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Dwelling approvals remain below peak despite December rise

<html><body>
If you pick up a newspaper these days, you had better have some Xanax handy. The headlines from China can be pretty scary.
But the truth is, the situation is more mixed than most fear-mongers would have you believe.
If you wear a miner's light on your hard hat when you go to work in the morning, then, sure, you have a right to worry that China's industrial economy could slow further.
But if you work or invest in real estate, or for that matter in the fields of education or tourism, you can rest easy.
You see, China has at least two different economies. The old industrial economy is slowing and being cleaned up. Even as the government moves to shut down polluting, outdated factories, consumer demand is booming, which means more buyers for Australian property, as well as for our tourism and education.
China doesn't rely solely on industry any more than Australia relies solely on mining. Industry only accounts for about 35% of GDP, but services account for more than half.
Credit Suisse sent me an interesting chart last week. It showed that China is importing about 20 percent less machinery and commodities like coal, but spending 80 percent more on international tourism. This is reflected in the fact that more than one million Chinese tourists came to spend their cash in Australia last year, the most ever.
Australia's educational sector is our number one export, after coal, iron ore and natural gas. Chinese outnumber all other foreign students in university, English-language, secondary and nonaward classes.
This is the same scenario we are seeing in real estate. With Chinese developers committed to billions of dollars of residential new construction in Australia, and Chinese buyers purchasing off-the-plan in large numbers, Australia finally has something it has been missing for decades: money to build.
Awe have spent years in a housing affordability crisis, but Chinese capital is finally making it possible to construct enough new homes to meet market demand.
In the past decade, China supported Australia's economy by funneling huge amounts of cash into our mining industry. In the coming decade, it looks like it will do so via real estate, education and tourism.
It's no coincidence that the famous Sydney Harbour Bridge Climb now offers a sky-high karaoke option for Chinese tourists.
Here's something that will make that shift sweeter: tourism, education and construction keep more than 2 million people working in this country, while mining just provides jobs for fewer than 200,000.
China's current expansion won't last forever, but experts like UBS global CEO Sergio Ermotti believe the rise of the Chinese consumer could last as long as did the commodities boom we just lived through.
Even at a pessimistic growth rate of 6.5 percent, China's economy will double in size by 2032.
Andrew Taylor is the founder and chief executive officer of sales and marketing at <a href="https://www.juwai.com/" target="_blank">Juwai.com</a>, the number-one Chinese real estate portal for property in Australia and around the world. Find out more about him <a href="https://list.juwai.com/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Property Development

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Property Development

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News