<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/broadbeach-qld-4218">Broadbeach</a> offers plenty of reasons to live vertically, but moving from a substantial family home into an apartment can expose the compromises of high-density living. Privacy, room for guests and usable living space tend to matter more when an apartment is intended as a permanent home rather than an occasional coastal base.

A typical residential floor at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-eveleigh-broadbeach-7-9-surf-parade-broadbeach-qld-4218">The Eveleigh</a>, on Surf Parade,&nbsp;contains just four apartments. The 94-residence development by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hirsch-faigen">Hirsch &amp; Faigen</a> is predominantly made up of expansive three-bedroom homes, with a limited collection of half-floor penthouses above.

Across the apartment floors, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a> has used the relatively limited number of residences to give each home greater access to natural light and outlook. Living spaces extend towards full-height glazing, while a series of bay windows frame selected views across the Pacific Ocean, city and hinterland rather than treating the building edge as a continuous wall of glass.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360965]

“The apartment floors deliver a collection of homes that embrace controlled outlook via a series of bay windows deliberately framing moments of view,” Rothelowman Director Kim Lowman said.

From outside, those projecting forms contribute to the tower’s faceted profile. Strong horizontal and vertical elements establish its proportions, while the changing position of the sun alters the light, shadow and reflection across the façade throughout the day.

The same attention moves inside the apartments, where the material palette combines warm timber, natural stone, metallic detailing and softer curved forms. Kitchens sit within the main living zone, with stone island benches, integrated joinery and European appliances, before the living areas extend towards the glazing and the outlook.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360981]

Three genuine bedrooms provide room to accommodate family and guests, while two secure car spaces and storage address some of the practical considerations that can become more noticeable when moving from a larger home. Feedback from the display suite has centred on the warmth and restraint of the interiors, with buyers commenting that the residences feel like homes rather than conventional coastal apartments.

A limited collection of half-floor penthouses occupies the upper levels, increasing the scale of the living spaces and adding private balconies and elevated finishes. From this position, the outlook extends between the ocean and hinterland.

Outside the private residences, The Eveleigh separates its shared spaces between the podium and rooftop. The podium is centred on wellness, with subtropical landscaping surrounding a swimming pool and pool terrace, yoga garden, private gymnasium, sauna and hot and cold plunge facilities. Landscaped retreats and pavilions provide additional places to sit away from the main recreation areas.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360966]

Higher in the building, a rooftop pavilion and private dining suite sit alongside resident lounge, barbecue and outdoor dining areas, opening towards panoramic views across the ocean, city and hinterland.

“Buyers are no longer just looking for an apartment, but a lifestyle where they can relax, reset, and enjoy a balanced way of living,” Hirsch &amp; Faigen Director of Sales Matt George said.

Interest to date has come from established owner-occupiers and interstate lifestyle purchasers, including buyers planning a future move to the Gold Coast. Many are coming from larger homes and want to reduce ongoing maintenance without giving up space for family and guests, privacy, two car spaces or the ability to entertain at home.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360969]

Much of that daily life can also take place beyond the building without requiring a drive. Kurrawa Beach and Pratten Park are an easy walk from Surf Parade, while Pacific Fair, Oracle Boulevard, The Oasis, restaurants, cafés, entertainment and public transport are also within walking distance.

The Eveleigh is Hirsch &amp; Faigen's fourth Gold Coast development since entering the market in 2021, following The Hemingway at Palm Beach, The Emerson at Kirra and Yves at Mermaid Beach. Each of the preceding projects sold out before completion.

“Broadbeach had been on our radar throughout our time operating on the Gold Coast,” the developer said. “Following our projects in Palm Beach, Kirra and Mermaid Beach, Broadbeach represented the natural next step for the business.”

The Surf Parade site brought together proximity to the beach, protected coastal outlooks and walkability to dining, shopping and recreation. Hirsch &amp; Faigen also identified the street as an emerging premium residential address, with enough separation from Broadbeach's busier destinations to retain a quieter environment at home.

The Eveleigh is now under construction by Maxcon, with completion forecast for mid-2028. Three-bedroom residences are currently available from $2.87 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=149670]

Joel Robinson

The Eveleigh brings house-like apartments to Broadbeach

A long-stalled Campbelltown development site is back in play, with new plans for 139 apartments set to supersede a mixed-use scheme approved almost a decade ago but never built.

The new proposal for 28 Cordeaux Street would deliver 116 market and 23 affordable apartments in a part 14-storey building, bringing a substantial new project into a Campbelltown market where new apartment supply remains limited.

Plans have been filed over the 3,092 sqm corner site at Moore-Oxley Street, around 600 metres from Campbelltown Railway Station and the city-centre retail core.

The site already carries a mixed-use residential approval dating to 2016. Doroch Architects has now been engaged on a larger replacement scheme, which is progressing as a State Significant Development Application following a Housing Delivery Authority determination in August 2025.

The apartment mix comprises 39 one-bedroom, 72 two-bedroom and 28 three-bedroom residences. Two-bedroom apartments make up just over half of the project, while three-bedroom homes account for 20 per cent.

<img alt="First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="136dd5b9-3791-4da6-9e31-76f533f5b4de" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Campbelltown%20da2.png?VersionId=LgOSy9nwf5u.MGswBBwaGGxuX8QpHSl_" />

Of the 139 apartments, 23 will be delivered as affordable housing under the in-fill affordable housing provisions of the Housing SEPP. The affordable component represents 15 per cent of the residential gross floor area and will be managed by a registered Community Housing Provider.

Doroch has sought to break the scale of the building into two distinct elements, with a masonry podium of around four storeys establishing the street edge before the residential tower steps back above.

The corner position has shaped that approach. Cordeaux Street faces toward the commercial and civic centre, while Moore-Oxley Street leads into the lower-scale residential neighbourhood to the south, and the design verification report describes the site as "bridging the commercial core to the north and established residential areas to the south."

The podium will be expressed predominantly in face brick, while the upper levels shift to brushed and grooved concrete cladding with darker metal detailing. Recessed sections, deep balcony edges and landscaping break down the upper form, with an approximately 11.8-metre setback to the northern boundary addressing the adjoining St Peters Anglican School.

<img alt="First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c8b3d2d3-c561-4bfc-a5d9-a68c0c10dac1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Campbelltown%20da1.png?VersionId=AeAEyJU02Gk2k5noUj2StziCvdQ7fW4B" />

Campbelltown has been starved of new residential developments in the last decade.

The only other notable development set to come to market this year is ALAND's Queen Square, a mixed-use precinct on over two hectares that will comprise apartments above a vibrant ground-level retail and hospitality dining precinct.

First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site

First Look: Sherlock Construction pitches apartments for low-rise Deception Bay

Queensland builder-developer MAYD has revealed the first look at its major North Kirra beachfront development, lodging amended plans that reduce the number of apartments and increase the proportion of larger residences.

The project is planned across a substantial 4,742 sqm amalgamated site spanning seven lots at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/2-6-pacific-parade-bilinga-qld-4225">2-6 Pacific Parade</a> and 27-33 Golden Four Drive in Bilin​ga, directly opposite Nor​th Kirra Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mayd-group">MAYD</a> secured the site for $32.5 million in 2025, in what was one of the Gold Coast's largest property transactions of the year.

The development will be delivered across two stages, with the first stage carrying an estimated gross realisation value of around $360 million.

The latest amendments seek to reduce the overall apartment count and shift the project further toward the owner-occupier market, with larger residences designed for buyers wanting considerably more space than traditionally offered in a beachfront apartment.

The residential mix will include townhomes, oversized two-bedroom apartments, substantial three-bedroom residences and four-bedroom homes.

MAYD has appointed Cera Stribley to lead the architecture and interiors, with the Melbourne-based design practice drawing on the beachfront setting through a series of ocean-facing terraces and heavily landscaped balconies.

Strong horizontal forms and curved balconies will define the exterior, with subtropical landscaping integrated throughout the building to soften the built form and increase the connection between the residences and the beachfront.

The project will also include an extensive collection of resident wellness and lifestyle facilities, continuing the broader shift across the Gold Coast's luxury apartment market toward larger homes supported by resort-style amenity.

<img alt="MAYD" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1bcbb05-e659-4b47-8bd4-1e595315e2ad" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%202.05.03%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=jj0XEud1X1DuLt7_KyElhjMdZGOXmLHP" />

MAYD Founder Todd Mould said North Kirra was increasingly appealing to buyers attracted to the more established, lower-density character of the southern Gold Coast.

"North Kirra presents one of the most compelling luxury residential opportunities currently emerging in Australia, combining absolute beachfront with the character and authenticity that buyers are increasingly seeking, and the same sense of tight-knit community that defined Burleigh and Currumbin perhaps 10 or 15 years ago," Mould said.

"With Gold Coast Airport on its doorstep, it also offers a level of accessibility that broadens its appeal across almost every market demographic."

The project comes as the southern Gold Coast continues to attract an increasing share of high-end apartment development and buyer activity.

Kirra in particular has emerged as one of the region's more tightly held beachfront markets, with its relatively low-density character, established surf and hospitality scene and proximity to Gold Coast Airport differentiating it from the higher-density markets further north.

Mould said those characteristics had informed the approach MAYD and Cera Stribley had taken to the project.

"We've worked closely with Cera Stribley to create a vision that is deeply connected to its surroundings," he said.

"Inspired by the coastline itself, the architecture has been shaped around space, privacy and resort-style living, creating a collection of homes that reflects the next generation of luxury on the southern Gold Coast."

MOTIV Managing Director Carly Cottam, who has been appointed to market the project, said buyer attention had continued to move south along the Gold Coast.

"Purchasers who may once have defaulted to Broadbeach, Main Beach or Surfers Paradise are increasingly recognising the value of a genuine beachfront location that offers lower density, strong amenity and a more established sense of community," Cottam said.

"Kirra has a powerful combination of growing demand and genuine scarcity. Beachfront supply is inherently constrained, the area remains relatively low density, and buyers are increasingly placing a premium on locations that feel established, uncrowded and authentic rather than heavily developed."

Cottam said the proximity to Gold Coast Airport was also proving increasingly important for interstate and second-home buyers.

"Being minutes from Gold Coast Airport makes it particularly compelling for interstate buyers, frequent travellers and second-home purchasers who can access an authentic coastal lifestyle almost immediately after stepping off a flight."

The acquisition takes MAYD's active development portfolio to more than $500 million, with the North Kirra project representing one of its largest undertakings to date.

MAYD is targeting an early 2027 launch.

First look at MAYD's North Kirra mixed-use precinct

<main data-perf-region="main">
Castle Hill, the longtime hub of the Hills District, has been one of the major beneficiaries of Sydney's Metro expansion, with improved connectivity helping drive continued population growth, development and buyer demand across the Hills District.

But despite that growth, the suburb has seen relatively few major new apartment projects brought to market over the past 18 months.

Hills District developer Reve Group is looking to fill that gap with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nova-r-ve-castle-hill-2-garthowen-crescent-castle-hill-nsw-2154">Nova Rêve</a>, a major new mixed-use precinct on the corner of Garthowen Crescent and Old Castle Hill Road, a short walk from Castle Hill Metro Station and Castle Towers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377679]

The project will comprise three residential towers alongside a hotel, restaurants, cafes and a skybar, more than 1,600 sqm of ground-floor retail and almost an acre of landscaped gardens.

It represents the largest project undertaken by Reve Group, the development arm of the Kassis family, which has been building across the Hills District for more than 30 years through Kassis Homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377675]

Nova Rêve also represents a significant step up from the family's first apartment development, Grand Rêve, which was delivered nearby on Garthowen Crescent.

Grand Rêve introduced larger, house-like apartment layouts and premium inclusions including Wolf and Sub-Zero appliances to the Castle Hill market.

Nova Rêve takes that approach to a precinct scale, combining the residential component with hospitality, retail and substantial public and resident landscaping.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377685]

Reve Group Managing Director Sam Kassis said the project reflected the family's three decades of building in the Hills, which has evolved from trophy homes on quarter-acre blocks to larger-scale apartment development.

"Grand Rêve was our first apartment project here and it showed us what this pocket of Castle Hill could be. Nova Rêve is the refinement of that idea: not just apartments, but a place the whole suburb can use," Kassis said.

A key part of that approach is the hotel, which has been designed to operate as an amenity for the wider Castle Hill community rather than solely hotel guests.

It will include restaurants, cafes, skybars and all-day dining, alongside conference and event facilities catering to business functions, community groups and private events.

At ground level, more than 1,600 sqm of shops and cafes will open onto the surrounding streets and landscaped areas.

Almost an acre of gardens designed by Land and Form Studios will run through the precinct, incorporating pathways, seating, barbecue areas and children's play spaces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377680]

Reve Group's Romio Georges said creating an active ground plane had been central to the planning of Nova Rêve.

"There are gardens with pathways, barbecues, seating and play areas, shops and cafes opening onto the street, and a hotel with restaurants and a skybar that anyone in Castle Hill can walk into," Georges said.

The project's elevated position on one of Sydney's highest ridgelines will also provide apartments with outlooks toward the Sydney skyline, surrounding parkland and the Blue Mountains.

More than 80 per cent of the apartments will occupy corner positions, with Turner responsible for both the architecture and interiors.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152737]

<h3 data-end="3697" data-section-id="q3n5ak" data-start="3672">&nbsp;</h3>
</main>

Nova Rêve arrives as Reve Group bets on Castle Hill's next growth phase

Land Tax

<html><body>
Queensland's state government has decided to tax foreign landowners with a 1.5 percent absentee land tax surcharge on land worth more than $350,000, following NSW and Victoria's moves to levy more taxes on foreigners.
The absentee land tax surcharge comes on top of the 3 percent transfer duty surcharge, which was introduced in 2016.
The new levy is expected to generate revenue of $20 million a year from 2017-18. 
Queensland Treasurer Curtis Pitt was quoted as saying by The Courier Mail that the “surcharge ensures that absentee owners of land are making a fair contribution and it has no direct impact on Queenslanders.”
Earlier this month, New South Wales announced it would double its foreign investors stamp duty surcharge to 8 percent as part of premier Gladys Berejiklian’s moves to address housing affordability ahead of the budget. 
And Victoria announced it would impose a tax on homeowners who leave their properties vacant in a bid to make housing more affordable in and around Melbourne
Victoria's Vacant Residential Property Tax will be levied at 1 percent, multiplied by the capital improved value of the taxable property. 
In May's Federal Budget, the Australian government also announced a new tax on any vacant properties owned by foreigners in a bid to improve housing affordability.
The new charge is expected to bring in $16.3 million over the forward estimates being monitored by the Australian Tax Office.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Queensland to slug foreigners with absentee land tax surcharge

<html><body>
No one needs to do more about housing affordability than the NSW State Government. Sadly, no one is doing less.
The Victoria State Government has made an encouraging start to tackling some of the issues in Melbourne. The Northern Territory Government is doing plenty to help first-home buyers in Darwin.
Even in Tasmania, where Hobart prices are so low relative to other cities you wonder why they feel the need, the State Government is taking decisive action to help young buyers and the housing industry generally.
But in Sydney, the location with the biggest problems, the NSW Government has to date done nothing.
It has contributed mightily to the problems by ripping obscene amounts of revenue out of the housing industry and imposing major regulatory burdens on the development industry. But despite the rhetoric of Premier Gladys Berejiklian (who, as a former state treasurer should have some understanding of the issues and the numbers), the State Government has done nothing to assist.
In NSW stamp duty receipts have reached a record high. Official figures show that $1.98 billion in stamp duty poured into government coffers in the March Quarter alone – a $315 million increase on the first quarter of last financial year.
Stamp duty from all property transfers has risen $859 million so far this financial year, compared with the same period in 2015-16. This represents a 10 percent increase in stamp duty on residential property, outpacing the Treasury forecast of a 4.8 percent rise for 2016-17.
That’s a major part of the problem. The State Government has built a Budget surplus on the back of revenue from real estate, thereby adding to the costs that burden buyers, while claiming to care about affordability issues.
In considering what it can do ease price pressures, the NSW Government might ponder this question: why does residential land in Sydney cost twice what it does in Melbourne? The median price for a home site in Sydney in 2016 was double that of Melbourne’s, according to the recent State of the Land report.
One possible explanation is that Melbourne brought far more residential land to the market last year than Sydney did. Indeed, 40 percent of the new land marketed in capital city Australia in 2016 was in Melbourne.
Increasing supply is regarded by some as the silver bullet solution. It’s not, but it’s certainly part of range of measures that jointly might create improvement.
And certainly the Property Council has “turbo-charging housing supply through increased land supply and planning reform” at the top of its five-point plan to address affordability issues in Sydney. If Melbourne can create so much new housing land for sale, what’s holding Sydney back?
Increasing the supply of housing won’t help affordability if the new dwellings are expensive, because it costs so much to create them.
Which is why next on the Property Council wish list comes “reforming state property taxes and reducing fees, charges and red tape”.
It’s been reported many times but it’s worth repeating: research indicates that 40 percent of the cost of creating the average house-and-land package comprises government fees, charges and taxes.
That reinforces my view that the politicians who rage against foreign investors and negative-geared Australian investors are themselves the problem. Every time a state government in Australia announces its annual Budget, affordability in that state gets worse.
Some of the most vocal critics of the affordability problem in Sydney have been NSW state politicians, when they themselves are the people best placed to create remedies. They can start by reducing the cost burdens they place on the process of building and buying new homes.
Meanwhile, their populist scapegoating of foreign investors, and multiple measures by federal and state governments to nobble offshore buyers, are making the affordability problems worse.
The most effective way to cause property prices to fall – indeed, in my experience, the only way – is to create an oversupply. Some of our major cities have been heading unwittingly down that path recently, notably in the inner-city apartment markets in Melbourne, Perth and Brisbane.
But major projects made viable by the prospect of selling some of the product to foreign buyers will not proceed because of a range of measures by federal and state governments to make investment by offshore buyers unattractive, if not unviable.
They’ve made matters worse for young buyers while claiming to be improving their chances.
Don’t be surprised if one of the few measures the NSW State Government will introduce in its next Budget will be extra taxes and charges on foreign buyers. It will be another cash grab, dressed up as policy to “level the playing field for young Australians”.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="mailto:%20%3Cscript%20type='text/javascript'%3E%20%3C!--%20var%20prefix%20=%20'ma'%20+%20'il'%20+%20'to';%20var%20path%20=%20'hr'%20+%20'ef'%20+%20'=';%20var%20addy38821%20=%20'ryder'%20+%20'@';%20addy38821%20=%20addy38821%20+%20'hotspotting'%20+%20'.'%20+%20'com'%20+%20'.'%20+%20'au';%20document.write('%3Ca%20'%20+%20path%20+%20'/''%20+%20prefix%20+%20':'%20+%20addy38821%20+%20'/'%3E');%20document.write(addy38821);%20document.write('%3C//a%3E');%20//--%3E/n%20%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%20type='text/javascript'" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Why does residential land in Sydney cost twice what it does in Melbourne?

<html><body>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
Minister Dominic Perrottet’s proposal to replace the transaction tax of stamp duty with a broad based land tax will help housing affordability. 
The Urban Taskforce has previously advocated for the replacement of stamp duty with a land tax and it is good to see the NSW Finance Minister raising the potential for this to occur.
Adding around $40,000 to the cost of buying a home discourages sales and increases the cost of housing.
Clearly state governments have come to rely on stamp duty income with NSW expecting $8.7 billion this year. The stamp duty will provide more funds in boom times and this will diminish as the market slows down. A land tax however will give consistent income that grows with the value of land.
Land tax, especially if it is distributed across all land, is a good way for governments to capture value from the uplift in land value through the impact of new infrastructure like a metro rail line.
Stamp duty is also contributing to an even bigger issue by discouraging owners of large homes to downsize to a smaller home. NSW Planning Minister, Rob Stokes, has raised the issue of the large number of unused bedrooms in large houses occupied by one or two older people. The removal of stamp duty would be an incentive for these people to downsize leaving the larger home for a family.
Housing Affordability is clearly a big issue across Sydney and the Urban Taskforce has recently proposed an approach that could yield 4,000 new affordable rental homes a year by modifying the NSW Affordable Rental Housing SEPP. We also support a speeding up of the planning system to boost supply and the removal of stamp duty. These three measures, using the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP, speeding up the planning system and replacing stamp duty would go a long way to helping with housing affordability in Sydney.
Recent demographic data from the NSW Department of Planning has shown that the population is increasing faster than expected. This means Sydney must average 37,000 new homes a year but in the current boom times this should be around 40,000 homes. Last financial year only 30,000 homes were built which is 10,000 below what is needed. The Urban Taskforce proposal to allow housing projects to add 20 percent more area for affordable homes would also boost supply in Sydney by around 4,000 a year.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with all levels of government to find ways to help with housing affordability. As the major providers of new housing stock it is the developers who must be incentivised to provide the thousands of affordable homes Sydney desperately needs.
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Replacing stamp duty with land tax will help housing affordability

<html><body>
Land ownership, site value and land use as at midnight 30 June each year is used to determine the land tax for the forthcoming financial year.
Land tax revenue assists in the provision of public services such as education, health and public safety.
RevenueSA is responsible for the collection of land tax under the Land Tax Act 1936, the Taxation Administration Act 1996and associated Regulations.
For details on how land tax is calculated refer to the <a href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/taxes-and-duties/land-tax/forms/LTGxx_0515_54767-RevSA-LandTaxGuide.pdf" target="_blank">Guide to Land Tax</a> or the <a href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/taxes-and-duties/land-tax/guides-to-legislation" target="_blank">Land Tax Guide to Legislation</a>.
You can also use our <a href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/taxes-and-duties/land-tax/calculate-land-tax-new" target="_blank">calculator</a> to determine your land tax.
An <a href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/taxes-and-duties/land-tax/exemption-from-land-tax" target="_blank">exemption</a> from land tax may be available depending on the use of the property and/or the owner of the property.
Where a property is held on Trust, the trustees can apply to have that property assessed separately from other land owned by the trustee in another capacity.
 
</body></html>

Property 101: Guide to land tax in South Australia

<html><body>
The practice of taxing foreigner property holdings at a higher rate than the locals is a world wide trend finally taken up by Australian legislators.
It looks like it will become the norm too in Sydney any day now. 
Just like the Labor Government in Victoria in 2015, overseas property investors look set to soon have to pay more to own a home in NSW under Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian’s upcoming state budget­.
The Daly Telegraph's state politics reporter Andrew Clennell says Ms Berejiklian is seriously considering a 1.5 percent foreigner land tax surcharge to "tackle housing affordability­" in the June budget.
It would mimic a 1.5 percent surcharge in Victoria, ­although there is a hint Ms Berejiklian could impose a slightly lesser rate of 1 percent, perhaps to obtain a competitive advantage over our southern rivals.
Victoria also imposes an extra 7 percent on stamp duty for foreign buyers but Ms Berejiklian is understood to have ruled that out.
In Victoria Premier Daniel introduced a 3 percent stamp duty charge and a 0.5 percent land tax levy for foreigners in his first 2015 budget and increased them to 7 percent and 1.5 percent this year.
Those measures are predicted to raise $486 million over four years.
Forget the tackling housing affordability, such measures are really just a cash grab against a buying group whose voice can't be heard at the ballot box.
Since words of the higher land tax emerged industry groups have been quick to suggest the proposals against foreign investors could actually slow down housing construction supply.
“The proposals by NSW Treasury to impose surcharge on land tax on foreign investors in housing will be a disincentive to invest in NSW,” says Urban Taskforce CEO, Chris Johnson. 
Johnson's taskforce says the Sydney region needs 33,200 new homes a year, but last financial year only 27,348 were built leaving a shortfall of nearly 6,000 homes.
"We must do all we can to boost housing supply and foreign investors have been contributing to this particularly through new apartments.
"To send a message that these investments are not wanted in NSW can only reduce the flow of capital into new housing.”
“Foreign investors often help make development projects become feasible by underpinning the pre-sales with up to 15% of purchases and this helps local purchasers buy into a viable project.”
But there has already been a slow-down in housing approvals in NSW inpart due to prior budgetry measures.
NSW lead the way on restricting first home grants for new builds rather than established homes, and this has contributed to record low recipients.
In the last budget NSW land tax revenues were forecast to rise at a faster rate than stamp duty revenues, rising from $2.49 billion this financial year to $3.11 billion by 2018-19.
This was based on no change in the tax rate, just reflecting growth in land values. 
The benchmark land tax base is the average of the last three years unimproved land value of all land owned above the indexed threshold for that year. The benchmark tax rate for the 2015 land tax year is $100 plus 1.6 percent of the land value between the thresholds of $432,000 and $2,641,000, and 2 percent thereafter.
Total stamp duty revenues were forecast to rise from $7.29 billion this year to $8.6 billion in 2018-19.
Property has become the constant cash cow for increasing desperate governments with just more than half of state and local government tax revenue now coming from property.
And it ain't ever going to ease off.
This article was first published in the Saturday Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

Taxing foreigner property holdings at a higher rate to become the norm

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Stamp duty is a tax that discourages the buying of homes and it should be replaced by a broad land tax. 
State governments have become comfortable with the large income they get from stamp duty on the purchase of homes but they must look at better, more efficient ways to raise funds.
Sydney’s housing is among the most expensive in the world and this is partly driven by the various taxes and levies required by governments. A broad based land tax would spread the income base across all land owners rather than only focussing on the sale of homes.
Recent discussion in the media has advocated for the end of stamp duty, to be replaced with an ongoing annual land tax, and this move has gained widespread support from business groups, social service advocates and the development industry. 
Many economists, including the Prime Minister himself, and Ken Henry, author of the 2010 Henry Tax Review, have stated that a broad based land tax is the most equitable and fairest way to tax property owners and developers. Unlike stamp duty which imposes a huge up-front financial burden upon home buyers, a broad-based land tax, paid annually and spread over a wider base of people, provides a steady income stream to government to fund infrastructure and does not hurt home buyers the way stamp duty does. 
Increasingly, young people are finding it more and costly to purchase a home, and stamp duty adds thousands and thousands to the cost of their mortgage. A land tax ensures that a larger pool of people contribute a small amount of tax, rather than hitting a home buyers with huge financial burden. Who wants to see their children struggling to pay off all thousands of dollars of taxes when they buy their first home? 
Broad based land taxes are simple to administer and encourage urban consolidation as the tax paid is based upon the size of the land. This tax encourages a more environmentally sustainable urban form. 
This is an excellent tax reform and will provide huge benefits for home buyers and a steady income stream for the government to fund infrastructure. 
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

A broad land tax should replace stamp duty: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Increasing land tax as an alternative to raising the GST rate could have far reaching ramifications on both property owners and the broader property industry. 
Imposing land tax to all land owners from a state level should only be considered in line with the reduction or abolition of transfer duty. 
Failure to do this could cause the property industry, one of Australia’s largest earners and employers, to slow drastically.
Lifting the GST rate could potentially have a regressive tax impact. 
Lower income earners generally spend a higher proportion of their income on necessities. 
Land is already heavily taxed through stamp duty, such as transfer duty, landholder duty, rates, income tax, including capital gains tax and, of course, land tax.
If land tax was to be increased, it could dampen activities in the sector which could also affect those working in the industry and the wider economy, not just property owners. 
Making the ownership and transaction costs of property too expensive could reduce investment and development activities in the sector. 
We all know the impact of a property industry downturn, which affects a wide range of workers in the real estate and construction industries, not just property owners. 
Many property owners are just mum and dad investors, so increasing ownership costs through land tax could erode the viability of their investments, which may also trigger a potential depression in property investments. 
It is not fair to punish people for wanting to get ahead financially by investing in property.
BDO is committed to encouraging public debate and being at the forefront of discussions around Australian tax reform. From next week BDO invites participation in the annual BDO Tax Reform Survey.
Hung Tran is BDO Brisbane Real Estate and Construction partner and can be contacted <a href="https://www.bdo.com.au/en-au/our-people/hung-tran" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Land tax hike not viable alternative to GST reform

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The major cities of Australia and New Zealand are experiencing an extraordinary wave of speculation in their respective real estate markets.
Over the past three years, the median house price to median income ratio has increased by 21.2% in Australia and 18.1% in New Zealand, a rate reminiscent of Ireland’s 20.5% before its housing crash at the time of the global financial crisis.
The rapid increase in property unaffordability on both sides of the Tasman has enriched a number of homeowners and speculators and made countless more eager to join the game. But it has had dramatic effects for businesses and landless families who find it exceedingly difficult to afford a place to live, work or operate.
Unsurprisingly, a lot of column space and political deliberation have been dedicated to finding a solution to the problem. Much of the analysis points to a lack of housing supply at a time of increasing demand as being the main driver of rising prices, resulting in a simple policy prescription: increase the supply of housing.
The main problem with this argument is it ignores the fact that it is land, not physical structures, that appreciates in value, making it an obvious area for speculation. Unlike houses or genuine capital, land does not depreciate or require maintenance. Instead, the value of land reflects its economic potential due to public expenditures on infrastructure (such as roads, schools or railway stations) in its vicinity and the effort and entrepreneurship of local workers and entrepreneurs.
When land prices soar, residential real estate becomes a more attractive investment opportunity than productive businesses. Land bubbles tend to produce two seemingly contradictory effects. Firstly, it produces urban sprawl as businesses and families are forced to seek cheaper land outside of the urban centres. Secondly, as owners are more interested in expected capital gains than any productive activities, much valuable land become idle.
Eventually, the burden of debt, lack of affordable land and investments based on wrong signals (e.g. luxurious condominiums promising high-profit margins) start affecting the real economy. As workers lose their jobs, they become unable to repay their debts and are forced to sell. Land prices finally stagnate and then fall, taking leveraged banks, speculators and people’s life savings with them. It is, therefore, clear that to escape this never-ending cycle, we need to focus on land.
Over a century ago, American economist Henry George suggested instead of taxing workers and entrepreneurs, governments should raise their revenue from land via a land value tax (LVT).
Indeed, both Australia (land taxes at the state level) and New Zealand (property rates at the council level) already have some taxation of land in place. But over the last century these taxes have become significantly debased due to the influence of various interest groups that secured exemptions or low rates. It is time to reconsider shifting the fiscal balance back onto land.
Unlike the land taxes already in place or the often suggested capital gains tax, LVT does not punish anyone for constructing houses or factories in the way that our current taxes do. As the supply of land is fixed, LVT becomes a cost of owning it. Consequently, it can bring in a decrease in prices as the owners of inefficiently used sites might feel compelled to sell or lease them to those willing to use them productively. Increasing the cost of owning land would drastically reduce the incentives for speculation.
Imagine central Auckland or Melbourne without vacant sites or dilapidated buildings. What is more, encouraging more efficient use of land is not only beneficial to economic growth and housing affordability, but also has a potential to substantially lower the costs of public infrastructure and encourage more efficient use of space and natural resources.
LVT would be a transparent and efficient alternative to our current taxes which are not only burdensome on businesses and families but also difficult and expensive to administer and enforce. It is impossible to hide land in a tax haven or a trust (trusts are not exempt from the current land taxes). Taxing it can be done cheaply and on the basis of publicly available information.
While LVT might persuade some modest-income earners to sell their valuable properties, most workers and homeowners would get net benefits from a reduction in taxes falling on their income (income taxes) and consumption (GST). Furthermore, a citizen’s dividend could be introduced in which part of the revenue raised from LVT is directly paid out to all citizens on a per-capita basis.
Given the multiple problems stemming from the rapidly expanding housing bubbles in Australia and New Zealand, introducing a tax on unimproved land values makes sense. Not only would it undoubtedly address house price inflation, it could also result in a more efficient use of land, mitigate urban sprawl, lower the burden on the natural environment and reduce the risk of real estate bubbles; all this without undermining the foundations of economic growth.
 
Nicholas Ross Smith is professional teaching fellow, University of Auckland and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/nicholas-ross-smith-201827" target="_blank">here</a>. Zbigniew Dumieński is lecturer, University of Auckland and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/zbigniew-dumienski-201829" target="_blank">here</a>. Both are authors for The Conversation.
</body></html>

mick.cee-iDmgDDAmu8

A land value tax could fix Australasia’s housing crisis

<html><body>
Australia does not build enough new housing to support the growing population according to the Urban Development Institute of Australia with inadequate investment in urban infrastructure, high taxes and charges and excessive red tape on new developments driving the shortage in housing supply.
Whilst the overall rate of home ownership has only declined by a relatively modest 7%, from 71.3% of households in 1982 to 64.3% of households in 2011, according to UDIA, it masks the disproportionate decline experienced by younger generations, where rates of home ownership have collapsed. 
"The 25-34 and 35-34 year old demographics have seen the largest declines in the rate of home ownership, falling by 39% and 20% respectively. 
<a href="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%209.31.53%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%209.31.53%20PM.png" alt="">
In the submission to the inquiry into Home Ownership, UDIA says there is an urgent need for governments to take necessary action in order to resolve these issues and restore housing affordability.
"UDIA is strongly of the view that Australia has not built enough new dwellings to support population growth for many years, and that the country now suffers from a significant underlying shortage of homes, pushing up both rents and house prices. 
"Population growth must be planned for, with the necessary land, new housing and infrastructure to support population growth. Doing so will ensure that population growth is managed sustainably and for the benefit of the entire community. 
"Timely and sufficient provision of new urban infrastructure, such as transport, utilities, and community facilities is a particularly important factor for ensuring an adequate supply of new land. Infrastructure investment can act as a critical catalyst for development and new supply, by improving access and opening up new areas for urban growth."
UDIA made several recommendations to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics such as provide additional funding for investment in new urban infrastructure, in order to unlock land for development. 
"The Commonwealth should work with state governments to prepare comprehensive strategic plans for future urban infrastructure, land-use planning, and land supply, to align with forecast population growth. 
"Facilitate non-traditional methods of funding infrastructure, to increase the level of funding available for infrastructure investment at both a federal and state level."
UDIA believes that costs associated with the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act) are a concern for the development industry.
"The Commonwealth should work with State Governments to undertake planning system reform to reduce delays and increase certainty in planning, zoning, assessment and approval systems, and increase the flexibility with which they operate. 
"UDIA supports the creation of a single, streamlined environmental approvals system to reduce the red tape associated with duplicated systems, without harming environmental outcomes. The Government should continue with its plan to streamline the environmental approval process to create a ‘one stop shop’. 
"The Commonwealth should stop attempts to restrict development around airports and airport corridors beyond the current and existing standards. 
"Stamp duty on property purchases should be phased out, and replaced with more efficient taxes, such as a broadening of the GST. 
"Governments should avoid revenue raising through the application of up front developer charges, and should seek to fund infrastructure through recurring charges directly related to specific infrastructure investment, over extended time frames. 
"The Commonwealth should cease plans to shift the cost of providing the National Broadband Network to new home buyers through up front connection, network and backhaul charges. 
"Governments should commit to broadening the base and reducing the rate of land tax regimes over a number of years, as an efficient way to raise revenue and reduce reliance on up front developer charges. 
"Governments should ensure land taxes apply per land holding, not on an aggregate basis, to in order promote large scale land development. 
"Land taxes should be levied on only the unimproved value of land, to avoid distorting disincentives to invest in improvements. 
"Exclude state and local government taxes and charges from GST calculations on land development, to reduce double taxation and improve tax system integrity. 
</body></html>

New housing needed to support population: UDIA

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Land tax is a tax levied on the owners of land as at midnight of the relevant date of each year depending on the state in which the property is located (refer below for dates for respective states).
Land tax may apply to land regardless of whether income is earned from the land depending on the state jurisdiction applicable. Each state is responsible for the calculation and collection of land tax and it is only applied to land held in a respective state.  (The tax is not applied to cumulative holdings of land across Australia.)
Assessment Dates     
<ul>
<li>   NSW – 31 December</li>
<li>   VIC - 31 December</li>
<li>   QLD – 30 June</li>
<li>   SA - 30 June    </li>
<li>   WA - 30 June</li>
<li>   TAS - 30 June</li>
<li>   ACT - 30 June</li>
</ul>
Note: NT does not apply land tax
Land Tax Registration
It is a requirement for individuals and entities to register their interests in land with the respective State Revenue Office (OSR).  
In some states this a requirement regardless of whether the individual or entity is below any land tax threshold. For example, many self-managed superannuation (SMSF) trustees have acquired investment property during the past few years (this includes SMSFs that have acquired their own business premises).  
The acquisition of one investment property would often result in the land value of this investment being below the respective land tax threshold. Regardless the SMSF trustee may be required to register the entity’s interest in the property with the appropriate OSR. The same principle applies for all individuals and entities. 
It is not essential to derive income from a property to have it subject to land tax. A holiday home used exclusively by the family may be subject to land tax and be subject to registration.
Land Tax Thresholds and initial rate for values above threshold
<ul>
<li>  NSW: $432,000  -  $100 + 1.6% per $ (scaled)</li>
<li>  VIC: $250,000    -  $275 + 0.2% per $ (scaled)</li>
<li>  QLD: $599,999   -  $500 + 1% per $ (scaled)*</li>
<li>  SA:  $316,000    -  0.5% per $ (scaled)</li>
<li>  WA: $300,00      -  0.11% per $ (scaled)</li>
<li>  TAS: $24,99       -  $50 + 0.55% per $ (scaled)                           </li>
<li>  ACT: $1             -  0.41% per $ (scaled)</li>
</ul>
Refer to the respective state Office of State Revenue (OSR) for further information (website details set out at the end of this article).
* (individuals only)
Other state specific exceptions:
<ul>
<li>  NSW - Special trusts – zero land tax threshold</li>
<li>  NSW - Fixed property trust – individual land tax threshold</li>
<li>  VIC - Special trusts - $25,000 land tax threshold and separate scaled rates</li>
<li>  QLD - $349,999 threshold for trusts, companies and SMSFs.</li>
</ul>
NSW &amp; Victoria apply different rates and thresholds for trusts.
In NSW, trusts (with the exception of fixed property trusts (FPT) and SMSFs) do not receive a land tax threshold and are described as “special trusts”. These include: discretionary, hybrid, unit and Property Investor trusts. Land tax is applied at a rate of 1.6% from the first dollar up to the premium land tax threshold and then at 2% thereafter.
A FPT enables the unit holder(s) to utilise their individual land tax threshold in determining the land tax applicable. In some instances it is possible to have a “special trust” altered to a FPT to obtain the benefit of the land tax threshold in future years.
In Victoria, if you own land as trustee of a trust you are required to pay land tax at the surcharge rate (subject to various exclusions) if the aggregate Victorian land holdings of the trust is valued at or over $25,000. The surcharge rate is 0.375 per cent above the general land tax rate for land holdings valued between $25,000 and $1.8 million. The surcharge rate tapers away for trusts with aggregate land holdings valued between $1.8 million and $3 million and for land holdings valued at or over $3 million, the surcharge rate is the same as the general land tax rate.  Victoria does not differentiate between the type of trust other than SMSFs.
Queensland has a separate land tax threshold for non-individuals (i.e. SMSFs, trusts and companies). Land tax is assessable for land values in excess of $349,999 at $1,450 + 1.7% per dollar (scaled).
OSR Land Tax audits
Some states are undertaking land assessment audit activities.  With the enhancement of computerisation of land records State Revenue Offices are able to cross match land holdings and ownership changes.  We have experienced a considerable increase in NSW OSR audits in recent times.  Interest penalties may be applied to prior year assessments if land tax payment has not been made.
We encourage all clients to check their land holding values and the appropriate jurisdictions website to check whether they should be registered for land tax.
State Office website addresses:
<ul>
<li>NSW:  <a href="https://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - NSW">https://www.osr.nsw.gov.au</a>
</li>
<li>VIC:    <a href="https://www.sro.vic.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - VIC">https://www.sro.vic.gov.au</a>
</li>
<li>QLD:   <a href="https://www.osr.qld.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - QLD">https://www.osr.qld.gov.au</a>
</li>
<li>SA:     <a href="https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - SA">https://www.revenuesa.sa.gov.au</a>
</li>
<li>WA:    <a href="https://www.finance.wa.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - WA">https://www.finance.wa.gov.au</a>
</li>
<li>TAS:   <a href="https://www.sro.tas.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - TAS">https://www.sro.tas.gov.au/</a>
</li>
<li>ACT:   <a href="https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="OSR - ACT">https://www.revenue.act.gov.au</a>
</li>
</ul>
Clive Nelson is a senior partner at <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/parramatta/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor Parramatta</a>.
</body></html>

Land Tax

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Land Tax

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News