Roseville is poised for a wave of new apartment development following the NSW Government's rezoning of land around Roseville Station under its Transport Oriented Development program.

The new planning controls have unlocked significant development potential within walking distance of the station, with a number of sites expected to be amalgamated and redeveloped in the coming years as developers seek to take advantage of the increased density allowances.

One of the more restrained developments in the precinct, and set among the first to be delivered having commenced well before the recent changes, is Hyecorp's Juliet. The boutique apartment project is already well under construction and remains on track to welcome residents by the end of the year, offering a markedly different proposition to many of the larger-scale developments now likely to emerge across the suburb.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278194]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/juliet-roseville-64-pacific-highway-roseville-nsw-2069">Juliet</a> will comprise just&nbsp;34 one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments opposite Roseville Station. For Hyecorp, which has delivered projects across Sydney's Lower North Shore for more than three decades, Roseville presented a rare opportunity to address a growing gap in the market.

"<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/roseville-nsw-2069">Roseville</a> has long been one of the North Shore's most tightly held and desirable suburbs, offering a unique combination of village charm, established greenery, excellent transport connections, and proximity to some of Sydney's best schools and lifestyle amenities," Hyecorp said.

"We recognised a growing demand from local homeowners seeking to downsize without leaving the community they have built their lives around. The location presented a rare opportunity to create homes that cater specifically to that buyer profile."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278196]

The six-level development has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/pbd-architects">PBD Architects</a> as a collection of residences that feel more like homes than apartments. The brief centred generous floorplans, abundant natural light, quality finishes, and strong connections to outdoor space.

PBD Architects drew inspiration from Roseville's established garden suburb character, creating a building that sits comfortably within its surroundings rather than dominating them. The architecture incorporates natural materials, soft forms, layered landscaping, expansive balconies, and generous setbacks to strengthen the connection between residents and the suburb's leafy environment.

"The focus was on designing spacious, house-like residences for discerning owner-occupiers and downsizers who wanted to remain on the North Shore without compromising on comfort, privacy, or design," PBD said.&nbsp;

"Every apartment was to feel considered, timeless, and highly functional."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278195]

Inside, residences feature engineered timber flooring, stone kitchen benchtops and splashbacks, integrated Fisher &amp; Paykel appliances, ducted air conditioning, and large outdoor entertaining areas designed to take advantage of district and treetop views.

Residents will also have access to a rooftop barbecue and lounge area, alongside practical amenities including parcel lockers, EV charging capability, bicycle storage, a dog wash bay, and a basement car wash facility.

The majority of purchasers so far have been local owner-occupiers from Roseville, Lindfield, Chatswood, Killara, and the broader Upper North Shore, many of whom are transitioning from larger family homes.

"Buyers are looking for spacious, house-like apartments that allow them to downsize without feeling like they are sacrificing comfort or functionality," Hyecorp noted.

"They value large kitchens, generous living areas, ample storage, quality finishes, secure parking, lift access, and low-maintenance living."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278204]

Juliet sits directly opposite Roseville Train Station and within walking distance of Roseville Village, while Chatswood's retail and dining precinct is only minutes away. The development is also surrounded by some of Sydney's most established schools, including Roseville College, Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College, and Knox Grammar, as well as nearby parklands and golf courses.

Juliet is currently more than 75 per cent sold ahead of its anticipated completion in late 2026.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7395]

Joel Robinson

Juliet to sit quietly amid Roseville apartment boom

Sherpa Property Group has unveiled the third instalment of its Flourish series, securing full approval for the two-tower, $500 million Flourish Soleira development in Palm Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-1150-1154-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a> will rise from a prominent site in the commercial heart of Palm Beach, the long-time home of Cash Converters and a range of local retailers.

The project will introduce a new retail and dining precinct at ground level, beneath 286 apartments.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370959]

“We’re very committed to not only providing affordable residential offerings that are much needed in Palm Beach, but also delivering a vibrant new commercial heart that complements the extraordinary growth of the southern Gold Coast,” Sherpa Property Group founder Christie Leet said.

The development will sit under Sherpa's Flourish brand, which is aimed at providing a pathway into the beachside suburb for locals, first-home buyers and downsizers. In a move designed to assist first-home buyers entering the market, Sherpa has reserved all one and two-bedroom, one-bathroom apartments exclusively for eligible first-home buyers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370964]

“Our vision through Flourish is to create a vibrant retail and lifestyle focal point within the Palm Beach centre zone, delivering thriving communities underpinned by lifestyle-rich locations,” Leet said.

“So far, Flourish has been an incredible success, and we hope to carry this momentum as we progress the next two Flourish projects in Palm Beach.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=371430]

Located across 1150-1164 Gold Coast Highway and 3 Sixth Avenue, the development will comprise two towers. The northern tower will deliver 154 apartments, while the southern tower will add a further 132 residences, helping address ongoing demand for new apartments in the tightly held coastal suburb.

Flourish Soleira will also feature the most extensive rooftop amenity offering ever delivered in Palm Beach.

The two towers will be connected by a skybridge, with residents gaining access to a rooftop recreation deck featuring a full-width swimming pool, hot and cold plunge pools, wellness spaces, a gymnasium, private dining facilities, massage treatment rooms, barbecue areas, a basketball court, golf simulator, indoor and outdoor dining spaces, sun lounges and extensive landscaping.

LPS Group is expected to start construction later this year.

Sherpa is already well advanced on construction of its debut Flourish project, Flourish Amargo, located just around the corner from Soleira. Meanwhile, Flourish Oasis, positioned opposite Amargo, recently commenced construction and has nearly sold out its collection of 47 apartments.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150017]

Sherpa unveils $500m mixed-use Palm Beach precinct, Flourish Soleira

Are mortgage holders set to get a reprieve from the RBA in 2026?

Big Four bank NAB believes so. They are now expecting the next move from the RBA to be a cut, rather than a hike, which they had pencilled in for August. They are unsure of the timing of the cut however, they note in their latest&nbsp;NAB Economics RBA Watch.

NAB Chief Economist, Dr Sally Auld, said recent data suggests the economy has lost momentum and the outlook for rates has shifted, noting that the broader economic backdrop has changed since earlier in the year.

“The next move in the cash rate is likely to be down, but the timing is uncertain," Dr Auld said.

"In February, growth was above trend, the economy was operating above capacity and there was uncertainty over the restrictiveness of rates. None of these conditions exist today,” she outlined.

Dr Auld said recent data pointed to softer momentum across the economy while acknowledging that at the same time, uncertainty remains a key feature of the outlook.

“Both Q1 GDP data and the NAB business survey suggest momentum in the economy has slowed, meaning that growth has likely peaked for the cycle. That said, we are cognisant there is still considerable uncertainty around the outlook, both with respect to activity and inflation.”

Dr Auld said inflation risks and labour market outcomes would be important to watch.

“On the prices side, we are still forecasting above target core inflation through to mid-2027. Margins will compress and weaker labour market outcomes are a risk.”

She said tighter financial conditions are expected to weigh on housing and activity.

“Tighter financial conditions will be reflected in a slowing in house price growth and housing credit growth. In summary, we have greater conviction that the next move in rates is down, but less conviction on the timing.”

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

A local downsizer has splashed $6.5 million on a penthouse in Perifa's Alex &amp; Willow development in Crows Nest. 
&nbsp; 
The purchaser sold their long-held family home in the area before embarking on a six-month search for the right apartment. After inspecting a range of options across the Lower North Shore, the buyer returned to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/alex-willow-crows-nest-82-90-alexander-street-crows-nest-nsw-2065">Alex &amp; Willow</a>. 
&nbsp; 
The buyer profile reflects the project’s broader purchaser mix. <a>Alex &amp; Willow</a> has attracted predominantly local downsizers looking to transition from larger homes without compromising on space or quality, alongside a smaller cohort of upsizers and investors drawn to the project’s location and design credentials. 
&nbsp; 
The milestone sale comes as the project, developed by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/perifa">Perifa</a>&nbsp;and delivered by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/versatile-made-construction">Versatile Construction</a>, both part of Versatile Group, reaches 60 per cent sold.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6680 project_image_fid=371325] 
&nbsp; 
Eddie Mansour, Managing Partner of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/ray-white-projects">Ray White Projects</a>, said the result demonstrates not only a headline price but also depth of demand. 
&nbsp; 
“This is an exceptional outcome and a clear reflection of sustained buyer demand for premium, well-located downsizer product,” Mansour said.

“We’re seeing a consistent pattern of local homeowners selling family residences and reinvesting into high-quality apartments that allow them to remain within their community. Alex &amp; Willow has resonated strongly with this group because it offers genuine scale, thoughtful design and immediate proximity to the village.” 
&nbsp; 
The sale reflects a broader and consistent trend of local downsizers actively seeking high-quality, low-maintenance residences close to established village centres. Agents report that demand for this product type has remained resilient, particularly where developments offer a rare combination of scale, design quality and walkable amenity. 
&nbsp;&nbsp; 
Fabrizio Perilli, Managing Director of Perifa and Versatile Group, said the sale marks a defining moment for the project. 
&nbsp; 
“The penthouse sale is a strong endorsement of the quality we have delivered, alongside our partners, and the clear demand from local downsizers for premium, boutique residences in this location,” Perilli said.&nbsp; 
&nbsp; 
“Most importantly, we’re proud to see the Alex &amp; Willow community beginning to take shape. As we move closer to completion, we’re looking forward to welcoming residents and seeing the project come to life.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6680 project_image_fid=338516] 
&nbsp; 
Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/nettletontribe">Nettleton Tribe</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/richards-stanisich">Richards Stanisich</a>, Alex &amp; Willow is a boutique collection of generously sized two- and three-bedroom residences in the heart of Crows Nest village.&nbsp;

Completion is slated for early 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6680]

Alex & Willow, Crows Nest penthouse sells off the plan for $6.5 million

Fresh from launching the first stage of its Wollongong precinct, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/keira-place-wollongong-120-122-smith-street-wollongong-nsw-2500">Keira Place</a>, builder-developer Urban Property Group has unveiled plans for the next phase of the masterplanned community.

Now on public exhibition through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway is a State Significant Development Application for a further 657 homes on the prominent gateway site opposite Beaton Park.

The proposal comprises three buildings, including two build-to-sell towers rising 25 and 30 storeys, delivering 391 apartments, alongside a 12-storey co-living building with 266 residences, making it one of the largest co-living proposals currently planned in regional New South Wales.

Of the apartments proposed in the build-to-sell towers, the majority, 310, are two-bedroom dwellings. The balance comprises 44 one-bedroom apartments and 37 three-bedroom residences. Apartment sizes range from around 50 sqm for one-bedroom homes to approximately 90 sqm for three-bedroom apartments.

<img alt="Smith St" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="19347059-1612-41a0-9c74-b86a657237f8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-10%20at%2010.02.18%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sWXnaCcA.cIC6N8YT1dg5pJ2e1V3Z6z7" />

The submission says the proposal has evolved significantly from its original Housing Delivery Authority application following extensive consultation with the State Design Review Panel and Wollongong City Council.

The final scheme has been designed to align with the emerging vision for the Flinders Street Precinct, an area identified by Council as a future high-density mixed-use neighbourhood capable of accommodating substantial housing growth close to transport, employment and community infrastructure.

According to the design report prepared by COX Architecture, the development aims to "deliver a built outcome consistent with the future character of the Wollongong CBD while responding to the site's unique constraints and opportunities."

"Our vision for the next phase of the site evolution in Wollongong is grounded in three design pillars that guide the design response: place, natural environment and celebration," COX said.

"Inspired by its surroundings and grounded in the stories of place on Wodi Wodi Country, the design proposal acknowledges the established character of its setting while creating a unique and timeless identity that sits harmoniously within it.

"The design proposal responds to its specific site conditions, acknowledging the vegetation, climate, wind conditions and solar access of the site."

The architecture responds directly to the site's position between Wollongong's urban core and its natural landscape setting.

COX identified views towards Mount Keira and the Illawarra Escarpment as defining features of the site, while the upper levels of the towers will also capture expansive views across the city and out to the Pacific Ocean.

The design team has positioned the tallest buildings closer to the rail corridor, where overshadowing impacts can be better managed while establishing a landmark built form on the northern approach into the city.

<img alt="Smith St" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="79580d5b-500c-4ebf-9629-797146a4a694" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-10%20at%209.51.59%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=WbTB1EKSG.KDfsfz0F3wp1QVa2oCMGR5" />

Urban Property Group secured the 11,000 sqm Smith Street site in 2022 and has since progressed plans for the broader Keira Place precinct.

Construction recently commenced on the first stage of Keira Place, which will deliver 150 apartments across two residential buildings, including 27 affordable housing apartments and 18 specialist disability accommodation dwellings, alongside activated ground-floor retail and commercial space.

Urban Co-CEO Patrick Elias said the commencement of construction marked a significant milestone for Wollongong and reflected the developer's long-term commitment to regional cities.

"Today's groundbreaking is about turning approvals into homes and moving quickly to deliver much-needed housing in Wollongong's city centre," Elias said.

"Keira Place will provide a diverse mix of homes close to jobs, transport and services, while setting a high benchmark for quality, durability and consumer protection."

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/groundbreaking-marks-start-of-construction-at-keira-place-in-wollongong-cbd">Groundbreaking marks start of construction at Keira Place in Wollongong CBD</a>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Urban Property Group unveils trio of towers for next stage of new Wollongong precinct, Keira Place

Bill Evans

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The new governor of the Reserve Bank Philip Lowe has used the minutes to the December board meeting to clearly lay out his delicate policy challenge over the next year.
We have been used to monetary policy being largely driven by changes in the inflation outlook or prospects for economic growth.
While these factors remain entirely relevant for the bank, the minutes note that the board members took time to assess the policy decisions made since the latest easing cycle began in late 2011.
The key issue for discussion was around the impact of lower interest rates on asset prices and borrowing decisions.
The definitive quote is: “Over recent years the board had sought to balance the benefits of lower interest rates in supporting growth and achieving the inflation target with the potential risks to household balance sheets. Members recognised that this balance would need to be kept under review.”
I think this observation, which figures so prominently in the minutes, is signalling that the hurdle to even lower rates which would be aimed at boosting demand is very high.
With housing markets in the south-east remaining vibrant the risks of further cutting rates appear to be quite concerning for the board.
That view has certainly been a key aspect of our view that the cash rate was likely to remain on  hold for an extended period following the (inflation-motivated) rate cut in August.
Observations around the economy were broadly in line with the governor’s statement on December 6.
At the time of the meeting the board was unaware that the Australian economy contracted by 0.5% in the September quarter.
However it was aware that growth in the September quarter was likely to be weak and certainly weaker than had been expected at the time of the November statement on monetary policy.
However, as we saw in the government’s mid-year economic and fiscal outlook which printed yesterday the official forecasts (not necessarily exactly held by the RBA) imply average quarterly growth rates of 0.8% in the December(2016), March ( 2017) and June (2017) quarters.
Hence the minutes still refer to “growth picking up to be above potential later in the forecast period”.
The views on the labour market are less confident than we saw in the last set of minutes – “there was still considerable uncertainty about the momentum in the labour market”.
Having noted this quote it is however interesting that the detailed discussion on the labour market seeks to align the fall in the unemployment rate with a similar hours-based measure, providing more credibility to that fall.
The commentary on the housing market remains upbeat while recognising that there was considerable variation across the country and between houses and apartments.
There is also some positive commentary around the consumer.
We now know that consumer spending in the September quarter was well below average but the minutes point out that since then retail sales have grown at an above average pace and liaison with retailers suggested that trading conditions had remained “steady”.
The minutes are also seeking to paint a better picture for non-mining investment than the downbeat capital expenditure survey that printed in late November – “Over the past few years the national accounts had tended to report stronger outcomes [than the capex survey]”.
The commentary around China remains unchanged with activity being supported by accommodative policy although longer term risks associated with rising debt remain elevated.
The minutes had no real insights into the outlook for the US or markets. Uncertainty around Mr Trump’s policy agenda remains the challenge.
With the negative GDP print for September not being known at the time of the meeting this was always going to be a difficult set of minutes to write.
In the event the board has chosen to highlight in the minutes aspects of the discussion that provide a reasonably upbeat assessment of the economy: growth is expected to bounce back; spare capacity in the labour market, while ongoing, appears to have been reduced; the housing market has strengthened; consumer spending and non- mining investment prospects have improved.
However of most significance is the policy commentary that, I believe, implies a fairly clear signal that monetary policy is now representing asymmetric forward risks with the benefits to spending from the lower rates not compensating for instability in asset markets. Of most concern here are the elevated levels of household debt.
It has been Westpac’s view for some time that rates are likely to remain on hold through 2017 and 2018 and the discussion in these minutes gives no reason to qualify that view.
Bill Evans is the chief economist with Westpac.
</body></html>

bevans-rYk9SxEa4r

RBA won't risk financial stability with another rate cut in 2017: Bill Evans

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The economic growth forecasts have undergone a number of revisions to reflect two major surprises since May, namely: conditions across the broader economy are weaker than anticipated; and commodity prices have spiked temporarily. The economic growth forecasts are optimistic in our view. Real GDP growth of 2.0% for 2016/17, downgraded from 2.50%, requires a quick return to solid growth, averaging 0.8% per quarter for the rest of the year. In addition, the medium-term economic projections err on the optimistic side. From 2018/19 to 2022/23 real GDP growth is assumed to be 3.0% each year, a little faster than potential, judged to be 2.75%. The thinking is that spare capacity is gradually absorbed, closing the output gap by the end of 2022/23. The terms of trade are projected to remain flat at around its 2005 level from 2019/20. Nominal GDP growth is assumed to be 5.50% over the long-run (described in a Treasury working paper in 2014 but not specifically mentioned in MYEFO). <a href="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.36%20pm.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.36%20pm.jpg" alt=""> 1) The real GDP growth profile for the four years 2016/17 to 2019/20 is: 2.0% (downgraded by 0.50%); 2.75% (downgraded by 0.25%); 3.0% and 3.0%. The Australian economy began the 2016/17 financial year on a weak note, with output contracting by 0.5%, the sharpest quarterly decline since the GFC. 2) Nominal GDP growth profile is: 5.75% (upgraded by 1.50%); 3.75% (downgraded by 1.25%); 4.25% (downgraded by 0.75%); and 4.50% (downgraded by 0.50%). Notably, the size of the nominal economy is 1.0% smaller at the end of 2019/20 than assumed at budget time. Inflation and incomes are softer than anticipated reflecting the weaker conditions across the broader economy. 3) The terms of trade jumps a forecast 14% in 2016/17 (upgraded from 1.25%) on the spike in commodity prices, followed by a 3.75% decline in 2017/18 (downgraded from 0%) as commodity prices retreat to more sustainable levels. There is considerable uncertainty around the timing / speed of commodity price adjustments. The iron ore price is assumed to decline from its recent average of US$68 per tonne FOB through the March and June quarters of 2017 to reach $55 in September 2017. The budget assumed a year average price of $55. The coking coal price is assumed to be US$200 per tonne FOB in line with the December quarter contract price, before declining through the September and December quarters of 2017 to $120 in March 2018. The Budget year average price was $91. Thermal coal prices are assumed to remain at $62 per tonne FOB, up from $52 at budget time. 4) Labour market forecasts have been downgraded to reflect the soft start to the 2016/17 year. Employment growth has been lowered by 0.5% this year and 0.25% next year, while wages growth has been lowered by 0.25% this year and next. See table 2 below for details. <a href="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.47%20pm.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.47%20pm.jpg" alt=""> The 2016/17 budget deficit forecast is effectively unchanged from that in May, while the cumulative deficit for the four years to 2019/20 has deteriorated by $10.3 billion (with net savings of $2.5 billion partially offsetting $12.8 billion in slippage due to the weaker forecasts). The medium-term projections have the budget returning to surplus in 2020/21, as assumed in May, although the size of the surplus has been trimmed from 0.2% of GDP to 0.1% of GDP. Policy decisions had little net impact on the budget position, with a net saving of $2.5 billion, back-loaded over the two out years. Revisions to the economic growth forecasts (including parameter variations more generally) cost the budget $12.8 billion over the four years, including a saving of $0.5 billion in the current year. Receipts are $30.5 billion lower than at Budget time over the four years, partially offset by a $16.5 billion undershoot on payments. Critically, as noted above, the size of the nominal economy at end 2019/20 is 1.0% smaller than assumed at Budget time. Of the $30.5 billion hit to receipts over the four years, key impacts include: individual income tax collections, down $18.3 billion due to weaker wage and employment outlook; company tax down $5.9 billion with weaker non-mining corporate profits only partially offset by higher mining profits from stronger commodity prices over 2016/17; and lower GST collections, down $5.3 billion.
On the payment side, weaker wages growth and lower inflation help to contain expenditure growth. <a href="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.58%20pm.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/12/19/Screen%20Shot%202016-12-19%20at%204.40.58%20pm.jpg" alt="">
Bill Evans is chief economist with Westpac.
Andrew Hanlan is senior economist with Westpac.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Surplus by 2020/21 on track, but at an estimated 0.1% GDP: Bill Evans and Andrew Hanlan

<html><body>
On August 22, I wrote a note in which I concluded:
<ol>
<li>Record low interest rates have not been effective in stimulating investment to close the savings/investment imbalance. A change in policy from governments on infrastructure and structural reform is urgently required. 
</li>
<li>Central banks are exacerbating the imbalance with (quantitative easing (QE) policies. With these policies now generating negative yields and pressuring the banking system while sending confusing signals on risk free rates there is an urgent need for these policies to be reviewed and abandoned.} 
</li>
<li>When these QE policies are finally abandoned, as they surely must be, there will be a huge re-pricing of risk free assets with rates heading in the direction of nominal GDP growth, although the pace of this adjustment will still depend on the other progress which governments have made in closing the savings/ investment imbalance.</li>
</ol>
At that time the US 10 year bond rate was 1.54% while the Australian 10 year bond rate was 1.9%. Today these rates stand at 2.35% and 2.75% respectively.
I nominated nominal GDP growth in the US at around 4% (2% real growth and 2% inflation).
The US bond rate has risen about a third of the way towards what I would call that “equilibrium” despite no clear progress on lifting investment although, of course, markets are pre-emptive.
In the period 1992-2002 when we had more of an alignment between savings and investment, and bond rates were broadly in line with nominal GDP growth, we saw that investment in the US was growing at around 8% compared to the average growth rate in recent years of around zero.
The recent rise in bond rates can be considered in two periods – before and after the Presidential election.
The US bond rate started to rise from around late September from 1.55% to reach 1.85% on the eve of the US presidential election.
A key catalyst for that move was a change in tone from both the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the European Central Bank (ECB). In the case of Japan policy was adjusted to target a level of the 10 year Japanese Government Bond (0%) rather than continuing to expand the balance sheet.
In the case of the ECB, prospects of further increasing the €80 billion of monthly asset purchases took a downturn and while there is no signal from the Board that tapering is imminent the debate around the effectiveness of QE and negative interest rates has been vigorous both in the market and amongst the officials.
Finally, I expect that markets believed that whoever was elected to the presidency we would see a measure of fiscal stimulus.
Since the election of Mr Trump, the US 10 year Treasury bond rate has risen from 1.85% to 2.35% - the total increase in bond rates, from the lows (80 basis points), represents about a third of the move towards my “equilibrium” target of 4% (250 basis points). As we expect with markets, this adjustment has occurred purely through a change in expectations. I would not expect this to progress much further until we see concrete evidence around progress on infrastructure and reform.
So what else in my “wish list” apart from a significant change in ECB and BOJ approaches has occurred?
The second part of the “wish list” was “change in policy from governments on infrastructure and structural reform”.
Do Mr Trump’s policies provide some comfort in that direction?
Recall that the first policy he referred to in his acceptance speech was to “rebuild” America. Given my emphasis on the need for aggressive infrastructure investment to lightening rod the US economy out of secular stagnation, I was impressed.
Until I looked into the details of his infrastructure policy. The current policy is to invest US$1 trillion (around 5% of GDP) in public infrastructure, over 10 years, with 85% to be financed from the private sector. Unless his team is aware of a massive list of public assets that could be privatised with the funds being used to finance the road/bridge/inner city spend, this policy is likely to fail due to a lack of support from the private sector.
My view is that he needs to redirect a large amount of the tax package towards direct infrastructure investment. The current tax package, which includes reducing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 15%, is estimated to cost (according to the <a href="https://crfb.org/donald-trump" target="_blank">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</a>) around US$5-6 trillion over 10 years. The corporate component is around 75% of the total package cost with the remainder representing the cost of lowering personal tax rates. But the <a href="https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/analysis-donald-trumps-tax-plan/full" target="_blank">Tax Policy Centre estimates</a> that 47% of the benefits of the personal cuts will go to the top 1% of income earners.
The starting point for the total government debt position also threatens the tax package. When Reagan adopted his “supply side” economic policies, government debt stood at 24% of GDP compared to 78% today. The tax package could lift debt to around 110% of GDP over the next 10 years.
So my view on policy as it stands is that a much larger and realistic infrastructure package needs to be embraced at the expense of a significantly more modest tax package.
What about reform?
Reform is required to convince businesses that growth is in prospect and therefore investment should be lifted.
US firms pay US taxes on income generated anywhere in the world while allowing the firms to defer tax on these earnings by keeping the money offshore. Trump has considered offering companies a window tax “holiday” to repatriate some of the $2 trillion held outside the US. Such reform would 'spark' new investment if firms anticipated stronger growth in the US. An angle might be to 'link' the tax savings to the proposed private funding of infrastructure.
Currently there is some market belief in his claim to “clean up regulation”, with the unwinding of Dodd-Frank (a complex banking regulation) being the most comprehensive. Policies to unwind excessive regulation and some early successes in that regard will be just as crucial as a much more aggressive infrastructure policy to lift confidence in growth prospects.
The moderated approach to QE and negative interest rates by the ECB and BOJ started the move away from unrealistically low rates.
The emphasis in the Trump rhetoric on infrastructure and reform has been a very welcome development. However, at this stage, Trump’s policies do not signal a clear commitment to infrastructure and there does not appear to be a list of “achievable” reform initiatives.
Markets and firms will need to see clear evidence of Trump’s ability to implement ambitious policies before I could declare that we are on a steady path towards equilibrium and 4% bond rates.
Bill Evans is chief economist at Westpac.
</body></html>

Bill Evans

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Bill Evans

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News