Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

Joel Robinson

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

IN BRIEF

<ul>
	<li>
	Just three double-storey Sky Homes sit at the top of The Waterline, each with its own private marina berth and rooftop terrace.
	</li>
	<li>
	Construction on The Waterline is complete, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.
	</li>
	<li>
	Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and are priced from $3.65 million.
	</li>
</ul>

<hr />
Lewis Land has opened the first completed sky home for inspection at Harbour Shores, giving buyers their first opportunity to step inside one of just three double-storey residences crowning The Waterline.

Each sky home comes with its own private marina berth, rooftop terrace and Broadwater views, combining the scale of a larger home with direct access to the boating lifestyle that underpins the wider <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/harbour-shores-biggera-waters-564-oxley-drive-biggera-waters-qld-4216">Harbour Shores</a> masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366708]

Lewis Land Head of Development Michael Long said the inclusion of a berth with every Sky Home had become increasingly valuable as marina access across the Gold Coast tightened.

“Marina berths are becoming increasingly difficult to secure across the Gold Coast, so including one with every Sky Home makes this a genuinely rare offering,” Long said.

“The private 70-berth marina will accommodate boats up to 12 metres in length and is positioned just 2.5 kilometres from the Broadwater, placing the open ocean only 15 minutes away.

“Being able to step out of your home onto your boat is a rare luxury, and it’s something residents here can look forward to when it opens later this year.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366709]

The display opening comes as construction completes on The Waterline, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.

The three Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and each feature three bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive kitchens with butler's pantries and large balconies taking in the Broadwater outlook.

Each residence also has three secure basement car spaces and additional storage.

“This is the first opportunity the Gold Coast has had to step into Harbour Shores and see, touch and feel what we’re bringing to life here,” Long said.

“There are only three Sky Homes within The Waterline, ranging in size from 282sqm to 367sqm, with each residence featuring three large bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive custom-built kitchens with butler’s pantry, and large balconies capturing Broadwater views.”

<img alt="Harbour Shores" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bab65e10-4fab-45e1-92d8-fc56e2ab98ff" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-25%20at%202.00.16%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=XT8q76LsPkw3cYTsvN3JfFDaPLud90PN" />

Residents of The Waterline will have access to a private pool, along with Harbour Shores' wider collection of amenity including a lagoon pool, social clubhouse, tennis court, gym, yoga facilities and sauna.

Lewis Land partnered with Studio Collective to furnish the completed display, with the interiors designed to demonstrate how the residences could function as permanent homes rather than simply as show apartments.

Studio Collective Director Melissa Park said the surrounding waterways informed the interiors, but in a more restrained way than a traditional coastal scheme.

“We drew inspiration from the canals and coastal surrounds, but our approach was to interpret that subtly through layered materials and a grounded palette of earthy tones, rather than literal coastal references,” Park said.

“We introduced hero moments of green and teal to reference the surrounding waterways, while mirrored elements help reflect natural light.

“The result is a residence that feels elevated yet comfortable, somewhere buyers can genuinely imagine themselves living, entertaining and unwinding.”

Sky Homes are priced from $3.65 million.

Lewis Land is also offering private marina berths with The Residences, its limited collection of three and four-bedroom villas positioned directly along the Harbour Shores waterfront boardwalk.

Three-bedroom villas are priced from $2.99 million, while four-bedroom residences start from $3.19 million.

Harbour Shores is being marketed by Colliers International.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113271]

Lewis Land opens sky home display as The Waterline completes at Harbour Shores

St Vincent de Paul Society Housing Australia has filed plans for a major mixed-use housing precinct on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, adding another significant proposal to a pocket around North Sydn​ey Station that is quickly becoming one of the LGA's busiest development zones.

The State Significant Development Application covers a 5,990 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1-19-mackenzie-street-lavender-bay-nsw-2060">1-19 MacKenzie Street and 211 Blues Point Road in Lavender Bay</a>, immediately south of Nor​th Sydney Station and between the commercial core and the lower-rise Lavender Bay Heritage Conservation Area.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal would deliver a new residential tower comprising 88 build-to-sell apartments and 19 affordable apartments, alongside a separate co-living building with 57 rooms and a building manager's studio.

It would also see the significant restoration and upgrade of St Francis Xavier Catholic Church, the adaptive reuse of the former school building, new parish facilities, retail, a new public square and around 1,000 sqm of publicly accessible open space.

<img alt="Vinnies North Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d5dd7f87-a617-463e-b577-17541e01f0e9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.13%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4R8TsFN3P_LrrXO2HswTOIrx2blil8lh" />

The project is seeking a concurrent rezoning of the site to R4 High Density Residential and an increase in the maximum building height to allow a tower reaching RL120, or up to 20 storeys. The proposal was progressed through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The build-to-sell component will be weighted toward larger apartments, with just six one-bedroom apartments compared with 31 two-beds, 43 three-beds and eight four-bedroom residences.

The 19 affordable apartments will comprise two studios, 15 one-bedroom apartments and two two-bedroom apartments, taking the total apartment component to 107 residences before the 58 co-living rooms are included.

<img alt="Vnnies" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d568ca5-cb90-4e18-96c6-d9795dba0c56" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GY2R5M9VtQh0EKy1vajaea19PSLOPuRD" />

Wardle's design for the Vinnies site has sought to negotiate that emerging high-rise context while retaining the lower-scale character of MacKenzie Street and the adjoining heritage conservation area.

The main building adopts a three-storey podium and tower arrangement, with the podium aligned to the ridgeline and front setback of St Francis Xavier Church.&nbsp;Wardle has designed the podium with colonnades, seating, recessed entries and active ground-floor frontages, with sandstone-toned precast concrete and face brick referencing the materiality of the existing church.

The tower then steps back eight metres to the south and six metres to the north before rising in a sculpted form comprising four interlocking quadrants. Wardle has also introduced rounded forms and chamfered corners to reduce the tower's perceived bulk and improve view sharing with neighbouring development sites.

Resident facilities and outdoor areas are planned at the separation between the podium and tower at Level 3, oriented toward Sydney Harbour and the CBD skyline.

The tower itself will feature a glass reinforced concrete facade, with recessed balconies and deep reveals used both to provide shading and privacy and frame views toward the harbour and city. The lower levels take a different architectural approach, using brick and sandstone-toned finishes intended to establish a stronger relationship with St Francis Xavier Church. The Church itself will be conserved and upgraded for its continued use, while the former school building will be adaptively reused as part of the co-living component.

<img alt="Lavendar Bay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2d4418ad-90aa-4d49-af93-c80b140aea80" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.09.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Kv4gzbsACaGvZSRuaqcfGC54jEJRXIDJ" />

&nbsp;

The proposal adds to an increasingly concentrated pipeline of residential development around Blue Street, MacKenzie Street and Lavender Bay.

Just west of the site, Central Element lodged plans earlier this year for one of the most significant residential developments proposed in Lavender Bay in recent years.

Central Element's SJB-designed scheme at 64-66 Lavender Street and 3-7 Middlemiss Street would deliver 163 apartments across two towers rising 23 and 32 storeys, replacing five existing apartment buildings containing 32 homes. The project also forms part of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-central-element-reveals-lavender-bay-apartment-plans?utm_source=chatgpt.com" rel="noopener" target="_blank">First look: Central Element reveals Lavender Bay apartment plans</a>

Immediately around North Sy​dney Station, another two significant proposals have emerged at 5 and 15 Blue Street.

Zurich Australian Insurance Properties is seeking to adaptively reuse its longstanding commercial building at 5 Blue Street, directly above North Sydney Station, rather than demolishing the structure.

Its SSDA proposes converting the building into a 14-storey mixed-use development with 62 apartments and 86 co-living rooms, together with ground-floor retail and a major refurbishment of Blue Street Plaza. The application is currently at the Response to Submissions stage.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-zurich-targets-north-sydney-office-conversion-with-148-unit-proposal-above-metro-station">First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Vinnies files for 20-storey Lavender Bay apartment tower as North Sydney housing pocket heats up

When the opportunity arose for South Australian developer Palumbo to return to Kent Town, where it had previously delivered East Park Apartments and the East 
Rundle Apartments, it wasn't one the longstanding developer-builder was going to pass up.

The decision was quickly vindicated, with more than 30 apartments sold within the first month of launching <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/royal-apartments-kent-town-2-8-north-terrace-kent-town-sa-5067">Royal Apartments</a> to the market.

The 206-apartment development, which will bring significant new supply to Adelaide's tightly held eastern city fringe, also gives <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/palumbo">Palumbo</a> the opportunity to bring new life to one of Kent Town's most recognisable watering holes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376073]

Royal Apartments incorporates the historic Royal Hotel, a venue Palumbo Managing Director Daniel Palumbo said has a longstanding connection with the local community.

"Everyone in the area has history with the Royal Hotel," Palumbo told Apartments.com.au.

"It was quite an active pub and social gathering place for locals. We want to bring it back to its former glory."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376072]

The wider development will comprise two residential towers alongside the restored hotel, sitting on North Terrace opposite the Adelaide Park Lands.

For Palumbo, the project also marks a return to familiar territory.

The developer completed East Park Apartments next door more than a decade ago and jumped at the opportunity to develop in Kent Town again when the Royal Hotel site became available.

"The opportunity emerged, and we moved to secure the site," Palumbo said.

"We were approached by the previous landowner, who said they had extensive commitments in Sydney and weren't in a position to deliver the project.

"We took over the site and within six months recut the design scheme to be more in keeping with the type of development we want to bring to Adelaide.

"Now we're on the market and those changes have really resonated with local buyers."

That has translated into a strong start to sales, with 33 apartments transacting in the project's first 35 days.

Palumbo said the early purchaser profile had been consistent with the group's traditional focus on owner-occupiers rather than investor-led apartment stock.

"Local owner-occupiers have always been our market," he said.

"There are always some investors, but we've never developed what would be called traditional development stock. Owner-occupiers are very much our market."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376068]

The buyer mix has been diverse so far, with downsizers and younger professionals both accounting for a significant portion of early sales.

South Australia's current stamp duty settings, which allow&nbsp;eligible homeowners in South Australia aged 60 savings of up to $103,830 on stamp duty when they downsize to a new property valued at up to $2 million,&nbsp;have helped encourage downsizer activity, while younger buyers in their late 20s and early 30s have been attracted to the opportunity to live immediately outside the CBD while still being able to walk into the city.



Location has been a major part of the proposition for both buyer cohorts.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376075]

Royal Apartments sits on North Terrace directly opposite the Adelaide Park Lands, with residents able to walk through the parklands toward the East End, Rundle Street and Rundle Mall.

Apartments have been positioned to capture views across the parklands, Adelaide skyline, Botanic Gardens and Adelaide Hills.

Palumbo believes the scarcity of developable land along this section of the Park Lands makes the site particularly difficult to replicate.

"There's very few allotments on that side that can be developed," he said.

"If this location was in New York and you were sitting on Central Park, you'd be talking about a $60 million apartments."

Royal Apartments will offer a broad mix of residences, ranging from one-bedroom apartments through to four-bedroom sub-penthouses and penthouses.

Current listings include one-bedroom apartments from $680,000, while larger three and four-bedroom residences are priced around $2.5 million.

Residents will have access to a swimming pool, gym, barbecue and recreation areas, residents' lounge and dining space, and a communal deck.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376067]

The apartments will feature generous balconies, while secure parking, bicycle storage and storage cages will also be provided.

A porte-cochère-style arrival and drop-off area has also resonated with buyers, particularly those attracted to being able to walk into the CBD during the day while retaining secure vehicle access at home.

Palumbo is acting as developer, architect and builder on Royal Apartments, continuing the vertically integrated model it has used across its South Australian portfolio.

The group was also behind the $150 million Sofitel Adelaide, the 251-room five-star hotel and residential tower which opened in 2021.

Palumbo said Royal's launch had come at an interesting time for the broader Adelaide apartment market.

Buyer confidence had initially been impacted by uncertainty surrounding the Federal Budget and broader economic conditions, but Palumbo believes sentiment is beginning to improve against a backdrop of significant investment flowing into South Australia.

He pointed to increased activity across defence and resources, including Olympic Dam, as potential long-term drivers of the state's economy and housing market.

"Money is starting to flow into Adeliade, significant amounts as Adelaide bucks the trend of the rest of the country.," Palumbo said.

"There's a lot of activity in the economy over the next decade. I think more investment will come into this market."

Early works on Royal Apartments are expected to commence this year, with major construction activity and cranes anticipated on site from early next year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6109]

Palumbo's return to Kent Town strikes early chord with buyers

Go-to builder-developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/graya">GRAYA</a> is continuing to bulk out its already impressive and diverse apartment portfolio across South East Queensland. Their latest milestone is securing development approval for Silk, its boutique riverfront apartment development in St Lucia.

The approval clears&nbsp;the way for the team to begin construction planning for the 22-residence project.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/silk-st-lucia-16-18-sandford-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">Silk</a> will rise 15 levels from an 810 sqm site at 16-18 Sandford Street, occupying a prominent bend of the Brisbane River with a prized northern aspect across Orleigh Park toward the Brisbane CBD.

The approved scheme will comprise 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences, continuing GRAYA's move into larger-format apartment developments targeting Brisbane's prestige owner-occupier market.

The project has been designed around the site's broad river frontage and dual-direction views, with GRAYA prioritising larger residences, privacy and outlook over apartment yield.

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa5c2349-f96c-4914-a812-1f2cd6827af8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.44%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=WY0vEU_7vYjeRJKQHiCwFdMxu8PvFh52" />

GRAYA Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Rob Gray said the project had been shaped around local homeowners wanting to remain in St Lucia without maintaining a traditional family home.

"St Lucia is one of those suburbs people do not want to leave," Gray said.

"They know the river, the trees, UQ, the golf course, Toowong and Indooroopilly, and that familiarity is hard to replace.

"True riverfront opportunities here are exceptionally scarce. What we have designed at Silk is a way to stay in the suburb people love, with the scale and privacy of a private home and far less to maintain.

"This is not typical apartment product. It is a proper home on the river, and that is exactly what this market has been missing."

The approval comes as new apartment development continues to increase across the St Lucia and neighbouring Toowong corridor, although direct riverfront sites remain considerably more tightly held.

GRAYA Co-founder and Managing Director Andrew Gray said securing the approval had removed a significant element of development risk from Silk.

"Genuine riverfront sites of this quality in St Lucia are not something that comes up regularly," Gray said.

"The approval removes a substantial layer of execution risk, and the location underwrites demand in a way very few inner-city sites can.

"The fundamentals here are as strong as anything we have assessed in Brisbane."

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d0f3d734-65e1-48e8-8ed3-2e0715ffcdd9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sOLSs_jdHkXLWbBKzRyayf5BfTb2vPsD" />

Silk will see GRAYA return to a stretch of the Brisbane River where it already has recent construction experience. The vertically integrated group recently completed ARC in neighbouring Toowong as builder for developer Spyre, delivering the riverfront project on a constrained site.

GRAYA will take a different role at Silk, controlling the project from design and development through construction and aftercare under its vertically integrated model.

The development will include a gym and resident leisure areas at ground level, integrated with the river's edge.

Silk joins a growing pipeline for GRAYA across Brisbane and the Gold Coast, which includes Enclave, The Gallery, Coral and Ripple.

The developer-builder has also recently lodged plans for its largest project to date, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-silo-19-chester-street-newstead-qld-4006">The Silo</a>, a proposed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/graya-buys-frasers-newstead-site-plans-the-silo-between-james-street-and-gasworks-precincts">$700 million mixed-use development</a> in Brisbane's James Street precinct.

Silk is expected to predominantly target local owner-occupiers and prestige buyers seeking a permanent riverfront home in Brisbane's inner west.

Registrations of interest are now open, with further details on the project and construction program to be released as it progresses.

<hr />
<h2>SILK PROJECT FACTS</h2>

Developer-builder: GRAYA

Project: Silk

Location: 16-18 Sandford Street, St Lucia

Apartments: 22

Built form: 15 levels

Site: 810 sqm riverfront holding

Mix: 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences

Status: Development approved

Next step: Construction planning underway

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152168]

GRAYA greenlit for riverfront St Lucia apartment development, Silk

<html><body>
The Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey has shrugged off the Reserve Bank call for a review of the negative gearing-capital gains tax regime.
"More policemen negatively gear than specialised tax accountants, management consultants or university lecturers," Mr Hockey told 2UE radio.
"This is a way for people on medium incomes, or even lower incomes, to be able to get into the property market in a way that they may not be able to."
The bank joined the debate over how negative gearing and the 50% capital gains tax discount are making housing less affordable.
"The bank believes there is a case for reviewing negative gearing but not in isolation," the RBA said in its submission to a House of Representative's parliamentary inquiry into home ownership.
Limiting negative gearing to new houses or a certain number of investment properties are among the changes Labor is reportedly considering.
The treasurers comments stem from analysis showng the vast majority of property investors taking advantage of negative gearing are “mum and dads” earning less than $80,000 a year, countering the long-held view that the property investment measure was a tax lurk for the rich.
Australian Taxation Office data shows that of the 1.266 million Australians who declared that the rental on their investment properties didn’t meet the interest repayment in 2011-12, 883,325 earned less than $80,000.
More than 70 per cent of people who accessed negative-gearing benefits only owned one investment property. 
About 60,000 clerical staff earning less than $80,000 benefited from negative gearing, as did 54,000 teachers, 46,000 sales staff and 35,590 nurses and midwives, the data showed as reported by The Australian. 
Nick Proud, the executive ­director of the Residential Development Council, which provided the statistics suggested investors incentivised by negative gearing would reduce the future reliance on the pension.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Policemen negatively gear property: Treasurer Joe Hockey

<html><body>
The Reserve Bank of Australia has called on the federal government to review the capital gains tax break for investment property suggesting it was directing too much money into residential housing.
The call came in its submission to the federal parliament's latest home ownership inquiry.
While the Reserve Bank acknowledged in its housing inquiry submission that negative gearing can assist in keeping rents down, it noted how it worked with other tax rules "may have the effect of encouraging leveraged investment in property."
"The bank believes there is a case for reviewing negative gearing, but not in isolation," the bank said.
"It's interaction with other aspects of the tax system should be taken into account."
The RBA's suggestions follows David Murray, head of the Abbott government's financial system inquiry, seeking a review of capital gains tax and negative gearing.
The head of the government's audit commission, businessman Tony Shepherd also recently recommended lifting the capital gains tax rate to a person's own income tax rate.
"I can't see any reason to treat capital gains any different from income gains," he said last month.
"And I think it does in fact probably lead to a greater emphasis in some respects on negative gearing." 
The RBA noted the proportion of the housing stock owned by investors looks to have risen over recent decades, offsetting the decline in the prevalence of public housing.
" The investor share is also likely to have risen a little further over the past few years, as investors have accounted for an increasing share of property purchases since 2012. 
"Data on the proportion of residential property transactions that involve investors as purchasers or sellers are not readily available, but loan approvals data give some guide as to the prevalence of investors as purchasers. 
"Investors’ share of loan approvals has risen from a little over 30 per cent in 2011 to almost 40 per cent recently, with the increase most pronounced in New South Wales. 
"As noted in 2014, prudent limits on loan sizes are less binding for property investors that have significant equity to deploy than for some other purchasers. 
"Typically the interest rate used to calculate allowable loan sizes does not fall as much as actual interest rates, or only up to a point; this practice has been strengthened recently in light of recent guidance issued by APRA (2014). 
"This means the marginal borrower has less scope to increase their loan size as interest rates fall. This practice is in the long-term interest of borrowers, as it helps ensure they can still service the loan once interest rates rise again. 
"However, it does mean that borrowers for whom these constraints are not binding appear to have a relative advantage during periods of low interest rates, since they can increase their loan size and make larger offers for specific properties. 
"In the Australian environment, the most constrained borrower is usually a first home buyer and the less constrained borrowers are investors or trade-up buyers with considerable equity. 
"As such, this might help to explain the low share of first home buyers in recent new lending for housing. 
"Reductions in state government incentives for first home buyers (of established housing) could also have contributed to this outcome. 
"It also implies that the increase in investor demand is likely to have contributed to the recent strong growth in housing prices, particularly in Sydney," the bank noted.
The submission can be downloaded <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/submissions/inquiry-into-home-ownership/index" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

RBA joins call for negative gearing - capital gains tax review

<html><body>
New research conducted by Newgate Research shows Australians dislike stamp duty when asked to rank taxes in terms of fairness.
Stamp duty comes last, closely followed by land tax. 
Over two-thirds of Australians support the idea of abolishing stamp duty completely, with over half saying it made it harder for them to afford a home. 
Some 65% of respondents also rated the GST fair or very fair, with 72% believing the GST will probably or definitely be increased over the next decade.
State governments could boost the efficiency of the economy by $9 billion a year if they adopted a wider tax on all property while phasing out stamp duty, a new policy paper suggests.
Property Taxes, the second working paper in Grattan’s Budget Repair series, finds that a levy of just $2 for every $1000 of unimproved land value would raise $7 billion a year with an annual charge of $772 on the median-priced Sydney home, $560 on the median-priced Melbourne home, and lower average rates in other cities and the regions.
The Grattan Institute has suggested a tax levied on the value of property holdings would be a fairer way of funding the burden of health and education services that are rising faster than gross domestic product.
Property taxes – which Grattan institute director John Daley concedes are politically difficult to impose – are positive economically because they don't distort incentives to work, save or invest.
"Unlike capital, property is immobile – it cannot shift offshore to avoid higher taxes," the report said. 
<a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/property-taxes/" target="_blank">The Grattan Institute</a> estimates that an annual levy of $2 for every $1000 of unimproved land value – or $1 for every $1000 of capital improved property value – would raise around $7 billion a year.
A homeowner living in a median-priced Sydney home of $772,000 would pay a levy of $772 a year. Their Melbourne equivalent would pay $560 and those on low incomes with no wealth would pay nothing, while low-income retirees with valuable houses could defer paying until their homes are sold, John Daley argues.
Mr Daley says that even higher property taxes could be used to pay for a reduction and eventual scrapping of stamp duties, which he described as among the most inefficient and unfair taxes still available to states, as well as being linked to property market volatility.
"Shifting from stamp duty to a broad-based property tax would provide a more stable tax base for states, spread the tax burden more fairly, and add up to $9 billion annually to GDP," Mr Daley said.
{mijopolls 121}
</body></html>

Scrap stamp duty for property tax for everyone: Grattan Institute

<html><body>
 
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/NBtax_PO_SponsoredLogoLink-01.jpg" alt="">
SPONSORED POST
Napier &amp; Blakeley this month are proud to launch NBtax, a breakthrough online property tax depreciation service to help property investors maximise their returns.  
Louise Hegarty talks with Chris Page, Napier &amp; Blakeley’s National Manager of New Projects about the revolutionary product that just had to happen.
“Over 70% of property owners under-claim their property tax depreciation allowances and many don't even claim them at all,” says Chris.
“It's a property investor's secret weapon for better cash flow yet sadly is widely misunderstood.  So we've created a simple solution that will help maximise a property investor’s return while making the whole process easier.”
Called NBtax, the online request service uses current technology to access Napier &amp; Blakeley's specialist property tax depreciation Quantity Surveyors.
“NBtax means investment property owners can start the process quickly and easily without the need to spend too much time going to and fro.
"Once you submit the required information, our expert teams get on with tailoring your property tax depreciation schedule, setting you up for the depreciable life of your investment.”
“We, Napier &amp; Blakeley, were the first in Australia to provide specialist property tax depreciation advice in the mid 80’s, and thirty years later we’re still the market leaders.
"A professional property tax depreciation schedule can boost your cash flow potentially by tens of thousands of dollars over the life of your investment.”
Yet many property owners stumble here, says Chris.
“A simple lack of knowledge and the specialist nature of depreciation means investors under-claim and at times even avoid the process often missing out on thousands. A poorly calculated property tax depreciation schedule is mostly likely costing you money right now!”
And no property is too old or small to benefit, Chris adds.
“Commercial, residential or industrial, brand new, renovated or just old, every investment property has the potential to further increase your cash-flow.
There's money sitting there waiting to be claimed. It's just a matter of taking the first step in the right direction, and that's where NBtax comes in.”
We all know that reducing our taxable income means one thing – more money in our pockets. It’s now easier and faster than ever before – with NBtax.
To find out more about NBtax, <a href="https://www.nbtax.com.au" target="_blank">click here</a>. 
</body></html>

NBtax is here, just in time for FY2015 tax time: Napier & Blakeley

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
In a recent address to the Economic Society of Australia, the Reserve Bank Governor Glenn Stevens hit the nail on the head when he remarked that “monetary policy alone can’t deliver everything we need and expecting too much from it can lead, in time, to much bigger problems”.
What was particularly important in this address was the (implicit) suggestion that the answer goes hand in hand with another question; what should we expect from fiscal policy?
Though at first sight it might appear to be a rather tenuous link, a decent review of the taxation system and more generally of the revenue side of the fiscal equation, may be a big help in taking some of the burden off monetary policy from its current constraints.
Stevens is not alone in suggesting that too much might be being expected of central bankers in promoting growth and reducing unemployment. Similar sentiments have come from former Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke.
It is useful to distinguish two aspects to the question of whether we expect too much of monetary policy. The first is whether we can expect it to work when the economy is on the downswing in the same degree as when it is on the upswing. In particular, can we expect an easing of monetary policy to stimulate growth as effectively as a tightening of monetary policy can choke it off.
Central banks for the most part have a brief of keeping inflation <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/inflation/inflation-target" target="_blank">within a certain range</a> and, with that done, to assist in keeping the economy’s growth rate near to trend; in the best of worlds, consistent with full employment.
Expectations about what more accommodating monetary policy can do for a sluggish economy have at times had to take a reality check here and in other parts of the world. Bringing interest rates down and making the assets side of bank balance sheets more liquid via “quantitative easing” can stimulate the real economy only to the extent that the binding constraint on spending by consumers and business is a financial one.
But in an environment where producers expect sluggish or even falling domestic or export demand, one would also expect to see sluggish investment demand, regardless of interest rates or the willingness of banks to lend. In other words, slow growth in demand may well mean expected rates of return from investment in new plant are revised down as much as interest rates.
As Stevens noted in his address, lower interest rates may not help consumption expenditure much either in present circumstances, since household sector’s debt burden means that it “has the least scope [compared with government and corporations] to expand their balance sheets to drive spending”.
And, as plenty of commentators have noted, injections of liquidity and easing credit conditions may be channelled into financial assets which don’t have significant stimulatory effects on the real side of the economy, which is where we need it for growth and reduced unemployment.
Some have even argued that a lengthy period of easy monetary policy has adverse distributional effects benefiting owners of stock and property. However the precise distributional effects of seem rather complex and less than clear cut, and will depend in part on whether or not accommodatory monetary policy stimulates the economy and hence employment growth.
The second and perhaps broader aspect related to expectations about what monetary policy can and should do is that it is often asked to effectively make use of a limited toolbox to deal with conflicting objectives. One could be forgiven for thinking that in this country we have only one macro policy instrument - interest rates – to both control inflation and manipulate growth in economic activity.
The obvious elephant in the room here is fiscal policy.
In his address Stevens actually raises an old and interesting idea about fiscal policy: that it can have a stimulatory role perfectly consistent with “sound financing” (to borrow a perverted phrase with which Keynes’ was forced to do battle); where stimulatory expenditure and any increased debt are on the capital or investment side of the budget.
Such fiscal stimulus may even have what some economists refer to as a “crowding-in” effect: a positive impact on expectations about growth, as Stevens notes. This idea also provides a bulwark against the nonsense about fiscal contraction or consolidation (as it’s euphemistically called) being necessary to stimulate the economy.
The caution here from the Governor is also sound it seems; that capital expenditure is not overnight, so the confidence boost is probably more important for the short-term than the actual direct impact on government expenditure.
In any case, if fiscal policy in general and government expenditure in particular is to come back into its own as a macro policy instrument, reform of the revenue base and thus the tax system is paramount.
But note here, a significant driver of tax reform should be the sustainable funding of an expenditure side which fulfils its macro economic role as a generator of demand growth and its social role in generating infrastructure.
Tax reform should not be seen exclusively as code for a lower taxes, this being an end, the means to which to point of is government withdrawing from its expenditure responsibilities. Unfortunately, this latter view seems to dominate much discussion in this country.
From a macro policy standpoint, looking at tax or more appropriately at the revenue side of the fiscal equation may well have a positive spin-off for monetary policy, leaving it to focus, if that is the continued wish of the political masters, on inflation.
And if one is worried about complex adverse distributional effects of monetary policy, expenditure on infrastructure, done properly, would surely help redress inequality by lifting the social wage.
Graham White is Associate Professor, School of Economics at University of Sydney. He can be contacted <a href="https://sydney.edu.au/arts/economics/staff/profiles/g.white.php" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

When monetary policy reaches its limits, what of fiscal policy?

<html><body>
NSW land tax revenues are forecast to rise at a faster rate than stamp duty revenues, according to the NSW state budget papers.
<div>There is an expected 5.7% annual average boost in land tax paid by NSW investors over the four year forward period, rising from $2.49 billion to $3.11 billion in 2018-19.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>No change in the tax rate, just reflecting growth in land values.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Home purchase stamp duty revenues are forecast to rise 4.2% over the period, from $7.29 billion this year to $8.6 billion in 2018-19..</div>
<div>In 2015-16 transfer duty is expected to increase by $551 million, up 7.6 compared to 2014-15, with residential duty tipped to be 11.8% higher.</div>
<div>Stamp duties remain a levels mostly introduced three decades ago.</div>
Duty is calculated on the total dutiable value of the property subject to the transaction.
<table style="height: 160px; width: 428px;">
<thead><tr valign="top">
<td>Value of the property subject to the transaction</td>
<td>Rate of duty</td>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>$0 - $14,000</td>
<td>$1.25 for every $100 or part of the value</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>$14,001 - $30,000</td>
<td>$175 plus $1.50 for every $100, that the value exceeds $14,000</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>$30,001 - $80,000</td>
<td>$415 plus $1.75 for every $100, that the value exceeds $30,000</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>$80,001 - $300,000</td>
<td>$1,290 plus $3.50 for every $100, that the value exceeds $80,000</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>$300,001 - $1m</td>
<td>$8,990 plus $4.50 for every $100, that the value exceeds $300,000</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>over $1m</td>
<td>$40,490 plus $5.50 for every $100, that the value exceeds $1,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
Premium Property Duty: over $3m</td>
<td>$150,490 plus $7.00 for every $100, that the value exceeds $3,000,000.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>  </div>
<div>Investors paid $2.49 billion in land tax during the current 2014-15 fiscal period, up from $2.33 billion in 2013-14. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The benchmark tax base is the average of the last three years unimproved land value of all land owned, on 31 December of the previous year, that is above the indexed threshold for that year (as defined in the Land Tax Management Act 1956), excluding land used for owner-occupied residences, or by the Commonwealth or NSW Governments.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The benchmark tax rate for the 2015 land tax year is $100 plus 1.6 per cent of the land value between the thresholds of $432,000 and $2,641,000, and 2 per cent thereafter.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The government's lesser known property tax, the inner city parking space levy revenue will rise 2.3% over the period, grossing $105 million this year.   </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The recent strength in the Sydney property boom was being especially driven by properties <a href="/expert-insights/less-revenue-growth-ahead-but-nsw-state-budget-benefits-from-7-29-billion-stamp-duty-bonanza">valued over $1.2 million, the NSW State Budget revealed</a>, but the housing boom longevity is not being assumed by the NSW Treasury.</div>
<div>
No change to NSW first home buyer grants in the state budget <a href="/expert-insights/no-nsw-state-budget-first-home-grant-changes-so-5000-january-2016-reduction-deadline-looms">could intensify activity before the grant's 1 January 2016 reduction</a>. 
</div>
</body></html>

NSW land tax revenue % increases to outdo stamp duty revenue growth

<html><body>
SPONSORED POST
Investing in rental property through a self-managed superannuation fund offers tax advantages which, for many people, will be even greater than the tax benefits of investing in property directly. 
The first advantage stems from the fact that money going into superannuation is taxed at a low rate. 
Most people receive 9.5% of their employment income as contributions to superannuation. In addition to these employer contributions, individuals can voluntarily add up to $30,000 in pre-tax wages to their super fund through a salary sacrifice arrangement.
These types of contributions are taxed within the super fund at 15%, rather than the marginal tax rate that applies to income taken outside of the fund.
Say your annual salary is $120,000 plus 9.5% superannuation, which comes out at $11,400. 
In the 2014-15 financial year, the marginal tax rate on an income of $120,000 is 39.5% including the Medicare levy. You will pay tax of $33,347 on your salary.
The $11,400 contributed to superannuation is taxed at 15%, so the fund pays $1710 in tax. 
The total bill for income tax plus tax the superannuation fund pays is $35,057. 
If you were to salary sacrifice $30,000 of your pay into superannuation, leaving you with $90,000 outside of the fund, you’d pay $21,497 in income tax and the superannuation fund would pay $4500 in tax on the $30,000 salary sacrifice contribution. Add that to the $1710 on the $11,400 compulsory contribution and the total tax bill is $27,707.
That’s a tax saving of $7350 a year, giving you more to invest.
Tax in the fund
Earnings and capital gains made inside a superannuation fund, like contributions, are taxed at 15% while the fund is in its accumulation phase, where members are adding to its balance. 
Capital gains are also taxed at a discounted rate if the property has been held for more than 12 months. While a 50% discount applies to capital gains made on directly-owned property, the CGT discount for property owned through an SMSF is lower, at one-third of the gain. However, the total tax bill may end up being less as the following example demonstrates.
If an SMSF sells a property it has held for five years and makes a $150,000 capital gain, it would have to pay tax on $100,000 of the gain. At the 15% SMSF tax rate, the CGT tax bill is $15,000. 
The same property held outside superannuation would qualify for a 50% discount on the capital gain, so tax would be payable on $75,000. If the owner earned more than $80,000 in the tax year, putting their marginal tax rate at 39.5%, tax on the gain would be $29,625. That’s $14,625 more than the fund had to pay. 
Where SMSFs have the biggest advantage over holding property in your own name is when the property is sold after retirement. 
Capital gains and other earnings are tax-free when the SMSF members have retired and are drawing a pension from the fund. 
If the SMSF member whose property made the $150,000 capital gain above had sold the property after they retired, the fund would have paid no tax on the gain. 
In contrast, a retiree who sells a property held in their own name making a $150,000 capital gain would still have to pay tax on the gain, even if they had no other income. In this case, after the CGT discount, the person’s taxable income for the year would be $75,000 and their tax bill would be $16,682. 
Expenses and deductions
SMSFs can claim the same deductions for property expenses and depreciation as individuals who invest in property in their own name.
Deductible expenses included charges such as agent fees, body corporate fees, council rates and maintenance costs. Draft legislation released in January confirmed that if the property was purchased with borrowed money, the SMSF can also claim interest costs as a tax deduction.
In general, assets valued at over $300 must be depreciated. The fund can also claim depreciation costs for the building itself if it was constructed after July 17, 1985.
To claim depreciation, the SMSF needs to obtain a depreciation schedule, usually prepared by an independent valuer. 
Expenses and depreciation costs are deducted against the income the property generates, reducing the tax liability. 
Property held inside an SMSF can be positively or negatively geared. If it is negatively geared, it’s important to make sure the fund has sufficient cash flow to service the debt without help from outside. This can come from other investment income within the fund, or through member contributions as long as they don’t exceed the maximum amounts.
</body></html>

Tax advantage in rental investment through SMSF: Forrester Cohen 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Australians know that adequate savings can help provide for a rainy day, help a family put down a deposit on a home, or ensure a comfortable retirement.
Debt also offers a way for households to make purchases that would otherwise be impossible and to achieve a higher current standard of living. Debt invested into an asset that will also grow in real value and is able to be serviced without placing too much ﬁnancial pressure on a household, is generally considered to be good debt.
The key is balance. Since the 2008 financial crisis, Australians have actually decreased their propensity to take on debt and have increased their savings. But debt rates still remain uncomfortably high and there is evidence that this savings discipline is beginning to fade. Have we grown too comfortable with debt?
<h2>Saving more, but more indebted</h2>
Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre’s second ‘Focus on the States’ report, <a href="https://business.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/BCEC_Beyond_Our_Means_Report.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond our Means? Household Savings a Debt in Australia</a> finds Australians have more debt and are more comfortable with it.
While household savings portfolios have seen an increase of 54% in real terms since 2005, household debt has risen by 51% in the same period. Many households are able to access and service this debt, with higher debts associated with higher incomes. On average, Australia’s estimated 9.1 million households have savings in the form of ﬁnancial assets of $340,900 and debts of $148,700.
However, there is a gulf between those at the top of the distribution and those at the bottom. The inequality in the distributions of household savings and debt are considerably worse than the much talked about inequality in incomes.
The average household disposable income of the top 20% of savers is less than four times those in the lowest savings quintile. However, their savings at an average of almost $1.3 million is 200 times the bottom 20%. This top quintile may receive one-third of all income, but they own three quarters of the total value of savings in the form of ﬁnancial assets.
 
<img src="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/85216/width668/image-20150616-5810-145cq3d.JPG" alt="">
Average household savings by savings quintile, Australia 2015 (mean $‘000)
The trifecta of debts, low (or no) savings and low incomes presents many low economic resource families with an unenviable challenge to maintain an acceptable quality of life for themselves and their families on a day-to-day basis.
Since the global financial crisis, the household savings rate have risen, with households exhibiting discipline in their expenditure at a time when the economic outlook was uncertain. In an economic downturn income can decline quickly while reining in spending can be more diﬃcult, for both households and governments. Debts can quickly get out of hand and become unmanageable in this situation.
<h2>Becoming used to debt</h2>
While Australian households have decreased their propensity to take on debt and have increased their savings in the post-GFC period, household debt still remains three times higher now than what it was 20 years ago. Australians are now more comfortable with debt and currently hold debt equal to 1.5 years of income, whereas in the past they had only debt equivalent to six months of annual income.
The share of debt associated with investment property loans has tripled from one-tenth to three-tenths between 1990 and 2015.
Unlike previous generations accustomed to more rigid ﬁnancial products, current households can access a greater number of ﬁnancial products, which have arguably become more complex and more ﬂexible.
This flexibility delivers beneﬁts, but with complexity comes risk and it is important to promote good ﬁnancial decisions and encourage a longer term outlook. <a href="https://theconversation.com/your-home-as-an-atm-home-equity-a-risky-welfare-tool-22000">Mortgage equity withdrawal has become a popular tool</a> to derive a higher current standard of living by using the family home as collateral.
More households now use these schemes to smooth consumption or relieve short-term ﬁnancial pressures. But this may have contributed to the average mortgage debt as a proportion of property values almost tripling over the last 25 years, rising from 10% to 28% since 1990.
 
<img src="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/85219/width668/image-20150616-5832-ijpxwv.JPG" alt="">Ratio of housing debt to housing assets, June 1990 to December 2014
 
Another issue is the use of superannuation savings to pay down mortgage balances, leading retirees to rely more on the pension.
So are we living beyond our means? With household debt to income ratios three times higher now than a quarter of a century ago, household debt up by over 50% in real terms over the last decade and the debt of those approaching retirement (55-64 year olds) up 64% in real terms, it would seem on the face of it to be true.
However, the reality is more nuanced. Household savings are growing faster than income and 8.5 cents in every dollar is being saved, and there is now $2 trillion tucked away in superannuation, while riskier investments are making way for more a more conservative approach. This is far better than we were 10 years ago, but with a note of caution that savings are again on the decline.
 
Alan Duncan is Director, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre and Bankwest Research Chair in Economic Policy at Curtin University. You can follow him on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/bankwestcurtin" target="_blank">here</a>.
Rebecca Cassells is Adjunct Associate Professor, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre at Curtin University. She can be contacted <a href="https://business.curtin.edu.au/research/centres-institutions/bankwest-curtin-economics-centre/staff.cfm/Rebecca.Cassells" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Australians saving more, but are more comfortable with debt: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre

<html><body>
The developer lobby is the boy who cried wolf in Australian real estate. He’s actually right about something and desperately wants to be heard, but no one is listening anymore.
The recurring topic is the cost of housing. It’s absorbing far too much time and energy for stakeholders everywhere, because politicians find the obvious solutions unpalatable.
If politicians stopped taxing real estate to within an inch of its life, life for home-buyers would become so much easier. The cost of a new home for a first-timer could be massively reduced. One estimate suggests the typical new home in Sydney could cost $250,000 less.
The developer lobby argues that stamp duty is the single biggest problem. I have to agree that stamp duty is an obscenity. Having to cobble together a deposit is a big enough challenge for property buyers, without having to save to pay an exorbitant and unjust tax as well.
Stamp duty on the median priced dwelling in Sydney ($752,000 according to RP Data) is almost $30,000. It’s similar sum for the same purchase in Perth, while anyone buying a home at that price in Melbourne would pay over $40,000.
It’s tantamount to paying a fine for the crime of buying a home or an investment to fund your retirement.
The developer lobby has been targeting this issue with one of its endless campaigns. It wants stamp duty scrapped. It presents some compelling evidence, but I doubt anyone important will take any notice because builders and developers have been crying wolf on multiple issues (e.g. the mythical housing shortage crisis) for years.
And its proposal overall is a massive turnoff. Its argument essentially is this: everyone should pay more tax so that the development industry can make more money.
The Property Council of Australia, arguably the most self-absorbed group in society, is suggesting that stamp duty should end and the lost government revenue be recouped by increasing the GST. 
The proposal, therefore, is that everyone should pay more for everything they buy so that real estate can be exchanged cheaper. I’m sure that’ll go over well with the general public and the politicians they elect.
The council argues stamp duty is inefficient and "a runaway cash grab that's hurting Australia's economy and locking out potential home buyers". It says the community should be outraged at figures like these:
The cost of stamp duty to a home buyer with an average-sized mortgage has increased 795% in Melbourne and 749% in Sydney in the past 20 years. 
Property owners have become Australia's largest collective taxpayer, contributing 9% of total tax revenue.
Property taxes make up as much as 46% of state, territory and local government budgets. Stamp duty alone contributes more than 20% of the total revenues of the NSW,      Victoria, Western Australia and Northern Territory governments.
The cost of stamp duty over the life of an average mortgage is now $61,542 in Sydney, $56,616 in Melbourne, $49,701 in Darwin and $35,427 in Canberra.
The Housing Industry Association, another noisy member of the developer lobby, says property taxes add around $250,000 to the price of a new home in Sydney. That, it says, accounts for 40% or $1,350 per month for the life of a home mortgage.
"Taxes on new housing are a brake on economic activity, and represent a constraint on housing affordability and labour productivity," the association's head of industry policy Graham Wolfe says.
Wolfe says stamp duty is the most inefficient tax in the system. However, he says there are many other taxes on new homes, including developer infrastructure levies, which can add $70,000 to the cost of a new home-and-land package. GST is also levied on new homes, but not existing properties, adding tens of thousands of dollars to the cost.
The problem is: state governments will never give up their property taxes. They’re addicted to them.
We’ve seen what’s happened with the ACT Government. It went to an election promising to eliminate stamp duty within a specific time frame. Now they’re reneging on their promise. They just can’t let go of all that lovely money.
And, for them, the protests of the developer lobby are just background static. No one is listening.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was recently joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

State governments addicted to property tax: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
Calls to curtail negative gearing or other tax concessions need to be assessed in the context of the whole tax system, Shane Oliver head of investment strategy and chief economist at AMP Capital says.
"Every time Australian residential property prices take off, calls erupt for negative gearing on investment property to be restricted or scrapped.
"Such calls are getting added currency now as some see it as a way to help close the budget deficit with a greater proportion of the dollar impact falling on higher income earners," he told the Money website.
He said any such move was of dubious merit.
Firstly, he says negative gearing is not the reason housing affordability is so poor in Australia.
"It has been in place for a long time and Australia is not alone in providing some form of “tax assistance” to home owners, as most comparable countries do," adding Americans can even deduct interest on the family home from their taxable income.
"And yet our house-price-to-income ratios are much higher."
Second, removing or restricting the deductibility of interest expenses incurred in property investment will cause a distortion in the tax system because negative gearing would still be available on other investments (so unfairly biasing investors in favour of, say, shares over property). 
"Allowing deductions for expenses incurred in producing income is a standard and common-sense feature of our tax system," he says.
Thirdly calls to curtail negative gearing or other tax concessions need to be assessed in the context of the whole tax system.
"Australia already has a relatively high reliance on income tax and the top marginal rate at 49% is at the high end of comparable countries.
"Curtailing access to negative gearing will only add to the burden on this relatively small group and act as a disincentive for work effort at a time when we should be doing the opposite."
</body></html>

tax

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

tax