Not all apartment amenities are immediately visible.

Swimming pools, gyms, rooftop terraces and residents' lounges have long featured on buyers' wishlists, but as the way Australians live has changed, so too have the features that make apartment living more convenient.

Increasingly, buyers are placing value on the practical aspects of day-to-day life. Fast internet, EV charging, secure bike storage, flexible workspaces and parcel management are becoming just as relevant as lifestyle amenities, reflecting changing habits and expectations.

Online shopping has been one of the biggest drivers of that shift.

Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally, making parcel deliveries a routine part of everyday life rather than an occasional convenience.

For apartment residents, however, receiving those deliveries isn't always straightforward.

Without someone home to accept a parcel, deliveries can be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in building foyers or common areas, or require building management to temporarily store packages. As apartment living continues to grow across Australia's cities, parcel management has become an increasingly important consideration for both residents and developers.

Australia Post's Parcel Locker network is one response to that shift.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KPZ9j5FRdsQ?si=Qztc1dNP3ZvEIUhb" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than relying on home delivery, eligible parcels can be directed to a nominated Parcel Locker, where they're securely stored until collected. Once a parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can retrieve it using a one-time code or QR code at a time that suits them.

The network has expanded to more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with Parcel Lockers positioned at Post Offices, shopping centres, supermarkets, transport hubs and, increasingly, within or alongside residential developments.

That growing presence reflects a broader change in how apartment buildings are being planned.

Developers are increasingly considering the operational side of apartment living alongside traditional lifestyle amenities. Just as secure mailrooms, bicycle storage and EV charging have become more common inclusions, parcel management is emerging as another feature that supports everyday convenience.

It also helps preserve the arrival experience within a building. Carefully designed lobbies and communal spaces can quickly become cluttered when deliveries accumulate, while secure parcel solutions reduce the likelihood of missed deliveries or parcels being left unattended.

For buyers comparing apartments, these everyday details are becoming part of the decision-making process.

Location, floorplans and finishes remain fundamental, but the features that simplify daily life are carrying greater weight than they once did. As online shopping continues to shape consumer behaviour, secure parcel delivery is increasingly becoming another amenity worth looking for.

Joel Robinson

Parcel delivery is joining the apartment amenity checklist

Inca Property Group has lodged a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for Dawn, a 53-apartment oceanfront development overlooking Mona Vale Beach.

The proposal, at 35-39 Darley Street East, would replace an existing 18-apartment strata building with a new owner-occupier-focused development comprising 53 two and three-bedroom apartments, including nine affordable built-to-rent residences delivered under the State's infill affordable housing scheme.

Positioned on a 2,679 sqm elevated site around 280 metres from Mona Vale Beach, the development has been designed to maximise panoramic ocean views while responding to the site's sloping topography.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/inca-property-group">Inca Property Group</a> Managing Director Josh Thompson said the State Significant pathway provided greater certainty for projects of this scale.

"This State Significant pathway gives the team real certainty to progress <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/dawn-35-39-darley-street-east-mona-vale-nsw-2103">Dawn</a> through to completion," Thompson said.

"It allows us to acquire a one-off site, design it carefully and deliver the right offering for the suburb, assessed by the NSW Government's planning department."

The project is one of the first developments in the area to be assessed under the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy, with the site sitting on the edge of the policy's designated inner area.

The proposal includes three basement levels providing 124 car spaces, alongside a range of resident amenities including a swimming pool, gym, sauna, wellness facilities and private plunge pools for selected ground-floor and penthouse apartments.

<img alt="Dawn" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fc1a1daf-0ce4-4f12-9076-b1fa553c7a91" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-21%20at%208.42.11%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4GZ9h.gpNkTljbxyAET8Jfhv51XUamDm" />

Thompson said Dawn had been designed specifically for owner-occupiers and downsizers, a buyer profile that has driven demand across Inca's recent Upper North Shore developments.

"The majority of buyers in our recent North Shore projects have been downsizers, and we are learning exactly what this market is looking for. Beyond the location itself, we have included resort-style amenities to deliver a genuine lifestyle offering," Thompson said.

Located within walking distance of Mona Vale Beach, the town centre, Mona Vale Golf Club and the Royal Motor Yacht Club, Dawn represents Inca's first Northern Beaches project following the sell-out of Tara on Park in Waitara and Ellis Residences, currently under construction in St Ives.

Construction will be undertaken by Inca's in-house construction arm, GOP Constructions.

Dawn is the latest major apartment proposal for Mona Vale, with the suburb emerging as one of the key beneficiaries of the NSW Government's new Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy.

New developer One Living, led by industry veteran Joseph Scuderi, recently secured a site on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, where it is planning around 140 apartments.

IPM is also planning its third project in Mona Vale, significantly increasing the scale of its previous developments with an 82-apartment proposal at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/159-167-darley-street-west-mona-vale-nsw-2103">159-167 Darley Street West</a>, opposite Bayview Golf Course and less than 800 metres from Mona Vale town centre.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/one-living-enters-sydneys-new-apartment-market-with-northern-beaches-site-acquisition">One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-ipm-plans-third-mona-vale-project">First look: IPM plans third Mona Vale project</a>

First look: Inca eyes Mona Vale with State Significant DA for Dawn apartments

Seasoned Victorian apartment developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a> has logged more than $400 million in sales in its luxury apartment project Palmera Residences at Northcliffe on the Gold Coast.&nbsp;

Central Equity Director Karl Kutner said the sales result reflected a combination of location, product quality and delivery certainty with the project already under construction by building powerhouse Multiplex.&nbsp;

"Surpassing $400 million in sales since launch is a significant milestone and an outstanding endorsement of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera Residences</a>,” he said.&nbsp;

"We believe one of the key reasons for this strong result is the confidence purchasers have in knowing the project is under construction with Multiplex. Buyers are increasingly looking for certainty. They want to know that the project they commit to today will be delivered by an experienced team with a proven track record."&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365782]

Kutner said it was clear there was still high demand for luxury projects that offered certainty of delivery.&nbsp;

“We are in a market where many residential developments have faced delays due to rising construction costs, labour shortages and financing challenges,” said Kutner.&nbsp;

"But having construction underway has provided our buyers with resounding confidence backed by more than 40 years of development delivery by Central Equity combined with construction by one of Australia's most respected construction companies."&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365785]

Central Equity is one of Australia's most experienced privately-owned property developers. Over more than four decades, the company has delivered in excess of 85 residential developments including 10,000 apartments and many thousands of stand alone homes.&nbsp;

Located on Garfield Terrace at Northcliffe, between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach, Palmera Residences occupies one of the Gold Coast's most sought after beachside locations. The development has been designed to appeal to owner occupiers seeking premium residences that combine generous living spaces and resort style amenities.&nbsp;

Palmera Residences will feature an exceptional collection of resort style amenities, including two swimming pools: a generously sized family pool with safe shallow zones for relaxed recreation, and a 20 metre lap pool positioned to maximise all day sunlight.&nbsp;

Residents will also enjoy exclusive access to wellness and recreational facilities including a magnesium pool, sauna, yoga studio, expansive fitted gymnasium, resident lounge, outdoor BBQ’s&nbsp;and indoor and outdoor dining areas, together with a dedicated concierge and luxurious hotel inspired entrance foyer.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365767]

A unique feature at Palmera Residences has been designed to enhance the Gold Coast lifestyle which includes both indoor and outdoor gymnasium facilities, together with thoughtfully designed indoor and outdoor dining and entertaining areas. A corner café has also been incorporated to provide residents with a destination for their everyday needs.&nbsp;

Kutner said buyer demand had been broad based with purchasers attracted from interstate as well as throughout South East Queensland.&nbsp;

"We're seeing strong interest from owner occupiers, lifestyle buyers and people relocating to the Gold Coast. Many purchasers have been searching for a premium beachside residence where quality, design and delivery are equally important."&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Kutner said the sales milestone was an important achievement, but the focus remained firmly on delivering an exceptional development.&nbsp;

"While reaching $400 million in sales is an important milestone, our priority remains delivering a project that exceeds purchaser expectations,” he said.&nbsp;

"Palmera Residences has been designed to become one of the Gold Coast's landmark residential addresses, and we look forward to welcoming our purchasers to their new homes."&nbsp;

There are a limited number of residences remaining in selected configurations with pricing from $2,950,000 to $8,950,000. Palmera Residences is also crowned by expansive penthouses with wrap around views.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

Construction certainty and strong buyer demand drive major sales result for luxury Gold Coast development

Palmera Residences fly out the door as sales pass $400 million

National property developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/goldfields-group">Goldfields</a> has appointed BINAH as its construction partner for Quartet, its new Brisbane apartment development in the undersupplied suburb of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/milton-qld-4064">Milton</a>.

Located just two kilometres from the Brisbane CBD and moments from key 2032 Olympic precincts, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/quartet-milton-33-manning-street-milton-qld-4064">Quartet</a> will deliver 131 one, two, three, and four-bedroom apartments priced from $1 million to $4.2 million, combining elevated design with a wellness-focused lifestyle offering.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108736 project_image_fid=368000]

Goldfields’ Chief Executive Officer, Lachlan Thompson, said the appointment of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/binah-constructions">BINAH</a> marked an important milestone for the project.&nbsp;

“Bringing BINAH on board as our construction partner will allow us to bring our vision for Quartet forward with a team that has a proven track record of delivering high-quality residential projects,” Thompson said.&nbsp;

“We’ve taken a considered approach to progressing the site because we wanted to deliver the whole package. Buyers ultimately back great developers, great projects and great builders, and with Quartet, we’ve made sure all three line up.

“People want certainty, they want to know the project will be built, that the homes will be delivered as promised, and that the developer stands behind the quality of what they create. That’s something Goldfields has built its reputation on over many years.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108736 project_image_fid=367993]

BINAH’s Managing Director, Khalil Hafza, said the company was proud to be partnering with Goldfields to deliver Quartet.&nbsp;

“Quartet is an exciting project to bring to life, particularly given the level of detail in the residences and the extensive rooftop amenity planned for the building,” Mr Hafza said.&nbsp;

“Our focus is on delivering a high-quality build that brings that design vision to life and creates homes residents will enjoy for many years.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108736 project_image_fid=367999]

The facilities at Quartet have been feared towards the roof, with a&nbsp;25 metre lap pool, spa, sauna and cold plunge, and a communal barbecue area and alfresco.

Town planning was designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a> and brought to life by Melbourne-based architecture firm Cera Stribley.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/cera-stribley">Cera Stribley</a> Co-Founder and Managing Principal, Dom Cerantonio, said the project responds to both its riverside setting and Brisbane’s evolving urban character.&nbsp;

“Quartet has been designed to sit comfortably within its riverside context, offering a refined take on urban living through well-planned, generously proportioned residences that will stand the test of time,” Mr Cerantonio said.&nbsp;

“An emphasis on natural light, natural textures and carefully selected finishes from timber and marble to premium appliances, creates calm, considered interiors designed for comfort and long-term liveability.”&nbsp;

Construction of Quartet will commence in July 2026, with completion anticipated in Q4 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108736]

Construction to commence on 131-residence tower designed around wellness-focused living

Goldfields appoints BINAH for Quartet apartments in Milton

The first partnership between national developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis">Fortis</a> and Adelaide-based developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/otello">Otello</a> has made a strong start, with the pair securing $21 million in unconditional sales at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/one-four-four-hutt-adelaide-144-hutt-street-adelaide-sa-5000">One Four Four Hutt</a>&nbsp;on the edge of the Adelaide CBD.

Over a third of apartments have been snapped up in the boutique 44-apartment project on the corner of Hutt Stret and Wakefield Road. Local downsizers and owner-occupiers wanting to remain in Adelaide's tightly-held southeast quarter have been the most prominent purchasers.

The DKO-designed, mixed-use development is one of the few new apartment projects in the precinct, an area where new housing supply has remained limited despite continued demand from buyers wanting to stay close to the CBD, Victoria Park and Adelaide's established east-end amenities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151233 project_image_fid=375378]

Fortis Head of Development SA Arthur Dendrinos said the early sales reflected both the strength of the local owner-occupier market and confidence in the Hutt Street location.

"The level of early commitment reflects the confidence local buyers have in the Hutt Street precinct," Dendrinos said.

"Many purchasers are long-term east-end residents who love the area and want to stay connected to the neighbourhood. They recognise the value of a well-designed, well-located development.

"Our partnership with Otello has been central to this success, and the number of unconditional sales at this stage only strengthens our confidence in the South Australian market."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151233 project_image_fid=375379]

Otello Director Daniel Harris said the sales result also highlighted the lack of new apartment opportunities within the Hutt Street precinct.

"One Four Four Hutt has clearly resonated with buyers, with strong early sales reflecting both the appeal of the Hutt Street corridor and the lifestyle on offer," Harris said.

"The activated ground-floor retail has also been a key drawcard, with purchasers responding to the vision of a more vibrant and connected streetscape, not just the residences themselves."

One Four Four Hutt will deliver 44 one, two and three-bedroom apartments, alongside a collection of penthouses, above a ground-floor retail offering designed to further activate the Hutt Street precinct.

Construction is scheduled to commence in the third quarter of this year, with completion anticipated in 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151233]

Fortis Head of Development SA Arthur Dendrinos said the early sales reflected both the strength of the local owner-occupier market and confidence in the Hutt Street location.

Fortis makes Adelaide debut with Otello as One Four Four Hutt records strong early sales

Skyscrapers

<html><body>
Last week it was announced <a href="/new-apartments/melbourne-vic">Melbourne's</a> tallest skyscraper was set to be released for sale domestically in February with the remainder of apartments expected to be snapped up after the project's successful launch in Asia. Developed by World Class Land Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of Singapore-based <a href="/developers/world-class-global">Aspial</a>, Australia 108 is expected to carry an end value of $1 billion.

With the initial hype and comment over the public launch subsiding, now presents an opportune time to pour over the figures that define Melbourne's next landmark structure.

<h2>From the ground up</h2>

<ul>
<li>Located at <a href="/buildings/australia-108-southbank-70-southbank-boulevard-southbank">70 Southbank Boulevard</a> in busy <a href="/new-apartments/southbank-vic-3006">Southbank</a>
</li>
	<li>100 levels and 319 metres in height</li>
	<li>Designed by <a href="/architects/fk-australia">Fender Katsalidis Architects</a> as an accompaniment to their earlier Southbank project, the 297 metre Eureka Tower</li>
	<li>Retail and lobby/concierge located at ground floor plus porte cochere access</li>
	<li>10 levels of podium car parking: 558 car parks and 310 bicycle spaces</li>
	<li>Level 11 lap pool, sauna, steam room and private theatre as well as indoor and outdoor entertaining areas and external deck</li>
	<li>944 apartments below the starburst including:</li>
	<li>Three studio apartments ranging in size from 53.6 to 57.8 square metres
	<ul>
<li>418 one bedroom, one bathroom apartments ranging in size from 47.1 to 65.7 square metres</li>
		<li>105 two bedroom, one bathroom apartments ranging in size from 57.8 to 66.3 square metres</li>
		<li>418 two bedroom, two bathroom apartments ranging in size from 59.6 to 128.2 square metres</li>
		<li>​Level 70/71 starburst with dual level residential facilities</li>
	</ul>
</li>
	<li>161 Sky residences above the starburst which include:
	<ul>
<li>Three bedroom apartments with either two or three bathrooms. Size ranges from 120.6 to 211.4 square metres</li>
		<li>Penthouses (they are also 3 bed 3 bath) – range from 355.4 to 391.6 square metres</li>
		<li>Penthouse 100 (top floor) – the tallest residence in the southern hemisphere. Customisable, it is 797.4 square metres</li>
	</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Exterior</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/tpa8467_australia_108_e01_hero_elevated-2.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Hero perspective of the Southbank behemoth. Image supplied"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="878" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/tpa8467_australia_108_e01_hero_elevated-2.jpg?itok=znmOAPJ6" title="Hero perspective of the Southbank behemoth. Image supplied" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Hero perspective of the Southbank behemoth. Image supplied</figcaption></figure><ul>
<li>Deep blue facade with white stripes enveloping the facade, and which have integrated LED lighting at visible outside daylight hours</li>
	<li>Starburst feature located 210 metres above ground, inspired by the Federation Star on the Australian Flag</li>
	<li>Similar design impetus to the neighbouring Eureka Tower whose exterior drew inspiration from the Eureka Stockade</li>
	<li>11-level podium features large glazed planter boxes and heavy with greenery providing contrast to City Road's drab frontage</li>
</ul>
<h2>Apartment interior design</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/resisences_06.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Interior of a typical apartment. Image courtesy australia108.com.au"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="361" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/resisences_06.jpg?itok=D7erNq20" title="Interior of a typical apartment. Image courtesy australia108.com.au" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Interior of a typical apartment. Image courtesy australia108.com.au</figcaption></figure><ul>
<li>Floor to ceiling windows over all apartments</li>
	<li>Apartments interiors delivered by <a href="/architects/carr-design">Carr Design Group</a>
</li>
	<li>Two colour palettes on offer - Starlight &amp; Sunlight</li>
	<li>Starlight (light scheme) comprise a white palette and strong geometric lines. Kitchen design incorporates a slender benchtop and island breakfast bar, which is finished in a grey porcelain slab. Bathrooms feature custom-designed wall-hung basins with integrated storage, finished in a finely-crafted solid surface material</li>
	<li>Sunlight (warm scheme) follows the same architectural line of the concept, but encompasses an off-white porcelain benchtop and splashback, complemented by timber effect laminate cabinetry</li>
	<li>Residents above the Star Club with find Carrara marble and limestone options, bespoke joinery and stone bathtubs as standard</li>
	<li>Miele appliances as standard, with premium Miele in upper level apartments</li>
	<li>Flooring in premium apartments comprise engineered timber flooring throughout, with woven carpet or wool carpet in bedrooms</li>
</ul>
<h2>Communal facilities</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/star70_06_l.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Lounge area within Australia 108. Image courtesy australia108.com.au"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="357" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/star70_06_l.jpg?itok=fIdAin2D" title="Lounge area within Australia 108. Image courtesy australia108.com.au" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Lounge area within Australia 108. Image courtesy australia108.com.au</figcaption></figure><ul>
<li>Three levels of communal facilities with a total of 3000 square metres available for use</li>
	<li>Level 11 includes pool, sauna, steam room, golf simulator, theatrette plus an outdoor entertaining space and external deck</li>
	<li>Star Club over levels 70 and 71 provides two separate communal facilities, with one reserved exclusively for use residents living above the starburst</li>
	<li>Differing finishes define the two levels with HBA designing the premium zone for upper level residents</li>
	<li>Premium zone includes an infinity pool in a double height space with floor-to-ceiling views, private dining room, club rooms and lounges</li>
	<li>Carr Design Group has designed the other zone for lower level residents, comprising an infinity pool with Port Phillip Bay views</li>
	<li>Dining rooms, private theatrettes and bars are common to both communal levels</li>
</ul>
As foreshadowed by Apartments.com.au last year construction giant Brookfield Multiplex holds the upper hand with contractual negotiations between developer and builder reported as in progress last week. With commencement of works a few short months away Australia 108 is due for staged completion through to 2019.
</body></html>

silvermb

Facts and figures that define Australia 108

<html><body>
Planning ideologies are slowly changing. The recently released Metropolitan Planning Strategy, Plan Melbourne, advocates densified residential and commercial buildings at increased heights, particularly within the CBD and urban renewal areas – both of which are strategically located near jobs, transport and existing infrastructure. Despite these positive steps, the Minister for Planning, Matthew Guy, has been widely criticised for what many view as his tall tower ‘approvals binge’, leading to him being dubbed “Mr Skyscraper”.

There are currently approximately 30,000 apartments within Melbourne City Council's boundaries, with over 100+ tall towers approved for construction in Central Melbourne. An estimated 15,000 more apartments housed within tall buildings are planned over the next five years.

In August 2013, Professor Rob Adams, Melbourne City Council's Director of City Design, questioned this growing trend towards tall buildings and higher plot ratios and warned that the city centre could become '”Hong Kong but without the spectacular setting” if planning rules were left unchecked.

Melburnians’ earnest engagement over the future of their city skyline exemplifies a community pride that has grown since the rejuvenation of the city centre in the 1980s, prior to which the Age newspaper’s architecture critic Norman Day described the bleak CBD in 1978 as “an empty, useless city centre”. Professor Adams’ comments thus embody a long-standing narrative of Melbourne’s developers and decision makers wrestling with community groups over the height of their projects. But are the claims that tall buildings are “soulless towers” destined to become “slums of the future” justified? What, if anything, is wrong with height and how do tall structures detract from Melbourne as the “world’s most liveable city”?

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/melbourne_growth_timeline1.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="A Melbourne growth timeline"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="787" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/melbourne_growth_timeline1.jpg?itok=QqnrOJJg" title="A Melbourne growth timeline" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>A Melbourne growth timeline</figcaption></figure>Apart from densification enhancing Melbourne’s prime “liveability” status by containing urban sprawl, tall buildings can elevate cities by redefining their local and regional environment, creating jobs and opportunities, and becoming the iconic structures of re-imagined city centres.

Melbourne’s flat topography allows appropriately positioned tall buildings to define and articulate the city structure, visually reinforcing areas of significance or noteworthy localities within the city area. The combination of appropriate site location and a considered architectural response enable tall buildings to become important city landmarks.

Tall buildings should therefore be appropriately located if they are to enhance and complement the city structure and protect the amenity of sensitive areas. A poorly located, poorly designed tall structure can physically and visually overwhelm adjacent streets and neighbourhoods, overshadow nearby open space, create unnecessary traffic congestion, and produce uncomfortable wind conditions.

Tall buildings thus have a responsibility to respect the surrounding environment. It is the opinion of this writer that Melbourne appropriately balances this obligation – take the Swanston Street city core as an example. The ‘heart’ of the CBD preserves its rich historic architecture and character by avoiding tall buildings and ensuring a thoughtfully blended contemporary design aesthetic. The majority of current tall building approvals are on the west and north-western edge of the Hoddle Grid, Southbank, or, more recently, Fishermans Bend.

Urban renewal precincts such as Fishermans Bend are strategically located near jobs, transport and existing infrastructure. By creating efficient and sustainable tall buildings within and near the central city, the need for transportation and land are economised, resulting in increased social equity, shared resources, energy savings, and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per person. Unfortunately, these powerful ecological, social and economic arguments appear to have become too passé for those Melburnians agitating against the aesthetic of their evolving city skyline.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image56.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Melbourne tall buildings growth prediction"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="279" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image56.jpg?itok=kESAW9kz" title="Melbourne tall buildings growth prediction" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Melbourne tall buildings growth prediction</figcaption></figure>Apart from the lifestyle benefits of proximity and connectivity to city amenity (not to mention the spectacular views), tall buildings are economically sound propositions. Taller buildings cost less per square metre to build. The rising land values in Melbourne’s central city have increased pressure to densify and achieve greater dividends for prime-location sites, which in turn allows high-risk investors the lure of recouping their outlays, thereby stimulating economic growth.

The increasing focus on developer contributions in the form of public open space is also encouraging. Not only do these areas enhance the sustainability of the city by securing land for public use and enjoyment, they also enhance the streetscape by ensuring a pleasant public realm and community asset. It is here, at the street interface and lower levels of tall buildings, where attention should be focussed – and this is where the concern surrounding some tall building approvals is justified.

The public domains of commercial buildings have generally been self-fulfilling because profits are maximised by creating generous retail space and public plazas that are as inviting as possible for business tenants. Residential buildings have caught up in recent years with an acknowledgement that the profit derived from the number of units needs to be balanced against an attractive public domain and activated retail frontage as investors have become increasingly ‘lifestyle’ savvy.

Melbourne does have poor examples of taller development (mainly approved in the 20 years between 1980 and 2000) with podium levels facing away from the street employing high, blank, unactivated walls, which force socioeconomic activities inside rather than out. Such internalisation of uses results in the isolation of retail and social activities from the collective city community and the ‘buzz’ of city life.

Simple landscaping elements such as tree canopies and streetscape designs incorporating awnings and retail frontages effectively mitigate internalisation of uses and solve the human-scale problem by creating a micro-environment for pedestrians.

To conclude, well-designed tall buildings do not detract from Melbourne as the “world’s most liveable city” because:

<ul>
<li>The combination of appropriate site location and a considered architectural response enable tall buildings to become important city landmarks.</li>
	<li>Tall buildings within and near the central city are sustainable – an argument that needs to be cogently reiterated.</li>
	<li>Appropriate street treatments can solve the human-scale problem by creating a micro-environment for pedestrians.</li>
</ul>
The article was produced by Tim Retrot as Senior Consultant at Meinhardt &amp; Jon Brock, National Director - Land Development at Meinhardt. The latest Meinhardt magazine <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/30b87167#/30b87167/1">Shaping</a> is available and features further articles and discussion on tall building trends.
</body></html>

Tim Retrot

Tall Building Criticism a Tall Tale

<html><body>
A planning application of some difference finds itself in focus, as the typical glass and/or horizontal bands of many of the city's current crop of residential towers makes way for a design with unique external properties. Lodged mid-year and having been given brief credence in the mainstream media, Hayball's design for 334-344 City Road is distinguished by its teardrop form and angular, modular facade.

334 City Road may also act as a nexus between the established Southbank and the Montague Precinct within the forthcoming Fishermans Bend urban renewal; at 270 metres it sits on the border of the two slated high density zones.

<h2>Summary</h2>

<ul>
<li>Currently site use: Urban Central hostel and Eve nightclub</li>
	<li>Application for development lodged July 2014</li>
	<li>82-storey building with residential apartments, hotel and cafe at 270.41 metres</li>
	<li>​578 apartments (156*1 / 407*2 / 15*3)</li>
	<li>198 hotel suites</li>
	<li>154 car parking spaces &amp; 315 bicycles</li>
	<li>GFA: 83,196sqm</li>
	<li>Retail space: Approximately 119 sqm</li>
</ul>
<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image25334.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Artist's interpretation of 334 City Road. Image courtesy Hayball"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="869" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image25334.jpg?itok=pR-hHEQ3" title="Artist's interpretation of 334 City Road. Image courtesy Hayball" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Artist's interpretation of 334 City Road. Image courtesy Hayball</figcaption></figure><h2>Laid out</h2>

Interestingly enough the tower has been submitted with two separate residential layouts. The intended yield sees a total of 578 apartments and 198 hotel suites whilst the alternative layout provides for 482 apartments with the identical number of hotel suites. This discrepancy is explained by the difference in apartment types where the baseline layout carries 156 single and 15 three bedroom apartments whilst the alternative sees only 12 single bedroom dwellings countered by a whopping 159 three bedroom dwellings.

Hotel accommodation size varies between 27sqm and 50sqm over the allocated 11 floors. This is further broken down into 132 hotel rooms and 66 hotel suites which as seen below are more generous in size.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image23334.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="The expected hotel floorplan. Image courtesy Hayball planning report"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="295" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image23334.jpg?itok=4Xqs0B7w" title="The expected hotel floorplan. Image courtesy Hayball planning report" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>The expected hotel floorplan. Image courtesy Hayball planning report.</figcaption></figure><h2>Designed to be different</h2>

<blockquote>
The elliptical tower form has been developed through detailed analysis of the subject site’s urban morphology, and an intelligent response to the building setback objectives of the Planning Scheme. The orientation of the tower and its aerofoil profile delivers oblique views to and from surrounding developments that are predominately rectilinear and orientated to property boundaries.

The Environmental Wind Assessment prepared by Mel Consultants in conjunction with the proposal, also demonstrates that the building form is very effective in mitigating effects of the strong winds from the southwest impacting on the exposed site, and delivering a comfortable environment for pedestrians at ground level.

The façade comprises a system of highly repetitive L-shaped precast concrete panels which interact with metal clad infill panels, and expand and contract to express different building functions. The lapped panel set-out addresses the elliptical tower form and provides further depth and interest.

A spiral motif is overlaid providing a formal mechanism to transition between façade elements associated with different programmes:

<ul>
<li>Podium green wall to apartment balconies;</li>
	<li>Hotel windows to apartment balconies; and</li>
	<li>Apartment balconies to winter garden windows</li>
</ul>
<cite>Hayball - 334 City Road planning application</cite>
</blockquote>

334 City Road's facade is similar to Hayball's awarded <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/65105/the-canada-hotel-hayball/">Canada Hotel</a> development in Carlton where a series of facade panels essentially interlock to create a repetitive pattern. Add the subtle use of coloured metal spandrel panels and a diagonal visual rhythm becomes evident over the proposed tower.

<h2>Ground zero</h2>

The planning application addresses what is a problem the length of City Road: active street level frontages or lack thereof. Hayball and Tract Consultants have jointly provided for a softening of the existing harsh street level environment by way of an indented ground level with an overhung podium.

In this way increased area is given to the public realm at ground level with bluestone paving to all frontages, public bench seats, a green feature wall, planters and scope for public sculpture artwork all envisaged. In addition the adjoining dead space under the neighbouring West Gate Freeway is also earmarked for urban revitalisation. Seen below are precedents which could be applied to the undercroft, delivering some much needed useable public space to City Road in the process.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image28.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Existing undercroft and possible urban solutions. Image courtesy Hayball"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="428" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image28.jpg?itok=L8FKXPAZ" title="Existing undercroft and possible urban solutions. Image courtesy Hayball" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Existing undercroft and possible urban solutions. Image courtesy Hayball</figcaption></figure><h2>A likely starter</h2>

It is worth noting that 334 City Road's urban context report does state that developer EAG Pty Ltd has had a presence on City Road for some years and has committed to delivering the project. According to a Fairfax Media <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/southbank-skyscraper-to-soar-over-city-20140715-zt8ix">report</a> site owner EAG Pty Ltd is tied to BRW rich lister Giuseppe “Joe” Catalfamo who owns the current Urban Central accommodation onsite.

Prolific builder LU Simon is also listed as a project partner within the submitted documents, suggesting that should it gain approval 334 City Road looks to have both the financial basis and building expertise in place turn the paper project into reality.

<h2>Development Team</h2>

<ul>
<li>Developer: EAG Pty Ltd</li>
	<li>Architect: Hayball</li>
	<li>Intended builder: LU Simon</li>
	<li>Planning Consultant: Urbis</li>
	<li>Structural Engineer: Rinovitch Consultants</li>
	<li>Services / ESD: ALA</li>
	<li>Building Surveyor: Gardner Group</li>
	<li>Landscape Architect: Tract</li>
	<li>Wind Engineer: MEL Consultants</li>
	<li>Fire Engineer: Thomas Nicolas</li>
	<li>Traffic Engineer: Traffix</li>
	<li>Waste Management: Leigh Design</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

Planning application > Hayball's 270 metre 334 City Road

<html><body>
<blockquote>
I wouldn't be surprised if in the next five or six years the height of the Eureka Tower is exceeded with a building in Melbourne, I fully expect that. I just hope it's a better looking building, a better architectural outcome than Eureka and then it deserves to be the tallest building in Melbourne.
<cite>Daniel Grollo, 'Super tower to top Eureka: Grollo', The Age, March 19, 2011.</cite>
</blockquote>

For so long it has teased and been hinted at, with Daniel Grollo in particular predicting that a 300 metre tower in Melbourne would become a reality in the not-too-distant future. And so in 2014 we find ourselves facing the prospect of not one but four separate 300 metre plus buildings gracing the Melbourne skyline in the next few years.

In what could be described as a classic case of sibling rivalry, two Singaporean brothers appear determined to outdo one another with competing towers. A third developer has its eyes set on transforming the western edge of the Hoddle Grid while Crown/Schiavello are looking to extend the footprint of the Crown with a giant mixed-use tower.

<h2>250 Spencer Street / Ritz Carlton - Far East Consortium</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/250spencer_zpsada55b2d.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Ritz Carlton at 250 Spencer Street. Image © Far East Consortium "><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="967" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/250spencer_zpsada55b2d.jpg?itok=o5_-atR-" title="Ritz Carlton at 250 Spencer Street. Image © Far East Consortium " width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Ritz Carlton at 250 Spencer Street. Image © Far East Consortium</figcaption></figure>Having completed two towers at Upper West Side, with another two at various stages of construction and a fifth on the verge of beginning, Far East Consortium has set its sights on its next big project at 250 Spencer Street. With demolition progressing well, the erection of a display suite earmarking the commencement of the sales and marketing campaign should occur early in the new year.

Four towers ranging in height from 205-300 metres have been approved, and the first cab off the rank would appear to be a 90-storey, 300 metre tower with Far East consortium securing Ritz-Carlton to anchor the premium hotel space located over the top 15 levels. Cottee Parker after designing all five towers at Upper West Side have also been charged with conceiving the 250 Spencer development plan.

<h2>70 Southbank Boulevard - Aspial/World Class Land</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/aus108_0.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Australia 108. Image © Fender Katsalidis"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="878" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/aus108_0.jpg?itok=LL5JK5Ee" title="Australia 108. Image © Fender Katsalidis" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Australia 108. Image © Fender Katsalidis</figcaption></figure><blockquote>
We are all born with the ability to soar, but only the brave trusts their wings. Australia's tallest tower will go where no development has gone before, offering a cloudbreaking lifestyle 319 metres above the glittering Melbourne streetscape. With the city's amenities within easy reach below and the boundless freedom of endless sky above, those who reside here will be part of a world that few others can imagine.

Australia 108 is a highly sculptural residential tower unlike any other in Australia. Its slender form is highlighted at the Cloud Residences levels by a golden starburst expression and then morphs into a curvaceous profile against the sky. The starburst which contains the resident facilities is inspired by the Commonwealth Star on the Australian flag and is an obvious celebration of the sense of community within the building.
<cite>Karl Fender</cite>
</blockquote>

The once 108 level, 388 metre giant has been scaled back on a number of occasions, with the final height now sitting at 319 metres and floor count at 99-storeys, following the purchase of the site by Koh Wee Seng's World Class Land. Still displaying the DNA of Eureka, the design has evolved into a much more streamlined and curvilinear form, with the 'star burst' evident in earlier schemes signaling the tower's shift from right angled to curvaceous.

The project's sales campaign is expected in the new year.

<h2>555 Collins Street - Fragrance Group</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/555_collins_street.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="555 Collins Street. Image © Bates Smart"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="975" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/555_collins_street.jpg?itok=ZMIAoqhw" title="555 Collins Street. Image © Bates Smart" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>555 Collins Street. Image © Bates Smart</figcaption></figure>Following an unsuccessful attempt to redevelop the site in a joint venture with Grocon, property developer Harry Stamoulis sold the existing 24-storey commercial building at 555 Collins Street to Koh Mee Seng's Singapore-listed Fragrance Group for $78 million. While not aiming for the 404m height flagged by a previous commercial scheme for the site, the 83-storey tower is still proposed to rise 305 metres above the corner of Collins and King Streets - stealing the crown of the Rialto directly opposite, which has dominated the Hoddle Grid for nearly 30 years.

The contentious proposal seeks approval to overshadow the southern bank of the Yarra, much like CBUS's 447 Collins Street development. An amendment of planning controls that would have allowed the 404 metre scheme to proceed is currently being reviewed.

<blockquote>
555 Collins St, overlooking both Southbank and the Yarra River, is perfectly positioned to create a unique destination, a place where people can truly work, live and play within a mix of office space, residential apartments and hotel environment.

The 83 storey tower splits into two intersecting rectilinear forms working in a north-south direction, reflecting the well known Melbourne grid. The twinned expression of the tower reduces the building mass and accentuates the elegant, transforming and vertical nature of the building. The sinuous form also serves to reduce the wind load effect on such a tall building, as well as softening and anchoring the mass of the building.

The facade of the building features a combination of soft transitioning forms that create openings for the office, hotel and residential apartments. The proportion and size of openings vary strategically to reflect the uses within, opening to important views and registering key datums of the surrounding context. The resulting play of patterning creates an additional layer of complexity and interest. As the openings vary and create shadow, the softness and movement of the building form is accentuated.

At street level the whole corner will be animated with activity, generated by the multiple functions of the building. Escalators provide a connection to the first level where the restaurant and hotel amenities are to be located and 24 hour concierge service will be available. The movement of the escalators both activates the space and improves safety for guests and residents.
<cite>Bates Smart</cite>
</blockquote>

<h2>Queensbridge Tower / Crown Residences - Schiavello &amp; Crown JV</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/queensbridgetower.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Queensbridge Tower or Crown tower 4? Image © Bates Smart"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="892" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/queensbridgetower.jpg?itok=jY9SxgaG" title="Queensbridge Tower or Crown tower 4? Image © Bates Smart" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Queensbridge Tower or Crown tower 4? Image © Bates Smart</figcaption></figure>The project with an ever expanding footprint and one which gained attention initially due to its proximity to residents in Freshwater Place has since expanded again in recent times, consuming the site once mooted for The Falls residential development. Maintaining the quad elliptical form of earlier iterations, the introduction of a glazed lift shaft running the height of the tower and a bridge connecting to the existing Crown Complex has seen it thrust into the spotlight again with the City of Melbourne not impressed in particular with the idea of a bridge spanning Queensbridge Street.

The Bates Smart-designed project still remains at the planning stage.

<h2>Comment</h2>

There's an argument to be made that 300 metre towers aren't necessary, but if developers keep seeking to build higher and higher within the guidelines then I certainly won't be complaining. Ultimately only Australia 108 might chart the 300m height with a final height for Far East's Ritz-Carlton tower to be confirmed and 555 Collins Street no guarantee of being approved at its current height.

Nevertheless the Melbourne skyline is about to take its next big step into the world of the Supertall.
</body></html>

Laurence Dragomir

Melbourne set to join the 300 club

<html><body>
Recently an enterprising young university student posed a direct question to Apartments.com.au:

<blockquote>
Your opinion on whether or not the Minister of Planning should have the power to approve projects over certain thresholds. For instance any building over 25,000sqm of gross floor area?

Should this legislation in the planning scheme be changed or reviewed considering the amount of development within this threshold is now more common than perhaps when the legislation was created? Also should local councils and other parties such as the Mayor of Melbourne or different lobbying groups from the public such as Save Our Suburbs be entitled to some input?
<cite>Adam Steel</cite>
</blockquote>

In light of the events of recent weeks this has become quite topical. I'm not going to talk on behalf of Apartments.com.au, but rather as an individual who's observed Melbourne's development scene for well over a decade and has gleaned more of an industry/developer perspective since Apartments.com.au's inception.

I'll also preface this piece by saying that once upon a time I masqueraded as an Economics student and certain habits die hard, hence my point of view on certain topics will no doubt be wildly different to other readers.

<h2>On the 25,000sqm threshold</h2>

There's always been a dichotomy between City of Melbourne (CoM) and the State Government on this issue - and there should be. CoM are naturally concerned about planning on a micro level as that is their charge but I've always perceived the State Government (irrespective of which party has been in power) to view development on a macro scale.

Whereas CoM focus far more on the intimacy of a project and what it means to City of Melbourne and its immediate residents/users, the State Planning Minister should factor in a variety of other concerns in addition to the worthiness of a given planning application. We live in a competitive world and yes domestic and foreign investment matters; if for instance CoM took a much sterner line with planning application approvals, would the construction and associated services employment sector be so buoyant?

External factors theoretically shouldn't apply to the merits of a planning application but in certain cases they are relevant, and that's the bigger picture that's swept away with talk of reverting control of planning applications back to CoM of other municipalities.

To scrap the 25,000sqm threshold and cede powers to City of Melbourne would be akin to stymieing the inner city's population growth and placing that burden elsewhere - an elsewhere which already excludes huge areas of inner Melbourne thanks to the new residential zones implemented during 2014. Consequently do we send residents to the urban fringes to exist without living or simply say we're full, go away. The latter on many levels is harmful to the economy.

It is to a degree a simple supply and demand equation in which Melbourne and surrounding areas such as Fishermans Bend, Docklands and Southbank must carry the burden of population growth - a point which I've heard countless times from planners and architects recently. To quote a hapless man we are beyond the rubicon - the new residential zones equates to inner Melbourne committing itself irrevocably to a higher density formula of living.

For City of Melbourne and the Lord Major to seek to repeal the 25,000sqm threshold is a self serving position, but highly likely to the Government of the day dismissing the notion out of hand.

<h2>A case in point</h2>

In response to the City of Melbourne 2014 State Election Questionnaire, Leader of the Victorian Greens Greg Barber responded with the following

<blockquote>
Question 1: Will you remove the 25,000 sqm threshold where the Minister for Planning becomes the Responsible Authority for planning applications, returning Responsible Authority status to the City of Melbourne?

YES. Under the old parties, planning ministers have been given successively greater powers to ride roughshod over local governments and community groups. These fast and loose laws have let Matthew Guy approve poorly planned developments with no consultation. The role of assessing planning applications should sit with Council as it does in other municipalities.
</blockquote>

Did I miss something here? No consultation? That is a flawed comment on a number levels and is typical of the politicisation of the planning process. I get the distinct impression if the Greens had their way every person and their dog would be sought for comment on any given planning application - economic realities dictate this is bad for generating and/or maintaining investment.

Assume for one moment it came to be that CoM regained power for approval over all planning applications. Almost instantly investment and growth would be hamstrung as fewer developments would be approved. An assumption yes but even the perception of a less that workable planning system means certain developers will neglect the market in favour of other cities etc. - that is fact.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image4_1.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Depending upon what you read, this could be the impression you get"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="420" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image4_1.jpg?itok=WW5lYezZ" title="Depending upon what you read, this could be the impression you get" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Depending upon what you read, this could be the impression you get</figcaption></figure><h2>A change in legislation?</h2>

Quite simply, no! I find the criticism of Matthew Guy in recent times excessively hard to swallow, particularly with The Age and their incessant use of Michael Buxton as a means of attacking the incumbent Planning Minister. Quite simply Matthew Guy has presided over an unparalleled period of inner-city growth in Melbourne's history.

To suggest it is his fault for approving more towers as if he were solely responsible for initiating the increased number of planning applications beyond 25,000sqm is farcical. Those increased applications are a function of the free market in which local or overseas developers make their own assessments and proceed with projects as they see fit.

Stripping away any political overtones the ultimate question is this: would this even be an issue if Melbourne maintained its previous level of planning applications rather than the heightened current number? Most people would answer no so therefore if it was in fact an issue previously why wasn't it brought up in preceding years?

<h2>Giving the little person their say</h2>

Well the heading is an oversimplification somewhat. Local councils (where applicable) and the Lord Major (regarding CoM) do have the means to address a planning application if it's the responsibility of the State. In the case of the latter this is done more so by City of Melbourne's planning officers which provide reports to State planning body DTPLI/Planning Minister via CoM's Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee.

As for lobby groups such as Save Our Suburbs or Fishermans Bend Network having a say on specific planning applications; more times than not that is an exercise in futility! These groups are far better served being given an official voice in shaping the development parameters for an urban renewal area or suburban activity centre prior to its commencement.

In this way they can shape an area from its outset with requests for certain infrastructure or community space or education requirements. Fishermans Bend Urban Renewal Area would have benefited greatly from its inception by having community groups lay out their vision early days rather than question every planning application thereafter as being too tall or some such.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/710c_05_edit.png" rel="gallery-all" title="Upsizing doesn't necessarily mean approval. Image courtesy Laurence Dragomir"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="272" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/710c_05_edit.png?itok=iPywBe0K" title="Upsizing doesn't necessarily mean approval. Image courtesy Laurence Dragomir" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Upsizing beyond 25,000sqm doesn't necessarily mean approval. Image courtesy Laurence Dragomir</figcaption></figure><h2>The system works</h2>

To put the topic in the most basic of terms, the current system is not perfect but it does work exceedingly well. Recent big ticket planning application refusals such as <a href="/developments/docklands-vic-3008">710 Collins Street</a> (rendered above) and <a href="/buildings/avant-60-abeckett-street-melbourne">54-64 A'Beckett Street</a> demonstrates we are not in a state of planning carte blanche. The key to this argument is to have as much relevant information on hand as possible in order to make a considered opinion.

To that end my opinion is simply that, I'd like to hear yours...

You can read co-editor Alastair Taylor's <a href="/expert-insights/buying/25-000sqm-threshold-yes-it-is-time-to-review-it">view on the same topic</a>.
</body></html>

State Ministers and the 25,000sqm threshold: is it time for a review?

<html><body>
With highly prized land parcels in Melbourne's CBD becoming smaller and scarcer, how do you maximise their development values and are skyscrapers viable on these compact sites? As well as sites getting smaller, so are apartments. But do they need to? How do we maximise floorspace to improve returns without compromising design and comfort?

Incredible shifts are happening in technology and building practices; we have a new generation of technology pushing the limits of concrete and steel like never before. But for engineers to continue to lead, they must provide compelling answers to the question: ‘Can we take what you want, and give you more?’

For developers, it’s more sellable area. For architects, it’s more space with less structure. For builders, it’s increased speed of construction, while at the same time ensuring health and safety.

At their very core, structural solutions for skyscrapers have to be simple, innovative and cost competitive. Melbourne is in the midst of a skyscraper construction explosion with three of the five tallest under construction benefiting from Meinhardt's expertise. They are the 72-storey Prima Pearl on the South Bank, the 68-storey 568 Collins Street; and the 58-storey Abode 318 on Russell Street.

Abode 318 and 568 Collins Street both sit on compact sites.

<h2>Abode 318</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/c8d4f3d67f050b21b492e71d270434cb.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Abode 318's unique facade. Image © Ryan Seychell"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="387" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/c8d4f3d67f050b21b492e71d270434cb.jpg?itok=MiL-VG2g" title="Abode 318's unique facade. Image © Ryan Seychell" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Abode 318's unique facade. Image courtesy Ryan Seychell</figcaption></figure>With a height to depth ratio of 9:1, Abode 318 on Russell Street in Melbourne’s CBD, could almost be classified as super skinny or pencil thin skyscraper (this is usually defined at a ratio of 11:1)

To achieve the requirements for 58-storeys on such a small site, optimising the building’s stability solution was critical. Wind tunnel testing and Finite Element Analysis were therefore conducted early in the project. This early analysis highlighted the challenges associated with wind acceleration and revealed an overall building natural frequency on the borderline for occupancy comfort.

<blockquote>
We incorporated provision for a tuned mass damper to be located at the top of the building, while at the same time optimising all of the building’s primary elements and lateral mechanisms, including car park ramps, lift cores and shear walls, in a computer model. When the structure was 80% complete the actual building frequency was measured using a ‘drop test’. One of the building cranes safely swung a weight above the structure and the building response was measured.

It was also important to not underestimate the importance of floor systems. When you have literally acres of the same footprint, it’s a significant cost to the overall project.
<cite>Vincent Amato, Senior Structural Engineer, Meinhardt</cite>
</blockquote>

This test revealed the dynamic response of the building to be acceptable without the need of the costly tuned mass damper, which could have cost the client $100k-$150k. The horizontal and vertical wave form of the Abode façade meant that every floor had a different geometry to the floor below and the floor above.

An economic floor plate design was achieved by seeking order in the waves and adopting a 10 floor repetition of the floor plate with the majority of the floor plate remaining consistent and variation being limited to the edge. This allowed the contractor to achieve economies of repetitive design with a bespoke outcome.

<h2>568 Collins Street</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/img_1290.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="568 Collins Street. Image courtesy Mark Baljak"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="870" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/img_1290.jpg?itok=tXoMtYrl" title="568 Collins Street. Image courtesy Mark Baljak" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>568 Collins Street. Image courtesy Mark Baljak</figcaption></figure>The 68-storey, mixed-use tower at 568 Collins Street meanwhile is set on a plan dimension of only 30m x 40m, which is very small for a building of this height. Traditionally in the Melbourne market high rise towers get their lateral stability solely by the central service core.

On this site, however with the limited space the client wished to maximise the sellable floor space while not impeding the views with bulky structure. By working closely with the architects and client in the early stages of the project a transfer-free structure has been created. This is rarely achieved in a mixed-use tower due to the floor plates requiring different functional grids for various uses.

<blockquote>
We were able to achieve this feat by use of advanced long term shortening and shrinkage modelling to predict and compensate for an uneven loading pattern to the structure. We called on our experience in the Middle East and Asia and adopted an outrigger system, which alleviated the core of all the work and kept the façade free of bulky structure.

With an outrigger system in two locations (top and bottom), we were able to shrink the core and give more sellable space back to the client. In addition, a retention system without temporary ground anchors accelerated construction and avoided potential damage to surrounding services.
<cite>Vincent Amato, Senior Structural Engineer, Meinhardt</cite>
</blockquote>

The whole approach also reduced the building’s overall height while keeping the desired number of floors and reduced the cost to the developer.

<h2>Prima Pearl Tower</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/rb9ci5.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="The sky high Prima Pearl. Image courtesy Paul D"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="393" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/rb9ci5.jpg?itok=VnGMK4K5" title="The sky high Prima Pearl. Image courtesy Paul D" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>The sky high Prima Pearl. Image courtesy Paul D</figcaption></figure>Located opposite Crown Casino, the prestigious 72-storey Prima Pearl apartment tower is nearing completion. The mixed-use building includes an indoor swimming pool, sauna, spa and gymnasium, private cinema, lounge and library, 8 –level podium car park, virtual golf driving range and level-67 sky lounge.

Unlike 568 Collins Street, this tower has the core doing all the work. Nevertheless, there are still opportunities to optimise space.

<blockquote>
We considered the impact of small internal core walls on the overall building stiffness. Despite receiving calls from the contractor’s steel scheduler to check what we had submitted was correct, we were able to reduce the required reinforcement and wall thickness of the main external core walls.

We have changed the shape of the floor plates above level 30 from concave to convex, which has created larger floor plates for the premium apartments. This structural floor plate design, which we developed, easily accommodated the changing building footprint without compromising a typical design philosophy for fast construction.
<cite>Vincent Amato, Senior Structural Engineer, Meinhardt</cite>
</blockquote>

This is clearly where the benefit to the project translates to added value back to the client.

It is literally possible to grab real estate out of the sky.
</body></html>

vincentamato

Skyscraper trends: Optimising sites and maximising floor plates

<html><body>
Project manager <a href="http://www.pdsgroup.com.au/">PDS Group</a> yesterday announced that one of Melbourne's largest residential buildings has been given the green light to proceed. 224-252 La Trobe Street Melbourne will now head to sales under the moniker Aurora Melbourne Central.

Designed by Elenberg Fraser, the scheme was initially referred to as "<a href="/news/the-answer-224-252-la-trobe-street-melbourne">The Answer</a>" within early planning documents, relating to the all-encompassing nature of the design. Changes ensued in line with planning authority recommendations which resulted in a leaner tower with increased setbacks and an altogether more curvaceous form.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image55.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Aurora Melbourne Central"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="860" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image55.jpg?itok=XiKp9Qt_" title="Aurora Melbourne Central" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Aurora Melbourne Central</figcaption></figure>The latest figures as released by PDS Group see 941 residential apartments and 208 serviced apartments within the 92 level structure which differs to the 88 levels initially called for. Podium levels will house a minimum of 300 car parking spaces and 781 bike spaces, in addition to commercial office space.

Aurora Melbourne Central will also connect to the north exit of Melbourne Central Train Station, a scenario which <a href="/news/changes-afoot-for-224-252-la-trobe-street">was explored in detail</a> previously.

<h2>What they say</h2>

<blockquote>
PDS Group is exceptionally proud of the team who have worked meticulously over the past 11 months to ensure the project was brought to market in accordance with world class design and our client’s expectations
<cite>Andrew Fortey, PDS Group Director</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
The tower's elegant tapering curves revolve seamlessly around its axial symmetry. Its complexity and beauty are created through rigorous geometric exploration of repetition and transition.
<cite>Callum Fraser, Architect</cite>
</blockquote>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image57.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="What's in a logo - Aurora Melbourne Central"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="275" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image57.jpg?itok=7UHGKlTu" title="What's in a logo - Aurora Melbourne Central" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>What's in a logo - Aurora Melbourne Central</figcaption></figure>Aurora Melbourne Central's developer UEM Sunrise also has planning consent for another nearby project, <a href="/buildings/conservatory-9-23-mackenzie-street-melbourne">Conservatory</a>. Together these two projects spearhead the push into the Australian market by the leading Malaysian property developer.

Marketing for Aurora Melbourne Central will begin in Melbourne shortly.
</body></html>

The answer becomes Aurora Melbourne Central upon approval

<html><body>
On Tuesday September 2nd the City of Melbourne's Future Melbourne Committee will vote on recommendations made by various departments to Council on whether to support a large development located at 224-252 La Trobe Street, to which Apartments.com.au has <a href="/news/the-answer-224-252-la-trobe-street-melbourne" target="_blank">previously reported on</a>. The relevant information for the reworked UEM Sunrise project is <a href="http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCouncil/Meetings/Lists/CouncilMeetingAgendaItems/Attachments/11741/agenda%20item%206.4.pdf" target="_blank">available online</a> (PDF format).

According to City of Melbourne's report, during pre-application discussions concerns were raised with regards to tower setbacks from the podium to the front, rear and side of the site. Subsequently an amended plan was submitted in July and it is summarised as follows:

<ul>
<li>Height of the building remains the same at 268.5 metres (286 metres RL).</li>
	<li>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burj_Khalifa">Burj Khalifa</a>-like tapered setbacks are gone giving the tower a more monolithic aesthetic.</li>
	<li>The tower is now set back on average 6-6.5 metres from its podium.</li>
	<li>Total apartments have been reduced from 1343 to 1208, broken down into 140 serviced apartments and 1068 dwellings.</li>
</ul>
City of Melbourne management have recommended the council support the amended 224-252 La Trobe Street planning application subject to various conditions (32 of them: <a href="http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCouncil/Meetings/Lists/CouncilMeetingAgendaItems/Attachments/11741/agenda%20item%206.4.pdf">see page 28</a> of the report toward the end of the document).

The assessment within <a href="http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCouncil/Meetings/Lists/CouncilMeetingAgendaItems/Attachments/11741/agenda%20item%206.4.pdf">the report</a> states:

<blockquote>
The visual impact of a 286m high tower on the city skyline is an important consideration in the assessment of this application.

Importantly it is noted that the building does not overshadow the library forecourt between the hours of 11am and 2pm on 22 September or 22 June.

Height in this location is not specifically an issue as there are a number of tall buildings within the Hoddle Grid, Southbank, Docklands and to the north of the Hoddle Grid. There is no specific height control that affects the site.
</blockquote>

It's out with the old...

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/224-252_la_trobe_street_old.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Out with the old..."><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="1109" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/224-252_la_trobe_street_old.jpg?itok=mZ-e1om8" title="Out with the old..." width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Out with the old...</figcaption></figure>... and in with the new.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/224-252_la_trobe_st_new.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="... and in with the new. Images © Elenberg Fraser"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="847" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/224-252_la_trobe_st_new.jpg?itok=drdwwqCm" title="... and in with the new. Images © Elenberg Fraser" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>... and in with the new. Images © Elenberg Fraser</figcaption></figure>The assessment further states:

<blockquote>
Tower setbacks to LaTrobe and Little LaTrobe have now been provided with 6m setbacks on both streets above podium level. We had recommended 10m setbacks but would accept 6m setbacks as a minimum, considering the curved/indented plan form.

Side setbacks have been increased to 6.5m and 7.5m minimum which are acceptable taking into account the curved/indented plan form of the tower and the orientation of apartment living spaces at the point of minimum side setback.
</blockquote>

The City of Melbourne management team also have expressed concern with the proposal to completely relocate Melbourne Central station entrances currently in existence on the northern side La Trobe Street to Little La Trobe Street.

The authors of the assessment go on to say:

<blockquote>
It is considered that the relocation would result in a poorer outcome for most users of the station who will be forced to walk longer distances underground.

Users of the La Trobe Street entry point wanting to head north to Little La Trobe Street have the opportunity to walk through the private lane along the western edge of the site and therefore do not have to use the Swanston / La Trobe intersection.

There has been no evidence submitted to the City of Melbourne to support the suggestion that the relocation would reduce congestion at that intersection.
</blockquote>

The commentary on the relocation of the station entry concludes by council management stating they recommend keeping a La Trobe Street entry and that furthermore the recommendation should not preclude an additional station access point being added to Little Lonsdale Street.
</body></html>

Alastair Taylor

Changes afoot for 224-252 La Trobe Street

<html><body>
If one statistic brings into focus Melbourne's current development boom, it's this one; since Rialto's completion heralding Melbourne's first 200 metre plus tower in 1986, a total of six towers beyond 200 metres (not including antennas) have been built in the proceeding 28 years.

Melbourne right now has 23 towers beyond 200 metres ranging from proposed to under construction.

It's a gobsmacking figure representative of a perfect storm of circumstances both locally and abroad which based upon the evidence at hand will see the vast majority of these proposals delivered, rather than land banked or onsold. Counted within the ranks of the 23 listed below are four towers of 300 metres or greater, propelling Melbourne in the the ranks of other global cities with 'Supertall' towers.

<h2>The 200 metre plus tower list as of August 2014</h2>

<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
<thead><tr>
<th>Address</th>
			<th>Height</th>
			<th>Developer</th>
			<th>Architect</th>
			<th>Status</th>
			<th>Apartments</th>
		</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/568-collins-street-melbourne">568 Collins Street</a></td>
			<td>218m</td>
			<td>Stamoulis Property Group</td>
			<td>Bruce Henderson</td>
			<td>Under Construction</td>
			<td>588</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/prima-tower-31-queensbridge-street-southbank">Prima Pearl - 31 Queensbridge Street</a></td>
			<td>254m</td>
			<td>PDG Corporation</td>
			<td>Disegno Australia</td>
			<td>Under Construction</td>
			<td>667</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vision - 500 Elizabeth Street</td>
			<td>226m</td>
			<td>Brady Group</td>
			<td>Peddle Thorp</td>
			<td>Under Construction</td>
			<td>524</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-apartments/150-queen-street-melbourne">Tower Melbourne - 150 Queen Street</a></td>
			<td>226m</td>
			<td>CEL Australia</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Delayed</td>
			<td>581</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/victoria-one-452-472-elizabeth-street-melbourne">Victoria One - 452 Elizabeth Street</a></td>
			<td>241m</td>
			<td>Golden Age</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Sales</td>
			<td>622</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/light-house-450-elizabeth-street-melbourne">Light House - 450 Elizabeth Street</a></td>
			<td>218m</td>
			<td>Hengyi - Sixth Grange</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Sales</td>
			<td>607</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/eq-tower-127-abeckett-street-melbourne">EQ Tower - 127 A'Beckett Street</a></td>
			<td>202m</td>
			<td>ICD Property</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Sales</td>
			<td>632</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-apartments/elysium-54-clarke-street-southbank">Elysium - 54 Clarke Street</a></td>
			<td>244m</td>
			<td>Baracon</td>
			<td>BKK Architects</td>
			<td>Registrations</td>
			<td>270</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-townhouses/272-queen-street-melbourne">272 Queen Street</a></td>
			<td>210m</td>
			<td>Site for sale</td>
			<td>Peddle Thorp</td>
			<td>Approved</td>
			<td>624</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/australia-108-southbank-70-southbank-boulevard-southbank">70 Southbank Boulevard</a></td>
			<td>319m</td>
			<td>Aspial WCL</td>
			<td>Fender Katsalidis</td>
			<td>Approved</td>
			<td>1105</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/west-side-place-melbourne-250-spencer-street-melbourne-vic-3000">250 Spencer Street T1</a></td>
			<td>295-300m</td>
			<td>Far East Consortium</td>
			<td>Cottee Parker</td>
			<td>Approved envelope</td>
			<td>750</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/west-side-place-melbourne-250-spencer-street-melbourne-vic-3000">250 Spencer Street T2</a></td>
			<td>235-240m</td>
			<td>Far East Consortium</td>
			<td>Cottee Parker</td>
			<td>Approved envelope</td>
			<td>805</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/west-side-place-melbourne-250-spencer-street-melbourne-vic-3000">250 Spencer Street T3</a></td>
			<td>205-210m</td>
			<td>Far East Consortium</td>
			<td>Cottee Parker</td>
			<td>Approved envelope</td>
			<td>520</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/west-side-place-melbourne-250-spencer-street-melbourne-vic-3000">250 Spencer Street T4</a></td>
			<td>225-230m</td>
			<td>Far East Consortium</td>
			<td>Cottee Parker</td>
			<td>Approved envelope</td>
			<td>788</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/380-melbourne-380-lonsdale-street-melbourne">380 Lonsdale Street</a></td>
			<td>217m</td>
			<td>Hiap Hoe</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>728</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-apartments/one-queensbridge-street-1-23-queensbridge-street-southbank">1 Queensbridge Street</a></td>
			<td>308m</td>
			<td>Schiavello - Crown</td>
			<td>Bates Smart</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>626</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-apartments/madison-grand-334-city-road-southbank">334-344 City Road</a></td>
			<td>270m</td>
			<td>Private</td>
			<td>Hayball</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>578</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/new-apartments/38-freshwater-place-southbank">25-35 Power Street</a></td>
			<td>274m</td>
			<td>ML Hospitality</td>
			<td>Metier 3</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>496</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/swanston-central-168-victoria-street-carlton">156-172 Victoria Street</a></td>
			<td>237m</td>
			<td>CEL Australia</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>1037</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/97-franklin-street-melbourne">97 Franklin Street</a></td>
			<td>216m</td>
			<td>Artemis Group</td>
			<td>Hassell Studio</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>367</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/news/planning-application-180-russell-street-melbourne">180 Russell Street</a></td>
			<td>271m</td>
			<td>AXF Australia</td>
			<td>Bunchan Group</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>506</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/aurora-melbourne-central-224-la-trobe-street-melbourne">224-252 La Trobe Street</a></td>
			<td>267m</td>
			<td>UEM Sunrise</td>
			<td>Eleneberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>1139</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/buildings/avant-60-abeckett-street-melbourne">54-64 A'Beckett Street</a></td>
			<td>253m</td>
			<td>Aspial WCL</td>
			<td>Elenberg Fraser</td>
			<td>Planning</td>
			<td>750</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/news/cbus-property-seeks-a-sky-high-planning-scheme-amendment-for-447-collins">447 Collins Street</a></td>
			<td>300m</td>
			<td>CBUS Property</td>
			<td>Woods Bagot + SHoP</td>
			<td>Proposed</td>
			<td>400</td>
		</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
All projects above include a residential component, with no purely commercial towers included. On that front QIC's 80 Collins Street comes closest with an overall height of 187 metres.

Given there are always minor fluctuations in apartment numbers per project, the above list would pump in the vicinity of 15,700 apartments or near on 30,000 permanent residents into the City of Melbourne. Factor in the thousands of hotel suites which are included within 10 of the 23 proposals and the transient population figure also rises sharply.

<h2>One image says it all</h2>

Below is a marketing image for ICD Property's EQ Tower located at 127 A'Beckett Street. If the opening Rialto statistic brings the matter into focus, the below image provides a visual aid as to the rapidly evolving nature of Melbourne's skyline.

In addition to EQ Tower, no less that 14 other towers of 200 metres or more would be visible in some way, excluding those already completed. A healthy number of these towers are located within the CBD's northern reaches surrounding EQ Tower; testament to the sudden explosion of apartments loosely surrounding Victoria Market.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/v02_ext_skyline_aerial_view_lr.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="One of many. Image courtesy eqtower.com.au"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="364" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/v02_ext_skyline_aerial_view_lr.jpg?itok=LtOraKr3" title="One of many. Image courtesy eqtower.com.au" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>One of many. Image courtesy eqtower.com.au</figcaption></figure><h2>Future towers on the radar</h2>

Listed on Melbourne-based Altus Development's website is a forthcoming scheme fo A'Beckett Street. With an expected value of $395 million, the proposal will hold a nominal 1125 apartments and hotel suites.

<blockquote>
On the high ground of Melbourne’s CBD and close to its famed premier universities, hospitals, parks and cosmopolitan nightlife of the city’s northern precinct will rise a magnificent tower. Comprising 900 residential apartments, a 4-star hotel and dining this development represents unparalleled growth opportunities. Central to key Melbourne destinations and exceptionally well-served by public transport and arterials, it is a foremost opportunity.
<cite><a href="http://www.altusdevelopment.com.au/melbourne-developments">Altus Development: Melbourne Developments</a></cite>
</blockquote>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/abeckett_crop.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="A'Beckett Street Melbourne CBD. Image © Altus Development"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="237" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/abeckett_crop.jpg?itok=9I_S9eHf" title="A'Beckett Street Melbourne CBD. Image © Altus Development" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Concept snippet for A'Beckett Street Melbourne CBD. Image © Altus Development</figcaption></figure>Elsewhere Fragrance Group's 555 Collins Street has been reported as seeking a height of 305 metres AHD in an all-commercial development, although this will be confirmed when the relevant planning application is submitted. The good oil also suggests that Fragrance Group's Savoy Tavern site on Spencer Street and PJ Development Holdings' Kavanagh car park site on Southbank will also (very) comfortably exceed the 200 metre barrier.

Of course there are also those projects which arise unbeknown to the greater public, but for the immediate future it seems likely the number of 200 metre plus proposals will slow as developers seek to materialise the many projects listed above.
</body></html>

Melbourne's 200 metre club bursting at the seams

<html><body>
Crane your neck skyward toward Southbank and you'll see the final floors appearing on Melbourne's latest high-rise icon: Prima Pearl.

Site works began in February 2011, giving a fair indication as to how much time, resource and effort is required to realise a tower of Prima Pearl's ilk. Under the guidance of Brookfield Multiplex the tower recently reached its maximum height of 256 metres, officially making Prima Pearl the 2nd tallest residential tower in Melbourne after Eureka Tower and overall the city’s fourth tallest building.

With 50 owners already inhabiting their lower level dwellings, all site construction will be completed by early 2015 marking the tower as the third successful joint project between development entities PDG and Schiavello.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/spp%2020140320.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Prima Pearl's lower levels looming over the Yarra earlier during 2014"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="385" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/spp%2020140320.jpg?itok=b-Tk4TaK" title="Prima Pearl's lower levels looming over the Yarra earlier during 2014" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Prima Pearl's lower levels looming over the Yarra earlier during 2014</figcaption></figure><h2>Design highlights</h2>

Created by Disegno Australia and defined by its highly reflective bronzed glass façade, the 72 level edifice moves incrementally from a concave to convex form over the full tower height. While aesthetically pleasing to those who look from afar, the highly reflective substrate provides uninterrupted views when looking out from within while also providing the comfort of complete privacy.

No less than 8,500 high performance glazing panels are employed over the facade whereas concrete structure specialist Form 700 employed 2372 precast panels, 42,536m³ of concrete, 4,068 tonnes of reinforcement and near on 400 tonnes of post tensioning in delivering the structure.

<h2>From the ground up!</h2>

Prima Pearl comprises two lobbies, one catering for the 369 apartments within the Pearl segment (most of which have settled), while the balance of the 661 apartments are held in the Prima component above. The Pearl lobby via Power Street provides an immediate sense of space and luxury, punctuated by a green wall. Concierge, building management and/or security personnel will be based at reception and are available 24 hours a day as required.

Eight levels of podium parking sit atop ground level while level 9 features over 2,350sqm of dedicated residential amenity space. Designed to equal the facilities of a six star hotel, the double height space incorporates a 25m in‐ground pool with sauna, spa and steam 
room. A gym, residents’ lounge, private dining room, sun lounge and barbeque terrace over the northern and eastern sides are also included.

Accessible to all residents of Prima Pearl, other amenity area facilities include a virtual golf driving range, meeting rooms, private cinema and a games room. 57 levels of residential apartments ensue while level 67 features the Skylounge, exclusively for the use of residents living on levels 46 – 65. Commanding panoramic views, the area includes multiple sun decks, swimming pool, spa with adjoining steam room, sauna and change facilities, lounge space and private dining room with catering kitchen facilities.

<h2>What they say</h2>

<blockquote>
Prima Pearl was such a unique opportunity for PDG and Schiavello to produce a world class residential tower which added significant value to Melbourne’s growing skyline. All apartments within Prima Pearl sold out within an 18 month timeframe. A prestigious position opposite the Crown Entertainment Complex with the associated five star fashion boutiques and restaurants was very appealing to a wide range of owner occupiers and investors.
<cite>PDG Sales Manager, Mark Giuliano</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
My goal was to ensure that the architectural intent was realised and that the most beautiful, liveable and unique residential tower currently in Australia would be created for PDG’s clients.
<cite>Disegno Australia Senior Associate, Roberto Dreolini</cite>
</blockquote>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Pool.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Mesmerising comes to mind. Prima Pearl's pool. Image © PDG Corporation"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="387" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/Pool.jpg?itok=rxBrnQIU" title="Mesmerising comes to mind. Prima Pearl's pool. Image © PDG Corporation" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Mesmerising comes to mind. Prima Pearl's pool. Image © PDG Corporation</figcaption></figure>Schiavello originally purchased the Prima Pearl site in 1984. After a number of designs surfaced, Prima Pearl was chosen after Schiavello joined forces with PDG during 2009 with a vision to in their own words, "create a development without equal in inner Melbourne." Testament to their hard work and dedication Melbourne now has a new, high quality icon to gaze upon.

I'm happy to say Apartments.com.au will tour Prima Pearl and provide a comprehensive pictorial review in the coming weeks.
</body></html>

Skyscrapers

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Skyscrapers

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News