Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

Joel Robinson

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

The Gold Coast Planning Committee has supported the preliminary approval for the Benowa Gardens Urban Village project following an extensive community consultation and assessment process.

The proposal will now proceed to a full council vote on June 2.

The application sought approval for a masterplanned urban village on the existing Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre site, combining new housing, retail, dining, health and lifestyle amenities within a walkable, integrated precinct.&nbsp;

The proposed redevelopment includes around 413 apartments integrated above a revitalised mixed-use centre featuring a full-line supermarket of 4,000 sqm, 6,000 sqm of specialty retail and dining space across around 30 retailers, a 7,000 sqm health and wellness precinct, and roughly 9,630 sqm of office and medical suites.&nbsp;

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fb36ae47-80bc-45f0-9914-31b0c7b6007d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C4%201121%20FI.jpg?VersionId=6mRKk2uU4r67TmTt39DKGUlvFRbTVqWa" />

The broader masterplan also includes very significant traffic and transport improvements, wide pedestrian walkways, upgraded pedestrian and cycle connections, and enhanced public areas designed to create a more connected and walkable community environment.&nbsp;

Centre owner Patrick Lu said the milestone reflected months of detailed planning, technical assessment and ongoing communication with local residents, businesses, schools and stakeholders.

“We appreciate the time, consideration and care Council officers and the Planning Committee have given this proposal throughout the assessment process,” Lu said.

“We also sincerely thank the local community for engaging with us, sharing feedback and participating in the consultation process over many months.

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32fd1fc3-d0e6-485f-ac57-9916c9bcb818" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C5%201121%20FI_2.jpg?VersionId=fz8qQKDBLQ7MyFRc856Zccfbh9nFwLOe" />

“We understand projects of this scale bring questions and concerns, which is why we have worked hard to listen carefully, provide information transparently and continue refining elements of the proposal where possible.

“Our vision has always been to create a well-designed, community-focused urban village that responds to the changing needs of the Gold Coast, while delivering improved amenity, housing diversity, healthcare access and local lifestyle benefits.

“This proposal is about creating a genuine live-work-play environment where residents can access everyday services, schools, healthcare, dining, shopping and green space within walking distance, while also supporting local jobs and economic activity.”

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="50dfbd04-590e-4fc6-983b-766880947867" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Dining%20Day%20Time%20-%20High%20Resolution.jpg?VersionId=BP7ZoKJ0DdL_8iRkkC8VVx99moICV6kg" />

Lu said the proposal had evolved significantly through consultation and technical review, particularly around traffic, pedestrian and student safety and neighbourhood connectivity.&nbsp;

Melissa Griffin, Director at Urbis, said the recommendation recognised the strategic importance of delivering more housing and services within established urban areas already supported by infrastructure.

“This proposal represents the type of thoughtful, integrated growth that planning frameworks across South-East Queensland are encouraging,” Ms Griffin said.

“The project seeks to place housing, retail, healthcare and employment opportunities together in a highly accessible location close to schools, transport and existing services.

“Importantly, the process has involved significant technical assessment and community engagement to ensure local issues and feedback were properly considered throughout the planning pathway.”

$1 billion Benowa Gardens Urban Village heads to council vote following Planning Committee support

Surfers Paradise is officially set for its first new residential development with a 45-storey skybridge connecting the two towers.

John Camilleri’s Celestino Developments has been given the green light by the Gold Coast City Council to develop its major beachfront precinct across its huge 4,000 sqm oceanfront site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/63-79-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">63–79 Garfield Terrace</a>, just five months after its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-billionaire-winx-breeder-s-bold-two-tower-surfers-paradise-play-with-45th-storey-skybridge">submission in late 2025</a>.

The approved scheme will deliver two towers rising 55 and 48 storeys, connected by a skybridge positioned on level 45 that will house a range of resident-only wellness and entertainment spaces.

In its notice of approval, the Gold Coast City Council said the&nbsp;proposed overall built form has been designed to complement the scale, intensity and protect the adjacent amenity and surrounding streets through the use of varied setbacks, site cover and architectural elements.

<img alt="First look exclusive: Billionaire Winx breeder’s bold two-tower Surfers Paradise play with 45th-storey skybridge" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-30%20at%209.53.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=ADyPJ_TFbJvSU9wZFOiCBnlPtgF7VWqW" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dbi">DBI</a>, the development will comprise 275 apartments across the two towers, including a mix of two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences, as well as several penthouses. The apartments will sit above a landscaped podium featuring more than 90 metres of beachfront pool frontage, private resident lawns, lounges, and wellness spaces.

DBI said the design draws heavily from the movement and form of the coastal environment, with curving balcony lines and sculpted façades intended to soften the scale of the towers while maximising ocean outlooks and passive shading outcomes.

“The project occupies a rare, uninterrupted oceanfront site and has been shaped by a design philosophy that merges architectural elegance with environmental responsiveness and a carefully curated lifestyle experience,” DBI said in planning documents submitted to the Gold Coast City Council.

The most distinctive element of the approved project is the skybridge linking the two towers at level 45. The elevated communal space is planned to include executive lounges, formal dining areas, wellness facilities, and panoramic ocean-facing outlooks.

“The skybridge enhances the identity of the development, promotes social interaction, and delivers a lifestyle experience not found elsewhere on the Gold Coast,” DBI said.

At podium level, residents will have access to a suite of resort-style amenities, including resident lounges, private dining rooms, a yoga lawn, gymnasium, plunge pools, and treatment spaces. The beachfront pool has been designed with separate lap, lounge, and children’s areas extending across the width of the site.

The project will also introduce new food and beverage offerings along the Enderley Avenue and Oceanway frontages, contributing additional activation to the beachfront precinct.

First look: Winx billionaire’s beachfront Surfers Paradise apartment development greenlit

Planning applications

<html><body>
A few games of Street Fighter II, killing your mates in Phaser Strike and throwing up on the Gravitron (with "Ice Ice Baby" blaring in the background) was a dream day out when growing up in Melbourne in the 1980's and 1990's. And the only place you could have all this was the Fun Factory on the Corner of Chapel Street and Toorak Road in South Yarra.

But the fun was not to last as Chapel Street became the place to be seen in Melbourne in the 1980's, developers started hatching plans to redevelop the massive Fun Factory Site. In 1989 a permit was issued for the demolition of the building and the development of a 15 storey apartment tower. However the Recession through the early 1990's meant that this plan was never built and the Fun Factory lived on. By 1999 economic conditions had improved and the owners of the site proposed a massive mixed use redevelopment of the site including a 42 storey tower. City of Stonnington officials were not ready for this scale of development and the application was promptly refused by Council.

<figure><a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image10_3.jpg" title="Early concepts for the Fun Factory. Images courtesy AppleInsider and Webber Design" class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" rel="gallery-all"><img src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/Image10_3.jpg?itok=Be1dhJAn" width="580" height="312" alt="" title="Early concepts for the Fun Factory. Images courtesy AppleInsider and Webber Design" class="image-article-full-width-580px"></a>
<figcaption>Early concepts for the Fun Factory. Images courtesy AppleInsider and Webber Design</figcaption></figure>Subsequently Fender Katsalidis Architects were employed to deliver a new design, they being at that time the go-to architects for getting difficult proposals through the planning system. A new plan was hatched that incorporated a retail podium with a 27 level, 91 metre high apartment tower rising above. The application was approved by the City of Stonington in 2001. A local residents group appealed the decision, but VCAT upheld Council's decision.

This development was also never built and by 2008 the owners of the site commissioned yet another proposal for the site. This time they employed Bates Smart Architects to design a redeveloped Fun Factory consisting a retail podium with a 9 storey office building and a 39 storey apartment tower rising above. At 134 metres high, the main tower would have easily become the tallest building outside of the central city area. This proposal was refused by the City of Stonnington despite the recommendation of Council officers who supported the application. That decision was overturned by VCAT on appeal in late 2009.

By late 2010 the project was known as The Capitol and apartments in the main tower were on sale to the public. Marketed as a high end luxury development with large, it contained well-appointed apartments with even larger penthouse apartments on the upper floors. Joint developers including APN Property Group were optimistic about the prospects of the development and around the same time applied to VCAT to increase the height of the tower to 151m by adding an additional 5 penthouse levels. This application was refused by Council and the refusal was upheld by VCAT who saw the increase in height as going one step too far. The developer’s optimism proved to be unfounded and by the end of 2011 sales in the development were struggling to break to 50% mark and by the end of the year the development had been shelved.

<figure><a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/capitol%20comparison_0.jpg" title="Image comparing the initial Bates Smart scheme to that currently seeking approval. Image © Bates Smart" class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" rel="gallery-all"><img src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/capitol%20comparison_0.jpg?itok=rT0_MJkT" width="580" height="400" alt="" title="Image comparing the initial Bates Smart scheme to that currently seeking approval. Image © Bates Smart" class="image-article-full-width-580px"></a>
<figcaption>Image comparing the initial Bates Smart scheme to that currently seeking approval. Image © Bates Smart</figcaption></figure>With the developers considering all options including the sale of the site, they have instead submitted yet another application to amend the approved development. Amendments involve a significant increase in the number of smaller one and two bedroom apartments and a reduction in floor to ceiling heights. These intended changes will also simplify the buildings floor plans, remove the office component and split the development into two stages.

The developers are hoping that these measures will increase the broader market appeal and in turn the financial viability of the project, making apartments far easier to sell at a lower price range. Council voted on 20th May not to support the proposed amendments as they viewed the new scheme as watereing down the design intent of the original Bates Smart scheme, signalling that the architectural expression of the amended development will no longer produce an iconic podium tower development or a sculptural and slender building.

VCAT will now have a very difficult decision between insisting that any development on the site must have an exceptional standard of architectural design, even if that means the site may remain underutilised for another 24 years, or accepting that it was not realistic to expect such a high standard of design would be economically viable and that in order to achieve the objective of providing more dwellings in existing activity centres that the amended design will be good enough. Time will tell...
</body></html>

nwharr

Sixth time lucky at the Fun Factory?

<html><body>
As some readers would know, a revised planning application was recently submitted for the old Queensbridge Hotel site at 1-23 Queensbridge Street, Southbank. Joint partners Schiavello Group and PDG Corporation intend to expand upon already approved plans for their previous Queensbridge Tower project.

Originally proposing the demolition of two buildings at 1-7 and 9-15 Queensbridge Street and the erection of a slim 276m residential tower, the developers have now decided to demolish a third site at 17-23 Queensbridge Street, which will be merged into the development allowing for much larger floor-plates than its predecessor.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image17_0.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Aerial of Southbank with1-23 Queensbridge Street highlighted."><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image17_0.jpg?itok=BX6n6RS1" title="Aerial of Southbank with1-23 Queensbridge Street highlighted." typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

While the height remains unchanged, the new tower will now be mixed use in nature. An initial 10 level podium will be followed by 17 levels of hotel accommodation, with the balance consisting of high-end apartments and residential facilities interspersed with five plant levels, for a total floor area of 138,859sqm. Taking inspiration from their earlier proposal and surrounding buildings, architects Bates Smart have evolved the elegant design to now show a bundle of three linked asymmetrical cylindrical towers creating a structure that, with the use of soft undulating forms and platinum/silver glass, is sure to become an iconic tower for Melbourne's Southbank precinct.

The make-up of the tower will see a single level of underground car parking (owing to unfavourable underground conditions), along with 10 levels of above ground car parking catering for 630 car spaces and 186 bicycle bays. A wrap of apartments over the podium and hotel recreational facilities have been included to activate the Queensbridge Street frontage. Directly above the podium will sit 408 hotel rooms, varying in size between 41sqm and 60sqm.

Upper levels contain 604 apartments, boasting 3.5 metre ceilings. 31 levels of mid-rise apartments and 10 levels of high-rise apartments will be split by a recreational level incorporating a pool abutting the northern facade allowing panoramic city views. Typical apartments will range from 61sqm to 137sqm.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image15_0.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="The proposed Queensbridge Tower as seen from Northbank"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image15_0.jpg?itok=0DQTTOFQ" title="The proposed Queensbridge Tower as seen from Northbank" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Queensbridge Tower incorporates an intended setback of 10 metres to the existing Freshwater Place apartment tower and the approved 25 Queensbridge Street highrise circa approximately 240m, however a variety of initiatives have been undertaken by Bates Smart to help alleviate any perceived intimacy issues. These include a screen-like façade, whilst also employing vertical privacy screening which allow for expansive views, without peering into neighbouring buildings.

Bates Smart have already used this method to great effect on Proximity Apartments which overlook Albert Park Lake, allowing for a stylist and efficient outcome. Further, balconies will be treated as winter gardens with the area protected by awning sashes which can be opened by occupants at their discretion, allowing for additional enclosed living space where desired.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image13_3.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Intended sight lines and privacy screeens for Queensbridge Tower"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image13_3.jpg?itok=jnVNiq2C" title="Intended sight lines and privacy screeens for Queensbridge Tower" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

A range of amenities will be located with the building, allowing residents the added benefit of hotel services within the one complex. These amenities include a recreational area on level 10 involving a pool, gym and spa as well as a bar for residents and hotel guests. Level 28 will also include similar recreational amenities, however will be exclusive to hotel members and residents of the upper levels of the building. One notion the planning application focuses on however, is the idea that this development will finally complete Queensbridge Square, in particular opening up the square to the southern end of Queensbridge Street. Bates Smart have designed all three buildings fronting the area allows for continuity of design.

The podium has been designed to keep uniformity with the current built environment along Queensbridge Street, drawing inspiration from the geometry of the Freshwater Place podium, with horizontal and vertical lines prevalent in the design. At ground level the development will include a large Schiavello showroom space, which is designed to be an “important visitor attraction in Southbank”. At street level, blue stone paving and greenery will be incorporated, an initiative which will definitely improve the area which is devoid of any vegetation at present.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image1111.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Queensbridge Street activation as envisaged by the planning aplication"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image1111.jpg?itok=dSoGaHym" title="Queensbridge Street activation as envisaged by the planning aplication" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Currently sections of Queensbridge Square are not pedestrian friendly, which was originally implemented to protect the area from party goers at the then QBH nightclub. The subsequent closure of the club and intended development of the site will allow for greater accessibility in and out of the square with the removal of the elevated wall separating Freshwater Place and Queensbridge Square.

The lack of smaller retail tenancies to help activate the area is noteworthy, although there are a great variety of outlets in the adjoining Freshwater Place precinct. Further the architects have emphasized the showroom component which they along with Schiavello believe will become a destination in itself. Based upon the plans there's no doubt Queensbridge Tower is one of the highest quality proposals in Melbourne at the moment and will definitely enhance Southbank. If approved, eventual construction will likely to be a joint venture between developers Schiavello and PDG, following the success of other recent developments undertaken by the pair including <a href="/buildings/prima-tower-31-queensbridge-street-southbank">Prima Pearl</a> in Southbank and <a href="/buildings/abode-318-318-russell-street-melbourne" target="_blank">Abode Apartments</a> on Russell Street.

 

All images © Bates Smart 

 
</body></html>

melbournee12

Planning Application > 1-23 Queensbridge Street, Southbank

<html><body>
Given it's a long weekend, a brief article today highlighting two developments that I believe should be the benchmark for all medium sized apartment developments in Melbourne when it comes to green credentials.

First up, <a href="http://www.yarracity.vic.gov.au/Planning--Building/Major-developments/97-99-Rose-Street-Fitzroy/" target="_blank">VCAT have recently overturned a Yarra City Council decision</a> to reject an apartment proposal at 97-99 Rose street, Fitzroy. Going by the name Rawhouse, the development has been jointly conceived by Breathe Architecture and Small Giants as a follow-up to their <a href="/news/is-this-melbournes-best-new-residential-development" target="_blank">Commons</a> project in Brunswick. Holding 12 apartments, 22 bike spaces and a restaurant at ground, no car parking has been included due to the area's excellent public transport connectivity.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image322.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Breathe Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image322.jpg?itok=gmpjoAG3" title="Image © Breathe Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Mirroring Commons, Rawhouse is also laden with <a href="/news/6-of-australia-s-top-sustainable-architectural-design-trends">ESD</a> features, including an open stairwell (below) which allows natural light and ventilation to foster a living facade. The building's timber and concrete finishes will be simple in their nature and recycled where possible allowing high insulation, high thermal and acoustic performance, low energy demands and an optimal living environment.

Further, rainwater will be harvested for reuse in toilet flushing while captured water will also serve all greenery via an irrigation system. Rawhouse is designed to be naturally ventilated and is expected to be a 100% green energy building. A fully useable rooftop green space will feature both winter (north) and summer (south) spaces with vegetable garden plots available. Extensive solar panels and solar hot water panels round out the building.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image3233.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Breathe Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image3233.jpg?itok=tYEEHU69" title="Image © Breathe Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Secondly, <a href="http://illura.com.au/" target="_blank">Illura Apartments</a> located at <a href="http://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=87-101+Roden+Street+West+Melbourne&amp;hl=en&amp;sll=-37.807521,144.948657&amp;sspn=0.003666,0.008256&amp;gl=au&amp;hnear=87-101+Roden+St,+West+Melbourne+Victoria+3003&amp;t=m&amp;z=17" target="_blank">87-101 Roden Street West Melbourne</a> is nearing completion. Conceived by Elenberg Fraser Architects with Tract Consultants (landscaping) for Manhattan Hansen Group, the 92 one and two bedroom project has been delivered by Construction Engineering.

Featured over the facade are four vertical garden panels holding native grasses, mirroring the area's ecology prior to settlement. An internal grey water system fed by apartment showers will ensure there is ample sustenance for the greenery.

If nothing else, Illura's facade looks stunning!
</body></html>

silvermb

Two thumbs up!

<html><body>
Given City of Port Phillip's resolute preference for a 100m height limit over the Montague precinct of the Fishermans Bend urban renewal project, they may well be sent into an apoplectic state should this exceptional concept design eventually come to fruition. Delivered by Architecton for an undisclosed client, it carries the address 120-132 Ferrars Street, South Melbourne. Currently home to a nondescript low level brown brick factory, the 1207sqm site may well become the areas landmark tower based on the images below.

For comparison's sake the block form below left is the 165m, <a href="/buildings/134-142-ferrars-street-south-melbourne">143-142 Ferrars Street, South Melbourne</a> scheme designed by Rothe Lowman which is currently under planning consideration.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/hd_2a61dc01bc07d143b94071bef3ac1863.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Architecton"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/hd_2a61dc01bc07d143b94071bef3ac1863.jpg?itok=2yZqFJfj" title="Image © Architecton" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

The design calls for retail and lobby facilities through the ground floor, followed by five levels of podium carparking. Thereafter residential apartments would rise to level 60, with (sub)penthouses to level 68. Level 69 includes a plant room while the remainder consists of essentially a sloping architecture feature measuring 235m to tip.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image51.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Architecton"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image51.jpg?itok=YGIjYZJR" title="Image © Architecton" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Granted the concept design is just that, but it would not have been commissioned with a basis of intent. When a planning application is eventually submitted for 120-132 Ferrars Street, it will be interesting to see what scale tower is called for and whether the above concept is an accurate precursor to the fact.

If nothing else Architecton's concept poses the question; should Montague have a signature tower much like what Eureka is to Southbank, or should the area be content in churning out towers of uniform height and bulk? I would suggest any precinct/skyline is far more dynamic with a degree of variety, so by all means add a tower of this scale on the proviso the design quality is of the highest calibre.

See Architecton's <a href="http://www.architecton.com.au/34556/1408291/select-projects/ferrars-street-south-melbourne" target="_blank">Ferrars Street project</a> webpage for further information and images
</body></html>

CoPP that! 235m tower for Fishermans Bend?

<html><body>
A closer look today at one of the ever increasing number of planning applications that eventually intend to call the Joseph Road Precinct of Footscray home. 1 Warde Street was submitted to state government body DPCD last year for approval, although as yet no planning decision has been revealed. Devised by <a href="http://elenbergfraser.com/#!/" target="_blank">Elenberg Fraser</a> for burgeoning property developers Urban Inc, and with the working name Romeo and Juliet, 1 Warde Street is already visible on <a href="http://urbaninc.com.au/pages/ajax/places/romeo-and-juliet#" target="_blank">Urban Inc's website</a> and forms part of the developers intended future development stock.

Located well back within the Joseph Street Precinct, 1 Warde Street's 2181sqm site would be hemmed in by the already approved <a href="/new-apartments/12-moreland-street-footscray" target="_blank">10 Moreland Street </a>development to the east, and the Footscray rail reserve to the west. Stage One is the smaller, 19 level tower whilst the taller Stage Two would match its intended neighbour at 26 levels, thereby not exceeding a height transition line as seen below.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image13_2.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="1 Warde street as seen from Newell Street, Footscray."><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image13_2.jpg?itok=H0YQLKXx" title="1 Warde street as seen from Newell Street, Footscray."></a>

As per the submission, 1 Warde Street would contain 311 apartments over two towers which when completed would appear as one solid structure. 263 car parking spaces would be available over five levels, as would be 211 bicycle bays. Overall height of the buildings would round out at 63m and 84m respectively, with Stage 1 including 140 apartments whilst the taller Stage 2 allows for 171 residential dwellings. All apartments will be a choice of one and two bedroom options.

Both rooftops would include useable areas for residents with stage 1 incorporating communal indoor and outdoor lounges, sundecks, landscaping, kitchen and a barbeque area. Stage 2 holds an altogether similar layout with the exception being a gym incorporated into the facility, offering excellent views.

Double level SOHO commercial spaces will be available at ground fronting either Warde Street or Neilson Place, as will apartments, a dedicated restaurant space and an 84sqm cafe. These retail spaces will front an intended public park directly west of the proposed development.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image2_14.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="1 Warde street as seen from Wightman Street within the Joseph Street Precinct."><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image2_14.jpg?itok=1LVx1yRs" title="1 Warde street as seen from Wightman Street within the Joseph Street Precinct."></a>

Heavily resembling Elenberg Fraser's previous project <a href="http://elenbergfraser.com/#!/project/clara" target="_blank">Clara</a>, 1 Warde Street's podium is designed to mimic an "Eroded, porous, inhabited base. It provides a continuous streetscape and an urban scale to Warde Street." Conversely the tower element has incorporated a number of vertical elements, with Elenberg Fraser describing the tower as "A light crystalline cluster of volumes. It introduces verticality above the podium level and provides articulated surfaces that structure the built form."

Bombastic language aside, the architects aim is to create two contrasting elements, they being the podium and tower. Particularly pleasing is the use of greenery over the carpark levels. Not only does the greenery hide the inactive perforated metal screens, it ties in nicely with the intended park greenery of the immediate area.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image11_5.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Cause and effect, 1 Warde Street inspirations."><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image11_5.jpg?itok=IlLzbGr3" title="Cause and effect, 1 Warde Street inspirations."></a>

As expected, Maribyrnong City Council have voiced opposition over a number of issues relating to this application. 1 Warde Street has failed to gain support from City of Maribyrnong based on the following factors.

<ul>
<li>The proposal significantly exceeds the 12 storey height limit allowed under local policy</li>
	<li>The proposal fails to provide an appropriate land use mix, with recreation and community uses lacking in particular</li>
	<li>The proposal fails to provide diversity in housing choice</li>
	<li>Overshadowing issues</li>
	<li>Unacceptable internal amenity for occupants due to wind impacts</li>
	<li>Insufficient carparking provisions</li>
</ul>
Whilst Council have submitted the above injections, they have also requested that upon gaining approval (in whatever form that may be) via DPCD, a Development Contribution of $900 per dwelling be imposed, which is higher than what has been allowed for in the planning application.

Whereas a number of planning applications in the Joseph Road Precinct have been put forward by non-developers seeking to sell their land parcel with planning approval in place, 1 Warde Street may well be the first development to break ground. Working on the assumption that 1 Warde Street will eventually gain planning approval from DPCD, its likely Urban Inc as a property developer will see this application through to fruition.

All images above taken from DPCD planning application and © Elenberg Fraser Architects.
</body></html>

Planning Application > 1 Warde Street, Footscray

<html><body>
As demolition progresses for the Upper House residential development on Swanston Street, another apartment building on an adjoining site awaits approval with a planning application lodged for 139-155 Queensberry Street, Carlton. Currently under assesment by Melbourne City Council, the site is also bound by Queensberry Way and Cornell Place. The building if constructed will rise 15 levels and sit between the 17 level <a href="/buildings/upper-house-516-520-swanston-street-carlton">Upper House</a> project and the 9 level, at sales <a href="/buildings/81-cardigan-street-carlton#content" target="_blank">81 Cardigan Street</a>.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/139QueensburyStreet5.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="As envisaged from Queensberry Street, with Upper House to the right. "><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/139QueensburyStreet5.jpg?itok=udmReqi7" title="As envisaged from Queensberry Street, with Upper House to the right." typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

<figcaption>As envisaged from Queensberry Street, with Upper House to the right.</figcaption></figure>A product of <a href="http://www.plusarchitecture.com.au/" target="_blank">Plus Architecture</a>, the building will hold a highly articulated light weight façade, which will include horizontal and vertical framing in a bid to break up the mass of the structure. It will comprise 193 residential dwellings and include 72 bicycle spaces.

138 on site car parking spaces will also be included in the development over 3 basement levels, with vehicular access to the building planned for both Queensberry Way and Cornell Place laneways, allowing for the activation of Queensberry Street which will be improved through the addition of 2 new retail outlets. Plus Architecture have also incorporated faux cottages through the ground floor facade, cleverly bringing an element of interest to an otherwise unused and seldom walked laneway.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/139QueensburyStreet3.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Ground level articulation. Image © Plus Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/139QueensburyStreet3.jpg?itok=-lo1YJXy" title="Ground level articulation. Image © Plus Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

<figcaption>Ground level articulation. Image © Plus Architecture</figcaption></figure>Adding to the amenity of the building will be a communal rooftop terrace which will be accessible to all residents of the building. The architects have designed the building in a way that allows for a transitional built form for the area, between the higher density Swanston Street precinct and the low rise Carlton precinct. Through this initiative, the Queensberry Street frontage will rise 10 levels to a total height of 32m with an additional 5 levels constructed above this which will be set back between 11.2 and 12.6 metres. The setback also allows for a clear differentiation between the podium levels and the upper levels in the building.

While an effort has been made to provide this transition in built form between the two precincts, Carlton residents have already voiced their opposition to the proposal, with the Carlton Residents Association claiming that 15 stories is of “excessive height” and that it does not aid the transition from taller buildings on Swanston Street to low-rise in the east of Swanston Street. Another point of concern is the domolition of the Australian Communication Workers Union building onsite.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image2_13.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="The current building as per Google Maps"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image2_13.jpg?itok=ebm2aFV_" title="The current building as per Google Maps" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

<figcaption>The current building as per Google Maps</figcaption></figure>If given the go ahead, one would assume apartments in the building would be highly sought after following the recent selling out of all apartments in the Upper House building. A decision has not yet been made on the permit.

Renders © Plus Architecture.
</body></html>

Planning Application > 139-155 Queensberry Street, Carlton

<html><body>
Trouble looms on the horizon for regulars who seek refreshment at the Rising Sun Hotel, one of a string of Richmond pubs engrained in the area's psyche and history. 395 Swan Street owner S. Tsourlenes &amp; Son Pty Ltd have teamed with SJB Planning and Catt Architects to submit for approval a seven level apartment building which would replace this historic venue.
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image11_4.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © theriser.com.au"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image11_4.jpg?itok=qoNTF6WT" title="Image © theriser.com.au" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
Sourcing the venue's website, The Rising Sun was established during the late 1800's. Through a number of owners and alterations the building has managed to maintain both character and a degree of heritage, lending itself as a local landmark in the process. The scheme below however calls for 30 apartments and 350sqm of retail space over seven levels. Heavy on precast panels and light on architectural flair, it's a clear departure from the present.
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image3_12.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Catt Architects"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image3_12.jpg?itok=-ZgaSwpr" title="Image © Catt Architects" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
The L-shaped building will contain two below ground levels catering for 23 vehicles, bicycle and apartment storage and services, all accessed via a laneway running off Beissel Street. With 22 two-bedroom and 8 one-bedroom options, expected living spaces range between 45sqm and 99sqm. The majority of dual bedroom options will sit around the 80sqm mark.
In response to the High Density Guidelines for the area, the planning report contends the following, "The development will make a positive and lasting contribution to the quality of architecture in the Burnley precinct. It is designed to address both main street frontages with a well resolved design that acknowledges the corner location." In relation to ensuring visual impacts to immediate dwellings are appropriate, the report suggests "The building has been designed to be viewed from all angles, with all elevations well-articulated."
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image6_7.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Image © Catt Architects"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image6_7.jpg?itok=SgMzw1_i" title="Image © Catt Architects" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
As disappointing as potentially losing this hotel is to many, evidently The Rising Sun seems to have met its end as a viable concern. As the saying goes, times change! Now it's the task of Yarra City Council to determine whether this proposal is an acceptable replacement. Issues to be addressed include the proposals impact upon the area's amenity, heritage concerns, the proposal's architectural merit and its sympathy toward its immediate surrounds.
 
For further details, click on the <a href="http://urbanmelbourne.info/projects/yarra/395-swan-street-richmond" target="_blank">395 Swan Street</a> database listing
</body></html>

Bad Moon Rising

<html><body>
It's not often that a developer goes to the trouble of commissioning two schemes for the one site with the expectations both will gain planning approval. That's precisely what South Yarra stalwart developer Michael Yates &amp; Co has done. 661 Chapel Street, South Yarra is currently a lowrise commercial complex yet should either or both applications gain approval, a minimum 287 apartments can be expected.

The developer has been in negotiations with the adjacent Melbourne High School (MHS) to sell a portion of the development site, all things proceeding as planned a 933sqm northern section of 661 Chapel Street will transfer to MHS for use as student accommodation and teaching facilities. Within this agreement is a clause where the intended MHS building can only rise to the equivalent of four carpark levels of the adjoining future 661 Chapel Street development, protecting residential sight lines by invoking light and air easements.

It's expected the site will be divided into three lots once MHS and the State Government complete negotiations for funding, with two being retained by the developer. Should the planned sale and transfer to MHS not proceed, a larger scheme incorporating the entire site has also been submitted to Stonnington for approval, leading to dual planning applications.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Img_5224_0.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="661 Chapel Street ground plan with Melbourne's High School's portion to the right"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Img_5224_0.jpg?itok=FvJ-cQZt" title="661 Chapel Street ground plan with Melbourne's High School's portion to the right" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Major differences between Michael Yates &amp; Co's schemes 1 and 2 can be summarised by the following, where Scheme 1 reserves the intended MHS plot C (seen above) while Scheme 2 incorporates plot C into a larger development.

<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" height="283" style="width: 100%;" width="829">
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col">Scheme 1</th>
			<th scope="col"> </th>
			<th scope="col">Scheme 2</th>
			<th scope="col"> </th>
		</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tower 1A</td>
			<td>Tower 1B</td>
			<td>Tower 1A</td>
			<td>Tower 1B</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
			<td> </td>
			<td> </td>
			<td> </td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>26 levels</td>
			<td>21 levels</td>
			<td>26 levels</td>
			<td>21 levels</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>76m</td>
			<td>60.35m</td>
			<td>76m</td>
			<td>60.35m</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>158 apartments</td>
			<td>129 apartments</td>
			<td>202 apartments</td>
			<td>137 apartments</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>131 car spaces</td>
			<td>128 car spaces</td>
			<td>175 car spaces</td>
			<td>161 car spaces</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>46 bicycle spaces</td>
			<td>45 bicycle spaces</td>
			<td>60 bicycle spaces</td>
			<td>57 bicycle spaces</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>unknown</td>
			<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>1187sqm office</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>54sqm retail space</td>
			<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>189sqm cafe</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>69sqm retail space</td>
			<td>&gt;&gt;</td>
			<td>217sqm shop</td>
		</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Working on the assumption that the MHS plan eventuates, the smaller scheme 1 would involve 287 apartments split between two buildings which share a common wall. The taller west building (1A) at 26 levels would command sweeping views over Port Phillip Bay and Melbourne's CBD while the abutting 21 level East building (1B) fronts Chapel Street with views to the Dandenongs.

Whilst appearing as one unbroken form, the two tower complex allows Developer Michael Yates &amp; Co to deliver a staged development if they so desire, releasing one or both to public sales at their discretion.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Img_5252_1.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="661 Chapel Street centre stage with Avenue (left) and Yarra house (right) at different stages of construction"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Img_5252_1.jpg?itok=GA529Q9W" title="661 Chapel Street centre stage with Avenue (left) and Yarra house (right) at different stages of construction" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Project architect Bird De La Coeur have by intent or coincidence devised a western tower that is remarkably similar in form to Buchan Group's Vogue apartment tower at 670 Chapel Street. Both employ a sheer glass facade indented with balcony openings. Conversely 661 Chapel Street's eastern building includes a number for setbacks from Chapel Street, the first of which occurs at level 6 or 20.5m above street level. A further setback occurs at level 18 or 55.85m, allowing the building to transition into the taller western tower.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image1_17.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Bird De La Coeur's proposed 661 Chapel Street with Buchan's existing 670 Chapel Street "><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image1_17.jpg?itok=JSolnWCU" title="Bird De La Coeur's proposed 661 Chapel Street with Buchan's existing 670 Chapel Street " typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

Questions may be raised as to the amount of vehicular space dedicated to the porte-cochere and whether it could be used in a more meaningful purpose, exacerbated by the fact the eastern tower will also have another carpark entry. This results in three separate vehicle access points to Chapel Street.

The porte-cochere is made possible by a 30m setback from Chapel Street for the western tower while the eastern tower maintains 2.82m setback, in line with the existing streetscape. Retail premises are prominent, as are the alfresco dining areas, thereby enhancing activity and interaction with Chapel Street.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Img_5250.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="The building as seen from Chapel Street"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Img_5250.jpg?itok=cU25I8XO" title="The building as seen from Chapel Street" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>

A Stonnington Council planning decision for 661 Chapel Street is imminent.

All renders and ground plan © Bird De La Coeur Artchitects
</body></html>

Take it either way > 661 Chapel Street planning application

<html><body>
A company associated with <a href="http://www.littleprojects.com.au/" target="_blank">Little Projects</a> is awaiting a planning decision from Minister Guy's department for a large residential complex on the banks of the Maribyrnong River. Located within the currently vacant <a href="http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/Page/Page.aspx?Page_id=2220" target="_blank">Joseph Road Precinct</a> that is earmarked for intensive redevelopment, Devcorp (Vic) Pty Ltd is the applicant for the subject site, 2 Hopkins Street Footscray. Whilst City of Maribyrnong have voiced their opposition to the scheme and called for improved planning controls for the precinct, ultimate responsibility rests with state planning body DPCD.
Considered the precinct's most important site due to its proximity to Maribyrnong River, <a href="http://www.plusarchitecture.com.au/" target="_blank">Plus Architecture</a> have subsequently incorporated a large tranche of open space slicing through the middle of the site, allowing future residents living deeper within the precinct direct access to the Maribyrnong River's bank and facilities.
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image3_13.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Site overview and ground layout. Image © Plus Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image3_13.jpg?itok=FRX1Di_C" title="Site overview and ground layout. Image © Plus Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
The scheme calls for four distinctive buildings of 16, 18, 20 and 25 levels holding a total 774 apartments. Of those 278 will be one bedroom, 496 two bedroom with no 3 bedroom or penthouse apartments available. Above ground podiums will accomodate 759 car parking bays (including 50 visitor parking spaces), 277 bicycle spaces while each apartment also receives at least one storage cage.
Intended building heights range between 50 and 82 meters. The tallest tower would sit to the site's north-west corner while a distinctive angular glass tower would front Hopkins Street and the Maribyrnong River, thereby becoming the most visible of all proposed buildings in the precinct if travelling in a westerly direction via Dynon Road.
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image46.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="View from the eastern bank of the Maribyrnong. Image © Plus Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image46.jpg?itok=juCXDuLq" title="View from the eastern bank of the Maribyrnong. Image © Plus Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
1315sqm of commercial space is expected to be split over two buildings, they being the two towers located closest to Hopkins Street. In this way retail street activation is maximised along the future Maribyrnong Street and extended Warde Street junction. Active frontages are also designed into the lower levels of all buildings fronting Maribyrnong River.
Having both Warde Street and Neilson Place extensions traverse the site will have a two-pronged effect. The public realm would be clearly defined with direct Maribyrnong River Trail and park access through the site, furthermore these pedestrian thoroughfares would physically divide the site into three parcels, allowing a staged development if the developer so wishes.
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image7_12.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Ground level from Maribyrnong Street and Neilson Street. Image © Plus Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image7_12.jpg?itok=bk-I2Xf-" title="Ground level from Maribyrnong Street and Neilson Street. Image © Plus Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
Maribyrnong City Council have voiced their opposition toward 2 Hopkins Street in its submitted form, stating "The proposal raises significant issues with respect to inappropriate built form, limited mix of uses, non-compliance with State and Local Planning Policies and impact on the Maribyrnong River."
Maribyrnong City Council have also included the following issues which led to their opposing this scheme;
<ul>
<li>
		request the Developer Contribution Payment increase from $450 to $900 per dwelling</li>
	<li>
		an inadequate mix of uses, in particular employment generating uses and fails to contribute to housing diversity</li>
	<li>
		lack of adequate parking on site for visitors/patrons. Scheme doesn't take parking needs of entire precinct into account</li>
	<li>
		noted overshadowing concerns, see below the expected shadow 2pm, September 22nd (equinox)</li>
</ul>
<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image13_1.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="22nd September shadow diagram. Image © Plus Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="http://urbanmelbourne.info/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image13_1.jpg?itok=g3ra-0tP" title="22nd September shadow diagram. Image © Plus Architecture" typeof="foaf:Image"></a>
Submitted during October 2012, no decision has been given by DPCD planning officials. Further the application is now listed as deferred on the State Planning Permit Register, pointing to the possibility that 2 Hopkins Street may well have found itself in limbo for the immediate future.
 
The original planning application as lodged with the Maribyrnong City Council, is in parts.  You can view each individual part here: <a href="http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/files/Attachments/DEC12_CDSC_2_Hopkins_Street_Footscray_Part1.pdf" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, <a href="http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/files/Attachments/DEC12_CDSC_2_Hopkins_Street_Footscray_Part2.pdf" target="_blank">Part 2</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/files/Attachments/DEC12_CDSC_2_Hopkins_Street_Footscray_Part3.pdf" target="_blank">Part 3</a> (PDF's hosted on Maribyrnong's CMS).
All images © Plus Architecture
</body></html>

From Little things, big things grow?

<html><body>
Forumers Nicholas Harrison and Fedsquared have been kind enough to post pictures and the planning report for a proposed residential tower at 57 Haig Street, Southbank. Designed by Bruce Henderson Architects, the scheme has been produced for Zoland Family Nominees Pty Ltd and R &amp; J Freeman Nominess Pty Ltd. Given the parties aren't known developers the application if approved may well be on-sold for profit to a developer capable of delivering the project.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/57%20haig%201.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="57 Haig Street. Image © Bruce Henderson Architects"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/57%20haig%201.jpg?itok=GYOxg-l6" title="57 Haig Street. Image © Bruce Henderson Architects"></a>

Regardless Apartments.com.au recent looked at the newly completed <a href="/news/theres-nothing-wrong-with-a-green-wall" target="_blank">Tiara Apartments</a> building also on Haig Street, in particular its dismal street activation. 57 Haig Street thankfully takes a different stance, while the render below may not look enthralling it at least gives something back to the streetscape.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/Image4_8.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="57 Haig Street and public interaction. Image © Bruce Henderson Architects"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/Image4_8.jpg?itok=nupW6qX3" title="57 Haig Street and public interaction. Image © Bruce Henderson Architects"></a>

Ground floor features of the proposed tower include an activated, glass fronted lobby facing Haig Street while a commercial tenancy of 150sqm is also available. Above ground sits a number of carpark levels wrapped with apartments facing Haig Street while vehicle access and loading is accessible via Blakeney Place. Having pedestrian access and vehicle/motorcycle access separated does wonders for Haig Street while the exposed carpark levels at the rear of the site fronting Blakeney Place are covered by existing buildings.

Given the intensive future development earmarked for the areas surrounding Haig Street and access lanes running both north &amp; south capable of handling all vehicles it raises the question - could Haig Street eventually become a pedestrian only thoroughfare? Once developments such Fishermans Bend and the approved <a href="/new-apartments/400-430-city-road-southbank">400-430 City Road</a> hotel and apartment complex eventuate, it strengthens the case for a retail-lined pedestrian only thoroughfare linking these areas with Crown.

<a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/1343116456one_melbourne_1b.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Perestrian Lane at approved 400-430 City Rd linking with Haig Street. Image © Crone Partners"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-702px" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_702px/public/pictures/article-images/1343116456one_melbourne_1b.jpg?itok=ApIXxv3r" title="Perestrian Lane at approved 400-430 City Rd linking with Haig Street. Image © Crone Partners"></a>

A Crone Partners image above shows the potential of linking 400-430 City Road's internal pedestrian arcade with that of Haig Street, eventually spilling onto Clarendon Street (itself in need of beautification) and Crown opposite. Pie in the sky? Quite possible, but it must start somewhere and that somewhere may just be 57 Haig Street.
</body></html>

Planning applications

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Planning applications

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News