The new <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/yarraville-green-42-stephen-street-yarraville-vic-3013">Yarraville Green</a> development in Melbourne's inner west is showing that landscaping can be just as influential as architecture, with buyers responding strongly to the garden-first approach adopted from the outset by developer Excelon Projects and the project's design team.

Excelon appointed Six Degrees Architects and landscape architects SBLA to work collaboratively on the development, with a brief to create "a sustainable, design-led building with a focus on community."

That approach has resonated with buyers. According to Next Chapter Director Tom Hirini, who is leading the sales campaign, the landscaped communal garden has become one of the project's defining features, alongside its boutique scale and European-inspired cluster housing concept.

Local downsizers, right-sizers and established families already living in Yarraville and surrounding suburbs have accounted for the majority of purchasers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297740]

Yarraville Green will comprise 53 homes, including apartments and townhomes, arranged around the shared central garden to maximise connections to the landscaped open space. Parking has been moved underground, allowing the ground plane to be dedicated to greenery, pedestrian movement and communal spaces.

The landscape extends well beyond passive planting. Productive garden beds, a pergola, communal gathering spaces, garden sheds and a pet wash have all been integrated into the masterplan, creating spaces designed to encourage everyday interaction between residents.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297741]

The interiors continue Excelon's focus on craftsmanship, incorporating bespoke elements by Melbourne artisans including leadlight detailing by Adadaz, hand-turned timber hardware by Auburn Woodturning and blown-glass lighting by Ruth Allen.

Sustainability has also been embedded throughout the project, with Yarraville Green targeting an average 7-star NatHERS energy rating through passive design principles, rooftop solar servicing common areas and rainwater harvesting for landscape irrigation.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297735]

Construction continues to progress at Yarraville Green, with structural works well underway and framing works approaching completion under builder Balmain &amp; Co. The project remains on track for completion in mid-2027.

Apartments at Yarraville Green are currently priced from $625,000, while townhomes start from $1.4 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144913]

Joel Robinson

Garden-led design drives buyer demand at Yarraville Green

National diversified developer Fortis has officially launched Crest &amp; Walker, its latest Brisbane apartment development, with construction now underway on the 20-storey Newstead project.

Award-winning builder BINAH has commenced construction on the Bureau^Proberts-designed building, which will deliver a limited collection of 65 two and three-bedroom apartments on Kyabra Street.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373556]

The project marks Fortis' fourth active residential development in Brisbane, following River House, which is nearing completion, alongside projects in New Farm and Hamilton as the national developer continues to expand its South East Queensland pipeline.

Fortis General Manager – Development Queensland Dan Boman said Crest &amp; Walker reflects the developer's long-term commitment to delivering design-led residential projects in Brisbane's established inner-city suburbs.

"We're proud to be strengthening our presence in Brisbane with Crest &amp; Walker, particularly in such a sought-after lifestyle destination as Newstead," Boman said.

"Every Fortis project is shaped by its context, and we approach each one with the respect and care it deserves.

"Our focus is always on creating places that feel connected to their neighbourhood and elevate the everyday experience for residents. Newstead continues to evolve as one of Brisbane's most sought-after urban communities, and Crest &amp; Walker reflects our ambition to contribute meaningfully to that story."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373559]

Positioned between Gasworks Plaza and James Street, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> has been designed as a boutique residential address offering privacy and generous living spaces within one of Brisbane's most established lifestyle precincts.

The building features a contemporary brick podium softened by integrated landscaping, while the upper levels are characterised by restrained architecture and enduring materiality. Interiors have been designed to maximise natural light, acoustic performance and long-term liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373583]

Residences comprise spacious two and three-bedroom floorplans, with two-bedroom apartments priced from $1.55 million and three-bedroom, half-floor residences from $3.95 million.

Residents will have access to a wellness-focused rooftop featuring a swimming pool, sauna, steam room, landscaped dining spaces and outdoor lounge areas overlooking Newstead and the Brisbane CBD.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373571]

Sales are being managed by Slaite Projects, with Fortis expecting strong demand from owner-occupiers seeking a high-quality, design-focused apartment in one of Brisbane's most tightly held inner-city suburbs.

Completion of Crest &amp; Walker is slated for late 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145922]

Fortis expands Brisbane pipeline with launch of Crest & Walker in Newstead

The enormity of delivering a true skyscraper in Australia's new development market is often overlooked.

It has taken the best part of a decade since plans for Chevron One were first unveiled, but the 41-storey tower is now complete, with residents collecting their keys and moving into what has become one of the Gold Coast's most recognisable new landmarks.

Rising 127 metres above Chevron Island, Chevron One stands almost twice as high as any other building on the island. Its scale places it alongside the trio of towers at Jewel, arguably the last truly significant addition to the central Gold Coast skyline when they were completed around six years ago.

While there are several developments underway around a similar height to Chevron One, they are more concentrated within clusters of the highest towers in the city. The fact Chevron One sits within a developing precinct, looking back at the other high-rise developments in Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach, makes it a different proposition altogether. It will certainly become a reference point on the Gold Coast skyline.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=68833]

Developer Bensons Property Group is behind the 41-storey tower, which has 229 apartments, along with an exhaustive list of resident amenity spread across what is the largest development site ever assembled on Chevron Island.

The tower has been the talk of the town for years, says Ray White Projects Gold Coast agent Caitlin Rosenboom, who is selling the remaining apartments.

"People have been watching Chevron One go up for years," Rosenboom says, adding that many prospective buyers have been surprised by the scale of the views once they step inside.

"It's only when they walk through a completed apartment that they truly understand the position of the building," Rosenboom says.

"The views are jaw-dropping. Whether you're looking east over the ocean, across Surfers Paradise, along the river systems or out to the hinterland, every level offers something different but equally impressive."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=360215]

One of Chevron One's defining advantages is its location on the eastern side of Chevron Island on Stanhill Drive, a position which protects the views forever.

"There's only one row of houses between Chevron One and the water, and the height restrictions along the river means views from Chevron One can never be built out,"&nbsp;Rosenboom says.

While new apartment developments continue to emerge across the Gold Coast, Rosenboom says opportunities to secure a completed apartment with this level of outlook are becoming increasingly rare.

"The size of the site is something that would be incredibly difficult to replicate today," she says.

"That's allowed Chevron One to deliver the sort of amenity, open space and resident facilities that very few projects can offer. There are not many completed apartment buildings on the Gold Coast right now that can compete with the combination of scale, quality and amenity."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=68839]

There's around 2,000 sqm of amenity solely for the use of residents of Chevron One. Club One features a uniquely shaped swimming pool that mirrors the footprint of the building itself, set within a extensively landscaped gardens. There's also an indoor pool and spa, a fully equipped gym with a Pilates room, a yoga garden, a bookable private dining area and lounge that can host up to 30 people, and a 24-hour concierge service.

As for the buyers, Rosenboom is fielding enquiry from everywhere: Sydneysiders and Melburnians looking at the new and off-the-plan market following the changes in the Federal Budget, as well as those looking to relocate, through to South East Queenslanders seeking either a permanent home or a weekender bolthole.

"The Gold Coast lifestyle continues to resonate with people relocating from the southern states, and when they see the views and the quality of what's been delivered at Chevron One, it becomes very easy for them to understand the appeal," Rosenboom says.

A diverse mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments remain available, with each offering "something a little different", be it the orientation and views, configuration, or level, to suit a wide variety of buyers.

The remaining apartments are ready to inspect in person, by appointment.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6515]

A decade in the making: Residents to move into Chevron One as construction wraps up

A general rule of thumb in new apartment developments is that the penthouses get the rooftop.

It's a formula that's become commonplace across Australia's apartment market. Residents might have access to a pool, gym or barbecue facilities on a dedicated lower level, but the most desirable outdoor spaces are typically reserved for the highest-priced homes at the top of the building.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sherpa-property-group">Sherpa Property Group</a> has taken the opposite approach.

Rather than dedicating the rooftop to a handful of buyers, the Gold Coast developer has made it the centrepiece of its Flourish collection, creating expansive shared spaces from the best vantage point in the building.

The philosophy has reached its most ambitious expression at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-palm-beach-1150-1160-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a> in Palm Beach, where two rooftop precincts connected by a skybridge will deliver one of the most extensive lifestyle offerings seen in a residential apartment project on the Gold Coast.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374053]

"We're seeing a clear move toward developments that offer more than just an apartment," Sherpa Group founder Christie Leet said.

"People want spaces that support how they actually live, whether that's working from home, staying active, or spending time with family and friends.

"That's where amenity becomes critical. It's not just about what's included, but how those spaces are designed to be used every day."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374052]

The breadth of amenity has already attracted buyers across multiple demographics. Younger first home buyers have been drawn to Soleira's one-bedroom apartments, a product rarely delivered in Palm Beach, while families have responded to practical inclusions such as the shallow children's pool adjoining the main lap pool and the extensive communal recreation areas.

Instead of a single rooftop, Soleira delivers two distinct lifestyle zones.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=372547]

The southern rooftop has been dedicated to wellness, featuring a gym, yoga and Pilates studio, work-from-home facilities, a wellness centre, spa, and hot and cold plunge pools.

The northern rooftop focuses on recreation and entertaining, incorporating a heated resort-style pool, private dining rooms, pizza ovens, barbecues, a golf simulator, children's recreation areas, and what is expected to be the Gold Coast's first rooftop basketball court, which will also double as a squash court.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374054]

Beyond the rooftops, Soleira will introduce 1,500 sqm of curated retail beneath the towers, creating one of Palm Beach's first genuinely mixed-use lifestyle precincts where cafés, restaurants and convenience retail become part of residents' everyday lives.

Sherpa has also retained management rights across the development, allowing it to oversee the long-term operation of the building through a 24-hour concierge model. The developer is also exploring additional revenue streams within the precinct aimed at helping offset ongoing body corporate costs for residents.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370962]

While Soleira is the largest project Sherpa has delivered, the rooftop-first philosophy has been evolving for several years.

It began with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/amargo-6-12-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Amargo</a>, the first project released under the Flourish brand. Rather than competing at the ultra-luxury end of the market with oversized half-floor and full-floor residences, Sherpa focused on creating lifestyle-driven apartments supported by resort-style shared spaces.

Amargo introduced more than 800 sqm of rooftop amenity, combining wellness facilities, heated pools, entertaining areas, cabanas, pizza ovens and private dining spaces into what was designed as an extension of residents' homes rather than a facility used only occasionally.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=146527 project_image_fid=366550]

That approach continued with Flourish Oasis, where the same amenity-led philosophy was refined into a more boutique development. Strong demand from Sherpa's growing VIP database saw much of the project sold before it reached the broader market, reinforcing buyer appetite for apartment communities centred around shared lifestyle experiences.

Flourish Amargo is slated for completion mid-way-through next year, with Oasis to be delivered by late 2027. Flourish Soleira is expected to complete in 2030.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150017]

Sherpa takes amenity to the sky as Flourish Soleira captures booming Palm Beach demand

As apartment living continues to evolve across Sydney's growth corridors, the quality and distribution of shared spaces is increasingly shaping how residents experience home. Rather than functioning as add-ons, amenities are being embedded into the daily rhythm of a building, supporting everything from quiet retreat to social interaction, often within a single vertical community.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/aeris-melrose-park-nursery-street-melrose-park-nsw-2114">Aeris</a> in Melrose Park, this approach is resolved through a layered amenity offering that unfolds from ground level through to its upper podium. Developed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sekisui-house-australia">Sekisui House Australia</a> in partnership with Hankyu Hanshin Properties, the project introduces 468 apartments across two towers and a mid-rise building, positioned at the highest point of the broader masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=359199]

The amenity experience begins at street level, where two courtyards sit within a landscaped setting that connects residents to the wider network of parks and green spaces. These green spaces are not isolated pockets but part of a wider pedestrian network that links Aeris to the surrounding <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/melrose-park-nsw-2114">Melrose Park</a> precinct, including Central Park, future schools, and the Town Centre opening in July 2026. The result is a transition that moves from public to private without abrupt boundaries, allowing residents to pass through shaded, tree-lined environments before reaching the building itself.

Moving upward, the focus shifts to the level five podium, where the primary communal facilities are concentrated. This space brings together a 16-metre swimming pool, outdoor seating areas, and a communal BBQ zone arranged to take advantage of elevated outlooks. Seating is positioned beneath pergolas, creating pockets of shade that extend the usability of the space throughout the day. The pool edge aligns with views toward the wider district, reinforcing the sense of elevation that defines the project’s positioning.

In the adjacent building, this is complemented by quieter, more contemplative spaces, including an outdoor cinema set within the same level. Positioned to operate primarily in the evening, it introduces a different tempo to the shared environment, shifting from daytime activity to after-hours use without requiring separate zones.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=360299]

The podium also accommodates an intimate private resident gym. Located on the lower levels, it gives residents convenient access to fitness facilities without leaving the building.

Above, the elevated podium sky deck extends the amenity offering, providing additional open-air spaces with elevated outlooks across the surrounding landscape. While more restrained in program, this upper level reinforces the project’s vertical progression, from ground-level greenery to elevated outlook, allowing residents to move between distinct spatial conditions within a single address.

This distribution of amenities reflects a deliberate response to how residents use space across the day. Sekisui House Australia Sales and Marketing Director Peter Kalaf points to the role these shared areas play in shaping buyer demand. Aeris has been conceived as more than a collection of apartments, with the podium pool, gym and outdoor cinema forming part of a broader lifestyle offering that extends the home beyond each individual residence.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=360300]

What distinguishes Aeris is not the inclusion of these elements individually, but how they are arranged in relation to one another. Active, social, and passive spaces are layered vertically rather than separated, allowing residents to choose between them without leaving the building or moving far from their apartment. This proximity supports both routine use, such as a morning swim or evening workout, and more occasional gatherings, whether around the BBQ area or within the cinema setting.

The amenity design also sits within a broader framework of connectivity across Melrose Park. The Melrose Park Town Centre, anchored by Coles and Dan Murphys, features a mix of retail, dining, health and lifestyle offerings, bringing everyday convenience closer to residents. By the end of the year, more than five hectares of parks and open space, equivalent to around seven football fields of green space on residents' doorstep, will further enhance the precinct, allowing the internal facilities at Aeris to operate as an extension of the wider neighbourhood rather than a substitute for it.

Construction at Aeris continues to gather momentum, with ground floor slabs expected to be completed in late 2026 before the first sections of the buildings begin to rise above ground.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=426]

Elevated amenity anchors daily life at Aeris, Melrose Park

Housing Affordability

<html><body>
<div class="x_page" title="Page 2">
<div class="x_layoutArea">
<div class="x_column">
GUEST OBSERVER
We need to get creative on the solutions to housing affordability.
Focusing on first home buyer and retiree activity is critical to literally get NSW moving again as the figures are so compelling.
Sales activity in many parts of Sydney has dropped by over 30 percent in the past 10 years, whilst the population has grown by over 15 percent.
This is not a good story and when you consider we are slipping behind on new construction at the rate of 5,000 dwellings per year, a fast turnaround is critical. We need to greater flexibility in town planning to provide the types of dwellings that will entice people to move, not just the high rise jungles solution currently on the table.
Vibrant integrated communities around infrastructure and transport hubs are essential to long term community benefit, where low cost housing solutions and both retail and commercial interests are side by side with mixed low, medium and high density residential living. It’s not hard to achieve but it requires vision and resolve to make it happen and happen quickly.
Queensland and Western Australia provide interesting examples as to how Governments can address affordability. Both states lowered stamp duty, reducing a major deterrent to people relocating, which saw people moving to new homes more frequently as their living requirements changed.
The net impact on Government revenue overall was negligible but the opportunities for first home buyers were given a boost.
By assisting those living in largely empty family homes, perhaps close to retirement or on a pension, Government has an opportunity to free up stock.
With presumably no mortgage these people are asset rich, however under the current system if they wanted to sell, all they would achieve is a reduction to their asset base and possible loss of entitlements by having too much money in the bank.
If the cost for people to move to smaller homes was reduced, ideally by removing stamp duty for retirees and ensuring sale proceeds aren’t means tested, more people would bring their properties to market and thereby increase supply.
Encouraging new supply is a central solution to addressing the affordability issue. While the NSW Government is making a conscious effort to provide new housing, this attracts investors because the depreciation on a new build is significant.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="x_page" title="Page 3">
<div class="x_layoutArea">
<div class="x_column">
Without discouraging investors, who play an important role in a diverse market, we need to investigate new ways to help those serious about a first home purchase. Simply waiting for prices to drop is insufficient and may lock would-be first home buyers out of the market forever.
For too long both state and federal governments have stuck their heads in the sand on the affordability issue - and when the market takes off like it has the past three years they “cry wolf” and start looking for band-aid solutions.
There is no singular quick fix because the horse has bolted in NSW due to 10 years of inaction.
However there is still hope and it will need a co-ordinated response from both federal and state governments working with the construction industry and all property industry stakeholders to get an equitable duty and tax regime in place to incentivise more activity in both established and new housing.
John Cunningham is president of the REINSW and can be contacted <a href="https://www.reinsw.com.au/imis15_prod/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

We need to get creative on the solutions to housing affordability: John Cunningham

<html><body>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUSET OBSERVER
With property prices typically viewed as the crux of the affordability problem, and little able to be done on this score, new ideas are needed to open the door to first home buyers - and targeting up-front costs is the place to start. 
While much has been written about the huge burden of stamp duty, particularly in NSW, Ms Pilkington nominates mortgage insurance as an area that could also be addressed to give first home buyers a more realistic chance of entering the market. 
Enabling first home buyers to negatively gear a percentage of their mortgage – even just a small one – is another opportunity to address affordability.
A 10 percent deposit on a Sydney property is a significant amount of money but when you factor in mortgage insurance, legal costs and initial home insurance, on top of the exorbitant cost of stamp duty, it’s no surprise so many first home buyers are disheartened. 
The various up-front costs mean the numbers fail to add up for many first home buyers. It’s at this point the excitement dissipates and stress takes over, and many looking to enter the market simply bow out, assuming they’ll never have enough. 
That’s why it’s at this point we need to help first buyers navigate a successful purchase.
Mortgage insurance is an important safeguard but questions the methodology of paying an up-front one-off lump sum. 
Most insurance policies are paid annually on an as-needed basis. There is no reason this couldn’t be applied to mortgage insurance too. 
One Laing+Simmons franchisee was recently working with a customer who had to pay over $8,000 in mortgage insurance up-front as they only had a 10 percent deposit. The property subsequently rose in value by 10% over the next six months, meaning their equity was now 20% and they therefore had no further need for mortgage insurance. 
Yet they had already incurred the cost - a cost that could, and should, be avoided.
The number of times an insurance company has to pay out on mortgage insurance is not in line with the amount they charge. 
Aside from a fairer approach to mortgage insurance, Ms Pilkington says Governments could also explore how negative gearing could help first home buyers. 
Under certain conditions, perhaps we could enable first home buyers to access negative gearing on the home they live in, even if it was only for a small percentage of their mortgage. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
For example, first home buyers might negative gear a percentage of their loan for a fixed period of time which would lower repayments and, like any property negatively geared, the Government could claim some sort of capital gains tax when they sell. 
Any options to improve the tax effectiveness for home ownership to support first home buyers could be considered.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 3">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Leanne Pilkington is managing director, Laing+Simmons and can be contacted <a href="https://www.lsre.com.au/home" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

New angles on the affordability issue: Leanne Pilkington

<html><body>
Housing affordability is not a new problem, and as the Federal Treasurer Scott Morrison pointed out, it has actually never been easy to buy a home, especially in our major metropolitan areas.
Housing affordability will be an important policy focus of the Turnbull Government. And to try to get it right, the Federal Treasurer gave a 4400 word speech last week to outline some of the issues.
"As we move forward it is important to properly diagnose the problems we are trying to solve," he said. 
He noted when combining both outright ownership and those paying off a mortgage, the proportion of Australian households that own their own home has fallen from 71 per cent to 67 per cent over the past two decades, so there is a certainly a trend there.
He did stress the increase in Australian house prices has largely been driven by fundamental determinants.  
"Australia's housing markets may be expensive, but in aggregate they are substantively sound, reflecting the natural tension between the forces of supply and demand," he said.
I took five nuggets from the speech which are concerning, but which highlight the complexity of it all.
1) Between June 2010 and June 2015, the time taken for a dual income couple to save for a 20 per cent deposit in Sydney increased from 5.8 years to 7.9 years. In Melbourne it increased from 5.3 years to 5.8 years. However, outside NSW and Victoria, the change in the number of years to save for a deposit actually fell, showing the impacts are not even across the country. 
2) Home ownership rates are falling across all age groups, not just young Australians. Between 2002 and 2014, Australian home ownership among 25-34 year olds declined from 38 per cent to 29 per cent while for 35 to 44 year olds it fell from 63 per cent to 52 per cent.
3) When we look at the change in home ownership by state, the largest falls over the last twenty years have been in Queensland and Victoria, rather than NSW.
4) The percentage of purchasing households aged under 44 that are dual income has risen from just over 50 per cent in 1981 to more than 80 per cent in 2011, while the proportion of single income households fell from around 50 per cent to less than 20 per cent over the same period.  
5) The proportion of home owners aged over 45 with a mortgage has increased significantly over the past 20 years. It's taking longer to be free of the mortgage with the trend having the potential to undermine retirement incomes.
Morrison noted the challenge of not being able to access secure housing has flow on effects to many other policy areas. It impacts health, work force participation, social cohesion, welfare dependency, family formation and household consumption to name a few.
Morrison concluded that of all the determinants of house prices in Australia, whether cyclical or structural, "the most important factor behind rising prices has been the long running impediments to the supply side of the market."
Some argue with that conclusion seeking him to look at the impact of overseas migration which was not addressed, although he did note between 2005 and 2010, Australia had the highest average rate of overall population growth in the OECD, except for Israel.  
As there is no single housing market in Australia, there will however never be a single solution.
This article was first published in the Saturday Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

Five concerning housing affordability issues

<html><body>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
The solution to Sydney’s affordable housing problems is contained in the existing legislation and recommendations of the Affordable Housing Taskforce as outlined on the Department of Planning’s website.
The Affordable Housing Taskforce report to the Coalition Government in 2012 clearly stated that the private sector will not enter the affordable housing market without incentives (Action 5).
The Affordable Housing Taskforce report said ‘These incentives have been particularly attractive where the bonus represents significant value’(Cl 4.12). 
The Taskforce report supported the principle of the Affordable Rental Housing State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) as a good way to generate affordable housing.
The Urban Taskforce, representing property developers, has presented to the NSW Government a clear strategy to produce 40,000 affordable homes over a 10 year period by slightly changing the NSW Government’s current incentive in the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP.
The current Affordable Rental Housing SEPP is based on rental housing being for a period of 10 years through ‘a restriction on the occupation certificate against the title of the property’ (Cl17) and the Urban Taskforce proposal uses exactly the same definition.
Since the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP was introduced a relatively small number of affordable homes have been produced because the incentives have been too low. With a lifting in the incentives thousands of affordable housing homes can be built in metropolitan Sydney.
The Coalition Government’s Taskforce raised concerns that inclusionary zoning would only work where land value was high. ‘Inclusionary zone policies have been shown to work most effectively in high value land locations and have limited application in lower cost markets.’ (Cl 4.14). The Urban Taskforce approach is an incentive that is adjusted to all suburbs irrespective of land value.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
It seems that the approach now preferred by the Greater Sydney Commission is to force inclusionary zoning as a tax on new housing development. While this may work where land value is high, like Vaucluse, it is unlikely that the suburbs that really need affordable housing will benefit.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the NSW Government to generate thousands of new affordable homes across Sydney. To simply force a new tax on the development industry in Sydney will act as a disincentive on the private sector to provide homes. By default it will be the NSW Government who will need to provide massive numbers of affordable homes.
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Affordable housing solution for Sydney is contained in Planning Department Policies: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/67796/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Scott Morrison is a “once bitten, never shy” sort of guy. Having had a bad experience in the high profile debate over whether to change the GST, which ultimately came to nothing, the Treasurer this week launched into the hot topic of housing affordability.
The question is, can he and the government manage the issue or will it, too, turn on them?
With tax, the then-new Turnbull government put “everything on the table”, only to produce a package limited in scope and reform. Even the centrepiece of that - a company tax reduction over a decade – will have to be pared back to pass the Senate.
The opposite approach is being brought to housing affordability. Morrison wants to confine what’s put on the table to the supply side. Attacking demand would crash the market, he says. So in his Monday speech to the Urban Development Institute of Australia he focused on the need to cut planning regulations to free up land.
But the pressure is strong for a broader discussion.
Morrison’s address had plenty of statistics illustrating the problem. Over the past 20 years the proportion of Australian households owning or paying off their home has fallen from 71% to 67%; the proportion of home owners over 45 with a mortgage has risen significantly.
As Morrison said, “the real pinch point” is breaking into the market. “Across the country, a 20% deposit on the nationwide median home loan is more than 100% of annual household disposable income … well above the 60% levels that were the norm prior to 2000.” The proportion of home loans to first home buyers was 13.4% in August, the lowest since February 2004; this compared with the long term average of 19.4%.
Morrison noted that the housing issue had implications for retirement incomes. If it takes longer to pay off your mortgage, you can save less for later, or perhaps eventually need to use some of your superannuation to clear your house loan. He didn’t observe, but it is also true, that many younger people facing the challenge of getting together a deposit will also have the burden of starting to pay back student debt.
Malcolm Turnbull is said to be very anxious the government search for solutions to the affordability challenge. Expert opinion and common sense indicate this search should be as broad as possible, looking at the demand as well as the supply side.
The government knows this. Before the last election it considered imposing some restraint on negative gearing. But, wanting to sharpen the contrast with Labor, which proposed bold changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, it did not go ahead.
Thus its attempt to put the affordability issue into the straightjacket labelled supply - with emphasis on regulations that are state and local rather than federal government responsibilities - is very political, when what’s needed is an open-minded quest for the best evidence-based policy.
Already the containment is being resisted.
Last term the government had a parliamentary inquiry underway by the House of Representatives economics committee into home ownership, chaired by Sydney Liberal John Alexander. Alexander was moved to another committee; by the time of the election the inquiry had not reported. Post-election Turnbull, hosing down another problem, had the economics committee divert onto quizzing bank CEOs.
Now Alexander wants the housing inquiry reconstituted under his House committee on infrastructure, transport and cities. That would make a lot of sense - much work was done and shouldn’t be wasted. Alexander wrote to Morrison in September seeking the reference, but hasn’t heard back yet.
This is a nice dilemma for Morrison. Alexander is widely on the record arguing the demand side is important and, what’s more, that investors are making it hard for young first home buyers. The evidence indicated “investors were trampling on the opportunity for people wanting to buy a first home”, he says.
Alexander believes there is a case for tweaking negative gearing - though he does not support Labor’s policy which would have been “catastrophic” - and for looking at capital gains tax provisions. He describes negative gearing as an “incredibly dynamic tool” and likens it to a high-powered car that needs to operate within a speed limit.
He says the policy objective should be a gradual transition “to maximum home ownership” and a reduction in “speculation and opportunism” in the market.
Not only does the government have to decide about the parliamentary inquiry but Morrison has said he will take up the issue of freeing up planning regulations with state treasurers when they meet in December.
This can be seen as pushing the issue onto the states. The perennial debate has also re-opened about how a shake up of state taxes could help.
Morrison faces the risk of perceived failure if the federal government raises expectations then little happens. Even if the states pledged to regulation reform, results would come in the medium term.
The other danger for Morrison and the government is that opening up the housing affordability issue is moving the play onto Labor’s ground. The opposition’s position on negative gearing doesn’t seem to have cost it votes on July 2. It gets the opportunity to run it again, arguing that it has a ready-made policy to respond to the problem the Treasurer has put right at the centre of the political agenda.
Michelle Grattan<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/michelle-grattan-20316" rel="author"></a> is professorial fellow, University of Canberra and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/michelle-grattan-20316" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Morrison opens housing affordability debate but can he control it?

<html><body>
Housing affordability, rather the lack of it, doesn’t seem to be going away anytime soon, and Treasurer Scott Morrison’s recent speech at an Urban Development Institute of Australia event just reinforced the view.  
In such a scenario, the ‘bank of mum and dad’ for first-home buyers might be the way to realise the ‘great Australian dream’.
With the apartment median price in Sydney around $850,000, and Melbourne not too far behind, saving for even that 10 percent or higher deposit is a tough task for the new kids on the property block.
Normally, when a borrower can’t meet a 20 percent deposit and stamp duty, the bank will impose a Lenders Mortgage Insurance, which adds up to a few thousands of dollars. 
The ‘bank of mum and dad’ can seem to be a good option in such circumstances.
Ask a parent how far they would go to support the financial aspirations of their children, and chances are they will say: “Yes, if I had the money I would be happy to act as a guarantor for my children to purchase a property.” 
According to Todd Hunter, founder and director wHeregroup, mum and dad can help their children — even when they are teenagers — get a head start into the property market by buying a cheap property in the right location and let it sit there for 10 or 20 years and grow in value. Once the property is sold, the children will have a ready-made deposit without asking parents for help.  
Cheap properties below $250,000, and they don’t have to be in the city. And cheap properties because they “tend to pay for themselves, meaning the rent pays the interest on the loan, so any extra payments they make go directly off the principal of the loan”.
While this may be a great way to get the next generation started in property, there’s also a rising trend for adult children who are already property owners to dip into the bank of mum and dad besides the first-home buyers, according to Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) director and managing director of smart lending Melissa Gielnik in an article in www.domain.com.au earlier this year.
“In the past three years brokers across the MFAA network have witnessed a spike in requests for these types of loans and expect this trend to continue. Parental guarantee loans represent over 15 per cent of loans written for some brokers,” Gielnik said.
“As the housing market continues to grow parental guarantees are becoming more popular with upgraders allowing them to avoid mortgage insurance and therefore borrow a larger amount,” she said.
Housing is the single biggest asset class in Australia, worth an estimated $6.5 trillion across 9.6 million dwellings, according to CoreLogic. To put it in perspective, this is worth more than three times the value of Australian superannuation funds ($2 trillion) and more than four times the value of Australian listed stocks ($1.5 trillion).
But roping in parents to guarantee loan doesn’t come without risks, as Mamiza Haq, a lecturer in finance at The University of Queensland, points out in an article in <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-problems-with-relying-on-the-bank-of-mum-and-dad-33826" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. 
The risk to lenders
Family-pledged loans can be categorised as non-conforming loans, an area where lenders seek to minimise the level of risk as much as possible. The Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority has outlined some guidelines for Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) with regard to loans including a guarantor relationship (e.g. from a parent of the borrower) as these loans carry a greater risk. 
Inadequate bank supervision and poorly underwritten home mortgages led to the financial crisis, adds Haq. 
Sydney mortgage broker Elaine Lam explains in an article in The Australian that while “a family guarantee can be a useful tool that allows borrowers to finance property with little or no deposit, the procedure can be a risky strategy as it allows borrowers to buy property with no cash and no evidence of genuine savings, as long as the bank is satisfied the borrower can meet the ongoing loan repayments, says Lam. In the event the borrower defaults on the loan, the bank will come after the parents for any losses and costs that the bank incurs.
Consumer advocates also cite “lots of cases" where guarantors have been faced with the prospect of losing their home, adds Haq.
In the current uncertain economic climate with low wage growth and rising costs of living, parents must consider the risks of acting as guarantor, and all the legal responsibilities that come with it, before pitching in to help your children realise the ‘Australian dream’.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Bank of mum and dad: Some pros and cons

<html><body>
There are few real estate activities more depressing than observing a media debate about housing affordability.
It’s a downer because it’s clear from the rhetoric that this nation is unlikely to ever achieve any kind of resolution of the issue.
There are four reasons: (1) the politicians don’t understand it and/or are unwilling to do what’s needed; (2) industry people who do understand it champion their vested interests rather than the national interest; (3) everyone else has their heads full of misinformation, political agendas and unhelpful emotion; and (4) most discussions focus on Sydney prices and ignore the realities in other parts of Australia.
The outcome is mishmash of misconceptions, myths and outright lies. Nothing useful is ever achieved.
A recent discussion of ABS TV program The Drum was representative of how bad it gets. None of the people at the discussion table had any knowledge on the issue and simply indulged their prejudices and personal agendas. One spectacular twit claimed no one can get into the housing market any more because you need a $200,000 deposit to buy a typical house. Not even in Sydney is that remotely close to the truth.
The so-called affordability crisis is never far from the headlines and it stepped up in prominence this week with Federal Treasurer Scott Morrison declaring he was serious about fixing the problem. But of course he wasn’t serious at all. He essentially dumped the problem at the feet of state governments, with a generalised assertion that taking steps to increase dwelling supply will make everything better.
That’s one of the subject’s biggest furphies – a simplistic policy of lifting supply won’t force down prices unless the idea is to deliberately generate a major oversupply. One thing Morrison got right was his statement that you won’t fix the problem by crashing the market.
As a general observation, we don’t need more dwellings in Australia. We’re already building far too many apartments, which will result in falling values, but only in specific areas such as the inner-city unit markets of Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, as well as surfside Gold Coast. This runs contrary to the statement by Malcolm Turnbull this week that “we simply haven’t been building enough dwellings” – which shows how little he understands about the situation.
Federal Labor responded with its standard party line that restricting tax benefits for investors will make housing affordable again – despite the assertion by leader Bill Shorten that his policy won’t cause house values to decline (so therefore how will it make housing more affordable?). And that, sadly, is the extent of his understanding of the issue.
There followed lots of finger-pointing, with each level of government blaming another level of government for the perceived problems, and each side of politics scapegoating their opponents.
Industry lobby groups leapt at the opportunity to advance their pet causes. Master Builders Australia agreed, naturally, that a big lift in new home construction would be the solution, but argued that politicians needed to make changes to make it really attractive for developers and builders. The Urban Taskforce declared that developers would be happy to build lots of affordable homes, just so long as government handed them plenty of financial incentives. 
As I’ve often commented, the biggest noise in real estate is always the voice of vested interest.
Even in Perth, where there is vast oversupply and high vacancies right across the metropolitan area, the Urban Development Institute of Australia urged the WA State Government to take steps to increase housing supply. 
To paraphrase Shakespeare, they were all tales told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
The problem is that none of solutions put forward will make the required difference. They’re all targeting the wrong villains.
Everyone has a theory on who’s to blame for rising prices: some say foreign investors, others claim Australian investors, a few proclaim it’s first-home buyers pumped up by government incentives and still others, including former federal minister Bob Carr, reckon it’s the high level of overseas migration into Australia.
Who’s right? Well, none of them. The real culprits are never mentioned.
The biggest single force in driving house prices comprises the market sector known as next-time buyers –i.e. home-buyers other than first-home buyers. Numerically they’re the biggest chunk of the market and they’re aspirational. They have the financial capacity and ambition to pay top dollar to secure the property they’re obsessing over.
Investors, generally, don’t do that and first-timers can’t afford to.
But there’s an even bigger villain, one the politicians never mention while they’re busy pointing their fingers in various other directions - because the biggest problems are caused by the politicians themselves.
The value of homes in Australia is under-pinned by their replacement cost – i.e. the high cost of creating new house-and-land packages, the biggest chunk of which comprises taxes, fees and charges from all three levels of government.
As long as local, state and federal governments treat the housing industry as a beloved cash cow, housing will remain pricey in this country. Most of the state budgets handed down this year made the problem worse by adding to housing costs. 
You can build as many new houses as you like, but developers can’t sell them for $250,000 if they cost $400,000 to create.
Federal politicians recently conducted an inquiry into the affordability issue, which took a lot of time, cost of lot of money and achieved absolutely nothing. The Federal Government made a show of clamping down on foreigners illegally buying mansions, but that has changed nothing for first-home buyers 
Last year another inquiry was initiated by the House of Representatives economics committee but, according to reports this week, that has lapsed through lack of energy.
So where are we after all that “sound and fury”? Exactly the same place we were before Scott Morrison stepped up to the microphone – nowhere closer to any solutions.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

We don’t need more dwellings in Australia

<html><body>
The Federal Government has let its housing affordability inquiry lapse.
News of the quashed inquiry emerged through Fairfax Media's commentator Peter Martin as Treasurer Scott Morrison delivered a speech in which he declared housing affordability to be an "important policy focus" of the Turnbull government in the new parliamentary term.
The inquiry was initiated by Morrison's predecessor, Joe Hockey early last year to be undertaken by the House of Representatives economics committee and chaired by Liberal backbencher John Alexander.
Alexander was replaced as chairman by Liberal MP Craig Laundy after hearings concluded in September last year.
Mr Laundy has told Fairfax Media he had worked on a draft report with the committee secretariat.
But he wasn't able to put it to the committee before he was promoted to the ministry and replaced with backbencher David Coleman shortly before the July election.
Under the rules governing committees, the inquiry lapsed with the election, meaning Mr Coleman is unable to conclude the report without a fresh referral from the Treasurer.
</body></html>

Federal Government lets housing affordability inquiry lapse

<html><body>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
The Property Council of Australia has welcomed the release of the government’s draft revision of the South East Queensland Regional Plan. 
The refresh of the State Government’s seven year old regional land-use plan is an important moment for industry, councils and the broader community alike. 
The goal of the regional plan is to outline how future growth can be accommodated in a manner which maintains the enviable way of life for South East Queenslanders.
While it’s certainly not everything the property industry feels is required, it does appear the State has taken onboard a number of the recommendations we have made during the consultation process. 
These included a commitment to greater monitoring and reporting against the plan, a strategic assessment of environmental values and focus on delivering employment as well as housing across the region. 
The property industry will now be sifting through the detail of the draft to test the underlying assumptions and determine if the Government’s approach is realistic.
The Government has proposed a shift towards more infill development to meet future housing demand, with a new target of 60 percent infill and 40 percent greenfield over the next 25 years. 
What the industry wants to deliver is a wide range of housing choice for South East Queenslanders.
South East Queensland will need considerably more of every type of housing over the next 25 years, whether it is apartments, new homes, retirement villages or student accommodation. 
We will be analysing this nominal infill target to ensure that it doesn’t create any artificial constraint on the delivery of new houses, and have a corresponding impact on affordability. 
The proposed modest expansion of the urban footprint isn’t anything revolutionary, but it acknowledges that growth is inevitable and Government’s role is to appropriately cater for it in a sustainable manner. 
As industry pours over the detail, we will be looking to ensure that each community in SEQ has its own adequate supply of future housing and employment lands.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
A strategic region-wide assessment of environmental considerations has been flagged by the Government in the plan as the way forward to achieve an evidence-based approach to ecological protection. 
Industry strongly supports the push to identify with certainty those areas that should be protected from urban uses, and those areas where urban uses are agreed to be the highest and best use of the land.
This will not only reduce red tape, but also achieve far better environmental outcomes.
Public consultation on the draft plan will run until 3 March 2017. It is expected that the final plan will come into effect in mid-2017. 
Once the document is finalised, the Government must take the leadership role in ensuring that their plan doesn’t gather dust, but is implemented on the ground.
This will mean sitting down with local governments to understand what impediments exist to ensuring this land is delivered to market as quickly as possible. 
Given the plan’s emphasis on infill development, this leadership role will also mean offering greater support to local governments over contentious infill projects.” 
The Property Council has called on the Queensland Government to establish a $200 million Regional Project Fund to assist local governments in financing key infrastructure that will enable them to translate the new South East Queensland Regional Plan (SEQRP) into their local planning schemes. 
As our population grows, so too will the demand for housing. If we want to ensure South East Queensland is an affordable place to live into the future, we need to unlock new housing supply to match this demand.
Chris Mountford is Queensland executive director of the Property Council and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertycouncil.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

South East Queensland Regional Plan refresh moves towards infill housing development

<html><body>
A block of 12 one bedroom apartments fronting Barangaroo Reserve in Millers Point has been listed for sale by Property NSW, on behalf of Family and Community Services.
The block is comprised of both heritage and modern apartments, and will be sold as one property.
The property is located on the corner of Merriman and Bettington Streets, with views of the western harbour, Harbour Bridge and the city skyline.
Any purchaser will need to adhere to the NSW Heritage Council-endorsed Conservation Management Plan (CMP). The CMP provides extensive detail on the types of works that are permitted on the property.
The property will be auctioned through Ray White and McGrath Estate Agents on November 30.
Proceeds from the Millers Point sales program will fund 1,500 new social housing dwellings across the State, with more than 600 new fit-for-purpose social housing dwellings funded to date.
A total of 103 Millers Point properties have so far been sold, delivering circa $280m for reinvestment in social housing across NSW.
The new block joins 15 other properties currently listed for sale, including 13 three-bedroom apartments in Windmill Street and duplex properties at 3 and 9 High Street.
</body></html>

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News