The new <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/yarraville-green-42-stephen-street-yarraville-vic-3013">Yarraville Green</a> development in Melbourne's inner west is showing that landscaping can be just as influential as architecture, with buyers responding strongly to the garden-first approach adopted from the outset by developer Excelon Projects and the project's design team.

Excelon appointed Six Degrees Architects and landscape architects SBLA to work collaboratively on the development, with a brief to create "a sustainable, design-led building with a focus on community."

That approach has resonated with buyers. According to Next Chapter Director Tom Hirini, who is leading the sales campaign, the landscaped communal garden has become one of the project's defining features, alongside its boutique scale and European-inspired cluster housing concept.

Local downsizers, right-sizers and established families already living in Yarraville and surrounding suburbs have accounted for the majority of purchasers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297740]

Yarraville Green will comprise 53 homes, including apartments and townhomes, arranged around the shared central garden to maximise connections to the landscaped open space. Parking has been moved underground, allowing the ground plane to be dedicated to greenery, pedestrian movement and communal spaces.

The landscape extends well beyond passive planting. Productive garden beds, a pergola, communal gathering spaces, garden sheds and a pet wash have all been integrated into the masterplan, creating spaces designed to encourage everyday interaction between residents.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297741]

The interiors continue Excelon's focus on craftsmanship, incorporating bespoke elements by Melbourne artisans including leadlight detailing by Adadaz, hand-turned timber hardware by Auburn Woodturning and blown-glass lighting by Ruth Allen.

Sustainability has also been embedded throughout the project, with Yarraville Green targeting an average 7-star NatHERS energy rating through passive design principles, rooftop solar servicing common areas and rainwater harvesting for landscape irrigation.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144913 project_image_fid=297735]

Construction continues to progress at Yarraville Green, with structural works well underway and framing works approaching completion under builder Balmain &amp; Co. The project remains on track for completion in mid-2027.

Apartments at Yarraville Green are currently priced from $625,000, while townhomes start from $1.4 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144913]

Joel Robinson

Garden-led design drives buyer demand at Yarraville Green

National diversified developer Fortis has officially launched Crest &amp; Walker, its latest Brisbane apartment development, with construction now underway on the 20-storey Newstead project.

Award-winning builder BINAH has commenced construction on the Bureau^Proberts-designed building, which will deliver a limited collection of 65 two and three-bedroom apartments on Kyabra Street.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373556]

The project marks Fortis' fourth active residential development in Brisbane, following River House, which is nearing completion, alongside projects in New Farm and Hamilton as the national developer continues to expand its South East Queensland pipeline.

Fortis General Manager – Development Queensland Dan Boman said Crest &amp; Walker reflects the developer's long-term commitment to delivering design-led residential projects in Brisbane's established inner-city suburbs.

"We're proud to be strengthening our presence in Brisbane with Crest &amp; Walker, particularly in such a sought-after lifestyle destination as Newstead," Boman said.

"Every Fortis project is shaped by its context, and we approach each one with the respect and care it deserves.

"Our focus is always on creating places that feel connected to their neighbourhood and elevate the everyday experience for residents. Newstead continues to evolve as one of Brisbane's most sought-after urban communities, and Crest &amp; Walker reflects our ambition to contribute meaningfully to that story."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373559]

Positioned between Gasworks Plaza and James Street, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> has been designed as a boutique residential address offering privacy and generous living spaces within one of Brisbane's most established lifestyle precincts.

The building features a contemporary brick podium softened by integrated landscaping, while the upper levels are characterised by restrained architecture and enduring materiality. Interiors have been designed to maximise natural light, acoustic performance and long-term liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373583]

Residences comprise spacious two and three-bedroom floorplans, with two-bedroom apartments priced from $1.55 million and three-bedroom, half-floor residences from $3.95 million.

Residents will have access to a wellness-focused rooftop featuring a swimming pool, sauna, steam room, landscaped dining spaces and outdoor lounge areas overlooking Newstead and the Brisbane CBD.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145922 project_image_fid=373571]

Sales are being managed by Slaite Projects, with Fortis expecting strong demand from owner-occupiers seeking a high-quality, design-focused apartment in one of Brisbane's most tightly held inner-city suburbs.

Completion of Crest &amp; Walker is slated for late 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145922]

Fortis expands Brisbane pipeline with launch of Crest & Walker in Newstead

The enormity of delivering a true skyscraper in Australia's new development market is often overlooked.

It has taken the best part of a decade since plans for Chevron One were first unveiled, but the 41-storey tower is now complete, with residents collecting their keys and moving into what has become one of the Gold Coast's most recognisable new landmarks.

Rising 127 metres above Chevron Island, Chevron One stands almost twice as high as any other building on the island. Its scale places it alongside the trio of towers at Jewel, arguably the last truly significant addition to the central Gold Coast skyline when they were completed around six years ago.

While there are several developments underway around a similar height to Chevron One, they are more concentrated within clusters of the highest towers in the city. The fact Chevron One sits within a developing precinct, looking back at the other high-rise developments in Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach, makes it a different proposition altogether. It will certainly become a reference point on the Gold Coast skyline.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=68833]

Developer Bensons Property Group is behind the 41-storey tower, which has 229 apartments, along with an exhaustive list of resident amenity spread across what is the largest development site ever assembled on Chevron Island.

The tower has been the talk of the town for years, says Ray White Projects Gold Coast agent Caitlin Rosenboom, who is selling the remaining apartments.

"People have been watching Chevron One go up for years," Rosenboom says, adding that many prospective buyers have been surprised by the scale of the views once they step inside.

"It's only when they walk through a completed apartment that they truly understand the position of the building," Rosenboom says.

"The views are jaw-dropping. Whether you're looking east over the ocean, across Surfers Paradise, along the river systems or out to the hinterland, every level offers something different but equally impressive."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=360215]

One of Chevron One's defining advantages is its location on the eastern side of Chevron Island on Stanhill Drive, a position which protects the views forever.

"There's only one row of houses between Chevron One and the water, and the height restrictions along the river means views from Chevron One can never be built out,"&nbsp;Rosenboom says.

While new apartment developments continue to emerge across the Gold Coast, Rosenboom says opportunities to secure a completed apartment with this level of outlook are becoming increasingly rare.

"The size of the site is something that would be incredibly difficult to replicate today," she says.

"That's allowed Chevron One to deliver the sort of amenity, open space and resident facilities that very few projects can offer. There are not many completed apartment buildings on the Gold Coast right now that can compete with the combination of scale, quality and amenity."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6515 project_image_fid=68839]

There's around 2,000 sqm of amenity solely for the use of residents of Chevron One. Club One features a uniquely shaped swimming pool that mirrors the footprint of the building itself, set within a extensively landscaped gardens. There's also an indoor pool and spa, a fully equipped gym with a Pilates room, a yoga garden, a bookable private dining area and lounge that can host up to 30 people, and a 24-hour concierge service.

As for the buyers, Rosenboom is fielding enquiry from everywhere: Sydneysiders and Melburnians looking at the new and off-the-plan market following the changes in the Federal Budget, as well as those looking to relocate, through to South East Queenslanders seeking either a permanent home or a weekender bolthole.

"The Gold Coast lifestyle continues to resonate with people relocating from the southern states, and when they see the views and the quality of what's been delivered at Chevron One, it becomes very easy for them to understand the appeal," Rosenboom says.

A diverse mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments remain available, with each offering "something a little different", be it the orientation and views, configuration, or level, to suit a wide variety of buyers.

The remaining apartments are ready to inspect in person, by appointment.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6515]

A decade in the making: Residents to move into Chevron One as construction wraps up

A general rule of thumb in new apartment developments is that the penthouses get the rooftop.

It's a formula that's become commonplace across Australia's apartment market. Residents might have access to a pool, gym or barbecue facilities on a dedicated lower level, but the most desirable outdoor spaces are typically reserved for the highest-priced homes at the top of the building.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sherpa-property-group">Sherpa Property Group</a> has taken the opposite approach.

Rather than dedicating the rooftop to a handful of buyers, the Gold Coast developer has made it the centrepiece of its Flourish collection, creating expansive shared spaces from the best vantage point in the building.

The philosophy has reached its most ambitious expression at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-palm-beach-1150-1160-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a> in Palm Beach, where two rooftop precincts connected by a skybridge will deliver one of the most extensive lifestyle offerings seen in a residential apartment project on the Gold Coast.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374053]

"We're seeing a clear move toward developments that offer more than just an apartment," Sherpa Group founder Christie Leet said.

"People want spaces that support how they actually live, whether that's working from home, staying active, or spending time with family and friends.

"That's where amenity becomes critical. It's not just about what's included, but how those spaces are designed to be used every day."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374052]

The breadth of amenity has already attracted buyers across multiple demographics. Younger first home buyers have been drawn to Soleira's one-bedroom apartments, a product rarely delivered in Palm Beach, while families have responded to practical inclusions such as the shallow children's pool adjoining the main lap pool and the extensive communal recreation areas.

Instead of a single rooftop, Soleira delivers two distinct lifestyle zones.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=372547]

The southern rooftop has been dedicated to wellness, featuring a gym, yoga and Pilates studio, work-from-home facilities, a wellness centre, spa, and hot and cold plunge pools.

The northern rooftop focuses on recreation and entertaining, incorporating a heated resort-style pool, private dining rooms, pizza ovens, barbecues, a golf simulator, children's recreation areas, and what is expected to be the Gold Coast's first rooftop basketball court, which will also double as a squash court.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=374054]

Beyond the rooftops, Soleira will introduce 1,500 sqm of curated retail beneath the towers, creating one of Palm Beach's first genuinely mixed-use lifestyle precincts where cafés, restaurants and convenience retail become part of residents' everyday lives.

Sherpa has also retained management rights across the development, allowing it to oversee the long-term operation of the building through a 24-hour concierge model. The developer is also exploring additional revenue streams within the precinct aimed at helping offset ongoing body corporate costs for residents.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370962]

While Soleira is the largest project Sherpa has delivered, the rooftop-first philosophy has been evolving for several years.

It began with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/amargo-6-12-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Amargo</a>, the first project released under the Flourish brand. Rather than competing at the ultra-luxury end of the market with oversized half-floor and full-floor residences, Sherpa focused on creating lifestyle-driven apartments supported by resort-style shared spaces.

Amargo introduced more than 800 sqm of rooftop amenity, combining wellness facilities, heated pools, entertaining areas, cabanas, pizza ovens and private dining spaces into what was designed as an extension of residents' homes rather than a facility used only occasionally.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=146527 project_image_fid=366550]

That approach continued with Flourish Oasis, where the same amenity-led philosophy was refined into a more boutique development. Strong demand from Sherpa's growing VIP database saw much of the project sold before it reached the broader market, reinforcing buyer appetite for apartment communities centred around shared lifestyle experiences.

Flourish Amargo is slated for completion mid-way-through next year, with Oasis to be delivered by late 2027. Flourish Soleira is expected to complete in 2030.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150017]

Sherpa takes amenity to the sky as Flourish Soleira captures booming Palm Beach demand

As apartment living continues to evolve across Sydney's growth corridors, the quality and distribution of shared spaces is increasingly shaping how residents experience home. Rather than functioning as add-ons, amenities are being embedded into the daily rhythm of a building, supporting everything from quiet retreat to social interaction, often within a single vertical community.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/aeris-melrose-park-nursery-street-melrose-park-nsw-2114">Aeris</a> in Melrose Park, this approach is resolved through a layered amenity offering that unfolds from ground level through to its upper podium. Developed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sekisui-house-australia">Sekisui House Australia</a> in partnership with Hankyu Hanshin Properties, the project introduces 468 apartments across two towers and a mid-rise building, positioned at the highest point of the broader masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=359199]

The amenity experience begins at street level, where two courtyards sit within a landscaped setting that connects residents to the wider network of parks and green spaces. These green spaces are not isolated pockets but part of a wider pedestrian network that links Aeris to the surrounding <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/melrose-park-nsw-2114">Melrose Park</a> precinct, including Central Park, future schools, and the Town Centre opening in July 2026. The result is a transition that moves from public to private without abrupt boundaries, allowing residents to pass through shaded, tree-lined environments before reaching the building itself.

Moving upward, the focus shifts to the level five podium, where the primary communal facilities are concentrated. This space brings together a 16-metre swimming pool, outdoor seating areas, and a communal BBQ zone arranged to take advantage of elevated outlooks. Seating is positioned beneath pergolas, creating pockets of shade that extend the usability of the space throughout the day. The pool edge aligns with views toward the wider district, reinforcing the sense of elevation that defines the project’s positioning.

In the adjacent building, this is complemented by quieter, more contemplative spaces, including an outdoor cinema set within the same level. Positioned to operate primarily in the evening, it introduces a different tempo to the shared environment, shifting from daytime activity to after-hours use without requiring separate zones.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=360299]

The podium also accommodates an intimate private resident gym. Located on the lower levels, it gives residents convenient access to fitness facilities without leaving the building.

Above, the elevated podium sky deck extends the amenity offering, providing additional open-air spaces with elevated outlooks across the surrounding landscape. While more restrained in program, this upper level reinforces the project’s vertical progression, from ground-level greenery to elevated outlook, allowing residents to move between distinct spatial conditions within a single address.

This distribution of amenities reflects a deliberate response to how residents use space across the day. Sekisui House Australia Sales and Marketing Director Peter Kalaf points to the role these shared areas play in shaping buyer demand. Aeris has been conceived as more than a collection of apartments, with the podium pool, gym and outdoor cinema forming part of a broader lifestyle offering that extends the home beyond each individual residence.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=426 project_image_fid=360300]

What distinguishes Aeris is not the inclusion of these elements individually, but how they are arranged in relation to one another. Active, social, and passive spaces are layered vertically rather than separated, allowing residents to choose between them without leaving the building or moving far from their apartment. This proximity supports both routine use, such as a morning swim or evening workout, and more occasional gatherings, whether around the BBQ area or within the cinema setting.

The amenity design also sits within a broader framework of connectivity across Melrose Park. The Melrose Park Town Centre, anchored by Coles and Dan Murphys, features a mix of retail, dining, health and lifestyle offerings, bringing everyday convenience closer to residents. By the end of the year, more than five hectares of parks and open space, equivalent to around seven football fields of green space on residents' doorstep, will further enhance the precinct, allowing the internal facilities at Aeris to operate as an extension of the wider neighbourhood rather than a substitute for it.

Construction at Aeris continues to gather momentum, with ground floor slabs expected to be completed in late 2026 before the first sections of the buildings begin to rise above ground.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=426]

Elevated amenity anchors daily life at Aeris, Melrose Park

Housing Affordability

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Determining funding for the right housing measures in the upcoming Federal Budget (May 9) would be much easier if the Government had a national housing plan and a Minister for Housing according to the managing director of a leading community housing provider and housing commentator.
Budgets should be developed to meet strategic and operational plans.  It makes no sense that Australia does not have a national plan nor a Minister responsible for something as fundamental as housing.
Housing, including social and affordable housing, needs to be viewed as part of Australia’s social and economic infrastructure and integrated with other infrastructure planning. He agreed with the treasurer, The Hon Scott Morrison, that there is no silver bullet to the housing crisis but says with rising social housing waiting lists, high capital city house prices and an increasing number of working people experiencing housing stress, action is long overdue.  
An effective plan will only be realised if the Commonwealth Government recognises that housing is a fundamental human right and the responsibility of the national Government and a national Minister, not just the states and territories.
The Government’s national co-ordination and responsibility must include direct investment in social and affordable housing.
There are less public housing dwellings now than last decade despite around 200,000 people on public and social housing waiting lists and a general acceptance that Australia has a shortfall of between 200,000 and 400,000 dwellings.
Australia was in a similar situation in 1945s when the national Government took action in conjunction with the States.
Back then there was a need for austerity but there was also acknowledgement that workers needed housing and that constructing housing would stimulate the economy and get people working.
With the current downturn in manufacturing and mining we have many workers for whom constructing housing is a realistic use of their skills; another example of housing’s integration with social infrastructure.
This way, more social and affordable housing becomes possible on the back of economic infrastructure investment and job creation rather than as welfare subsidy.
If we had another “Affordable Housing Commission” type policy response the housing built could eventually sold by Government, as it was previously.
One example of possible integration of housing and other infrastructure planning was high speed rail links. He said such infrastructure is already being proposed and would create new commuter towns between those capital cities, taking pressure of capital city housing demand and boosting regional Australia’s economy.
 A rising tide can lift all ships and makes the provision of affordable housing and housing subsidies more sustainable.
A number of housing and community organisations, economists, academics and other experts have done considerable work to help the Government to create a national plan.
Where are Australia’s long term plans for infrastructure and housing? It is time for such plans rather than one off political cycle centric planning and initiatives.
You can budget for a plan.
Greg Budworth is a managing director of Compass Housing group and co-chair of the United Nations Habitat program’s civil society partner constituent group. he can be <a href="https://www.compasshousing.org" target="_blank">contacted here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Infrastructure and housing plan needed before budget initiatives: Greg Budworth

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/75609/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Those who value “multiculturalism” and “access to the city” as key markers of a vibrant, progressive city will find these attributes in the Melbourne suburb of Footscray.
Yet, at the same time, they will find them under threat through the forces of gentrification. These are the same forces that have, through time, transformed former “slums” such as Carlton, Fitzroy, Abbotsford and Richmond into “blue-ribbon” suburbs of Melbourne.
It is, inevitably, Footscray’s turn because of its proximity to the CBD. Many outside stakeholders have aspirations and conceptualised visions for the suburb.
These emerged at the turn of the millennium, when the Melbourne 2030 plan and its subsequent updates envisioned a new “central activity area” in Footscray.
A suburb in transition
In response to the metropolitan plans, substantial changes have been made to the council’s planning framework. New schemes allow for developments up to 25 storeys high along the banks of the Maribyrnong River and over the Footscray Market site.
With public investment to match, further catalysts of urban renewal were the substantial upgrade of Footscray railway station and other investments to polish the public realm.
Following the script of urban intensification, apartments have mushroomed in and around the suburb – with developers and investors colluding to rewrite and perpetuate new narratives.
In a tacit attempt to dilute Footcray’s shadier reputation, the suburb has been reimagined as the next “St Kilda” or “Fitzroy”. This has helped to raise unit prices and attract different types of residents and businesses.
These market-led models of urban development and renewal discount Footscray’s existing socio-physical and cultural landscape. The result is exclusionary, culturally homogeneous places and spaces. These reflect the fundamental top-down global and cultural drivers of the city in the race to climb (or, in Melbourne’s case, retain) liveability rankings.
On the contrary, multiculturalism is essentially a bottom-up phenomenon: ethnic enclaves form organically in the process of migrants settling down and “accessing the city” economically, socially and culturally. This is something that cannot be planned nor designed, but can be assisted.
In fact, Footscray has been an exemplar of this practice. The suburb’s absorption of immigrants has given rise to distinct Vietnamese, South Asian and Horn of African commercial precincts.
Improvement or displacement?
Formal agents of change (politicians, administrators, planners, designers) seem to view this urban condition as a temporary, transitional state to be eventually “improved”. They are often narrowly focused on physical and economic benchmarks.
The changes are compounded by a contemporary housing affordability crisis. Footscray has been attracting a local migration of first-home buyers and “hipsters” searching for more affordable properties and rent.
One might argue that this is a recipe for a multiculturalism where differences co-exist – or at least are juxtaposed. That might be true, if only the local white gentrification culture does not displace the minority cultures and socio-economic groups, as is happening to newer outer centres such as Sunshine and Broadmeadows.
Footscray’s beating heart
Critically, many may not realise the tenuous vulnerability of the place.
Last December, Footscray lost one of its most substantial cultural institutions, when the Little Saigon Market burnt down due to an electrical fault. Befitting current development trends, there are now plans for the site to become a 12-storey “mixed use” apartment building.
Both Footscray Market and Little Saigon Market are the key urban centres that sustain the commercial, culinary and cultural life of the suburb. However, Footscray Market is wholly owned by an individual – and there has been a proposal to replace it with a ubiquitous “mixed use” tower-on-podium development. This would (and still could) hasten the demise of Footscray’s distinctive character.
This is in stark contrast to the hundreds of millions of dollars being invested in Melbourne’s Queen Victoria Market and other markets. Established during the European colonisation and migration period, these have accrued heritage status. This arguably implies that Footscray’s markets are “minority markets” for lesser sub-cultures.
Significantly, in Footscray, multiculturalism and access to the city are lived experiences. The spatial and social implications are reflected in the ways buildings are used and goods are sold on the street.
A walk along Leeds Street reveals the finest scale of commercial practice by individual vendors. They hand-carry or push their cultural-specific wares on shopping trolleys – tactics to camouflage their subversive practices in busy pedestrian areas.
A different story
What we advocate for here is that there are alternatives to the ubiquitous developer-driven urbanisation; these make it possible to carefully consider the local communities directly affected by developments.
The City of Melbourne’s complex negotiations between developers and key stakeholders at Queen Victoria Market offers a potential local model. There’s no reason this model could not be carefully applied and extended to Footscray’s markets.
Complementing the markets, Footscray’s small and fine-scaled businesses should be recognised as alternative models of urban vibrancy and participative, socioeconomic resilience.
These are highly interrelated practices, which help mitigate socio-economic inequity, while meaningfully contributing to and showcasing Melbourne’s multiculturalism.
Sidh Sintusingha is senior lecturer in Landscape Architecture, University of Melbourne and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/sidh-sintusingha-352893" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Footscray: When a suburb's turn for gentrification comes

<html><body>
Anthony Millet, chief executive officer of BRICKX, says when it comes to investing in real estate we need to shift our mindsets.
"Property investment is possible without ever handing over the keys to the front door," he says.
It is an acknowledgement that the cost of housing within Sydney has well and truly moved away from the simple cost of land and building fundamentals, with a shortage of supply and unprecedented demand driving the market.  
With the Federal Budget due next month, housing affordability has emerged as a red hot issue.
"I don’t envy the Treasurer because it’s a complex issue with no quick fix," Millet told me.
"Changes to negative gearing, a superannuation plan for first home buyers, unlocking Government land for housing, a review of foreign property investment, public and social housing grants and the list of potential solutions goes on."
Millet is behind the innovative private enterprise scheme where owning a fractional share in a house or apartment is possible without the need to own the entire property. It has been taken up over the past few months by some 3300 plus participants.
BrickX buys properties in blue chip suburbs and divides the acquisition price into 10,000 shares, or ‘bricks,’ available to the public currently priced between $100 to $150.
In the past, fractional ownership has been a method where unrelated parties share in ownership of a high-value tangible asset, usually a jet, yacht and sometimes piece of resort real estate in paradise. 
BrickX offers premium residential suburb access with seven properties so far in Melbourne and Sydney, including Bondi Beach, Annandale and Mosman. There are plans to own in all capital cities, then its is likely they will consider regional centres.
Fifty percent of its customers are under the age of 35 and around three quarters had not invested in or owned real estate before. It has accordingly been described as the Uber of property investing, the newest way to keep up with the rising property market.
BrickX investors earn rental income from their proportion of the investment. They can also make capital gains by selling their bricks. 
The online platform, launched last September, offers a valuable insight into the world of property, and no doubt its pluses and minuses, and ups and downs. 
Those $100 bricks allow young savers an option other than a savings account while making progress towards to ultimate goal of home ownership.
Millet is keen on the debate moving on from housing affordability to housing accessibility in part because he says the so-called solving affordability solutions often actually equates to seeing house prices coming down. 
"With 65 percent of this nation’s wealth tied up in residential property, to the majority, it’s not in their interests for house prices to fall." 
 This article first appeared in the Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

Real estate investment mindshift needed: BRICKX

<html><body>
Days before the Federal Budget in which Treasurer Scott Morrison is expected to announce housing affordability measures, the Treasurer has said that the apartment market has peaked and regulatory controls on investor lending are working.
"The apartment market is already turning," Morrison said in a pre-budget interview with The Australian Financial Review. "To the extent that we're going to have a landing in the Sydney housing market depends on a lot of the choices we make over the next little while."
His comments came a day after property analytics firm CoreLogic said dwelling values increased by just 0.1% across the combined capital cities in April, with housing market conditions slowing in both Sydney and Melbourne.
Corelogic’s head of Research, Tim Lawless noted that the April results mark the weakest monthly change in dwelling values across the Sydney market since December 2015, when CoreLogic reported a 1.2 percent fall in Sydney dwelling values. 
But at the same time, he advised caution, saying “We need to be cautious in calling a peak in the market after only one month of soft results.”
Morrison, however, was more upbeat and took a swipe at Labor, saying further measures such as cutting negative gearing or capital gains tax breaks as the opposition party proposes could risk crashing a market that is already slowing. 
"Labor's approach would give us a hard landing, potentially a crash landing. We're obviously going for a much more smooth process and that means you don't do things which potentially overreact, over-respond,” he told the AFR.
Emphasising the effect of APRA's tighter credit rules on property lending, Morrison sought to play down expectations of federal government intervention to improve housing affordability. 
Morrison said any changes to tax breaks were "enormously complex”. 
Labor is pushing for the curbs on investor demand and said last month it would bar SMSF borrowing to invest in property.
The property industry opposes any change to SMSF property tax breaks.  
Morrison, however, also rejected the idea that Howard-era changes making it easier for super funds to invest in property had stimulated demand.
"Bricks and mortar was already encouraged," Morrison said. "The thing about it, you've had Sydney house prices rise by 18 per cent. Who was getting 18 per cent in their self-managed super fund? It commends itself."
Tighter regulator-driven curbs on lending to foreign buyers had also slowed the apartment market, he said.
CoreLogic said Sydney units fell 1.2 per cent in value in April while houses gained just 0.2 per cent. Apartment values in the nation's second city, Melbourne, fell 0.9 per cent while detached houses gained 0.6 per cent. 
"You talk to developers in this city and they'll tell you," Morrison said. "At the moment you wouldn't get finance on a development that was expecting more than a quarter or even a third of the sales to go to foreign investors."
Morrison did say, however, housing affordability – particularly for renters – was necessary as this would reduce the country's growing social welfare bill in the long run.
"If you want to get your welfare budget under control then get young people into a job, get homeless people into a house, get people on low income into a rent that they can afford and not get kicked out of a house every six months and their kids have to change schools every time. If you want to deal with a welfare budget, deal with that," he said.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Morrison says apartment market turning, APRA controls on lending taking effect

<html><body>
Australia’s residential land market showed signs of increased supply pressures during the closing quarter of 2016, as demand for land continues to outstrip supply, according to the latest Housing Industry Association-CoreLogic Residential Land Report.
The report is another indicator of the challenges the government faces in its battle to make housing affordable. The federal budget to be unveiled on May 9 is expected to address the affordability problem. 
HIA senior economist Shane Garrett said the sharp dip in volume of residential lot transactions during the December 2016 quarter had placed pressure on land prices.
“With land being such a crucial ingredient in new home supply more challenging cost conditions in the market for residential land in 2017 will make the battle to improve housing affordability more difficult,” Garrett said.
“We need to make it easier and less costly to deliver additional stocks of shovel-ready residential land to market. This can only be done by tackling planning delays in zoning and subdivision, releasing government-held land and improving funding mechanisms for housing infrastructure.”  
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/27/ResiLand.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/04/27/ResiLand.png" alt="">
Eliza Owen, CoreLogic’s commercial research analyst, said the continued fall of sales volumes against sustained value increases suggests demand is outstripping the available supply of vacant residential lots.
She said this was particularly evident in Melbourne, where the value of lots experienced the highest growth of all capital cities in the year to December (16.3 percent).
Sales volumes in the city fell 15.2 percent in the six months to December 2016.
“The median lot value in Melbourne is still lower than Sydney, which has consistently maintained the highest median lot price of the capital city markets. With a median vacant lot price of $455,000, this accounts for approximately 45 per cent of the median Sydney house price at the December quarter, assuming the median house was on the median lot. This median lot value has increased a staggering 65 per cent over the last five years,” she said. 
“With housing affordability high on all government’s agenda, and an increasing concern for households, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne, more attention must be paid to how increased supply of residential land could help ease demand,” concluded Eliza Owen. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/27/ResiLand2.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/04/27/ResiLand2.png" alt=""> 
According to the latest HIA-CoreLogic Residential Land Report, the weighted median land lot price rose by 4.8 percent to $254,406 during the December 2016 quarter – 9.3 percent higher than a year earlier. 
The report also indicates that the estimated number of land lot sales across Australia totalled 10,756 during the final quarter of 2016 – down by 22.7 percent compared with the previous quarter and 39.5 percent lower than a year earlier. 
Based on land transactions during the December 2016 quarter, the annual pace of residential land price growth was strongest in Melbourne (+16.3 percent), followed by Sydney (+10.7 percent) and Adelaide (+10.3 percent). Over the same period, Perth’s residential land market experienced the weakest price growth (+0.9 percent) with modest land price increases affecting Brisbane (+5.4 percent) and Hobart (+3.1 percent). 
</body></html>

Supply pressures forcing land prices up: HIA-CoreLogic report

<html><body>
Credit rating firm Moody's Investors Service says housing affordability deteriorated on average across Australia over the year to March 2017, which is a credit negative for Australian residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS).
Moody's conclusions are contained in a just-released report, RMBS -- Australia: Housing Affordability Worsening Amid Rising Property Prices, and measures housing affordability as the proportion of household income needed to meet mortgage repayments. 
Less affordable mortgages increase the risk of delinquencies and defaults and are therefore are a credit negative for Australian RMBS, it says. 
Housing affordability has been a hot topic ahead of the May 9 federal budget, and Treasurer Scott Morrison has also spoken about it in a recent speech.  
"Rising housing prices outstripped the positive effects of lower interest rates and moderate income growth," said Alena Chen, a senior analyst at Moody's.
"In the near term, we expect housing affordability to continue to deteriorate because of ongoing housing price increases.” 
On average across Australia, Australian households with two income earners needed 27.9 percent of their monthly income to meet monthly mortgage repayments in March 2017, up from 27.6 percent in March 2016.
Housing affordability deteriorated in Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide, where housing prices rose the most over the year to March 2017, but improved in Perth and Brisbane.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/27/Moodys1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/04/27/Moodys1.jpg" alt="">
While household incomes increased by an average 1.6 percent and average mortgage interest rates declined by 0.35 percent percentage points over the year, the positive effects of higher incomes and lower interest rates were outweighed by the 6.4 percent rise in housing prices.
Sydney remains the least affordable city in Australia, with 37.5 percent of household income needed on average to meet monthly mortgage repayments in March 2017, compared to 30.3 percent in Melbourne, 23.9 percent in Brisbane, 23.0 percent in Adelaide and 19.9 percent in Perth.
The affordability of houses worsened over the year to March 2017, while the affordability of apartments was unchanged, it said.
 <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/27/Moodys2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/04/27/Moodys2.jpg" alt="">
The credit rating firm expects new regulatory measures from APRA to restrict interest-only mortgage lending will have some impact on demand for housing, particularly apartments. But in the near term, there will be upward pressure on housing prices will amid the low interest rate environment.
Moody's also tested the impact of changes to housing prices, incomes and interest rates on housing affordability. Of all Australian cities, Sydney is the most sensitive to changes in the three variables.
</body></html>

Housing affordability worsening amid rising property prices: Moody's

<html><body>
Australia needs supply not demand focused solutions to address our national affordability challenges, said the Housing Industry Association.
“Attempts to remove demand for new housing will reduce supply, affordability and jobs,” said HIA’s Deputy Managing Director, Graham Wolfe.
“While several measures announced today by Labor to address Australia’s housing affordability challenges provide a sensible approach to increasing supply of new homes, others targeting demand will have an adverse impact on affordability now and into the future,” said Mr Wolfe.
“We can’t address housing affordability nationally with both eyes solely on Sydney and Melbourne,” said Mr Wolfe.
“Sydney house price increases have been driven by many factors, including significant population growth, a ten-year supply recession, low interest rates and the impact of extremely high stamp duty costs on sales in the established housing market.”
The dynamics in Perth, Adelaide, Northern Queensland and Darwin are very different.
Foreign investors and self-managed superannuation fund investors cannot be blamed for the recent fall in house prices in Perth and Darwin, or the slower level of new housing activity in Adelaide.
Inflicting demand side measures on these capital cities ignores the significant negative impact on housing supply, jobs and economic growth in these economies.
Right now, if foreign capital investment in Australia helped bring significant residential development projects to commencement in Perth, creating jobs and production, the Western Australian economy would be much better for it.
Australia needs a credible land planning body to provide national monitoring and forecasting of future land release and housing requirements.
The body would help to inform government policy on financing, infrastructure and demographics.
Other policies to address housing affordability must include a reduction in the imbedded taxation on new housing, government funding to support infrastructure and reforms to address unnecessary planning delays in bringing new residential developments to market.
Our national housing affordability challenge is complex, and necessitates a national ‘cost of housing’ inquiry to identify impediments to the supply of new housing.
Such an inquiry would bring together the overlapping impact of regulations, taxes and barriers imposed by all three levels of government, and importantly, inform governments in developing cohesive, integrated and responsible housing reforms, measures and programs,” concluded Mr Wolfe.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

The answer to our housing affordability challenge is housing supply: HIA

<html><body>
<h2>GUEST OBSERVER </h2>
<div>New research from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) finds that, alongside the growing shortage of affordable housing, the country’s largest non-government affordable housing providers have substantial under-used capacity. Making more effective use of this resource calls for concerted and purposeful action from both levels of government to support the industry in playing a fully effective part in the expansion of affordable housing supply recently pledged by Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The research, ‘Developing the scale and capacity of Australia’s affordable housing industry’, commissioned by AHURI and led by the University of New South Wales, highlights the role of affordable housing providers as players within a wider system. Importantly, this system extends beyond the organisations directly responsible for providing secure low-cost housing (mainly not-for-profit community housing providers) to include supporting entities and institutions such as service delivery partners, lenders, peak bodies and government policy-makers, program managers and regulators. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The research identifies industry capacity challenges in four main areas: </div>
<ol>
<li>the lack of a resourced plan for tackling the national affordable housing shortage</li>
<li>a major loss of housing policy-maker expertise over the past 10–20 years and, over the past five years, a neglected and underperforming affordable housing regulatory system</li>
<li>stronger and more enduring leadership is needed from both governments and housing providers</li>
<li>support for the Indigenous housing sector has lagged behind that for mainstream providers.</li>
</ol>
<div>Key recommendations include revitalisation of the affordable housing regulatory system; official recognition of affordable housing as a long-term national policy goal (through the Council of Australian Governments), and the creation of a joint government-industry Affordable Housing Industry Council to direct and oversee industry development. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The report also stresses the importance of Indigenous-controlled and culturally appropriate service models in better meeting the housing needs of Indigenous communities.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>‘We believe there is a case for national legislation that defines affordable housing and sets out the economic and social purpose of the industry,’ says Inquiry leader, Professor Hal Pawson. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>‘Australia’s leading affordable housing providers are, in our judgement, ready for further growth. With the right leadership, resourcing and regulatory accountability, they have what it takes to help this country tackle what has become a key problem governments can no longer ignore.’</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Hal Pawson is a Professor of Housing Research and Policy, Associate Director of the City Futures Research Centre, and Director of the UNSW AHURI Research Centre.</div>
</body></html>

elalademann0606-LAMLni4EAX

Affordable housing industry has capacity, lacks Government certainty: Hal Pawson

<html><body>
Housing affordability is not a new problem, and as the Federal Treasurer Scott Morrison pointed out, he like anyone in Sydney has actual experience that it has actually never been easy to buy a home.
He rightly argues, dealing with housing affordability must involve a scalpel, not a chainsaw given the likely or unintended consequences of some policy.
He warns declining housing affordability can't be answered with lower economic growth.
It is likely the housing affordability will be an important policy focus of the Turnbull Government May budget.
And to try to shape the agenda, the Treasurer gave a 4600 word speech this month to outline some of the issues.
I took four nuggets from his speech to the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute which highlight the complexity of it all.
1) Some two million taxpayers in Australia have an interest in a residential investment property. Around 72 per cent own just one property and 90 per cent own no more than two. Less than one percent of investors have six or more investments. Around 1.3 million of these taxpayers negatively gear, including 58,000 teachers and one in five police officers. 
2) Mum and dad investors are putting a roof over the head of around a quarter of all renting households in the country. If mum and dad investors were not part of our private rental market, there would be fewer rental properties available, meaning higher rents. Morrison notes disrupting negative gearing would come at a cost, especially to renters. It would not be good news for the 30 per cent of Australian households who rent. 
3) Morrison said you can't help first homebuyers save for a deposit by implementing policies that increase their rent. Over 85 per cent of private renters move within five years and almost one third of moves are forced. Around 47 per cent of low-income rental households in our capital cities spend more than 30 per cent of their household income on housing costs. His concern for families with children who need housing stability to have beneficial access to schools and medical assistance suggests we need longer term leases. 
4) Australian residential property investment is more geared to capital gain than yield. Morrison sees the need to establish a new institutional investment class as is occurring overseas. Property needs to be a longer term fixed interest investment that can comfortably sit within institutional investment portfolios and Australian super funds. 
"Previous governments have avoided dealing with these issues for fear of raising and disappointing expectations," Morrison concluded, adding that failure to confront these issues in the past can be traced back to the problems we face today. I only hope he hasn't overly raised expectations.
Morrison's first property purchase cost $330,000 with his wife, bought in Bronte in 1995, where he grew up as a child, and then they upgraded to the Shire at $920,000 in 2009.
This article first appeared in the Daily Telegraph. 
</body></html>

Scott Morrison advises housing affordability is not a new problem

<html><body>
Limiting how much investors of multiple properties could negatively gear and a possible cap on the number of investor properties has divided the industry even as the government toys with ideas to cool the overheated property market.
The suggestion was favoured by SQM Research managing director Louis Christopher, who said a limit was a good idea “conceptually”, according to Fairfax Media.
The new debate opened up after news broke that the government is examining the possibility of putting a limit on the number of properties investors can buy or impose a dollar value limit on how much can be negatively geared by investors.
Questions around the preferred option hinge on how to find a measure that recognises large differences between property markets around the country and avoids generating new regional or price-bracket distortions, The Australian Financial Review reported, citing sources.
“For those who own 20 properties that are all negative geared, it does need to be done,” Christopher said. “But where you draw the line is political – two properties? Five?
“It’s a very small proportion of the population when you get to three properties plus, and at that point it would only have a small effect [on the market].”
A limit of one property would, however, have an impact on the overall demand from investors, he said.
The government has ruled out dumping negative gearing, and has also shown reluctance to lowering capital gains tax concessions. It has promised a housing affordability package in the May budget.
Experts say the latest idea is not a fix for affordability.
Grattan Institute chief executive John Daley told Fairfax Media that the idea was “genuinely stupid”.
In fact, one of the major problems facing those in the housing market today was not multiple property owners but so-called “mum and dad” landlords with just one investment property, Daley said.
“One of the fundamental problems with the Australian rental market is that it doesn’t have enough multiple property landlords,” he said.
Data from the Australian Taxation Office found slightly fewer landlords in the market but more investment properties per landlord overall.
But a majority of Australia’s 2 million landlords did not have a substantial portfolio – 72 per cent had one property in the 2015-16 financial year and 90 per cent had two or fewer.
Daley said those with large portfolios – such as 10 or 20 investment properties – would be more inclined to offer long-term leases and stability for tenants.
“There are very few big landlords and very few long-term tenancies.”
He said while the idea of portfolio investors helping the market was “counter-intuitive”, it did not make sense to blame housing affordability on a small number of multiple property owners.
BIS Oxford Economics senior manager residential Angie Zigomanis said a cap was not a good idea.
“If someone wants to add more properties to the rental stock, I don’t think we should be stopping them,” Zigomanis said.
Limiting deductions that could be claimed was more effective, as it would “reduce the willingness of an investor to pay top dollar for the property”, he said.
Domain Group chief economist Andrew Wilson said any moves to interfere and reduce investment activity would be a “disruption in the rental market” – whether from altering the tax mix or limiting how many properties investors could buy.
“It would cause higher rents, and we already have a tight rental market,” Dr Wilson said.
</body></html>

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Housing Affordability

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News