Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

National Australia Bank (NAB) has brought forward the timing of the first RBA cash rate cut by three months.

NAB is now expecting a cut in February, in line with ANZ and Westpac, having initially thought a cut wouldn't come until May.

Commonwealth Bank, the nation's largest lender, still thinks the first cut will come in December.

NAB changed its call following the August monthly inflation figures that were released at the end of September, showing it had dropped to 2.7 per cent.

"The risk has been skewed to a first cut earlier in 2025, and today’s change acknowledges the balance of risks has likely shifted sufficiently for the RBA to feel comfortable cutting a little sooner than we earlier expected," NAB noted in its latest update.

They added that the cadence of the cuts may be faster than its central profile.

"Domestic inflation pressures are cooling, but only gradually, and we continue to expect the conditions for a cut will not be in place this year.

NAB believes the easing cycle will end at 3.1 per cent by early 2026, which is five cuts from the current 4.35 per cent cash rate.&nbsp;

CBA also thinks 3.1 per cent will mark the end of the cutting cycle, while Westpac is forecasting 3.35 per cent, and ANZ is the most pessimistic at 3.6 per cent, which would be just three interest rate cuts.

<h2>What would a rate cut in February look like for borrowers?</h2>

According to&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn%3Du001.IVvjJ-2BPT0A8C3VxtqKc6e3bj5hBuw27WFEYqovsYs7kPsgFulYrdOzeP8gI7CybJOya3_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20hPXdLlPP9yD7DvFFDBM5yrTqxvcCiMfAsW1onD-2FcriL628eYdhNQE7bwzYrxcOYnmaYfRhGl-2FEHQ6eK2uQcLxs6Cbu6Dx0bYvpi5A6enmxMWU5TkcRYrP6Z8GbXZYtc5qSoKu6eWFBQR9K7fsjXwHMmby3D3X6Yx-2BxcDcdRruTG&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1727774368149000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2vK2ujS77CHs9VRvSSXzLC" href="https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.IVvjJ-2BPT0A8C3VxtqKc6e3bj5hBuw27WFEYqovsYs7kPsgFulYrdOzeP8gI7CybJOya3_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20hPXdLlPP9yD7DvFFDBM5yrTqxvcCiMfAsW1onD-2FcriL628eYdhNQE7bwzYrxcOYnmaYfRhGl-2FEHQ6eK2uQcLxs6Cbu6Dx0bYvpi5A6enmxMWU5TkcRYrP6Z8GbXZYtc5qSoKu6eWFBQR9K7fsjXwHMmby3D3X6Yx-2BxcDcdRruTG" target="_blank">Canstar</a>, if there is a cut in February, a borrower with a $600,000 loan today and 25 years remaining would see their monthly repayments drop by $92.&nbsp;

<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="3">
			Impact of 0.25% pt cut in February 2025
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			Current loan size
			</td>
			<td>
			Drop in monthly repayment
			</td>
			<td>
			New monthly repayment
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$600,000
			</td>
			<td>
			-$92
			</td>
			<td>
			$3,907
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$750,000
			</td>
			<td>
			-$114
			</td>
			<td>
			$4,884
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$1M
			</td>
			<td>
			-$153
			</td>
			<td>
			$6,512
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="3">
			Source:&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn%3Du001.xWMOP9hChsvn-2BC9O-2FebBihXIZ4cEzbiuENdxm-2Bx3-2FYEEgYMhZlKWNj5Zzy1YZ56RuASD_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20v2akwr6-2BqLyRrlEgkJ4J-2BCCyY0x189xEHZA4Ylf8c7ChBqNIkhmftZzoFuZKFn43pw3oJVg2o1gumrpdA-2B7MB-2FBtmL2rFCI-2FXORATQHySCLVOMg7Vywv-2BqnnQUAtDz6XkvpwxdHFXh70VwKazzhJsICilEYOvP4ju0sIfi5g6TL&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1727774368149000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2qVnp6oqATgqDUi2Frm22q" href="https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.xWMOP9hChsvn-2BC9O-2FebBihXIZ4cEzbiuENdxm-2Bx3-2FYEEgYMhZlKWNj5Zzy1YZ56RuASD_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20v2akwr6-2BqLyRrlEgkJ4J-2BCCyY0x189xEHZA4Ylf8c7ChBqNIkhmftZzoFuZKFn43pw3oJVg2o1gumrpdA-2B7MB-2FBtmL2rFCI-2FXORATQHySCLVOMg7Vywv-2BqnnQUAtDz6XkvpwxdHFXh70VwKazzhJsICilEYOvP4ju0sIfi5g6TL" target="_blank">www.canstar.com.au</a>. Starting rate is the RBA existing average owner-occupier variable rate of 6.36%. Assumes banks pass the cash rate cut on in full the month after the meeting.
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

Canstar Data Insights Director, Sally Tindall, says if core inflation continues to track in the right direction, or unemployment starts to accelerate significantly, we could well see a cash rate cut as early as February of next year.

“All four big banks now believe the RBA will be ready to cut the cash rate in just over four months’ time, if not before, in the case of CBA.

“However, the outlook for both inflation and unemployment is still highly uncertain. A couple of wobbly sets of inflation data could see the RBA holding for longer, particularly if unemployment remains relatively steady."

&nbsp;

Commonwealth Bank, the nation's largest lender, still thinks the first cut will come in December.

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

<html><body>
Interest rates hikes have struck home owners and investors after the Commonwealth Bank (CBA) lifted fixed rate deals on its loans by as much as 0.5 per cent. Customers taking out fixed rate deals with rate will now be hit with increases across 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 year fixed terms. It is the second rate hike within 20 days.
However, the bank provided for owner occupiers signing up to principal and interest fixed home loan deals to escape the latest hikes.
The Commonwealth Bank said the move was to ensure it "continue[d] to meet our regulatory requirements".
In a memo issued to mortgages brokers, CBA outlined that interest-only investment loans would be the worst hit — 2, 3, 4, and 5 year terms would all rise by 0.5 per cent.
The changes are effective for new and existing customers who switch into one of these products from today.  
Three-year fixed rate interest-only owner occupier loan rates will rise by 0.25 per cent to 4.49 per cent.
Three-year fixed rate interest-only investment loan rates will rise by 0.5 per cent to 4.94 per cent.
Three-year principal and interest investment loan rates will rise by 0.25 per cent 4.69 per cent.
CBA raised rates for interest-only loans to 5.94 percent in March.
Homebuyers also faced increased fixed interest rates in December 2016.
The bank’s measures follow an increased crackdown by the banking regulator, the Australian Prudential and Regulation Authority, to limit interest-only loans.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Commonwealth Bank increases interest rates for home owners and investors 

<html><body>
Interest-only loans account for a sizeable number of total housing credit, according to the RBA’s latest Financial Stability Review 2017.
Interest-only (IO) loans account for a sizeable and growing share of total housing credit in Australia, now representing around 23 per cent of owner-occupier lending and 64 per cent of investor lending (Graph B1)
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/19/Graph%20B1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/04/19/Graph%20B1.jpg" alt="">
IO lending has the potential to increase households’ vulnerability in part due to the higher average level of indebtedness over the life of an IO loan compared with a regular principal-and-interest (P&amp;I) loan.
Measures to address some risks associated with IO lending practices were among those taken in late 2014 by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), in conjunction with the Council of Financial Regulators, to reinforce sound housing lending practices.
While the share of IO loans in total lending approvals subsequently declined, IO loans have since started to rise again, especially for investors, which has again attracted regulator attention.
In March 2017, APRA announced new measures requiring authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) to limit new IO lending to 30 per cent of total new residential mortgage lending and, within that, to tightly manage new IO loans extended at high loan-to-valuation ratios (LVRs).
This box outlines in more detail recent trends in IO lending and the nature of the potential risks that can arise from this type of lending.
For P&amp;I loans, the balance of the loan must be paid down over the entire term of the loan. In contrast, for IO loans repayments of principal are not required during the IO period, which is typically the first five to ten years of the loan.
Instead, scheduled principal repayments start at the end of the IO period, with the balance of the loan then paid off over the residual loan term.
As a consequence, for a typical 30-year P&amp;I loan of $400 000 with an interest rate of 4 per cent, borrowers would be ahead on principal repayments by around $38 000, or about 10 per cent of the initial balance, after five years compared with an IO loan (Graph B2).
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/04/19/Graph%20B2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/04/19/Graph%20B2.jpg" width="700" height="425">
Further, because the scheduled balance on an IO loan is always higher than on a comparable P&amp;I loan, IO loans incur a greater interest cost over the term of the loan (around 9 per cent extra in the previous example).
An IO loan can potentially also be refinanced at the end of the IO period into another IO loan, prolonging the period before scheduled principal repayments start.
Both investors and owner-occupier borrowers make extensive use of IO lending for a range of reasons.
Housing investors make the most use of IO loans.
Since interest payments on investment loans are tax deductible, the incentive to pay down a loan’s principal is reduced.
IO loans also enable investors to maintain a higher level of leverage and so magnify potential gains or losses if housing prices rise or fall.
As noted earlier, the share of owner-occupier lending that is IO has also risen noticeably over time.
This has been due to increasing numbers of owner-occupiers using IO loans and the increasing average sizes of IO loans (relative to P&amp;I loans).
Another reason borrowers may prefer IO loans to P&amp;I loans is because they can offer greater repayment flexibility.
Borrowers with lumpy income or those wanting to build buffers or save for planned expenditures, such as renovations, can use IO loans with an offset or redraw facility to minimise the effective interest costs over the period of the loan while still ensuring funds are readily available for other uses.
In particular, offset accounts and redraw facilities allow borrowers to effectively amortise loan balances during the IO period and so reduce (or eliminate) the extra interest cost associated with the higher principal balance on IO loans compared with P&amp;I loans.
However, borrowers need to be disciplined in their repayment behaviour to receive these benefits; otherwise they may incur greater interest costs, and remain more indebted for longer.
IO loans are also routinely used for bridging finance and construction loans to minimise repayments for the short duration of these loans.
For some time regulators have highlighted the potential risks associated with IO compared with P&amp;I loans.
Because IO loans allow borrowers to remain more indebted for longer, there may be greater credit risks associated with such loans.
When loan balances stay high, there is an increased risk of borrowers falling into negative equity should housing prices decline.
Another risk is that borrowers may find it difficult to service higher required payments at the end of the IO period, which increases the chance of default.
For example, repayments on a $400 000 loan with a 4 per cent interest rate and a five-year IO period would typically increase by around 60 per cent at the end of the IO period.
While some borrowers may have planned to refinance into another IO loan at the end of the IO period, this may be difficult if circumstances have changed.
Borrowers who anticipate future price rises can use IO loans to maintain a higher level of leverage for a given servicing payment, thereby magnifying their returns from rising housing prices but also magnifying any losses.
More generally, at an aggregate level this behaviour could induce a more pronounced cycle in housing prices than would otherwise occur, amplifying the size of any subsequent downswing in housing prices.
In recognition of the higher risks associated with IO loans, some lenders have introduced premiums on advertised interest rates for IO loans.
For example, the four major banks have announced, on average, an 18 basis point premium for IO owner-occupier loans and a 15 basis point premium for IO investor loans (in addition to premiums for investor loans relative to owner-occupier loans).
Lenders’ practices in assessing the ability of borrowers to repay their loans are important to manage the systemic risks posed by IO lending.
These practices determine the maximum loan size that a borrower could sustainably repay out of their income.
In particular, APRA serviceability guidance for ADIs sets out prudent practices for IO loans, with the capacity to repay assessed at the higher repayment amount required when the IO period ends (known as the residual-term method).
Under this residual-term method, borrowers seeking IO loans receive a lower maximum loan size than would be available for an equivalent P&amp;I loan.
Nonetheless, prior to the 2014 measures, some lenders assessed serviceability based on lower hypothetical P&amp;I repayments calculated from the entire term of IO loans (including the IO period; known as the full-term method).
This approach risks borrowers being unable to meet their repayment obligations when the IO period ends and higher repayments commence.
This is potentially in breach of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009, which requires that lenders make loans that consumers will be able to repay without undue hardship.
ASIC has found that around 40 per cent of loans reviewed in 2014 used the full-term approach; lenders have since undertaken to change their practices in order to meet their responsible lending obligations and APRA’s guidance.
There have also been some recent reports of borrowers applying for P&amp;I loans to maximise their borrowing capacity, and then switching soon after approval to an IO loan. APRA has recently issued guidance to address this behaviour.
Find the RBA's latest Financial Stability Review 2017 <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Interest-only loans account for a sizeable housing credit portion: RBA

<html><body>
Citigroup has announced measures targeting overseas investors, including a ban on interest-only loans.
Following recent regulatory guidance, Citigroup has become the first major lender to take the step, according to The Australian Financial Review.
The Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) recently announced a 30% cap on interest-only loans as it said the category, which represents nearly 40% of the stock of residential mortgage lending by banks, was "quite high" by international and historical standards. 
The major changes, which were notified to mortgage brokers last week, will be a ban on interest-only loans for:
<ul>
<li>All non-resident loans;</li>
<li>Loans reliant on foreign income;</li>
<li>Loans requiring Foreign Investment Review Board approval; and,</li>
<li>Loans solely with owner-occupied security.</li>
</ul>
"That means, interest-only repayments will only be allowed for resident loans secured by an investment property," Matt Wood, head of mortgages distribution, told mortgage brokers.
Citigroup has only 1% of Australian property market share, but has a high profile across Asia.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Citi restricts loans to foreign investors in response to regulatory nudge

<html><body>
The minutes of the Monetary Policy meeting of the Reserve Bank Board on April 4 contained some significant changes from the previous minutes for the March meeting. 
Of most importance has been the final sentence in the section Considerations for Monetary Policy – “the Board judged that developments in the labour and housing markets warranted careful monitoring over coming months”.
We previously noted that the discussion of the Governor’s statement immediately following that April board meeting on the labour market had become more down beat and the housing market commentary, more concerned, emphasising “risks associated with high and rising levels of indebtedness”.
The minutes provide more detailed commentary on these issues. The Board has been concerned that soft conditions in the labour market prevail. 
It has also been surprised that indications from forward looking indicators of labour demand, which were quite positive, have not led to an improvement in current labour market conditions. 
Of course, this meeting preceded the announcement that full-time jobs in March had jumped by 74,500 while total employment had increased by 60,900. 
Annual employment growth jumped to 1.2%, although the unemployment rate remained at 5.9%. 
This encouraging result partly confirms the signals from the forward looking indicators, although the Board will remain cautious given the volatility in the monthly series.
The subsidiary  concern around weak employment growth is the feedback to household consumption which has been “a little weaker than expected”
I do not expect that the Board would regret the decision to highlight the importance of the labour market in these minutes based on this one result. 
But the March employment report should certainly provide some evidence that any policy response around the labour market is not imminent.
While a policy response around labour market concerns would involve an interest rate cut, the policy response around housing markets is more likely entail further direct controls. 
The minutes note that “developments needed to be kept under review and depending on how the system responds to the various measures, members noted that the Council of Financial Regulators would consider further measures if needed”.
A further policy response around the housing market cannot be discounted. 
Consistent with heightened concerns around the labour market, the Board decided to drop its confident prediction from the March Minutes, “Looking forward, year-ended growth was expected to pick up gradually to be above its potential rate over the forecast period”. 
The April minutes merely refer to the economy continuing to grow moderately.
The link between soft income growth and the housing market appears prominently in the minutes.
Even though household credit growth has moderated slightly, soft income growth has led to an increase in household debt ratios and “risks associated with the housing market and household balance sheets had been rising”.
Two issues that stand out in the bank’s Financial Stability Review are firstly that the proportion of borrowers with no buffer on their repayments has risen to around a third.
Secondly, a common theme for many years of the Bank has been that the build-up in household debt is largely concentrated amongst high income/wealth borrowers.
That theme may now be less certain.
The data on which the bank relies to form that conclusion comes from a survey in 2014, which noted that only 12% of the loans by value of highly indebted borrowers is attributed to those borrowers in the bottom 40% of the wealth/income stratum.
With household debt ratios rising since 2014, concerns that more debt is transitioning to lower income/wealth cannot be dismissed.
Conclusion
The decision by the Board to specifically highlight labour market and housing market is significant. 
However, it does not change our view that rates are set to remain on hold over the course of 2017 and 2018. 
We expect that further upside on employment growth is likely, and while consumer spending growth will remain around trend, the case to cut rates is not strong.
On the other hand, the evidence from the second half of 2015, when a tightening of regulations contributed to a sharp slowdown in house price inflation points to the likelihood that any official concerns with rising household debt will be dealt with through the regulatory channels.
</body></html>

bevans-rYk9SxEa4r

Employment and housing "warrant careful monitoring"- rate changes still very unlikely

<html><body>
Former property developer Craig Kirrin Gore has been arrested and charged with fraud in a Brisbane court following an ASIC investigation.
He appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court after being arrested on April 14 and  was charged with 15 offences, said a release on ASIC’s website.
Gore was charged on 12 counts of fraud relating to the obtaining of funds, totalling $800,000, from self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) investors during 2013 and 2014. The funds were allegedly to be invested in debentures associated with the companies Arion Financial Pty Ltd and Arion Property Pty Ltd. 
He also faces three charges of acting in the management of three corporations (MOGS Pty Ltd, Sleipner Financial Pty Ltd and Arion Financial Pty Ltd) whilst disqualified from doing so.
ASIC obtained an arrest warrant after concerns that Gore may not remain in the jurisdiction. 
Gore was picked up by the police while on his way to catch a flight to Stockholm, adds Fairfax Media. 
He was not required to enter a plea and was granted conditional bail. The matter is listed for return at the Brisbane Magistrates Court on May 5, 2017. 
If proven, the fraud charges could see him getting penalties of between five and 20 years.
The charges of acting in the management of corporations whilst disqualified each carry a maximum penalty of one year imprisonment or 50 penalty units.
</body></html>

Former property developer Craig Gore arrested and charged with fraud

<html><body>
The RBA has noted that some banks had curtailed lending to some segments of the housing market, notably the Brisbane apartment market, where the supply of apartments was expected to increase significantly, raising the risks associated with oversupply. 
But the RBA acknowledged reports of settlement failures had remained isolated.
Conditions in housing markets continued to vary considerably across the country, the April minutes noted.
"The established markets in Sydney and Melbourne appeared to have strengthened further, but housing prices had continued to fall in Perth.
"The additional supply of apartments scheduled to come on stream over the subsequent couple of years in the eastern capital cities was expected to put some downward pressure on growth in apartment prices and rents, particularly in Brisbane."
It also noted vacancy rates had been increasing, particularly in Perth.
"Strong growth in the supply of new apartments was continuing to drive a wedge between price growth for apartments and detached houses in Melbourne and Brisbane."
It noted members discussed the recent actions taken by APRA and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to support prudent lending practices. 
"These actions had been focused particularly on interest-only lending, serviceability assessments and responsible lending practices. 
"APRA's guidance had included limits on the share of interest-only loans in new housing loans and a requirement that banks impose strict limits on new interest-only lending at high loan-to-valuation ratios. 
"Members recognised that the calibration of this guidance was not precise or straightforward. 
"Developments needed to be kept under review and, depending on how the system responds to the various measures, members noted that the Council of Financial Regulators would consider further measures if needed," it concluded.
 
</body></html>

RBA notes banks curtailing Brisbane apartment lending given oversupply fears

Minutes of the April Monetary Policy meeting of the Reserve Bank Board

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
Given the Reserve Bank’s intense concentration on stability issues, including the introduction of new guidelines from APRA, the April Stability Review is of particular interest.
Our interest is twofold. Firstly to gauge the degree of concern with which the Bank views the current risks and secondly whether it has released any new research which sheds more light on the issues.
Evidence on the first issue confirms the Bank’s concerns. “Risks to household balance sheets and housing markets have increased.” Compare that assessment with the previous Review in October last year, “Risks to financial stability from lending to households have lessened a little over the past 6 months.”
The risk that was emphasised back in October – “risks around the projected large increases in supply in some inner city apartment markets are coming to the fore, especially in Brisbane and Melbourne” - is still seen to be a major consideration - “concerns about an oversupply of apartments in pockets of Melbourne and in parts of Brisbane.”
Current risks around household balance sheets are seen to be macroeconomic in nature rather than direct risks to the stability of financial institutions. The key dynamic is seen to be “a highly indebted household sector is likely to be more sensitive to declines in income and wealth and may respond by reducing consumption sharply”.
Of most interest is the investor. While the Bank recognises that arrears data shows that investors have historically performed better than owner occupiers, this observation has not been tested “in a severe downturn.”
The recent guideline from APRA to limit the interest only component of new lending to 30 percent appears to be aimed at investors. Only around 23 percent of owner occupier loans are interest only whereas 64% of investor loans are interest only. IO loans have a higher average indebtedness over the loan than principal and interest; while after the IO period expires (typically 5-10 years) repayments are considerably higher.
Since the October Review, household indebtedness has increased further primarily due to rising levels of housing debt and weak income growth.
The Bank has emphasised in the past that offset accounts and redraw facilities have increased considerably (at around 17 percent of outstanding balances or around 2.5 years of scheduled repayments at current interest rates).
But around one third of borrowers have either no accrued buffer or a buffer of less than one month’s repayments. For the vulnerable “highly indebted households”, which represent the top 10 percent on the household debt to disposable income ratio measure, only 40 percent hold any kind of buffer.
Presumably as new lending lifts this ratio will continue to rise since minimal buffers are dominated by newer mortgages or lower income or lower wealth households. This ratio strongly debunks the assertion that the “buffer” is an important source of stability.
However, in previous Reviews a much more relaxed Bank has emphasised the point that those borrowers with the high leverage tend to be the high income earners who can best manage debt. The Review takes a revised look at “Highly Indebted Households”.
The aggregate household debt to income ratio has increased further in recent years up to 160 percent, but 30 percent of households have no debt.
In assessing the characteristics of highly indebted households the Bank uses information on the distribution of debt, income, and wealth which is available in the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics Survey (HILDA). Unfortunately this data is only available to 2014. In fact it is only collected every 4 years with the next survey due for 2018 – an interminable wait for an update to the critical issue of whether debt is accumulating with those borrowers who are the most vulnerable.
The Household Debt to Disposable Income ratio has risen from around 150 percent to over 160 percent (latest available). The Bank defines a “highly indebted” household as one with debt to income ratio in the top 10 percent. Over the 10 years to 2014, households in that group had a debt to income ratio above 550 percent and represented 35-40 percent of total household debt. Around 30 percent of the “highly indebted” households’ debts were investor loans.
Of some concern is that around 25 percent of the highly indebted households are in the bottom two quintiles for income and wealth, although this group only owes 12 percent of the debt owed by the highly indebted households.
These “ratios” confirm the Bank’s previous position that much of the debt held by highly indebted households is owed by households with high income and wealth. However, the lift in household indebtedness since 2014, coupled with the lack on any significant “buffer” for the highly indebted borrower, must be presenting reasons for the Bank and APRA to raise concerns.
The other issue is around the risks of relying on “averages” . Even though the 2014 data indicated that only 12 percent of the debt of highly indebted borrowers is held in the two bottom income quintiles, that still represents nearly 5 percent of total household debt .
The policy challenge for the Bank is clear. It’s most comforting “defence” of the risks associated with Australia’s high household debt is that high debt levels are associated with those in the best position to deal with them – high income / high wealth. But this data is already three years out of date and an update will not be available for another year at least. Household debt to disposable income ratios have lifted from 150 percent to above 160 percent over that time period and appear to be rising further.
Vulnerable borrowers with limited buffers appear to be growing. The higher risk aspects of interest only loans may be exacerbating that issue.
All the Bank can really do is focus on slowing the rise in household debt without really having much comfort about the risks they face.
For our part we remain reasonably relaxed about these risks, not because of the distribution of the debt, but because we see that Australia has sufficient flexibility around policy; its exchange rate and strong banking system to ameliorate the impact of shocks.
BILL EVANS is chief economist of <a href="https://www.westpac.com.au/">Westpac</a>. 
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Rising household debt risks but no timely measure of the effective threat: Westpac's Bill Evans

<html><body>
National Australia Bank (NAB) has announced further changes for residential investor and owner-occupier borrowers.
The rate for NAB’s 1 Year Package Fixed Rate for Residential Investment Home Loan has risen to 4.29 percent p.a. for principal and interest repayments.
For the 1 Year Package Fixed Rate for Interest Only Residential Investment Home Loan, rates changed to 4.39 percent p.a.
Fixed rates for all other interest only owner occupier and interest only residential investment loans increased by 0.10 percent p.a. 
“We are operating within a dynamic financial, economic and regulatory environment, and it’s important that we regularly review our pricing and policy measures across all of our home loan products to ensure we continue to lend responsibly,” a spokesperson from NAB told Australian Broker.
The changes made to our fixed rates on Friday 7 April 2017 apply to new loan accounts only.
Throughout March and the beginning of April, the Mozo website saw a spate of interest rate hikes from 40 lenders, including all four of the big banks.
"Investors were hammered in this round of increases, with rates rising an average of 0.19% on principal and interest loans, and 0.23% on interest only," Steve Jovcevski at Mozo noted.
</body></html>

NAB lifts fixed rates for new borrowers

<html><body>
In the first sign of the impact of tighter lending practices by banks, investor loans showed a sharp 6 percent drop in value in February, along with a fall in home loan demand, according to a senior economist with a leading bank. 
New data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that not only the number of new loans ease modestly in the February, but the value of all loans also fell, said Savanth Sebastian, senior economist at CommSec.
The Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA) also confirmed the view, saying the latest ABS data shows finance approvals for investor housing is moderating.
“The value of investment housing commitments increased by a modest 0.7 per cent in February in trend terms and decreased by 5.9 per cent in seasonally adjusted terms. This is down from its 2015 peak”, REIA president Malcolm Gunning said.
“It is still early days but data over the next couple of months will be more telling,” added Sebastian on the fall in investor borrowings.  
All the major banks have put brakes on investor loans or refinancing of investment property mortgages, in addition to higher interest rates for investors, in line with the prudential regulator APRA’s guidelines to cool a heated property market. 
“The average loan size recorded a fall of almost $10,000 in February. In fact over the past two months the average loan balance has fallen by over $22,000 or 6.2 per cent,” said Sebastian.  
“The recent shift by the banking sector in regards to loan serviceability may have played a part. It should be noted that the average home loan is also influenced by home prices, composition of borrowers and the geographic location of home purchases.”
He said the Reserve Bank was correct in its view that conditions in the housing market are very mixed. There is a healthy pipeline of work, with owner occupiers likely to dominate home building and buying. The value of loans to build new homes stood at a just under $2.9 billion – easing modestly from the record high of $3.3 billion in March 2016. 
The latest Housing Finance data found 54,816 home loans were written throughout the month of February, down from 55,099 written the month prior.
“After three consecutive months of growth in home loan approval numbers, we saw a decrease in February,” said Mortgage Choice chief executive John Flavell.
But he added that January and December are “notoriously strong months” in terms of home loan demand and there is generally a drop off in home loan approvals come February.
In February 2017, $32.9 billion worth of home loans were approved, down 2.7% on the previous month, but up 0.3% on February 2016.
Of the $32.9 billion worth of home loans approved over the month of February, $19.9 billion were for owner-occupied loans, while $12.9 billion were for investment purposes.
Looking ahead, Flavell said recent investment policy and pricing changes by many of Australia’s lenders could cause this type of home loan demand to tumble. 
“Over the coming months, we expect to see lending for investment housing to decrease because a lot of Australia’s lenders are making changes in this space,” he said.
“In recent weeks, we have seen a number of lenders tweak their investment pricing, with some increasing their interest rates by as much as 39 basis points across some of the investment products."
In addition, some lenders have removed themselves from the investment lending space altogether, whilst others have tweaked their policy and made it clear that they will only lend to certain types of investor customers, he added.
"All of these changes will ultimately have an impact on the level of investment activity and investment loan approvals,” said Flavell.
</body></html>

Latest Finance Insights

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Finance Insights

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News