Repeat buyers are one of the strongest measures of confidence in any apartment development.

At <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/era-newcastle-west-124-126-bull-street-newcastle-west-nsw-2302">ERA</a> in Newcastle West, some purchasers are returning to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gwh">GWH</a> after living at the developer's One Apartments. Their decision to purchase again was driven by the quality of life they found after moving into their first GWH home.

Keith Wilton had spent years living in a house in East Maitland before deciding it was time for a change. Apartment living had always been on his radar, but he was selective about what he wanted.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FH_1EzB-1vs?si=XScVlP1ERsTDJoME" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

"I had some boxes I wanted to tick," he says.

Keith points to the open-plan design, generous outdoor areas and considered inclusions as key reasons One Apartments worked for him.

“One of those things was a nice indoor open plan area, but also I wanted a nice outdoor open area that I could entertain on in summer or Christmases or birthdays,” he says.

He also found value in the smaller details, from integrated appliances to shared resident spaces including the pool, cinema and rooftop areas.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356818]

After comparing several developments, he chose One Apartments because of GWH's longstanding local reputation and his own experience working with the developer on a commercial project more than a decade earlier.

"I knew that they were local, that the quality of the build was going to be up there. I'd looked at other apartment complexes around and close by, and I just knew that here was a better decision location wise."

Today, Keith says the move has completely changed how he experiences Newcastle.

"I enjoy living in this location because it's more of a lifestyle change. That Newcastle city living where you can walk to restaurants and bars and even beaches and parks and even shopping across the road."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356828]

Beyond the location, he says it's the sense of community that has surprised him most.

"Everyone loves living here because they chose to live here, but everyone looks out for each other. It's a real great community feel here."

For Aimee and Lyle Goodman, the journey started almost by chance.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tsioMLcnjas?si=zq-ys3JuWpfa5hFv" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The couple happened to be having coffee in Newcastle when they noticed the site where One Apartments was about to begin construction.

"We were aware GWH was planning a development," Aimee says. "We made one phone call and things moved pretty quickly after that."

As busy business owners, they initially thought apartment living would simply reduce the maintenance that came with larger homes. Instead, it fundamentally changed how they spent time together.

"We actually catch up more as a family now," Aimee says.

"We've had homes with big yards and lots of space, but everyone ended up in different rooms. Here we'll have dinner together, the kids can play, and we spend far more quality time together."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356829]

Lyle says their confidence came from GWH's reputation within Newcastle's building industry.

"I know people who've worked across different apartment projects, and whenever GWH came up the feedback was always the same. They're rock solid. They're quality."

That confidence only grew throughout the buying process.

"One of the things that really impressed us with GWH was the whole process, was the communication," Lyle says. "It was consistent, it was regular, there was no problem if we had some weird questions, there was no problems in getting answers."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351104]

Aimee says one moment stood out.

"The project actually finished on time. We realised we needed to hurry up and sell our house because everything was happening exactly when they said it would."

The positive experience at One Apartments ultimately gave all three buyers the confidence to purchase again with GWH, this time at ERA.

Their confidence reflects what many buyers are seeking in today's apartment market. Location remains important, but so too does certainty around delivery, quality and long-term liveability.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356822]

ERA builds on those foundations with 280 one, two and three-bedroom apartments across two landmark towers in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/newcastle-west-nsw-2302">Newcastle West</a>.&nbsp;

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fk-australia">Fender Katsalidis</a>, the project will include more than 2,000 square metres of resident amenities, including a resort-style pool, gym, sauna, private cinema and rooftop entertaining spaces overlooking the harbour and coastline.&nbsp;

The development is also within walking distance of the Newcastle Interchange, Honeysuckle, Darby Street, the harbour foreshore, restaurants, retail and the city’s beaches, continuing the walkable lifestyle that existing GWH buyers say has transformed how they live.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=356826]

For Keith, the appeal remains straightforward.

"You feel at home even before you've moved into your home."

For Aimee, the change is measured in time.

“I just felt like I had more time,” she says.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135096 project_image_fid=351102]

Construction at ERA is now underway, with more than half of the residences already sold and limited two and three-bedroom apartments remaining in the East Tower release. Priced from $980,000 for two-bedroom residences and $1.46 million for three-bedroom residences, buyers can secure an apartment with a 10 per cent deposit, with premium homes offering ocean views from Level 8 and harbour views from Level 10.

ERA is also backed by Resilience Insurance's 10-year Latent Defects Insurance policy, providing protection against structural or waterproofing defects for 10 years after completion. The project is anticipated to be completed in early 2028.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135096]

Joel Robinson

From ONE to ERA: Why buyers are choosing GWH again in Newcastle West

Virgate Property Group is preparing to commence construction of Verdé, its new apartment development in Melbourne's Arts Precinct at Southbank, following a strong run of sales that has seen more than half of the project's 173 apartments secured.

Verdé has attracted a broad mix of first home buyers, owner-occupiers upgrading from nearby inner-city suburbs and investors, with younger owner-occupier couples aged between 28 and 45 accounting for the strongest enquiry. Many are already living in Southbank, South Melbourne, Albert Park, Port Melbourne, South Yarra and the CBD.

"Verdé is located in one of the most desirable pockets of southern Melbourne," Blair Property Group Director Darren Blair, who is managing sales at Verdé, said.

"It's within walking distance of the Arts Centre, Royal Botanic Gardens, Albert Park Lake, and Southbank's restaurants and retail. It's a great lifestyle location with strong amenity and liveability, which made it a very attractive choice for the project."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372549]

Virgate was already familiar with the precinct, having previously delivered the successful Domain House development in neighbouring South Melbourne. That experience gave the developer confidence to acquire the Coventry Street site and continue expanding its presence in Melbourne's inner south.

"We had been keeping an eye on the site and the broader precinct for a few months before deciding to move forward with the acquisition," Virgate said.

The project was ultimately secured in 2020 following feasibility studies, planning assessments and due diligence, with the brief centred on delivering "a high-quality, considered design that feels both refined and fit for purpose."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=314259]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bruce-henderson-architects">Bruce Henderson Architects</a>, Verdé comprises 173 one, two and three-bedroom apartments priced from $599,000. The architecture is distinguished by a faceted glass façade that responds to both the site's outlook and Melbourne's changing light conditions.

According to Bruce Henderson Architects, the coloured glazing gives the building a distinctive identity while also providing privacy and solar shading, with residences oriented to capture views across the bay, city skyline and surrounding parklands.

Inside, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/designoffice">DesignOffice</a> has created interiors focused on natural light, efficient planning and enduring materials. Apartments feature engineered oak flooring, natural stone benchtops, floor-to-ceiling glazing and SMEG appliances, while a restrained material palette aims to complement the expansive outlooks rather than compete with them.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=4661 project_image_fid=372550]

Resident amenity has also been designed around everyday functionality rather than occasional use. Facilities include a concierge-serviced lobby, residents' lounge with fireplace, library and co-working space, gym, terrace garden with barbecue facilities, ground-floor café, and package delivery management.

The project's location continues to be one of its strongest drawcards. Positioned on Coventry Street, Verdé sits within walking distance of the National Gallery of Victoria, Arts Centre Melbourne, Royal Botanic Gardens and Albert Park Lake, while Southbank's dining precinct, Sturt Street trams and the new ANZAC Station are all nearby. The surrounding education catchment also includes Melbourne Grammar, Melbourne Girls Grammar, Mac.Robertson Girls' High School and several major university campuses.

The sales team says buyers have responded particularly well to the combination of location, design quality and long-term liveability.

"They're responding really positively to the quality of the design, premium resident amenities and the uninterrupted views. Many also appreciate the location and how connected it is to everything they need."

The ability to secure stamp duty savings before completion has also been a key factor for purchasers, alongside the opportunity to personalise finishes ahead of settlement.

With construction set to commence soon and more than half the apartments already sold, Verdé enters its next phase as one of the Arts Precinct's more established apartment developments, offering remaining buyers an opportunity to secure a residence before construction advances further. Expected completion is scheduled for late 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=4661]

Virgate's Verdé Southbank moves toward construction as sales fly past halfway stage

Downsizer-focused apartment development Kooyongkoot in Hawthorn has been recognised at the 2026 Better Future Melbourne Design Awards, taking home Gold and Silver awards in two categories.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/kooyongkoot-hawthorn-1-kooyongkoot-road-hawthorn-vic-3122">Kooyongkoot</a>, currently being delivered by developer PQD and designed by Cera Stribley, received Gold in the Interior Design – Proposed category and Silver in the Architecture – Proposed category.

The dual recognition reflects the design approach behind the boutique development on prestigious Kooyongkoot Road, where the focus has been on creating homes for downsizers seeking the space, quality and functionality of a detached house within a low-rise apartment building.

Rather than maximising apartment numbers, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pqd">PQD</a> and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cera-stribley-architects">Cera Stribley</a> limited the development to just 18 residences, allowing for larger floorplans, greater privacy, generous landscaping and expansive communal spaces.&nbsp;The majority of the apartments also benefit from corner aspects, allowing for dual sources of natural light.

Now around 70 per cent complete and on track for completion in November 2026, Kooyongkoot will comprise a mix of garden residences, ter​race apartments, sub-penthouses, and is crowned by two half-floor penthouses with direct lift access and private rooftop terraces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355297]

The Silver Award for Architecture recognised the way the building responds to its prominent corner position at the ent​rance to Hawthorn's Scotch Hill precinct, one of Melbourne's most established residential neighbourhoods.

Rather than competing with the grand homes that line Kooyongkoot Road, the architectural approach focused on restraint and longevity, using curved brickwork, generous landscaping and carefully considered proportions to integrate with the existing streetscape.

"The form feels fluid and timeless, as though shaped by the landscape itself – architecture that belongs, rather than competes," said Chris Stribley, Co-Founder and Managing Principal of Cera Stribley.

The judging submission also highlighted practical innovations throughout the building, including lift cores servicing only nine homes each, a central landscaped lightcourt designed to bring daylight and ventilation into the building, and fully enclosed private storage rooms with lighting, power and shelving to better accommodate residents transitioning from larger family homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355293]

The Gold Award for Interior Design recognised the project's focus on long-term liveability rather than display-home aesthetics.

According to the awards submission, the interiors were designed from the inside out, prioritising how homes would function over decades of daily use through generous proportions, practical storage, durable natural materials and flexible layouts.

The specification includes natural stone throughout, upgraded acoustic glazing, V-ZUG appliances and fully enclosed storage rooms, alongside an amenity offering focused on wellness, entertainment and everyday convenience.&nbsp;

Residents will have access to a gym and yoga studio, a wellness centre featuring traditional and infrared saunas, a cold therapy shower and treatment room, as well as a residents' lounge and golf simulator/cinema room for entertainment.&nbsp;Kooyongkoot has also considered the everyday convenience of its residents by offering a private carwash and pet wash facilities on site as well as dedicated parcel lockers and oversized fully enclosed storage rooms.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355303]

The project's attention to detail has already resonated with buyers. Earlier this year, Kooyongkoot recorded one of Boroondara's highest apartment sales when an $8 million penthouse was purchased by a Melbourne CEO downsizing from a nearby family home.

"Every detail feels deliberate, from the overall design down to the smallest touches," the purchaser said.

"The level of quality and refinement is exceptional, but what really sold it was how liveable it felt... It felt like a place where everything had been considered, not just a luxury building."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=102717 project_image_fid=355304]

Sustainability also formed a key part of both award submissions. Kooyongkoot is targeting a minimum 7.5-star NatHERS rating across all residences, supported by passive design principles, high-performance glazing, EV charging infrastructure, water reuse systems and a wellness model focused on lower-energy dry facilities rather than pools and large wet areas.

Located within walking distance of Scotch College, Methodist Ladies' College, Koo​yong Lawn Tennis Club, Aubur​n Village and Camberwell Junction, Kooyongkoot continues to target owner-occupiers looking to remain in Melbourne's inner east without compromising on space or quality. A limited selection of two, three and four-bedroom residences remains available, with prices starting from $1.9 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=102717]

Kooyongkoot wins Gold and Silver at Better Future Melbourne Design Awards

New apartment supply has become increasingly constrained across <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/parramatta-nsw-2150">Parramatta</a> in recent years, with fewer projects progressing through to completion as development conditions have become more challenging.

It makes <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/novm">NOVM</a>'s 2021-completed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/the-lennox-parramatta-12-phillip-street-parramatta-nsw-2150">The Lennox</a> one of the most recently completed residential towers on the Parramatta River, and among the newest apartment developments in Sydney's second CBD.

With the project largely completed before the sharp escalation in construction costs and inflation following the pandemic, The Lennox is now offering pricing that would be difficult to replicate in a comparable new development in Parramatta today, or across much of Western Sydney.

The majority of the 413 apartments at The Lennox sold before and shortly after completion. A limited release of the remaining apartments has recently been brought to market by capital partner <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/equitifund-group">Equitifund</a>, with entry-level pricing from $700,000 and two-bedroom apartments available from under $1 million.

Rising above the Parramatta River at 12 Phillip Street, The Lennox comprises one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments, appealing to first home buyers, young professionals, families, downsizers and interstate investors seeking a completed apartment in one of Australia's fastest-growing economic centres.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=372394]

Rather than positioning Parramatta as an alternative to Sydney's CBD, Equitifund believes the city has reached a point where it stands on its own merits.

"Parramatta is no longer simply an alternative to Sydney CBD, it's becoming a destination in its own right," Equitifund Executive Chairman Greg Huxley said.

"The Lennox captures that evolution with a level of quality and amenity that's difficult to match at its price point."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=953]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/marchese-partners">Marchese Partners</a>, the tower responds directly to its riverfront setting through expansive glazing and open-plan layouts that maximise views across the Parramatta River and city skyline. Interiors feature engineered timber flooring, stone benchtops, stainless steel appliances and floor-to-ceiling glazing, while generous balconies extend the living spaces outdoors.

Marchese Partners says the project was conceived to balance high-quality apartment living with practical, long-term functionality, pairing larger, efficient floorplans with amenities more commonly associated with five-star hotels.

That emphasis continues through the resident facilities, which include a 20-metre rooftop swimming pool, fully equipped gym and wellness spaces, full-time concierge, a residents' lounge, function room, private lifts, secure basement parking and rooftop communal areas overlooking the Parramatta River. Ground-floor boardwalk retail and dining further activate the riverfront and integrate the building into the surrounding public realm.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=925]

Australian housing and finance group Equitifund has secured the remaining apartments, believing there are few completed apartment opportunities in Parramatta that offer the same combination of location, amenity and pricing.

Equitifund National Sales Director Ben Hamblett says buyers are increasingly recognising that premium apartment living no longer needs to come with Sydney CBD pricing.

"The Lennox is where aspirational living becomes attainable," Hamblett said.

"Wake to river and mountain views, step into Sydney's Second CBD, and arrive home to resort-calibre amenities, all without the harbour price tag."

Hamblett says owner-occupiers are also attracted by the convenience of having Westfield Parramatta, Church Street's dining precinct, Parramatta Park, Riverside Theatres, Western Sydney University and major transport connections all within walking distance.

"At The Lennox, lifestyle is not an afterthought, it is the foundation."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=5743 project_image_fid=5374]

The Lennox places residents within walking distance of Parramatta Square, Westfield Parramatta, Church Street Eat Street, Parramatta Station, the ferry wharf, Light Rail, the future Sydney Metro West, Parramatta Park and CommBank Stadium, reinforcing Parramatta's position as one of Australia's most connected metropolitan centres outside Sydney's CBD.

Equitifund says buyers visiting the display suite consistently comment on the quality of the finishes, generous floorplans, river and skyline views, and the walkability of the location. The project has attracted a broad mix of local professionals, upsizers, downsizers, buyers relocating from Sydney's inner suburbs and interstate investors seeking long-term growth opportunities.

That demand aligns with Parramatta's continued evolution as an economic powerhouse. Equitifund Research and Market Insights specialist John Bekiaris says sustained population growth, infrastructure investment and expanding employment opportunities continue to support long-term housing demand across the city.

"Parramatta has evolved from a satellite city into one of Australia's most important economic centres. Population growth, infrastructure investment and employment are all supporting sustained long-term housing demand."

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=5743]

The apartment price gap drawing Sydney buyers west

A luxury beachfront apartment at Rainbow Bay has more than doubled in value since it sold off the plan six years ago, setting a new local apartment record in the process.

The three-bedroom apartment in the Flow development on Petrie Street, the first of four new projects locally by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects, has sold for $7.4 million, after originally selling for $3.27 million when the project launched in 2020.

The seventh-floor apartment, comprising 187 sqm of internal living space and a 54 sqm balcony overlooking Froggies Beach and Snapper Rocks, was purchased by a local family.

The transaction was negotiated by Pezet Matheson director Kerry Pezet and equates to more than $30,000 per sqm.

Pezet said the sale reflected the limited opportunities to buy into the boutique beachfront development.

"The sale highlights the rarity of opportunities within the boutique beachfront development, where residences seldom become available," Pezet said.

"Flow is one of the Gold Coast's most tightly held buildings. Buyers from our database move quickly when residences become available, and achieving an off-market sale at $7.4 million demonstrates the depth of demand for property of this calibre."

<img alt="Flow" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c585b206-2130-4eee-a50c-3f27c51a7c70" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-06%20at%208.33.25%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=m3pHRDV62Y3fvN.XQuQHq.52ilTWpRLf" />

Flow was the first of four luxury apartment developments delivered by Paul Gedoun's S&amp;S Projects at Rainbow Bay and was completed in 2023.

Positioned on the beachfront overlooking Snapper Rocks, the residence includes three bedrooms, three bathrooms, a powder room and views stretching north along the coastline towards Surfers Paradise.

Pezet Matheson Residential principal Mitchell Lambert said buyers continued to prioritise quality beachfront apartments in tightly held locations.

"Flow Residences offers a rare combination of elevated beachfront positioning, architectural excellence, comprehensive resident amenity and premium finishes, which is exactly what discerning purchasers are seeking," Lambert said.

"The transaction further reinforces Rainbow Bay's reputation as one of Australia's premier coastal lifestyle destinations, where limited supply and growing demand continue to support strong market performance."

Pezet Matheson originally marketed and sold out Flow off the plan, making the latest transaction a return to one of the project's original buyers.

Paul Gedoun is selling his third project, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/radia-rainbow-bay-271-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Radia Rainbow Bay</a>, after recently completing, and selling out, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/esprit-217-227-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Esprit</a>. He has plans for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-s-s-projects-proposes-88-apartment-wellness-tower-at-coolangattas-boundary-street">fourth building</a>, 88 apartments on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/209-213-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Boundary Street</a>.

Rainbow Bay apartment doubles in price since off the plan sale during pandemic

Australia Post is one of the country’s most trusted institutions, powering one of the largest delivery networks in Australia. As online shopping continues to scale, Australians spent a record $82.6 billion online in 2025, with nearly one in four retail dollars now spent online.

That scale of eCommerce activity has fundamentally changed expectations around how and when parcels arrive, and what happens when someone isn't home.

<h3>Problem solved with Parcel Lockers</h3>

The traditional alternatives to home delivery are far from ideal. Buildings can rely on reception teams to manage deliveries, which introduces ongoing staffing costs and liability concerns. Parcels can be left in common areas, which creates security and aesthetic issues. Or residents are redirected to nearby Post Offices for collection, which shifts the inconvenience rather than solving it.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dVG5ChLHf7E?si=D9hQRGCBuzlSQBqK" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The data behind that frustration is significant. Nationally, around 9 per cent of deliveries are carded, meaning the recipient was not home and must collect the parcel from a Post Office. That figure reflects the national average reported between November 2025 and January 2026. In Melbourne, that figure rises to 20 per cent. In high-density living, it climbs again to 28 per cent. In other words, more than one in four deliveries in Melbourne apartment buildings results in a failed first attempt.

<h3>How Parcel Lockers work</h3>

The mechanics are simple. When a parcel arrives, the resident receives a notification either through the Australia Post app or via SMS. They scan a QR code, use their one-time PIN and the compartment opens. The parcel is secure, accessible and removed from the lobby floor.

Located in thoughtfully chosen, easily accessible areas, including external building interfaces, mixed-use precincts or shared communal zones, Parcel Lockers enhance convenience without requiring internal building access or additional operational oversight.

<h3>The scale of the network</h3>

This expansion represents Australia Post's largest investment in parcel infrastructure to date, building on momentum that began in 2011 when the first 24 Parcel Locker sites were introduced.

Today the Australia Post Parcel Locker network spans over 1,400 locations and more than 105,000 individual compartments, with major investment already underway to significantly expand the network further.

<h3>What it means for developers and building operators</h3>

A Parcel Locker bank is free to install and free for residents to use. That removes one of the primary barriers to adoption and shifts the conversation from cost to integration.

Australia Post's preference is to engage with developers during the design phase. That allows Parcel Lockers to be located in a considered, publicly accessible space that works for residents and the broader community. Retrofit is possible, and existing buildings can be assessed, but the strongest results occur when Parcel Lockers are treated as part of the core services plan rather than a bolt-on solution.

While the iconic Australia Post red is widely recognised, Parcel Lockers can also be delivered in more muted palettes such as beige or green to align with architectural intent.

For developers, they offer a tech-forward amenity that meets modern expectations, a reduction in courier congestion and building-management load supporting lower emissions and better ESG outcomes, and a meaningful marketability advantage in high-density, eCommerce-active areas, all at no cost for installation and maintenance, with Australia Post funding the program aside from power access.

<h3>Who's using them</h3>

Generational shopping behaviours show strong, sustained growth across all cohorts. Millennials (27–43) led online spend in 2024, contributing nearly $25 billion. Baby Boomers (60–78) increased their online spend by 17.6 per cent, becoming the fastest-growing adopters. Gen Z (13–26) and Gen X (44–59) continue to lean on delivery services as part of their everyday shopping habits.

Internationally, uptake is even more pronounced. Overseas markets are seeing rapid adoption by both developers and consumers, positioning Parcel Lockers as standard infrastructure in many new residential projects. For Melbourne's development community, this signals a shift in baseline expectations. Just as secure bike storage and dedicated parcel rooms have become more common, integrated Parcel Locker networks may soon be viewed as part of the essential service mix.

<h3>The bigger picture</h3>

Parcel Lockers aren't just a logistics fix. Developers invest heavily in lobby design, materials, lighting and landscaping to shape first impressions. Yet a stack of unattended parcels can undo that effort in an instant. Embedding parcel infrastructure early allows projects to respond to how people actually live today, supporting resident satisfaction, reducing operational strain and aligning with broader community and ESG outcomes.

As Belinda Quinn, Senior Transaction Manager – Retail &amp; Out of Home at Australia Post, puts it, residents increasingly expect delivery solutions that align with real life, are flexible, secure and available whenever they need them.

How Australia Post is solving the parcel problem for apartment living

<html><body>
The Peninsula residential development site at Monterey Keys on the northern Gold Coast has been listed for receivership sale.
The current listing is 32,994 square metres of waterfront land in a gated community, which potentially consists of up to 62 individual titled lots.
CBRE Gold Coast managing director Mark Witheriff said the sale campaign is expected to generate interest from domestic house and land developers.
“The sale could provide an opportunity for the incoming owner to either sell down the individual waterfront lots or develop a themed waterfront community on the remaining land and super lot,” Witheriff says.
The Peninsula is located on the natural waterway of Saltwater Creek, offering views to Hope Island Resort from its Helensvale location.
Offers close on December 1.
Stefan Dopking and Quentin J. Olde of Taylor Woodings were appointed as receivers and managers of Kabale, the site’s owner, in June 2011.
The Monterey Keys residential estate was launched in 1992, initially comprising 1,100 lots on a 182-hectare riverfront site on the northern Gold Coast.
The site was purchased in a vacant state in 1998 for $12 million by Kabale Holdings, a company associated with the Dalley family, with a view to the development of an integrated residential resort.
It was a canal housing project with an estimated $300 million completion value.
In 1989 when Kabale went through a period of reconstruction the estate lay dormant, with sales beginning in late 1992 averaging 10 to 15 blocks a month for the first two years. The dry lots were fetching around $70,000 and the wet lost $130,000.
Most recently the developer was selling wet blocks from $495,000, which were re-priced over recent times down to $395,000.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Last plot of Gold Coast's Monterey Keys up for receivership sale

<html><body>
Lachlan Murdoch, the Channel Ten boss, has not yet confirmed the 2012 return of The Renovators series after its ratings failure. 
He has noted some of the sponsors of the $25 million series were keen for its return, “with reset expectations”.
“If we bring it back it will be in a different format and with different expectations,” Murdoch says.
Ratings for Channel Ten's The Renovators did not come close to the similar Channel 9 show The Block.
The ratings of The Renovators finale topped 1.26 million across the five cities, its best result since its 1.25 million August debut.
Some 56% of the $725,000 average nightly audience over the past three months were women.
The series was created by the television production house Shine Australia. The Renovators finale was October 12.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a>
</body></html>

The Renovators will not return in same format, and possibly not at all: Lachlan Murdoch

<html><body>
We are often asked about the impact of maintenance and capital improvements on direct residential property returns. More specifically, what are the annual performance leakages attributable to these costs? Today’s column will try and shed some analytical light on this murky subject. 
As an aside, I will not examine how the same issues afflict the far smaller “commercial property” sector – there is less than $300 billion of commercial, industrial and retail real estate compared with circa $3.6 trillion of housing – which nevertheless assumes far higher weights in institutional investor portfolios to the latter’s detriment. 
The very poor performance reported by Australian super funds in recent years has been in part driven by unnecessarily high exposures to risky listed property trusts (or REITs) and unlisted commercial property. As but one illustration, my first chart below compares the performance of Australian houses (capital growth plus 50% of gross rents to control for costs), which is the red line, with the ASX/LPT Accumulation Index, which captures all REITs and is denoted by the blue line.
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/oct251.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct251thumb.gif"></a>
For some reason, Australian super funds have loaded up on the blue line but completely overlooked the red one. Go figure. And which of these two lines gives more pause in relation to the perennially emotive “bubble trouble” question? We read so much crap about “house price bubbles”, but almost never hear about the far bigger bubbles that one finds in commercial property prices. The hard data suggests that the real “irrational exuberance” was attributable to institutional investors, like super funds, chasing too much commercial, as opposed to residential, property. 
Commercial property advocates try to dismiss the highly liquid “market pricing” afforded by the ASX LPT index and point to the much lower volatility (risk) numbers that derive from indices that purport to track “unlisted” portfolios of commercial real estate. The problem with these measures is that they are heavily influenced by “non-market” human valuations that typically ignore distressed sales (i.e., those properties selling at discounts during times of crisis) and thus artificially smooth returns. That’s akin to saying, “We are going to remove all the really badly performing companies listed on the ASX because they are distressed.” 
But enough venting. Let’s return to my central task today: quantifying the impact of capex and maintenance on residential property returns (the results are similar for commercial property). Some house price proxies, such as “median price” or “stratified median price” indices – of the kind reported by APM and the ABS – make no attempt to control for the bias induced by capital improvements (viz., renovations) and the other maintenance required to preserve the value of the underlying assets included in the index to mitigate depreciation. 
The repeat-sales indices reported by Residex are probably hampered by similar problems: rather than plucking the median or middle sales observation every quarter, Residex only looks at homes for which it can find both a purchase and sale, and then measures buy-and-hold returns via a regression-based index. This approach has the obvious drawback of excluding all newly built homes. Another problem is that over the average owner’s holding period of seven to eight years, many will carry out some structural improvements in order to boost the value they extract from that asset, and/or to offset the effects of the inexorable depreciation of the dwelling. 
Standard repeat-sales indices do not directly deal with this problem, and are therefore biased measures of house price changes over time. In the academic research literature, there are a number of modifications one can make to the basic repeat-sales methods used by the likes of Case-Shiller in the <country-region><place>US</place></country-region> to statistically control for non-linear changes in a dwelling’s value, which, it is assumed, arise as a function of capex (or depreciation in the absence of capex). But these are inherently imperfect. 
Unfortunately, we cannot know exactly what Residex does because, unusually for a supplier of house price indices, it has historically refused to provide specific details on the methodology it uses. 
Within Rismark’s library of house price index products, we privately produce all of the known techniques, including adjusted repeat-sales models that control for the abovementioned biases. 
By far the best, and most direct, way to address the problems induced by capex on time-series measures of housing costs is through the use of “hedonic” indices. These benchmarks are RP Data-Rismark’s preferred tools for evaluating changes in housing costs over time, and have become the gold standard for the RBA and most banks. 
Critically, a hedonic index explicitly controls for the exact attributes of all the homes included in the index, ranging from their precise location, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, the property’s type and land size, whether it has a garage or pool, and its view, among other things. 
As a filter in RP Data and Rismark’s data processing method, we also insist on being able to confirm the specific attributes of all homes within six months of the sales data that is used in the index. In this way, we know that the characteristics that the index relies upon – such as number of bedrooms, bathrooms, land size, etc – are up-to-date. 
Hedonic indices are designed to very explicitly compare like with like. They effectively take the highly heterogeneous “apples and oranges” that are the homes that transact over time, and normalise them such that we can identify the true underlying rates of capital growth attributable to regions, cities and the national market. 
This brings me back to my original question about the return leakages deriving from both high-value structural capital investments (i.e., development application-approved renovations), and other lower value, or non-DA approved, maintenance. 
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
In what follows, I will try and quantify these for you. It is important to bear in mind that these costs need to be weighed against the asset’s total returns: that is, both capital growth and normal or imputed rental incomes. They should not be deducted exclusively from one or the other. 
The ABS reports two measures of the value of alterations and additions (A and A) on a quarterly basis. The first is the Construction Work Done Series and leverages off the ABS’s Building Activity Survey. The Building Activity Survey (BAS) supplies estimates of the value of work done on alterations and additions with an approval value of $10,000 or more as collected via DAs submitted to Australian councils. 
In the ABS National Accounts a second, far broader measure of residential A and A is published. In particular, the National Accounts upwardly adjusts the BAS estimates to reflect the fact that a substantial amount of alterations and additions activity is not covered in the BAS survey (eg, work under $10,000, and work not done with permits). The National Accounts also boost the BAS A and A by an “undercoverage adjustment” to control for some reporting biases (eg, DAs tend to be undervalued). 
Our previous correspondence with the ABS suggested that the overall National Accounts adjustment factor, which varies on a state-by-state basis, is between four and five times. 
In the chart below we show the <personname>sma</personname>ller BAS estimate of A and A as a share of the value of the total private residential housing stock since 1986. This is calculated by multiplying the number of private dwellings each quarter with RP Data-Rimark’s measure of the all regions, all property types median dwelling price. Since 1986 the average BAS A and A has been 0.26% per annum. Click to enlarge
 
<a href="/images/stories/oct252.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct252thumb.gif"></a>
In the next figure we move to the more comprehensive A and A proxy reported in the National Accounts. Consistent with our prior correspondence, this total A and A estimate is on average 4.95 times larger than the BAS result (see the penultimate figure below). That is, the ABS believes that all forms of dwelling maintenance and capital investments, excluding the construction of new buildings, amount to about 1.26% per annum. Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/oct253.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct253thumb.gif"></a>
<a href="/images/stories/oct254.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct254thumb.gif"></a>
A useful sanity test of these A and A estimates is to look at the value of depreciation as a share of the housing stock. In its National Accounts, the ABS spends considerable time computing the annual value of the depreciation of the private residential dwelling stock owned by individuals. In the final figure we have taken this depreciation proxy and divided it by the same estimate of the total housing stock value used above.
<a href="/images/stories/oct255.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct255thumb.gif"></a>
Unsurprisingly, depreciation, which averaged 1.2% per annum between 1986 and 2011, is almost exactly the same as average capital expenditure. In fact, it also tapers off during the 2000s, just as capex appeared to do. And it reconciles almost perfectly with the ABS’s estimate of the average dwelling life of 88 years. 
To summarise, this analysis suggests that the total value of maintenance and A and A as a share of the value of the dwelling stock is around 1.2% per annum (rounded down), all else being equal.
Christopher Joye is a leading financial economist. The above article is not investment advice.
</body></html>

chrisjoye-JYhJsTrNRC

How much value renovating adds to your home

<html><body>
Kevin McCloud, the star of the increasingly popular TV series Grand Designs, fronted the decor home show Grand Designs Australia Live in Sydney today.
Crowds hovered as the cult television star cashed in on his international acclaim.
"I'm just a whinging Pom," he suggested, then spoke on what made great, rather than grand designs.
Judging unusual housing projects, Grand Designs first screened in Britain in 1999, airing in Australia on the LifeStyle Channel six years later, then on ABC1 a year later.
Earlier this month its 11th season premiered in the UK. Naturally the couple involved in the transformation of a derelict mill cottage in Northumberland, Stefan Lepkowski and Annia Shabowska, who began work in 2006, had a £250,000 budget, which was completely inadequate.
The series reportedly rates better in Australia than on Channel 4 in Britain.
McCloud told an Australian audience earlier this week that the biggest mistake people made renovating or building a home was "not planning enough" and "failure to work with good professionals."
McCloud said technology was making the home simpler, not more complicated.
McCloud admits his own house is typicall messy and says the kitchen is the centre of the home.
The exhibition space is filled with stalls highlighting interiors and home decor ideas for non-televised home grand designs.
It follows recent exhibitions that take place annually in London and Birmingham.
Grand Designs Australia Live will take place in Melbourne in September 2012.
While in Australia McCloud will catch up with one of his two brothers, who lives in northern NSW.
The show continues until Sunday. 
</body></html>

Kevin McCloud talks grand designs in Sydney

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.Mistake #1 – Getting emotionally involved
Many homeowners undertake a home renovation for emotional reasons. Very often they fall ‘in love’ with the property. This emotional issue applies to both home owners and investors. One of the biggest mistakes homeowners make when undertaking a home renovation is to overcapitalise their property. 
Mistake #2 – Failing to understand the meaning of overcapitalisation
According to the Royal Australian Institute of Architects; many homeowners are paying thousands of dollars only to devalue their homes. One of the ways they do this is by overcapitalising which means to improve a property beyond its resale value. Overcapitalisation means you spend too much money on the property and are not be able to recoup these monies if you decide to sell it. A simple example would be if a homeowner spends $150,000 on home renovations and then decides to sell the property. The homeowner may find that the value of the property has only increased by $75,000 meaning that they have effectively lost $75,000 through the renovations. In effect, they have over-capitalised the property by $75,000. 
Mistake #3 – Not doing your homework on comparable market pricing
Unfortunately, it is important to recognise that most suburbs have a median sale price and an upper sale threshold specific to your suburb. Even different streets in your suburb have different price thresholds; that’s because your neighbour’s houses and the general streetscape have considerable influence on the value of homes in your street. Before renovating it is important to consider the housing styles, demographics of your suburb, and sale prices achieved of other homes in the area that have recently sold.
Mistake #4 – Under-estimating all of the costs involved in building
This is one of the biggest mistakes that homeowners make when renovating their homes. Homeowners typically under-estimate the costs involved in building. Such as; demolition costs, professional fees, contingencies for variations, foundation changes due to soil conditions, fit-out and landscaping, kitchens and bathrooms, escalation of building costs and delay and acceleration costs to finish the project on time. 
Mistake #5 – Poor selection of a builder
Property owners who decide to employ a builder to undertake home extensions also encounter problems because they have not undertaken sufficient research on the experience of the builder, and their past record in undertaking renovations. Especially their “variation claims” history, often Builders locks unsuspecting homeowners into building contracts which cost homeowners thousands in variation costs. Another common mistake is to let the Builder provide the design, and therefore restrict the homeowner from getting competitive quotations upon the Builders design. 
 
Mistake #6 – Doing it DIY to save money
Some people also make the mistake of trying to undertake home renovations themselves. This can prove costly in time and is financially unwise because a poor standard of work will only devalue the property. Character homes, in particular, require a higher standard of renovation work and you may need to carefully select tradesmen with past experience in this area to ensure that the work is properly completed. If you decide on a major renovation don’t cut corners doing it yourself. There is no such thing as a cheap renovation. Ultimately, it will impact on the resale value of the property or you will spend more funds at a later date to fix the original faulty work. Always seek competent, professional advice and trades people before undertaking a major renovation.
 
 
Mistake #7 – Failing to stick to a budget
A common problem is that home renovators do not operate with a strict budget and are unable to complete planned renovations because of a lack of money. This mistake results in homeowners financially overextending themselves through a lack of financial planning. The “Catch 22” is that renovators often can’t then sell their ‘half completed’ renovation and end up in severe financial hardship. 
Mistake #8 – Poor functional design layout and design
A very common problem is that home renovators end up spending too much on a poor functional layout because of the limitations of the existing building. In many cases the homeowner would have been better off, to have demolished the existing house and start all over again. Another common problem is where the style of the renovation is inconsistent with the rest of the house; you’ll often see houses for sale with a modern extension that clash with the rest of the house which is still stuck in the 1970’s. These properties are “lemons” on the market and typically homeowners lose money on these renovations.  
Mistake #9 – Spending money on the wrong things
If you are living in $100,000 house you will not get a good return on an investment in a $35,000 bathroom. Swimming pools are a good example of additions to a property that often doesn’t add value. Many buyers do not want the work, expense, and potential for accidents that come with a pool. The general rule is that you should not spend more than 25 per cent of the value of your home on home improvement renovations. 
Mistake #10 – Underestimating the disruption to your lifestyle
Undergoing a major renovation and living through it, is often overlooked by most home owners. The disruption to your lifestyle, the mess, the noise and restrictions is something that should not be discounted. If you are having major renovation (especially if you are a family with young children) consider moving out and renting elsewhere during the construction phase. 
Before you make the decision to renovate or buy a new house, carefully ask yourself the following questions: 
1. Decide what it is you are looking for in a final result and ask yourself if it will be cheaper to buy a different home or to renovate your old one. 
2. What is the average selling price of homes in your area? 
3. Will renovations alter the appearance of your home so that it appears out of place in the neighbourhood? Check the styles of other homes in the area. Keep in mind it might be a better idea to match or keep in step with the styles of other homes in the area. A poor design could devalue your home by thousands of dollars. 
4. How much will renovations cost compared to what you paid for your home. What is the expected increase in value as a result of the renovations? Will the renovations actually cause your home to lose value?
The decision to buy a new home or to renovate is not one to be taken lightly. It is recommended that you think through every aspect of the project prior to getting started. Seek the advice of a local professional architect/building designer as well as a real estate professional if necessary to determine how the proposed renovations will affect the value of your home. 
Gary Pemmelaar is a co-principal of <a href="https://www.rhglenelg.com.au/" target="_blank">Raine &amp; Horne Glenelg</a>. Gary is a civil engineer and hold a builder's licence in SA. He has considerable experience in both property develoment and renovations.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/" target="_blank">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

gpemmelaar-JzY6mVRhhq

Top 10 mistakes home renovators make

<html><body>
With all the renovation shows on television there’s currently a lot of interest in buy, renovate and sell projects.  Here’s a real example of why would-be renovators should consider a buy, renovate and hold strategy rather than choosing to sell off their asset.
 
Property summary:
 
Location: <a href="/news">Cremorne</a>, Sydney
Property type: Three-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment 
A three bedroom apartment was purchased in <city><place>Sydney</place></city>’s <place><placename>North</placename><placetype>Shore</placetype></place> in original condition. The property boasted <place><placename>Sydney</placename><placename>Harbour</placename></place> views from the kitchen, lounge and dining rooms. 
The apartment was gutted with walls removed between the kitchen and dining and lounge rooms. This opened up the living space and increased the natural light in the apartment. A false ceiling and down lighting were added to the kitchen to define the space. 
Both bathrooms were gutted and redone from scratch. A brand new kitchen was installed complete with a washer/dryer in a cupboard, allowing the tenants to do their laundry without leaving the apartment. The renovation was completed with new paint, blinds and light fittings over a six week period. 
The numbers:
<ul>
<li>Purchase price: $805,000</li>
<li>Post renovation value: $1,025,000</li>
<li>Total added equity: $220,000</li>
<li>Renovation costs: $101,500 (includes project management fees and holding costs)</li>
<li>Manufactured equity: $118,500</li>
<li>Pre renovation rent: Estimated $675 per week (owner-occupied at time of purchase)</li>
<li>Post renovation rent: $850 per week</li>
</ul>
After renovation the owner had the option to hold onto the property as an investment or sell the property and pocket any profit.  Both options are examined below using the figures from this real example.
 
Renovate and hold:
The benefits of holding onto this property after renovation are twofold.  Firstly, the increased equity of $118,500 can be used as security to borrow against to buy another property or invest elsewhere. 
Secondly this renovate and hold strategy example resulted in an increased rental rate of $175 per week.  This rental increase ($9,100 per annum) more than covers the interest cost of the funds required to undertake the renovation ($101,500 x 7% = $7,105 per annum). In this example the renovation increased the return on investment both in capital value and cashflow. 
It’s important to note that under a buy and hold strategy the purchasing costs are apportioned over the period the property is held and are only realised upon the sale of the property.
 
Renovate and sell:
Most people who undertake a buy, renovate and sell project complete the transaction within a 12-month period.  Therefore they receive no tax concessions on the profit unlike the owner who chooses to hold the property for more than 12 months. 
Under this strategy, the owner must account for the buying and selling costs as the asset is being realised with the major expenses in this example totalling $65,971 as outlined below:
<ul>
<li>Marketing - $1,500 (web, signboard, floor plan, brochures) </li>
<li>Selling fees - $22,550 (2.2%)</li>
<li>Stamp duty - $41,921 </li>
</ul>
After costs the owner is left with a profit of $52,529 which is then taxed at their marginal tax rate resulting in a modest return for the work invested.
 
The final word:
The example above illustrates the difficulty in making a reasonable profit when undertaking a buy, renovate and sell project in comparison to the financial gain and flexibility provided under a buy, renovate and hold strategy. 
Patrick Bright is a real estate author and founder of Sydney-based buyer’s agency <a href="https://%20www.epspropertysearch.com.au" target="_blank">EPS Property Search</a>. Bright has purchased over $500 million worth of real estate for clients. His best-selling titles include The Insider’s Guide to Buying Real Estate, The Insider’s Guide to Saving Thousands at Auction and The Insider’s Guide to Profitable Property Investing.  
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

pbright-aNtgvRfvJN

After you renovate, sell or hold? A case study

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/developments/fender-katsilidis-ever-changing-place-in-melbourne-s-skyline/2011101351927?source=flicker4" target="_blank">With the success of the Melbourne Terrace Apartments</a>, a newly established firm and several landmark buildings under its belt, the big-ticket commissions began rolling in for Fender Katsalidis.
<img src="/images/stories/richmondsilos.jpg">
There was the Richmond Silos (pictured above), converted from old grain silos and built in 1996, the Ian Potter centre (1998), the Republic Tower, HM@S Tower (pictured below) and Bendigo Art Gallery (1999), and New Quay at Docklands (2004).
<img src="/images/stories/hmas.jpg">
But one building would say more about the ambition of Fender Katsalidis than any other – a gleaming, gold-tipped pillar called the Eureka Tower, which at 92 storeys Nonda Katsalidis insists is “still the tallest building in the country”, despite that title officially belonging to Q1 on the Gold Coast. (To set the record straight, Katsalidis says the roof height of Q1 is 275 metres, Eureka’s is 297, he reckons Q1 cheated by adding a 45-metre spire on top, “but let’s not start that argument again!”.)
<img src="/images/stories/eurekafka.jpg">
Katsalidis says designing the Eureka Tower (pictured above), which turns five years old this month, was always about creating “an iconic, huge thing”, and the firm certainly achieved that.
When awarding Eureka Tower the Royal Australian Institute of Architects Harry Seidler Award for Commercial Architecture in 2007, the jury said it “clearly demonstrates that commercial architecture can be about more than the ‘bottom line’ – it can contribute a broader value to the life and character of the city”.
And Eureka Tower’s bottom line is still doing just fine. According to end-of-financial-year reports for 2010 compiled by Harcourts City Residential, the average selling price for apartments in the Eureka Tower in 2010 was just under $1.047 million, up from $707,685 the previous year. The median sale price for Southbank apartments in 2010 was $602,900.
Katsalidis is coy about Eureka’s financial success. “It’s still the slickest-looking building in Melbourne,” he says. “It’s a very striking building; it’s used as the backdrop in the news and is a symbol for <city><place>Melbourne</place></city>.”
With Eureka under its belt and its stamp firmly placed on Melbourne, Fender Katsalidis set about looking for opportunities outside the city where the firm made their name.
<img src="/images/stories/monafka.jpg">
Katsalidis says his most recent highlight was designing entrepreneur David Walsh’s “adult <place>Disneyland</place>” MONA (the <place><placetype>Museum</placetype> of <placename>Old</placename></place> and New Art) in <city><place>Hobart (pictured above)</place></city>, carved into the sandstone cliffs of the <place><placename>Berriedale</placename><placetype>Peninsula</placetype></place>. Some have called it Katsalidis’ masterwork and it’s even been labelled the “Bilbao of the South” a reference to Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim.
MONA aside, the majority of Fender Katsalidis’ work is still focused on creating new residential possibilities, with much of its work being on large planning projects, even designing entire cities.
<img src="/images/stories/fkakl.jpg">
In <city><place>Kuala Lumpur</place></city> the firm has designed luxury apartments near the <place><placename>Petronas</placename><placetype>Towers</placetype></place> and in the millionaire’s precinct of Taman Duta (pictured above). In Thailand the firm designed several luxury resorts in Phuket and on the east coast of Gibraltar, an entire residential estate on the waterfront.
In Dubai, the firm consulted on the much talked-about Palm Jebel Ali, a reclaimed island designed to resemble the fronds of a palm tree, which developer Nakheel still hopes will house more than 250,000 people by 2020 although construction on the development has stalled. The firm was involved in some of <city><place>Dubai</place></city>’s most ambitious projects, but most stalled or were abandoned when in the 2008 property crash, when house prices plummeted 64%.
Karl Fender, quoted in a 2009 article about the Dubai crash in The Age, said “Dubai was a place in a hurry. It was based on a hard-to-define marketplace, and built on a frenzy of speculation.”
Despite Dubai’s well-documented property crash, its initial boom gave Fender Katsalidis architects the chance to push their design skills and imagination to a new level.
Today, the firm hires nearly 100 staff, but Katsalidis says he and Fender are still personally involved in every project and they are still as ambitious as ever. Their reach is now global, but they still call Melbourne home and aren’t done there yet.
<img src="/images/stories/phoenix.jpg">
Not just happy to build the tallest skyscraper in Melbourne, now the pair want to design the slimmest. <city><place>Phoenix</place></city> 82 (pictured above)looks set to make quite an impact on <street><address>Flinders Street</address></street>, with a unique trail of blue light “snaking” down its side. The site is only 6.7 metres wide and 24.3 metres deep. The 28-storey building will rise 88.5 metres, with one apartment on each floor.
Maxx Apartments in St Kilda has just begun construction and will be a mixed-use development incorporating two commercial storeys and 11 residential. Apartment prices range from $387,000 to $640,000.
<img src="/images/stories/bendigoart.jpg">
Fender has also been invited back to the Bendigo Art Gallery (pictured above) to assist with a $7.55 million expansion it hopes will give it more room to host big-name exhibitions.
Fender, who over the years has called the Melbourne Terrace Apartments, the <place><placetype>Republic</placetype><placetype>Tower</placetype></place> and <city><place>Eureka</place></city> home, says he had no trouble believing high-rise living would take off in <city><place>Melbourne</place></city>. As an expat from 1975 to 1995 he lived in high-rise apartments in London, Hong Kong and Rome and his many years as a happy apartment dweller would help shape his strong belief that high-density living is not only the answer to burgeoning population growth, but that it can provide the same sense of community, even more, than the long sprawl of the outer suburbs, which he calls “anonymous” and a place where “every man is an island”.
Fender Katsalidis’ most ambitious, or at least tallest, building is still to come. Katsalidis is tight-lipped on details, but confirms the firm has been commissioned to design a 100-storey, 500-metre skyscraper in Kuala Lumpur in mid-2012. It will be the firm’s tallest yet and just scrape through to be the second tallest building in the world. Further proof perhaps that Fender Katsalidis’ rising ambition is far from satisfied.
</body></html>

cknowlton-QnEa6ntUYP

Onwards and upwards in Kuala Lumpur for Fender Katsalidis after Eureka moment

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
Stand anywhere in the Melbourne <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> and it’s almost impossible for an upwards-glancing eye not to catch one of Fender Katsalidis Architects’ distinctive residential towers.
<img src="/images/stories/eurekafka.jpg">
There’s the gold-capped peak of Southbank’s Eureka Tower (pictured above), the rocket-like Republic Tower (pictured above) on the corner of Queen and La Trobe streets, the revolutionary Little Hero building and its Lego-style construction method in Russell Place, and just about all of New Quay in the Docklands, to name just a few.
<img src="/images/stories/republic.jpg">
Fender Katsalidis buildings are typically low-impact, high-density designs that aim to create a “vertical neighbourhood” for <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> dwellers.
Both Karl Fender and Nonda Katsalidis are public proponents of high-density living as opposed to the flat urban sprawl embraced by the baby boomers.
“You have to keep your mind open to new housing typologies that use less land, and in so doing give greater community facility,’’ Fender says. ‘‘Because the idea of just building houses cheek-by-jowl and going on forever is just not sustainable”. Although he does add: “You don’t have to go building Eurekas all over town”.
Most of FKA‘s apartments are designed to be relatively affordable, which ties in with the firm’s outspoken intention to convince the average buyer to embrace high-density living. Affordability, Fender says, is the key to encouraging buyers to choose an apartment over traditional house and land.
Apartments in the upcoming <street><address>Fulton Lane</address></street> development for example are being offered at a starting price of $365,000. The development is the first in Australia for Malaysian group SP Setia, which reported in June that 70% of Fulton Lane’s apartments had sold off the plan in just three days.
At <street><address>108 Flinders Street</address></street>, where construction has just commenced on a 12-storey development tucked in behind AC/DC Lane, a one-bedroom can be snapped up for $390,000. Developer Riverlea announced in August that 85% of 108’s apartments were sold before construction began in September.
While FKA’s main focus is on affordable high-density living, the firm does have its trophies. At time of writing, the Eureka Tower’s penthouse, which occupies the entire 84th floor of the building is on the market. It’s expected to fetch upwards of $13 million.
<img src="/images/stories/melbourneterrace.jpg">
Karl Fender and Nonda Katsalidis’ <city><place>Melbourne</place></city> footprint began with the Katsalidis solo project Melbourne Terrace Apartments (pictured above), just near the Queen Victoria Markets on <street><address>Franklin Street</address></street>. Opened in 1994, it was one of the first residential developments to come out of Jeff Kennett’s Postcode 3000 planning policy in the early ’90s, aimed at encouraging Melburnians to live in the <stockticker>CBD</stockticker>. The plan had its critics, – ‘‘where will people buy milk, Myer?’’ was a running joke – but they were ultimately proven wrong as Melbourne was put on a pedestal as an example of how to reinvigorate a city centre so it becomes not only a place of work, but also of entertainment, and for many, a place to live.
Considered an early test case for the ambitious Postcode 3000 strategy, Katsalidis’ Melbourne Terrace Apartments were lauded as a new model for medium- and high-rise living in the <stockticker>CBD</stockticker>. Its success would convince architects and planners that <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> living was not only possible, it had the potential to move <city><place>Melbourne</place></city> towards gaining the ‘‘most liveable city’’ badge it proudly wears now.
It also established Nonda Katsalidis as an architect to watch in <country-region><place>Australia</place></country-region>. In 1996, he would merge with Bob Nation and Karl Fender to create Nation Fender Katsalidis, which would go on to build some of Melbourne’s most recognisable landmarks.
On Monday we will look at the next step for Fender Katsilidis and its projects outside Victoria. 
</body></html>

Fender Katsalidis' ever-changing place in Melbourne's skyline

<html><body>
Whenever I have watched reality shows what resonates most with me is an obvious lack of due diligence. How can you have an advertising campaign that any other vendor in Australia would dream of only to see failure and disappointment on auction day?
The other problem is that in the vast majority of cases that I’ve seen the contestants have little to no experience with renovation yet by the end of the series they give the impression that they are master builders.
On top of that the general public gets the impression that they have cut corners given the shows focus on a tight renovation budget. This creates a no-win situation, which has been reflected in the sales evidence.
The contestants keep running down to the local hardware store (which is usually a sponsor) to buy appliances, where they would be paying full retail as against sourcing the products far more cheaply over the internet. With better planning in advance these appliances could be purchased much cheaper – although that does not fit in with the strict timing schedules of the shows.
The problems facing these shows are sourcing the right properties in the right locations. This is nearly impossible, especially given that they have to find multiple properties the fit the criteria. When they find a compromise more often than not they have paid too much acquiring the properties and the cost of renovations combine to deliver over-capitalised properties. It is then very difficult to make the money back at auction.
I don’t see a great future with these reality realty shows given they are not financially viable. It’s an expensive gamble if you are not an owner-builder who is developing the property to live in.
It is well-documented around the country that punting on real estate using that formula is a recipe for disaster – and they keep delivering this conclusive evidence, don’t they?
Robert Simeon is a director of <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/" target="_blank" title="RWM">Richardson  Wrench Mosman and Neutral Bay </a>and has been selling residential real estate in Sydney since 1985. He has also been writing real-estate blog <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" target="_blank" title="Virtual Realty News">Virtual Realty News</a> since 2000. The RWM real estate model has sold in excess of $1 billion in database sales globally.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Lack of experience, research and planning a problem with reno TV

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
We recently looked at the new draft <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/tips-for-borrowing-through-your-diy-super-for-property-investment/2011101151890" target="_blank">ATO ruling surrounding borrowing via your self-managed super fund and property</a>. The rules are more lenient, but investors still need to be careful.
Understand the difference between repairs and improvements of geared property
 
Detail: Under last year’s amendments, superannuation law specifies that money borrowed by a SMSF under a limited recourse loan arrangement must only be used to buy and maintain an asset – not to improve it.
Draft ruling: An improvement of an asset, in contrast to a repair, will improve its efficiency and/or substantially increase its value. 
Crucially, a fund can use its own money to improve a property – provided those improvements are not so extensive so as create a new asset, according to the ruling. 
The draft ruling stresses that what the ATO regards as the difference between repairs and improvements for tax deductibility is not necessarily the same as its interpretation in relation to SMSF gearing. Meg Heffron, co-principal of specialist SMSF administrator Heffron and a former member of the Cooper superannuation review, says the draft ruling shows the ATO will take a “fairly liberal view” about the difference between a repair and an improvement. 
The draft ruling states that a repair may include restoration to an asset’s former appearance or condition – without changing its character. 
“These issues will always be a matter of degree,” comments Heffron, “but the ATO clearly envisages quite a wide range of activities which might incidentally add to the value of the property falling into the repairs category. 
“This is obviously highly beneficial to funds that have borrowed to acquire real property.” 
Case studies from draft ruling: A SMSF borrows to buy a house with broken windows. Not surprisingly, the ATO would treat the replacement of the windows as a repair, not an improvement. Therefore, the new windows could be financed under a borrowing arrangement.
SMSF trustees renovate a rundown house immediately following its purchase. Under the draft ruling, the ATO would treat renovations that improve the efficiency of the asset and substantially increase its value as an improvement. This means that the renovations could not be financed under the loan arrangement. 
A SMSF renovates a property and adds a bathroom. Property investors, of course, commonly undertake such projects. The ATO would regard the addition of the bathroom as an improvement.
A kitchen is restored following a fire that damages the stove, benches and walls. Under the draft ruling, the ATO would regard the kitchen’s restoration as a repair. But if the kitchen is extended at the same time, the extension would be treated as an improvement. 
A SMSF adds a swimming pool or garage to a geared property. The ATO would view the changes as improvements, which could not be financed under a borrowing arrangement. 
Understand what improvements create a new asset 
 
Detail: A basic challenge for property investors is whether proposed improvements to a geared property are so extensive as to effectively create a new asset. 
Under superannuation law, a fund cannot even use its own cash, let alone borrowed money, to finance improvements to a geared asset that lead to the creation of a new asset. The fund would have to wait until the gearing expired before using its own money to pay for such improvements. 
Drafting ruling: “The ATO has previously taken the view that improving a property will necessarily trigger the replacement of one asset, the unimproved one, with a new asset,” says Heffron. 
“The ruling takes a far more liberal position,” she says, “and indicates that in the ATO’s view, not all improvements will necessarily result in a replacement asset.” 
The draft ruling gives the ATO’s opinion that an improvement that fundamentally changes the character of an asset amounts to the creation of a new asset. 
Case studies from draft ruling: A SMSF owns a geared house and land. The house is then demolished and replaced with three strata units. New assets would be created. 
A SMSF owns a geared house and land. The land is rezoned and the house converted into commercial premises. Again, a new asset would be created. 
A fire destroys a fund-owned, four-bedroom house. The fund uses the insurance payout to build a replacement four-bedroom house. The fundamental character of the property has not changed. The proceeds of an insurance payout could finance the replacement.
For more on self-managed super and property, download our e-book.
</body></html>

Latest Building Insights

How Australia Post is solving the parcel problem for apartment living

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Building Insights

How Australia Post is solving the parcel problem for apartment living

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News