The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Joel Robinson

Wing Tai unveils 325-apartment St Kilda Road tower on former VACC House site

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Roberts Co has entered a new phase of growth following its acquisition by Arada, one of the world’s fastest-growing property developers in Australia.

The acquisition is supported by a $50 million capital injection into Roberts Co’s Australian balance sheet, consisting of the previously announced $25 million recapitalisation and an additional $25 million in new funding from Arada.

This investment strengthens Roberts Co’s financial position, stabilises operations, and provides the foundation for strategic expansion beyond its New South Wales base, with a focus on new opportunities in Queensland, including the Brisbane and Gold Coast regions.

With Arada’s international resources and financial backing, Roberts Co will broaden its portfolio across residential, commercial, and infrastructure sectors, reinforcing its strong market position in New South Wales and setting itself to capture growth in one of Australia’s most dynamic construction markets.

Ahmed Alkhoshaibi, Group CEO of Arada, said Roberts Co has a proud Australian heritage, an outstanding delivery record, and a strong reputation for collaboration with clients and partners.

"By combining this expertise with Arada’s global scale and financial capacity, we are creating a platform for sustained growth in the Australian market,"&nbsp;Alkhoshaibi said.

“Our $50 million capital injection, including new funds from Arada, underlines our commitment to both stabilise and expand Roberts Co’s operations, particularly into the fast-growing Queensland market. We see significant potential in South-East Queensland’s pipeline and are confident Roberts Co is well placed to deliver lasting value for clients and communities.”

George Kostas, CEO of Roberts Co, said Queensland, and particularly South-East Queensland, is one of the most active and opportunity-rich regions in Australia right now.

"The lead-up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic Games will bring unprecedented investment across housing, transport, and infrastructure. Roberts Co is eager to play a major role in that transformation and secure a meaningful share of this fast-growing market.”

Arada pours more funds into Roberts Co, flags expansion into South East Queensland construction market

<html><body>
Lachlan Murdoch, the Channel Ten boss, has not yet confirmed the 2012 return of The Renovators series after its ratings failure. 
He has noted some of the sponsors of the $25 million series were keen for its return, “with reset expectations”.
“If we bring it back it will be in a different format and with different expectations,” Murdoch says.
Ratings for Channel Ten's The Renovators did not come close to the similar Channel 9 show The Block.
The ratings of The Renovators finale topped 1.26 million across the five cities, its best result since its 1.25 million August debut.
Some 56% of the $725,000 average nightly audience over the past three months were women.
The series was created by the television production house Shine Australia. The Renovators finale was October 12.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

The Renovators will not return in same format, and possibly not at all: Lachlan Murdoch

<html><body>
We are often asked about the impact of maintenance and capital improvements on direct residential property returns. More specifically, what are the annual performance leakages attributable to these costs? Today’s column will try and shed some analytical light on this murky subject. 
As an aside, I will not examine how the same issues afflict the far smaller “commercial property” sector – there is less than $300 billion of commercial, industrial and retail real estate compared with circa $3.6 trillion of housing – which nevertheless assumes far higher weights in institutional investor portfolios to the latter’s detriment. 
The very poor performance reported by Australian super funds in recent years has been in part driven by unnecessarily high exposures to risky listed property trusts (or REITs) and unlisted commercial property. As but one illustration, my first chart below compares the performance of Australian houses (capital growth plus 50% of gross rents to control for costs), which is the red line, with the ASX/LPT Accumulation Index, which captures all REITs and is denoted by the blue line.
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/oct251.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct251thumb.gif"></a>
For some reason, Australian super funds have loaded up on the blue line but completely overlooked the red one. Go figure. And which of these two lines gives more pause in relation to the perennially emotive “bubble trouble” question? We read so much crap about “house price bubbles”, but almost never hear about the far bigger bubbles that one finds in commercial property prices. The hard data suggests that the real “irrational exuberance” was attributable to institutional investors, like super funds, chasing too much commercial, as opposed to residential, property. 
Commercial property advocates try to dismiss the highly liquid “market pricing” afforded by the ASX LPT index and point to the much lower volatility (risk) numbers that derive from indices that purport to track “unlisted” portfolios of commercial real estate. The problem with these measures is that they are heavily influenced by “non-market” human valuations that typically ignore distressed sales (i.e., those properties selling at discounts during times of crisis) and thus artificially smooth returns. That’s akin to saying, “We are going to remove all the really badly performing companies listed on the ASX because they are distressed.” 
But enough venting. Let’s return to my central task today: quantifying the impact of capex and maintenance on residential property returns (the results are similar for commercial property). Some house price proxies, such as “median price” or “stratified median price” indices – of the kind reported by APM and the ABS – make no attempt to control for the bias induced by capital improvements (viz., renovations) and the other maintenance required to preserve the value of the underlying assets included in the index to mitigate depreciation. 
The repeat-sales indices reported by Residex are probably hampered by similar problems: rather than plucking the median or middle sales observation every quarter, Residex only looks at homes for which it can find both a purchase and sale, and then measures buy-and-hold returns via a regression-based index. This approach has the obvious drawback of excluding all newly built homes. Another problem is that over the average owner’s holding period of seven to eight years, many will carry out some structural improvements in order to boost the value they extract from that asset, and/or to offset the effects of the inexorable depreciation of the dwelling. 
Standard repeat-sales indices do not directly deal with this problem, and are therefore biased measures of house price changes over time. In the academic research literature, there are a number of modifications one can make to the basic repeat-sales methods used by the likes of Case-Shiller in the <country-region><place>US</place></country-region> to statistically control for non-linear changes in a dwelling’s value, which, it is assumed, arise as a function of capex (or depreciation in the absence of capex). But these are inherently imperfect. 
Unfortunately, we cannot know exactly what Residex does because, unusually for a supplier of house price indices, it has historically refused to provide specific details on the methodology it uses. 
Within Rismark’s library of house price index products, we privately produce all of the known techniques, including adjusted repeat-sales models that control for the abovementioned biases. 
By far the best, and most direct, way to address the problems induced by capex on time-series measures of housing costs is through the use of “hedonic” indices. These benchmarks are RP Data-Rismark’s preferred tools for evaluating changes in housing costs over time, and have become the gold standard for the RBA and most banks. 
Critically, a hedonic index explicitly controls for the exact attributes of all the homes included in the index, ranging from their precise location, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, the property’s type and land size, whether it has a garage or pool, and its view, among other things. 
As a filter in RP Data and Rismark’s data processing method, we also insist on being able to confirm the specific attributes of all homes within six months of the sales data that is used in the index. In this way, we know that the characteristics that the index relies upon – such as number of bedrooms, bathrooms, land size, etc – are up-to-date. 
Hedonic indices are designed to very explicitly compare like with like. They effectively take the highly heterogeneous “apples and oranges” that are the homes that transact over time, and normalise them such that we can identify the true underlying rates of capital growth attributable to regions, cities and the national market. 
This brings me back to my original question about the return leakages deriving from both high-value structural capital investments (i.e., development application-approved renovations), and other lower value, or non-DA approved, maintenance. 
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
In what follows, I will try and quantify these for you. It is important to bear in mind that these costs need to be weighed against the asset’s total returns: that is, both capital growth and normal or imputed rental incomes. They should not be deducted exclusively from one or the other. 
The ABS reports two measures of the value of alterations and additions (A and A) on a quarterly basis. The first is the Construction Work Done Series and leverages off the ABS’s Building Activity Survey. The Building Activity Survey (BAS) supplies estimates of the value of work done on alterations and additions with an approval value of $10,000 or more as collected via DAs submitted to Australian councils. 
In the ABS National Accounts a second, far broader measure of residential A and A is published. In particular, the National Accounts upwardly adjusts the BAS estimates to reflect the fact that a substantial amount of alterations and additions activity is not covered in the BAS survey (eg, work under $10,000, and work not done with permits). The National Accounts also boost the BAS A and A by an “undercoverage adjustment” to control for some reporting biases (eg, DAs tend to be undervalued). 
Our previous correspondence with the ABS suggested that the overall National Accounts adjustment factor, which varies on a state-by-state basis, is between four and five times. 
In the chart below we show the <personname>sma</personname>ller BAS estimate of A and A as a share of the value of the total private residential housing stock since 1986. This is calculated by multiplying the number of private dwellings each quarter with RP Data-Rimark’s measure of the all regions, all property types median dwelling price. Since 1986 the average BAS A and A has been 0.26% per annum. Click to enlarge
 
<a href="/images/stories/oct252.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct252thumb.gif"></a>
In the next figure we move to the more comprehensive A and A proxy reported in the National Accounts. Consistent with our prior correspondence, this total A and A estimate is on average 4.95 times larger than the BAS result (see the penultimate figure below). That is, the ABS believes that all forms of dwelling maintenance and capital investments, excluding the construction of new buildings, amount to about 1.26% per annum. Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/oct253.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct253thumb.gif"></a>
<a href="/images/stories/oct254.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct254thumb.gif"></a>
A useful sanity test of these A and A estimates is to look at the value of depreciation as a share of the housing stock. In its National Accounts, the ABS spends considerable time computing the annual value of the depreciation of the private residential dwelling stock owned by individuals. In the final figure we have taken this depreciation proxy and divided it by the same estimate of the total housing stock value used above.
<a href="/images/stories/oct255.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/oct255thumb.gif"></a>
Unsurprisingly, depreciation, which averaged 1.2% per annum between 1986 and 2011, is almost exactly the same as average capital expenditure. In fact, it also tapers off during the 2000s, just as capex appeared to do. And it reconciles almost perfectly with the ABS’s estimate of the average dwelling life of 88 years. 
To summarise, this analysis suggests that the total value of maintenance and A and A as a share of the value of the dwelling stock is around 1.2% per annum (rounded down), all else being equal.
Christopher Joye is a leading financial economist. The above article is not investment advice.
</body></html>

chrisjoye-JYhJsTrNRC

How much value renovating adds to your home

<html><body>
Kevin McCloud, the star of the increasingly popular TV series Grand Designs, fronted the decor home show Grand Designs Australia Live in Sydney today.
Crowds hovered as the cult television star cashed in on his international acclaim.
"I'm just a whinging Pom," he suggested, then spoke on what made great, rather than grand designs.
Judging unusual housing projects, Grand Designs first screened in Britain in 1999, airing in Australia on the LifeStyle Channel six years later, then on ABC1 a year later.
Earlier this month its 11th season premiered in the UK. Naturally the couple involved in the transformation of a derelict mill cottage in Northumberland, Stefan Lepkowski and Annia Shabowska, who began work in 2006, had a £250,000 budget, which was completely inadequate.
The series reportedly rates better in Australia than on Channel 4 in Britain.
McCloud told an Australian audience earlier this week that the biggest mistake people made renovating or building a home was "not planning enough" and "failure to work with good professionals."
McCloud said technology was making the home simpler, not more complicated.
McCloud admits his own house is typicall messy and says the kitchen is the centre of the home.
The exhibition space is filled with stalls highlighting interiors and home decor ideas for non-televised home grand designs.
It follows recent exhibitions that take place annually in London and Birmingham.
Grand Designs Australia Live will take place in Melbourne in September 2012.
While in Australia McCloud will catch up with one of his two brothers, who lives in northern NSW.
The show continues until Sunday. 
</body></html>

Kevin McCloud talks grand designs in Sydney

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.Mistake #1 – Getting emotionally involved
Many homeowners undertake a home renovation for emotional reasons. Very often they fall ‘in love’ with the property. This emotional issue applies to both home owners and investors. One of the biggest mistakes homeowners make when undertaking a home renovation is to overcapitalise their property. 
Mistake #2 – Failing to understand the meaning of overcapitalisation
According to the Royal Australian Institute of Architects; many homeowners are paying thousands of dollars only to devalue their homes. One of the ways they do this is by overcapitalising which means to improve a property beyond its resale value. Overcapitalisation means you spend too much money on the property and are not be able to recoup these monies if you decide to sell it. A simple example would be if a homeowner spends $150,000 on home renovations and then decides to sell the property. The homeowner may find that the value of the property has only increased by $75,000 meaning that they have effectively lost $75,000 through the renovations. In effect, they have over-capitalised the property by $75,000. 
Mistake #3 – Not doing your homework on comparable market pricing
Unfortunately, it is important to recognise that most suburbs have a median sale price and an upper sale threshold specific to your suburb. Even different streets in your suburb have different price thresholds; that’s because your neighbour’s houses and the general streetscape have considerable influence on the value of homes in your street. Before renovating it is important to consider the housing styles, demographics of your suburb, and sale prices achieved of other homes in the area that have recently sold.
Mistake #4 – Under-estimating all of the costs involved in building
This is one of the biggest mistakes that homeowners make when renovating their homes. Homeowners typically under-estimate the costs involved in building. Such as; demolition costs, professional fees, contingencies for variations, foundation changes due to soil conditions, fit-out and landscaping, kitchens and bathrooms, escalation of building costs and delay and acceleration costs to finish the project on time. 
Mistake #5 – Poor selection of a builder
Property owners who decide to employ a builder to undertake home extensions also encounter problems because they have not undertaken sufficient research on the experience of the builder, and their past record in undertaking renovations. Especially their “variation claims” history, often Builders locks unsuspecting homeowners into building contracts which cost homeowners thousands in variation costs. Another common mistake is to let the Builder provide the design, and therefore restrict the homeowner from getting competitive quotations upon the Builders design. 
 
Mistake #6 – Doing it DIY to save money
Some people also make the mistake of trying to undertake home renovations themselves. This can prove costly in time and is financially unwise because a poor standard of work will only devalue the property. Character homes, in particular, require a higher standard of renovation work and you may need to carefully select tradesmen with past experience in this area to ensure that the work is properly completed. If you decide on a major renovation don’t cut corners doing it yourself. There is no such thing as a cheap renovation. Ultimately, it will impact on the resale value of the property or you will spend more funds at a later date to fix the original faulty work. Always seek competent, professional advice and trades people before undertaking a major renovation.
 
 
Mistake #7 – Failing to stick to a budget
A common problem is that home renovators do not operate with a strict budget and are unable to complete planned renovations because of a lack of money. This mistake results in homeowners financially overextending themselves through a lack of financial planning. The “Catch 22” is that renovators often can’t then sell their ‘half completed’ renovation and end up in severe financial hardship. 
Mistake #8 – Poor functional design layout and design
A very common problem is that home renovators end up spending too much on a poor functional layout because of the limitations of the existing building. In many cases the homeowner would have been better off, to have demolished the existing house and start all over again. Another common problem is where the style of the renovation is inconsistent with the rest of the house; you’ll often see houses for sale with a modern extension that clash with the rest of the house which is still stuck in the 1970’s. These properties are “lemons” on the market and typically homeowners lose money on these renovations.  
Mistake #9 – Spending money on the wrong things
If you are living in $100,000 house you will not get a good return on an investment in a $35,000 bathroom. Swimming pools are a good example of additions to a property that often doesn’t add value. Many buyers do not want the work, expense, and potential for accidents that come with a pool. The general rule is that you should not spend more than 25 per cent of the value of your home on home improvement renovations. 
Mistake #10 – Underestimating the disruption to your lifestyle
Undergoing a major renovation and living through it, is often overlooked by most home owners. The disruption to your lifestyle, the mess, the noise and restrictions is something that should not be discounted. If you are having major renovation (especially if you are a family with young children) consider moving out and renting elsewhere during the construction phase. 
Before you make the decision to renovate or buy a new house, carefully ask yourself the following questions: 
1. Decide what it is you are looking for in a final result and ask yourself if it will be cheaper to buy a different home or to renovate your old one. 
2. What is the average selling price of homes in your area? 
3. Will renovations alter the appearance of your home so that it appears out of place in the neighbourhood? Check the styles of other homes in the area. Keep in mind it might be a better idea to match or keep in step with the styles of other homes in the area. A poor design could devalue your home by thousands of dollars. 
4. How much will renovations cost compared to what you paid for your home. What is the expected increase in value as a result of the renovations? Will the renovations actually cause your home to lose value?
The decision to buy a new home or to renovate is not one to be taken lightly. It is recommended that you think through every aspect of the project prior to getting started. Seek the advice of a local professional architect/building designer as well as a real estate professional if necessary to determine how the proposed renovations will affect the value of your home. 
Gary Pemmelaar is a co-principal of <a href="https://www.rhglenelg.com.au/" target="_blank">Raine &amp; Horne Glenelg</a>. Gary is a civil engineer and hold a builder's licence in SA. He has considerable experience in both property develoment and renovations.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/" target="_blank">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

gpemmelaar-JzY6mVRhhq

Top 10 mistakes home renovators make

<html><body>
With all the renovation shows on television there’s currently a lot of interest in buy, renovate and sell projects.  Here’s a real example of why would-be renovators should consider a buy, renovate and hold strategy rather than choosing to sell off their asset.
 
Property summary:
 
Location: <a href="/news">Cremorne</a>, Sydney
Property type: Three-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment 
A three bedroom apartment was purchased in <city><place>Sydney</place></city>’s <place><placename>North</placename><placetype>Shore</placetype></place> in original condition. The property boasted <place><placename>Sydney</placename><placename>Harbour</placename></place> views from the kitchen, lounge and dining rooms. 
The apartment was gutted with walls removed between the kitchen and dining and lounge rooms. This opened up the living space and increased the natural light in the apartment. A false ceiling and down lighting were added to the kitchen to define the space. 
Both bathrooms were gutted and redone from scratch. A brand new kitchen was installed complete with a washer/dryer in a cupboard, allowing the tenants to do their laundry without leaving the apartment. The renovation was completed with new paint, blinds and light fittings over a six week period. 
The numbers:
<ul>
<li>Purchase price: $805,000</li>
<li>Post renovation value: $1,025,000</li>
<li>Total added equity: $220,000</li>
<li>Renovation costs: $101,500 (includes project management fees and holding costs)</li>
<li>Manufactured equity: $118,500</li>
<li>Pre renovation rent: Estimated $675 per week (owner-occupied at time of purchase)</li>
<li>Post renovation rent: $850 per week</li>
</ul>
After renovation the owner had the option to hold onto the property as an investment or sell the property and pocket any profit.  Both options are examined below using the figures from this real example.
 
Renovate and hold:
The benefits of holding onto this property after renovation are twofold.  Firstly, the increased equity of $118,500 can be used as security to borrow against to buy another property or invest elsewhere. 
Secondly this renovate and hold strategy example resulted in an increased rental rate of $175 per week.  This rental increase ($9,100 per annum) more than covers the interest cost of the funds required to undertake the renovation ($101,500 x 7% = $7,105 per annum). In this example the renovation increased the return on investment both in capital value and cashflow. 
It’s important to note that under a buy and hold strategy the purchasing costs are apportioned over the period the property is held and are only realised upon the sale of the property.
 
Renovate and sell:
Most people who undertake a buy, renovate and sell project complete the transaction within a 12-month period.  Therefore they receive no tax concessions on the profit unlike the owner who chooses to hold the property for more than 12 months. 
Under this strategy, the owner must account for the buying and selling costs as the asset is being realised with the major expenses in this example totalling $65,971 as outlined below:
<ul>
<li>Marketing - $1,500 (web, signboard, floor plan, brochures) </li>
<li>Selling fees - $22,550 (2.2%)</li>
<li>Stamp duty - $41,921 </li>
</ul>
After costs the owner is left with a profit of $52,529 which is then taxed at their marginal tax rate resulting in a modest return for the work invested.
 
The final word:
The example above illustrates the difficulty in making a reasonable profit when undertaking a buy, renovate and sell project in comparison to the financial gain and flexibility provided under a buy, renovate and hold strategy. 
Patrick Bright is a real estate author and founder of Sydney-based buyer’s agency <a href="https://%20www.epspropertysearch.com.au" target="_blank">EPS Property Search</a>. Bright has purchased over $500 million worth of real estate for clients. His best-selling titles include The Insider’s Guide to Buying Real Estate, The Insider’s Guide to Saving Thousands at Auction and The Insider’s Guide to Profitable Property Investing.  
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

pbright-aNtgvRfvJN

After you renovate, sell or hold? A case study

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/developments/fender-katsilidis-ever-changing-place-in-melbourne-s-skyline/2011101351927?source=flicker4" target="_blank">With the success of the Melbourne Terrace Apartments</a>, a newly established firm and several landmark buildings under its belt, the big-ticket commissions began rolling in for Fender Katsalidis.
<img src="/images/stories/richmondsilos.jpg">
There was the Richmond Silos (pictured above), converted from old grain silos and built in 1996, the Ian Potter centre (1998), the Republic Tower, HM@S Tower (pictured below) and Bendigo Art Gallery (1999), and New Quay at Docklands (2004).
<img src="/images/stories/hmas.jpg">
But one building would say more about the ambition of Fender Katsalidis than any other – a gleaming, gold-tipped pillar called the Eureka Tower, which at 92 storeys Nonda Katsalidis insists is “still the tallest building in the country”, despite that title officially belonging to Q1 on the Gold Coast. (To set the record straight, Katsalidis says the roof height of Q1 is 275 metres, Eureka’s is 297, he reckons Q1 cheated by adding a 45-metre spire on top, “but let’s not start that argument again!”.)
<img src="/images/stories/eurekafka.jpg">
Katsalidis says designing the Eureka Tower (pictured above), which turns five years old this month, was always about creating “an iconic, huge thing”, and the firm certainly achieved that.
When awarding Eureka Tower the Royal Australian Institute of Architects Harry Seidler Award for Commercial Architecture in 2007, the jury said it “clearly demonstrates that commercial architecture can be about more than the ‘bottom line’ – it can contribute a broader value to the life and character of the city”.
And Eureka Tower’s bottom line is still doing just fine. According to end-of-financial-year reports for 2010 compiled by Harcourts City Residential, the average selling price for apartments in the Eureka Tower in 2010 was just under $1.047 million, up from $707,685 the previous year. The median sale price for Southbank apartments in 2010 was $602,900.
Katsalidis is coy about Eureka’s financial success. “It’s still the slickest-looking building in Melbourne,” he says. “It’s a very striking building; it’s used as the backdrop in the news and is a symbol for <city><place>Melbourne</place></city>.”
With Eureka under its belt and its stamp firmly placed on Melbourne, Fender Katsalidis set about looking for opportunities outside the city where the firm made their name.
<img src="/images/stories/monafka.jpg">
Katsalidis says his most recent highlight was designing entrepreneur David Walsh’s “adult <place>Disneyland</place>” MONA (the <place><placetype>Museum</placetype> of <placename>Old</placename></place> and New Art) in <city><place>Hobart (pictured above)</place></city>, carved into the sandstone cliffs of the <place><placename>Berriedale</placename><placetype>Peninsula</placetype></place>. Some have called it Katsalidis’ masterwork and it’s even been labelled the “Bilbao of the South” a reference to Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim.
MONA aside, the majority of Fender Katsalidis’ work is still focused on creating new residential possibilities, with much of its work being on large planning projects, even designing entire cities.
<img src="/images/stories/fkakl.jpg">
In <city><place>Kuala Lumpur</place></city> the firm has designed luxury apartments near the <place><placename>Petronas</placename><placetype>Towers</placetype></place> and in the millionaire’s precinct of Taman Duta (pictured above). In Thailand the firm designed several luxury resorts in Phuket and on the east coast of Gibraltar, an entire residential estate on the waterfront.
In Dubai, the firm consulted on the much talked-about Palm Jebel Ali, a reclaimed island designed to resemble the fronds of a palm tree, which developer Nakheel still hopes will house more than 250,000 people by 2020 although construction on the development has stalled. The firm was involved in some of <city><place>Dubai</place></city>’s most ambitious projects, but most stalled or were abandoned when in the 2008 property crash, when house prices plummeted 64%.
Karl Fender, quoted in a 2009 article about the Dubai crash in The Age, said “Dubai was a place in a hurry. It was based on a hard-to-define marketplace, and built on a frenzy of speculation.”
Despite Dubai’s well-documented property crash, its initial boom gave Fender Katsalidis architects the chance to push their design skills and imagination to a new level.
Today, the firm hires nearly 100 staff, but Katsalidis says he and Fender are still personally involved in every project and they are still as ambitious as ever. Their reach is now global, but they still call Melbourne home and aren’t done there yet.
<img src="/images/stories/phoenix.jpg">
Not just happy to build the tallest skyscraper in Melbourne, now the pair want to design the slimmest. <city><place>Phoenix</place></city> 82 (pictured above)looks set to make quite an impact on <street><address>Flinders Street</address></street>, with a unique trail of blue light “snaking” down its side. The site is only 6.7 metres wide and 24.3 metres deep. The 28-storey building will rise 88.5 metres, with one apartment on each floor.
Maxx Apartments in St Kilda has just begun construction and will be a mixed-use development incorporating two commercial storeys and 11 residential. Apartment prices range from $387,000 to $640,000.
<img src="/images/stories/bendigoart.jpg">
Fender has also been invited back to the Bendigo Art Gallery (pictured above) to assist with a $7.55 million expansion it hopes will give it more room to host big-name exhibitions.
Fender, who over the years has called the Melbourne Terrace Apartments, the <place><placetype>Republic</placetype><placetype>Tower</placetype></place> and <city><place>Eureka</place></city> home, says he had no trouble believing high-rise living would take off in <city><place>Melbourne</place></city>. As an expat from 1975 to 1995 he lived in high-rise apartments in London, Hong Kong and Rome and his many years as a happy apartment dweller would help shape his strong belief that high-density living is not only the answer to burgeoning population growth, but that it can provide the same sense of community, even more, than the long sprawl of the outer suburbs, which he calls “anonymous” and a place where “every man is an island”.
Fender Katsalidis’ most ambitious, or at least tallest, building is still to come. Katsalidis is tight-lipped on details, but confirms the firm has been commissioned to design a 100-storey, 500-metre skyscraper in Kuala Lumpur in mid-2012. It will be the firm’s tallest yet and just scrape through to be the second tallest building in the world. Further proof perhaps that Fender Katsalidis’ rising ambition is far from satisfied.
</body></html>

cknowlton-QnEa6ntUYP

Onwards and upwards in Kuala Lumpur for Fender Katsalidis after Eureka moment

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
Stand anywhere in the Melbourne <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> and it’s almost impossible for an upwards-glancing eye not to catch one of Fender Katsalidis Architects’ distinctive residential towers.
<img src="/images/stories/eurekafka.jpg">
There’s the gold-capped peak of Southbank’s Eureka Tower (pictured above), the rocket-like Republic Tower (pictured above) on the corner of Queen and La Trobe streets, the revolutionary Little Hero building and its Lego-style construction method in Russell Place, and just about all of New Quay in the Docklands, to name just a few.
<img src="/images/stories/republic.jpg">
Fender Katsalidis buildings are typically low-impact, high-density designs that aim to create a “vertical neighbourhood” for <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> dwellers.
Both Karl Fender and Nonda Katsalidis are public proponents of high-density living as opposed to the flat urban sprawl embraced by the baby boomers.
“You have to keep your mind open to new housing typologies that use less land, and in so doing give greater community facility,’’ Fender says. ‘‘Because the idea of just building houses cheek-by-jowl and going on forever is just not sustainable”. Although he does add: “You don’t have to go building Eurekas all over town”.
Most of FKA‘s apartments are designed to be relatively affordable, which ties in with the firm’s outspoken intention to convince the average buyer to embrace high-density living. Affordability, Fender says, is the key to encouraging buyers to choose an apartment over traditional house and land.
Apartments in the upcoming <street><address>Fulton Lane</address></street> development for example are being offered at a starting price of $365,000. The development is the first in Australia for Malaysian group SP Setia, which reported in June that 70% of Fulton Lane’s apartments had sold off the plan in just three days.
At <street><address>108 Flinders Street</address></street>, where construction has just commenced on a 12-storey development tucked in behind AC/DC Lane, a one-bedroom can be snapped up for $390,000. Developer Riverlea announced in August that 85% of 108’s apartments were sold before construction began in September.
While FKA’s main focus is on affordable high-density living, the firm does have its trophies. At time of writing, the Eureka Tower’s penthouse, which occupies the entire 84th floor of the building is on the market. It’s expected to fetch upwards of $13 million.
<img src="/images/stories/melbourneterrace.jpg">
Karl Fender and Nonda Katsalidis’ <city><place>Melbourne</place></city> footprint began with the Katsalidis solo project Melbourne Terrace Apartments (pictured above), just near the Queen Victoria Markets on <street><address>Franklin Street</address></street>. Opened in 1994, it was one of the first residential developments to come out of Jeff Kennett’s Postcode 3000 planning policy in the early ’90s, aimed at encouraging Melburnians to live in the <stockticker>CBD</stockticker>. The plan had its critics, – ‘‘where will people buy milk, Myer?’’ was a running joke – but they were ultimately proven wrong as Melbourne was put on a pedestal as an example of how to reinvigorate a city centre so it becomes not only a place of work, but also of entertainment, and for many, a place to live.
Considered an early test case for the ambitious Postcode 3000 strategy, Katsalidis’ Melbourne Terrace Apartments were lauded as a new model for medium- and high-rise living in the <stockticker>CBD</stockticker>. Its success would convince architects and planners that <stockticker>CBD</stockticker> living was not only possible, it had the potential to move <city><place>Melbourne</place></city> towards gaining the ‘‘most liveable city’’ badge it proudly wears now.
It also established Nonda Katsalidis as an architect to watch in <country-region><place>Australia</place></country-region>. In 1996, he would merge with Bob Nation and Karl Fender to create Nation Fender Katsalidis, which would go on to build some of Melbourne’s most recognisable landmarks.
On Monday we will look at the next step for Fender Katsilidis and its projects outside Victoria. 
</body></html>

Fender Katsalidis' ever-changing place in Melbourne's skyline

<html><body>
Whenever I have watched reality shows what resonates most with me is an obvious lack of due diligence. How can you have an advertising campaign that any other vendor in Australia would dream of only to see failure and disappointment on auction day?
The other problem is that in the vast majority of cases that I’ve seen the contestants have little to no experience with renovation yet by the end of the series they give the impression that they are master builders.
On top of that the general public gets the impression that they have cut corners given the shows focus on a tight renovation budget. This creates a no-win situation, which has been reflected in the sales evidence.
The contestants keep running down to the local hardware store (which is usually a sponsor) to buy appliances, where they would be paying full retail as against sourcing the products far more cheaply over the internet. With better planning in advance these appliances could be purchased much cheaper – although that does not fit in with the strict timing schedules of the shows.
The problems facing these shows are sourcing the right properties in the right locations. This is nearly impossible, especially given that they have to find multiple properties the fit the criteria. When they find a compromise more often than not they have paid too much acquiring the properties and the cost of renovations combine to deliver over-capitalised properties. It is then very difficult to make the money back at auction.
I don’t see a great future with these reality realty shows given they are not financially viable. It’s an expensive gamble if you are not an owner-builder who is developing the property to live in.
It is well-documented around the country that punting on real estate using that formula is a recipe for disaster – and they keep delivering this conclusive evidence, don’t they?
Robert Simeon is a director of <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/" target="_blank" title="RWM">Richardson  Wrench Mosman and Neutral Bay </a>and has been selling residential real estate in Sydney since 1985. He has also been writing real-estate blog <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" target="_blank" title="Virtual Realty News">Virtual Realty News</a> since 2000. The RWM real estate model has sold in excess of $1 billion in database sales globally.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a> 
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Lack of experience, research and planning a problem with reno TV

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
We recently looked at the new draft <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/tips-for-borrowing-through-your-diy-super-for-property-investment/2011101151890" target="_blank">ATO ruling surrounding borrowing via your self-managed super fund and property</a>. The rules are more lenient, but investors still need to be careful.
Understand the difference between repairs and improvements of geared property
 
Detail: Under last year’s amendments, superannuation law specifies that money borrowed by a SMSF under a limited recourse loan arrangement must only be used to buy and maintain an asset – not to improve it.
Draft ruling: An improvement of an asset, in contrast to a repair, will improve its efficiency and/or substantially increase its value. 
Crucially, a fund can use its own money to improve a property – provided those improvements are not so extensive so as create a new asset, according to the ruling. 
The draft ruling stresses that what the ATO regards as the difference between repairs and improvements for tax deductibility is not necessarily the same as its interpretation in relation to SMSF gearing. Meg Heffron, co-principal of specialist SMSF administrator Heffron and a former member of the Cooper superannuation review, says the draft ruling shows the ATO will take a “fairly liberal view” about the difference between a repair and an improvement. 
The draft ruling states that a repair may include restoration to an asset’s former appearance or condition – without changing its character. 
“These issues will always be a matter of degree,” comments Heffron, “but the ATO clearly envisages quite a wide range of activities which might incidentally add to the value of the property falling into the repairs category. 
“This is obviously highly beneficial to funds that have borrowed to acquire real property.” 
Case studies from draft ruling: A SMSF borrows to buy a house with broken windows. Not surprisingly, the ATO would treat the replacement of the windows as a repair, not an improvement. Therefore, the new windows could be financed under a borrowing arrangement.
SMSF trustees renovate a rundown house immediately following its purchase. Under the draft ruling, the ATO would treat renovations that improve the efficiency of the asset and substantially increase its value as an improvement. This means that the renovations could not be financed under the loan arrangement. 
A SMSF renovates a property and adds a bathroom. Property investors, of course, commonly undertake such projects. The ATO would regard the addition of the bathroom as an improvement.
A kitchen is restored following a fire that damages the stove, benches and walls. Under the draft ruling, the ATO would regard the kitchen’s restoration as a repair. But if the kitchen is extended at the same time, the extension would be treated as an improvement. 
A SMSF adds a swimming pool or garage to a geared property. The ATO would view the changes as improvements, which could not be financed under a borrowing arrangement. 
Understand what improvements create a new asset 
 
Detail: A basic challenge for property investors is whether proposed improvements to a geared property are so extensive as to effectively create a new asset. 
Under superannuation law, a fund cannot even use its own cash, let alone borrowed money, to finance improvements to a geared asset that lead to the creation of a new asset. The fund would have to wait until the gearing expired before using its own money to pay for such improvements. 
Drafting ruling: “The ATO has previously taken the view that improving a property will necessarily trigger the replacement of one asset, the unimproved one, with a new asset,” says Heffron. 
“The ruling takes a far more liberal position,” she says, “and indicates that in the ATO’s view, not all improvements will necessarily result in a replacement asset.” 
The draft ruling gives the ATO’s opinion that an improvement that fundamentally changes the character of an asset amounts to the creation of a new asset. 
Case studies from draft ruling: A SMSF owns a geared house and land. The house is then demolished and replaced with three strata units. New assets would be created. 
A SMSF owns a geared house and land. The land is rezoned and the house converted into commercial premises. Again, a new asset would be created. 
A fire destroys a fund-owned, four-bedroom house. The fund uses the insurance payout to build a replacement four-bedroom house. The fundamental character of the property has not changed. The proceeds of an insurance payout could finance the replacement.
For more on self-managed super and property, download our e-book.
</body></html>

mlaurence-vhAHaLZT8y

What you need to know about borrowing via a SMSF and property repairs

<html><body>
Without giving the results away, the auction prices on the Channel Ten renovation series The Renovators were pretty ordinary, because the houses had been seriously overcapitalised within a short period of time.
Flipping property in quick time is a complicated task that tests even the experts.
So spending 20% of the purchase costs on renovation was always going to be a hard ask on resale.
The rule of thumb is to keep the reno spend to less than 10% of the value of a home.
The prices paid by the producers of the Channel Ten series were not excessive, but they went awry in their allowances.
They took the purchase price and then the stamp duty costs into their calculations before adding the 20% renovation outlay.
There were also extra prizes thrown into the mix, making the auction results that little bit more disappointing.
The respected renovation blogger Alex Brooks from RenovationPlanning.com.au says it's easy to spend more on the renovation than the increase it will deliver to the property.
Indeed she suggests that if the renovation will put your house near the top end of local market prices, you’d be better off selling and upgrading rather than paying more in building costs than you will gain in prices.
However, if the house was undercapitalised, it could be perfect for renovation. Brooks suggests undercapitalised houses are worth about 10% less than the area's median house price.
Obviously if the house only needs or gets cosmetic improvements without major structural changes, you are less likely to overcapitalise.
But of course the whole point of the television series was to stretch it out for the full three-month airing timetable duration.
Cutting corners and keeping it cheap wouldn’t have been the drawcard.
Selling Houses Australia, on The LifeStyle Channel presented by Andrew Winter, typically has three days to transform a home - on a budget of only 1% of the property's market price.
While the ratings for The Renovators was well short of expectations, that hasn’t stopped agents experiencing a dramatic increase in buy, renovate and sell project enquiries.
But buyers’ agent Patrick Bright suggests many are blissfully unaware of the true costs involved in renovating property.
“Whilst they are great entertainment, the biggest downfall from programs like The Renovators and The Block is that they don’t reveal to viewers the real cost of labour to make these improvements as well as the total costs associated with buying and selling real estate like stamp duty, legals, marketing and selling agents costs,” he says.
“The concept of buying, renovating and selling property as soon as the paint is dry can be profitable if executed correctly, however for most people is almost a guaranteed way to make a loss,” says Bright.
“Most would-be renovators who try to copy the formula seen on TV hoping to make a quick profit will end up bitterly disappointed and lose a lot of money.”
Following three months of hard work, August, Peter, Luke, Melissa, Natalia and Michael's houses will have their auctions broadcast tonight.

The winner will be the contestant with the property that has increased the most in value. They will take home the combined profit of each of the six houses after auction, which somehow just doesn’t seem fair.
For expert commentary and analysis on lessons to be learnt from property reality TV, <a target="_blank" href="https://register.propertyobserver.com.au/lights-camera-auction/">download our e-book Lights, Camera, Auction!</a>
</body></html>

Latest Building Insights

Arada pours more funds into Roberts Co, flags expansion into South East Queensland construction market

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Building Insights

Arada pours more funds into Roberts Co, flags expansion into South East Queensland construction market

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News