The long-awaited redevelopment of the former Eastlakes Shopping Centre site has reached a major milestone, with Conquest's plans for a new mixed-use precinct officially placed on public exhibition.

The State Significant Development Application would transform the 1.7-hectare site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/19a-evans-avenue-eastlakes-nsw-2018">19A Evans Avenue</a> into one of Sydney's largest urban renewal projects, delivering 736 apartments above a new shopping centre anchored by Woolworths, alongside specialty retail, dining, commercial space and new public open spaces.

The public exhibition marks the next chapter for the project after <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/conquest">Conquest</a> acquired the stalled Stage Two development from Crown Group, who completed the first stage across the road prior to their voluntary liquidation.

<img alt="First look: Conquest unveils plans for 736-home Eastlakes Shopping Centre redevelopment" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5fca22c5-d1ed-4e2c-8801-03f7df1eafc8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/eastland%20podium.png?VersionId=uomwr41nF8CmLUZRDcu3mHQechlbxucS" />

&nbsp;

Designed by DKO Architecture, the proposal comprises four residential buildings ranging from 14 to 18 storeys above a two-level retail podium. The development would deliver 736 apartments, including 74 affordable homes, 215 Build-to-Rent apartments and 521 market residences. Provision has also been made for dual-key apartments, which could increase the total number of dwellings to 877.

At ground level, the shopping centre has been designed as the suburb's new meeting place, anchored by a full-line Woolworths and complemented by a curated mix of fresh food retailers, cafés, restaurants, health services and everyday convenience shopping. Generous pedestrian links and landscaped public spaces will connect the retail precinct through to Jack Mundey Reserve, creating a more walkable and connected neighbourhood.

Conquest CEO Michael Akkawi said the redevelopment was about far more than replacing a shopping centre.

"Eastlakes has been overlooked for too long, and this is the community’s moment. We are building a shopping centre and homes, a genuine heart for the suburb, and we genuinely want locals to help shape it."

"We enrich communities through the creation of homes, places, and experiences designed for life, built to last, and owner for generations. That starts with listening, so we warmly encourage everyone with a connection to Eastlakes to view the plans and share their thoughts."

<img alt="First look: Conquest unveils plans for 736-home Eastlakes Shopping Centre redevelopment" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="22f6fb20-54fb-4bd7-8a92-48fafdd00608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/eastland.png?VersionId=cugp7s9hrMHGJJdYzkeAkrFoQgnF4GXf" />

DKO said the design had been shaped by the site's landscape setting and surrounding open space.

"Our vision for the site embraces its unique Bidjigal identity by blending the residential living with generous landscaping and a material palette inspired by the Bidjigal locality, and celebrating the panoramic views to Botany Bay and the wetlands reserves."

"Taking cues from Country, we seek to harmonise built form with the landscape and lightly touch the earth. By reconnecting, retaining and regenerating existing ecology, and weaving in natural elements, we can deepen our connection to Country."

The landscape strategy extends across the podium and rooftops, incorporating communal gardens, children's play areas, lawns, community gardens, family gathering spaces and extensive tree planting. New landscaped links will also strengthen the connection between the precinct and Jack Mundey Reserve, while publicly accessible open spaces have been integrated throughout the development.

The proposal builds on Conquest's broader placemaking strategy for the site. Through an ongoing partnership, local artist Joe Rashbrook has been appointed Urban Art Curator, working alongside young residents to transform the project's site hoardings into a public art gallery that allows the community to engage with the redevelopment before construction is complete.

Conquest has rapidly expanded its development pipeline since acquiring the Eastlakes site, with more than $6 billion worth of mixed-use projects now in planning across Sydney, including Stanmore, Castlecrag and Waterloo.

Conquest CEO Michael Akkawi said the redevelopment was about far more than replacing a shopping centre.

Joel Robinson

First look: ‘Far more than replacing a shopping centre’ as Conquest unveils 736-home Eastlakes redevelopment

Abadeen has lodged a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for one of Mosman's largest apartment developments in recent years, seeking approval to transform the former Honeysuckle Garden and Midas site on Military Road into a 100-apartment mixed-use development.

The SSDA, lodged with investment partner Phoenix Property Investors, proposes around $230 million worth of new housing on the prominent <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/494-516-military-road-mosman-nsw-2088">494-516 Military Road</a> site.

The proposal comes as Mosman Council continues to progress its recently endorsed Masterplan, which identifies the precinct for increased housing density while maintaining the suburb's established character.

Designed by DKO Architecture, the development would comprise 100 apartments above ground-floor retail, with a rooftop wellness precinct including a gym, sauna, entertaining areas and landscaped communal spaces.

Rather than pushing to the full 12-storey height identified in Council's Masterplan, the proposal ranges between five and nine storeys, stepping down towards Hale Road. A tenth level would accommodate resident amenities rather than additional apartments.

The project has been designed to appeal to a broad range of buyers, from first home buyers and young professionals through to families and local downsizers looking to remain on the Lower North Shore.

<img alt="Mosman" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5dada03f-5b4c-43ba-ba62-2868add31440" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-27%20at%209.57.55%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=7LBy0B.Jo8_iWAFJsClcV7Q3UnXrv49r" />

Abadeen Executive Chairman Justin Brown said the apartments had been designed as genuine long-term homes rather than investor-focused stock.

"The apartments have been designed as genuine long-term homes, with efficient floorplans that maximise usable living areas, generous storage, natural light and strong connections between indoor and outdoor spaces," Brown says."

"We've focused on creating homes for a broad range of buyers, from first home buyers and growing families through to downsizers who want to remain in Mosman."

The rooftop wellness offering forms a key part of the proposal, with residents set to have access to a gym, sauna, outdoor entertaining spaces, communal dining areas, landscaped gardens and a multi-use recreation court overlooking Sydney Harbour.

<img alt="Mosman" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d37c2d6b-583a-4a0f-b7a9-9f46b893d2f4" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-27%20at%209.58.06%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=FPoa5FCm2RtzjhAh2w5FTWJbV6GHfY8D" />

DKO drew heavily on the site's natural and cultural history, undertaking a Connecting with Country process with local Aboriginal Elders to inform the architectural and landscape design.

Senior Associate Matthew Ritchard said the design sought to create a building that responded to both the site's landscape and its cultural significance.

"The architectural language of the project is a deep expression of Connecting with Country, where the materiality and colour palette serve as a bridge between the site's geological history and its future as a residential sanctuary."

The proposal also retains the site's established blue gum tree as the centrepiece of the communal landscaped gardens, while introducing activated retail fronting Military Road to strengthen the connection between Mosman and Cremorne villages.

If approved, the project would deliver 100 new homes within walking distance of shops, public transport, schools and local amenities, adding to the limited pipeline of new apartments on the Lower North Shore.

<h2>Project Snapshot</h2>

Project: Honeysuckle Garden Redevelopment

Address: 494-516 Military Road, Mosman

Developer: Abadeen and Phoenix Property Investors

Architect: DKO Architecture

Lead Architect: Matthew Ritchard

Value: $230 million

Residences: 100 apartments

Key features:

<ul>
	<li>
	Ground-floor retail
	</li>
	<li>
	Rooftop wellness precinct
	</li>
	<li>
	Gym and sauna
	</li>
	<li>
	Outdoor entertaining and BBQ areas
	</li>
	<li>
	Landscaped communal gardens
	</li>
	<li>
	Multi-use recreation court
	</li>
	<li>
	Retained mature blue gum tree
	</li>
	<li>
	Connecting with Country design process
	</li>
	<li>
	Harbour, CBD and Balmoral views from upper-level apartments
	</li>
</ul>

Abadeen Executive Chairman Justin Brown said the apartments had been designed as genuine long-term homes rather than investor-focused stock

First look: Abadeen plans 100 apartments on former Honeysuckle Garden site in Mosman

The wave of apartment proposals sweeping through Mosman shows no signs of slowing, with another major residential development lodged through the NSW Government's State Significant Development pathway.

Developer First Quadrant Properties, which recently completed Willoughby Grounds and has several projects in planning across the North Shore, has unveiled plans for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/cove-on-ourimbah-40-56-ourimbah-road-mosman-nsw-2088">Cove on Ourimbah</a>, a 63-apartment development on Ourimbah Road, adding to the growing pipeline of projects reshaping one of Sydney's most tightly held harbour suburbs.

The proposal would consolidate nine properties at 40-56 Ourimbah Road into a part eight, part nine-storey apartment building, continuing the momentum created by the NSW Government's accelerated planning pathways that have seen several significant developments emerge across Mosman over the past 12 months.

Designed by Doroch Architects, the project would deliver 63 apartments, resident wellness facilities including a gym, pool and sauna, landscaped communal spaces and basement parking, while using recessed upper levels, generous setbacks and extensive planting to reduce the perceived scale of the building.

<img alt="First look: First Quadrant Properties eyes nine-storey Mosman apartment project under State Significant pathway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32ee68e4-141e-4a10-8f83-48e961a5e71e" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Ourimbah%20Road%2C%20Mosman%20a.png?VersionId=CUeILFc6APlwXPc.iplElbxHvREKwjig" />

Doroch Architects said the building had been designed to reinforce Mosman's established character.

"The building's aesthetic is grounded in the existing residential character of Ourimbah Road and the broader Mosman context," the architect noted in the planning documents submitted to the NSW Government.

The design adopts a contemporary material palette of natural stone, textured concrete and brown concave metal cladding, complemented by integrated planters and deep balconies. The podium incorporates softened curved concrete forms, while increased setbacks have been provided adjacent to the heritage-listed property at 60 Ourimbah Road to create a more sympathetic transition.

The site sits around 330 metres from Mosman Town Centre, placing it within the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy area, where increased residential density is being encouraged close to shops, transport and services.

The proposal follows a string of major apartment projects lodged or declared State Significant in Mosman in recent months, including Abadeen's 100-apartment Honeysuckle Garden redevelopment on Military Road and several other developments across Awaba Street, Redan Street and Muston Street from the likes of Time &amp; Place, HELM and Prosker Property.

&nbsp;

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Time &amp; Place to take on Mosman apartment market</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-abadeen-plans-100-apartments-on-former-honeysuckle-garden-site-in-mosman">First look: Abadeen plans 100 apartments on former Honeysuckle Garden site in Mosman</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Another major apartment proposal signals Mosman's development boom

A new State Significant Development Application (SSDA) could reshape a prominent vacant site in Gosford's CBD, with Ming Tian Real Property proposing a mixed-use precinct that combines affordable housing, retail activation and a new public plaza.

The proposal for 43-45 Beane Street and 2 Keevers Lane would deliver a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/43-45-beane-street-gosford-nsw-2250">two-building development</a> comprising a 26-storey residential tower and a five-storey affordable housing building above ground-floor commercial space. A key focus of the project is the delivery of dedicated affordable housing alongside new public domain improvements designed to transform Keevers Lane into a more active urban destination.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/tony-owen-partners">Tony Owen Partners</a>, the development would provide 130 apartments, including 20 affordable housing dwellings managed by a registered community housing provider for at least 15 years. The market housing component comprises 110 apartments across a mix of one, two and three-bedroom residences, while the affordable housing includes six one-bedroom, 13 two-bedroom and one three-bedroom apartment. The proposal also incorporates 416 sqm of ground-floor retail, three basement levels accommodating 140 car spaces, 42 bicycle spaces, communal open space and extensive landscaping.

<img alt="First look: Ming Tian Real Property plans landmark affordable housing tower for Gosford city centre" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9b858791-9060-4ee7-9178-44cb9e640a85" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Beane%20Street%20b_0.png?VersionId=_jbY0mqPEs7.jBZxozR7d6T4u85FoPmb" />

The affordable housing component has been distributed across both buildings, with four apartments located within the main tower and a dedicated five-storey building delivering a further 16 affordable homes. The project also includes 12 adaptable apartments and 24 dwellings designed to Silver Level Liveable Housing Guidelines.

The architectural design draws inspiration from Indigenous storytelling.

"The design is based on the indigenous motif of the Rainbow Serpent," Tony Owen Partners said in the Design Verification Statement.

"The Rainbow Serpent is a traditional totem of coastal eastern Australia. It represents natural forces, creation, change, and rebirth and is often associated with bodies of water. This motif can be seen in the undulation of the balconies rising on the building," Tony Owen Partners said in the Design Verification Statement.

Beyond the residential offering, the proposal seeks to revitalise the surrounding public realm, particularly Keevers Lane.

"The ground floor streetscape includes a commercial and dining precinct which will significantly improve the amenity of the area. This strategy transforms a currently inhospitable laneway into a thriving centre of urban renewal and day and night time activation to compliment the new adjoining UNC facilities," the architects said.

<img alt="First look: Ming Tian Real Property plans landmark affordable housing tower for Gosford city centre" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36b0ca6b-af15-424c-81db-9f3049c07b0c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Beane%20Street%20podium.png?VersionId=QCAv7bCitrg3zIGZUHI2z_HR8qVfKbp1" />

The Environmental Impact Statement notes that the project aims to "improve the provision of diverse housing options within Gosford City Centre, enhancing the mixed-use precinct by delivering high quality residential development, whilst concurrently providing a diverse range of housing choices through the provision of affordable housing, which is in growing need within the Gosford City Centre."

The site occupies approximately 2,070 sqm in the Gosford city centre, around 250 metres from Gosford Railway Station and within walking distance of Gosford Hospital, Mann Street's retail precinct and the University of Newcastle's Gosford campus currently under construction. The currently vacant site previously received approval for a lower-scale residential development, with the new proposal leveraging the NSW Government's in-fill affordable housing pathway to increase density while introducing dedicated affordable housing.

First look: Rainbow Serpent inspires bold new Gosford apartment tower

Developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/bottega-property-group">Bottega House</a> has secured council approval for its first Brisbane project - a $270 million luxury residential development on an absolute riverfront site in leafy St Lucia.&nbsp;

The 15-storey project, known as <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/st-lucia-by-bottega-house-180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">St Lucia by Bottega House</a> , will occupy a prime north-facing site at 178-180 Macquarie Street, directly fronting the Brisbane River in the established inner-west suburb known for its rowing clubs, golf courses and sprawling University of Queensland campus.&nbsp;

St Lucia by Bottega House will feature a suite of amenities including dedicated wellness spaces, a mineral pool and cold plunge. The project has been positioned to attract affluent owner-occupiers seeking high-quality, house-sized apartments.&nbsp;

Bottega House has been set up by co-directors Nick Malloch, Louis Mennes and Craig Marsh.

Malloch said the project drew inspiration from its Brisbane River setting and leafy inner-west surrounds, while responding to the demands of discerning locals looking to transition from freestanding homes into apartment living.&nbsp;

"With an expansive river frontage and lush green surrounds, we knew we had to create something special that reflects the natural beauty of the location while offering residents masterfully crafted homes," said Malloch.&nbsp;

"Our intent was to complement the project's quiet, private setting by introducing residences that offer a calm retreat and sanctuary from the everyday. The result is a harmonious blend of architecture, interiors and amenity that emphasises wellbeing, comfort and beauty without excess."&nbsp;

Malloch added that project consultants had been carefully selected in alignment with Bottega House's commitment to care, quality and attention to detail. The design team includes architects <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a>, interiors practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and landscaping by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/urbis">Urbis</a>.&nbsp;

Three-bedroom apartments are expected to start around $5 millio. Selling agents Keenan &amp; Byrne said the pricing strategy for the project was anticipated to achieve upwards of $25,500 per square metre.&nbsp;

The project's development approval this week follows the success of Bottega House's inaugural Queensland project - a 22-storey collection of full-floor sky homes at Broadbeach on the Gold Coast which included the sale of a two-storey penthouse at a record price for a beachside residence.&nbsp;

St Lucia by Bottega House is expected to launch to market in November, with construction anticipated to be completed mid 2029.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151826]

Bottega House to make Brisbane debut with St Lucia riverfront apartment development

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
The peak body for professionals that provide advice on the fast expanding self-managed super fund sector (SMSF) is urging that real estate agents who recommend these investments and mortgage brokers who arrange financing for them be required to hold a licence.
It follows a growing number of cases and complaints against so-called “spruikers” targeted at unwary investors through free introductory lunches as well as ASIC clamping down on unscrupulous operators that don’t disclose the risks of such investments.
SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery, has told the Australian Financial Review it wants Treasury to licence mortgage brokers and real estate agents that provide advice in this area.
SPAA offers its own SMSF adviser and SMSF auditor accreditations.
Mortgage brokers and real estate agents are not a big chunk of the SPAA membership, which counts accountants, auditors, financial planners, lawyers, risk providers, actuaries, administrators and educators among its members.
She says there has been talk of greater regulation of those who provide SMSF advice, but little action to date.
In February ASIC said it was considering increasing its powers to include oversight of property investments schemes recommended to self-managed super funds, but nothing formal has been proposed to date.
In April, it released a report on the quality of advice in the sector and ways to improve it.
ASIC found that while most advice provided was rated as adequate there were pockets of poor advice.
ASIC found issues in the following areas: 
<ul>
<li>advice was not sufficiently tailored to the needs of the investor</li>
<li>replacement product disclosure was absent or inadequate</li>
<li>insurance recommendations were absent or inadequate</li>
<li>an inappropriate single asset class was provided to investors</li>
<li>suitable alternatives to an SMSF were not considered, and</li>
<li>there was inadequate consideration of the investor’s long-term retirement planning objectives.</li>
</ul>
APRA superannuation figures to the end of March show that SMSF assets increased from $473.9 billion to $496.2 billion for a $22.3 billion or 4.7% gain over the quarter with sector accounting for almost a third (31.5%) of the total $1.58 trillion superannuation pool.
According to SPAA research, more than three quarters of SMSF trustees buy assets such as property and shares directly rather than through a managed fund.
In May, ASIC cancelled the credit licence of Money Choice and banned its director, Matthew George, after an investigation found failures to comply with credit laws, responsible lending shortfalls and instances of unlicensed self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) advice.
In April, it was revealed that <a target="_blank" href="/news">four Melbourne businesses running seminars on investing in real estate through SMSF</a>s are being investigated by ASIC over the potentially misleading nature of flyers, advertisements and online ads promoting these seminars.
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Real estate agents and mortgage brokers must have SMSF licence: SPAA

<html><body>
Property spruikers target SMSFs with good reason.
SMSFs often have large amounts of money at their ready disposal with the average fund holding almost $1 million.
Funds also have the ability to borrow to invest.
And significantly, SMSF members –whether as individual trustees or trustee directors if the fund has a corporate trustee– make the investment decisions, including whether to invest in direct property.
ASIC does not want to SMSFs to become the “vehicle of choice for property spruikers”, says the regulator’s deputy chairman Peter Kell.
 
<hr>
 This article is part of Property Observer's <a style="color: #000000; font-size: 15px;" href="http://propertyobserver.com.au/ebooks/free-ebook-21-dos-and-donts-for-smsf-property-investors">free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors</a>.
 
</body></html>

mlaurence-vhAHaLZT8y

Don't ignore ASIC warning about property spruikers

<html><body>
Reduced super contributions caps for people over 50 have resulted in self-managed superannuation fund contributions falling by almost 25% in the 2012-13 financial year, according to new research.
In the past year, average contributions fell $12,300 from $47,500 to $35,200, a study by SMSF fund administrator Multiport found.
The report found the decline was most likely the result of the reduction in the concessional contribution cap, with a cap of $25,000 applying to members of all ages during the 2013 financial year, rather than just those under 50.
In the past three financial years SMSF holders over 60 years old could make a concessional contribution of $50,000 to their fund.
In the 2013-14 financial year the cap will be increased and people over 60 will be able to contribute $35,000.
“With the increase in Super Guarantee to 9.25% and the increased concessional cap of $35,000 applying to the over 60s from July 1, 2013, a small lift is expected in the contribution levels for the 2014 financial year,” the Multiport report states.
But SMSF Professionals Association of Australia chief executive Andrea Slattery said it’s not just the changes in concessional caps which are influencing the amount people contribute.
“Our research confirms people have contributed less because they were concerned by the government’s constant tinkering with super and they had less confidence in the super system for the long term.
“People are not confident in the decisions which were being made around super,” she says.
Both major parties have recently committed to a <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/056797-small-business-tax-experts-remain-unconvinced-over-canberra-s-five-year-superannuation-freeze">freeze in superannuation changes</a> for five years.
Labor has said it would make no major changes, while the Coalition committed to making no detrimental changes.
Slattery says the freeze will give Australians greater confidence in planning for their futures.
The Multiport survey of 1950 of its clients also found SMSFs are starting to favour higher risk investment options.
“A significant amount of cash holdings moved into the fixed interest sector early in the financial year, with the cash down almost 2.7% and fixed interest up 2.6%,” AMP SMSF administration head of technical services Philip La Greca said in a statement.
La Greca says the changes in these investments were influenced by the reduction in official interest rates and improving sentiment about future movements.
“The allocation to Australian shares was up 0.8% to 37.5%, slightly higher than expected from normal growth in the market. This was mostly driven by the significant weighting that direct Australian shareholders have in the top 20 stocks, which outperformed the All Ordinaries,” he says.
Slattery says SPAA research also indicates more people are investing in property and equity.
“SMSF trustees are professionally advised as well as more engaged, and that engagement means they’re making decisions that are for their benefit in retirement and SMSF trustees do perform quite well,” she says.
 
<hr>
This article was originally published on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/?">SmartCompany.</a>
 
</body></html>

yredrup-o4Anfe78KF

Reduced super contribution caps for people over 50 has led to 25% fall in SMSF contributions

<html><body>
An SMSF can own business property (such as offices, shops and factories) and residential investment property.
However, there are crucial differences between the legal requirements for funds regarding business and residential properties.
Business real estate is among the few types of assets that SMSFs are permitted to acquire from their members and other related parties.
And business real estate is one of the few types of assets that funds can lease to related parties – including fund members and their businesses – without a restriction on its value.
Generally, an SMSF is barred under the in-house asset rules in superannuation law from leasing or having investments with related parties involving assets that are worth more than 5% of the fund’s total market value.
Business property is among the few exceptions to the rule.
SMSFs are prohibited from acquiring residential real estate from related parties– even if the market value is paid.
An SMSF can be the sole owner of a property or hold a property with other investors, commonly using a unit trustor joint-ownership arrangement.
Some SMSFs enter arrangements to hold property with their own membersor with other SMSFs.
This enables the funds to invest in otherwise unaffordable properties.
<hr>
This article is part of the <a style="color: #000000; font-size: 15px;" href="http://propertyobserver.com.au/ebooks/free-ebook-21-dos-and-donts-for-smsf-property-investors">free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors</a>. 
</body></html>

Do understand what types of property your fund can own

<html><body>
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission wants to beef up the mandatory disclosures advisers give to people setting up a self-managed super fund, saying in many cases the advice given doesn’t reflect the risks.
In a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byHeadline/13-243MR%20ASIC%20consults%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20SMSF%20advice?opendocument" target="_blank">report released yesterday</a>, the regulator flagged it wants to make SMSF advisers warn clients that if they set up a SMSF, they do not have access to compensation in the event of fraud or theft.
It also wants advisers to give more information about the roles and responsibilities of trustees, the costs of setting up a SMSF, as well as more information about other types of superannuation products that might be more suited to someone’s particular situation.
“When it comes to planning your retirement, establishing an SMSF is a very significant decision,” said ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell.
“We want to help ensure that the SMSF sector is healthy, and that investors make informed decisions about SMSFs.
“Our recent surveillance of the sector found that advice was not up to a standard we would like.”
The warning comes after the Trio Capital affair, which saw the company collapse in 2009 after directors and executives stole $176 million from SMSF investors in<a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/economy/056372-trio-capital-directors-accept-enforceable-undertakings-from-apra-construction-sector-contracts-for-34th-consecutive-month-midday-roundup" target="_blank">what was called “the biggest superannuation fraud in Australian history”</a> by a joint parliamentary committee. More than 6000 investors lost money after placing it into two offshore hedge funds through Trio Capital.
However, Graeme Colley, the director of technical and professional standards at the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia, says ASIC’s concerns about poor quality advice may be overblown.
“Last year, ASIC decided to have a look at advice on a very select part of the superannuation industry, which was self-managed super funds with less than $150,000 in them that had received advice on property investments where the property was mortgaged. Looking at those, they concluded that the advice being given wasn’t adequate.
“But it was a very selective sample.
“Unfortunately, ASIC hasn’t provided examples of the poor or inadequate advice it saw.”
ASIC also released a report yesterday by actuaries Rice Warner, which looked at the minimum balances needed before SMSFs become cost-effective relative to other superannuation arrangements.
“Through our consultation we are looking to encourage further discussion and explore the issues relating to SMSF costs with industry and consumer stakeholders,” Kell said. “We think that understanding the costs associated with having an SMSF will help advisers and their clients consider whether a SMSF is a cost-effective option when compared with an APRA-regulated fund.
“ASIC does not want to see an influx of trustees who are ill-equipped to cope with the responsibilities and obligations of running a SMSF.”
The report found that when the maximum level of compliance administration is assumed, SMSFs do not become cost-effective when they have balances of less than $500,000.
However, many trustees do their own administration and compliance, which means the costs of maintaining a SMSF would be lower, Peter Burgess, the head of policy and technical at AMP SMSF said.
“This is in line with what we already knew – you need a reasonable amount in your SMSF for it to be cost-effective.
“But cost isn’t the only consideration here. There are other reasons to manage your own super – you might have specific estate-planning needs, or want to take advantage of specific investment opportunities and so on.
“And while it’s not cost-effective for very low balances, when you have more than $100,000 in your fund, it does depend on how much work you’re doing yourself. It’s hard to get data on this, but a significant amount of trustees do their administration work and so forth themselves. This can make it cost-effective below the $500,000 threshold.”
Colley was also reluctant to accept the higher threshold, saying that in his experience most trustees contribute to the operation of their fund.
“Much of the work with these funds is done by the trustees, so the expense is exaggerated. The Rice Warner report does say that where trustees do contribute, the running cost is around 1.5% of assets. In my view, that’s at the upper end, but probably more realistic.
“We think the $200,000 threshold mentioned by both ASIC and the ATO many years ago is still valid when it comes to cost-effectiveness.”
Recently, ASIC has flagged its <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/054815-asic-sounds-warning-bell-on-smsfs-2">concerns about the growth of the self-managed superannuation industry</a>, saying the increasing amount of money being held in SMSFs could prompt newcomers who are far less financially sophisticated to set up their own funds.
The self-managed superannuation industry now holds just under a third of all the money held by Australians in superannuation, having grown around 20% per annum in recent years. There is now $439 billion in assets held by SMSFs. There are over a million SMSF trustees who together manage half a million SMSFs.
Colley does not believe SMSFs are necessarily more risky than investing through a major fund.
“There are two persistent criticisms around SMSFs. One is that trustees don’t know what they’re doing, and the other is that SMSFs are being used by property spruikers to invest in property.
“I was at a major super fund conference earlier this year when one of the speakers got up and said: ‘If you think SMSFs are jokes, who don’t do as well, you need to think again’. They do, roughly, 1% better, on average, than bigger super funds.
“And there’s a huge amount of noise around property, but if you look at the statistics, less than half of 1% of SMSFs invest in property loans.”
Burgess believes there’s still further growth to be had for the industry. “There’s still significant room to grow. There’s a lot of research and statistics out there that shows there are plenty of people with tendencies that could benefit from a self-managed super fund, but who don’t currently have one.”
 
<hr>
 This article was originally publsihed on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
 
</body></html>

mrobin-TVRYiru7si

ASIC warns that when it comes to fraud, SMSF trustees are on their own

<html><body>
Just because the law allows investors to do something doesn’t, of course, mean it is a good idea.

This investment adage comes to mind with the recent final ruling from the tax office – in its role as regulator of self-managed super – relating to the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of geared properties in a self-managed super fund (SMSF).
In short, the ruling – clarifying much of the uncertainty about the commissioner’s interpretation of the SMSF gearing laws – is likely to encourage many more SME owners to at least consider holding their business premises in their family super funds.
Property Observer discussed the ruling in detail on June 5, including in regard to the gearing of business premises built over several titles and the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finance/five-strategies-for-investing-in-geared-property-through-an-smsf/2012060655012" target="_blank">undertaking of improvements to business and other properties</a>.
Particularly given the new ruling, it is crucial for business owners to carefully weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of holding their business premises in their SMSFs – whether or not the properties are geared.
The advantages are clear.
Business real estate, such as the premises of a family SMSE, is among the few types of assets that SMSFs are allowed to acquire from their members and other related parties. And business real estate is one of the few types of assets that funds can lease to related parties – including fund members and their businesses – without a limit on its value.
Your business pays a commercial rent to your SMSF. The rent is tax-deductible to your business and your SMSF pays tax at no more than 15% on the rent.
If your fund has borrowed to buy the business premises, the interest is tax-deductible.
Unrivalled asset protection is another advantage. If you later experience financial difficulties, superannuation assets (including business premises) are generally out of the reach of creditors if individual fund members are declared bankrupt – subject to the claw-back provisions in the Bankruptcy Act.
Further, no capital gains tax (CGT) is payable if your fund eventually sells the property when the fund’s assets are backing the payment of a superannuation pension.Bu
Some business owners, however, would tend to concentrate only on the advantages of acquiring their business premises through their SMSFs without giving sufficient attention to the possible disadvantages.
Here are six tough questions to ask yourself:
<h3>1. What happens if my business experiences financial difficulties?</h3>
Family SMSFs sometimes face the difficulty of having a financially-troubled family business – owned by the fund’s members – unable to pay the rent for fund-owned business premises.
Under superannuation law, fund trustees (who are the members themselves) must operate their super fund for the sole purpose of providing member retirement benefits. And that means pursuing a tenant for unpaid rent – even if that wayward tenant is the members’ own business.
“It can become very difficult because you are then wearing two hats,” says Martin Murden, a director of Partners Group, a financial services provider to accountants.
“You are the landlord in the superannuation fund and then you are the tenant, being a director of the business which is facing difficulties,” he adds.
“I have seen businesses, which have fallen into financially difficulties, not paying the true amount of rent to the super fund,” says Murden, the author of How to invest in property through your self managed super fund (released by Major Street Publishing).
These super funds had breached superannuation law by providing financial assistance to a related party.
The tax office, as regulator of self-managed super, has the power to strip an SMSF of its complying status.
In turn, the market value of a non-complying fund is taxed at the top marginal rate, less any non-concessional or undeducted contributions. This can remove almost half of a fund’s assets in tax, depending upon the circumstances.
And if your business cannot pay proper rent on a fund-owned business premises, your SMSF may have trouble meeting loan repayments if the property is geared. (See question four.)
<h3>2. What happens if I divorce?</h3>
Husband-and-wife business partners often arrange for their SMSF to acquire their business premises. The sad reality is that a marriage break-up will typically destroy the business partnership – in addition to the closure of the couple’s SMSF when their personal financial links are severed.
Frequently in such instances, the business premises are sold – perhaps in an unfavourable market – in order to split the super savings.
Of course, some husband-and-wife SMSFs would have sufficient other assets to enable one spouse to keep the property in his or her super fund and for other fund-held assets to go into the super account of the other spouse.
Couples who are considering acquiring the premises for their family businesses through their self-managed funds should keep in mind that the possibility that their relationship may fail is far from remote. Figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) suggest that 40% of marriages will end in divorce – a statistic that doesn’t include de facto relationships.
“Trying to disentangle superannuation assets [in a property settlement] can become very difficult,” says Murden.
He points out the need to split an SMSF’s assets such as business premises following a marriage breakdown do not solely involve husband-and-wife funds.
For instance, business partners may have set up an SMSF together to acquire their business premises. And the failure of the marriage or de facto relationship of one of the partners may trigger the splitting of superannuation assets.
In other words, the super savings of both business partners may be affected even though both may have been married to spouses with no involvement in the business.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
<h3>3. What if a member of my SMSF unexpectedly dies?</h3>
Depending upon the circumstances, the death of a fund member may force the sale of fund-owned business premises.
Under superannuation law, a fund must payout the superannuation death benefits of a deceased member to his or her beneficiaries. And funds often have to sell assets such as property to pay the death benefits.
The forced sale of business premises may, in turn, damage the commercial prospects of the family business.
Of course, the beneficiary of a deceased member’s super is often a surviving spouse who is also a member of the same SMSF. In such cases, there is perhaps no need to sell the business premises to pay death benefits.
Murden says some SMSFs deal with risk of having to pay death benefits by taking insurance policies on the life of each member.
A fund’s trustees would arrange for their SMSF to setup a special reserve account to pay the premiums on the life insurance policies. And the beneficiary of any payout upon death or permanent disability would be the SMSF through its special reserve account.
Under superannuation law, fund trustees must have an investment strategy that has regard to such matters as the risk of making an investment, the risks of inadequate diversification, and the liquidity of investments. Liquidity is a key issue when it is time to pay death benefits.
<h3>4. What if my SMSF defaults on a loan to buy my business premises?</h3>
The lender could sell the property in attempt to recover its debt (including any outstanding interest) along with the costs of selling the property and discharging the mortgage. Whatever is left is repaid to the fund.
Particularly if the property has fallen in value, the fund could lose capital and interest paid to the date of the default.
Sydney tax and superannuation lawyer Robert Richards suspects that some SMSFs will have difficulty making loan repayments after the halving from the concessional contributions cap for members over 50 to $25,000 a year from July. (Concessional contributions comprise salary-sacrificed and compulsory contributions as well as personally-deductible contributions by the self-employed and eligible investors.)
Craig Morgan, a director of mortgage broker SMSF Loans, points out that SMSFs tend to keep their loan-to-valuation ratio for commercial property to a maximum of 55%. With most of the loans Morgan arranges, the rent at least covers the interest payments.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
<h3>5. What are my possible CGT obligations when selling or contributing my business premises to my SMSF?</h3>
The increased value of the business premises during your personal ownership may be subject to capital gains tax (CGT) upon the transfer of its ownership – whether by sale or contribution – to your self-managed fund.
However, the small business CGT concessions on the sale of active assets of a business (such as its business premises) together with the standard CGT discount for assets owned for at least 12 months may eliminate any CGT – depending upon the circumstances. Get specialist tax advice on this point.
You should also be aware that some states apply stamp duty when a property owned by a member is contributed to a super fund.
“You may be eligible for the small business CGT concessions,” says Murden, “but speak to your tax adviser before doing a single thing. Get it wrong and you are going to pay a lot of tax.”
<h3>6. Are my retirement investments adequately diversified?</h3>
One of the negatives about owning your business premises in your SMSF is that your fund may have insufficient other assets to adequately diversify its portfolio against risks and to take advantage of non-property investment opportunities.
If a fund is poorly diversified, the retirement savings of the members depend on whether the property turns out to be a good investment. Of course, much will rely on the members’ personal circumstances including their other super and non-super investments.
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/index.php" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

Divorce, death, debt and default: Six questions SMSF trustees should be asking

<html><body>
Since 2007 investors have been able to purchase property in super with debt, giving them the twin benefits of leverage and concessional tax rates. Another benefit of buying in super was that at age 60 no tax is payable on either rental income or capital gains. 
What has eluded the investor, however, was the ability to practically and efficiently add value by doing a renovation. There was confusion by both the profession and the ATO in what was possible and how it is funded. 
With a stroke of the pen the ATO has clarified and simplified these elusive questions.
With the release of SMSFR 2012/1 the ATO has defined three critical areas and clearly defined what constitutes a renovation. 
In summary the ATO has confirmed that a self-managed super fund (SMSF) can borrow money to fund a cosmetic renovation, e.g. kitchen, bathroom, flooring etc. If the renovation is structural, e.g. if it moves internal walls, then the funds must come from internal SMSF cash, not borrowings. 
More technically this ruling clarifies what is a:
<ol>
<li>Repair</li>
<li>Improvement</li>
<li>Change to the single acquirable asset (SAA) </li>
</ol>
Specifically:
<ol start="1">
<li>Cosmetic renovation is identified as a repair by the ATO and so can be funded with debt. For tax purposes a scrapping schedule and a depreciation schedule would be completed. These costs cannot be expensed, so the use of the word repair can be misleading, but ATO has chosen to define repair differently for superannuation purposes and for tax. </li>
<li>Improvement such as moving internal walls, the addition of a granny flat, second story, swimming pool etc which does not change what the SAA is (i.e., it is still a single dwelling) can be done with internal SMSF cash but not debt. </li>
<li>A substantial improvement that alters the SAA to a point where what you end up with is not what you started with eg single dwelling into a duplex, land to land and dwelling, etc., cannot be done while there is a loan on the property/land. If there if no debt then it can be done but it must be funded by internal cash. </li>
</ol>
Note: properly documented and financed off the plan or a single contract that includes the land purchase and dwelling construction where in both cases a deposit is paid and then final payment is made on completion is OK. 
Unfortunately the ATO has also confirmed that an existing asset in super with no debt cannot have a loan facility created against it. 
Please note that you need to have your own SMSF to purchase property direct with debt as your retail/industry fund will not oblige.
Ken Raiss is a certified accountant and director of <a title="Chan &amp; Naylor " href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_self">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> national accounting firm. Ken’s experience lies in working with large publically listed multi-national companies, which gives Ken excellent insight into international market trends. Ken specialises in educating “mum and dad” property investors and small business owners with advice on wealth creation, asset protection, taxation, superannuation and compliance. Chan &amp; Naylor offers a free five-minute question-and-answer session on its website under the<a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/ask-the-experts/" target="_blank"> "Ask the Experts" section.</a>
</body></html>

kenraiss-JsVyb3YKka

Changes to SMSF legislation will benefit property investors: Ken Raiss

<html><body>
“Hey Jeff, just wanted to let you know that I’ve transferred some money into my super account, can you tell me the best place to invest it right now within the fund?”  This was a question I asked of my financial planner yesterday.  It was that time of year when I had to make the obligatory transfer of money into my managed super account to meet requirements as an employer (to myself).  Each year I struggle with this: transferring cash into my super then watching it disappear into the deep, dark hole of the managed super fund then opening my bi-yearly statement to see it has disintegrated!
Jeff said, “Well, Australian equities are good buying right now (translation: because the market is so crap), so we’ll just put it in there.” So that’s what we did, dumped some money into shares, and I will now await my statement to see how that investment performs.
My next question for Jeff was, “How far out of retirement should we start moving money out of the more risky areas and into the safe havens or defensive stocks?” While I’m not at that age yet, I don’t want to end up like a lot of retirees at the moment who have lost buckets of their retirement funds in the poorly performing share market because they were caught out with the impact the GFC had on their super.  They’ve been forced back to work or to rely on the government pension. Jeff recommended that we should look at transferring into the safer areas, such as cash about 10 years before you are looking to retire.  Wow, so for 10 years we have to cop a low return on our money just to play it safe?  The alternative is to run the risk or losing a fair chunk of it.
Gosh, a lot can happen in 10 years in property, I thought.
Reading my mind, Jeff said, “Jo, with your experience in property, why don’t you set up a self-managed super fund and then you can just invest in property?”
He thought that to be a really good bet.  The fact that I’m already holding a substantial amount of property didn’t seem to faze him, but I always thought it best to diversify.
So I thought this an interesting topic to ponder on today: just how much property do we need to retire comfortably? I picked up my favourite property magazine and saw on the cover the headline “Retire Richer and Sooner” – OK, what have they got to say?
The headline story was titled “Get Rich from Regional Australia”.  Of the nine regional towns they highlighted as having the best capital growth potential, two were from the Hunter region of NSW.  Property Bloom tracks the long-term growth of suburbs we develop in. I pulled up my graph on a particular town that I just had Residex update for me.  I track the quarterly median value and the volume of sales in this postcode. There was a very nice upward trend with varying degrees of peaks since March 1996 when I started the tracking. I personally bought into this particular town in 2001. Looking back over the past 10 years I saw the median price was $114,500 in March 2002 and in March 2012 it was $250,268. It had grown 119% in this 10-year period.
That 119% says it all, really.  I know where I’m putting my retirement funds.
My retirement strategy is to buy and hold but with one very important twist and that is to add value.  The property I purchased in 2001 in this town has increased by 119%, but I also renovated and developed the land, adding more dwellings, so the yield on this property is also very high.
Property Bloom is always looking at development strategies that will add value, increase yield and create equity. We have one very new strategy that we are adding to our portfolio now that will mean clients make an 8% yield on an affordable investment. It will also give good depreciation for those still working.  The NSW government is also helping us with this strategy by throwing in $5,000, as it sees the need to boost housing in this state.  If you’d like to hear more about this growth strategy then let me know, I’ll be covering it in more detail on Property Observer soon. It just might be what you need to boost your retirement fund.
Jo Chivers is director of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/" title="Property Bloom">Property Bloom</a>, which manages property development.</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Investing in property through a self-managed super fund a good bet to retire comfortably

<html><body>
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) is warning trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to be cautious when investing in property.
Its warned arrangements that are “deliberately entered into to get around the law” can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties and even criminal charges.
The ATO has also joined ASIC by warning of those individuals and companies promoting property investments to SMSF trustees.
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Last week ASIC</a> revealed to The Australian that it is undertaking “limited surveillance” of financial advisers and accountants over concerns that property spruikers are encouraging investors to set up self-managed super funds purely as vehicles for "dodgy" property investments.
Acting tax commissioner Bruce Quigley says he is concerned people are using their SMSF to invest in property without fully understanding their obligations under the law or some people are seeking to take advantage of certain types of arrangements.
 "We have observed that some arrangements are deliberately entered into to get around the law, which can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties or even facing criminal charges.
“Those marketing properties to SMSF trustees as part of such arrangements could be referred to ASIC,” he says.
Quigley says investing in property can be a confusing area for some people.
"The fine details are important and trustees need to be sure that property is the right investment for their SMSF and that the arrangement is legal,"
"We have also seen instances where holding trusts have not even been established at the time the contracts to acquire are signed.
“In other instances the title of the property is held in the individual's name rather than the trustee of the holding trust. Another common mistake is gearing in a related unit trust, which is not allowed under the law," he says.
"Some of these arrangements, if structured incorrectly, cannot simply be restructured or rectified. The only option may be to unwind the arrangement which could involve forced sale of assets at an inconvenient time. This could be very expensive for the fund with potential stamp duty and tax consequences."
"I urge trustees to get reliable, independent advice when making investment decisions and to obtain advice from us if they are contemplating entering into these sorts of arrangements. The responsibility for ensuring their SMSF complies with the law rests with them," says Quigley.
</body></html>

Australian Tax Office joins ASIC by warning SMSF trustees on illegal property investment arrangements

<html><body>
DIY super investors should consider acquiring an NRAS property because of the positive cashflow benefits, according to a new report by property investment and financial advisory firm Onyx Wealth.
Investing in a property that qualifies for the government’s national rental affordability scheme (NRAS) is a way for SMSF trustees to avoid being in the position, where they hold a property that is both negatively geared and provides negative cashflow, according to report authors Paul Thewlis and Margaret Hardy.
Such a holding would require the SMSF to have large enough liquid assets and/or cash inflows to allow for these losses.
In an interview with <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/queensland/nras-and-smsf-investors-helping-keep-inner-brisbane-off-the-plan-market-afloat-david-devine/2012112858155">Property Observer last week,</a> Brisbane apartment developer David Devine said SMSF and NRAS investors were among the biggest buyers of off-the-plan projects developed by his Metro Property Development company, which has the two top selling projects in inner Brisbane.
Metro has marketed more than 50% of the 308 apartments in its Madison Heights development as NRAS-approved investments, compared with 20% in its first development, the Chelsea, now completed.
But yesterday, <a target="_blank" href="/news">property investment advisor Margaret Lomas</a> warned investors against investing in NRAS properties, labelling it a tax scheme intended for institutional investors and said investors considering the scheme should seek a private tax ruling "before taking the plunge on any scheme that sounds so good".
SMSFs can purchase an NRAS approved property, which provides an annual tax free incentive estimated at $119,833 over the next 10 years.
In return, the property must be rented out to eligible tenants at a rent at least 20% below market rent as assessed by an independent valuer, with eligible tenants determined by government income thresholds.
“NRAS properties have greater negative gearing than equivalent non-NRAS properties,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
“By giving up 20% of the taxable rental income the SMSF increases its tax loss. Normally a loss is undesirable, but in this case it is usually offset by the value of the NRAS incentive.
“Take for example an NRAS property which has a market rental value of $300 per week. A 20% discount on that rent means the SMSF is giving up $60 per week of taxable income.
“At the same time, the SMSF gains $190 per week of untaxed income in the form of the NRAS incentive."
Due to superannuation act rules SMSFs can only purchase completed or off-the-plan property
The majority of NRAS properties purchased by Onyx Wealth clients are priced between $250,000 and $400,000.
Because they are new properties, they also have the tax benefit of having greater depreciation allowances than older property.
Another benefit is stamp duty savings in some states.
“SMSFs buying property off the plan can benefit from substantial stamp duty savings. For example, in Victoria and Western Australia, purchasers who buy apartments off the plan prior to construction only pay stamp duty on the land value apportioned to each individual apartment,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
<a target="_blank" href="https://onyx.net.au/">Onyx Wealth</a> provides the following example to show income generated for a SMSF with no property investment, an SMSF with a normal property investment and an SMSF with an NRAS property investment:
Click to enlarge
<a rel="shadowbox" href="/images/stories/2012/12/onyx.gif" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2012/12/onyxthumb.gif"></a>
 
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News