Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
The peak body for professionals that provide advice on the fast expanding self-managed super fund sector (SMSF) is urging that real estate agents who recommend these investments and mortgage brokers who arrange financing for them be required to hold a licence.
It follows a growing number of cases and complaints against so-called “spruikers” targeted at unwary investors through free introductory lunches as well as ASIC clamping down on unscrupulous operators that don’t disclose the risks of such investments.
SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery, has told the Australian Financial Review it wants Treasury to licence mortgage brokers and real estate agents that provide advice in this area.
SPAA offers its own SMSF adviser and SMSF auditor accreditations.
Mortgage brokers and real estate agents are not a big chunk of the SPAA membership, which counts accountants, auditors, financial planners, lawyers, risk providers, actuaries, administrators and educators among its members.
She says there has been talk of greater regulation of those who provide SMSF advice, but little action to date.
In February ASIC said it was considering increasing its powers to include oversight of property investments schemes recommended to self-managed super funds, but nothing formal has been proposed to date.
In April, it released a report on the quality of advice in the sector and ways to improve it.
ASIC found that while most advice provided was rated as adequate there were pockets of poor advice.
ASIC found issues in the following areas: 
<ul>
<li>advice was not sufficiently tailored to the needs of the investor</li>
<li>replacement product disclosure was absent or inadequate</li>
<li>insurance recommendations were absent or inadequate</li>
<li>an inappropriate single asset class was provided to investors</li>
<li>suitable alternatives to an SMSF were not considered, and</li>
<li>there was inadequate consideration of the investor’s long-term retirement planning objectives.</li>
</ul>
APRA superannuation figures to the end of March show that SMSF assets increased from $473.9 billion to $496.2 billion for a $22.3 billion or 4.7% gain over the quarter with sector accounting for almost a third (31.5%) of the total $1.58 trillion superannuation pool.
According to SPAA research, more than three quarters of SMSF trustees buy assets such as property and shares directly rather than through a managed fund.
In May, ASIC cancelled the credit licence of Money Choice and banned its director, Matthew George, after an investigation found failures to comply with credit laws, responsible lending shortfalls and instances of unlicensed self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) advice.
In April, it was revealed that <a target="_blank" href="/news">four Melbourne businesses running seminars on investing in real estate through SMSF</a>s are being investigated by ASIC over the potentially misleading nature of flyers, advertisements and online ads promoting these seminars.
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Real estate agents and mortgage brokers must have SMSF licence: SPAA

<html><body>
Property spruikers target SMSFs with good reason.
SMSFs often have large amounts of money at their ready disposal with the average fund holding almost $1 million.
Funds also have the ability to borrow to invest.
And significantly, SMSF members –whether as individual trustees or trustee directors if the fund has a corporate trustee– make the investment decisions, including whether to invest in direct property.
ASIC does not want to SMSFs to become the “vehicle of choice for property spruikers”, says the regulator’s deputy chairman Peter Kell.
 
<hr>
 This article is part of Property Observer's <a style="color: #000000; font-size: 15px;" href="http://propertyobserver.com.au/ebooks/free-ebook-21-dos-and-donts-for-smsf-property-investors">free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors</a>.
 
</body></html>

mlaurence-vhAHaLZT8y

Don't ignore ASIC warning about property spruikers

<html><body>
Reduced super contributions caps for people over 50 have resulted in self-managed superannuation fund contributions falling by almost 25% in the 2012-13 financial year, according to new research.
In the past year, average contributions fell $12,300 from $47,500 to $35,200, a study by SMSF fund administrator Multiport found.
The report found the decline was most likely the result of the reduction in the concessional contribution cap, with a cap of $25,000 applying to members of all ages during the 2013 financial year, rather than just those under 50.
In the past three financial years SMSF holders over 60 years old could make a concessional contribution of $50,000 to their fund.
In the 2013-14 financial year the cap will be increased and people over 60 will be able to contribute $35,000.
“With the increase in Super Guarantee to 9.25% and the increased concessional cap of $35,000 applying to the over 60s from July 1, 2013, a small lift is expected in the contribution levels for the 2014 financial year,” the Multiport report states.
But SMSF Professionals Association of Australia chief executive Andrea Slattery said it’s not just the changes in concessional caps which are influencing the amount people contribute.
“Our research confirms people have contributed less because they were concerned by the government’s constant tinkering with super and they had less confidence in the super system for the long term.
“People are not confident in the decisions which were being made around super,” she says.
Both major parties have recently committed to a <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/056797-small-business-tax-experts-remain-unconvinced-over-canberra-s-five-year-superannuation-freeze">freeze in superannuation changes</a> for five years.
Labor has said it would make no major changes, while the Coalition committed to making no detrimental changes.
Slattery says the freeze will give Australians greater confidence in planning for their futures.
The Multiport survey of 1950 of its clients also found SMSFs are starting to favour higher risk investment options.
“A significant amount of cash holdings moved into the fixed interest sector early in the financial year, with the cash down almost 2.7% and fixed interest up 2.6%,” AMP SMSF administration head of technical services Philip La Greca said in a statement.
La Greca says the changes in these investments were influenced by the reduction in official interest rates and improving sentiment about future movements.
“The allocation to Australian shares was up 0.8% to 37.5%, slightly higher than expected from normal growth in the market. This was mostly driven by the significant weighting that direct Australian shareholders have in the top 20 stocks, which outperformed the All Ordinaries,” he says.
Slattery says SPAA research also indicates more people are investing in property and equity.
“SMSF trustees are professionally advised as well as more engaged, and that engagement means they’re making decisions that are for their benefit in retirement and SMSF trustees do perform quite well,” she says.
 
<hr>
This article was originally published on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/?">SmartCompany.</a>
 
</body></html>

yredrup-o4Anfe78KF

Reduced super contribution caps for people over 50 has led to 25% fall in SMSF contributions

<html><body>
An SMSF can own business property (such as offices, shops and factories) and residential investment property.
However, there are crucial differences between the legal requirements for funds regarding business and residential properties.
Business real estate is among the few types of assets that SMSFs are permitted to acquire from their members and other related parties.
And business real estate is one of the few types of assets that funds can lease to related parties – including fund members and their businesses – without a restriction on its value.
Generally, an SMSF is barred under the in-house asset rules in superannuation law from leasing or having investments with related parties involving assets that are worth more than 5% of the fund’s total market value.
Business property is among the few exceptions to the rule.
SMSFs are prohibited from acquiring residential real estate from related parties– even if the market value is paid.
An SMSF can be the sole owner of a property or hold a property with other investors, commonly using a unit trustor joint-ownership arrangement.
Some SMSFs enter arrangements to hold property with their own membersor with other SMSFs.
This enables the funds to invest in otherwise unaffordable properties.
<hr>
This article is part of the <a style="color: #000000; font-size: 15px;" href="http://propertyobserver.com.au/ebooks/free-ebook-21-dos-and-donts-for-smsf-property-investors">free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors</a>. 
</body></html>

Do understand what types of property your fund can own

<html><body>
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission wants to beef up the mandatory disclosures advisers give to people setting up a self-managed super fund, saying in many cases the advice given doesn’t reflect the risks.
In a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byHeadline/13-243MR%20ASIC%20consults%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20SMSF%20advice?opendocument" target="_blank">report released yesterday</a>, the regulator flagged it wants to make SMSF advisers warn clients that if they set up a SMSF, they do not have access to compensation in the event of fraud or theft.
It also wants advisers to give more information about the roles and responsibilities of trustees, the costs of setting up a SMSF, as well as more information about other types of superannuation products that might be more suited to someone’s particular situation.
“When it comes to planning your retirement, establishing an SMSF is a very significant decision,” said ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell.
“We want to help ensure that the SMSF sector is healthy, and that investors make informed decisions about SMSFs.
“Our recent surveillance of the sector found that advice was not up to a standard we would like.”
The warning comes after the Trio Capital affair, which saw the company collapse in 2009 after directors and executives stole $176 million from SMSF investors in<a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/economy/056372-trio-capital-directors-accept-enforceable-undertakings-from-apra-construction-sector-contracts-for-34th-consecutive-month-midday-roundup" target="_blank">what was called “the biggest superannuation fraud in Australian history”</a> by a joint parliamentary committee. More than 6000 investors lost money after placing it into two offshore hedge funds through Trio Capital.
However, Graeme Colley, the director of technical and professional standards at the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia, says ASIC’s concerns about poor quality advice may be overblown.
“Last year, ASIC decided to have a look at advice on a very select part of the superannuation industry, which was self-managed super funds with less than $150,000 in them that had received advice on property investments where the property was mortgaged. Looking at those, they concluded that the advice being given wasn’t adequate.
“But it was a very selective sample.
“Unfortunately, ASIC hasn’t provided examples of the poor or inadequate advice it saw.”
ASIC also released a report yesterday by actuaries Rice Warner, which looked at the minimum balances needed before SMSFs become cost-effective relative to other superannuation arrangements.
“Through our consultation we are looking to encourage further discussion and explore the issues relating to SMSF costs with industry and consumer stakeholders,” Kell said. “We think that understanding the costs associated with having an SMSF will help advisers and their clients consider whether a SMSF is a cost-effective option when compared with an APRA-regulated fund.
“ASIC does not want to see an influx of trustees who are ill-equipped to cope with the responsibilities and obligations of running a SMSF.”
The report found that when the maximum level of compliance administration is assumed, SMSFs do not become cost-effective when they have balances of less than $500,000.
However, many trustees do their own administration and compliance, which means the costs of maintaining a SMSF would be lower, Peter Burgess, the head of policy and technical at AMP SMSF said.
“This is in line with what we already knew – you need a reasonable amount in your SMSF for it to be cost-effective.
“But cost isn’t the only consideration here. There are other reasons to manage your own super – you might have specific estate-planning needs, or want to take advantage of specific investment opportunities and so on.
“And while it’s not cost-effective for very low balances, when you have more than $100,000 in your fund, it does depend on how much work you’re doing yourself. It’s hard to get data on this, but a significant amount of trustees do their administration work and so forth themselves. This can make it cost-effective below the $500,000 threshold.”
Colley was also reluctant to accept the higher threshold, saying that in his experience most trustees contribute to the operation of their fund.
“Much of the work with these funds is done by the trustees, so the expense is exaggerated. The Rice Warner report does say that where trustees do contribute, the running cost is around 1.5% of assets. In my view, that’s at the upper end, but probably more realistic.
“We think the $200,000 threshold mentioned by both ASIC and the ATO many years ago is still valid when it comes to cost-effectiveness.”
Recently, ASIC has flagged its <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/054815-asic-sounds-warning-bell-on-smsfs-2">concerns about the growth of the self-managed superannuation industry</a>, saying the increasing amount of money being held in SMSFs could prompt newcomers who are far less financially sophisticated to set up their own funds.
The self-managed superannuation industry now holds just under a third of all the money held by Australians in superannuation, having grown around 20% per annum in recent years. There is now $439 billion in assets held by SMSFs. There are over a million SMSF trustees who together manage half a million SMSFs.
Colley does not believe SMSFs are necessarily more risky than investing through a major fund.
“There are two persistent criticisms around SMSFs. One is that trustees don’t know what they’re doing, and the other is that SMSFs are being used by property spruikers to invest in property.
“I was at a major super fund conference earlier this year when one of the speakers got up and said: ‘If you think SMSFs are jokes, who don’t do as well, you need to think again’. They do, roughly, 1% better, on average, than bigger super funds.
“And there’s a huge amount of noise around property, but if you look at the statistics, less than half of 1% of SMSFs invest in property loans.”
Burgess believes there’s still further growth to be had for the industry. “There’s still significant room to grow. There’s a lot of research and statistics out there that shows there are plenty of people with tendencies that could benefit from a self-managed super fund, but who don’t currently have one.”
 
<hr>
 This article was originally publsihed on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
 
</body></html>

mrobin-TVRYiru7si

ASIC warns that when it comes to fraud, SMSF trustees are on their own

<html><body>
Just because the law allows investors to do something doesn’t, of course, mean it is a good idea.

This investment adage comes to mind with the recent final ruling from the tax office – in its role as regulator of self-managed super – relating to the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of geared properties in a self-managed super fund (SMSF).
In short, the ruling – clarifying much of the uncertainty about the commissioner’s interpretation of the SMSF gearing laws – is likely to encourage many more SME owners to at least consider holding their business premises in their family super funds.
Property Observer discussed the ruling in detail on June 5, including in regard to the gearing of business premises built over several titles and the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finance/five-strategies-for-investing-in-geared-property-through-an-smsf/2012060655012" target="_blank">undertaking of improvements to business and other properties</a>.
Particularly given the new ruling, it is crucial for business owners to carefully weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of holding their business premises in their SMSFs – whether or not the properties are geared.
The advantages are clear.
Business real estate, such as the premises of a family SMSE, is among the few types of assets that SMSFs are allowed to acquire from their members and other related parties. And business real estate is one of the few types of assets that funds can lease to related parties – including fund members and their businesses – without a limit on its value.
Your business pays a commercial rent to your SMSF. The rent is tax-deductible to your business and your SMSF pays tax at no more than 15% on the rent.
If your fund has borrowed to buy the business premises, the interest is tax-deductible.
Unrivalled asset protection is another advantage. If you later experience financial difficulties, superannuation assets (including business premises) are generally out of the reach of creditors if individual fund members are declared bankrupt – subject to the claw-back provisions in the Bankruptcy Act.
Further, no capital gains tax (CGT) is payable if your fund eventually sells the property when the fund’s assets are backing the payment of a superannuation pension.Bu
Some business owners, however, would tend to concentrate only on the advantages of acquiring their business premises through their SMSFs without giving sufficient attention to the possible disadvantages.
Here are six tough questions to ask yourself:
<h3>1. What happens if my business experiences financial difficulties?</h3>
Family SMSFs sometimes face the difficulty of having a financially-troubled family business – owned by the fund’s members – unable to pay the rent for fund-owned business premises.
Under superannuation law, fund trustees (who are the members themselves) must operate their super fund for the sole purpose of providing member retirement benefits. And that means pursuing a tenant for unpaid rent – even if that wayward tenant is the members’ own business.
“It can become very difficult because you are then wearing two hats,” says Martin Murden, a director of Partners Group, a financial services provider to accountants.
“You are the landlord in the superannuation fund and then you are the tenant, being a director of the business which is facing difficulties,” he adds.
“I have seen businesses, which have fallen into financially difficulties, not paying the true amount of rent to the super fund,” says Murden, the author of How to invest in property through your self managed super fund (released by Major Street Publishing).
These super funds had breached superannuation law by providing financial assistance to a related party.
The tax office, as regulator of self-managed super, has the power to strip an SMSF of its complying status.
In turn, the market value of a non-complying fund is taxed at the top marginal rate, less any non-concessional or undeducted contributions. This can remove almost half of a fund’s assets in tax, depending upon the circumstances.
And if your business cannot pay proper rent on a fund-owned business premises, your SMSF may have trouble meeting loan repayments if the property is geared. (See question four.)
<h3>2. What happens if I divorce?</h3>
Husband-and-wife business partners often arrange for their SMSF to acquire their business premises. The sad reality is that a marriage break-up will typically destroy the business partnership – in addition to the closure of the couple’s SMSF when their personal financial links are severed.
Frequently in such instances, the business premises are sold – perhaps in an unfavourable market – in order to split the super savings.
Of course, some husband-and-wife SMSFs would have sufficient other assets to enable one spouse to keep the property in his or her super fund and for other fund-held assets to go into the super account of the other spouse.
Couples who are considering acquiring the premises for their family businesses through their self-managed funds should keep in mind that the possibility that their relationship may fail is far from remote. Figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) suggest that 40% of marriages will end in divorce – a statistic that doesn’t include de facto relationships.
“Trying to disentangle superannuation assets [in a property settlement] can become very difficult,” says Murden.
He points out the need to split an SMSF’s assets such as business premises following a marriage breakdown do not solely involve husband-and-wife funds.
For instance, business partners may have set up an SMSF together to acquire their business premises. And the failure of the marriage or de facto relationship of one of the partners may trigger the splitting of superannuation assets.
In other words, the super savings of both business partners may be affected even though both may have been married to spouses with no involvement in the business.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
<h3>3. What if a member of my SMSF unexpectedly dies?</h3>
Depending upon the circumstances, the death of a fund member may force the sale of fund-owned business premises.
Under superannuation law, a fund must payout the superannuation death benefits of a deceased member to his or her beneficiaries. And funds often have to sell assets such as property to pay the death benefits.
The forced sale of business premises may, in turn, damage the commercial prospects of the family business.
Of course, the beneficiary of a deceased member’s super is often a surviving spouse who is also a member of the same SMSF. In such cases, there is perhaps no need to sell the business premises to pay death benefits.
Murden says some SMSFs deal with risk of having to pay death benefits by taking insurance policies on the life of each member.
A fund’s trustees would arrange for their SMSF to setup a special reserve account to pay the premiums on the life insurance policies. And the beneficiary of any payout upon death or permanent disability would be the SMSF through its special reserve account.
Under superannuation law, fund trustees must have an investment strategy that has regard to such matters as the risk of making an investment, the risks of inadequate diversification, and the liquidity of investments. Liquidity is a key issue when it is time to pay death benefits.
<h3>4. What if my SMSF defaults on a loan to buy my business premises?</h3>
The lender could sell the property in attempt to recover its debt (including any outstanding interest) along with the costs of selling the property and discharging the mortgage. Whatever is left is repaid to the fund.
Particularly if the property has fallen in value, the fund could lose capital and interest paid to the date of the default.
Sydney tax and superannuation lawyer Robert Richards suspects that some SMSFs will have difficulty making loan repayments after the halving from the concessional contributions cap for members over 50 to $25,000 a year from July. (Concessional contributions comprise salary-sacrificed and compulsory contributions as well as personally-deductible contributions by the self-employed and eligible investors.)
Craig Morgan, a director of mortgage broker SMSF Loans, points out that SMSFs tend to keep their loan-to-valuation ratio for commercial property to a maximum of 55%. With most of the loans Morgan arranges, the rent at least covers the interest payments.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
<h3>5. What are my possible CGT obligations when selling or contributing my business premises to my SMSF?</h3>
The increased value of the business premises during your personal ownership may be subject to capital gains tax (CGT) upon the transfer of its ownership – whether by sale or contribution – to your self-managed fund.
However, the small business CGT concessions on the sale of active assets of a business (such as its business premises) together with the standard CGT discount for assets owned for at least 12 months may eliminate any CGT – depending upon the circumstances. Get specialist tax advice on this point.
You should also be aware that some states apply stamp duty when a property owned by a member is contributed to a super fund.
“You may be eligible for the small business CGT concessions,” says Murden, “but speak to your tax adviser before doing a single thing. Get it wrong and you are going to pay a lot of tax.”
<h3>6. Are my retirement investments adequately diversified?</h3>
One of the negatives about owning your business premises in your SMSF is that your fund may have insufficient other assets to adequately diversify its portfolio against risks and to take advantage of non-property investment opportunities.
If a fund is poorly diversified, the retirement savings of the members depend on whether the property turns out to be a good investment. Of course, much will rely on the members’ personal circumstances including their other super and non-super investments.
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/index.php" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

Divorce, death, debt and default: Six questions SMSF trustees should be asking

<html><body>
Since 2007 investors have been able to purchase property in super with debt, giving them the twin benefits of leverage and concessional tax rates. Another benefit of buying in super was that at age 60 no tax is payable on either rental income or capital gains. 
What has eluded the investor, however, was the ability to practically and efficiently add value by doing a renovation. There was confusion by both the profession and the ATO in what was possible and how it is funded. 
With a stroke of the pen the ATO has clarified and simplified these elusive questions.
With the release of SMSFR 2012/1 the ATO has defined three critical areas and clearly defined what constitutes a renovation. 
In summary the ATO has confirmed that a self-managed super fund (SMSF) can borrow money to fund a cosmetic renovation, e.g. kitchen, bathroom, flooring etc. If the renovation is structural, e.g. if it moves internal walls, then the funds must come from internal SMSF cash, not borrowings. 
More technically this ruling clarifies what is a:
<ol>
<li>Repair</li>
<li>Improvement</li>
<li>Change to the single acquirable asset (SAA) </li>
</ol>
Specifically:
<ol start="1">
<li>Cosmetic renovation is identified as a repair by the ATO and so can be funded with debt. For tax purposes a scrapping schedule and a depreciation schedule would be completed. These costs cannot be expensed, so the use of the word repair can be misleading, but ATO has chosen to define repair differently for superannuation purposes and for tax. </li>
<li>Improvement such as moving internal walls, the addition of a granny flat, second story, swimming pool etc which does not change what the SAA is (i.e., it is still a single dwelling) can be done with internal SMSF cash but not debt. </li>
<li>A substantial improvement that alters the SAA to a point where what you end up with is not what you started with eg single dwelling into a duplex, land to land and dwelling, etc., cannot be done while there is a loan on the property/land. If there if no debt then it can be done but it must be funded by internal cash. </li>
</ol>
Note: properly documented and financed off the plan or a single contract that includes the land purchase and dwelling construction where in both cases a deposit is paid and then final payment is made on completion is OK. 
Unfortunately the ATO has also confirmed that an existing asset in super with no debt cannot have a loan facility created against it. 
Please note that you need to have your own SMSF to purchase property direct with debt as your retail/industry fund will not oblige.
Ken Raiss is a certified accountant and director of <a title="Chan &amp; Naylor " href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_self">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> national accounting firm. Ken’s experience lies in working with large publically listed multi-national companies, which gives Ken excellent insight into international market trends. Ken specialises in educating “mum and dad” property investors and small business owners with advice on wealth creation, asset protection, taxation, superannuation and compliance. Chan &amp; Naylor offers a free five-minute question-and-answer session on its website under the<a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/ask-the-experts/" target="_blank"> "Ask the Experts" section.</a>
</body></html>

kenraiss-JsVyb3YKka

Changes to SMSF legislation will benefit property investors: Ken Raiss

<html><body>
“Hey Jeff, just wanted to let you know that I’ve transferred some money into my super account, can you tell me the best place to invest it right now within the fund?”  This was a question I asked of my financial planner yesterday.  It was that time of year when I had to make the obligatory transfer of money into my managed super account to meet requirements as an employer (to myself).  Each year I struggle with this: transferring cash into my super then watching it disappear into the deep, dark hole of the managed super fund then opening my bi-yearly statement to see it has disintegrated!
Jeff said, “Well, Australian equities are good buying right now (translation: because the market is so crap), so we’ll just put it in there.” So that’s what we did, dumped some money into shares, and I will now await my statement to see how that investment performs.
My next question for Jeff was, “How far out of retirement should we start moving money out of the more risky areas and into the safe havens or defensive stocks?” While I’m not at that age yet, I don’t want to end up like a lot of retirees at the moment who have lost buckets of their retirement funds in the poorly performing share market because they were caught out with the impact the GFC had on their super.  They’ve been forced back to work or to rely on the government pension. Jeff recommended that we should look at transferring into the safer areas, such as cash about 10 years before you are looking to retire.  Wow, so for 10 years we have to cop a low return on our money just to play it safe?  The alternative is to run the risk or losing a fair chunk of it.
Gosh, a lot can happen in 10 years in property, I thought.
Reading my mind, Jeff said, “Jo, with your experience in property, why don’t you set up a self-managed super fund and then you can just invest in property?”
He thought that to be a really good bet.  The fact that I’m already holding a substantial amount of property didn’t seem to faze him, but I always thought it best to diversify.
So I thought this an interesting topic to ponder on today: just how much property do we need to retire comfortably? I picked up my favourite property magazine and saw on the cover the headline “Retire Richer and Sooner” – OK, what have they got to say?
The headline story was titled “Get Rich from Regional Australia”.  Of the nine regional towns they highlighted as having the best capital growth potential, two were from the Hunter region of NSW.  Property Bloom tracks the long-term growth of suburbs we develop in. I pulled up my graph on a particular town that I just had Residex update for me.  I track the quarterly median value and the volume of sales in this postcode. There was a very nice upward trend with varying degrees of peaks since March 1996 when I started the tracking. I personally bought into this particular town in 2001. Looking back over the past 10 years I saw the median price was $114,500 in March 2002 and in March 2012 it was $250,268. It had grown 119% in this 10-year period.
That 119% says it all, really.  I know where I’m putting my retirement funds.
My retirement strategy is to buy and hold but with one very important twist and that is to add value.  The property I purchased in 2001 in this town has increased by 119%, but I also renovated and developed the land, adding more dwellings, so the yield on this property is also very high.
Property Bloom is always looking at development strategies that will add value, increase yield and create equity. We have one very new strategy that we are adding to our portfolio now that will mean clients make an 8% yield on an affordable investment. It will also give good depreciation for those still working.  The NSW government is also helping us with this strategy by throwing in $5,000, as it sees the need to boost housing in this state.  If you’d like to hear more about this growth strategy then let me know, I’ll be covering it in more detail on Property Observer soon. It just might be what you need to boost your retirement fund.
Jo Chivers is director of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/" title="Property Bloom">Property Bloom</a>, which manages property development.</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Investing in property through a self-managed super fund a good bet to retire comfortably

<html><body>
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) is warning trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to be cautious when investing in property.
Its warned arrangements that are “deliberately entered into to get around the law” can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties and even criminal charges.
The ATO has also joined ASIC by warning of those individuals and companies promoting property investments to SMSF trustees.
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Last week ASIC</a> revealed to The Australian that it is undertaking “limited surveillance” of financial advisers and accountants over concerns that property spruikers are encouraging investors to set up self-managed super funds purely as vehicles for "dodgy" property investments.
Acting tax commissioner Bruce Quigley says he is concerned people are using their SMSF to invest in property without fully understanding their obligations under the law or some people are seeking to take advantage of certain types of arrangements.
 "We have observed that some arrangements are deliberately entered into to get around the law, which can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties or even facing criminal charges.
“Those marketing properties to SMSF trustees as part of such arrangements could be referred to ASIC,” he says.
Quigley says investing in property can be a confusing area for some people.
"The fine details are important and trustees need to be sure that property is the right investment for their SMSF and that the arrangement is legal,"
"We have also seen instances where holding trusts have not even been established at the time the contracts to acquire are signed.
“In other instances the title of the property is held in the individual's name rather than the trustee of the holding trust. Another common mistake is gearing in a related unit trust, which is not allowed under the law," he says.
"Some of these arrangements, if structured incorrectly, cannot simply be restructured or rectified. The only option may be to unwind the arrangement which could involve forced sale of assets at an inconvenient time. This could be very expensive for the fund with potential stamp duty and tax consequences."
"I urge trustees to get reliable, independent advice when making investment decisions and to obtain advice from us if they are contemplating entering into these sorts of arrangements. The responsibility for ensuring their SMSF complies with the law rests with them," says Quigley.
</body></html>

Australian Tax Office joins ASIC by warning SMSF trustees on illegal property investment arrangements

<html><body>
DIY super investors should consider acquiring an NRAS property because of the positive cashflow benefits, according to a new report by property investment and financial advisory firm Onyx Wealth.
Investing in a property that qualifies for the government’s national rental affordability scheme (NRAS) is a way for SMSF trustees to avoid being in the position, where they hold a property that is both negatively geared and provides negative cashflow, according to report authors Paul Thewlis and Margaret Hardy.
Such a holding would require the SMSF to have large enough liquid assets and/or cash inflows to allow for these losses.
In an interview with <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/queensland/nras-and-smsf-investors-helping-keep-inner-brisbane-off-the-plan-market-afloat-david-devine/2012112858155">Property Observer last week,</a> Brisbane apartment developer David Devine said SMSF and NRAS investors were among the biggest buyers of off-the-plan projects developed by his Metro Property Development company, which has the two top selling projects in inner Brisbane.
Metro has marketed more than 50% of the 308 apartments in its Madison Heights development as NRAS-approved investments, compared with 20% in its first development, the Chelsea, now completed.
But yesterday, <a target="_blank" href="/news">property investment advisor Margaret Lomas</a> warned investors against investing in NRAS properties, labelling it a tax scheme intended for institutional investors and said investors considering the scheme should seek a private tax ruling "before taking the plunge on any scheme that sounds so good".
SMSFs can purchase an NRAS approved property, which provides an annual tax free incentive estimated at $119,833 over the next 10 years.
In return, the property must be rented out to eligible tenants at a rent at least 20% below market rent as assessed by an independent valuer, with eligible tenants determined by government income thresholds.
“NRAS properties have greater negative gearing than equivalent non-NRAS properties,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
“By giving up 20% of the taxable rental income the SMSF increases its tax loss. Normally a loss is undesirable, but in this case it is usually offset by the value of the NRAS incentive.
“Take for example an NRAS property which has a market rental value of $300 per week. A 20% discount on that rent means the SMSF is giving up $60 per week of taxable income.
“At the same time, the SMSF gains $190 per week of untaxed income in the form of the NRAS incentive."
Due to superannuation act rules SMSFs can only purchase completed or off-the-plan property
The majority of NRAS properties purchased by Onyx Wealth clients are priced between $250,000 and $400,000.
Because they are new properties, they also have the tax benefit of having greater depreciation allowances than older property.
Another benefit is stamp duty savings in some states.
“SMSFs buying property off the plan can benefit from substantial stamp duty savings. For example, in Victoria and Western Australia, purchasers who buy apartments off the plan prior to construction only pay stamp duty on the land value apportioned to each individual apartment,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
<a target="_blank" href="https://onyx.net.au/">Onyx Wealth</a> provides the following example to show income generated for a SMSF with no property investment, an SMSF with a normal property investment and an SMSF with an NRAS property investment:
Click to enlarge
<a rel="shadowbox" href="/images/stories/2012/12/onyx.gif" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2012/12/onyxthumb.gif"></a>
 
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News