The long-awaited redevelopment of the former Eastlakes Shopping Centre site has reached a major milestone, with Conquest's plans for a new mixed-use precinct officially placed on public exhibition.

The State Significant Development Application would transform the 1.7-hectare site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/19a-evans-avenue-eastlakes-nsw-2018">19A Evans Avenue</a> into one of Sydney's largest urban renewal projects, delivering 736 apartments above a new shopping centre anchored by Woolworths, alongside specialty retail, dining, commercial space and new public open spaces.

The public exhibition marks the next chapter for the project after <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/conquest">Conquest</a> acquired the stalled Stage Two development from Crown Group, who completed the first stage across the road prior to their voluntary liquidation.

<img alt="First look: Conquest unveils plans for 736-home Eastlakes Shopping Centre redevelopment" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5fca22c5-d1ed-4e2c-8801-03f7df1eafc8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/eastland%20podium.png?VersionId=uomwr41nF8CmLUZRDcu3mHQechlbxucS" />

&nbsp;

Designed by DKO Architecture, the proposal comprises four residential buildings ranging from 14 to 18 storeys above a two-level retail podium. The development would deliver 736 apartments, including 74 affordable homes, 215 Build-to-Rent apartments and 521 market residences. Provision has also been made for dual-key apartments, which could increase the total number of dwellings to 877.

At ground level, the shopping centre has been designed as the suburb's new meeting place, anchored by a full-line Woolworths and complemented by a curated mix of fresh food retailers, cafés, restaurants, health services and everyday convenience shopping. Generous pedestrian links and landscaped public spaces will connect the retail precinct through to Jack Mundey Reserve, creating a more walkable and connected neighbourhood.

Conquest CEO Michael Akkawi said the redevelopment was about far more than replacing a shopping centre.

"Eastlakes has been overlooked for too long, and this is the community’s moment. We are building a shopping centre and homes, a genuine heart for the suburb, and we genuinely want locals to help shape it."

"We enrich communities through the creation of homes, places, and experiences designed for life, built to last, and owner for generations. That starts with listening, so we warmly encourage everyone with a connection to Eastlakes to view the plans and share their thoughts."

<img alt="First look: Conquest unveils plans for 736-home Eastlakes Shopping Centre redevelopment" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="22f6fb20-54fb-4bd7-8a92-48fafdd00608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/eastland.png?VersionId=cugp7s9hrMHGJJdYzkeAkrFoQgnF4GXf" />

DKO said the design had been shaped by the site's landscape setting and surrounding open space.

"Our vision for the site embraces its unique Bidjigal identity by blending the residential living with generous landscaping and a material palette inspired by the Bidjigal locality, and celebrating the panoramic views to Botany Bay and the wetlands reserves."

"Taking cues from Country, we seek to harmonise built form with the landscape and lightly touch the earth. By reconnecting, retaining and regenerating existing ecology, and weaving in natural elements, we can deepen our connection to Country."

The landscape strategy extends across the podium and rooftops, incorporating communal gardens, children's play areas, lawns, community gardens, family gathering spaces and extensive tree planting. New landscaped links will also strengthen the connection between the precinct and Jack Mundey Reserve, while publicly accessible open spaces have been integrated throughout the development.

The proposal builds on Conquest's broader placemaking strategy for the site. Through an ongoing partnership, local artist Joe Rashbrook has been appointed Urban Art Curator, working alongside young residents to transform the project's site hoardings into a public art gallery that allows the community to engage with the redevelopment before construction is complete.

Conquest has rapidly expanded its development pipeline since acquiring the Eastlakes site, with more than $6 billion worth of mixed-use projects now in planning across Sydney, including Stanmore, Castlecrag and Waterloo.

Conquest CEO Michael Akkawi said the redevelopment was about far more than replacing a shopping centre.

Joel Robinson

First look: ‘Far more than replacing a shopping centre’ as Conquest unveils 736-home Eastlakes redevelopment

Abadeen has lodged a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for one of Mosman's largest apartment developments in recent years, seeking approval to transform the former Honeysuckle Garden and Midas site on Military Road into a 100-apartment mixed-use development.

The SSDA, lodged with investment partner Phoenix Property Investors, proposes around $230 million worth of new housing on the prominent <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/494-516-military-road-mosman-nsw-2088">494-516 Military Road</a> site.

The proposal comes as Mosman Council continues to progress its recently endorsed Masterplan, which identifies the precinct for increased housing density while maintaining the suburb's established character.

Designed by DKO Architecture, the development would comprise 100 apartments above ground-floor retail, with a rooftop wellness precinct including a gym, sauna, entertaining areas and landscaped communal spaces.

Rather than pushing to the full 12-storey height identified in Council's Masterplan, the proposal ranges between five and nine storeys, stepping down towards Hale Road. A tenth level would accommodate resident amenities rather than additional apartments.

The project has been designed to appeal to a broad range of buyers, from first home buyers and young professionals through to families and local downsizers looking to remain on the Lower North Shore.

<img alt="Mosman" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5dada03f-5b4c-43ba-ba62-2868add31440" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-27%20at%209.57.55%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=7LBy0B.Jo8_iWAFJsClcV7Q3UnXrv49r" />

Abadeen Executive Chairman Justin Brown said the apartments had been designed as genuine long-term homes rather than investor-focused stock.

"The apartments have been designed as genuine long-term homes, with efficient floorplans that maximise usable living areas, generous storage, natural light and strong connections between indoor and outdoor spaces," Brown says."

"We've focused on creating homes for a broad range of buyers, from first home buyers and growing families through to downsizers who want to remain in Mosman."

The rooftop wellness offering forms a key part of the proposal, with residents set to have access to a gym, sauna, outdoor entertaining spaces, communal dining areas, landscaped gardens and a multi-use recreation court overlooking Sydney Harbour.

<img alt="Mosman" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d37c2d6b-583a-4a0f-b7a9-9f46b893d2f4" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-27%20at%209.58.06%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=FPoa5FCm2RtzjhAh2w5FTWJbV6GHfY8D" />

DKO drew heavily on the site's natural and cultural history, undertaking a Connecting with Country process with local Aboriginal Elders to inform the architectural and landscape design.

Senior Associate Matthew Ritchard said the design sought to create a building that responded to both the site's landscape and its cultural significance.

"The architectural language of the project is a deep expression of Connecting with Country, where the materiality and colour palette serve as a bridge between the site's geological history and its future as a residential sanctuary."

The proposal also retains the site's established blue gum tree as the centrepiece of the communal landscaped gardens, while introducing activated retail fronting Military Road to strengthen the connection between Mosman and Cremorne villages.

If approved, the project would deliver 100 new homes within walking distance of shops, public transport, schools and local amenities, adding to the limited pipeline of new apartments on the Lower North Shore.

<h2>Project Snapshot</h2>

Project: Honeysuckle Garden Redevelopment

Address: 494-516 Military Road, Mosman

Developer: Abadeen and Phoenix Property Investors

Architect: DKO Architecture

Lead Architect: Matthew Ritchard

Value: $230 million

Residences: 100 apartments

Key features:

<ul>
	<li>
	Ground-floor retail
	</li>
	<li>
	Rooftop wellness precinct
	</li>
	<li>
	Gym and sauna
	</li>
	<li>
	Outdoor entertaining and BBQ areas
	</li>
	<li>
	Landscaped communal gardens
	</li>
	<li>
	Multi-use recreation court
	</li>
	<li>
	Retained mature blue gum tree
	</li>
	<li>
	Connecting with Country design process
	</li>
	<li>
	Harbour, CBD and Balmoral views from upper-level apartments
	</li>
</ul>

Abadeen Executive Chairman Justin Brown said the apartments had been designed as genuine long-term homes rather than investor-focused stock

First look: Abadeen plans 100 apartments on former Honeysuckle Garden site in Mosman

The wave of apartment proposals sweeping through Mosman shows no signs of slowing, with another major residential development lodged through the NSW Government's State Significant Development pathway.

Developer First Quadrant Properties, which recently completed Willoughby Grounds and has several projects in planning across the North Shore, has unveiled plans for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/cove-on-ourimbah-40-56-ourimbah-road-mosman-nsw-2088">Cove on Ourimbah</a>, a 63-apartment development on Ourimbah Road, adding to the growing pipeline of projects reshaping one of Sydney's most tightly held harbour suburbs.

The proposal would consolidate nine properties at 40-56 Ourimbah Road into a part eight, part nine-storey apartment building, continuing the momentum created by the NSW Government's accelerated planning pathways that have seen several significant developments emerge across Mosman over the past 12 months.

Designed by Doroch Architects, the project would deliver 63 apartments, resident wellness facilities including a gym, pool and sauna, landscaped communal spaces and basement parking, while using recessed upper levels, generous setbacks and extensive planting to reduce the perceived scale of the building.

<img alt="First look: First Quadrant Properties eyes nine-storey Mosman apartment project under State Significant pathway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32ee68e4-141e-4a10-8f83-48e961a5e71e" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Ourimbah%20Road%2C%20Mosman%20a.png?VersionId=CUeILFc6APlwXPc.iplElbxHvREKwjig" />

Doroch Architects said the building had been designed to reinforce Mosman's established character.

"The building's aesthetic is grounded in the existing residential character of Ourimbah Road and the broader Mosman context," the architect noted in the planning documents submitted to the NSW Government.

The design adopts a contemporary material palette of natural stone, textured concrete and brown concave metal cladding, complemented by integrated planters and deep balconies. The podium incorporates softened curved concrete forms, while increased setbacks have been provided adjacent to the heritage-listed property at 60 Ourimbah Road to create a more sympathetic transition.

The site sits around 330 metres from Mosman Town Centre, placing it within the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy area, where increased residential density is being encouraged close to shops, transport and services.

The proposal follows a string of major apartment projects lodged or declared State Significant in Mosman in recent months, including Abadeen's 100-apartment Honeysuckle Garden redevelopment on Military Road and several other developments across Awaba Street, Redan Street and Muston Street from the likes of Time &amp; Place, HELM and Prosker Property.

&nbsp;

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Time &amp; Place to take on Mosman apartment market</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-abadeen-plans-100-apartments-on-former-honeysuckle-garden-site-in-mosman">First look: Abadeen plans 100 apartments on former Honeysuckle Garden site in Mosman</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Another major apartment proposal signals Mosman's development boom

A new State Significant Development Application (SSDA) could reshape a prominent vacant site in Gosford's CBD, with Ming Tian Real Property proposing a mixed-use precinct that combines affordable housing, retail activation and a new public plaza.

The proposal for 43-45 Beane Street and 2 Keevers Lane would deliver a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/43-45-beane-street-gosford-nsw-2250">two-building development</a> comprising a 26-storey residential tower and a five-storey affordable housing building above ground-floor commercial space. A key focus of the project is the delivery of dedicated affordable housing alongside new public domain improvements designed to transform Keevers Lane into a more active urban destination.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/tony-owen-partners">Tony Owen Partners</a>, the development would provide 130 apartments, including 20 affordable housing dwellings managed by a registered community housing provider for at least 15 years. The market housing component comprises 110 apartments across a mix of one, two and three-bedroom residences, while the affordable housing includes six one-bedroom, 13 two-bedroom and one three-bedroom apartment. The proposal also incorporates 416 sqm of ground-floor retail, three basement levels accommodating 140 car spaces, 42 bicycle spaces, communal open space and extensive landscaping.

<img alt="First look: Ming Tian Real Property plans landmark affordable housing tower for Gosford city centre" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9b858791-9060-4ee7-9178-44cb9e640a85" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Beane%20Street%20b_0.png?VersionId=_jbY0mqPEs7.jBZxozR7d6T4u85FoPmb" />

The affordable housing component has been distributed across both buildings, with four apartments located within the main tower and a dedicated five-storey building delivering a further 16 affordable homes. The project also includes 12 adaptable apartments and 24 dwellings designed to Silver Level Liveable Housing Guidelines.

The architectural design draws inspiration from Indigenous storytelling.

"The design is based on the indigenous motif of the Rainbow Serpent," Tony Owen Partners said in the Design Verification Statement.

"The Rainbow Serpent is a traditional totem of coastal eastern Australia. It represents natural forces, creation, change, and rebirth and is often associated with bodies of water. This motif can be seen in the undulation of the balconies rising on the building," Tony Owen Partners said in the Design Verification Statement.

Beyond the residential offering, the proposal seeks to revitalise the surrounding public realm, particularly Keevers Lane.

"The ground floor streetscape includes a commercial and dining precinct which will significantly improve the amenity of the area. This strategy transforms a currently inhospitable laneway into a thriving centre of urban renewal and day and night time activation to compliment the new adjoining UNC facilities," the architects said.

<img alt="First look: Ming Tian Real Property plans landmark affordable housing tower for Gosford city centre" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36b0ca6b-af15-424c-81db-9f3049c07b0c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Beane%20Street%20podium.png?VersionId=QCAv7bCitrg3zIGZUHI2z_HR8qVfKbp1" />

The Environmental Impact Statement notes that the project aims to "improve the provision of diverse housing options within Gosford City Centre, enhancing the mixed-use precinct by delivering high quality residential development, whilst concurrently providing a diverse range of housing choices through the provision of affordable housing, which is in growing need within the Gosford City Centre."

The site occupies approximately 2,070 sqm in the Gosford city centre, around 250 metres from Gosford Railway Station and within walking distance of Gosford Hospital, Mann Street's retail precinct and the University of Newcastle's Gosford campus currently under construction. The currently vacant site previously received approval for a lower-scale residential development, with the new proposal leveraging the NSW Government's in-fill affordable housing pathway to increase density while introducing dedicated affordable housing.

First look: Rainbow Serpent inspires bold new Gosford apartment tower

Developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/bottega-property-group">Bottega House</a> has secured council approval for its first Brisbane project - a $270 million luxury residential development on an absolute riverfront site in leafy St Lucia.&nbsp;

The 15-storey project, known as <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/st-lucia-by-bottega-house-180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">St Lucia by Bottega House</a> , will occupy a prime north-facing site at 178-180 Macquarie Street, directly fronting the Brisbane River in the established inner-west suburb known for its rowing clubs, golf courses and sprawling University of Queensland campus.&nbsp;

St Lucia by Bottega House will feature a suite of amenities including dedicated wellness spaces, a mineral pool and cold plunge. The project has been positioned to attract affluent owner-occupiers seeking high-quality, house-sized apartments.&nbsp;

Bottega House has been set up by co-directors Nick Malloch, Louis Mennes and Craig Marsh.

Malloch said the project drew inspiration from its Brisbane River setting and leafy inner-west surrounds, while responding to the demands of discerning locals looking to transition from freestanding homes into apartment living.&nbsp;

"With an expansive river frontage and lush green surrounds, we knew we had to create something special that reflects the natural beauty of the location while offering residents masterfully crafted homes," said Malloch.&nbsp;

"Our intent was to complement the project's quiet, private setting by introducing residences that offer a calm retreat and sanctuary from the everyday. The result is a harmonious blend of architecture, interiors and amenity that emphasises wellbeing, comfort and beauty without excess."&nbsp;

Malloch added that project consultants had been carefully selected in alignment with Bottega House's commitment to care, quality and attention to detail. The design team includes architects <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a>, interiors practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and landscaping by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/urbis">Urbis</a>.&nbsp;

Three-bedroom apartments are expected to start around $5 millio. Selling agents Keenan &amp; Byrne said the pricing strategy for the project was anticipated to achieve upwards of $25,500 per square metre.&nbsp;

The project's development approval this week follows the success of Bottega House's inaugural Queensland project - a 22-storey collection of full-floor sky homes at Broadbeach on the Gold Coast which included the sale of a two-storey penthouse at a record price for a beachside residence.&nbsp;

St Lucia by Bottega House is expected to launch to market in November, with construction anticipated to be completed mid 2029.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151826]

Bottega House to make Brisbane debut with St Lucia riverfront apartment development

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
The self-managed superannuation industry has welcomed the government's decision to abandon amendments that would have introduced new regulations on off-market transfers between related parties.
The decision to abandon the amendment comes as the government passed its superannuation reforms – including the passage of the long-awaited loss-carry back scheme for small businesses, first announced last year.
Small business and tax industry officials have been worried the government won't be able to pass many of its scheduled reforms by the time Parliament ends its current session, which is the last before the September election.
Andrea Slattery, chief executive of the Self-Managed Superannuation Fund Professionals Association of Australia, said the organisation was "very pleased" by the move to abandon the regulation of off-market transfers.
"We've always had the feeling this was something that if people understood what it was, then there wouldn't be such an interest in actually introducing the legislation," she says.
"We're very pleased this piece of legislation has been removed," she says, although adds the government should still examine what would be best practice in this area.
Dan Butler, principal at DBA Lawyers says the removal of the amendment is a positive given <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/050719-relief-for-diy-super-funds-off-market-transfers-ban-delayed-by-a-year-2">there were still unknowns</a> about how the transactions would work.
"It's probably been pulled for matters of expediency, the government wants to put other matters forward too and they just haven't been able to work out an amendment that could work here."
"There were a lot of unknown issues in this. For example, with regard to real estate transfers, did you need two independent valuers, or just one? That was still unknown."
The original amendment would have banned off-market transfers between self-managed super funds and related parties.
However, analysts quickly raised problems with the amendment. The new law would mean transactions would have to be conducted on-market, such as through the Australian Securities Exchange, but the law currently restricts those types of arrangements.
Butler says dropping the amendment provides much more certainty to the industry.
"We were sitting in the dark as to how these things would work," he says, but also comments the government needs to "get its act into gear", citing a history of proposing tax changes without fully explaining them.
In the past month tax experts have warned the government still has over 100 proposed changes which haven't been legislated yet. With only a handful of sitting days left until the election, it is unlikely anything except the most important amendments will be passed.
"The government has been very poor for legislative agenda," he says. "It's quite remarkable."
Meanwhile, the government has also finally passed the loss carry-back regime, which was announced last year but until now has not been legislated.
The scheme allows businesses to claim losses of up to $1 million against tax they had already paid during the previous two years. Two new amendments have also removed the possibility a business could claim the loss carry-back during the same year it comes into existence.
The loss carry-back scheme is part of a package of tax amendments which has now been sent to the Senate for approval.
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

pmcstafford-pr9eMARWoN

SMSF industry welcomes abandoning of proposed off-market transfer amendment smsf superannuation

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds are continuing to grow in popularity with the latest figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) showing assets increased to $22 billion.
APRA’s quarterly superannuation statistics for March 31, 2013 show <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/052307-government-warned-to-back-off-on-proposed-changes-to-smsfs">SMSF assets </a>now make up 33.9% of the total $68.4 billion increase in superannuation assets in the last quarter.
SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australian director, Graeme Colley, said this increase means the total assets in SMSFs now stands at $496.2 billion or about 31.5% of the total $1.58 trillion superannuation pool.
“What these numbers say about SMSFs is positive on two fronts,” he said in a statement.
“First, that the fund trustees and their professional advisors have not missed the upswing in the equity markets in this quarter or over the past year.”
Colley said the investment performance of the SMSF sector has been on a par or better than the other sectors.
“Second, that despite the market volatility of the past years post the global financial crisis, people still want to take control of their superannuation and be responsible for it,” he said.
“This reflects both a growing awareness by trustees of superannuation and their capacity to be able to get professional advice on all issues pertaining to the management of their SMSF.”
A spokesperson from the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees said the APRA data showed industry funds were aware of the market competition from SMSFs and are increasingly offering products which compete.
“While the figures also show strong growth in the SMSF sector, superannuation funds are increasingly offering innovative, good value new products and services, which mirror some of the features of self-managed funds and aim to help retain members, particularly those with large balances,” the spokesperson said.
This article originally appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

cwaters-YrtBR88nBe

APRA figures show SMSF assets have hit $22 billion

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Your SMSF could be hurt by proposed super and pension changes

<html><body>
The federal government’s off again, on again super tax grab has likely done irreparable damage to public confidence in Australia’s superannuation system and simultaneously created the likelihood of a future lose-lose environment for up to 50% of self-managed super funds.  
Many more Australian super fund holders will be hit both in short and long term bull and bear markets than the government has conceded and the short term ‘cash grab’ nature of this proposed legislation has ridden roughshod over much needed long term vision which will short change Australia of future infrastructure investment.  
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Whilst the government has argued it will only target super funds with balances of $2 million or more</a>, funds with just a quarter of this figure may in better years accrue earnings revenue that easily exceeds the $100,000 cap and therefore be subject to the punitive higher rate of tax. Case in point is the significant positive upturn seen in the Australian share market which over the last 12 months has exceeded the 20% growth necessary for someone with an investment balance of $500,000 in their super to see a return of $100,000 or more if cashed out for retirement purposes or to pay out home loans.  
Furthermore, for someone hitting the age of 60 there is now a strong likelihood of living a further 30 years and given the cyclical nature of investments many self-funded pensioners could see themselves selling down portfolios when entering downward markets only to be hit with taxes to safeguard their retirement funds. Conversely when they buy back in and in the next cycle sell will be hit with further taxes.  
This means the possibility of four to six tax penalties over their remaining life.  
The government’s lack of foresight will create a lose-lose situation whereby people entering retirement on this figure will over the next 30 years likely see their retirement fund slashed with cyclical downward directions and and then when the market corrects itself they will get slugged again. The super cash grab tax will not just hurt retirees but also small business owners wanting to sell their businesses  
In the current regime small business concessions allow business owners to roll between $500,000 and $1,200,000 of profits from sale of business into superannuation. Given this will automatically be subject to potentially higher tax, business owners are likely to reconsider where they put their funds and look instead at more risky mechanisms than the current relative safety of their super. The hot spots for proposed legislative changes will now see the possibility of the business owner having to pay more tax if they invest through superannuation than if investing outside.  
This is completely at odds with the purpose of superannuation. Small business, property owners and self-funded retirees are the hardest hit again. The compulsory contributions increase from 9% to 12% over time, younger Australians who indubitably will accumulate substantial funds in their super will find themselves in the $500,000 target ‘super pool’ many years before retirement.  
With approximately 50% of self-managed super funds having a balance between $200,000 and $1,000,000 (many more than advertised) hard working Australians will be hit by this regressive impost over time. We could even see the hard work of many experts that have successfully pushed financial literacy into the school curriculum negatively impacted by the constant change in what should be long term and stable financial legislation.  
The industry has talked about a class divide, but the reality is that here we have a government setting itself up against small business, property investors and SMSF trustees as well as every day Australians. This is almost a silent push to get people out of super, which is ironic given it was the same party that introduced the compulsive scheme in the first instance.  
Equally concerning is the lack of government acknowledgement, let alone vision, for the potential of wide scale super fund investment in domestic infrastructure projects, with the heads of large super funds readily admitting that they have funds to invest but no dedicated infrastructure assets in which to invest thanks to the government’s short-sightedness.  
There is no shortage of capital to invest and as a properly managed tool for the future, super should be a mechanism for large scale capital investments that deliver tangible community benefits. For example super funds could be invested into a national first time buyer mortgage scheme which would help many Australians get onto the property ladder and over the long term bridge the growing property gap.  
We should be thinking in terms of abundance instead of scarcity, but sadly the government can’t see can’t see the forest from the trees.  
National Property, Business Tax Accounting and Wealth Advisory Group Chan &amp; Naylor supports the Business Council of Australia’s call to action for the current and future governments to end short-term political fixes in favour of substantial economic reform.
Ken Raiss is a certified accountant and director of <a target="_self" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" title="Chan &amp; Naylor " rel="nofollow">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> national accounting firm. Chan &amp; Naylor offers a free five-minute question-and-answer session on its website under the<a target="_blank" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/ask-the-experts/" rel="nofollow"> "Ask the Experts" section.</a>
</body></html>

kenraiss-JsVyb3YKka

Government's SMSF changes a lose-lose situation for many funds: Ken Raiss

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds (SMSFs) experienced the largest growth in the number of tax returns lodged over 2010-11 by entity type rising to 391,163, according to the latest release of ATO figures.

This was an increase of 4.8% from 373,195 SMSF tax returns lodged 2009-10.
The figures show that the highest allocation remains to shares (32%) and cash and term deposits (28.7%) with 3.5% invested in residential property, 11.4% in non-residential property, 4.2% invested in listed property trusts and 8.8% invested in unlisted property trusts.
In total 14.9 million tax returns were lodged, an increase of 2.1% from 2009-10.
Individual returns represented 84.7% of all tax returns lodged.
 
Self–managed super funds, 2010–11 and 2011–12 financial years
 
<table width="349" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" border="1" dir="ltr"><tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Self–managed super funds
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
2010–111
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
2011–12
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Funds (no.)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
442,987
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
478,263
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Members2 (no.)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
846,227
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
913,550
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Assets2 ($m)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
423,232
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
438,995
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
 

Asset allocation across self–managed super funds, 2009–10 and 2010–11 income years
 
<table width="349" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" border="1" dir="ltr"><tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" rowspan="2" valign="top" height="17">
Asset type
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="17">
2009–102
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="17">
2010–11
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="17%" valign="top" height="7">
%
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="50%" valign="top" height="7">
%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Listed Shares
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
31.4
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
32.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Cash and term deposits
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
27.1
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
28.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Non-residential real property
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
11.5
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
11.4
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Unlisted trusts
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
9.6
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
8.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Other Managed Investments
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
5.0
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Listed trusts
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.9
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Residential real property
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
3.7
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
3.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Unlisted Shares
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
1.2
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
1.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Overseas assets3
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
0.9
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
0.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Other assets4
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.8
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Total5
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
100.0
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
100.0
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

SMSF tax return numbers rise 4.8% in 2010-11 to 391,000: ATO figures

<html><body>
The possibility of a taking an un-interrupted walk at lunch time in the Melbourne CBD is rare these days.
If you manage to avoid the charity muggers with their cheesy grins and clipboards, you’re more than likely to run into someone trying to hand you a flyer for a free seminar promising to make you rich through SMSF property investment.
The latest gang spruiking their free property investment seminar is Ray White SouthBank.
A short walk down Flinders Lane  and back along Collins Street and I passed at least half a dozen people dressed in Ray White branded outfits handing out fliers suggesting that I learn about property investment while enjoying a free lunch at the Rendezvous Grand Hotel on May 2.
The flyer promises a “beginner’s guide to profitable property investing” include a free “crash course” in “how to pay off a mortgage in a fraction of the time, or structure your investment by using your super fund”.
In previous months it was the Park Trent Property Group spruiking their property investment seminars with similar flyers handed out on just about every street corner.
Another round of free Park Trent webinars is taking place this week across the country promising a 90 minute conference including among other things “how to “borrow within your self managed super fund for property investment”.
This type of promotion comes as growing numbers of people look to set up a self-managed super fund to be able to invest in property – the ATO expects up to 1,000 applications a week this month and next - but with many not knowing how to do so or the risks involved.
This week, the Australian Financial Review’s superannuation writer Sally Patten highlighted some of the findings of the Centre for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College’s report on the $5 trillion retirement savings industry, including the issue of low levels of financial literacy when it comes to super.
“Workers will need some level of financial literacy to understand and manage their retirement accounts and the level currently appears to be quite low,” says the report which can be downloaded for free on the <a href="https://crr.bc.edu/" target="_blank">CRR website.</a>
No doubt such seminars will look to cash in on this lack of knowledge, but equally, a strong desire to get onto the property market and make the returns so often highlighted in property investment magazines – though not always alongside the tragic stories of investments gone wrong.
The Ray White Southbank flyer certainly plays on this fear on missing out.
It’s first four sentences read:
“Have you ever…
THOUGHT about property investing…but where to start?
WONDERED how others have managed to get so far ahead?
WISHED you could begin accumulating property for your own financial future?
It comes as ASIC looks to clamp down on the misleading advertisement of property investment, particurlarly promotions via flyers and online ads that do not include information about the risks involved in investing or the fees or costs associated with setting up an SMSF.
Yesterday Property Observer wrote of an <a target="_blank" href="/news">ASIC special taskforce investigation </a>into the advertising of seminars in Melbourne’s sand belt suburbs prepared by a real estate agency in partnership with an accounting firm, mortgage broker and law firm.
ASIC’s chief concern is that advertising of property investment through self-managed super funds should provide a "balanced message about the returns, features, benefits and risks associated with the product" and that it protects the vulnerable from unscrupulous spruikers.
Neither the Ray White Southbank flyer, nor the Park Trent seminar I attended last year spoke of the risk of property investment.
The Ray White Southbank seminar is due to take place at the Rendezvous Grand Hotel on Flinders Street on May 2.
Coincidentally, this is the same hotel where I attended the free Park Trent seminar last year with around 50 other people, with complimentary lunch provided.
The Park Trent seminar focused on the low-risk nature of investing in property, beginning with a slide with the heading “safe as houses” and the familiar story that if you’re not investing in property now you may not have enough income to sustain you in retirement.
No mention was made of the risk of investing in property or fees involved.
Attendees were asked to tick a box on a form if they wished to receive further information and possible one on one meetings with Park Trent advisors.
The closest Park Trent came to disclosing the risks of property investment was this comment made at the end of the presentation.
“You won’t see me on A Current Affair," said the seminar presenter.
"We don’t appeal to the greedy and gullible.”
</body></html>

SMSF property spruikers competing with charity muggers on Melbourne street corners

<html><body>
Four Melbourne businesses running seminars on investing in real estate through self-managed super funds are being investigated by ASIC over the potentially misleading nature of flyers, advertisements and online ads promoting these seminars.
The four businesses operating in the 'sand belt' region of the city - a law firm, a mortgage broker, a real estate agency and a firm of chartered accountants – are named in a leaked letter sent by ASIC commissioner Peter Kell to Liberal MP Peter Fletcher.
The letter was obtained by the Australian Financial Review.
Their last known seminar was held in late 2011.
It follows a review of property sales by the special SMSF taskforce established last year by ASIC chairman Greg Tanzer to examine “high-risk SMSF issues” with its first major project, being “looking at the quality of advice provided to investors”.
ASIC has yet to form an opinion as to whether the material being promoted by these four companies was unlawful.
It comes as part of an ASIC drive to improve the quality of advice provided to SMSF trustees as the sector continues to expand as does the appeal of property as an income-generating asset to hold in these funds.
A spokesperson for ASIC would not comment on the companies named in the letter, but told Property Observer it was “cracking down on the sector, including advertising”. He said ASIC had released guidance for how investing in property through SMSFs should be advertised and expected promoters to adhere to these guidelines.
“We don’t want SMSF investors to become the targets of unscrupulous spruikers," he said.
The guidance on advertising is contained in <a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/pdflib.nsf/LookupByFileName/rg234-published-15-November-2012.pdf/%24file/rg234-published-15-November-2012.pdf" target="_blank">Regulatory Guide 234</a> - Advertising financial products and services (including credit): Good practice guidance.
“Advertisements for financial products and credit products should give a balanced message about the returns, features, benefits and risks associated with the product. Benefits should not be given undue prominence compared with risks,” reads the guide.
ASIC established its special SMSF taskforce in September last year.
In a speech made earlier this month ASIC commissioner Peter Kell said it had been established due to several concerning developments including “an increase in geared investment strategies and increasingly aggressive advertising for SMSFs”.
ASIC does not regulate direct property investment, except where the investment is made through an SMSF.
“In the last year we have seen a rise in SMSF advertising. Unfortunately, we’ve seen more blatant examples of misleading or deceptive advertisements. Particular problem areas we have seen include misleading or deceptive statements about SMSF fees, returns and risks,” said Kell in his speech.
Following this speech, Kell later warned that ASIC “did not want to see SMSFs become the vehicle of choice for property spruikers.
“Where we see examples of unlicensed SMSF advice, or misleading marketing, we will be taking regulatory action," he said.
In its report on the sector released earlier this month, ASIC said it had seen “blatant examples of misleading or deceptive advertising and have taken regulatory action to stop these advertisements”.
“Particular problem areas we have seen include misleading or deceptive statements about SMSF fees; SMSF returns; and SMSF risks.
Misleading advertising of property investment through self-managed super funds can result in ASIC seeking civil penalties of up to $340,000 for an individual or $1.7 million for a body corporate, investors being compensated and orders seeking correct disclosure.
ASIC’s particular areas of focus over the next 12 months are:
<ul>
<li>enforcement—looking at unlicensed financial advice, misleading or deceptive advertising in relation to SMSFs, and continuing to actively pursue enforcement matters in the SMSF sector; </li>
<li>policy implementation—working with accountants following the Government’s announcement to remove the accountants’ exemption, consulting on SMSF issues (e.g. SMSF disclosure requirements and the costs of establishing an SMSF) and registering SMSF auditors; and </li>
<li>education and disclosure—continuing our financial literacy work, updating our MoneySmart website to provide Australian consumers with useful and reliable information about all types of superannuation, including SMSFs, and examining investor attitudes to SMSFs. </li>
</ul>
In March, the Australian Taxation Office revealed it expects more than 1,000 applications a week to be lodged for SMSFs in May and June this year.
<ul></ul>
</body></html>

Melbourne sandbelt SMSF property spruikers face ASIC probe over seminar advertising

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF with a likely low opening balance:
An AFS licensee conducted its regular review of advice files with a focus on SMSF advice.
The licensee reviewed a file for a couple in their 40s who sought financial product advice on all aspects of their financial situation.
The SOA recommended the investors set up an SMSF by rolling over their existing superannuation balance of $87,000.
At first glance, and based on the investors’ existing superannuation balance alone, the licensee thought the advice appeared to be inappropriate.
However, a thorough review of the advice file and SOA revealed that the investors:• were both professionals, with a combined income of $700,000;
• had multiple trust and company structures established;
• in addition to their family home, had multiple investment properties, including a rural property. They also had debt relating to these investments—however, the value of investments far exceeded their level of debt;
• had lower superannuation balances than expected, given their age and income, because they were self-employed. Accordingly, the investors had not been required to make compulsory superannuation contributions and had only made irregular voluntary contributions in the past;
• had minimal levels of insurance; and
• had a cash flow surplus and were seeking advice to ensure they were making the most of all their financial opportunities.
The SOA had also recommended that the investors fully utilise their concessional contributions cap and transfer their rural property (valued at $600,000 and held in their personal names) into their SMSF.A complete review of the advice file revealed that, although the starting balance of the SMSF was low, the advice was appropriate because:
• the recommendations in the SOA ensured that the fund would quickly build to a cost-effective level;• the investors already had corporate structures and were familiar with arranging their finances in this manner; and
• the SOA covered issues such as information about product replacement, insurance, estate planning, cash flow and efficient debt management.
The licensee was able to efficiently complete its review because the advice file was easy to follow, contained a full fact find and detailed file notes, and the SOA was clear, concise and easy to read.
Commentary:
The advice was appropriate because the investors’ personal circumstances demonstrated they had experience with different assets and investment structures.
They also had the ability to build the SMSF balance quickly and ensure that the SMSF would be cost-effective for them over their lifetime.
</body></html>

ASIC advice on the appropriate establishment of a low balance SMSF

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF investing in shares:
An investor approached an advice provider about purchasing listed shares with their superannuation.
The investor’s existing superannuation fund did not provide this option so the investor sought advice about an appropriate alternative that would allow them to purchase listed shares.
The investor undertook their own research and selected a portfolio of blue chip shares that they intended to buy and hold as a long-term investment.
The advice provider determined that the investor was not nearing retirement and was correctly prioritising the repayment of their mortgage.
The advice provider appropriately scaled the advice to the recommendation of a superannuation account that suited the specific needs of the investor.
Commentary:
The advice provider determined that the needs of the investor were not complex and identified an APRA-regulated superannuation fund that offered all of the features that the investor required at a competitive price.
The advice provider also considered an SMSF for the investor, but decided that it would not be suitable, given that the investor was looking for a simple option and had no desire to be actively involved in the administration of the fund.
The advice provider appropriately recommended the APRA-regulated fund to the investor.
</body></html>

ASIC advisory: purchasing shares with superannuation

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF investing in real property:
A couple in their early 50s received advice on establishing an SMSF.
The advice provider discussed the various investment options and asset classes available to the SMSF.
The investors informed the advice provider that they were experienced real property investors, having acquired three investment properties in their personal name, and that they now wished to use their superannuation savings to purchase a further investment property with the assistance of gearing.
The advice provider undertook further inquiries and determined that the investors:
• owned their home outright and had no dependants;
• had an investment property portfolio totalling $1 million, with investment loans of $800,000 and 20 years remaining on the term of the loans;
• had combined superannuation totalling $200,000 to which they only contributed superannuation guarantee contributions;
• earned a combined annual income of $120,000 which only just covered their annual living expenses, tax and the commitments for their investments; and
• intended to retire in 10 years time with a retirement income of $60,000 per year in today’s dollars.
The advice provider immediately identified the following issues for the investors:
• they had no budget, which was limiting their ability to contribute to superannuation and accumulate retirement savings;
• they had no plan in place to repay their investment loans before retirement;• the establishment of a real property investment in the SMSF would further increase their outstanding debt and concentrated investment exposure to direct real property; and
• to retire in 10 years with an annual retirement income of $60,000 in today’s dollars, they would require retirement savings of around $1.5 million in 10 years time.
Following a discussion with the investors, it was decided that the SMSF real property investment was not appropriate for the investors.
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News