Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
The self-managed superannuation industry has welcomed the government's decision to abandon amendments that would have introduced new regulations on off-market transfers between related parties.
The decision to abandon the amendment comes as the government passed its superannuation reforms – including the passage of the long-awaited loss-carry back scheme for small businesses, first announced last year.
Small business and tax industry officials have been worried the government won't be able to pass many of its scheduled reforms by the time Parliament ends its current session, which is the last before the September election.
Andrea Slattery, chief executive of the Self-Managed Superannuation Fund Professionals Association of Australia, said the organisation was "very pleased" by the move to abandon the regulation of off-market transfers.
"We've always had the feeling this was something that if people understood what it was, then there wouldn't be such an interest in actually introducing the legislation," she says.
"We're very pleased this piece of legislation has been removed," she says, although adds the government should still examine what would be best practice in this area.
Dan Butler, principal at DBA Lawyers says the removal of the amendment is a positive given <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/050719-relief-for-diy-super-funds-off-market-transfers-ban-delayed-by-a-year-2">there were still unknowns</a> about how the transactions would work.
"It's probably been pulled for matters of expediency, the government wants to put other matters forward too and they just haven't been able to work out an amendment that could work here."
"There were a lot of unknown issues in this. For example, with regard to real estate transfers, did you need two independent valuers, or just one? That was still unknown."
The original amendment would have banned off-market transfers between self-managed super funds and related parties.
However, analysts quickly raised problems with the amendment. The new law would mean transactions would have to be conducted on-market, such as through the Australian Securities Exchange, but the law currently restricts those types of arrangements.
Butler says dropping the amendment provides much more certainty to the industry.
"We were sitting in the dark as to how these things would work," he says, but also comments the government needs to "get its act into gear", citing a history of proposing tax changes without fully explaining them.
In the past month tax experts have warned the government still has over 100 proposed changes which haven't been legislated yet. With only a handful of sitting days left until the election, it is unlikely anything except the most important amendments will be passed.
"The government has been very poor for legislative agenda," he says. "It's quite remarkable."
Meanwhile, the government has also finally passed the loss carry-back regime, which was announced last year but until now has not been legislated.
The scheme allows businesses to claim losses of up to $1 million against tax they had already paid during the previous two years. Two new amendments have also removed the possibility a business could claim the loss carry-back during the same year it comes into existence.
The loss carry-back scheme is part of a package of tax amendments which has now been sent to the Senate for approval.
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

pmcstafford-pr9eMARWoN

SMSF industry welcomes abandoning of proposed off-market transfer amendment smsf superannuation

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds are continuing to grow in popularity with the latest figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) showing assets increased to $22 billion.
APRA’s quarterly superannuation statistics for March 31, 2013 show <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/052307-government-warned-to-back-off-on-proposed-changes-to-smsfs">SMSF assets </a>now make up 33.9% of the total $68.4 billion increase in superannuation assets in the last quarter.
SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australian director, Graeme Colley, said this increase means the total assets in SMSFs now stands at $496.2 billion or about 31.5% of the total $1.58 trillion superannuation pool.
“What these numbers say about SMSFs is positive on two fronts,” he said in a statement.
“First, that the fund trustees and their professional advisors have not missed the upswing in the equity markets in this quarter or over the past year.”
Colley said the investment performance of the SMSF sector has been on a par or better than the other sectors.
“Second, that despite the market volatility of the past years post the global financial crisis, people still want to take control of their superannuation and be responsible for it,” he said.
“This reflects both a growing awareness by trustees of superannuation and their capacity to be able to get professional advice on all issues pertaining to the management of their SMSF.”
A spokesperson from the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees said the APRA data showed industry funds were aware of the market competition from SMSFs and are increasingly offering products which compete.
“While the figures also show strong growth in the SMSF sector, superannuation funds are increasingly offering innovative, good value new products and services, which mirror some of the features of self-managed funds and aim to help retain members, particularly those with large balances,” the spokesperson said.
This article originally appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

cwaters-YrtBR88nBe

APRA figures show SMSF assets have hit $22 billion

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Your SMSF could be hurt by proposed super and pension changes

<html><body>
The federal government’s off again, on again super tax grab has likely done irreparable damage to public confidence in Australia’s superannuation system and simultaneously created the likelihood of a future lose-lose environment for up to 50% of self-managed super funds.  
Many more Australian super fund holders will be hit both in short and long term bull and bear markets than the government has conceded and the short term ‘cash grab’ nature of this proposed legislation has ridden roughshod over much needed long term vision which will short change Australia of future infrastructure investment.  
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Whilst the government has argued it will only target super funds with balances of $2 million or more</a>, funds with just a quarter of this figure may in better years accrue earnings revenue that easily exceeds the $100,000 cap and therefore be subject to the punitive higher rate of tax. Case in point is the significant positive upturn seen in the Australian share market which over the last 12 months has exceeded the 20% growth necessary for someone with an investment balance of $500,000 in their super to see a return of $100,000 or more if cashed out for retirement purposes or to pay out home loans.  
Furthermore, for someone hitting the age of 60 there is now a strong likelihood of living a further 30 years and given the cyclical nature of investments many self-funded pensioners could see themselves selling down portfolios when entering downward markets only to be hit with taxes to safeguard their retirement funds. Conversely when they buy back in and in the next cycle sell will be hit with further taxes.  
This means the possibility of four to six tax penalties over their remaining life.  
The government’s lack of foresight will create a lose-lose situation whereby people entering retirement on this figure will over the next 30 years likely see their retirement fund slashed with cyclical downward directions and and then when the market corrects itself they will get slugged again. The super cash grab tax will not just hurt retirees but also small business owners wanting to sell their businesses  
In the current regime small business concessions allow business owners to roll between $500,000 and $1,200,000 of profits from sale of business into superannuation. Given this will automatically be subject to potentially higher tax, business owners are likely to reconsider where they put their funds and look instead at more risky mechanisms than the current relative safety of their super. The hot spots for proposed legislative changes will now see the possibility of the business owner having to pay more tax if they invest through superannuation than if investing outside.  
This is completely at odds with the purpose of superannuation. Small business, property owners and self-funded retirees are the hardest hit again. The compulsory contributions increase from 9% to 12% over time, younger Australians who indubitably will accumulate substantial funds in their super will find themselves in the $500,000 target ‘super pool’ many years before retirement.  
With approximately 50% of self-managed super funds having a balance between $200,000 and $1,000,000 (many more than advertised) hard working Australians will be hit by this regressive impost over time. We could even see the hard work of many experts that have successfully pushed financial literacy into the school curriculum negatively impacted by the constant change in what should be long term and stable financial legislation.  
The industry has talked about a class divide, but the reality is that here we have a government setting itself up against small business, property investors and SMSF trustees as well as every day Australians. This is almost a silent push to get people out of super, which is ironic given it was the same party that introduced the compulsive scheme in the first instance.  
Equally concerning is the lack of government acknowledgement, let alone vision, for the potential of wide scale super fund investment in domestic infrastructure projects, with the heads of large super funds readily admitting that they have funds to invest but no dedicated infrastructure assets in which to invest thanks to the government’s short-sightedness.  
There is no shortage of capital to invest and as a properly managed tool for the future, super should be a mechanism for large scale capital investments that deliver tangible community benefits. For example super funds could be invested into a national first time buyer mortgage scheme which would help many Australians get onto the property ladder and over the long term bridge the growing property gap.  
We should be thinking in terms of abundance instead of scarcity, but sadly the government can’t see can’t see the forest from the trees.  
National Property, Business Tax Accounting and Wealth Advisory Group Chan &amp; Naylor supports the Business Council of Australia’s call to action for the current and future governments to end short-term political fixes in favour of substantial economic reform.
Ken Raiss is a certified accountant and director of <a target="_self" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" title="Chan &amp; Naylor " rel="nofollow">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> national accounting firm. Chan &amp; Naylor offers a free five-minute question-and-answer session on its website under the<a target="_blank" href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/ask-the-experts/" rel="nofollow"> "Ask the Experts" section.</a>
</body></html>

kenraiss-JsVyb3YKka

Government's SMSF changes a lose-lose situation for many funds: Ken Raiss

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds (SMSFs) experienced the largest growth in the number of tax returns lodged over 2010-11 by entity type rising to 391,163, according to the latest release of ATO figures.

This was an increase of 4.8% from 373,195 SMSF tax returns lodged 2009-10.
The figures show that the highest allocation remains to shares (32%) and cash and term deposits (28.7%) with 3.5% invested in residential property, 11.4% in non-residential property, 4.2% invested in listed property trusts and 8.8% invested in unlisted property trusts.
In total 14.9 million tax returns were lodged, an increase of 2.1% from 2009-10.
Individual returns represented 84.7% of all tax returns lodged.
 
Self–managed super funds, 2010–11 and 2011–12 financial years
 
<table width="349" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" border="1" dir="ltr"><tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Self–managed super funds
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
2010–111
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
2011–12
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Funds (no.)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
442,987
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
478,263
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Members2 (no.)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
846,227
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
913,550
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Assets2 ($m)
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
423,232
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
438,995
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
 

Asset allocation across self–managed super funds, 2009–10 and 2010–11 income years
 
<table width="349" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" border="1" dir="ltr"><tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" rowspan="2" valign="top" height="17">
Asset type
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="17">
2009–102
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="17">
2010–11
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="17%" valign="top" height="7">
%
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="50%" valign="top" height="7">
%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Listed Shares
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
31.4
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
32.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Cash and term deposits
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
27.1
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
28.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Non-residential real property
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
11.5
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
11.4
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Unlisted trusts
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
9.6
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
8.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Other Managed Investments
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
5.0
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Listed trusts
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.9
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Residential real property
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
3.7
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
3.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Unlisted Shares
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
1.2
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
1.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Overseas assets3
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
0.9
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
0.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Other assets4
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.8
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
4.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
Total5
</td>
<td colspan="2" width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
100.0
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top" height="7">
100.0
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

SMSF tax return numbers rise 4.8% in 2010-11 to 391,000: ATO figures

<html><body>
The possibility of a taking an un-interrupted walk at lunch time in the Melbourne CBD is rare these days.
If you manage to avoid the charity muggers with their cheesy grins and clipboards, you’re more than likely to run into someone trying to hand you a flyer for a free seminar promising to make you rich through SMSF property investment.
The latest gang spruiking their free property investment seminar is Ray White SouthBank.
A short walk down Flinders Lane  and back along Collins Street and I passed at least half a dozen people dressed in Ray White branded outfits handing out fliers suggesting that I learn about property investment while enjoying a free lunch at the Rendezvous Grand Hotel on May 2.
The flyer promises a “beginner’s guide to profitable property investing” include a free “crash course” in “how to pay off a mortgage in a fraction of the time, or structure your investment by using your super fund”.
In previous months it was the Park Trent Property Group spruiking their property investment seminars with similar flyers handed out on just about every street corner.
Another round of free Park Trent webinars is taking place this week across the country promising a 90 minute conference including among other things “how to “borrow within your self managed super fund for property investment”.
This type of promotion comes as growing numbers of people look to set up a self-managed super fund to be able to invest in property – the ATO expects up to 1,000 applications a week this month and next - but with many not knowing how to do so or the risks involved.
This week, the Australian Financial Review’s superannuation writer Sally Patten highlighted some of the findings of the Centre for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College’s report on the $5 trillion retirement savings industry, including the issue of low levels of financial literacy when it comes to super.
“Workers will need some level of financial literacy to understand and manage their retirement accounts and the level currently appears to be quite low,” says the report which can be downloaded for free on the <a href="https://crr.bc.edu/" target="_blank">CRR website.</a>
No doubt such seminars will look to cash in on this lack of knowledge, but equally, a strong desire to get onto the property market and make the returns so often highlighted in property investment magazines – though not always alongside the tragic stories of investments gone wrong.
The Ray White Southbank flyer certainly plays on this fear on missing out.
It’s first four sentences read:
“Have you ever…
THOUGHT about property investing…but where to start?
WONDERED how others have managed to get so far ahead?
WISHED you could begin accumulating property for your own financial future?
It comes as ASIC looks to clamp down on the misleading advertisement of property investment, particurlarly promotions via flyers and online ads that do not include information about the risks involved in investing or the fees or costs associated with setting up an SMSF.
Yesterday Property Observer wrote of an <a target="_blank" href="/news">ASIC special taskforce investigation </a>into the advertising of seminars in Melbourne’s sand belt suburbs prepared by a real estate agency in partnership with an accounting firm, mortgage broker and law firm.
ASIC’s chief concern is that advertising of property investment through self-managed super funds should provide a "balanced message about the returns, features, benefits and risks associated with the product" and that it protects the vulnerable from unscrupulous spruikers.
Neither the Ray White Southbank flyer, nor the Park Trent seminar I attended last year spoke of the risk of property investment.
The Ray White Southbank seminar is due to take place at the Rendezvous Grand Hotel on Flinders Street on May 2.
Coincidentally, this is the same hotel where I attended the free Park Trent seminar last year with around 50 other people, with complimentary lunch provided.
The Park Trent seminar focused on the low-risk nature of investing in property, beginning with a slide with the heading “safe as houses” and the familiar story that if you’re not investing in property now you may not have enough income to sustain you in retirement.
No mention was made of the risk of investing in property or fees involved.
Attendees were asked to tick a box on a form if they wished to receive further information and possible one on one meetings with Park Trent advisors.
The closest Park Trent came to disclosing the risks of property investment was this comment made at the end of the presentation.
“You won’t see me on A Current Affair," said the seminar presenter.
"We don’t appeal to the greedy and gullible.”
</body></html>

SMSF property spruikers competing with charity muggers on Melbourne street corners

<html><body>
Four Melbourne businesses running seminars on investing in real estate through self-managed super funds are being investigated by ASIC over the potentially misleading nature of flyers, advertisements and online ads promoting these seminars.
The four businesses operating in the 'sand belt' region of the city - a law firm, a mortgage broker, a real estate agency and a firm of chartered accountants – are named in a leaked letter sent by ASIC commissioner Peter Kell to Liberal MP Peter Fletcher.
The letter was obtained by the Australian Financial Review.
Their last known seminar was held in late 2011.
It follows a review of property sales by the special SMSF taskforce established last year by ASIC chairman Greg Tanzer to examine “high-risk SMSF issues” with its first major project, being “looking at the quality of advice provided to investors”.
ASIC has yet to form an opinion as to whether the material being promoted by these four companies was unlawful.
It comes as part of an ASIC drive to improve the quality of advice provided to SMSF trustees as the sector continues to expand as does the appeal of property as an income-generating asset to hold in these funds.
A spokesperson for ASIC would not comment on the companies named in the letter, but told Property Observer it was “cracking down on the sector, including advertising”. He said ASIC had released guidance for how investing in property through SMSFs should be advertised and expected promoters to adhere to these guidelines.
“We don’t want SMSF investors to become the targets of unscrupulous spruikers," he said.
The guidance on advertising is contained in <a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/pdflib.nsf/LookupByFileName/rg234-published-15-November-2012.pdf/%24file/rg234-published-15-November-2012.pdf" target="_blank">Regulatory Guide 234</a> - Advertising financial products and services (including credit): Good practice guidance.
“Advertisements for financial products and credit products should give a balanced message about the returns, features, benefits and risks associated with the product. Benefits should not be given undue prominence compared with risks,” reads the guide.
ASIC established its special SMSF taskforce in September last year.
In a speech made earlier this month ASIC commissioner Peter Kell said it had been established due to several concerning developments including “an increase in geared investment strategies and increasingly aggressive advertising for SMSFs”.
ASIC does not regulate direct property investment, except where the investment is made through an SMSF.
“In the last year we have seen a rise in SMSF advertising. Unfortunately, we’ve seen more blatant examples of misleading or deceptive advertisements. Particular problem areas we have seen include misleading or deceptive statements about SMSF fees, returns and risks,” said Kell in his speech.
Following this speech, Kell later warned that ASIC “did not want to see SMSFs become the vehicle of choice for property spruikers.
“Where we see examples of unlicensed SMSF advice, or misleading marketing, we will be taking regulatory action," he said.
In its report on the sector released earlier this month, ASIC said it had seen “blatant examples of misleading or deceptive advertising and have taken regulatory action to stop these advertisements”.
“Particular problem areas we have seen include misleading or deceptive statements about SMSF fees; SMSF returns; and SMSF risks.
Misleading advertising of property investment through self-managed super funds can result in ASIC seeking civil penalties of up to $340,000 for an individual or $1.7 million for a body corporate, investors being compensated and orders seeking correct disclosure.
ASIC’s particular areas of focus over the next 12 months are:
<ul>
<li>enforcement—looking at unlicensed financial advice, misleading or deceptive advertising in relation to SMSFs, and continuing to actively pursue enforcement matters in the SMSF sector; </li>
<li>policy implementation—working with accountants following the Government’s announcement to remove the accountants’ exemption, consulting on SMSF issues (e.g. SMSF disclosure requirements and the costs of establishing an SMSF) and registering SMSF auditors; and </li>
<li>education and disclosure—continuing our financial literacy work, updating our MoneySmart website to provide Australian consumers with useful and reliable information about all types of superannuation, including SMSFs, and examining investor attitudes to SMSFs. </li>
</ul>
In March, the Australian Taxation Office revealed it expects more than 1,000 applications a week to be lodged for SMSFs in May and June this year.
<ul></ul>
</body></html>

Melbourne sandbelt SMSF property spruikers face ASIC probe over seminar advertising

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF with a likely low opening balance:
An AFS licensee conducted its regular review of advice files with a focus on SMSF advice.
The licensee reviewed a file for a couple in their 40s who sought financial product advice on all aspects of their financial situation.
The SOA recommended the investors set up an SMSF by rolling over their existing superannuation balance of $87,000.
At first glance, and based on the investors’ existing superannuation balance alone, the licensee thought the advice appeared to be inappropriate.
However, a thorough review of the advice file and SOA revealed that the investors:• were both professionals, with a combined income of $700,000;
• had multiple trust and company structures established;
• in addition to their family home, had multiple investment properties, including a rural property. They also had debt relating to these investments—however, the value of investments far exceeded their level of debt;
• had lower superannuation balances than expected, given their age and income, because they were self-employed. Accordingly, the investors had not been required to make compulsory superannuation contributions and had only made irregular voluntary contributions in the past;
• had minimal levels of insurance; and
• had a cash flow surplus and were seeking advice to ensure they were making the most of all their financial opportunities.
The SOA had also recommended that the investors fully utilise their concessional contributions cap and transfer their rural property (valued at $600,000 and held in their personal names) into their SMSF.A complete review of the advice file revealed that, although the starting balance of the SMSF was low, the advice was appropriate because:
• the recommendations in the SOA ensured that the fund would quickly build to a cost-effective level;• the investors already had corporate structures and were familiar with arranging their finances in this manner; and
• the SOA covered issues such as information about product replacement, insurance, estate planning, cash flow and efficient debt management.
The licensee was able to efficiently complete its review because the advice file was easy to follow, contained a full fact find and detailed file notes, and the SOA was clear, concise and easy to read.
Commentary:
The advice was appropriate because the investors’ personal circumstances demonstrated they had experience with different assets and investment structures.
They also had the ability to build the SMSF balance quickly and ensure that the SMSF would be cost-effective for them over their lifetime.
</body></html>

ASIC advice on the appropriate establishment of a low balance SMSF

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF investing in shares:
An investor approached an advice provider about purchasing listed shares with their superannuation.
The investor’s existing superannuation fund did not provide this option so the investor sought advice about an appropriate alternative that would allow them to purchase listed shares.
The investor undertook their own research and selected a portfolio of blue chip shares that they intended to buy and hold as a long-term investment.
The advice provider determined that the investor was not nearing retirement and was correctly prioritising the repayment of their mortgage.
The advice provider appropriately scaled the advice to the recommendation of a superannuation account that suited the specific needs of the investor.
Commentary:
The advice provider determined that the needs of the investor were not complex and identified an APRA-regulated superannuation fund that offered all of the features that the investor required at a competitive price.
The advice provider also considered an SMSF for the investor, but decided that it would not be suitable, given that the investor was looking for a simple option and had no desire to be actively involved in the administration of the fund.
The advice provider appropriately recommended the APRA-regulated fund to the investor.
</body></html>

ASIC advisory: purchasing shares with superannuation

<html><body>
The recent ASIC review of SMSF advice revealed a number of areas for improvement in the advice-giving process.
Given the risks associated with a DIY option, ASIC has issued guidelines on the things advice providers and investors should discuss and consider before setting up an SMSF.
They outline some practical tips that advice providers can use to improve the quality of SMSF advice they provide to investors.
ASIC set out a scenario as to appropriate advice when it came to a SMSF investing in real property:
A couple in their early 50s received advice on establishing an SMSF.
The advice provider discussed the various investment options and asset classes available to the SMSF.
The investors informed the advice provider that they were experienced real property investors, having acquired three investment properties in their personal name, and that they now wished to use their superannuation savings to purchase a further investment property with the assistance of gearing.
The advice provider undertook further inquiries and determined that the investors:
• owned their home outright and had no dependants;
• had an investment property portfolio totalling $1 million, with investment loans of $800,000 and 20 years remaining on the term of the loans;
• had combined superannuation totalling $200,000 to which they only contributed superannuation guarantee contributions;
• earned a combined annual income of $120,000 which only just covered their annual living expenses, tax and the commitments for their investments; and
• intended to retire in 10 years time with a retirement income of $60,000 per year in today’s dollars.
The advice provider immediately identified the following issues for the investors:
• they had no budget, which was limiting their ability to contribute to superannuation and accumulate retirement savings;
• they had no plan in place to repay their investment loans before retirement;• the establishment of a real property investment in the SMSF would further increase their outstanding debt and concentrated investment exposure to direct real property; and
• to retire in 10 years with an annual retirement income of $60,000 in today’s dollars, they would require retirement savings of around $1.5 million in 10 years time.
Following a discussion with the investors, it was decided that the SMSF real property investment was not appropriate for the investors.
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News