Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
Buyers should be able to pinpoint reasons why a particular property will appreciate in value and, if they can’t, they should give it a miss.  
Perth property researcher Gavin Hegney, founding director of LMW Hegney, says this is particularly relevant now as many older buyers – often through their SMSFs - base their retirement incomes on, hopefully, rising property values.  
Presently, growth in the self-managed super funds and their frequent use as property-buying vehicles – perhaps in over 70% of transactions - has prompted some commentators to say they are helping create a property ‘bubble’.  
While property investing is an acknowledged ‘super’ strategy, it can only be judged on the income a property generates and its increase in value over time.  
Mr Hegney says that, to generate a decent income, a property has to have a good reason to grow in value. Investors should be able to identify that - or those - reasons before buying.  
‘’My thoughts are not so much the volume, but that often the SMSFs are buying the wrong types of properties,’’ he said.  
‘’Regardless of the ownership of the property, be it in a private name or a SMSF, its financial success relies on one thing: that the property goes up in value and that, when combined with the rental return, that it creates wealth for the owner or beneficiaries over time.  
‘’History has shown that, to create wealth during the early and mid section of the property cycle, there must be a realistic and identifiable reason why a property will increase in value, and the owner must have a best guesstimate as to what that value should be.  
Mr Hegney said experience and research can help identify these points.  
He said significant developments in most capital cities will have a knock-on effect on the values of property in surrounding areas. For instance, in Sydney it may be the effect of the Barangaroo development and its flow-on effect to specific pockets of Sydney, or, in Perth, it may be the City Link and waterfront developments and their knock-on effects.  
‘’There are numerous examples in most cities which simply require an identification of major changes and then an answer to the question: ‘What would this property be worth if this new development or infrastructure was in place?’  
‘’One concern I do have is where a SMSF simply buys a new apartment that has very little identifiable reason to increase in value, and then holds onto that property for 10-20 years .  
‘’Typically, that new apartment of, say, $600,000 becomes worth, say, only $450,000 as a 20-year-old apartment in today’s dollar terms.  
‘’That difference in value must be made up in value terms, plus a reasonable growth factor as well, before the owner of the new apartment creates real wealth.  
‘’If it has a real location reason to increase in value it may be worth buying, but, without it then the prospect of real growth may be very difficult.’’  
Mr Hegney said this situation ‘’becomes very interesting’’ considering that SMSFs today control about $200 billion in property investments with gearing of around $2.4 billion.  
‘’If they decided to gear up then this sector could increase over 100-fold in today's dollars. Let’s hope most of them get it right.’’    
</body></html>

staylor-63KgDrKwoY

SMSF investors should be able to pinpoint reasons for property rises before they buy

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds (SMSFs), also known as DIY super funds, have been in the news lately regarding their alleged propensity for borrowing to invest in property.
Proponents of both sides of the argument have put forward their case and, needless to say, the sector will continue to come under scrutiny from the regulators, including the ATO and ASIC.
For its part, as the main regulator of SMSFs, the Tax Office says it tries to help super fund trustees and the professionals who assist them to <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/big-money/057730-big-money-the-reason-our-superannuation-system-doesn-t-work">understand their obligations</a>(and there are plenty of those!) and comply with these voluntarily.
While the ATO considers that SMSFs “generally operate in a well-run market”, ATO assistant deputy commissioner in charge of superannuation Stuart Forsyth says there are however a number of risk areas it is keeping an eye on. These include:
<ul>
<li>
Trustees and SMSF professionals who fail to understand SMSF obligations
</li>
<li>
Trustees who fail to voluntarily comply with their SMSF obligations, including lodgement of returns
</li>
<li>
Approved SMSF auditors who fail to undertake audits appropriately or fail to report contraventions of the rules to the ATO
</li>
<li>
Trustees who intentionally take inappropriate actions with their SMSFs, such as setting them up for illegal early release or down the track obtaining early access to money in the fund without meeting a condition of release
</li>
<li>
Professionals who promote and assist in the establishment of SMSFs for inappropriate reasons
</li>
</ul>
SMSFs have a myriad of rules to comply with. These include reporting of payments of fund member benefits, appointing an approved auditor, and maintaining the appropriate records. In the current environment, perhaps the most notable requirement is complying with the numerous investment restrictions that the law imposes, for example:
<ul>
<li>
The ‘sole purpose test’ – the law requires an SMSF to be maintained solely for at least one of the legislated core purposes, i.e. the provision of benefits upon retirement, attaining age 65 or death.
</li>
<li>
Trustees of an SMSF are prohibited from intentionally acquiring assets from fund members or a related party (although some limited exceptions apply).
</li>
<li>
An SMSF is generally restricted from having more than 5% of its total assets invested in so-called ‘in-house’ assets – these include a loan to a related party, an investment in a related trust of the fund, and an asset of the fund subject to a lease with a related party.
</li>
</ul>
The law generally prohibits funds from borrowing money, but there is an exception for so-called limited recourse borrowing arrangements (e.g. instalment warrants). Assets acquired with these borrowings must be kept separate from other assets of the fund. Money borrowed under these rules can be used in maintaining or repairing an asset. An SMSF trustee looking to acquire property via a limited recourse borrowing arrangement should obtain independent advice in relation to the borrowing agreement and the establishment of the holding trust structure.
Forsyth said the ATO is planning more comprehensive audits and closer scrutiny of annual returns and auditor contravention reports. He said the annual independent SMSF audit is a critical factor in the ongoing tax concessional treatment of SMSFs, satisfying the government and the community that SMSFs are meeting their obligations.
Forsyth said SMSF trustees should comply, lodge on time and (reflecting the comments made above) ensure that transactions such as limited recourse borrowing arrangements are undertaken with care. Limited recourse borrowing is an area where there are risks of breaches which can be very expensive and may not be easily rectified if professional advice had not been sought, he said.
SMSF fund trustees should check and understand the deed of the fund to ensure they are clear in what it allows and does not allow.
The ATO will review breaches of trustee obligations reported to it by approved SMSF auditors.
Other issues for SMSF trustees to be aware of are that they are now are required to value their fund’s assets at market value. They must also regularly review the fund’s investment strategy, and should consider the needs of insurance for members. The ATO is sure to be checking on these requirements.
One of the main changes affecting SMSF trustees this year has been that, from July 1, 2013, auditors have had to be registered with ASIC to undertake an SMSF audit. Forsyth said that from now on, when an SMSF annual return is lodged with the ATO, the ATO will check that the return has an SMSF auditor number (SAN) on it and that the number has been registered by ASIC. If there is no SAN or the number is not recognised as a registered auditor, the ATO will not accept the lodgment. SMSF trustees need to be particularly careful about this requirement.
From July 1, 2014, large and medium employers (those with more than 20 employees) will start paying super contributions using the new superannuation data and payment standard. SMSFs receiving contributions from these employers will need to receive them using the new standard. This requires being able to receive electronic contribution payments (paid to a nominated bank account) and messages (sent to a nominated electronic address). The ATO intends to publish more detailed information explaining the standard, how it applies to SMSFs and what trustees need to do to comply.
The attractions of SMSFs mean we are seeing continuing strong growth in these types of super funds. The many rules and regulations surrounding the running of these funds however should not be overlooked or underestimated.

<hr>
Terry Hayes is the editor-in-chief of tax news reporting at <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/" rel="nofollow">Thomson Reuters</a>, a leading Australian provider of tax, accounting and legal information solutions.
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_parent" rel="nofollow">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

thayes-XhNcNKLNWa

Beware of the risk areas surrounding self-managed super funds: Terry Hayes

<html><body>
Rarely has there been such a concerted warning from financial regulators as we've seen in recent days about the exposure of the self-managed superannuation fund industry to investment property markets. It has now emerged as the first financial regulatory test of the new government.

For those with a memory longer than five minutes -- which doesn't seem to include Assistant Treasurer Arthur Sinodinos, based on his <a href="https://www.afr.com/p/national/economy/liberals_question_diy_super_amid_Qe0JyGDpATUuISvpx5Wd0N" target="_blank">comments in the Financial Review</a> yesterday -- it's a problem dripping with irony and big risks.

As the RBA went to some lengths to explain in Wednesday's second <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/2013/sep/pdf/0913.pdf" target="_blank">Financial Stability Review</a> of the year, this is a problem that successive federal governments have created. The RBA explains a series of legislative steps and other changes from 2006 up to 2010 that cleared the way for self-managed super funds to step up their investment in property, especially geared residential property.

The central bank said Australian households continued to show prudence in managing their finances compared with 10 years ago, with a higher rate of saving and a slower pace of credit growth. This included taking advantage of low interest rates by paying down their existing mortgage debts and other debt.

But (and there's always a but or 20 in documents like this) "[t]here are some signs that households are taking on more risk in their investment decisions,'' the RBA said. "The potential for a further increase in property gearing in self-managed superannuation funds is a development that will be monitored closely by authorities for its implications, both for risks to financial stability and consumer protection." The bank said the same in last week's RBA board minutes -- the broader context for the RBA's concern is the revival in housing price growth:

"An increase in housing market activity more generally is not surprising given reductions in interest rates. However, it is important that those purchasing property maintain realistic expectations of future dwelling price growth. In contrast to the decades leading up to the crisis -- when dwelling prices grew rapidly in response to disinflation and financial deregulation -- long-run future growth in dwelling prices might be expected to be more in line with income growth."

And to underline the importance of self-managed super funds, which now have around a fifth to a quarter of their assets in property, the RBA <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/boxes/2013/sep/d.pdf" target="_blank">devoted separate article to them</a> and this explanation in the report's foreword:

"In this issue of the Review, a particular focus has been placed on the self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) sector. Although this sector does not currently pose material risks to financial stability, it is important for the financial position of the household sector and has a number of aspects that warrant careful observation in the period ahead. Changes to legislation in recent years have permitted superannuation funds, including SMSFs, to borrow for investment, for example to purchase property."

What changes? The Howard government (when Sinodinos was Howard's chief of staff) established "Choice of Fund" for super in July 2005 in an effort to undermine the industry super sector; it allowed individuals to choose which superannuation funds, including an SMSF, their employer’s superannuation guarantee contributions are paid into. The 2007 "Simplified Superannuation" legislation eliminated tax on super benefits for over-60s and for a limited period encouraged individuals to pump up to $1 million into their super funds, which massively inflated member contributions to self-managed funds. And in 2010, borrowing rules were clarified to protect other assets in self-managed funds if funds had borrowed money to purchase assets, which had been permitted by the 2007 changes.

As the bank notes, these changes all drove SMSFs toward property investment:

"Since then, property holdings by SMSFs have increased and this type of investment strategy is being heavily promoted. The sector therefore represents a vehicle for potentially speculative demand for property that did not exist in the past. SMSFs and other retail investors have also been the dominant class of purchasers of hybrid securities recently. These investors seem to have been attracted by the higher yields offered on hybrids compared with conventional debt securities; it is important that they fully appreciate and price in the risks embedded in these more complex products."

As the history of legislative change makes clear, SMSFs are a favoured sector of the Coalition and its media cheerleaders. The Right might like retail super funds because they keep a diehard Liberal constituency, financial planners, rolling in fees, but they're ultimately run by AMP and the big banks. SMSFs have the air of rugged individualism about them. Judith Sloan, for example, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/unions-play-politics-with-super-funds/story-fnbkvnk7-1226524486152" target="_blank">has repeatedly suggested</a> that industry super funds have been "haemorraghing" members and money to SMSFs (when it's actually retail funds that have been losing out -- <a href="https://www.apra.gov.au/Super/Publications/Documents/June%202013%20Quarterly%20Superannuation%20Performance.pdf" target="_blank">the most recent APRA data</a> for 2012-13 shows industry super increasing market share while retail funds go backwards and SMSFs have been flat).

And Mathias Cormann, who was shadow assistant treasurer in opposition, used to spruik SMSFs. <a href="https://www.mathiascormann.com.au/speeches/CEDASpeech13.pdf" target="_blank">In May this year</a> he rejoiced in how "[a] growing number of Australians are taking advantage of the opportunities they perceive from self-managed super," Cormann said. "It gives you more control, it gives you choice, it gives you the opportunity to tailor your investment strategies for retirement according to your individual needs, but it also of course can come with increased risk."

Ah -- the increased risk -- especially given SMSFs are not entitled to compensation if they are the victims of theft or fraud in APRA-regulated funds. Cormann was unhappy that the previous government had left SMSFs out of compensation for the victims of the Trio fraud in which investors in APRA-regulated funds were ripped off. "In all of the circumstances, we do believe that there is a case for the government to look more closely as to whether there would be some justification for a level of compensation, if not for the full amount of the loss, but at least a level of compensation."

Cormann didn't take the bait offered at the time and back a general compensation arrangement for SMSFs -- he was only applying it to the Trio circumstances. But with SMSFs rushing into property -- and particularly riskier commercial property -- you can bet the heat will be on if a big property collapse burns a lot of SMSFs. And that heat will not merely be on politicians, but on anyone nearby with deep pockets -- which will mean the banks.

Sinodinos is now singing a different tune to Cormann's. He hasn't lauded the surge in SMSFs as the triumph of Howardesque aspirationalism and choice; instead he described it as "[o]n one level ... quite understandable". However, "we have to make sure that no matter what the vehicle is, it’s done in such a way that the ultimate objective is to preserve and maximise the savings for retirement. In the super space we need to make sure it’s a level playing field and that you get appropriate competition between the different funds, the industry funds, the self-managed super funds and that’s the starting point."

Perhaps Sinodinos forgot he was "present at the creation" of this issue back in 2005. But he, or at least the Treasury advisers who will have been briefing him over the last week, have worked out that SMSFs' exposure to the property sector contains the seeds not merely for a lot of angry victims but for a systemic problem: if the SMSF sector's $80-100 billion in property investments goes bad, the impacts will be felt well beyond retirees, into the banks and the entire property market.

<hr>
This article originally appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.crikey.com.au">Crikey</a>.
 

</body></html>

bkeane-XQ2u7CA6bB

Coalition changes its self-managed super tune as regulators fret

<html><body>
Both the Reserve Bank and the government have hinted at a crackdown on the self-managed superannuation sector, with both entities saying they are concerned about the number of property investments being made in the industry.
<a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/055187-asic-issues-warning-on-property-advisors-dabbling-in-smsfs">Corporate regulator ASIC has been worried</a> about the same thing for months – but the industry says there’s no reason to panic.
SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery said the “problem” is slightly overblown.
“The numbers show investments in property within SMSFs break down to about 80% in commercial and 20% in residential,” she says.
“From the SPAA’s point of view we think the position has been overstated that SMSFs may be supporting growth there … those numbers are so small to have any ability to influence prices.”
In its latest Financial Stability Review, the RBA said legislative changes have meant SMSFs can borrow money to invest in property – which has led to an increase in this type of activity being spruiked by advisors.
“The sector therefore represents a vehicle for potentially speculative demand for property that did not exist in the past.”
The risk, it said, is that these investments could influence property prices.
“One risk of the increase in property investment by SMSFs is that at least some of it is a new source of demand that could potentially exacerbate property price cycles,” it said.
The warning is timely – it comes as property investors and analysts across the country are speculating about the prospects of a property bubble, given relaxed lending standards and historically low interest rates.
SMSFs have been permitted to borrow money to invest in property for the last six years.
Meanwhile, Assistant Treasurer Arthur Sinodinos has told the Australian Financial Review the new government wants to keep track of SMSFs to ensure they don’t have advantages over other funds.
“In the super space we need to make sure it’s a level playing field and that you get appropriate competition between the different funds, the industry funds, the self-managed super funds, and that’s the starting point,” he said.
SMSFs have become increasingly popular since the global financial crisis, as they’ve grown a reputation for being safer investments. SMSFs are widely used by business owners.
But Andrea Slattery says there isn’t much to worry about, emphasising the government is simply conducting a review it pledged before the election.
“The SPAA is not worried the government is concerned about a level playing field … they are interested in reviewing the financial services system in general.”
However, there has been some concern over property investments. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has consistently said over the past year it will continue cracking down on dodgy SMSF advisors who promise returns in property.
Slattery says she is also concerned – but that the overall ratio of property investments doesn’t warrant panic.
“It’s important for people to be cautionary, but it’s only a small number of SMSFs which are taking out loans for property.
“We’ve been concerned about spruikers … but we note there has also been little take-up of all the hype around the spruikers, and so we encourage consumers to seek professional advice on any matters.”
 
<hr>
 
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

pmcstafford-pr9eMARWoN

Reserve Bank, government crackdown on self-managed super funds

<html><body>
Australia’s superannuation system, the fourth largest in the world, is huge and growing.
The total assets held in superannuation accounts in Australia are currently worth 100% of annual GDP. By 2033, Deloitte reports that will grow to 180% of GDP – an extraordinary savings pool for a country with historically low savings rates.
Accountancy Deloitte has, for the past six years, been conducting an annual overview of the sector, and how it is meeting Australia’s retirement needs.
The latest report, <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Australia/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/Financial%20services/Deloitte_Dynamics_of_Superannuation_2013_report.pdf">released yesterday</a>, is a fascinating glimpse into how the money that leaves our weekly pay cheque will end up serving us. Here are four gems from Deloitte’s report.
How much you need to retire comfortably
Going on current life expectancy rates, Deloitte has calculated how much super you need to retire with a ‘modest’ or ‘comfortable’ lifestyle.
For men aged 65 today, they need $330,000 in superannuation to fund themselves to the tune of a ‘modest’  $22,654 every year. For women, who generally live slightly longer, they need $360,000 in superannuation assets to pay out the same amount every year.
For those who want a ‘comfortable’ lifestyle in retirement, the figures are nearly double. A man requires $590,000 to pay themselves $41,197 a year, while women need to have $660,000 in superannuation assets for the same.
But most people don’t have anywhere near that
For most Australians nearing retirement, these figures are far, far more than they currently have in their superannuation balances.
According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, the average male 60-64 year old has $85,000 in superannuation assets. For women, who on average live longer, the disparity is even more stark – most have just $59,000 in superannuation assets.
For those slightly older – the 65-69 year olds, some of whom are already in retirement – the figures are worse. Men in that age group have, on average, $77,000 in superannuation assets while women have $55,000.
For those who have lived only a few decades under the current superannuation regime, there is no way they will have enough in their balances to fund their retirement, Deloitte notes. They will have to rely on the aged pension instead.
As the report’s author, Deloitte partner Wayne Walker, puts it, “despite the $7.6 trillion asset pool we project for 2033, [the potential of superannuation] to generate wealth and prosperity may well bat risk for the average Australian”.
“Many Australians now approaching retirement have only received super for a limited portion of their working lives as our system is still maturing.”
“The concern is that current policy settings, including changes to caps and drawdowns, and the SG 12% increase, will not deliver the lifestyle that the majority of those retiring in the next 20 years are seeking. The reality is that many Australians will need to work longer and where possible contribute more.
“To that end our report projects the possibility of Australians deferring retirement by two and five years respectively. The results are significant.”
 For Gen X, the situation is better
For those who’ve worked most of their life paying money into superannuation, the system is working, but not perfectly.
For a statistically average 30 year old working currently on $60,000 a year (the average income for people of that age), Deloitte estimates they’ll retire with $1.1 million in superannuation.
Given rising inflation, Deloitte thinks this’ll be enough to support themselves until they’re 94, but only on a ‘modest’ retirement. If this worker choses a ‘comfortable’ retirement, the $1.1 million will last them only until they’re 77. To have a comfortable retirement that doesn’t run out, Deloitte thinks that worker will need $1.6 million in superannuation assets if male, or $1.8 million if female.
Superannuation hasn’t recovered from the GFC
The financial crisis, which began in 2009, had a huge impact on Australia’s superannuation assets, eclipsing that of recent economic crises such as the dot-com crash.
Deloitte sees the superannuation asset pool remaining below GFC levels until 2016 (see graph), highlighting how much of a setback it was to the balances of millions of Australians, particularly those about to retire.
<img style="max-width: 540px; max-height: 480px;" width="470" height="355" src="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/images/stories/news/super-picture-540-408.jpg" alt="super-picture-540-408">
Industry funds as popular as SMSF
For much of the past few years, self-managed superannuation funds have <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/057570-asic-warns-smsf-trustees-when-it-comes-to-fraud-you-re-on-your-own">grown strongly in numbers</a>. But in the years to 2033, Deloitte expects industry funds to grow just as fast. Ultimately, most people move from industry funds to SMSFs as they retire.
Over the past year, growth in SMSFs has slowed, Deloitte notes. This reflects the reduction in concessional contribution limits and product innovation in industry and retail funds, which have blunted the advantages of SMSFs.
 
<hr>
 This artcile originally appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
 
</body></html>

mrobin-TVRYiru7si

How much superannuation do you need to retire comfortably?

<html><body>
The release of a report this week shows self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) are more expensive to run than once thought.
The Rice Warner report into SMSFs found that if you have $500,000 and more in a self managed fund, it is cost-competitive with public funds, but if you have between $200,000 and $500,000 in assets, the financial viability depends on how much administration work you can do yourself and whether you need advice in investing.
The costs that large funds spread across thousands of members and billions of dollars have to be met by each SMSF. They include annual audits, tax lodgements, investment arrangements, advice, administration and legal costs.
SMSFs are favoured by professionals and business owners who are confident with financial responsibility, want control over their wealth and typically want direct ownership of property. SMSFs are also popular with retirees who take an active interest in running their affairs.
One third of all Australian superannuation assets are held in these funds.
However, control is one thing: you also have to make sufficient returns to live in retirement. If your fund costs are greater than your returns, you are not doing yourself any favours.
Luckily, there are other ways of gaining control of super while avoiding the headache of SMSFs.
For a start, you could ensure that you understand every option in your current fund’s portfolio. Control can start with becoming informed about which particular investment option you should be in.
If the choices aren’t there, look around: many public superannuation funds now offer options such as cash, term deposits and direct shares. So people may be going to the extra cost of establishing an SMSF when their preferred options are available in a public fund.
One of the real advantages of an SMSF is the access you get to direct property. Recent rule changes allow superannuation funds to borrow to buy property which has seen property promoters push SMSFs as a way of buying property. However, superannuation is just a tax structure. The investment decision must still follow fundamentals: does this investment give you the required income in retirement?
For conservative retirement savers, taking more control outside an SMSF could involve public products that invest in cash and bonds, to give a similar risk profile to cash but a higher return.
I mention this because around 29% of all SMSF investments are held in cash, even though conservative retirement savers can find security in a retail environment without having to administer their own super fund.
And don’t forget to calculate the insurance benefits in a public fund. Generally the life and TPD premiums are lower in a super fund than can be sourced through a SMSF.
A final word: in the end, super assets must compound in value and (after fees) at least outstrip inflation. If you want to be in a self-managed fund, you must ensure that the costs don’t inhibit the point of the exercise, which was to have enough money to live well in retirement.

<hr>
Mark Bouris is executive chairman of <a href="https://www.ybr.com.au/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Yellow Brick Road</a>, a financial services company offering home loans, financial planning, accounting and tax, and insurance.
You can contact Mark on <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/markbouris" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

mbouris-tauSvXGAM2

SMSFs are more expensive to run than first thought: Mark Bouris

<html><body>
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission wants to beef up the mandatory disclosures advisers give to people setting up a self-managed super fund, saying in many cases the advice given doesn’t reflect the risks.
In a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byHeadline/13-243MR%20ASIC%20consults%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20SMSF%20advice?opendocument" target="_blank">report released yesterday</a>, the regulator flagged it wants to make SMSF advisers warn clients that if they set up a SMSF, they do not have access to compensation in the event of fraud or theft.
It also wants advisers to give more information about the roles and responsibilities of trustees, the costs of setting up a SMSF, as well as more information about other types of superannuation products that might be more suited to someone’s particular situation.
“When it comes to planning your retirement, establishing an SMSF is a very significant decision,” said ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell.
“We want to help ensure that the SMSF sector is healthy, and that investors make informed decisions about SMSFs.
“Our recent surveillance of the sector found that advice was not up to a standard we would like.”
The warning comes after the Trio Capital affair, which saw the company collapse in 2009 after directors and executives stole $176 million from SMSF investors in<a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/economy/056372-trio-capital-directors-accept-enforceable-undertakings-from-apra-construction-sector-contracts-for-34th-consecutive-month-midday-roundup" target="_blank">what was called “the biggest superannuation fraud in Australian history”</a> by a joint parliamentary committee. More than 6000 investors lost money after placing it into two offshore hedge funds through Trio Capital.
However, Graeme Colley, the director of technical and professional standards at the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia, says ASIC’s concerns about poor quality advice may be overblown.
“Last year, ASIC decided to have a look at advice on a very select part of the superannuation industry, which was self-managed super funds with less than $150,000 in them that had received advice on property investments where the property was mortgaged. Looking at those, they concluded that the advice being given wasn’t adequate.
“But it was a very selective sample.
“Unfortunately, ASIC hasn’t provided examples of the poor or inadequate advice it saw.”
ASIC also released a report yesterday by actuaries Rice Warner, which looked at the minimum balances needed before SMSFs become cost-effective relative to other superannuation arrangements.
“Through our consultation we are looking to encourage further discussion and explore the issues relating to SMSF costs with industry and consumer stakeholders,” Kell said. “We think that understanding the costs associated with having an SMSF will help advisers and their clients consider whether a SMSF is a cost-effective option when compared with an APRA-regulated fund.
“ASIC does not want to see an influx of trustees who are ill-equipped to cope with the responsibilities and obligations of running a SMSF.”
The report found that when the maximum level of compliance administration is assumed, SMSFs do not become cost-effective when they have balances of less than $500,000.
However, many trustees do their own administration and compliance, which means the costs of maintaining a SMSF would be lower, Peter Burgess, the head of policy and technical at AMP SMSF said.
“This is in line with what we already knew – you need a reasonable amount in your SMSF for it to be cost-effective.
“But cost isn’t the only consideration here. There are other reasons to manage your own super – you might have specific estate-planning needs, or want to take advantage of specific investment opportunities and so on.
“And while it’s not cost-effective for very low balances, when you have more than $100,000 in your fund, it does depend on how much work you’re doing yourself. It’s hard to get data on this, but a significant amount of trustees do their administration work and so forth themselves. This can make it cost-effective below the $500,000 threshold.”
Colley was also reluctant to accept the higher threshold, saying that in his experience most trustees contribute to the operation of their fund.
“Much of the work with these funds is done by the trustees, so the expense is exaggerated. The Rice Warner report does say that where trustees do contribute, the running cost is around 1.5% of assets. In my view, that’s at the upper end, but probably more realistic.
“We think the $200,000 threshold mentioned by both ASIC and the ATO many years ago is still valid when it comes to cost-effectiveness.”
Recently, ASIC has flagged its <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/superannuation/054815-asic-sounds-warning-bell-on-smsfs-2">concerns about the growth of the self-managed superannuation industry</a>, saying the increasing amount of money being held in SMSFs could prompt newcomers who are far less financially sophisticated to set up their own funds.
The self-managed superannuation industry now holds just under a third of all the money held by Australians in superannuation, having grown around 20% per annum in recent years. There is now $439 billion in assets held by SMSFs. There are over a million SMSF trustees who together manage half a million SMSFs.
Colley does not believe SMSFs are necessarily more risky than investing through a major fund.
“There are two persistent criticisms around SMSFs. One is that trustees don’t know what they’re doing, and the other is that SMSFs are being used by property spruikers to invest in property.
“I was at a major super fund conference earlier this year when one of the speakers got up and said: ‘If you think SMSFs are jokes, who don’t do as well, you need to think again’. They do, roughly, 1% better, on average, than bigger super funds.
“And there’s a huge amount of noise around property, but if you look at the statistics, less than half of 1% of SMSFs invest in property loans.”
Burgess believes there’s still further growth to be had for the industry. “There’s still significant room to grow. There’s a lot of research and statistics out there that shows there are plenty of people with tendencies that could benefit from a self-managed super fund, but who don’t currently have one.”
 
<hr>
 This article was originally publsihed on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
 
</body></html>

ASIC warns that when it comes to fraud, SMSF trustees are on their own

<html><body>
If you are thinking about setting up a SMSF, then there are five things that you must do:
1. Seek professional advice
If you set up an SMSF, you're in control – you make the investment decisions for the fund and you are responsible for complying with the law.
Your personal circumstances will determine the effectiveness of a SMSF strategy, so seek out quali?ed licensed professionals to help you. Licensed financial planners and accountants can help you understand what's involved and advise you on your options.  Advice provided to you at a BBQ is not considered professional, so be very wary of free advice or free SMSF set ups as these can be traps and could ruin your retirement plans.
2. Know the laws and understand the risks
Think carefully about your investment options and how you can manage the associated risks.
You need to consider the short, medium and long term investment strategy of the fund and the level of risk each member is comfortable with.
All funds must maintain a degree of liquidity so be aware of this, spreading risk by diversifying a portfolio will require previous investment knowledge or expert advice.
With control also comes responsibility and in a SMSF that lands squarely on the shoulders of the trustees. If you decide to set up an SMSF, you’re legally responsible for all the decisions made, even if you get professional advice.
Remember that superannuation has one purpose, saving for your retirement; this means using your super funds for anything else prior to retirement could be deemed illegal and fraudulent.
3. Ask yourself, ‘do I have what it takes?’
The main responsibility of a trustee is making sure that your funds are invested appropriately, so ask yourself:
<ul>
<li>
Do I have the time and knowledge required to maintain and operate a fund?
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
Do I have the confidence and ability to make sound investment decisions?
</li>
<li>
Can I meet the obligations that are required to be a trustee?
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
Can I outperform the professional funds managers?
</li>
</ul>
If you're not sure you can get the best result, you will need to employ the services of professionals. Choose these professionals wisely.
4. Make sure it’s right for you
Just because you can set up a SMSF doesn’t mean you should. Establishing and maintaining a fund is not for everyone, so if you are not happy with your existing funds poor returns seek professional advice and make sure that a SMSF is right for you.
5. Build your A-team of professionals
After you have thoroughly considered your options, and you decide that a SMSF is the way to go, get to work on building your A-team.  Most successful SMSF investors will have a team that they have put in place to the get the best results; this will generally be made up of a financial planner, accountant, auditor, mortgage broker, and solicitor. Also more recently qualified property investment advisers, buyer's agents and property managers have been playing very important roles in the process for investors.
 
<hr>
 Julian Fadini is director of <a target="_blank" href="https://bellevuecapital.com.au/?">Bellevue Capital Financial Services</a>.
 
 
</body></html>

jfadini-mreomShgeV

Protect your golden egg; five steps to help set up an SMSF: Julian Fadini 

<html><body>
The Australian residential property market is the largest domestic asset class, with an aggregate total value estimated at $4.2 trillion. The investor segment, where the occupants are renters with a private landlord, represents 23.7% of Australia’s 8,711,000 total occupied private dwellings. Investors equate with a market value of $985 billion. Owner occupiers retain the majority of ownership of residential property in Australia.
While the total size of residential asset class dwarfs the Australian share market (around $1.4 trillion), fixed interest market (around $1.2 trillion) and commercial property market (around $600 billion), there has been almost no investment in residential property from institutional superannuation. There has however been considerable interest in residential property from SMSFs.
The steady growth in residential property assets and total assets within SMSFs over the past five years is shown in the chart below.
SMSFs - Residential property and total assets
Click to enlarge
<a title="Click to enlarge" href="/images/stories/2013/08/easton-chart-aug-30-big.png" rel="shadowbox"><img src="/images/stories/2013/08/easton-chart-aug-30-small.png"></a>
ABS – Australian Social Trends – Housing, National Summary, 1998–2012
As shown in the chart above, SMSF investment in residential property has been growing in-line with total assets. At March 31 2013 the value of residential property assets in SMSFs was just over $17 billion, representing approximately 2% of the value of total residential property investment.
Trustees of SMSFs may be attracted to residential property for a number of reasons. There is the familiarity with the asset class for most Australians either through owning their home or investment property or both.
Property is a tangible asset that can be researched online and is accessible. Prospective investors can visit the site to gauge the desirability of the location, the likelihood of attracting good tenants and for the potential for increase in value over time. Residential property may be attractive for trustees of self-managed superannuation funds as it enables some level of participation in management of the asset that is absent from most other asset classes.
A key driver of SMSF investment into residential property is the ability to borrow, within quite strict rules, to purchase property within superannuation. Limited recourse borrowing arrangements allow trustees to purchase an asset of greater value than would be otherwise possible with an outright purchase using equity. There are costs involved in setting up a holding trust for the asset and trustees also need to consider a range of risks of investing in residential property such as tenancy risk and whether there would be appropriate diversification within the fund.
Institutional superannuation funds have not invested in residential property due to a number of factors. Residential property tends to have a significantly lower yield than commercial property which the larger funds have the scale to invest in while SMSFs do not. Commercial property also offers tenant diversification which individual residential property does not.
The lack of a geographically diversified portfolio of sufficient size to have a meaningful impact on the return characteristics of the fund as a whole has inhibited institutional investment. An efficient management structure for an asset class that requires intensive management would also be required for institutional superannuation funds to invest in Australian residential property.

<hr>
Paul Easton is a senior analyst at <a href="https://atchison.com.au/" target="_blank">Atchison Consultants</a>
 
<div></div>
</body></html>

peaston-2dTB6MdgmG

Why SMSFs invest in residential property and institutional superannuation funds do not: Paul Easton

<html><body>
Superannuation law allows self-managed super funds to borrow to invest provided strict rules are met.
Geared assets must be held in a special trust until payment of the final installment.
And lenders cannot make a claim against any other assets of the super fund – apart from the geared asset – in the event of a default on the loan.
Martin Murden, director of SMSF consulting with the Partners Group in Melbourne, says his firm receives about one serious question a day from people who are interested in gearing through an SMSF.
“This is beyond tyre-kicking,” he emphasises.
<hr>
This article is part of Property Observer's <a href="http://propertyobserver.com.au/ebooks/free-ebook-21-dos-and-donts-for-smsf-property-investors" style="color: #000000; font-size: 15px;">free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors</a>.
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News