Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

<html><body>
An ageing population, distrust in the super system and a dependency on foreign debt will put significant strain on Australia’s retirement income system over the next 40 years and will potentially leave Aussies without enough super to retire on, according to a panel of industry experts that included David Murray, the head of the <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/42840-what-the-murray-financial-industry-report-means-for-your-business" target="_blank">Financial System Inquiry</a> (FSI).
Murray told a breakfast in Melbourne the superannuation system needed clearer objectives in the coming years.
"We need to make sure the objective of the system is clear. If it’s not, and we don’t make some improvement, we will increasingly have to ask the question: Would we have been better off without this system?” said Murray.
“It’s not clear that we’ve made an overwhelming strong start in the superannuation system. There are a lot of people that start at 3% that won’t have adequate outcomes in retirement.”
The panel, which was hosted by the Self Managed Super Fund Association, also included former Keating government advisor Don Russell, economist and former Reserve Bank board member Warwick McKibbin, and SMSF Association chief Andrea Slattery.
Ageing population
McKibbin, an economic modeller, argued while <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/superannuation/31367-smsf-experts-say-ageing-population-a-concern-for-industry" target="_blank">Australia’s ageing population</a> was not facing as much pressure as some countries, such as Japan and certain areas in Europe, we are still at the mercy of an increasing rate of old age dependency.
“Demographics is always destiny,” said McKibbin, who pointed to research showing while world economies would continue to grow, work participation rates will conversely decline.   
“Just from demographics alone, we can see there will be a fundamental slowdown in the world economy,” he says.
“The people who are working can’t support the number of old age people.”
Superannuant apathy
Russell, who was one of the architects of compulsory superannuation system, argued the public is becoming increasingly apathetic about super, and the superannuation industry was guilty of not having done enough to convince people to lock away their money for 40 years.
“Unless we can continue to convince people it’s a good deal to have their money locked, people will start saying, ‘I’ll have my money now’,” said Russell.
He said the failure of the industry to speak with one voice had discredited it in the eyes of many people and had strengthened criticism of compulsory super.
Foreign reliance
Murray, the former chief of the Commonwealth Bank, used the analogy of Australia as a bank customer to illustrate our reliance on foreign debt, saying the country could be classed as “a prolific borrower”.
He said while the country is generally “a style of borrower that does prefer to pay their debts”, it was now at risk of <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/growth/economy/42017-australia-s-aaa-credit-rating-at-risk-we-ask-three-economists-does-it-matter">the consequences of irresponsible budgetary management</a>.
“Well, what [does Australia] do when things are crook? Generally they have managed the budget fairly responsibly. Well we’ve reached a point where we don’t anymore,” said Murray.
Russell agreed Australia was too reliant upon other economies and was at risk of “being run over” if it slowed down reform to the super system.
“The US is of such a size, if it sits in the middle of the road, everyone goes round it. If Australia stops in the middle of the road, it gets run over. It’s not an option for us to be stopping,” he said.
SMSF sector
Meanwhile, the two-day conference also canvassed the condition of the self-managed super fund sector, with Slattery saying a growing number of people were “taking responsibility” for their super in the face of the challenges on the system.
In her keynote address, Slattery said recent reports, including the FSI, had given the SMSF sector “a clean bill of health”.
“We all know the figures. Of $1.85 trillion invested in superannuation at 30 June 2014, $560 billion is in SMSFs,” said Slattery.
“That’s 31% of all superannuation funds, with SMSFs now representing the majority of those that are self-sufficient in their retirement with 93% of members drawing income streams in the retirement phase.”
Slattery also pointed to “sobering” statistics that show approximately 84% of Australians are currently retiring on $21,000 or less a year through APRA-regulated funds.
SMSF investors making growth a priority
While concerns remain clear for the superannuation system as a whole, the conference also drew attention to research showing “green shoots” for SMSF investments.
The SMSF Investor Product Needs Report released on Tuesday shows trustees are now swinging away from cautious investments and are beginning to make growth a priority.
“For the past few years, the pendulum has been on the fear side; it was moving back towards optimism, but a lot of caution has emerged in 2014,” said the report.
The survey of 2681 investors with an SMSF, which examines investment trends in the six-year period from 2009 to 2014, says SMSF investors are in a period of “cautious optimism”, and while maximizing income remains important, trustees are focusing more on growth.
Slattery said in a statement the study “put to bed” the myths that SMSF investors don’t like making decisions, are apathetic, and basically sit on large cash reserves.
“As the report says, SMSF investors tend to lead the general investor population in investing behaviour and, as such, it’s critical to watch what they are doing,” she said.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

krobb-aCrRNnPq6D

The future of the super system and how your SMSF will fare

<html><body>
A recent Federal Court case underlines the potentially destructive consequences when the assets of a family’s self-managed super fund are used in an attempt to save a family’s struggling small business.
The trustee of the super fund in this case made six back-to-back loans totalling $190,000 to his brother-in-law who immediately transferred the money to the trustee’s Sunshine Coast convenience store.
A high price is being paid by the SMSF’s two members – Anthony Shaune Lyons and his wife, Julianne Marie – for the decision to use their super money as working capital for their financially-troubled business:
<ul>
<li>Their savings in the SMSF have been lost. None of the superannuation injected into their family business has been repaid and is, according to the court, irrecoverable. (The $190,000 in loans represented almost all of the super fund’s $193,000 in assets.) </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The court has personally fined the trustee Anthony Shaune Lyons $32,500 plus $5000 towards costs for contravening a range of the most fundamental laws including the bar on providing financial assistance to members or their relatives.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>By using their SMSF assets to prop up their failing business, the couple lost the protection of superannuation as a means to quarantine their super savings from the fate of their convenience store. Superannuation is widely regarded as an effective means for small business operators to gain asset-protection subject to certain conditions.</li>
</ul>
The couple is now bankrupt because of personal debts incurred in running their business. Their plight is setout in stark detail in the court’s judgment, <a href="https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2014/2014fca1353">Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Superannuation) v Anthony Shaune Lyons</a>.
Peter Crump, superannuation strategist for ipac South Australia, is emphatically against business owners using their super savings to try to save their financially-troubled businesses.
Crump, who is chairman of the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia, says owners of small businesses that are experiencing difficulties may tend to look at their business’s chances of recovering with “very rose-coloured” glasses.
“They may say to themselves, ‘I only need to put in a little more money to see the business through’. It is in a similar vein to gambling,” Crump believes.
The sad experience of the business couple in this court case highlights why SME business owners should:
<ol>
<li>
Not overlook the excellent asset-protection qualities of superannuation  Assets held in a super fund are generally inaccessible to trustees in bankruptcy – provided contributions were not made with the main purpose of defeating creditors. “By moving savings outside super,” says Crump, “you are exposing those savings. Keeping super and business assets separate is one of the key advantages of superannuation.” 
</li>
<li>
Know when to quit a failing business and understand the need for quality professional advice Rather than chasing good money after bad in a failing business, Crump says business owners should listen to expert and independent professional advice about when to quit. “You should have advisers with the courage and conviction to tell you when to quit a business,” he stresses. 
</li>
<li>
Never overlook thefundamental laws of super  The trustee in this court case contravened the most basic laws of super. The trustee breached the sole-purpose test (a super fund must be maintained to provide retirement benefits); the ban on providing financial assistance or loans to fund members and their relatives; the in-house asset rule (with a few exceptions, super funds are prohibited from making loans or having investments with related parties and entities that exceed 5% of its total asset value); and the requirement that transactions must be conducted on an arm’s length basis. 
</li>
<li>
Recognise the “certainty of detection” for illegal payments from a super fund  Crump says a superannuation auditor conducting the compulsory annual audit of a super fund will inevitably detect and ask for an explanation about such transactions as loans to members or their relatives.</li>
</ol>
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>. 
</body></html>

mlaurence-vhAHaLZT8y

SMSF money lost in failed attempt to save business: Four ways to protect your SMSF

<html><body>
Last December, the Financial Services Inquiry’s final report <a href="https://fsi.gov.au/publications/final-report/chapter-1/direct-borrowing/" target="_blank">recommended a ban on borrowing to inves</a>t in property through self-managed superannuation.<a href="https://fsi.gov.au/publications/final-report/chapter-1/direct-borrowing/"> </a>
Among its 44 recommendations the FSI report, advised government that to minimise risk to the financial system it should stop self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) using limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LBRAs) to acquire property and other assets.
Superannuation rules were changed in 2007 to allow SMSFs to borrow using LBRAs. The value of the loans rose from $497 million in June 2009 to $8.7 billion in June 2014.
“Further growth in superannuation funds’ direct borrowing would, over time, increase risk in the financial system,” the FSI report noted.
The inquiry pointed out that while a lender only had recourse to the asset over which the LBRA was held, trustees would likely sell other fund assets to repay the debt if the asset’s value fell.
“As a result, LRBAs are generally unlikely to be effective in limiting losses on one asset from flowing through to other assets, either inside or outside the fund,” it warned.
It also raised concerns that borrowing reduced diversification and concentrated risk in superannuation funds, and allowed SMSF members to circumvent contribution caps, which restrict the amount members can add to their funds.
Self-Managed Superannuation Professionals’ Association of Australia director of technical and professional standards Graeme Colley said there was “scant evidence of abuse of LBRAs to date”.
“But [SPAA] can appreciate the FSI’s position if leverage in superannuation did grow to a level where it could be a threat to people’s retirement savings,” he added.
Separate from the review, regulators have been cracking down on unlicensed property spruikers who have been luring investors into setting up SMSFs to buy residential property, often using borrowed money.
In November, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales against property investment promoter, Park Trent Properties Group. <a href="/guides/asic-commences-proceedings-against-property-promoter-park-trent-properties">ASIC alleges</a> Park Trent advised at least 500 members of the public to establish an SMSF and then use the fund to buy investment properties that were owned or promoted by Park Trent companies.
If the FSI’s proposed ban on borrowing goes ahead, funds with existing LBRAs would not be affected, although those disposing of assets bought with an LBRA would have to extinguish the associated debt at the same time. No date was set for the proposed regulations to begin. 
</body></html>

zfielding-GvX3Uq9KTa

Growth in SMSF borrowing will "increase risk in the financial system"

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Self-managed super funds are, and have been, flavour of the month for some time now.
The opportunities SMSFs provide for people to control their retirement incomes can be attractive. Of course, running such a fund has its own costs and the person in control (the trustee) has the onus to ensure the fund performs at an acceptable level.
But there are many rules and regulations that govern SMSFs and they can be a trap for the unwary. A recent Federal Court decision shows what can go wrong.
In the case, the Federal Court imposed civil penalties of $13,000 (plus $5000 in costs) for each of three directors of the corporate trustee of an SMSF in relation to breaches of the superannuation laws involving short-term loans to a related business.
The first respondent, Early Sunshine, was the corporate trustee of the SMSF known as the George MacDonald &amp; Sons Superannuation Scheme No 2. The other three respondents are the directors of Early Sunshine Pty Ltd.
Over a four-year period from 2007 to 2011, the three directors caused the SMSF to make 71 loans to the freight trucking business George MacDonald &amp; Sons of which the respondents were employees, directors and shareholders. The freight trucking business lost its principal customer in 2001 and began to experience significant financial stress in 2007-08 amid the global financial crisis.
Typically, the loans were outstanding for only a few weeks at a time and used to cover the working capital of the business (primarily to pay salaries and wages). A total of $553,568 in loans was made by the SMSF to George MacDonald &amp; Sons.
Each of the 71 separate loans was less than $20,000 (with an average of $7,768). The loans were unsecured and did not bear interest but each loan was ultimately repaid in full. The SMSF also made a $2000 loan to a company controlled by one of the respondents. This loan was unsecured but was repaid on demand with 8.5% interest.
In August 2009, the SMSF's auditor lodged the first of several auditor contravention reports for the relevant years noting breaches of the superannuation law in relation to the loans. The reports recorded breaches of the sole purpose test, the in-house asset rules and the arm's length dealing requirement.
In October 2011, the Tax Office issued the SMSF with a notice of non-compliance. As a result, the SMSF lost its concessional tax treatment and was issued with an assessment of $63,254 for the 2008 year (which it paid in January 2012). In August 2011, the trustee resolved to wind up the SMSF and roll over the members' benefits to an industry fund.
The applicant, as Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Superannuation), applied to the Federal Court to impose civil penalties. A statement of agreed facts indicated there was no dispute among the parties as to any aspect of the case.
While a maximum civil penalty of $220,000 could apply for each contravention under the relevant superannuation laws, the court imposed a penalty of $13,000 for each director of the trustee of the SMSF, together with $5000 (each) for the Commissioner's costs. The court agreed that the contraventions were "serious" from a regulatory perspective as they involved deliberate, repetitive breaches over a four-year period and put at risk the assets of the fund.
However, the court said it must be remembered that, in the end, the fund did not suffer any loss of capital. The foregone interest income was not significant. In addition, all of the respondents admitted all of the contraventions which were ultimately pressed by the Tax Commissioner and co-operated fully with the Commissioner both at the investigation stage and in the proceeding. Also, the fund has now been wound up and the members’ balances have now been transferred to a public fund which the court noted should ensure they are satisfactorily protected.
The court was also cognizant of the fact that each of the individual respondents had taken full responsibility for their involvement in the contraventions and had expressed remorse and contrition for their conduct.
In the case of multiple contraventions, the court said the pecuniary penalty should reflect the totality of the conduct. Although Early Sunshine was the primary contravener of the superannuation law, the court accepted there was no point imposing a civil penalty on the corporate trustee (which was now dormant). Instead, the court held that the three directors were each liable for a pecuniary penalty of $13,000.
The court initially considered that the penalties proposed by the parties were insufficient. However, after taking into account all of the circumstances, the court ultimately agreed that a penalty of $13,000 (plus $5,000 in costs) for each director was appropriate.
The court reached this conclusion after having regard to the relevant factors and applying the general principles for imposing civil penalties under the superannuation law, as set out in the established cases.
The case is a salutary reminder of the penalties that can apply when SMSFs contravene the laws that govern them. The penalties in this case were significantly lower than the statutory maximum and SMSF trustees can take a lesson from the reasons why the court considered that appropriate.
Terry Hayes is the editor-in-chief of tax news reporting at <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/">Thomson Reuters</a>, a leading Australian provider of tax, accounting and legal information solutions.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

thayes-XhNcNKLNWa

Making loans from SMSFs – court imposes $40,000 in penalties: Terry Hayes

<html><body>
The number of self-managed superannuation funds in breach of borrowing requirements increased over the past year, according to research by the Partners Wealth Group.
<a href="https://www.partnerswealthgroup.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2014-Partners-Wealth-Group-Audit-Survey.pdf" target="_blank">The research</a> is based on over 600 SMSFs across Australia audited in 2014 and found 23% of funds with a relevant breach were in breach as a result of borrowing requirements.
This is a significant increase from 12% of funds the year before.
However, overall the number of SMSFs requiring a contravention report to be lodged with the ATO has fallen over the past year in line with the past seven years.
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="77">
Year
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2014
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2013
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2012
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2011
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2010
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2009
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
2008
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="77">
% funds in breach overall
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
5
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
5.3
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
5.3
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
5.5
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
3.4
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
7.2
</td>
<td valign="top" width="77">
11.3
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
 
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="205">
Key breaches 
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
% of funds with relevant breaches in 2014
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
% of funds with relevant breaches in 2013
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="205">
SMSF borrowings
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
23%     
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
12%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="205">
Loan to members
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
23%
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
38%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="205">
In-house assets
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
20%
</td>
<td valign="top" width="205">
31%
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Partners Wealth Group director of SMSF consulting and auditing, Martin Murden, attributes the increase in breaches to a misunderstanding of the rules.
SMSFs are entitled to borrow under limited circumstances in order to pay benefits, settle on investments and acquire investments via a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA).
“Because borrowing via a LRBA is relatively new and has been subjected to several rule changes since inception, my suspicion is that there has been confusion, resulting in some SMSF trustees thinking it was permissible to use their fund to borrow to overcome a short-term liquidity problem – much like a small business seeking a temporary extension to a bank overdraft in difficult circumstances,” Murden said in a statement.
Two other key areas of transgression highlighted by the Partners’ research came from funds taking personal loans for members and funds breaching the in-house assets rule.
Murden said, periodically, loans occur by mistake. For example, using the wrong cheque book (that of the SMSF) to pay a personal expense. On other occasions members are simply in need of money and there is no one to stop them from borrowing from the fund.
“However, it is important to remember that while the loan may appear small in dollar terms and when compared to overall fund assets, personal loans are simply not allowed under super legislation. They’re an absolute no-no and size is no excuse,” Murden said. 
Graeme Colley, director of technical and professional standards at the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA), said the spike probably means auditors are being more fastidious in analyzing the operation of SMSFs.
“Hopefully with requirements for the registration of auditors, the auditors that are left in the registration group are taking their jobs more seriously as they have greater obligations in reporting to ASIC,” he says.
“We may see an increase again simply because of the thoroughness of the audits that are conducted.”
Colley says the types of breaches identified by the Partners Wealth Group are not surprising.   
“The main issue is people taking money out of their funds, in-house assets which is next and then separation of assets,” he says.
“Mixing assets is really serious as it means SMSF trustees may be putting their hand into the operation of the fund.”
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

cwaters-YrtBR88nBe

Spike in number of SMSFs in breach of borrowing requirement

<html><body>
Whether you’re a first time buyer or a home owner purchasing your first investment property, it’s important to work out the best approach for the best returns.
This free Property Observer eBook, 12 crucial steps for every first time investor, brought to you by RAMS, has done the hard work for you. It guides you through the key issues you’ll be facing when it comes to first time investment.
We bring you a snapshot of the essential must-know tips that will set you up on the property ladder, covering the key areas of financing, forward planning and finding.
You’ll learn:
<ul>
<li>Deposit and saving advice;</li>
<li>Deciding on fixed, split or variable home loans;</li>
<li>Preparation before going to the lenders;</li>
<li>Forward planning strategies;</li>
<li>Self-management vs expert management of a property;</li>
<li>Choosing a positive or negative cash flow property;</li>
<li>The implications of moving into your investment property;</li>
<li>Finding the right property for you, and much more.</li>
</ul>
<div class="ebookformcontainer">{rsform 57}</div>
</body></html>

leldred-s3gDjqZCKM

Free eBook: Crucial tips every first time investor needs to know

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
All too often we get calls or emails from clients and some non-clients even, who are late with getting important information back to their accountant, whether it is tax returns, information for their auditor, or engaging with their wealth planner!  So, we thought we would find out what is the right information and when it is needed.
We are focussing on audits of SMSFs and trading entities. We have captured here the key areas of process, or events where you must advise your auditor.
SMSFs
<ul>
<li>Make sure all SMSF transactions go through the fund’s bank account. 
</li>
<li>Put an investment strategy in place.  If you do not have an investment strategy, then please talk to our wealth planning team who will be only too happy to assist you. 
</li>
<li>Tell your accountant when anything significant happens so they can produce a minute of the trustees meeting. e.g. buying or selling a significant asset. 
</li>
<li>“I transferred money into or out of the SMSF bank account in error” - Tell your accountant straight away and agree the best way to I fix this. 
</li>
<li>One of the members/trustees is seriously ill – Tell your accountant. 
</li>
<li>A trustee is leaving Australia ‘permanently’ or for more than six months – Tell your accountant. 
</li>
<li>SMSF trustees should work with their accountant to ensure that they don’t do anything to prejudice the tax advantaged 15% tax or tax free pension income. 
</li>
<li>Maximum or minimum pension amounts must be drawn every year 
</li>
<li>If you receive an auditors management letter, you should act on any matters raised, before they become reportable contraventions 
</li>
<li>If you don't have much money invested in your SMSF - check with your accountant to make sure it is still viable to maintain.  It could be a good option to transfer your super monies into a public offer super fund. 
</li>
<li>Have you considered having life and income protection insurance inside the super fund? 
</li>
<li>SMSFs are not allowed to buy residential property from a member or related party. 
</li>
<li>In a SMSF it can't rent or provide a residential property to a family member or yourself. 
</li>
<li>If part of your investment strategy is to collect art, then it can’t be displayed or leased in a SMSF member’s home or property (sole purpose test).</li>
</ul>
Other Audit Clients:
<table style="width: 460px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="26">#</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Issue Description</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Reason</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Preferred course of action</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="26">1</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Not keeping full records in a business-like manner.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">It makes performing an audit difficult as sufficient appropriate audit evidence cannot be accumulated by the auditor to support an audit opinion and allow for a ‘clean’ audit report to be issued.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Full and proper record keeping needs to be employed – seek the advice of your accountant early.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="26">2</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">AGM timing – ‘Not for Profit’ organisations sometimes schedule their AGM far too close to the end of their financial year.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Does not leave enough time for the financials to be compiled leaving enough time for an appropriate audit to be conducted.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Liaise with your accountant and auditor on achievable time frames and preferred AGM dates.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="26">3</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">If your business has bank lending covenants that need to be maintained, an auditor may need to check these and report accordingly.The terms of your lending covenants might include not declaring a dividend large enough to create negative current assets. Or your interest coverage ratio needs to stay above a certain level.You should be aware of any loan or overdraft conditions imposed by the bank and work with your accountant to ensure they’re not breached.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">If breached, at any time during the year, the bank may have the right to call in the loan. This could be inconvenient for you and require the loan to be quickly refinanced – if possible.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Be aware of lending conditions, maintain monthly or quarterly financials promptly and have your accountant regularly checking that covenants are met.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="26">4</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Directors not being aware of other factors that would require an annual audit to be conducted e.g. ASIC requirements.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">If a shareholder (holding 5% or more of the shares) requests an audit; if the company becomes a Large Proprietary company, if the company has  any two of the following -  more than 50 employees; Assets of more than $12.5M; and turnover of greater than$25m.</td>
<td valign="top" width="197">Keep your accountant informed of changes with your company so they can advise if ASIC regulations require an annual audit.</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Robert Edwards is a partner at <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor</a> Audit Services.
Disclaimer: This article contains general information. Before you make any financial or investment decision you should seek professional advice to take into account your individual objectives, financial situation and individual needs.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

What you need to tell your accountant about your SMSF

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Former Prime Minister Paul Keating recently suggested that self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) should be restricted from investing in residential property
Keating told the Financial Review: “If I was treasurer today, I would be looking very hard at the whole entitlement or availability of debt to SMSFs. They have gearing available to them and, of course, many of them are taking the option of buying residential property.”
According to the latest Australian Taxation Office (ATO) SMSF statistics, real residential property represents 3.5% of the value of all assets held in SMSFs.  This level of investment has been consistent since 2009 with the bulk of properties worth between $200,000 and $1 million.  SMSF investment in commercial property is around 12%.
However, what has changed is the number of investors with an average of 1,200 new investors using their SMSFs to purchase residential property each year.  The explosion in limited recourse borrowing arrangements which have increased 1,758% between June 2009 and June 2014.
For many SMSFs however, there are some very big risks if the borrowing arrangements and property purchases are not put in place correctly.  If your SMSF breaches its compliance obligations, it is at risk of being deemed non-compliant and losing its concessional tax status and the trustees also risk being fined personally under the ATO’s new penalty powers that came into effect on 1 July 2014.
Here are the top SMSF property issues:
<ol>
<li>
Should your SMSF buy a property? Liquidity, diversification and cashflow.  The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (SIS Act) requires trustees to take heed of these elements when making any investment.  When an SMSF invests in real property, there is a risk that the trustees are putting all of the fund’s ‘investment eggs’ in one basket and the rate of return will not be enough to meet the fund’s obligations. Funds in, or entering, pension phase need to meet the minimum pension drawdown requirements.  The question is, will the rental yield meet the ongoing expenses of the fund including pension payments?  Funds are required to increase the minimum pension drawdown over time: 4% at age 64, and 6% at age 75.  That's an increase of 50% in draw down obligations.  Will rent increase by 50% to keep pace? But what if a member wants a lump sum and not a pension, where will the immediate cash come from? What about when a member dies?  How will the benefits be paid out from the fund? You can't sell one room of an investment property. 
</li>
<li>
Can my SMSF purchase my investment property? A common question that often comes up is, can my SMSF buy a residential rental property, holiday home, or house from me or someone related to me?  The answer is no, not unless the property is business real property (a property used wholly and exclusively for business).  And, in most cases, residential property will not meet the requirements to be business real property.  It’s important to bear in mind that the penalty for breaching the related party investment rules is up to 12 months in jail. 
</li>
<li>
Improving a property If your SMSF has borrowed money to purchase a property, it cannot use any part of those borrowings to improve that property.  Also, a SMSF cannot borrow money to repair an asset it already owns outright. However, a SMSF can use its own money to improve or repair a property acquired with borrowings, as long as the improvements do not result in the asset becoming a different asset.  For example, the trustees could not change a residential property into a childcare centre.  Or, turn a vacant block of land into an investment property. Take the example of a SMSF that borrows to buy a residential house on a large block of land ripe for development.  The fund cannot subdivide the land and build another house because the borrowing rules prohibit a change in the character of an asset bought with borrowed money until the borrowings are extinguished. 
</li>
<li>
Getting the essentials wrong The common problem areas for SMSF trustees are often simple things in the rush of the moment or simply poor structuring. The most obvious example is when a property is purchased by an SMSF but the contract is in the name of the individuals.  Sometimes people just get carried away and make the purchase without thinking through the details.  Or, where there is a related entity involved like a unit trust but the unit trust was not established before the property was purchased or the incorrect name is inserted on the contract or registered with the titles office
</li>
</ol>
Shukri Barbara is principal adviser at Property Tax Specialists.
</body></html>

ShukriBarbara-XZhfVURjbR

The top four SMSF property investment issues

<html><body>
Former chairman of BHP Billiton and chief executive of the National Australia Bank, Don Argus, is embroiled in a legal battle with the Australian Tax Office over his superannuation.
The ATO wants to charge tax on almost $1.2 million in income earned by the $15 million self-managed superannuation fund of <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/leadership/profiles/21793-20110906-the-selling-of-reform">the elder statesman</a> and his wife, Patricia.
Argus, who is now chairman of the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Australia Advisory Board, claims the income should be tax free.
On 16 April 2014 the Argus’s objected to the ATO’s assessment of income tax issued to their SMSF for the year ended 30 June 2010.
On 29 September 2014 the ATO disallowed the objection and so the Argus’s have now filed an application for the decision to be varied in the Federal Court.
The Argus’s are seeking an almost $1.2 million reduction on the tax paid by them for the 2010 tax year claiming the assessment of $2.25 million in tax is “excessive” because it wrongly concluded the SMSF did not pay out the minimum amount required.
Graham Colley, director of technical and professional standards at the SMSF Professionals’ Association, said with a $15 million fund value the minimum amount of pension to be paid should be around $900,000. 
“[SMSF trustees] need to make sure you pay the minimum amount of your pension for the year,” he says.
“You can do it simply by making sure you have direct debits into your bank account.”
Colley advises SMSF trustees also need to make sure the valuation of the investments are made so the calculation of the amount has been correctly done. 
“Even if you have underpaid a small amount the commissioner will exercise his powers of administration providing you make up the shortfall as soon as it is discovered,” he says.
“Make sure you know when your pension starts, make sure you know when it stops and one of the standards to qualify as a pension is to make sure you pay the minimum amount.”
<a href="https://www.afr.com/p/national/don_argus_takes_on_taxman_over_super_JwuiiKK4asPzKTku9UdW9K" target="_blank">Fairfax</a> reports the dispute is scheduled for a court hearing in Melbourne on 2 Februrary.
SmartCompany contacted Argus but did not receive a response prior to publication.  The ATO declined to comment.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

Former BHP chairman Don Argus takes on the Tax Office over his $15 million SMSF 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Last month, the government released it’s latest <a href="https://fsi.gov.au/files/2014/12/FSI_Final_Report_Consolidated20141210.pdf" target="_blank">Financial Systems Inquiry Report</a>. 
The Inquiry led by David Murray laid out a ‘blueprint’ for the financial system over the next decade. It has been 16 years since the last 1997 Wallis report which led to ASIC and APRA being setup, amongst other things. The previous Campbell report in 1981 led to the floating of the Australian dollar and the deregulation of the financial sector.
In short, this is an important report that is listened to and will have impacts on the way financial system moves forward.
One key recommendation in the report was to ban leveraging (borrowing) within superannuation and therefore the removal of limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA). LRBAs have been growing at an astounding rate as property investors have been able to use all the tax benefits of self-managed super funds to buy investment properties in a low tax rate environment. Obviously with the love of property Australians have, this has been a great idea for some and not so great for others.
The reason Murray is worried about borrowing and for considering banning these arrangements is due to the leveraging of assets may destabilise the superannuation industry sometime in the future if property prices should fall. He is also concerned by the shear number going forward and does this make our superannuation industry property heavy.
The government may after the consulting period which finishes on 31 March 2015 decide to make an immediate change from any day going forward. If it believes it is a wise suggestion, they would remove the ability to borrow inside superannuation for property and make this change for future arrangements only and all current SMSFs can continue as normal.
So is this an opportunity you could miss?
It is important to be very mindful that this is not for everyone. Investing in any property has different associated risks and especially when using debt. One of the drivers for change, is down to there being greedy property spruikers that have been targeting lower balance disgruntled superannuation members with new properties for sale.
Spruikers have been using Australians love of property as bait and selling properties to unsuitable super members. This is the real risk for this strategy; purchasing poor property at top prices with no diversification in place or buffer if things should go wrong. I have seen this first hand. I have been offered and absolutely refused the opportunity to sell horrendous investment properties to my clients for huge commissions. This is a disaster waiting to happen and I have been actively against this type of behaviour for many years.
Putting this to one side;  For some purchasing a great, sound, highly sought after investment property in an SMSF can however be an absolute brilliant strategy to build wealth for retirement in a diversified way. The tax advantages of Superannuation means debt can be repaid faster with lower tax on contributions and rental income. It does however solely come down to it being an outstanding property – one characterised by limited supply and an ever increasing demand.
So should you buy a sound stable property in your SMSF?<a href="https://www.canopyprivate.com.au/" target="_blank"> </a>
It can give you a great low volatile asset and with the power of debt can increase your exposure to the investment market by three to four times what you are currently have in an investment portfolio. While this is not suitable for all, if you are currently contributing more than $15-20,000 per year, have over $300,000 in your family super funds and have at least five years till you retire; you may like to consider it before the opportunity may go in 2015.
However, If you are still under $200,000 and still growing your contributions, I would sit tight and wait a few years before even looking at it.
I am actively disagreeing with the removal of LRBAs as i believe it should be the right for investors to decide how their superannuation is invested. I do however want greater attention on property spruikers and developers who are selling these without any concern on the effect it has on the person buying.
Chris Bates is a director of financial advisory firm <a href="https://www.canopyprivate.com.au/" target="_blank">Canopy Private</a>.
</body></html>

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Guides

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

News

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

News

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News