<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/wickton">Wickton</a>’s completed Linacre Rise development in Hampton is giving Bayside downsizers the opportunity to move into a spacious apartment near the beach, with the developer covering stamp duty for a limited time.

The 27-residence development has been designed for buyers who want to simplify their living arrangements without giving up the space, warmth and quality associated with a long-term family home. Most apartments have already been secured by Bayside locals, leaving a select collection of two and three-bedroom residences and penthouses available.

Two-bedroom apartments are priced from $1.275 million, three-bedroom residences from $2.25 million and penthouses from $3.375 million, with the completed homes available to inspect and move into now.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=95289 project_image_fid=366760]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/linacre-rise-hampton-8-10-linacre-road-hampton-vic-3188">Linacre Rise</a> occupies an elevated position on one of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/hampton-vic-3188">Hampton</a>’s quiet, tree-lined streets, around 250 metres from the bay and 500 metres from Hampton’s village centre. Its setting gives residents access to the beach, local cafés, shops and Hampton Train Station while retaining the feel of an established residential neighbourhood.

Architecture and interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a> draw on the warmth and permanence of traditional brickwork, with the building integrated into terraced landscaping by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/john-patrick-landscape-architects">John Patrick</a>. Ground-floor apartments are elevated above the street and include private garden courtyards, while several upper-level residences have generous balconies and outlooks toward the bay.

Inside, the residences favour natural materials and generous proportions. Herringbone-pattern European oak flooring, natural stone benchtops, premium joinery and Swiss V-ZUG appliances are among the key inclusions, while integrated storage has been incorporated across kitchens, bathrooms, studies and living areas.

The kitchens have been planned as practical spaces for both everyday use and entertaining, with substantial island benches, detailed cabinetry and adjoining dining and living zones. Full-height wardrobes, plush bedroom carpeting and carefully considered lighting reinforce the residential character Wickton sought to retain for buyers moving from larger homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=95289 project_image_fid=366769]

A Linacre Rise purchaser said the completed apartment had delivered the space, outlook and construction quality they had been seeking.

“The unit is very light, has views to die for over the bay, all construction materials and fittings are premium quality, we have secure parking for three cars, EV charging at very competitive rates, the neighbours are friendly and there is just a lovely ambiance about the place,” the purchaser said.

Environmental features include solar panels, shared electric vehicle charging stations, rainwater harvesting for toilet flushing and landscape irrigation, double-glazed windows and water-efficient fixtures and appliances.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=95289 project_image_fid=366762]

The development was built by Balmain &amp; Co, with Wickton managing the broader development process through its in-house team.

For downsizers, the project’s completed status removes much of the uncertainty associated with buying off the plan. Purchasers can inspect the finished apartments, understand their outlook and proportions, and move in without waiting for construction to conclude.

The remaining selection includes north-oriented balconies, corner configurations and penthouses with elevated bay views. The developer-paid stamp duty initiative is available for a limited time, with potential savings of up to $200,000 depending on the residence purchased.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=95289]

Joel Robinson

Limited-time stamp duty offer at completed Linacre Rise apartments in Hampton

Luxury apartment buyers have long prioritised design, space and finishes, but increasingly they're placing equal importance on something less tangible: how easily they can live without relying on a car.

At <a>Richmond Square</a>, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis">Fortis</a> believes that convenience begins beyond the apartment itself, with the mixed-use precinct earning a near-perfect Walk Score of 99.

The development has been planned around the idea that some of the most valuable amenities aren't contained within a building, they're the restaurants, cafés, parks, transport connections and daily conveniences that can all be reached on foot.

Located just behind Swan Street and Church Street, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/richmond-square-1-wiltshire-street-richmond-vic-3121">Richmond Square</a> places residents within one of Melbo​u​rne's most established lifestyle precincts while offering a quieter residential setting removed from the busiest thoroughfares. East Richmond Station is moments away, trams run along both Swan and Church Streets, and the MCG, Melb​​ourne Park, Yarra River trails and the CBD are all within walking distance. At the same time, the precinct itself will introduce a curated mix of dining, retail, hospitality and wellness offerings, creating a destination that extends well beyond its residential buildings.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348530]

For Fortis, that combination of location and scale was what made the site unique.

"<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/richmond-vic-3121">Richmond</a> is one of Melb​o​urne's most established and distinctive inner-city neighbourhoods, with a rare combination of dining, culture, recreation, public transport and proximity to the CBD," the developer said.

"The opportunity at Wiltshire Street was particularly compelling because the site sits slightly removed from the activity of Swan and Church Streets while remaining only moments from everything that makes the area desirable."

Rather than developing a standalone apartment building, Fortis consolidated 15 individual properties to create one of the larger development parcels assembled on Mel​b​ourne's city fringe in recent years. That allowed the team to deliver a genuine mixed-use precinct comprising 107 residences across Wiltshire House and Carmine House, premium office space, hospitality venues, retail, wellness offerings and a future 57-room hotel.

"The scale of the site allowed Fortis to think beyond a standalone apartment building," the developer said.

"Richmond Square could be planned as a complete lifestyle precinct, bringing homes, workplaces, dining, retail, hospitality and wellness together around a series of activated public spaces. The aim was to create a destination that feels connected to Richmond rather than separate from it."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348533]

The emphasis on walkability has also resonated with buyers.

Interest has been strongest from established owner-occupiers, particularly downsizers from Richmond and Melb​ourne's inner east who want to remain close to familiar restaurants, workplaces, family and social networks while moving into a more secure, lower-maintenance home. The project is also attracting Mornington Peninsula and interstate buyers seeking a Melb​ourne residence they can lock up and leave between visits.

Many are looking for generous living spaces, room to entertain, quality finishes and confidence in the project team, but location remains one of the biggest deciding factors.

"For many buyers, Richmond Square provides a way to simplify the practical side of home ownership without reducing the quality of their lifestyle," the sales team said.

"Location is also a major driver of interest. Buyers can remain connected to the CBD, major sporting events, the arts centres, local restaurants, cafes and bars and their family while living in a private and secure residence that is easy to lock up and leave for weekends or longer periods away."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13181 project_image_fid=348549]

The residences themselves have been designed with that buyer in mind. Award-winning architecture practice SJB and interior designers Hecker Guthrie have created spacious two and three-bedroom apartments and penthouses that prioritise generous living areas, natural light, bespoke joinery and private terraces. Above, a rooftop sanctuary by Acre includes landscaped lawns, bookable dining rooms, barbecue facilities, wellness spaces and panoramic views across the CBD, the MCG and Port Phillip Bay.

Fortis believes Richmond Square reflects a broader evolution in apartment living, where the surrounding neighbourhood becomes just as important as the residence itself.

"Richmond Square introduces a different proposition: generously proportioned residences within a genuinely mixed-use, hospitality-led destination," the developer said.

"The project's location and Walk Score of 99 further support a lifestyle where residents can complete many everyday journeys without relying on a car."

Fortis has assembled an experienced team that includes <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/hecker-guthrie">Hecker Guthrie</a>, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/acre">Acre</a> and builder <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/hacer-group">Hacer Group</a>, reflecting the developer's commitment to creating projects with enduring design quality and meaningful connections to the communities in which they sit.&nbsp;

Richmond Square is an expression of that philosophy, bringing together homes, workplaces, hospitality and wellness within one of Me​lb​ourne's most walkable neighbourhoods.&nbsp;

Construction is now almost complete, providing purchasers with growing confidence ahead of its expected September 2026 completion.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=13181]

Walk Score of 99 places Richmond Square at the heart of Melbourne's most connected lifestyle

<h3 data-end="19" data-section-id="1dvgwoe" data-start="0">Summary</h3>

<ul data-end="634" data-start="21">
	<li data-end="170" data-section-id="1o77v31" data-start="21">Walker Corporation has lodged plans for a second major residential development in the Maroochydore City Centre, a 29-storey tower known as Celeste.</li>
	<li data-end="327" data-section-id="1lb0y6t" data-start="171">The Plus Studio-designed proposal at Lot 30 Sunshine Coast Parade would deliver 208 apartments, including four four-bedroom sub-penthouses and penthouses.</li>
	<li data-end="487" data-section-id="za720" data-start="328">The application comes as Walker doubles down on Maroochydore following the strong sales campaign at SOL by Walker, where the first tower is nearing sell-out.</li>
	<li data-end="634" data-section-id="5sovec" data-start="488">Walker is a key partner in the transformation of the Maroochydore City Centre, which is expected to ultimately deliver at least 4,000 new homes.</li>
</ul>

Walker Corporation is doubling down on Maroochydore following the successful sales campaign at its first residential project in the emerging CBD.

The national developer has filed plans for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/celeste-30-sunshine-coast-parade-maroochydore-qld-4558">Celeste</a>, a new 29-storey apartment tower at Lot 30 Sunshine Coast Parade, just metres from its under-construction SOL by Walker development.

The plans, prepared by Plus Studio, would see 208 apartments delivered across a 100-metre tower on the 2,376 sqm site, which fronts Sunshine Coast Parade, First Avenue and Future Way within the Maroochydore Priority Development Area.

<img alt="Walker" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="17038209-6fea-4ed2-855d-fd4df65b3d02" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-10%20at%2010.24.16%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=iZD.oVXcQn.aLpUytDAW.CWjxP4puWMy" />

The proposed apartment mix comprises 36 one-bedroom apartments, 48 two-bedroom apartments, 72 two-bedroom apartments with an additional multipurpose space, and 48 three-bedroom apartments.

The upper levels would be capped by two four-bedroom sub-penthouses and two four-bedroom penthouses, taking the total apartment count to 208. The preliminary yield study also provides 262 car spaces, 114 resident bicycle spaces and storage for each apartment.

It represents Walker's next major residential move in the new Maroochydore CBD after the success of SOL by Walker, its $220 million two-tower project nearby.

SOL launched to market in early 2025 and has since seen strong demand, particularly from local owner-occupiers. By February this year, Walker said the first SOL tower was nearing sell-out, with a strong waitlist also emerging for its recently released penthouse collection.

Construction is already underway on SOL, with the first tower expected to be completed in late 2027 and the second to follow in early 2028.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=147777 project_image_fid=319846]

<h2 data-end="2518" data-section-id="1b2dyo5" data-start="2459">Celeste to rise 100 metres over Maroochydore City Centre</h2>

Celeste would take a different form to the twin 19-storey buildings at SOL.

Plus Studio has designed a single 100-metre tower above an activated podium, with the architecture responding to the site's prominent position and three street frontages.

The podium would incorporate commercial tenancies and public art, with sweeping façade elements wrapping the street edges. The scalloped concrete podium has been inspired by the patterns created in sand at low tide, while extensive landscaping would continue vertically through the tower.

The ground level plans show three commercial tenancies addressing Sunshine Coast Parade alongside the residential lobby and landscaped public realm. The podium would then accommodate several levels of car parking before the residential tower rises above.

<img alt="Celeste" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="121f77b1-71c5-46d7-9b36-0a7d474211ca" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-10%20at%2010.24.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=MGrg9Hb7HgzLN0Lelq_xrXNAruVl77ia" />

Plus Studio said the tower had been designed to maximise views from each apartment, taking in the Maroochy River, Sunshine Coast hinterland, Cotton Tree and Maroochydore Beach and ocean.

Those views have also shaped one of the project's key features, with Walker proposing to put the primary resident amenity on Level 29 rather than lower within the building.

The rooftop would feature a 284.9 sqm pool area with an infinity edge, along with a cold pool, spa, sauna, 93.2 sqm gym, sunset lounge, BBQ and dining areas, pool deck and private dining space. Cabanas and day beds are also shown across the recreation level.

The two penthouses would extend across the upper levels and each feature private terraces and plunge pools.

<h2 data-end="4202" data-section-id="v5f4ix" data-start="4160">Walker's growing Maroochydore footprint</h2>

Celeste further reinforces Walker's commitment to the transformation of Maroochydore City Centre.

Walker is one of the key partners delivering the new CBD alongside Sunshine Coast Council and SunCentral Maroochydore, with the broader 62-hectare Priority Development Area occupying the former Horton Park Golf Course and surrounding land.

The precinct is ultimately expected to accommodate at least 4,000 new homes as Maroochydore evolves into the Sunshine Coast's principal commercial and residential centre.

When SOL secured approval in February 2025, Walker Managing Director and CEO David Gallant described it as the "first of many residential projects" the company planned for the Maroochydore City Centre.

Celeste now provides the clearest indication yet of what comes next.

The site sits immediately within the new CBD, with the design report identifying Sunshine Plaza and surrounding parkland within walking distance and Maroochydore Beach around a five-minute drive away.

For Walker, the timing of the application comes as its first residential bet on the new CBD appears to have been vindicated.

SOL has progressed from planning approval to construction while its first release has approached sell-out, giving Walker confidence to push ahead with another 208 apartments and take its residential pipeline in the Maroochydore City Centre to around 450 dwellings across the two projects.

Celeste remains subject to planning approval, with the architectural material describing the scheme as a preliminary yield study that may change through the assessment process.

Walker doubles down on Maroochydore with 29-storey Celeste apartment tower

For most Australians, buying an apartment is one of the biggest financial decisions they'll ever make

The location, floorplan and price are often the first considerations, but in recent years another question has become increasingly important: who is actually delivering the project?

A series of high-profile builder collapses, construction delays and defect concerns have fundamentally changed how many Victorians approach buying off the plan. The collapse of Porter Davis in 2023, which reportedly left around 1,700 homes unfinished, became one of the most visible examples of the risks that can emerge when a construction company fails. <a href="https://www.equifax.com.au/sites/default/files/lpassets/pdf/Final-Business-Market-Pulse-June-Sector-Deep-Dive-Report-2.pdf">Similar challenges across the broader construction sector</a> have left buyers asking more questions before signing a contract.

As Victoria continues encouraging higher-density housing to address supply shortages, transparency is becoming just as important as location or price.

One tool increasingly entering the conversation is the <a href="https://icirt.com/">Independent Construction Industry Rating Tool (iCIRT)</a>, an independent assessment framework designed to help buyers better understand the developer or builder behind a project. Originally developed by Equifax in consultation with government and industry as part of NSW's Construct NSW reforms, the system has since expanded nationally.

<h2 data-end="1519" data-section-id="7nmx3" data-start="1492">What is an iCIRT rating?</h2>

Most Australians are familiar with independent ratings in everyday life.

We compare ANCAP safety ratings before buying a car. We look at Health Star Ratings in supermarkets. Banks rely on credit assessments when lending money.

Until recently, however, there has been very little independent information available to help apartment buyers assess the business responsible for delivering a residential project.

That gap is what iCIRT was designed to address.

Builders, developers and other construction professionals with an iCIRT rating have demonstrated high-trust characteristics through an independent, evidence-based assessment across six criteria: Character, Capability, Conduct, Capacity, Capital and Counterparties. This involves a rigorous review of financial health, past project track record, and ethical conduct. Crucially, an iCIRT rating could help provide property buyers with confidence that they are working with a professional who has demonstrated the capability, capacity, and willingness to return and rectify issues.

Importantly, iCIRT is not a recommendation to purchase a particular property, nor is it a traditional credit rating. It is an independent assessment framework designed to provide objective information about a construction business using a <a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Methodology-Issue1-May-2021.pdf">published methodology</a>.

The system has been widely adopted in New South Wales, where more than one-third of medium and large residential builders and developers now hold an iCIRT rating, representing over two-thirds of the state's residential building market by value as of 2025/26.

<h2 data-end="3126" data-section-id="h6ohtj" data-start="3084">Why buyers are doing more due diligence</h2>

For many buyers, particularly those purchasing off the plan, the biggest risk isn't whether they'll like the kitchen finishes.

It's whether the project will be delivered on time, to the expected quality, and by a company capable of completing the development.

<a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2026-07/iCIRT%202025%20Consumer%20Survey%20Report%20v05.pdf">Consumer research commissioned by iCIRT</a> found more than half of respondents believed current protections do not adequately safeguard buyers from builder insolvencies or defective projects. Other research found 88 per cent of prospective buyers would seek independent ratings or due diligence before purchasing, while 90 per cent said trust in construction professionals is essential.

That doesn't mean buyers should rely on a single rating alone.

Independent legal advice, understanding the contract, and seeking financial advice all remain important parts of the due diligence process.

However, an independent assessment can provide another source of information alongside those traditional checks.

<h2 data-end="4138" data-section-id="pquzxc" data-start="4094">Trust is becoming a competitive advantage</h2>

The conversation isn't only changing for buyers.

Developers are also recognising that trust has become an increasingly important part of the sales process.

Five years ago, purchasers typically asked about floorplans, finishes and settlement dates.

Today, sales teams are increasingly being asked about the developer's experience, financial stability, previous projects and construction partners.

For companies with strong governance and established delivery records, an independent iCIRT rating provides another way to demonstrate those credentials before buyers even visit a display suite.

According to Equifax, the assessment can also help businesses drive sales and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/icirt-rating-helps-scion-secure-high-value-projects">secure high-value projects</a>, as well as identify operational improvements and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/mirvac-reinforces-brand-trust-and-quality-independent-icirt-rating">attract top talent</a>.

<h2 data-end="4962" data-section-id="1j54ng5" data-start="4912">Beyond buyers: lenders are paying attention too</h2>

The influence of independent construction ratings is also extending beyond consumers.

According to Stamford Capital's Real Estate Debt Capital Markets Survey, an increasing number of lenders now incorporate iCIRT ratings into their due diligence processes when assessing residential development finance applications.

The survey found lender adoption has continued to rise, with many respondents saying independent assessments provide additional insight into governance, counterparties and delivery capability beyond traditional financial analysis. Some lenders also reported declining funding applications where businesses had poor or no ratings.

As construction costs remain elevated and access to development finance becomes more selective, demonstrating credibility is becoming increasingly valuable.

<h2 data-end="5801" data-section-id="1qazuxs" data-start="5772">What it means for Victoria</h2>

Victoria's apartment market is entering a new phase.

The state is seeking to accelerate higher-density housing while simultaneously introducing reforms aimed at improving confidence in residential construction.

For buyers, that means there are more tools available than ever before to research the businesses behind a project.

For developers, it signals that transparency is becoming another point of differentiation in an increasingly competitive market.

Buyers are asking more questions than ever before and increasingly expecting independent information, not just marketing material, before making one of the biggest financial commitments of their lives.

Find out how to get iCIRT rated <a href="https://www.icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Infographic-Assessment-Process-Final.pdf">here</a>.

<hr data-end="6469" data-start="6466" />
The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personal, financial, legal or tax advice. It does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it and, where appropriate, seek independent professional advice.

This article contains links to third-party websites. These links are provided for convenience only. Equifax Australia does not control and is not responsible for the content, accuracy or privacy practices of external sites.

Copyright © 2026 Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Apartment buyers in New South Wales are set to gain a decade of insurance-backed protection against major building defects, after the NSW Parliament passed the Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026.&nbsp;

The Bill establishes decennial defect insurance, known in the market as Latent Defects Insurance (LDI), as an alternative to the existing two-year strata building bond. It cleared the Legislative Council with amendments on Tuesday evening (August 4, 2026), with the Legislative Assembly agreeing to those amendments shortly after.

Under the reform, eligible developers can satisfy their statutory bond obligation by taking out an approved decennial-style policy that gives owners 10 years of cover for major structural defects from completion, claimable directly, without first having to pursue developers or builders through costly legal action.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=111820 project_image_fid=344699]

The change forms the final tranche of amendments arising from the 2021 statutory review of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 and related legislation.

Resilience Insurance, which originated the cover in Australia and has delivered it in NSW since 2022, welcomed the passage and credited the NSW Government for delivering it.

“This is protection apartment buyers have needed for a long time, and the credit for delivering it belongs to the NSW Government,”&nbsp;said Corey Nugent, CEO of Resilience Insurance.

“Minister Chanthivong and his team have shown real leadership in replacing an outdated two-year bond with cover that matches the lifespan of the buildings people are buying into. Reform like this is what good, evidence-based regulation looks like.”

Resilience has delivered LDI in NSW since 2022, protecting thousands of apartments, giving the State, and now the country, real-world evidence of how decade-long, no-fault protection works in practice.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=136442 project_image_fid=374084]

The reform also places NSW within a wider national shift.

NSW is the third jurisdiction to put decennial cover into law. The ACT legislated for it in 2024, with the scheme taking effect in late 2025, and Victoria passed its own framework on 17 June. Between them, the three cover the majority of Australia's apartment market.

The reform commences once the legislation is proclaimed, which is expected in the coming weeks. From that point, developers of Class 2 residential apartment buildings can meet their statutory obligation with an approved decennial policy in place of the bond.

Buyers who purchased into projects that took out the cover early are among the first in the country to take keys to apartments carrying decade-long structural protection.

“With the legislation passed, the focus now turns to making it work for buyers,”&nbsp;Nugent said.

“There are already thousands of apartments in NSW covered by this insurance, bought by developers who moved early. The question every buyer should be asking in a display suite is a simple one: does this building come with 10-year defect cover, and who stands behind it?&nbsp;

“We look forward to working with the Government and the Building Commission in coming weeks as the framework moves to implementation, and to sharing what we have learned over the past four years so the protection reaches owners as smoothly and quickly as possible.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134954 project_image_fid=4553]

Other states are working through their own reform programs. Western Australia has indicated that decennial cover is within consideration a later stage of its reform sequence, and Queensland has been examining the settings as it looks at the development pipeline ahead of the 2032 Olympics.

Resilience Insurance acknowledges the NSW Government’s continued focus on strengthening consumer protection while supporting housing delivery across the State.

Fast Facts: What the reform means

<ul>
	<li>Proven at scale:&nbsp;Decennial cover has operated in NSW since 2022, protecting thousand of apartments.</li>
	<li>10 years of cover:&nbsp;Protection for major structural defects runs for a decade from completion, claimable directly and with no legal action required.</li>
	<li>An alternative to the bond:&nbsp;Eligible developers can meet their statutory obligation with an approved decennial-style policy in place of the 2% strata building bond.</li>
	<li>Part of a national shift:&nbsp;The ACT has had decennial provisions in force since 2025 and Victoria passed its framework in June. NSW now joins them.</li>
	<li>No-fault, first resort:&nbsp;Owners corporations claim directly from the insurer without first having to establish who is liable for the defect.</li>
	<li>Cost-competitive:&nbsp;At approximately 1.8% of build cost, LDI is typically priced below the 2% bond while offering broader, longer protection.</li>
	<li>Market position:&nbsp;Resilience originated LDI in Australia and has delivered it in NSW since 2022.</li>
</ul>

Fast Facts: What is Resilience LDI?

<ul>
	<li>Resilience Latent Defects Insurance (LDI):&nbsp;Covers major structural defects for 10 years from completion.</li>
	<li>Consumer-first:&nbsp;Direct claim access, no need for lengthy legal action.</li>
	<li>Cost advantage:&nbsp;At approximately 1.8% of build cost, LDI is typically priced below the traditional 2% Strata Bond while offering broader protection.</li>
	<li>Market leader:&nbsp;&nbsp;Resilience Insurance originated LDI in Australia and is the national market leader.</li>
</ul>

NSW parliament passes 10-year defect insurance laws for new apartment buyers

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

<html><body>
Marketing your home for sale through a real estate agent leaves you in their power.
You need to trust them to effectively guide you through how the campaign for your property should be and how much you should be spending.
You must rely on them to ensure you do not overcapitalise, and in a space where the arguments over print versus online advertising and even the use of signboards are rife, it's understandable that you might be feeling a little lost.
For our Tuesday Q&amp;A, Property Observer asked Century 21's national training manager Alastair Kay all about advertising, marketing and his own experiences in real estate.
What was the most exciting property you ever marketed, and how did you express this in your marketing?
The most exciting sale I’ve been involved in was the successful transaction of a property in Banksia Beach, Bribie Island's premier postcode which is known locally as millionaire’s row.<img src="/images/2014/08/12/kay-aug-12-one.png" alt="" style="float: right;">
My point of contact for the property was the owner’s son, who lived between the Bribie home and his main residence in Brisbane. The son demanded excellence in everything he was involved in, having previously served in the military and being at that time employed as a well-respected prosecutor.
After much discussion, we chose to take their home to auction as it had only attracted five inspections after having been on the market for over two years. This high risk strategy required a significant investment to ensure we attracted the right buyers, so together we created a professional, targeted marketing campaign which required an investment in excess of $30,000 from the vendor.
The four week auction campaign attracted in excess of 100 viewings, an incredible amount of interest for the global financial crisis and a figure that dramatically exceeded the seller’s expectations. The auction was held at twilight on the deck of the home overlooking the Pumicestone Passage and was sold 24 hours later, after being passed in at the auction.
How do you tailor advertising and marketing to each individual property and vendor situation?
The most vital consideration for tailoring marketing and advertising is finding out what the seller hopes to achieve from the sale, and how they’d like to achieve it. More specifically, I like to ask the vendor questions relating to the sale based around three key areas: price, privacy and timing.
If obtaining the highest price possible is the most important result they want to achieve, I will show them what marketing is available to them and what attracts the most enquiries. I’ll also provide them with all the options and assist them with building their own campaign as the more the vendor can be involved, the better the likely result. Some real estate agents forget this and often present completed marketing campaigns, or only a few options. The danger with this approach is that it overlooks the fact the vendors are transacting what, for most people, is their single largest asset. This means that peace of mind in knowing that everything possible is being done to sell it at the best possible price should be of paramount importance.
Some vendors are worried about their privacy, a concern which may be driven by any number of different reasons. In these instances, I’ve occasionally been asked to design a discrete marketing campaign where a particular group of buyers is intensively targeted, or asked not to advertise at all and merely shop it around to interested buyers I’m aware of in the community.
<blockquote>
After much discussion, we chose to take their home to auction as it had only attracted five inspections after having been on the market for over two years.
</blockquote>
Timing is also crucial to tailoring a marketing campaign – if the vendor is desperate to sell, the only choice is often an intensive marketing campaign which showcases the property to as many potential buyers as possible.
What questions do vendors commonly ask around marketing?
Generally vendors want to discuss how much a marketing campaign for their property is going to cost, because they are often concerned that there can be no guarantee that they will achieve the price they hope for. These are legitimate concerns which your real estate agent should be comfortable addressing. Typically, I’ll explain how it’s in my best interest for the property to sell as real estate agents only ever get paid when a property settles.
Successfully transacting a property requires a well thought-out, structured and targeted marketing campaign that is designed to meet the vendor’s specific needs and requirements. If your agent isn’t paying adequate attention to your marketing requirements, it’s probably best to consider speaking with another agent to compare approaches.
Turn over page for more, including the difference between auction and private treaty marketing.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
How does advertising differ between auctions and private treaty marketing?
There isn’t a great deal of difference, however vendors tend to invest less into marketing when they sell via private treaty. This is because when property is being transacted by private treaty, all that’s required is one passionate buyer to place an offer, as opposed to an auction where you want to attract several passionate bidders to compete for the property.
Regardless of the vendor’s preference regarding how they sell their property, I always recommend investing in the strongest campaign possible, as this has the highest possibility of finding the buyer that is going to pay the most.
I always caution that marketing for a property should be considered an investment – not a cost. This is because vendors often find that they’re able to achieve significantly more for their property through a premium marketing campaign, and doubling, or even tripling, their initial marketing investment.
For which type of properties does print advertising work?
I always recommend vendors consider every avenue of marketing available to them, as the reality is we’re after the buyer for the property – not just a buyer. This distinction is crucial, as marketing for the buyer means that you’re exploring all possible options, not just pursuing the cheapest, easiest option.
When I was selling in a rural location on the Queensland coast, most vendors wanted to choose a local paper that had a readership of 20,000 people every week and more often than not, found that they weren't getting the result they'd hoped for. My consistent recommendation to vendors was that they choose a different paper that had a greater readership of 950,000 people.
Doing this did mean an increased marketing investment; however, they increased attendance at open for inspections by an average of five buyers per week. This helped achieve a premium price for every seller who chose to add paper marketing to their campaign.
The moral of the story is that there’s still a place for paper advertising, especially newspapers that have a larger, more targeted circulation. There’s no use in having 10,000 people viewing your property online if 9,950 are in another state and only browsing for fun.
Are there any aspects of advertising where vendors should be spending less or more?
As you’ve probably realised, I'm a big believer in creating and executing the best campaign possible. Vendors only get one opportunity to make a good first impression and selling your home is no different.
There are ways of cutting costs. But in my experience when vendors try to cut costs in their marketing, they ultimately end up cutting the price they’re able to achieve for the property. I recently sold a unit on the waterfront by auction which the vendors had been contemplating listing at a price and seeing what happened.
The vendors were working on the assumption that because an identical unit above theirs sold for $360,000 only a few months earlier, they'd get a similar price. After talking through a range of options, they chose to invest into the best marketing campaign they could as they agreed that they’d only get one shot at introducing the property to the market.
By taking this approach they achieved a result of $418,500 – well above the recent sale, and a result that only came about because the marketing campaign reached the market completely. Had they sold by private treaty, they had planned on listing for $389,000.
What does the best listings copy look like – and what tips do you have for agents who consistently get it wrong?
Listing copy is one area that does need a lot of work in Australian real estate. Unfortunately, it often boils down to time and writing skills, and often agents will be a little short on both.
The best listing copy will portray the property in a positive light, while providing plenty of detail about the local area with a quirky edge which makes the property stand out. Some agents tend to go a little details-heavy, writing copy that ends up reading like an extended novella. Some agents, on the other hand, try too hard to be memorable and sacrifice too much detail. The ideal copy will get this balance right, which is a delicate process.
How much does it really cost to advertise a property?
For a long time now agents have used a rule of thumb that says that the marketing budget of a property should be roughly 1 per cent of the price of the home. Therefore if the value of the home is roughly $500,000 then a budget of $5,000 would be advisable.
However, this isn't always accurate and my advice is to recommend the campaign which will give the agent the best opportunity of achieving the highest price for the home. Naturally all real estate agents have to work within the constraints of the vendor’s budget, but often the vendor finds it’s worth the extra investment as they’ll likely achieve more at the sale.
One property that I transacted for $1,600,000 had a vendor who invested in a marketing campaign in excess of $30,000. Due to the nature of the property and its target market, anything less than this would have been inadequate and a waste of money. 
If there's someone you'd like to see asked about a topic for a Tuesday Q&amp;A, email <a href="mailto:jduke@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">jduke@propertyobserver.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Print v online, the costs and effectiveness of advertising: Q&A with Century 21's Alastair Kay

<html><body>
Sydney's cheapest weekend auction sale was 8/58 MacDonald St, Lakemba, a two bedroom offering at $326,000 sold by John Shalala at Ray White Croydon.
<a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-unit-nsw-lakemba-117420671" target="_blank">It last sold in 2010 at $245,000, so reflected 7.8% annual growth over the four years</a>.
As Property Observer reported yesterday, Sydney's most expensive property sold at weekend auction <a href="/expert-insights/buying/mosman-price-shocker-tops-sydneys-weekend-auctions">was a three-bedroom Beauty Point home with Middle Harbour views</a>.
The house at 12 Euryalus Street, Mosman fetched $3.23 million.
However, Property Observer noted it last sold at $3.1 million in June 2010, so not even 1% price growth during the past four years.
The bungalow property comes with approval to rebuild a three level family home on the elevated, north facing 773 square metre block.
Sydney's 80% weekend auction result was the highest clearance rate reported since early April.
Australian Property Monitors reported the Sydney weekend auction market was in "revival mode" over the past five weekends with the average initial clearance rate over that period rising to 78.3% compared to just 74.1% over the previous five-weekend period.
Auction listings have flattened over recent weekends. The significantly higher volumes this year compared to past years has almost disappeared.
There were 434 auctions scheduled in Sydney on the weekend compared to 404 listed over the same weekend last year, just 7.5% higher.
But prior weekends over the past two months were up on last year by 24%; 52%; 31%; 35%; 54%; 37%; 37%; 32% and 61% on the June long weekend.
Sydney's north-west recorded a 92.3% clearance rate at the weekend and was the best performer of all the Sydney suburban regions.
This was closely followed by the inner west with 90.7%, the south 85.7%, the upper north shore 84.3%, the city and east 81.8%, the northern beaches 81.3% and Canterbury-Bankstown with a clearance rate of 80%.
Next weekend Sydney agents have around 430 auction offerings (about 10% up on last year) and APM's preliminary figures for the 23 August weekend is currently sitting at 410 offerings, which is around the same weekend last year.
The recent rise in volumes - that may have waned - has not been just a Sydney trend. A  review of volumes nationally over the first eight months of the year shows there have been nearly 50,833 capital city auctions in total, or 38% more auctions held when compared to the same period last year, according to RP Data.
Fewer listings with strong buyer demand means the days of 80% clearance rates will return, making it harder to buy without strong competition.
Back to that cheapest weekend sale at 8/58 MacDonald St, Lakemba, a two bedroom offering sold at $326,000 pre-auction. 
It was sold by an investor who got around $270 a week on its 2010 purchase to an investor who will be hoping to now secure around $325 a week.
So in the past four years the yield has tightened from 5.7% to a 5.1% yield now.
The 2013-2014 price upswing has triggered this drop in rental yields, into which investors still rush.
Recent RP Data research shows rents have failed to keep pace with prices in all capital cities.
Sydney and Melbourne have the lowest yields of all capital cities, at 3.9% and 3.4% respectively.
Most investors must be chasing capital growth rather than rental return. Be wary when at the currently highly competitive auctions.
Sydney rents rose by 3.7% in the past year, making it the only city where growth outstripped inflation. 
By comparison, house prices in the city increased by 16.7% since April 2013.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

As investors dominate, Lakemba sale highlights price growth and tightening yields

<html><body>
The historic Collingwood warehouse of the Hong Kong-based banker Richard Lee was passed in at weekend auction at $1.3 million.
Lee, chief operating officer of the investment banking division of CLSA, and his wife Peta, bought the property in 2010 for $905,000.
They spent the next 18 months renovating part of the 150-year-old Victoria distillery.
The four-level three bedroom warehouse at <a href="https://www.realestateview.com.au/Real-Estate/14-21-northumberland-street-collingwood/Property-Details-buy-residential-7289509" target="_blank">14/21 Northumberland Street</a> had been listed Sarah Sharp, of RT Edgar.
The warehouse conversion was within the Barrett Burston Collingwood Malthouse.
</body></html>

The Barley House, 1860s Collingwood warehouse fails to sell

<html><body>
The total value of housing finance commitments increased by 1.0% in June 2014. 
The total value of housing finance commitment is 15.6% higher year-on-year.  Meanwhile the number of housing finance commitments to owner occupiers has increased by 0.2% over the month and has increased by just 2.4% over the 2013/14 financial year.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3581" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Chart-1.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="179">
The total value of housing finance commitments continues to trend higher however; the strength of the investment segment has waned over recent months. 
Over the month the owner occupier segment fuelled the increase with refinances up 1.6% and non-refinances up 1.9% while investment lending fell by -0.3%.It was the first time investment lending has fallen over consecutive months since December 2012. 
Year on year, the value of housing finance commitments is 15.6% higher with owner occupier refinances up 14.8%, owner occupier non-refinances up 9.4% and investment loans rising 23.8%.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3582" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Chart-2.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="181">
As a proportion of total lending, the level of lending for investment purposes remains inflated on an historic basis although it has eased slightly. 
Owner occupier non-refinance commitments accounted for 43.4% of total lending in June compared to 18.1% to owner occupiers for refinances and 38.5% for investors. 
Although investment lending has eased it continues to hover at around its highest levels since late 2003. Remember 2003 was the final days of the housing boom in both Sydney and Melbourne which commenced in 2001.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3583" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Chart-3.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="181">
The number of housing finance commitments to owner occupiers increased by 0.2% over the month and was 2.4% higher year on year. 
The year-on-year increase is the slowest rate of increase since February 2013.  This indicates that although demand for housing demand has increased, the rate of growth in this demand is slowing. 
Looking at the more detailed components, refinance commitments are -0.7% lower over the month and 5.1% higher year on year.  Non-refinance commitments have increased by 0.6% over the month and are 1.2% higher year-on-year.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3584" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Chart-4.jpg" alt="Chart 4" width="500" height="182">
The number of owner occupier housing finance commitments can be further broken down in to the type of commitments the finance is for.  The three categories we analyse here are: construction of dwellings, purchase of new dwellings and purchase of established dwellings (excluding refinances). 
Over the month, construction of dwellings rose by 1.1%, purchase of new dwellings was 4.6% higher and purchase of established dwellings edged just 0.1% higher. 
Year on year, the market strength has been associated with construction of new dwellings (+17.0%) rather than purchase of new dwellings (-2.1%) and purchase of established dwellings (-1.7%).  In fact the number of owner occupier finance commitments for construction of new homes is at its highest level since February 2010.
Keep in mind that in June 2014, 17.9% of these non-refinance commitments were for construction of dwellings, 8.2% were for purchase of new dwellings and 73.9% were for purchase of established dwellings.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3585" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Chart-5.jpg" alt="Chart 5" width="500" height="179">
The number of owner occupier housing finance commitments for first home buyers fell by -3.6% in June 2014 and are -6.2% lower year-on-year.
First home buyers continue to play little role in the market, accounting for just 13.2% of total owner occupier housing finance commitments in June. 
Interestingly the average loan size for first home buyers is increasing.  As home values rise they need to borrow a greater amount, this is highlighted by the 7.1% year-on-year rise which is the largest since December 2009.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3586" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Fianl-chart.jpg" alt="Fianl chart" width="500" height="272">
RP Data’s Mortgage Index (RMI) which provides a lead indicator to the number of owner occupier housing finance commitments indicates that there is likely to be a lift in July.  Activity levels were 6.7% higher in July 2014 compared to June suggesting a likely rise in housing finance commitments over the coming month.
The data shows that while demand for housing finance is holding, we are potentially seeing a slowdown in demand from the investment segment.  Meanwhile demand for owner occupiers is steady, albeit the rate of growth is slowing with the strongest increases arising for those constructing their own home. 
Spring will be the real test for the market from here, investment activity remains elevated, auction volumes and results have been strong throughout winter and we wait to see if this momentum continues for the remainder of the year.  Particularly given that although values are continuing to increase, they are doing so at a more moderate pace than they were throughout late 2013 and early 2014.
Although mortgage demand has picked-up over the past two years, it is important to note that the number of finance commitments remain well below 2009 and much lower than activity levels prior to the financial crisis.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

Housing finance data reveals possible slowdown in investment demand

<html><body>
Politicians have a great appetite for exercises that chew up lots of time and money for little purpose other than to attract spotlight and give the impression that they’re doing something.
The current federal inquiry into housing affordability is a classic of the genre. Let’s galvanise the nation with a talkfest about a non-existent problem. We can stretch it out over many months, with regular media events, and really make it look like we’re on the ball and genuinely care.
Sir Humphrey Appleby would be proud.
But the Yes Minister icon would be fit to burst at the latest effort of the Queensland government.
It’s only taken them two and half years in government, but they’ve finally come up with it: a vision for the state.
Not just any vision. This is a blueprint for what Queensland will look like 30 years from now.
As we’ve seen regularly in state and federal politics, most governments can’t estimate the state of their own budget one year ahead, let alone the state of play in 30 years’ time.
But this is not about reality. This is about creating an illusion. The delusion that Campbell Newman and his crew are actually in charge of the state’s destiny.
The current Queensland government is busily turning a landslide into a mudslide. They hold almost all the seats in the Parliament but still manage to look like they’re under siege a lot of the time, fighting for their lives.
Labor, almost wiped out in the 2012 state election, has just won a by-election with a swing of 18.6%, after winning a February by-election with a swing of 17.2%.
Queensland unemployment has risen sharply and, at 6.8%, is well above the national average and the highest in 11 years. Economic activity, as measured by state final demand, has fallen recently. Queensland got a mediocre rating in the latest State of the States report from CommSec, well behind the growth leaders Western Australia, the Northern Territory and New South Wales.
So it’s a good time to create a diversion, more for their own benefit than the publics’. As Sir Humphrey observed, politicians don’t believe they exist unless they read about themselves in the paper.
But what a pointless exercise. Why create a 30-year plan when you won’t be around to implement it? The current mob is unlikely to be in government even four years from now, given the extraordinary volatility in the electorate.
Newman won’t be Premier in 2024, much less in 2044 which is the ultimate destination of this plan - during which time there will be a dozen new governments, each with its own deep vision and long-term plan.
So why bother with this window dressing? Why publish a plan that you have no chance of implementing?
And why get excited about it as journalists, consumers, businesses and developers?
But some have. Media lapped it up and one newspaper came up with this: “A wave of housing demand in Queensland areas such as Gladstone is expected to flow from The Queensland Plan …”
One development company latched on to this to promote the “masterplanned community” it’s developing in Gladstone. It said Gladstone had emerged as a growth area recently.
In reality, the only real estate factors growing in Gladstone at the moment are the vacancy rate (around 7%) and the consternation of investors who own property there. Prices have 10% in the past 12 months and it will get worse when the construction phase of the three mega gas projects winds down.
There are plenty of Queensland places worthy of consideration by investors, including Toowoomba, Cairns and the Sunshine Coast – each of them growing strongly for local reasons. Toowoomba, as I discussed earlier in the week, is arguably the nation’s strongest property market. Cairns is pumping in a way not seen since the 1980s and the Sunshine Coast is rising on the back of a big infrastructure spend.
None of this has anything to do with the 30-year “vision” that will be filed along with all the other political plans, never to be heard of or thought about again.
You can contact Terry via <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email</a> or on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.
Photo courtesy of BBC Television.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Queensland's "30-year vision" a plot worthy of Yes Minister

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Rising world demand for gas, iron ore, and coal have already made a mark on several property markets across Australia over the last four to five years. Propertyology’s continuous investment in property economics has us questioning whether another commodity, nickel, might soon create other property investment opportunities.
While not as well known as other metals, nickel plays an important role in modern life. When mixed with other metals it helps create strong alloys that won't rust, can withstand high and low temperatures, and can be easily shaped into anything from thin wires to flat sheets.
One such use of nickel is adding it to iron to make stainless steel. Just ponder: with the existing western world and the fast rising Asian middle class, how much extra demand will there be for cooking utensils and kitchen equipment, surgical instruments, marine equipment, the construction industry, crank-shafts and axles in cars, washing machines, aircraft engines? What opportunities will this create for businesses with links to nickel? Where might all the new jobs be created?
Ponder this also: rising petrol prices, a push for cleaner energy and more advanced technology is expected to result in a major ramp up in production of battery-powered cars. It doesn’t require rocket science to figure out that a similar increase in production of portable devices such as smart phones and laptops is also expected to boom. Rechargeable batteries for mobile phones, cars, clocks, kid’s toys, and remote controls require nickel.
Get the picture? Now ponder this...
Australia is currently the world’s fourth largest producer (11.4%) of nickel, behind Russia, Indonesia and Philippines. If world demand for nickel intensifies as forecast, it might become even more prevalent that Australia is ranked number one in the world for nickel resources with 24.4% of known reserves.
Stock market analysts, Credit Suisse, recently placed a couple of Australian-based nickel mining companies on their ‘watch list’. Western Australia (refer Kalgoorlie) has the lion’s share of nickel resources. Other less significant resources are located in the central west of New South Wales, far northern tip of Tasmania, south of Gladstone and near Townsville. Property investors might consider placing a couple of these locations on their watch list, too.
<img src="/images/2014/08/12/nikel-deposits-aug-12-one.jpg" alt="">
Source: Geoscience Australia, '<a href="/news">Australia's Identified Mineral Resources 2013</a>'.
Buying an investment property in a remote location because of the potential for a single mine is something that Propertyology would consider to be very speculative. However, when we combine economic sustainability with some future upside we often get a really astute investment decision which stands out from the rest of the pack.
Sometimes the best investment results over the longer-term come from buying in the towns nearby to the mines, although an understanding of the higher volatility from commodity price fluctuations is important. In different situations the wisest investment might be in the large city (capital or regional) which will supply most of the goods and services to the smaller towns.
Perth, for example, has one of only two existing major nickel refineries in Australia. The BHP-owned Nickel West refinery at <a href="/news">Kwinana</a> processes most of Western Australia’s nickel and you’d have to think that there is considerable potential to increase upon its current 2,000 employees.
QCG Resources has just acquired the Avebury nickel mine in Tasmania for $40 million. The mine closed in 2009 due to floundering nickel prices. Due to the aforementioned rising demand for nickel, the commodity price has increased by a significant 34% since Christmas and QCG clearly see an encouraging outlook for nickel.
Clive Palmer will be as excited as anyone about the forecast demand for nickel. He may be controversial, however he didn’t become a billionaire by chance. Palmer owns the Queensland Nickel Refinery in <a href="/news">Townsville</a>. Queensland Nickel imports the commodity from mines in the Pacific, processes it, and then exports it out as a refined product. Whilst nothing has materialised as yet, Palmer has proposed a $1 billion upgrade of the refinery and supporting infrastructure. If that goes ahead there will be significantly more than the existing 1,000 people employed at the Townsville refinery. Townsville already has a lot to offer for property investors.
Palmer is also the major shareholder of Gladstone Pacific Nickel Limited (GPNL) which has proposed the establishment of a $3.5 billion nickel and cobalt refinery adjacent to the existing deepwater Port of Gladstone. GPNL already owns a nickel mine at <a href="/news">Marlborough</a>, near Gladstone. In spite of Gladstone’s current property market downturn, population growth forecasts are very strong and the surplus property stock will be soaked up before too long in Australia’s industrial powerhouse.
The future outlook may well be one of those ‘upside’ factors for Gladstone and Townsville – both are very strong regional cities with incredibly strong long-term property investment fundamentals. 
<img src="/images/2014/08/11/press-aug-11-one.jpg" alt="">
Simon Pressley is managing director of <a href="https://www.propertyology.com.au/" target="_blank">Propertyology</a>, a full-time property market analyst, accredited property investment adviser, and Australia’s (REIA) Buyer’s Agent of the Year (2012+2013+2014).
Picture courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
</body></html>

spressley-sBoeMhannA

Nickel could be behind the next mining boom: Here are the areas set to benefit

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Australian politicians are keen property owners. <a href="/expert-insights/investing/the-propertied-federal-politicians-pollies-and-their-300-million-property-portfolio">Data compiled by Lindsay David, Deakin University’s Philip Soos and Paul Egan</a> from the parliamentary register of members’ interests shows the 226 members of federal parliament (both houses) have an ownership stake in some 563 properties. While these properties may be jointly owned with a spouse, this is an average of 2.5 properties per member.
In 2013, the 76 members of the Senate had 202 property holdings and the 150 members of the House of Representatives had 361 property holdings.
Top of the leader board is National Party Senator Barry O’Sullivan with a portfolio of 50 properties. David Gillespie follows with 18 and Palmer United Party Senator Clive Palmer has a seemingly conservative 13, although the total value of Palmer’s properties is unknown (see table below).
<img src="/images/2014/08/06/Table2-1.png"> 
Compiled by Lindsay David, Philip Soos and Paul Egan.
The estimated total value of these properties is said to be around A$298 million. This was calculated by multiplying the 563 properties by the median dwelling price of $530,000, as of July 2014. If these properties are located in major cities or other high-value areas the property holding could be substantially higher.
Property, democracy and fairness
Major Australian cities have been feeling the housing affordability squeeze for some time now. Owning multiple investment properties does nothing to ease the upward pressure on real estate prices or to increase first home buyer opportunities. Ensuring housing equality – for example, by providing adequate housing for all social groups – is becoming an increasingly complex task in Australian cities.
When the philosopher <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/" target="_blank">John Rawls</a> coined the phrase the “property-owning democracy” he was interested in how property might be used to satisfy the principles of justice as fairness. Rawls could hardly have known the illuminating irony he might cast on the property holdings of politicians.
Should we be alert, perhaps even alarmed, at the real estate investment practices of the guardians of Australian democracy? Well, maybe. Some 94% of the members of federal parliament owned real estate in 2013. More than 50% own investment or commercial property. By comparison, ABS data show less than 20% of the general population owned a property other than the one they lived in in 2012. But it’s politicians that set the taxation and housing policies that attempt to address our housing concerns.
Policy push
Senator Xenophon is currently <a href="https://nickxenophon.com.au/media/releases/show/home-affordability-a-super-idea/?Stage=stage" target="_blank">seeking</a> changes to the Superannuation Act that would allow funds to be released to purchase a first home. This would not put downward pressure on first home buyer housing stock. In fact, it could diversify the investment pool and lead to upward pressure.
According to the register, Independent Senator for South Australia Nick Xenophon has a portfolio of eight investment properties.
A spokesperson for Senator Xenophon said the register was outdated, but confirmed the Senator owns four investment units and his super fund also owns a property (under management). The correct figure is expected to be reflected in the next register of Senator’s interests.
Addressing housing disparity
Australia’s democratic process is predicated on notions of impartiality and transparency. The parliamentary register of members’ interests is an important citizenry “watch dog” mechanism. It is a mechanism that should be employed to monitor the property holdings of Australian politicians and then deployed to call their actions to account.
It is important to note that the research doesn’t show a causal link between property holdings and decisions of politicians. But it would be imprudent to assume prima facie that the property holdings of Australian politicians do not play a role in their political thinking, especially as this thinking relates to housing, taxation or even superannuation policy.
What is needed is a broader discussion about housing disparity that fully acknowledges and accounts for these vested interests and tools of political influence. This should include the politics and interests of the politicians themselves.
The naïve assumption that housing wealth will trickle down through a property-owning democracy have been shattered by the realities of 21st century Australian cities. The question which remains is whether our democratic processes can be reorganised to address these now clearly evident housing disparities. A discussion about the real estate ideologies that underwrite the investment agendas of Australian politicians seems like a fitting starting point.
Dallas Rogers is research fellow at the Urban Research Centre, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-western-sydney">University of Western Sydney</a>.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

drogers-JvoVgMGDGm

Our $300 million propertied federal pollies: How should they influence housing policy?

<html><body>
A preliminary weighted average clearance rate of 65.9% was recorded this week across capital cities compared to 68.9% last week, and 70.1% this time last year. 
The lower clearance rate was a result of a softening in the Melbourne market. This contrasted with the very buoyant outcome in Sydney and Adelaide.
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3590" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Capital-city-580x430.jpg" alt="RP Data National Auction Comment" width="580" height="430">
Sydney continues to be the capital city with the strongest and most consistent auction market. A preliminary clearance rate of 75.5% was recorded this week compared to 76.7% last week.
<a href="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Sydney.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g3589]"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3591" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Sydney-580x380.jpg" alt="RP Data National Auction Comment - Sydney" width="580" height="380"></a>
The lowest result in nine weeks occurred in Melbourne where a preliminary clearance rate of 63.9% recorded compared to 69% last week.
Auction numbers have risen in the inner east after a seasonal lull. Rising stock numbers in the next month will clearly test the market.
<a href="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Melbourne.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g3589]"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3592" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Melbourne-580x384.jpg" alt="RP Data National Auction Comment - Melbourne" width="580" height="384"></a>
In Brisbane a preliminary clearance rate of 35.3% was recorded compared to 36.7% last week.
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3593" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Brisbane-580x383.jpg" alt="RP Data National Auction Comment - Brisbane" width="580" height="383">
Adelaide recorded a very strong clearance rate of 75% compared to 61% last week.
Low stock numbers at this time of the year can affect the clearance rate by making in more variable than in spring and summer.
In Canberra a clearance rate of 45.8% was recorded and in Perth there was a clearance rate of 66.7%.
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3594" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20140811-Adelaide-580x387.jpg" alt="RP Data National Auction Comment - Adelaide" width="580" height="387">
</body></html>

rlarocca-zWhvjay44N

Sydney leads as national clearance rate dips: RP Data's national auction wrap

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Independent Australian Senator Nick Xenophon is planning a legislative <a href="https://nickxenophon.com.au/media/releases/show/home-affordability-a-super-idea/?Stage=stage" target="_blank">push</a> for first home buyers to be able to access their superannuation savings to pay for a house deposit, mirroring a similar policy in Canada.
As with Australia and Canada, home ownership in New Zealand continues to be seen as a birthright and there is concern about home affordability as house prices, in the main centres at least, continue to rise.
When New Zealand’s workplace-based retirement savings scheme - KiwiSaver - was launched in 2007 the government included several incentives to make the scheme more attractive. One of these was the ability to withdraw contributions to enable the KiwiSaver member to purchase his or her first home.
The government also offers a first home deposit subsidy of NZ$1,000 per year of KiwiSaver membership, with a minimum of three years and a maximum of five years. Both benefits were in response to concerns that the deduction of KiwiSaver contributions from a young person’s pay packet would restrict their ability to get on the home ownership ladder.
How it works
Withdrawing savings for a first home becomes an option after three years or more of KiwiSaver membership. The member’s own contributions can be withdrawn, along with those of their employer. However, the government’s contributions, comprising a NZ$1,000 kickstart for new members and a member tax credit of up to $521.43 per annum, cannot be withdrawn.
The availability of the deposit subsidy is more restricted, with limits on income and the maximum purchase price of the property. Both benefits are only available for the purchase of a first home, with very limited exceptions, and never for an investment property.
These incentives were important in making the controversial scheme more palatable to the public. However, research has shown these incentives are less important to KiwiSaver members than the other government incentives. (Although this is likely to reflect the fact that many members will have already purchased their first home).
Incentives aren’t helping affordability
The benefits for first home buyers do little to assist with home affordability, which relates to the ongoing cost of home ownership. The latest <a href="https://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/learning/colleges/college-business/school-of-economics-and-finance/research/mureau.cfm">report</a> from Massey University’s Real Estate Analysis Unit found home affordability across New Zealand had deteriorated by 7.6% over the year to May 2014.
The benefits are also likely to have limited impact on house prices overall, particularly given the purchase price restrictions associated with the deposit subsidy. Certainly no restraining impact has been indicated, with house prices continuing to rise and ongoing concerns of a housing bubble in New Zealand.
While the benefits could also potentially help push prices up by increasing demand from first home buyers, there is no evidence this has occurred. The purchase price restrictions associated with the deposit subsidy will help curb any potential inflationary impact on house prices. The persistent increase in house prices, particularly in Auckland, continues to be driven primarily by immigration and speculation.
However, KiwiSaver’s first home benefits do assist New Zealanders into their first home by helping them meet the minimum deposit levels required to be able to obtain a loan, something made more difficult with the introduction of loan-to-value ratio (LVR) limits by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand in October 2013. (This has meant that 90% of a bank’s new home loans require a deposit of 20% or more).
The most recent figures available pre-date the LVR changes, but show that more than 10,000 New Zealanders withdrew savings of more than NZ$120 million from their KiwiSaver accounts to assist with their first home purchase in the year to March 2013. In addition, nearly 5,000 subsidies worth more than NZ$15 million were provided in the year to May 2013.
While it’s likely some KiwiSaver members have simply taken advantage of the availability of these benefits, for many young people they will have been vital to helping them achieve their goal of home ownership.
It could be argued that allowing withdrawals from KiwiSaver accounts defeats the purpose of retirement savings. While we know that the earlier you start saving the better, the reality is losing three to five years’ worth of contributions at a relatively young age will not be a disaster – and the retention of the government contributions means the member does not go back to square one as a result of the withdrawal.
Helping young people to help in retirement
While the lifetime benefits of renting versus home ownership continue to be debated, the <a href="https://media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/document/pdf/201333/RetExpBudget_Report_Aug2013.pdf">New Zealand Retirement Expenditure Guidelines</a> identified the financial benefits for retirees who own their own unencumbered home, compared to those who are renting. This suggests assisting young people to make their first home purchase will provide benefits for them in the long-term, and improve their retirement prospects.
Another reason to support home ownership is that it provides more secure accommodation for families, compared to renting. Fundamental changes to the property rental market in New Zealand would be needed to change this.
However, there is a large difference between a 25-year old withdrawing three years of contributions and a 50-year old withdrawing 10 years of contributions –the latter will be significantly disadvantaged in terms of retirement income. To counter this it would be sensible to restrict the withdrawal amount or the age at which withdrawals can be made from the scheme.
While the ability to use KiwiSaver savings to achieve a greater level of home ownership has been a successful policy in New Zealand, there is a strong case for introducing some limits to protect its underlying focus on retirement.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/29950/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="line-height: 1.3em;">
Claire Matthews is director of academic programmes at <a href="https://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/home.cfm" target="_blank">Massey University</a>.
Claire Matthews has received funding from Finsia. She is affiliated with the Fin-Ed Centre, NZCU Baywide and the New Zealand Association of Credit Unions.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

cmatthews-j6ptUweXhR

New Zealand's experience shows that tapping super is unlikely to improve affordability

<html><body>
Six Melbourne 7-Elevens outlets were sold last week.
The average initial yield was 4.7%.
The sales ranged between Malvern East at $2.85 million and <a href="https://www.realcommercial.com.au/property-retail-vic-mill+park-501210303" target="_blank">Mill Park</a> (pictured above) at $6.45 million with a $333,339 annual rental.
The other sales were Prahran ($4.23 million), Rowville ($5.9 million), Wantirna South ($5.6 million) and Glen Waverley ($4 million).
The buyers were private investors.
All up, the Withers family secured $71 million last week at the JLL auctions in the latest offering of 15 of its 7-Eleven service station and convenience stores.
Last week.<a href="/expert-insights/investing/yields-tighten-in-latest-7-eleven-sydney-service-station-offering"> seven NSW offerings of 7-Eleven service stations sold</a> at auction with an average 4.6% yield, tighter than the 6.8% two years ago.
</body></html>

Latest Expert Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Guides

Editor's Picks

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Expert Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Guides

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News