Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Joel Robinson

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

When buying an apartment, most people compare the big-ticket items first. Floorplans. Kitchens. Balcony size. Natural light. The view.

But there's one everyday consideration that often doesn't come up until after moving in: how parcels are delivered.

As online shopping has become part of everyday life, parcel deliveries have shifted from an occasional event to a regular occurrence. Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally.

For apartment residents, that can present a challenge.

If nobody is home to accept a delivery, parcels may be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in a building lobby or common area, or require building management to step in. In higher-density buildings, where dozens or even hundreds of residents may receive deliveries each day, parcel management has become an increasingly important part of everyday living.

That can create a range of frustrations. A missed delivery often means making time to collect a parcel elsewhere, while packages left unattended in foyers or mail areas can create clutter and increase the risk of theft. What seems like a minor inconvenience can quickly become a recurring issue for residents who shop online regularly.

It's one of those details that rarely features in a display suite but can have a noticeable impact once residents move in.

As a result, buyers are beginning to look beyond traditional apartment features and consider how a building supports day-to-day convenience, including whether there are secure options for receiving deliveries.

Australia Post's Parcel Lockers provide one solution.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CkF2oKmlACg?si=C50sDaoUUn2nuLmq" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than having a parcel delivered directly to an apartment, eligible deliveries can be sent to a nominated Parcel Locker. Once the parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can collect it using a QR code or one-time PIN at a time that suits them.

The Parcel Locker network now includes more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with installations at Post Offices, shopping centres, transport hubs and an increasing number of residential developments. By providing a secure collection point, Parcel Lockers help reduce missed deliveries and avoid parcels being left unattended in common areas.

For developers, parcel infrastructure is becoming another way to improve the resident experience. Rather than relying on concierge staff or leaving parcels in communal spaces, secure collection points help streamline deliveries while preserving the presentation and functionality of shared areas.

For buyers, it's a reminder that the best apartment features aren't always the most obvious.

A generous floorplan or quality finishes might help narrow the shortlist, but the conveniences that simplify everyday life, whether that's EV charging, secure bike storage or reliable parcel delivery, often become the features residents appreciate most once they're living there.

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hg-developments">HG Developments</a> is doubling down on Maud Street in Newstead, filing plans for a new apartment tower just a few doors down from its under-construction Aire Newstead development.

Recently submitted to Brisbane City Council, the proposal is for an 18-storey building designed by bureau^proberts, which has drawn heavily on Brisbane's subtropical design principles while referencing the suburb's industrial heritage.

A total of 64 apartments are planned for the amalgamated 1,518 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/17-21-maud-street-newstead-qld-4006">17–21 Maud Street</a>, a short walk from the Brisbane River and Newstead Riverwalk.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a400c7fd-bd15-48f8-a63b-10ede92efe00" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20bldg.png?VersionId=.0vPmjpbC7CNP7kqGWa6L7rGIwsNExaw" />

"The building is defined by a series of vaulted motifs that reinterpret the arches, colonnades and layered facades evident throughout Newstead's historic built fabric," the Urban Design Report states.

"Combined with recessed glazing and generous balconies, these elements create a layered building envelope that provides shade, weather protection and opportunities for natural ventilation whilst establishing a distinctive architectural identity."

The proposal comprises 64 two, three and four-bedroom apartments across 18 residential levels, positioning it alongside a growing number of taller residential projects transforming Newstead's northern precinct. The tower incorporates extensive subtropical landscaping, with cascading planter boxes, deep planting at street level and a landscaped rooftop recreation area.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="1d8140f4-8b98-45cd-b1b8-1efe8c8e266b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20podium.png?VersionId=VAZtbCoD44YCJ57N99fQCAKeSJx7ldZs" />

Bureau Proberts has prioritised passive environmental design throughout the project, with generous balconies, recessed glazing and operable façades helping reduce solar heat gain while maximising natural ventilation. River views become available from the upper levels, while the building has been orientated to capture prevailing breezes from both the Brisbane River and the west.

The architects say landscape is intended to be integral to the building rather than an applied element.

"Vertical greenery, cascading planter boxes and elevated gardens are woven throughout the architecture, softening the built form and strengthening the connection between residents and the subtropical environment."

"Through the integration of landscape, high-quality materials and passive design principles, the development delivers a refined residential address that celebrates Newstead's heritage character while contributing positively to Brisbane's evolving subtropical identity."

Newstead has remained one of Brisbane's most active apartment markets in recent years, with a number of developers continuing to back the inner-city suburb.

HG Developments is currently delivering the 40-apartment Aire Newstead at 25 Maud Street. Fortis recently launched the 65-apartment <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> on Kyabra Street, while builder-developer BPG and Don O'Rorke's Consolidated Properties are both expected to launch their respective Newstead projects before the end of the year.

HG Developments doubles down in Newstead with second Maud Street apartment development

Walk past a new apartment development promoting its sustainability credentials and it's easy to picture rooftop gardens, mature trees, landscaped courtyards and residents surrounded by nature.

But in many cases, that's not actually what those sustainability ratings guarantee.

Australia's leading environmental rating tools have played a significant role in improving the energy efficiency and environmental performance of buildings. Yet despite their focus on reducing emissions, many don't require developers to include trees, biodiversity or meaningful green space.

In other words, a building can achieve one of the country's highest sustainability ratings while containing little more than concrete, glass and hard landscaping.

That disconnect has led to the emergence of a new movement across Australia's property industry: nature-based cities.

The concept goes beyond designing buildings that consume less energy. Instead, it encourages developers to treat nature as essential infrastructure, integrating biodiversity, tree canopy, living landscapes and green spaces into projects from the earliest stages of planning.

Research has consistently linked access to nature with better physical and mental health, cooler neighbourhoods, improved biodiversity, stronger climate resilience and more connected communities. As Australia's cities continue to become denser, advocates say those outcomes should be considered just as important as energy efficiency.

Nature Based Cities (NBC) was established in 2022 to help accelerate that shift.

Founded by Hamton Executive Chairman Paul Hameister OAM, the not-for-profit was created after research highlighted a significant gap in Australia's sustainability framework. While existing environmental rating tools rewarded energy performance and emissions reductions, they placed little emphasis on the inclusion of living landscapes.

"We've always wanted to do more, and we know other developers who want to do more, but the ESD rating tools just aren't there," Hameister says.

"In Australia, you can have a five-green-star rated building that's concrete and glass with not a blade of grass.

"The focus is on reducing emissions, which is laudable, but there hasn't been enough attention paid to protecting and re-establishing nature. We need both for the health of the environment and for communities."

Since its launch, NBC has developed independent design guidelines and accreditation frameworks that encourage developers to prioritise ecology, biodiversity, tree canopy, walkability and living landscapes alongside traditional sustainability measures. The organisation first focused on medium and high-density residential developments before recently expanding into precinct-scale communities and masterplanned neighbourhoods.

Jan Talacko, founder of sustainability consultancy Ark Resources and a member of the Nature Based Cities Advisory Council, says the initiative addresses an area that has largely been overlooked by the property industry.

"Throughout my 25 years of working collaboratively with all stakeholders in the property sector, I've always favoured a pragmatic approach to sustainable design which encourages initiatives that not only meet environmental expectations but also improve amenity," Talacko says.

"Whilst we are making steady progress in relation to energy and carbon emissions from buildings, there has been much less emphasis on encouraging biodiversity and tackling the urban heat island effect.

"The Nature Based Cities initiative responds to a gap in the suite of tools currently used by the property development sector, which don't provide sufficient incentive, or recognition, for the integration of landscaping and greenery."

For apartment buyers, the shift is also changing the questions worth asking.

Rather than assuming a sustainable building will naturally include abundant green space, buyers are increasingly being encouraged to look beyond environmental ratings and ask what nature is actually being delivered. How much tree canopy will the development create? Has biodiversity been considered? Are landscaped spaces designed for people as well as appearance?

As Australia's cities continue to grow upwards and outwards, the next generation of sustainability may not simply be measured by lower emissions, but by how successfully developments bring nature back into everyday urban life.

What does it really mean for a building to be 'green'?

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

<html><body>
<img src="/images/2015/06/05/Holdencapital_banner.jpg" alt="" width="532" height="112">
 
SPONSORED POST
With interest rates at levels not seen for generations, the conditions are ripe for fresh approaches to construction funding methods and while the majority of construction debt is sourced from the major banks.
HoldenCAPITAL have utilised their experience and real-time market data to access alternative lending institutions securing some attractive alternatives to suit individual client needs. This includes the sourcing and negotiation of Joint Venture Partnerships and passive equity investment for medium to large sized projects.
The HoldenCAPITAL team is often asked what is the difference between bank and non-bank funding and in most instances there are only three significant differences:
• Interest rate  • Pre-sales requirements  • the amount of equity commitment required from the borrower.
Two of these factors are easily quantifiable but what about the question of pre-sales?
Pre-sales or no Pre-sales 
Interest rate and equity requirements might initially indicate that one option be preferred over the other, but if we assess their specific requirements with a full understanding of the project and market conditions, the best choice might not be the most obvious. The best way to illustrate this is by way of a case study that HoldenCAPITAL has prepared.
<a href="/images/2015/06/17/holden1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/05/holden1.jpeg" alt="">
<a href="/images/2015/06/17/feasibility_holden.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/05/holden2.jpeg" alt="">
 
Funding table comparison 
Bank and non-bank lenders have different requirements regarding loan ratios. Most non-bank lenders are so called gross realisation (GR) lenders and the main criterion for them is a loan to value ratio (LVR) of no more than 65%. Bank lenders also require a maximum LVR of 65%, but in addition they impose a limit of no more than 80% of the total development cost (TDC).
<a href="/images/2015/06/17/holden_3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/05/holden3.jpeg" alt="">
These differences in lending criteria allow you in many cases to borrow more when choosing the non-bank option. In this case study, the required equity contributions are:
• Bank option of $1,118,100, compared to  • Non-bank option of $603,240 – a significant reduction.
The internal rate of return (IRR) on an investment or project is the annualised effective compounded return rate. It is commonly used to evaluate projects and gives a return that can be compared against the annual cost of capital. As can be seen in the graph below, as a result in the lower requirement for equity, the non-bank option shows a much higher return on equity and the internal rate of return is more than double that of the bank option.
<a href="/images/2015/06/17/holdenlast.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/05/holden4.jpeg" alt="">
The benefits of managing project timing 
The bank option benefits from a significantly lower total interest cost however, the non-bank alternative does not require the delay of between 3-6 months associated with the pre-sales requirement and benefits from a lower requirement on developer equity with the potential for a significantly increased return on investment.
The key differential is that the non-bank option potentially allows the project to be completed in a shorter timeframe with a consequential reduction in the potential for a market shift to impact the project viability. 
Daniel Erez, Managing Director of New Ground Properties endorses these points noting that “For every pre-sale we currently secure we could probably sell 4-5 near completed units…”.
In the case of a no-presales option “… we are still providing the same de-risking strategy by selling out prior to completion, the difference is that it is happening later in the project … you don’t need to fund the pre-sales and commissions are paid 100% from settlement proceeds.”
To find out more about which option best suits your next project, contact Dan Holden at HoldenCAPITAL on 0401 669 502 or visit HoldenCAPITAL <a href="https://www.holdencapital.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>. 
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Bank Vs Non-Bank in townhouse project funding: Holden CAPITAL case study

<html><body>
As coincidence would have it I recently had a conversation with Dr Hazel Easthope, Senior Research Fellow, City Futures Research Centre UNSW following the news last month of yet another delay being announced in the now long over due review of NSW Strata Title legislation.
It has been confirmed that the Strata law reforms in NSW are to be delayed (again) with changes now not due to come into force until July next year. That’s another 18 months, which for such an important area of reform appears almost to be neglected.
The plans have been delayed several times since being announced in 2011. The reforms to the state’s 50-year-old strata laws are now urgent, but this message appears not to being heard by the State Government. In part a series of ministerial changes have hampered the process, but concerns among apartment dwellers are on the rise, and their concerns are justified.
The research being undertaken by Dr Easthope is looking at the experience of people living in strata titled property. Her work will look at details of people and seek to learn about their experiences of living in an apartment, and what they like and dislike about strata tile living. How strata title impacts the feeling of ‘home’ and how the quality of building management impacts residents. It’s notable that the quality of building management is now a key issue for many apartment buyers and investors.
The aim being to better understand the needs of different people living together in strata schemes and what can be done to make them more attractive places for everyone. The survey is due to be completed by 30thJune 2015 and I look forward to seeing the results.
The survey can be accessed at <a href="https://www.be.unsw.edu.au/research-centres-and-clusters/city-futures/about-us" target="_blank">City Futures</a>, and along with Dr Easthope I will keep readers up to date on the survey and related topics.
 Also in a national survey on strata-titled property conducted by Queensland’s Griffith University, the author, Professor Christopher Guilding has named building defects as the main challenge for apartment owners, which was also identified as the biggest issue for strata lawyers, and in the top five by resident building managers.
As a result the SMH recently reported that Professor Guilding is calling for a federal government inquiry about the issue, which must also put even more pressure on the NSW review process.
Professor Guilding will be releasing the results of the Inquiry Into Key Challenges In Australian Strata Title in September at the launch of the biennial national conference Strata and Community Title in Australia for the 21st Century.
The work by Professor Guilding and Dr Easthope appears very opportune and may well be central to helping to maintain the quality of life for the many apartment owners and future buyers across Australia and I am sure there will be a lot of valuable information and insights to share.
Peter Chittenden is managing director for residential of Colliers International. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.projectagenda.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

pchittenden-eLqUUC8TWW

Yet more strata legislation delays: Peter Chittenden

<html><body>
Perth housing conditions have remained stable over the last year with only one city making the exception, a new report found.
Buying conditions are ripe in the central metropolitan area of Perth according to the <a href="/expert-insights/buyers-favoured-over-sellers-in-queensland-commonwealth-bank-home-buyers-index">Commonwealth Bank-Core Logic Home Buyers Index</a>, which noted an 'equilibrium' in the marketplace, with neither buyers nor sellers holding power during negotiations.
<img src="/images/2015/06/17/PErth_hbi.jpg" alt="">
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Perth housing market on middle ground: Commonwealth Bank-Core Logic Home Buyers Index

<html><body>
Most of the price data that clutters up the airways is essentially useless information.
Boffins sitting in an office in Paris look at a number which says “Australian property values rose 9% in the past year” and imagine that tells them something about conditions in the fictitious creature they call the Australian property market.
Suddenly we have the OECD telling us we’re at risk of a price correction after gazing at Australia through an out-of-focus telescope across a distance of 17,000km. Seriously, these turkeys have no right to even express an opinion. Especially as that opinion is based on a meaningless statistic.
I’ve read in the past two weeks at least five different figures purporting to describe the median cost of the home in Sydney, ranging from $750,000 to $1 million.
Most of them are fanciful and inaccurate but that doesn’t stop commentators from giving them enormous import. The walking talking ego generally known as Graham Richardson pontificated that the average Sydney home cost a million dollars and declared that no one could afford that. The statement was inherently absurd because if the Sydney market is raging and a million dollars is the median price, clearly a lot of people can afford it because half of all sales are higher than that median figure.
The bottom line is: the average, mean or median is not a million dollars. CoreLogic RP Data’s latest figures suggest the median dwelling price for Sydney is currently $752,000. The other bottom line is that this figure is meaningless and misleading when you understand that Sydney has over 700 suburbs with median house prices ranging from $345,000 to $3.46 million.
It’s particularly meaningless and misleading in this context: first-home buyers can’t afford to pay $752,000 therefore, according to the misinformed, we have an affordability crisis which means we need to scrap negative gearing, ban foreign investment, cut out all first-home buyer grants because apparently they just inflate prices, introduce lending restrictions, call another federal parliamentary inquiry because the 18-month inquiry recently concluded didn’t discover anything new and savage the Federal Treasurer for daring to suggest a good job enhances your prospects of getting a loan.
The end result: truth, accuracy, balance and fair play just took another hammering - but, hey, lots of newspapers got sold.
The latest edition of Market Monitor from the Real Estate Institute of Queensland highlights how unhelpful it is to quote a single price statistic for an entire large city.
CoreLogic RP Data says the home value index for the Greater Brisbane area rose 3.1% in the past 12 months. Domain says the median house price increased 2.8%.
What do you deduce from that? That the Brisbane market is lukewarm? That growth in the city is anaemic at best? Richardson, in his irresponsible outburst on Sky News last week, declared Brisbane had recorded “no growth for years”.
You have to look deeper, otherwise you’re wasting everyone’s time.
Market Monitor shows the median house price for the Brisbane City local government area rose 7.2% in the year to April. So the Brisbane City Council area has been better than the wider Brisbane metropolitan area. 
And many individual suburbs did considerably better than that. Northgate grew 12.7% and Holland Park 13.5%, while Chermside rose 18.4% and Nudgee 17.3%.
A scan of the figures suggests that the middle market suburbs of Brisbane City have done much better than the LGA average, which in turn in much higher than the Greater Brisbane average result.
But media quotes the area average rise, which creates a quite misleading impression.
If you take the time to look through a report like Market Monitor, there are hundreds of stories about suburban and town markets, all doing different things influenced by local events - oblivious to the level of interest rates or the ignorance of media talking heads or the pompous proclamations of twits working for a bureaucracy based in Europe.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor yesterday for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Accurate price data or useless information? Terry Ryder

<html><body>
<div>
SQM's top 10 discounted properties have four located in Western Australia, and these four properties are clear examples of the continued impact of the commodities downturn.
Set in the rural town of Carabooda, number five and six on the list are not your typical family homes.
Sitting 48km outside of Perth CBD, both properties are set on over 15 hectares, with the potential to live and earn a living of the land.
Interestingly, both properties have been on the market for the same amount of time, however, number five, 292 Carabooda Road, as been reduced by two more percentage points, a total saving of $618,000. 
In contrast to these rural beauties, number eight and nine on our list are suitable for buyers wanting to be pampered and live in and close to Perth City.
Number eight, 4/134 Marine Parade, Cottesloe, has been on the market over two years now with the vendor slashing the price by $950,000.
With a reduction of just under a million dollars, this property is clearly a bargain.
Comparatively, number ten on our list 11/580 Hay Street, Perth, has recently passed the one year mark on the market, with the vendor slashing the price by half a million dollars.
</div>
<img src="/images/2015/06/17/sqmfallback2.jpg" alt="">
 Loius Christopher is an indépendant property analyst for SQM. You can follow him on twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/louichristopher" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

louischristopher-TWpYcZDLBK

Mining boom downturn triggers four WA offerings on SQM top discounted list 

<html><body><div class="article__content">
<div class="parsys parsys-article-content-top">
<div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
The global bond fund giant PIMCO has suggested that falling interest rates and rising house prices had the potential to drive a more irrational response with a 'herd mentality' that assumed continued capital price appreciation.
Based on the fear of missing out, PIMCO portfolio manager Aaditya Thakur said there was a risk that people build unrealistic and unsustainable expectations that house prices could continue to rise given prevailing conditions.  
"If you think about why people lever up its because they expect further income or price appreciation or a combination of both, but if they are extrapolating from past history, it might not be a true reflection of future productivity of the asset," she told The Australian Financial Review after issuance of her co-authored report.
PIMCO noted Australian household debt to net worth had increased from below 15 per cent in the early 90s to a peak to almost 30 per cent in 2009 - and now remained above 25%. 
PIMCO, which manages $US1.6 trillion of assets globally and $35 billion in Australia, completed the research paper to understand the drivers of household borrowing decisions.
The fund's thesis is of a "new neutral" which suggested Australian interest rates would be held lower for longer by a number of factors.
<div class="cq-article-content-paras section">
Australians being "irrationally exuberant" by borrowing too much to invest in housing, exposed the economy to financial shocks, global bond fund giant PIMCO tipped.
The PIMCO researchers found that Australians' decision to borrow was driven by falling interest rates and rising house prices – not economic fundamentals that reflect the health of the economy like employment.
The world's biggest bond investor said Australians appeared to be "trigger happy" about debt – responding far quicker than others to changes in interest rates and asset prices. 
PIMCO says they start borrowing more after only six months of increases in house prices compared with a year in the US.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

PIMCO warns of "trigger happy" Australian herd mentality in property

<html><body>
It was four months ago - the WA mining town auction that shocked the nation.
The ABC reported on a Port Hedland February auction where the fibro cottage was passed in at auction for $360,000 unsold - its highest offer reflecting 2006 price levels.
Immediately after the auction came its declared $600,000 asking price, then $590,000 in March.
It had last traded four years ago for $1.3 million, and before that at $870,000 in 2009 and at $350,000 nine years ago in 2006. 
<a href="https://www.janfordrealestate.com.au/1928630/" target="_blank">It is now for sale at $470,000</a> after yet another price adjustment. 
The three bedroom, one bathroom 1960s house sits in the heart of the Western Australian mining town. It is within the business and commercial district, opposite developments and not far from the boat ramp, Marapikarrinya Park, and fishing wharf.
<img src="/images/2015/06/17/700_headland.jpg" alt="">
Real estate agent Barry Walsh at Jan Ford Real Estate told the ABC the top bid was a sign the mining boom's construction phase had tapered off.
Negotiations continue for the sale of the cottage with 145 square space on its 600 square metre block.
It was initially listed for private treaty sale in June 2013 at $1.42 million.
Property Observer understands its most recent rental asking price was $800 a week in mid-2014, having been in excess of $2000 a week in 2008 and 2011, when it was last sold.
ABC reported that the <a href="/expert-insights/buying/sydneys-weekend-auction-clearance-rate-soars-to-82-but-port-hedland-highlights-how-the-mighty-can-fall">fibro cottage passed in at auction at $360,000</a>, with the highest offer reflecting 2006 price levels.
In February the listing agent, Barry Walsh at Jan Ford Real Estate, told Property Observer that at the peak of the mining boom, property prices in the Port Hedland and South Hedland regions were unsustainable.
"It was totally unsustainable where it was, and now that it's stabilising, it will bottom out, and is in the throes of doing that," says Walsh. He says 18 Edgar Street was advertised to rent at $2,400 per week at the market's peak," said Walsh.
"And now, you wouldn't rent it for $500 per week. That's a reflection of the rental market."
According to Walsh, the market was now in the process of returning to its fundamental value.
"The stabilisation of the market is a very good thing for Port/South Hedland and the Pilbura region," he says.
"It was unfortunate that the market went where it did, to unsustainable and disproportionate price levels."
He attributes some of the price escalation to the inability to release a sufficient amount of land for development to cope with the influx of residents who were attracted to the area's mining economy. The infrastructure required to house the expected 30,000 to 50,000 residents – everything from hospitals and schools to sewers and roads – wasn't available to facilitate the expansion of the region, making tenants compete for the existing properties.
"The rents got to about $2,800 a week – some of the dearest in the world."
He says 18 Edgar Street is currently advertised for $600,000 through private treaty, with a couple of potential buyers engaged. He says the property, as it exists now, would only be worth around $250,000 to investors as a residential building.
"Everyone up here would want at least 10% gross return", Walsh explained.
</body></html>

Port Hedland auction shocker - still unsold four months on

<html><body>
The display home at Frasers Property’s master-planned neighbourhood, Putney Hill sold at its recent auction.
The 76 Lardelli Drive offering was designed by Cox Richardson at one end of the picturesque Lardelli Park. 
It was styled by Coco Republic.
The ready-to-move-in four-bedroom family home sold through auctioneer Vic Lorusso for $2.15 million to a family with three young boys.
There had been around 160 inspecting the property throughout the campaign with six bidders registering for the auction.
It was a mix of owner-occupier buyers including empty nesters (over 50s), young professional couples (between 30-40 years of age), and young families. 
Frasers Property sales director Paul Lowe said the auction gave everyone an equal chance of buying this newly completed house.  
To date all opportunity to buy from the developer in the <a href="https://putneyhill.com.au/" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Putney Hill precinct</a> have been initially offered via off the plan private treaty.
<div>It had been listed with a $1.85 million plus price guidance.</div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>
Three display homes have also become available at <a href="https://www.belleproperty.com/buying/NSW/North-Shore-~-Upper/Turramurra/House/78P0011-414-420-bobbin-head-road-turramurra-nsw-2074" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">St Columbans Estate</a> at North Turramurra through Belle Property.
</div>
</div>
All homes feature an impressive formal entrance.
</body></html>

Putney Hill display home fetches $2.15 million

<html><body>
As someone who works analysing housing markets every day it is good to see that housing policy is back on the agenda especially considering that we currently don’t have a Federal Housing Minister.  The lack of a Housing Minister at the Federal level is intriguing when you look at some of the statistics relative to the housing market.
According to CoreLogic RP Data the total value of residential property at the end of May 2015 was $5.9 trillion.  To put this in perspective, gross domestic product (GDP) for Australian was recorded at $1.587 trillion over the 12 months to March 2015. 
The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ housing finance data showed that as at April 2015 there was $1.392 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt to Australian banks, building societies and credit unions.  Meanwhile, the share market garners plenty of attention, as at April 2015 the market capitalisation of listed domestic equities was $1.693 trillion.  Based on this data it would be fair to say that housing is Australia’s largest and arguably most important asset class. 
Even the value of Superannuation clocks in at a much lower $2 trillion, nearly three times smaller than the overall value of housing.
Given the importance of shelter and the runaway growth currently being experienced in Sydney and, to a lesser degree, Melbourne home values, it is no wonder that housing is becoming a politically very sensitive topic.  In particular negative gearing has become a topic of plenty of debate over the past few weeks. 
While the current Government have ruled out changes to negative gearing, both the Labor and Green parties are highlighting potential changes to their policies.
Negative gearing allows owners of investment properties to offset their expenses (losses) against their taxable income and as a result it can reduce their taxable income.  While this most certainly makes investment attractive the suggestion that negative gearing alone drives up the cost of housing is somewhat debatable.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4979" src="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Chart-12.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="180">
The above chart shows the total value of net rent claimed by individual taxpayers by financial year up to 2012-13.  Net rent is gross rent minus applicable deductions such as rental interest, depreciation and costs such as capital works.  What you will immediately note is that prior to 1999-00 the net profit or loss made from rent was fairly negligible. 
The Federal Government made changes to capital gains tax in September 1999 and this has seemingly helped to make negative gearing much more attractive than it was previously.  In September 1999 the Federal Government made changes which offered investors a 50% discount on capital gains tax when they sold their property if they held their investment for at least 12 months. 
As the first chart shows, since thes 1999-00 financial year net rental losses have spiked.  This would seem to suggest that the 50% discount to capital gains tax has conspired to make negative gearing of residential property a much more attractive investment option.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4980" src="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Chart-22.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="110">
If we take a look at the most recent financial year’s taxation data available there are some interesting statistics about negative gearing and who is claiming the benefit. In terms of the number of individuals claiming net rent, 68.9% of claimants had a taxable income of less than $80,000. 
While more taxpayers with a taxable income of less than $80,000 claim net rent losses, only 13.1% of all individuals with a taxable income below $80,000. 
On the other hand, more than a quarter (25.8%) of all taxpayers with an income of more than $80,000 claimed net rent.  In terms of the value of these losses, individuals earning less than $80,000 claimed rental losses of $2.781 billion or an average of $2,050 per claimant.  Individuals earning more than $80,000 claimed $2.613 billion in rental losses at an average of $4,276 per claimant. 
More people on incomes below $80,000 claim rental income but that is largely due to the fact that 81% of taxpayers had a taxable income of less than $80,000.  Conversely, a greater proportion of total higher income earners own rental properties and the typical losses claimed from these properties are much larger than those with taxable incomes below $80,000.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4981" src="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Chart-32.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="182">
In my opinion negative gearing is essentially a way in which the Government outsources social housing to the private sector or at least this should be how it works.  If we take a look at dwelling approvals data you can see that very few new approvals have been granted to the public sector over the past three decades. 
Typically more than 90% of all dwelling approvals over any month are granted to the privates sector with very few being approved and ultimately constructed by the public sector.  Ultimately the private sector takes on the role of construction of homes and it appears private citizens are incentivised to provide rental accommodation via the provision of negative gearing. 
If negative gearing were removed no doubt housing would still be an attractive investment for some who are seeking to be positively geared however, you may find that fewer people are attracted to housing as an investment option because of the absence of the tax deductions which negative gearing provides.
The data shows that a greater number of people on lower taxable incomes claim rental losses than those on higher incomes however, as a proportion of total taxpayers a greater proportion of high income earners claim rental losses and the value of these losses is greater for higher income earners.  The longer term net rental losses chart indicates that negative gearing alone didn’t really result in a high level on net rental losses however, when the capital gains tax discount was halved that seemingly made negative gearing much more attractive and the losses began to add up.
While scrapping negative gearing would likely provide a saving to the Budget bottom line, I believe it is unlikely to result in the substantial improvement in housing affordability that many are hoping for.  Arguably removing the capital gains discount which was introduced after negative gearing is a good first step to addressing the problems and then Government can revisit negative gearing.
The housing market has many moving parts that result in relatively expensive housing prices here in Australia.  While the removal of negative gearing may help improve the Budget bottom line it is unlikely to be the silver bullet which improves housing affordability. 
Zoning restrictions on developable land which drive up the cost of housing, the tax-free nature of the family home, stamp duty, the mass-centralisation of our population and shortage of jobs away from the major capital cities all conspire to make housing less affordable. 
Any discussion about improving housing affordability shouldn’t solely focus on just one of the issues such as negative gearing rather it needs to look at all of the factors which contribute to high housing costs.
Cameron Kusher is RP Data’s senior research analyst. Follow Cameron on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/cmkusher" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

CGT 50% discount spiked negative attractiveness as investment option: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
The arguments Terry Ryder presents need to be anchored in facts, he urged last week, and we couldn’t agree more. The subject of Mr Ryder’s piece for Property Observer was about recent GetUp email on negative gearing and unfortunately the facts of the matter were the first casualty. 
Getting into the policy nuances of an issue as complex as housing affordability is challenging in a blog. What we have to do is cut through the haze of complexity, often used by politicians and lobbyists to diffuse popular calls for reform, and get to the heart of the issue in clear language, anchored in the facts. With the luxury of a few more words, let’s go through Mr Ryder’s statements compared to GetUp’s, and see which way the facts fall.
1. Mr Ryder said we were wrong to claim “millions of first home buyers” were priced out of the market, because: “Australia has 8.6 million households, of which 6 million are homeowners and much of the rest (according to the research) are renters by choice.”
Mr Ryder was looking at household data, not individuals - but if you look at individuals, the last census in 2011 <a href="https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/factsheetshtdc?opendocument&amp;navpos=450" target="_blank">found about 2.3 million people in Australia rent</a> (and that figure doesn’t include the people who want to buy, but are living at home with their parents rather than renting). 
Mr Ryder does not provide any reference to the “research” allegedly showing most of these are “renters by choice.” However, a November 2014 report by the <a href="https://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/download/ahuri_51002_fr2" target="_blank">The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute</a>, under a section titled “deferring, not rejecting purchase”, shows renting for longer to save for a later purchase is one of several approaches would-be homebuyers are using to deal with higher prices.
It’s difficult to know for sure how many renters would rather be home owners, so we probably should have qualified it by saying “potentially” millions in our email, but when you look at the numbers and the research there are plenty of clues to suggest millions of renters would rather own their own homes. 
2. He claims, “25% of all current residential sales are to first-time buyers.” 
That’s wrong. The <a href="https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/5609.0Main%20Features3Apr%202015?opendocument&amp;tabname=Summary&amp;prodno=5609.0&amp;issue=Apr%202015&amp;num=&amp;view=" target="_blank">Australian Bureau of Statistics Housing Finance figures for April 2015</a> shows first home buyers made up just 15% of residential sales. The last time first home buyers made up 25% of the market was nearly five years ago, in October 2009. In fact, this precipitous drop in less than five years supports the proposition that would-be first home buyers are being pushed out of the market.
3. He questions the link between negative gearing and housing affordability, saying, “An 18-month federal parliamentary inquiry … couldn’t provide any definitive evidence that it did.”
Research from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows housing finance for investment properties rose from 16% to over 40% over the past 25 years, with the proportion of people renting increasing over that period, too. In particular, rental loss reported through negative gearing exploded after the capital gains tax discount was introduced in 1999. All this points to more investors in the market bidding up the price.
4. Though it’s not a key point in our email, Mr Ryder takes issue with the implication that investors are buying a second or third property, referencing ATO data showing “three-quarters of investors own only one property.” 
But that ATO data refers to investment properties. Mr Ryder forgets most people who buy an investment property are also owner occupiers. So when they buy an investment property, it’s generally their second property.
5. Mr Ryder says “the [GetUp] claim about ‘a skyrocketing housing market’ is patently absurd, given that only one of the eight capital cities has a boom market.” 
If that’s true, we’re not sure what all the fuss is about in the media, every single day. But let’s look at the figures and listen to the experts.  
A fascinating article on 15 April by ABC Business journalist Michael Janda quotes:
<ul>
<li>RMIT housing expert Emeritus Professor Mike Berry: "Housing prices more or less doubling over the last 10, 12 years in the capital cities.”</li>
<li>ABS statistics: Australian capital city home prices rose 68% over the past 10 years, and 125% in the decade before.</li>
<li>
BIS figures: over the last 40 years Australia has seen stronger house price growth than anywhere except Norway.
</li>
<li>International property analysts at Demographia: Australia is one of the world's least affordable places to live, with their measure of median home prices to median incomes showing all five of Australia's biggest cities are "severely unaffordable," with Sydney and Melbourne in the world's top 10, along with Tweed Heads.</li>
</ul>
According to the International Monetary Fund, Australia has the third highest house prices, relative to the level of people's incomes, among 24 advanced economies.
Even if you limit the discussion to the Sydney and Melbourne property markets, that’s where more than nine million Australians live. Other capital cities, like Perth and Brisbane, have also seen<a href="https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6416.0Dec%202014?OpenDocument#Time" target="_blank"> dramatic price rises</a> at times within the past 12 years (more than doubling and a 75% increase, respectively) that have made it very difficult for first home buyers. 
6. Mr Ryder disputes this statement: “A massive $4.2B in negative gearing tax breaks per year go to the top 10% of income earners.”
The $4.2 billion in tax breaks for the top 10% of income earners is the combined impact of the negative gearing and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) discount - we should have said this in the email (and have since done so on the web page). That figure comes from the GetUp commissioned Australia Institute report, ‘It’s the revenue stupid,’ released in May this year, which was cited in the email.
The wider issue is how negative gearing interacts with the capital gains tax discount to drive up prices. It is the two policies working together that makes property investment so profitable and means that more and more of it is happening. For this very reason, scrapping the capital gains tax discount is also part of the GetUp/Australia Institute policy recommendations. It is simply too difficult to tell that entire story in one blog (and many in the media have had the same difficulty), though we have information about it online.
7. Mr Ryder then cites ATO data to argue that most Australians who own an investment property earn less than $100,000. 
On this point it is essential to understand that one of the core purposes of using negative gearing is to reduce the investor’s taxable income (i.e. below $100,000, or $80,000, the marginal tax thresholds).
As ABC Business Journalist Michael Janda explains, “the “ATO's measure of ‘total income’ includes net, not gross, rent - that is, rental earnings or losses after deductions such as interest payments have already been removed. The very reason that many housing investors fall below the $80,000 threshold is because they have used negative gearing to slash their tax bill.”
For this reason, both Mr Janda and Greg Mckenna (in an article for Business Insider), point out that the HILDA survey data, used by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), is more accurate. According to the RBA (as cited in Mr McKenna’s piece), “investor households with incomes in the top 20 per cent of the income distribution owe the bulk of the investor housing debt and over a quarter of total housing debt outstanding … The bottom 20% [of the income distribution] account for just 2% of investor housing debt.”
For further reinforcement, Professor Judy Yates, one of the country’s most respected housing experts, who was seconded by the Australian government to work on their National Housing Strategy, said: “the biggest benefits [of negative gearing] go to high-income households, lowest benefits go to lower-income households."
8. Mr Ryder next takes issues with our claim there’s a “consensus among housing experts and economists that negative gearing is one policy area driving unaffordable housing.”
In arguing this, he says only a minority are concerned about negative gearing, and describes highly respected economist, Saul Eslake, as being part of the “lunatic fringe”. (Who knew the chief economist at Merrill Lynch could possibly be considered fringe?) Nevertheless, here are a few other notable ‘lunatics’ who have shown concern about negative gearing:
<ul>
<li>Former Governor of the Reserve Bank Bernie Fraser </li>
<li>Former Commonwealth Bank CEO David Murray </li>
<li>ANZ boss Mike Smith</li>
<li>Australian Council of Social Service </li>
<li>John Daley, CEO of the Grattan Institute </li>
<li>The Australia Institute </li>
</ul>
We’d run out of pixels if we completed the list.
9. Mr Ryder claims “the GetUp campaign is based on the notion that eliminating negative gearing will somehow make housing cheaper.” 
Except, that’s not what we said. The GetUp/Australia Institute policy recommendation was to limit future negative gearing to new properties, which currently represent only six per cent of the value of negatively geared purchases. By driving investment dollars into new properties, the idea is to stimulate the creation of additional housing supply, which can help reduce prices and rents, as well as create construction jobs. This is also an approach that’s been put forward by the McKell Institute and is reportedly being considered by the Labor party.
But, to take Mr Ryder’s point on more directly, the logic is pretty straight forward. Reducing the tax incentives for investors buying second hand property will reduce demand for that property and therefore put downward pressure on prices. 
10. Finally, Mr Ryder takes issue with our reference to the property bubble. He says, “What we have seen throughout history is that boom markets eventually stop growing and prices level out. But we have never seen a crash, not in the history of this nation.”
In fact, RBA data shows several <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/1999/pdf/rdp1999-06.pdf" target="_blank">precipitous price drops in the history of the Australian property market</a>, including in 1891 and the Great Depression. And if we go just a bit outside the direct experience of our nation, the entire Global Financial Crisis was triggered by a property bubble and crash in just one country - the United States. As a reminder, that included the near collapse of some of the largest financial institutions in the world (only prevented through massive government intervention) and recessions in most industrialised nations of a scope and duration not seen since the Great Depression (prevented in Australia only by a $52.4 billion stimulus package). So property bubbles and crashes do happen and they can have pretty dire consequences.
Tens of thousands of Australians have signed the petition calling for reform to negative gearing - we’re disappointed to hear Mr Ryder doesn’t support it, but GetUp’s member driven, which means if members don’t support a campaign they are free not to. We welcome constructive criticism, but as Mr Ryder said, it needs to be grounded in the facts. 
Picture this: 43% of Australia’s wealth is held in real property now, compared to 30% of America’s wealth in 2001, just prior to the Global Financial Crisis. Australia also has just four banks holding 75% of all Australian mortgages. So, if you want to talk about systemic economic risks, then the property bubble would have to be at the top of your list. With that in mind, it makes sense why Saul Eslake, the RBA Governor and the Treasury Secretary, among others, have been so concerned.
In the context of so much risk, the burden is on Mr Ryder to explain what magical mechanism would prevent the Australian housing bubble from a price crash.
Mark Connelly is GetUp's Campaign Director. GetUp can be reached <a href="https://www.getup.org.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Latest Expert Insights

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

Guides

Editor's Picks

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Expert Insights

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

Guides

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Guides

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News