Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
At a time where it would seemingly be an unfortunate game of “free-for-all” in the real estate and property arena that has negative-compounding effects on the public, the question remains; what institution or governing body, should take centre stage and curve the unethical practices of many agents, by adopting and implementing higher standards in new-training curriculums, before issuing licenses? 
Will it be the Real Estate Institute NSW (REINSW) or should Fair Trading and NSW Government offices alone handle the accreditations and certifications? Perhaps it should only be handled by specialists groups that are privately owned. Bodies that are licensed and empowered by the respective State Government.
No matter what the right or wrong answer may be, one thing is clear: it is presently a free-for-all in training provided to upcoming would-be real estate agents, as it is in the same agent’s behavior in and on their field of practice. It appears the answer is not closer today than it was yesterday. 
The reason for this article continues to center around current practices followed by real estate agents. Behavior that stems from practices adopted by agents in falsely presenting property to market and to bait consumers. Also further alarming discoveries of property not being properly represented. I have heard of property that has sold for 10 percent it’s true worth under a “forced legal auction [campaign]” and this being one of many that warrants further investigation and an article of its own. 
Staying true to this article and not being tempted to discuss our findings about these forced auctions, as I’m sure they will also make a great piece to read later on over another coffee; allow me to briefly discuss the anomalies around our industry’s state of affairs when it comes to training.  
The Real Estate Institute’s role
Admittedly, very little is known about the level and standard of training provided by REINSW. The actual course is not dissimilar to any other certification or licensing course found outside its walls. 
One thing for sure is that there is a common thread occurring, as most of the recipients of allegations and accusations labeled at agents for bad and unethical behavior, are actually members of the REINSW themselves. So the question is, how many have been trained and licensed through the REINSW's classrooms?
Yet, it is the voice of the REINSW that mainly calls on reform and changes to education but it appears in their eyes this will work, only if they are in control of the course curriculum and standards. 
I find it difficult to see how organizations with so much to offer as a lobby group, want to corner the market in so called implementing “ethical-training” measures but only as they see it. I won’t even venture into notions of parliamentary representation as a political party which has come from my friends in office at the REINSW.
My question to REINSW is simple. What other industry organisations and lobby groups train and license the work force they represent? 
The NSW Government
It is no secret and we all understand that our NSW Government Institutions are sadly under-resourced and therefore unable to maintain what I thought was once a well-controlled and monitored training and licensing unit. 
It’s not to say they don’t provide the service through TAFE courses. Again sadly, with privatization, options that are more readily accessed are available and the latter being the path of least resistance to many wanting to enter the industry. It is a no brainer to guess, where the wannabe real estate agents obtain their accreditations from.
The Private Sector
Most of the private Training Facilitators I know are both ethical and provide rigid and structured programs. I say most but despondently not all. 
Sadly, I feel it is in this lack of oversight by the government that some private institutions run what may well be questionable programs and courses to license an individual to sell and manage, the most valuable assets people have. 
However, this oversight cannot be blamed entirely on the current system, again how can governing bodies run proper audits when they are understaffed? 
What I am aware off is this: an audit is conducted on a private facilitator once every 5 years.  Please do tell me how this does not dissuade operators from implementing free-for-all training programs with very little accountability? 
I do not have the answer to what is the ideal solution but: if the real estate institute wants to rule the nest in providing training, again I say clean out your own house before preaching to the masses. If the Private Training Facilitators is the answer, then the governing bodies should implement auditing measures that are less susceptible to low rate training practices. Finally, if the government is to resume control, perhaps it’s also time the Federal Government got involved and laid down the law. Legal requirements with more stringent penalties and levels of accountability and all, before licensing individuals to deal with major assets.  
EDWIN ALMEIDA is licensee in charge of <a href="https://www.just-think.com.au/" target="_blank">Just Think Real Estate</a>.<a href="https://www.just-thin.com.au/"> </a>
He is also the creator of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/JustThinkProperty" target="_blank">Oz Real Estate.TV</a> and a presenter for <a href="https://propertyinvestingvault.com/" target="_blank">propertyinvestingvault.com</a>.
</body></html>

ealmedia-arK4DBYLjS

Curbing the free-for-all mentality of the real estate industry: Edwin Almeida

<html><body>
<div>No surprise that the Reserve Bank of Australia opted to leave interest rates on hold at 2% yesterday, preferring to "wait and see" how data flows play out in the months ahead.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Not all that many surprises in the <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2015/mr-15-11" target="_blank">media release</a> either in truth. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Perhaps the most notable point was this:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>"The Australian dollar has declined noticeably against a rising US dollar over the past year, though less so against a basket of currencies. Further depreciation seems both likely and necessary, particularly given the significant declines in key commodity prices."</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Although the Aussie dollar has touched a six year low against the US dollar at 74 cents, with commodity prices in an ongoing funk, the Reserve Bank wants to see further depreciation still. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2015/07/08/audusd.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div><img src="/images/2015/07/08/audusd.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Just how much further depreciation is open to interpretation, but given the strength of the wording one might safely assume that this means at least 10 per cent, and probably more.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>With the release also noting that "monetary policy needs to be accommodative" there is every chance that interest rates will fall again at some point within the next year.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Futures markets are all but pricing in another cut over that time frame.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2015/07/08/RBA.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div><img src="/images/2015/07/08/RBA.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Asset markets</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The ASX 200 (XJO) surged by well over 100 points for no apparent reason to record its second strongest trade of the year to date.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Another interesting development this week has been lenders tightening the screws further on investor loans.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As of today Westpac - the Australian bank with the largest dollar amount of credit outstanding to investors - will reportedly apply a maximum 80 per cent loan to value ratio on its investment loans.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This will make it comparatively more difficult for investors without substantial deposits to purchase property.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>To compensate we can expect that some lenders will instead encourage owner occupier loans, perhaps by dropping lenders mortgage insurance in some instances, or by dropping standard variable rates in others.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The regulator APRA has evidently applied heavy pressure to banks and other lenders to slow the pace of credit growth to investors, and therefore the outlook for our property markets will shift accordingly over the period ahead.</div>
<div>
 With rock bottom interest rates all but assured through 2015 and 2016 we can expect to see a shallower but probably longer recovery in property markets, driven increasingly by owner occupiers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Another point of interest is that certain capital city markets have already been distorted by a steady flow of foreign capital, while simultaneously we also have a central bank which wants to depreciate the currency by a further 10 to 20 per cent. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>This may well be the action which opens the sluice gates...just sayin'.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>. 
His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

No surprise from the RBA: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
<div>Halifax released its House Price Index for the month of June 2015 which showed the average house price passing £200,000 for the first time.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>After a long slow recovery nationally, the average UK house price has also finally eclipsed its August 2007 peak.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The index moved 1.7% higher in June to be up 3.3% over the quarter and 9.6% over the year.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This represents a clear acceleration on the annual growth rate recorded in May of 8.6%.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2015/07/09/UK.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div><img src="/images/2015/07/09/UK.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Homes sales increased by 1% in the month of May to 98,540, despite a tight market.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The housing shortage and population pressures in South East of the country continue to be major market drivers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nationally the price per square metre has increased by 18% since 2010 from £1,179 to £2,010 in 2015, according to Halifax research.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Unsurprisingly the strongest performing market on this metric since 2010 has been London (+45%) with the next best performing region being the adjacent South East (+22%).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>By comparison the North (+3%) and Scotland (+5%) have recorded very little growth over the past half decade.</div>
<div>
 Supply remains tight in the South East with rents in the Home Counties reportedly soaring by 5.4% in the six months to June 2015.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>While mortgage approvals dipped in the May, the seasonally adjusted three month rolling figures show approvals up by 6% on the three months to February result according to <a href="https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/" target="_blank">Bank of England </a>data.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>. 
His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

UK house prices pass 2007 peak: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
For what seams a long time we have been in the midst of a debate about the impact of offshore investment into our domestic residential property market, both private buyers and now increasingly developers. Revelations that FIRB regulations appear not to have been enforced for some years has as fuelled the idea that offshore buyers are driving up local prices and as a result locking some buyers, in particular first time buyers, out of the market.
However I think it’s important to acknowledge that this is not a new trend, offshore investment into Australia has been going on now for a very long time. Currently there appears to be a particular focus on Asian buyers, and this was a topic of a recent breakfast presentation I was involved in.
The breakfast presentation was hosted for a very interested audience by Coco Republic at their Sydney flagship store. The event has helped focus my views about this important debate, and so I am recounting some of the key points from that presentation.
There’s a Lot of Wealth in Asia
We need to remember that these buyers have very deep pockets, in some cases very deep and this extends to high net worth individuals (HNWI). While Asia is generally considered to rank third in number of HNWI after Europe and the USA, Asian numbers are growing rapidly, and will soon overtake the USA. Wealth also creates mobility and Asian buyers have always been happy to travel and invest in other countries, this mobility is often overlooked.
For these wealthy buyers as well as for a rapidly growing middle-class across the region, Australia is seen as a safe investment destination that also comes with a great lifestyle. Political stability and our property laws are also positives. Because of the current restrictions most offshore investment is naturally focused on new apartments, but within that market activity is generally spread across diverse areas, it’s not only CBD centric and I think that investment growth should be welcomed.
To say this is pushing up prices is too simplistic, prices are increasing, but it’s because of a combination of factors. Above all it’s tied to supply problems and poor delivery of infrastructure to enable a free flow of new stock and problems with supply are not new, we’ve know about problems with supply for years.
The supply side is also now being influenced by the direct development involvement of Asian investors into our markets, and so they are helping boost supply.
What we are seeing is the offshore investors/developers being very competitive in the market. They move quickly, they bring new ideas and we have to also keep in mind the impact of the local currency. Local and state governments with a development focus are looking for investment and many Asian investors have a critical level of expertise and access to capital that will only see this trend strengthen as more sites are acquired.
Lifestyle a Key Factor
One key point I made during my presentation is that offshore buyers are not coming here to play cricket in the streets, they are anxious to engage in every aspect of society and they take a long-term and very considered view of what and where they buy. Many buyers also have long term existing family connections here.
The flow of Asian buyers and the number of Asian students is one key example that has had a marked impact on some areas of the market in Sydney, and Melbourne and other cities. Big student numbers help drive demand for accommodation, and Sydney’s Broadway/Ultimo area is a dynamic example.
Largely because of student numbers and associated development, the area is heading for a true ‘downtown’ feel with 7-day a week activity. Because of its direct impact on residential property, it’s worth looking in more detail at the impact of the education sector. Figures show that in 1994 total student numbers were less than 100,000, by 2000 that had grown to 150,000.
However in 2009 numbers last peaked at around 620,000 students, numbers then fell away until 2012 and but since then numbers have been on the increase again and in 2014 were heading back towards 590,000, and the biggest sector is students in higher education. Although there’s growth in numbers also attending, and paying to do so, at the primary and high school level. There’s a direct link with more offshore buyers as some apartments are purchased for investments to cater for this demand, or parents buying to directly house their kids.
I think from a marketing perspective this has helped create more vibrant areas, and is a progressive development across several sectors and it is a big boost to economic activity; it’s a good example of why offshore direct investment into residential property is a positive trend. Education is a key part of the service sector economy and growth is required to help re-balance the economy as we exit the mining boom.
Helping to Revive the CBD
And while we have a strong in-flow of funds this is also helping to further shape core CBD residential markets, and is driving demand that will see more and more B &amp; C grade office buildings converted for residential use.
As the CBD evolves it can also be seen that offshore buyers are also having an indirect influence in a more subtle way. For example planners looking to change our local dependence on cars can have apartments with no parking and they can influence demand and size of apartments, all deriving from the fact that offshore buyers take a different view of these two sometimes touchy areas for local buyers, this helps to create diversity of product and supply.
This trend of re-developing secondary office stock will go on and motivate demand for new office inventory for example in Sydney in areas like Barangaroo.
Such investment activity has a deep and powerful impact on our cities, it helps make sure they are ever more dynamic places, and that’s important if Sydney’s continued ambitions of being a major international city are to be realised. We cannot have that ambition on the one hand, and then on the other restrict or shackled offshore buyers, we have to have an open (if regulated) approach.
We are Not Creating ‘Little Asia’
A question I was asked at the Coco Republic event was centred on the idea that some buildings or projects might be focused just on offshore or Asian buyers.
In reality this is not the case, really it is just the opposite, as might be expected in an open market, buildings vary with the buyer profile they attract. Just what might be seen as Asian facilities I am not sure, but as far as design and interiors and common areas are concerned, projects are being built to meet the general demands of the market, we are not setting out to just accommodate Asian buyers.
What is true is that just like any local buyer, offshore buyers do put a lot of energy into selecting the right home or investment. They don’t just rush in and buy anything. They may appear to be dominant in particular areas but this is more as a result of where supply happens to be. Most offshore buyers are astute buyers – they express 5-10 year plans, and re-sale is the key concern.
Like all investors, they also focus on the potential of capital gains in later years and so they look for apartments that have strong appeal to the local market, after all it is often said you can’t exactly pack up an apartment and ship it off in your luggage on the next Qantas flight.
There are some location specific buyer profiles, but again that is not a unique factor, local buyers will be attracted by access to a particular university or school or shopping centre or business park, the same applies to offshore buyers.
I think it’s also worth acknowledging that the big four banks are looking at buyer profiles and they can put a cap on lending to the sector, however offshore buyers can access external funds.
ATO Takes on Part of FIRB Role
The recent changes to FIRB merit some comment. From my experience over the last few months, the government changes have not had any significant impact. Most buyers accept that there is a need to enforce the current laws, the ATO is now checking and perhaps it’s more a failure of policy and not an attempt to contravene the laws that really reflects market sentiment.
As I suggested earlier, the rule of law is important to offshore buyers, this helps make our market attractive alongside the fact that title is secure, here in Australia. I see constant evidence that these buyers never take anything for granted and so they are happy to work within the rules.
The Federal Government is also taking up the benefit’s Free Trade Agreements, and Significant Investment Visas as ways of boosting economic activity and investment, and so I do not think that residential property can sit outside these sorts of policies.
Suggesting that offshore buyers are the main cause of higher prices and tight markets is counter productive. Offshore buyers are looking for a full cultural involvement with Australia and that extends beyond the apartments themselves, they go on and buy furniture, cars and services and so that filters into the economy. If you look at the education sector again, and were to remove foreign students then the sector starts to look pretty poor. I think offshore buyers can do much the same for the housing market, helping to sustain activity and also directly boosting supply via direct development and sizeable investment as is already happening.
Given the existing FIRB rules, it is not reasonable to suggest that offshore buyers are having any more than a marginal impact on the local market, and while that may be more apparent in some pockets, I think it’s a distraction from the failure of long-term policy, that all levels of government need to take responsibility for. This include the chronic neglect of infrastructure, neglect that we are now being reminded of almost daily.
Peter Chittenden is managing director for residential of Colliers International. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.projectagenda.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

pchittenden-eLqUUC8TWW

Offshore investment is essential: Peter Chittenden

<html><body>
Back in my distant and naive past, I regarded Time Magazine as a quality publication. It had the aura of authority and integrity in the presentation of global news. Until one day it published an article on a subject I knew well. I was appalled at the inaccuracies and the sensationalism.
It was the worst kind of tabloid journalism in a publication with pretensions to quality. I could never again see the magazine in the same light, because I began to wonder about the authenticity of its information on other subjects.
I’ve just had a similar experience with GetUp. I’ve admired the achievements of the GetUp movement as an expression of people power and I’ve supported many of its campaigns, particularly those related to environment. My support of some of these campaigns was based on the assumption that the arguments they presented were anchored in facts.
That all changed this week when GetUp launched a campaign against negative gearing. I received the GetUp email letter asking for my support and could scarcely believe what I was reading. It was a dishonest and emotive rant littered with falsehoods and unsubstantiated claims.
Sadly, it was based on the kind of misinformation that is rife in real estate media. The people who wrote it are either unethical or incompetent - probably a mix of both.
Everything the organisers of this movement tell me on any subject henceforth will be tainted by the suspicion the information has been distorted or fabricated.
Because that is certainly the case with the “information” presented on negative gearing.
The people who wrote the GetUp statement smelled the blood of Joe Hockey following his alleged gaffe about housing affordability. I say “alleged” because there is nothing in Hockey’s statements (that the key to affording a home is a good job that pays well and enhances your chances of getting a loan) that justifies the media hysteria that followed. Further proof that a rational debate on any subject is beyond the scope of Australian media.
The GetUp statement began with the claim that there are “millions of frustrated first home buyers priced out of a skyrocketing housing market”.
This is plain wrong and easy to disprove. Australia has 8.6 million households, of which 6 million are home-owners and much of the rest (according to the research) are renters by choice. The research shows that 25% of all current residential sales are to first-time buyers, which means around 120,000 households bought their first property in the past 12 months. The two affordability indexes published quarterly indicate affordability overall is strong and, if you remove Sydney from the equation, the best it’s been in 12 years.
It’s impossible on those numbers to substantiate the claim that there are “millions of frustrated first-home buyers” across Australia.
The claim about “a skyrocketing housing market” is patently absurd, given that only one of the eight capital cities has a boom market. Of 16 major markets (eight cities, each with a house market and a unit market), based on the latest annual price data, six are going backwards (prices decreasing), seven have price growth below 3.5% and only one has double-digit growth. One big growth market out of 16 does not, by any definition, constitute a skyrocketing property market.
This suggests the campaign is based on two false premises: that we have a skyrocketing market and that there are millions trying to buy who can’t.
And the GetUp argument goes downhill from there.
It takes a further leap of imagination in claiming that negative gearing is “one of the root causes” of the alleged affordability problem. This, like all the sweeping statements in the GetUp letter, is not supported by any factual evidence.
An 18-month federal parliamentary inquiry was unable to produce any evidence that negative gearing had any bearing on the cost of housing for first-home buyers. The final report said they suspected it might, but couldn’t provide any definitive evidence that it did. After 18 months of inquiry, which included four time extensions.
Then there’s this statement: “Negative gearing forces everyday Aussie home buyers to compete with investors armed with generous tax breaks looking to buy their second or third property. It reduces home ownership and locks many out of the housing market, increasing the gap between the haves and have-nots.”
The claim that investors are commonly buying second or third investment properties is contradicted by ATO data showing that three-quarters of investors own only one property. The statement also assumes that all property investors are negatively-geared, whereas the ATO evidence shows that 640,000 Australians own investment property but don’t claim negative-gearing deductions. I’m one of them.
It further claims: “A massive $4.2B in negative gearing tax breaks per year go to the top 10% of income earners.” That is another lie. There are many different figures bandied about in terms of how much is claimed in negative gearing benefits - the Green have quoted two different figures this week, $2.9 billion and $4.2 billion, but to suggest it all goes to the biggest income earners is, once again, clearly false. The ATO data shows that most Australians who own an investment property earn less than $100,000.
The GetUp statement also lies when it claims: “There's consensus among housing experts and economists that negative gearing is one policy area driving unaffordable housing in Australia.” No such consensus exists, nor anything remotely like it. In my reading of media, those who see a link between negative gearing and housing affordability are very much in the minority, albeit a very noisy one populated by people from the lunatic fringe, like dodgy forecaster Saul Eslake.
Beyond the inaccuracies and sweeping political statements, the GetUp campaign is based on the notion that eliminating negative gearing will somehow make housing cheaper. The process by which that would occur is not explained - possibly because it makes no sense.
There is also the furphy that increasing housing supply will somehow, again miraculously, bring down the cost of housing. There’s evidence that a massive oversupply will cause prices to fall but how we convince large numbers of developers and builders to be willing to lose money to create such a scenario is not explained. There’s no evidence that an orderly increase in supply, which is what we’ve had in Australia for three years now, will lower prices.
There’s also this statement: “The thing about bubbles is that they eventually burst. If we don't take some heat out of the property market now, we could see a crash that would devastate homeowners and investors alike – with dire implications for the Australian economy.” 
Well, actually, no. Media has been writing about alleged bubbles in our property markets – constantly - for the past 15 years but there has been no property crash - which suggests those bubble claims were false. What we have seen throughout history is that boom markets eventually stop growing and prices level out. But we have never seen a crash, not in the history of this nation.
Finally we have this statement: “It’s high time we saw Government leadership to make housing more affordable for all Australians.” But eliminating negative gearing simply won’t achieve it. The tax benefits of a small number of people are not the problem, if indeed there is one.
GetUp has been an interesting experiment in ordinary people using modern media resources to lobby for worthy causes. But they’ve crossed the line with this dishonest and misguided anti-investor campaign and I wonder how many people, like me, will withdraw their support.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry is presenting a free webinar with Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor on Tuesday June 16 at 12.30pm titled on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. Sign up here.
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Present arguments anchored in facts: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
If I put a deposit to buy a house before the new financial year, can I claim it this year tax time or is it to late to buy? Also, is it greedy to buy our 4th house in 7 months?
Regards,
Thor
 
Hi Thor,
To answer this question we must first work out what can and cannot be claimed against your tax. The deposit on a house is not a claimable item. The costs you incur when you buy a property are able to be claimed, but each item is treated differently.  For example, all buying costs such as legal fees and inspections form part of your cost base, and serve to essentially reduce your payable capital gains tax when you sell, rather than provide an immediate deduction.  Borrowing costs are divided up over 5 years (or the length of time you own the property if less than 5 years) and claimed at the end of the year. I think you are really asking me whether the interest on the deposit is claimable, and the answer is no, for two reasons.  The first one is that any deduction you claim against your income is only available on an 'income producing asset', an at the stage where you pay a deposit, this property does not produce income, for you.  The second one is that the deposit does not denote a transfer of ownership, and so you don't legally own an income producing  asset against which you are allowed to make these claims - the present owner does however, and they are allowed to make those claims right up until you settle the property. As to your second question, it's not greedy to buy your fourth property in seven months, but whether it is wise to do so is an entirely different thing.  You need to ask the following questions: 
<ul>
<li>Do you know your personal risk profile and whether this number of properties is consistent with that?</li>
<li>Have you had an independent, professional investment plan prepared for you by someone who is not trying to sell property to you?</li>
<li>Have you analysed your capacity to meet your current debts and property costs should interest rates rise?</li>
<li>Have you ensured that you have diversified your property portfolio across a number of markets? Some of our markets (namely, Sydney) will likely enter a protracted period of stagnation after this present frenzy, so you don't want all of your properties to be in such a market?</li>
<li>Have you considered your financial future - is there any upcoming changes which may make a larger portfolio create extra stress on your finances?</li>
</ul>
You should not simply buy a property every time you feel like it, or each time the bank offers you more money - instead, your acquisition of property should be part of a carefully articulated plan which considers all of your personal financial circumstances, investing time horizon and risk profile.
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: Is it greedy to buy our 4th house in 7 months?

<html><body>
As coincidence would have it I recently had a conversation with Dr Hazel Easthope, Senior Research Fellow, City Futures Research Centre UNSW following the news last month of yet another delay being announced in the now long over due review of NSW Strata Title legislation.
It has been confirmed that the Strata law reforms in NSW are to be delayed (again) with changes now not due to come into force until July next year. That’s another 18 months, which for such an important area of reform appears almost to be neglected.
The plans have been delayed several times since being announced in 2011. The reforms to the state’s 50-year-old strata laws are now urgent, but this message appears not to being heard by the State Government. In part a series of ministerial changes have hampered the process, but concerns among apartment dwellers are on the rise, and their concerns are justified.
The research being undertaken by Dr Easthope is looking at the experience of people living in strata titled property. Her work will look at details of people and seek to learn about their experiences of living in an apartment, and what they like and dislike about strata tile living. How strata title impacts the feeling of ‘home’ and how the quality of building management impacts residents. It’s notable that the quality of building management is now a key issue for many apartment buyers and investors.
The aim being to better understand the needs of different people living together in strata schemes and what can be done to make them more attractive places for everyone. The survey is due to be completed by 30thJune 2015 and I look forward to seeing the results.
The survey can be accessed at <a href="https://www.be.unsw.edu.au/research-centres-and-clusters/city-futures/about-us" target="_blank">City Futures</a>, and along with Dr Easthope I will keep readers up to date on the survey and related topics.
 Also in a national survey on strata-titled property conducted by Queensland’s Griffith University, the author, Professor Christopher Guilding has named building defects as the main challenge for apartment owners, which was also identified as the biggest issue for strata lawyers, and in the top five by resident building managers.
As a result the SMH recently reported that Professor Guilding is calling for a federal government inquiry about the issue, which must also put even more pressure on the NSW review process.
Professor Guilding will be releasing the results of the Inquiry Into Key Challenges In Australian Strata Title in September at the launch of the biennial national conference Strata and Community Title in Australia for the 21st Century.
The work by Professor Guilding and Dr Easthope appears very opportune and may well be central to helping to maintain the quality of life for the many apartment owners and future buyers across Australia and I am sure there will be a lot of valuable information and insights to share.
Peter Chittenden is managing director for residential of Colliers International. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.projectagenda.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Yet more strata legislation delays: Peter Chittenden

<html><body>
The developer lobby is the boy who cried wolf in Australian real estate. He’s actually right about something and desperately wants to be heard, but no one is listening anymore.
The recurring topic is the cost of housing. It’s absorbing far too much time and energy for stakeholders everywhere, because politicians find the obvious solutions unpalatable.
If politicians stopped taxing real estate to within an inch of its life, life for home-buyers would become so much easier. The cost of a new home for a first-timer could be massively reduced. One estimate suggests the typical new home in Sydney could cost $250,000 less.
The developer lobby argues that stamp duty is the single biggest problem. I have to agree that stamp duty is an obscenity. Having to cobble together a deposit is a big enough challenge for property buyers, without having to save to pay an exorbitant and unjust tax as well.
Stamp duty on the median priced dwelling in Sydney ($752,000 according to RP Data) is almost $30,000. It’s similar sum for the same purchase in Perth, while anyone buying a home at that price in Melbourne would pay over $40,000.
It’s tantamount to paying a fine for the crime of buying a home or an investment to fund your retirement.
The developer lobby has been targeting this issue with one of its endless campaigns. It wants stamp duty scrapped. It presents some compelling evidence, but I doubt anyone important will take any notice because builders and developers have been crying wolf on multiple issues (e.g. the mythical housing shortage crisis) for years.
And its proposal overall is a massive turnoff. Its argument essentially is this: everyone should pay more tax so that the development industry can make more money.
The Property Council of Australia, arguably the most self-absorbed group in society, is suggesting that stamp duty should end and the lost government revenue be recouped by increasing the GST. 
The proposal, therefore, is that everyone should pay more for everything they buy so that real estate can be exchanged cheaper. I’m sure that’ll go over well with the general public and the politicians they elect.
The council argues stamp duty is inefficient and "a runaway cash grab that's hurting Australia's economy and locking out potential home buyers". It says the community should be outraged at figures like these:
The cost of stamp duty to a home buyer with an average-sized mortgage has increased 795% in Melbourne and 749% in Sydney in the past 20 years. 
Property owners have become Australia's largest collective taxpayer, contributing 9% of total tax revenue.
Property taxes make up as much as 46% of state, territory and local government budgets. Stamp duty alone contributes more than 20% of the total revenues of the NSW,      Victoria, Western Australia and Northern Territory governments.
The cost of stamp duty over the life of an average mortgage is now $61,542 in Sydney, $56,616 in Melbourne, $49,701 in Darwin and $35,427 in Canberra.
The Housing Industry Association, another noisy member of the developer lobby, says property taxes add around $250,000 to the price of a new home in Sydney. That, it says, accounts for 40% or $1,350 per month for the life of a home mortgage.
"Taxes on new housing are a brake on economic activity, and represent a constraint on housing affordability and labour productivity," the association's head of industry policy Graham Wolfe says.
Wolfe says stamp duty is the most inefficient tax in the system. However, he says there are many other taxes on new homes, including developer infrastructure levies, which can add $70,000 to the cost of a new home-and-land package. GST is also levied on new homes, but not existing properties, adding tens of thousands of dollars to the cost.
The problem is: state governments will never give up their property taxes. They’re addicted to them.
We’ve seen what’s happened with the ACT Government. It went to an election promising to eliminate stamp duty within a specific time frame. Now they’re reneging on their promise. They just can’t let go of all that lovely money.
And, for them, the protests of the developer lobby are just background static. No one is listening.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was recently joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
 
</body></html>

State governments addicted to property tax: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
<div>
 Hi Margaret,
I was looking at getting into property investment this year and my mother is retiring and plans to sell her older place for something easier living.
She currently likes where she lives so we are considering an option, if feasible, of me buying her current place to rent out and then she could build a modest seperate house at the rear of the property.
Apparently the zoning allows for this but not for a full subdivision (only 790m2) in Queanbeyan, NSW.
My question/s are, would setting up a strata be the best option? I still want an option of being able to sell one property in the future if needed. Who would I speak to and how do I go about setting something like this up? Or is it just too complicated (tax/titles, etc) for everyone involved.
Thanks
Kris
  
Hi Kris,
There is certainly a lot to consider when thinking about not only buying an investment property, but also carrying out a subdivision. So, let me tackle your question one section at a time:
1. You buying your mum's house.
While I think it is a very noble thought assisting your elderly parents in this way, I want to be sure that your own personal circumstances are well take care of first. If you have a sound retirement plan and feel that you are set up for your own retirement (so that you can make choices in retirement without depending upon your own dependents to assist you), then by all means, take this step to assist your mother.
However, if you are not, then you must seriously consider whether you would otherwise purchase a property like this one as part of your own investing strategy.  Thinking that any property, anywhere is suitable to start an investment portfolio is a trap which leads many to owning property which does not perform over the long term and which provides lackluster rental return.
So, to start off with, ask yourself the question "If this were a property advertised on a real estate website, would I be interested in buying it?'. To answer that question, you will need to carry out the same extensive research that you would on any area to ascertain the existence, or absence of suitable growth drivers. You also need to consider opportunity cost - if you bought this property, what is the opportunity cost of having bought somewhere which may have a better short term prognosis for growth than this area.
2. Subdividing
You say that this property is not eligible for 'full' subdivision, but a strata titled subdivision is a full subdivision. When you subdivide, you will do so either as a Torrens title (Green title in WA), a strata title or any number of other titles such as community title etc. All of them are full subdivisions and must satisfy both state planning rules and local authority subdivision requirements. Very often property investors underestimate the financial and time costs of subdivision – you will face architects fees, planning fees, engineers costs, labour costs if the subdivision requires any works, council contributions, fees and charges, titles office fees – the list goes on and on.  Far from gaining a free block of land when you subdivide, very often costs can run to tens of thousands of dollars and sometimes hundreds of thousands. You must be able to come up with these funds up front, since they are costs which cannot be financed unless you have other property elsewhere to offer as security. Often investors so underestimate these costs, and the time involved, that they are left disillusioned, exhausted and out of pocket by the end of the process.
If this property does not qualify for actual subdivision, you may be talking about the ‘Granny flat’ option available in NSW. This means that as, as long as the property is more than 450 sqm you may add a second dwelling to the property and this can be rented to anyone. Permission to add a granny flat bypasses normal planning rules and is approved within 10 days. The only issue here is that there is still only a single title, and so you cannot sell one property without selling the other. The decision to add a granny flat to any property brings its own issue – will it add or subtract value? Will it make it harder or easier to selling the future? Will it be harder to rent out the main house with a second dwelling in the backyard?
3. The Financials
When your mum sells the property to you, she wont pay any tax as it’s her own home.  When you buy it, you must pay stamp duty on its full market value, even if she sells it to you for less than that. When you rent it to your mum, you must rent it for the full market rent or you may not be able to claim full deductions, although you can give her a discount if you don’t have to pay a property manager or do some of the other things nornally associated with earning a rental income. 
Your first port of call should be to a local town planner. They should be able to give you an idea of what kind of sub division is allowed and also outline the kinds of costs you would be looking at.  Then ask a builder to quote you for the new build – complete to occupancy so you get the full idea of the costs involved.  Make sure the town planner you use has previously worked with council or otherwise is fully conversant with local government and state planning rules. Once you have a fair idea of the costs, add 20%, because in my experience this is the amount that the budget of a development usually blows out by.  And lastly, compare all of this to what it would cost for your mum to simply sell it to someone else, buy a unit somewhere which is ready to move into, while you look all over Australia for the next hotspot and invest there.
</div>
<div>Have a property question?    <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a></div>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Can subdividing make for easy retirement living?

<html><body>
Commentary on the affordability issue has become so twisted that media is quoting Sydney’s median house price as a relevant topic.
We recently had the Australian Financial Review, which should know better, writing about the level of income needed by a first-home buyer to afford the median Sydney dwelling, as well as the median-priced dwelling in the other capital cities.
My question is: how is this in any way relevant to the issue of affordability?
First-home buyers don’t buy at the median price, not in Sydney, nor in Melbourne, nor anywhere else in Australia. First-home buyers buy below the median, indeed well below it. Always have done – and, I dare say, always will.
The median price for dwellings in the major cities at the moment are $750,000 in Sydney, $570,000 in Melbourne, $465,000 in Brisbane and $510,000 in Perth. According to CoreLogic RP Data, the median across the eight state and territory capital cities is $570,000.
But the average first-home-buyer loan at present is $334,800, according to the latest figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Assuming the typical first-timer has a 10% deposit, this means the median dwelling price for a first-home buyer is around $370,000.
Given that 25% of all residential sales are being made to first-time buyers, there’s are a lot of novice buyers out there acquiring properties at the lower end of the market. In the past year, around 120,000 Australians have made a first-time purchase.
Those numbers are relevant to the discussion. The median price in our most expensive city is not.
The Real Estate Institute of Western Australia published some numbers this week that also have some relevance to the topic. Good to see those people putting out material that’s actually useful to a sensible debate, unlike some of their recent talk-down-the-market nonsense.
REIWA president David Airey said, quite rightly, that it was important not to use the median price as the guide for the costs of getting into the market for first-home buyers and others.
Airey said the median was the middle point in the market and that half of all sales were under it. This means buyers don’t need to be able to afford the median-priced dwelling to enter the market.
I think it’s sad that anyone needs to make this point, which is so obvious it should be a given in the debate. But the media coverage of the issue has become so irrational that industry people have to go back to kindergarten levels to try inject some balance.
“It’s also important to recognise that first-home buyers, in particular, usually purchase homes well under the median price, with Office of State Revenue data for May showing the median point for entry-level buyers being $450,000 in Perth and $366,000 in the WA regions,” Airey said.
“Even the median purchase price for first-home buyers means that half of all entry-level buyers are paying under these city and country median prices for their demographic.”
Airey said it was more useful for first-home buyers to look at the lower quartile, or bottom 25%, of the more affordable homes in an area to get a better perspective of what was available at more accessible prices.
REIWA data for the year to March shows that the south-east sub-region of Perth through Gosnells, Armadale and Serpentine-Jarrahdale had the most affordable lower quartile, with  houses selling around $370,000. 
Apartments and land were most affordable in the south-west sub-region through Cockburn, Kwinana and Rockingham.
Airey said even within the various sub-regions around Perth there were individual suburbs which were under the lower quartile for their local area.
“For example, the central sub-region has a lower quartile of $550,000, but it’s possible to find houses in Balga priced at around $385,000.
“Similarly, while the median price for units in the south-west sub-region is $277,000, you can find them in Orelia at around $196,000.”
Airey said that buyers should not be put off by the median price for a region or suburb, and look to the lower quartile for opportunities in areas they might initially think are out of their price range based on the overall median.
So true, so bleeding obvious and so sad that anyone needs to stand up and say it. 
 
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a> 
Terry was recently joined by Property Observer editor at large Jonathan Chancellor for a webinar on why research is the key to successful property investing in 2015. You can download slides and audio from the webinar here.
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News