Article summary

<ul data-end="785" data-start="311">
	<li data-end="459" data-section-id="5hbcyr" data-start="311">Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at Skye Kangaroo Point, headlined by a two-storey sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm.</li>
	<li data-end="561" data-section-id="1p7lq8n" data-start="460">Early buyer interest suggests the residences could set a new Queensland apartment price record.</li>
	<li data-end="667" data-section-id="1y70z0l" data-start="562">The collection includes four move-in ready penthouses and the highly customised Skye One residence.</li>
	<li data-end="785" data-section-id="yvm0y1" data-start="668">The release caps one of Bri​sbane's most ambitious luxury apartment developments overlooking the Brisbane River.</li>
</ul>

<hr data-end="790" data-start="787" />
Pikos Group has released the five-penthouse collection at its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/skye-residences-by-pikos-kangaroo-point-8-river-terrace-kangaroo-point-qld-4169">Skye by Pikos</a> development in Kangaroo Point, with early buyer interest indicating the flagship residences could eclipse every apartment sale previously recorded in Queensland.

The collection crowns the luxury riverfront development with five residences, including four completed penthouses and Skye One, a two-level sky home spanning more than 1,000 sqm that will be tailored to its eventual owner.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374075]

Wanting to offer a fully customisable home, Pikos is offering Skye One as a blank canvas, allowing the buyer to work alongside the developer's design team to customise the home's layout, finishes and internal spaces.

The residence will feature a 247 sqm private rooftop terrace with its own swimming pool, sauna, steam room, outdoor kitchen and multiple entertaining areas overlooking the Brisbane River and CBD skyline.

The remaining four penthouses have been completed and are ready for immediate occupation, each offering four bedrooms, expansive open-plan living areas, soaring ceilings and private lift access.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374059]

One of the defining features throughout the project is its use of Roman Classic Travertine, with more than 20,000 sqm of the natural stone imported from Italy after being personally selected by Pikos Group Founder and Executive Director Pedro Pikos, interior designer Julie Williamson and third-generation stone specialist Mario Caucci.

Pikos said the penthouse collection represented the culmination of the company's long-term vision for Skye.

"True legacy isn't measured by what we build today, but by what endures tomorrow," Pikos said.

"Our ambition is to create places that become more valuable with time, enrich the lives of generations, and stand as timeless landmarks long after we've stepped away."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=90059 project_image_fid=374060]

Williamson said the interiors were inspired by the natural character of Kangaroo Point and the Brisbane River rather than international design trends.

"Materiality tells the story of a place," Williamson said.

"We looked to the movement of the Brisbane River, the texture of the cliff face and the warmth of the surrounding landscape to create interiors that feel understated, enduring and unmistakably Brisbane."

Positioned above the Kangaroo Point cliffs, Skye places residents within walking distance of Howard Smith Wharves, South Bank and James Street while offering uninterrupted river and city views.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=90059]

Joel Robinson

Brisbane's next apartment price record? Pikos unveils Skye's exclusive penthouse collection

Article summary

<ul data-end="888" data-start="289">
	<li data-end="442" data-section-id="8tsh6o" data-start="289">DVB Projects is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway at 137 Old Burleigh Road, Broadbeach.</li>
	<li data-end="573" data-section-id="1nyxl3e" data-start="443">The 34-level tower will comprise just 49 ultra-luxury residences, including half-floor, full-floor and penthouse apartments.</li>
	<li data-end="717" data-section-id="oiyimj" data-start="574">The launch follows strong demand at DVB's nearby Sea Glass project, which is more than 50 per cent sold and currently under construction.</li>
	<li data-end="888" data-section-id="epk9o9" data-start="718">The development adds to the transformation of Old Burleigh Road, with premium beachfront apartment projects continuing to reshape the tightly held Broadbeach strip.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/dvb-projects">DVB Projects</a> is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway on the Broadbeach site as the Sydney developer moves closer to bringing the ultra-luxury project to market.

The 34-level tower at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/137-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">137 Old Burleigh Road</a> will comprise just 49 residences, ranging from half-floor apartments through to full-floor homes and a penthouse. The launch follows the strong sales performance of DVB's nearby Sea Glass development. More than half of the apartments at Sea Glass, on the other side of Broadbeach, have been snapped up, well ahead of its late 2027 completion

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2944b4be-c84e-4b54-8dc1-c712e76704c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E02_Exterior_Street%20Level%20Entrance.jpg?VersionId=YoNig7pRdrE3HCue7sUj78LzJteeQf3H" />

The start of demolition at 137 Old Burleigh Road signals DVB Projects’ underlying confidence in the Gold Coast’s luxury beachside apartment sector.

“We see the Gold Coast as one of the most compelling lifestyle markets in Australia, particularly at the premium end where demand continues to deepen,” said Dean Brown, Managing Director of DVB.&nbsp;

“This project has been carefully designed to respond to that demand - delivering large-format residences with a level of quality, privacy and amenity that is still relatively rare in the apartment market on the beachside."

Brown says the site itself is "exceptional."

"Old Burleigh Road is one of the most tightly held beachfront strips, and opportunities to deliver a project of this scale and calibre in this location are extremely limited.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="398f377a-c037-455e-9250-0c5e0d84c35b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/I12_FF%20Balcony.jpg?VersionId=NwOiRWGMubR1c8wthuEfggklcja7al9." />

The project will comprise 40 half-floor residences of approximately 260 sqm, alongside eight full-floor residences spanning around 524 sqm.

A single penthouse will crown the building, featuring a private pool, barbecue area, indoor gym and dedicated entertaining spaces.

Residents will have access to a resort-style suite of amenities, including a 20-metre pool with daybeds, a gymnasium, hot and cold plunge pools, a sauna, and private residents’ lounge and dining facilities.

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1642bb0-9a66-4427-a022-dfc0988c6287" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/A02_Pool%20to%20View.jpg?VersionId=c0IXPyn_Gp_Kn3XCwzMrqIVkAdCEwVXP" />

Sales agent Todd Matheson, of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/pezet-matheson">Pezet Matheson</a>, which is marketing both 137 Old Burleigh Road and Sea Glass, said 137 Old Burleigh Road would address a clear gap in the market for genuine luxury products.

“There are very few opportunities on the Gold Coast where buyers can secure a residence of this size and quality in a new building,” Matheson said.

“What we’re seeing is a growing cohort of downsizers and interstate buyers who still want space - they’re not willing to compromise on living area, entertaining or finishes.

“This project has been designed with that buyer in mind. It offers the scale of a home, combined with the convenience and security of apartment living, in one of the coast’s most desirable positions.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="59aae0ca-5639-4320-8aca-d0bf60f48e43" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E01_Exterior%20Hero.jpg?VersionId=DS8Zfy2WtgUEtdfe0TEUuf1W1GfcZq8S" />

Located on a 1,156 sqm site one block from the beachfront, the development will replace an ageing walk-up building and is expected to contribute to the ongoing transformation of the Old Burleigh Road strip into one of the Gold Coast’s most prestigious residential corridors.

With the development moving into the delivery phase, 137 Old Burleigh Road is slated to hit the market later this year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145141]

DVB Projects to launch second Broadbeach apartment tower as demolition commences

A proposal to redevelop one of North Sydney's ageing commercial buildings has taken another step forward, with plans for a 38-storey mixed-use tower adding momentum to the long-awaited transformation of the Alfred Street precinct.

Now on public exhibition through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority-led State Significant Development pathway, the proposal for 271-273 Alfred Street would replace an underutilised commercial building with 95 apartments, ground-floor retail, commercial space and affordable housing. The proposal was submitted by&nbsp;Tara Shore Pty Ltd, acting for the John Taylor Family Trust.

While the project will deliver much-needed housing on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, it also represents another piece of a broader precinct that has spent years in planning limbo.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7e1ce1b4-38df-48ab-992f-386814d86308" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20podium.png?VersionId=sC_h6w.A9VEoB98qsqowPlIoz__sBZBt" />

Despite its proximity to both North Sydney Station and the Victoria Cross Metro, redevelopment of Alfred Street has progressed slowly over the past decade as broader planning controls, zoning and building heights remained unresolved. The introduction of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway has provided a new avenue for projects to progress, allowing rezoning and development assessment to occur concurrently and unlocking sites that have long been earmarked for renewal.

Designed by Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder, the proposal seeks to do more than replace an ageing office building. The architects have positioned the project as the first stage of a wider public domain vision that would improve pedestrian connectivity and create a more cohesive mixed-use precinct as neighbouring sites are redeveloped over time.

The proposal includes a widened Alfred Street setback, new street trees, landscaping and outdoor seating, along with a landscaped through-site pedestrian link connecting Alfred Street with Little Alfred Street. The connection is intended to become the first section of a future east-west pedestrian network extending across the precinct.

<img alt="First look: New public domain vision underpins 95-apartment North Sydney tower on Alfred Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8ea39ac3-46ad-4562-b4a0-b862e91c2dda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Alfred%20St%20da%20site.png?VersionId=K7umCd21KpetEFuVfsPlnJKhUOsmTTdV" />

The mixed-use tower would comprise retail space at ground level, commercial uses on level two and apartments from level three upwards.

In total, the development would deliver 95 apartments, including nine one-bedroom, 28 two-bedroom, 56 three-bedroom and two four-bedroom residences. Twenty-one apartments, representing 15 per cent of the residential gross floor area, would be secured as affordable housing and managed by a registered community housing provider for at least 15 years.

Nine basement levels would provide 133 resident car spaces, seven motorcycle spaces and 111 bicycle spaces.

According to the Architecture and Urban Design Report, the public domain strategy is designed to transform what is currently an inward-facing commercial edge into a more active and connected pedestrian environment, creating a stronger relationship between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighbourhoods.

Office of Cortese &amp; Gilder has also prepared a broader public domain framework spanning neighbouring properties between 263 and 283 Alfred Street, arguing that a coordinated approach to redevelopment will deliver better public spaces, improved tower separation and a more connected streetscape as the precinct evolves.

The proposal comes at a time where North Sydney is slated for future residential growth. Commercial developer FiveX has residential plans for the neighbouring site at 275 Alfred Street. They've proposed a 39-storey mixed-use tower with 184 apartments, while Freecity was recently approved for nearly 300 apartments across a 51-storey building on Walker Street.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-freecity-gets-green-light-for-mixed-use-apartment-and-hotel-tower-in-north-sydney">First look: Freecity gets green light for mixed-use apartment and hotel tower in North Sydney</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-fivex-plans-39-storey-residential-tower-in-booming-north-sydney">First look: Fivex plans 39-storey residential tower in booming North Sydney</a>

&nbsp;

Alfred Street the latest North Sydney pocket to be transformed by residential development

Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Victorians will soon go to the polls to decide who will be responsible for the management of the state for the next four years. Voters are confronted with many issues on which they must pass judgement, with roads, railways and ports all prominent in the debate. But what are the key characteristics of the Victorian economy?
Economic modelling at Victoria University’s Centre of Policy Studies tells us about the types of jobs Victorians can expect to be doing over the next few years. The Victorian economy employs around 2.9 million people. In line with growth in both the population and the economy, this is set to increase by around 300,000 people by 2020.
<h3>Which industries are winning</h3>
In Victoria, as in Australia as a whole, the vast majority of jobs are in the service industries. This is a diverse group of industries including (but not limited to) retail trade, health and social assistance, professional and technical services, transport and warehousing and public administration and safety. The non-service industries – agriculture, mining, manufacturing, utilities and construction – comprise just below 23% of jobs in Victoria. For the remainder of this decade, the proportion of jobs in service industries will increase only slightly, to almost 78% of jobs by 2020.
At a more detailed level, greater change is revealed. As the construction phase of the mining boom draws to an end, employment in the construction industry will fall from its present level of 8.5% of jobs to just 7% of jobs in 2020. This partly reflects the transitory impact the mining boom has had on the construction sector. The “release” of many construction workers into the economy over the next couple of years could be a boon to major government-backed infrastructure projects.
Construction is the only sector in which employment is forecast to fall. Manufacturing, agriculture and transport and warehousing are forecast to expand, more than compensating for the fall in construction activity. These sectors have a similar skills profile to construction, employing relatively large proportions of workers with no post-school qualifications or Certificate I-IV level qualifications.
<h3>Manufacturing surprise</h3>
The positive forecast for manufacturing may seem surprising, given the high-profile announcements of closures of the last motor vehicle manufacturing plants in Victoria. Manufacturing in Victoria employs around 270,000 people, of which 10% work in the motor vehicle and parts sector.
On the whole, manufacturing is a very trade-exposed activity. Products are either exported (for example, processed food products, wine and pharmaceuticals) or they compete against imports in the domestic market (for example, textiles, pharmaceuticals, motor vehicles and various types of appliances). Because of this, movements in the exchange rate have a very significant impact on manufacturing. Throughout the “boom” years, with the exchange rate very high, manufacturing has been uncompetitive, a phenomenon known as “Dutch Disease”. Motor vehicle manufacturing has been a conspicuous casualty.
<a href="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/65351/area14mp/image-20141124-19612-16ii7uc.png"><img src="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/65351/width668/image-20141124-19612-16ii7uc.png" alt=""></a>
As the boom unwinds, the effects of Dutch Disease will also unwind. A large fall in the Australian dollar will revive the competitiveness of manufacturing, more than compensating for the loss of the motor vehicle plants. Export-oriented sectors like agriculture and education will also benefit from a fall in the Australian dollar.
The professional and technical services sector is forecast to expand the most, gaining 44,000 jobs by 2020. This sector includes activities such as legal and accounting services, architectural, engineering and technical services, and computer services.
Almost half of all people working in professional and technical services hold a bachelor degree or higher qualification. By 2020, this is estimated to have grown to 53% of people working in the sector. In Victoria as a whole, 28% of people employed hold at least a bachelor degree.
Another significant source of employment growth is the health and social assistance sector. Although only <a href="https://theconversation.com/australias-g20-growth-challenge-protecting-our-standard-of-living-33837" target="_blank">weak growth is forecast for domestic incomes</a>, leading to weak growth in domestic demand, health and social assistance is a significant expenditure item for older Australians. While the average household spends just over 5% of their budget on medical care and health expenses, households where the reference person is aged over 65 spend almost 10%. Government spending on health care will also increase as the population ages.
This article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
<h3>State of the regions</h3>
Melbourne accounts for 75% of employment in Victoria. Two-thirds of growth in Melbourne will be concentrated in five sectors: professional and technical services, manufacturing, health and social assistance, transport and warehousing, and education and training.
Differences in the underlying structures of regional economies mean that overall performance is varied.
For example, in Barwon, an area including the regional city of Geelong, the manufacturing sector has a relatively large representation of motor vehicle manufacturing. As a result, Barwon’s manufacturing sector is forecast to grow more slowly than the state average, and Barwon is forecast to be the slowest-growing regional economy. However, for the reasons given above, growth is still positive in Barwon manufacturing.
Strong forecast growth in the agriculture sector is the main contributor to growth in several regional economies. In the Wimmera, Western Districts, the Mallee, Goulbourn, East Gippsland, Gippsland and Ovens-Murray, growth in agriculture will contribute between 20% and 50% of regional employment growth.
In the Wimmera, the Mallee and the Western Districts, the agriculture sector currently accounts for a fifth of jobs. However, the Wimmera and the Western Districts are the regions with the highest forecast growth rates, while the Mallee is one of the slowest. Although all agricultural economies, the nature of agriculture in these regions is quite different. The strongly growing agricultural activities sheep, beef, grains and dairy are well represented in the Wimmera and Western Districts. However, Mallee agriculture includes a sizable portion of fruit growing, an activity with a relatively low growth forecast.
<a href="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/65326/area14mp/image-20141124-19627-10m4ak0.png"><img src="https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/65326/width668/image-20141124-19627-10m4ak0.png" alt=""></a>
Agriculture is relatively less important in the economies of the Central Highlands (including Ballarat) and Loddon (including Bendigo). While agriculture will account for around 10% of employment growth in these regions, health, education and manufacturing are forecast to be of greater significance, accounting for around 40% of growth in employment.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/33831/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Janine Dixon is senior research fellow at <a href="https://www.vu.edu.au/" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Victoria University</a>.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

JanineDixon-cHemc6fRVX

Victoria votes: Where will the growth and jobs of the future be?

<html><body>
Are you a vertical or horizontal analysis type?
Most would answer that they are not sure given they apply a number of metrics whilst attempting to draw a conclusion on a particular subject. Real estate is a classic example; there are so many suggested formulas that can be applied to draw a conclusion, yet there is no stand-out determination process.
I was asked this week: What is the best method within the real estate industry to better understand what exactly what is going on? I was also asked: Do I look at the markets from a vertical or horizontal position? 
The answer to that would be both. On a weekly basis I look at the stock number movements and the <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" target="_blank" title="weekly sales activity.">weekly sales activity.</a> Unlike the share market which closely watches the market capitalisation from its All Ordinaries Index, the real estate market is an entirely different beast and offers no decisive measures or methodology.
The residential and commercial investor stampede has been unprecedented in 2013 and 2014 prompting many to call this a property ‘bubble’. One should ask the question, if the ‘bubble’ theorists were investing in real estate would they still refer to this as a ‘bubble’. Of course not because they are simply commentators, not participants and there is a striking difference between the two. 
The investors are looking at the markets overall from a vertical position (which also encompasses their entire investment portfolio) whilst the commentators have adopted a horizontal position concerned only at what’s immediately before them.
To put these theories into practice one must apply what I call the <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/science/features/whyisitso/" target="_blank">Professor Julius Sumner Miller</a> analogy – “Why is it so?” Firstly, are the Australian real estate markets weaker or stronger post global financial crisis (GFC)? The answer to that is that the markets overall were much stronger pre-GFC, although for some strange reason this point is entirely missed in the debate (thanks to the horizontal observation). We need to remember that prior to the GFC, the Australian economy was basking in an unprecedented 20 plus years of economic growth.
Next, in the “why is it so?” analogy, trying to understand why the household and the investment markets bear no resemblance to what is happening in the property markets. In particular the Reserve Bank, which is actually now quite blasé with its outlook, especially when commenting on the Australian real estate markets. Why aren’t households trading-up to take full advantage of the historical low cash rates?
Look no further than the latest <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/smp/2014/nov/pdf/dom-eco-cond.pdf" target="_blank" title="Quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy ">Quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy</a>: “The forecast for output had not materially changed. GDP growth was still expected to be below trend over 2014/15, before gradually picking up to an above trend pace towards the end of 2016.”
It’s all very well to borrow more and upgrade the family home given record low rates, so what’s stopping the markets from jumping-in?
Look no further than annual wage growth, which is presently at the slowest rate on record. It’s all very well to increase the debt ratios in the present environment (horizontal analysis) but when one applies the vertical analysis there are severe headwinds ahead when rates start to rise again, which looks like 2016/2017.
The Reserve Bank pointed out in another one of their papers recently: “Nominal labour income has grown at an average annual rate of 2.7% over the past two years, compared with a decade average of 6.2%. And the widespread expectation is that wage growth will remain subdued for a time.”
Another clue is the rising rate of household borrowers who have preferred to pay back their loans via the interest-only option, which is not a positive sign for when the cash rate starts heading back to that pre-GFC thingummy called ‘normality’.
So this might go part of the way into trying to explain this thing called a ‘bubble’ – I prefer to call it a burp (due mainly to a lot of external wind).
On that basis we can expect to see the cash rate coming down further in 2015, only to (hopefully) see it start increasing late in 2015 to early-2016, as a best case scenario.  Watch annual wage growth statistics as they become available given this is an obvious trigger for increased action in the housing markets. For those on the interest-only option, you still have the best part of 12 to 18 months to strategise your best options going forward, history tells us it is not simply a case of 'who dares wins'.
So to answer (or should that be update) my preferred options when analysing the real estate markets: I am a confirmed vertical observer.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

What's the best method to understand the real estate market?

<html><body>
Australian food franchise Pie Face has collapsed into voluntary administration.
In a statement released to SmartCompany, the Pie Face Group confirmed Jirsch Sutherland has been appointed as administrators.
However, Pie Face said it is “business as usual” as the administrators conduct a review of the chain’s operations.
“The move comes as part of a wider company review, which will see the company focus on supporting the growth of its franchise-operated stores as well as the wholesale business,” Pie Face said.
“The international businesses are not affected”.
A spokesperson for Pie Face confirmed there are currently 70 Pie Face franchises across Australia, although the Pie Face website lists 78 outlets, including 15 in the Melbourne CBD and 20 in the Sydney CBD.
There are Pie Face stores in all states and territories, except Tasmania, South Australia and the Northern Territory, although South Australians can purchase its pies in On the Run convenience stores.
The collapse comes after Pie Face <a href="/expert-insights/investing/pie-face-quietly-closes-up-new-york-shops">quietly closed six of its seven stores in New York City</a> last month. While Pie Face has previously attempted to expand into India and New Zealand without much obvious traction, the chain is also believed to have agreements to enter South Korea and the Philippines.
The chain also became embroiled in a legal battle with a former franchisee <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/legal/41452-pie-face-in-legal-action-as-former-franchisee-seeks-800-000-for-misleading-conduct" target="_blank">earlier this year</a>.
Former franchisee Prit Dutta sued Pie Face for $800,000 in February, alleging the pie chain was misleading and deceptive when communicating the expected returns for its franchise stores.
The lawsuit followed reports in 2013 that around 50 Pie Face franchises were up for sale, although founder Wayne Homschek <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/growth/economy/32003-pie-face-founder-fights-back-against-loss-making-accusations" target="_blank">denied the reports to SmartCompany at the time</a>, saying the claims were “totally blown … out of proportion”.
Jason Gehrke, executive director of the Franchise Advisory Centre, said he believes some stores in the Pie Face network are company-owned and in some cases, company-owned stores can “be a drag on a franchisor’s resources if they are not part of a conscious growth strategy”.
Gehrke says Pie Face franchisees will need to be aware that a voluntary administration does not relieve them of the obligations in their franchise agreement.
“They will still have to pay loyalties, maintain supply agreements and so forth,” he says.
Gehrke says an administration can spell bad news for franchisees as it can “adversely affect the level of support available to franchises if the administrators opt to make any head office staff redundant”.
It’s also an issue when head office staff are busy assisting administrators, which is time they would otherwise be spending supporting the franchisees. 
But he says the administration of Pie Face may present a new business prospect for any interested buyers.
“I think this represents an opportunity for an existing franchisor or a group of motivated existing Pie Face franchisees to move quickly to acquire a brand that has some significant traction in the market,” Gehrke says.
SmartCompany contacted Jirsch Sutherland but did not receive a response prior to publication.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

ekeating-PWvazjYE25

Pie Face bakery chain collapses into administration

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Last week brought the latest instalment in the continuing Australian financial planning industry saga. Senators Jacqui Lambie and Ricky Muir blocked the Abbott government’s <a href="https://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014L00891/Explanatory%20Statement/Text" target="_blank">rollback</a> of some of Labor’s Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms.
The proposed changes to FoFA watered down some of its more controversial aspects. They included the provisions establishing a “best interests” duty for financial planners and restrictions on conflicted remuneration. Other rollbacks included changes that required fee disclosure statements and the obligation for clients paying ongoing fees to “opt in” by written consent every two years.
The Abbott government maintained the reforms were merely to streamline regulation, prompted by the need to reduce bureaucracy and red tape. However, the recent and continuing <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/timbercorp-victims-set-to-sue-financial-planners-while-liquidator-presses-for-loans-to-be-repaid-20140810-102gco" target="_blank">financial planning scandals</a> made such streamlining politically unsustainable.
So we are back to Labor’s original FoFA legislation. But where does this leave the financial planning industry and the thousands of Australians in need of financial advice?
There are claims within the financial planning industry the blocking of the regulation will cause further <a href="https://www.theage.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/fofa-reforms-senate-shock-spurs-financial-adviser-scramble-20141119-11q2te">instability</a>. This is as firms scramble to meet the FoFA requirements, particularly those relating to fee disclosure and opt in obligations.
Yet FoFA has been law since 1 July 2013, so it is difficult at first glance to understand why the blocked rollback would significantly impact the industry.
It seems that large sections of the industry have been operating on the basis the coalition’s FoFA rollback changes would become law.
It is a view reflected by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. It <a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2013-releases/13-355mr-asic-update-on-fofa/" target="_blank">said</a> in December 2013 it would take a “facilitative” approach to FoFA enforcement in light of the proposed changes and would “not take enforcement action in relation to the specific FoFA provisions that the government is planning to repeal”.
After the reforms were disallowed in the Senate, ASIC said this week it would take a “<a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2014-releases/14-307mr-disallowance-of-fofa-regulations/" target="_blank">practical and measured approach</a>” to administering FoFA as it now stands. The regulator says it recognises that compliance with FoFA will require systems changes for many Australian financial services licensees. This facilitative approach to FoFA compliance will continue until 1 July 2015.
It seems unlikely there is any need for panic within the industry as there is still some time before ASIC will enforce FOFA compliance. Nonetheless, those licensees who deferred making costly system changes in line with Labor’s legislation may now find themselves having to make those changes rapidly in a highly uncertain regulatory environment.
In the long run, this situation is likely to lead to less affordable financial advice for Australian consumers.
Despite the reform rollback not going ahead, there still isn’t an easy solution for the financial advice industry. The unchanged legislation now retains greater consumer protection. But it does <a href="https://www.theage.com.au/business/comment-and-analysis/fofa-doesnt-clean-up-the-financial-advice-minefield-20141121-11riwk" target="_blank">little to address </a>what many regard as the fundamental cause of the poor reputation of the Australian financial planning industry – the need to raise the professional, ethical and educational standards of financial advisers.
While consumers will get some greater level of protection through increased fee disclosure, this comes at a price. This protection also relies on consumers taking the time to read and understand the disclosures made by their financial planners. Financial planners can continue to give poor quality advice. What will change is increased upfront fees and greater disclosure around these fees resulting in higher costs. There will be less scope for scaled advice which was part of the Abbott government reforms.
FoFA still fails to set educational or professional standards for financial planners. Until industry entry standards are lifted, FoFA will not deliver accessible financial advice for the Australians who need it.
Absent an urgent rethink by the Abbott government on FoFA, after last week’s events it seems the goal of access to affordable and trustworthy financial advice for Australian consumers is more elusive than ever.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/34486/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Julie Walker is associate professor in accounting at The University of Queensland.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-queensland"></a>
Julie Walker has previously received research funding from the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. She is affiliated with Chartered Accountants Australia New Zealand.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

FoFA fiasco: No quick fix for the advice industry

<html><body>
Australian superannuation funds will increasingly look to invest in global real estate in 2015 as they are close to Asian cities that are benefiting from major demographic shifts, while there are fewer opportunities in the domestic market, a fund manager has predicted.
The forecast comes as a separate study by Australian researchers, released by the US-based Defined Contribution Real Estate Council (DCREC), shows an allocation of just 10% of a fund’s portfolio to real estate can match or beat the returns of a fund with less property exposure at a lower risk to investors.
TIAA Henderson Real Estate executive director Nick Evans, who heads the fund manager’s Australian business, said sophisticated investors such as superannuation funds were attracted to creating tailored real estate portfolios that suited their particular risk and return profiles.
Australia’s largest super fund, AustralianSuper has partnered with TIAA Henderson Real Estate to invest in emerging global real estate.
“Major investors are approaching global real estate in a very different way to pre-GFC days and we expect to see more Australian funds building a tailored approach that gives them the flexibility, exposure and returns they need,” Evans said.
He added that Australia’s superannuation funds were searching for better investment solutions for their ageing members who wanted secure income at a reasonable level of risk to support a lengthy retirement.
The study, which was released by the DCREC in the US in early November, found that allocating 10% of a portfolio to a mix of listed and unlisted real estate enhanced the risk-return profile of a defined contribution plan portfolio.
Defined contribution plans are investment vehicles where members contribute set amounts over a period of time, such as Australia’s superannuation funds where members contribute 9.25% of their salary each year.
The study, A Path to Better Retirement Outcomes: Allocating Real Estate Assets to Retirement Portfolios was conducted by researchers at Australia’s Griffith University, professor of finance Michael Drew and Adam Walk, also from Griffith University, and Jason West from Bond University.
It found a portfolio that includes property could smooth fund members' transition from accumulating savings to drawing a pension and could help investors avoid mistakes such as selling risky assets during a market downturn, which locked in losses.
The study noted that funds often used listed real estate investment trusts (REITs) for property exposure due to their liquidity, diversity and valuation cycles that mirrored stocks and bonds, but had been slower to adopt unlisted real estate.
Unlisted property could deliver returns that were closer to those of bonds with less risk than stocks, regular income, low volatility and low correlation to listed markets, the study showed. Some types of unlisted real estate could also act as a hedge against inflation.
</body></html>

zfielding-GvX3Uq9KTa

Australian funds looks to Asian property markets as domestic opportunities run dry

<html><body>
Foreign property ­buyers in Australia will not be slugged extra stamp duty, as modelling by the Parliamentary Budget Office has concluded the charge would be self-defeating.
But the federal government is being asked to consider a $1,500 application fee to process their purchasing paperwork.
Kelly O'Dwyer's parliamentary committee has concluded the prospect of additional stamp duties would likely kill off the market for foreign buyers.
The stamp duty issue will not be formally recommended by the parliamentary committee into housing affordability and foreign ownership when it publishes its long-awaited report on Thursday, the Australian Financial Review has reported.
The review is expected to recommend the establishment of a single database of property purchases across states and territories and linking that information to customs data.
The Treasurer Joe Hockey recently said the federal government was prepared to go it alone after resistance from state bureaucracies.
The $1,500 application fee would raise $600 million over the first decade, News Ltd papers reported.
The funds would help track compliance for unauthorised acquisitions.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

A $1,500 application fee, but no higher property stamp duty for foreign buyers

<html><body>
Of all the policies employed by the government to exacerbate Australia’s housing affordability crisis, our inequitable tax system, which includes negative gearing, is top of the list.
Negative gearing has reduced Australia’s housing supply. Over 92% of investors chase the capital gains associated with second hand dwellings rather than increase the stock of housing through investment into new supply. We replace properties for sale, with properties for rent.
<img src="/images/2014/11/20/cashmore-nov-20-one.jpg" alt="">
Negative gearing has pushed up the price of housing and widened the gap between price and yield. High and rising house prices naturally put upward pressure on rents and assist in keeping first homebuyers locked out the market.
<img src="/images/2014/11/20/cashmore-nov-20-two.jpg" alt="">
Negative gearing has turned us into a nation of speculators. Today, the investor share of the market is close to 50%. Investor finance commitments are rising at their fastest pace since 2007. 65% of loans to investors are on interest only terms and an estimated 95% of all bank lending is being channeled into real estate – mostly residential. Negative gearing costs the government billions in lost tax revenue each year. Around 1.25 million taxpayers (approximately 13% of the total) now have at least one negatively geared property. <img src="/images/2014/11/20/cashmore-nov-20-three.jpg" width="676" height="440"> Negative gearing employs one rule for the landowner and another rule for the worker. Investors that negatively gear can deduct non-work-related property losses against wages and salaries.They can lower their taxable income as much as they wish by simply by buying enough negatively geared dwellings. The wage earner has no such advantage – why work when you can speculate? Negative gearing favours the wealthy rewarding high-income earners handsomely. Notwithstanding, the property lobby use artificially reduced taxable incomes to falsely claim that most investors are “<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-24/janda-the-myth-of-mum-and-dad-negative-gearers/5766724">mum and dad</a>” average income earners.
Negative gearing merely scratches the surface of Australia’s inequitable tax system. 
Investor tax incentives and their effect on house and land values have been repeatedly clarified by independent tax reviews, as well as previous Senate Inquiries into housing affordability.
The first inquiry conducted by the Productivity Commission in 2004, determined that prices had surpassed levels explicable by demographic factors and supply constraints alone. They stressed that a large surge in demand had rather been “predicated on unrealistic expectations (in a 'supportive' tax environment) of on going capital gains”.
The second inquiry overseen by a Select Senate Committee in 2008, found that the average house price in capital cities had climbed to over seven years of average earnings and once again, they identified inequitable disparities in the overall fairness of the tax system, that had lead to “speculative investment on second and third properties.”
Australia's Future Tax System review conducted in May 2010 stated that tax benefits and exemptions had been capitalised into higher land values, encouraging investors to chase ‘large’ capital gains over rental income and landowners to withhold supply.
The Future Tax System review recommended allowing only 40% of interest (and other expenses) associated with investments as a deduction.
This would reduce the amount investors are able to claim against negatively geared dwellings and provide a good starting point for phasing out the policy altogether.
Negative gearing as well as stamp duties (which are a volatile source of revenue, dependent on the volume of housing transfers in addition to the transacted price), should be replaced by a broad-based SLT (state land tax) – as I recommended <a href="https://catherinecashmore.com.au/wp/?p=414" target="_blank">here</a>.
Under this scenario, the upfront cost of land would fall, the higher tax base would blunt potential capital gains from speculation, and housing supply would naturally increase as land would need to generate an income.
An enhanced land tax would also provide a steady source of revenue for state government giving them greater control over public finances for the provision of essential infrastructure.
Moreover, study after study demonstrates, that basing a system on the collection of resource rents and monopoly profits, for the direct application of facilitating local and community services, can reduce the tax liability on most households whilst also maintaining complete revenue neutrality.
Unfortunately, 95% of our federal MPs own investment properties. Collectively, the are in possession of an estimated <a href="https://blog.australiaboomtobust.com/2014/08/propertied-federal-political-class/" target="_blank">$300 million</a> personal portfolio of residential dwellings. 
It is therefore unsurprising that all recommendations from previous Senate inquiries for meaningful and equitable tax reform have been studiously ignored.
This is an extract from Property Observer's exclusive article where the experts were asked: <a href="/expert-insights/investing/exclusive-negative-gearing-what-needs-to-change">Negative gearing – what needs to change?</a>.
</body></html>

catherinecashmore-6LXia3pPQj

Negative gearing merely scratches the surface of Australia’s inequitable tax system

<html><body>
In the aftermath of the Block Glasshouse auctions, theories about why some contestants made as little as $10,000 profit were abundant.
Just one season before, in <a href="/news">Albert Park's</a> Fans v Faves, all four teams received profits in excess of $500,000.
Most pointed to a particularly shallow buyer pool, thanks to what Property Observer called a <a href="/expert-insights/buying/not-enough-bidding-baby-boomer-buyers-to-boost-b-grade-location-in-the-block-glasshouse-2014-auction-results">"B-grade" location</a>, with little appeal to the cashed-up boomers that usually buy Block properties.
"For Sydneysiders it would be like flogging prestige apartments on Parramatta Road, Annandale, which has very nice houses away from its busy thoroughfare, though without the trams," wrote editor at large Jonathan Chancellor.
According to Michael Townsend, director of Hodges Real Estate St Kilda, an apartment's location on a main road may rule out certain buyers.
"I suppose when we look at apartments, there is definitely certain concessions placed on main road property locations," said Townsend.
"Definitely those on major thoroughfares, with noise and pollution."
<a href="/news">Prahran</a>'s High Street, where The Block Glasshouse apartments are located, has four lanes of traffic, with trams. Down the street is a hybrid car wash-burger diner; across the roads sits a Swinburne University campus.
While a main road location doesn't necessarily cut out buyers, Townsend explained, it will appeal to certain markets more than others.
"When we look at the apartment market as a whole, there are obviously price points and sub price points within that market place," said Townsend.
"There are buyers who definitely graduate towards main hubs and busy areas with cafe cultures and bars and restaurant areas," he said, with younger buyers and investors perhaps more interested in living among Prahran's busier strips.
But for buyers who are willing to spend the prices seen on Fans v Faves (as much as $2.47 million), a main street might not cut it.
"If someone's spending within $2 million on an apartment, they usually have very strict criteria," said Townsend.
"Avoid main roads if you can, avoid busy streets, avoid places with no outdoor space."
Upgraders with $2 million to spend are likely to have lived in areas with considerable room and amenity, Townsend said.
"Premium buyers – owner occupiers – are often coming out of a substantial home on a leafy backstreet," he explained.
"The might ask: 'Why would I sell out of leafy Hawthorn or Brighton or St kilda property? Why would i want to move out to a busy thoroughfare?'"
Those buyers, Townsend said, are more likely to move to a character home in suburbs like Albert Park, rather than an apartment complex in Prahran.
It seems there are certainly those who would pay to live amid the noise and activity of a main road – just not quite enough to make up for the money and time poured into The Block Glasshouse's renovated apartments.
You might also want to read:
<a href="/expert-insights/building/renovation-rumble-showdown-with-the-block-contestants-v-house-rules-contestants">Renovation rumble showdown with The Block contestants v House Rules contestants?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/building/former-block-contestants-craft-new-careers-in-renovation">Former Block contestants craft new careers in renovation</a>
 
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Do apartments on main roads sell? Lessons from The Block

<html><body>
The conversation around a potential Docklands oversupply has been going for some years.
Adjacent to Melbourne's CBD, Docklands is conveniently located and Places Victoria has big plans for the suburb.
With construction starting in 1997, and a 25 year time frame, we're right in the latter half of the development process. Teething problems have, almost inevitably, been highly scrutinised.
Last year, we reported that <a href="/news/vic/docklands-finding-its-feet-after-a-difficult-conception">Docklands was beginning to find its feet after a difficult conception</a>. However, there were <a href="/news/water-usage-reveals-high-vacancy-rates-in-southbank-and-docklands">still reports in late-2013 that water usage was revealing high vacancy rates</a> in the area of around 11%.
The 2014 <a href="/news/vic/over-64-000-melbourne-properties-sit-vacant-prosper-australia">Prosper Australia report found that this had not improved this year</a>. In fact, in terms of water usage, Docklands has potentially the highest number of vacant properties in Melbourne.
With a median unit price of $600,000 currently, Docklands offers a gross rental yield of 4.51% with a median weekly advertised rent of $520, according to RP Data. They note the average hold period for a Docklands apartment is seven years, and while a -1.64% dip has been seen in the median price over the past three months, the 12 month growth is at 6.57% with annual average growth of 2.38%.
Glenn Lucas, managing director of Lucas Real Estate, is a resident in Docklands. He began selling real estate in the area in 2000 before establishing Lucas Real Estate in 2004. It is now the largest independent agent in the area and this year secured the Real Estate Institute of Victoria's Residential Property Manager of the Year title.
He doesn’t believe that the vacancy rate is a huge issue.
SQM Research records the vacancy rate at 4.4% at present, down from  a 2013 peak above 9%, with regular swings prior to this.
His agency’s vacancy rate sits at around 2%, and he’s quick to note that changing vacancy rates, or cyclical results, are a normal transitional part of any new market.
“Real estate goes through cycles and when a developer puts a tower to the market it’s when the market is at its highest. Then it takes a couple of years to build the tower. It takes time for the buyers to settle,” explains Lucas.
“There’s a good demand for [existing] properties, rentals are not dropping at all,” he says.
Renters come in many forms in Docklands. He points to the professional couples and singles that like the convenience of apartment living in the area, but also says a number of downsizers are also active in the area. Some students in budget apartments also make up a portion of the market.
“There is a market for one bedroom rentals, but it’s the two bedrooms that have done very well,” he says. These rent for between $450 and $650 per week.
While success in the short term may not have occurred for everyone, Lucas has seen some of the first Dockland properties that sold off the plan for $450,000 now achieving $650,000.
He shared four of their recent sales highlights:
<ul>
<li>1401/20 Rakaia Way, Docklands VIC 3008 - $915,000</li>
<li>2504/90 Lorimer Street, Docklands VIC 3008 - $1,310,000</li>
<li>1902/5 Caravel Lane, Docklands VIC 3008 - $900,000</li>
<li>2301/1 Point Park Crescent, Docklands VIC 3008 - $1,160,000</li>
</ul>
Property Observer looked through the latest RP Data to see what sales we could find.
When looking at the sales record from September 1 to today, with 72 sales, it appears gains and losses are in a strong mix. Those who held the property since 2002 or prior, particularly those with larger apartments, seem to have done well with strong gains.
However, those purchasing for the short term – as well as a pain period in 2003 where it seems a number of investors overspent – have realised losses upon selling in the past two and a half months.
Refining the search to those in even more recent days, from 1 November to today, we found the following sales:
<ul>
<li>Two bedroom, one bathroom apartment sold for $467,000 in 2008 and was listed as non-disclosed on the recent sale. It was advertised at $405,000 to $435,000.</li>
<li>Two bedroom, two bathroom apartment was bought for $677,500 in 2001 and listed non-disclosed on sale. It was advertised at $759,000 plus.</li>
<li>Two bedroom, one bathroom apartment bought in 2003 for $532,600 (after 2002 construction), it then sold in 2007 for $495,000, before selling again this month for $550,000.</li>
<li>Two bedroom, one bathroom apartment sold in 2002 for $430,000 before being purchasing in 2011 for $505,000. It sold again for $505,000 less than two weeks ago.</li>
<li>One bedroom, one bathroom apartment was listed as non-disclosed for sale price on 10 November. It transacted for $438,000 in 2002, and was asking for "offers over $420,000" this time round.</li>
<li>Two bedroom, two bathroom apartment sold at the beginning of the month for $450,000. No previous sales information available, but seems it was asking $499,000 to $539,000, before lowering the expectations to $455,000 in January 2013.</li>
<li>One bedroom, one bathroom apartment sold for $456,000 this month after selling in June for $310,000, prior to this it was bought for $301,000 in 1999.</li>
<li>Three bedroom, two bathroom apartment sold for $1,310,000 on the 14th, previously selling for $1,100,000 in 2011. Prior to this it sold for $1 million in 2008 and $1,370,000 in 2005.</li>
<li>Three bedroom, three bathroom apartment sold for $765,000 on the 11th. It was bought for $715,000 in 2013 and $683,000 in 2001.</li>
<li>Two bedroom, two bathroom apartment sold for $730,000 on 11th. It last sold for $1,025,000 in 2010.</li>
<li>One bedroom, one bathroom apartment sold for $335,000. It was purchased in February 2008 for $375,000 and March 2007 for $350,000.</li>
<li>One bedroom, one bathroom apartment sold for $380,000 on 12th. It was previously bought for $400,000 in 2009.</li>
</ul>
Looking at the list a little closer, it shows that there were three clear losses, four clear gains, three “possible” losses, one “possible” gain and one that recorded no change (though likely a loss for the investor in terms of transaction costs).
What is particularly interesting is the losses seen by those who sold to our most recent vendors in the list; even when gains are seen now there has been pain in the past. Perhaps it suggests an emerging recovery.
“Like any investment, we recommend [holding] for the medium to long term,” Lucas urges of those considering a Docklands investment.
It seems he is on the money.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Docklands: Are gains to be had amid "oversupply" speculation?

<html><body>
I was lucky to recently spend an amazing weekend riding horses in the NSW Snowy Mountains National Park.
It was one of those bucket list trips and I went with an old school friend. We'd gone to pony club together and grown up as horse crazy girls. We'd spend most of our teenage years riding and looking after our horses (which kept us out of trouble!).
Whilst sitting around the camp fire at night with a group of other women and staff we'd just met, I was discussing property investing with one of the ladies – can't help myself!
She was a pretty amazing single lady with her sights set on the future. She'd been clever enough to buy a few investment properties in-between serving our country in the army.  We were discussing her recent purchase of an off the plan apartment.
She shared with me the numbers on her deal and I was a bit surprised. I have good experience with buying off the plan but it was over ten years ago now that I used this strategy. Back then, the property developer offered a good discount to purchasers and this helped create some equity. If the market was also moving upwards, then a nice chunk of money could be made by settlement time. I would settle an apartment then draw out the equity to use as a deposit to settle the next one.
But things have changed. There seems to be more risk as there isn't the same discounts being applied. So you buy in at today's market price. If, of course, it's a hot market, as Sydney is at the moment, that price could end up more than what the apartment may be worth in a year or two once completed.
I explained what I did to the lady. Property Bloom manages small developments for our clients. A dual occupancy development can create a big chunk of money within twelve months and you end up with two properties.  I explained that the big difference between buying off the plan and developing yourself, is that you are creating the equity through the development process, not hoping for capital growth whilst your apartment is being constructed.
Would you rather control of the equity creation by cutting some keen deals on the land and construction or rely on a stranger to build your investment and hope for the market to rise?
I did the latter six times and was lucky four out of the six times. The other two deals were borderline. If I had my time again, I would not have completed on the two ordinary investments.  But as they say, time heals all wounds and because I held onto these investments (in lieu of selling at a loss) they've turned out well.
My big lesson from buying off the plan?  It is far more lucrative to be the developer than the investor.
<a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au">www.propertybloom.com.au</a>
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News