Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

Joel Robinson

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

IN BRIEF

<ul>
	<li>
	Just three double-storey Sky Homes sit at the top of The Waterline, each with its own private marina berth and rooftop terrace.
	</li>
	<li>
	Construction on The Waterline is complete, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.
	</li>
	<li>
	Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and are priced from $3.65 million.
	</li>
</ul>

<hr />
Lewis Land has opened the first completed sky home for inspection at Harbour Shores, giving buyers their first opportunity to step inside one of just three double-storey residences crowning The Waterline.

Each sky home comes with its own private marina berth, rooftop terrace and Broadwater views, combining the scale of a larger home with direct access to the boating lifestyle that underpins the wider <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/harbour-shores-biggera-waters-564-oxley-drive-biggera-waters-qld-4216">Harbour Shores</a> masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366708]

Lewis Land Head of Development Michael Long said the inclusion of a berth with every Sky Home had become increasingly valuable as marina access across the Gold Coast tightened.

“Marina berths are becoming increasingly difficult to secure across the Gold Coast, so including one with every Sky Home makes this a genuinely rare offering,” Long said.

“The private 70-berth marina will accommodate boats up to 12 metres in length and is positioned just 2.5 kilometres from the Broadwater, placing the open ocean only 15 minutes away.

“Being able to step out of your home onto your boat is a rare luxury, and it’s something residents here can look forward to when it opens later this year.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366709]

The display opening comes as construction completes on The Waterline, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.

The three Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and each feature three bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive kitchens with butler's pantries and large balconies taking in the Broadwater outlook.

Each residence also has three secure basement car spaces and additional storage.

“This is the first opportunity the Gold Coast has had to step into Harbour Shores and see, touch and feel what we’re bringing to life here,” Long said.

“There are only three Sky Homes within The Waterline, ranging in size from 282sqm to 367sqm, with each residence featuring three large bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive custom-built kitchens with butler’s pantry, and large balconies capturing Broadwater views.”

<img alt="Harbour Shores" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bab65e10-4fab-45e1-92d8-fc56e2ab98ff" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-25%20at%202.00.16%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=XT8q76LsPkw3cYTsvN3JfFDaPLud90PN" />

Residents of The Waterline will have access to a private pool, along with Harbour Shores' wider collection of amenity including a lagoon pool, social clubhouse, tennis court, gym, yoga facilities and sauna.

Lewis Land partnered with Studio Collective to furnish the completed display, with the interiors designed to demonstrate how the residences could function as permanent homes rather than simply as show apartments.

Studio Collective Director Melissa Park said the surrounding waterways informed the interiors, but in a more restrained way than a traditional coastal scheme.

“We drew inspiration from the canals and coastal surrounds, but our approach was to interpret that subtly through layered materials and a grounded palette of earthy tones, rather than literal coastal references,” Park said.

“We introduced hero moments of green and teal to reference the surrounding waterways, while mirrored elements help reflect natural light.

“The result is a residence that feels elevated yet comfortable, somewhere buyers can genuinely imagine themselves living, entertaining and unwinding.”

Sky Homes are priced from $3.65 million.

Lewis Land is also offering private marina berths with The Residences, its limited collection of three and four-bedroom villas positioned directly along the Harbour Shores waterfront boardwalk.

Three-bedroom villas are priced from $2.99 million, while four-bedroom residences start from $3.19 million.

Harbour Shores is being marketed by Colliers International.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113271]

Lewis Land opens sky home display as The Waterline completes at Harbour Shores

St Vincent de Paul Society Housing Australia has filed plans for a major mixed-use housing precinct on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, adding another significant proposal to a pocket around North Sydn​ey Station that is quickly becoming one of the LGA's busiest development zones.

The State Significant Development Application covers a 5,990 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1-19-mackenzie-street-lavender-bay-nsw-2060">1-19 MacKenzie Street and 211 Blues Point Road in Lavender Bay</a>, immediately south of Nor​th Sydney Station and between the commercial core and the lower-rise Lavender Bay Heritage Conservation Area.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal would deliver a new residential tower comprising 88 build-to-sell apartments and 19 affordable apartments, alongside a separate co-living building with 57 rooms and a building manager's studio.

It would also see the significant restoration and upgrade of St Francis Xavier Catholic Church, the adaptive reuse of the former school building, new parish facilities, retail, a new public square and around 1,000 sqm of publicly accessible open space.

<img alt="Vinnies North Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d5dd7f87-a617-463e-b577-17541e01f0e9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.13%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4R8TsFN3P_LrrXO2HswTOIrx2blil8lh" />

The project is seeking a concurrent rezoning of the site to R4 High Density Residential and an increase in the maximum building height to allow a tower reaching RL120, or up to 20 storeys. The proposal was progressed through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The build-to-sell component will be weighted toward larger apartments, with just six one-bedroom apartments compared with 31 two-beds, 43 three-beds and eight four-bedroom residences.

The 19 affordable apartments will comprise two studios, 15 one-bedroom apartments and two two-bedroom apartments, taking the total apartment component to 107 residences before the 58 co-living rooms are included.

<img alt="Vnnies" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d568ca5-cb90-4e18-96c6-d9795dba0c56" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GY2R5M9VtQh0EKy1vajaea19PSLOPuRD" />

Wardle's design for the Vinnies site has sought to negotiate that emerging high-rise context while retaining the lower-scale character of MacKenzie Street and the adjoining heritage conservation area.

The main building adopts a three-storey podium and tower arrangement, with the podium aligned to the ridgeline and front setback of St Francis Xavier Church.&nbsp;Wardle has designed the podium with colonnades, seating, recessed entries and active ground-floor frontages, with sandstone-toned precast concrete and face brick referencing the materiality of the existing church.

The tower then steps back eight metres to the south and six metres to the north before rising in a sculpted form comprising four interlocking quadrants. Wardle has also introduced rounded forms and chamfered corners to reduce the tower's perceived bulk and improve view sharing with neighbouring development sites.

Resident facilities and outdoor areas are planned at the separation between the podium and tower at Level 3, oriented toward Sydney Harbour and the CBD skyline.

The tower itself will feature a glass reinforced concrete facade, with recessed balconies and deep reveals used both to provide shading and privacy and frame views toward the harbour and city. The lower levels take a different architectural approach, using brick and sandstone-toned finishes intended to establish a stronger relationship with St Francis Xavier Church. The Church itself will be conserved and upgraded for its continued use, while the former school building will be adaptively reused as part of the co-living component.

<img alt="Lavendar Bay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2d4418ad-90aa-4d49-af93-c80b140aea80" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.09.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Kv4gzbsACaGvZSRuaqcfGC54jEJRXIDJ" />

&nbsp;

The proposal adds to an increasingly concentrated pipeline of residential development around Blue Street, MacKenzie Street and Lavender Bay.

Just west of the site, Central Element lodged plans earlier this year for one of the most significant residential developments proposed in Lavender Bay in recent years.

Central Element's SJB-designed scheme at 64-66 Lavender Street and 3-7 Middlemiss Street would deliver 163 apartments across two towers rising 23 and 32 storeys, replacing five existing apartment buildings containing 32 homes. The project also forms part of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-central-element-reveals-lavender-bay-apartment-plans?utm_source=chatgpt.com" rel="noopener" target="_blank">First look: Central Element reveals Lavender Bay apartment plans</a>

Immediately around North Sy​dney Station, another two significant proposals have emerged at 5 and 15 Blue Street.

Zurich Australian Insurance Properties is seeking to adaptively reuse its longstanding commercial building at 5 Blue Street, directly above North Sydney Station, rather than demolishing the structure.

Its SSDA proposes converting the building into a 14-storey mixed-use development with 62 apartments and 86 co-living rooms, together with ground-floor retail and a major refurbishment of Blue Street Plaza. The application is currently at the Response to Submissions stage.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-zurich-targets-north-sydney-office-conversion-with-148-unit-proposal-above-metro-station">First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Vinnies files for 20-storey Lavender Bay apartment tower as North Sydney housing pocket heats up

When the opportunity arose for South Australian developer Palumbo to return to Kent Town, where it had previously delivered East Park Apartments and the East 
Rundle Apartments, it wasn't one the longstanding developer-builder was going to pass up.

The decision was quickly vindicated, with more than 30 apartments sold within the first month of launching <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/royal-apartments-kent-town-2-8-north-terrace-kent-town-sa-5067">Royal Apartments</a> to the market.

The 206-apartment development, which will bring significant new supply to Adelaide's tightly held eastern city fringe, also gives <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/palumbo">Palumbo</a> the opportunity to bring new life to one of Kent Town's most recognisable watering holes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376073]

Royal Apartments incorporates the historic Royal Hotel, a venue Palumbo Managing Director Daniel Palumbo said has a longstanding connection with the local community.

"Everyone in the area has history with the Royal Hotel," Palumbo told Apartments.com.au.

"It was quite an active pub and social gathering place for locals. We want to bring it back to its former glory."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376072]

The wider development will comprise two residential towers alongside the restored hotel, sitting on North Terrace opposite the Adelaide Park Lands.

For Palumbo, the project also marks a return to familiar territory.

The developer completed East Park Apartments next door more than a decade ago and jumped at the opportunity to develop in Kent Town again when the Royal Hotel site became available.

"The opportunity emerged, and we moved to secure the site," Palumbo said.

"We were approached by the previous landowner, who said they had extensive commitments in Sydney and weren't in a position to deliver the project.

"We took over the site and within six months recut the design scheme to be more in keeping with the type of development we want to bring to Adelaide.

"Now we're on the market and those changes have really resonated with local buyers."

That has translated into a strong start to sales, with 33 apartments transacting in the project's first 35 days.

Palumbo said the early purchaser profile had been consistent with the group's traditional focus on owner-occupiers rather than investor-led apartment stock.

"Local owner-occupiers have always been our market," he said.

"There are always some investors, but we've never developed what would be called traditional development stock. Owner-occupiers are very much our market."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376068]

The buyer mix has been diverse so far, with downsizers and younger professionals both accounting for a significant portion of early sales.

South Australia's current stamp duty settings, which allow&nbsp;eligible homeowners in South Australia aged 60 savings of up to $103,830 on stamp duty when they downsize to a new property valued at up to $2 million,&nbsp;have helped encourage downsizer activity, while younger buyers in their late 20s and early 30s have been attracted to the opportunity to live immediately outside the CBD while still being able to walk into the city.



Location has been a major part of the proposition for both buyer cohorts.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376075]

Royal Apartments sits on North Terrace directly opposite the Adelaide Park Lands, with residents able to walk through the parklands toward the East End, Rundle Street and Rundle Mall.

Apartments have been positioned to capture views across the parklands, Adelaide skyline, Botanic Gardens and Adelaide Hills.

Palumbo believes the scarcity of developable land along this section of the Park Lands makes the site particularly difficult to replicate.

"There's very few allotments on that side that can be developed," he said.

"If this location was in New York and you were sitting on Central Park, you'd be talking about a $60 million apartments."

Royal Apartments will offer a broad mix of residences, ranging from one-bedroom apartments through to four-bedroom sub-penthouses and penthouses.

Current listings include one-bedroom apartments from $680,000, while larger three and four-bedroom residences are priced around $2.5 million.

Residents will have access to a swimming pool, gym, barbecue and recreation areas, residents' lounge and dining space, and a communal deck.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376067]

The apartments will feature generous balconies, while secure parking, bicycle storage and storage cages will also be provided.

A porte-cochère-style arrival and drop-off area has also resonated with buyers, particularly those attracted to being able to walk into the CBD during the day while retaining secure vehicle access at home.

Palumbo is acting as developer, architect and builder on Royal Apartments, continuing the vertically integrated model it has used across its South Australian portfolio.

The group was also behind the $150 million Sofitel Adelaide, the 251-room five-star hotel and residential tower which opened in 2021.

Palumbo said Royal's launch had come at an interesting time for the broader Adelaide apartment market.

Buyer confidence had initially been impacted by uncertainty surrounding the Federal Budget and broader economic conditions, but Palumbo believes sentiment is beginning to improve against a backdrop of significant investment flowing into South Australia.

He pointed to increased activity across defence and resources, including Olympic Dam, as potential long-term drivers of the state's economy and housing market.

"Money is starting to flow into Adeliade, significant amounts as Adelaide bucks the trend of the rest of the country.," Palumbo said.

"There's a lot of activity in the economy over the next decade. I think more investment will come into this market."

Early works on Royal Apartments are expected to commence this year, with major construction activity and cranes anticipated on site from early next year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6109]

Palumbo's return to Kent Town strikes early chord with buyers

Go-to builder-developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/graya">GRAYA</a> is continuing to bulk out its already impressive and diverse apartment portfolio across South East Queensland. Their latest milestone is securing development approval for Silk, its boutique riverfront apartment development in St Lucia.

The approval clears&nbsp;the way for the team to begin construction planning for the 22-residence project.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/silk-st-lucia-16-18-sandford-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">Silk</a> will rise 15 levels from an 810 sqm site at 16-18 Sandford Street, occupying a prominent bend of the Brisbane River with a prized northern aspect across Orleigh Park toward the Brisbane CBD.

The approved scheme will comprise 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences, continuing GRAYA's move into larger-format apartment developments targeting Brisbane's prestige owner-occupier market.

The project has been designed around the site's broad river frontage and dual-direction views, with GRAYA prioritising larger residences, privacy and outlook over apartment yield.

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa5c2349-f96c-4914-a812-1f2cd6827af8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.44%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=WY0vEU_7vYjeRJKQHiCwFdMxu8PvFh52" />

GRAYA Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Rob Gray said the project had been shaped around local homeowners wanting to remain in St Lucia without maintaining a traditional family home.

"St Lucia is one of those suburbs people do not want to leave," Gray said.

"They know the river, the trees, UQ, the golf course, Toowong and Indooroopilly, and that familiarity is hard to replace.

"True riverfront opportunities here are exceptionally scarce. What we have designed at Silk is a way to stay in the suburb people love, with the scale and privacy of a private home and far less to maintain.

"This is not typical apartment product. It is a proper home on the river, and that is exactly what this market has been missing."

The approval comes as new apartment development continues to increase across the St Lucia and neighbouring Toowong corridor, although direct riverfront sites remain considerably more tightly held.

GRAYA Co-founder and Managing Director Andrew Gray said securing the approval had removed a significant element of development risk from Silk.

"Genuine riverfront sites of this quality in St Lucia are not something that comes up regularly," Gray said.

"The approval removes a substantial layer of execution risk, and the location underwrites demand in a way very few inner-city sites can.

"The fundamentals here are as strong as anything we have assessed in Brisbane."

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d0f3d734-65e1-48e8-8ed3-2e0715ffcdd9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sOLSs_jdHkXLWbBKzRyayf5BfTb2vPsD" />

Silk will see GRAYA return to a stretch of the Brisbane River where it already has recent construction experience. The vertically integrated group recently completed ARC in neighbouring Toowong as builder for developer Spyre, delivering the riverfront project on a constrained site.

GRAYA will take a different role at Silk, controlling the project from design and development through construction and aftercare under its vertically integrated model.

The development will include a gym and resident leisure areas at ground level, integrated with the river's edge.

Silk joins a growing pipeline for GRAYA across Brisbane and the Gold Coast, which includes Enclave, The Gallery, Coral and Ripple.

The developer-builder has also recently lodged plans for its largest project to date, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-silo-19-chester-street-newstead-qld-4006">The Silo</a>, a proposed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/graya-buys-frasers-newstead-site-plans-the-silo-between-james-street-and-gasworks-precincts">$700 million mixed-use development</a> in Brisbane's James Street precinct.

Silk is expected to predominantly target local owner-occupiers and prestige buyers seeking a permanent riverfront home in Brisbane's inner west.

Registrations of interest are now open, with further details on the project and construction program to be released as it progresses.

<hr />
<h2>SILK PROJECT FACTS</h2>

Developer-builder: GRAYA

Project: Silk

Location: 16-18 Sandford Street, St Lucia

Apartments: 22

Built form: 15 levels

Site: 810 sqm riverfront holding

Mix: 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences

Status: Development approved

Next step: Construction planning underway

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152168]

GRAYA greenlit for riverfront St Lucia apartment development, Silk

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

National Australia Bank (NAB) has brought forward the timing of the first RBA cash rate cut by three months.

NAB is now expecting a cut in February, in line with ANZ and Westpac, having initially thought a cut wouldn't come until May.

Commonwealth Bank, the nation's largest lender, still thinks the first cut will come in December.

NAB changed its call following the August monthly inflation figures that were released at the end of September, showing it had dropped to 2.7 per cent.

"The risk has been skewed to a first cut earlier in 2025, and today’s change acknowledges the balance of risks has likely shifted sufficiently for the RBA to feel comfortable cutting a little sooner than we earlier expected," NAB noted in its latest update.

They added that the cadence of the cuts may be faster than its central profile.

"Domestic inflation pressures are cooling, but only gradually, and we continue to expect the conditions for a cut will not be in place this year.

NAB believes the easing cycle will end at 3.1 per cent by early 2026, which is five cuts from the current 4.35 per cent cash rate.&nbsp;

CBA also thinks 3.1 per cent will mark the end of the cutting cycle, while Westpac is forecasting 3.35 per cent, and ANZ is the most pessimistic at 3.6 per cent, which would be just three interest rate cuts.

<h2>What would a rate cut in February look like for borrowers?</h2>

According to&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn%3Du001.IVvjJ-2BPT0A8C3VxtqKc6e3bj5hBuw27WFEYqovsYs7kPsgFulYrdOzeP8gI7CybJOya3_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20hPXdLlPP9yD7DvFFDBM5yrTqxvcCiMfAsW1onD-2FcriL628eYdhNQE7bwzYrxcOYnmaYfRhGl-2FEHQ6eK2uQcLxs6Cbu6Dx0bYvpi5A6enmxMWU5TkcRYrP6Z8GbXZYtc5qSoKu6eWFBQR9K7fsjXwHMmby3D3X6Yx-2BxcDcdRruTG&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1727774368149000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2vK2ujS77CHs9VRvSSXzLC" href="https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.IVvjJ-2BPT0A8C3VxtqKc6e3bj5hBuw27WFEYqovsYs7kPsgFulYrdOzeP8gI7CybJOya3_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20hPXdLlPP9yD7DvFFDBM5yrTqxvcCiMfAsW1onD-2FcriL628eYdhNQE7bwzYrxcOYnmaYfRhGl-2FEHQ6eK2uQcLxs6Cbu6Dx0bYvpi5A6enmxMWU5TkcRYrP6Z8GbXZYtc5qSoKu6eWFBQR9K7fsjXwHMmby3D3X6Yx-2BxcDcdRruTG" target="_blank">Canstar</a>, if there is a cut in February, a borrower with a $600,000 loan today and 25 years remaining would see their monthly repayments drop by $92.&nbsp;

<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="3">
			Impact of 0.25% pt cut in February 2025
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			Current loan size
			</td>
			<td>
			Drop in monthly repayment
			</td>
			<td>
			New monthly repayment
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$600,000
			</td>
			<td>
			-$92
			</td>
			<td>
			$3,907
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$750,000
			</td>
			<td>
			-$114
			</td>
			<td>
			$4,884
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>
			$1M
			</td>
			<td>
			-$153
			</td>
			<td>
			$6,512
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="3">
			Source:&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn%3Du001.xWMOP9hChsvn-2BC9O-2FebBihXIZ4cEzbiuENdxm-2Bx3-2FYEEgYMhZlKWNj5Zzy1YZ56RuASD_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20v2akwr6-2BqLyRrlEgkJ4J-2BCCyY0x189xEHZA4Ylf8c7ChBqNIkhmftZzoFuZKFn43pw3oJVg2o1gumrpdA-2B7MB-2FBtmL2rFCI-2FXORATQHySCLVOMg7Vywv-2BqnnQUAtDz6XkvpwxdHFXh70VwKazzhJsICilEYOvP4ju0sIfi5g6TL&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1727774368149000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2qVnp6oqATgqDUi2Frm22q" href="https://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.xWMOP9hChsvn-2BC9O-2FebBihXIZ4cEzbiuENdxm-2Bx3-2FYEEgYMhZlKWNj5Zzy1YZ56RuASD_RgrM7qq-2BfK-2FtAHeRBLv5Qrb-2Bii5fzjLeKcP4w-2FkNgJPXygpiRhVUan3WV3QEggcf617UC8Z60RjQJZAqx7PiO7FtVJQSn0D46Zc3iTVP0kAhTTzG51cPpa5hrqz1OkSA-2BiXAxUajQ686MTtiseWBIdMdknd83aB7cOVgXlVTeHCGf3-2BcMHwfvI8TYlkUovqEhn4dj0KXf2eJGpb9-2BBv20v2akwr6-2BqLyRrlEgkJ4J-2BCCyY0x189xEHZA4Ylf8c7ChBqNIkhmftZzoFuZKFn43pw3oJVg2o1gumrpdA-2B7MB-2FBtmL2rFCI-2FXORATQHySCLVOMg7Vywv-2BqnnQUAtDz6XkvpwxdHFXh70VwKazzhJsICilEYOvP4ju0sIfi5g6TL" target="_blank">www.canstar.com.au</a>. Starting rate is the RBA existing average owner-occupier variable rate of 6.36%. Assumes banks pass the cash rate cut on in full the month after the meeting.
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

Canstar Data Insights Director, Sally Tindall, says if core inflation continues to track in the right direction, or unemployment starts to accelerate significantly, we could well see a cash rate cut as early as February of next year.

“All four big banks now believe the RBA will be ready to cut the cash rate in just over four months’ time, if not before, in the case of CBA.

“However, the outlook for both inflation and unemployment is still highly uncertain. A couple of wobbly sets of inflation data could see the RBA holding for longer, particularly if unemployment remains relatively steady."

&nbsp;

Commonwealth Bank, the nation's largest lender, still thinks the first cut will come in December.

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

<html><body>
Given the outlook for the economy and the significant degree of monetary stimulus already in place to support economic activity, the RBA board judged that the current accommodative stance of policy was likely to be appropriate for "some time yet," the RBA June Board meeting minutes published today.
At recent meetings, the board had judged that it was prudent to leave the cash rate unchanged. And it appears for some time yet.
"Low interest rates were working to support demand, although it was difficult to judge the extent to which this would offset the expected substantial decline in mining investment and the effect of planned fiscal consolidation. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.rba.gov.au/monetary-policy/rba-board-minutes/2014/03062014" target="_blank">"Those uncertainties were likely to take some time to resolve</a>," the minutes advise. 
"The earlier decline in the exchange rate was assisting in achieving balanced growth in the economy, but less so than previously as a result of its higher levels over the past few months."
The board members noted that the exchange rate remained high by historical standards, particularly given the further decline in commodity prices over the past month. 
It noted a range of indicators of housing construction confirmed that a significant recovery was underway. 
"Residential work done picked up strongly in the March quarter," the minutes noted.
"Forward-looking indicators of new dwelling investment were at high levels relative to recent years, although building approvals had declined in recent months.
"In the established housing market, dwelling price growth had eased from the rapid pace seen in 2013 and auction clearance rates in Sydney and Melbourne had declined from the high rates that prevailed during much of 2013."
The minutes noted measures of consumer sentiment had fallen sharply over the past month and were now below their long-run average levels. 
However, it was noted that while low-frequency movements in confidence measures had been broadly associated with trends in consumption spending, there was little evidence from the historical record that high-frequency movements carried much predictive content.
In its post-meeting statement earlier this month, the RBA did not explicitly mention the deterioration in consumer confidence but comments around the improvement in business confidence and conditions compared with a year ago were removed.
ANZ believed there was a prospect the minutes could read a little more dovishly than the post-meeting statement.
ANZ concluded that the minutes were "slightly more dovish" than previous recent communications from the Bank.
ANZ suggested the key phrases included “Low interest rates were working to support demand, although it was difficult to judge the extent to which this would offset the expected substantial decline in mining investment and the effect of planned fiscal consolidation. Those uncertainties were likely to take some time to resolve.
ANZ advised this suggested that the Bank will err on the side of maintaining its very expansionary policy setting until it is clear that growth is above trend and spare capacity in the economy is reducing. 
"Our base case is that the Bank starts to remove monetary policy support in Q1 2015 and increases the cash rate by 100bps over the year," ANZ economist Justin Fabo said.
"This would be relatively gradual initial policy tightening by historical standards. 
"The risks, however, appear tilted towards a somewhat later start to policy tightening and/or more gradual cash rate hike increases if easy monetary policy is required for longer to support the transition in growth drivers in the economy."
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Uncertainties likely to take some time to resolve: RBA

<html><body>
It’s coming up to tax time, which is great news for those few that enjoy filling out extra paperwork and visiting their accountant.
Last year, thousands of <a href="/news/aussies-scammed-out-of-89-million-in-2013-accc-report">Australians were scammed out of a combined $89 million in 2013</a>, according to an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission report that was released yesterday.
It’s unfortunately also a time of year when you’re more comfortable providing your details to sort out your tax return and get your affairs in order. Here are five tips from the Australian Taxation Office on being aware of, and recognising, signs of fraud and unscrupulous activity.
Simple tips to recognise fake SMS and emails that pretend to be from the ATO
These aren’t all ‘Nigerian Prince’ style emails that you can tell at a single glance should be deleted without opening and some can actually look convincing, the ATO warns.
If the emails are one or many of the below, then you may be dealing with a case of fraud:
<ul>
<li>Unsolicited 
</li>
<li>Not from a valid ATO address (but may look as though it is from an official email) 
</li>
<li>Do not address you by your name, or uses your email address instead of your name 
</li>
<li>Asks for your personal or financial details (in particular, date of birth, address or PIN number) – This is a big warning sign. The ATO notes they will never ask for these details via SMS or email 
</li>
<li>Poorly worded, containing gramma errors (pun intended) – this helps to avoid filters 
</li>
<li>Promises money – Do we need to explain why this one is unlikely? 
</li>
<li>Contains an attachment 
</li>
<li>Contains fake links (the ATO suggests moving your cursor over the link, not clicking, and seeing where you’ll be redirected to. If it’s not to the ATO’s official site, then don’t click it.)</li>
</ul>
If the SMS or email you have received fits the above categories - head to the official ATO website and give them a call.
Report SMS and emails offering tax refunds in exchange for your personal details
Tax refunds are calculated after you’ve reported your information – not before.
“Any SMS or email that requests additional information before a refund can be released is a hoax,” they warn.
If an SMS or email says that you owe money, or that your account is in arrears and you will be taken to court – it’s time to ignore it.
This information will not be sent in an email or as a text. The phone, mail, an external collection agency or a personal visit are the methods more likely to be used.
Use online services via the official ato.gov.au
Don’t use other websites or methods, other than phoning the official number, to do business with the ATO. If they text you, it’s probably not them.
You’ll be prompted to sign in with a TFN and password and often AUSkey. If you aren’t asked to login, beware – it’s not the ATO. Double check the address bar.
Keep your TFN and passwords secure
Don’t share your password, and do not respond to emails with your TFN or password.
When are SMS and emails used by the ATO? For promotional or information services. Reminders, notifications, requests for you to contact the ATO and confirmation may be sent in these formats.
YOU MAY ALSO WANT TO READ
ATO warns of tax time scammers:<a href="/expert-insights/finance/ato-warns-of-tax-time-scammers-here-s-how-to-spot-them"> Here's how to spot them</a>
ATO branded scam alert: <a href="/news/ato-branded-scam-alert-fake-landlord-tax-exemption">Fake landlord tax exemption</a>
Beware of tax scams: <a href="/expert-insights/finance/beware-of-tax-scams-how-to-make-sure-you-don-t-get-fleeced">How to make sure you don't get fleeced</a>
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Four ATO tips to protect yourself from end of financial year scams

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
After much anticipation, the European Central Bank (ECB) finally announced some important policy changes that have seen the euro weaken by around one and a half cents against the Australian dollar. 
The fall reduces the cost of imports from the eurozone by over A$3,000 for every €100,000 in a little over a week.
So why has the ECB caused the sharp move in the currency?
Most of the talk has been around the decision to reduce the deposit rate for bank deposits. Going forward, the ECB will charge commercial banks a fee in the form of a negative deposit rate for parking funds with them. This is a first for a developed nation and is aimed at forcing the banks to release capital, i.e. lend more so the real economy can get easier access to money. A real headline grabber!
The other less sexy measure was a new Targeted Long Term Refinancing Operation, with the acronym TLTRO, likely to replace the previous LTRO. The difference? This one is now targeted (just add T to the beginning). This policy is another injection of cash into the banking sector with some caveats attached which make it more targeted than the previous version. Commercial banks now have to use the money specifically to lend it out to the private sector.
In its accompanying statement, the ECB decided to “intensify the preparatory work related to outright purchases in the ABS market”. In other words, it's now committed to embarking on a European-style quantitative easing program which will serve to weaken the euro.
But it’s not all about the euro
Coinciding with a weaker euro, we have seen the Aussie strengthening on the back of some better than expected domestic economic data and a rosier outlook for China. In this context the local unit has pushed through 94 US cents and is seeing some calls for parity once again. The combination of these two forces sees the AUD/EUR cross-rate edging closer to 0.7, a level not seen since November last year.
<img src="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/images/stories/vrondas%201606%20graph.jpg" alt="">
Whilst the trend is expected to continue, the <a href="https://www.ozforex.com.au/forex-tools/my-fx-dashboard?mode=advanced" target="_blank">chart above</a> highlights what could be a significant resistance point around 0.7116. For those businesses importing from Europe, a move above 0.7 to this level could represent a good opportunity to hedge some future exposures and lock in an exchange rate some 11% better than what it was in January of this year. Such significant cost savings should help deliver a better bottom line for businesses in the next financial year.
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jimvrondas">Jim Vrondas</a> is Chief Currency strategist, Asia-Pacific at <a href="https://www.ozforex.com.au/?cid=1300">OzForex</a>, a global provider of online international payment services and a key provider of <a href="https://www.ozforex.com.au/news-commentary/daily">Forex news</a>.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Negative interest rates a boon for Aussie importers

<html><body>
Serviceability is a crucial part of obtaining finance. Essentially, it dictates how able you are to meet repayments of your loan.
To banks and lenders this is crucial as it determines whether or not they can lend a certain amount to you - the less serviceable you are, the less you can borrow.
It is defined by a number of criteria. Largely, it looks at your income and financial situation against your debt and liabilities, as well as living costs. They’re trying to work out how much you can afford to set aside for a mortgage each month. Think of this as your “in” and “out” columns.
Your income covers money that you bring “in” from all sources – your salary, any child support you receive (if you provide child support, this will fall into your “out” column), any money you receive from rental properties or other investments, and so forth.
Your “out” column, or your outgoings, includes all repayments and current debt, such as for credit cards, living expenses and other ongoing costs. Any children you have, or dependents, will also fall into this category. Note that your 'living expenses' will be likely based on an amount that the lender considers appropriate for your type of household - just because you are particularly frugal does not necessarily mean that this will benefit the numbers on this occasion.
After you have both of these worked out - the remainder of your money is what is then looked at to determine whether you can afford to make repayments on a loan.
According to Build.com.au “When you’re looking for approval for a loan, your total monthly debt expenses are expressed as a proportion of your gross monthly income. This is known as the ‘debt service ratio’ - and it should be set at a maximum of between 30 and 35% of your gross income.”
Future rate rises are also calculated in, and some lenders include a "buffer" that can affect buy-and-hold investors. If you come up against a serviceability wall it isn't uncommon to find that you are deemed serviceable by a different lender due to varying criteria.
Homeloanexperts' Otto Dargan notes that there are three methods for calculating serviceability. These include Net Surplus Ratio (NSR), Debt Servicing Ratio (DSR) and Surplus/Uncommitted Monthly Income (UMI). He <a href="https://www.homeloanexperts.com.au/how-much-can-i-borrow/" target="_blank">notes that these are used by the bulk of Australian lenders and banks</a>.
Serviceability can be complicated when considering all of the different factors that the banks are required to consider to ensure you can repay your loan. Luckily, they can be fairly transparent about this process.
For instance, you can do some fairly quick serviceability checks online. While these aren’t foolproof, you’ll have a pretty good understanding of where you’re sitting.
For instance, there is <a href="https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=8&amp;ved=0CHUQFjAH&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.genworth.com.au%2Fdocs%2Fdownloads%2Fservicing-calculator_2013-06.xls&amp;ei=5KSXU5ObIsrjkwWeqoHICA&amp;usg=AFQjCNEiPSoi5ce-u6W4YMZuDin7fWsojw&amp;sig2=QkJbIxL827m6v84W-uM5qg" target="_blank">this fairly thorough Genworth calculator (note: this is an excel spreadsheet download)</a>.
Or you can try <a href="https://www.amp.com.au/wps/portal/au/AMPAUPlannersGeneral3C?vigurl=%2Fvgn-ext-templating%2Fv%2Findex.jsp%3Fvgnextoid%3Da498a451359c2210VgnVCM10000083d20d0aRCRD%20" target="_blank">one of the others in AMP’s range</a>.
Did you know that reducing the limits on your credit cards can help increase your serviceability? We will look at tips for how to increase your serviceability and the specific factors you should take a second look at tomorrow in our ‘how to’.
</body></html>

What is serviceability? Investment terms explained

<html><body>
Toni Collette and her musician husband, David Galafassi have secured a small reduction in the damages they must pay in their legal battle over abandoned plans to buy a Paddington terrace.
After a two day hearing, the NSW Court of Appeal ruled on Friday that the couple pay $602,500 to Industrie clothing label founder Susan Kelly for reneging on <a href="/expert-insights/investing/actor-toni-collette-and-muso-david-galafassi-fall-for-the-charms-of-contemporary-inner-city-paddington">their 2011 agreement to buy Kelly's double fronted Stewart Street property</a> (pictured in gallery above).
The revised damages bill represents a reduction of $212,407 on the original damages bill of $814, 907 ordered by Supreme Court Acting Justice William Windeyer last year.
The purchase price under the contract was $6,350,000, of which the purchasers paid a 5% deposit ($317, 500). The date fixed for completion under the contract was 30 December 2011.
But on the morning of 30 December 2011 the purchasers' solicitors advised that the purchasers did not have the funds necessary to enable them to complete and that they would not be able to proceed with the purchase.
The vendor responded that she did not accept the purchasers' apparent repudiation and intended to institute proceedings for specific performance.
On 4 January 2012 the purchasers' solicitors again advised that the purchasers were not financially capable of completing the contract and that they would be unable to comply with an order for specific performance.
On 20 January 2012 the vendor commenced proceedings in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court seeking orders for specific performance and, in the alternative, damages.
On 24 January 2012 Mrs Galafassi sent an email to the vendor and her husband apologising for their failure to complete. 
The email explained that the purchasers had been unable to sell their own home and had instead agreed to a property swap arrangement with the vendor of a different property, and in the process they had lost all their savings, meaning that they were unable to go through with the purchase. 
On or about 24 February 2012 Mrs Galafassi sent a further email again stating that there was no way they could comply with an order for specific performance if such an order was granted because they did not have the means to raise the funds to complete.
But the Galafassi couple pursued the latest court hearing where the NSW Court of Appeal ruled that Mrs Kelly was not entitled to "special condition interest", which is paid in cases where completion of a property deal is late.
The court found that since completion of the sale had not occurred, special condition interest did not apply.
But Ms Collette and Mr Galafassi will still have to forfeit their $317,500 deposit, taking the total bill to more than $920,000. Plus much of the legal expenses of Ms Kelly.
Ms Collette and Mr Galafassi had agreed to buy the terrace in September 2011 for $6.35 million, but when due to settle three months late they backed out.
"We feel sick about this, you and the vendors nothing but great and we apologise profusely," the couple said in an email to the McGrath selling agent Ben Collier.
"David and I feel absolutely sick about not being able to go through with the purchase of your house. We had every intention of doing so and it has broken our hearts. We can't apologise enough and totally empathise with your position. We are mortified. If we had the money we would happily be living in it by now," she emailed the Kelly's.
The Purchasers' email concluded with the plea: "Please reconsider taking us to court. It just makes a very sad situation much worse. We can no longer buy your beautiful house. Again, we apologise profusely. We don't have the finances to go through with the purchase. For the sake of both our families, I implore that you find a way to settle this less publicly. Understandably, all of this is not your concern. You thought you had sold the house and the sale has fallen through. We sincerely hope that you can understand our position and find it in your hearts to deal with this in another way."
The email contained the postscript: "ps...our lawyer was not entirely comfortable with us writing this letter and does not want it used against us. His advice is to state that this "appeal" is without prejudice and should not be used in a legal case against us, or in the press, and is very much confidential."
This article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
On or about 24 February 2012, Mrs Galafassi sent a further email to the vendor's husband referring to recent publicity in the press and stating: "... I wanted to write to you in the hope that we can try and sort something out before good press becomes bad press. We are truly sorry for the position that we put you in last year, we can't stress that enough, but there has to be a way that this matter can be resolved. 
"If we can't settle it commercially, quickly, rather than legally, slowly, the value of Paddington may well be jeopardised once our legal teams get in to the Court room and the media have a field day. I am being perfectly honest when I say that there is no way that we could comply with an order to complete the purchase of Paddington if your order was granted. We don't have the means to raise the funds to settle on Paddington. When Bronte Road didn't sell at auction last November, we were very worried. 
"I fully appreciate that I am not in a good position but, without admitting that I am liable for anything, I understand that if you were to sell Paddington now, it is likely I would have to find the difference to satisfy a claim of damages if the price came in under the contract price that we signed. 
"So you would be in the same position as you would have been had you sold to us at the end of last year. Whether that happens or not, that all makes sense to me but what doesn't make sense is that the longer this matter is dragged out through legal processes (at least another month), the more damage it will do when the property is finally listed. 
"It would become like a forced sale and the media coverage would not force the price up! At the moment you have $315,000 and you still have the house, so in essence you are in a better position than you were at the end of last year. In my humble view I wouldn't put that position at risk."
Mrs Galafassi's email continued: "I am due to settle on the sale of our Bronte Road house in the next few days. As the article in the media said <a href="/news/actor-toni-collette-changes-her-mind-over-paddo-and-buys-again-in-bronte-title-tattle">we have 'swapped' our house for one not too far away</a>, and at the moment the story that we wanted to stay close to the ocean with our young family, is not too far from the truth. 
"My view is that if that story was maintained in the press, rather than coverage of all the details of a litigious battle, you will get a far better result than if you pursue me in the Courts. If you listed Paddington for sale now, who knows, you may get more than the price we agreed to pay. You just don't know. But if you don't get a higher price, well, then Dave and I may have to suffer the consequences of a damages claim. 
"Either way, you really are not going to be any commercially worse off, but we all will have avoided some of the stress, anxiety, time and effort that inevitably go hand in hand with litigation. I am not trying to avoid the consequences of our action but trying to consider more commercial and realistic options with more satisfactory outcomes for everyone, rather than paying lawyers to follow procedures and argue legal points on our behalves."
At trial the Galafassi couple contended, unsuccessfully, that these two emails were "without prejudice" and should not have been admitted into evidence.
About two months after the second email, the Kellys sold the house to Ernst &amp; Young accountant Ian Ball for $5.5 million. Ben Collier had shown the property to nine interested purchasers between January and April 2012; and that the offer ultimately accepted from Mr Ball on 24 April 2012 of $5,500,000 was an increase of $200,000 on his first offer.
Mrs Kelly then sued for the difference plus interest and land tax that arose on the December 31, since they had already bought their next home in Vaucluse.
Ms Collette wrote to Mrs Kelly's husband Nick in 2012, urging the couple not to proceed with the court case.
"I wanted to write to you directly in the hope that you will understand," she said in an email.
"We can no longer buy your beautiful house. We don't have the finances to go through with the purchase. For the sake of both our families I implore you to find a way to settle this less publicly."
The court has yet to finally decide on legal costs indicating that Ms Collette and Mr Galafassi should pay 65% of Mrs Kelly's costs though the parties are to be given the opportunity to make further submissions on costs, the chief Justice Thomas Bathurst and Justices Julie Ward and Fabian Gleeson proffered.
David Galafassi (First appellant) and Toni Galafassi (Second appellant) were represented by solicitors: YBR Solicitor and counsel: J Stoljar SC with J C Hewitt.
Susan Kelly engaged B A Coles QC with C G Carroll who were advised by solicitors, Osborne Lawyers. 
There were 66 prior cases cited in the matter which was first ruled on in May last year.
</body></html>

Toni Collette's appeal secures reduced Paddington property sale damages legal bill

<html><body>
Getting legal advice when buying or selling is absolutely crucial.
There are often tweaks that are required to be made to contracts, and even your most standard property transaction comes with its own unique quirks and requirements.
Professional advice should be able to tell you exactly what you’re signing up for, anything specific that the vendor or buyer is requesting and what you can insert to add your own wants into the contract.
When it comes to choosing the expert to do this, you usually end up with either a conveyancing agent (conveyancer) or a lawyer. Which one of these is best is highly contended, and there are pros and cons to each.
Just Think Real Estate’s Edwin Almeida took this comparison on, noting that the majority of property lawyers and conveyancers he has met have been “great”, however “like every other industry, there are the bad apples that create the misbalance in opinions, of what otherwise is a great and critical service provided by both solicitors and conveyancers. “
The first point of discussion: Pricing. Everything comes down to the numbers, but it pays to know what it will cost you and what you’re paying for.
Firstly, notes Almeida, note that this isn’t the only difference between the two – although many do believe that it’s the biggest difference.
“Yes, most lawyers but not all, do charge more for the conveyancing process. However, I have in my time as a selling agent, noted that when things become difficult for conveyancers to handle, conveyancers inevitably refer the matter to a solicitor,” he said.
“With the trend of SMSF purchasing property, people feel more comfortable in paying the higher service fees; knowing and having the peace of mind that their conveyance matter is handled properly. Off the plan purchases, in a market where property values are particularly hot, people generally believe lawyers are more apt to act on their behalf.”
So, while lawyers on the whole are more expensive – you may be paying for their expertise.
Which brings us to the second point: Readiness to act.
“I have noticed that conveyancers act quicker with regard to the conveyance of the sale. This is notable particularly when exchanges are required to happen quickly and with few, if any, glitches. I often ask myself, is this because conveyancers only work on conveyancing and nothing else? I believe it is,” he explains.
He warns that solicitors he has dealt with in the past put the matters on the “back burner”.
“This is more noticeable in practices where it is typical of only having one lawyer and a paralegal,” he said.
Lastly, he notes that lawyers often seem to be less cooperative with real estate agents, often lacking communication. His suspicion is that this may be the case of the lawyer “that begrudges the commissions earned by the real estate agent when compared to the fees they charge, to do the conveyance”.
{qtube vid:=UERVnouElIk}
{module Would you prefer to use a property lawyer or a conveyancing agent?}
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN:
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/whats-the-difference-between-a-conveyancer-and-a-lawyer-and-do-i-really-need-one">What's the difference between a conveyancer and a lawyer, and do I really need one?</a> by Stephen Jensen
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/the-ins-and-outs-of-conveyancing-pamela-bennett">The ins and outs of conveyancing</a> by Pamela Bennett<a href="/expert-insights/investing/the-ins-and-outs-of-conveyancing-pamela-bennett"></a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/a-good-conveyancer-can-hold-a-property-transaction-together-penny-erskine">A good conveyancer can hold a property transaction together</a> by Penny Erskine
</body></html>

Conveyancers or property lawyers? Who do you trust with your contract

<html><body>
ME Bank cut the its one year Standard Home Loan rate by 0.05% and its five year Standard Home Loan rate by 0.4%.
The bank’s one year Standard Home Loan now has a 4.89% per annum interest rate, with a comparison rate of 5.35% per annum. The five year fixed Standard Home Loan rate is now at 5.39% per annum, with a comparison rate of 5.40%.
According to ME Bank, it currently offers the lowest three year and five year fixed home loan rates on the market. Chief executive Jamie McPhee said that the cost of fixed rate funding has been falling amidst persisting “global economic weaknesses” and growing expectations for fiscal tightening after the budget.
“Fixed rate funding costs are falling as the market pushes out expectations for future RBA rate movements. ME Bank has taken advantage of these falls and is passing on the savings to customers,” he said. He also noted the economy’s ongoing transition away from the mining sector and “below average” domestic economic performance.
McPhee warned customers not to be swayed by cash-back incentives offered by some banks.
“Cash back sweeteners can be nice in the short-term, but customers should understand they can save much more on their home loan in the long-term by locking in a lower rate," said McPhee.
For more interest rate coverage, see:
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/moderation-in-pace-of-house-prices-lately-despite-significant-yearly-growth-glenn-stevens-june-statement">Moderation in pace of house prices lately, despite significant yearly growth: Glenn Stevens' June statement</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/thanks-to-low-interest-rates-affordability-at-highest-level-for-over-a-decade-hia-cba-index">Thanks to low interest rates, affordability at highest level for over a decade: HIA-CBA index</a>
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

ME Bank cuts rates for one and five year fixed Standard Home Loans

<html><body>
In general terms, in order to claim input tax credits (ITCs) under the GST system, an enterprise must be carried on. This can be a tricky issue when property developments are concerned, as two taxpayers recently found out to their detriment before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).
A business needs to be carried on before claims for ITCs can be made and this is where the taxpayers ran into trouble before the AAT.
In that case, the two taxpayers failed before the AAT in a matter concerning a number of ITC claims in respect of purported acquisitions made in relation to two property developments.
The first taxpayer (a company that was the trustee of a trust) and the second taxpayer (a partnership of two individuals) claimed to have made acquisitions in relation to a 4900 acre property development near Goulburn in NSW. The first taxpayer also claimed to have made acquisitions in relation to another property development in Grenfell NSW.
Both taxpayers were registered for GST. However, the Tax Commissioner issued to both taxpayers amended assessments denying ITCs claimed on those purported acquisitions – in the first taxpayer's case, for the tax periods April 2010 to June 2011, and in the second taxpayer's case, for the tax periods April 2009 to December 2010.
The Commissioner's position was that neither taxpayer carried on an enterprise at all, so that neither of them could be entitled to any ITCs. The Commissioner also imposed a 50% administrative penalty.
The tribunal dealt mainly with the arrangements of the first property development as it was of the view the arrangements did not differ materially from the second development. The tribunal noted there had been some work done on the property; however, the parties disputed what that work consisted of, how much of it was done, who it was done for, and whether it had been paid for.
The taxpayers said they were "principal contractors to the project". The project was presumed by the tribunal to be the development of the property for eventual subdivision. However, the tribunal noted that exactly what the "principal contractors" did in respect of the property remained the subject of "quite profound mystery". It also said the same observation applied in respect of what the "principal contractors" were supposed to have acquired from various entities, described by the taxpayers as the "subcontractors", who were said to have undertaken some of development activities.
The tribunal understood the case put by the taxpayers as follows: the owner of the property engaged the principal contractors to get certain work done on the property; the principal contractors in turn engaged subcontractors to do the physical work; the subcontractors did the work and charged the work to the principal contractors; and the principal contractors bundled up the charges with a 20% mark-up and on-charged the owner of the property.
The total amount invoiced to the first taxpayer by the subcontractors (in relation to both property developments) was over $250,000. The total amount invoiced to the second taxpayer was over $820,000. However, the tribunal said the invoices themselves were "short on detail". The tribunal also noted that the Commissioner had notified the taxpayers his doubts concerning the work undertaken on the property after he was informed by the relevant council authority that approval to subdivide the property had been refused.
The tribunal said each taxpayer's claim for ITCs failed "at the most basic level". It said that an entity is not a "project manager" simply because someone says it is, and it was important that, to carry on an enterprise (thus enabling the ITC claim to potentially succeed), "an entity must do something".
The tribunal was unable to identify the "activity" that the taxpayers were undertaking in respect of the properties. It was also not satisfied that either of the taxpayers, in relation to the relevant property developments, carried on any activities "in the form of a business". A key issue identified was the difficulty the taxpayers had in articulating the arrangement between themselves, landowners and subcontractors. The AAT said it could not see that either taxpayer did much at all, beyond receiving invoices from the subcontractors and it rejected any notion that receiving invoices is relevantly an “activity”.
The tribunal member (Deputy President Frost) said the taxpayers "could not take me to any document that set out an agreement, between either of the landowners and either of the applicants, that the applicants would perform services or tasks, engage or co-ordinate third parties, or even make arrangements of any kind in relation to the development of the properties".
That, to say the least, was not helpful to the taxpayers' cause.
The tribunal was of the view the "true arrangement" was work was done for, and the supplies were made to, the owners of the properties, and that at most, the taxpayers agreed to pay for some of the supplies. The tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that there were "supplies" by the subcontractors; however, it was of the view that any supplies were not made by the subcontractors to the taxpayers. It said it could not see any indicators of a business being carried on. Accordingly, it held the claims for ITCs were not sustainable.
Although not required to, the tribunal also rejected the taxpayers' argument that "promissory notes" issued by them to the subcontractors for work done constituted consideration at the time of the supplies. The tribunal also affirmed the penalty at 50% of the shortfall amount.
The tribunal said the arrangement involved multiple entities, many of them not at arm's length, and that given the type of arrangement involved and its size, independent advice should have been obtained.
This case is a clear demonstration of the need to properly and fully document the operations of a business. The need to obtain clear and independent advice on any business proposition, be it property development or something else, is also a "take-away" message from this case.
Terry Hayes is the editor-in-chief of tax news reporting at <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/" target="_blank">Thomson Reuters</a>, a leading Australian provider of tax, accounting and legal information solutions.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.SmartCompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
Photo courtesy of Chris Tolworthy/Flickr/<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>.
</body></html>

thayes-XhNcNKLNWa

The tricky business of property development and GST credits

<html><body>
First home buyers are back at record lows.
Loans to first home buyers as a proportion of total new home loans fell 4% in the year to April – the share of first-time buyers in the market equalled the record November 2013 low at 12.3% of all loans.
Meanwhile the value of investor home loans rose by 2.3% to a record $11 billion in April, surging some 29.9% in the same 12 month period, filling the void.
First home buyer mortgages peaked in May 2009, accounting for 31.4% of total new home loans on the back of boosted government grants.
Craig James, the CommSec economist noted the first home buyer finance levels were well below the long-term average of 20%.
The St George senior economist, Hans Kunnen attributed the lack of first home buyers to state governments scrapping first home buyer grants for existing dwellings and the solid increase in house prices over the past year.
First home buyer families might need three income sources in future, he told Ross Greenwood's 2GB Money News.
Total housing finance edged 1.7% higher in April, in seasonally adjusted terms to $27.89 billion, while commitments for owner-occupied housing rose 1.4% and investor commitments by greater 2.3%, the Australian Bureau of Statistics ­figures showed.
The average home loan across Australia stood at $323,400 in April, up 7.2% on a year ago
Fairfax Media columnist Michael Pascoe noted the RBA had intriguingly dropped first home figures from its <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/" target="_blank">June economic data chart pack</a>, perhaps as a consequence of rising concerns about the underestimating of first home buyer statistics.
<img src="/images/2014/06/11/fhb%20june%2011%20one.gif" alt="">
A RBA spokesperson advised Property Observer that the Bank had decided to remove the data from the graph while it is being reviewed by the provider.
</body></html>

First home buyers fall back to record lows

<html><body>
There has been <a href="/expert-insights/buying/the-property-boom-is-over-a-good-headline-but-no-evidence-to-back-it-up">a lot of media chat</a> about house prices "falling" in May, which is basically a result of the famed Daily House Price Index recording a decline in that month (as it has done every May, due to seasonality).
Meanwhile, back in the real world, the housing markets continue to look strong, with the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/5609.0" target="_blank">ABS Housing Finance data</a> recording further increases in April.
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AXUV3ocvw0c/U5Z10in1aeI/AAAAAAAANxM/iG9g2ZabZ5g/s1600/ABS+housing+finance.jpg" style="line-height: 1.3em;"><img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AXUV3ocvw0c/U5Z10in1aeI/AAAAAAAANxM/iG9g2ZabZ5g/s1600/ABS+housing+finance.jpg"></a>
This comes as no surprise, because, as I posted <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/record-high-mortgage-demand-in-may" target="_blank">here</a>, other mortgage market data has suggested the same thing, with Australian Finance Group (AF) recording the its highest mortgage demand ever in May.
In particular, AFG's data suggested to me that the markets are being driven by property investors more than ever before, a direct effect of the lowest interest rates we have seen in a generation.
At long, long last it also seems that the penny is beginning to drop that first home buyers are not (and never were, in fact) "on strike" - they're still around but often in a different guise than in previous cycles.
Some are buying but a little later in life than before, others are buying yet aren't being recorded as first-timers, others still are buying as investors and as such slip through the net in that manner.
Shifting trends, yes... but not a "strike".
Construction?
Remember that through this property cycle in Australia what we really want to see is heavy investment in new dwellings in order to generate dwelling construction and economic activity to offset the coterminous decline in mining investment.
On the face of it, construction finance for owner occupiers still looks strong for owner-occupiers on a moving annual basis.
However, what this chart doesn't quite show so clearly is that the data for the last few months is beginning to look decidedly sketchy.
Hopefully I'm wrong, but the peak may soon be in for this segment of the market:
<div class="separator"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lkJg4iJcsB8/U5Z2kCkPncI/AAAAAAAANxU/NRRSmk98TjE/s1600/CFOO.jpg"><img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lkJg4iJcsB8/U5Z2kCkPncI/AAAAAAAANxU/NRRSmk98TjE/s1600/CFOO.jpg"></a></div>
On the other hand construction finance for investors is very strong and looks to be heading for a record heights on a moving annual basis:
<div class="separator"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AdMP-Wzd3wM/U5Z2kD0p9UI/AAAAAAAANxc/8dSzdgyCZ_I/s1600/CFI.jpg"><img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AdMP-Wzd3wM/U5Z2kD0p9UI/AAAAAAAANxc/8dSzdgyCZ_I/s1600/CFI.jpg"></a></div>
In aggregate, finance for new dwellings remains strong which bodes well for the construction index, particularly for apartments.
Investor loans shatter all-time records
As for total property investment loans in April, the monthly figure printed at an astonishing $10,978,872,000.
That is comfortably the highest aggregate of monthly property investment loans ever recorded in Australia, roundly plonking a very large question mark against the suggestion that property prices have been receding.
<div class="separator"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ibINLNmRdS4/U5Z2kGnDYfI/AAAAAAAANxY/u95-PjW85ts/s1600/Invloans.jpg"><img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ibINLNmRdS4/U5Z2kGnDYfI/AAAAAAAANxY/u95-PjW85ts/s1600/Invloans.jpg"></a></div>
That's certainly the on the ground experience in Sydney: the idea that one might pick up under market value bargains based upon the supposedly falling prices is absurd. For decent properties, you'd be outbid very time.
The <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/5671.0" target="_blank">Lending Finance data</a> for April to be released on Friday will provide more detail by state, and I have little doubt that rolling 12 monthly property investment loans in New South Wales will be at or close to record highs.
There are simply far too many investors in the market for it to be otherwise.
Article continues on next page. Please click below. 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Strike or shift?
There's been a long-running debate about the so-called "first home buyer strike" in Australia.
It never really made any sense, since first home buyer numbers have remained very solid in states which have grants for first-times such as Western Australia, where <a href="https://www.afgonline.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WA-June-14.pdf" target="_blank">20-25% of loans written</a> continue to be for first-timers.
Yet mysteriously FHBs had apparently disappeared in states such as New South Wales, crowded out by greedy Baby Boomer investors.
I summed up the basic issue incomplete records issue at the beginning of the year <a href="/expert-insights/buying">here</a>.
Further, as noted <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2014/04/investment-mortgages-crunch-all-time" target="_blank">here</a> as mortgage data broke new record heights, it's important to listen to what the data is actually telling you, which has not been commensurate with an entire sector of the market casually sitting on the sidelines.
There has been a shift, certainly.
First home buyers are getting older, often buying in couples rather than alone.
Many are choosing to buy an investment property as their first step, especially in Sydney.
But they are not "on strike", as has been claimed.
RBA reporting
The Reserve Bank released its chart pack to the end of May last week <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/index" target="_blank">here</a>, and it seems that the central bank has at long last reached the same conclusion, completely stripping the first home buyer data out of its chart pack.
<div><img src="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/images/5-6-household-sector/6br-hla-small.gif?accessed=2014-06-10-08-22-50" alt="Housing Loan Approvals graph" width="400" height="320"></div>
Previously, the split had been shown between owner-occupiers, investors and first-timers, but since the FHB data was both incomplete and non-sensical, a decision has clearly finally been reached to have it pulled.
Other RBA charts show building approvals to be approaching something of a crossroads, although remaining close to record highs:
<div><img src="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/images/5-6-household-sector/5bl-privbapp-small.gif?accessed=2014-06-10-08-41-45" alt="Private Residential Building Approvals graph" width="400" height="316"></div>
And dwelling prices remain in an uptrend.
<div><img src="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/images/5-6-household-sector/6bl-dwelpri-small.gif?accessed=2014-06-10-08-41-45" alt="Housing Prices graph" width="400" height="330"></div>
The rest of the chart pack, which you can see <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/index" target="_blank">here</a> makes for interesting reading as always.
In particular, note the near-exponential rate of growth in bulk commodity export volumes which are now overwhelmingly driving Australia's economic growth.
<div><img src="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/images/16-17-balance-payments/16tr-bcomx-small.gif?accessed=2014-06-10-08-43-32" alt="Bulk Commodity Exports graph" width="400" height="332"></div>
With a third of Australia's annual exports by value destined for China, it's a highly leveraged play.
You can visit <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) or Pete's <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blog</a>.
His new book '<a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>' is out now.
</body></html>

Latest Finance Insights

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Finance Insights

NAB bring forward first RBA cut to February 2025

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News