<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> has lodged plans for a $750 million, three-tower mixed-use precinct that would complete the long-running redevelopment of Carlton's former Carlton United Breweries site.

The proposal at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/185-195-queensberry-street-carlton-vic-3053">46-78 Bouverie Street and 185-195 Queensberry Street</a> spans a 6,468 sqm site, the last remaining undeveloped parcels within the former brewery's 2007 masterplan.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the development will comprise two purpose-built student accommodation towers and a third build-to-sell apartment tower above a shared commercial podium and basement.

Across the three towers, SP Setia is proposing 606 build-to-sell apartments and 1,499 student accommodation units containing 2,009 beds.

The apartments will sit in the tallest tower, which will rise nearly 200m and 55 storeys. It will become&nbsp;one of the more substantial new build-to-sell apartment projects at the northern edge of Melbourne's CBD.

The apartment mix is weighted toward smaller inner-city product, with 188 studios, 206 one-bedroom apartments, 192 two-bedroom apartments and 20 three-bedroom apartments

<img alt="First look: SP Setia plans three-tower finale for Carlton’s former CUB precinct" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8271bc87-1b0a-41b7-ac73-a425ee375261" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/3_2.png?VersionId=G4lw23o90B1boX4k4dj7rdz2ZEajS9wy" />

Part of the precinct will be a large-scale&nbsp;3,684 sqm supermarket and a further 2,198 sqm of speciality retail, creating close to 5,900 sqm of new commercial space within the precinct.

But one of the biggest components of the proposal is what sits between the buildings.

Around 4,650 sqm, or roughly 72 per cent of the site, will be publicly accessible open space, incorporating plazas, pedestrian connections, landscaped laneways and retail spill-out areas.

The ground plane is intended to finally complete pedestrian connections envisaged when the CUB masterplan was first approved nearly two decades ago, stitching together Victoria Street, Queensberry Street, Bouverie Street and Swanston Street through the former brewery precinct.

Urbis said the development would "complete the CUB precinct", with the public realm providing important north-south and east-west connections through what is currently the final undeveloped portion of the masterplanned site.

SP Setia is also exploring a new linear park within the Bouverie Street road reserve, with the concept to be developed further with the City of Melbourne through the planning process.

The proposal is being pursued through the Victorian Government's Development Facilitation Program under Clause 53.23 for significant residential development with affordable housing.

The planning report acknowledges the proposed heights exceed those contemplated under the original Comprehensive Development Plan and masterplan, but argues the built-form context has changed considerably over the past two decades.

Urbis said the three towers would instead create a stepped transition between Carlton and the Hoddle Grid, rising progressively from the 94.1-metre Tower One along the Queensberry Street edge to the 199.44-metre Tower Three closer to the established CBD-scale buildings to the south.

<img alt="SP Setia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e885a07a-592c-40fc-bf82-e6dbaf32da54" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.52.24%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=7s_ErUkSKAdY1mAWp3GRZgMNCGtwhk5m" />

SP Setia plans to deliver the development across three stages.

Stage One would deliver the basement, podium and retail areas for the entire precinct alongside the first student tower. Tower Two would follow in Stage Two, before the 606-apartment Tower Three is delivered as the final stage.

If approved and delivered, the project would close out a redevelopment process that has been underway since the former brewery masterplan was approved in 2007, adding more than 2,600 student beds and apartments to a precinct already home to Swanston Central, the Barak Building, RMIT Design Hub and several large student accommodation developments.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Joel Robinson

SP Setia plans three-tower finale for Carlton’s former CUB precinct

Melbourne developer Lowe Living is seeking to add to its growing bayside apartment pipeline, filing plans for a boutique eight-residence development in tightly held Middle Park.

Lowe Living, which has built much of its development portfolio across Melbourne's affluent bayside and south-east suburbs, is behind the plans for the 730 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/123-125-erskine-street-middle-park-vic-3206">123-125 Erskine Street</a>, just off Armstrong Street and within the Armstrong Street Neighbourhood Activity Centre.

The developer is seeking approval for a five-storey residential building above two basement levels, with just eight large-format apartments and 18 car spaces.

“This is a deliberately very different proposition for us,"&nbsp;Tim Lowe, Co-Founder of Lowe Living, said.

"Eight residences is exceptionally boutique, but that's precisely what this site calls for.

“There is a strong community in Middle Park and the surrounding suburbs who have spent decades building a life here. They no longer want the maintenance of a large period home, but they aren't prepared to compromise on space, quality or location. We think there is a real opportunity to capture that hyper local market. A site like this rarely comes to market.”

<img alt="Lowe " data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="875fe572-0f14-4d90-9e11-55b28dd07731" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.42.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GDNQRv9BfpR9r1zkZ5UDyUM4ZvpIksut" />

The low-density proposal has been designed by Cera Stribley and is being progressed through the Victorian Government's Great Design Fast Track pathway, having already secured eligibility from the Minister for Planning.

The Office of the Victorian Government Architect supported its eligibility after finding the proposal demonstrated consistency with the program's seven design principles, while the project's financial feasibility has also been independently confirmed by Invest Victoria.

The project is targeting the downsizer market, with the planning documents describing the homes as larger-format residences and noting the two penthouses could otherwise have been configured as four separate apartments.

<img alt="Lowe 2" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="60ab0987-2da6-4175-adac-315dcf6053c6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.43.15%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=bOCPH0B2MFwlmaRW.TTCF9TzyifgVoQI" />

The site has dual frontage to Erskine Street and Canterbury Place and currently comprises a collection of commercial buildings used as offices, including a former heritage bakehouse, a former stable, a later gabled addition and a central courtyard.

It sits within the Commercial 1 Zone and the Armstrong Street Commercial Precinct heritage overlay, with the existing property classified as a contributory heritage place.

Heritage has subsequently played a significant role in Cera Stribley's design.

The front section of the former bakehouse facing Erskine Street will be retained, including its return walls, street-facing hipped roof and chimneys, while the Erskine Street façade and part of the western return wall of the former stable will also be incorporated into the new development.

Levels four and five will be set back five metres from the retained stable façade, while bricks removed through demolition are proposed to be salvaged and reused within the new building where possible.

<img alt="Lowe 3" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e97927a9-a2de-4a0f-83b6-65451238abfa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.43.06%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VR44AChLrX9q1XPB9GvVQV.ALXXbe4gC" />

Rather than presenting as a single five-storey building to Erskine Street, Cera Stribley has broken the development into a series of distinct forms.

A three-storey infill element will sit between the retained bakehouse and stable façades, with the upper levels recessed behind the heritage fabric. Canterbury Place will similarly feature two three-storey podium forms, separated by a central pedestrian accessway, before the upper two levels step back from the street.

A pedestrian through-link will run through the centre of the project between Erskine Street and Canterbury Place, creating entrances from both sides of the site and introducing landscaping and communal areas through the ground plane.

Landscape architect Acre has designed planting across the ground level, private terraces and upper levels, including a feature canopy tree at level three and integrated planting and arbours across the level four terraces. Five existing Erskine Street trees are proposed to be retained.

Sustainability is also a significant component of the Great Design Fast Track application. The apartments are targeting an average eight-star NatHERS rating, with no residence below 6.5 stars, while the project has achieved a 75 per cent BESS score. Seven of the eight apartments are designed for cross-ventilation, with the remaining residence using mechanically assisted natural ventilation.

The plans also incorporate an 8kWp rooftop solar system, a 5,000-litre rainwater tank and infrastructure allowing future electric vehicle charging for every residence.

Lowe has a strong portfolio across Melbourne's blue-chip suburbs. They recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/jardin-house-by-lowe-living-camberwell-335-camberwell-road-camberwell-vic-3124">Jardin House by Lowe Living</a> in Camberwell, their first development in the Stonnington LGA.

Lowe Living unveils Middle Park apartment development

Article summary

<ul data-end="888" data-start="289">
	<li data-end="442" data-section-id="8tsh6o" data-start="289">DVB Projects is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway at 137 Old Burleigh Road, Broadbeach.</li>
	<li data-end="573" data-section-id="1nyxl3e" data-start="443">The 34-level tower will comprise just 49 ultra-luxury residences, including half-floor, full-floor and penthouse apartments.</li>
	<li data-end="717" data-section-id="oiyimj" data-start="574">The launch follows strong demand at DVB's nearby Sea Glass project, which is more than 50 per cent sold and currently under construction.</li>
	<li data-end="888" data-section-id="epk9o9" data-start="718">The development adds to the transformation of Old Burleigh Road, with premium beachfront apartment projects continuing to reshape the tightly held Broadbeach strip.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/dvb-projects">DVB Projects</a> is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway on the Broadbeach site as the Sydney developer moves closer to bringing the ultra-luxury project to market.

The 34-level tower at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/137-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">137 Old Burleigh Road</a> will comprise just 49 residences, ranging from half-floor apartments through to full-floor homes and a penthouse. The launch follows the strong sales performance of DVB's nearby Sea Glass development. More than half of the apartments at Sea Glass, on the other side of Broadbeach, have been snapped up, well ahead of its late 2027 completion

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2944b4be-c84e-4b54-8dc1-c712e76704c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E02_Exterior_Street%20Level%20Entrance.jpg?VersionId=YoNig7pRdrE3HCue7sUj78LzJteeQf3H" />

The start of demolition at 137 Old Burleigh Road signals DVB Projects’ underlying confidence in the Gold Coast’s luxury beachside apartment sector.

“We see the Gold Coast as one of the most compelling lifestyle markets in Australia, particularly at the premium end where demand continues to deepen,” said Dean Brown, Managing Director of DVB.&nbsp;

“This project has been carefully designed to respond to that demand - delivering large-format residences with a level of quality, privacy and amenity that is still relatively rare in the apartment market on the beachside."

Brown says the site itself is "exceptional."

"Old Burleigh Road is one of the most tightly held beachfront strips, and opportunities to deliver a project of this scale and calibre in this location are extremely limited.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="398f377a-c037-455e-9250-0c5e0d84c35b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/I12_FF%20Balcony.jpg?VersionId=NwOiRWGMubR1c8wthuEfggklcja7al9." />

The project will comprise 40 half-floor residences of approximately 260 sqm, alongside eight full-floor residences spanning around 524 sqm.

A single penthouse will crown the building, featuring a private pool, barbecue area, indoor gym and dedicated entertaining spaces.

Residents will have access to a resort-style suite of amenities, including a 20-metre pool with daybeds, a gymnasium, hot and cold plunge pools, a sauna, and private residents’ lounge and dining facilities.

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1642bb0-9a66-4427-a022-dfc0988c6287" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/A02_Pool%20to%20View.jpg?VersionId=c0IXPyn_Gp_Kn3XCwzMrqIVkAdCEwVXP" />

Sales agent Todd Matheson, of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/pezet-matheson">Pezet Matheson</a>, which is marketing both 137 Old Burleigh Road and Sea Glass, said 137 Old Burleigh Road would address a clear gap in the market for genuine luxury products.

“There are very few opportunities on the Gold Coast where buyers can secure a residence of this size and quality in a new building,” Matheson said.

“What we’re seeing is a growing cohort of downsizers and interstate buyers who still want space - they’re not willing to compromise on living area, entertaining or finishes.

“This project has been designed with that buyer in mind. It offers the scale of a home, combined with the convenience and security of apartment living, in one of the coast’s most desirable positions.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="59aae0ca-5639-4320-8aca-d0bf60f48e43" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E01_Exterior%20Hero.jpg?VersionId=DS8Zfy2WtgUEtdfe0TEUuf1W1GfcZq8S" />

Located on a 1,156 sqm site one block from the beachfront, the development will replace an ageing walk-up building and is expected to contribute to the ongoing transformation of the Old Burleigh Road strip into one of the Gold Coast’s most prestigious residential corridors.

With the development moving into the delivery phase, 137 Old Burleigh Road is slated to hit the market later this year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145141]

DVB Projects to launch second Broadbeach apartment tower as demolition commences

<a data-end="327" data-is-only-node="" data-start="250" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/norus-projects" rel="noopener" target="_new">Norus Developments</a> has lodged plans for a new apartment development in Clayton that would add further momentum to the suburb's emerging Green Street corridor.

Plans have been lodged for the consolidated site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1359-1365-centre-road-clayton-vic-3168">1359-1365 Centre Road</a>, where Norus is seeking approval for 218 apartments across a 12-storey apartment building designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/life-architecture-and-urban-design">Life Architecture</a>.

The proposal sits within the Clayton Major Activity Centre at the threshold of the planned Green Street corridor, a landscaped pedestrian connection intended to improve links through the precinct towards Clayton Railway Station.

The development would replace the site's existing collection of low-scale residential and commercial buildings with a single consolidated building, introducing significantly greater housing density to this part of Centre Road.

A retail tenancy is proposed at ground level to activate the Centre Road frontage, accompanied by transparent street interfaces and landscaping intended to create a more pedestrian-focused edge to the development.

<img alt="First look: Norus Developments plans landscape-led apartment project for Clayton’s emerging Green Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0a5a763a-d9e9-4253-af2f-88008de27ebf" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Clayton%20a.png?VersionId=S2WJJbat1XVkZwB9SnYtygirXgWHiklX" />

The building has been designed with stepped massing and upper-level setbacks to manage its transition towards surrounding residential properties. The planning report describes the approach as one that integrates the building into the landscape rather than treating landscaping as a secondary element.

"A strong landscape and public realm strategy underpins the proposal," Urbis states in the planning report.

"Public benefits include an affordable housing contribution, a new pocket park, generous landscaped setbacks, deep soil planting and integrated Water Sensitive Urban Design."

The report adds that these elements are intended to create "a permeable, pedestrian-focused ground plane that enhances walkability, supports urban cooling and reinforces the emerging Green Street character."

Biophilic and passive design principles extend through the residential levels, with planting, daylight, natural ventilation and views towards landscaped areas forming part of the amenity strategy.

Parking would be concentrated away from the public realm, with 145 car spaces proposed from the rear laneway rather than dominating the Centre Road frontage.

The proposal follows an extensive pre-application process with the City of Monash. Three formal meetings were held between the project team and Council from December 2025 to March 2026, with the scheme evolving through several concept iterations before the current design was lodged.

The project arrives as Clayton prepares for substantial change around its established activity centre and the wider Suburban Rail Loop precinct. Its position on Centre Road places the development within an existing concentration of shops, services and public transport, while the Green Street connection is intended to strengthen pedestrian access towards Clayton Railway Station.

First look: Norus plans landscape-led apartment project for Clayton’s emerging Green Street

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gardner-vaughan-group">Gardner Vaughan Group</a> has officially commenced construction on Bronze on Chevron, celebrating the sod turning of its first-ever Gold Coast development and marking a significant milestone in the company's continued expansion across South East Queensland.&nbsp;

Following the successful delivery of premium residential developments throughout Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bronze-on-chevron-8-mawarra-street-chevron-island-qld-4217">Bronze on Chevron</a> represents Gardner Vaughan Group's entry into the Gold Coast market. Bronze will deliver 119 one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments above two ground-level retail tenancies.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107520 project_image_fid=367193]

The recent sod turning ceremony was attended by Deputy Mayor Mark Hammel, President of the Surfers Paradise Surf Life Saving Club, Cassandra Sedgman, project consultants, purchasers, project partners and invited guests to celebrate the commencement of construction.&nbsp;

Gardner Vaughan Group Chief Executive Officer Simon Betteridge said Bronze on Chevron represented an exciting new chapter for the business.&nbsp;

"We've spent almost four decades building homes that respond to the way people want to live, and we're excited to bring that experience to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/chevron-island-qld-4217">Chevron Island</a>," Betteridge said.

"Bronze on Chevron is particularly significant because it marks Gardner Vaughan Group's first development on the Gold Coast following many successful projects across Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107520 project_image_fid=367183]

Betteridge said the ground breaking is a proud moment for the&nbsp;team and their purchasers, who can now see their future homes beginning to take shape.&nbsp;

"As both developer and builder, we're able to oversee every aspect of the project from design through to construction, ensuring the quality and attention to detail Gardner Vaughan Group has become renowned for."&nbsp;

Designed by acclaimed architectural practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cottee-parker-architects">Cottee Parker</a>, Bronze on Chevron has been thoughtfully designed to complement Chevron Island's evolving streetscape while embracing its relaxed coastal lifestyle.

The development will offer generous residences with refined interiors, premium finishes and resort-style amenities, with completion anticipated in early 2029.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=107520]

The development will offer generous residences with refined interiors, premium finishes and resort-style amenities, with completion anticipated in early 2029

Gardner Vaughan Group breaks ground on first Gold Coast development, Bronze on Chevron

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

For most Australians, buying an apartment is one of the biggest financial decisions they'll ever make

The location, floorplan and price are often the first considerations, but in recent years another question has become increasingly important: who is actually delivering the project?

A series of high-profile builder collapses, construction delays and defect concerns have fundamentally changed how many Victorians approach buying off the plan. The collapse of Porter Davis in 2023, which reportedly left around 1,700 homes unfinished, became one of the most visible examples of the risks that can emerge when a construction company fails. <a href="https://www.equifax.com.au/sites/default/files/lpassets/pdf/Final-Business-Market-Pulse-June-Sector-Deep-Dive-Report-2.pdf">Similar challenges across the broader construction sector</a> have left buyers asking more questions before signing a contract.

As Victoria continues encouraging higher-density housing to address supply shortages, transparency is becoming just as important as location or price.

One tool increasingly entering the conversation is the <a href="https://icirt.com/">Independent Construction Industry Rating Tool (iCIRT)</a>, an independent assessment framework designed to help buyers better understand the developer or builder behind a project. Originally developed by Equifax in consultation with government and industry as part of NSW's Construct NSW reforms, the system has since expanded nationally.

<h2 data-end="1519" data-section-id="7nmx3" data-start="1492">What is an iCIRT rating?</h2>

Most Australians are familiar with independent ratings in everyday life.

We compare ANCAP safety ratings before buying a car. We look at Health Star Ratings in supermarkets. Banks rely on credit assessments when lending money.

Until recently, however, there has been very little independent information available to help apartment buyers assess the business responsible for delivering a residential project.

That gap is what iCIRT was designed to address.

Builders, developers and other construction professionals with an iCIRT rating have demonstrated high-trust characteristics through an independent, evidence-based assessment across six criteria: Character, Capability, Conduct, Capacity, Capital and Counterparties. This involves a rigorous review of financial health, past project track record, and ethical conduct. Crucially, an iCIRT rating could help provide property buyers with confidence that they are working with a professional who has demonstrated the capability, capacity, and willingness to return and rectify issues.

Importantly, iCIRT is not a recommendation to purchase a particular property, nor is it a traditional credit rating. It is an independent assessment framework designed to provide objective information about a construction business using a <a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Methodology-Issue1-May-2021.pdf">published methodology</a>.

The system has been widely adopted in New South Wales, where more than one-third of medium and large residential builders and developers now hold an iCIRT rating, representing over two-thirds of the state's residential building market by value as of 2025/26.

<h2 data-end="3126" data-section-id="h6ohtj" data-start="3084">Why buyers are doing more due diligence</h2>

For many buyers, particularly those purchasing off the plan, the biggest risk isn't whether they'll like the kitchen finishes.

It's whether the project will be delivered on time, to the expected quality, and by a company capable of completing the development.

<a href="https://icirt.com/sites/default/files/2026-07/iCIRT%202025%20Consumer%20Survey%20Report%20v05.pdf">Consumer research commissioned by iCIRT</a> found more than half of respondents believed current protections do not adequately safeguard buyers from builder insolvencies or defective projects. Other research found 88 per cent of prospective buyers would seek independent ratings or due diligence before purchasing, while 90 per cent said trust in construction professionals is essential.

That doesn't mean buyers should rely on a single rating alone.

Independent legal advice, understanding the contract, and seeking financial advice all remain important parts of the due diligence process.

However, an independent assessment can provide another source of information alongside those traditional checks.

<h2 data-end="4138" data-section-id="pquzxc" data-start="4094">Trust is becoming a competitive advantage</h2>

The conversation isn't only changing for buyers.

Developers are also recognising that trust has become an increasingly important part of the sales process.

Five years ago, purchasers typically asked about floorplans, finishes and settlement dates.

Today, sales teams are increasingly being asked about the developer's experience, financial stability, previous projects and construction partners.

For companies with strong governance and established delivery records, an independent iCIRT rating provides another way to demonstrate those credentials before buyers even visit a display suite.

According to Equifax, the assessment can also help businesses drive sales and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/icirt-rating-helps-scion-secure-high-value-projects">secure high-value projects</a>, as well as identify operational improvements and <a href="https://icirt.com/resources-for-business/mirvac-reinforces-brand-trust-and-quality-independent-icirt-rating">attract top talent</a>.

<h2 data-end="4962" data-section-id="1j54ng5" data-start="4912">Beyond buyers: lenders are paying attention too</h2>

The influence of independent construction ratings is also extending beyond consumers.

According to Stamford Capital's Real Estate Debt Capital Markets Survey, an increasing number of lenders now incorporate iCIRT ratings into their due diligence processes when assessing residential development finance applications.

The survey found lender adoption has continued to rise, with many respondents saying independent assessments provide additional insight into governance, counterparties and delivery capability beyond traditional financial analysis. Some lenders also reported declining funding applications where businesses had poor or no ratings.

As construction costs remain elevated and access to development finance becomes more selective, demonstrating credibility is becoming increasingly valuable.

<h2 data-end="5801" data-section-id="1qazuxs" data-start="5772">What it means for Victoria</h2>

Victoria's apartment market is entering a new phase.

The state is seeking to accelerate higher-density housing while simultaneously introducing reforms aimed at improving confidence in residential construction.

For buyers, that means there are more tools available than ever before to research the businesses behind a project.

For developers, it signals that transparency is becoming another point of differentiation in an increasingly competitive market.

Buyers are asking more questions than ever before and increasingly expecting independent information, not just marketing material, before making one of the biggest financial commitments of their lives.

Find out how to get iCIRT rated <a href="https://www.icirt.com/sites/default/files/2025-08/iCIRT-Infographic-Assessment-Process-Final.pdf">here</a>.

<hr data-end="6469" data-start="6466" />
The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personal, financial, legal or tax advice. It does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it and, where appropriate, seek independent professional advice.

This article contains links to third-party websites. These links are provided for convenience only. Equifax Australia does not control and is not responsible for the content, accuracy or privacy practices of external sites.

Copyright © 2026 Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

<html><body>
The current Brisbane market is throwing challenges at vendors and marketing agents, with large volumes of listed properties and a dwindling buyer group.
The buyers who are around are educated, and by majority, cautious and uncertain about where property prices and interest rates are heading.
This is a market where vendors have to be very careful about price-positioning their property. The auction process can deliver a best sale outcome in such conditions.
When offering a property with a predetermined asking price, vendors tend to err on the high side. That is widely recognised – it’s human nature.
This is potentially damaging to sale prospects, as it attracts less buyer interest and can increase time-on-market, which generally translates to negative buyer perception.
There are buyers in the market, but they can easily dismiss a property based on its initial listed price, and we are dealing with educated buyers who know roughly what price range they can expect without the listed price.
With an auction program, there is a rough four-week deadline which spurs on buyers to make up their mind. Through that period vendors get real feedback on where buyers are prepared to go with a price.
With a fixed price, in reality there is little a marketing agent can do in this market to encourage a buyer to act within a given time period.
In the current market, choosing which property to auction is far more about the seller being genuine about the sale and price expectation than about any particular ‘type’ of property.
In Brisbane a four- to six-week sale period is very achievable for realistic vendors.
Nothing creates interest and profiles a property better than an auction marketing program.
In most reports, auction results quoted are ‘under the hammer’ results and not a true indication.
At LJ Hooker Sunnybank Hills, a top-performing LJ Hooker office internationally year after year, 6% of auctioned properties sell prior to auction, 40% sell under the hammer, 16% in the 10 days post auction and a further 12% between 10 and 30 days.
That is a total of over 70% in six to eight weeks on market; add another 10% withdrawn from market because a vendor has had a genuine change of mind or decides that the result available to them does not suit their needs.
Presentation of a property to market and fair expectations on price are proving the best positioning for a sale and the auction marketing process delivers this best to vendors.
In Brisbane, prices are back to where they were three years ago. At that time, everyone was very excited – and they never thought prices could go even higher.
Prices being achieved on the current Brisbane market are very solid. The Gold Coast market is lagging a bit behind, but it’s also looking promising on the whole.
My final word is about choosing the right marketing agent for the job. Auction is a specialist method of sale so select an auction marketing specialist and agency just as you would engage a specialist for any other valuable asset, like your car – or your health!
Paul Moore has been principal of LJ Hooker Sunnybank Hills, Brisbane, for 10 about years.
</body></html>

paulmoore-sDCB2jZz3n

Post-auction negotiations take Brisbane clearance rates closer to 70%: LJ Hooker 

<html><body>
Increased confidence in the housing sector is the only positive aspect to emerge from Westpac/Melbourne Institute’s latest survey of consumer sentiment.
Against a backdrop of overall sentiment falling 8.3% in July, confidence in the housing sector increased by 3.3%, reaching its highest level since January 2010.
The improvement in housing market sentiment comes as ABS lending figures for May reveal owner-occupier financing commitments increased by just 2.2% to $14 billion on a seasonally adjusted basis, compared to stronger gains for commercial lending (up 8.7%) and personal lending (up 3.8%).
According to RP Data, national city dwelling values have fallen 2.3% over the last 12 months while properties for sale listings have reached 280,000 compared with 217,000 at the same time last year.
Westpac chief economist Bill Evans attributes the improvement in housing confidence to modest recent falls in house prices, improving affordability.
The survey found the majority of respondents still expect house prices to rise, though Evans notes that the majority has “shrunk noticeably since we last asked the question back in April”.
“Recognition that houses have become a little more affordable might improve sentiment but concerns that prices may fall further are likely to continue to restrain households’ buying intentions,” Evans says.
Buying intentions may also be tempered by a 16.5% drop in the confidence of mortgage holders, due to the RBA persisting with “its strongly hawkish rhetoric”, he said.
“This is continuing to undermine confidence amongst households who it would appear are incredulous that such a policy is favoured given the current circumstances,” Evans says.
The ABS figures reveal that total commercial finance commitments rose 8.7% on a seasonally adjusted basis in May to $32 billion, compared with $29.5 billion in April – their highest level since September 2009.
Fixed commercial loans increased 9% following an 11.2% fall in the previous month, while revolving commercial credit commitments rose 8% during May.
Personal loans ticked up by 3.8% to just over $7 billion.
Leasing finance fell by 5.7% in May on a seasonally adjusted basis, reversing rises of 2.1% in April and 11.2% in March 2011.
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Housing confidence at 18-month high: Westpac

<html><body>
Auction clearance rates have become one of the more widely reported property statistics over recent times.
But even in the big capital cities auctions account for a small number of sales – 11% of all house sales in Sydney in the 2009 financial year, according to Australian Property Monitors. For units, the proportion was even lower, with auctions accounting for 6% of all unit sales in Sydney in that period.
Canberra is the only other capital city where auctions accounted for more than 5% of all property sales.
But Rob Forde, a Ray White South Australian auctioneer, recommends vendors consider putting their properties to auction despite the slowing conditions of the current market.
“Auction in this market should not be feared – it should be embraced,” Forde says.
“In a market with so many unknowns, auction is one of the few things that provides certainty to buyer and seller alike.
“Especially with above-average listings, it is crucial to not put a price on the property.
“By not putting a price on the property, all buyers have the opportunity to look at the market and see where they think the value lies,” Forde says.
Auction has been producing results in all market and demographics, he suggested.
“I think all types of property should use the auction process in this market to get the best result – a cash unconditional contract with no cooling off, in a short time with a short settlement.
“Still, some vendors are choosing to be on the market for extended periods of time, in a climate where days on market are increasing, and then having to sign a contract with certain conditions, like subject to finance or subject to the sale of another property.
“At a time when days on market are blowing out and getting finance approval is becoming more and more difficult, it’s reaffirming to see the power of the auction process still proving itself.”
He suggested the initial clearance rate figure doesn’t necessarily take into consideration the power of the auction process in engaging buyer offers before the auction date.
He says often the buyer and seller have divergent opinions on the value of a property and the agent is there to find a middle ground.
“People may hold back hoping that they will be able to negotiate with the agent post auction,” Forde says.
“A well-run auction campaign identifies buyers and helps to determine a realistic price in today's market.
“It enables the negotiation process to get started and, most importantly, achieves the best price in the shortest possible time.”
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Auctions versus private treaty: certainty in uncertain times

<html><body>
In general property investors are all after the same thing. They buy property because they want to develop a degree of financial freedom. While some are looking to quit their jobs, others just want to have the choice of whether they work or not. Some are trying to save for their retirement while others want to leave something for their children.
Yet most property investors never achieve the financial independence they strive for, with close to 90% never owning more than one or two properties. On the other hand, a small group of investors manage to build substantial property portfolios.
Over the years I found that investors tend to fall into three main categories, which led me to investigate if one style of investing was more successful than others.
So let’s look at the 3 main types of property investor.
Firstly there is the passive investor, who tends to spend little time looking for a property. They are not interested in understanding all the ins and outs that go along with creating a property portfolio and are more likely to buy the first thing they come across, rather than conducting any due diligence or consulting others for advice.
The more active investor puts in some degree of work in order to find a good investment prospect. They gain a basic understanding of the principles involved in property, finance and taxation. They seek professional advice regarding structuring their portfolio and conduct some due diligence in the hope of increasing the likelihood of making a viable investment purchase.
Finally, there is the analytical investor, who tends to run around for months, sometimes even years, examining every nook and cranny of our property markets, endlessly comparing values and sales, reading reams of material regarding property do’s and don’ts and seeking advice from as many experts as possible before committing to anything. They like to conduct as much due diligence as possible and look for the ‘perfect' investment property.
If property investment is like many other things in life, the more effort and energy you sink into property investing, the greater your rewards are likely to be. In other words, the passive investor would enjoy smaller gains than the active investor, while the analytical investor would come out on top as they were willing to do the hard yards.
In reality this is only partially true!
Many passive investors purchase their investment properties the way they would buy their home – emotionally. They tend to buy their investments near where they live, or close to where they want to retire or holiday – all emotional reasons. Some live to regret their investment decisions and have difficulty holding on to their investments and end up selling their properties after only a year or two. Those who can hold on usually do well, but more of that later.
The more active investor puts in some degree of work in order to find a good investment prospect. They gain a basic understanding of the principles involved in property, finance and taxation. They also tend to seek professional advice with regard to the structuring of their portfolio and tend to conduct some due diligence in the hope that they can increase the likelihood of making a viable investment purchase.
What about the analytical investor? Let me share a story with you.
A while ago I bumped into Leonard, a successful IT engineer. When I first met him years earlier he said he was going to invest in property, so I asked him how his investments were going.
He explained that he was still researching the markets. Now Leonard is very intelligent but has a tendency to over-analyse things, hence he was still waiting for the perfect property, the perfect time and the perfect set of circumstances in which to buy.
What he doesn’t realise is that this will never happen.
If he had invested in a well-located property in his home town of Melbourne (or in almost any major city) three or four years earlier, when I first met him, despite that time frame including some of the worst years in property market in more than a decade, his property would have increased in value significantly.
While the value of many properties has gone by 20 or 30% in that time, Leonard had $500,000 sitting in the bank waiting for the ‘right opportunity’ to come along.
On the other hand, let’s look at Mark – a passive investor who was so naïve that he bought the first property that he could get their hands on 20 years ago for $50,000. At the time, everyone told him he was “crazy” – it was a bad time to buy; it was a foolish thing to do and he paid way too much.
Although he may not have done all of his homework, Mark bought in a popular inner suburb and the value of that property is now in the order of $500,000. And if he was half smart, Mark has borrowed against its increasing equity to allow him to buy more properties.
The lesson from all this is that it really doesn’t matter if you’re a passive, active or analytical investor, as long as you are taking action and are in the market.
Of course, you can’t just buy any property and hope it will increase in value – particularly in the current market. Educate yourself and make informed investment decisions, as long as you don’t get so absorbed in the process of learning that you forget to use that knowledge to buy something!
If you have been thinking about investing in property, maybe now is the right time to act. After all, we are in a buyer’s market – a time of great opportunity.
Buy a property that suits your current circumstances and investment strategy. If you are in it for long term, as you should be, doing something some might consider foolish right now could be much better than waiting to do something “smart” later.
Michael Yardney is the director of <a href="https://www.metropole.com.au/">Metropole Property Investment Strategists</a>, a best-selling author and one of Australia's leading experts in wealth creation through property. He also writes the <a href="https://www.propertyupdate.com.au/">Property Investment Update</a> blog.
</body></html>

myardney-DFoGhGbSJX

What type of property investor are you? 

<html><body>
Syndicated property investment options provide investors with access to high value, high quality properties with strong capital growth potential and the ability to attract and retain quality, long-term tenants.
The two favoured vehicles for investors looking to spread risk by investing in syndicated property are listed property funds or trusts – also known as LPTs or AREITs – or their unlisted counterparts.
When it comes to listed vehicles, some issues have become apparent, both from a portfolio construction perspective and when considering returns.
On the portfolio construction side, over the years it has become apparent that, as an asset class, listed property behaves like equities – to the point where many commentators now class LPTs as such.
In tracking the market and the index alongside the equities in the portfolio, they provide no real diversification should the sharemarket begin to slide, as recent performance figures show.
The second issue is volatility of returns, which in the case of listed property, is far higher than unlisted. As an example, the listed property index fell 76% through the worst of the GFC.
High volatility means total returns can be greatly diminished by poor timing of purchases and sales by investors who make decisions driven by strong sentiment – as we have seen in the current market.
So in the case of listed property, while an investor might have the perceived benefit of lower liquidity risk, other risks, such as correlation with a volatile sentiment-driven index, with a poorly performing index, may well countervail it.
The performance of unlisted property, on the other hand, while to an extent reliant on the broader property market, is also dependent on two more rational and controllable factors: the quality of the underlying core assets and the quality of its management.
It is far less volatile and, historically, has offered much steadier returns than its unlisted counterpart, as the chart below shows.
Unaligned to an index, the right unlisted vehicle can offer investors the benefit of genuine diversification throughout the investment cycle. 
Comparison of 10-year returns from listed and unlisted property funds
<img src="/images/stories/mcbain1again-cropped.png">
<img src="/images/stories/mcbain2-cropped.png">
<img src="/images/stories/mcbain3-cropped.png">
John McBain is the CEO of Centuria.
 
</body></html>

jmcbain-es2ipo5pCG

Listed versus unlisted property: balancing performance and volatility

<html><body>
Property auctions have lost their lustre, with falling clearance rates contributing to a pall over the market.
The decline in clearance rates has been accompanied by a rise in poorer voluntary reporting of results.
Some 20% of Melbourne’s auctions results now come with the price marked ''undisclosed'' – a significant increase from last year when it was sitting at about half that level.
A recent survey also revealed that 43% of properties scheduled for auction in June had no published price range, frustrating buyers' attempts to obtain basic listing information, according to The Age.
The same trend has not been as evident in the reporting of Sydney results.
Not that long ago, houses were selling for prices undreamed of with many already-inflated reserves being topped by thousands of dollars as frenzied purchasers bid for what they believed to be their last chance of acquiring a home.
The lowest clearance rates in Melbourne have been in Sunshine North, with just a 42% success rate over the past year, according to APM, along with Highton, at 44%, and Sunshine West, at 46%.
In the first six months of the year, according to the REIV, Melbourne clearance rates city-wide 59%, with four suburbs having a success rate of more than 80%, led by Chadstone with 86% of auctions resulting in a sale. Windsor's clearance rate was 82%; Abbotsford and Donvale were 81%.
The Sydney housing market remains relatively quiet, with auction clearance rates stabilising at levels consistent with the normally-subdued winter selling season, according to Andrew Wilson, the senior economist at Australian Property Monitors.
Recent data shows that while much of the Sydney property market has cooled, many suburbs in the inner-west have been well above the overall 55% Sydney clearance rate, including Enmore, Lilyfield and St Peters, which all achieved 80%-plus success rates.
But some suburbs lag considerably behind, including Church Point at 45% over the year to April, Darling Point at 43% and Yowie Bay with 44% success rate under the hammer.
The stark overall drop in clearance rates from the 70% and 80% of recent years coincides with the typical winter slowdown in auctions, so the reduction in stock might typically be expected to provide a floor for the clearance rate.
A recent Real Estate Business poll found 64% of 322 estate agent respondents indicated that private treaty was the most effective sales strategy in the current market.
But some agents argued that agents who were not actively embracing auctions in the current flat market were not being honest with their clients.
“As the price of properties fall, only the poor agents fall back to private treaty,” says Ray White Caloundra Group director Tom Garland.
“This type of agent shies away from the true, tough nature of our industry: the truth and brutal honesty. That truth is to be honest with our clients and give the news from potential buyers back to the seller as to what they believe properties [are] worth.”
Results this year show his Caloundra office has been clearing 79% of properties in 48 days through the auction process, while private treaty clearance is running at 18% on 121 days.
Ray White auctioneer in South Australia Rob Forde maintains auction in this market should be embraced, rather than feared.
“In a market with so many unknowns, auction is one of the few things that provides certainty to buyer and seller alike,” Mr Forde says.
General manager of sales at McGrath Estate Agents, Matt Lahood, says where there are not a lot of comparable sales, people are probably better off paying for an auction.
He says the decision could depend on the area, as some markets are less amenable to auctions. Larger properties, which can take longer to sell, might suit a private treaty sale.
"If it's a unique waterfront or something that's rare, you'd definitely auction it," Mr Lahood says.
</body></html>

Auctions versus private treaty: the debate over the right listing decision 

<html><body>
Since 2003 I've argued that many academics, economists, commentators and consumers confuse two fundamentally different concepts: the risk observable in a broad-based house price “index” and the probability of loss (or risk) faced by individual homeowners. This is a profoundly relevant issue for us all. 
The popular notion of bricks and mortar being a safe investment for owner-occupiers is at least partly based on the observed volatility, or risk, associated with regional house price indices.
The problem here is that a house price index proxies for literally millions of homes worth billions or trillions of dollars. An index is, therefore, an incredibly well-diversified portfolio.
In contrast, an individual homeowner is making an economic commitment to one highly idiosyncratic asset. 
You are buying one home, on one street, facing one direction, with all of its manifest peculiarities. This is, by definition, a poorly diversified investment with a much larger prospect of loss. 
A similar analogy can be found when comparing the risk of a micro-cap listed on the ASX with the fluctuations observed in the ASX All Ordinaries index, which captures every company listed on the exchange.
The micro-cap’s volatility will be much greater than the variations observed in the index. This is why your average super fund's portfolio invests in the index, and not micro-caps. 
Diversification is meant to be the one “free lunch” in economics. It’s the one time you really can walk along the street and pick up 100-dollar bills.
Since the circa 7-8 million property owners out there do not get the benefit of a national portfolio comprising millions of assets, understanding and managing individual asset-level risk (ie: your own home) is of great importance.
Regrettably, there is very little research on the economic hazards faced by single family homeowners. Rismark's team has, however, spent a lot of time thinking about this subject. 
Applying one methodology developed by professor William Goetzman, a leading financial economist at Yale, we found that the total risk of an individual home is about 15-20% per annum depending on the holding horizon. If we take a seven to eight-year ownership period, the individual property volatility is about 15% per annum. The chart below illustrates the results of this research based on all purchases and sales of Australian homes between 1990 and 2009. 
<img src="/images/stories/joyegraph1-cropped.png">
 Based on this analysis, owning a home outright is slightly less risky than owning every company listed on the ASX, which has exhibited historical volatility of nearly 20% per annum over the past 30 years. The next diagram shows a simulation of the risk profile of an individual home compared with capital city and national house price indices between 2004 and 2009. For the purposes of this analysis, the team used RP Data-Rismark's Hedonic Home Value Index. Importantly, we have also assumed that the individual property owner, which is represented by the red dotted line, has no mortgage debt. You can see that the value of the individual asset varies strikingly through time, compared with the capital city and national indices. 
<img src="/images/stories/joy-new-graph-cropped.png">
To highlight these differences further, here are approximations of the expected return ‘distributions’ attributable to both a national portfolio of housing and a single family home. 
<img src="/images/stories/joyegraph3-cropped.png">
 Observe how the individual property’s return distribution, which is proxied by the blue bars, has far 'fatter' tails and a lower peak. This tells us that the prospect of realising positive or negative capital growth outcomes is much higher than a nationally diversified portfolio, which is represented by the comparatively narrow red distribution. The latter demonstrates that the dispersion in the range of possible outcomes is very tightly wound around the average, or expected, capital growth rate. 
This is just one way of saying that a national housing portfolio has exceptionally low risk of just 3-4% per annum. If you had this holding, the value of your investment would have fallen only 2.5% in 2008. If, on the other hand, you had a single, million-dollar-plus property in Sydney or Melbourne, it probably fell by about by 10 to 15%.
The final chart illustrates the monthly returns attributable to a simulated Australian home between 2004 and 2009. Critically, we have created both 'geared' and 'ungeared' capital growth profiles. The blue line denotes the value changes associated with a homeowner with 70% mortgage debt. The red line represents a homeowner with no debt (they own the property outright). The impact of leverage is vivid: it amplifies the probability of loss, with the blue line dipping far below the zero% (ie, no change in value) axis with disturbing regularity.
<img src="/images/stories/joyegraph4-cropped.png"> So, what is the message from all of this? Over and above simple portfolio diversification, one take-away is that households have a profound (latent) desire to deleverage their balance sheets. This is an obvious statement today – but it was not something that many folks focused on back in 2003, when I first made it.
The only way to reduce debt is by boosting equity. This brings us to an economic puzzle: equity markets for housing finance don’t exist. While listed and unlisted companies raise debt and equity every day of the week, homeowners are stuck with debt. So, whereas a company with 90% gearing would be punished by the market for being excessively risky, we happily allow first-time buyers to leverage up to the tune of 95% against far riskier underlying assets.
The principal value of equity finance, as opposed to debt, is that the equity provider wears the risk of loss alongside you.
When times get tough, equity costs you nothing. In comparison, you always have to service your debt. Equity only has a positive cost when things go well, and you can afford to pay. This is precisely why financial markets and regulators like to see companies with more equity and less debt. 
The Bank of England's Andy Haldane recently arrived at this conclusion: policymakers need to revisit the housing finance paradigm and promote the design of smarter instruments that help households better mitigate their risks. Of course, real change is an awfully difficult thing to implement.
Christopher Joye is a leading financial economist, and works with <a style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: underline; color: #6888b1;" target="_blank" title="Rismark International" href="https://www.rismarkinternational.com/">Rismark International</a>. Rismark and RP Data provide house price analytics products, and solutions that enable investors to go long and/or short the housing market. The above article is not investment advice.
</body></html>

chrisjoye-JYhJsTrNRC

Residential: not as safe as bricks and mortar

<html><body>
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
 
The stream of extreme bullish and bearish views regarding the real estate market adopts the guise of a political contest.
Those of us working in the industry are constantly accused of talking up the market for our own ‘greedy’ ends. On the other end of the spectrum are the ‘bubble’ doomsday pundits, who are so determined to see our market suffer an American style crash and shoot down the drain, they hang onto any bit of negative data they can lay their hands on.
The real truth is neither bearish nor bullish, but in many respects overwhelmingly predictable.
Most Australians recognise the beauty and quality of lifestyle we’re privileged to experience in comparison to many other countries. It’s the reason our major cities top the list of the world’s most liveable destinations.
However, debate is rife concerning our rapidly increasing population, simply because our infrastructure in major metropolitan areas is woefully over-capacity. We don’t have enough accommodation in the areas where people want to live, so is it any wonder we continue to see inner-city property cycles of unsustainable booms, followed by flat periods of pain and grief, for potential buyers who can’t afford a foot in the door?
Real estate has always seemed unaffordable and overpriced to first-home buyers – a simple search through newspaper archives will teach you this.
However, as the metropolitan belt tightens, it’s fast becoming a split between ‘those who can’ and ‘those who can’t’. In short, any single person on an average wage fighting to save a deposit will find they’re limited to regional locations with sparse amenities, or high-rise inner-city rabbit hutches which banks are not all that keen to lend on.
Is it any wonder fewer first home buyers are entering the market? The incentive to scrimp and save for a deposit is only there when the reward is achievable.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard, and Sustainable Population Minister Tony Burke, recently commented that Australia's most densely populated cities, Sydney and Melbourne, have reached their ''carrying capacity''.
This could have been a political ploy to gain kudos in the polls – after all, there’s huge consensus to cap Australia’s population, but it would be interesting to debate how we intend to achieve this.
Australia is one of the least densely populated countries in the world. It’s not good enough to protest that much of the land isn’t arable when we’ve already proved our ability to adapt to different terrains and climates. Although we may be able to slow our growth, we can’t single-handily stop it any more than we can single-handily stop climate change! People are going to keep coming, and a consistent fertility rate alone will see a population of 29 million by 2050.
Therefore, unless we look outside the square and find real, feasible options for an increasing number of buyers who can no longer afford to purchase, we’ll see tremendous pressure on rental accommodation and our market will become an investor’s domain.
Increasing stock supply is not the ‘simple’ answer to this equation, if it is to be located where commuting time will outweigh any savings made.   Increasing inner-city density is well and good, however, as any first home buyer knows, banks place strict criteria on the type and size of property they’ll lend against.
Many of the Manhattan-style high-rise developments (supposedly built to ease home buyer pain) don’t come close to filling the necessary criteria.
At about $290,000 – the average loan for a first home buyer – it’s all but impossible to purchase something in a metro location that will provide a decent stepping stone for future advancement.
Anyone experienced in property investing knows the number one consideration for home buyers is proximity to public transport. Schools are also high on the list.
We have to face the stark reality that our population cannot be ‘capped’, but neither should we feel like factory-farmed chickens squashed into metropolitan areas where housing is reserved for ‘those who can’.
By 2013 Australia will be the only continent without any high speed rail! A high-speed network linking regional locations would see commuting times to the nearest CBD from as little as 20 minutes and open a wide range of affordable options for homebuyers.
Unless we start understanding extra roof space is not the answer to sustainable population without serious commitment to improving transport systems, we can expect the house hunting-pain of ‘those who can’t’ to get progressively worse.
Catherine Cashmore is senior buyer advocate for <a target="_blank" href="https://www.elitebuyeradvocates.com.au/">Elite Buyer Advocates</a>. With extensive experience in all matters regarding real estate, Elite Buyer Advocates purchases and negotiates more than $100 million worth of property each year for its clients.
 
 
</body></html>

catherinecashmore-6LXia3pPQj

How rapid population growth divides prospective buyers

<html><body>
Website developers in Australia have never been busier thanks to the insatiable consumer desire to shop online.
With the strong Australian dollar, local big-brand retailers have been caught asleep behind the counter given until recently online branding had been largely ignored. As a consequence, Australian retailers quickly observed significant drops in profits which have now prompted the battle of the homepage. Make no mistake: the online economy is booming with revenues increasing by up to 40% in 2010.
Apple recently reported that more than 15 billion applications have been downloaded for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. Latest statistics show that in early 2010, about 25% of mobile phone users were shopping via their phones.
The online doubters now find themselves in a denial freefall given the total revenue from electronic payment systems in Australia was estimated at about $3.8 billion in 2010. When compared to 2009, virtual spending increased by 40% in 2010. The 2011 retailing results keep getting worse, and now they have been told that unless they quickly adapt, they will perish given consumers are sending out a clear message that their preference now is to shop online from home.
The latest findings by Macquarie Equities Research confirmed that 18% of shopping centre visitors are only there to check out prices and sizes before going home to complete the purchase online. In an amazing admission of defeat, Australia’s largest retailers are now turning their attention to finally building vast online platforms, but the question begs: what took them so long given the real estate industry has been selling real estate on property portals since the early 1990s?
With interest I have been reading a fascinating (and scary) <a href="https://www.business2.com.au/2011/07/project-rebellion-reas-problems-continue-with-accc-investigation-underway/">blog</a> on Business2, the real estate news and technology website, which follows up a recent story that appeared in the Australian Financial Review which investigated a revolt by real estate agencies across Australia against realestate.com.au. In short, some of Australia’s largest real estate groups are looking at starting up a combined property portal, which has been called Project Rebellion. While I support the concept of an industry website – I can also see many of the same mistakes in this concept that retailers are making at the moment. Aside from the reality that such a venture would require at least $1 million dollars to get it up and running, it certainly appears to me that such an exercise lacks vision. Simply put: the agent sentiment of dissatisfaction is built on the past, not the future.
Building websites if you don’t know what you are doing can be costly mistakes. Just look at the City of Sydney council, which is now spending a massive $1 million of ratepayers’ money tweaking their website – just six years after it was constructed. Anyone with the slightest online knowledge would see this as an embarrassing waste of money – given in another six years’ time they will be back at it again. Everything may be now moving to digital, however, the answer is providing clients with the best online experience that separates your online model ahead of your competitors.
The secret to search engine marketing (SEM) is not having the best-looking website. It is about having the best database. One vital component that has not changed over the past decade is that for any online platform to perform to its best ability, it must be connected to a database. This flows through to search engine optimisation (SEO) where the content on that particular website is collected by the search engines. The more content, the higher the search engine ranking. It should be every website’s goal to appear on page one of a Google keyword search.
There are many great success stories in Australia where amazing growth strategies are on display where we are only talking a few short years. Online shopping club Ozsale launched in 2007. Last week it reached two million members. More than 5,500 new members are signing up each day and exponential sales growth saw revenue grow by more than 300% last financial year.
In the real estate industry, businesses need to take ownership of their very own online models, rather than rely on third-party assistance. We measure our business growth on competing with the two major property portals: Domain.com.au and realestate.com.au. As this graph identifies, you need to be your first point of contact to your demographic market. Here is a typical report that we sent a vendor showing the first week’s activity for their apartment.
<img src="/images/stories/simeon-cropped.png">
Successful SEM and SEO allow a business to take ownership of their demographic markets where they become the online voice for that market. It does require a lot of work and dedication – blogging, database management, social media and constant email alerts. This is the new online platform for the real estate industry which explains why website developers have never been busier.
The choice of letting competitors control your market online is self-explanatory – they will make your market their new market, which is otherwise known as capturing market share. In this modern era, if you are not running your own website, you run the risk of being irrelevant – the internet already has made many businesses irrelevant, where via natural attrition, they have now closed – not by choice.
That is why your homepage must be your online ‘home sweet home.’
Robert Simeon is a director of <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/" target="_blank" title="RWM">Richardson &amp; Wrench Mosman &amp; Neutral Bay </a>(RWM) and has been selling residential real estate in Sydney since 1985. He has also been writing real-estate blog <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" target="_blank" title="Virtual Realty News">Virtual Realty News</a> since 2000. The RWM real estate model has sold in excess of $1 billion in database sales globally.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Why online presence has never been more important for estate agents

<html><body>
Sometimes the best-looking property can be the worst real estate investment you've ever made. Remember that investing in commercial property is all about the price, the terms and the ongoing return on investment. Here are several tips for successful commercial property investing.
Be an investor – not merely an accumulator of commercial properties.
The reason you make investments is to produce a worthwhile profit. So if you end up buying a property that produces little or no growth, \you basically acquired a property (instead of making an investment).
Get yourself a mentor so you benefit from his or her experience.
Mentors can save you from making very costly mistakes, identify when you've missed due diligence items, and connect you with resources that you otherwise wouldn't have immediate access to.
Understand that every commercial property has a lifetime.
One of the biggest errors you can make as an investor is to ignore the fact you will need to spend money on the upkeep of the building over time. The building may need a new roof, or the electrical system may need to be upgraded. Every building goes through these renewal phases. Therefore, make sure you have a long-term strategy to handle such repairs.
Focus on one commercial property sector at a time.
Especially when you're starting out, you should focus on one type of investment: offices, shops, warehouses, or whatever you prefer. Each deal needs your undivided attention. It's much better to master one aspect than to be average over many. And who wants average-performing properties anyway?
Decide whether you and your assets are adequately protected.
As with anything in life, messy lawsuits can occasionally occur. Therefore, you need to do everything in your power to protect yourself and your investment. Ask yourself the following questions to determine whether you're fully covered:
How is your commercial property protected – both legally and insurance-wise?
Are your other investments totally separate from each other so one lawsuit can’t affect the other investments?
What do you have at stake, if you lose a lawsuit? Is your personal property, for example, your home, isolated?
Don't try to guess when it comes to the answers of these questions. Talk to a lawyer to ensure you're fully protected if ever you were to be sued.
For a partnership or syndicate, finance the deal using non-recourse finance. Non-recourse means you aren't personally guaranteeing the loan. This gives you two distinct advantages: it allows you to be taken off the loan if the partnership sour, and, if the property were to fail, the financier cannot come after you personally.
Once you understand the “rules of the game”, buying commercial property is really quite straightforward. You just need to do a little homework and make sure you get the right advice along the way.
Chris Lang is a commercial property investor and gives keynote speeches and regular seminars on the best way to invest in commercial property. He maintains a blog, <a href="https://his-best.biz/" title="Chris Lang's blog" target="_blank" style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: underline; color: #6888b1;">his-best.biz</a>, which he updates regularly about the best way to get the most out of your commercial property investment.
</body></html>

Latest Buying Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Buying Insights

Buying off-the-plan in Melbourne? How independent iCIRT ratings are set to change Victorian property

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News