<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I am buying my first home at 30, having rented before this with a friend.
I have got about $50,000 saved as a deposit and some other money set aside for costs, and have been given the option to either buy on my own or with the friend I’m renting with.
What are the benefits of buying with him and should I be considering it?
Thanks,
G.
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Dear G,
I am often asked by many investors whether or not they should be buying property with a friend, a sibling or with a group of other investors.  It’s a common thing for people to buy property with a spouse, and if you think about that, you are already taking the good with the bad when it comes to a life partner. Sharing real estate is only another facet in the complex fabric of life.
When it comes to a friend, you could be tossing up buying together for a number of reasons.  It could be that you can’t afford to go alone, or can’t save enough of a deposit.  Another reason may be that you feel more confident buying with someone else than you would alone.  Whatever the reason, it might seem like a good idea at the time, but like a lot of good ideas, it can all come apart later on.
If you are tossing up whether or not to buy with someone who is not your spouse or life partner, it can help if you go in with your eyes wide open. 
Here are just a few of the things you must know:
<ol>
<li>
You can trust yourself, but.... You probably know that you can afford to meet the repayments, and that in times of stress you have enough money to be able to see through until the good times.  You know that your job is secure, and so you will always have a steady income flow.  But can you be as sure about the person you are planning to buy with? It is easier when it is your spouse – when you get married or choose to live together it is always for better or worse.  And it may seem easy when we are talking about a brother or a sister, a mum or dad or son or daughter (although often that is not the case). However, when it comes to friends you can never be sure how much of what they are telling you is actually true.  It’s amazing how quickly someone’s circumstances can change, and the last thing you need is to be left holding all of the commitments on a property whose title you only half own.  
</li>
<li>
Difficult financing arrangements Where all parties are bringing in the same amount of money as a cash deposit, and a joint loan, secured by only the property in question (the one being purchased) is accessed, this may remain relatively simple. All parties pay their required portion of the debt, receive their share of the income and complete separate tax returns claiming their own tax deductions. Where differing amounts are provided by each person, or where the other party may be borrowing against the equity they have in another property and bringing in their deposit via another loan from elsewhere, things get tricky. All bills will then need to be divided up according to the original allocation and the tile will need to reflect the different proportions of ownership. The risk increases too, if one party is using a loan for their deposit – it creates a higher risk of that person not being able to manage their repayments. It is useful to note here also that, when you sign mortgage documents for a debt where another party is involved, you become jointly, and severally, responsible for the repayment of that debt.  If the other party takes off to Rio, you cannot call your bank and offer to repay only your half, or to keep repayments on only your half going.  You become responsible for the entire debt, while at law you still only own half (or your share) of the property. 
</li>
<li>
What’s yours is mine – including all your debt! Since you become jointly and severally responsible for any loan you take out with other people, the commitment for the entire loan, rather than half of it, may be considered when establishing your serviceability with a bank.  So, you may have a loan of $300,000 with two other people, and your share is $100,000, but a bank may consider that you have a commitment to the entire $300,000. Conversely that same lender will only consider the income on your third of the property, since you only own a one third share. This may limit your ability to borrow additional funds to undertake more borrowing to buy investments in your name only, and could hamper your ultimate progress. 
</li>
<li>
Using the growing equity Imagine if the equity in your shared property grew so quickly that you were ready to buy again soon – but you decided that you did not want to buy with that person again. Unless you are prepared to liquidate, lose a fair portion in capital gains tax and start again, unfortunately you may have difficulty using this equity to invest further. 
</li>
<li>
Time to get out – but do you both agree? Your life suddenly changes.  You meet the perfect partner and want to move to the country, you are offered a divine job overseas for 20 years, or you simply want to cash out and take a Harley around route 66.  If your timing does not coincide exactly with that of your fellow property owner, you may not be able to take advantage of this great new opportunity because you cannot realise your assets.  Unless you are both ready to make a major change, owning property with others can often prevent you from taking on a great opportunity which may come along out of the blue. 
</li>
<li>
When you are doing all the work. Owning a property is not without its hard work.  If you suddenly find yourself doing all the work, it may seem like an unfair thing that you are only accessing your title’s share of any growing equity.  You may believe you are entitled to a greater share, but at law, this is not possible.  You cannot really know the capacity of another person to do their bit until after the deed is done, and by then it may be too late.
</li>
</ol>
In summary:
If there is absolutely no other way for you to get into the market than to do it with another, non spouse person, then at least sign a partnership agreement at the commencement of the deal in which you cover every possible eventuality and agree to a procedure to manage it. Going in with your eyes open may prevent a major disaster in the long-term. So will not investing with others at all!
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Should I buy a property with a friend? Six things to consider first: Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have already met eligibility requirements to buy a property with my First Home Saver Account (FHSA) money. 
Do you know whether i still have to meet the 'live in the property for at least six months over the next 12 months' requirements given the 12 months will extend beyond the date that this rule is abolished?
Regards,
FHB
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi FHB,
The First Home Saver Account (FHSA) was an initiative by the federal government to boost the savings of first home buyers by providing incentives via an additional deposit and tax advantages to this account as long as you placed your own savings in it. 
The rules were simply that you use it only on your first home, do not draw anything out of it for four years, and pay at least $1000 a year into the account over at least four years. In return the government made a 17% contribution on the first $6,000 and only taxed any earnings at 15%. The funds from your first home saver account could only be used to buy a property you intended to live in. The occupancy rule stated that you must live in the home for at least six months and it must be your main residence.
The six-month period must start within:
<ul>
<li>12 months of you becoming the home owner (from settlement date) or;</li>
<li>12 months from the day construction was completed if you are building a home</li>
</ul>
If you failed to use the funds on your first home, it had to be rolled over into superannuation.
However these accounts did not take off as expected and so the following changes will occur:
<ul>
<li>Accounts opened after 7:30pm Tuesday 13 May 2014 will not be entitled to the government contribution</li>
<li>Existing account holders will not be eligible for a government contribution on personal deposits after the 2013-2014 financial year</li>
<li>Tax and social security concessions will cease 1 July 2015</li>
<li>Restrictions on withdrawals will be removed on 1 July 2015</li>
<li>First home saver accounts will be abolished on 1 July 2015</li>
</ul>
Having said all of that, as of today the accounts are current and this means that the requirements are current.  Since ‘living in the property for six months starting sometime within the first 12 months’ could potentially mean that your six months might feasibly start after the abolition of this rule, one would expect that it would no longer apply at that date. 
However, as you would be accessing the funds during the time that the scheme is still current, you will most likely be required to fulfill your obligations and start living in the property, staying there for the full six months, regardless of when this falls.  The government has provided the benefit and so you should follow the rules relating to that benefit.
If I were you I’d make a call to the Office of State Revenue in your state and clarify their position.  If they do, be sure to get it in writing so that you can prove that this is what you were told, if questioned at a later date.
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Do the First Home Saver Account eligibility requirements still apply?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
I have a mortgage of $420,000 and my home is worth $750,000.
Is my equity $330,000 and would the bank theoretically allow me to borrow this amount and buy an investment property to rent?
Does your wage dictate the amount the bank will lend for the investment loan, or does it just lend you the $330,000 if you indicate that the rent would cover the loan?
Thanks, 
PC
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below. 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi PC, 
The bank allows you to borrow up to 80% of the entire value of your property without lender’s mortgage insurance (LMI) applying, or up to 95% (depending upon the lender) of the value with LMI. 
LMI is an insurance policy to protect the bank in the event that you default and a forced sale does not provide enough proceeds to cover your outstanding debt. While it’s a policy for the bank, you pay the premium which, depending on the loan amount and how close to 95% you get, can run to thousands and thousands of dollars.
In your case, your total property is worth $750,000 and so, at 80% of that total value, you can borrow $600,000 all up. As you only owe $420,000, this means that you still have $180,000 of potentially available borrowings. Now remember that this potentially available borrowing is on the existing property – once you find a property to buy and add it to the mix, you can borrow up to 80% against that property, too! So that means that whatever you have left as potential available borrowings on your current home will cover the 20% deposit. 
Given that you have $180,000, technically it’s enough to cover the 20% deposit on $900,000 of additional property. As you will have stamp duties and costs in there too, you can probably expect to easily be able to secure a further $800,000 of property with the current equity you have in your own home, and cover all costs too.
I say ‘potentially available borrowing’ as equity is not the only criteria for borrowing. 
You also need to be able to demonstrate the ability to service a debt. Your income, plus any rent from the property you want to buy, will be considered and a formula used to determine if you can afford to meet your daily living expenses plus the cost of your total borrowings.  
Most lender’s will accept the total amount of PAYG income you earn, self-employed income, as long as you can prove it over two years, and 80% of the actual or projected rent return. Some lenders will consider things like family allowance payments and child support, some investment income and other income – each lender is different.  
In considering your total liabilities, banks will take into account current payments on all loans and credit cards, commitment to child support if any, and the future repayments on the new loan being applied for. Usually, they will add a margin to the new loan repayment just to be sure you can Afford any unforeseen interest rate rises.
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

How much can I borrow against my home to buy an investment property? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I just settled and was having a look at the settlement and saw lender’s mortgage insurance (LMI) was charged as a lump sump straight out.
I would have preferred that LMI payment to be added on to the loan.
Can I change this now and how can I do this in future?
Should I wait next time so I don’t have to pay any LMI?
Kind regards,
B.
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi B,
LMI, also known as lender’s mortgage insurance, is a policy which is taken out by the bank, on your behalf, on any loans where the amount of that loan is greater than 80% of the total value of the property you are buying.  
The purpose of LMI is for the protection of the bank – if for some reason you default on your loan and do not repay it, the insurer will pay to the bank any shortfall between the loan balance and the sale price of the property, and then pursue you to get it back.  This might occur if you just stop paying the loan, or if you have a forced property sale and the property sells for less than what you owe to the bank.
The reason it applies to loans of more than 80% of the property’s value is that loans where the owner starts out with little equity are the ones most at risk. Where you borrow less than 80%, there is a greater chance that any forced sale would still recover enough to pay off the debt.
Be aware that although the insurance policy covers the bank (and not you), you pay the premium.  LMI does not cover you for any inability to meet repayments – and so it is not a policy for you, and if you want to cover your mortgage payment in the event of your incapacity to pay, you would need a mortgage repayment protection policy as well.
Where LMI is concerned, you usually have two options – to meet the payment yourself, or add it to the loan. Note that if you add it to your loan, not only will you increase your mortgage repayments (and essentially pay interest on this premium), you reduce the equity you have in the property.  This means you own less of the property, and it would then take you longer to gain the equity you need to leverage into the next property.  It is for this reason that I always advise borrowers who need LMI to meet the payment themselves, if possible.
It’s unlikely that you will now be able to go back and simply add it to the loan without paperwork.  The bank may, however (and depending upon the loan type) go back and reapprove your loan at a higher amount to allow you to  repay yourself for the LMI.  This is known as a loan increase and is possible with many loan types these days.  A loan increase is easier as it does not require a discharge of mortgage to be put in place - it’s just an additional advance of funds.  Note that in doing this you are changing the loan to valuation ratio further (as LMI can be up to 2% of the loan amount) which incurs further LMI again.
Be aware though that if this is an investment loan and you choose to do this, the interest on the amount you ‘draw back’ will not be tax deductible. The tax office will consider this amount to be a payment to you, and therefore of a ‘personal nature’, and so they will not allow deductibility on that portion of your interest.
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Do I have to pay LMI as a lump payment?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
I have read some of your Q&amp;A's and decided to email you. I hope that you may be able to give me some advice.
I am going through my divorce settlement with my partner and we have a one bedroom apartment investment house in Melbourne that is currently leased.
I intend to keep the investment house and turn into my principal place of residence after the divorce settlement.
Therefore, I hope you can advise whether this is a good idea and what the pros and cons of changing an investment house  into my principal place of residence?
Looking forward to hear from you soon.
Kind regards,
Thomas
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Dear Thomas,
In Victoria, it is possible to transfer ‘by way of love and affection’ a property from one spouse to another and avoid stamp duty on that transfer.  In a divorce in any state, you can also make the transfer under a divorce settlement and avoid any transfer duty.
However there are a few other issues to consider.  Firstly, and depending upon the value of your spouse’s half at the time, she may incur capital gains tax on her half which is disposed of to you.  This would be assessed on the difference in the value as at time of transfer and the original cost base.  In your case, you would then have two separate cost bases on this property – the half you already owned would have the cost base applicable at the time of purchase and the half you acquire would have one applicable at the time of transfer under the property settlement.
If you live in the property and subsequently sell at a later date, half of the property would incur pro-rated capital gains tax using the cost base on the first half and the eventual sales price, calculated according to days rented, not rented. The second half would be CGT free. 
If at any time you do rent the entire property out, then it’s all complicated further – the half you owned is still pro-rated as above, but the half you acquire may qualify under the six year rule CGT exemption (as long as you do not claim that exemption elsewhere), or not, in which case it has a different method for CGT calculations.
In any event there is no impact on you until you eventually sell, but in the meantime I advise you to keep full and accurate records about everything, even any money you may spend on the property, as these records will be required by the tax office and be crucial for you to correctly establish all of your different cost bases. Apart from this issue, I cannot see anything else you should really worry about, as you are planning to make this your own home and so no further taxes should arise.
Kind regards,
Margaret
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

What are the pros and cons of moving into an investment property post-divorce?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret
My father has owned his 150 acre property since the '60s. He subdivided the land into three 50 acre blocks in the '90s, but he still owned all three blocks. He lives on one block and is intending to pass a vacant block into my name so I can build my home on it. All blocks are used for a farming business, however he has no taxable income. He is registered for GST.
There is no way to avoid the capital gains tax (CGT) when he places it in my name is there? 
Do you know roughly how much he will have to pay? The CGT calculators don't make sense to me. Even if I do not pay for the block, it is worth about $800,000. The three blocks were purchased for $60,000 in the 60s so the one would have been $20,000.
Many thanks,
Alan from WA
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Alan,
As you father owned the block in the pre CGT days, this block is still a pre-CGT asset. Subdividing the one pre-CGT asset into three does not changed the pre-CGT status and subdividing does not result in capital gain or capital loss. 
Although your father will make a capital gain when he sells (or passes title of) the block to you, the date he acquired the block is considered to be the date that he acquired the original parcel of land, and the cost base of the original land is divided between the subdivided blocks on a reasonable basis. Therefore there is not CGT for your father to pay at all.
More importantly for you is considering how you will receive this block of land, and in what entity.  If you plan to live there then it may become your principal place of residence, and later if you sell there may be CGT consequences from the date you acquired the land in your name. This is because any part of the land over five acres attracts capital gains tax and cannot use the principal place of residence exemption. 
If you are going to conduct a farm then it could be considered business real property, or the part where the farm is conducted could be. It’s worth considering potentially using a self-managed superannuation structure, as business real property can be transferred into super even if it has initially been given to you.
In any event, my advice is for you to seek quality accounting advice before the transfer takes place. This will allow you to ensure that the right structures are in place from the outset.
Kind regards
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

My father subdivided a property he's owned since the '60s, does he have to pay CGT?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
My partner and I are thinking of buying our first home by the end of this year and are currently researching on where to build, the demographics, etc which will suit our budget.
We are from WA and are thinking of going for a home and land package. Therefore will you have any piece of advice as we are newbies to the property market and believe that extensive research needs to be conducted before we embark on this journey.
Is there any of your books that are specifically targeted towards first home buyers.
Regards,
Amira
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Amira,
It's really important to understand that the parameters around how we choose the home we wish to live in are not the same as those we choose the home to invest in.
If you were buying purely for an investment, it's more likely that you would not invest in the same kind of area that you would choose to buy in as an owner occupier.  This is because, at any moment in time, some areas make better investments than others due to the existence of growth drivers which have not yet had a big impact on that market.
If you were choosing to invest you would be looking for areas which are not yet fully serviced, yet show signs of increasing population, infrastructure and popularity. These areas then have a good chance to grow quickly and you will benefit from that by having an investment which grows well.  If you are looking to buy a home to live in you would be looking for an established area which most likely already has had some good growth - you choose it for the convenience and lifestyle benefits it can provide to you and consider its potential to grow as a secondary requirement.
You want to buy in WA, and most residential areas in Perth have had a good run last year, with prices softening this year.  Therefore, as an investment it's not as good, at this moment in time, as say, Brisbane, and so you would most likely not choose a Perth suburb as an investment right now.  But as you want to live there, your aim instead should be to find something within your budget which also allows you to meet all of your lifestyle needs - a decent proximity to your work, near family and friends and close to any of the things you like to do in your leisure time, such as go to the beach, go bushwalking etc.
As you are choosing a house and land package, make very sure that the total price to build this house does not exceed the current price for similar, established properties which are already built.  Often there is a builder premium which you cannot recover through market growth, as this house will only have the same value as similar established houses once it is built.
Then, make sure that you get the right type of loan, right from the start, one which is flexible and will allow you to redraw anything you pay off it to make a deposit on an investment property.  You want to be able to pay down your loan as quickly as you can so that the combined effect of debt reduction and market growth of the property creates the equity you need to get started with a property investment portfolio. 
While my books don't specifically help a first time owner occupier, the latest one, <a href="https://www.booktopia.com.au/how-to-achieve-property-success-margaret-lomas/prod9780987368294" target="_blank">How to Achieve Property Success</a>, which is a combination and update of my first three books, definitely helps you to undertake effective mortgage reduction and prepare yourself for starting on your property investing journey. 
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

What should I look for in a house and land investment? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
Just a query on capital gains tax (CGT).
Our principle place of residence is currently on the market to sell, and once it does we would like to buy another property.
However the kind of property we would like to buy next as a primary residence is at this point out of our price range.
What we would like to do is climb the property ladder by doing a quick reno then selling.
Is there a required time frame for us to live in this property to be exempt from CGT?
Regards, 
Grace
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Grace,
As long as you live in a property and do not claim another property as your principal place of residence (PPOR) during that time, then there is no set period of time in which you must live in a property in  order to avoid capital gains tax (CGT). 
The CGT exemption applies to any residential property in which we live and claim the principal place of residence upon. The requirements to claim this exemption are that you live in the property and it is your primary place of residence, and that you have no other primary place of residence.
If you kept buying properties, lived in them and did a renovation, and then sold them quickly, doing it again and again in short periods of time, you may place yourself in the situation where the tax office would consider that you are in fact in the business of property renovation and may disallow the exemption. Under such circumstances it is more likely that they would also see the gains you made as income and tax you accordingly, rather than apply capital gains tax.
If you are genuinely moving in in order to climb the property ladder for your personal circumstances only, rather than looking to make more and more profit from renovations and using the PPOR exemption rule simply to avoid tax, then it won't matter how long you live there, the exemption should apply.
Kind regards, 
Margaret
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Moving up the property ladder via renovating and selling: But do I need to pay capital gains tax?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,

I currently live in Sydney and on a 970 square metres property, and have been for 27 years now. The property is located approximately 20 kilometres from Sydney CBD.

I am thinking to knock down my existing home, building a duplex and then selling one to finance the construction costs for both. Thereafter, I intend to live in one of them. 

What is the taxation implication on my current and future property (i.e. one of the duplex I plan to live in)? Will I pay tax on both properties? What tax (and deduction) do I need to pay for one of the duplexes I plan to sell?  Can you provide a sample taxation calculation? Is there a correct procedure to minimise my tax?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers! 
Dave 

Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below.

<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Dave,

If you subdivide a block of land, each block that results is registered with a separate title. In terms of capital gains tax (CGT), the subdivision means that you will end up with two separate assets. Subdividing the land does not result in a CGT event if you retain ownership of the subdivided blocks and this means that you don’t make a capital gain or a capital loss at the time of the subdivision.

You are intending the demolish the family home, leaving you with a vacant block. As you bought the original property 27 years ago, you may trigger CGT once you erect the new dwellings and sell one. Your principal place of residence exemption can be applied to one property (likely the one you live in) but the second dwelling will incur CGT.

The date you acquired the subdivided blocks is the date you acquired the original parcel of land and the cost base of the original land is divided between the subdivided blocks on a reasonable basis. Then, the cost of erecting the dwelling on the block you intend to sell will add to the original assessed value of the newly created block to create a cost base for that property.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=94621]

Once you sell you will be charged CGT on any profits you make. As long as the new house and land is kept for 12 months from the contract date to build the new house, then the 50% discount will apply.

I chatted to my Property Success tax expert, Ian Rodrigues, about this and he said that I should add that practically any gain is likely to be in the land, not the building, in such a short time frame. Even over time, most gain is in land and not building value, but it is a matter for a valuer to split the amounts to establish which is worth what.

Regards,

Margaret 

Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Building a new duplex on the family home block: What tax do I have to pay?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
My husband and I brought a property in Emerald, Queensland in 2008 and resided there while he was working in the town as a paramedic. After we moved on we decided to rent the property out. We understand that with the economic downturn, we have been patiently waiting for things to improve but we're beginning to wonder if and when they ever will. 
It's frustrating to hear comments that property owners are seeing great capital returns while we are just treading water. I regularly log on to CQ News to see what is happening in Emerald and it all seems very negative. I have met people who still have family over there and they're saying a lot of projects are still going ahead. My question is do we still hang in there or cut our losses? I know Emerald has not been picked as a hotspot in the past for nothing. 
Regards,
Yvette
Margaret's answer on the next page. Please click below. 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Hi Yvette,
One of the inherent dangers of following ‘hotspot’ recommendations (even those I make myself) is that these recommendations can only be based on the available data at the time.  No one has a crystal ball and when we use such data to suggest hotspots we are doing so using the data available at the time.
One of the things I have always tried to do is to suggest a risk rating alongside any hotspot recommendation.  This is because certain types of areas have greater downside risks than others should the hotspot not turn out to be a hotspot at all.
For example, a hotspot which is in a residential area, say a suburb of a capital city, with a diversity of employment, lowering unemployment rates, rising population and improving median household income is one which will either boom soon, rise nicely over the longer term or not fulfil boom expectations, but rather experience the average kind of growth we would expect from a stable market. A buy in such an area carries little risk as you either get a great return, or an OK one.  Investors with lower appetites for risk and a need to preserve capital can buy in these areas confidently knowing that the downside risk is small.
At the opposite end of this scale is a hotspot in a single industry town, such as a mining town.  It will fulfil boom expectations as long as the economy does not turn or an outside influence does not conspire to damage its potential.  As the chance for this is fairly high, only investors who can face losses and who have a big appetite for risk should buy in such areas.
At present, the future of Emerald is impossible to predict.  This is because it is an area which suffers extreme impact from economic circumstances and, as confident as we all feel right now, these remain at high risk of a second downturn.  The information you are reading now about the area is current now, but could equally change as soon as the economy changes and become positive again.
For you, you must consider your entire financial circumstances and ask yourself whether you can withstand the downside risk – will short or medium term values losses impact on your ability to leverage into more property (do you have enough equity to see you through any potential value losses?) and do you have the personal cash flows required to support this property if there is a significant fall in rental returns?  If not, then selling now might be the best choice – although if you do sell, you cannot later look back and bemoan any growth you subsequently missed.  You must instead realise you made the decision that was right for you at the time.  Considering all of these things is something that the person helping you to buy this property (if any) should have done with you in the first place.
If you think you can withstand any storms, Emerald, like all mining towns, is likely to see good times ahead again, although I cannot predict when, so there’s no way of knowing how long this present situation will impact you. Perhaps buy more property in more stable areas so that you don’t watch and focus on Emerald and continue to keep your finger on the pulse of all mining markets.
Regards,
Margaret 
</body></html>

My hotspot investment is treading water: Should I hang in there or cut my losses?

&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Joel Robinson

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more internation and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-5" data-turn="user" data-turn-id="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" data-turn-id-container="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" dir="auto">Time &amp; Place’s plans to transform the former David Jones factory building in Surry Hills into a mixed-use residential precinct have gone on exhibition through the NSW Government’s In-fill Affordable Housing pathway.</section>

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" dir="auto">
The Marlborough House proposal, lodged for the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marlborough-house-47-97-marlborough-street-surry-hills-nsw-2010">47-97 Marlborough Street</a> site, would see the adaptive reuse of the heritage-listed warehouse building alongside the construction of new residential additions and a separate apartment building on the northern portion of the site.

The proposal seeks approval for 172 apartments across three buildings, including 15 per cent affordable housing managed by a community housing provider for at least 15 years from occupation.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5d1d3c2a-bf13-47d6-a335-7c01102cdee1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.36%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=cjMYrbR.BLUlWH4dar0RVDDo0bG.u2YT" />

Interior view from the Northern Building Penthouse overlooking the park

&nbsp;

The redevelopment is planned for the prominent 3,413 sqm site bounded by Marlborough Street, Goodlet Street and Lansdowne Street, directly opposite Eddie Ward Park and around 200 metres from the Surry Hills light rail stop.

Time &amp; Place acquired the former David Jones building in 2024, marking the first time the property had changed hands in around 50 years.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal centres around the adaptive reuse of the former David Jones factory, originally constructed between 1913 and 1935 in the Inter-War Chicagoesque architectural style.

Wardle noted in its Architectural Design Report that the building “occupies a significant place in the industrial and cultural history of Surry Hills” and at its peak was “the largest department store manufacturing facility in Australia, employing over 800 people and fuelling the growth of Sydney’s fashion and retail industries.”

The practice said the project positions itself “not as an isolated intervention, but as a contributor to the civic, social, and architectural grain of the precinct.”

The proposal would deliver 75 apartments within the retained southern heritage building, 59 apartments within the central addition, and a further 38 apartments within the new northern building fronting Lansdowne Street.

Planning documents show the scheme would comprise a mix of heritage apartments, new-build apartments, townhouses and penthouses.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="57758518-40a3-4b83-958c-d06e96a2cffa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.42%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VerlX9ST5xgBi8.1_YRsqdWTJeT6ygjs" />Interior View of the Heritage Building Apartment

The development would also include a ground-floor retail tenancy on the corner of Marlborough and Lansdowne streets, rooftop communal open space, a landscaped pedestrian link along the western edge of the site, and basement parking accessed from Lansdowne Street via a car stacker system.

&nbsp;

The scheme emerged from a competitive design process run by Urbis, with Wardle ultimately selected as the winning architect ahead of FJC Studio, TZG, Architectus and Wilkinson Eyre.

The Design Integrity Panel later described several aspects of the Wardle scheme as fundamental to the project, including “the stepped character of the new addition to the north of the site”, the landscaped western pedestrian link, and the “garden arrival” experience separating the original Marlborough House from the heritage addition.

Wardle’s design heavily references the site’s industrial and heritage history, while also responding to the surrounding Surry Hills streetscape.

The Architectural Design Report describes Surry Hills as “a finely grained neighbourhood with beautiful and expressive brickworks throughout the suburb,” with the proposal introducing a material palette intended to sit comfortably alongside the existing warehouse fabric and neighbouring terraces.

The report also outlines the project’s relationship with Eddie Ward Park and the broader landscape context of the area.

“Marlborough House occupies a site of deep cultural memory and the neighbouring Eddie Ward Park is of local ecological significance, where natural systems, topography, and stories have long shaped human experience,” Wardle noted in the report.

The architects said the proposal sought to “rebind built form to Country” through landscape, materiality and the adaptive reuse of the heritage structure.

<img alt="Marlborough House" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9ae3f2f9-c85f-477a-a6f8-b43f6cb97c41" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.53%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=B.qUCLqRvJOR.n9CvYcTpaknIX9LuqKZ" />

The project is also being progressed under the NSW Government’s in-fill affordable housing provisions, allowing developments that include affordable housing to access additional height and floor space incentives.

Under the plans, 2,593 sqm of the project’s floor space would be dedicated to affordable housing, slightly exceeding the required 15 per cent threshold.

In its Design Excellence Strategy, Urbis said the project aimed to “sensitively adapt and enhance the heritage-listed building on site through alterations and additions that preserve its historical significance” while delivering “high-quality market and infill affordable housing development in Surry Hills.”

Time &amp; Place has been one of the most active developers nationally in the last 12 to 24 months. Late last year they completed&nbsp;The Queensbridge in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/southbank-vic-3006">Southbank</a>, a mixed-use tower with 353 apartments and a hotel. They are currently selling Park Modern, 246 apartments near the famous Botanic Gardens in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/south-melbourne-vic-3205">South Melbourne</a>, and have future projects, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-wilmot-173-burke-road-28-hope-street-glen-iris-vic-3146">The Wilmot</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>, the redevelopment of the Northcote Plaza, and another tower in South Melbourne.

The developer broke into Sydney just a few years ago with Two Tides in Manly. They have another project nearby, which is at the ultra-luxury end of the market on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/shoreline-manly-beach-89-90-north-steyne-manly">North Steyne</a>, fronting the beach.

It is also continuing to work through the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-time-place-settles-on-design-for-the-chimes-potts-point-redevelopment">redevelopment of The Chimes building</a> on Macleay Street in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/potts-point-nsw-2011">Potts Point</a>, as well as a project on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Mosman's Redan Street</a>.
</section>

First look: Time & Place unveils Marlborough House redevelopment designs for former David Jones warehouse in Surry Hills

The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Margaret Lomas

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News