<html><body>
Westpac has called for the introduction of additional regulatory requirements before any SMSF can be established, in its response to the Financial System Inquiry’s interim report.
The bank says "suitability" remained the most important policy consideration in light of the complexity, ongoing administration and unique risks.
Westpac propose a test requiring an adviser or accountant to be satisfied the benefits from the establishment of the SMSF clearly outweigh the risk.
Westpac suggested the current take-up of borrowing by SMSFs has been a “rational” response to the current policy and tax settings, but has encouraged the inquiry to possibly consider how appropriate caps could ensure leverage does not become a systemic risk.
It also said the current level of official data, and oversight and analysis of the systemic implications of the SMSF sector were insufficient, given the sector’s size and continuing growth rate.
“This poses important issues for the government and SMSF members, including risk of shortfalls in retirement savings due to poor management and/ or mismanagement; calls to compensate SMSF members in the event of a failure; and poor understanding of the economic and financial system implications of the sector,” Westpac stated.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Westpac sees SMSF borrowing as rational, but seeks to avoid systemic risk prospect

<html><body>
The Federal Treasury's Murray Financial System Inquiry has recommended that self-managed superannuation funds be banned from borrowing to buy assets such as property and shares.
There is no indication the recommendation will be accepted, or how it may be implemented, but the spectre could see the current levels of SMSF property investors further elevated before any announcement in 2015 of changes or grandfathering of the current rules.
<div title="Page 118">
In implementing the recommendation, Murray says funds with existing borrowings should be permitted to maintain those borrowings.
Funds disposing of assets purchased via direct borrowing would be required to extinguish the associated debt at the same time.
<div title="Page 117">
<div>
<div>
Over the past five years, the amount of funds borrowed using LRBAs increased almost 18 times, from $497 million in June 2009 to $8.7 billion in June 2014.
The inquiry opted against imposing a maximum cap on fund assets that can be invested in a single asset other than cash or bonds, saying it would impose additional regulation, complexity and compliance costs on the superannuation system. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
David Murray, chairman of the Financial System Inquiry, said the panel recommended a removal of the exception to the general prohibition on direct borrowing for limited recourse borrowing arrangements by superannuation funds.
</div>
One reason for the recommendation was that it would fulfil the objective for superannuation to be a savings vehicle for retirement income, rather than a broader wealth management vehicle. 
“Restoring the original prohibition on direct borrowing by superannuation funds would preserve the strengths and benefits the superannuation system has delivered to individuals, the financial system and the economy and limit the risks to tax payers,” the report also said.
After borrowings within super funds have risen to $8.7 billion, the FSI noting the level of borrowing was relatively low, but could pose a risk to the financial system.
“Further growth in superannuation funds’ direct borrowing would, over time, increase risk in the financial system,” the report stated.
“Borrowing, even with LRBAs, magnifies the gains and losses from fluctuations in the prices of assets held in funds and increases the probability of large losses within a fund.”
The FSI recommended the government should remove section 67A of the SIS Act on a "prospective basis".
The report noted that lenders can charge higher interest rates given the higher risks associated with limited recourse lending, and often required personal guarantees from SMSF trustees.
There were 44 recommendations to the government from the inquiry, the first wide scale review of the financial system in 17 years. Treasurer Joe Hockey will respond next year.
Previous financial system inquiries, including the Campbell Report in 1981 and Wallis Report in 1997, were the catalysts for major economic reforms in Australia. The Campbell Report led to the floating of the Australian dollar and the deregulation of the financial sector.
The Wallis Inquiry led to streamlined financial services regulation, the creation of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), and the current form of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
</body></html>

SMSFs to rush further into property after borrowing ban looms following Murray Financial System Inquiry

<html><body>
The Preston house on the first season of Channel Seven’s renovation program House Rules has been listed for August 29 auction.
It is the home of the contestant brothers, Nick and Chris Stavropoulos.
John Petsinis from Hocking Stuart has the three bedroom, two bathroom weatherboard house.
<div>
<div id="property-upper-display">
<div id="pane-tab">
<div id="displayphotos" data-photocount="15" data-floorplancount="1" data-iswa="0">
<div>
<div id="mainphoto">
<div id="link-photo"><img src="https://images.realestateview.com.au/pics/376/19-Jackman-Street-Preston-VIC-3072-Real-Estate-photo-1-large-9273376.jpg" alt="19 Jackman Street Preston VIC 3072 Real Estate Photo 1" title="19 Jackman Street Preston VIC 3072 House - Photo 1"></div>
<div> </div>
<div id="soldbanner">The property at 19 Jackman Street, Preston, last traded at $555,000 in mid-2012.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
One of its new features is the stacked-stone fireplace.
Jackman Street's most recent sale was $895,000 in July this year for another three bedroom 1930s cottage that last sold at $446,000 in 2008.
Nick and Chris, the Channel 7 Melbourne House Rules brothers handed over the keys to fellow renovation contestants of their Californian bungalow in Preston in 2013.
It came with a mortgage of $524,000 which would have beeen wiped off by Channel 7 if they had won the renovation competition series hosted by Johanna Griggs.
<img class="img-responsive" src="/images/stories/flexicontent/l_houserulesmay30breakout.jpg" alt="Preston House Rules renovation with $524,000 mortgage after $555,000 brotherly purchase">
The 1930s bungalow went to July 2012 Ray White auction without success, subsequently listed at $580,000.
The brothers paid $555,000 in August 2012 for the 1930s bungalow on its 475 square metre block.
"A lot of our money went into our deposit," <a href="/news/preston-house-rules-renovation-with-524-000-mortgage-after-555-000-brotherly-purchase">the Stavropoulos brothers told the House Rules viewers</a>. 
There was a subsequent $49,000 development application with Darebin Council.
The brothers, who also appeared on Channel 9’s Reno Rumble, have made a few minor alterations since the show, including extending the outdoor area.
No price guidance is being given.
The median price of houses in Preston has jumped 8.8 per cent over the past 12 months to $700,000, <a href="/news">according to CoreLogic RP Data</a>, having been at around $575,000 when the house was bought in mid-2012.
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

Preston House Rules house hits the Melbourne auction market

<html><body>
Tim Mackay, principal of financial advice firm Quantum Financial, says property investors struggling to pay higher demanded deposits on off the plan purchases through their SMSFs need to be careful they do not breach Australian Taxation Office rules.
Abrupt lending policy changes on required deposit has meant some buyers have lost out on valuable tax deductions given the top up deposit balance was a non-concessional (or after-tax) contribution. 
His other recommendations to Australian Financial Review readers included:
<ul>
<li>Consider if the investment is worth keeping. It might be worth cutting losses rather than losing generous tax concessions or being forced to liquidate scheme assets on unfavourable terms;</li>
<li>Reduce costs;</li>
<li>Sell other assets in the fund to reduce the debt;</li>
<li>Contribute more to your super – either through personal contributions or salary-sacrificing (making pre-tax contributions);</li>
<li>Seek a better deal on your loan;</li>
<li>Review existing advice and question how it allowed you to get into mortgage stress.</li>
</ul>
Last week it was suggested one in three off-the-plan Bankstown district investors are facing financial distress completing purchase of their properties because of tough new lending rules for higher deposits.
Chan &amp; Naylor partner Peter Ristevski's analysis suggested he had not had anyone's sale fall through yet with second mortgages being secured at higher interest rates.
Financial planner Sam Henderson, chief executive of Henderson Maxwell, says he thinks buying a property using SMSF was a great idea for a solid long-term strategy, but only for the right people and under the right conditions. 
"The idea of an off-the-plan development diminishes my excitement owing to potential onerous sunset clauses (whereby developers can change the terms and price), banks altering their lending criteria between exchange of contract and settlement, developers potentially going bust and the common issue of being surrounded by scores of similar properties in overdeveloped suburbs," he suggested to AFR readers.
"Consider, for example, that you buy a $700,000 property and put down your 10% deposit of $70,000.
"Let's assume the bank has agreed to fund your loan of 80% (thereby allowing you to use $140,000 of your fund as a deposit) and that you will fund the stamp duty via your next contribution of $30,000.
"Let's say the bank changes its view on SMSF loans and drops its LVR (loan to value ratio) so it will lend to 60 per cent, as many of the banks do for commercial properties.
"Well, you've just done your $70,000 deposit!"
</body></html>

Off the plan SMSF investors face challenges under higher deposit era

<html><body>
With renting increasingly the new normal for many, an innovative fintech company has come up with a way to reduce the pesky rental bond payment.
The product, called Trustbond and created by the startup Traity, lets tenants avoid paying a traditional bond and instead pay a premium, which is a proportion of the rent paid for the term of the lease.
The innovative fintech company has partnered with landlord insurance specialist Terri Scheer Insurance to launch Trustbond.
Trustbond provides security to landlord without freezing the savings of tenants in a rental bond using world-first technology that "will ensure trustworthy Australians save thousands of dollars."
A traditional bond is a large sum that is tied up for the duration of the lease while Trustbond will allows tenant to pay a relatively small fee upfront to cover the protection their landlord required.
The Trustbond system will also allow estate agents and landlords to determine a person’s suitability as a tenant while providing landlords with the same level of protection as a traditional cash bond.
Trustbond is being launched initially in South Australia and it is expected will roll out to other states in the coming months. In NSW around 80,000 residential rental bonds, totalling $1.31 billion are held by the NSW Rental Bond Board.
The new product is marketed as a five step process:
<ul>
<li>Go to <a href="https://www.trustbond.com" target="_blank">www.trustbond.com</a>
</li>
<li>Prove you are a trustworthy tenant by building your reputation profile</li>
<li>Replace the cash bond with a Trustbond</li>
<li>Share the Trustbond with your real estate agent or landlord for their agreement</li>
<li>Keep your cash in your pocket for when you need it most</li>
</ul>
Trustbond measures trustworthiness using online data including networks, ratings and reviews from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Airbnb, eBay and Uber to determine a tenant’s TrustScore.
Once eligibility has been established, the tenant pays an upfront fee that is a percentage of what a conventional rental bond would cost.
As a traditional cash bond might require a tenant to pay $2000, with Trustbond, the tenant might pay around $250 that still covers their landlord for the $2000, freeing up $1750 for the tenant.
The most recent census data revealed the trend towards renting as Australians renting increased from 29.6 to 30.9 per cent in 2016.
The inspiration for Trustbond came from the Traity CEO, Juan Cartagena's own experience of renting property.
As a new resident of the United States with no local rental or employment history, landlords were requesting rental cash bonds of up to $14,000.
He was untrusted as a foreigner, and his landlords requested very expensive bonds as they did not have enough information to trust him.
“Trustbond recognises a person’s digital profile as an asset, putting money back in tenants’ pockets to spend on the things that matter to them,” Traity executive Will Soutar, said.
“It allows people who may have an unconventional working life, such as freelancing, or who have no rental history, greater access to the property rental market.
“In addition to the financial incentives, Trustbond is a better way for tenants to show who they really are.
“It’s a way to build stronger relationships between tenants, landlords and property managers based on trust.”
Terri Scheer Insurance executive manager, Ms Carolyn Parrella, said there were key incentives for landlords to choose tenants who are eligible for Trustbond.
“Trustbond is based on the premise that good online citizens will also be good tenants. Only tenants with a high TrustScore are eligible,” Ms Parrella said.
“Trustbond gives landlords and property managers the ability to rate and review tenants.
“This encourages tenants to be responsible and motivates them to take care of their landlord’s property, in order to keep their TrustScore high.
“Landlords who use Trustbond can save time with automatic verification and screening, fill their properties faster by appealing to a broader pool of tenants and make better decisions for tenant selection.
“These benefits can be achieved with the same level of protection as a conventional cash bond.
“Trustbond covers the same breaches of a tenancy agreement including unpaid rent, damage, broken leases and associated costs, without the need to go to a tribunal.
“We want to take the stress out of investing for landlords, support tenants to feel trusted and remove barriers to entry for renting,” Ms Parrella said.
Visit <a href="https://www.trustbond.com" target="_blank">www.trustbond.com </a>to check your TrustScore and Trustbond eligibility.
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WlzfGI_7cJE?rel=0&amp;controls=0&amp;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" width="450" height="315"></iframe>
</body></html>

Costly rental bond outlay foregone in fintech Trustbond revolution 

<html><body>
A new global inner city metropolitan housing trend has arrived in Australia with full force which may assist to solve some of Sydney's housing shortages and affordability constraints.
Compact co-living dominated by young professional residents often from the start-up, creative, financial or professional sectors has become an emerging property sector, reports recent Savills Australia research.
Many occupants earn above the national average income, making them ideal prospective tenants for housing that mixes high quality rental rooms with communal lifestyle spaces.
Tertiary students have long sought co-living most recently in pod-style micro-apartments.
But the purpose built graduate, young professional city dweller accommodation is seen as a new rung, a step up from high quality purpose built student accommodation.
With the latest offering in a Paddington terrace house, there is no one size fits all approach in creating spaces for these community inspired, experience orientated young renters.  
The research shows that co-living is on the rise, emerging in key cities such as San Francisco, New York, London, Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore.
The top five co-living hotspots in Sydney, according to the Savills report, are Waterloo-Beaconsfield, Parramatta-Rosehill, Potts Point-Woolloomooloo, Redfern-Chippendale, Sydney-Haymarket-The Rocks.
These are followed by Newtown-Camperdown-Darlington, Pyrmont-Ultimo, Surry Hills, Bondi Beach-North Bondi, and Erskineville-Alexandria.  
Leading the way are UKO, Hmlet, Zuu. 
One runs everything from movie nights, yoga in the courtyard, to gin making workshops!
They have been reporting full $500 a week occupancy, highlighting demand for their product that comes with bicycle parking, roof top terraces, outdoor cinema screens, shared laundries, barbeques, pools and kitchens.
The properties often fall under the next-generation boarding house code, so occupants typically sign a membership agreement instead of a lease.
“What’s interesting is that there is no one size fits all approach in creating spaces, as experienced in the student accommodation sector,” according to direct of student accommodation at Savills Australia, Conal Newland.
Sydney and Melbourne dominate emergence of the sector at scale in Australia as analysis shows that 88 of the top 100 regions for investment and development are located across these two global gateway cities with strong international student prescence.
In Melbourne, the top co-living hotspots are the Melbourne CBD, Richmond, Southbank, South Yarra East, St. Kilda, Prahran-Windsor, Brunswick, North Melbourne, Nawthorn, and Carlton.  
"As development costs and relative housing unaffordability continues its upward trend in Australia's capital cities, co-living options will only mature and success," said Newland.
"Co-living is a viable need, and it's going to become more and more of a necessity over time," said Mr Newland.
Some co-living operators are looking to be leaseholders with others fully developing and owning the real estate and operations.
The high-quality rental rooms on short-to long-term leases generally operate under the boarding house regulations. 
Across Australia, 1.46 million 25 to 35 year olds rent, reports Savills. 
Nationally, over 250,000 25 to 34 year olds live on their own.
For this demographic in particular, co-living offers social interactions, wellbeing and experience, alongside privacy in your living space and beautiful, sophisticated building designs, said Paul Savitz at Savills Australia.  
He said government policy is pivotal in attracting ongoing investment.
"Australian lawmakers should be mindful of passing legislation that may reduce the attractiveness of investments into new housing typologies which are more suited to generations with different preferences," Mr Savitz notes.
This article first appeared in The Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

Co-living emerging as new global property trend

<html><body>
Property promoters recommending self-managed super funds (SMSFs) borrow and invest in property must be careful not to break the law, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission commissioner, Greg ­Tanzer has warned.
ASIC said it was investigating ­SMSF seminars for evidence of misleading and deceptive conduct.
ASIC was also warning of unlicensed ­financial services conduct following a rise in promoters urging investors set up or use an existing fund to invest in property.
“These promoters may not be ­complying with the law,” Greg Tanzer said in a speech to the annual CPA Australia Self-Managed Super Fund Conference entitled,The regulator’s perspective on the regulation of SMSFs.
He referred to ASIC’s SMSF task force which is examining "high-risk" SMSF issues making specific note of the Charterhill group collapse earlier this year.
"It operated as a ‘one-stop shop’, providing advice to clients on the establishment of SMSFs, rollover of existing superannuation funds into an SMSF, sourcing and purchase of investment properties, property management, insurance and taxation services. 
"This raised a number of questions about operators using this business model," Greg Tanzer advised.
He said the ASIC taskforce appointed a small project team to explore the trend of ‘one-stop shop’ operators offering a range of services to SMSFs. 
"The purpose of the project team is to investigate the (often complex) business model structures of these operators and the risks to investors that this trend poses. 
"So far the project team have identified that a feature of these business models is a ‘one size fits all’ approach where all investors who use their multiple services receive the same suite of products and services – that is, they end up with an SMSF, a property investment and a limited-recourse borrowing arrangement."
The project team is also exploring whether commissions are being paid within these business models and whether these commissions are consistent with the restrictions on payment of commissions for advice under the FOFA reforms. 
Under the Corporations Amendment (Streamlining of Future of Financial Advice) Bill 2014 introduced on 19 March 2014, some forms of commission that were originally banned under FOFA will be reintroduced. 
Tanzer added it was worth noting that where commissions are permitted, they must still be clearly disclosed to retail clients. 
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia supported moves to stop any risky borrowing by funds.
Recent figures from the Tax Office show funds with borrowings had tripled over the past four years.
The average loan size has doubled to $357,000 with commercial and residential property holdings now comprising more than 15% of total assets held by the $1.6 trillion self-managed super sector.
Property ranks as the third-largest allocation after cash and listed shares.
Greg Tanzer noted section 911A of the Corporations Act requires any person carrying on a financial services business in Australia to hold an AFS licence or be a representative of an AFS licensee.
A person provides a financial service if they provide financial product advice. 
Financial product advice is defined as a recommendation, a statement of opinion or a report of either of those things that is, or could reasonably be regarded as being, intended to influence a person’s decision in relation to a financial product. 
Providing financial product advice includes making a recommendation or a statement of opinion to a person to set up an SMSF or use an existing SMSF to purchase property through that SMSF. 
ASIC is concerned that, with the increased popularity of SMSFs and property investment, real estate agents and property advisers may not realise that they may be carrying on a business of providing financial product advice and may need an AFS licence, or authorisation under an AFS licence, when making recommendations or statements of opinion to a person to use an SMSF to invest in property. 
Where an AFS licence is required, unlicensed entities must immediately cease offering and providing financial services or advertising the provision of financial services until such time as an AFS licence is obtained or they become a representative of an AFS licence holder. 
A person convicted of carrying on an unlicensed financial services business may be subject to a fine of up to $34,000 or imprisonment for two years or both. If a company is convicted it may also be liable to penalties, including a fine of up to $170,000.
</body></html>

Charterhill collapse prompts warning for SMSF property promoters: ASIC

<html><body>
Savills have advised clients on what they see as the four advantages of utilising SMSF for direct commercial property investment, in preference to other asset classes.
<ol>
<li>Commercial property is one of the few assets that can be bought by an SMSF from its members. Your SMSF can potentially buy your own business premises and then you can pay rent to your SMSF. A residential property, on the other hand, cannot be lived in by a fund member or any fund members’ related parties, nor can it be rented by a fund member of any fund members’ related parties.  </li>
<li>
The MoneySmart website details the strict rules against using borrowed funds to make improvements to residential property that forms an asset in your SMSF portfolio, so don’t even think about buying a renovators’ delight. This can severely limit potential capital gains as you cannot renovate it to increase its value. In contrast, an investment such as a bulk storage unit or warehouse has very low capital expenditure requirements. 
</li>
<li>Commercial leases are typically for a longer period than residential leases – usually around five years with a further option for another five years with incremental rental increases built into the lease. If you choose the right property and tenants with stable businesses which are unlikely to be adversely affected by an economic downturn you won’t have to deal with a regular turnover of tenants and can rely on a steady rental return.  </li>
<li>Many industrial properties are purely functional in design and construction, so there is less concern about tenants maintaining them or investors having to pay for costly renovations, which is often the case with residential property investments. That said, it’s important to ensure any essential, expensive upgrades, such as those required to meet new fire safety or health and safety standards, have already been carried out before investing in a commercial premise.</li>
</ol>
Visit the <a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="Australian Securities and Investments Commission ASIC">Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)</a> website to familiarise yourself thoroughly with all the rules and regulations surrounding SMSFs and property investment.
</body></html>

Four reasons why commercial and industrial property suits SMSFs: Savills

<html><body>
Forget that supposed over-crowded black Mercedes van carrying around would-be Chinese buyers to prestige Sydney open for inspections.
An Australian expat has snapped up the grand 1904 Mosman merchant home, Rona (pictured above) for $8 million plus ahead of this weekend's Belle Property auction.
Some 60 parties had inspected Rona which sits on a 1,445 square metre Bradleys Head Road block.
The Miller family bought the property back in 1987 for about $2.1 million with the subsequent restoration and modernisation by architect Michael Suttor.
The founder of Millers Self Storage, who sold the business in 1999, now plan spend more time at their beef cattle property near Jugiong.
As I wrote last week, those expatriates are beginning to capitalise on the lower Australian dollar, especially when they are experts in the currency rollercoaster. 
ANZ Singapore based Eddie Listorti recently spent $6.55 million at Palm Beach, for a Sydney northern beaches holiday home. 
Designed by architect Michael Fountain, the three level house (pictured below) comes with 18 metre infinity pool with a floating observation terrace. Positioned on the beach side of Northview Road, with views that span the length of Palm Beach - north to the Lighthouse, south to the rock pool - it was sold by the Doughman family through LJ Hooker Palm Beach agents David Edwards and Amethyst McKee. 
<a href="https://palmbeach.ljhooker.com.au/2JZF6Z" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">It was listed</a> at $7.25 million last October.
<img src="/images/stories/2014/03/11/palm-beach-march-11-breakout.jpg" width="460">
In 2010 Eddie Listorti, former global head of fixed income, currencies and commodities at Dresdner Kleinwort, took the job as head foreign exchange and commodities at ANZ. His title is now ANZ's co-head of fixed income, currencies and commodities in Singapore. 
In 2010 he spent $6.5 million on a Mosman home,  Melleray, the Federation home situated on a 1,975 square metre block a few minutes from Mosman village. 
</body></html>

Expats emerging from hibernation as Mosman's Rona sold pre-auction for $8 million plus

<html><body>
An Australian Securities and Investments Commission report warns that while most advice given to SMSFs was "adequate" there were "pockets of poor advice".
Most of the poor pockets of advice arose from aggressive advertisements urging ill-suited investors to start a DIY fund and borrow to invest in real estate inside the fund.
"In the right hands, SMSFs can be very effective retirement savings vehicles," ASIC says.
"In the wrong hands, however, SMSFs can be high-risk.
"We do not want to see SMSFs become the vehicle of choice for property spruikers. Where we see examples of unlicensed SMSF advice, or misleading marketing, we will be taking regulatory action," ASIC commissioner Peter Kell says.
As the restrictions around borrowing to invest in real estate through a SMSF had been relaxed over recent years, ASIC noted the emergence of property spruikers touting the tax advantages of holding property inside superannuation's low tax environment.
Self-managed super funds represent the fastest growing superannuation sector in Australia, with $439 billion assets held by funds. 
Since their official introduction in 1999, the number of SMSFs has grown strongly with SMSFs now accounting for a third of total superannuation assets in Australia, with $439 billion in funds under management.
As at 30 June 2012, there were over 478,000 SMSFs, with approximately 913,550 members.
Kell said ASIC had ramped up its attention given its growing importance to more Australian investors.
"We want to help ensure that we have a healthy SMSF sector. "The decision to establish an SMSF is one of the most significant steps an investor can take in relation to their retirement savings.
"It involves taking greater personal responsibility for retirement investments.
"ASIC therefore wants to make sure those investors can be confident they can obtain good quality advice through gatekeepers such as accountants and financial planners," Kell said. "At the very least, investors need to understand the time, resources, compliance obligations and risks associated with do-it-yourself superannuation, before moving their superannuation savings out of an APRA-regulated environment," he said. ASIC conducted a review of over 100 investor files relating to the establishment of an SMSF considered to be in higher risk categories. "While most advice provided was rated as adequate there were pockets of poor advice," it found.
The majority of files we reviewed had a fund balance of $150,000 or less and included some, or all, of the following features:
 (a) older members (i.e. members at, or close to, retirement age); (b) members with a low income; (c) borrowing; and (d) investment in a single asset class (e.g. real property).
ASIC found issues in the following areas:
<ul type="disc">
<li>advice was not sufficiently tailored to the needs of the investor </li>
<li>replacement product disclosure was absent or inadequate </li>
<li>insurance recommendations were absent or inadequate </li>
<li>an inappropriate single asset class was provided to investors </li>
<li>suitable alternatives to an SMSF were not considered, and </li>
<li>there was inadequate consideration of the investor’s long-term retirement planning objectives. </li>
</ul>
 Kell said that ASIC is also particularly concerned about the rise in aggressive advertisements pushing property purchases through SMSFs. "We do not want to see SMSFs become the vehicle of choice for property spruikers.
"Where we see examples of unlicensed SMSF advice, or misleading marketing, we will be taking regulatory action." 
ASIC established an SMSF taskforce in September 2012 in response to an increase in geared investment strategies, increasingly aggressive advertising and the collapse of Trio and the subsequent Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services’ inquiry. 
</body></html>

ASIC states retirement incomes at risk from some SMSF property spruikers

Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.

Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;

David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;

“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;

Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;

At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.

Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.

Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.

David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.

“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;

Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;

Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;

However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.

Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;

Joel Robinson

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.

The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.

Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.

“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.

“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" />

Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.

The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.

“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.

“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" />

Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.

“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.

The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.

“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”

The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.

The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.

Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.

Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.

The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.

“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.

“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.

“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”

The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.

“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”

From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.

“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”

The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.

“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.

Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.

“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.

“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”

The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.

“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.

Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.

&nbsp;

Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

Jonathan Chancellor

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News