<html><body>
The Treasurer Scott Morrison has approved the $280 million sale of the Van Diemen’s Land Company to Chinese company Moon Lake Investments on the condition that it complies with Australian tax law.
The Foreign Investment Review Board approved the sale which would guarantee job retention and additional jobs.
The sale of Tasmania’s biggest dairy was previously agreed with TasFoods consortium but the New Plymouth District Council (NPDC), its New Zealand vendors, then accepted the better offer from Moon Lake.
Moon Lake's Lu Xianfeng said they wanted to further develop Australasia’s biggest dairy.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Van Diemen's Land Tassie dairy sale to Chinese by New Zealand owners

<html><body>
The Canterbury earthquakes of 2010-11 required a momentous recovery undertaking by the City of Christchurch in New Zealand. 
Thousands of tremors have been recorded since the February 22 earthquake that killed 185 people, injured thousands, destroyed more than 50% of the CBD and damaged tens of thousands of homes.
Five years on, what insight can we glean from the fallout?
The city faced enormous challenges. Many remain unresolved. The political approach of the national government to response and recovery has raised important issues for understanding the politics of disasters.
These issues are relevant elsewhere too as climate-related disasters become more frequent. This applies particularly in Australia, which has experienced widespread bushfires from Western Australia to Tasmania.
Christchurch is finally starting to enter a phase of sustained construction. The keenly awaited Margaret Mahy children’s playground has opened. Work has begun on government-led precincts and anchor projects in the central city.
Signs of progress and public discontent 
Despite the signs of progress, the government’s approach has caused simmering discontent in the local community.
My current research reveals this dissatisfaction is particularly with the actions of central government. Many people expressed displeasure at the treatment of residents in official processes. They say they felt dismissed and excluded – even deliberately left out of consultation and engagement.
Other studies have found that more than 75% of respondents disagreed with the government’s recovery priorities. And 59% believed the recovery to be a convenient excuse to push the government’s own agendas.
To understand these perspectives and why people are dissatisfied, it is necessary to explore what the government did. Almost immediately after the first big, but non-fatal, earthquake in September 2010, the government introduced legislation that gave a newly appointed earthquake recovery minister the power to amend almost any statute to support the recovery.
This move was met with concern. In particular, legal academics highlighted the unprecedented nature of the legislation and the truncated democratic process.
Under further legislation introduced after the February 2011 earthquake, the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) gained wide-ranging control of the recovery. In some cases, it took over projects managed by local authorities. The most prominent example is the creation of a unit within the CERA to manage the city centre rebuild, removing the task from the locally elected city council.
Other agencies also felt the effects of this approach. In early 2010, the government had removed the democratically elected officials of the regional council Environment Canterbury. The government later extended this arrangement until 2016, citing the earthquakes as one justification.
Community feels excluded by centralised powers
The removal of elected officials, along with the CERA legislation, are indicative of an approach to post-disaster politics that favours central government intervention and control.
While this upset many in the community, research conducted just before the earthquakes found existing legislation may not have been sufficient to manage some aspects of recovery from such a large disaster.
However, it must be asked why the earthquake recovery legislation did not adopt extensive parts of the New Zealand civil defence plan and strategy. These are highly regarded for their community-driven approach.
The primary provision for community engagement in the act is a 20-person committee appointed by the minister. The stories I have collected suggest that establishing such a powerful government department created a hierarchy which has emphasised a top-down, command-and-control approach.
That approach has excluded many individuals and community organisations. This, in turn, has contributed to feelings of disenfranchisement and disillusion. Unfortunately, this was exactly the situation some academics feared the creation of the CERA would create.
Grassroots-driven recovery gives hope 
Existing alongside these higher-level politics during the disaster recovery period is a thriving network of community and grassroots groups. Initiatives such as Greening the Rubble, Gap Filler and Agropolis have demonstrated the possibilities for citizen-led recovery.
Many residents, when interviewed, mentioned the importance of these organisations and their projects. Their successes had brought joy to their lives and restored hope for the future of the city.
The question then is: why can’t Christchurch lead its own recovery? A strong feeling exists in the city that the community can undertake this task. The community organisations that sprang up from the rubble have provided hope, social services and public spaces for those living through their own personal recovery alongside that of the city.
In my research, many people said they would have preferred to see a locally led recovery supported and resourced by central government, but with a more “hands-off” approach. Recent submissions from the public on the plan to replace CERA with another agency also demonstrate the community’s desire for more powers at the local level.
The lessons from Christchurch show the importance of social and political dynamics in shaping the experience of cities and their citizens in long-term disaster recovery. To carry out more democratic and community-focused recovery, authorities need to actively appreciate and collaborate with residents, organisations and communities.
Looking towards a future that seems destined to bring more bushfires, floods and cyclones, it is vital to understand how exceptional post-disaster political tools influence recovery. Of particular concern are those that challenge the democratic right to local participation and representation.
 
Raven Marie Cretney is a PhD Candidate, Disaster Studies and Urban Geography, RMIT University and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/raven-marie-cretney-171651" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
 
</body></html>

Christchurch five years on: have politicians helped or hindered the earthquake recovery?

<html><body>
This time every year, with the close of February approaching, we all dream of an endless summer. But according to our agents, the sun hasn’t set on the marketplace, and won’t for some time.
Spring and summer have traditionally been the major selling seasons for vendors, but conditions could turn that tradition on its head in the coming cooler months, especially with the recent strength seen in auction markets in both Sydney and Melbourne.
The numbers of people turning out to open-for-inspections have been very strong since the holidays wound up. Many buyers have been enticed by a slowdown in price growth across certain markets.
It is this very demand combined with positive economic fundamentals that will keep real estate markets humming along in 2016.
However, overzealous commentators trying to capture media headlines and mountains of data risk overloading and confusing consumers. It is, therefore, important that buyers and sellers not be swept up in the short-term outlook.
Ensure that you do what is right for your situation and your own investment strategy rather than trying to second-guess the timing of the market.
The best data to keep an eye on is that from your own street and neighbourhood.
Strong employment figures combined with the share market volatility and already historic low-interest rates should negate any “gloom and doom” talk directed towards property markets.
While buyers are out and about, listings are tightening in parts of the country. 
We can see this in Melbourne where a lack of stock has resulted in price growth of 2.5 percent In January, outperforming even Sydney (+0.5%). The figures from CoreLogic RP Data, released last week, could well indicate both these markets are bouncing back following a slow down at the end of last year. 
Overall the economic outlook remains positive with retail spending increasing and cheaper petrol adding more money to family budgets.
Homeowners have income to pay mortgages, interest rates are still low and affordability is improving. Some of these savings will be used by people to try and pay down their debt quicker. 
Homes will spend longer on the market as we return to more normal conditions but it doesn’t necessarily mean sellers will be disappointed with the final result. 
In fact, it could prove to be similar to what I have seen from our Harveys real estate business in New Zealand where prices in Auckland skyrocketed over the past 12 months, driven by migration. Prices there are now starting to moderate to a more sustainable level, as buyer demand turns to more affordable regional markets.
Grant Harrod is chief executive officer of LJ Hooker and can be contacted <a href="https://about.ljhooker.com.au/leadership-team" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

The sun hasn’t set on the marketplace: LJ Hooker's Grant Harrod

<html><body>
Scentre Group, owner and operator of Westfield Australia and New Zealand, has reported comparable specialty sales in the Australian portfolio grew 5.3% over the past 12 months, with average annual specialty sales of $10,826 per square metre (psm).
It noted strong sales performance was seen across most categories, with good increases in the fashion, footwear, jewellery, leisure, health and beauty, technology and cinemas categories.
Average annual specialty retail sales in New Zealand increased to NZ$12,117 psm, representing comparable specialty sales growth of 6.6% for the year.
In Australia, average specialty retail sales had been at $10,666 per square metre and comparable specialty store sales growth was 5.8% for the nine months to September.
In New Zealand, average specialty retail sales increased to NZ$10,534 per square metre, and comparable specialty store sales growth was 6.5% for the initial nine months.
 
Comparable property net operating income increased 2.6% for the 12 months, higher than the forecast range of 2.0 - 2.5%, reflecting lower vacancies and additional income streams. 
Scentre was spun out of the Westfield empire in 2014, and now runs the local malls. Westfield Corp runs the overseas malls.
It reported a 58.9 per cent drop in after tax profit to $2.71 billion for the full year, despite a 32.5 per cent jump in revenue to $2.87 billion. 
Funds from operations for the period was $1.199 billion. 
The group will pay a final dividend of 10.45c a security on February 29, taking the total dividend for the year to 20.9c. 
The results were for the 12 months to 31 December 2015. 
The Chairman of Scentre Group, Mr Frank Lowy said the rationale for the creation of Scentre Group has been validated with the strong results released today.
“Scentre Group’s pre-eminent portfolio and unique market position have provided a strong operating performance and excellent returns for security-holders since the Group was established as a separate entity.”
Scentre Group’s shopping centre assets saw significant revaluations of $1.5 billion during the year.
The value increase was driven by growth in underlying income, the completion of developments and a firming of capitalisation rates across the portfolio. The portfolio weighted average capitalisation rate reduced by 38 bp during 2015 to 5.57% reflecting the quality of the centres.
At 31 December 2015, Scentre Group had a balance sheet with total assets of $31.8 billion, a gearing ratio of 33.3% and liquidity of $3.7 billion.  
In 2015, the Group commenced $830 million (SCG share: $583 million) of redevelopments, including projects at Casey Central, Chatswood, Hurstville, Kotara, North Lakes and Warringah Mall.
“We have already opened the redevelopments at Chatswood, Hurstville, North Lakes and Kotara which are trading strongly. These developments will be accretive to earnings and create substantial long-term value,” chief executive officer of Scentre Group, Peter Allen, said
These recently opened developments featured new experiential precincts and offerings for shoppers and retailers with:
<ul>
<li>a “Hawker Lane” Asian dining market at Westfield Chatswood alongside a new five-level mall on Victoria Avenue including a flagship two level Topshop Topman, H&amp;M, Uniqlo, a relocated Rebel Sport and 40 new retailers.</li>
<li>an extensive ambience upgrade and a new rooftop dining and entertainment precinct at Westfield Hurstville, with a range of late-trading casual dining outlets, linking directly to the refurbished Event Cinemas. New retailers to the centre include a Woolworths supermarket, BIG W discount department store, JB Hi-Fi HOME, Cotton On Mega Store and Rebel Sport.</li>
<li>“The Marketplace” fresh food and “The Laneway” al fresco dining precincts at Westfield North Lakes. </li>
<li>A Hunter Valley-inspired outdoor dining and entertainment precinct, “The Rooftop”, featuring nine new restaurants, a performance stage, play area, and a new Event Cinemas complex at Westfield Kotara.</li>
</ul>
In 2016, the Group has commenced the $355 million redevelopment at Westfield Chermside, which will include the introduction of five international mini-major retailers, a broadening of the range and depth of the centre’s fashion offer as well as the largest lifestyle and entertainment precinct in an Australian centre. The centre will add 26,000 sqm of retail space bringing the total size to 156,643 sqm on completion.
At Westfield North Lakes the Group has also commenced the $140 million Stage 2 IKEA Link Mall project which connects a new IKEA-owned store with the existing centre. The development will include a new Kmart discount department store, JB Hi-Fi HOME, Rebel and approximately 50 new specialty stores over a single level with completion expected in December 2016.
Pre-development work continues across the portfolio and the Group maintains a forward development pipeline in excess of $3 billion.
During the year Scentre Group completed the sales of Figtree, Strathpine, Warrawong and North Rocks in Australia for gross proceeds of $783 million and also announced the sales of Glenfield, Queensgate and Chartwell in New Zealand for a total of NZ$549 million, the latter two being expected to settle in the first half of 2016. 
</body></html>

Increased speciality store sales, but stronger in NZ than Australia: Scentre 

<html><body>
The clifftop Rovina estate which was the season's top Portsea property offering, has been sold for $10.7 million, well above its $8 million-plus price guidance.
CoreLogic RP Data put <a href="/news">the seaside suburb's median house price</a> at a record $1.8 million.
The five bedroom home has a Mediterranean villa influence interpreted by society architect Geoffrey Sommers.
The eclectic home comes with a separate bluestone cottage at the 3808 Point Nepean Road holding on Fishermans Beach accessed via a private walkway. 
<a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-vic-portsea-121585322" target="_blank">Gerald Delany and Liz Jensen of Kay &amp; Burton had the property</a> inconjunction with Warwick Anderson and IIze Moran at RT Edgar.
It last sold in 1983 at $714,000 under mortgagee instructions through RT Edgar having previously traded at $450,000 in late 1977.
Businessman James O'Connor's 1983 sale came after his Mercedes dealership, Kew Star Motors hit some financing issues in the recession. 
The 1983 Rovina transfer paperwork was to Pacrana Pty Ltd, a company associated with Brighton businessman Brian Davis, the octogenarian 1950s founder of the Australian housewares company Décor Corp.
Rovina <a href="/news/rovina-headlines-portseas-summer-of-limited-2016-prestige-property-listings">headlined Portsea's summer of limited 2016 prestige property listings</a> in January.
 
</body></html>

Rovina at Portsea sells for $10.7 million

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Infrastructure Australia’s latest report, Australian Infrastructure Plan, is a substantial contribution to better infrastructure planning.
For our cities, it cogently argues for more compact settlement patterns and transport pricing reform. However, it has some substantial weaknesses.
<h2>Integrating land use and transport priorities</h2>
The report’s discussion about the need for more compact cities is impressive but falls into the same trap as the state governments it criticises for failing to adequately integrate land use development directions and transport priorities.
The Infrastructure Priority List is rather light on initiatives that will support development of Australia’s four largest cities as more compact cities, rather than just cities with a compact core.
For example, while many public transport projects are included, these are mainly rail projects focused on feeding central business districts. These are worthy projects that will improve services and promote agglomeration economies. However, they deal with only part of the overall public transport needs for development of more compact cities.
The report clearly recognises that higher-frequency public transport services will be needed more broadly across our cities. It includes some rail projects for growth areas and bus rapid transport in some locations. It does not focus sufficiently, however, on public transport, walking and cycling projects that will help the middle suburbs achieve their potential.
These are the areas where much more employment and residential development needs to take place if our cities are to become more compact. Supportive infrastructure, particularly public transport and active transport, is central to this goal.
Another illustration of the failure to adequately integrate land use and transport thinking is the discussion of servicing the outskirts of our cities.
A major reason these areas have infrastructure and service delivery problems is that their development densities are too low. Yet I found no reference to the need to increase densities in outer urban areas. This would help with issues such as the need to improve public transport services and associated cost-recovery rates.
<h2>Urban governance</h2>
There is useful discussion in the plan on governance matters but also a significant hole.
International conversations about cities currently emphasise the importance of someone being able to “speak for the city” and of cities having more financial autonomy. These matters are important for cities to have the resources to perform their roles more effectively and be more accountable for their performance.
The plan looks at the need to reform local government, as well as project planning and delivery arrangements, but does not consider the central governance question: “who speaks for our cities?”. This is a challenge that is fundamental to our cities' common difficulties of sustaining long-term land use transport plans.
The apparent answer is “state governments” at present, but the recent Sydney introduction of a Greater Sydney Commission is a very innovative step to strengthen partnerships between the state and local governments at city-wide level. This move is recognition that the right answer needs to be wider than simply the state government. New governance arrangements should have figured more prominently in the report.
 
On funding, the report cites London on a number of occasions. There is no better city to use as a model, given that its population is about what Sydney and Melbourne can expect in 40 years – and that nobody does it better. London has already resolved the problem of “who speaks for the city”.
Under the mayor’s leadership, London is pursuing greater financial autonomy. The city is using measures such as value capture quite aggressively to increase its financial autonomy. The plan discusses value capture to an extent, but it needs a stronger focus on this as a great funding opportunity for more autonomous and accountable cities.
<h2>Externalities and pricing reform</h2>
From a public transport perspective, the weak treatment of externalities is the biggest problem in the plan.
There is much discussion of congestion and recognition of potential issues of social disadvantage, but not much systematic recognition of other externalities of cities, particularly transport externalities. The assumption seems to be, for example, that:
<ul>
<li>
agglomeration economies (or wider economic benefits more broadly) will be recognised somehow and dealt with at an appropriate time in some way;
</li>
<li>
greenhouse gas emissions will be dealt with by whatever Australia decides to do to meet its international obligations;
</li>
<li>
air pollution externalities will be met by vehicle emission standards; and
</li>
<li>
accident and health externalities do not exist or are not important.
</li>
</ul>
This provides scant comfort for the pricing reform the plan proposes. Road pricing reform is about more than recovering infrastructure costs and making motorists aware of congestion costs.
It is about improving the efficient allocation of scarce resources by making road users (and public transport users) more accountable for all the net external costs attributable to their travel choices. This includes (for example) the air pollution costs that remain after emission standards are applied, the accident costs not covered by insurance, rising health costs from a lack of exercise linked to motor vehicle dependence, and the costs of greenhouse gas emissions.
The report should have been much stronger on all the externalities involved in all modes of transport being internalised within reformed transport pricing arrangements.
The plan cites evidence that Australia’s urban public transport cost-recovery rates are low by comparison with similar cities elsewhere. If road pricing reform is implemented and includes a wide range of external costs, the case for increasing these cost-recovery rates is defensible, on two conditions:
<ol>
<li>
measures are in place to support particular disadvantaged groups (which could be through government funding of targeted fare concessions); and
</li>
<li>
external benefits of public transport (for example, agglomeration economies) are recognised as warranting cost-recovery rates that are less than 100%.
</li>
</ol>
<h2>Road funding model</h2>
The discussion about reforming the road funding model is hard to evaluate because the treatment of external costs of vehicle use is too vague.
If those costs were all internalised, as they should be for more efficient asset use, then it would be a mistake to hypothecate all the revenue in the road funding model to roads. The payments for air pollution damage, health and accident costs, for example, would need to be separated and be available for other uses that help lower such external costs.
More broadly, the process of determining road infrastructure priorities should not be ultimately devolved to the board of a road funding entity. It should be subject to an integrated process of planning land use and transport, to which that board contributes. Elected politicians ought to remain the ultimate decision-makers on major works.
<h2>Infrastructure planning vs integrated planning</h2>
The plan’s discussion about long-term infrastructure planning being “an opportunity to improve the value of community engagement” needs to provide more clarity about just what this means.
If long-term integrated land use transport planning had been undertaken more effectively in Australian cities, we would not need separate infrastructure agencies at federal and state levels.
If the report is suggesting community consultation on strategic infrastructure planning that is separate to what should be happening around long-term land use transport plans, which are becoming increasingly broad in international best-practice cities, then we will have very confused communities.
The long-term process of planning integrated land use transport should be where strategic consultation takes place. Infrastructure would be one of the matters subject to consultation and infrastructure priorities one output from the planning process.
The fundamental discussion point needs to be what we want our cities to be like in 30 to 40 years' time. Transport and other infrastructure discussions and priorities should be placed in the context of creating those cities.
<h2>The market’s role in public transport</h2>
The plan argues for more competition in the delivery of public transport services.
The cost savings it cites are essentially from settings where a private operator replaces a public operator (the greater the savings, the more bloated the initial public operator). International experience is that subsequent rounds of market testing, once a private provider is in place, deliver few savings.
Furthermore, recent research by David Hensher, from the Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies at University of Sydney, suggests that if you have an efficient private operator operating under a negotiated performance-based contract, this will be as efficient as a tendered outcome. The report does not seem to be aware of these important nuances.
<h2>Improving the policy debate</h2>
Infrastructure Australia has done much to raise the quality of debate about infrastructure planning and delivery. Its Australian Infrastructure Plan continues this contribution.
However, so far as our cities are concerned, the effectiveness of the plan will be compromised unless Infrastructure Australia walks the walk in terms of land use transport integration. It needs to align its priorities much more comprehensively with its well-framed land use development directions, and take a broader perspective on pricing reform and associated funding and governance matters.
This is about better integration and delivery in the broadest sense.
John Stanley is adjunct professor, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The Business School, University of Sydney and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/john-stanley-115" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Australian infrastructure plan has some way to go to give our cities what they need

<html><body>
Following ASIC raising concerns, Urban Seed Project Marketing Pty Ltd (Urban Seed), Skybridge Portfolios (Skybridge) Pty Ltd and Tatnell DLS (Tatnell) Pty Ltd have taken steps to remove or amend potentially misleading representations about Self Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) in social media advertising.
Skybridge and Tatnell
Skybridge’s Facebook page included representations such as “Get yourself a SMSF for your Super – from $99, fully advised. No industry fund can compete with this” and “Want your Super Fund to replace your current income from work? You need to look at a SMSF – highest account balances out of all Super Funds.”
Tatnell’s YouTube videos included representations favourably comparing SMSFs to other superannuation funds without explaining or referencing the range of factors that will contribute to whether an SMSF is better performing or lower cost to consumers than industry and retail funds. 
ASIC was concerned that the representations made by Skybridge and Tatnell were potentially misleading about the benefits, risks and costs associated with SMSFs. Advertisements regarding financial products, including SMSFs, should give a balanced message about the returns, features, benefits and risks associated with a product. They should also not draw comparisons with other products without qualification or substantiation. 
Urban Seed
Urban Seed’s YouTube videos linked to a promotional website which included representations about “SMSF qualified” and “SMSF friendly” properties available for sale.
ASIC was concerned that the promotional website suggested that there was a category of property particularly suited to investment through an SMSF. Whether or not property is suitable for purchase through an SMSF will depend upon the investment strategy of the SMSF purchasing the property and the circumstances of the purchase. 
ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said, ‘Accuracy in advertising is integral to maintaining consumer trust and confidence in the SMSF sector. ASIC will continue to take action where we  see advertising that might mislead consumers, whether that advertising is on social media or more traditional media '
Skybridge, Urban Seed and Tatnell have all removed the relevant posts and videos, have ensured future marketing on social media will undergo appropriate review and approvals processes, and have fully cooperated in responding to ASIC's concerns.
Background
With the growing popularity of social media sites including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, social media has become an increasingly important channel for the promotion of financial products and services, including SMSFs. 
In 2012 in response to the growth in SMSFs, ASIC established the SMSF Taskforce. A specific focus of the taskforce has been misleading advertising of SMSFs. Particular problems identified include misleading or deceptive statements about SMSF fees, returns and risks. 
In 2014 and 2015 ASIC’s SMSF Taskforce expanded its work on SMSF advertising to include a review of online SMSF advertising through social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Youtube. 
Outcomes and actions stemming from the SMSF Taskforce include:
<ul>
<li>Following an ASIC investigation, Ms Sarah Jane Busteed was charged with three counts of dishonestly obtaining a financial advantage by deception and one count of dealing with over $100,000 that was the proceeds of crime (refer: 16-040MR);</li>
<li>Superannuation Warehouse Australia Pty Ltd was ordered to pay a penalty of $25,000 for false and misleading“Free SMSF Setup” advertising (refer: 15-332MR);</li>
<li>The Supreme Court of NSW found Park Trent Properties Group Pty Ltd had been unlawfully carrying on a financial services business for over five years by providing advice to clients to purchase investment properties through a SMSF (refer: 15-300MR);</li>
<li>Dixon Advisory Group Limited complied with two ASIC infringement notices, paying two $10,200 penalties after including potentially misleading claims on its website (refer: 15-207MR);</li>
<li>The credit licence of Queensland-based Smithson &amp; Baye was cancelled following an investigation into a property and SMSF promoting group (refer: 15-228MR<a href="https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2015-releases/15-228mr-asic-cancels-australian-credit-licence-of-queensland-company-involved-with-property-promoting-group/">)</a>;</li>
<li>ASIC released two information sheets to improve the quality of advice provided by advisers on  SMSFs: Information Sheet 205Advice on self-managed superannuation funds: Disclosure of risks (INFO 205) and Information Sheet 206 Advice on self-managed superannuation funds: Disclosure of costs <a href="https://www.asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/financial-services/giving-financial-product-advice/advice-on-self-managed-superannuation-funds-disclosure-of-costs/">(</a>INFO 206) (refer 15-192MR).</li>
<li>Omniwealth Services paid a $10,200 penalty for potentially misleading claims on its website (refer: 15-190MR);</li>
<li>The principal of Sherwin Financial Planners, Bradley Thomas Sherwin, was charged with fraud. The charges relate to the use of SMSFs of former clients of Sherwin Financial Planners (refer: 15-158MR);</li>
<li>The Federal Court of Australia ruled that Craig Gore and several other parties and financial services businesses, including Queensland-based ActiveSuper and Royale Capital, contravened sections of the Corporations Act or were knowingly concerned in those contraventions. (refer: 15-134MR);</li>
<li>Australian Financial Planning Solutions Pty Ltd paid $10,200 in penalties for potentially misleading SMSF ads (refer: 15-052MR);</li>
<li>ASIC banned the founder of the Charterhill Group of Companies, George Nowak, from providing financial services until 3 July 2017 on the basis that Mr Nowak is an undischarged bankrupt (refer: 15-048MR);</li>
<li>Interprac Financial Planning agreed to address ASIC concerns relating to advice provided to some clients about SMSFs (refer: 14-258MR);</li>
<li>Sentry Financial Services agreed to address ASIC concerns about SMSF advice provided to clients (refer: 14-109MR);</li>
<li>SuperHelp Australia paid a $10,200 penalty after making potentially misleading statements about the cost of setting up SMSF (refer: 14-051MR);</li>
<li>Media Super paid $10,200 in penalties for potentially misleading SMSF ads (refer: 14-001MR);</li>
<li>Spring Financial Group entered into an enforceable undertaking following ASIC concerns about the level of monitoring and supervision of its representatives (refer: 13-263MR);</li>
<li>Anne Street Partners agreed to engage an independent expert following ASIC concerns about SMSF advice provided to clients (refer: 13-248MR); and</li>
<li>publishing Report 337 Improving the quality of advice given to SMSF investors. (refer: 13-081MR).</li>
</ul>
SMSFs will continue to be a focus in ASIC's enforcement work. Most recently, following an ASIC investigation, one New South Wales woman appeared in court on four charges, in relation to self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) property purchases.
</body></html>

ASIC warn of $99 SMSF social media campaign 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Fishermans Bend is Australia’s largest urban renewal zone and has Melbourne’s biggest speculative apartment supply pipeline.
17,873 residential dwellings have been proposed in Fishermans Bend since January 2014, yet only one project, Gravity Tower has proceeded. More than 6,500 dwellings currently hold planning approval while a further 23 projects totaling 10,800 dwellings are still awaiting a decision.
So what’s the problem?
The 450 hectares of land located adjacent to Melbourne’s existing CBD is prime for residential living. It presents the growing city an opportunity to expand whilst alleviating current housing affordability concerns. The City of Melbourne is forecast to grow by 100,000 new residents per year and is earmarked as Australia’s largest city by 2051, overtaking Sydney.  Further, social trends to live in close proximity to Melbourne’s CBD have added existing pressure on dwelling supply across the inner ring.
Fishermans Bend was rezoned from an industrial use in 2012. In 2014 the existing Fishermans Bend Strategic Framework Plan was released. But the plan has caused large uncertainty over the precinct’s future livability, which has ultimately stifled development. Vague transport and infrastructure plans specifically have undermined confidence. As a result land owners have postponed construction and flipping approved development sites has become a common practice.
The newly elected Victorian Minister for Planning, the Hon Richard Wynne, is to reboot the plans with the intention to create a clear vision for the future Fishermans Bend community. Appointing the Fishermans Bend Advisory Committee (FBAC) in July 2015 was his first step.  Whilst the plans are not set to be finalised until the end of 2016 multiple amendments have already been made:
<ul>
<li>
Land coverage increased: An additional 250 hectare zone has been added to the Fishermans Bend precinct; labelled as the employment precinct.</li>
<li>
Neighbourhood planning: Individual localised structure plans will be devised for the four neighbourhood precincts of Wirraway, Sandridge, Lormier and Montague, in addition to the overarching plan.</li>
<li>
Interim mandatory height limits: previously discretionary height controls were made mandatory in April 2015.</li>
<li>
Proposed Transport infrastructure: The 2014 infrastructure plans for two metro stations and a tram extension from the western end of Collins Street across the Yarra River were never finalised. A new integrated transport plan will be developed.</li>
<li>
Alternative use of the Port of Melbourne: In 2015 the Victorian State government leased the Port of Melbourne on a further 50 year term putting redevelopment plans on hold.</li>
<li>
Public third party engagement: A draft Communications and Engagement Plan was released in September 2015 putting greater emphasis on community and stakeholder engagement.</li>
</ul>
The sheer magnitude of potential development activity is a major challenge. Docklands, Melbourne’s most recent urban regeneration precinct is 20 years into its urban renewal and has witnessed a mere 5,300 apartments developed in this timeframe.
A multitude of factors will still need to be overcome by the refreshed plans to ensure Fishermans Bend emerges as a complementary mini city to the world’s most livable city, MELBOURNE.
<a href="/images/2016/02/22/Picture2_10Feb2016.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/02/22/Picture2_10Feb2016.jpg" alt="">
Annabelle Atkins is Research Analyst for JLL in Australia and can be contacted <a href="https://www.jllapsites.com/research/author/annabelle-atkins/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Melbourne’s hot spot for future apartment supply: Annabelle Atkins

<html><body>
One of Melbourne's most iconic trophy homes, Lalor House has been listed with $5 million plus.
The house was built in 1888 for Joseph Lalor, the doctor son of Eureka Stockade rebellion leader and politician Peter Lalor, who died in the house a year later.
The property is on the market for the first time in 50 years.
Designed by American architect William George Woolf, 293 Church Street has a classical Italiante facade and Jellis Craig Richmond agent Andrew Macmillan thinks it could be a private hotel, office or art gallery.
Set on 1135 sqm, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/jelliscraig/photos/pb.223320834501948.-2207520000.1456006561./529830753850953/?type=3&amp;theater" target="_blank">the five bedroom brick mansion</a> has been home of the Morton's and was used as a medical practice up until 1973.
Expressions of interest close March 22.
Jellis Craig Richmond says it should set a new price benchmark for the suburb. 
The current record of $5.13 million is held by Araluen, a five-bedroom 1856 mansion at 207 Lennox Street, which sold in 2015.
 
 
</body></html>

The 1880s classic Lalor House, Richmond set for listing

<html><body>
Architect Conrad Johnston and his wife Katrina have sold their Balmain home.
The <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-balmain-121742926" target="_blank">Stewart Place home</a> was a 100 year old worker’s cottage before its 2009 makeover.
Set on a sloping 241sq m block, the Fox Johnston architects director bought the property for $860,000 in 2006 then added a modern open-plan extension.
The original cottage now contains three bedrooms overlooking gardens ­designed by Daniel Baffsky from 360 Degrees Landscape.
On the second level there is a bedroom with ensuite and an adjoining study.
The interiors have green walls and an internal atrium.
The home sold ahead of its weekend auction having been listed with a price guide of $2.4 million to $2.5 million through Cobden &amp; Hayson agent Peter Gordon, with it selling at $2.5 million plus.
This article was first published in the Sunday Telegraph.
</body></html>

Fox Johnston Balmain workers cottage reno snapped up pre-auction

Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Joel Robinson

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

When buying an apartment, most people compare the big-ticket items first. Floorplans. Kitchens. Balcony size. Natural light. The view.

But there's one everyday consideration that often doesn't come up until after moving in: how parcels are delivered.

As online shopping has become part of everyday life, parcel deliveries have shifted from an occasional event to a regular occurrence. Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally.

For apartment residents, that can present a challenge.

If nobody is home to accept a delivery, parcels may be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in a building lobby or common area, or require building management to step in. In higher-density buildings, where dozens or even hundreds of residents may receive deliveries each day, parcel management has become an increasingly important part of everyday living.

That can create a range of frustrations. A missed delivery often means making time to collect a parcel elsewhere, while packages left unattended in foyers or mail areas can create clutter and increase the risk of theft. What seems like a minor inconvenience can quickly become a recurring issue for residents who shop online regularly.

It's one of those details that rarely features in a display suite but can have a noticeable impact once residents move in.

As a result, buyers are beginning to look beyond traditional apartment features and consider how a building supports day-to-day convenience, including whether there are secure options for receiving deliveries.

Australia Post's Parcel Lockers provide one solution.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CkF2oKmlACg?si=C50sDaoUUn2nuLmq" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than having a parcel delivered directly to an apartment, eligible deliveries can be sent to a nominated Parcel Locker. Once the parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can collect it using a QR code or one-time PIN at a time that suits them.

The Parcel Locker network now includes more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with installations at Post Offices, shopping centres, transport hubs and an increasing number of residential developments. By providing a secure collection point, Parcel Lockers help reduce missed deliveries and avoid parcels being left unattended in common areas.

For developers, parcel infrastructure is becoming another way to improve the resident experience. Rather than relying on concierge staff or leaving parcels in communal spaces, secure collection points help streamline deliveries while preserving the presentation and functionality of shared areas.

For buyers, it's a reminder that the best apartment features aren't always the most obvious.

A generous floorplan or quality finishes might help narrow the shortlist, but the conveniences that simplify everyday life, whether that's EV charging, secure bike storage or reliable parcel delivery, often become the features residents appreciate most once they're living there.

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hg-developments">HG Developments</a> is doubling down on Maud Street in Newstead, filing plans for a new apartment tower just a few doors down from its under-construction Aire Newstead development.

Recently submitted to Brisbane City Council, the proposal is for an 18-storey building designed by bureau^proberts, which has drawn heavily on Brisbane's subtropical design principles while referencing the suburb's industrial heritage.

A total of 64 apartments are planned for the amalgamated 1,518 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/17-21-maud-street-newstead-qld-4006">17–21 Maud Street</a>, a short walk from the Brisbane River and Newstead Riverwalk.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a400c7fd-bd15-48f8-a63b-10ede92efe00" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20bldg.png?VersionId=.0vPmjpbC7CNP7kqGWa6L7rGIwsNExaw" />

"The building is defined by a series of vaulted motifs that reinterpret the arches, colonnades and layered facades evident throughout Newstead's historic built fabric," the Urban Design Report states.

"Combined with recessed glazing and generous balconies, these elements create a layered building envelope that provides shade, weather protection and opportunities for natural ventilation whilst establishing a distinctive architectural identity."

The proposal comprises 64 two, three and four-bedroom apartments across 18 residential levels, positioning it alongside a growing number of taller residential projects transforming Newstead's northern precinct. The tower incorporates extensive subtropical landscaping, with cascading planter boxes, deep planting at street level and a landscaped rooftop recreation area.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="1d8140f4-8b98-45cd-b1b8-1efe8c8e266b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20podium.png?VersionId=VAZtbCoD44YCJ57N99fQCAKeSJx7ldZs" />

Bureau Proberts has prioritised passive environmental design throughout the project, with generous balconies, recessed glazing and operable façades helping reduce solar heat gain while maximising natural ventilation. River views become available from the upper levels, while the building has been orientated to capture prevailing breezes from both the Brisbane River and the west.

The architects say landscape is intended to be integral to the building rather than an applied element.

"Vertical greenery, cascading planter boxes and elevated gardens are woven throughout the architecture, softening the built form and strengthening the connection between residents and the subtropical environment."

"Through the integration of landscape, high-quality materials and passive design principles, the development delivers a refined residential address that celebrates Newstead's heritage character while contributing positively to Brisbane's evolving subtropical identity."

Newstead has remained one of Brisbane's most active apartment markets in recent years, with a number of developers continuing to back the inner-city suburb.

HG Developments is currently delivering the 40-apartment Aire Newstead at 25 Maud Street. Fortis recently launched the 65-apartment <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> on Kyabra Street, while builder-developer BPG and Don O'Rorke's Consolidated Properties are both expected to launch their respective Newstead projects before the end of the year.

HG Developments doubles down in Newstead with second Maud Street apartment development

Walk past a new apartment development promoting its sustainability credentials and it's easy to picture rooftop gardens, mature trees, landscaped courtyards and residents surrounded by nature.

But in many cases, that's not actually what those sustainability ratings guarantee.

Australia's leading environmental rating tools have played a significant role in improving the energy efficiency and environmental performance of buildings. Yet despite their focus on reducing emissions, many don't require developers to include trees, biodiversity or meaningful green space.

In other words, a building can achieve one of the country's highest sustainability ratings while containing little more than concrete, glass and hard landscaping.

That disconnect has led to the emergence of a new movement across Australia's property industry: nature-based cities.

The concept goes beyond designing buildings that consume less energy. Instead, it encourages developers to treat nature as essential infrastructure, integrating biodiversity, tree canopy, living landscapes and green spaces into projects from the earliest stages of planning.

Research has consistently linked access to nature with better physical and mental health, cooler neighbourhoods, improved biodiversity, stronger climate resilience and more connected communities. As Australia's cities continue to become denser, advocates say those outcomes should be considered just as important as energy efficiency.

Nature Based Cities (NBC) was established in 2022 to help accelerate that shift.

Founded by Hamton Executive Chairman Paul Hameister OAM, the not-for-profit was created after research highlighted a significant gap in Australia's sustainability framework. While existing environmental rating tools rewarded energy performance and emissions reductions, they placed little emphasis on the inclusion of living landscapes.

"We've always wanted to do more, and we know other developers who want to do more, but the ESD rating tools just aren't there," Hameister says.

"In Australia, you can have a five-green-star rated building that's concrete and glass with not a blade of grass.

"The focus is on reducing emissions, which is laudable, but there hasn't been enough attention paid to protecting and re-establishing nature. We need both for the health of the environment and for communities."

Since its launch, NBC has developed independent design guidelines and accreditation frameworks that encourage developers to prioritise ecology, biodiversity, tree canopy, walkability and living landscapes alongside traditional sustainability measures. The organisation first focused on medium and high-density residential developments before recently expanding into precinct-scale communities and masterplanned neighbourhoods.

Jan Talacko, founder of sustainability consultancy Ark Resources and a member of the Nature Based Cities Advisory Council, says the initiative addresses an area that has largely been overlooked by the property industry.

"Throughout my 25 years of working collaboratively with all stakeholders in the property sector, I've always favoured a pragmatic approach to sustainable design which encourages initiatives that not only meet environmental expectations but also improve amenity," Talacko says.

"Whilst we are making steady progress in relation to energy and carbon emissions from buildings, there has been much less emphasis on encouraging biodiversity and tackling the urban heat island effect.

"The Nature Based Cities initiative responds to a gap in the suite of tools currently used by the property development sector, which don't provide sufficient incentive, or recognition, for the integration of landscaping and greenery."

For apartment buyers, the shift is also changing the questions worth asking.

Rather than assuming a sustainable building will naturally include abundant green space, buyers are increasingly being encouraged to look beyond environmental ratings and ask what nature is actually being delivered. How much tree canopy will the development create? Has biodiversity been considered? Are landscaped spaces designed for people as well as appearance?

As Australia's cities continue to grow upwards and outwards, the next generation of sustainability may not simply be measured by lower emissions, but by how successfully developments bring nature back into everyday urban life.

Jonathan Chancellor

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News