<html><body>
The majority of apartments in Melbourne are failing to meet all the minimum requirements, according to Secret Agent’s latest report.
Secret Agent said compared recently built apartments with the Better Apartments Design Standards and found inner Melbourne's apartments lacking.
"What we found only confirmed our intuitive assumptions of inner Melbourne’s apartments: they’re generally hard to live in,” the report stated.
"Of the 3000 apartments that were surveyed only 9 passed.
“While our full report dove into detail about each standard, this bulletin sums up the results of the overall study to shed light on the bigger picture (see Table 1).
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/03/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-03%20at%2012.11.00%20pm.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/03/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-03%20at%2012.11.00%20pm.jpg" alt="">
"We sampled 3000 apartments built in the last 6 years across 21 suburbs in Melbourne.
"Overall, 99.7 percent (2,991 apartments) failed to meet all the minimum requirements.
"Only 9 apartments passed the seven standards we assessed (main bedroom dimensions, smallest bedroom dimensions, living room dimensions, private open space, windows, room depth, storage).
"Out of these, 4 were 1 bedroom units, and 5 had 2 bedrooms,” the report advised.
The group then went to list the errors or faults that they found in the surveyed apartments.
Private open space
94.2 percent (2,826 apartments) had balconies that were too small, or had none at all.
Bedroom and living room dimensions
92.3 percent (2,770 apartments) were too small in terms of both bedrooms and living rooms, failing to meet all minimum dimensions.
Accessibility
84 percent (2,520 apartments) had either bathrooms or corridors that were too small. These failed accessibility standards.
Natural ventilation
70 percent (2,100 apartments) were not well-ventilated. Most of these only had windows on one side of the apartment, with the opposite wall facing the internal corridors.
Windows
52 percent (1,560 apartments) did not provide adequate sunlight to bedrooms. More than half of our sample either had no windows to their bedrooms, or had ‘snorkel’ windows that were deeper than allowed.
Room depth
15.6 percent (468 apartments) were too deep, reducing natural light in parts of the living and dining areas,” the report stated.
For more information, <a href="https://secretagent.com.au/">click here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Majority of Melbourne apartments fail to meet minimum requirements: Secret Agent

<html><body>
The 2017 Budget may make downsizers delay the sale of the family home - and not just because the new scheme doesn't start until July 2018.
Individuals who are already 65 and thinking of selling their home have been urged to consider putting off a sale at least until the legislation has been approved so they don't miss out on an opportunity to top up their super accounts, tax advisers said. 
Under the proposal, retirees will each be able to inject up to $300,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the family home into super, three times the new annual limit for post-tax contributions.
They will be able to make the contribution even if they have more than $1.6 million in super savings with any amount over $1.6 million needing to be placed in an accumulation rather than a pension account.
While financial advisers have expressed doubt the scheme would be widely used by retirees looking to downsize, there is another likely delay within the mix.
Australians in their late 50s or early 60s could also be expected to delay the sale of the family home if they are confident of becoming self-funded retirees.
Individuals in their late 50 and 60s might also decide to delay a sale of the family home until they turn 65, if they have other assets that they would like to get into super in the interim.
Of course any net proceeds from the sale of the family home will still be included in the assets test for the age pension, which Mark Beveridge, director of Superfund Partners, told The Australian Financial   Review was a major barrier for many retirees wanting to move to a smaller residence.
Following the changes to the pension rules that came in effect in January, for every additional $100,000 of assessable assets, an age pensioner stands to lose $7800 a year of CentreLink income.
Yesterday Property Observer reported on how the budget encourages older residents to downsize.
Last month Property Observer reported on how downsizing will be an important topic in the Budget.
</body></html>

Budget may make downsizers delay big family home sale for a year or even longer

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/77101/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
The measures in the 2017-18 Federal Budget targeting the supply of lower-cost rental housing are limited.
There are no significant funding increases to social housing and homelessness services. There is no increase in rent assistance to help low-income renters in the private rental market.
Capital gains tax and negative gearing settings remain largely untouched, and the proposed bond aggregator will support expansion of housing aimed at very specific groups. 
For the majority of Australia’s renters, housing will remain unaffordable, insecure and out of reach.
<h2>Community housing</h2>
If private investors get on board, the bond aggregator may help boost the supply of affordable and community housing by providing cheaper financing to community housing providers.
These two forms of housing are extremely important. However, they do little to help most renters.
Eligibility requirements for community housing mean many who require low-cost housing, where rent is calculated at between 25 percent and 30 percent of household income, are not able to gain access.
Single older women are among the fastest-growing group of homeless people in Australia. However, most are unable to access community housing because the only eligibility benchmark they meet is their low-income status. 
Women not leaving situations of domestic violence or who do not have a recognised disability will find it difficult to qualify for housing before they reach homelessness.
The private rental market these women face is obscene. There is extremely low housing security with the risk of eviction when the standard lease agreement (of six and 12 months) runs out. High rents place sufficient, nutritious food out of reach of their budget, and they face difficulties paying power bills.
Time spent bringing up children, the gendered pay gap and – for some – relationship breakdown are among the factors that lead to this housing experience.
Long waiting lists for social housing and eligibility restrictions mean this year’s budget proposals are likely to fail this group.
<h2>Affordable housing</h2>
The second target of the bond aggregator is affordable housing. This is housing that is rented at between 75% and 80% of market rent. It is often described as “key worker” housing, where teachers, ambulance drivers and police officers can live.
Affordable housing has an important place in the housing system. However, below-market rents in central, work-rich regions are still extremely high and out of reach for many.
Of more concern, it is unlikely that many of these lower-income workers would be able to maintain their high rents at retirement. This generates two risks:
<ul>
<li>
that the renter is evicted and forced to find housing on the private market, which puts them at high risk of homelessness
</li>
<li>
that the housing provider continues their commitment to house the tenant securely once their income drops, so the risk here is to the housing provider’s bottom line. They will face a loss of income, as they drop rents from 80% of market value to around 30% of the retired person’s pension.
</li>
</ul>
<h2>First home buyers</h2>
The budget tips its hat to first home buyers; prospective buyers will now be allowed to save up to A$30,000 at a reduced tax rate. But this is barely one-quarter of a standard 20% deposit for most apartments in Sydney.
Renters who aspire to home ownership and have sufficient income to service a mortgage may benefit from this measure. However, it will do little for the large number of low- and moderate-income households. For this group, spiralling housing costs put home ownership well out of reach.
It is also possible that this measure will add to inflationary pressure on housing prices by boosting demand for entry-level homes. Existing owners who are selling their homes would be the primary beneficiaries.
<h2>What’s missing?</h2>
There remains a need for courageous government action to tackle the structural inequities in the housing market. 
Removing tax incentives that keep investor heat in the market will be essential – and so will increases to social housing budgets.
Investment in a large stock of secure low-cost social housing should be prioritised. Failing this, there will be a need to increase rent assistance payments, particularly in high-cost regions. 
But this is far from ideal. More rent assistance will help renters in the short term, but amounts to a subsidy for private landlords in the long term.
<h2>Does the government care?</h2>
Underpinning much budget analysis is a sense that government should be concerned with the needs of the disadvantaged. Sociologist Keith Jacobs argues we should disavow ourselves of that view, describing housing policy in Australia as a “form of reverse welfarism that exacerbates social inequality”. 
Jacobs argues:
… the state should be understood as an agency that sustains the conditions necessary for the finance industry, developers and real estate agents, along with well-off householders and landlords, to reap profits.
The failure of the 2017 budget to tackle tax measures that support individual private investment, and its emphasis on funding social and affordable housing through market investment mechanisms while providing little direct support at the bottom end of the market, does little to challenge this argument.
Emma Power is senior Research Fellow, Geography and Urban Studies, Western Sydney University and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/emma-power-250930" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Is this the budget that forgot renters?

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Stop eating smashed avocado. Stop taking overseas holidays. Live with your parents, save harder and set your sights lower – why don’t you just buy an apartment? The advice to millennials about how to afford the Australian dream of home ownership is as gratuitous as it is patronising.
New research from CoreLogic shows that owning an apartment as a “forever home” is largely a myth in Australia and not much of an option for millennials who are increasingly dependent on their parents for help to enter the property market.
The Perceptions of Housing Affordability Report identifies that while 72 percent of us live in houses, apartment dwellers make up just 15 percent of the population. Add to that duplexes and townhouses and the number of people living in shared title accommodation is still small at 28 percent. 
The data also shows there are just over 152,600 units currently under construction across Australia – 85 percent more than the decade average and virtually double the 30 year average. 
So why don’t millennials just buy into this cheaper housing stock?
There are multiple reasons. The first is that the data also shows that apartments – despite their lower prices when compared to houses - are still significantly more expensive and harder to afford than 15 years ago. The price to income ratio of apartment ownership across Australia is currently 6.6x income for units now compared with 4.8x 15 years ago. Back in 2002, it was not unheard of to snap up a unit within 10km from the city for under $300,000. Now, in Sydney and Melbourne, the figure is closer to $750,000.
The second reason is that saving for a unit is equally difficult. It now takes 1.3 years of average annual income to save the deposit for an apartment compared to 1 year back in 2002. And that’s not “just put some money aside for a year and a bit”. That means put every cent you get into a saving account until you reach 20 percent (and then save some more to cover stamp duty and other costs). You can see therefore for those who want to eat, put petrol in their car or have a roof over their head in the meantime, the time it takes to pull a deposit together can blow out.
According to the CoreLogic research, the biggest impediments preventing Millennials from buying a property are most likely to be finding the deposit (49 percent), interest rates (44 percent) and a combination of certainty of employment and getting loan approval (41 percent each).
The third reason is that the majority of stock currently under construction is not actually intended as long term occupancy. Most is high rise units and most developments currently under construction are one and two bedrooms, making it more suitable to investors and singles, rather than young families. 
Developers are building to where the demand is. Investors have historically comprised of 33 percent to 40 percent of housing demand however the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows investors comprised closer to 50 percent of new mortgage demand nationally. 
Despite the emphasis on “rentvesting”, Millennials are the least likely to own an investment property (12 percent) compared to 19 percent for Gen X and 18 percent for Baby Boomers. Investment properties are also more likely to be owned by families with children living at home. It turns out investment properties are most likely to be owned by families with children aged 5-17 (22 percent), indicating that property is an important family investment strategy.  
So simply legislating to reduce the numbers of investors in the market so owner occupiers can step in, needs to be carefully managed. Investors affect the availability and therefore cost of rental accommodation and as we move through an unprecedented ‘boom’ in apartment construction, investors play a critical role in absorbing new unit supply and ensuring off the plan sales transition smoothly to settlement.  
All of this means that cashed up Baby Boomers and late Gen Xers, who are more likely to have paid off their home, more likely to have significant equity that they are looking to invest, and more capable of raising a deposit are the property winners if they are capable of servicing a mortgage. 
But there is no such thing as a free smashed avocado breakfast. The cost of this bounty will are children who stay at home longer with 21% not expecting now to move out until they are at least 30 and a further 38 percent expecting to move out between 25-29. 
Waiting til Mum and Dad either pop off the perch and leave them an inheritance, or stump up to help them fund their move, is now a real option for 30% of Australians, meaning housing affordability really is becoming a life/death issue.
 
Kylie Davis is the head of property services marketing at CoreLogic and the author of the CoreLogic Perceptions of Housing Affordability Report 2017. She can be contacted <a href="https://solutionsblog.rpdata.com/author/kylie-davis/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Millennials, apartment living and the myth of smashed avocado: Kylie Davis

<html><body>
SPONSORED POST
Savills has recently unveiled the findings of its 2017 Tech Cities research programme, which aims to understand the diverse factors that make places good locations for the tech sector. 
The Tech Cities programme currently measures 22 global centres against more than 100 individual metrics, but for the first time in 2017 Tech Cities has also considered how each city performs on buzz and wellness.
Cities attract young tech talent who increasingly want to live in dynamic, healthy neighbourhoods within walking or cycling distance of the office. The Tech Cities ‘buzz and wellness index’ specifically looks to capture these qualities and identify the liveable cities that deliver what this demographic desires by measuring ‘buzz’ (i.e. nightlife, entertainment and cultural offer), ‘wellness’ (i.e. pollution levels, quality of parks, healthcare, commuting times) and the cost of living (excluding property costs) in each location. 
These new metrics have seen some changes to the cities included in the programme, with Melbourne appearing for the first time as the top tech city in Australia. When looking specifically at buzz and wellness, Melbourne ranks 16th on city buzz, 13th on cost of living and 3rd for wellness.
The trade-off between buzz and wellness
Cities with high buzz scores tend to have great bars, clubs, restaurants, shops, music venues and museums, and radiate excitement and creativity. 
But buzzy cities can have downsides: being popular on a world stage tends to lead to high property and living costs, and can lead to overcrowding and congestion. This could lead to younger generations of talent increasingly looking for something different as more young workers aim to strike a better balance between living in fun, energetic cities and maintaining their physical and mental health. Buzz alone may not be enough to attract these potential workers to a city, many of whom are either already employed or are looking to start careers in tech and its related industries.
That’s why it’s also important to look at wellness in a city - low crime and pollution rates, quality parks and public spaces, and low congestion. Copenhagen, Stockholm and Melbourne are at the top of this list.
While there’s often a trade-off between ‘buzz’ and ‘wellness’, Amsterdam and Toronto balance the two. Occupiers looking to attract the new generation of talent therefore need to pay close attention to such factors when looking for new locations
Looking at the future, we suspect it is these cities which can balance both factors (representing shorter commutes, easier access to amenities and a better work/life balance), that will move up the rankings in future iterations of Tech Cities.
City Buzz and Wellness index
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/08/Buzz-and-wellness-Index-2017.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/08/Buzz-and-wellness-Index-2017.jpg" alt=""> 
City Buzz + Wellness + Cost of Living index*
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/08/City-buzz-wellness-index-separate-2017.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 <img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/08/City-buzz-wellness-index-separate-2017.jpg" alt="">
*Each of the three components is weighted then averaged together to get the final index score.
Source: Savills World Research, Tech Cities 2017. 
More Information
<a href="https://www.savills.co.uk/tech-cities" target="_blank">Savills Tech Cities</a> 2017 programme aims to understand the diverse factors that make places a good location choice for the tech sector; examining 22 global centres which have thriving and growing tech industries, home grown start-ups and incubators, and are at the top of global shopping lists for tech companies looking for space in which to locate. 
Savills is a leading global real estate service provider offering the full spectrum of services from strategic advice to managing assets and projects and transacting deals. To learn more about Savills, visit <a href="https://www.savills.com.au" target="_blank">savills.com.au</a>.
</body></html>

What buzz and wellness mean to a tech city: Savills 

<html><body>
An ATO rule was introduced to catch foreign sellers taking money overseas.
But it was applied to all Australian sellers of $2 million-plus properties - and will now cover all sales above $750,000 in an expanded audit which will also catch local hidden black market property sellers.
The rule classifies all sellers as overseas investors unless they get a special tax clearance.
That means that all buyers of $750,000 plus properties must deduct 10 percent from the purchase price and pay that amount to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) unless the seller can furnish a tax clearance. 
The rule will affect everyone, including Australians, despite being aimed at overseas investors taking their property windfalls overseas.
The measure can be traced back to the days when former treasurer Joe Hockey caved into pressures to curb Chinese investment in Australian residential property in 2015.
In the process, the treasurer was convinced by the Australian Taxation Office to widen the net to cover local residents.
According to an ATO fact sheet, in May 2013, the government announced that it would introduce a 10 percent non-final withholding tax on payments made to foreign residents who dispose of certain taxable Australian property with a market value above a specified $2 million threshold.
The new legislation for this measure became law in February 2016.
The $2 million rule applied to vacant land, buildings, residential and commercial property, leaseholds and strata title schemes.
The ATO website says, "The government is strengthening our foreign resident capital gains tax (CGT) regime to assist in the collection of foreign residents' liabilities."
A purchaser who does not receive a “clearance certificate” from the vendor and does not send 10 per cent of the purchase price off to the ATO will be liable to pay that 10 percent to the ATO plus
In the majority of cases, local resident vendors will have no problem obtaining a clearance certificate, but it might increase the risk of a tax audit for property sellers who:
<ul>
<li>Have not filed tax returns for many years;</li>
<li>Have filed tax returns, which would indicate they could not afford such a property;</li>
<li>Are selling their residential house at the same time as their neighbours to a single developer, which may give rise to a profit making scheme (such that the principal residence capital gains tax exemption may not apply to the value uplift generated by selling the properties together); or</li>
<li>Where the ATO has gathered information that indicates the vendor is in the business of developing property, which means that the principal residence capital gains tax exemption may not apply.</li>
</ul>
It was inevitable that over time, the ATO would shift their audit target identification processes to lower than $2 million-plus property vendors.
If the vendor has a tax debt, the application for a “clearance certificate” may in some circumstances involve the ATO seeking to recover some or all of that tax debt from the purchaser by way of a garnishee notice. 
In June of last year Property Observer reported on the obligations for seller and buyers for $2 million plus clearance certificates.
Similarly in June last year Property Observer reported on new legislation on the sale of $2 million plus homes.
Property Observer also reported in May last year about the upcoming ATO legislation that will affect sales of $2 million.
Property Observer commented on how the new ATO rule on property deals for $2 million houses will affect Chinese buyers.
</body></html>

All $750,000 plus property sales to be caught in ATO audit aimed at overseas investors

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The Federal Government has achieved a good balance between encouraging more housing supply as well as policies that make housing more affordable.
Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison, has carefully balanced the need to boost housing supply with policy levers that make housing more affordable in this year’s budget.
To unlock housing supply the budget allocates $1 billion for critical infrastructure along with $70 billion for transport infrastructure while working with the states to reform planning systems to speed up development.
To encourage more affordable housing the budget has lifted the Capital Gains tax discount to 60 percent where private investment is made in affordable housing.
This will be a real incentive for the development industry to invest in this area particularly if the bond aggregator through the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation is available to the private sector.
The proposal to have Managed Investment Trusts to develop affordable housing to hold for rent for more than ten years is another positive move.
The proposal to encourage older people to downsize from large houses through allowing up to $300,000 from the sale of a house to be invested in a superannuation fund is a good way to facilitate this process.
By not overacting in the areas of negative gearing and the potential to reduce capital gains tax reductions on property, the Government has clearly understood the sensitivities in the role of investors in maintaining a viable rental housing market.
To pull policy levers in an aggressive manor could lead to a devaluation in the main asset that many families rely on in their own home.
The establishment of the Western Sydney Airport Corporation with funding of $5.3 billion to drive this important game changer project for Sydney is important in maintaining the momentum for this giant project.
The allocation of $1.7 billion through the Asset Recycling Fund to the Sydney Metro project will help progress this important infrastructure that will underpin where new urban development can be located in metropolitan Sydney.”
We are impressed with the careful balance the federal budget has achieved between stimulating much needed housing supply while developing policies that help with housing affordability.
As indicated in the budget papers the state governments will now need to reform their planning systems to ensure more homes are built more quickly for Australian families.
The Federal Government in working with the states on planning reform must question why New South Wales standards for apartments are so much higher than those in other states.
The well-meaning but expensive standards in the NSW Apartment Design Guide are adding around $100,000 to the cost of an average apartment above that of other states.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the federal and state governments to achieve reforms to planning systems that can speed up development.
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI">here</a>.
</body></html>

2017 Budget a good balance for housing supply and affordability: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
Young first home buyers willing to save are the big Budget winners thanks to a simple superannuation top-up scheme that offers generous tax breaks.
The Budget also offers the elderly an incentive to down-size homes with tax breaks too.
Treasurer Scott Morrison has shown no restraint on taxing foreigners either – which is a big revenue earner.
And Aussie investors will lose travel expense claims when they inspect their investment property interstate. This measure will save about $200 million annually.
The headline housing measure kicks in from July 1 when the first-home buyer can salary sacrifice into their super account above their already hefty compulsory contribution.
For Sydney buyers, there’s an issue with the low cap as The First Home Super Savers Scheme limits total contribution to $30,000 per person or $60,000 a couple, so the bank of mum and dad will still be needed to get anything close to Sydney’s median $990,000 house or $740,000 unit.
Regular super contributions remain off limits. But certainly it’s better than money in the bank, as Treasurer Scott Morrison calculates most will accelerate savings by 30 percent.
The measure will cost the government about $65 million annually. The downsizing incentive is calculated to cost about $10 million annually, with a delayed 2018 start.
Unfortunately, this mean it would be premature to expect a flood of five bedroom houses hitting the market any time soon.
Taxing foreigners in many ways is the revenue treat in the Budget, which could turn them away.
Capturing the $5000 plus annual tax on vacant properties owned by foreigners – the so-called ghost home tax – will be tricky. Though they could start by looking at the lights off in Haymarket.
This article was first published in the Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

Super idea in 2017 Budget for first home buyers

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/77316/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
It’s unsurprising that in the lead-up to this year’s federal budget there was a lot of discussion about housing affordability as its centrepiece.
Over the past 20 years price-to-income and price-to-rent ratios have doubled. Sydney’s price-to-income ratio is over 12, making it the second-least-affordable city in the world. Melbourne is in fourth place.
And in a budget tableau as bland as this one, it wouldn’t have taken much to really play up the housing affordability policies.
Yet the measures in this budget involve not much more than tinkering.
On the minus side, the biggest announcement was a “first home super saver scheme”, which would allow voluntary contributions of A$15,000 per annum and A$30,000 in total (per person if in a couple) to superannuation for prospective first home buyers from July 2017. These could be withdrawn and taxed at 30 percentage points below the normal marginal rate and used for a deposit.
This will cost the government A$250 million over four years and do absolutely nothing to help first home owners. We have seen this movie before, with 50 years of first home owner grants in one form or another. All that happens is that this subsidy goes into the price of existing housing. Sellers benefit, buyers get no joy.
It’s bad economics, somewhat costly, and a cruel hoax on prospective home buyers who are struggling with an out-of-control housing market.
But the biggest minus of all was the absence of any measure whatsoever to address negative gearing and CGT exemptions for rental properties. Sorry, there is one: you now won’t able to deduct an airfare to the Gold Coast to “inspect” your rental property. The government has boxed itself in on this, with Labor having taken a plan to the last election to tackle both of these issues (full disclosure, the Labor plan bears a good deal of resemblance to my McKell Institute plan).
Nonetheless, it is reflective of the state of our politics that the one thing that could really help the most (and which the PM has agreed with very publicly in the past) is off the table.
But the measures aren’t all bad. On the plus side, there were incentives for people over 65 to downsize by allowing A$300,000 of the proceeds of a sale of their main residence to go into their superannuation, above the controversial A$1.6 million cap announced in last year’s budget.
Will the budget encourage older Australians to downsize? Maybe. One measure of how powerful an incentive it will be is that it costs only A$30 million over the four-year forward estimates period. This is not a big government spend.
It’s also unclear whether it will be a large enough financial incentive to overcome the emotional and psychological barriers to moving from the family home after many years in it. There was also a conspicuous absence of reforms to stamp duty, which is a major impediment to downsizing.
There was also good news on affordable housing with the establishment of the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (NHFIC). It will provide A$63.1 million over four years to operate a so-called “bond aggregator” that aims to provide cheaper financing for community housing providers. This is a good idea that should have a positive effect, and help address the high cost of funds that often plagues financing of housing for low-income earners.
Consistent with the recent populist policy announcements by this government, foreign purchasers of Australian properties were targeted in this budget. There will no longer be a capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for primary residences of foreign and temporary tax residents, and the grandfathering will only last until June 30 2019. There will also be a lower threshold for CGT withholding (A$750,000, down from A$2 million) on foreign tax residents, and the rate will be increased from 10 percent to 12.5 percent.
There were some wishy-washy words about the crucial issue of housing supply. The government has definitely identified the key role that supply plays. They are proposing a variety of “city deals” to provide incentives for zoning reform — especially in western Sydney. That’s all good, but whether it is anything more than the budget-summary feel-good headline - “Working with the states to deliver planning and zoning reform” - remains to be seen.
There was also the announcement of a tax on foreign owners who leave their properties vacant. This is supposed to raise A$16.3 million over four years — which is a rounding error in the scheme of things.
We had a housing affordability crisis before this budget, and we will have one after it. If the first step to recovery is acknowledging that one has a problem, then the government is still on step one.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/richard-holden-118107" target="_blank">Richard Holden</a> is a Professor of Economics and PLuS Alliance Fellow at UNSW and author for <a href="https://theconversation.com/au" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

Government tinkering with housing affordability in 2017 Budget: Richard Holden

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The 2017-18 Budget has a welcome focus on housing affordability and infrastructure.
Subdued wages growth is keeping revenue collection down contributing to a slight deterioration in near term deficit projections (a deficit of $29.4bn for 2017-18) but a return to surplus is still projected for 2020-21. 
This year’s Budget should be positive for confidence.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.24.06%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.24.06%20AM.png" alt="">
The impact on the RBA and the shares is likely minimal. 
The 2017-18 Budget has much to make it popular. In fact, the goodies make it almost feel like a pre-election rather than a post-election budget. The transformation from the austerity to end “the age of entitlement” of the 2014 budget to the “fairness, security and opportunity” of this Budget has been profound.
Key budget measures
As always, most of the key new measures were pre-announced or leaked. On the spending front, the goodies include:
A further ramp up in infrastructure spending (by an additional $20bn over the forward years) including Western Sydney Airport, inland rail &amp; various road projects.
Extending the small business $20,000 asset write-off scheme and working with states to remove red-tape.
A housing package: first home buyers can save via their super for a deposit out of pre-tax income (up $30,000), retirees who downsize get exemptions from super limits, more stringent rules on foreign investors (eg, vacant home tax), encouraging the supply of low cost community housing and rewarding states for boosting supply.
Increased spending on health through committing to fully fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme and reintroducing Medicare rebate indexation. 
Removal of the “zombie” welfare cuts.
$18.6bn over ten years in extra school funding (Gonski 2.0). This has been offset by various savings, including:
Increased university fees.
An increase in the Medicare levy by 0.5 percent from 2019.
A 0.6 percent levy on the major banks with liabilities over $100bn.
More measures to curtail the cash economy and improve the integrity of the tax and welfare system.
Little change to the deficit outlook
Despite a temporary boost to corporate tax revenue from a bounce in the iron ore price, extra spending and soft personal tax collections on the back of weak wages growth means the near-term budget deficit outlook is a bit worse than MYEFO and $2.3bn worse over four years compared to last year’s budget.
The return to surplus has been maintained for 2020-21 and looks better at 0.4 percent of GDP. After a 2016-17 budget deficit of $37.6bn, the deficit for 2017-18 is forecast to be $29.4bn (1.6 percent of GDP). 
With the Government offsetting all new spending with savings, the actual policy impact on the economy this year and next is trivial (see the red figures in the table above). However, the projected decline in the budget deficit in the years ahead means that fiscal policy will still be acting as drag on growth. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.25.02%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.25.02%20AM.png" alt="">
Economic assumptions
The major economic assumptions underpinning the Budget are shown in the next table. Most of the assumptions look reasonable, except that the assumption that wages growth rises to 3.75 percent over the next four years looks too optimistic given unemployment is not expected to fall much. The iron ore price is still expected to average $US55/tonne over the next four years. This looks reasonable albeit the recent volatility in the iron ore price highlights the uncertainty around it. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.26.08%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.26.08%20AM.png" alt="">
Assessment and risks
The goodies and the focus on fairness in the Budget should provide a bit of a boost to confidence and spending. But the risks around the projected return to surplus remain huge. Australia still has a budget deficit problem.
Government spending surged 25 percent between 2006-07 and 2008-09 to combat the GFC and this has never been unwound. While our net public debt to GDP ratio is low compared to the US, Europe and Japan, comparing ourselves to a bad bunch is dangerous. The Budget is projecting a 12 year run of deficits totalling 27 percent of GDP which swamps the deficits of the 1980s and 1990s.
And this is without the deep recessions of the early 1980s and 1990s! Rather we have achieved this thanks to a combination of ramping up spending on a whole range of things without facing up to how they will be paid for.
Unfortunately after 102 quarters without a recession there is no support for hard-nosed economic reform in Australia and this also applies to reforms to limit spending growth. So we continue to rely inordinately on assuming the best to drive revenue up.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.27.14%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.27.14%20AM.png" alt="">
 
This is evident in the Budget’s projections for average revenue growth of a whopping 6.7 percent per annum over the next four years. Such optimistic assumptions have disappointed in recent years and the biggest risk now is that wages don’t accelerate as assumed leading to continuing poor personal tax collections.
While the Budget still projects a return to surplus by 2020-21, it remains pretty thin and the budget deficit projections over the next two years actually take us further away from a surplus not closer. The trouble is we don’t have a lot of flexibility to provide stimulus should the economy turn down. While the 2017-18 Budget should help us keep our AAA sovereign rating for now, the risk remains high that we lose it at some point. 
On infrastructure, the Budget has much to commend it. Infrastructure spending can help short term growth, boost long term productivity and can actually “crowd in” private investment. Increased public investment is helping to offset weak private investment (see the next chart) and the infrastructure commitment in the Budget will help ensure this continues. 
In this regard, the move to report a “net operating balance” in this year’s Budget is welcome and there is much merit in focusing debt on capital spending and not recurrent spending. But debt is still debt and there is always the risk some of the infrastructure projects turn out to be white elephants resulting in “good debt” becoming “bad”.
Finally, it’s commendable to see housing affordability being a key part of this Budget. Certainly the measures are to be welcomed, particularly those helping first home buyers, downsizers and measures to boost supply. Getting housing supply up on a sustainable basis is critical so the key is for the Federal Government to follow through with its plan to incentivise states to meet housing supply targets.
Implications for the RBA
While this Budget should provide a boost to confidence (albeit not for university students), ongoing fiscal tightening will act as a mild drag on growth in the years ahead. As such, it’s hard to see major implications for the RBA. In fact recent data on trade and retail sales continues to point to more risk of a rate cut than a rate hike in Australia this year.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.28.13%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/10/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-10%20at%208.28.13%20AM.png" alt="">
Implications for Australian assets
Cash and term deposits – with interest rates remaining low, returns from cash and bank term deposits will remain low.
Bonds – a major impact on the bond market from the Budget is unlikely. With five year bond yields at 2.2%, it’s hard to see great returns from sovereign bonds over the next few years.
Shares – the potential boost to confidence from this Budget could be a small positive for the Australian share market. Overall, the Budget’s impact is unlikely to be huge. Construction stocks may be beneficiaries and banks losers.
Property – the Budget’s housing affordability measures may have an impact on home prices over time if they incentivize states to ramp up supply, but it’s likely to be marginal in the short term. We continue to expect momentum in the Sydney and Melbourne property markets to slow.
Infrastructure – the ramp up in infrastructure spending should in time provide more opportunities for private investors as many of the resultant assets are ultimately privatised.
The $A – the Budget alone is unlikely to have much impact on the $A. With the iron ore price falling back again, the interest rate differential in favour of Australia continuing to narrow and the $A still too high, the downtrend in the $A is likely to resume.
Concluding comments
The 2017-18 Budget has a sensible focus on housing affordability and infrastructure. The main risks remain around the revenue assumptions and when we will get back to surplus. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://plus.google.com/110172465327488162875?rel=author">SHANE OLIVER</a> is head of investment strategy and economics and chief economist at <a href="https://www.ampcapital.com.au/home">AMP Capital</a> and is responsible for AMP Capital's diversified investment funds.
</body></html>

After 102 quarters without recession pragmatism and fairness rule in 2017 Budget: Shane Oliver

One of North Sydney's best-known commercial buildings could become hundreds of new homes, with insurance giant Zurich Australia lodging a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) to transform 5 Blue Street into a mixed-use residential development above North Sydney Station.

Rather than demolishing the existing building and starting again, Zurich is proposing an adaptive reuse project that would convert the landmark office building into a 15-level residential development delivering 62 apartments, 86 affordable co-living dwellings, activated retail and significant upgrades to the Blue Street Plaza.

The proposal reflects a growing trend of commercial property owners repositioning ageing office assets into residential housing as Sydney grapples with housing supply shortages and changing workplace demand.

<img alt="Zurich" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0bba7d12-06dc-4375-aad7-238c94b21ac5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-22%20at%2010.42.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=NJl5oLAEBDGuPmY3RnyliKODjMc8lvRh" />

Located directly above North Sydney Metro and train station, the 3,051 sqm site occupies one of the most strategically positioned parcels of land on Sydney's Lower North Shore.

Designed by fjcstudio, the proposal seeks to retain and adapt much of the existing structure while creating a contemporary residential address that better connects with the public domain surrounding North Sydney Station.

The application proposes two basement levels, ground floor retail, affordable co-living accommodation across the podium levels, and apartments above, while preserving and enhancing the publicly accessible Blue Street Plaza.

Rather than pursuing maximum apartment numbers, Zurich has opted for a housing mix heavily weighted towards larger owner-occupier residences.

The proposal includes 62 build-to-sell apartments comprising 12 one-bedroom, 19 two-bedroom, 29 three-bedroom apartments and two premium penthouses. It also incorporates 86 affordable co-living dwellings, which would be managed in perpetuity by a Community Housing Provider.

That balance between traditional apartments and affordable housing reflects the NSW Government's push to increase housing diversity around major transport infrastructure.

The proposal has been lodged concurrently with a rezoning application, with Zurich arguing the site is ideally positioned to support additional housing given its immediate proximity to public transport, employment and services.

"The proposal aims to respond to the housing challenges facing Sydney through the delivery of diverse housing types in a highly accessible location," the design report by fjcstudio states. It also seeks to improve pedestrian amenity through upgrades to Blue Street Plaza while creating a high-performing residential building that responds to the surrounding context.

<img alt="Zurich" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36082e15-c636-4481-bb68-5a5f6443fe39" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-22%20at%2010.41.36%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=5P6VD.fvmqjQfIG3TWWMRXxQWiQBjeFB" />

Rather than replacing the commercial building, fjcstudio has developed a design that works with the existing structural framework above the rail corridor, an approach that significantly reduces demolition while allowing the site to be repositioned as a mixed-use residential precinct.

The existing structural constraints have informed much of the building's design, including its relationship with Blue Street and surrounding public spaces.

The building has been designed as a slender tower rising above a clearly defined podium, with vertically expressed façades intended to reduce the perceived bulk while reinforcing North Sydney's emerging skyline.

According to fjcstudio, the architectural language responds directly to the surrounding commercial towers while maintaining a finer grain expression more closely aligned with the neighbouring Lavender Bay streetscape.

The tower incorporates articulated façade elements, landscaped podium edges and recessed upper levels to soften its appearance and improve pedestrian amenity below.

A significant component of the proposal is the revitalisation of Blue Street Plaza.

The existing public space has long served as one of the primary pedestrian connections between North Sydney Station, Greenwood Plaza and Blue Street, yet its role is expected to become even more important following the opening of Sydney Metro.

Zurich's proposal seeks to strengthen that role by improving landscaping, introducing new retail frontages, enhancing pedestrian permeability and creating more active edges throughout the day and evening.

Ground floor retail would wrap the plaza, while separate residential and co-living entries have been designed to improve wayfinding without reducing street activation.

Landscape design has been integrated throughout the podium and public realm, softening what is currently one of the most heavily urbanised parts of North Sydney.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

fjcstudio has carefully oriented apartments towards Sydney Harbour and the CBD while using privacy blades and articulated façades to minimise overlooking between neighbouring buildings.

Large framed openings along the western elevation maximise harbour outlooks, while the eastern apartments have been angled towards the south-east to improve privacy from neighbouring development.

The project forms part of the continuing transformation of North Sydney from a predominantly commercial CBD into a genuine mixed-use city centre.

Since the completion of Victoria Cross Metro Station, developers have increasingly shifted their attention towards residential projects capable of leveraging the area's unparalleled transport connectivity.

&nbsp;

FiveX recently lodged plans for a 61-storey, 490-apartment tower that would become one of the tallest residential buildings in North Sydney if approved.

Aqualand continues to expand its Lower North Shore presence following the completion of AURA on Walker Street and its recent St Leonards and Roseville proposals.

Developers are also progressing projects throughout Walker Street, Miller Street and the Victoria Cross precinct as demand for well-located owner-occupier apartments continues to strengthen.

Joel Robinson

First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station

Busy developer Aqualand Prestige has formally taken the next step in its expansion across Sydney's Lower North Shore, lodging a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for its long-held Archer Street site in Chatswood.

The application covers <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/51-55-archer-street-chatswood-nsw-2067">51-55 Archer Street</a>, a 1,767 sqm amalgamated site on the eastern edge of the Chatswood CBD, where the developer is seeking approval for a 45-level mixed-use tower delivering 114 apartments, including a significant affordable housing component, alongside retail, commercial space and six basement levels of parking.

The SSDA marks the latest milestone for a project Aqualand has been quietly progressing over the past two years. The developer first secured the site for its Aqualand Prestige platform before undertaking an alternative design excellence process with PTW Architects, ultimately avoiding a formal design competition through the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The proposal has evolved considerably from Aqualand's original concept. The revised scheme has been designed around larger owner-occupier product, with an unusually high proportion of three and four-bedroom apartments, targeting the more affluent buyer profile, and downsizer, emerging across the North Shore.

<img alt="Archer St" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0171204c-5811-41b5-9b09-2335d1b7c3d0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-22%20at%208.52.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=6YTuxfq.puZo7k2wbfgemcO5K3QfXYGQ" />

The 114-apartment mix comprises six studios, 27 one-bedroom apartments, 18 two-bedroom apartments, 50 three-bedroom residences and 13 four-bedroom homes. A quarter of the building will be dedicated to affordable housing, well above the mandated 15 per cent&nbsp;

PTW has structured the building vertically, with affordable housing across levels one to six, premium apartments through levels seven to 31, duplex skyhomes on klevels 32 to 43, a penthouse on level 44, and a rooftop plant level above. Six basement levels will provide resident parking and servicing.

The tower is proposed to reach approximately 154 metres, placing it among a growing collection of residential high-rises transforming Chatswood's skyline.

Rather than competing purely on height, PTW says the design has been driven by creating a slimmer tower capable of delivering significantly larger apartments.

"The primary objective of this project was to create a distinctive building that stands out from the recently approved or built structures in the Chatswood area," the design report states, noting the structural efficiency allows greater investment into apartment quality and resident amenity.

Residents would have access to more than 450 sqm of communal open space including landscaped gardens, swimming pool, rooftop entertaining areas, fitness spaces, community gardens, children's play areas and barbecue facilities.

A major focus of the design has been the public domain.

The ground plane has been opened up through landscaped terraces inspired by Willoughby's sandstone ridges, with native planting, public seating, artwork, retail activation and a series of gathering spaces intended to soften what has traditionally been a hard commercial streetscape.

The landscape strategy references Blue Gum forests once common throughout the area, while incorporating Indigenous storytelling, public art and lighting installations to strengthen the connection to Country.

Chatswood has been one of Sydney's busiest apartment markets over the past 12 months, with a steady pipeline of both new project launches and fresh development applications.

Hyecorp recently launched Celine, a 122-apartment development just along Archer Street, while Changfa and Huirong Group are progressing The Anderson, an 84-apartment project on Anderson Street.

Develotek recently secured approval for a 101-apartment tower on Pacific Highway, while Tian An LFD received the green light for Hammond Greens, its apartment development on the edge of the Chatswood Bowling Club.

Commercial property developer FiveX is also making its move into the residential market. Last month it lodged plans for a 61-storey tower with 490 apartments, which, if approved, would become one of the tallest residential buildings in Chatswood.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-fivex-targets-chatswood-skyline-with-61-storey-tower-after-north-sydney-plans">First look: FiveX targets Chatswood skyline with 61-storey tower after North Sydney plans</a>

Aqualand is also expanding its development pipeline following the launch of its luxury residential brand, Aqualand Prestige. The developer has delivered a string of high-end apartment projects across Sydney's affluent suburbs over the past decade, most recently AURA by Aqualand on Walker Street in North Sydney.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=30959 project_image_fid=292863]

It has since quietly assembled its next wave of projects.

Earlier this year Aqualand launched Boronia in Roseville, a boutique 111-apartment development on Larkin Street. The project is one of the first significant apartment developments to launch in the suburb ahead of what is expected to become one of Sydney's most active new housing precincts under the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing reforms, which allow greater density around train stations.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152095 project_image_fid=373685]

The developer has also lodged plans for a two-tower, 413-apartment development on Herbert Street in nearby St Leonards, further strengthening its presence across the Lower North Shore.

Beyond that, Aqualand remains behind the final stage of Barangaroo, where plans will deliver a five-hectare mixed-use precinct comprising new homes, retail, hospitality and community facilities, alongside a new Metro entrance and more than two hectares of public open space, completing the Barangaroo precinct.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/central-barangaroo-development-takes-big-step-with-concept-proposal-approval">Central Barangaroo development takes big step with concept proposal approval</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-aqualand-joins-st-leonards-apartment-party">First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party</a> 
&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

First look: Aqualand pushes ahead with Chatswood apartment tower as SSDA lodged for Archer Street

Mass timber is becoming an increasingly popular construction material in apartment developments, but Adelaide developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/otello">Otello</a> is taking the approach a step further.

At its new <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flowe-bowden-18-gibson-street-bowden-sa-5007">Flowe Bowden</a> development, the exposed cross-laminated timber (CLT) structure isn't just about reducing the building's environmental footprint. It also forms the foundation of a broader wellness strategy, influencing everything from indoor air quality and natural materials to the way residents move through and experience the building.

The 115-apartment mixed-use development, designed by Melbourne-based architecture practice Fieldwork, will occupy a prominent island site opposite Bowden Village Reserve, combining one, two and three-bedroom apartments with retail and a dedicated wellness destination.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152022 project_image_fid=375528]

Wellness isn't confined to a gym or shared resident facility at Flowe. Instead, Fieldwork embedded the concept into the building itself.

The development has been split into two residential wings connected by a naturally ventilated central breezeway, replacing traditional enclosed corridors with open-air walkways that improve natural light, encourage cross ventilation and create more opportunities for neighbourly interaction.

"Rather than treating wellness as something that only happens on the ground floor, our response integrates it throughout the building, which led us to ask what it really means to design a healthy building," Fieldwork Director Quino Holland said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152022 project_image_fid=375531]

The building's architecture also reflects Bowden's industrial heritage. The lower podium references the area's historic brick and sandstone buildings, while the upper levels transition to exposed CLT, allowing the timber structure to become a defining feature throughout the apartments and shared spaces.

The use of mass timber sits alongside a range of sustainability initiatives, including a fully electric, gas-free design, rooftop solar and a targeted 5 Star Green Star rating.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152022 project_image_fid=375524]

Inside the residences, the focus remains on natural, durable materials. Blackbutt engineered timber flooring, exposed CLT ceilings, porcelain surfaces and warm timber joinery create a calming interior palette, while low-VOC finishes and responsibly sourced materials have been selected to improve indoor air quality.

Kitchens have been designed as the centrepiece of each apartment, featuring porcelain island benchtops, timber-look cabinetry and brushed steel tapware, with layouts that maximise natural light and ventilation.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152022 project_image_fid=375530]

The more traditional interpretation of wellness comes in the form of Level Eleven, a two-storey wellness club spanning the ground floor, mezzanine and first floor.

The facility will include a gym, yoga and reformer Pilates studios, Finnish and infrared saunas, magnesium hot and cold plunge pools, and dedicated recovery spaces. Unlike many residential wellness facilities, Level Eleven will also operate commercially, allowing the broader Bowden community to access the venue while giving residents exclusive membership benefits.

The ground floor has also been designed around everyday living. A café overlooking Bowden Village Reserve will activate the street frontage, while a bike workshop with tool storage, co-working space and dog wash has been incorporated to support daily routines and encourage interaction between residents.

"Flowe brings together my two biggest passions, creating places and creating healthier lives," Otello founder Daniel Harris said.

"We wanted to create something Adelaide hasn't seen before, a genuinely healthy building, where the way you live is lifted without even trying."

Flowe is positioned directly opposite Bowden Village Reserve and within walking distance of Bowden Railway Station and the Adelaide Entertainment Centre, placing future residents just minutes from the Adelaide CBD while remaining connected to one of the city's most established urban renewal precincts.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152022]

Otello launches wellness-focused Flowe Bowden with Adelaide-first mass timber apartment design

Not all apartment amenities are immediately visible.

Swimming pools, gyms, rooftop terraces and residents' lounges have long featured on buyers' wishlists, but as the way Australians live has changed, so too have the features that make apartment living more convenient.

Increasingly, buyers are placing value on the practical aspects of day-to-day life. Fast internet, EV charging, secure bike storage, flexible workspaces and parcel management are becoming just as relevant as lifestyle amenities, reflecting changing habits and expectations.

Online shopping has been one of the biggest drivers of that shift.

Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally, making parcel deliveries a routine part of everyday life rather than an occasional convenience.

For apartment residents, however, receiving those deliveries isn't always straightforward.

Without someone home to accept a parcel, deliveries can be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in building foyers or common areas, or require building management to temporarily store packages. As apartment living continues to grow across Australia's cities, parcel management has become an increasingly important consideration for both residents and developers.

Australia Post's Parcel Locker network is one response to that shift.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KPZ9j5FRdsQ?si=Qztc1dNP3ZvEIUhb" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than relying on home delivery, eligible parcels can be directed to a nominated Parcel Locker, where they're securely stored until collected. Once a parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can retrieve it using a one-time code or QR code at a time that suits them.

The network has expanded to more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with Parcel Lockers positioned at Post Offices, shopping centres, supermarkets, transport hubs and, increasingly, within or alongside residential developments.

That growing presence reflects a broader change in how apartment buildings are being planned.

Developers are increasingly considering the operational side of apartment living alongside traditional lifestyle amenities. Just as secure mailrooms, bicycle storage and EV charging have become more common inclusions, parcel management is emerging as another feature that supports everyday convenience.

It also helps preserve the arrival experience within a building. Carefully designed lobbies and communal spaces can quickly become cluttered when deliveries accumulate, while secure parcel solutions reduce the likelihood of missed deliveries or parcels being left unattended.

For buyers comparing apartments, these everyday details are becoming part of the decision-making process.

Location, floorplans and finishes remain fundamental, but the features that simplify daily life are carrying greater weight than they once did. As online shopping continues to shape consumer behaviour, secure parcel delivery is increasingly becoming another amenity worth looking for.

Parcel delivery is joining the apartment amenity checklist

Inca Property Group has lodged a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for Dawn, a 53-apartment oceanfront development overlooking Mona Vale Beach.

The proposal, at 35-39 Darley Street East, would replace an existing 18-apartment strata building with a new owner-occupier-focused development comprising 53 two and three-bedroom apartments, including nine affordable built-to-rent residences delivered under the State's infill affordable housing scheme.

Positioned on a 2,679 sqm elevated site around 280 metres from Mona Vale Beach, the development has been designed to maximise panoramic ocean views while responding to the site's sloping topography.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/inca-property-group">Inca Property Group</a> Managing Director Josh Thompson said the State Significant pathway provided greater certainty for projects of this scale.

"This State Significant pathway gives the team real certainty to progress <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/dawn-35-39-darley-street-east-mona-vale-nsw-2103">Dawn</a> through to completion," Thompson said.

"It allows us to acquire a one-off site, design it carefully and deliver the right offering for the suburb, assessed by the NSW Government's planning department."

The project is one of the first developments in the area to be assessed under the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy, with the site sitting on the edge of the policy's designated inner area.

The proposal includes three basement levels providing 124 car spaces, alongside a range of resident amenities including a swimming pool, gym, sauna, wellness facilities and private plunge pools for selected ground-floor and penthouse apartments.

<img alt="Dawn" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fc1a1daf-0ce4-4f12-9076-b1fa553c7a91" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-07-21%20at%208.42.11%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4GZ9h.gpNkTljbxyAET8Jfhv51XUamDm" />

Thompson said Dawn had been designed specifically for owner-occupiers and downsizers, a buyer profile that has driven demand across Inca's recent Upper North Shore developments.

"The majority of buyers in our recent North Shore projects have been downsizers, and we are learning exactly what this market is looking for. Beyond the location itself, we have included resort-style amenities to deliver a genuine lifestyle offering," Thompson said.

Located within walking distance of Mona Vale Beach, the town centre, Mona Vale Golf Club and the Royal Motor Yacht Club, Dawn represents Inca's first Northern Beaches project following the sell-out of Tara on Park in Waitara and Ellis Residences, currently under construction in St Ives.

Construction will be undertaken by Inca's in-house construction arm, GOP Constructions.

Dawn is the latest major apartment proposal for Mona Vale, with the suburb emerging as one of the key beneficiaries of the NSW Government's new Low and Mid-Rise Housing policy.

New developer One Living, led by industry veteran Joseph Scuderi, recently secured a site on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, where it is planning around 140 apartments.

IPM is also planning its third project in Mona Vale, significantly increasing the scale of its previous developments with an 82-apartment proposal at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/159-167-darley-street-west-mona-vale-nsw-2103">159-167 Darley Street West</a>, opposite Bayview Golf Course and less than 800 metres from Mona Vale town centre.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/one-living-enters-sydneys-new-apartment-market-with-northern-beaches-site-acquisition">One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition</a>

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-ipm-plans-third-mona-vale-project">First look: IPM plans third Mona Vale project</a>

Jonathan Chancellor

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News