<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The backdown by the NSW Government on it’s Planned Precincts along the Sydenham to Bankstown corridor is yet another pre-election move that will put new housing on hold.
For some years the NSW Government has been promoting the redevelopment of land around proposed new metro stations along the Sydenham to Bankstown line as the correct approach to provide new housing for Sydney's booming population.
The government committed to Priority Precincts around rail stations which sent signals to the private sector that these precincts were where new development should occur.
Many private developers purchased land to help realise the government's vision.
We now hear from the media that the government has done a backflip (to use the media's term) and is handing the planning powers back to the local councils.
The media comments from representatives of the Canterbury Bankstown and Inner West councils are now saying that the decision puts an end to high rise development around the stations.
The same councils also complained about the NSW Government's new Housing code for town houses and terrace houses and the NSW Government quickly allowed the two councils to delay the code for over a year.
Clearly the NSW Government is spooked by community concerns about the extent of development that the government's own planning rules proposed.
Rather than taking an advocacy role to explain to the community that 725,000 new homes will be required over the next 20 years in Sydney, and that development around stations on a new metro rail line is good planning, the government seems to be moving away from its leadership role.
With an election 9 months away it is clear that the government is happy to put the planning for new housing on hold.
This will only lead to a collapse in housing supply in a few years’ time which will push house prices up again.
The Premier's rhetoric that the solution to housing affordability is for more supply has clearly been replaced by putting supply on hold.
What were called Priority Precincts to help with supply then became Planned Precincts at the end of last year and are now seen by the suppliers of new housing as being 'Paused Precincts'.
On 25 June 2017 Anthony Roberts, NSW Planning Minister, issued a Media Release on the Sydenham to Bankstown corridor where he said: 'It is fundamental that we harness the benefits of the Sydney Metro.Supply was the key to tackling housing affordability in Sydney and growth strategies such as the Sydenham to Bankstown corridor will make a positive impact.'
He also announced that Canterbury, Campsie, Lakemba and Belmore have been made priority precincts. A year later it seems that the benefits of the metro have been diminished and that supply of new housing is not the key to housing affordability.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the councils along the Sydenham to Bankstown line to ensure that development opportunities for new housing are still available.
Chris Johnson is the CEO of Urban Taskforce
</body></html>

cjohnson-8xfqfuuCSq

Sydenham to Bankstown planning backdown will be bad for future housing supply: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
The proposed development of the Tallawong Station Precinct by Landcom and the Sydney Metro demonstrates how a new diverse community can be planned.
The concept plan for 1,100 new apartments with 5 percent as rental affordable housing along with a park and retail uses has the ingredients for a quality outcome.
It is good to see that Landom’s approach to providing affordable housing is based on NSW Government’s Affordable Rental Housing SEPP of 2009 that provides the affordable housing for a 10 year period.
The Urban Taskforce has promoted the use of the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP approach with reasonable uplift to fund the affordable component.
In the Landcom proposal there is no uplift as the cost will be reflected in the value of the land and the normal SEPP requirement of 20 percent affordable units has been reduced to 5 percent.
This is a reasonable economic approach to the delivery of affordable housing and signals government support for a 10 year rental approach.
The Urban Taskforce supports this flexible, sensible and pragmatic approach to the provision of affordable housing which takes into account the sensitivity of the property market.
The overall scale of development at Tallawong appears to be reasonable for the location at the end of the North West Metro line (pictured above).
The Urban Taskforce is supportive of large scale developments with a number of buildings, mixed uses and the provision of a park as this gives a sense of community and balances shared amenities with 1,100 apartments in this case.
When the concept plan has been approved we assume Landcom will call for expressions of interest from the private sector to undertake the project.
Urban Taskforce members will be interested in becoming involved.
Chris Johnson is the CEO of Urban Taskforce
</body></html>

Tallawong Station development has created a diverse new community: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The Draft Affordable Housing Policy to be considered by the City of Parramatta Council at tonight’s Council meeting, needs to better understand market conditions.
The City of Parramatta Council recently deferred it’s Draft Planning Agreements Policy to an independent panel for review and the same should occur for its Draft Affordable Housing Policy due to be considered at its meeting tonight.
The Planning Agreements Policy included mandatory affordable housing contributions as a significant component so if the council was concerned about the impact on the market of the Draft Planning Agreements Policy and deferred this to an independent panel then clearly the same should occur for the Affordable Housing Policy.
The two policies are clearly intrinsically linked and should be reviewed together.
The draft policy for Affordable Housing includes a proposal to phase affordable housing contributions out of the Planning Agreement process and to replace this with an Inclusionary Zoning approach that requires developers to give 10 percent of new housing projects back to council for affordable housing.
Presumably the Planning Agreement Policy will still have the 50% of uplift to be given to council so developers will be contributing even more back to council.
In the current environment where the feasibility of new housing projects is diminishing as prices are dropping across Sydney the Affordable Housing Policy will only make projects less feasible and potentially stop them from going ahead.
It is vital that the City of Parramatta Council get input from the risk taking real world of the development industry before locking in this Affordable Housing Policy.
The independent panel already appointed by council should involve industry in the review of these new policies.
The opportunity to also involve two recent appointments by the NSW Government should also be taken by the independent panel.
The appointment of a NSW Productivity Commissioner and of a NSW Chief Economist includes a brief for both to look at housing affordability from an economic system perspective.
Their input into the approach proposed by the City of Parramatta Council would benefit the potential roll out of affordable housing policies to all of Sydney’s councils that could flow from Parramatta’s leadership.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to be involved in discussion with all parties involved in Affordable Housing Policy to ensure that a sustainable, market based, approach occurs.
Chris Johnson is Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

Parramatta Council affordable housing policy needs to understand the market: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The baffling exemption of 47 NSW Councils from the adoption of a new law to encourage terrace housing until July 2019 demonstrates that these councils are shirking their responsibility to promote a diverse range of housing types.
This is a sad day for future generations looking to live an affordable lifestyle in a diverse range of housing types.
All the ‘Missing Middle’ Low-Rise Medium Density Housing Code did was provide a faster approval process for medium density housing types where councils already permitted this type of development in their local government area. To see this over reaction and backlash against two storey town houses and terrace houses by councils demonstrates just how out of touch they are with young families and other demographic groups looking for somewhere to live.
The publishing today of the amendment to the Low Rise Medium Density Housing Code in the NSW Government Gazette includes at clause 3B.63 a list of 47 councils that are in a deferred area until 1 July 2019. The councils include Bayside, Burwood, Campbelltown, Canada Bay, Canterbury-Bankstown, Cumberland, Georges River, Hornsby, Inner West, Lane Cove, Mosman, Northern Beaches, Parramatta, City of Sydney, Willoughby and Woollahra. These are all areas where terrace houses should be part of the diverse mix of homes to accommodate our growing population.
These 47 councils are clearly bowing to small activist groups who are desperate to keep Sydney as a 1950s suburban structure with detached houses. It is fine for many people to live this way but there are other people who want to live in more urban ways and they should not be denied this opportunity.
It is unfortunate that the NSW Government has permitted this large number of councils to signal that they are against growth. The Urban Taskforce believes the Missing Middle Housing Code is an important pathway to Sydney's future. The approach to encouraging smaller, terrace house layouts like those in Paddington is an important component of the provision of a diverse range of housing types. We support the code and the housing types it encourages as a vital part of the mix to house Sydney's population growth.
The NSW Government must not allow councils to remove the potential for terrace houses from their LEPs during the deferral period but they must ensure that there are appropriate areas for this building type.
The result of the council rejection of two storey terrace houses is likely to be the need for many more high-rise towers of apartments. Those councils that reject low rise density should be forced to allocate larger precincts for high rise residential towers to make up for the loss of new housing.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the 47 councils to make sure they are providing a diverse and affordable range of homes for the children and grandchildren of their current ratepayers.
CHRIS JOHNSON is CEO of the Urban Taskforce.
</body></html>

Housing diversity exemption for NSW councils marks a sad day for future generations: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
Recent data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) indicates flat housing approvals in NSW but falling non-residential approvals.
The non-residential building approvals in NSW have dropped by 25% between December 2017 and May 2018 which is of concern.
In December 2017 non-residential approvals were valued at $1,272,944,000 but six months later this has dropped to $957,551,000 according to the latest release of ABS building approval data.
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2018/7/4/UBT%20CJ%20Graph%201.JPG" alt="">
Over the six months from December 2017 to May 2018 the high density residential approvals were flat with 3,221 approvals in December rising slightly to 3,256 in May 2018.
Overall NSW housing approvals were also flat with 5,691 approvals in December 2017 and 5,860 approvals in May 2018.
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2018/7/4/UBT%20CJ%20graph%202.JPG" alt="">
The signals in the industry are that there is a slow-down building up in the housing market that will carry on for some time but that the slow-down will not be dramatic.
Normally the nonresidential building sector balances a slow-down in residential construction but it appears this is not happening.
Sydney still has a need for large numbers of new homes so the NSW Government will need to carefully monitor the trends ahead to ensure new housing supply continues at a steady rate.
We at the Urban Taskforce are concerned that the lifting of caps on infrastructure contributions and potential value capture and affordable housing levies could add costs to housing development at a time when the industry is slowing.
This would lead to even less housing projects going ahead.
We are also concerned that in the lead up to the next NSW election in March 2019 there is a significant amount of anti-development discussion in the media and a number of politicians are using the concerns in the community to put planning for new housing on hold.
A pre-election slow-down in development approvals could lead to a more difficult post-election environment where housing supply went backwards.
Chris Johnson is Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

Housing approval rates flat and non-residential falling in NSW: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The NSW Labor Party targets announced by Shadow Minister for Social Housing, Tania Mihailuk, that 15 to 25 percent of housing on privately owned land would be mandated to be affordable would make most housing projects economically unviable.
A heavy handed policy that simply adds an excessive tax to housing supply will mean many housing projects do not proceed.
The current housing supply market is slowing down through restrictions on lending from banks and from the uncertain climate of potential levies from councils.
To add another tax of 15 to 25 percent to a market that is slowing down will have a very negative impact on the number of new homes that will be built in future years.
The NSW Government is removing the cap on local infrastructure levies that could add around $40,000 to the cost of an average home.
On top of this councils like the City of Parramatta are proposing to apply excessive value capture taxes on all development.
The recent Reserve Bank research on the impacts of restrictive zoning in Sydney indicated that this has added $489,000 to the cost of an average house and around $400,000 to the cost of an average apartment.
The clear message from the RBA research is that interference in the market place by government and council regulations will increase the cost of housing.
Those well-meaning politicians and community housing providers who believe the developers of new housing can give away a significant percentage of their new homes must understand how the economics of the complex supply system works.
The banks will not fund the 15 to 25 percent proportion that Labor wants to give away and developers will find it very difficult to make a project viable without some incentive.
The report on housing affordability for the NSW Government by the former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Glenn Stevens, made it clear that housing affordability was linked to housing supply and that the planning system in NSW was too slow and complex and that standards that add to housing costs should be reviewed.
Claims by the Community Housing sector that England and America provide massive percentages of affordable housing must be moderated by an understanding of the tax systems and incentives applied in these countries.
We have proposed an incentive based policy for affordable housing that could provide 40,000 new affordable rental homes over a 10 year period.
The policy is based on the NSW Government’s Affordable Rental Housing SEPP and could provide 20 percent of a project as affordable housing for a 10 year period with a 20 percent floor space uplift.
</body></html>

Housing projects will be unviable under NSW Labor mandated housing affordability targets: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
The report for the South Sydney Regional Organisation of councils on the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP is missing opportunities to improve the policy.
The City Futures report on the Affordable Rental Housing State Environmental Planning Policy (ARHSEPP) for the South Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils recommends that this policy document be replaced but all it needs is modifications to make it more useful.
The report says the infill affordable housing section has had little impact in South Sydney but this is because the incentives are too low.
Currently the ARHSEPP requires at least 20 percent of a project to be affordable rental housing but only gives a bonus uplift of around 8 percent.
Clearly the economics are not working to encourage developers to use this formula.
Rather than replacing the whole policy all that is required is to match the 20 percent affordable housing component with a 20 percent uplift in floor space.
This will make the provision of affordable rental housing much more viable for the 10 year rental period the policy requires.
The report also criticises the Boarding Houses component of the ARHSEPP yet it does indicate that these have rentals that are 20-40 percent cheaper than equivalent apartments in areas away from universities.
The City Futures report raises concerns that the boarding houses do not conform to the strict rules required for apartments through the Apartment Design Guide (ADG).
The boarding house model is a different model with shared communal spaces that provide a different approach to amenity.
Recent changes made to car parking requirements also makes boarding house developments unfeasible in many inner areas of Sydney, where there is a critical under supply of affordable accommodation.
The Urban Taskforce believes the intent of the Affordable Rental Housing SEPP is good but that the details are stopping successful implementation of the policy.
Discussion with the industry that produces housing would lead to improvements to the ARHSEPP that would help provide significant numbers of new affordable homes across Sydney.
It would have been useful if the City Futures report had made positive suggestions about where changes could be made to achieve the intended outcomes.
CHRIS JOHNSON is the Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

Incentives too low to create affordable housing: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
The recent announcement of a draft State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) for the revitalisation of the Gosford City Centre demonstrates the value of state leadership in planning.
The draft SEPP for the Gosford City Centre appoints the Department of Planning and Environment asthe assessment authority for all projects over a value of $10 million.
This allocation of most projects to the state government planning department will ensure local politics is removed from decision making and that the importance of the revitalisation of Gosford as a state significant project is reinforced.
It is good to see the state government taking a stronger role in ensuring new development occurs by taking over planning powers for projects over $10 million.
The same approach could occur for many of the priority and planned precincts across urban areas in New South Wales.
The government’s funding of infrastructure with $42 million and an upgrade of parks with a further $10 million demonstrates a strong commitment to Gosford City Centre.
The use of the NSW Government Architect in developing plans for the revitalisation of the public realm including connections to the waterfront and the hospital are positive contributions to the future of Gosford.
It is of concern that the Central Coast Council has collected $8.1 million in contributions for local infrastructure that has not been committed to projects.
The development industry must make contributions for infrastructure on all projects and they expect this to lead to public domainimprovements in a timely manner.
The Urban Taskforce supports the measures introduced in the Gosford City Centre SEPP and the associated packages with this.
The current market across metropolitan Sydney is slowing down and it is important that the NSW Government considers similar interventions to those being applied in Gosford to planned precincts across Sydney.
Chris Johnson is the Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

Gosford City Centre planning policy demonstrates state leadership: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The major commitment to fund infrastructure, particularly for Sydney, in the NSW Budget will underpin the state’s growth.
The ongoing funding of major infrastructure by the NSW Government will future proof the state as the population grows.
The commitment to funding Metro West with $3 billion is an example of the forward thinking required to ensure Sydney grows in a sustainable manner.
This connection between the Harbour City and the River City of Parramatta will enhance both cities and generate significant development between the two cities
The allocation over the forward estimates of $8 billion to health infrastructure and $6 billion to schools infrastructure is a further support for the states strong growth.
The NSW Generation Fund (NGF) with $3 billion seed funds is a good way to plan ahead for Sydney's rapid growth.
The allocation of $27.5 million from the NGF for the ‘My Community Dividend’ is clearly a sweetener to communities to support growth. The funds will allow communities to vote for projects up to $200,000 that add value to their neighbourhood.
The Urban Taskforce, however, is concerned that last year's focus on housing affordability has not been repeated. Last year there was a strong commitment to the Premier’s priority to drive housing supply and the report by the former Governor of the Reserve Bank, Glenn Stevens, raised important issues about housing affordability and supply. We now have a slow-down in housing supply as evidenced by the budget's acknowledgement that $6 billion of income from stamp duty will be eliminated from the forward estimates.
Clearly the supply of housing is slowing down and we would have expected some actions in the budget to ensure a continuous supply of much needed housing. In particular a hold on the removal of the cap on council infrastructure levies would help the housing industry as would a hold on potential affordable housing levies by councils.
The recently announced NSW Productivity Commission is an opportunity to remove red tape from the planning system to help with housing affordability.
The funds allocated to Sydney's Third City in Western Sydney including the $439.4 million for infrastructure is positive as is the $258 million allocated to the Parramatta Light Rail project.
While the focus on infrastructure is the strength of this budget there does seem to be a missed opportunity to encourage Sydney communities to be part of the massive change that is occurring to the city's structure and form.
The Treasurer, Dominic Perrottet's speech titled 'Building for Tomorrow, Delivering for Today' sets the tone for the government's long term commitment to delivering essential infrastructure for the growth of the state. Many of the budget commitments help families including, increases to apprentice numbers, employing more teachers and health professionals and these are positive contributions.
The missing element is more support for new housing that is needed particularly in Sydney. The NSW planning system is still very complex and the delegation to councils to manage population growth is leading to an increase in community concerns about growth.
Overall this is a good budget for setting the framework for growth in urban areas of the state. The commitment to metro rail projects is the key to underpinning growth and the government deserves credit for driving this.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the NSW government, including the NSW Productivity Commission, to find ways to help with housing supply and affordability particularly by reducing red tape in the planning system.
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Infrastructure budget does little for housing: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
The proposal for a high level control of infrastructure delivery for Western Sydney by former NSW Premier John Fahey is needed for efficient delivery.
Currently the developers providing new housing in greenfield areas of Western Sydney find that there is little coordination of the multiple state government agencies who deliver infrastructure.
It seems to be left to each developer to coordinate with the agencies that deliver roads, sewers, water and electricity rather than having a single agency ensuring all of this infrastructure delivery is managed efficiently.
Former Premier Fahey has stated that multiple authorities should answer to a single boss through a coordinator general working for the Premier.
Fahey is reported as saying that Western Sydney needs ‘a coordinator general with wide-ranging powers to go around councils and various agencies and to bring them to the party, without delays’.
The Urban Taskforce agrees completely with this proposition and that it is required immediately as the current system is at the mercy of different infrastructure agencies.
The coordination role for the City Deal announced by the NSW Premier at the recentAerotropolis Conference, where Geoff Roberts will take on this role, may be what Mr Fahey is considering but it needs to relate to a broad range of greenfield land release areas for housing as well as a jobs focus.
The Aerotropolis seems to be mainly about jobs for Western Sydney that are very much needed but the delivery of new housing is equally important.
A stronger state government role that ensures efficient delivery of infrastructure like roads, sewer, water and electricity is desperately needed.
The Queensland Government has established the State Assessment and Referral Authority (SARA) to give a single point of contact for those developing new housing to ensure all infrastructure is coordinated properly.
The NSW Government should look at this example in its response to former Premier Fahey’s proposals.
Chris Johnson is the Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

John Fahey’s proposal for Western Sydney infrastructure coordination is essential: Chris Johnson

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-5" data-turn="user" data-turn-id="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" data-turn-id-container="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" dir="auto">Time &amp; Place’s plans to transform the former David Jones factory building in Surry Hills into a mixed-use residential precinct have gone on exhibition through the NSW Government’s In-fill Affordable Housing pathway.</section>

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" dir="auto">
The Marlborough House proposal, lodged for the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marlborough-house-47-97-marlborough-street-surry-hills-nsw-2010">47-97 Marlborough Street</a> site, would see the adaptive reuse of the heritage-listed warehouse building alongside the construction of new residential additions and a separate apartment building on the northern portion of the site.

The proposal seeks approval for 172 apartments across three buildings, including 15 per cent affordable housing managed by a community housing provider for at least 15 years from occupation.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5d1d3c2a-bf13-47d6-a335-7c01102cdee1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.36%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=cjMYrbR.BLUlWH4dar0RVDDo0bG.u2YT" />

Interior view from the Northern Building Penthouse overlooking the park

&nbsp;

The redevelopment is planned for the prominent 3,413 sqm site bounded by Marlborough Street, Goodlet Street and Lansdowne Street, directly opposite Eddie Ward Park and around 200 metres from the Surry Hills light rail stop.

Time &amp; Place acquired the former David Jones building in 2024, marking the first time the property had changed hands in around 50 years.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal centres around the adaptive reuse of the former David Jones factory, originally constructed between 1913 and 1935 in the Inter-War Chicagoesque architectural style.

Wardle noted in its Architectural Design Report that the building “occupies a significant place in the industrial and cultural history of Surry Hills” and at its peak was “the largest department store manufacturing facility in Australia, employing over 800 people and fuelling the growth of Sydney’s fashion and retail industries.”

The practice said the project positions itself “not as an isolated intervention, but as a contributor to the civic, social, and architectural grain of the precinct.”

The proposal would deliver 75 apartments within the retained southern heritage building, 59 apartments within the central addition, and a further 38 apartments within the new northern building fronting Lansdowne Street.

Planning documents show the scheme would comprise a mix of heritage apartments, new-build apartments, townhouses and penthouses.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="57758518-40a3-4b83-958c-d06e96a2cffa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.42%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VerlX9ST5xgBi8.1_YRsqdWTJeT6ygjs" />Interior View of the Heritage Building Apartment

The development would also include a ground-floor retail tenancy on the corner of Marlborough and Lansdowne streets, rooftop communal open space, a landscaped pedestrian link along the western edge of the site, and basement parking accessed from Lansdowne Street via a car stacker system.

&nbsp;

The scheme emerged from a competitive design process run by Urbis, with Wardle ultimately selected as the winning architect ahead of FJC Studio, TZG, Architectus and Wilkinson Eyre.

The Design Integrity Panel later described several aspects of the Wardle scheme as fundamental to the project, including “the stepped character of the new addition to the north of the site”, the landscaped western pedestrian link, and the “garden arrival” experience separating the original Marlborough House from the heritage addition.

Wardle’s design heavily references the site’s industrial and heritage history, while also responding to the surrounding Surry Hills streetscape.

The Architectural Design Report describes Surry Hills as “a finely grained neighbourhood with beautiful and expressive brickworks throughout the suburb,” with the proposal introducing a material palette intended to sit comfortably alongside the existing warehouse fabric and neighbouring terraces.

The report also outlines the project’s relationship with Eddie Ward Park and the broader landscape context of the area.

“Marlborough House occupies a site of deep cultural memory and the neighbouring Eddie Ward Park is of local ecological significance, where natural systems, topography, and stories have long shaped human experience,” Wardle noted in the report.

The architects said the proposal sought to “rebind built form to Country” through landscape, materiality and the adaptive reuse of the heritage structure.

<img alt="Marlborough House" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9ae3f2f9-c85f-477a-a6f8-b43f6cb97c41" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.53%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=B.qUCLqRvJOR.n9CvYcTpaknIX9LuqKZ" />

The project is also being progressed under the NSW Government’s in-fill affordable housing provisions, allowing developments that include affordable housing to access additional height and floor space incentives.

Under the plans, 2,593 sqm of the project’s floor space would be dedicated to affordable housing, slightly exceeding the required 15 per cent threshold.

In its Design Excellence Strategy, Urbis said the project aimed to “sensitively adapt and enhance the heritage-listed building on site through alterations and additions that preserve its historical significance” while delivering “high-quality market and infill affordable housing development in Surry Hills.”

Time &amp; Place has been one of the most active developers nationally in the last 12 to 24 months. Late last year they completed&nbsp;The Queensbridge in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/southbank-vic-3006">Southbank</a>, a mixed-use tower with 353 apartments and a hotel. They are currently selling Park Modern, 246 apartments near the famous Botanic Gardens in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/south-melbourne-vic-3205">South Melbourne</a>, and have future projects, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-wilmot-173-burke-road-28-hope-street-glen-iris-vic-3146">The Wilmot</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>, the redevelopment of the Northcote Plaza, and another tower in South Melbourne.

The developer broke into Sydney just a few years ago with Two Tides in Manly. They have another project nearby, which is at the ultra-luxury end of the market on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/shoreline-manly-beach-89-90-north-steyne-manly">North Steyne</a>, fronting the beach.

It is also continuing to work through the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-time-place-settles-on-design-for-the-chimes-potts-point-redevelopment">redevelopment of The Chimes building</a> on Macleay Street in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/potts-point-nsw-2011">Potts Point</a>, as well as a project on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Mosman's Redan Street</a>.
</section>

Joel Robinson

First look: Time & Place unveils Marlborough House redevelopment designs for former David Jones warehouse in Surry Hills

The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Wing Tai unveils 325-apartment St Kilda Road tower on former VACC House site

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Chris Johnson

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News