<html><body>
For the first three months of 2014 there were 82,051 house sales and 30,417 unit sales recorded. Sales over the first quarter of this year were much softer than over the last quarter of 2013.
 Regardless, March 2014 managed to record the strongest first quarter for house sales since 2009, and the strongest for units since 2010. House sales were 7.9% higher and unit sales are 4.0% higher than for the same quarter in 2013.
 <img src="/images/2014/06/06/kusher-june-6-one.gif" alt="">
Sales volumes are generally lower over the first quarter of any year compared to the remaining quarters which is largely due to a slowing in housing market activity throughout most of January and often well into February.
Given this, it’s not necessarily best to compare sales between quarters because the housing market acts very differently in each period however, comparing to the same quarter in previous years does provide insight into the comparative performance of the market.
Across individual capital city markets, the annual change in sales is quite varied and dependent upon where each city is within the property cycle.
 <img src="/images/2014/06/06/kusher-june-6-two.gif" alt="">
In the more subdued capital city markets of Brisbane and Adelaide where value growth has been limited, these two cities managed to record the greatest annual rise in sales; up 21.1% and 10.8% respectively. Perth and Canberra on the other hand, have recorded falls in sales over the year, down -8.2% and -4.2% respectively.
By way of the variation between houses and units the pick-up in sales activity year-on-year has been greater for houses (7.9%) than it has been for units (1.2%). Over the first three months of this year, house sales were higher than in the same period last year across each city except for Perth (-5.9%) and Darwin (-6.0%). Focussing on unit sales, sales are lower over the first quarter in Sydney (-1.7%), Perth (-17.6%) and Canberra (-23.9%).
 <img src="/images/2014/06/06/kusher-june-6-thre.gif" alt="">
Historically there has always been a strong correlation between sales volumes and property values. If demand is greater and more homes are selling, the likelihood is that values will rise. Alternatively, if fewer buyers are active in the market selling conditions become tougher and values fall,” he said.
When the number of homes sales across Australia’s capital cities edge below 80,000 on a quarterly basis, values are typically rising by a quarterly rate of less than 2.0%. However, when quarterly sales fall to 70,000, this has generally been a trigger point for values to start falling.
While our March sales volumes data indicates that although sales are higher than they were a year ago, monthly sales activity isn’t as strong as it was at the end of 2013.
With the quarterly rate of home value growth having most recently peaked in September 2013 and quarterly sales having peaked shortly thereafter in November, it will be interesting to watch what happens to sales and values from here.
 <img src="/images/2014/06/06/kusher-june-6-four.gif" alt="">
The May RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index results released earlier this week confirmed that capital city home values fell by -1.9% in May 2014. Although this is likely the result of a seasonal influence on the reading, I question that with quarterly value growth peaking and sales volumes tapering, will volumes continue to ease and value growth continue to moderate? Alternatively, will the second half of the year see a rebound in both sales and values much like occurred over the second half of 2013?
While as yet we don’t know the answer to this question, we do know is that last year values rose by 3.0% over the first six months of 2013 followed by a 6.6% capital gain over the second half. With interest rates set to remain low, it may provide enough stimuli to see values start climbing more rapidly once more. We believe that the strong growth in late 2013 and early 2014 has peaked and although values are likely to keep rising, they will most likely do so at a more moderate pace.
This is largely due to affordability constraints becoming more prevalent in the market and both lower returns and capital growth potential for the investors that have been so active in the market. Adding to this is consumer sentiment, which has been trending lower since September last year.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

March quarter strongest for house sales in five years

<html><body>
Growing demand for housing close to inner city areas was the topic of a recent speech by The Reserve Bank’s (RBA) head of financial stability, Luci Ellis.
Entitled ‘Space and Stability: Some Reflections on the Housing-Finance System’, Ellis made some valid points relevant to the housing market in her speech.
Ellis’ speech goes some way to explaining why detached housing closer to the centre of a city is much more expensive than for those suburbs located further away. Put simply, Ellis noted in her speech that housing in these areas is in short supply and with high demand due to its convenience to major working nodes. 
Several key points made on housing within the speech were:
<ul>
<li>Housing prices in the inner-ring are becoming more expensive than those in outer areas of our capital cities;</li>
<li>The availability of jobs is becoming even more centralised, particularly within already established working nodes;</li>
<li>There are minimal jobs outside of city areas; it is becoming increasingly difficult to grow smaller cities and few centres outside of the capital cities have job magnets. Given this, when residents are priced out of capital cities and more affordable regional housing options are not a viable alternative.</li>
</ul>
A rise in the popularity of inner-city unit living is driven by a desire to live closer to the city centre at a lower cost than detached housing. Australia has comparatively low density cities with significant price premiums in the most convenient areas of the city.
Ellis’ speech noted that if housing costs rise beyond people's comfort levels, it is not always feasible or attractive for households to respond by moving to cheaper areas, especially if the more affordable options are further away from their place of employment.
The RBA is hopeful that over time the structure of our cities is such that home owners will have more options as to where they can live, rather than having to live in expensive housing closer to working nodes such as current policies often necessitate.
With plenty of commentary around on some of the best performing areas around the country, it’s important to note that this analysis is typically undertaken over a relatively short-time frame of around 10 years, and where it is often reported that new greenfield areas and regional housing markets are better for capital growth than inner city areas.
The nature of new greenfield developments, both within a capital city and in regional areas, can lift prices in these areas from a very low starting point to a much higher new base as the area sees an influx of new modern housing. While over a shorter time frame this may result in heightened levels of median price increases, this is typically a relatively short-term phenomenon.
It also compares to the shift from a much lower quality initial housing product to a far superior newer housing supply.
Below is a list of suburbs that have recorded the largest rise in median selling prices over a 10 year and a 20 year timeframe. Interestingly, Miles and Chinchilla in regional Queensland are the only regional suburbs listed. Elsewhere, the list is dominated by a collection of the most desirable inner city suburbs in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane - all with high median prices, and all relatively close to major working nodes .
<img src="/images/2014/05/29/kusher-may-29-chart-one.gif" alt="">
With the population continuing to grow and housing supply insufficient we would expect that inner-city houses will continue to be the best performed over the long-term with significant demand and a short supply available.
Note: Median prices are not the most appropriate measure of a market change because these don’t continually measure the change across the same collection of properties. Median prices look at those properties that transaction over specific periods (which may be dramatically different each year).
The table above shows a strong bias towards regional areas of the country over a shorter time frame, particularly those linked to the resource sector. The rate of compound growth over the 10 years is much higher than those in the second table which looks at the 20 year period and reflects the boom in the mining sector over recent years.
The table below supports comments from the RBA with the list dominated by inner city suburbs.
<img src="/images/2014/05/29/kusher-may-29-chart-two.gif" alt="">
</body></html>

Reserve Bank’s take on current housing market

<html><body>
Earlier this week the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released data which revealed that 46.4% of state and local government taxation revenue over the 2012-13 financial year came from property related taxes.
The data showed that over the year, state and local governments collected a record $35.931 billion in taxes from property related sources.  
In comparison, they collected $20.752 million in taxes from employers, $11,089 million in taxes from the provision of goods and services and $9.638 million in taxes on the use of goods and performance of activities.  As this shows, at a state and local government level property taxes are the largest source of revenue.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3293" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-13.jpg" alt="Chart 1">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
The total value of property related taxes increased by 7.2% over the most recent financial year.  In comparison, taxes on employer’s payroll and labour force rose by 5.1%, taxes on the provision of goods and services rose 2.4% and taxes on the use of goods and performance of activities rose 8.6%.
With home values nationally beginning to rise in June 2012, it is clear that state and local government are a major benefactor. With higher home values, taxes such as land tax, municipal rates and stamp duty on conveyances all increase.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3294" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-23.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="501">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
Of the $35.931 billion in property related tax revenue collected in 2012-13, 40% came from municipal rates and 36% came from stamp duties on conveyances.  Land tax was the only other sizeable contributor to property related tax accounting for 17% of revenue.  Over the year the most significant increase in property related taxes came from stamp duty, up by 16.9%.  The amount of tax revenue collected from municipal rates increased by 6.8%, and land taxes increased by 1.5%.
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Property related tax revenue is only collected by those who own properties. Ultimately every property is owned by someone, some as an owner occupier and some as an investor. 
The taxes levied against property are typically only payable by the owner of the property.  Given this, those who choose to rent rather than own property pay no tax on property.  Not to mention the fact that the cost of renting is typically much lower than the cost of owning, it is no surprise more people are choosing to rent rather than own property.
State and local governments have clearly experienced a significant revenue boost via the improvement in the residential housing market over the year.  Stamp duty in particular has seen a significant rise.  With sales volumes and property values rising there have been more sales to receive stamp duty from and at a higher price which also increases the stamp duty collected. 
Of course, the issue with stamp duty is that it is a tax only collected across those properties which sell.  From a residential perspective this is just 5% to 7% of the total housing stock over a given year.  Stamp duty also acts as a disincentive for home owners to transact property on a more regular basis because it is a tax paid on a new purchase.
Many people have called for the removal of stamp duties which would be a positive move to encourage greater mobility of residents.  Of course state and local governments would lose 36% of their property related tax revenue and 17% of their total taxation revenue. 
Many have called for replacing stamp duty with a blanket land tax, another tax would likely be very unpopular and you’d have to consider how equitable that would be particularly for those who have recently paid stamp duty. 
To put a blanket land tax into perspective to cover the $12.841 billion in stamp duty revenue over the 2012-13 financial year, each residential dwelling would have to pay $1,391.69 based on the ABS estimate of 9,226,900 residential dwellings as at June 2013.  Keep in mind that stamp duty isn’t just payable on residential property transactions.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3295" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-33.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="163">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
Over the year, stamp duty revenue was higher in each state except for Victoria (-1.4%), Queensland (-6.7%) and the Australian Capital Territory (-3.3%).  New South Wales (21.4%), Western Australia (33.0%) and the Northern Territory (35.5%) recorded the greatest rises in stamp duty revenue. 
According to the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index, Sydney home values rose by 5.6% over the year, Perth values were 6.0% higher and Darwin values were 6.1% higher.  Conversely, Melbourne home values were 3.4% higher, Brisbane values were just 0.6% higher and Canberra value were 1.1% higher.  Clearly home value rises have a positive effect on stamp duty revenues.
The data highlighted shows that property is the most important source of revenue for state and local governments, accounting for 46.4% of their total taxation revenue.  The issue of course is that these levels of government are looking to constantly grow their revenues. 
The two main sources of property related revenue are rates and stamp duty.  Rates can be grown by encouraging a greater number of ratepayers into a region (create more housing) and stamp duty can only be lifted by changing the rates or encouraging higher prices and/or more sales. 
In certain regions increasing the supply of ratepayers is not possible so it is clear that stamp duty is an extremely important source of revenue. With the housing market recording significant value growth and much higher sales volumes throughout the 2013-14 financial year, no doubt stamp duty revenue will be much higher again. 
The question is can governments continue to rely on property being a one-way bet?  Particularly when the Reserve Bank has repeatedly warned of late that it is not.
</body></html>

Can governments continue to rely on property being a one-way bet?

<html><body>
While a rise in home values across Australia’s property market has been welcome news for Sydney and Melbourne property owners in particular, the flow on effect hasn’t been so favourable for rental growth and yields.
Rental growth has slowed markedly and rental yields are falling as value growth significantly outpaces rental growth.
<img src="/images/2014/05/22/kusher-may-22-one.gif" alt="">
The May RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index reported that combined capital city home values increased by 11.5%. At an individual capital city level, value growth ranged from 1.2% in Canberra to a 16.7% rise in Sydney. Australia’s combined capital cities recorded an increase in rental rates of 2.4% over the past year.
Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart are the only capital cities where rental growth was greater over the past 12 months than for the previous 12 months. At the other end of the spectrum, growth slowed across five of the eight capital cities with Perth experiencing the most extreme slowdown.
<img src="/images/2014/05/22/kusher-may-22-two.gif" alt="">
Over the 12 months to April 2013, Perth rental rates had increased by 10.4% compared to a -0.5% fall over the most recent 12 months. Sydney was the only city to record an increase in rental rates higher than inflation; up 3.7% over the past year.
With a large percentage of loans now going to investors at a time when the rate of rental growth is slowing would suggest that most investors are chasing capital growth rather than rental return. When you consider that the value growth in our two largest cities (Sydney and Melbourne) has been so strong over the past year, it’s no surprise.
<img src="/images/2014/05/22/kusher-may-22-three.gif" alt="">
Comparing annual value growth and annual rental growth across each capital city, home values rose at a faster pace than rental rates and as a result, rental yields experienced a fall over the year.
It wasn’t surprising to see that the greatest differences between home value growth and rental growth have been recorded in Sydney and Melbourne.
<img src="/images/2014/05/22/kusher-may-22-four.gif" alt="">
As a result of values rising faster than rental rates, gross rental yields have fallen over the past year across each capital city. The largest falls in yields have been experienced across Sydney and Melbourne where value growth has been strongest. These two cities also have the lowest yields of all capital cities at 3.9% and 3.4% respectively.
This highlight that as home values rise, the level of rental growth has not been able to keep pace.
</body></html>

Flow on effect of rising home value is slowing rental growth and falling yields

<html><body>
Over the three months to April 1990, the median selling price of a dwelling (a combination of houses and units) across Sydney was recorded at $152,500. 
As at April 2014, the median selling price of a dwelling was $680,000 which represents a 347% increase in selling price over the 24 year period.  Of course a median price is only measured across properties which actually transacted but it is interesting to look at what the median priced home is over time
The following charts will look at the changes in median price over time and the location of median priced sales.  Note that the each dot represents one sale and the red dots indicate house sales while the blue dots represent unit sales.  The buffers shown on the maps represent a 10 kilometre, 20 kilometre and 50 kilometre distance from the Sydney CBD.
Three months to April 1990
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3252" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-1990-580x533.jpg" alt="Sydney 1990" width="580" height="533">
The median price of a Sydney home over the three months to April 1990 was $237,000, across the city there was 12 sales at that price over the period, three of which were units and the remaining nine were houses. 
Apart from one sale at <a href="/news">Sylvania</a>, the reaming 11 sales all occurred within a 20 kilometre radius of the city.  For houses, you will note that four of the nine suburbs are located within a 10 kilometre radius of the city and for units, <a href="/news">Epping</a> was the only suburb with a sale outside of the 10 kilometre region.
Three months to April 1994
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3253" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-1994-580x537.jpg" alt="Sydney 1994" width="580" height="537">
Moving to April 1994, there were 34 sales at the median price over the three month period and the median price was recorded at $169,000. 
Comparing this chart to the previous chart you see that the median priced house is beginning to move further away from the city centre with only five of the 24 median priced house sales within 10 kilometres of the city centre and five of those 24 sales were located more than 20 kilometres from the city centre.  For units, three of the 10 sales were outside of a 10 kilometre radius of the city, two of which were more than 20 kilometres away.
Three months to April 1999
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3254" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-1999-580x540.jpg" alt="Sydney 1999" width="580" height="540">
By April 1999, the Sydney median house price was recorded at $237,000 and over that three month period there was 28 houses sold at that price and 31 units. 
The big shift over the five year period was the fact that none of the median priced house sales were within a 10 kilometre radius and a greater proportion were located more than 20 kilometres from the city than those within 20 kilometres. 
Within a 10 kilometre radius of the city, units where the only sales at the median price however, units transacting at the median price were becoming more common in areas more than 10 kilometres from the city centre.
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Three months to April 2004
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3255" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-2004-580x543.jpg" alt="Sydney 2004" width="580" height="543">
The median Sydney dwelling price over the three months to April 2004 in Sydney was recorded at $440,000.
Over the preceding three months there were 62 house sales and 65 unit sales at that price.
Compared to five years earlier there were a few house sales within 10 kilometres of the city centre however, once again the majority occurred more than 20 kilometres from the city centre.  For units, most sales still occurred close to the city centre however, more and more were transacting at the median price further away from the city centre.
Three months to April 2009
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3256" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-2009-580x544.jpg" alt="Sydney 2009" width="580" height="544">
By April 2009, the median dwelling price in Sydney was slightly lower than from five years earlier, recorded at $420,000. Keep in mind that from early 2004 to mid-2009 there was no growth in Sydney home values after they fell by around 10%.  
The map is quite similar to the previous one with 102 houses and 103 units sold at the median price. 
Once again only a few house sales were within a 10 kilometre radius of the city with the vast majority occurring more than 20 kilometres from the CBD.  Unit sales were fairly similar and mostly focused within the 20 kilometre radius of the city.
Three months to April 2014
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3257" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sydney-2014-580x550.jpg" alt="Sydney 2014" width="580" height="550">
Over the most recent three month period, the median Sydney dwelling price was recorded at $680,000.  Over the three month period (and note these figures will be revised higher) there was 31 house sales at the median price and 40 unit sales. 
Looking at the above map again we see few house sales within a 20 kilometre radius of the city and the median priced unit is pushing further away from the city centre with more and more sales occurring more than 10 kilometres from the CBD.
The analysis is an interesting exercise in how over time, the ‘typical’ home across the city is moving further and further away from the city centre. 
As a result, it is no wonder we are seeing growing levels of higher density development in the major capital cities.  As the typical housing option moves further away from the city centre, those that need or want to be close to the city centre look for more affordable alternatives such as units. 
As the city continues to grow and density in the inner city increases we would expect a further drift outwards of both the typical house and unit sale in Sydney.
</body></html>

Sydney housing over time: A case study

<html><body>
The differential between house and unit values is widening across Australia’s capital cities where houses are now recording greater value growth than units.
 Of the top five areas surveyed in each capital city, Peppermint Grove on the banks of the Swan River in Perth holds the greatest differential between capital city unit and house values; house values are 687% (or almost seven times) more expensive than unit values in the suburb.
Centennial Park in Sydney’s eastern suburbs followed and recorded a 523% differential then came the upmarket suburb of Toorak in Melbourne’s inner city at 283%.
Adelaide was a surprise addition with Toorak Gardens recording a differential of 280%, while Ascot in Brisbane recorded 236%. Forrest in Canberra recorded 242%. Lagging behind was Darwin and Hobart with their respective widest differentials of 156% and 105%.
<img src="/images/2014/05/15/kusher-may-15-two.jpg" alt="">
The data shows that at the end of the first quarter of 2014, combined capital city house values were 28% higher than those for combined capital city unit values while for the past 12 months, house values increased by 10.7% compared to a 9.4% rise in unit values. The faster rate of value growth for houses is likely to result in a growing differential between house and unit values.
Across the individual capital cities, house values are higher than unit values in each city with the differentials recorded at: Sydney (40%), Melbourne (40%), Brisbane (27%), Adelaide (31%), Perth (23%), Hobart (12%), Darwin (34%) and Canberra (46%). In most capitals we are seeing this differential widening.
I’m not surprised at the results given the widening gap between houses and units. It’s no real surprise we are seeing a rapid shift to greater development of units as opposed to houses.
More units have been approved for construction than houses in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Darwin and Canberra. However, it’s important to remember that more houses sell each year than the more affordable alternative which is units. As values rise, the challenge for some buyers is that they become priced out of the detached house market and will then need to divert the attention to more affordable alternatives found in the unit market. Today’s adjacent table listing the Top 5 suburbs highlights this fact well.
While many people aspire to living in desirable inner city areas, the reality is that there is a short supply of detached houses in these areas coupled with plenty of demand. As a result many will never be able to meet these aspirations. The alternative is to look to the unit market where the cost is still going to be comparatively high but is generally significantly lower than that of a detached house.
Units in these suburbs are often older style units which don’t come with modern architecture. Most of these suburbs are long established suburbs and have a fairly limited supply of units, most of which were built many years ago.
</body></html>

House price growth increasingly higher than unit values

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released housing finance data for March 2014 earlier this week.
The data showed that the number of owner occupier housing finance commitments fell by -0.9% in March.  In value terms, lending to owner occupiers was -1.2% lower over the month and lending to investors was down -0.8%.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3222" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-11.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="182">
Looking at the break-down of housing finance commitments by value over-time, you can see that on a 12 month average basis, the greatest proportion of lending over the past year has gone to investors (37.7%) followed by: owner occupier subsequent purchasers (non-first home buyers) (36.7%), refinances by owner occupiers (17.6%) and owner occupier first home buyers (7.9%). 
As the above chart shows, investment lending is at its highest level in a number of years and there has previously only ever been one period where investment lending was greater than lending to subsequent purchasers. 
The proportion of lending to first home buyers is at a record low, accounting for an average of 7.9% of the value of finance commitments over the 12 months to March 2014.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3223" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-21.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="179">
Turning the focus to the monthly data on the number of owner occupier housing finance commitments, as mentioned these were -0.9% lower with refinance commitments down -1.0% and non-refinance commitments falling -0.9%. 
Despite the monthly fall, as the above chart shows, both refinances and non-refinances are trending higher albeit non-refinances in particular remain well below historic average levels.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3224" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-31.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="182">
Over the month, owner occupier housing finance commitments to first home buyers increased by 12.2% which was the largest monthly rise since May 2012.  Despite the monthly rise, first home buyer commitments remain slightly lower than a year ago (-0.8%). 
As a proportion of total owner occupier finance commitments, first home buyers accounted for 12.6% of commitments in March, up from 12.5% in February but down from 14.1% in March 2013.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3225" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-41.jpg" alt="Chart 4" width="500" height="181">
The total value of investment housing finance commitments fell by -0.8% in March 2014 however, it has increased by 27.9% year-on-year.  As mentioned, the proportion of investment commitments has, on average, been higher than owner occupier subsequent purchases over the past year. 
In March, investment finance commitments accounted for 39.1% of total finance commitments.  The level of investment activity remains at a level which is well above average and of a magnitude not recorded since late in 2003.  Although it is hard to bed down any timely and accurate statistics on overseas buyers it is important to note that if foreign buyers are purchasing with funds sourced from abroad, they are not captured in these figures.
<blockquote>
The last time we saw investment activity at these levels we also witnessed a marked slowdown in value growth nationally.
</blockquote>
With the level of investment remaining stubbornly high, it is no wonder that the Reserve Bank continues to repeat its warning that housing in Australia is not a one-way bet.  Obviously low mortgage rates coupled with strong value growth, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne is attracting the attention of investors. 
The potential challenge will be what happens next with investors once value growth slows and mortgage rates rise. 
The last time we saw investment activity at these levels we also witnessed a marked slowdown in value growth nationally. As an example, in Sydney values began falling shortly thereafter and values took five and a half years to return to their previous peaks.  Investors jumping into the market at this time should definitely bear this in mind.
Overall, the monthly read on housing finance data was weak, however, the trend shows that demand for finance is continuing to escalate. In particular, investors and upgraders are really driving the housing market at the moment.
However, the level of activity by owner occupiers purchasing homes (as opposed to refinancing) remains well below average levels.  Obviously the rise in investment lending is to some extent restricting the level of lending to owner occupiers.
</body></html>

Level of investment remains stubbornly high in housing finance data

<html><body>
Negative gearing, which allows expenses associated with investments to be off-set against income earnings, is repeatedly referenced in the 2011-2012 Taxation Statistics Report released recently by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Some of the most common deductions for residential property are: rental interest, capital works and other costs such as strata levies and depreciation.
The ATO stated that over the 2011/12 financial year there were 9,799,820 million taxable individuals in Australia. Of these individuals, 19.3% or almost one in five owned investment properties.
<img src="/images/2014/05/08/kusher-may-8-one.jpg" alt="">
The proportion of Australian’s that now own an investment property is currently trending higher although there was a slight fall over the most recent year; in 1993/94, 12.9% of taxpayers owned an investment property compared to 19.3%.
It was interesting to see the increase in the proportion of investment property owners that are negatively geared.
<img src="/images/2014/05/08/kusher-may-8-two.jpg" alt="">
The proportion of investors reporting a net loss on investment property increased from just over half (51.0%) in 1993/94 to 66.8% in 2011/12.
Once again, the proportion of negatively geared investors has eased slightly over the most recent year however, less than one third of all owners of residential investment property are actually producing a net profit from that investment.
The 2011/12 taxation statistics show that gross rent from investment properties was recorded at a record high $33.999 billion. The analysis on the deductions claimed from this amount: $24.177 billion, was for rental interest deductions. $2.167 billion was claimed in rent capital works deductions and $15.351 billion was claimed in ‘other deductions’. As a result, the net rental losses on investment property over the 2011/12 financial year were recorded at $7.859 billion.
<img src="/images/2014/05/08/kusher-may-8-three.jpg" alt="">
Although this is a large sum, it has reduced from its peak of $9.064 billion in 2007/08.
Over the 2011/12 financial year, 629,230 individuals recorded a gross profit from their investment properties with the total profit recorded at $5.939 billion or $9,439 per investor per annum. Conversely, 1,266,540 taxpayers claimed a loss, with total losses reaching $13.798 billion. On a per person basis, this equates to $10,895 per annum.
Negative gearing continues to be a contentious issue and feature of the tax system which is unique to Australia.
Another point worth noting is that the data in the 2011 Census shows that the government only owns and rents out around 4.1% of total housing stock; conversely dwelling approvals data shows that a very small proportion of new housing approvals are granted to the public sector.
<img src="/images/2014/05/08/kusher-may-8-four.jpg" alt="">
Looking at these two individual results, it would suggest that the government has little interest in building or managing rental accommodation. This suggests that negative gearing is in place to encourage developers to build new rental accommodation and private individuals to act as landlord for those who aren’t in a position to own their own home.
While it would make sense to apply negative gearing only to newly constructed properties, politically it would likely be unpopular. Furthermore, if negative gearing was to be removed the government would likely have to play more of a role in constructing new homes and managing a portfolio of properties. On balance, they probably see that foregoing almost $8 billion in taxation revenue is more cost effective than developing and managing a greater proportion of new housing stock.
</body></html>

Slight fall in number of negatively geared property investors

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released dwelling approvals data for March 2014 earlier this week.  Although the monthly reading recorded a fall, the trend of the data showed that the number of approvals is continuing to rise.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3203" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-1.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="181">
Total dwelling approvals fell by -3.5% (seasonally adjusted) over the month however, they are still 20.0% higher year-on-year. 
House approvals fell by -0.5% over the month compared to a much larger -7.5% fall in the more volatile unit category. 
Year on year both houses and units have recorded a significant increase, up 19.1% and 21.3% respectively.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3204" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-2.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="179">
The month-to-month index is inherently volatile; as a result we prefer to look at the rolling annual number of approvals.  Over the 12 months to March 2013, there were 188,153 dwelling approvals nationally.  This was the highest annual number of approvals since the 12 months to January 1995.  Annual house approvals outweighed unit approvals with 104,598 and 83,554 approvals respectively.  House approvals are at their highest level since April 2011 while unit approvals are currently at an all-time high.
With interest rates currently set at low levels, population growth quite high and property values rising, developers are becoming more comfortable in seeking applications for new developments.  Of course this is just the approval stage and it will be interesting to see what proportion of these approvals actually make it to commencement in the near-term.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3205" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-3.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="181">
Across the individual capital city markets the annual number of approvals is also generally trending higher with record high approvals in some capitals.  Following is the annual number of approvals across the capital cities with the annual change in brackets: Sydney 38,436 approvals (35.7%), 42,231 (2.7%) in Melbourne, 19,566 (43.8%) in Brisbane, 8,264 (36.4%) in Adelaide, 24,375 in Perth (45.1%), 770 (5.8%) in Hobart, 1,637 (-23.7%) in Darwin and 5,157 (27.6%) in Canberra. 
As you can see dwelling approvals are generally trending higher over the past year. 
In fact dwelling approvals over the year were at a record high level in Sydney and Perth. 
In Melbourne dwelling approvals are at their highest level since November 2011, Brisbane approvals are at their highest level since July 2004, in Adelaide approvals are at their highest level since August 2011, Hobart approvals are at their highest level since January 2013, Darwin approvals are trending lower and Canberra approvals are at their highest level since February 2012.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3206" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-4.jpg" alt="Chart 4" width="500" height="177">
The other interesting evolution of the market is the ongoing rise in prominence of unit approvals. 
The number of unit approvals is at a record high in both Sydney and Brisbane.  As a proportion of all dwelling approvals, more than 50% of all approvals over the past year have been for units rather than houses in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Darwin and Canberra.  Sydney has consistently approved more units than houses for the past 20 years and both Darwin and Canberra have approved more units than houses consistently since 2010. 
The rising prominence of unit approvals in Melbourne and Brisbane is a relatively new phenomenon with unit approvals over-taking those of houses in Melbourne from August 2012 and in Brisbane from June 2013.
It is encouraging to see that dwelling approvals are trending higher nationally and across most capital cities. 
This is a desired outcome of low interest rates with the Reserve Bank hoping that a pick-up in dwelling construction can somewhat offset falling mining investment.  New dwelling construction also has a significant multiplier effect throughout the economy creating jobs and encouraging additional retail spending.
The main challenge will be that in many cities we are seeing an unprecedented level of units approved for construction.  Certainly demand for units has risen over recent years however, the pipeline of approvals is at record levels which are not yet tested.  Obviously most developments will need a level of presale to trigger finance to commence construction and it will be interesting to see how many of these unit approvals actually make it to construction phase over the coming months and years.
</body></html>

Highlights from the March 2014 building approvals data

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released Consumer Price Index figures for the March 2014 quarter earlier this week. 
The data showed that over the first quarter of the year inflation was recorded at 0.6%, down from 0.8% over the final quarter of last year.
Over the past year, inflation has been recorded at 2.9%.  The Reserve Bank (RBA) has an annual inflation target of between 2% to 3% over the medium term and although the reading is at the higher end of that band it is still within the range.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3147" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-12.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="184">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3148" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-22.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="179">
Interestingly, non-tradable (or domestic inflation) was outside of the target range at 3.1% but has fallen from 4.2% a year ago. On the other hand, tradable (or imported inflation) was recorded at 2.6% up from -0.2% a year ago.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3149" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-31.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="184">
Turning the focus specifically to housing, the housing component of CPI has increased by 3.6% over the 12 months to March 2014, its lowest annual reading since June 2012. 
Across the housing sub-categories, new dwelling purchases by owner occupiers rose by 2.4% over the year with relatively tame growth also recorded for: maintenance and repair of the dwelling (2.5%), rents (2.9%) and other housing (4.7%).  Water and sewerage recorded the greatest annual rise at 10.8% followed by: property rates and charges (7.9%), gas and other household fuels (6.9%), utilities (6.8%) and electricity (5.2%).
The 2.9% annual increase in rents was the lowest reading since June 2006.  Similarly, the 5.2% annual increase in electricity was the lowest annual rise since June 2007.  On the other hand, the 10.8% annual increase in water and sewerage was the greatest rise since the 12 months to June 2011.
Another important consideration is the impact of inflation on home values.  Calculating ‘real’ home values by adjusting the RP Data-Rismark Home value Index for inflation provides valuable insight.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3150" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-41.jpg" alt="Chart 4" width="500" height="178">
As the above chart highlights, once you adjust for the impact of inflation the level of capital growth over the longer term is much lower. 
In fact, when you adjust for inflation, combined capital city home values peaked in the September 2010 quarter and are still -1.8% lower than that level.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3151" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-51.jpg" alt="Chart 5" width="500" height="182">
Over the 12 months to March 2014, combined capital city home values have increased by 10.6% however, when you adjust for inflation the rise has been a lower 7.5%. 
Across each city the rate of capital growth over the year is somewhat lower when you adjust for inflation and markets such as Hobart and Canberra which have recorded low levels of value growth have actually recorded value falls.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3152" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-6.jpg" alt="Chart 6" width="500" height="184">
Home values across the combined capital cities are currently 7.2% higher than their previous peak according to the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index. 
However, as mentioned above, when values are adjusted for inflation the story is quite different with values -1.8% lower. 
Across every capital city except for Sydney home values are lower than their previous peak in inflation adjusted terms.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3153" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-7.jpg" alt="Chart 7" width="500" height="179">
Looking at the compound annual rate of value growth over the past five, ten and 15 years in inflation adjusted terms you can see some interesting trends.  Sydney home values have increased at an annual rate of 3.6% over the past five years, but earlier soft market conditions have resulted in value growth of just 0.4% pa over the past decade.
Brisbane home values have fallen at a rate of -2.3% per annum over the past five years and over the same period Adelaide home values are -1.0% lower per annum, Perth values have fallen by -0.2% per annum and Hobart values have declined by -3.1% each year. 
Over the past decade, Darwin has been the standout performer with values rising by 5.9% per annum and the weakest market has been Hobart where values have fallen at a rate of -0.1% each year.
With mortgage rates at such low levels and the 10 years of no ‘real’ growth in Sydney home values it goes some way to explaining the rising demand and surging home values. 
Melbourne is also seeing strong capital growth but when compared to Sydney has been a much stronger capital growth performer over the past decade.  Despite a weak five years in terms of capital growth we are yet to really see the housing market heat up in Brisbane and Adelaide. 
In Perth the housing market was strong early in this growth phase however; capital growth is now fading despite the fact that values are still lower in real terms than they were five years ago.
</body></html>

Inflation remains contained within the RBA's target range

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Cameron Kusher

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News