<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sunland-group">Sunland Group</a> has officially lodged plans for its first Gold Coast apartment project since the departure of the Abedian family from the company three years ago, unveiling a new high-rise proposal for a prominent Broadbeach corner site on Old Burleigh Road.

The application was submitted by an entity directed by Tom Jamieson, stepson of longtime Sunland leader Soheil Abedian, and Riaz Rezvanipour, brother-in-law of Sahba Abedian, Soheil’s son.

Sunland acquired the 1,283 sqm site on the corner of Old Burleigh Road and Armrick Avenue for $9.5 million late last year and is now seeking approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/99-101-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">42-storey tower with 81 apartments</a>.

<img alt="First look: Sunland Group returns to Broadbeach with new Old Burleigh Road tower plans" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fea2946d-90ee-4cfc-babe-2a8ad5db2cb6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers.png?VersionId=BV0fihJw31nDIQ8ozY_h3GbS8mxDyhnm" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/contreras-earl-architecture">Contreras Earl Architecture</a>, the proposed tower at 99-101 Old Burleigh Road would deliver a predominantly larger-format apartment mix aimed at the owner-occupier market. Plans include 17 two-bedroom apartments, 55 three-bedroom apartments, and nine four-bedroom residences across 35 residential levels.

The development also incorporates three basement levels, four podium parking levels, two levels of communal recreation facilities, and rooftop plant and equipment. A total of 189 car spaces are proposed, significantly exceeding the 90 spaces required under the planning scheme.

The architecture adopts a sculpted, curvilinear form, with deep wraparound balconies and integrated landscaping intended to soften the tower’s vertical expression. The planning report states the building’s “slender footprint/form provides a complimentary yet varied built form within the local streetscape” and contributes to “a varied, yet ordered skyline.”

Contreras Earl noted in its Architectural Statement that from the early stages, the project addressed a fundamental challenge: how to accommodate the required residential yield while avoiding the conventional model of a tower sitting on a rigid, fully resolved parking podium.

“The most direct response would have been to consolidate parking into a singular, flat podium and extrude a repetitive tower above,” the statement said. “While efficient, this approach would result in a consolidated built form with limited engagement with the surrounding landscape and public realm.”

Instead, the conventional podium model was “deliberately rejected”. The architects described the base of the building as “a landscaped architectural condition where structure, planting and circulation are integrated”.

“Rather than presenting a continuous built mass, the base of the building is articulated through a series of concrete planter elements that organise the podium into a fragmented system,” the statement said. “This approach reduces the perceived bulk of the lower levels while establishing a more permeable interface with the streetscape and adjacent open space.”

<img alt="Sunland" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="923fad8d-c960-4527-8fbe-975cf1ddf88d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-25%20at%2010.32.03%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=pngwb0hYOIUpq9vDw6F2EsOiVuHF3DiX" />

&nbsp;

The site sits within the High Density Residential Zone and inside the City of Gold Coast’s unrestricted “HX” building height area, where the planning framework anticipates intensified residential development tied to the expanding light rail corridor. The planning report notes the area is undergoing “transition toward more intense development forms” given its proximity to Broadbeach, Surfers Paradise, and high-frequency public transport infrastructure.

Positioned directly opposite Broadbeach Park and within walking distance of Florida Gardens light rail station, the development would sit among a rapidly evolving stretch of Old Burleigh Road that has become one of the Gold Coast’s most active apartment development corridors.

The application joins a growing pipeline of luxury residential projects reshaping Broadbeach, including nearby developments by 5Point Projects, Polycell, and Graya.

The planning report argues the project contributes toward the Gold Coast’s long-term housing targets under the South East Queensland Regional Plan, which forecasts the need for more than 100,000 additional high-rise dwellings across the city by 2046.

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-4" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-1" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-1" dir="auto">
The Abedian family departed Sunland Group in late 2023, ending a four-decade association with the company, and subsequently established the private development firm Abedian &amp; Co. The group is currently delivering <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/greenmount-residences-cnr-hill-street-and-marine-parade-coolangatta-qld-4225">Greenmount Residences</a> at Rainbow Bay and recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/18-mary-avenue-14-18-mary-avenue-broadbeach-qld-4218">18 Mary Avenue</a> in Broadbeach.
</section>

Joel Robinson

First look: Sunland Group returns to Broadbeach new apartment market with new Old Burleigh Road tower plans

The Minns Labor Government has established the new Bays West Delivery Authority to lead the development&nbsp;of the Bays West Precinct and Blackwattle Bay Precinct.&nbsp;

The Authority is charged with creating Sydney’s newest precinct, a thriving, connected, sustainable hub with White Bay Power Station as its cultural heart. Its vision is to build on the area’s natural, cultural and industrial history to shape a vibrant new neighbourhood.

The precinct will deliver up to 8,500 well-located homes, including a minimum of 10 per cent affordable and essential worker homes. Combine new housing with public open space, opening public access to the waterfront for the first time in more than 100 years, while retaining important deep-water facilities to support Sydney’s working harbour.

Located just minutes from the Sydney CBD and connected to a world-class metro, ferry, walking and cycling links, the Bays West precinct will rebalance housing growth towards well-serviced inner-city locations and help tackle the state’s housing crisis.

The Bays West Delivery Authority,&nbsp;an agency of the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure, will report to the NSW Minister for Lands and Property who already has oversight of major precinct renewal projects including at Blackwattle Bay and Barangaroo.

As part of the broader Bays West transformation, the Minns Government recently announced that a proposal from Lendlease to redevelop part of the Bays West Precinct has progressed to Stage 2 of the NSW Government’s unsolicited proposals process.

<img alt="Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2ed71eb9-d8e8-4fa7-b9d1-de4531dcf2f3" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-25%20at%209.42.31%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=IDryFIbped9SNDg72LEN_EecvhUsOPvp" />

The Minns Labor Government has also confirmed the Bays West precinct will have a new suburb name. This will be the first major suburb built in close proximity to Sydney’s CBD in decades and will encompass the area currently being referred to as Bays West, including Glebe Island and the White Bay Power Station. Served by a new Metro station just five minutes from the CBD, it will become one of the most populous suburbs in the Inner West and one of Sydney’s premier cultural destinations.

An early works program is taking shape, which&nbsp;includes the first stages of an international design competition.&nbsp;

The aim of the Bays West&nbsp;International&nbsp;Design Competition is to&nbsp;ensure design excellence is embedded in the project from the start. The competition will deliver an&nbsp;urban framework that defines the character, ambition and long-term identity of&nbsp;this&nbsp;former industrial precinct as it transitions to a vibrant, inclusive and sustainable residential&nbsp;neighbourhood.

The competition will be led by the Bays West Delivery Authority in partnership with Government Architect NSW.&nbsp;

It will launch with an invitation for a global Expressions of Interest, before moving to an invitation-only stage that will be assessed by a panel that&nbsp;will provide advice to Cabinet who will select a winner.

Premier of NSW, Chris Minns said the establishment of the new Authority is the first step in transforming the Bays West precinct into a vibrant, livable suburb minutes from the Sydney CBD and two stops from Hunter St Station on the Metro West line.

“The Authority will deliver well-located homes close to the heart of the city and integrate the new precinct with Blackwattle Bay and the new Sydney Fish Market.

“This is a generational opportunity to build a new suburb on the city’s edge and open the harbour foreshore to the public for the first time in a century.”&nbsp;

Minister for Lands and Property Steve Kamper said the new Bays West Delivery Authority established by the Minns Government will turbocharge the development of Sydney’s newest suburb.

“The Authority is working at a record pace to deliver an international design competition, planning pathways and a financial model so that this development benefits Sydney with well-designed homes in a central location, close to public transport, jobs, entertainment and essential services.

“If we want Sydney to stay liveable and affordable, we need to be bold about using underutilised government-owned land to deliver homes for the future while making sure essential working harbour functions can be accommodated.”

Bays West Delivery Authority established to "turbocharge" Sydney’s newest suburb

Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

Smsfs

<html><body>
<div>
Westpac will stop new loan offers to self-managed superannuation funds for investing in property.
The nation's second largest mortgage lender, and its subsidiaries Bank of Melbourne, St George Bank and BankSA, will withdraw from lending to small super funds at the end of July.
It follows a review of funds' prospects and its exposure to the sector.
The move has shocked mortgage brokers and financial advisers, the Australian Financial Review reported.
All lenders have been tightening their lending to self-managed funds, in response to tightening regulatory interventions, tougher investment and property markets and the shift from investment to principal and investment loan products.
</div>
<div>
<div id="article-inline-ad">"We continually review our products and services to ensure they meet the requirements of our customers," a Westpac spokesman said.</div>
</div>
<div>
"In order to simplify and streamline our self-managed super fund products, we will be withdrawing from sale our SMSF home loan product and business lending to SMSFs, effective Tuesday 31 July 2018."
The bank advised continue to service customers with existing loans through switching loans and extending loan maturity. 
</div>
<div>
More than 600,000 investors have more than $700 billion invested in SMSFs, with many self-employeds also investing in their work places via their business factories, warehouses or consulting rooms.
A recent ASIC review found 90 per cent of funds failed to comply with the "best interests" test and other legal obligations.
</div>
<div>
"The strategy of gearing through an SMSF to invest in property, which is being actively promoted by 'property one-stop shops', is high risk," the ASIC report noted.
</div>
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Westpac set to stop property loans for SMSFs

<html><body>
Around 90% of financial advice on setting up a self-managed super fund (SMSF) did not comply with relevant laws, a review by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has found.
ASIC today released Report 575 SMSFs: Improving the quality of advice and member experiences and Report 576 Member experiences with self-managed superannuation funds.
ASIC reviewed 250 client files randomly selected based on Australian Taxation Office (ATO) data and assessed compliance with the Corporations Act’s ‘best interests’ duty and related obligations.
<img src="https://download.asic.gov.au/media/4780401/rep-576-infographic.jpg" alt="Rep 576 Infographic" width="500" height="353">
In 91% of files reviewed the adviser did not comply with Corporations Act’s ‘best interests’ duty and related obligations. The non-compliant advice ranged from record-keeping and process failures to failures likely to result in significant financial detriment. This included:
<ul>
<li>In 10% of files reviewed, the client was likely to be significantly worse off in retirement due to the advice;</li>
<li>In 19% of cases, clients were at an increased risk of financial detriment due to a lack of diversification.</li>
</ul>
ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said the standard of advice on SMSFs must improve. ‘A healthy and robust SMSF sector is an important part of our super system. However, it is clear lots of people are setting up self-managed super funds without knowing whether this is the best option. The financial advice sector has significant work to do to lift their performance on this issue.’
ASIC will be taking follow up regulatory action, in particular where consumers have suffered detriment.
ASIC also conducted market research which included interviews with 28 consumers who had set up an SMSF and an online survey of 457 consumers who had set up an SMSF. Through this work we found a lot of people do not understand fully the risks of SMSFs, or their legal obligations as trustees.
In the online survey:
<ul>
<li>38% of respondents found running an SMSF more time consuming than expected;</li>
<li>32% found it to more expensive than expected;</li>
<li>33% did not know the law required an SMSF to have an investment strategy; and</li>
<li>29% mistakenly believed that SMSFs had the same level of protection as prudentially regulated superannuation funds in the event of fraud.</li>
</ul>
Mr Kell said, ‘Decisions about super are some of the most important a person can make. However, ASIC found there is a lack of basic knowledge of the legal obligations in setting up or running an SMSF. It is also concerning many people with an SMSF have not understood the importance of diversification, which puts their financial future at risk.’ 
ASIC also found some people had moved to SMSFs as a way to get into the property market, and were using it solely for this purpose without a wider investment strategy.
The interviews also identified a growing use of 'one-stop-shops' where the adviser has a relationship with a developer or a real estate agent whose products the person is encouraged to invest in. This put people at increased risk of getting poor advice that did not take account of their personal circumstances or is not given in their best interests.
ASIC’s findings are supported by the recent Productivity Commission super report which found smaller SMSFs (with balances under $1 million) delivered on average returns below larger funds, and that the costs for low-balance SMSFs are higher than for funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
ASIC’s SMSF report will inform its surveillance and regulatory work into the SMSF sector. ASIC will take enforcement action as appropriate, including ensuring licensees with non-compliant advisers undertake client review and remediation.
More broadly, ASIC and the ATO will have an increased focus on property one-stop-shops. This will include sharing data and intelligence, and ASIC taking enforcement action where it sees unscrupulous behaviour.
</body></html>

Most new SMSFs set up with flawed advice, and not even compliant 

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The superannuation fund for the real estate industry has called for stricter controls on the establishment of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) with small account balances.
It follows the release of the Productivity Commission’s draft report on superannuation, which finds that SMSFs with low account balances perform “significantly worse” than APRA regulated funds.
The Productivity Commission’s draft report confirms recent Australian Tax Office data on the performance of SMSFs, which show that very low balance SMSFs are unsustainable – often delivering negative returns – and that a lack of scale is a major risk to members.
REI Super is calling for new rules to make it harder for people with under $200,000 in their super to set up an SMSF.
The Productivity Commission’s draft report found that “many smaller SMSFs (those with balancesunder $1 million in assets) have delivered materially lower returns on average than larger SMSFs.”
It found that “costs for low-balance SMSFs are particularly high, and significantly more so than APRA-regulated funds. These high costs are the primary cause of the poor net returns experienced by small SMSFs on average.” 
It comes on top of devastating evidence before the Royal Commission into the Banking and Financial Services Industry earlier this month, of financial advisers pushing people with small superannuation balances into SMSFs, without considering whether or not it is in their best interest.
REI Super CEO Mal Smith said the ATO data showed that approximately one in five SMSFs have account balances of $200,000 or under. 
“This is a significant proportion of the superannuation industry to be subject to such considerable risk.
“The data is clear, and shows that you need an average of $2 million in your SMSF until you start to match the returns of APRA regulated funds.”
Mal Smith said the fund had recently spoken to several REI Super members who set up an SMSF, only to return to the fund after realising it was a mistake – due to low returns and hidden costs.
“One member with an account balance of $100,000 was advised to go into an SMSF by her accountant.
<div title="Page 2">
<div>
<div>
“Another member was given bad advice and set up an SMSF with her husband with a combined account balance of $300,000.
“Like the other members we spoke to, they have returned to REI Super, where they have told us they are better off.
“They told us they were not prepared for how hard it was, how much time it took, and how much expertise was required to make informed investment decisions.”
Mal Smith said it shouldn’t be as easy as it is to set up an SMSF when good returns on low balances are on average not achieved.
“Changes to SMSF rules would help prevent financial advisers from encouraging people into an SMSF when it is not in their best interest.”
</div>
</div>
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

REI Super calls for tougher regulation of low account balance SMSFs

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
While there are a large number of cryptocurrencies in existence (currently over 1600), this article will focus on Bitcoin for simplicity. Our comments contained here may apply to other cryptocurrencies with the same characteristics as Bitcoin.
What is Bitcoin?
As a very basic explanation, the Bitcoin network is a peer-to-peer payments network that uses public key cryptography to validate transactions involving Bitcoin and to generate new Bitcoins. This network is ‘decentralised’ in that it is not controlled by any government or other central authority.
Bitcoins are created via ‘mining’. This is a process where computer processing power is used to verify Bitcoin transactions and add to the public Bitcoin ledger, known as the block chain. By performing this task the miners may receive new Bitcoin.
Bitcoins in existence may be sent and received via an ‘address’, a unique alphanumeric identifier. A person proves their ownership of a Bitcoin using a public/private key pair. While the public key is known to all and corresponds to a specific Bitcoin, the corresponding private key is kept secret within a digital wallet. The use of the public/private key allows a person to transfer Bitcoin to another address. These transactions are verified by others in the network and added to the public ledger.
Generally, a person would purchase Bitcoin using their own address/wallet privately or via an exchange using a broker (similar to a share trading broker) and if needed transfer the purchased Bitcoin to their own address/wallet.
Can an SMSF invest in Bitcoin?
Any SMSF investment is subject to the regulations under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) (‘SISA’) and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth) (‘SISR’). This article does not intend to determine if any specific investment is permissible under superannuation law but generally discusses areas that may need to be considered prior to an investment in Bitcoin. Broadly, there is no specific prohibition on an SMSF investing in Bitcoin but certain factors must be considered.
Investment Strategy
Under s 52B of the SISA and reg 4.09 of the SISR, the trustee of an SMSF is required to formulate, review regularly and give effect to an investment strategy that has regard to the whole of the circumstances of the fund including, but not limited to, the following:
(a)         the risk involved in making, holding and realising, and the likely return from, the fund's investments, having regard to its objectives and its expected cash flow requirements;<a id="LPlnk629164" class="OWAAutoLink" name="x_paragraphsub" href=""></a>
(b)         the composition of the fund's investments as a whole including the extent to which the investments are diverse or involve the fund in being exposed to risks from inadequate diversification;
(c)         the liquidity of the fund's investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements;
(d)         the ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities; and
(e)         whether the trustees of the fund should hold a contract of insurance that provides insurance cover for one or more members of the fund.
The SISA and SISR do not specify a particular level of risk that is acceptable for a fund’s investment strategy. This would ultimately depend on the risk tolerance of the trustee and members.
If a person suffers loss or damage as a result of a contravention of a covenant imported in an SMSF deed by the SISA, such as the requirement to formulate an investment strategy, they may take action against a person involved in the contravention to recover the amount of the loss or damage. In an SMSF context, it may not be viable for a member to take action against themselves or the corporate trustee. If an adviser assists a client to invest in Bitcoin while the SMSF governing rules do not authorise such an investment and a member suffers loss, the adviser could be exposed to legal liability.
Further, it should be understood that SMSF trustees are in a fiduciary relationship in respect of fund members and any other beneficiaries of the fund. Due to the nature of a fiduciary relationship, SMSF trustees are under the highest of duties to act in the best interests of the SMSF’s beneficiaries. In addition to the various state and territory trustee Act obligations which may apply, s 52B(2)(b) of the SISA places the following covenant on an SMSF trustee:
to exercise, in relation to all matters affecting the fund, the same degree of care, skill and diligence as an ordinary prudent person would exercise in dealing with property of another for whom the person felt morally bound to provide.
The investment strategy for an SMSF must allow for investing in Bitcoin. However, the question of whether such a strategy is prudent for an SMSF will depend on the circumstances of the fund. Considering the volatility of Bitcoin and the fact that it appears (currently) to offer only speculative capital growth opportunities there is clearly a high risk inherent to any Bitcoin investment. On that basis a prudent SMSF trustee may decide that only a small component of a fund’s overall investment portfolio should be made up of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. What is prudent in any situation would depend on the particular circumstances of the fund, such as how close the members are to retirement.
While the DBA Lawyers SMSF deed specifically excludes the rules regarding prudent trustee investment considerations under the various state and territory trustee Acts, not all SMSF deeds will do this. If these provisions haven’t been excluded under a Fund’s deed the Trustee may find them difficult to comply with when investing in Bitcoin.
Governing rules of the fund
As well as the regulations contained in the SISA and the SISR an SMSF trustee will be bound by the governing rules of the fund relating to investment. An SMSF trustee should ensure the governing rules expressly allow them to invest in Bitcoin. As older SMSF deeds are unlikely to provide for this, a variation of the fund’s governing rules may be required prior to such an investment.
Requirement to identify trust assets
A possible issue with SMSFs investing in Bitcoin is the requirement for a trustee to be able to identify the assets of the fund. The Bitcoin market ultimately allows anonymous holdings of Bitcoin. Accordingly, processes should be put in place to ensure that a trustee can evidence any Bitcoin is held as trustee of the SMSF. This could include using the fund’s bank account when purchasing, passing relevant trustee resolutions, ensuring any exchange account is in name of the SMSF trustee acting as trustee, creating a fund-specific email address, completing statutory declarations and otherwise ensuring good documentary evidence exists to satisfy an auditor and the ATO. Prospective advice should be obtained on these requirements prior to investing in Bitcoin. 
SMSF trustees should also ensure they take appropriate action to secure the fund’s property. In relation to Bitcoin, this could include ensuring private keys are kept securely.
Acquisitions from a related party
Section 66 of the SISA prohibits an SMSF trustee from acquiring an asset from a related party of the fund. While s 66(2)(a) provides an exemption for the acquisition of a listed security acquired at market value, any Bitcoin holdings will not meet the definition of a listed security in the SISA and so care should be taken to ensure this provision is not contravened.
Further, while ‘acquiring an asset’ does not include accepting money, the ATO has stated that it does not consider Bitcoin to be money nor Australian or foreign currency.
Hedging/Derivatives and Bitcoin
A Bitcoin exchange may allow a user to hedge their Bitcoin against normal currencies or other cryptocurrencies which could involve giving a charge over the Bitcoin holdings. An SMSF trustee is prohibited from giving a charge over the assets of the fund. However, an SMSF is able to give a charge over assets when investing in derivatives if it is in compliance with the SISR. This exemption is only available to SMSFs obtaining derivatives through an ‘approved body’ (subject to a number of other requirements). As no Bitcoin exchange is an ‘approved body’ for the purposes of the SISR, any derivative instrument or hedging that involved a charge over the fund’s assets would be in breach of the SISR.
Valuations and superannuation caps
As has been shown in recent times, the price of Bitcoin can fluctuate widely and rapidly. Trustees and members should be aware of the value of a member’s interest in the fund to ensure relevant superannuation caps aren’t breached. Sharp rises in the value of Bitcoin could result in a member’s total superannuation balance being over the total superannuation balance cap and a member not being eligible to make any further non-concessional contributions to the fund and may affect other caps such as the $500,000 cap for unused concessional contributions (applying from 1 July 2018).
Tax treatment of Bitcoin
This article does not consider the tax treatment of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The ATO have released a number of tax determinations on the treatment of Bitcoin. Broadly, the ATO’s position is that Bitcoin is a CGT asset for capital gains tax purposes. Specific tax advice should be obtained as part of any investment considerations.
Conclusion
An SMSF trustee is not specifically prohibited from investing in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. However, as reflected above, there are numerous compliance aspects which must be considered. Ultimately, a trustee should act prudently and in accordance with the fund’s governing rules and investment strategy.
Clients should obtain written advice before investing in Bitcoin to ensure they obtain clearance on all of the compliance aspects.
Naturally, for advisers, the Australian Financial Services Licence obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and tax advice obligations under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) need to be appropriately managed to ensure any advice is appropriately provided.
This article is for general information only and should not be relied upon without first seeking advice from an appropriately qualified professional.
DBA Lawyers hold SMSF CPD training at venues all around Australia and online. For more details or to register, visit <a id="LPlnk360475" class="OWAAutoLink" href="http://www.dbanetwork.com.au/" target="_blank">www.dbanetwork.com.au</a> 
Shaun Backhaus, Lawyer and Daniel Butler, Director, DBA Lawyers 
 
 
</body></html>

jrobinson-rf4aSBido9

Can SMSF invest in Bitcoin?

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Most Australians entrust their super funds to professionals but you can control your own superannuation and invest your contribution yourself.
Managing your super not only gives you the opportunity to take matters into your own hands, you may also save thousands of dollars on fees.
However, you need to know if managing your own super is right for you.
The biggest advantage of setting up your own SMSF is control. You can invest your money the way you want to – in companies, a property or a fixed interest term deposit.
You can choose among a wide range of investment options like direct mortgages, bank deposits, managed funds, direct property and shares.
Another advantage of DIY SMSF is lower fees. If you have over $300,000 in your superannuation, you may be able to operate your SMSF for less than the annual management fees of a company.
You can also use gearing and leverage to purchase assets like shares and property to expand your investment portfolio faster.
Remember that contributions to your SMSF are tax deductible so you can save more tax through franked dividend income and timing your capital gains carefully.
SMSFs also let you buy other assets for a maximum of 15% tax. SMSFs can continue indefinitely and family members may still enjoy this benefit even after the member's death.
However, you should be aware of the disadvantages, too. As a trustee, make sure you comply with super and taxation laws otherwise, you can be charged a hefty fine and even be imprisoned.
You also have to be savvy about investing to ensure that your SMSF is earning more than what a super company could earn. If not, you can choose to appoint brokers or advisors for a fee.
You will also be required to meet all record-keeping and reporting obligations such as transactions and contribution records and annual tax returns.
Just the same, you may want to ask the experts to handle this for a fee. Another downside of setting up your own SMSF is it may be less diversified than it could have been if handled by a superannuation company.
Note that gearing may add to the risk and though super funds sometimes come with insurance coverage, you still have to get an independent life, income protection and total permanent disability insurance that you need.
Do you think you can set up your own SMSF? Why don't you assemble a team of professionals, such as a lawyer, experienced investor, SMSF expert and financial partner to help you?
You can start with a solicitor, accountant, investment strategist and financial planner. Check their fees and accreditation and don't be afraid to get a second opinion.
ED CHAN is founder and non executive chairman of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor Accountants</a>.
<a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/contact-us/?utm_medium=propertyobserver" target="_blank">Click here</a> to schedule a chat or call one of their <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/contact-us/?utm_medium=propertyobserver" target="_blank">local offices</a>.
</body></html>

echan-hSGJw4wwC5

How to decide if you should set up your own SMSF: Ed Chan

<html><body>
SMSF retirees need to save more to achieve their retirement goals due to a weaker investment outlook that indicates returns will remain lower for longer, according to new research.
According to a scenario from the report titled SMSFs Treading Water, a 65-year-old SMSF couple to afford a comfortable retirement (as defined by ASFA1) has increased by 17% from $702,000 to $824,000. 
However, 66% of SMSF trustees can remain confident (with an 80% probability) that they are well placed to live comfortably in retirement on $60,063 a year, according to the report by the SMSF Association and SMSF retirement experts Accurium.
At a higher spending level of $70,000 a year, 50% can be confident of achieving this goal, while 39% can be very confident of doing so. 
The median desired spending level in retirement for an SMSF couple is $78,800, up from $75,000 a year earlier, says the report. However, 24% of SMSF couples aim to spend over $100,000 a year in retirement. 
At an aspirational level of $100,000 a year spending, 28% can be confident and just 20% very confident. 
Another key finding is that the median balance for a two-member SMSF at retirement rose to $1.137 million for the 2016 financial year compared with $1.124 million for the previous year. SMSF median balances at retirement have risen 17% since 2010. 
Contrary to the widely-held belief that bequests are central to SMSF retirement plans, only 7% of SMSF households have specific inheritance plans. 
More than half of SMSF retirees cannot be reasonably confident (80% probability) of achieving their desired lifestyle in retirement, although about 25% can be very confident (95% probability).
One in four are unlikely (less than 50% chance) to achieve their goals.
SMSF Association head of Technical Peter Hogan said the report highlights that most SMSF trustees are still on track to meet their retirement goals, despite a difficult investment environment and low interest rates. 
“But for trustees and their specialist advisors, these are challenging times, especially on the investment front. From our perspective, this is why it’s critical superannuation has a sustained period of stability free from significant changes to give trustees greater confidence in the system.” 
Accurium’s general manager, Douglas McBirnie, said the Reserve Bank had said in July that the neutral nominal cash rate, a key indicator, was now 3.5% rather than 5% previously, indicating an increased probability of a ‘lower for longer’ situation — interest rates and equity returns remaining low.
“The upshot for the average SMSF household approaching retirement is that their improving balance has not been able to keep up with the increased cost of meeting their desired lifestyle in retirement,” said McBirnie.   “Even so, SMSF households are still better placed than most sectors of the community to meet their financial goals in retirement.”
The SMSF Association and Accurium study is the first report to provide detailed figures on how the retirement wealth of Australia’s SMSFs has changed post the 2016 SMSF annual tax returns. 
The report draws from Accurium’s database and looks at how SMSFs have fared in the 2016 financial year and considers how well prepared trustees are for retirement.
The research shows that although SMSFs are generally well prepared for retirement, lower expected investment returns means that trustees need to review their retirement plans to ensure they have enough capital to support their retirement goals.
It takes a probability-based approach which factors in more than 2,000 investment scenarios to show the capital levels required for trustees to retire with confidence of achieving the retirement lifestyle they want. 
Statistical analysis is drawn from a database of over 65,000 SMSFs (approximately 130,000 SMSF trustees) which precedes the Australian Taxation Office’s Statistical Overview for 2016, which is likely to become available in late 2017. 
Accurium’s dataset represents SMSF households who are phasing into retirement.
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Lower investment returns to stretch SMSF investment goals, says study

<html><body>
ASIC has disqualified Ross Russo of New South Wales from being an approved self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditor.
ASIC determined that Mr Russo had breached fundamental independence and audit requirements.
Given the nature of these breaches, it was considered appropriate to disqualify Mr Russo.
ASIC found that Mr Russo had breached:
<ul>
<li>auditor independence requirements of APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, where he audited the fund of a close family member;</li>
<li>audit evidence requirements of Australian auditing standards.　</li>
</ul>
ASIC Commissioner John Price said, “SMSF auditors play a fundamental role in promoting confidence in the SMSF sector so it is crucial that they adhere to ethical and professional standards. ASIC will continue to take action where the conduct of SMSF auditors is inadequate.”
SMSF trustees and members can check whether their auditor is registered, or whether a person has been disqualified, by searching ASIC's SMSF auditor register at <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/connectonline.asic.gov.au" target="_blank">connectonline.asic.gov.au</a>
Information about Mr Russo was referred to ASIC by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) under section 128P of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (the SIS Act).
From 1 July 2013, the SIS Act required all auditors of SMSFs to be registered with ASIC.
This was to ensure that all SMSF auditors meet the base standards of competency and expertise.
ASIC and the ATO work closely together as co-regulators of SMSF auditors.
The ATO monitors SMSF auditor conduct and may refer matters to ASIC for possible action such as disqualification or suspension of their registration.
</body></html>

SMSF auditor disqualified by ASIC

<html><body>
After interest rate hikes for investors, Westpac has now turned its attention to self-managed superannuation funds with likely changes including halving the maximum interest-only repayment term from 10 years to five.
SMSF property investors will be slugged with tougher rates, policies and processes in the lead up to this weekend's changes to caps on tax concessions being imposed by the federal government, The Australian Financial Review reported.
Westpac subsidiaries Bank of Melbourne, BankSA, St George, are also increasing mortgage rates for interest-only property buyers.
"This will help us meet our regulatory requirements and apply responsible lending practices in assessing a customer's ability to pay," a bank spokesman told the AFR.
Also, for a loan application, there has to be a minimum SMSF balance of $200,000.
"There are no exceptions to this requirement," the bank is warning clients.
SMSF trustees will also have to complete a new statutory declaration stating that customers have sought independent financial and legal advice when applying for an SMSF loan.
There are about 570,000 funds with about $654 billion under management and 1.1 million members, according to the AFR.
Borrowing – or gearing – for property by SMSFs has always been a debated issue because too much exposure to property could be a disaster in the event of a housing market crash.
A 2014 Financial Systems inquiry recommended that SMSF borrowing should cease.
Real property within SMSFs grew from $15 billion in 2003-04 to more than $100 billion by the end of last year, statistics from the Australian Taxation Office show.
Westpac changes, which are expected to be followed by other major lenders, will be imposed as the federal government introduces changes to concessional and non-concessional caps are introduced this Saturday.
That means the use of limited recourse borrowing arrangements will be included in a member's total superannuation and $1.6 million transfer balance cap calculations.
Lenders face higher risk with a limited recourse loan because it is debt in which the creditor has limited claims if a default occurs.
A typical SMSF property investor will pay about 5.85 per cent for a loan, which is about 135 basis points higher than for an investor loan outside a fund.
Over a 25-year term a borrower would make additional repayments of more than $270,000, assuming rates remained constant, according to analysis by Canstar.
Several other lenders have already restricted access to interest-only loans for SMSF by either no longer offering them or imposing strict loan-to-value ratios.
SMSF investors continue to increase exposure to listed trusts and other managed investments, latest analysis by the ATO shows.
For example, more than $207 billion is held in listed trusts compared to about $14 billion in 2012 as the global economy struggled to recover from the global financial crisis.
During that time cash and term deposits have fallen from about $134 billion to $28 billion.
</body></html>

Westpac to introduce tough rules for lending to SMSFs

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Measures including toughening the requirements for interest-only loans and property investments in self-managed super funds introduced in March have reduced the number of investors purchasing property in Sydney by 20% and helped cool the market.
Investors comprised more than 50% of the entire Sydney market in 2016 but have started to level off this year, which I largely attribute to APRA’s tightened macro-prudential measures.
Many experts believe we shouldn’t interfere with the market and simply let nature take its course, but I feel that this laissez-faire approach would have had dire consequences.
Although there are several factors at play, the excessive number of investors in the market was primarily responsible for the recent exponential price growth, so it is encouraging to see the further tightening is putting the brakes on the investor boom – which is what the measures were designed to do.
But, Australians should not expect a market crash. 
I believe the market has now plateaued, which was inevitable as prices couldn’t continue to rise indefinitely but this shouldn’t be a reason to panic.
We must caution against the inevitable scaremongering, and maintain some perspective because we are looking at the aftermath of the investor ‘boom’, but that doesn’t mean we are heading for a crash.
Sydney prices will remain strong for the short- to medium-term, and will naturally realign and readjust over time.
I remain very optimistic about the Sydney market. We will see a correction in prices but there are so many variables, making it difficult to forecast.
Over the past 18-24 months, we’ve witnessed prices across most Sydney suburbs rise at the same pace, which is quite unusual, so we could see this start to adjust and become nuanced.
Starr Partners has seen a shift this year amongst investors in Sydney, with many now starting to set their sights on areas such as the Newcastle and Hunter regions.
The APRA measures were designed to encourage lending institutions to be more prudent, not necessarily to solve the housing affordability crisis.
With these measures having taken hold, I’m hopeful we will see the return of natural market equilibrium, with higher numbers of first home buyers and other owner occupiers, which we are already starting to see at our open for inspections and auctions.
In saying that, investors will still be competing for property amongst these buyers – as they have always done. A bump in the road won’t be too impactful for experienced investors. Normally, they are very sensible in their approach, they have enough capital in their investment portfolio and carry a long-term view.”
Following APRA strengthening its policies, the federal government’s recent budget announced tougher rules on foreign investment such as removing the main residence capital gains tax exemption and an annual foreign investment levy for future foreign investors who fail to occupy or lease their property for at least six months each year.
It also revealed plans to restore the requirement that prevents developers from selling more than 50% of new developments to foreign investors.<a href="https://outlook.office.com/owa/?realm=propertyobserver.com.au#_ftn1"></a>
Despite this, more could be done to curb investment from non-residents, given the action taken to restrict investor spending for residents. 
My one lingering concern is that the new measures could pave the way for more foreign buyers.
Although I welcome the recent introduction of tougher rules on foreign investment, I’m not convinced that these measures are enough.
We have gone to great lengths to curb investor spending for residents, so shouldn’t we be doing the same for non-residents?
However, my fears could be allayed, with reports out of China suggesting its new regulatory crackdown on capital outflows is really starting to work.
Douglas Driscoll is CEO of real estate group Starr Partners and can be contacted <a href="https://www.starrpartners.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

Sydney property investor activity drops by 20% - but don’t expect a crash: Doug Driscoll

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The SMSF Association remains supportive of Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements (LRBAs) in the wake of today’s announcement by the Labor Party to recommend their abolition in line with the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) final report. 
SMSF Association Managing Director/CEO Andrea Slattery says the right decision was made when this FSI recommendation was rejected in late 2015, and there is no compelling argument to suggest anything has changed since regarding LRBAs.
“The fact remains there’s little or no convincing evidence that the use of LRBAs by SMSFs is playing a significant role in affecting housing affordability.
“The most recent Australian Tax Office statistics show that SMSFs hold $24.3 billion in LRBAs, with these financial instruments being predominantly used to invest in residential and non-residential property in an almost 50-50 split. 
“That estimated $12 billion where SMSFs have used LRBAs to invest in residential housing has to be put in the context of a $6.43 trillion housing market. In other words, LRBAs comprise only 0.18% of the market. On these figures, it’s hard to argue LRBAs are a ‘market mover’.
“SMSFs investing in residential property, whether through borrowing arrangements or not, should not be singled out from other investors when looking at policy solutions to improve housing affordability.
“The idea that SMSFs have plunged into property investment in recent times also is not borne out by the statistics, with SMSF residential property holdings (both geared and ungeared) being consistent between 4-6% of total SMSF assets in recent times.
“In addition, there is scant evidence to support the notion that the use of LRBAs by SMSFs pose a systemic risk to superannuation or the broader financial sector.
“Consistent with our view submitted to the FSI, we still believe that the clear majority of SMSFs are using LRBAs appropriately to build their retirement savings and therefore should remain an investment option.”
In a recent speech given at the 2017 SMSF Association National Conference, Andrea suggested SMSFs are integral to our superannuation system.
<h1>Andrea Slattery is managing director and chief executive officer, SMSF Association, and can be contacted <a href="https://www.smsfassociation.com/" target="_blank">here</a>.</h1>
 
</body></html>

Smsfs

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Smsfs

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News