An entity directed by HSN's Rafi Assouline and Rebel Property's Allen Linz has filed plans for an impressive new precinct in Woolloomooloo.

The major mixed-use development would transform a prominent William Street site into a new residential village anchored by affordable housing and a large public park.

The proposal, submitted as a State Significant Development Application, covers 164-172 and 174-194 William Street, a 6,398 sqm site between Forbes Street and Dowling Street on the southern edge of Woolloomooloo.

Designed by fjcstudio in collaboration with Bangawarra, Studio Bright and Tribe Studio Architects, the scheme would deliver 227 apartments across four residential buildings ranging in height up to 18 storeys, alongside retail space, public domain improvements and a new publicly accessible park.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0eb59b7c-914a-4a5c-b849-3a56749f5e93" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.18.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=mxM6EEqeoLjrCiTlCzTKTvzpKuh6kSkH" />

It's another design scheme for Rebel, who took <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-rebel-property-group-takes-woolloomooloo-precinct-to-nsw-government">concept plans to the NSW Gov late last year</a>.

The latest plans will be a mix of 167 build-to-sell apartments and 60 affordable apartments, with the affordable housing component representing 15 per cent of the project's gross floor area. The apartment mix includes 12 one-bedroom, 53 two-bedroom, 89 three-bedroom apartments and 13 penthouses, while the affordable housing component would comprise 42 one-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom apartments.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3b3d4553-8a8c-4af5-aa8c-519ffb1e28c6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.12%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=_Yb6ibN7eDnOtQjCNDK2eviORa4qzgv." />

Rebel Property is seeking to take advantage of the NSW Government's infill affordable housing bonus provisions under the Housing SEPP, which provide additional floor space and height in exchange for the delivery of affordable housing for a minimum of 15 years. The planning pathway allows a 30 per cent increase in floor space ratio and building height where 15 per cent of the development is dedicated to affordable housing.

&nbsp;

At the centre of the development is a 1,356 sqm sunlit public park designed to become a new community gathering space at the gateway to Woolloomooloo. The park would be complemented by a network of pedestrian laneways connecting William Street with the surrounding streets, improving permeability through what is currently a largely impermeable block.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="257af931-a393-4007-8c6d-7219796df58d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=KAHy94GrhaReFsWTGDKfy39EDJ8gEEv4" />

The design team says the public domain has been heavily influenced by the site's topography and Aboriginal cultural heritage, drawing on the escarpments, gullies and landscape characteristics that historically defined the area before urbanisation. The landscape design has been developed in partnership with First Nations consultancy Bangawarra.

The project would be delivered across four separate buildings. The William Street East and William Street West buildings, designed by fjcstudio, would contain the majority of the apartments. Melbourne-based Studio Bright has designed the Forbes Street building, while Tribe Studio Architects is responsible for the Dowling Street building.

Rebel had secured approval for the concept plans late last year.

Joel Robinson

First look: HSN, Rebel, advances Woolloomooloo precinct plans

A locally heritage-listed furniture showroom on Water Street is set to become the centrepiece of a new mixed-use residential development as local developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/keylin-group">Keylin</a> seeks approval for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lotus-on-water-street-290-water-street-fortitude-valley-qld-4006">Lotus on Water Street</a>, a 15-storey project on the Fortitude Valley side of Spring Hill.

The proposal spans 290 Water Street and 137-141 Warry Street, combining several properties into a 2,869 sqm site that sits between Fortitude Valley, Spring Hill and the rapidly evolving Victoria Park precinct. Keylin's plans would deliver 132 apartments alongside new retail, hospitality and commercial space, while retaining and repurposing the historic Brunswick Home Furnishers Showroom that fronts Water Street.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/jackson-teece">Jackson Teece</a>, Lotus on Water Street comprises a 12-storey residential tower rising above a three-storey podium and communal rooftop terrace. The development includes 76 apartments classified as multiple dwellings and a further 56 units proposed as short-term accommodation, designed to be flexibly used as either accommodation or permanent residences. The apartment mix comprises six one-bedroom, 54 two-bedroom and 16 three-bedroom homes.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9822bb79-6c49-49c9-95ba-319e8c8d81c3" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20front.png?VersionId=ioW8zbN4UVebbLetTFuv92t.HkdgfR5e" />

Residents would have access to an extensive rooftop recreation level spanning more than 1,200 sqm of communal open space. Plans include a pool, gym, sauna, infrared sauna, yoga area, library, private dining room, barbecue facilities and landscaped entertainment spaces, making the rooftop the project's largest shared amenity offering.

At street level, the proposal focuses on the adaptive reuse of the heritage buildings along Water Street, where 518 sqm of retail and commercial space is planned across shop, office and food and drink outlet uses. A permeable residential lobby would be positioned between the retained heritage buildings, creating a pedestrian connection between the historic streetscape and the new tower behind.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="269cf3e0-7d13-48bf-a318-05a00deb5c10" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20podium.png?VersionId=DLXmTCLsp6GOcLpQ0h.0z7wKCw59EhN_" />

The heritage retention strategy is central to the scheme. The development application notes that the Brunswick Home Furnishers Showroom and adjoining heritage buildings will remain, with only non-significant structures on the site earmarked for removal under a previously issued Heritage Exemption Certificate. Levels one and two of the new podium are recessed behind the heritage façades to maintain their prominence within the streetscape.

Jackson Teece has drawn inspiration from the site's manufacturing history when designing the podium. The planning documents state that the façade incorporates perforated metal screening that references the woven and rattan furniture historically produced on the site. Cascading and climbing plants are integrated throughout the podium to soften the building's presentation and screen parking levels behind. The landscape strategy also informs the project's name, Lotus on Water Street, drawing on the historic Spring Hollow waterholes that once ran through Spring Hill and the blue water lilies associated with Meeanjin, Brisbane's traditional name.

The proposal also incorporates the neighbouring property at 141 Warry Street, currently occupied by a healthcare service. The existing building would remain, with nine dedicated parking spaces allocated within the new development to support its ongoing operation. In total, Lotus on Water Street proposes 117 car spaces, including 110 resident spaces and seven visitor bays, alongside 100 bicycle spaces.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="70cf07bc-4fd8-4e70-92dd-be8b21c4e4f0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20site.png?VersionId=txlxrJImM0Sm_vTzHVKh5DDUkyL_CiiA" />

The site sits within the Spring Hill East Precinct of the Spring Hill Neighbourhood Plan and is positioned around 650 metres from both Fortitude Valley Station and Exhibition Station. It is also within walking distance of the King Street precinct, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Quarter and Victoria Park, which is earmarked to become a major venue precinct ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Planning documents describe the location as a key gateway between Spring Hill and Fortitude Valley and highlight the area's increasing importance as new transport infrastructure and Olympic-related investment reshape Brisbane's inner north. The development team argues the project will contribute additional housing supply while activating a section of Water Street that has historically received less investment than other parts of the Valley.

Keylin has become increasingly active across Brisbane and southeast Queensland, assembling sites in strategic inner-city locations. They are currently selling and delivering <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/oria-spring-hill-447-gregory-terrace-spring-hill-qld-4000">Oria Spring Hill</a>, just over 140 apartments due for completion in 2027.

Keylin plans heritage-led Lotus on Water Street apartment development in Fortitude Valley

Roseville is poised for a wave of new apartment development following the NSW Government's rezoning of land around Roseville Station under its Transport Oriented Development program.

The new planning controls have unlocked significant development potential within walking distance of the station, with a number of sites expected to be amalgamated and redeveloped in the coming years as developers seek to take advantage of the increased density allowances.

One of the more restrained developments in the precinct, and set among the first to be delivered having commenced well before the recent changes, is Hyecorp's Juliet. The boutique apartment project is already well under construction and remains on track to welcome residents by the end of the year, offering a markedly different proposition to many of the larger-scale developments now likely to emerge across the suburb.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278194]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/juliet-roseville-64-pacific-highway-roseville-nsw-2069">Juliet</a> will comprise just&nbsp;34 one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments opposite Roseville Station. For Hyecorp, which has delivered projects across Sydney's Lower North Shore for more than three decades, Roseville presented a rare opportunity to address a growing gap in the market.

"<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/roseville-nsw-2069">Roseville</a> has long been one of the North Shore's most tightly held and desirable suburbs, offering a unique combination of village charm, established greenery, excellent transport connections, and proximity to some of Sydney's best schools and lifestyle amenities," Hyecorp said.

"We recognised a growing demand from local homeowners seeking to downsize without leaving the community they have built their lives around. The location presented a rare opportunity to create homes that cater specifically to that buyer profile."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278196]

The six-level development has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/pbd-architects">PBD Architects</a> as a collection of residences that feel more like homes than apartments. The brief centred generous floorplans, abundant natural light, quality finishes, and strong connections to outdoor space.

PBD Architects drew inspiration from Roseville's established garden suburb character, creating a building that sits comfortably within its surroundings rather than dominating them. The architecture incorporates natural materials, soft forms, layered landscaping, expansive balconies, and generous setbacks to strengthen the connection between residents and the suburb's leafy environment.

"The focus was on designing spacious, house-like residences for discerning owner-occupiers and downsizers who wanted to remain on the North Shore without compromising on comfort, privacy, or design," PBD said.&nbsp;

"Every apartment was to feel considered, timeless, and highly functional."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278195]

Inside, residences feature engineered timber flooring, stone kitchen benchtops and splashbacks, integrated Fisher &amp; Paykel appliances, ducted air conditioning, and large outdoor entertaining areas designed to take advantage of district and treetop views.

Residents will also have access to a rooftop barbecue and lounge area, alongside practical amenities including parcel lockers, EV charging capability, bicycle storage, a dog wash bay, and a basement car wash facility.

The majority of purchasers so far have been local owner-occupiers from Roseville, Lindfield, Chatswood, Killara, and the broader Upper North Shore, many of whom are transitioning from larger family homes.

"Buyers are looking for spacious, house-like apartments that allow them to downsize without feeling like they are sacrificing comfort or functionality," Hyecorp noted.

"They value large kitchens, generous living areas, ample storage, quality finishes, secure parking, lift access, and low-maintenance living."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278204]

Juliet sits directly opposite Roseville Train Station and within walking distance of Roseville Village, while Chatswood's retail and dining precinct is only minutes away. The development is also surrounded by some of Sydney's most established schools, including Roseville College, Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College, and Knox Grammar, as well as nearby parklands and golf courses.

Juliet is currently more than 75 per cent sold ahead of its anticipated completion in late 2026.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7395]

Juliet to sit quietly amid Roseville apartment boom

Sherpa Property Group has unveiled the third instalment of its Flourish series, securing full approval for the two-tower, $500 million Flourish Soleira development in Palm Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-1150-1154-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a> will rise from a prominent site in the commercial heart of Palm Beach, the long-time home of Cash Converters and a range of local retailers.

The project will introduce a new retail and dining precinct at ground level, beneath 286 apartments.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370959]

“We’re very committed to not only providing affordable residential offerings that are much needed in Palm Beach, but also delivering a vibrant new commercial heart that complements the extraordinary growth of the southern Gold Coast,” Sherpa Property Group founder Christie Leet said.

The development will sit under Sherpa's Flourish brand, which is aimed at providing a pathway into the beachside suburb for locals, first-home buyers and downsizers. In a move designed to assist first-home buyers entering the market, Sherpa has reserved all one and two-bedroom, one-bathroom apartments exclusively for eligible first-home buyers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370964]

“Our vision through Flourish is to create a vibrant retail and lifestyle focal point within the Palm Beach centre zone, delivering thriving communities underpinned by lifestyle-rich locations,” Leet said.

“So far, Flourish has been an incredible success, and we hope to carry this momentum as we progress the next two Flourish projects in Palm Beach.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=371430]

Located across 1150-1164 Gold Coast Highway and 3 Sixth Avenue, the development will comprise two towers. The northern tower will deliver 154 apartments, while the southern tower will add a further 132 residences, helping address ongoing demand for new apartments in the tightly held coastal suburb.

Flourish Soleira will also feature the most extensive rooftop amenity offering ever delivered in Palm Beach.

The two towers will be connected by a skybridge, with residents gaining access to a rooftop recreation deck featuring a full-width swimming pool, hot and cold plunge pools, wellness spaces, a gymnasium, private dining facilities, massage treatment rooms, barbecue areas, a basketball court, golf simulator, indoor and outdoor dining spaces, sun lounges and extensive landscaping.

LPS Group is expected to start construction later this year.

Sherpa is already well advanced on construction of its debut Flourish project, Flourish Amargo, located just around the corner from Soleira. Meanwhile, Flourish Oasis, positioned opposite Amargo, recently commenced construction and has nearly sold out its collection of 47 apartments.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150017]

Sherpa unveils $500m mixed-use Palm Beach precinct, Flourish Soleira

Are mortgage holders set to get a reprieve from the RBA in 2026?

Big Four bank NAB believes so. They are now expecting the next move from the RBA to be a cut, rather than a hike, which they had pencilled in for August. They are unsure of the timing of the cut however, they note in their latest&nbsp;NAB Economics RBA Watch.

NAB Chief Economist, Dr Sally Auld, said recent data suggests the economy has lost momentum and the outlook for rates has shifted, noting that the broader economic backdrop has changed since earlier in the year.

“The next move in the cash rate is likely to be down, but the timing is uncertain," Dr Auld said.

"In February, growth was above trend, the economy was operating above capacity and there was uncertainty over the restrictiveness of rates. None of these conditions exist today,” she outlined.

Dr Auld said recent data pointed to softer momentum across the economy while acknowledging that at the same time, uncertainty remains a key feature of the outlook.

“Both Q1 GDP data and the NAB business survey suggest momentum in the economy has slowed, meaning that growth has likely peaked for the cycle. That said, we are cognisant there is still considerable uncertainty around the outlook, both with respect to activity and inflation.”

Dr Auld said inflation risks and labour market outcomes would be important to watch.

“On the prices side, we are still forecasting above target core inflation through to mid-2027. Margins will compress and weaker labour market outcomes are a risk.”

She said tighter financial conditions are expected to weigh on housing and activity.

“Tighter financial conditions will be reflected in a slowing in house price growth and housing credit growth. In summary, we have greater conviction that the next move in rates is down, but less conviction on the timing.”

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

Rental Laws

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
RE/MAX Australia Managing Director Michael Davoren puts his network’s support behind the Real Estate Institute of Queensland’s call to the Queensland Premier to reconsider proposed measures relating to tenancy.
Mr Davoren vehemently agrees with the REIQ that a more balanced and fairer framework providing equal protection for renters and owners of investment properties is needed.
The REIQ has taken the fight to the state government because the right of the landlords has been completely eroded – and the pervading perception of landlords as wealthy landowners is false. Fact is that 77 per cent of singe-property landlords are ‘ordinary people’ earning less than $100,000 a year.
Mr Davoren’s concern is that the current ‘protections’ are potentially devastating to a much broad sector of the population.
I have grave concerns about the information the Queensland Government is basing its decisions on.
People in the real estate industry – residential and commercial - have access to possibly more sectors of the population than any other, and certainly at the grass roots level.
This is about shelter… and when you talk about shelter – whether for residential or commercial premises, for owner occupiers, for tenants, for businesses – all roads lead to real estate.
We in the real estate industry are the experts in our field, just as those in the medical profession are the experts. Stop listening to people who are not the experts.
Mr Davoren agrees that governments have to lean towards the tough side when it comes to COVID-19, the virus itself, because it involves saving lives but he suggests what the Queensland government is doing in relation to landlords and tenants goes beyond dealing with the virus.
It’s a short-sighted vision. If the proposed measures go through, large numbers of landlords will divest themselves of their investment property as soon as they can. The tenant becomes the real loser. With fewer properties to rent, rents will go through the roof.
He said leadership particularly now, needed to demonstrate confidence, strength and sensitivity, and such leadership was drawing the real estate industry together, on its own behalf and on that of real estate consumers, to address how COVID-19 affects the population.
REIP (Real Estate Industry Partners), a group of the largest real estate brands and independents in Australia, is across state boundaries and engages all levels of government. At the state level, all the institutes are stepping up.
Chairman Peter Brewer and CEO Antonia Mercorella have stood up as leaders in a time when good leadership is needed like never before.
He said the Palaszczuk Government was quick to respond to the thousands of letters it received in a day from landlords, following the launch of the REIQ’s ‘Everybody Matters’ campaign.
It was pleasing to read that the Queensland government promised to consult more widely on its proposed rental protections but I sincerely hope this happens in time to prevent  the initially proposed measures being passed when Parliament sits on Wednesday 22 Apri.
MICHAEL DAVOREN is the RE/MAX Australia Managing Director 
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

RE/MAX head calls for Queensland to rethink COVID-19 rental rules

<html><body>
<div>The Victorian Parliament has passed the Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill 2018, which includes more than 130 reforms providing increased protections for renters, while ensuring rental housing providers can still effectively manage their properties.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>When the new laws come into effect, renters will be able to: </div>
<ul>
<li>have a pet with the written consent of their residential rental provider. Consent can only be reasonably refused through a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) order </li>
<li>make certain modifications without first obtaining the residential rental provider's consent, such as installing picture hooks, and furniture anchors to stop televisions and other heavy items falling on children.</li>
</ul>
<div> Other key changes will: </div>
<ul>
<li>require every rental home to meet basic minimum standards, to be set out in regulations, such as providing functioning stoves, heating and toilets</li>
<li>require residential rental providers to undertake mandatory safety maintenance for gas, electricity, smoke alarms and pool fences</li>
<li>implement the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Family Violence that relate to rental housing. These include: </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>allowing victims to end a lease in family violence situations without first needing a final intervention order, and</li>
<li>ensuring victims are not held unfairly liable for debts created by perpetrators of the violence  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>allow caravan and residential park residents to seek compensation if their park closes</li>
<li>clarify rights of entry and photography when a landlord needs to sell a rental property, and</li>
<li>streamline the rules dealing with goods left behind at the end of a tenancy. </li>
</ul>
<div>Work will continue next year on complementary reforms to provide easily accessible and informal dispute resolution through VCAT. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The reforms respond to extensive community feedback during the Victorian Government’s Fairer Safer Housing consultation to review the Residential Tenancies Act 1997. More than 4,800 public comments were received from a wide range of people and organisations. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The changes will come into force progressively, and further consultation will be undertaken where necessary to develop guidelines around the new laws. We will provide updates on the new laws as implementation progresses.</div>
</body></html>

The lowdown on Victoria's new rental laws

<html><body>
Despite the popularity of Airbnb, a recent survey reveals that more than 40% of Sydney’s inner-city residents oppose short term renting as a full-time investment and believe strata should be able to ban short-term rentals.
The survey of 1000 residents was commissioned by the City of Sydney Council.
However, the majority of residents supported short-term letting on home sharing platforms such as Airbnb and Stayz if the host stayed in the property or was away on holidays, according to The Australian Financial Review.
But a huge 42% were against short-term letting if it was used as a full-time investment. Only 35% said they are in favour of short-term letting as a full time investment.
The report said 45% only support short-term letting for a limited number of days a year.
Earlier this year, Sydney was ranked the second highest city to recoup investment on a home using a peer to peer rental service like Homeaway or Airbnb with an expected yearly return of 11.96% by peer-to-peer motorhome rental platform SHAREaCAMPER.
The new survey’s finding comes as cities get increasingly tough on Airbnb as a full-time investment tool. Both London and Paris each have 90 day and 120-day limits on entire home rentals on Airbnb.
The survey has sparked off a debate.
Airbnb's head of public policy ANZ Brent Thomas said "one small survey in one corner of inner-city Sydney is hardly a representative or robust basis for policy making right across NSW" and the majority of Airbnb hosts are people who rent out their home, rather than property investors.
Sydney is one of Airbnb's top ten cities globally, with over 22,000 listings.
"The vast majority of our hosts in Australia share their primary residence - the home they live in - for an average of just 30 nights per year," Thomas said.
Airbnb is running an "Airbnb Citizen" campaign asking hosts to fight for "fair home sharing rules" in NSW.
Stayz advisor Richard Colbeck said the short-term letting platform supports a "reasonable framework" to address "genuine amenity concerns" in cities, particular strata blocks.
But Stephen Goddard of Owners Corporation Network, which represents strata, said the survey results show there should be "sensible regulation" of short-term letting.
"We don't want to ban short-term lets, we just want to give apartment owners a say on whether or not it occurs in their respective buildings," Goddard said.
Carol Giuseppi of Tourism Accommodation Australia, which represents the hotels industry, said the survey results show residents support "sensible caps" on the number of nights an entire property could be short term-let.
An NSW parliamentary inquiry had previously recommended Airbnb operators should only be subject to "light regulation".
But in an options paper released in July, the NSW government said it was considering a range of options, from industry self-regulation to giving strata the power to put restrict or prohibit apartment short term letting.
It is also considering putting a restriction on the total days per year that a place can be used for short-term letting. The consultation is ongoing and submissions are due close on October 31.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Many Sydney inner city residents against Airbnb letting as 'full-time investment': Survey

<html><body>
When a tenant goes bust, there’s a big impact on the landlord. 
The insolvency practitioner appointed to the tenant has rights and powers under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) while the landlord has rights and powers under the lease with the tenant.
Here’s a run-down of who can do what.
Start at the beginning and look at the lease 
The lease is a binding contract between the tenant and landlord, so it’s the first thing to read when the tenant becomes insolvent.
For example, the lease might say that any insolvency event of the tenant constitutes such a breach that the lease is immediately terminated.  Otherwise, the insolvency event may be a breach and the lease stays on-foot at the option of the landlord.
In any event, the appointment of an insolvency practitioner to the tenant doesn’t waive the tenant’s liability to any rent or other amounts outstanding under the lease.
What happens when a receiver is appointed to the tenant? 
A company typically goes into receivership when a secured creditor appoints a receiver to those assets of the company over which the creditor has security. The receiver’s role is to collect and sell enough of the company’s charged assets to pay back the debt owed by the company to the secured creditor.
If a receiver is appointed to a tenant company:
• Within the first 7 days after the appointment, the receiver can give the landlord notice that the receiver doesn’t intend to exercise any rights in relation to the landlord’s property, which means the receiver isn’t personally liable for rent or other amounts payable under the lease during their occupation of the landlord’s premises.  
• If no notice is given, the receiver is personally liable for rent and other amounts payable under the lease from 7 days after the receiver’s appointment until:  
the receiver retires from their appointment; or the company ceases to occupy the landlord’s premises.  
• The receivership doesn’t affect the rights of creditors, which means the landlord can move to take possession of the premises, or enforce the terms of the lease, or commence legal action against the tenant (eg to recover rent arrears).  
• The company does remain liable for rent and other amounts owing under the lease before the receiver’s appointment.  
• Personal guarantees under the lease can be enforced by the landlord during the receivership.
What happens when an administrator is appointed to the tenant? 
An administrator is usually appointed by a company’s directors after they decide the company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent.  The effect of the appointment of an administrator is to provide the company with “breathing space” while the company’s future is contemplated and resolved.
If an administrator is appointed to a tenant company:
• Within the first 5 days after the appointment, the administrator can give the landlord notice that the administrator doesn’t intend to exercise any rights in relation to the landlord’s property, which means the administrator isn’t personally liable for rent or other amounts payable under the lease during their occupation of the landlord’s premises.  
• A notice will cease to have effect if: the administrator revokes the notice in writing; or the company exercises, or purports to exercise rights in relation to the landlord’s property (eg continues to trade from the premises).  
• If no notice is given, the administrator is personally liable for rent or other amounts payable under the lease from 5 days after the administrator’s appointment for so long as: the company continues to use, occupy or be in possession of the premises; and the administration continues.  
• The administration does affect the rights of creditors, which means the landlord can’t move to take possession of the premises, or enforce the terms of the lease, or commence legal action against the tenant (eg to recover rent arrears) without: the administrator’s consent; or leave of a court.  
• The company does remain liable for rent and other amounts owing under the lease before the administrator’s appointment.  
• Personal guarantees under the lease can’t be enforced by the landlord during the administration.
What happens when a liquidator is appointed to the tenant? 
A liquidation brings a complete end to the company. It involves a liquidator realising (selling) the company’s assets, cessation or sale of its operations, distributing the proceeds of realisation among its creditors and distributing any surplus among its shareholders.
If a liquidator is appointed to a tenant company: 
• At any time the liquidator can disclaim the lease and vacate the landlord's premises, which means: the liquidator isn’t personally liable for rent or other amounts payable under the lease and nor is the company during the liquidator’s occupation of the premises; and the landlord can, if permitted by the lease, re-enter and take possession of the premises.  
• If the lease isn’t disclaimed and the liquidator stays in the premises, the liquidator still isn’t personally liable for rent or other amounts payable under the lease although these amounts will be treated as expenses incurred in the liquidation (and therefore paid out of the proceeds of sale of the company’s assets).  
• If the lease hasn’t been disclaimed and the liquidator hasn’t otherwise advised their intentions, the landlord can issue a notice asking the liquidator to confirm their position about the lease and the liquidator has 28 days to respond.  
• The liquidation does affect the rights of creditors, which means the landlord can’t continue or commence legal action against the tenant (eg to recover rent arrears) without leave of a court.  
• The company does remain liable for rent and other amounts owing under the lease before the liquidator’s appointment.  
• Personal guarantees under the lease can be enforced by the landlord during the liquidation. 
What does it all actually mean? 
Our experience of what actually happens and our tips for landlords about how to deal with the situation are these: 
• The insolvency practitioner appointed to the tenant contacts the landlord as soon as possible to say they’ve been appointed and “let’s talk”.  
• The landlord tells the insolvency practitioner the debt currently owing by the tenant under the lease for rent and other amounts, and provides the practitioner with a copy of the lease and proof of the debt. 
• It’s in the landlord’s best interests to work with rather than against the insolvency practitioner to deal with the tenant’s problems, which might include:  
helping the practitioner find a buyer for the tenant’s business in whole or part, and that buyer taking a new lease in the premises;  
if the lease is terminated and disclaimed by the insolvency practitioner, the landlord alone finding a new tenant to go into the premises as quickly as possible; or  
the landlord buying the tenant’s business or assets (eg fit out) from the practitioner and leaving the assets in-situ for a new tenant.  
• Subject to the terms of the lease, the landlord should call upon the tenant’s bank guarantee and take advice on whether any personal guarantee can be pursued as a means to recover the pre-external administration (or any other) debt owing by the tenant under the lease as soon as possible. 
• The landlord has rights as a creditor in the external administration, so should stay engaged and attend creditor meetings with the insolvency practitioner.  
• The landlord should be prepared to have some amount of rent forever unpaid by the insolvent tenant because an insolvent company’s debts are greater than its assets, and there’s only ever a finite amount of money to be split between all the tenant’s creditors.  
This article was produced by <a href="https://www.meyervandenberg.com.au" target="_blank">Meyer Vandenberg lawyers</a>.
</body></html>

Liquidators versus landlords: who wins?

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/76263/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
For renting to become a truly viable, long-term alternative to home ownership, greater rental affordability and security is needed.
Deloitte Access Economics’ Chris Richardson recently suggested that young Australians would be better off renting than trying to buy a house. He argued:
… rents today make a lot more sense than housing prices.
This may be true. However, the situation for renters is far from clear-cut. Rents continue to increase in Australian cities, and are out of reach for low- and very-low-income earners.
Renters also face substantial housing insecurity. In Australia, 50% of renters are on a fixed-term one-year lease; 20% are on a month-to-month “rolling” lease. 
For renting to become a truly viable, long-term alternative to home ownership, greater rental affordability and security is needed.
Rental affordability
Longer-term structural changes to tackle housing affordability, including boosting the supply of social housing and increasing tenure diversity, will be essential. There are some promising moves, including the recently announced proposal for a bond aggregator model to fund social and affordable housing.
Failing a substantial increase in affordable housing, there will be a need to increase rent assistance payments, particularly in high-cost regions. 
This acknowledges that housing costs differ across the country and that many low-income earners need to remain in high-cost regions. This includes older people whose social and family networks are in these regions, and people who work in these areas.
Many industries in high-cost cities are dependent on people who earn low and very-low incomes. These people have a right – and need – for affordable, secure housing – and a house that is a home.
Affordability is the thin end of the wedge
For renting to become a true alternative to home ownership, greater rental security is needed. 
To move toward secure rentals we need to reward long-term investment. One example might include encouraging institutional investors, including superannuation companies and other businesses that invest in large amounts of rental housing, who are in it for the long haul.
However, there is no reason to assume that institutional investors will offer more affordable rental properties, or be any better landlords than so-called “mum and dad” investors. We therefore need to pursue changes to rental laws to ensure renters, including the growing generation of long-term renters, can experience a secure sense of home. Specific changes include:
Removing no-grounds eviction. The perceived risk of eviction leads to stress for renters. And the right to no-grounds eviction can lead to retaliatory eviction by landlords when tenants exercise their rights, including rights to maintenance and repairs.
The Tenants’ Union of NSW has called for a balancing of landlord and tenant interests through tenancy laws that specify reasonable grounds for termination.
Such laws could follow the German example. In Germany, rental laws ensure security of tenancy while retaining the right of landlords to terminate a lease in certain circumstances, such as if a tenant violates the lease agreement (for example, by not paying rent) or if the landlord requires the property for personal use. 
Rent increases are sometimes a “backdoor” way of evicting tenants. In a recent survey, 11% of renters reported receiving a “rent hike after requesting a repair and 10 percent said that their landlord or agent became angry”. We need stronger regulation of rent increases and stronger penalties for unreasonable increases.
There are precedents for this in other jurisdictions. Germany again provides a great example. There, rent increases are allowed less frequently. And they:
… must be based in the rents of three similar dwellings or a database of local reference rents and rents may not increase more than 20 percent over three years. 
Ensuring the right to make a home. Rental laws need to ensure the right of tenants to make their house into a home, including making cosmetic changes to a property, ability to keep pets, and allowing alterations that would allow an older person or person with a disability to live there.
Some older renters I have interviewed recently have had to move after these types of adjustments were rejected by landlords who thought age-related modifications were not attractive.
In New South Wales, the right to make changes that would ensure a property is liveable for people with different housing needs is being considered as part of the current residential tenancy law review. However, the right to make cosmetic changes is excluded.
Popular wisdom often suggests that tenants and landlords have different interests. In fact, they have very similar interests. Both benefit from secure tenancies and a property that is well maintained and cared for.
Failure to ensure rental affordability and security will require a raft of policy changes in other areas, including pension income calculations that assume home ownership. It will also condemn a generation of long-term renters to increasingly unaffordable and insecure housing.
Emma Power is an ARC DECRA fellow based in the Institute for Culture and Society at Western Sydney University. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/emma-power-250930">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

For renters, making housing more affordable is just the start: Emma Power

<html><body>
Rules for keeping a pet in a rental property and the rights of landlords to enter rented premises are among topics Victorians are being asked to have a say on, as part of a Victorian Government review of the state’s rental laws.
Public consultation is underway on the third in a series of issues papers as part of the review.
Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants considers how the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (the Act) sets boundaries around what tenants and landlords can and cannot do throughout the tenancy.
Issues up for discussion include all aspects of letting out a property, from the first application and screening process, to moving in and compensation for ending a lease early.
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria Simon Cohen said the review is calling for people’s views on matters such as tenants' rights to keep pets and to sub-let a property, tenant privacy and notices to end tenancies.
“The review forms part of the Victorian Government’s Plan for Fairer Safer Housing, and aims to ensure rental laws strike a fair balance between the rights and responsibilities of tenants and landlords across all forms of rental accommodation,” Mr Cohen said.
“We want to hear people’s views on the issues raised by landlords and tenants, as they exercise their rights and responsibilities during the various stages of a tenancy.
“Make a submission by sharing your story, participating in polls, blogs and discussions through the Fairer Safer Housing website."
Feedback on these issues will help identify how the needs and preferences of Victorian landlords and tenants have changed since the legislation came into effect almost 20 years ago, and indicate areas that should be a priority for reform.
Three more issues papers are scheduled for release in the first half of 2016.
“We want to hear from renters and rental property owners from all corners of the state,” Mr Cohen said.
Details about how you can have your say, including information for culturally and linguistically diverse communities, are available on the <a href="https://fairersaferhousing.vic.gov.au/renting" target="_blank">Fairer Safer Housing website</a>.
Issues for public consultation include:
<ul>
<li>the tenancy application process and appropriate screening practices</li>
<li>information that should be disclosed to a tenant at the start of a tenancy</li>
<li>digital technology and the form and service of documents and notices</li>
<li>the process to be followed when a landlord or tenant breaches a duty under the Act</li>
<li>enforcing additional terms in the tenancy agreement, including rules about pets</li>
<li>balancing the right of tenants to quiet enjoyment and the right of landlords to enter premises, particularly where the premises are being sold</li>
<li>balancing the interests of landlords and tenants in respect of sub-letting and lease assignments</li>
<li>reasons a landlord or tenant can terminate a lease, and rules around compensation for lease breaking</li>
<li>what arrangements should apply to goods left behind by a tenant at the end of a tenancy</li>
<li>increasing protections for tenants experiencing family violence</li>
<li>the conduct of agents acting on behalf of landlords.</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

Rental Laws

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Rental Laws

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News