Investors may soon find themselves with fewer reasons to buy established property and more incentives to look towards the new apartment market.

Proposed changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions would see new and off-the-plan apartments retain access to the tax benefits, while established properties would miss out, creating a clear advantage for buyers purchasing newly built housing.

The policy direction aligns with what many developers have been saying for several years. Australia needs more housing supply, and governments are increasingly looking for ways to encourage investment into new stock rather than existing homes.

The challenge for investors is that suitable product is becoming harder to find.

For much of the last decade, one-bedroom apartments were the cornerstone of investor demand. They offered a lower entry price, strong rental appeal, and were a common feature across most apartment developments.

Today, the development pipeline looks very different.

Across both New South Wales and South East Queensland, developers are increasingly targeting owner-occupiers and downsizers, delivering larger two, three and four-bedroom apartments in response to changing buyer preferences. While one-bedroom apartments still exist, they now form a much smaller portion of many new projects.

That shift has created a shortage of investor-friendly stock, particularly in well-located projects close to transport, employment hubs and lifestyle amenity.

At the same time, rising apartment prices have pushed many new developments beyond the reach of traditional investors. On the Gold Coast and across South East Queensland, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find new apartments priced around the $1 million mark, particularly those offering strong rental fundamentals and long-term growth prospects.

We've rounded up four new apartment developments where investors can still secure a foothold in the market for around $1 million or less.

<h2 data-end="1140" data-start="844">Flourish Soleira</h2>

<h2>Priced from: $1.07 million</h2>

Popular Palm Beach developer Sherpa is soon to officially launch its newest local apartment development, Flourish Soleira.

The one-bedroom apartments in the building were only offered to first home buyers rather than investors, and all of those have been snapped up. The two-bedroom apartments will start from $1.07 million, and the three-bedrooms, still a good investment given the popularity of Palm Beach for owner-occupiers, starting at $2,045,000.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370964]

Flourish Soliera will comprise 153 apartments across two buildings, connected by a skybridge, the first ever delivered in the suburb.

True to Sherpa's booming Flourish brand of apartment projects, Flourish Soleira will have extensive rooftop amenity across both buildings including a&nbsp;wellness centre with gym, work from home, yoga, pilates, a&nbsp;heated pool, private dining rooms, pizza oven and barbecues, basketball court, and golf simulator.

<h2>Corallo, Palm Beach</h2>

Priced from: $841,500

Nearby Flourish Soleira is Changfa Group's beachfront-inspired Corallo development. They still have some one-bedroom apartments remaining, priced from $841,500.

The 105-apartment project on Palm Beach Avenue is otherwise dominated by larger two and three-bedroom residences, many of which are aimed at owner-occupiers and downsizers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112194 project_image_fid=808]

For investors, the appeal lies in Palm Beach's continued transformation from a laid-back beachside suburb into one of the Gold Coast's most sought-after residential markets. Residents at Corallo will be within walking distance of Palm Beach's surf beaches, the recreational amenity of Tallebudgera Creek, and the increasingly popular collection of cafes, restaurants and boutique retailers along the suburb's central dining precinct.

<h2>Corner House, Stones Corner</h2>

<h2>Priced from: $880,000</h2>

One of only two Brisbane apartment developments to make the list with prices under $1 million is DeMartini Fletcher's Corner House development in Stones Corner.

One-bedroom apartments start from $880,000 within the 88-apartment development, providing investors with exposure to one of Brisbane's most established inner-south locations.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149098 project_image_fid=330594]

Stones Corner has long been supported by strong tenant demand due to its proximity to major employment and education destinations. The suburb sits less than five kilometres from Brisbane's CBD and is within easy reach of the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Queensland Children's Hospital and several university campuses.

The project's location within a walkable urban village environment, surrounded by retail, dining and public transport infrastructure, continues to attract both professionals and healthcare workers seeking accommodation close to work.

Parkdrive Apartments, Chermside

Priced from: $749,000

The most affordable apartments across Brisbane's new and off the plan market are in Chermside where developer AusDev is selling one-bedroom apartments from $749,000, and two-beds from $929,000, at its recently launched Parkdrive development.

The development is strategically positioned in one of Brisbane's largest employment and retail precincts, placing residents within easy walking distance of Westfield Chermside, The Prince Charles Hospital, St Vincent's Private Hospital Northside and the suburb's major bus interchange.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152125 project_image_fid=363782]

Already under construction and scheduled for completion in early 2028, Parkdrive benefits from Chermside's ongoing evolution into Brisbane's northern metropolitan centre. The suburb continues to attract significant public and private investment, supporting population growth and underpinning long-term rental demand.

For investors focused on yield and tenant depth, the combination of healthcare, retail and transport infrastructure within close proximity provides a strong foundation for occupancy and rental performance.

Joel Robinson

Investors to turn to new apartments after Federal Government changes spark hunt for Queensland's best $1 million apartments

A mix of Gold Coast locals, fly-in, fly-out purchasers from Sydney and Melbourne, and Brisbane-based families has driven early sales success at Broadbeach's newest apartment tower, Lumara.

The 26-level project, a joint venture between builder-developer 5Point Projects and Bourke Projects, comprises just 37 luxury residences and is attracting a buyer profile that is looking for exclusivity, above the most amenity-rich suburb on the Gold Coast.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150454 project_image_fid=364156]

Jamie Bourke, Director of Bourke Projects, says every buyer secured so far intends to use Lumara as a lock-up-and-leave residence, combining holiday use with the ability to work remotely when required.

“The size of the apartments, both half- and full-floor options, and the different zones within the floorplans, lends itself perfectly to dedicated home office setups and multi-generational family holidays,” Bourke says.

That flexibility has become a key drawcard for affluent buyers seeking a second residence on the Gold Coast without sacrificing the ability to conduct business away from their primary home base.

The absence of holiday letting within the building has also resonated strongly with purchasers.

“This type of buyer doesn't need to generate holiday rental income,” Bourke says. “They're paying for exclusivity, privacy and certainty around who their neighbours are.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150454 project_image_fid=366491]

The strong demand comes amid broader shifts in the high-end apartment market following the Federal Budget announcements in May.

“We were already seeing strong enquiry from high-net-worth buyers, but that has only accelerated since the policy changes,” Bourke says.

“A lot of those buyers are looking to place more capital into premium lifestyle assets rather than investment-grade stock that has been targeted by the Federal Government.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150454 project_image_fid=366486]

Designed by Cottee Parker, Lumara adopts a slender, sculpted form with an emphasis on natural materials suited to its beachfront setting. The architectural approach draws on coastal influences, with a palette of stone, timber and concrete selected for durability and the ability to weather over time.

Apartments are limited to three and four-bedroom configurations, with a maximum of two residences per floor through the mid-levels and a selection of full-floor and dual-level homes in the upper levels. All apartments are oriented to the north to maximise natural light, cross-ventilation and views across the ocean, city skyline and hinterland.

A two-level amenity offering is positioned high within the building on levels 20 and 21, conceived as a sky wellness retreat. Facilities include a magnesium pool, spa, sauna and steam rooms, alongside more social spaces such as a private dining room, resident lounge, workspaces and outdoor barbecue areas integrated with landscaped greenery.

The uppermost levels are reserved for larger-format residences, including several full-floor homes and a dual-level penthouse with its own private wellness features and recreational spaces.

&nbsp;

To give buyers confidence, 5Point and Bourke commenced construction ahead of the apartments launching to the market, a sure-fire way to prove they mean business, and the building will be delivered. They are targeting a 2028 completion date.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150454]

Locals, interstate holiday makers, drive early sales at Lumara, Broadbeach's newest luxury apartment tower

Often when it comes to purchasing property, the biggest barrier to entry is the deposit. Buyers of established homes typically aim for a 20 per cent deposit to avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance, while most property transactions require around a 10 per cent deposit when contracts are exchanged.

The off-the-plan market works differently, with buyers typically paying a deposit during construction and settling the balance upon completion. As completion approaches at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/fabbrica-fitzroy-369-gore-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">Fabbrica Fitzroy</a>, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/pace-development-group">Pace</a> is making it easier for buyers to secure a residence through a deposit-matching incentive. Purchasers need only contribute a five per cent deposit*, with Pace matching the remaining five per cent.

The offer comes as Pace unveils a completed display apartment and townhouse, now available for inspection by appointment ahead of the project's Spring completion.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139552 project_image_fid=371009]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/winwood-mckenzie-architecture">Winwood Mckenzie</a> and landscaping by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/acre">Acre</a>, Fabbrica draws on Fitzroy’s industrial and manufacturing history, incorporating references to the former Argyle Shirt Factory and Life Savers Confectionery Company that once occupied the site.

The development comprises 85 residences, spanning low-maintenance apartments through to larger-format townhouses with private street access and double lock-up garages, a relatively uncommon offering in Fitzroy’s higher-density apartment market.

Pace says the project has been designed to appeal to buyers seeking inner-city convenience without sacrificing space, flexibility, or amenity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139552 project_image_fid=371016]

Inside the residences, Winwood Mckenzie has focused on adaptable layouts and integrated detailing, with features including custom joinery, and concealed storage solutions. The material palette leans into warm, tactile finishes intended to complement the building’s industrial architectural language.

Fabbrica’s rooftop amenity is a key part of the project offering. Spanning around 800 sqm, the communal rooftop includes a private dining room, communal kitchen, lounge spaces, work-from-home zones, and outdoor dining areas overlooking the Melbourne CBD skyline.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139552 project_image_fid=371017]

Landscape architecture studio Acre has introduced a layered rooftop garden designed to soften the urban setting while creating a more communal environment for residents.

The Fitzroy location also positions residents within walking distance of Brunswick Street, Smith Street, parks, cafés, galleries, and public transport, while remaining only minutes from Melbourne’s CBD. The project has an enviable Walk Score of 96.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139552 project_image_fid=371025]

Pace, which is also delivering the project as builder, has developed more than 100 projects across Melbourne over the past three decades. The vertically integrated approach has become increasingly common among developers seeking greater control over construction delivery amid broader market pressures affecting the apartment sector.

The strikingly contemporary Gore Street development is now around 70 per cent complete, with purchasers expected to move into their new homes in Spring 2026. A limited number of residences remain available under the current deposit match offer.

*Conditions apply in relation to the deposit match offer.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=139552]

Pace offers five per cent deposit match at Fabbrica Fitzroy ahead of Spring completion

Sydney developer Hyecorp's roots on the Lower North Shore stretch back three generations, and that deep understanding of the market continues to shape where and how it develops today.

From high-rise towers to boutique apartment projects, the family-run developer has built its reputation by focusing on a part of Sydney it knows intimately. Founded by Michael Abolakian in the early 1990s, Hyecorp is now led by his sons Stephen, Troy and Patrick.

Stephen Abolakian, joint managing director alongside Troy, has spent more than two decades in the business, overseeing development, planning, finance, marketing and sales.

Abolakian says the developer's disciplined focus on where it chooses to operate has been, and continues to be, one of Hyecorp's greatest strengths.

“We know the buyer profile exceptionally well,” Abolakian says.

“The demographics between places like Willoughby, Chatswood, St Leonards and Roseville are very similar. There are nuances between suburbs and projects, but culturally and from a buyer perspective, there’s a strong overlap.”

That buyer has historically been overwhelmingly owner-occupier driven.

Unlike many Sydney apartment developers that have traditionally relied heavily on investor demand, Hyecorp’s projects have typically attracted downsizers, upsizers, rightsizers and family owner-occupiers seeking long-term homes rather than short-term investments.

“Historically, investors have been a much smaller portion of our demand profile,” Abolakian says.

“We design for owner-occupiers. We don’t design for yield, we design for comfort, amenity, family living and long-term usability.”

That philosophy extends well beyond apartment layouts.

From landscaping and communal gardens to shared amenities and circulation spaces, Hyecorp’s developments are designed around how people actually live, something Abolakian believes has become increasingly important in Sydney’s apartment market.

“There was probably a period where having an approved project in market was enough,” he says.

“There wasn’t as much competition and if you built it, buyers would come. That’s no longer the case.”

“There’s more supply in the pipeline now, particularly with TOD precincts and low and mid-rise reforms opening up opportunities across Sydney. Buyers have more choice, so if you get the product wrong, they’ll simply go elsewhere.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110379 project_image_fid=311393]

The shift has forced developers to become more sophisticated in how they approach apartment design, particularly as owner-occupier expectations continue to rise.

For Hyecorp, that means thinking beyond who the buyer is today and designing for who they may become in five or 10 years' time.

“People buying now often aren’t moving in for several years,” Abolakian says.

“You might have a young couple buying today, but by the time they move in they may have children, older children, or changing lifestyle needs. You’ve got to think about how families evolve.”

That thinking also shapes Hyecorp’s approach to amenity, which positions wellness at the forefront.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149594 project_image_fid=362634]

While resort-style facilities have become increasingly common marketing tools across Sydney apartment developments, Abolakian says the challenge is ensuring amenities are genuinely usable and appropriate for the scale of the project.

“If amenities are done right, they can materially improve the living experience,” he says, adding however that if you&nbsp;overdo it or get it wrong, you can end up with facilities nobody uses that simply create ongoing strata costs.”

That balance is something Hyecorp is aiming to strike with projects like Roseville Avenue, one of the group's upcoming Lower North Shore developments, which Abolakian describes as bringing a resort-style living experience into a metropolitan setting.

“It’s about creating something that feels special without being excessive,” he says.

“Good gardens, quality apartments, thoughtful amenity. Creating that resort feeling in a metro location.”

<img alt="Hyecorp" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="13c4c0f3-b1b7-44cf-9344-0b3d1d07797a" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-02%20at%2012.14.57%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=9OLWjyj2bYkDV35F78WJnyMSPfc2bJ2z" />

The focus on owner-occupier product comes as Sydney’s apartment market continues to navigate a difficult development environment.&nbsp;For Hyecorp, maintaining an in-house operating model across construction, sales, marketing and development management has become increasingly important in navigating that environment.

“We’ve always believed in keeping a lot of the process in-house,” Abolakian says.

“It creates efficiencies, but it also creates quality control. You can make faster decisions and ensure the end product stays aligned with the original vision.”

Despite the challenges, Abolakian believes demand for quality owner-occupier apartments across Sydney remains strong beneath the surface, particularly across established Lower North Shore suburbs where downsizers continue to seek new housing options close to existing communities.

“There are definitely people waiting,” he says.

“Once some of the broader uncertainty settles, whether that’s the global environment or some of the local economic noise, I think the right projects will perform very strongly.”

Hyecorp currently has three residential developments on the market across Sydney’s Lower North Shore.&nbsp;Audrey, St Leonards, positioned opposite Newlands Park, is nearing completion and preparing to welcome its first residents, with the project now almost sold out.

Hyecorp has also recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/celine-chatswood-37-archer-street-chatswood-nsw-2067">Celine Chatswood</a>, an architectural tower, while continuing to deliver&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/juliet-roseville-64-pacific-highway-roseville-nsw-2069">Juliet Roseville</a>, a more boutique scale of development with just 34 apartments.

Why Hyecorp continues to back Sydney's Lower North Shore apartment market

South East Queensland’s apartment market is entering a new phase defined by rising prices, constrained affordability, and mounting pressure on the construction pipeline, according to RPM Group’s latest SEQ Apartments &amp; Townhomes Market Report.

The May 2026 report highlights a widening divide between what buyers can afford and what developers can viably deliver, with detached house prices continuing to push more buyers toward apartments across Brisbane, the Gold Coast, and the Sunshine Coast.

RPM says Brisbane’s median house price has reached around $1.5 million, accelerating the shift toward higher-density housing as buyers are increasingly priced out of the detached market.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135094 project_image_fid=356540]

Median unit prices rose across all three major SEQ markets in the March quarter. Brisbane City recorded the strongest annual growth, with median unit prices climbing 21 per cent to $862,000, while the Gold Coast reached the highest overall median at $950,000, up 17 per cent year-on-year. The Sunshine Coast followed at $870,000, representing annual growth of nine per cent.

RPM noted the affordability gap between houses and units remains significant, with detached homes commanding premiums of 67 per cent in Brisbane and 68 per cent on the Gold Coast relative to apartments.

The report suggests this price disparity is increasingly consolidating buyer demand within the apartment market, particularly among downsizers and owner-occupiers.

“Demand is real. Supply is moving. But they’re operating on different timelines and the gap between what’s being built and what buyers can afford is the defining tension in this market right now,” RPM Queensland and NSW Managing Directors Peter Neale and Clinton Trezise said in the report.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150787 project_image_fid=366230]

While approvals and commencements are strengthening, RPM argues the delivery pipeline remains constrained by construction costs, labour shortages, and extended build timelines.

Apartment approvals across Queensland increased 86 per cent over the year to February 2026, reaching 12,682 approvals, the highest level recorded since 2016. Brisbane overtook the Gold Coast as the state’s most active apartment approval market, with nearly 5,000 apartments approved over the past 12 months.

Unit commencements also strengthened considerably, rising 48 per cent year-on-year to 5,453 commencements in the December 2025 quarter, the highest level since 2018.

However, RPM’s research found apartment delivery timeframes have expanded sharply compared to the previous cycle. Projects are now averaging around 30 months from approval to completion, compared to roughly 20 months a decade ago.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=143932 project_image_fid=367515]

The number of units under construction has climbed to approximately 31,530 dwellings, nearing the previous 2016 peak, though projects are remaining in the pipeline for considerably longer.

Construction costs continue to weigh heavily on feasibility. RPM found the average apartment construction cost in Greater Brisbane reached $630,000 per dwelling in 2025, exceeding both Sydney and Melbourne. Coastal Queensland markets, including the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast, were even higher at an average of $817,418 per apartment due to the prevalence of larger premium product.

The report also points to increasing pressure from Olympic-related infrastructure spending ahead of Brisbane 2032, with labour competition expected to intensify over the next several years.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370960]

ANZ Associate Director of Property Daniel Gradwell said the underlying demand drivers across South East Queensland remain strong, supported by interstate migration, downsizers, and population growth.

“The challenge is bringing enough supply to market to meet that demand, and nothing on the horizon makes that straightforward,” Gradwell said.

RPM’s analysis found the affordability challenge is becoming more pronounced in the new apartment market itself, with only three per cent of surveyed new apartments priced below $1 million.

Instead, the market is increasingly concentrated in higher price brackets, with the most common new apartment price band across SEQ sitting between $1.5 million and $1.75 million. Around half of all new apartment stock surveyed is priced below $2 million.

The report suggests developers are not necessarily avoiding lower price points by choice, but because current construction economics make delivering affordable apartments increasingly difficult at scale.

Rental conditions also remain tight across the region. Median rents for one-bedroom apartments rose 12 per cent in Brisbane over the past year to $580 per week, while Gold Coast one-bedroom rents increased nine per cent to $630.

Despite rising rents, RPM noted bond lodgements have generally trended downward over the past five years, indicating more apartments are being absorbed by owner-occupiers rather than retained as investor-held rental stock.

Looking ahead, RPM expects projects targeting the mid-market owner-occupier segment between $1.25 million and $2 million to remain the most viable part of the market, while premium projects in highly constrained coastal or riverfront locations continue to attract demand.

“Construction costs are rewriting the feasibility rulebook across Greater Brisbane, and with little relief in sight, only projects in the right price band, right location, and with presales secured early will make it through,” the report concludes.

SEQ apartment demand outpacing affordable supply as construction timelines stretch: RPM

Foreign Investment

<html><body>
The South Australian Weatherill government has reversed its position on foreign ­investor taxes.
It intends to raise more revenue by increasing a proposed levy on foreign buyers.
The reframing of the budget comes after Premier Jay Weatherill conceded the state bank tax was “dead” following its rejection by parliament.
State Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis responded by increasing the proposed “foreign investor surcharge” from 4% to 7% to raise an extra $36.6 million over four years.
It will recoup well short of the estimated $417 million the bank levy had been expected to raise, The Australian noted.
Foreign investor taxes on residential transactions in NSW are set at 8%, Victoria at 7%, Western Australia at 4% and Queensland at 3%, with an extra 1.5% levy for absentee foreign owners.
Koutsantonis last year said such a measure was an eastern states revenue grab driven by “a little bit of xenophobia”.
“It is also a recognition there are a lot of people in Southeast Asia and India who are fleeing … and they want to invest in other economies and bring their capital to Australia,” he said at the time.
“I am never going to say that I don’t want a type of investment because ‘I don’t speak your language’ … I think that’s appalling.’’
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

South Australia ignores their own xenophobia concerns to raise tax on foreigner property purchases

<html><body>
Purchases by foreign buyers do not, on the whole, reduce the supply of dwellings available to local residents, according to the RBA.
"In fact they may actually contribute to expansion of the housing stock," according to Jonathan Kearns the bank's head of Financial Stability.
He said foreign buyers in Australia for work or study would have been renting if they did not purchase.
"Other foreign buyers rent the property as an investment and so contribute to the rental stock.
"Also, there are some new developments that only proceed because they get high pre-sales from foreign buyers," he said in a speech to the Aus-China Property Developers, Investors &amp; Financiers.
<a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2017/sp-so-2017-11-20" target="_blank">The speech</a> noted purchases by foreign buyers have received considerable focus in recent years.
However he did acknowledge foreign buyers of residential property could amplify cycles or transmit foreign shocks. 
"Non-residents purchasing Australian real estate as an investment may choose between different countries based on expected returns, which can increase the correlation of the Australian market with other countries. 
"Changes in economic and regulatory conditions in foreign buyers' home countries can also be transmitted to their demand for Australian property. 
"But if purchases of residential property by foreign buyers mainly depend on conditions in their home country, their participation could actually have a moderating impact on the Australian housing cycle."
Kearns noted non-residents are able to purchase newly constructed dwellings in Australia, while temporary residents, such as those in Australia for work or study, are able to purchase an existing dwelling for their primary residence.
"It has been hard to get a firm estimate of how large these purchases are, but drawing on a range of sources, it seems that, nationally, purchases by foreign buyers are equivalent to around 10-15 per cent of new construction, or about 5 per cent of total housing sales," he noted.
"The share of new construction purchases is highest in Melbourne and Sydney.
"It is also higher for apartments, but it is still only perhaps around one-quarter of newly built apartments.
"Many foreign buyers come from China, seemingly around three-quarters."
He noted purchases of new properties by foreign buyers have eased over the past year, reportedly because of stricter enforcement of Chinese capital controls and tighter access to finance for foreign buyers.
Kearns concluded the strength of the Australian property market, and the participation by foreign buyers, had enticed some foreign developers to Australia for specific projects, "but overall they remain a small part of the market."
Foreign banks also have a very small role in residential property lending in Australia, he added.
 
</body></html>

Foreign buyers do not reduce residential dwelling supply: RBA's Jonathan Kearns

<html><body>
<div class="tg-tlc-storybody_intro">
The Foreign Ownership of Land Register released by the State Government has revealed overseas Chinese buyers purchased over 7600 land parcels over the past 12 months, totalling $1.47 billion, up from $463 million in 2013/14.
</div>
It is the first time China has topped the list, taking over from the United Kingdom as the most prolific buyer of Queensland land.
China’s investment in Queensland totals nearly $1 billion more than any other country in the world over the same time period.
The total amount of foreign investment in Queensland land has risen from $1.6 billion in 2013/14 to over $4.2 billion last year.
The Foreign Ownership of Land Register released by the State Government reveals the United Kingdom maintained its position as the premier buyer of Queensland land when it comes to size.
UK owners purchased 2.2 million hectares over the year, ahead of the Netherlands with 1.9 million hectare and China with 1.6 million hectare.
</body></html>

Chinese buy 7600 properties last year in Queensland 

<html><body>
One-third of commercial property deals in the first half of 2017 involved offshore money, according to latest figures from commercial real estate firm CBRE.
However, there was a decline in the volume of transactions as prices increase, prompting a standstill between owners and would-be buyers.
Australia was the top destination for cross-border capital in CBRE's latest survey on investor intentions.
Commercial property deals – across the hotel, office, industrial and retail property sectors – were at $10.8 billion in the first half of the year, compared to a year earlier when total sales were $15.6 billion. 
"Foreign investment still accounted for approximately one-third of all activity in Australia's commercial property sector, with demand for assets remaining strong given the higher yields and strong fundamentals demonstrated by the Sydney and Melbourne markets," CBRE research chief Stephen McNabb was quoted as saying by The Australian Financial Review.
About $2 billion Asian capital was directly invested into the local commercial real estate market in the first half, CBRE figures showed, a fall of 25 per cent from a year earlier.
But it fell less slowly than the overall drop, with transaction volumes down by 37 per cent.
The fall in investment activity was due to a lack of available stock rather than a decline in buyer interest, said McNabb.
Outlining the preference for Australian assets, he said in April a Hong Kong investor bought the Australian Securities Exchange headquarters at 20 Bridge Street in Sydney for a record yield – below 4.5 per cent – for more than $330 million
In June, Singapore's Keppel REIT outlaid $348 million to take a half stake in a new police headquarters in the Melbourne CBD.
He said Asian appetite was holding up into the second half as well, with Mirvac selling a half stake in a landmark Collins Street office development in Melbourne to Singapore's Suntec REIT for $414 million.
"At this stage of the yield cycle, which is nearing its peak in Australia's major markets, and with a reasonable immediate outlook for rent growth, there isn't a compelling reason to sell assets," McNabb said.
"From an investment perspective, assets remain eagerly sought after and this is evident in further yield compression across all assets classes nationally in the first half of 2017."
Around $US45.2 billion of Asian outbound capital was directly invested into global property in the first six months of 2017, up 98.4 per cent on the $US22.8 billion in the first half of 2016.
However, a slowdown in Chinese investment offshore is expected as the government there restricts the flow of outbound capital.
 
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Foreigners net one-third of commercial property deals in first half of 2017: CBRE

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The Housing Industry Association's recent Stamp Duty Watch report claims foreign investors now pay nearly $100,000 in taxes to buy a Sydney unit, almost four times as much as local buyers.
Shane Garrett, HIA Senior Economist said the average stamp duty bill in Australia paid by resident owner occupiers is also up by 16.4 percent over the year to $20,725, even though dwelling prices increased by just 10.5 percent.
Shane Garrett, HIA Senior Economist said recent changes to stamp duty in NSW mean that foreign investors now pay almost $100,000 in transaction taxes to acquire a standard apartment in Sydney – almost four times as much as local buyers.
“Foreign investors are a vital component of rental supply in cities like Sydney and Melbourne," he said.
"With rental market conditions now so tight in Australia’s two biggest cities, should we really be placing more and more barriers in the way of new supply. 
“On the owner occupier side, stamp duty drains family coffers of $107 each and every month over a 30- year mortgage term.
“For owner occupiers, the typical stamp duty bill now amounts to $20,725 – an increase of some 16.4 percent on a year ago.
“Shelling out so much in stamp duty drains the household piggy bank of vital funds for their home deposit. Families are then forced to take out larger mortgages and incur heavier mortgage insurance premiums."
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/08/04/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-04%20at%2011.13.27%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/08/04/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-04%20at%2011.13.27%20AM.png" alt="">
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Foreign investors slugged with taxes on Sydney apartment sales

<html><body>
Queensland's state government has decided to tax foreign landowners with a 1.5 percent absentee land tax surcharge on land worth more than $350,000, following NSW and Victoria's moves to levy more taxes on foreigners.
The absentee land tax surcharge comes on top of the 3 percent transfer duty surcharge, which was introduced in 2016.
The new levy is expected to generate revenue of $20 million a year from 2017-18. 
Queensland Treasurer Curtis Pitt was quoted as saying by The Courier Mail that the “surcharge ensures that absentee owners of land are making a fair contribution and it has no direct impact on Queenslanders.”
Earlier this month, New South Wales announced it would double its foreign investors stamp duty surcharge to 8 percent as part of premier Gladys Berejiklian’s moves to address housing affordability ahead of the budget. 
And Victoria announced it would impose a tax on homeowners who leave their properties vacant in a bid to make housing more affordable in and around Melbourne
Victoria's Vacant Residential Property Tax will be levied at 1 percent, multiplied by the capital improved value of the taxable property. 
In May's Federal Budget, the Australian government also announced a new tax on any vacant properties owned by foreigners in a bid to improve housing affordability.
The new charge is expected to bring in $16.3 million over the forward estimates being monitored by the Australian Tax Office.
</body></html>

Queensland to slug foreigners with absentee land tax surcharge

<html><body>
The least understood, worst reported and most unfairly treated issue in residential real estate is foreign investment.
The degree to which a patchwork of half-truths, empty rhetoric and outright lies has come to be accepted by almost everyone as truth is quite startling.
All forms of investment in real estate have become demonized amid the increasingly hysterical “debate” about housing affordability, but especially foreign investment. 
Politicians’ handling of the affordability issue has been taken directly from the Yes Minister playbook. The iconic British comedy series has provided the scripts for federal and state politicians seeking a convenient scapegoat for the affordability issue – someone they can attack to give the appearance they care, without costing votes. 
Overseas investors are the perfect target because they are seen as filthy rich foreign bastards, so everyone dislikes them or at least envies them, and they don’t vote in Australian elections.
After two long and pointless federal parliamentary inquiries into housing affordability, the Federal Government decided to blame it all on foreign investors. This provided lots of opportunities for sabre-ratting and righteous speech-making, followed by a big clampdown on foreign buyers who break the rules. 
State Governments seized the opportunity to not only blame foreign investors for high prices but also to extract still more revenue from the property investment sector by slapping extra taxes and other imposts on the dastardly foreigners. Media, of course, has lapped it up.
So thoroughly have foreign buyers been demonized that a recent public opinion survey found that most people blame foreign investors for rising property prices. Even in Perth, where house prices have been falling for four years, half of respondents claim foreigners are forcing their house prices to rise. That pretty much says it all.
The anecdotal evidence suggests that anyone who has bid at an auction in Sydney and Melbourne in recent years, and been out-gunned by someone of Asian appearance, has gone away complaining about foreign investors. They could be third generation Australians for all they know.
The NSW Government, which is more to blame for poor housing affordability than any other entity or group of individuals, has seized the opportunity to exploit the unpopularity of foreign investors by slugging them with further taxes, while claiming – rather remarkably - that it won’t affect the level of foreign buying in Sydney.
If that’s what they believe, then what’s the point of doing it? It’s a rhetorical questions – the answer, of course, is that it’s all about revenue-raising.
The mounting imposts on offshore buyers will deter them and that will cause high-rise projects to be cancelled, thereby reducing supply - one of the factors needed to improve affordability.
The craziest thing about the whole sorry issue is that foreign investors are such a small part of the overall buying market. The research indicates that offshore buyers account for less than 10 percent of residential sales. We’re being asked to believe that this tiny minority is somehow driving prices up everywhere, overpowering the more than 90 percent of buyers who are Australians. Are we really that weak and puny?
It’s likely suggesting that a Japanese sevens team with two players in the bin could defeat a 15-man Wallabies outfit.
Yet 54 percent of South Australians think foreigners are the greatest factor in forcing up property prices, even though prices have hardly moved in Adelaide; and 56 percent of Queenslanders have the same attitude, despite the absence of boom conditions in Brisbane.
Of course, it all depends how the survey is framed – also well-documented in the scripts of Yes Minister. Strange that this recent survey had little to say about negative gearing, another hugely-popular scapegoat. Seven out of 10 nationwide blame foreigners.
It shows, once again, how opinion surveys do little more than reflect the prevailing media view. Politicians and media keep telling the public that foreign buyers are forcing up prices - so that’s what most people think. It’s not as if the average citizen goes out and conducts their own research. They just believe what they read.
The proof that foreign buyers are unfairly blamed is this: both federal and state governments, as well as lenders, have been clamping down on foreign investment for the past two years. New taxes and charges have made it incredibly expensive for them to buy our real estate, while those who are deemed to have done the wrong thing have been forced to sell back the properties they acquired.
The level of foreign investment is falling significantly. But prices have continued to rise in Sydney and Melbourne.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="mailto:%20%3Cscript%20type='text/javascript'%3E%20%3C!--%20var%20prefix%20=%20'ma'%20+%20'il'%20+%20'to';%20var%20path%20=%20'hr'%20+%20'ef'%20+%20'=';%20var%20addy38821%20=%20'ryder'%20+%20'@';%20addy38821%20=%20addy38821%20+%20'hotspotting'%20+%20'.'%20+%20'com'%20+%20'.'%20+%20'au';%20document.write('%3Ca%20'%20+%20path%20+%20'/''%20+%20prefix%20+%20':'%20+%20addy38821%20+%20'/'%3E');%20document.write(addy38821);%20document.write('%3C//a%3E');%20//--%3E/n%20%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%20type='text/javascript'" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Level of foreign investment is falling significantly as foreigners are demonized: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
The majority of respondents to a new survey believe foreign investors are the greatest factor pushing up house prices.
The survey of 1006 Australians conducted on behalf of non-bank lender State Custodians Home Loans, found 69% of those aged 50 plus believe so, 54% of Gen X, and 49% of Gen Y.
Some 60% of respondents in New South Wales considered foreign investment as the greatest factor in pushing up house prices, 63% in Victoria, 50% in WA, 54% in SA and 56% in Queensland. 
Out of survey, 32% believe current low interest rates are merely encouraging more cashed up buyers into the market, driving up prices even further.
Joanna Pretty, general manager of State Custodians, said the collective impact of so many forces at work is what’s really contributing to the housing affordability crisis, rather than any one thing in particular.
“It’s the perfect storm of numerous factors coming together which is shaping the market we are experiencing today,” she said.
“The budget changes will go some way to help regarding foreign investment levels, but then the other factors still exist. There is still a lot of work to be done regarding affordability in general.”
"Other major concerns relate to population issues.
"Some 42% of people believe that over population in major cities is pushing up demand.
Another 28% also feel there’s not enough overall housing stock on offer for the amount of people looking, the survey found.
“It is definitely tough to buy in metro areas these days in the larger cities, especially if you’re struggling to make ends meet on your current wage," said Pretty.
“There is currently a lot of competition with limited stock.
"Plus, the deposit requirements are significant, even if you’re an expert saver. 
“Unfortunately buying your ‘forever home’ right off the bat is not always a feasible or quick option like it has been in the past.
"People who are competing for limited stock need to be open to suggestions on how to move forward.
“Look at different types of investing options. For example, if you don’t want to move from your neighbourhood, consider renting there and buy an investment property elsewhere. Make sure you’re constantly scouring real estate sites and be on good terms with local agents so they can alert you early on if something in your price range pops up.
“Also seek out advice from lending experts about areas you are interested in and how much you can borrow. Make sure your finances are sorted out prior to your search starting so you can truly understand your limit.”
Other factors Australians feel are increasing house prices are negative gearing incentives for property investors (41%), and high costs like stamp duty and capital gains tax putting homeowners off selling and buying, thereby limiting homes for sale (35%).
</body></html>

Survey finds majority believe foreign investors the greatest factor for house price rises

<html><body>
Foreign investors will pay higher surcharges when buying residential real estate in New South Wales following new measures to combat housing affordability to be introduced by the State Government.
From July 1 2017 stamp duty surchage for new purchases by foreign investors will rise from four percent to eight percent.
The surcharge on land tax will rise from 0.75 percent to two percent and foreign developers will be exempt from the increased surcharges.
Investors of any kind will no longer be able to delay paying stamp duty on off-the-plan properties for 12 months.
</body></html>

Foreign investors in NSW to lose out under stamp duty changes

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/77959/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Sydneysiders are concerned that foreign investors, and particularly Chinese real estate investors, are pushing up housing prices, according to survey findings published this month. 
A majority believed foreign investors should not be allowed to buy residential real estate in Sydney.
The federal budget was the government’s latest attempt at navigating a policy solution that supports its pro-foreign investment position while responding to public concern about housing affordability in Australian cities.
China’s government is also searching for a policy solution to restrict the large amount of capital that’s flowing out of the country. But the Chinese crackdown “doesn’t appear to be working”.
We surveyed almost 900 Sydneysiders to investigate their views on foreign real estate investment. The effectiveness of government regulations on foreign investment and investors was a major concern for respondents.
Views on government regulations
The survey obtained the views of people aged over 18 living in the Greater Sydney region. They were asked about housing affordability, foreign investment, the drivers of Sydney housing prices, and perceptions of Chinese investors specifically.
Support for the government’s regulation of foreign investment in housing was weak. Only 17% of respondents thought it was effective.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/30/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-31%20at%209.10.10%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/30/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-31%20at%209.10.10%20AM.png" alt="">
 
Source: Public Perceptions of Foreign and Chinese Real Estate Investment: Intercultural Relations in Global Sydney
Almost 56 percent of participants believed foreign investors should not be allowed to buy residential real estate in Sydney. Only 18 percent believed this should be permitted.
More than 63 percent of participants disagreed that the “government should encourage more foreign investment in greater Sydney’s housing market”. Only 12 percent of participants agreed with this.
These views stand in stark contrast to the government’s geopolitical support for foreign investment in Australia.
Views on foreign investors
There is little fine-grained data about the impacts of foreign capital and investors on specific neighbourhoods and developments in Australian cities. Therefore, we did not set out to compare public attitudes against the limited empirical evidence on the effects of foreign real estate investment in Sydney.
What’s significant about the survey results is that Sydneysiders have strong views on foreign investment, despite the absence of reliable evidence. Participants’ concerns about foreign investors and investment were consistent with their concerns about the government’s foreign investment rules.
Around 63 percent of Sydneysiders identified the Chinese as the heavyweights of foreign investment. This is likely to be accurate, given the concentration of Chinese investment in Sydney and Melbourne.
When presented with the statement “I welcome Chinese foreign investors buying properties in my suburb”, more than 48 percent of participants disagreed.
Other studies, however, have shown the potential for public confusion between domestic Australian-Chinese and international Chinese buyers.
Views on the drivers of housing prices
Respondents were asked to choose up to three drivers of house prices based on their understanding of Sydney’s housing market. By far the most commonly nominated driver of house prices (64 percent of respondents) was foreign investors buying housing.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/30/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-31%20at%209.11.43%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/05/30/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-31%20at%209.11.43%20AM.png" alt="">
Source: Public perceptions of foreign and Chinese real estate investment: intercultural relations in Global Sydney 
Roughly one in three survey participants saw low interest rates (37 percent of respondents) and domestic home owners (32 percent) and investors (32 percent) as the drivers of higher housing prices. Local housing analysts generally agree with this.
But more than three in four participants (78 percent) agreed with the statement:
Foreign investment is driving up housing prices in greater Sydney.
When framed inversely, as “Foreign investment has no impact or very small impact on greater Sydney’s housing market”, more than two-thirds of participants (68 percent) disagreed with the statement.
Only 6 percent of our participants disagreed that foreign investment was increasing real estate prices. Around 11 percent agreed that foreign investment had no or minimal impact.
Views on housing supply and affordability
We expected people to report that foreign people and capital are driving up housing prices and making it more difficult for Australians to compete in the housing market. But we were surprised by the findings about Sydneysiders’ views on foreign capital and housing supply.
A strong message from the real estate and property development industries is that foreign investment increases housing supply, which in turn puts downward pressure on prices.
Politicians and lobby groups argue this will help improve housing affordability in major Australian cities. But many housing analysts argue that this supply solution does not stack up for purchases made by either foreign or domestic investors.
It seems that Sydneysiders don’t accept the real estate industry message about foreign investors increasing housing supply, and therefore helping to ease housing affordability pressures.
When asked if “Foreign investment can help increase housing supply in greater Sydney”, 48% of participants disagreed with the statement. Another 25% “neither disagreed or agreed”.
An unresolved policy dilemma
The government’s dilemma is how to manage foreign investment alongside an increasing housing affordability problem in major Australian cities.
This month’s federal budget included a crackdown on foreign investors, but the government still supports foreign real estate investment.
Our survey results support other studies that suggest this pro-foreign investment stance must be accompanied by strategies to protect intercultural community relations. This must happen alongside efforts to improve housing affordability.
 
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/dallas-rogers-5269" target="_blank"></a>
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/dallas-rogers-5269" target="_blank">Dallas Rogers</a> is Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/dallas-rogers-5269" target="_blank"></a>
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/alexandra-wong-378393" target="_blank">Alexandra Wong </a>is Engaged Research Fellow, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University. <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jacqueline-nelson-134741" target="_blank">Jacqueline Nelson</a> is Chancellor's Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Technology Sydney.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/dallas-rogers-5269" target="_blank"></a>
All are authors for The Conversation.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/dallas-rogers-5269" target="_blank"> </a>
 
</body></html>

Foreign Investment

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Foreign Investment

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News