&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Joel Robinson

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more internation and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-5" data-turn="user" data-turn-id="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" data-turn-id-container="e65dbe94-e3b6-47f7-b62a-9cbb30c9bf79" dir="auto">Time &amp; Place’s plans to transform the former David Jones factory building in Surry Hills into a mixed-use residential precinct have gone on exhibition through the NSW Government’s In-fill Affordable Housing pathway.</section>

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:f4d533b7-64a5-413d-86fd-5c99649c2b73-2" dir="auto">
The Marlborough House proposal, lodged for the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marlborough-house-47-97-marlborough-street-surry-hills-nsw-2010">47-97 Marlborough Street</a> site, would see the adaptive reuse of the heritage-listed warehouse building alongside the construction of new residential additions and a separate apartment building on the northern portion of the site.

The proposal seeks approval for 172 apartments across three buildings, including 15 per cent affordable housing managed by a community housing provider for at least 15 years from occupation.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="5d1d3c2a-bf13-47d6-a335-7c01102cdee1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.36%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=cjMYrbR.BLUlWH4dar0RVDDo0bG.u2YT" />

Interior view from the Northern Building Penthouse overlooking the park

&nbsp;

The redevelopment is planned for the prominent 3,413 sqm site bounded by Marlborough Street, Goodlet Street and Lansdowne Street, directly opposite Eddie Ward Park and around 200 metres from the Surry Hills light rail stop.

Time &amp; Place acquired the former David Jones building in 2024, marking the first time the property had changed hands in around 50 years.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal centres around the adaptive reuse of the former David Jones factory, originally constructed between 1913 and 1935 in the Inter-War Chicagoesque architectural style.

Wardle noted in its Architectural Design Report that the building “occupies a significant place in the industrial and cultural history of Surry Hills” and at its peak was “the largest department store manufacturing facility in Australia, employing over 800 people and fuelling the growth of Sydney’s fashion and retail industries.”

The practice said the project positions itself “not as an isolated intervention, but as a contributor to the civic, social, and architectural grain of the precinct.”

The proposal would deliver 75 apartments within the retained southern heritage building, 59 apartments within the central addition, and a further 38 apartments within the new northern building fronting Lansdowne Street.

Planning documents show the scheme would comprise a mix of heritage apartments, new-build apartments, townhouses and penthouses.

<img alt="Marlborough" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="57758518-40a3-4b83-958c-d06e96a2cffa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.42%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VerlX9ST5xgBi8.1_YRsqdWTJeT6ygjs" />Interior View of the Heritage Building Apartment

The development would also include a ground-floor retail tenancy on the corner of Marlborough and Lansdowne streets, rooftop communal open space, a landscaped pedestrian link along the western edge of the site, and basement parking accessed from Lansdowne Street via a car stacker system.

&nbsp;

The scheme emerged from a competitive design process run by Urbis, with Wardle ultimately selected as the winning architect ahead of FJC Studio, TZG, Architectus and Wilkinson Eyre.

The Design Integrity Panel later described several aspects of the Wardle scheme as fundamental to the project, including “the stepped character of the new addition to the north of the site”, the landscaped western pedestrian link, and the “garden arrival” experience separating the original Marlborough House from the heritage addition.

Wardle’s design heavily references the site’s industrial and heritage history, while also responding to the surrounding Surry Hills streetscape.

The Architectural Design Report describes Surry Hills as “a finely grained neighbourhood with beautiful and expressive brickworks throughout the suburb,” with the proposal introducing a material palette intended to sit comfortably alongside the existing warehouse fabric and neighbouring terraces.

The report also outlines the project’s relationship with Eddie Ward Park and the broader landscape context of the area.

“Marlborough House occupies a site of deep cultural memory and the neighbouring Eddie Ward Park is of local ecological significance, where natural systems, topography, and stories have long shaped human experience,” Wardle noted in the report.

The architects said the proposal sought to “rebind built form to Country” through landscape, materiality and the adaptive reuse of the heritage structure.

<img alt="Marlborough House" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9ae3f2f9-c85f-477a-a6f8-b43f6cb97c41" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.29.53%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=B.qUCLqRvJOR.n9CvYcTpaknIX9LuqKZ" />

The project is also being progressed under the NSW Government’s in-fill affordable housing provisions, allowing developments that include affordable housing to access additional height and floor space incentives.

Under the plans, 2,593 sqm of the project’s floor space would be dedicated to affordable housing, slightly exceeding the required 15 per cent threshold.

In its Design Excellence Strategy, Urbis said the project aimed to “sensitively adapt and enhance the heritage-listed building on site through alterations and additions that preserve its historical significance” while delivering “high-quality market and infill affordable housing development in Surry Hills.”

Time &amp; Place has been one of the most active developers nationally in the last 12 to 24 months. Late last year they completed&nbsp;The Queensbridge in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/southbank-vic-3006">Southbank</a>, a mixed-use tower with 353 apartments and a hotel. They are currently selling Park Modern, 246 apartments near the famous Botanic Gardens in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/south-melbourne-vic-3205">South Melbourne</a>, and have future projects, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-wilmot-173-burke-road-28-hope-street-glen-iris-vic-3146">The Wilmot</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/glen-iris-vic-3146">Glen Iris</a>, the redevelopment of the Northcote Plaza, and another tower in South Melbourne.

The developer broke into Sydney just a few years ago with Two Tides in Manly. They have another project nearby, which is at the ultra-luxury end of the market on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/shoreline-manly-beach-89-90-north-steyne-manly">North Steyne</a>, fronting the beach.

It is also continuing to work through the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-time-place-settles-on-design-for-the-chimes-potts-point-redevelopment">redevelopment of The Chimes building</a> on Macleay Street in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/potts-point-nsw-2011">Potts Point</a>, as well as a project on <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/time-place-to-take-on-mosman-apartment-market">Mosman's Redan Street</a>.
</section>

First look: Time & Place unveils Marlborough House redevelopment designs for former David Jones warehouse in Surry Hills

The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Wing Tai unveils 325-apartment St Kilda Road tower on former VACC House site

<html><body>
In general terms, in order to claim input tax credits (ITCs) under the GST system, an enterprise must be carried on. This can be a tricky issue when property developments are concerned, as two taxpayers recently found out to their detriment before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).
A business needs to be carried on before claims for ITCs can be made and this is where the taxpayers ran into trouble before the AAT.
In that case, the two taxpayers failed before the AAT in a matter concerning a number of ITC claims in respect of purported acquisitions made in relation to two property developments.
The first taxpayer (a company that was the trustee of a trust) and the second taxpayer (a partnership of two individuals) claimed to have made acquisitions in relation to a 4900 acre property development near Goulburn in NSW. The first taxpayer also claimed to have made acquisitions in relation to another property development in Grenfell NSW.
Both taxpayers were registered for GST. However, the Tax Commissioner issued to both taxpayers amended assessments denying ITCs claimed on those purported acquisitions – in the first taxpayer's case, for the tax periods April 2010 to June 2011, and in the second taxpayer's case, for the tax periods April 2009 to December 2010.
The Commissioner's position was that neither taxpayer carried on an enterprise at all, so that neither of them could be entitled to any ITCs. The Commissioner also imposed a 50% administrative penalty.
The tribunal dealt mainly with the arrangements of the first property development as it was of the view the arrangements did not differ materially from the second development. The tribunal noted there had been some work done on the property; however, the parties disputed what that work consisted of, how much of it was done, who it was done for, and whether it had been paid for.
The taxpayers said they were "principal contractors to the project". The project was presumed by the tribunal to be the development of the property for eventual subdivision. However, the tribunal noted that exactly what the "principal contractors" did in respect of the property remained the subject of "quite profound mystery". It also said the same observation applied in respect of what the "principal contractors" were supposed to have acquired from various entities, described by the taxpayers as the "subcontractors", who were said to have undertaken some of development activities.
The tribunal understood the case put by the taxpayers as follows: the owner of the property engaged the principal contractors to get certain work done on the property; the principal contractors in turn engaged subcontractors to do the physical work; the subcontractors did the work and charged the work to the principal contractors; and the principal contractors bundled up the charges with a 20% mark-up and on-charged the owner of the property.
The total amount invoiced to the first taxpayer by the subcontractors (in relation to both property developments) was over $250,000. The total amount invoiced to the second taxpayer was over $820,000. However, the tribunal said the invoices themselves were "short on detail". The tribunal also noted that the Commissioner had notified the taxpayers his doubts concerning the work undertaken on the property after he was informed by the relevant council authority that approval to subdivide the property had been refused.
The tribunal said each taxpayer's claim for ITCs failed "at the most basic level". It said that an entity is not a "project manager" simply because someone says it is, and it was important that, to carry on an enterprise (thus enabling the ITC claim to potentially succeed), "an entity must do something".
The tribunal was unable to identify the "activity" that the taxpayers were undertaking in respect of the properties. It was also not satisfied that either of the taxpayers, in relation to the relevant property developments, carried on any activities "in the form of a business". A key issue identified was the difficulty the taxpayers had in articulating the arrangement between themselves, landowners and subcontractors. The AAT said it could not see that either taxpayer did much at all, beyond receiving invoices from the subcontractors and it rejected any notion that receiving invoices is relevantly an “activity”.
The tribunal member (Deputy President Frost) said the taxpayers "could not take me to any document that set out an agreement, between either of the landowners and either of the applicants, that the applicants would perform services or tasks, engage or co-ordinate third parties, or even make arrangements of any kind in relation to the development of the properties".
That, to say the least, was not helpful to the taxpayers' cause.
The tribunal was of the view the "true arrangement" was work was done for, and the supplies were made to, the owners of the properties, and that at most, the taxpayers agreed to pay for some of the supplies. The tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that there were "supplies" by the subcontractors; however, it was of the view that any supplies were not made by the subcontractors to the taxpayers. It said it could not see any indicators of a business being carried on. Accordingly, it held the claims for ITCs were not sustainable.
Although not required to, the tribunal also rejected the taxpayers' argument that "promissory notes" issued by them to the subcontractors for work done constituted consideration at the time of the supplies. The tribunal also affirmed the penalty at 50% of the shortfall amount.
The tribunal said the arrangement involved multiple entities, many of them not at arm's length, and that given the type of arrangement involved and its size, independent advice should have been obtained.
This case is a clear demonstration of the need to properly and fully document the operations of a business. The need to obtain clear and independent advice on any business proposition, be it property development or something else, is also a "take-away" message from this case.
Terry Hayes is the editor-in-chief of tax news reporting at <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/" target="_blank">Thomson Reuters</a>, a leading Australian provider of tax, accounting and legal information solutions.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.SmartCompany.com.au" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
Photo courtesy of Chris Tolworthy/Flickr/<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>.
</body></html>

thayes-XhNcNKLNWa

The tricky business of property development and GST credits

<html><body>
Being the trustee of a self-managed super fund (SMSF) gives you the opportunity to manage your own superannuation investments and make your own investment choices.
As the trustee and member of a SMSF, you can have full control over how your retirement savings are invested, whether you want returns from property, shares or even art and collectables.
If you’re thinking of setting up a SMSF, your duties as a trustee will include devising an investment strategy, accepting contributions and paying benefits.
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is the authority of SMSFs, enforcing the majority of regulations and restrictions that apply to the investment strategy. This morning Peter Iordanidis of the ATO provided an overview of SMSFs for trustees. 
Some top tips to ensure your fund is compliant:
<ol>
<li>
 Understand the sole purpose of your fund As a trustee, you must ensure that the sole purpose of your SMSF is to provide for its members in retirement. Even if you use a professional to do certain tasks on your behalf, you still must comply with super and tax laws to protect your members’ assets. To ensure that you get the full tax concessions available to SMSFs, you must pass the sole purpose test. Your investment decisions should be based on increasing returns to your fund. You need to consider diversification, risks and likely returns from your assets. You also need to consider your members’ needs and circumstances – even if you are the only member. For example, if you’re nearing retirement age, you may want to change your SMSF asset mix to include more low risk, low reward investments.  
</li>
<li>
Make sure you don’t get any benefit pre-retirement… With post-retirement benefits the sole purpose of your SMSF, you must ensure that you don’t use the fund to get any current day benefits, or you face penalties including the loss of your tax concessions, fines up to $220,000 or up to five years’ jail time. Trustees are prohibited from dipping into their funds to pay for bills, school fees or for any non-retirement investments. As a trustee you are prohibited from borrowing money from the SMSF pre-retirement (with some exceptions) and all transactions made with your SMSF must be made “at arm’s length”. Trustees must make and maintain investments on a strict commercial basis, while the purchase and sale prices of fund assets should always reflect true market value. You can use your SMSF to invest in a wide variety of assets, even art and collectables. You can use your fund for artwork and collectables, but you cannot enjoy a direct or indirect benefit from the investment by displaying it in your home or business prior to retirement. 
</li>
<li>
…And your family doesn’t either A fund is prohibited from lending money to a member of the fund or a relative of a member. The definition of relative is quite broad – this can include siblings, parents, children, and extended family members. The definition also covers the spouse of any family members. That means that you can’t lend money from your SMSF to your sister-in-law. Your SMSF is also prohibited from providing financial assistance to a member or a member of a relative, whether directly or indirectly. This means can’t use your SMSF as security for your child’s mortgage. Iordanidis provided the example of a husband and wife who were trustees of their SMSF. Their SMSF sold a property it owned, but no money was paid for the property, as the sale contract created a loan between the fund and the purchasers. However, it turned out that the purchasers were relatives of the husband and wife, which meant that they had made a loan to family members. The trust incorrectly advised the ATO that the loan was repaid in full, and the fund was deemed non-complying and stripped of its tax concessions. Trustees are generally prohibited from acquiring non-cash assets from related parties – a rental property, for example. 
</li>
<li>
Do your paperwork (or get someone else to do it for you) As a trustee for a SMSF, you have a range of annual responsibilities. You must keep your records up to date and value assets at their current market value at least once a year. You have to prepare financial statements, lodge an annual return and report contributions, even if no contributions were made that year. You’ll also need to lodge an income return every year from the year you set up your fund, for each member. Most of those duties can be performed by an accountant, but it’s your responsibility to make sure they are done and lodged with the ATO. The ATO also requires an audit of your SMSF each year, performed by an approved SMSF auditor who is registered with ASIC and has a SMSF Auditor Number. The auditor can’t be a trustee member of the fund, or your accountant who prepares your other financial statements. You’ll also need to make sure you appoint the auditor early enough for them to do the audit and for you to submit it.  An audit is required even if you haven’t made any contributions in the year.  When you engage professionals, make sure you have a clear understanding of their responsibilities. Any contraventions of super or tax law that are identified by your auditor must be fixed. You can ask the ATO for advice on how to go about rectifying any mistakes you’ve made.
</li>
</ol>
There are a range of other rules and regulations surrounding SMSFs that you need to know to receive full tax concessions (and avoid penalties). Go to the <a href="https://www.ato.gov.au/" target="_blank">ATO's website</a> to learn more.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ:
<a href="/guides/ato-cast-doubts-on-smsf-property-zero-interest-loan-strategy">ATO cast doubts on SMSF property zero interest loan strategy</a>
<a href="/guides/taxing-times-for-self-managed-super-funds">Taxing times for self-managed super funds</a>
<a href="/guides/investors-should-expect-smsf-borrowing-to-come-under-greater-government-scrutiny">Investors should expect SMSF borrowing to come under greater government scrutiny</a>
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Self-managed super funds: Top tips from the ATO

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 61">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
From the 2014-15 land tax year onwards, the Queensland Land Tax Act 2010 will be amended to provide a new exemption.
It is for land that did not previously receive a home exemption with the owner in the process of selling their old home and moving into a new home, where certain conditions are met. 
The home exemption currently previously only applied to one parcel of land at a land tax liability date.
 However, this limitation resulted in liability where a person is selling their previous home and moving into a new home at the land tax liability date of 30 June. 
The new exemption will mean that an earlier home in the process of being sold, or a new home in the process of being moved into is also exempted, provided that by the next land tax liability date the taxpayer is entitled to the home exemption for the new home, and the taxpayer no longer owns the earlier home.
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Queensland land tax home mover's exemption

<html><body>
The end of financial year will be upon us in 24 days, and there’s much you should be doing to make the most of it.
Over the next few weeks, Property Observer will attempt to avoid nagging you about timely tax returns, but will provide some tips and advice on how to make the most of this final month.
While you have until 31 October to lodge, your expenses and transactions will only count up until the official end of the financial year – 30 June. The ATO’s <a href="/expert-insights/finance/landlords-tax-deductions-rise-to-38-6-billion-or-23-000-per-tax-return-ato-figures">2010-2011 stats saw the average claimed amount per landlord sitting at $23,000</a> – not something to be sniffed at.
Today’s tip is about working out which expenses you can claim.
In June last year, the <a href="/expert-insights/finance/ato-to-write-to-110-000-rental-property-owners-over-incorrect-rent-deductions">ATO wrote to 110,000 property investors over incorrect rental deductions</a>.
Guess what? They did <a href="/expert-insights/investing/landlords-under-investigation-as-ato-cracks-down">the same thing in 2011, writing to 100,000 property investors </a>about the exact same issue.
You don’t want to be in the ATO’s bad books, so be wary of what you claim ahead of assuming you can.
For instance – that seminar you went to that set you back a few hundred dollars or your ticket to the Home Show, is it deductible? If you don’t know, then you can <a href="/expert-insights/investing/how-much-of-your-property-education-is-actually-tax-deductible">read our article here about the amount of your “property education” that you can actually claim</a>. It’s not as straight forward as you might think.
With the long weekend coming up, it’s time to <a href="/expert-insights/your-weekend-must-do-items-three-things-to-put-on-the-list">sort out your shoebox of receipts and start figuring out what needs to go to the accountant</a>.
For rental properties, here are seven quick rules:
<ol>
<li>Claim straightaway for interests on loans 
</li>
<li>Claim straightaway for depreciating assets 
</li>
<li>Claim straightaway for costs to repair and maintain your rental property 
</li>
<li>Claim straightaway for tenancy costs 
</li>
<li>Claim deductions over a number of years for assets that are part of the property 
</li>
<li>Claim deductions over a number of years for assets on construction costs 
</li>
<li>Claim deductions over a number of years on stamp duty and other fees</li>
</ol>
Source: ATO
Read <a href="/expert-insights/finance/seven-rental-property-deductions-property-investors-are-allowed-to-claim-to-reduce-their-tax-bill">more about these expenses and what you can claim</a>.
Ken Raiss suggests that there are <a href="/expert-insights/finance/nine-tax-tips-for-property-investors">nine things you must know about maximising your tax return</a>. At the top of the list is documentation.
If you’re an industry professional, you can also be useful at tax time. It’s worth reminding your clients about tax depreciation schedules, notes BMT’s managing director Bradley Beer.
“Real estate agents are a critical component in the property-buying process and have a fantastic opportunity, before and after a sale, to enhance their relationships with clients by broadly informing them about how tax depreciation works and the benefits it provides,” said Beer. 
“The result would be a win-win situation for both parties as the buyer maximises his cash flow and the agent strengthens his relationship with the buyer through the process.”
Estimates for deductions are often free ahead of getting an actual schedule undertaken.
USEFUL READING FOR TAX TIME
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/12-tips-for-property-investors-to-reduce-their-tax-bill-ken-raiss">12 tips for property investors to reduce their tax bill</a>: Ken Raiss <a href="/expert-insights/the-top-19-rental-expenses-that-landlords-claim-from-the-ato">The top 19 rental expenses that landlords claim from the ATO</a>: Jonathan Chancellor <a href="/expert-insights/investing/rental-properties-keeping-deductions-working-for-you">Rental properties – keeping deductions working for you</a>: Daniel Deutsch
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

End of financial year countdown: Make the most of the next 24 days

<html><body>
The Australian Taxation Office appears to have cast doubt on the emerging practice of property investors lending money to their self-managed superannuation fund at zero, or low interest rates, to get around the contribution limit.
The likelihood of future favourable rulings to taxpayers adopting the strategy appears in doubt, the Australian Financial Review (AFR) reported today.
It has been among the 30 tax minimisation strategies used by investors able to have incomes taxed at zero to 15%, instead of the current top rate of 46.5%, by using generous concessions through superannuation.
Adelaide lawyer of Suzanne Mackenzie of DMAW Lawyers noted while at least one Tax Office ruling appeared to accept, or not reject, the strategy, there had been two other rulings rejecting it.
Raising the prospect of penalty taxes, Mackenzie forecast future private rulings on the strategy would now be knocked back.
However a Tax Office spokesman told the AFR the ATO will continue to issue private rulings "decided on the particular facts to which they relate".
The latest statistics show residential property within superannuation jumped in the year to March 2014 from $17.5 billion to $20.5 billion.
Commercial property holdings rose from $58 billion to $68 billion.
The Tax Office figures show there were 528,000 self-managed funds managing $558 billion in assets as at March 2014, up from 501,000 funds in March 2013.
These self-managed super schemes had $3.3 billion of loans, up from $3.1 billion.
The Australian Financial Review reported last month that around 9,200 self-managed super funds have a $5 million plus balance, a rise of 76% in the past three years.
The zero loan strategy has been used to get around the limit on post-tax superannuation contributions, which is $25,000 rising to $30,000 from July.
The loans were typically at zero or low interest with long repayment terms and the money was to be used by the self-managed superannuation fund to invest in property.
Following the recent private rulings, some tax advisers are now suggesting these loans ought now replicate loans from a financial institution in both the terms and the interest rate charged. 
</body></html>

ATO cast doubts on SMSF property zero interest loan strategy

<html><body>
Earlier this week the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released data which revealed that 46.4% of state and local government taxation revenue over the 2012-13 financial year came from property related taxes.
The data showed that over the year, state and local governments collected a record $35.931 billion in taxes from property related sources.  
In comparison, they collected $20.752 million in taxes from employers, $11,089 million in taxes from the provision of goods and services and $9.638 million in taxes on the use of goods and performance of activities.  As this shows, at a state and local government level property taxes are the largest source of revenue.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3293" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-13.jpg" alt="Chart 1">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
The total value of property related taxes increased by 7.2% over the most recent financial year.  In comparison, taxes on employer’s payroll and labour force rose by 5.1%, taxes on the provision of goods and services rose 2.4% and taxes on the use of goods and performance of activities rose 8.6%.
With home values nationally beginning to rise in June 2012, it is clear that state and local government are a major benefactor. With higher home values, taxes such as land tax, municipal rates and stamp duty on conveyances all increase.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3294" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-23.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="501">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
Of the $35.931 billion in property related tax revenue collected in 2012-13, 40% came from municipal rates and 36% came from stamp duties on conveyances.  Land tax was the only other sizeable contributor to property related tax accounting for 17% of revenue.  Over the year the most significant increase in property related taxes came from stamp duty, up by 16.9%.  The amount of tax revenue collected from municipal rates increased by 6.8%, and land taxes increased by 1.5%.
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Property related tax revenue is only collected by those who own properties. Ultimately every property is owned by someone, some as an owner occupier and some as an investor. 
The taxes levied against property are typically only payable by the owner of the property.  Given this, those who choose to rent rather than own property pay no tax on property.  Not to mention the fact that the cost of renting is typically much lower than the cost of owning, it is no surprise more people are choosing to rent rather than own property.
State and local governments have clearly experienced a significant revenue boost via the improvement in the residential housing market over the year.  Stamp duty in particular has seen a significant rise.  With sales volumes and property values rising there have been more sales to receive stamp duty from and at a higher price which also increases the stamp duty collected. 
Of course, the issue with stamp duty is that it is a tax only collected across those properties which sell.  From a residential perspective this is just 5% to 7% of the total housing stock over a given year.  Stamp duty also acts as a disincentive for home owners to transact property on a more regular basis because it is a tax paid on a new purchase.
Many people have called for the removal of stamp duties which would be a positive move to encourage greater mobility of residents.  Of course state and local governments would lose 36% of their property related tax revenue and 17% of their total taxation revenue. 
Many have called for replacing stamp duty with a blanket land tax, another tax would likely be very unpopular and you’d have to consider how equitable that would be particularly for those who have recently paid stamp duty. 
To put a blanket land tax into perspective to cover the $12.841 billion in stamp duty revenue over the 2012-13 financial year, each residential dwelling would have to pay $1,391.69 based on the ABS estimate of 9,226,900 residential dwellings as at June 2013.  Keep in mind that stamp duty isn’t just payable on residential property transactions.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3295" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chart-33.jpg" alt="Chart 3" width="500" height="163">
Source: RP Data, ABS.
Over the year, stamp duty revenue was higher in each state except for Victoria (-1.4%), Queensland (-6.7%) and the Australian Capital Territory (-3.3%).  New South Wales (21.4%), Western Australia (33.0%) and the Northern Territory (35.5%) recorded the greatest rises in stamp duty revenue. 
According to the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index, Sydney home values rose by 5.6% over the year, Perth values were 6.0% higher and Darwin values were 6.1% higher.  Conversely, Melbourne home values were 3.4% higher, Brisbane values were just 0.6% higher and Canberra value were 1.1% higher.  Clearly home value rises have a positive effect on stamp duty revenues.
The data highlighted shows that property is the most important source of revenue for state and local governments, accounting for 46.4% of their total taxation revenue.  The issue of course is that these levels of government are looking to constantly grow their revenues. 
The two main sources of property related revenue are rates and stamp duty.  Rates can be grown by encouraging a greater number of ratepayers into a region (create more housing) and stamp duty can only be lifted by changing the rates or encouraging higher prices and/or more sales. 
In certain regions increasing the supply of ratepayers is not possible so it is clear that stamp duty is an extremely important source of revenue. With the housing market recording significant value growth and much higher sales volumes throughout the 2013-14 financial year, no doubt stamp duty revenue will be much higher again. 
The question is can governments continue to rely on property being a one-way bet?  Particularly when the Reserve Bank has repeatedly warned of late that it is not.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

Can governments continue to rely on property being a one-way bet?

<html><body>
The end of the financial year is almost here, so it’s time to do your tax return. Or perhaps undertake some strategies that save on the tax payable.
Apart from the usual receipts and items claimable by property investors, there are deeper tips and reminders suggested by tax advisors in advice to their private clients. 
<ol>
<li>
Now might be the right time to consider refinancing your home. Do this before the end of the financial year, and the cost and saving could affect the tax payable. But be aware a clear accounting link between the initial mortgage to acquire the property, and the refinanced amount, must be maintained if you wish to offset the interest paid on the investment mortgage. Best be wary of refinancing and including home and investment properties under one mortgage, which may cause ATO red flags, so best check with your accountant before any refinancing.
</li>
<li>Capital losses incurred in any financial year are available to be carried forward to future financial years for an indefinite period if there are insufficient gains to absorb it in the same year. Capital losses cannot be offset against other income such as business trading income if you've made a capital gain. With just a month to go, it might be too late to review your property portfolio to see whether it is worth realising a capital loss to offset the gain. You can't carry losses back.</li>
<li>The 50% discount on capital gains is available where an asset is held for longer than 12 months. Remember the relevant date for calculating capital gains is the contract date, not the eventual date of property settlement.</li>
<li>If you have a geared investment it is worth considering pre-paying next year's bank interest to gain an immediate tax deduction benefit in the 2013-2014 year.</li>
<li>Get a deduction now by pre-paying next year's income protection insurance premiums.</li>
<li>Bring forward expenditure to before 30 June, if you are planning on repairs on your property, though note care should be taken in determining whether a maintenance or repair is deductible or if it is considered a renovation or of a capital nature.</li>
<li>Check on the depreciation claim of the property and its fittings, any repairs or maintenance you have undertaken, any management fees or rental losses throughout the financial year, all taken into consideration in calculating your tax deduction. </li>
<li>Use debt recycling strategies, pooling much of your cashflow through an financial institution offset account to reduce your total annual interest payable. </li>
</ol>
Obtaining sound financial, taxation and investment advice is highly recommended in order to implement any of the above strategies. 
</body></html>

Eight tax tips for end of financial year property investment planning

<html><body>
Land tax is on the Property Council of Australia’s radar, as they ask the South Australian government to use the upcoming state budget to look towards a lower taxing, more efficient state.
Property Council acting executive director, Lino Iacomella, said that an urgent tax review is necessary to make the system fairer and more effective.
“This includes, broadening the land tax base and reducing the top rate of land tax, which is the highest in the country,” said Iacomella.
“The budget's difficult fiscal position is clear and with the government's election commitments yet to be factored in to the forward estimates, there is an urgent need to drive savings and initiate reform.
“Before committing to more spending, it is vital that the government initiates a line-by-line review of all existing state programs and projects,” he said.
If land tax is your bugbear, then here are <a href="/expert-insights/finance/how-property-investors-can-avoid-the-traps-and-pitfalls-of-land-tax">some tips on avoiding the traps and pitfalls</a>.
Growth orientated reforms should be the focus, the Property Council believes, including removing outdated regulations, freeing up trading hours and creating an independent infrastructure agency to prioritise key projects.
“South Australia also needs to play a leadership role in the emerging national tax reform agenda. It must engage with other states and the federal government to maximise opportunities to replace ugly state taxes like stamp duties with more sustainable and equitable revenue measures,” said Iacomella.
The <a href="/expert-insights/finance/everyone-knows-we-need-to-get-rid-of-stamp-duty-reinsw">Real Estate Institute of New South Wales has also been asking for a stamp duty and land tax cut</a>, arguing for a broader-based system.
</body></html>

Property Council of Australia calls for South Australia land tax and stamp duty reform

<html><body>
The federal government should offer a firm commitment to tackle key issues on tax reform in order to strengthen venture capital in Australia, according to Australian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association chief executive Yasser El-Ansary.
Specifically, El-Ansary says reforms are needed to the Venture Capital Limited Partnership regime, which is currently producing outcomes for domestic investors inconsistent with those of non-resident investors.
Such changes were set to be introduced by the previous Labor government and <a href="https://fsi.gov.au/files/2014/04/AVCAL2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">endorsed by the Board of Taxation.</a>
“As of about 12 months ago, or even longer than that, there was across the VC industry and understanding that the government at that time was committed to making these changes,” El-Ansary says.
“Then there was a decision in late 2013 to abandon this change.
“It’s a very obvious change that should be put in place as a matter of priority.
“It’s been talked about for so long now that arguments for and against have been made, the technical analysis of the shortcomings have been worked through, not just by those that stand to realise the benefits, but also by the government’s own independent tax review authority.
“There’s many in the industry frustrated by the amount of time it’s taking to convert discussion, debate and analysis into meaningful change.
“I think ultimately it would lead to an upswing of venture capital funding here in Australia.”
Further, El-Ansary says it’s a move that would have very little impact on the government’s budget.
“Our analysis of this issue confirms for us that there is not very significant cost to the government, instead it would be a net benefit for the government because it would generate greater level of activity but does not involve a significant cost to budget bottom line,’’ he says.
Another area El-Ansary would like to see tax reform is employee share schemes. Starfish Venture’s co-founder John Dyson agrees.
“I think improving the tax regime around employee share options, to me that’s a specific issue around tax reform that would be really beneficial," he says.
“Will it mean more competitive companies get funded? Maybe. But it gives the existing companies the best chance of success.”
Dyson criticised the government’s decision to axe the Innovation Investment Fund and is concerned the Entrepreneurship Infrastructure Program, which there is currently very little detail about, will be focused on offering entrepreneurs advice and mentorship.
A statement from Minister for Industry Ian Macfarlane says the new program will bring research and business together to develop and commercialise home-grown ideas and equip small to medium enterprises and the management and business skills to lead and change expansion.
“I think the Innovation Investment Fund program in theory, is a really good program, they had some challenges in the implementation of that program, but the Australian economy is much better off than not having that,’’ Dyson says.
“I see that as a huge disappointment that it’s been axed.
“My view is we have a weakness in the market in Australia when companies are going to raise between $1 million and $5 million.
“I don’t think entrepreneurs want $200,000 and want to have to call up advisers and ask that they think about their app.”
Those concerns are shared by AngelCube co-founder Adrian Stone.
“What we know is that the Commercialisation Australia grants program is gone,’’ he says.
“Replacing that with advice and guidance is a huge step in the wrong direction.
“What startups don’t need is more advice, more consultants, more people telling startups what to do.”
Macfarlane <a href="https://www.brw.com.au/p/investing/industry_minister_full_macfarlane_LGuW2U7RL2dtkJmZyaIW1M" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">told The Australian Financial Review</a> the startup community should hold their fire on the government’s innovation strategy until the results of national competitiveness and tax reviews are in.
The Industry Investment and Competiveness Agenda will examine the issues raised by venture capital and startup groups, which Macfarlane says is not expected to be completed until after July.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.startupsmart.com.au/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">StartupSmart</a>.
Photo courtesy of <a href="https://lendingmemo.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-rapid_p="22">Lendingmemo.com</a>.
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

Investors demand tax reform in budget’s aftermath

<html><body>
Pointing to the federal government’s failure to address GST issues in the budget, Real Estate Institute of New South Wales president, Malcolm Gunning, said that “for some reason” the review of the taxation system is being avoided.
He said that everyone knows specific taxes needed to be removed, and that the sooner the government figures it out, the sooner the logistics can be decided.
“Everyone knows we need to get rid of our inefficient taxes, including stamp duty, land tax and payroll tax, and implement a broad based tax system,” said Gunning.
“Both state and federal government are sitting back and refusing to bring the issue to the table. Someone has to move first and last night’s budget was the right opportunity to acknowledge that something needs to be done.”
The current state-based tax system is inhibiting economic growth and must be overhauled, he said, explaining that industry and commerce compliance costs and the public servants administering this will be removed if the taxes are abolished – leading to savings that he believes justify the review.
“The federal budget focused too much on debt and the solving of the debt problem very quickly. Eliminating debt so swiftly could have an adverse effect on growth,” he said.
</body></html>

tax

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

tax